Next Article in Journal
Quota and Space Allocations of New Urban Land Supported by Urban Growth Simulations: A Case Study of Guangzhou City, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Composition of the Anuran Community in a Forest Management Area in Southeastern Amazonia
Previous Article in Journal
Which Spatial Elements Influence Waterfront Space Vitality the Most?—A Comparative Tracking Study of the Maozhou River Renewal Project in Shenzhen, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Chronicle of Indonesia’s Forest Management: A Long Step towards Environmental Sustainability and Community Welfare
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Lodgepole Pine and White Spruce Thinning in Alberta―A Review of North American and European Best Practices

Land 2023, 12(6), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061261
by Mark Baah-Acheamfour 1,*, Amanda Schoonmaker 1, Mark Dewey 2 and Brian Roth 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Land 2023, 12(6), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061261
Submission received: 4 May 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 20 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversifying Forest Landscape Management Approaches)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I've read your manuscript and feel that it contributes to enhancing our understanding of intensity, timing, and types of silvicultural thinning and their impacts on crop tree growth responses. Suitable literatures have been cited and their results have been discussed properly.

One issue I had to point out was that access to tables 1 and 2 was limited as they extend outside the page borders. 

I've attached a copy of the draft manuscript with comments inserted.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors reviewed the thinning treatments of two tree species and their effects, as well as various disturbance types interacting with the thinning. The topic of the manuscript falls into the scope of the journal. The manuscript is structured clearly and well written.

Specific concerns:

I am wondering whether the authors considered the recovery of two tree species after thinning treatments?

More quantitative description of the section “Risk factors” is encouraged to give, e.g. biomass reduction of two tree species resulted from drought, insect breakout, wind or snow. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop