Next Article in Journal
The Hydrothermal Alteration of the Cordón de Inacaliri Volcanic Complex in the Framework of the Hidden Geothermal Systems within the Pabelloncito Graben (Northern Chile)
Previous Article in Journal
Basalt from the Extinct Spreading Center in the West Philippine Basin: New Geochemical Results and Their Petrologic and Tectonic Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zircons from Collisional Granites, Garhwal Himalaya, NW India: U–Th–Pb Age, Geochemistry and Protolith Constraints
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue “U-Pb Dating and Chemistry of Zircon in Metamorphic, Magmatic and Sedimentary Rocks”

by
Annamaria Fornelli
* and
Francesca Micheletti
Department of Earth and Geo-Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Edoardo Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(11), 1278; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111278
Submission received: 11 November 2021 / Revised: 11 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
This Special Issue was conceived with the aim of contributing to disclosure of the applications of U-Pb dating and zircon chemistry for deciphering the growth and the evolution of the continental crust. The twenty scientific contributions cover the most important aspects of zircon-related research, dating and chemistry, and extensively illustrate how an understanding of zircon can enable interpretation of different geological scenarios, from individual igneous units to entire orogens.
A new method for identification of promising zircon grains for geochronology is proposed by McAller et al. [1]. These authors document the use of a petrographic microscope to observe the internal textures of selected grains under ultraviolet light, returning detailed photoluminescence images.
The collected papers within the theme “Metamorphic continental crust” are dedicated to case studies regarding metamorphic basements for geological reconstruction of tectonic events forming orogenic belts. The ability of zircon to monitor the metamorphic evolution of high-grade basements affected by granulite metamorphism is revealed by Yang et al. [2] and Takehara et al. [3]. Zircon age clusters detected in leucosomes and melanosomes, together with the definition of mineral phase equilibrium during anatexis, can constrain the tectonic evolution of orogeny and demonstrate how decompression plays a relevant role in crustal melting. The ability of zircon to record the geological history of the Carboniferous–Permian orogeny and its evolution over the Mesozoic was documented by collecting U-Pb age data from magmatic protoliths of a tectonic mélange. The geochemical features of magmatism constrain the extensional and compressional phases of tectonic evolution in northeastern China [4]. Analogously, Fornelli et al. [5] show how zircon ages from metasediments affected by polymetamorphism in the Variscan orogen can reveal the timing of tectonic phases during the construction of the belt, thus establishing the origin and the maximum sedimentation age of protoliths. An example of ancient orogeny reconstruction is described in detail by Yi et al. [6], in which the timing of tectonic phases within the Ross orogeny is reconstructed by coupling mineral phase equilibria for P–T calculations with U-Pb zircon ages. Moreover, the geodynamic evolution of an Archean polymetamorphic complex is proposed by Hölttä et al. [7], linking REE distributions in garnet and zircon with precise age constraints.
The nine papers on “Magmatic continental crust” represent case studies emphasizing the central role of zircon in the characterization of magmatic intrusions and volcanic products. Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes can constrain the origin of magmatic rocks and highlight the chemical modifications of the mantle source in a subduction context. The metasomatic effect of the continental crust on the lithosphere mantle is revealed by monitoring the chemical and isotopic evolution of magmatic rocks [8,9]. Although the partial melting of younger, thinned continental crust against thickened continental crust in the temporal evolution of subduction [10,11] can be defined using classical geochemical data, isotopic markers in zircon allow more precise and accurate interpretations. The timing of the evolution of the subduction zone can be defined using U-Pb zircon data from magmatic rocks in many contexts [12,13]. The geochronology of zircon could also elucidate late pneumatolytic or hydrothermal processes associated with the formation of mineralization containing elements such as Mo, W, Sn and Cu [14,15,16].
The contributions on “Sedimentary continental crust” show case studies on the relevance and significance of detrital zircon ages for reconstructing the paleogeographic evolution of sedimentary basins forming younger orogenic chains. The provenance of siliciclastic detritus utilizing zircon age records [17] is particularly valuable for constraining the sedimentation age of sandstone sequences affected by a synchronous volcanic activity, as shown by Fornelli et al. [18]. The huge potential of detrital zircon ages was highlighted by Ershova et al. [19] in their study of Devonian sandstones containing zircons connected to a hidden coeval magmatism successively covered by sedimentary events, as well as by Lee et al. [20] in a subduction context.
We hope that the present volume will meet the interest of a wide audience of specialists across every geological field. Last but not least, we would like to thank all the researchers who contributed to the success of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McAleer, R.; Jubb, A.; Hackley, P.; Walsh, G.; Merschat, A.; Regan, S.; Burton, W.; Vazquez, J. Photoluminescence Imaging of Whole Zircon Grains on a Petrographic Microscope—An Underused Aide for Geochronologic Studies. Minerals 2020, 10, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.-C.; Li, Y.; Groppo, C.; Rolfo, F. Zircon U-Pb Dating and Petrogenesis of Multiple Episodes of Anatexis in the North Dabie Complex Zone, Central China. Minerals 2020, 10, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takehara, M.; Horie, K.; Hokada, T. Geochemical Characterization of Zircon in Fyfe Hills of the Napier Complex, East Antarctica. Minerals 2020, 10, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, Z.; Li, J.; Song, Z.; Liu, G.; Zhong, W.; Gao, L.; Du, Q. Geochemistry and Zircon U-Pb-Hf Isotopes of Metamorphic Rocks from the Kaiyuan and Hulan Tectonic Mélanges, NE China: Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Paleo-Asian and Mudanjiang Oceans. Minerals 2020, 10, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fornelli, A.; Festa, V.; Micheletti, F.; Spiess, R.; Tursi, F. Building an Orogen: Review of U-Pb Zircon Ages from the Calabria–Peloritani Terrane to Constrain the Timing of the Southern Variscan Belt. Minerals 2020, 10, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yi, S.-B.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, J.I.; Kim, H. Timing and Metamorphic Evolution of the Ross Orogeny in and around the Mountaineer Range, Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Minerals 2020, 10, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hölttä, P.; Kivisaari, T.; Huhma, H.; Rollinson, G.; Kurhila, M.; Butcher, A. Paleoproterozoic Metamorphism of the Archean Tuntsa Suite, Northern Fennoscandian Shield. Minerals 2020, 10, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, K.; Shi, Z.; Liao, R.; Zhu, F. Petrogenesis and Geological Implications of the Oligocene Mingze monzodiorites, Southern Lhasa. Minerals 2020, 10, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Meng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gan, B.; Liu, J. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of the Early Cretaceous Granitic Pluton in the Sulu Orogenic Belt: The Caochang Granitic Pluton as an Example. Minerals 2020, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mao, A.; Sun, D.; Gou, J.; Zheng, H. Genesis of Early–Middle Jurassic Intrusive Rocks in the Erguna Block (NE China) in Response to the Late-Stage Southward Subduction of the Mongol–Okhotsk Oceanic Plate: Constraints from Geochemistry and Zircon U–Pb Geochronology and Lu–Hf Isotopes. Minerals 2020, 10, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mishra, S.; Slabunov, A.I.; Svetov, S.A.; Kervinen, A.V.; Nesterova, N.S. Zircons from Collisional Granites, Garhwal Himalaya, NW India: U–Th–Pb Age, Geochemistry and Protolith Constraints. Minerals 2021, 11, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, W.; Li, H.; Chang, F.; Lv, X. The Early Silurian Gabbro in the Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt, Northeast Tibet: Constraints on the Proto-Tethyan Ocean Closure. Minerals 2020, 10, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, K.; Cai, W. Paleoproterozoic Adakitic Rocks in Qingchengzi District, Northeastern Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt: Implications for Petrogenesis and Tectonism. Minerals 2020, 10, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mikulski, S.Z.; Williams, I.S.; Stein, H.J.; Wierchowiec, J. Zircon U-Pb Dating of Magmatism and Mineralizing Hydrothermal Activity in the Variscan Karkonosze Massif and Its Eastern Metamorphic Cover (SW Poland). Minerals 2020, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.; Cao, Y.; Song, Z.; Xiao, D. Zircon U-Pb and Pyrite Re-Os Isotope Geochemistry of ‘Skarn-Type’ Fe-Cu Mineraliza-tion at the Shuikoushan Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Implications for an Early Cretaceous Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range. Minerals 2021, 11, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, M.; Liu, Q.; Hou, Q.; Sun, J.; Yan, Q. Petrogenesis of the Microgranular Enclaves and Their Host Granites from the Xitian Intrusion in South China: Implications for Geodynamic Setting and Mineralization. Minerals 2020, 10, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, Z.; Luo, J.; Liu, X.; Hu, X.; Ma, S.; Hou, Y.; Fan, L.; Hu, Y. Provenance and Implication of Carboniferous–Permian Detrital Zircons from the Upper Paleozoic, Southern Ordos Basin, China: Evidence from U-Pb Geochronology and Hf Isotopes. Minerals 2020, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fornelli, A.; Gallicchio, S.; Micheletti, F.; Langone, A. Preliminary U-Pb Detrital Zircon Ages from Tufiti di Tusa Formation (Lucanian Apennines, Southern Italy): Evidence of Rupelian Volcaniclastic Supply. Minerals 2020, 10, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ershova, V.; Prokopiev, A.; Khudoley, A. Hidden Middle Devonian Magmatism of North-Eastern Siberia: Age Constraints from Detrital Zircon U–Pb Data. Minerals 2020, 10, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, T.H.; Park, K.H. Detrital Zircon U-Pb Geochronology and Hf Isotope Geochemistry of the Hayang Group, SE Korea and the Himenoura and Goshoura Groups, SW Japan: Signs of Subduction-Related Magmatism after a Long Resting Period. Minerals 2020, 10, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fornelli, A.; Micheletti, F. Editorial for Special Issue “U-Pb Dating and Chemistry of Zircon in Metamorphic, Magmatic and Sedimentary Rocks”. Minerals 2021, 11, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111278

AMA Style

Fornelli A, Micheletti F. Editorial for Special Issue “U-Pb Dating and Chemistry of Zircon in Metamorphic, Magmatic and Sedimentary Rocks”. Minerals. 2021; 11(11):1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fornelli, Annamaria, and Francesca Micheletti. 2021. "Editorial for Special Issue “U-Pb Dating and Chemistry of Zircon in Metamorphic, Magmatic and Sedimentary Rocks”" Minerals 11, no. 11: 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop