Next Article in Journal
Some Results on Submodules Using (μ,ν,ω)-Single-Valued Neutrosophic Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Analysis of Fractional-Order Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi Models
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Development of a Macro to Compare Sections of Planes to Parts Using Programming with Visual Basic for Applications in CATIA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Analysis of Fractional-Order Parabolic Equation Involving Atangana–Baleanu Derivative
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Post-Quantum Integral Inequalities for Three-Times (p,q)-Differentiable Functions

by
Loredana Ciurdariu
1,*,† and
Eugenia Grecu
2,†
1
Department of Mathematics, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
2
Department of Management, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2023, 15(1), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010246
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Quantum Calculus)

Abstract

:
A new ( p , q ) -integral identity involving left and right post quantum derivatives, by using three times ( p , q ) -differentiable functions is established and then this identity is used to derive several new post-quantum Ostrowski type integral inequalities for three times ( p , q ) -differentiable functions. These results are generalizations of corresponding results in the area of integral inequalities.

1. Introduction

Convexity theory played an essential role in the development of the theory of mathematical inequalities [1]. Some inequalities have numerous applications and a growing role, both in different branches of pure mathematics and in a number of applied sciences. In the last few decades, many generalizations of convex functions have been formulated [2] and used, such as m-convex, ( α , m ) - convex, log-convex, h-convex, exponentially convex, harmonically convex, preinvex functions, generalized-convex functions and convex with respect to the pairs of functions. Inequalities and convexity play an important role in approximation and optimization theory.
Mathematical inequalities have also given interesting study perspectives in some economic fields, such as cost, income and profit [3], and also in welfare economics [4], wealth distribution, the study of utility and even prospect theory (e.g., comparing the satisfaction that the consumer gets if he makes one choice or another) [5].
Mathematical researchers have proposed many types of inequalities, such as the Hermite–Hadamard (H-H) type, the Ostrowski type, the Opial type, the H-H-Mercer type, the Simpson type, the Bullen type and other types by using convex functions and focusing on obtaining some new bounds for the left and right sides of these inequalities.
One of the most studied of such inequalities is the H-H one, also known as the “trapezoidal inequality”. It was discovered independently by Hermite and Hadamard [6] and has attracted the interest of many researchers in the last few decades [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Compared with the initial perspective, this inequality has been and is being studied through a variety of new approaches. A possible explanation of the exceptional interest given to this type of inequality may be represented by the symmetry contained within. Even the new generalizations of this type of inequality preserve such symmetry, and sometimes they may contain a certain type of asymmetry.
Jackson analyzed the q-difference operator in [17]. The knowledge of q calculus [18] and difference equations was first used in physics and chemistry problems [17]. In [19], Siegel presented string theory involving q calculus.
The classical concept of quantum calculus introduced in [20] has been extended and generalized in several directions. In quantum calculus H-H, Ostrowski-, Gruss- and Montgomery-type inequalities have been studied in numerous articles [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. This topic has a number of applications in many fields of mathematics (number theory, combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials and hypergeometric functions) and also in physics and mathematics (mechanics and relativity theory) [31,32,33,34,35].
Chakarabarti and Jajonnathan [36] introduced the concept of post-quantum calculus for the generalization of q-oscillator algebra, which is well known in physics, and in [37], Tunc and Gov introduced the concepts of ( q 1 , q 2 ) derivatives ω 1 D q 1 , q 2 f ( x ) and ( p , q ) integrals over finite intervals.
The fundamental theorem of ( p , q ) calculus [38] and some ( p , q ) Taylor formulas were studied in [39], and as an example, the concept of ( p , q ) beta [38] and ( p , q ) gamma functions was introduced in [40]. ( p , q ) calculus is efficiently used in fields such as Lie groups, hypergeometric series and physics. In addition, ( p , q ) calculus is expected to be very important in the development of analysis and applications [40].
In [41], Kunt et al. found some ( q 1 , q 2 ) analogues of H-H-type inequalities and midpoints. Cortez et al. obtained the integral identities via the ϕ preinvex function in [42]. Using new ideas [41,43], in recent years, numerous authors have provided other refinements and extensions of the inequalities [44,45,46] of the H-H and Ostrowski types [18,38,44,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Studies relative to convexity and preinvex functions have applications such as maximizing the likelihood from multiple linear regression involving a Gauss–Laplace distribution [54,55,56,57,58].
Starting from the inequalities given in [48], our goal is to find a similar identity regarding the post-quantum left and right derivatives and the corresponding inequalities in the case of three-times differentiable functions in post-quantum calculus.
This article is organized into four main sections. After the introduction in Section 1, there follows a brief review of the fundamental notions of ( p , q ) calculus necessary for subsequent approaches (Section 2). Section 3 provides an identity that plays an essential role in developing the main results of this paper (i.e., new refinements to the Ostrowski-type integral inequality for three-times ( p , q ) differentiable functions). Section 4 presents the conclusions as well as future research perspectives.

2. Materials and Methods

The traditional H-H-type inequality says that “if f : [ a , b ] R is a convex function, then the following inequality takes place:
f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2
and when f is a concave function, then previous inequality holds in the opposite direction” [6].
The Ostrowski integral inequality for differentiable functions was given in [59], being studied by many researchers:
 Theorem 1. 
“Let f : [ a , b ] R be a differentiable function on ( a , b ) whose derivative f : [ a , b ] R is bounded on ( a , b ) and
| | f | | = s u p t ( a , b ) | f ( t ) | < .
Then
| f ( x ) 1 b a a b f ( t ) d t | 1 4 + ( x a + b 2 ) 2 ( b a ) 2 ( b a ) | | f | |
for all x [ a , b ] ” [48,59].
Throughout this paper, it is assumed that 0 < q < p 1 , and [ a , b ] is a real interval with a < b . In addition, the ( p , q ) number of n is [ n ] p , q = p n q n p q = p n 1 + p n 2 q + + p q n 2 + q n 1 , n N :
 Definition 1 
([46]). “For a continuous function f : [ a , b ] R , the ( p , q ) a derivative of function f at t on [ a , b ] is defined by
a D p , q f ( t ) = f ( p t + ( 1 p ) a ) f ( q t + ( 1 q ) a ) ( p q ) ( t a ) , t a ,
a D p , q f ( a ) = lim t a a D p , q f ( t ) .
 Definition 2 
([47]). “For a continuous function f : [ a , b ] R , the ( p , q ) b derivative of a function f at t on [ a , b ] is defined by
b D p , q f ( t ) = f ( q t + ( 1 q ) b ) f ( p t + ( 1 p ) b ) ( p q ) ( b t ) , t b ,
b D p , q f ( a ) = lim t b b D p , q f ( t ) .
 Example 1. 
We define the function f : [ a , b ] R by f ( x ) = A x 2 + B x + C , where A , B and C are constants with 0 < q < p 1 . Then, for x a , we obtain
a D p , q ( A x 2 + B x + C ) = A ( p x + ( 1 p ) a ) 2 + B ( p x + ( 1 p ) a ) + C ( p q ) ( x a ) A ( q x + ( 1 q ) a ) 2 + B ( q x + ( 1 q ) a ) + C ( p q ) ( x a ) = A ( x a ) ( p q ) [ ( p + q ) x + a ( 2 ( p + q ) ) ] + B ( p q ) ( x a ) ( p q ) ( x a ) = A ( [ 2 ] p , q ( x a ) + 2 a ) + B .
 Definition 3 
([46,48]). “For a continuous function f : [ a , b ] R , the ( p , q ) a integral of a function f at t on [ a , b ] is defined by
a x f ( t ) a d p , q t = ( p q ) ( x a ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 f q n p n + 1 x + ( 1 q n p n + 1 ) a
for x [ a , b ] . The function f is called a ( p , q ) a integrable function on [ a , b ] if a b f ( t ) a d p , q t exists”.
 Definition 4 
([47,48]). “For a continuous function f : [ a , b ] R , the ( p , q ) b integral of a function f at t on [ a , b ] is defined by
x b f ( t ) b d p , q t = ( p q ) ( b x ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 f q n p n + 1 x + ( 1 q n p n + 1 ) b
for x [ a , b ] . The function f is called a ( p , q ) b integrable function on [ a , b ] if a b f ( t ) b d p , q t exists”.
 Example 2. 
We define the function f : [ a , b ] R with f ( t ) = A t 2 + B , where A and B are constants. Then, we have
a b ( A t 2 + B ) a d p , q t = A ( p q ) ( b a ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 q n p n + 1 b + 2 + B ( p q ) ( b a ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 = A ( b a ) [ b 2 [ 3 ] p , q + a 2 1 2 [ 2 ] p , q + 1 [ 3 ] p , q + 2 a b 1 [ 2 ] p , q 1 [ 3 ] p , q ] + B ( b a ) .
 Lemma 1 
([46]). “For α R { 1 } , the following equality holds:
a b ( t a ) α a d p , q t = ( b a ) α + 1 [ α + 1 ] p , q .
 Theorem 2 
([37]). “Let f , g : [ a , b ] R be continuous functions and r > 1 with 1 s + 1 r = 1 . Then,
a b | f ( t ) g ( t ) | a d p , q t a b | f ( t ) | s a d p , q t 1 s a b | f ( t ) | r a d p , q t 1 r .
The basic properties of these derivatives and integrals can be found in [18,38].
In recent years, new estimations of post-quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for twice ( p , q ) differentiable functions were presented in [48]:
 Theorem 3 
([48]). “Let f : a , b R be a twice ( p , q ) differentiable function such that b D p , q 2 f and a D p , q 2 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 1 and J 2 , respectively. If | b D p , q 2 f | and | a D p , q 2 f | are convex functions, then
| a b L p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 2 ( b x ) 2 [ ( x a ) 1 [ 4 ] p . q | a D p , q 2 f ( x ) | + [ 4 ] p , q [ 3 ] p . q [ 3 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q | a D p , q 2 f ( a ) |
+ ( b x ) 1 [ 4 ] p . q | b D p , q 2 f ( x ) | + [ 4 ] p , q [ 3 ] p . q [ 3 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q | b D p , q 2 f ( b ) | ] .
 Theorem 4 
([48]). “Let f : a , b R be a twice ( p , q ) differentiable function such that b D p , q 2 f and a D p , q 2 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 1 and J 2 , respectively. If | b D p , q 2 f | r and | a D p , q 2 f | r are convex functions for r 1 , then
| a b L p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 2 ( b x ) 2 1 [ 3 ] p , q 1 1 r × [ ( x a ) 1 [ 4 ] p . q | a D p , q 2 f ( x ) | r + [ 4 ] p , q [ 3 ] p . q [ 3 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q | a D p , q 2 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 4 ] p . q | b D p , q 2 f ( x ) | r + [ 4 ] p , q [ 3 ] p . q [ 3 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q | b D p , q 2 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
 Theorem 5 
([48]). “Let f : a , b R be a twice ( p , q ) differentiable function such that b D p , q 2 f and a D p , q 2 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 1 and J 2 , respectively. If | b D p , q 2 f | r and | a D p , q 2 f | r are convex functions for r > 1 , 1 s + 1 r = 1 , then
| a b L p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 2 ( b x ) 2 1 [ 2 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s × [ ( x a ) | a D p , q 2 f ( x ) | r + ( p + q ) | a D p , q 2 f ( a ) | r [ 2 ] p , q 1 r + ( b x ) | b D p , q 2 f ( x ) | r + | b D p , q 2 f ( b ) | r [ 2 ] p , q 1 r ] .

3. Results

Several new estimates of post-quantum H-H-type integral inequalities for three-times ( p , q ) differentiable functions are presented below, starting from the results presented in [48]. Let us define J 1 = [ b p ( b x ) , b ] and J 2 = [ a , a + p ( x a ) ] . At first, a basic result (a new identity) for the following inequalities is established:
 Lemma 2. 
Let f : [ a , b ] R be a three-times ( p , q ) differentiable function with a D p , q 3 f and b D p , q 3 f continuous and integrable functions on J 2 and J 1 , respectively. Then, we have
a b M p , q ( x ) = ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 [ ( a x ) 0 1 t 3 a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) d p , q t + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) d p , q t ] ,
where
a b M p . q ( x ) = [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q p 6 q 6 [ ( b x ) 3 a p 3 x + ( 1 p 3 ) a f ( t ) a d p . q t + ( x a ) 3 p 3 x + ( 1 p 3 ) b b f ( t ) b d p , q t ] 1 ( p q ) 2 p q { p 5 [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q q ( p q ) 2 p 2 q 5 [ ( x a ) ( b x ) 3 f ( p 2 x + ( 1 p 2 ) a ) + ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) f ( p 2 x + ( 1 p 2 ) b ) ] + p q 3 [ ( x a ) ( b x ) 3 f ( q 2 x + ( 1 q 2 ) a ) + ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) f ( q 2 x + ( 1 q 2 ) b ) ] + p 3 q [ 3 ] p , q p q 4 [ ( x a ) ( b x ) 3 × f ( p q x + ( 1 p q ) a ) + ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) f ( p q x + ( 1 p q ) b ) ] } .
 Proof. 
By using Definition 1, we have
a D p , q 3 f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a ) = a D p , q ( a D p , q 2 f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) ) = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( b a ) 3 t 3 p q
× [ q f ( p 3 t b + a ( 1 p 3 t ) ) + p f ( p q 2 t b + a ( 1 q 2 p t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p 2 q t b + a ( 1 p 2 t q ) ) p 2
q f ( p 2 q t b + a ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) + p f ( q 3 t b + a ( 1 q 3 t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p q 2 b t + a ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) q 2 ] .
Now, by applying the relation in Equation (9) and Definition 3, we obtain
I = 0 1 t 3 a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) d p , q t = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( b a ) 3 p q
× 0 1 [ q f ( p 3 t x + a ( 1 p 3 t ) ) + p f ( p q 2 t x + a ( 1 q 2 p t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p 2 q t x + a ( 1 p 2 t q ) ) p 2
q f ( p 2 q t x + a ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) + p f ( q 3 t x + a ( 1 q 3 t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p q 2 x t + a ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) q 2 ] d p , q t ,
or we can obtain
I = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( x a ) 3 p q 0 1 { q p 2 f ( p 3 t x + a ( 1 p 3 t ) ) p q 2 f ( q 3 t x + a ( 1 q 3 t ) ) + p + q q 2 + 1 p f ( p q 2 t x + a ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) 1 q + p + q p 2 f ( p 2 q t x + a ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) } d p , q t = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( x a ) 4 p q { ( x a ) ( p q ) q p 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 3 q n p n + 1 x + a ( 1 p 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) p q 2 ( x a ) ( p q ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( q 3 q n p n + 1 x + a ( 1 q 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) + p 2 + p q + q 2 p q 2 ( x a ) ( p q ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p q 2 q n p n + 1 x + a ( 1 p q 2 q n p n + 1 ) ) p 2 + p q + q 2 p 2 q ( x a ) ( p q ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 2 q q n p n + 1 x + a ( 1 p 2 q q n p n + 1 ) }
= ( x a ) ( p q ) ( x a ) 4 ( p q ) 3 p q { q p 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 3 q n p n + 1 x + a ( 1 p 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) p 4 q 5 n = 0 q n + 3 p n + 4 f ( p 3 q n + 3 p n + 4 x + a ( 1 p 3 q n + 3 p n + 4 ) ) + p 2 + p q + q 2 q 4 p n = 0 q n + 2 p n + 3 f ( p 3 q n + 2 p n + 3 x + a ( 1 p 3 q n + 2 p n + 3 ) ) p 2 + p q + q 2 p q 2 n = 0 q n + 1 p n + 2 f ( p 3 q n + 1 p n + 2 x + a ( 1 p 3 q n + 1 p n + 2 ) ) } = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( x a ) 4 p 4 q { [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q ( p q ) 3 p 2 q 4 a p 3 x + ( 1 p 3 ) a f ( t ) a d p , q t + p 3 [ ( x a ) ( p q ) [ p 5 [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q q ( p q ) p 2 q 5 f ( p 2 x + a ( 1 p 2 ) )
+ p q 3 f ( q 2 x + a ( 1 q 2 ) ) + p 3 q [ 3 ] p , q p q 4 f ( p q x + a ( 1 p q ) ) ] } .
By using Definition 2, we have
b D p , q 3 f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) = b D p , q ( b D p , q f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) ) = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( b a ) 3 t 3 p q
× [ p f ( q 3 t a + b ( 1 q 3 t ) ) + q f ( p 2 q t a + b ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p q 2 t a + b ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) q 2
p f ( q 2 p t a + b ( 1 q 2 p t ) ) + q f ( p 3 t a + b ( 1 p 3 t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p 2 q t a + b ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) p 2 ] .
Now, by applying the relation in Equation (11) and Definition 4, we obtain
J = 0 1 t 3 b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) d p , q t = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( b x ) 3 p q
× 0 1 [ p f ( q 3 t x + b ( 1 q 3 t ) ) + q f ( p 2 q t x + b ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p q 2 t x + b ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) q 2
p f ( q 2 p t x + b ( 1 q 2 p t ) ) + q f ( p 3 t x + b ( 1 p 3 t ) ) [ 2 ] p , q f ( p 2 q t x + b ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) p 2 ] d p , q t ,
or we can obtain
J = 1 ( p q ) 3 ( b x ) 3 p q 0 1 { p q 2 f ( q 3 t x + b ( 1 q 3 t ) ) q p 2 f ( p 3 t x + b ( 1 p 3 t ) ) p + q q 2 + 1 p f ( p q 2 t x + b ( 1 p q 2 t ) ) + 1 q + p + q p 2 f ( p 2 q t x + b ( 1 p 2 q t ) ) } d p , q t .
In the same way, we find that
J = ( p q ) ( b x ) ( b x ) 4 ( p q ) 3 p q { p q 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( q 3 q n p n + 1 x + b ( 1 q 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) q p 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 3 q n p n + 1 x + b ( 1 p 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) p 2 + p q + q 2 p q 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p q 2 q n p n + 1 x + b ( 1 p q 2 q n p n + 1 ) ) + p 2 + p q + q 2 p 2 q n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 2 q q n p n + 1 x + b ( 1 p 2 q q n p n + 1 ) ) }
= ( p q ) ( b x ) ( b x ) 4 ( p q ) 3 p q { p 4 q 5 n = 0 q n + 3 p n + 4 f ( p 3 q n + 3 p n + 4 x + b ( 1 p 3 q n + 3 p n + 4 ) ) q p 2 n = 0 q n p n + 1 f ( p 3 q n p n + 1 x + b ( 1 p 3 q n p n + 1 ) ) p 2 + p q + q 2 q 4 p n = 0 q n + 2 p n + 3 f ( p 3 q n + 2 p n + 3 x + b ( 1 p 3 q n + 3 p n + 3 ) ) + p 2 + p q + q 2 p q 2 n = 0 q n + 1 p n + 2 f ( p 3 q n + 1 p n + 2 x + b ( 1 p 3 q n + 1 p n + 2 ) ) } ,
or
J = 1 ( b x ) 4 ( p q ) 3 p 4 q { [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q ( p q ) 3 p 2 q 5 p 3 x + b ( 1 p 3 ) b f ( t ) d p , q t p 3 [ p 5 [ 2 ] p , q [ 3 ] p , q ( p q ) q p 2 q 5 ( b x ) ( p q ) f ( p 2 x + b ( 1 p 2 ) ) + p q 3 ( b x ) ( p q ) f ( q 2 x + b ( 1 q 2 ) )
+ p 3 q [ 3 ] p , q p q 4 ( b x ) ( p q ) f ( p q x + b ( 1 p q ) ) ] } .
Now, by multiplying Equation (10) by ( x a ) 4 ( b x ) 3 and Equation (12) by ( b x ) 4 ( x a ) 3 , as well as adding the resultant equality, we obtain the desired equality. □
Some new post-quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for three-times ( p , q ) differentiable functions are given below:
 Theorem 6. 
Let f : [ a , b ] R be a three-times ( p , q ) differentiable function such that a D p , q 3 f and b D p , q 3 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 2 and J 1 , respectively. If | a D p , q 3 f | and | b D p , q 3 f | are convex functions, then the following inequality takes place:
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 { ( x a ) [ | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | 1 [ 5 ] p , q + | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | [ 5 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 5 ] p , q ]
+ ( b x ) [ | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | 1 [ 5 ] p , q + | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | [ 5 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 5 ] p , q ] } .
 Proof. 
Taking into account the modulus of Equation (8) and the convexity of the functions | a D p , q 3 f | and | b D p , q 3 f | , we have
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 [ ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 | a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) | d p , q t + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 | b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) | d p , q t
( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 { ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 t | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | + ( 1 t ) | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | d p , q t + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 t | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | + ( 1 t ) | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | d p , q t }
= ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 { ( x a ) [ | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | 0 1 t 4 d p , q t + | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | 0 1 ( t 3 t 4 ) d p , q t ] + ( b x ) [ | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | 0 1 t 4 d p , q t + | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | 0 1 ( t 3 t 4 ) d p , q t ] } ,
This completes the proof. □
 Theorem 7. 
Let f : [ a , b ] R be a three-times ( p , q ) differentiable function such that a D p , q 3 f and b D p , q 3 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 2 and J 1 , respectively. If | a D p , q 3 f | r and | b D p , q 3 f | r are convex functions for r 1 , then the following inequality takes place:
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 1 [ 4 ] p , q 1 1 r × [ ( x a ) 1 [ 5 ] p , q | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + [ 5 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 5 ] p , q | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 5 ] p , q | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + [ 5 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 4 ] p , q [ 5 ] p , q | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
 Proof. 
By using Lemma 2 and the power mean inequality, we obtain
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 [ ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 | a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) | d p , q t + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 | b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) | d p , q t
( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 [ ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 d p , q t 1 1 r 0 1 t 3 | a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) | r d p , q t 1 r + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 d p , q t 1 1 r 0 1 t 3 | b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) | r d p , q t 1 r ] .
With the convexity of | a D p , q 3 f | r and | b D p , q 3 f | r , we have
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 × [ ( x a ) 1 [ 4 ] p , q 1 1 r 1 [ 5 ] p , q | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 [ 4 ] p , q 1 [ 5 ] p , q ) | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 4 ] p , q 1 1 r 1 [ 5 ] p , q | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 [ 4 ] p , q 1 [ 5 ] p , q ) | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
 Theorem 8. 
Let f : [ a , b ] R be a three-times ( p , q ) differentiable function such that a D p , q 3 f and b D p , q 3 f are continuous and integrable functions on J 2 and J 1 , respectively. If | a D p , q 3 f | r and | b D p , q 3 f | r are convex functions for r 1 and 1 r + 1 s = 1 , then the following inequality holds:
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s × [ ( x a ) 1 [ 2 ] p , q | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] p , q ) | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 2 ] p , q | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] p , q ) | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
 Proof. 
By using Holder’s inequality and applying Lemma 2, we obtain
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 [ ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 | a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) | d p , q t + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 | b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) | d p , q t ] .
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 × [ ( x a ) 0 1 t 3 s d p , q t 1 s 0 1 | a D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) a ) | r d p , q t 1 r + ( b x ) 0 1 t 3 s d p , q t 1 s 0 1 | b D p , q 3 f ( t x + ( 1 t ) b ) | r d p , q t 1 r ] .
Now, by taking into account Lemma 1 and the convexity of | a D p , q 3 f | r and | b D p , q 3 f | r from the hypothesis, we obtain
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 × [ ( x a ) 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s 0 1 ( t | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 t ) | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | r ) d p , q t 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s 0 1 ( t | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 t ) | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | r ) d p , q t 1 r ] .
From here, we have
| a b M p , q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3
× [ ( x a ) 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s 1 [ 2 ] p , q | a D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] p , q ) | a D p , q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r
+ ( b x ) 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s 1 [ 2 ] p , q | b D p , q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] p , q ) | b D p , q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] ,
The proof is finished. □
 Remark 1. 
Under conditions of Theorem 6, if | a D p , q 3 f | M and | b D p , q 3 f | M , then we have
| a b M p , q ( x ) | M ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 ( b a ) 1 [ 4 ] p , q ,
where M is a positive constant.
 Remark 2. 
Under the conditions in Theorem 8, if | a D p , q 3 f | M and | b D p , q 3 f | M , then we have
| a b M p , q ( x ) | M ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 ( b a ) 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] p , q 1 s ,
where M is a positive constant.
 Remark 3. 
All previous results can also be particularized for quantum calculus when we have p = 1 . This means the identity in Equation (8) and the inequalities in Equations (13)–(15) can be rewritten for quantum calculus if we set p = 1 .
Therefore, the following can be obtained:
 Remark 4. 
(a) If p = 1 in Theorem 6, then the following inequality holds:
| a b M q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 { ( x a ) [ | a D q 3 f ( x ) | 1 [ 5 ] q + | a D q 3 f ( a ) | [ 5 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 5 ] q ]
+ ( b x ) [ | b D q 3 f ( x ) | 1 [ 5 ] q + | b D q 3 f ( b ) | [ 5 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 5 ] q ] } .
(b) If we have p = 1 in Theorem 7, then the following inequality holds:
| a b M q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 × 1 [ 4 ] q 1 1 r [ ( x a ) 1 [ 5 ] q | a D q 3 f ( x ) | r + [ 5 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 5 ] q | a D q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 5 ] q | b D q 3 f ( x ) | r + [ 5 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 4 ] q [ 5 ] q | b D q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
(c) If p = 1 in Theorem 8, then the following inequality holds:
| a b M q ( x ) | ( x a ) 3 ( b x ) 3 × 1 [ 3 s + 1 ] q 1 s [ ( x a ) 1 [ 2 ] q | a D q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] q ) | a D q 3 f ( a ) | r 1 r + ( b x ) 1 [ 2 ] q | b D q 3 f ( x ) | r + ( 1 1 [ 2 ] q ) | b D q 3 f ( b ) | r 1 r ] .
Analogue results similar to the inequalities in Equations (16) and (17) are given in [48,52] for twice ( p , q ) differentiable functions and in [22].

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Starting from the identity and inequalities given in [48], our goal was to find a similar identity involving the left and right post-quantum derivatives and the corresponding inequalities in the case of the three-times ( p , q ) differentiable functions in the frame of post-quantum calculus.
In this paper, we presented a new ( p , q ) integral identity by using the third ( p , q ) a and ( p , q ) b derivatives. This identity was used to establish new post-quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for three-times ( p , q ) -differentiable convex functions in Theorems 6–8. Several examples and consequences were presented in Examples 1 and 2 and Remark 4 to illustrate the investigated results.
It was also proven that these newly established integral inequalities can be turned into q Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for convex functions or classical Ostrowski-type inequalities for convex functions. These results contribute to the enrichment of the specialized literature in the field of Ostrowski-type inequalities. We hope that our results can be applied in interpolation theory, hypergeometric series, quantum algebra and applied mathematics.
It is a new and interesting problem that these results can be used to obtain similar inequalities for the new concepts of convexity, which have been extended and generalized in different dirrections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C. and E.G.; methodology, L.C.; software, L.C.; validation, L.C. and E.G.; formal analysis, L.C.; investigation, L.C. and E.G.; resources, L.C. and E.G.; data curation, L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.; writing—review and editing, L.C. and E.G.; visualization, L.C. and E.G.; supervision, L.C. and E.G.; project administration, L.C. and E.G.; funding acquisition, L.C. and E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

PFE 26/30.12.2021, PERFORM-CDI@UPT100.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, project number PFE 26/30.12.2021, PERFORM-CDI@UPT 100 . The increase in performance was thanks to the Polytechnic University of Timisoara, who strengthened the research, development and technological transfer capacity in the field of “Energy, Environment and Climate Change” at the beginning of the second century of its existence within Program 1-Development of the national system of Research and Development, Subprogram 1.2-Institutional Performance-Institutional Development Projects-Excellence Funding Projects in RDI, PNCDI III.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, T.-H.; Wang, M.-K.; Chu, Y.-M. Monotonicity and convexity involving generalized elliptic integral of the first kind. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Math. 2021, 115, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, T.-H.; Shi, L.; Chu, Y.-M. Convexity and concavity of the modified Bessel functions of the first kind with respect to Holder means. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Math. 2020, 114, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fare, R.; Grosskopf, S. Notes on some inequalities in economics. Econ. Theory 2000, 15, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bleichrodt, H.; van Doorslaer, E. A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement. J. Health Econ. 2006, 25, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mathews, T.; Schwartz, J.A. Comparisons of utility inequality and income inequality. Econ. Lett. 2019, 178, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hadamard, J. Etude sur les proprietes des fonctions entieres en particulier d’une fonction consideree par Riemann. J. Math. Pures. Appl. 1893, 58, 171–215. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dragomir, S.S. A companion of Ostrowski’s inequality for functions of bounded variation and applications. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2014, 5, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dragomir, S.S. The Ostrowski’s integral inequality for Lipschitzian mappings and applications. Comput. Math. Appl. 1999, 38, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cerone, S.; Dragomir, S.S.; Roumeliotis, J. An inequality of Ostrowski-type for mappings whose second derivatives are bounded and applications. East Asian Math. J. 1999, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Budak, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z. A new Ostrowski type inequality for functions whose first derivatives are of bounded variation. Moroc. J. Pure Appl. Anal. 2016, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kunt, M.; Iscan, I. Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Fejer type inequalities for GA-convex functions. Turk. J. Inequal. 2018, 2, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Khan, A.; Chu, Y.M.; Khan, T.U.; Khan, J. Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications. Open Math. 2017, 15, 1414–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Kirmaci, U.S. Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions. Acta Math. Sci. 2011, 31, 1643–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Latif, M.A.; Dragomir, S. New inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for n-times differentiable convex and concave functions with applications. Filomat 2016, 30, 2609–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ozdemir, M.E.; Ekinci, A.; Akdemir, A.O. Some new integral inequalities for functions whose derivatives of absolute values are convex and concave. TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 2019, 2, 212–224. [Google Scholar]
  16. Butt, S.I.; Budak, H.; Nonlaopon, K. New Variants of Quantum Midpoint-Type Inequalities. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jackson, F.H. On q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soontharanon, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. Fractional (p,q)-calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Siegel, W. Introduction to String Field Theory. Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics; World Scientific: Teaneck, NJ, USA, 1998; Volume 8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ali, M.A.; Abbas, M.; Budak, H.; Agarwal, P.; Murtaza, G.; Chu, Y.M. Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 2021, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Akkurt, A.; Chu, Y.M. Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus. Open Math. 2021, 19, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ali, M.A.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Generalization of quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Kunt, M.; Iscan, I. q2-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convexand quasi-convex functions. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2018, 30, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chu, H.H.; Kalsoom, H.; Rashid, S.; Idrees, M.; Safdar, F.; Chu, Y.M.; Baleanu, D. Quantum analogs of Ostrowski-type inequalities for raina’s function correlated with coordinated generalized Φ-convex functions. Symmetry 2020, 12, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jhanthanam, S.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Nonlaopon, K. On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for differentiable convex functions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kunt, M.; Kashuri, A.; Du, T.; Baidar, A.W. Quantum Montgomery identity and quantum estimates of Ostrowski type inequalities. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 5439–5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aljinovic, A.A.; Kovacevic, D.; Puljiz, M.; Keko, A.Z. On Ostrowski integral inequality doe quantum calculus. Appl. Math. Comput. 2021, 410, 126454. [Google Scholar]
  29. Budak, H.; Ali, A.; Tunc, T. Quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for functions of two variables. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 5857–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noor, M.A.; Awan, M.U.; Noor, K.U. Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bangerezako, G. Variational q-calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 289, 650–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dobrogowska, A.; Odzijewicz, A. Second order q-difference equation solvable by factorization method. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2006, 193, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Exton, H. q-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications; Halstead Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ismail, M.E.H.; Simeonov, P. q-difference operators for orthogonal polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 233, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Page, D.N. Information in black hole radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 3743–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chakrabarti, R.; Jagannathan, R. A (p,q)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A 1991, 24, L711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tunc, M.; Gov, E. Some integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p,q)-calculus and some (p,q)-Taylor formulas. Results Math. 2018, 73, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  39. Milanovic, G.V.; Gupta, V.; Malik, N. (p,q)-Beta functions and applications in approximation. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2018, 24, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Cheng, W.T.; Zhang, W.H.; Cai, Q.B. (p,q)-Gamma operators which preserve χ2. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kunt, M.; Iscan, I.; Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z. (p,q)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and (p,q)-estimations for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 2018, 112, 969–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Awan, M.U.; Talib, S.; Kashuri, A.; Noor, M.A. Some new post-quantum integral inequalities involving twice (p,q)-differentiable ϕ-preinvex functions and applications. Axioms 2021, 10, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kalsoom, H.; Amer, M.; Junjua, M.-U.-D.; Hussain, S.; Shahzadi, G. Some (p,q)-estimates of Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi-convex functions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Luangboon, W.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Simpson and Newton-type inequalities for convex functions via (p,q)-calculus. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Prabseang, K.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J. (p,q)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and (p,q)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tunc, M.; Gov, E. (p,q)-integral inequalities. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Ali, A.; Budak, H.; Kalsoom, H.; Agarwal, P. Some new Hermite-Hadamard and related inequalities for convex functions via (p,q)-integral. Entropy 2021, 23, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luangboon, W.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Budak, H. Post-Quantum Ostrowski type integral inequalities for twice (p,q)-differentiable functions. J. Math. Ineq. 2022, 16, 1129–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Araci, S.; Duran, U.; Acikgoz, M.; Srivastava, H.M. A certain (p,q)-derivative operator and associated divided differences. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Duran, U.; Acikgoz, M.; Esi, A.; Araci, S. A note on the (p,q)-Hermite polynomials. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2018, 12, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nasiruzzaman, M.; Mukheimer, A.; Mursaleen, M. Some Opial-type integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meftah, B.; Boukerrioua, K. Some new Ostrowski-type inequalities for functions whose second derivative are h-convex via Riemann-Liouville fractional. Malaya J. Mat. 2014, 2, 445–459. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu, Z. Some companions of an Ostrowski type inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2009, 10, 52. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, X.S.; Huang, C.X.; Hu, H.J.; Liu, L. Inequalities estimates for the boundedness of multilinear singular and fractional integral operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; North-Holland Mathematical Studies; Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Nederlands; London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  56. Srivastava, H.M.; Karlesson, P.W. Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series; Halsted Press: Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  57. Barnett, N.S.; Cerone, P.; Dragomir, S.S.; Roumeliotis, J. Some inequalities for the dispersion of a random variable whose pdf is defined on a finite interval. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2001, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cerone, P.; Dragomir, S.S. On some inequalities for the expectation and variance. Korean J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 2, 357–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ostrowski, A.M. Uber die absolutabweichung einer differentiebaren funktion vonihrem integralmitelwert. Comment. Math. Helv. 1938, 10, 226–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciurdariu, L.; Grecu, E. Post-Quantum Integral Inequalities for Three-Times (p,q)-Differentiable Functions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010246

AMA Style

Ciurdariu L, Grecu E. Post-Quantum Integral Inequalities for Three-Times (p,q)-Differentiable Functions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(1):246. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciurdariu, Loredana, and Eugenia Grecu. 2023. "Post-Quantum Integral Inequalities for Three-Times (p,q)-Differentiable Functions" Symmetry 15, no. 1: 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop