Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Numerical Study of the Symmetry Chaotic Jerk System with a Hyperbolic Sine Function via Two Different Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Elastic Wave Mechanics in Damaged Metallic Plates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Height-Zero Characters in p-Constrained Groups

by
Manal H. Algreagri
1,2,* and
Ahmad M. Alghamdi
1
1
Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 14035, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mathematics, Jamoum University College, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 14035, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(11), 1990; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111990
Submission received: 30 August 2023 / Revised: 22 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 28 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics)

Abstract

:
Consider G to be a finite group and p to be a prime divisor of the order | G | in the group G. The main aim of this paper is to prove that the outcome in a recent paper of A. Laradji is true in the case of a p-constrained group. We observe that the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character in a p-constrained group G is generally undefined. We illustrate this with a suitable example. Let ϕ I r r ( G ) have a positive height, and let there be an anchor group A ϕ . We prove that if the normalizer N G ( A ϕ ) is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) { 1 G } , where O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) is the maximal normal p ´ subgroup of N G ( A ϕ ) . We use character theoretic methods. In particular, Clifford theory is the main tool used to accomplish the results.

1. Introduction

Fix a prime number p, and consider G to be a finite group. Let I r r ( G ) be the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of G . Let B be a p block of G with defect group D . We write I r r 0 ( B ) to denote the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of G with a height of zero which belong to the p block B . Let S be a normal subgroup of G and θ I r r ( S ) . We write I r r ( G | θ ) : = { χ : χ I r r ( G ) and R e s S G ( χ ) , θ 0 } for the set of all ordinary irreducible characters of G which lie over θ and I r r 0 ( B | θ ) : = I r r ( G | θ ) I r r 0 ( B ) . For any term which is not defined here, the reader is referred to [1] and [2].
Throughout this paper, ( k , R , F ) is a p-modular system [3,4,5]. The system is composed of a complete discrete valuation ring R with a field of fractions k of a characteristic of zero. Let υ p be a valuation of a field k such that υ p ( p ) = 1 . Then, we have F = R / J ( R ) , which is the residue field of the characteristic p, where J ( R ) refers to the Jacobson radical of the local ring R .
In this introduction, we try to provide and give sufficient background for our subject. Consider G to be a finite group of the order | G | = p α n such that g c d ( p , n ) = 1 , α , n Z + . Let ϕ I r r ( G ) . If p m is the greatest power of p which divides the positive integer | G | ϕ ( 1 ) , then p m = | G | p ϕ ( 1 ) p , where r p refers to the p part of an integer r. The nonnegative integer m is termed as the defect of the irreducible character ϕ , and we denote it by d e f ( ϕ ) . If d e f ( ϕ ) = α , then we say ϕ is of a full defect. The greatest defect of irreducible character which belongs to the p block B is termed the defect number of B and is denoted by d e f ( B ) . The process of subtracting the defect number of ϕ from the defect number of B produces a height of ϕ . We write h ( ϕ ) = d e f ( B ) d e f ( ϕ ) to indicate the height of ϕ . Let C l ( G ) be the set of all conjugacy classes of G. Consider the center Z ( R G ) . This is a commutative group ring over R with the basis { C ^ : C C l ( G ) } such that C ^ = x C x is the class sum of the conjugacy class C of G. For every ϕ I r r ( G ) and g C g , we have
ω ϕ ( C ^ g ) = | C g | ϕ ( 1 ) ϕ ( g ) ,
as an algebra homomorphism ω ϕ : Z ( k G ) k , which is called a central character.
The most notable references that deal with block theory R are from Brauer [6,7], C. W. Curtis and I. Reiner, [8] and W. Feit [9]. The first description of a p block’s defect group was provided by R. Brauer [6] and J. A. Green [10].
Let ϕ I r r ( G ) . Then, ϕ can be extended to an algebra map ϕ : k G k in a unique way by the rule ϕ ( a G β a a ) = a G β a ϕ ( a ) . We consider the group algebra element
e ϕ = ϕ ( 1 ) | G | a G ϕ ( a 1 ) a ,
where the unique primitive central idempotent in k G satisfies ϕ ( e ϕ ) 0 . The algebra R G e ϕ is a primitive G-interior R algebra [11] because the center Z ( k G e ϕ ) contains the center Z ( R G e ϕ ) as a subring.
In 1970, D. Wales [12] proved that if the normalizer of the nontrivial defect group D for a nonprincipal p block N G ( D ) is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( N G ( D ) ) { 1 G } , where O p ´ ( N G ( D ) ) is the largest normal p ´ subgroup of N G ( D ) . This result is essentially a restatement of [13] when the p-constrained is present.
The anchor group of an irreducible character ϕ of G was defined as the defect group of the primitive G-interior R algebra R G e ϕ by R. Kessar, B. Külshammer, and M. Linckelmann in [14]. In this paper, we prove the relative version of the result for D. Wales [12], which states the following. Let ϕ I r r ( G ) with a positive height and an anchor group A ϕ . If the normalizer N G ( A ϕ ) is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) { 1 G } . A similar result holds for the normalizer N G ( H ) for { 1 G } H A ϕ .
In 1987, G. Cliff, W. Plesken, and A. Weiss [15] proved that 2 | I r r 0 ( B ) | for any p block of G with a positive defect. In 1990, G. O. Michler [16] introduced another proof for this result using Brauer’s main result [7] which states that d e f ( B ) = 2 α υ p ( d i m F ( B ) ) , where d i m F ( B ) is the dimension of B as an F space.
Recall that the group G is said to be p-solvable if each of its composition factors is either a p group or a p ´ group. We say ϕ I r r ( G ) is p-special if it satisfies the following: the degree of ϕ is a p number (a multiple of the prime number p), and if Q is a subnormal value of G and λ I r r ( Q ) such that R e s Q G ( ϕ ) , λ > 0 , then the determinant order of λ , O ( λ ) = O ( d e t ( λ ) ) is a p number. (Since d e t ( λ ) is a linear character of G according to [17] (Exercise 2.3), then it is an element of the group of linear characters of G.) If we can factorize the irreducible character ϕ of G in a unique way such that ϕ = ϕ p ϕ p ´ , where ϕ p is p-special and ϕ p ´ is p ´ -special, then ϕ is called p-factorable. For more information, see [18,19].
In 2002, G. Navarro [20] introduced the concept of a vertex for an ordinary irreducible character of a p-solvable group. In 2005, C.W. Eaton [21] extended the concept of Navarro vertices for ordinary irreducible characters of a p-solvable group to irreducible characters of any finite group belonging to the p blocks, with defect groups which are contained in a normal p-solvable subgroup.
In 2022, A. Laradji [22] proved that a relative version of the previous result for G. H. Cliff, W. Plesken, and A. Weiss in the case where G is a p-solvable group. A. Laradji in [22] proved the result in the case where G is a finite p-solvable group and S is a normal subgroup of G. Let B be a p block of G with a defect group D such that | D S | < | D | . If θ I r r ( S ) with a height of zero, then the number of irreducible characters of a height of zero in I r r ( B ) which lie over θ is greater than or equal to two.
A p-solvable group is characterized by the existence of normal subgroups. Thus, it is considered a suitable environment to use Clifford theory (see [23]). But we know that any p-solvable element is a p-constrained group [24] (VI, 6.5) which again has many normal subgroups, and then we can use the tool of Clifford theory.
One of our main methods is character theory, which includes the restrictions, induction, orthogonality relations, and inner product of characters (see [1,17]). In addition, the most important theorem for studying character theory and the p blocks of finite groups is Clifford theory. Given a finite group G with its normal subgroup S and τ I r r ( S ) , assume that I G ( τ ) = { a G | τ a = τ } < G is the inertia group of τ in G, Clifford theory could be employed for creating a bijection between any ϕ I r r ( G | τ ) and η I r r ( I G ( τ ) | τ ) such that ϕ = I n d I G ( τ ) G ( η ) and R e s I G ( τ ) G ( η ) = e τ , where e is a nonnegative integer. The nonnegative integer e is said to be the ramification index of ϕ relative to S, which satisfies R e s S G ( ϕ ) = e ( a [ G / I G ( τ ) ] τ a ) . Here, τ a is the conjugate character of τ such that τ a ( x ) = τ ( a x a 1 ) for all x S . (See [1,3,19] for more details about Clifford theory). The motivation of this paper is to prove that A. Laradji’s result in [22] is true in the case of a p-constrained group. Also, we illustrate with an example that the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertices in a p-constrained group is generally undefined.
The concept of a p-constrained group appeared in [25] (Section 8.1) and in [26] (VII, 13.3). In Section 2, we present the basic facts of a p-constrained group and the essential theories which were used in the proofs of the main results of this paper. In Section 3, we present the main results. In Section 4, titled Future Work, we propose several problems which extend many results from the class of p-solvable groups to the class of p-constrained groups. We end this paper with two sections: Section 5 contains the discussion about this topic, and Section 6 contains the conclusion that we came up with from our work.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we provide some details about p-constrained groups. We offer the essential theories that we rely on to prove our main results.
Assume that G is a finite group and p is a prime divisor of | G | . Write O p ´ , p ( G ) to mean the second term of the lower p series { 1 G } O p ´ ( G ) O p ´ , p ( G ) O p ´ , p , p ´ ( G ) which are linked through the following relation:
O p ´ , p ( G ) / O p ´ ( G ) = O p ( G / O p ´ ( G ) ) ,
where O p ( G ) is the maximal normal p subgroup of G and O p ´ ( G ) is the maximal normal p ´ subgroup of G. Write C G ( O p ( G ) ) to mean the centralizer of O p ( G ) in G . We say that G is p-constrained if it satisfies C G ( P O p ´ , p ( G ) ) O p ´ , p ( G ) , where P is any Sylow p subgroup of G. If O p ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } , then O p ´ , p ( G ) = O p ( G ) . It follows that if O p ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } , then G is said to be p-constrained if it satisfies C G ( O p ( G ) ) O p ( G ) .
The following corollary is immediate from the definition of a p-constrained group:
Corollary 1.
If G is a finite group which possesses a normal p subgroup that contains its centralizer, then G is p-constrained and O p ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } .
Modulo the maximal normal p ´ subgroup of G, the quotient of a p-constrained group is p-constrained. The proof can be seen in [25] (Theorem 1.1 (ii), p. 269).
Theorem 1.
If G is a p-constrained group, then G / O p ´ ( G ) is p-constrained.
Let M be a normal subgroup of G and G ¯ = G / M . Assume that ϕ ¯ I r r ( G ¯ ) . We call the character ϕ the lift of ϕ ¯ to G if it satisfies ϕ ( a ) = ϕ ¯ ( a M ) for a G . From Lemma 2.22 in [17], if ϕ ¯ I r r ( G ¯ ) , then ϕ I r r ( G ) if M k e r ϕ . Consequently, we consider I r r ( G ¯ ) to be a subset of I r r ( G ) . From [2] (p. 137), there exists a unique p block B of G that contains the p block of G / M , say B ¯ ; that is, I r r ( B ¯ ) I r r ( B ) . The following theorems appeared in [2] (Theorem 9.9 (C) and Theorem 9.1, respectively).
Theorem 2.
In accordance with the above notations, if M is a p ´ -normal subgroup of G and I r r ( B ¯ ) I r r ( B ) , then I r r ( B ¯ ) = I r r ( B ) , and the set of all defect groups of B ¯ is of the form
{ D B M / M | D B i s a n y d e f e c t g r o u p o f B } .
Theorem 3.
Let S be a normal subgroup of G. Let ψ I r r ( G ) and θ I r r ( S ) . Then, ψ lies over θ if and only if ω ψ ( C ^ ) = ω θ ( C ^ ) for all conjugacy classes C of G which are contained in S.
As is well known, a p block with a defect value of zero has only one irreducible ordinary character as well having only an irreducible Brauer character (see [1] (Chapter 3, Theorem 6.29) and [2] (Theorem 3.18)), while a p block with a positive defect appeared in [15] (Proposition 3.3).
Proposition 1.
Let B be a p block of G with a positive defect. Then, | I r r 0 ( B ) | 2 .

3. Main Results

In this section, we extend the result from [22] (Theorem 2.1) in the case of a p-constrained group. Then, we give some examples. Let ϕ I r r ( G ) with a positive height and an anchor group A ϕ . We prove that if the normalizer N G ( A ϕ ) is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) { 1 G } . A similar result holds for the normalizer N G ( H ) , for { 1 G } H A ϕ .
Theorem 4.
Suppose that G is a p-constrained group and S is a normal subgroup of G. Let B be a p block of G with a defect group D such that | D S | < | D | . Let θ I r r ( S ) with a height of zero. Assume that I r r 0 ( B | θ ) ϕ . Then, | I r r 0 ( B | θ ) | 2 .
Proof
Suppose that G is a p-constrained group. We have two cases for this group:
  • Case 1: G is p-solvable. According to [24] (VI, 6.5), any p-solvable group is a p-constrained group. Then, the result from A. Laradji holds (Theorem 2.1 in [22]).
  • Case 2: G is not p-solvable, and O p ´ ( G ) { 1 G } . We use induction on the order of G. Since G is p-constrained, then under Theorem 1, G / O p ´ ( G ) is p-constrained. We write M : = O p ´ ( G ) as the maximal normal p ´ subgroup of G . Let B ¯ be a p block of G / O p ´ ( G ) and B ¯ B . According to Theorem 2, if D ¯ is a defect group of B ¯ , then D ¯ { D B M / M | D B i s a n y d e f e c t g r o u p o f B } , and I r r ( B ) = I r r ( B ¯ ) . Without loss of generality, we may assume that D ¯ = D M / M . We have | D S | < | D | , which implies that | D M / M S M / M | < | D M / M | . Since D M = { 1 G } , then under the second isomorphism theorem [27], | D | = | D / D M | = | D M / M | and | D M / M S M / M | = | ( D S ) M / M | = | D S | | M | / | M | = | D S | as ( D S ) M = { 1 G } . Now, let θ I r r ( S ) , and assume that I r r 0 ( B | θ ) ϕ . Since, under Theorem 2, I r r ( B ) = I r r ( B ¯ ) , then I r r 0 ( B ¯ | θ ) ϕ . We have G / O p ´ ( G ) as a p-constrained group with an order less than that of G and I r r 0 ( B ¯ | θ ) ϕ . Therefore, by induction, | I r r 0 ( B ¯ | θ ) | 2 . Now, according to Theorem 2, | I r r 0 ( B | θ ) | 2 .
  • Case 3: G is not p-solvable, and O p ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } . Then, from the definition of a p-constrained group, we have C G ( O p ( G ) ) O p ( G ) . Hence, G has a unique p block, namely the principal block B 0 from [9] (Chapter V, Corollary 3.11). thus, from Proposition 1, there are at least two irreducible characters χ , ψ with a height of zero which belong to B 0 . Since we have I r r 0 ( B 0 | θ ) ϕ , assume that χ I r r 0 ( B 0 | θ ) . It follows that R e s S G ( χ ) , θ 0 . . Then, under Theorem 3, ω χ ( C ^ ) = ω θ ( C ^ ) for all conjugacy classes C of G which are contained in S. We know from [1] (Chapter 3, Theorem 6.24) that two irreducible characters χ , ψ belong to the same p block if and only if ω χ ( C ^ ) ω ψ ( C ^ ) m o d ( p ) for all conjugacy classes C of G. Thus, ω ψ ( C ^ ) = ω θ ( C ^ ) . Then, from Theorem 3 again, R e s S G ( ψ ) , θ 0 . It follows that | I r r 0 ( B 0 | θ ) | 2 .
 □
In the following examples, we verify our theorem above in the case of p-constrained groups. The wreath product (cyclic group (p), alternating group (5)) for p = 2 , 3 , 5 is a typical example of a p-constrained group which is not p-solvable. The wreath product arises naturally from the symmetric group. We emphasize that there is a strong relationship between our work and the concept of symmetry. The information for these examples about the height of the irreducible character, the defect of the block, and the structure of the defect group are from the GAP [28].
Example 1.
Let G : = wreath product (cyclic group (2), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order 1920. We set p = 2 . We have O 2 ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } and O 2 ( G ) = C 2 × C 2 × C 2 × C 2 × C 2 such that C G ( O 2 ( G ) ) = O 2 ( G ) . Therefore, the group G is 2-constrained by the definition above. From [9] (Chapter V, Corollary 3.11.), there is only one 2-block B 0 of G. It contains 24 irreducible characters with d e f ( B 0 ) = 7 and the defect group D = C 2 × ( ( ( C 2 × C 2 × C 2 ) : C 4 ) : C 2 ) of an order of 128. We have S : = ( C 2 × C 2 × C 2 × C 2 ) : A 5 as the normal subgroup of G such that D S = ( ( C 2 × C 2 × C 2 × C 2 ) : C 2 ) : C 2 is a group of the order 64. Let θ I r r ( S ) have a height of zero. Then, there are exactly two irreducible characters of G of a height of zero over θ. Note that this group is 2-constrained, making it not a 2-solvable group because it has the alternating group A 5 as a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 2-group nor a 2 ´ -group.
Example 2.
Let G : = wreath product (cyclic group (3), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order 14 , 580 . We set p = 3 . The group G is 3-constrained. Because we see that O 3 ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } , then under the definition of a p-constrained group, the unique largest normal 3 subgroup of G, O 3 ( G ) = C 3 × C 3 × C 3 × C 3 × C 3 , is self-centralizing; that is, C G ( O 3 ( G ) ) = O 3 ( G ) . It follows that there is only one 3-block B 0 of G. It contains 72 irreducible characters with d e f ( B 0 ) = 6 , and the defect group D = C 3 × C 3 × ( ( C 3 × C 3 × C 3 ) : C 3 ) is of the order 729. We have S : = ( C 3 × C 3 × C 3 × C 3 ) : A 5 as the normal subgroup of G and D S = C 3 × ( ( C 3 × C 3 × C 3 ) : C 3 ) as a group of the order 243 . Let θ I r r ( S ) have a height of zero. Note that there are at least two irreducible characters of G of a height of zero over θ. Note that this group is 3-constrained, meaning it is not a 3-solvable group because it has the alternating group A 5 as a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 3 group nor a 3 ´ group.
Example 3.
Let G : = wreath product (cyclic group (5), alternating group (5)) be a group of the order 187 , 500 . We set p = 5 . We see that the unique largest normal 5 subgroup of G is O 5 ( G ) = C 5 × C 5 × C 5 × C 5 × C 5 . This is a group of the order 3125 such that C G ( O 5 ( G ) ) = O 5 ( G ) . Under Corollary 1, the group G is 5-constrained, and O 5 ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } . We have only one 5-block B 0 of G which contains 337 irreducible characters with d e f ( B 0 ) = 6 , and the defect group D = ( ( ( C 5 : C 5 ) : C 5 ) : C 5 ) : C 5 is a group of the order 15 , 625 . We have S : = ( C 5 × C 5 × C 5 × C 5 ) : A 5 as the normal subgroup of G and D S = ( C 5 × C 5 × C 5 × C 5 ) : C 5 as a group of the order 3125. Let θ I r r ( S ) have a height of zero. Note that there are exactly five irreducible characters of G with a height of zero which lie over θ. Also, this group is 5-constrained, meaning it is not a 5-solvable group because it has the alternating group A 5 , which is a non-Abelian composition factor of G for neither a 5 group nor a 5 ´ group.
Consider the p-solvable group G and ψ I r r ( G ) . A nucleus of ψ [23] is a unique (up to G conjugacy) canonical pair ( H , ζ ) such that H G , ζ I r r ( H ) is p-factorable, and I n d H G ( ζ ) = ψ . The nucleus is defined as a result of repeated construction standard inducing pairs. If ψ is p-factorable, then ( G , ψ ) = ( H , ζ ) is a nucleus of ψ . If it is not p-factorable, then let ( S , η ) be a pair under ( G , ψ ) such that S is a maximal normal subgroup of G and η I r r ( S ) is p-factorable such that R e s S G ( ψ ) , η 0 . Assume that I G ( η ) = { a G | η a = η } < G is the inertia group of η in G. If ϕ I r r ( I G ( η ) | η ) , then under Clifford theory, I n d I G ( η ) G ( ϕ ) I r r ( G | η ) . Assume that ϕ is the Clifford correspondent of ψ . Hence, I n d I G ( η ) G ( ϕ ) = ψ . Then, by induction, there is a nucleus ( H , ζ ) for ( I G ( η ) , ϕ ) . It follows that ( H , ζ ) is a nucleus for ( G , ψ ) since
I n d H G ( ζ ) = I n d I G ( η ) G ( I n d H I G ( η ) ( ζ ) ) = I n d I G ( η ) G ( ϕ ) = ψ .
We say that ( V , α ) is Navarro’s vertex of ψ if there exists a nucleus ( H , ζ ) for ψ such that V is a Sylow p subgroup of H and α = R e s V H ( ζ p ) (see [20]).
Note that in this case, G is a p-constrained finite group Navarro’s vertex is generally undefined. In 2005, C. W. Eaton gave a generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertices to vertices of ordinary irreducible characters of any finite group, with the additional condition that the irreducible character belongs to a p block with a defect group contained in a normal p-solvable subgroup of G in [21] (Theorem 4.2).
Example 4.
Consider G to be a 2-constrained group in a case where p = 2 .
G : = W r e a t h P r o d u c t ( C y c l i c G r o u p ( 2 ) , A l t e r n a t i n g G r o u p ( 5 ) ) ,
with an order of 1920 . In Example 1, G has only one 2-block, namely the principal 2-block B 0 with a defect group D = C 2 × ( ( ( C 2 × C 2 × C 2 ) : C 4 ) : C 2 ) , which is a Sylow 2 subgroup of G of the order 128 . Note that there is no a normal 2-solvable subgroup of G which contains a defect group of the 2-block B 0 . Moreover, not all irreducible characters of G are 2-factorable. There are irreducible characters of a degree of 10 which are not 2-factorable, and they cannot be associated with a nucleus.
Recall that the ordinary irreducible character χ with a height of zero, which belongs to a p block B, has an anchor equal to a defect group of the p block B from [14] (Theorem 1.3 (d)). As is well known, the principal p block contains the principal irreducible character (the trivial character), and it has a Sylow p subgroup of G as a defect group (see [1] p. 316).
Theorem 5.
Consider G to be a finite group. Let ϕ I r r ( G ) with a positive height and a nontrivial anchor group A ϕ . Let Q be a subgroup of G which contains C G ( A ϕ ) , with O p ( Q ) { 1 G } . If Q is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( Q ) { 1 G } .
Proof 
(Proof). We have ϕ with a positive height. Hence, ϕ cannot be the principal irreducible character of G. Assume that ϕ I r r ( G ) belongs to a non-principal p block B of G. If A ϕ is the defect group of the p block B, then the result holds from [12] (Theorem 1). Now, assume that the anchor of ϕ is a proper subgroup of the defect group D of the p block B. We have C G ( A ϕ ) Q , where O p ( Q ) { 1 G } . From [14] (Theorem 1.2 (a)), since A ϕ D , then C G ( D ) C G ( A χ ) Q . Again, from [12] (Theorem 1), if Q is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( Q ) { 1 G } . □
The following corollary is immediately from the above theorem:
Corollary 2.
Consider G to be a finite group. Let ϕ I r r ( G ) with positive height and a nontrivial anchor group A ϕ . Suppose that { 1 G } H A ϕ . Let Q be a subgroup of N G ( H ) , contains C G ( A ϕ ) , that is C G ( A ϕ ) Q N G ( H ) . If Q is a p-constrained, then O p ´ ( Q ) { 1 G } .

4. Future Work

The class of p-constrained groups is very large. It includes the class of p-solvable groups. So our project is to extend many and important results in the literature from the class of p-solvable groups to the class of p-constrained groups. In particular, according to recent work [29,30,31]. We raise the following questions:
Problem 1: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Write Q ´ to denote the commutator subgroup of Q. Then
| I r r ( N G ( Q ) / O p ´ ( N G ( Q ) ) Q ´ ) | = | I r r 0 ( B 0 ( N G ( Q ) ) ) | = | I r r 0 ( B 0 ( G ) ) | ,
where | I r r 0 ( B 0 ( G ) ) | denotes to the number of irreducible ordinary characters of height zero in the principal p block of G, | I r r 0 ( B 0 ( N G ( Q ) ) ) | denotes to the number of irreducible ordinary characters of height zero in the principal p block of N G ( Q ) and | I r r ( N G ( Q ) / O p ´ ( N G ( Q ) ) Q ´ ) | refers to the number of irreducible ordinary characters in the group N G ( Q ) / O p ´ ( N G ( Q ) ) Q ´ .
For more details on the commutator subgroup see [27,32,33].
Problem 2: If G is p-constrained group and its principal p block satisfies the Alperin-Mckay conjecture, then
2 | I r r 0 ( B 0 ( G ) ) | .
Recall that Alperin-Mckay conjecture states: Let B be a p block of G, with defect group D B , and let b be the Brauer correspondence of B in N G ( D B ) . Then | I r r 0 ( b ) | = | I r r 0 ( B ) | . For more details on Brauer correspondence of blocks, see [4], Section 12.6.
Problem 3: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be its Sylow p-subgroup. For each linear character γ of Q, then
| I r r p ´ ( G γ ) | = | I r r p ´ ( N G ( Q ) γ ) | .
Here | I r r p ´ ( G γ ) | : = | { ψ I r r ( G ) | p d o e s n o t d i v i d e ψ ( 1 ) a n d R e s Q G ψ , γ 0 } | .
Problem 4: Let G be p-constrained group and Q be its Sylow p-subgroup. If ϕ I r r ( G ) , then ϕ p is a sum of characters induces from p-subgroup P of G which contained in Q such that ϕ ( 1 ) p = | Q : P | .
Let I B r ( G ) be the set of all Brauer irreducible characters of G. We write ψ 0 refers to the restriction of ψ to the set of all p-regular elements of G, that is (p does not divide the order of the elements). One of the most prominent theories that distinguish p-solvable group is the Fong-Swan theorem in [1], Theorem 7.5 and Wolf theorem [2], Theorem 10.3. We raise the following questions.
Problem 5: Consider G to be p-constrained group. If ϕ I B r ( G ) , then there is ψ I r r ( G ) that satisfies ψ 0 = ϕ .
Problem 6: Let Q be normal subgroup of G. Assume that G / Q is p-constrained group and ϕ I r r ( Q ) with ϕ 0 I B r ( Q ) and I G ( ϕ ) = I G ( ϕ 0 ) . Suppose that O ( ϕ ) ϕ ( 1 ) does not divisible by p. If γ I B r ( G | ϕ 0 ) , then there is ψ I r r ( G | ϕ ) that satisfies ψ 0 = γ .
Remark 1.
We can think of the above problems in different ways. The first one is to get a theorem that extends the result from p-solvable groups to p-constrained groups. The second one is to look at an example that distinguishes between two classes of groups.

5. Discussion

In this work, let ϕ I r r ( G ) with positive height and an anchor group A ϕ . We prove that if the normalizer N G ( A ϕ ) is p-constrained, then O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) { 1 G } . The same discussion holds for the normalizer N G ( H ) , for { 1 G } H A ϕ . This result is the relative version of the result for D. Wales in [12] which states: if the normalizer of the nontrivial defect group D for a nonprincipal p block, N G ( D ) is a p-constrained then O p ´ ( N G ( D ) ) { 1 G } . Since the anchor of irreducible character is the defect group of the primitive G-interior R -algebra R G e ϕ , the previous conclusion is logical. The main result of this paper is the generalization of A. Laradji’s result in [22] to the case that G is a finite p-constrained group and S is a normal subgroup of G: let B be a p block of G with defect group D such that | D S | < | D | . If θ I r r ( S ) with height zero then the number of irreducible characters of height zero in I r r ( B ) which lie over θ is greater than or equal to 2. We have applied this result on some examples for p-constrained group which is not p-solvable group. A p-solvable group is characterized by the existence of normal subgroups. Thus, it is considered a suitable environment to use Clifford theory. But we know that any p-solvable is p-constrained group which again has many normal subgroups and then we can use the tool of Clifford theory. If G is a finite p-constrained which is not p-solvable group, then we have either O p ´ ( G ) { 1 G } or O p ´ ( G ) = { 1 G } . In the first case to prove this result we used the method “induction on the order of G”. In the second case we used the group properties also the block theory. While the generalization the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character of a p-solvable group to a p-constrained group is fails in general. The outcomes of work are important because contains generalize the related theory of p-solvable group to a p-constrained group. We plan to study the necessary conditions to generalize the concept of Navarro’s vertex in a p-constrained group. We plan to generalize properties of an irreducible character of a p-solvable group to a p-constrained group.

6. Conclusions

Consider G to be a p-constrained group and S to be a normal subgroup of G and θ I r r ( S ) with height zero. Let B be a p block of G with defect group D such that | D S | < | D | . Our research shows that the number of I r r 0 ( B | θ ) is greater than or equal to 2. We have applied this result on some examples for p-constrained group. We have introduced the example to show that Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character in a p-constrained group G is generally undefined. For ϕ is an irreducible character of a finite group G with positive height and a nontrivial anchor group A ϕ . We have proved that if A ϕ has a p-constrained normalizer group then O p ´ ( N G ( A ϕ ) ) is nontrivial. A similar result holds for the normalizer N G ( H ) , for { 1 G } H A ϕ . The theories that we extended above which have been developed before by other influential scientists, see [12,22]. In the future we will try to establish the necessary conditions for the generalization of the concept of Navarro’s vertex for an irreducible character of a p-solvable group and some of its characteristics to a p-constrained group.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.A. and A.M.A.; Methodology, M.H.A.; Validation, M.H.A.; Investigation, M.H.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.H.A.; Writing—review and editing, M.H.A.; Supervision, A.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work forms part of the first author’s PhD studies at the Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences at Umm Al-Qura University. Ahmad M. Alghamdi would like to thank A. Laradji for some valuable discussions regarding the subject of his paper [22]. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for his/her valuable comments and suggestions which improve the writing of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nagao, H.; Tsushima, Y. Representations of Finite Groups; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1989; pp. 186–316. [Google Scholar]
  2. Navarro, G. Characters and Blocks of Finite Groups; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 60–200. Volume 250. [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis, C.W.; Reiner, I. Methods of Representation Theory; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 262–472. Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Webb, P. A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 167–176. Volume 161. [Google Scholar]
  5. Craven, D.A. Representation Theory of Finite Groups: A Guidebook; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 26–49. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brauer, R. On blocks of characters of groups of finite order. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1946, 32, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brauer, R. Notes on representations of finite groups, I. J. London Math. Soc. 1976, 13, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Curtis, C.W.; Reiner, I. Methods of Representation Theory; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 407–529. Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feit, W. The Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Volume 25 of North-Holland Mathematical Library; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 23–206. [Google Scholar]
  10. Green, J.A. Some remarks on defect groups. Math. Z. 1968, 107, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thévenaz, J. G-Algebras and Modular Representation Theory; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 76–167. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wales, D. Defect Groups in p-Constrained Groups. J. Algebra 1970, 14, 572–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brauer, R. zur Darstellungstheorie der Gruppen endlicher Ordnung. II. Math. Z. 1959, 72, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kessar, R.; Külshammer, B.; Linckelmann, M. Anchors of irreducible characters. J. Algebra 2017, 475, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cliff, G.H.; Plesken, W.; Weiss, A. Order-theoretic properties of the centre of a block. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 1987, 47, 413–420. [Google Scholar]
  16. Michler, G.O. Trace and defect of a block idempotent. J. Algebra 1990, 131, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Isaacs, I.M. Character Theory of Finite Groups; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 9–72. [Google Scholar]
  18. Isaacs, I.M. Characters of π-separable groups. J. Algebra 1984, 86, 98–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huppert, B. Character Theory of Finite Groups; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 252–547. [Google Scholar]
  20. Navarro, G. Vertices for characters of p-solvable groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 354, 2759–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eaton, C.W. Vertices for irreducible characters of a class of blocks. J. Algebra 2005, 286, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Laradji, A. On height zero characters of p-solvable groups. Osaka J. Math. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Isaacs, I.M. Characters of Solvable Groups; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2018; pp. 7–102. Volume 189. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huppert, B. Endliche Gruppen I; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 688–696. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gorenstein, D. Finite Groups, 2nd ed.; Chelsea Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 267–269. [Google Scholar]
  26. Huppert, B.; Blackburn, N. Finite Groups, II; Volume 242 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften (Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1982; pp. 184–187. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dummit, D.; Foote, R. Abstract Algebra, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; p. 97. [Google Scholar]
  28. The GAP Group. GAP—Groups, Algorithms, and Programming. Version 4.12.1. 2022. Available online: Http://www.gap-system.org (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  29. Hung, N.N.; Schaeffer Fry, A.A.; Vallejo, C. Height zero characters in principal blocks. J. Algebra 2023, 622, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isaacs, I.M.; Navarro, G. Characters of p´-degree of p-solvable groups. J. Algebra 2001, 246, 394–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rossi, D.; Sambale, B. Restrictions of characters in p-solvable groups. J. Algebra 2021, 587, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hungerford, T.W. Abstract Algebra: An Introduction, 3rd ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; p. 286. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rose, J.S. A Course in Group Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1978; pp. 58–60. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Algreagri, M.H.; Alghamdi, A.M. On Height-Zero Characters in p-Constrained Groups. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111990

AMA Style

Algreagri MH, Alghamdi AM. On Height-Zero Characters in p-Constrained Groups. Symmetry. 2023; 15(11):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Algreagri, Manal H., and Ahmad M. Alghamdi. 2023. "On Height-Zero Characters in p-Constrained Groups" Symmetry 15, no. 11: 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop