Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Idai Simulations to Cumulus Parametrization Schemes
Next Article in Special Issue
Storm-Surge Induced Water Level Changes in the Odra River Mouth Area (Southern Baltic Coast)
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Variation of Radon Concentrations in Russian Residential High-Rise Buildings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Co-Occurrence of Marine Extremes Induced by Tropical Storms and an Ocean Eddy in Summer 2016: Anomalous Hydrographic Conditions in the Pacific Shelf Waters off Southeast Hokkaido, Japan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Air Temperature Change and Southern Baltic Coastal Lagoons Ice Conditions

by
Józef Piotr Girjatowicz
and
Małgorzata Świątek
*
Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, ul. Mickiewicza 16, 70-383 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2021, 12(8), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12080931
Submission received: 30 June 2021 / Revised: 16 July 2021 / Accepted: 18 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Environment of Coastal Areas under Current and Future Climate)

Abstract

:
The relationship between air temperature (mainly winter, December-March) in Świnoujście, Gdynia, and Elbląg and ice parameters (dates of the first ice and disappearance of the last ice, the length of the ice season, number of days with ice, maximum ice height) of southern Baltic coastal lagoons (Szczecin, Puck, and Vistula) was investigated. Trends in these parameters were determined, too. The observation material comes from the archives of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management and spanned the winters from 1950/51 through to 2019/20. Relationships between the selected ice parameters for the study basins and the values of air temperature were examined using correlation and regression methods. The regression equations and trends, as well as their correlation and determination coefficients, were determined. The statistical significance of these relationships was examined using the Fisher-Snedecor test. Strong correlations between ice parameters values and air temperature were obtained, characterized by high values of both correlation coefficients and statistical significance. All trends of ice parameters indicate mitigation of ice conditions. An acceleration in both temperature and ice condition mildening occurred in the late 1980s, and especially in the last years of the study period. These trends, except the first ice date, are statistically significant, some even at α < 0.001. The length of the ice season becomes significantly shorter, the number of days with ice and the maximum thickness is smaller, and the last ice is disappearing early. An increase in the correlation and determination coefficients and a characterized trend of ice parameters values towards the East was found. It shows the increased impact of a warming climate in this direction on the southern Baltic coast. Strong correlations and trends may be of prognostic significance.

1. Introduction

Southern Baltic coastal lagoons are important basins for the maritime economy. These basins are crossed by shipping lanes leading to large ports: to Police, Stepnica and Szczecin via Zalew Szczeciński; to Puck, Kuźnica and Jastarnia via Puck Lagoon, and to Baltiysk, Kaliningrad, and Elbląg via Vistula Lagoon. In addition to the ports mentioned above, situated along the coasts of the lagoons are numerous smaller harbors, mostly fishing ports and marinas. The lagoons are sheltered basins, separated from the sea by islands (Szczecin Lagoon) or spits (Puck Lagoon and Vistula Lagoon). Only Puck Lagoon is in direct contact with marine waters via the Gulf of Gdańsk. The remaining lagoons are linked to the sea via channels. In the present paper, the inner part of Puck Bay (which is the western part of the Gulf of Gdańsk) is termed Puck Lagoon due to the considerable shallowing of Rewa Mewia (in some papers referred to as Seagull Shallow or Mewia Shallow), protruding toward the SW from Hel Peninsula, and Rewa Cape, protruding from the mainland coast toward the NE opposite the Seagull Shallow. Rewa Mewia is an elongated shoal, only about 1 m deep along its whole length, and in some places (especially close to the shore), it is entirely emerged.
Both these features distinctly separate the NW part of the bay from the remainder, effectively making it a lagoon with respect to water circulation, temperature and ice conditions, and biota. Between the shallow and the cape, there is a dredged furrow which enables a crossing for the vessels traveling from Gdynia to Puck.
The common occurrence of ice phenomena on coastal lagoons, and their rapid development, requires, nearly every winter, a continuous, comprehensive study, that would enable, for instance, forecasting ice conditions. Assessing the time of ice occurrences and intensity has considerable significance for shipping companies and fishing fleets, and for other enterprises, including tourism. Ice phenomena also have a direct impact on shore erosion. Ice cover, especially its duration, impacts biota in a given basin [1,2,3]. It changes the living conditions of biota, enables or disables photosynthesis, and regulates both eutrophication and biodiversity to a high degree. Ice cover is also an important factor influencing water circulation and bottom sediment accumulation [4].
Previous research largely focused on ice phenomena on the southern Baltic coastal lagoons from a physical perspective [1,5,6,7,8,9]. Rukšéniené et al. [10] and Jakimivičius et al. [11] investigated ice phenomena on the Curonian Lagoon, located a short distance NE from the basins studied in the present work. However, there are no studies concerning forecasting analyses of the basic ice parameters, such as: dates of the first ice occurrence and last ice disappearance, ice season duration, number of days with ice, and maximum ice thickness, which precisely determine the ice conditions in a winter season. Although first attempts at analyzing the relationships between ice parameters and air temperature at the southern Baltic coast were undertaken in the 1990s [12], these early works did not investigate all ice parameters. For instance, first ice occurrence and last ice disappearance dates, and maximum ice thickness were not investigated.
Having a seasonal forecast (for winter) of the basic ice parameters would enable the enterprises to use the studied basins to make rational plans for their respective economic activities. The scientific and applied value of such forecasts increases with the length of time series for the studied parameters included in the observational data set. It is also essential to apply objective methods of quantitative analysis. Because of this, long-term (seasonal) forecasts are based on statistical methods, including correlation and regression analysis. Given the above, the aim of the present paper is to determine and investigate empirical relationships between winter air temperature and individual ice parameters. In order to determine the impact of trends in air temperature changes on ice conditions on the sheltered southern Baltic basins, we determined linear trends in multi-year changes in ice parameter values for Szczecin, Puck, and Vistula Lagoons.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is based on data characterizing the ice conditions on Szczecin, Puck, and Vistula Lagoons, situated along the southern Baltic coast. Ice monitoring stations for these lagoons are located as follows: Trzebież (Szczecin Lagoon), Puck (Puck Lagoon), and Tolkmicko (Vistula Lagoon; Figure 1).
Air temperature (AT) data come from weather stations located in close proximity to the studied basins: Świnoujście, Gdynia, and Elbląg recording air temperatures for Szczecin Lagoon, Puck Lagoon, and Vistula Lagoon, respectively. All source materials were retrieved from the database of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management—National Research Institute (IMGW-PIB), which serves as the state hydrological and meteorological survey in Poland. The data series spans the winters 1950/51 through to 2019/20. Data from the period 1950/51–1999/2000 were published as part of the “Catalogue of ice conditions …” [13]. Data from the period 2000/01–2019/20 were retrieved directly from the online IMGW-PIB database.
Ice conditions were described by five ice parameters, including first ice (F), last ice (L), ice season duration (S), number of days with ice (N), and maximum ice thickness (H) in a given winter season. There are standard parameters, commonly accepted as the best descriptors of ice conditions during a given winter in a study region cf. [14,15,16]. The first ice is the date when any ice phenomenon occurred in a given season. Last ice is the last day of ice occurrence in a given winter season. Ice season duration is the number of days from first ice to last ice, inclusively, and the number of days with ice is the sum of days, during which ice occurred on a given basin in a given winter season.
In order to assess the diversity of distribution among these ice parameters, we used a coefficient of variability (i.e., the standard deviation to the arithmetic mean ratio for a given variable). For regression equations concerning calendar dates, the actual dates of F and L were converted to numerical values. 1 November was assigned number 1, 2 November—number 2, and so on, until the latest date (19 April), which was assigned the consecutive number 170. In order to examine the relationship between AT and ice parameters in more detail, we used mean AT values not only for the standard winter period spanning December through March (Dec–Mar) but also for the periods Nov–Dec, Dec–Jan, Feb–Mar, and Mar–Apr. This was prompted by the observation that the first ice tended to occur within the former two intervals, while the last ice tended to disappear from the study basins in the latter two intervals.
Empirical relationships between ice parameters (F, L, S, N, H) and average winter AT were investigated using correlation and regression methods. Ice parameters were the assumed dependent variables (predicted variables, y), and AT was regarded as the independent variable (predictor variable, x). We applied linear regression expressed by the equation y = ax + b, where a is the slope of the regression line and b is the intercept. The obtained relationships were evaluated statistically. Correlation (R) and determination (R2) coefficients were computed. Statistical significance of the relationships was examined using the Fisher-Snedecor test [17].
Ice occurrence probability was calculated according to the rules set out in the papers by Jevrejeva et al. [18], Leppäranta [19], and Karetnikov et al. [20]. Ice occurrence probability on a given basin in consecutive years (p), and standard deviation of the estimator (SD) were computed using the following formulas:
p = 1 N n = 1 N I ( n ) ,
SD = p ( 1 p ) N
where: N represents the total number of seasons (years), n—the season number, I(n)—binary variable, I(n) = 0—season n is ice-free, I(n) = 1—ice occurs during season n.
Ice condition value variability coefficients (i.e., the standard deviation to the arithmetic mean ratio) were also computed in the present work.

3. Results

3.1. Description of Ice Conditions, and Probability of Ice Occurrence on Coastal Lagoons

Coastal lagoons, in comparison to the open southern Baltic Sea, are much shallower, less saline, and more sheltered, which is reflected in the considerably more frequent (common, in nearly every year) occurrence of ice phenomena on the lagoons cf. [21,22,23]. Ice conditions on the coastal lagoons are also more severe than on the Odra River, and slightly milder than on the coastal lakes cf. [13,24,25]. Fast ice cover is the most frequent ice form on the coastal lagoons (especially on Vistula Lagoon), and fine ice forms such as grease ice, shuga, and pancake ice, as well as ice floes, are dominant on lakes and rivers.
Coastal lagoons are characterized by relatively weak water dynamics. The strongest motion of water masses is due to wind-induced wave action. Water currents are very weak, and no tides occur [22,23]. Mean depths of the study basins range from 2.6 m for Vistula Lagoon to 3.8 m for Szczecin Lagoon. For each study basin, the surface area to average depth ratio is high, as reflected by the very high exposure index values (Table 1).
Coastal lagoons freeze considerably earlier than the unsheltered, coastal marine waters of the southern Baltic. Ice occurs on the coastal lagoons nearly every winter. The first ice occurs on the lagoons rather early, even as early as November. On Vistula Lagoon, ice has been observed as early as late October (22 October 1979, Ušakovo). Ice occurs over a relatively long period, in extreme cases even up to 166 days (Krasnoflotskoye), and its maximum thickness reaches up to 70 cm (Tolkmicko) [21]. In the sheltered basins of the southern Baltic, higher ice thicknesses are noted only on the Curonian Lagoon (up to 90 cm) [27,28].
On Szczecin Lagoon, fast ice disintegration and drift occur earlier than on the remaining two lagoons. Fast ice is divided on Szczecin Lagoon by a furrow which is kept ice-free, thus sustaining shipping via a shipping lane that enables seagoing vessels to enter Szczecin Lagoon from Pomeranian Bay (Baltic Sea), en route to the seaport in Szczecin. The furrow accelerates the disintegration of fast ice cover. Further, an extensive current polynya occurs where the waters and ice ouflow to the sea, i.e., at the southern end of Piastowski Channel (an artificial waterway connecting Szczecin Lagoon to the Pomeranian Bay). The inflow of waters from the Odra River also accelerates the disintegration of fast ice cover in the southern part of the lagoon. Fast ice survives the longest in the northeastern part of Szczecin Lagoon. This is facilitated not only by bathymetric conditions (shoals) but also by a clear dominance of winds blowing from the SW in winter.
On Puck Lagoon, the relatively early fast ice cover disintegration is facilitated by an influx of marine waters from the southeast. Winds blowing from the W/NW push ice floes toward the Gulf of Gdańsk. On Puck Lagoon, fast ice survives the longest in the NW part of the basin. This is facilitated by the presence of land sheltering this part of the lagoon, especially Hel Spit.
Ice drift usually occurs on the study basins during the period of fast ice cover disintegration (late winter/early spring). During periods of strong winds, ice floes drift in an eastward direction, inducing rafted ice and piled ice formation. Ice hummocks form along eastern coasts of the lagoons, and on shoals, often reaching a height of several meters, with a maximum height of 10 m. Mathematical models concerning ice rafting and piling and the height of ice piles on southern Baltic coastal lagoons are presented in the paper by Girjatowicz [29]. As shown by Kolerski et al. [30], ice conditions will locally undergo modification due to the ongoing construction of the channel across Vistula Spit, which separates Vistula Lagoon from the sea, and the ongoing construction of artificial islands within Vistula and Szczecin Lagoons.
The earliest ice phenomena observed, mostly during wave action, are coastal grease ice, shuga, and pancake ice, and when conditions are still—coastal ice rind. Such ice conditions occur the earliest in small, shallow bays that are sheltered from wind and waves.
Characteristic values of ice parameters on southern Baltic coastal lagoons are tabulated in Table 2 and presented in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4. The first ice phenomena occur the earliest in the eastern part of the coast. The earliest observed first occurrences are in November (11–13), and the latest observed first occurrences arein February (6–27). On average, however, ice occurs in December, from 11 December on Vistula Lagoon to 25 December on Szczecin and Puck lagoons. Last ice disappears the latest in the eastern part of the coast. On Vistula Lagoon, ice disappears on average on 15 March, and the latest on 19 April. On Szczecin Lagoon, the respective dates are 5 March and 10 April.
The last ice phenomena are fine floes and brash ice. The location of the last ice disappearance on the lagoons is determined by wind direction. In spring, the prevailing wind direction is from the SW, which causes the last ice to melt in NE parts of the respective lagoons. The period between F and L (i.e, the ice season) is progressively longer toward the east. On average, S equals 64 days for Szczecin Lagoon to 69 days for Puck Lagoon to 94 days for Vistula Lagoon (Table 2, Figure 2). The longest ice season took place on Vistula Lagoon during the very severe winter of 1962/63 and lasted for 151 days (18 November–17 April). Similarly, N also increases toward the east, on average from 51 days for Szczecin Lagoon to 80 days for Vistula Lagoon. The maximum observed N values are 123 to 138 days, respectively (Table 2, Figure 3). Additionally, H increases toward the east, on average from 17 cm for Szczecin Lagoon to 28 cm for Vistula Lagoon (Table 2, Figure 4).
An analysis of variability coefficients for ice parameters (Table 2) indicates that these coefficients are higher for Szczecin and Puck Lagoons, and lower for Vistula Lagoon. Vistula Lagoon is located in the eastern part of the southern Baltic coast. In winter, it is characterized by more severe, and more stable climatic conditions. The variability in ice parameters on Puck Lagoon is strongly influenced by the inflows of marine waters. In this case, contact with open marine waters is considerably larger than in the case of Szczecin and Vistula lagoons. This results in a stronger motion and exchange of waters, and consequently, in relatively high ice parameter variability coefficients (Table 2). In the case of Szczecin Lagoon, high variability in ice parameters is influenced by the relatively high traffic on the shipping lane.
Ice occurs the most frequently on the lagoons located in the eastern part of the southern Baltic coast. On Vistula Lagoon, the easternmost basin, no ice occurred only once, during the winter of 2019/20. No ice occurred on Puck Lagoon four times, during the winters of 1974/75, 2007/08, 2014/15, and 2019/20. On the westernmost Szczecin Lagoon, no ice occurred seven times, during the winters of 1974/75, 1987/88, 1988/89, 1989/90, 2006/07, 2014/15, and 2019/20. It is clear from this overview that ice-free conditions tend to occur in the latter half of the study period. Ice occurrence probability (p) increases toward the east. For Szczecin Lagoon, p equals 0.900, for Puck Lagoon p = 0.943, and for Vistula Lagoon p = 0.986 (Table 3). The standard deviation of ice occurrence probability (SD) is higher in the western part of the study area (Szczecin Lagoon, 0.036) than in the east (Vistula Lagoon, 0.014). The eastward decrease in the number of ice-free days, increase in p (along with a concomitant decrease in SD) are influenced not only by winters being more severe in the east but also by the higher stability of climatic conditions in that direction. This is related to the stronger continental influence in the eastern part of the southern Baltic coast.
Notably, relatively strong relationships occur between individual ice parameters on the coastal lagoons, with correlation coefficients usually exceeding 0.80 (Table 4). Only F correlates less strongly with the studied ice parameters (especially with L). The strongest relationship concerns N and S. On Puck Lagoon, the correlation coefficient for both variables equals 0.90. All relationships between the studied ice parameters are statistically significant at α < 0.001 level. Only some relationships with F are statistically significant at a slightly lower level (Table 4). This section may be divided into subheadings. It should provide a succinct, precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.
The southern Baltic coast is located in a temperate climate zone and is characterized by seasonal changes in temperature and insolation. Two main and two transient seasons occur, determined by the quantity of solar energy influx, and are characterized, especially in the cooler half of the year, by a high intensity of atmospheric circulation. This causes high variability in weather conditions, and diverse, and temporal variable air temperatures. Air temperature amplitudes between summer (Jun-Aug) and winter (Dec-Feb) are very pronounced and exceed 17 °C [31]. Absolute amplitudes, however, equal 61 °C for Świnoujście (from 37.4 to −23.6 °C), and 66.6 °C for Elbląg (from 36.5 to −30.1 °C) [32]. Mean monthly air temperatures are the lowest in January and range from 0 °C (Świnoujście) to −1.5 °C (Elbląg) [31]. A higher air temperature in the western than the eastern part of the coast influences the diversity of ice conditions on the coastal lagoons. Ice conditions are milder in the western part of the coast, which is manifested in a later ice occurrence and earlier disappearance, shorter ice season duration, a lower number of days with ice, and a lower maximum ice thickness cf. [1,33].

3.2. Analysis of Relationships between Coastal Lagoon Ice Parameters and Winter Temperature Conditions

Southern Baltic coastal lagoons are located at a similar latitude and within the same climatic zone. They are also characterized by similar physiographic (surface area, depth) and hydrologic conditions. This influences the high similarity among the strength of relationships between ice parameters and AT, but some diversity is evident. The relationships between ice parameters and winter AT are usually highly statistically significant (α < 0.001, Table 5). They have high correlation coefficients (R), indicating a very strong inverse correlation (except for correlation to F), ranging from −0.81 to −0.93. The strongest relationships, with average correlation coefficients concern N (−0.92). Slightly weaker relationships were observed for L (−0.87), H (−0.86), and S (−0.83). The relationships for F, however, are distinctly weaker. This is because F is influenced not only by AT, but also by water temperature, wind, snowfall, and marine water incursions. The relationships of F and L with ATNov-Dec and ATFeb-Mar, respectively, were stronger than the relationships obtained when AT was averaged for the whole standard winter period (Dec-Mar). This was because F most frequently occurred in the Nov-Dec period, and L most frequently occurred in the Feb-Mar period.
On the study basins, AT makes the strongest impact on N. Linear regression determination coefficients in these cases range from 0.80 for Vistula Lagoon to 0.86 for Puck Lagoon (Figure 5). This means that the variability in winter (December–March) AT explains the variability in N on the studied basins as 80–86%. As indicated by the y-intercept of the regression line, a 1 °C increase in AT from December to March will cause N to become reduced by as many as 5 and 19 days on these basins, respectively (Figure 5).
The AT influences N more strongly than S because N includes only those days on which ice actually occurred. S is defined by the dates of F and L. Ice-free days may occur in between. Thus, this parameter may not correspond to temperature conditions as closely as N. N, which correlates the strongest with temperature conditions of a given winter, will describe ice conditions on a given basin more accurately (the most accurate among the studied parameters).
Very strong correlations (negative) concern also the relationships of L with ATFeb-Mar. Determination coefficients range from 0.75 for Szczecin Lagoon to 0.77 for Vistula Lagoon (Figure 6). This means that air temperature variability explains the variability in L on the lagoons as 75–77%. As indicated by the regression equation, a 1 °C increase in AT in the Feb-Mar period will cause L on the lagoon to occur on average 9–11 days earlier (Figure 6).
No spatial diversity was observed in the strength of relationships between ice parameters and winter AT on the studied basins. The values of correlation coefficients of the respective ice parameters among individual lagoons are minor, of the order of several 0.01. AT was observed to make the strongest influence on N (R = −0.93), S (R = −0.84), and F (R = 0.70), in the eastern part of the coast, mainly on Puck Lagoon (Table 5). Variability in N, S, and F is explained by AT variability as 86, 71, and 49%, respectively (Figure 7). As indicated by the regression equations, a 1 °C air temperature increase on Puck Lagoon will reduce N (and S) by 19 days, and delay F by 12 days (Figure 7). On Vistula Lagoon, L (R = −0.88) and H (R = −0.087; Table 5) are the most strongly dependent on AT changes. Szczecin Lagoon is characterized by slightly weaker relationships. Such differences in relationship strength for individual basins are influenced by the degree of winter severity and the stability of winter temperature conditions. The western part of the coast is under a strong influence of the oceanic climate that is milder and more variable than the climate of the eastern part of the southern Baltic coast.
The overall conclusion is that the relationships between ice parameters and AT are very strong. This is indicated by high correlation and determination coefficient values and their high statistical significance. This can be explained by the very shallow depth (high exposure index), and the isolation of the coastal lagoons from marine waters, which together enable rapid reaction of the studied ice parameters to changes in AT.
Of all the ice parameters studied for the coastal lagoons, N displays the strongest relationships with AT. This parameter is the best descriptor of the coastal lagoon ice conditions and is closely linked to the severity of winter. In turn, of all the ice parameters studied for the coastal lagoons, F displays the weakest relationships with AT. This is because the formation of first ice is influenced not only by AT, but also by other factors, such as water temperature, snow cover, wind, or marine water incursions (salinity).
In addition to air temperature, future studies should also focus on the influence of water temperature on the first ice occurrence date, and the influence of solar factors on the last ice disappearance date.

3.3. Analysis of Trends in Coastal Lagoon Ice Parameters

Climate warming has influenced the mildening of ice conditions on the southern Baltic coastal lagoons. ATDec-Mar values measured at Świnoujście, Gdynia, and Elbląg weather stations display a positive trend, statistically significant at α < 0.01 level. Correlation coefficients for these trends range from 0.35 to 0.39, and determination coefficients, respectively, from 0.12 to 0.16 (Figure 8 and Figure 9). This means that AT increases on the southern Baltic coast are explained as 12–16% over the passage of time. In earlier periods, up to the winter of 1986/87, low AT and high ice parameter values (L, S, N, H) occurred relatively frequently. From the winter of 1987/88, mild winters definitely prevail, which is manifested in a clear mildening of ice conditions. As indicated by the regression equations of linear trends in AT at the studied weather stations, winter air temperature rises along the southern Baltic coast by 0.03–0.04 °C/year, or 3–4 °C per 100 years (Figure 8 and Figure 9).
The statistical significance of trends in ice parameters is high for all the studied lagoons, and mostly equals α < 0.001 (Table 6). The average values of correlation coefficients range from −0.32 (H) to −0.50 (S). The largest changes, i.e., the strongest decreasing trends, concern S. The slope of the regression line (a) values for regression lines range from −0.89 for Vistula Lagoon to −1.08 for Puck Lagoon. These are very high values, indicating a reduction in S by about a day per year (Figure 8). Determination coefficients for the discussed trends equal 0.28 and 0.26, respectively. For Vistula Lagoon, the reduction in S is thus explained as 28% over the passage of time. A similar trend was obtained for N on Vistula Lagoon (Figure 9). The regression equations indicate that N and S are both being reduced on average by 0.9 days/year. The first ice occurs on average 0.3 days/year later, and the last ice disappears on average 0.5 days/year earlier. H is diminishing on average by 0.3 cm/year (Figure 9).
Nearly all trends in ice parameters, except for F, display an increase in intensity toward the east (Table 6). Correlation coefficients for the relations between individual ice parameters and passage of time increase from the west (Szczecin Lagoon) to the east (Vistula Lagoon) by 0.07 for S; 0.09 for L, 0.10 for N, and 0.19 for H, respectively. However, absolute values of average correlation coefficients increase by 0.08, that is, from 0.36 for Szczecin Lagoon to 0.44 on Vistula Lagoon (Table 6). An increase in correlation coefficients for trends in ice phenomena toward the east indicates the impact of climate warming is stronger in the eastern than in the western part of the southern Baltic coast. Negative values of correlation coefficients for trends in ice parameters indicate that L will occur 0.36–0.52 days/year earlier, S will become 0.89–1.08 days/year shorter, N will be diminishing by 0.72–0.91 days/year, and H will become 0.14–0.32 cm/year thinner. It is a clear manifestation of climate warming in Europe, like in the whole of the Northern Hemisphere.
In general, both the determined trends in winter AT and in coastal lagoon ice parameters indicate a pronounced mildening of climate conditions. An acceleration in both temperature and ice condition mildening occurred in the late 1980s, and especially in the two last decades of the study period (2000–2020). Trends in AT and individual ice parameter changes are relatively strong and highly statistically significant. The reason for mildening in winter ice conditions may be explained by progressive climate warming. The strongest trends observed for the coastal lagoons concern S and N. H and F are undergoing changes to a considerably lesser extent.

4. Discussion

The analyses performed as part of this study have shown a very strong influence of AT changes on ice conditions on the studied basins, although the investigated relationships between AT and ice parameters were spatially diverse. Various parameters were dependent on temperature increase to a variable degree, and not always were the relationships very strong. Although AT, dependent on insolation and air mass circulation, is the main factor influencing ice phenomena formation, there are also other factors playing significant parts. These include water temperature, which obviously depends mostly on AT. Most of all, water temperature influences the occurrence of the first ice phenomena in a given season. Water temperature has no significant influence on the remaining ice parameters, because in the period from the occurrence of the first ice all the way until the disappearance of the last ice, water temperature is nearly constant and close to 0 °C. L is to some degree influenced by the insolation and intensity of solar radiation. L is also influenced by H in a given season [19], and the occurrence of rainfall (liquid precipitation) and strong wind [34]. H is in turn influenced to a high degree by the occurrence of snow cover during a given winter [19].
Ice conditions are influenced also by local geographic conditions such as bathymetry, distance from the open sea, or the degree to which a basin is sheltered from the open sea. Shallow and more exposed basins cool more rapidly, which results in a more intense development of ice phenomena cf. [25,35]. Notably, on unsheltered, marine, deeper basins characterized by more intense water dynamics, the influence of factors other than the temperature on ice phenomena is stronger than on lagoons. Such factors do weaken the relationships with air temperature on lagoons, but the degree of weakening is higher on marine basins. For instance, along the southern Baltic coast (in Hel), the correlation coefficient for the relationship between N and AT was lower than those for the studied lagoons and equaled −0.53 [12]. Such relationships may also be weakened by anthropogenic factors, such as icebreaking services, or discharge of heated and saline waters that disrupt the natural development of ice phenomena. These and other factors (wind, marine water incursions, waves, currents) will obviously weaken the relationship between ice conditions and winter AT. Including these factors in the analysis is impossible, for instance, due to the lack of observational data. For this reason, the current work is restricted to the most important factor, i.e., AT variations.
Differences in salinity do not impact the differences in ice conditions among the studied lagoons. Of all the basins, Puck Lagoon is characterized by the highest salinity, on average 5.97 PSU (Puck station) [26]. This value is only slightly lower than average water salinity in the southern part of the open Baltic Sea, equal to as little as 7.5 PSU [36]. The salinity of Vistula Lagoon in Tolkmicko is 2.34 PSU, and in Szczecin Lagoon in Podgrodzie the salinity is only 0.81 PSU [37]. The latter lagoon may therefore be considered a freshwater basin. Even though Szczecin Lagoon has the lowest salinity, it is characterized by the mildest ice conditions. In this case, the water chemistry is a much less significant factor than climatic conditions, specifically an increase in the severity of winters toward the east.
Scientific papers on the contemporary climatic changes emphasize progressive global warming, especially in central and northern Europe. In higher latitudes, it is anticipated that permafrost will recede, glaciers will melt, ice phenomena will develop less intensely, and progressively larger areas of seas and oceans will remain free of ice cf. [38,39,40]. The influence of the greenhouse effect on the mildening of ice conditions was evident on the Baltic Sea as early as the end of the 18th century [41,42]. Since then, ice conditions on the Baltic Sea have been progressively milder cf. [43,44,45]. It is estimated that during the 21st century, the maximum sea ice extent on the Baltic Sea will become reduced by 50 to 80% [46]. Through the 20th century (specifically, from 1896 to 1993), on the basins located along the southern Baltic Sea coast, S was becoming 1–3 days shorter per decade [47]. The largest changes in the Baltic Sea ice cover concern the western part of the basin, and areas east of Bornholm [48]. These changes were not as pronounced in the whole of the Baltic. For instance, in the Gulf of Finland, through the latter half of the 20th century, no statistically significant trend in S was observed [49]. Progressively more intense mildening of ice conditions on the Baltic Sea is manifested by the decrease in values of the basic ice parameters. N is decreasing [18,49], as is H [18,50]. The ice season is becoming shorter, depending on locality, by 14 to 44 days per century [18,50,51]. In addition, ice disintegrates by 8 to 12 days per century earlier [18]. Ice disappearance is also progressively earlier in individual winters [49,52]. Similar to the studied lagoons, changes in S (0.8 days per year) were observed also on the Curonian Lagoon [11], located several tens of km NE from the northern coast of Vistula Lagoon. Further, from the latter half of the 19th century, there has been a clear decreasing trend in the annual maximum sea ice extent on the Baltic Sea [50,53].
The results of the present work show that already in the late 1980s there was a clear acceleration of mildening in temperature conditions and ice conditions on the southern Baltic coastal lagoons. Additionally, in distant Japan (Saroma-ko Lagoon, Hokkaido Island), changes in ice parameter values displayed similar dynamics. A sharp decrease in the number of days with ice has been observed there since 1988. Since then, winters without complete ice coverage occur there frequently. Before 1988, such winters were rare on Saroma-ko Lagoon [54].

5. Conclusions

Southern Baltic coastal lagoons are shallow, brackish basins characterized by high exposure indices, which facilitate rapid cooling, and intense development of ice phenomena. Their waters are susceptible to changes in temperature and solar conditions, especially to AT variations. In the autumn-winter period, these basins quickly release the accumulated warmth and become covered in ice, predominantly fast ice (ice rind, ice cover). The lagoons are linked to the sea via straits, which may serve as a conduit for marine water incursions in the autumn-winter period. Such marine waters are slightly warmer and more saline than those in the lagoons. Only Puck Lagoon, from the SE, via Puck Bay, is open to marine waters. The close proximity of the Baltic Sea influences the waters of the lagoons by warming them in winter.
-
On coastal lagoons, winters are more severe and ice phenomena are more intense toward the east. In the eastern part of the southern Baltic coast, ice occurs earlier and disappears later, the ice season is longer, the number of days with ice is higher, and the maximum ice thickness is larger.
-
Additionally, ice cover stability (N/S ratio), p, correlation, and determination coefficients for relationships between ice parameters and AT all increase in an eastward direction. However, coefficients of ice parameter variability, except for F, decrease toward the east.
-
Physiographic conditions distinguishing the studied basins from the open sea significantly influence the relations between coastal lagoon ice parameters and AT. The relationships are considerably more significant for the coastal lagoons, in comparison to the marine waters of the southern Baltic.
-
The relationships between ice parameters and AT are weakened by inflows of warmer and more saline marine waters into the lagoons in autumn and winter. Other factors, like strong wind causing water and ice movement, or human activity (discharge of heated and saline waters, shipping traffic, icebreaking services, especially on Szczecin Lagoon), are also significant in this respect.
-
The strength of trends in ice parameters increases in an eastward direction, which indicates a stronger climate warming toward the east. This pattern is displayed the most clearly by H and N.
-
Winter AT is clearly increasing along the southern Baltic coast. At the same time, first ice phenomena occur later on the coastal lagoons, and last ice phenomena disappear earlier, S is distinctly shortening, and both N and H are diminishing.
-
The correlations between ice parameters and AT, and trends in ice parameters and AT, characterized by high correlation coefficients and high statistical significance, may be utilized for forecasting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.G.; methodology, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; software, M.Ś.; validation, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; formal analysis, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; investigation, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; resources: J.P.G. and M.Ś.; data curation, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; writing—review and editing, J.P.G. and M.Ś.; visualization, M.Ś.; supervision, J.P.G. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable (study not involving humans or animals).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable (study not involving humans).

Data Availability Statement

The data used in the work are available on the website: https://danepubliczne.imgw.pl/data/dane_pomiarowo_obserwacyjne/, accessed on 10 March 2021 and in the catalogs provided in the references list.

Acknowledgments

The authors of the article would like to thank the employees of IMGW-PIB for preparing and providing access to source data and two anonymous reviews for their help in improving the quality of the manuscript. Józef Girjatowicz praises the God for the care and protection he experienced during 50 years of his oceanographic studies particularly during ice studies on the southern Baltic coast.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dyrcz, C. Analysis of ice conditions in the Baltic Sea and in the Puck Bay. Sci. J. Pol. Nav. Acad. 2017, 3, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nôges, P.; Nôges, T.; Jolma, A.; Kaitaranta, J. Impact of climate change on Physical characteristics of lakes in Europe. In JRC Scientific and Technical Reports; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxemburg, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Salonen, K.; Leppäranta, M.; Viljanen, M.; Gulati, R.D. Perspectives in winter limnology: Closing the annual cycle of freezing lakes. Aquat. Ecol. 2009, 43, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chubarenko, B.; Chechko, V.; Kileso, A.; Krek, E.; Topchaya, V. Hydrological and sedimentation conditions in a non-tidal lagoon during ice coverage—The example of Vistula Lagoon in the Baltic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 216, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maliński, J. Forecast of Icing in the Area of Polish Coastal Waters; Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Hydrologiczno-Meteorologicznego: Warszawa, Poland, 1964. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  6. Zakrzewski, W. The Forecast of the Fast Cover Break Up Decay in the Puck Bay; Wiadomości Instytutu Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej: Warszawa, Poland, 1978. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  7. Zakrzewski, W. The origin of the formation of ice pressure ridges in Puck Bay. Stud. Mater. Oceanol. 1979, 27, 225–252. [Google Scholar]
  8. Girjatowicz, J.P. Forms of Onshore Ice Thrusting in Coastal Lagoons of the Southern Baltic Sea. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2015, 29, 04014008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Girjatowicz, J.P. Characterization of Grounded Ice Hummocks Found in Coastal Lagoons of the Southern Baltic Sea. J. Coast. Res. 2019, 35, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rukšėnienė, V.; Dailidienė, I.; Myrberg, K.; Ducinskas, K. A simple approach for statistical modelling of ice phenomena in the Curonian Lagoon, the south-eastern Baltic Sea. Baltica 2015, 28, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jakimavičius, D.; Šarauskienė, D.; Kriaučiūnienė, J. Influence of climate change on the ice conditions of the Curonian Lagoon. Oceanologia 2020, 62, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Girjatowicz, J.P. The relationships of ice parameters with thermal conditions of winter at the coast of the southern Baltic. Czas. Geogr. 1999, 70, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  13. Girjatowicz, J.P. Catalogue of Ice Conditions and Thermic Conditions on the Polish Coast; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: Szczecin, Poland, 2007. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  14. Janérus, K.; Jansson, J.E. (Eds.) Climatological Ice Atlas for the Baltic Sea, Kattegat, Skagerrak and Lake Vänern (1963–1979); Sjöfortsverket: Norrköping, Sweden, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  15. Leppäranta, M.; Palosuo, E.; Grönvall, H.; Kalliosaari, S.; Seinä, A.; Peltola, J. Phases of the ice season in the Baltic Sea. Finn. Mar. Res. 1988, 254, 1–83. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmelzer, N.; Holfort, J. Climatological Ice Atlas for the Western and Southern Baltic Sea (1961–2010); Bundesamt fűr Seeschiffahrt und Hydrographie: Hamburg and Rostock, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Time Series Analysis Section III; Department of Statistics, University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2010.
  18. Jevrejeva, S.; Drabkin, V.; Kostjukov, J.; Lebedev, A.; Leppäranta, M.; Mironov, Y.; Schmelzer, N.; Sztobryn, M. Baltic Sea ice seasons in the twentieth century. Clim. Res. 2004, 25, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leppäranta, M. Interpretation of statistics of lake ice time series for climate variability. Hydrol. Res. 2014, 45, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karetnikov, S.; Leppäranta, M.; Montonen, A. A time series of over 100 years of ice seasons on Lake Ladoga. J. Great Lakes Res. 2017, 43, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Girjatowicz, J.P. Ice Conditions on the Southern Baltic Sea Coast. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2011, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Azarienko, N.N.; Majewski, A. (Eds.) Hydrometeorological Regime of Vistula Lagoon; Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności: Warszawa, Poland, 1975. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  23. Majewski, A. (Ed.) Szczecin Lagoon; Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności: Warszawa, Poland, 1980. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  24. Choiński, A.; Ptak, M.; Skowron, R. Trends to changes in ice phenomena in Polish lakes in the years 1951–2010. Przegląd Geogr. 2014, 86, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Girjatowicz, J.P.; Świątek, M. Relationships between the Baltic Sea ice extent and ice parameters in the sheltered basins of the southern Baltic coast. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2020, 49, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nowacki, J. Morphometry of Puck Bay. In Puck Bay; Korzeniewski, K., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego: Gdańsk, Poland, 1993; pp. 71–78. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  27. Zorina, V.A. Forecast methods of ice phenomena in spring-time in the Curonian and Vistula Lagoons. Tr. GOIN 1965, 86, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sergejeva, L.G. Methodics forecast of ice phase spring in the Kuronsk and Kaliningrad Lagoons. In Calculation and Forecast Regime Sea Elements; Abuzjarov, Z.K., Ed.; Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1983. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  29. Girjatowicz, J.P. Ice Thrusting and Hummocking on the Shores of the Southern Baltic Sea’s Coastal Lagoons. J. Coast. Res. 2014, 30, 456. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolerski, T.; Zima, P.; Szydłowski, M. Mathematical Modeling of Ice Thrusting on the Shore of the Vistula Lagoon (Baltic Sea) and the Proposed Artificial Island. Water 2019, 11, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lorenc, H. Atlas Climatological of Poland; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej: Warszawa, Poland, 2005. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Ustrnul, Z.; Czerkierda, D. Atlas of Extreme Meteorological Phenomena and Synoptic Situations in Poland; Wydawnictwo Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej: Warszawa, Poland, 2009. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  33. Girjatowicz, J.P. Ice Cover Atlas for Polish Baltic Coastal Waters; Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej w Szczecinie: Szczecin, Poland, 1990. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  34. Kirillin, G.; Leppäranta, M.; Terzhevik, A.; Granin, N.; Bernhardt, J.; Engelhardt, C.; Efremova, T.; Golosov, S.; Palshin, N.; Sherstyankin, P.; et al. Physics of seasonally ice-covered lakes: A review. Aquat. Sci. 2012, 74, 659–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wrzesiński, D.; Ptak, M.; Baczyńska, A. Effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation on Ice Phenomena on Selected Lakes in Poland Over the Years 1961–2010. Quaest. Geogr. 2013, 32, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Janssen, F.; Schrum, C.; Backhaus, J.O. A climatological data set of temperature and salinity for the Baltic Sea and the North Sea. Ocean Dyn. 1999, 51, 5–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Girjatowicz, J.P. Catalogue of Salinity and Water Levels at the Polish Coast; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: Szczecin, Poland, 2008. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  38. Rothrock, D.A.Y.Y.; Maykut, G.A. Thinning of the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophisical Res. Lett. 1999, 26, 3469–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Laxon, S.W.; Giles, K.A.; Ridout, A.L.; Wingham, D.J.; Willatt, R.; Cullen, R.; Kwok, R.; Schweiger, A.; Zhang, J.; Haas, C.; et al. CryoSat-2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Walsh, J.E.; Fettever, J.; Scott, J.; Chapman, L. A database for depicting Arctic Sea variation back to 1850. Geogr. Rev. 2017, 107, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Betin, V.V. Severe Winters in Europe and Ice Cover of the Baltic; Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1962. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  42. Mälkki, P.; Tamsalu, R. Physical features of the Baltic Sea. Finn. Mar. Res. 1985, 252, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  43. Global Climate Change; WMO; ICSU: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990.
  44. Global Change: Our World in Transition; The Federal Minister for Research and Technology: Bonn, Germany, 1991.
  45. Seina, A.; Palosuo, E. The classification of the maximum annual extent of ice cover in the Baltic Sea. Meri 1993, 27, 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  46. Leppäranta, M.; Myrberg, K. Physical Oceanography of the Baltic Sea; Springer and Praxis Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sztobryn, M. Long-term changes in ice conditions at the Polish coast of the Baltic Sea. In Proceedings of the IAHR 1944 12th International Symposium on Ice, Trondheim, Norway, 23–26 August 1994. [Google Scholar]
  48. Haapala, J.J.; Ronkainen, I.; Schmelzer, N.; Sztobryn, M. Recent change—Sea ice. In Second Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin; The BACC Author Team; Springer: Geesthacht, Germany, 2015; pp. 145–154. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jaagus, J. Trends in sea ice conditions in the Baltic Sea near the Estonian coast during the period 1949/50–2003/04 and their relationships to large-scale atmospheric circulation. Boreal Environ. Res. 2006, 11, 169–183. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vihma, T.; Haapala, J. Geophysics of sea ice in the Baltic Sea: A review. Prog. Oceanogr. 2009, 80, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Omstedt, A.; Elken, J.; Lehmann, A.; Leppäranta, M.; Meier, H.E.M.; Myrberg, K.; Rutgersson, A. Progress in phisical oceanography of the Baltic Sea during the 2003–2014 period. Prog. Oceanogr. 2014, 128, 139–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jevrejeva, S. Severity of winter seasons in the northern Baltic Sea between 1529 and 1990: Reconstruction and analysis. Clim. Res. 2001, 17, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Omstedt, A.; Chen, D. Influence of atmospheric circulation on the maximum ice extent in the Baltic Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2001, 106, 4493–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shirasawa, K.; Ishikawa, M.; Takatsuka, T. Sea Ice Conditions, and Meteorological and Oceanographic Observations at Saroma-ko Lagoon, Hokkaido, November 2003–September 2004. Low Temp. Sci. Ser. A 2005, 63, 34–49. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Location of coastal lagoons on the southern Baltic Sea coast; and maps of (b) Szczecin Lagoon; (c) Puck Lagoon; and (d) Vistula Lagoon. In figure (a) the dotted line marks the border of the Puck Lagoon. In figures (bd) the black line underline weather stations and the red lines show ice monitoring stations, the pink line marks the state border. Source of maps (bd): https://en.mapy.cz/, accessed on 14 July 2021, maps were slightly modified by authors.
Figure 1. (a) Location of coastal lagoons on the southern Baltic Sea coast; and maps of (b) Szczecin Lagoon; (c) Puck Lagoon; and (d) Vistula Lagoon. In figure (a) the dotted line marks the border of the Puck Lagoon. In figures (bd) the black line underline weather stations and the red lines show ice monitoring stations, the pink line marks the state border. Source of maps (bd): https://en.mapy.cz/, accessed on 14 July 2021, maps were slightly modified by authors.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g001aAtmosphere 12 00931 g001b
Figure 2. Box and whisker plots, presenting descriptive measures for first ice (F) and last ice (L) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–F and Sz–L, respectively), Puck Lagoon (P–F and P–L, respectively), and Vistula Lagoon (V–F and V–L, respectively) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters. Consecutive day numbers (with 1 Nov as day 1) are given instead of dates.
Figure 2. Box and whisker plots, presenting descriptive measures for first ice (F) and last ice (L) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–F and Sz–L, respectively), Puck Lagoon (P–F and P–L, respectively), and Vistula Lagoon (V–F and V–L, respectively) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters. Consecutive day numbers (with 1 Nov as day 1) are given instead of dates.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g002
Figure 3. Box and whisker plots, presenting descriptive measures for ice season duration (S) and the number of days with ice (N) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–S and Sz–N, respectively), Puck Lagoon (P–S and P–N, respectively), and Vistula Lagoon (V–S and V–N, respectively) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters.
Figure 3. Box and whisker plots, presenting descriptive measures for ice season duration (S) and the number of days with ice (N) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–S and Sz–N, respectively), Puck Lagoon (P–S and P–N, respectively), and Vistula Lagoon (V–S and V–N, respectively) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g003
Figure 4. Box and whisker plot, presenting descriptive measures for maximum ice thickness in season (H) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–H), Puck Lagoon (P–H), and Vistula Lagoon (V–H) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters.
Figure 4. Box and whisker plot, presenting descriptive measures for maximum ice thickness in season (H) on Szczecin Lagoon (Sz–H), Puck Lagoon (P–H), and Vistula Lagoon (V–H) through the period 1950/51–2019/20. Boxes indicate the positions of the lower and upper quartile, and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values of ice parameters.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g004
Figure 5. Correlations between the number of days with ice (N) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, with winter (Dec–Mar) air temperatures (ATs) through the period 1950/51–2019/20, along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient (R2).
Figure 5. Correlations between the number of days with ice (N) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, with winter (Dec–Mar) air temperatures (ATs) through the period 1950/51–2019/20, along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient (R2).
Atmosphere 12 00931 g005
Figure 6. Correlations between the date of the last ice disappearance (L) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, with Feb–Mar air temperatures (ATs) through the period 1950/51–2019/20, along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient (R2).
Figure 6. Correlations between the date of the last ice disappearance (L) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, with Feb–Mar air temperatures (ATs) through the period 1950/51–2019/20, along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient (R2).
Atmosphere 12 00931 g006
Figure 7. Correlations between: (a) date of first ice occurrence (F); (b) ice season duration (S); (c) the number of days with ice (N) on Puck Lagoon, and air temperature (AT) from selected periods (Nov–Dec, Dec–Mar), along with the regression line and determination coefficient R2. AT data span 1950/51–2019/20.
Figure 7. Correlations between: (a) date of first ice occurrence (F); (b) ice season duration (S); (c) the number of days with ice (N) on Puck Lagoon, and air temperature (AT) from selected periods (Nov–Dec, Dec–Mar), along with the regression line and determination coefficient R2. AT data span 1950/51–2019/20.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g007
Figure 8. Variations and trend lines for ice season duration (S) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, and winter (Dec–Mar) air temperature (AT), along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient R2 (AT data span 1950/51–2019/20).
Figure 8. Variations and trend lines for ice season duration (S) on (a) Szczecin Lagoon; (b) Puck Lagoon; (c) Vistula Lagoon, and winter (Dec–Mar) air temperature (AT), along with the regression line equation and determination coefficient R2 (AT data span 1950/51–2019/20).
Atmosphere 12 00931 g008
Figure 9. Variations and trend lines for: (a) first ice occurrence (F); (b) last ice disappearance (L); (c) the number of days with ice (N); (d) maximum ice thickness (H) on Vistula Lagoon, and air temperature (AT) from selected months (Nov–Dec, Feb–Mar, and DecMar), along with the regression line equations and determination coefficient R2 through the period 1950/51–2019/20.
Figure 9. Variations and trend lines for: (a) first ice occurrence (F); (b) last ice disappearance (L); (c) the number of days with ice (N); (d) maximum ice thickness (H) on Vistula Lagoon, and air temperature (AT) from selected months (Nov–Dec, Feb–Mar, and DecMar), along with the regression line equations and determination coefficient R2 through the period 1950/51–2019/20.
Atmosphere 12 00931 g009
Table 1. Morphometric and bathymetric data for the coastal lagoons of the southern Baltic Sea after: [22,23,26].
Table 1. Morphometric and bathymetric data for the coastal lagoons of the southern Baltic Sea after: [22,23,26].
LagoonSurface Area (km2)Volume (km3)Average Depth (m)Maximum Depth (m)Shoreline Length (km)Lake Exposure (km2m−1)
Szczecin686.92.5823.88.6243181
Puck102.70.3203.19.75233
Vistula838.02.3002.65.1270322
Table 2. Means and extreme values and coefficients of variability (v) of ice parameters: date of first ice occurence (F), date of last ice disappearance (L), number of days with ice (N), duration of ice season (S), maximum ice thickness (H) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Table 2. Means and extreme values and coefficients of variability (v) of ice parameters: date of first ice occurence (F), date of last ice disappearance (L), number of days with ice (N), duration of ice season (S), maximum ice thickness (H) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Ice ParametersValuesLagoons
SzczecinPuckVistula
F (date)earliest13 November11 November11 November
mean25 December25 December11 December
latest27 February22 February6 February
v0.400.420.48
L (date)earliest13 January8 December16 December
mean5 March7 March15 March
latest10 April12 April19 April
v0.180.220.18
S (days)shortest000
mean646994
longest135139151
v0.620.620.36
N (days)minimum000
mean515680
maximum123128138
v0.690.680.45
H (cm)lowest000
mean172028
highest507070
v0.720.710.55
Table 3. Probability of ice (p) and its standard deviation (SD) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Table 3. Probability of ice (p) and its standard deviation (SD) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
LagoonsWinters without IcepSD
Szczecin70.9000.036
Puck40.9430.028
Vistula10.9860.014
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between the individual ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between the individual ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
FLSNH
Szczecin Lagoon
F −0.41 ***−0.86 ***−0.68 ***−0.53 ***
L−0.41 *** 0.82 ***0.82 ***0.71 ***
S−0.87 ***0.82 *** 0.89 ***0.73 ***
N−0.68 ***0.82 ***0.89 *** 0.85 ***
H−0.53 ***0.71 ***0.73 ***0.85 ***
Puck Lagoon
F −0.31 *−0.79 ***−0.61 ***−0.50 ***
L−0.31 * 0.83 ***0.84 ***0.71 ***
S−0.79 ***0.83 *** 0.90 ***0.75 ***
N−0.61 ***0.84 ***0.90 *** 0.84 ***
H−0.50 ***0.71 ***0.75 ***0.84 ***
Vistula Lagoon
F −0.14−0.70 ***−0.49 ***−0.37 **
L−0.14 0.81 ***0.83 ***0.68 ***
S−0.70 ***0.81 *** 0.89 ***0.71 ***
N−0.49 ***0.83 ***0.89 *** 0.82 ***
H−0.37 **0.68 ***0.71 ***0.82 ***
*—value significant at α < 0.05; **—value significant at α < 0.01; ***—value significant at α < 0.001.
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between the air temperature in individual periods and ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between the air temperature in individual periods and ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Ice Parameters and Periods Lagoons Mean
SzczecinPuckVistula
F, Dec-Mar0.45 ***0.44 ***0.30 *0.40
L, Dec-Mar−0.83 ***−0.83 ***−0.83 ***−0.83
S, Dec-Mar−0.84 ***−0.84 ***−0.81 ***−0.83
N, Dec-Mar−0.92 ***−0.93 ***−0.90 ***−0.92
H, Dec-Mar−0.85 ***−0.86 ***−0.87 ***−0.86
F, Nov-Dec0.65 ***0.70 ***0.64 ***0.66
F, Dec-Jan0.46 ***0.51 ***0.35 **0.44
L, Feb-Mar−0.87 ***−0.87 ***−0.88 ***−0.87
L, Mar-Apr−0.69 ***−0.76 ***−0.77 ***−0.74
*—value significant at α < 0.05; **—value significant at α < 0.01; ***—value significant at α < 0.001.
Table 6. Correlation coefficients of linear trends of ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Table 6. Correlation coefficients of linear trends of ice parameters (designations as in Table 2) in southern Baltic coastal lagoons (1950/51–2019/20).
Ice ParametersLagoonsMean
SzczecinPuckVistula
F0.38 **0.41 ***0.30 *0.36
L−0.33 **−0.36 **−0.42 ***−0.37
S−0.46 ***−0.51 ***−0.53 ***−0.50
N−0.42 ***−0.47 ***−0.52 ***−0.47
H−0.23−0.31 *−0.42 ***−0.32
Averages of obsolute values0.360.410.440.40
*—value significant at α < 0.05; **—value significant at α < 0.01; ***—value significant at α < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Girjatowicz, J.P.; Świątek, M. Relationship between Air Temperature Change and Southern Baltic Coastal Lagoons Ice Conditions. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12080931

AMA Style

Girjatowicz JP, Świątek M. Relationship between Air Temperature Change and Southern Baltic Coastal Lagoons Ice Conditions. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(8):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12080931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Girjatowicz, Józef Piotr, and Małgorzata Świątek. 2021. "Relationship between Air Temperature Change and Southern Baltic Coastal Lagoons Ice Conditions" Atmosphere 12, no. 8: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12080931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop