Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Liftover Tools for the Conversion of Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37 to Build 38 Using ClinVar Variants
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression, Polymorphism, and Potential Functional Sites of the BMPR1A Gene in the Sheep Horn
Previous Article in Journal
Chromosome Microarray Analysis and Exome Sequencing: Implementation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses with Digestive System Malformations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/genes14101873
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between DNA Methylation in the Core Promoter Region of the CUT-like Homeobox 1 (CUX1) Gene and Lambskin Pattern in Hu Sheep

by
Xiaoyang Lv
1,2,†,
Yue Li
3,4,†,
Weihao Chen
2,3,
Shanhe Wang
2,3,
Xiukai Cao
1,2,
Zehu Yuan
1,2,
Tesfaye Getachew
2,5,
Joram Mwacharo
2,5,
Aynalem Haile
2,5,
Yutao Li
6 and
Wei Sun
1,2,3,7,*
1
Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
International Joint Research Laboratory in Universities of Jiangsu Province of China for Domestic Animal Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
3
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
4
Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Zhuba Street, Hongze District, Huai’an 223100, China
5
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Addis Ababa 999047, Ethiopia
6
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, 306 Carmody Rd., Saint Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
7
“Innovative China” “Belt and Road” International Agricultural Technology Innovation Institute for Evaluation, Protection, and Improvement on Sheep Genetic Resource, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Genes 2023, 14(10), 1873; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101873
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 18 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Mechanism Analysis and Application of Important Economic Traits in Sheep and Goats)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CUT-like homeobox 1 (CUX1) has been proven to be a key regulator in sheep hair follicle development. In our previous study, CUX1 was identified as a differential expressed gene between Hu sheep lambskin with small wave patterns (SM) and straight wool patterns (ST); however, the exact molecular mechanism of CUX1 expression has been obscure. As DNA methylation can regulate the gene expression, the potential association between CUX1 core promotor region methylation and lambskin pattern in Hu sheep was explored in the present study. The results show that the core promoter region of CUX1 was present at (−1601–(−1) bp) upstream of the transcription start site. A repressive region (−1151–(−751) bp) was also detected, which had a strong inhibitory effect on CUX1 promoter activity. Bisulfite amplicon sequencing revealed that no significant difference was detected between the methylation levels of CUX1 core promoter region in SM tissues and ST tissues. Although the data demonstrated the differential expression of CUX1 between SM and ST probably has no association with DNA methylation, the identification of the core region and a potential repressive region of CUX1 promoter can enrich the role of CUX1 in Hu sheep hair follicle development.

1. Introduction

Hu sheep is a native breed of sheep characterized by precocity and high productivity in China. Hu sheep lambskins, known for their unique water-wave pattern, are popular in the clothing industry and the home sector worldwide [1]. The type of wave pattern is determined by many factors, such as curvature, density, and fineness of the wool, among which the pattern width is the major determination factor. According to the pattern width, Hu sheep lambskin can be classified into four grades: small waves (0.5–1.25 cm), medium waves (1.25–2 cm), large waves (≥2 cm), and straight hair (no pattern) [2]. Of these, the small wave pattern is the finest and is known as “Soft gemstones in China”. Mechanistically, the formation of the lambskin pattern is closely related to the hair follicle functionalities; after hair morphogenesis, the hair follicle undergoes cyclic transformation including growth (anagen), apoptosis-driven regression (catagen), and relative quiescence (telogen). The hair follicle’s functionalities are largely controlled by dermal papilla cells (DPCs), a kind of dermal origin cell composed of specialized fibroblasts of mesenchymal origin located in the center of the hair bulb, which function as a reservoir of multi-potent stem cells and specify hair size, shape and cycling [3]. Molecular studies to date have revealed several key transcriptional signaling mediating cellular progresses of DPCs, such as TGFβ [4], Wnt [5], Shh [6], Notch [7], BMP [8], etc. BMP and TGFβ are examples of prominently “suppression” pathways in hair growth. The downregulation of BMP- and TGF-related genes have been proven to be associated with the promotion of hair growth. The activation of Wnt is involved in the re-epithelialization of hair follicles and upgrades hair regrowth. Notch controls cell differentiation of hair follicle stem cells, ensuring the growth of the inner root sheath and hair shaft, while the activation of Shh can induce the proliferation of hair follicle stem cells and lead hair morphogenesis. In addition, subsets of candidate gene have also been identified, such as Sox10 in the hair follicle stem cell cycle [9], WNT10A in hair morphogenesis [10] and BMP7 in DPC proliferation [11]. Although subsets of transcriptional signaling and candidate genes have been revealed, the specific genetic mechanisms controlling the DPCs are still unknown, especially in sheep. CUT-like homeobox 1 (CUX1), which is also known as CULT1, belongs to the homeodomain transcription factor family [12]. As a transcription factor, numerous studies on the transcriptional repressor role of CUX1 have been reported, the promoter-specific CCAAT-displacement activity of CUX1 can bind to the region surrounding the CCAAT box and repress the expression of the target protein even when the protein is bound at a distance. To date, CUX1 has been proven to participate in many biological processes [13,14,15], including tissue development, diverse cellular processes, DNA damage repair, etc. Regarding hair follicle functionalities, previous studies in mice showed that the inactivation of CUX1 can lead to altered hair follicle morphology, and the loss of its exon (CUX1ΔCR1, also known as CUX1 tm1Ejn) can disturb the proper growth of the hair fiber and cause multiple hair abnormalities. The mutant CUX1 tm1Ejn can also lead to coat hair in mice, while the abnormal hair phenotype diminishes with age [16,17]. Regarding the key pathways regulating hair follicle functionalities, several lines of evidence have shown that CUX1 can serve as a positive regulator of the Wnt pathway in cancers [18]. A conserved CUX1-binding site exists in wnt5a, a key gene regulating TGFβ and Notch signaling [19], and although no direct evidence has proven a connection between these and CUX1 in hair follicle growth, these aforementioned results enlighten us that certain regulation may also exist in the sheep hair follicle functionalities. The effect of CUX1 on sheep lambskin has also been reported in our previous studies; Zhou et al. [20] revealed that the overexpression of CUX1 can drive the proliferation of DPCs and regulate the activation of subsets of genes including WNT10, MMP7, C-JUN, PPARD, FOSL1, etc. (key genes in Wnt/β-catenin pathway functions essentially in hair follicle induction) [21]. In addition, we also found that miR-143 can function as a sponge to CUX1 to downregulate its mRNA and protein expression, and consequently affect the proliferation of DPCs [22], which increases our understanding of CUX1 expression regulation and hair follicle growth and development. Collectively, this evidence led to our hypothesis that the sheep hair follicle functionalities are mediated by CUX1 expression; however, the specific molecular mechanism is still required to be deciphered.
DNA methylations are one of the most common epigenetic modifications in promoter regions of eukaryotic genomes. They are involved in gene silencing and genetic stability in mammals [23,24,25]. Regarding hair follicle functionalities, the methylation statuses of several key transcripts have also been proven to be biomarkers in hair development. For example, Kim et al. [26] reported that the methylation level of the hair CSX and SOX genes increased with age before 2 years old in Angora rabbits [27], and the CpG5 (−175 bp) site of Wnt10b serves as a critical methylated site in the secondary hair follicle cycle. DNA methylation of non-coding transcripts can also mediate hair development. Zhao et al. found that methylation levels of the lncRNA2919 promoter were involved in rabbit hair follicle regeneration [28]. The lncRNA-related DNA methylation level was found to be lower in the differentiation stage compared to the induction stage in Cashmere goat hair follicles [29]. A previous study conducted by Laurent et al. [30] found that DNA methylation at the CUX1 gene is closely related to early-life growth trajectories and male infertility. Considering that the formation of lambskin is determined during the early-life growth period of lambs, and that CUX1 was found differentially expressed in the hair follicles of lambskin with small waves and straight hair patterns [31], a hypothesis was thus raised that the DNA methylation on CUX1 may be the reason for the regulation of CUX1 expression in sheep lambskin. Our goals were thus to investigate the association between DNA methylation in the CUX1 gene and Hu sheep lambskin pattern. In the present study, we first evaluated the expression of the CUX1 gene and Hu sheep lambskin tissue and determined the core promoter region using bioinformatics analyses and dual luciferase assay. Then, the methylation level of the CUX1 core promoter region was detected via bisulfite amplicon sequencing. Our study aims to gain insights into the CUX1-related molecular mechanism underlying hair follicle functionalities, and provide basic knowledge for lambskin production in the sheep industry.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The sample information was detailed described in our previously published reports [11]. Briefly, all experimental lambs were supplied by Suzhou Stud Farm (Suzhou, China). Approximately 1 cm2 of skin from the dorsal side of full-sib 3-day-old Hu sheep lambs with different lambskin patterns was collected and divided into two groups: small waves (SM, n = 3), and straight wool (ST, n = 3). The collected samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until use.

2.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the collected tissues using Trizol (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The first strand of cDNA was prepared using a FastKing RT Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), and cDNA was stored at −20 °C until use.
Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed in 20 μL of reaction mixture that contained 10 µL FastReal qPCR premix (TIANGEN, Beijing, China), 0.4 µL of each forward and reverse primer, 6.4 µL RNase-Free ddH2O, and 2 µL cDNA. PCR amplification was performed in triplicate using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The dissociation curve was analyzed after amplification. A melting temperature (Tm) peak at 85 °C ± 0.8 on the dissociation curve was used to determine the specificity of PCR amplification.
GAPDH was selected as the reference gene, the primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 software (Supplementary Table S1). The 2−ΔΔCt method [32] was used to calculate the expression level of CUX1. The results were shown as relative expression level (log2 Fold Change mean ± standard error) using GraphPad Prism 6 software.

2.3. Cell Culture

Isolation, culture and identification of Hu lamb dermal papilla cells (DPCs) were carried out according to our laboratory methods [33]. DPCs and HEK-293T cell line were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.4. Determination of CUX1 Core Promoter Region

The 2000-bp upstream sequence of the transcription start site of the sheep (Ovis aries) CUX1 gene was obtained from the NCBI database (Accession number: XM_004020987.5). The prediction of the CUX1 core promoter region was conducted using Neural Network Promoter Prediction software v2.0 (https://www.bdgp.org/seq_tools/promoter.html, accessed on 1 June 2023). Based on the prediction results, the 2000-bp upstream sequence was truncated at the 3′ end for the amplification of six promoter fragments including CUX1-U1 (1985 bp), CUX1-U2 (1601 bp), CUX1-U3 (1151 bp), CUX1-U4 (751 bp), CUX1-U5 (499 bp) and CUX1-U6 (149 bp). The detailed information on the designed primers is shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Then, the genomic DNA was isolated from the collected skin tissues using the TIANamp genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The six promoter fragments were amplified from the isolated genomic DNA using PCR, and then gel-purified, sequenced and ligated into a pGL3-Basic vector using ClonExpress® II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).
Subsequently, pGL3-CUX1-U1~U6 were co-transfected with a pRL-TK vector into DPCs and HEK-293T using jetPRIME transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France). The cells were collected at 48 h after transfections for the dual luciferase assay using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The CUX1 core promoter region was determined based on the luciferase activity of each sample normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity.

2.5. DNA Methylation Detection in CUX1 Core Promoter Region

The Genomic DNA of skin tissues was transformed using the EpiTect Fast DNA Bisulfite Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), the transformed DNA was used as a template for PCR amplification via the PyroMark PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The PCR primers (Supplementary Table S1) were designed based on the sequence of sulfite transformation using the MethPrimer software v2.0 (http://www.urogene.org/cgi-bin/methprimer2/MethPrimer.cgi, accessed on 1 July 2023). Then, the PCR products were purified and ligated into the pMD19-T vector.
Ten positive clones of SM and ST groups were randomly chosen for bisulfite amplicon sequencing (Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The methylation level was evaluated using the QUMA software v1.1.13 (http://quma.cdb.riken.jp/, accessed on 1 July 2023).

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 18.0 software (Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test was used to detect the difference between the SM and ST groups. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. CUX1 Was Identified as a Potential Candidate Gene Regulating Lambskin Pattern of Hu Sheep

In our previous study [31], we conducted an RNA-seq study to detect the mRNA expression in the hair follicles of Hu sheep lambskin with SM pattern and ST pattern, within the differentially expressed genes, CUX1 was found to be highly expressed in the hair follicles of the SM group (Figure 1B) and was considered as a potential candidate gene regulating the lambskin pattern of Hu sheep.
In the present study, we further evaluated the expression of CUX1 in lambskin tissues with SM and ST patterns (Figure 1A). The results demonstrate that the expression of CUX1 was >6 fold higher in SM than ST, which indicates that CUX1 expression was significantly higher in the lambskin tissue of SM than in ST (p < 0.05).

3.2. Determination of CUX1 Core Promoter Region

Considering that the promoter regions are the main regulatory elements of gene expression, our study mainly focused on the core promoter-induced CUX1 expression mechanisms underlying lambskin pattern formation.
First, a 2023-bp sequence upstream of the CUX1 transcription start site was obtained and assessed using the Neural Network Promoter Prediction software. The results showed that five potential core promoter regions of the CUX1 gene were predicted, which were present at −1789–(−1739) bp (a), −395–(−345) bp (b), −319–(−269) bp (c), −258–(−208) bp (d) and −247–(−197) bp (e) upstream of the transcription start site (Figure 2).
Then, the 2023-bp upstream sequence was divided into six fragments according to the predicted potential core promoter regions (Figure 3A), containing −1985–(−1) bp (U1), −1601–(−1) bp (U2), −1151–(−1) bp (U3), −751–(−1) bp (U4), −499–(−1) bp (U5), −149–(–1) bp (U6). As shown in Figure 3B, the PCR amplification products of each fragment (Figure 3B) were evaluated via agarose gel electrophoresis and ligated into a pGL3-Basic vector. The results of the agarose gel electrophoresis showed that all six designed regions were successfully amplified and ligated into the vector (Figure 3C).
Subsequently, pGL3-CUX1-U1~U6 and the pRL-TK vector were co-transfected into DPCs and HEK-293T for the dual luciferase assay. The results show that the luciferase activity of the U2 region was highest among all the regions both in DPCs (Figure 4A) and HEK-293T (Figure 4B), and luciferase activity was significantly decreased in the transformation of pGL3-CUX1-U1 and -U2, which indicates that the core promoter region of CUX1 is located at −1601–(−1) bp.
It is worth noting that the luciferase activity of the pGL3-CUX1-U3 was extremely significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that of U4 and U6, and given the molecular mechanism of gene promotion, we assume that certain regulatory elements of CUX1 transcription may exist at −1151–(−751) bp, such as the key methylated CpG sites.

3.3. DNA Methylation Detection in CUX1 Core Promoter Region

To further explore the molecular regulatory roles of the CUX1 core promoter region, a methylation analysis was conducted. The prediction results of MethPrimer (Figure 5A) showed that two CpG islands exist in the CUX1 core promoter region, namely, −886–(−429) bp (Island 1) and −427–(−33) bp (Island 2). Considering the overlap between the U3 region and the predicted CpG islands, CpG Island 1 was selected and −821–(−505) bp of Island 1 region was sulfite-transformed (Figure 5B) for bisulfite amplicon sequencing (BAS).
The results of BAS (Supplementary Material S2) showed that only four and six methylated CpG sites were detected in the selected region of SM tissues and ST tissues under 30 repetitions, respectively (Figure 6). The average methylation levels of SM and ST were 0.9% and 1.0%, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the methylation levels of the SM group and the ST group, indicating that there was no statistical correlation between the DNA methylation and CUX1 mRNA expression.

4. Discussion

The formation of lambskin pattern is a dynamic and complex process which happens in early life and involves delicate molecular regulatory mechanisms. Lambs carrying hairy lambskin (with waves) are of more economic value and have proven to be more adapted to harsh environmental conditions. Although the genetic basis of Hu sheep lambskin pattern formation is still largely unknown, studies on other sheep breeds have identified subsets of candidate genes in wool phenotype; a genome-wide study in Romane and Merinos sheep revealed that the insertion of a polymorphism (asEIF2S2) into the 3′ UTR of the IRF2BP2 gene can lead to the regulation of EIF2S2 and IRF2BP2 mRNA expression, and is associated with the formation of hairy fleece and woolly fleece phenotypes [2]. Interestingly, the EIF2S2 and IRF2BP2 genes have both proven to be a regulator of transcription factors (EIF2S2 encodes a transcription factor and IRF2BP2 functions as a transcription factor coregulator). Another well-studied transcription factor that plays essential roles in hair follicle functionalities is SOX10. As a member of the Sox gene family, SOX10 can mediate the expression of genes involved in stem cell behavior during embryonic development. During the hair follicle cycle, the expression of SOX10 can control the hair follicle stem cell function and regulate hair follicle morphogenesis and postnatal follicular cycling [9]. In addition, other transcription factors such as HOXC13, JUNB, LHX2, VDR and GATA3 have also been reported participating in hair follicle differentiation [29]. Collectively, the unravelling of the crucial function of transcription factors in wool pattern formation gives rise to our interest in transcription factor-regulated mechanisms in Hu sheep lambskin phenotype. CUX1 is a key member of the homeodomain transcription factors family. According to its specific CCAAT-displacement activity, CUX1 can function as a transcriptional repressor during the cell cycle and has proven to be associated with multiple cellular processes including cell differentiation, proliferation, cell cycle, etc. [34,35]. Our previous study established that an increased level of CUX1 expression is associated with the proliferation of DPCs, which can lead to the promotion of hair follicle growth and development in sheep. Several studies have reported post-translational modifications of CUX1 including phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, acetylation and proteolytic processing [36], which can lead to a decrease in DNA binding activity of CUX1; however, there is little knowledge concerning the other transcriptional modifications of CUX1, such as DNA methylation. Here, we analyzed the effects of promoter methylation on CUX1 transcriptional activity and its potential role in the formation of lambskin pattern.
It is well acknowledged that DNA methylation is a fundamental epigenetic mark that correlates with gene expression. Regarding CUX1-related researches, the methylation modifications of CUX1 have been proven to be associated with complex biological processes, including amygdala and hippocampus development [37], chronic kidney disease [38] and obesity [30]. In sheep, a increased methylated level of CUX1 was observed in preterm ovine cerebrum and cerebellum compared to the normal ovine. CUX1 was also identified as a highly methylated gene in brain tissue of fetal sheep [39], which highlighted the effect of CUX1 methylation on early nervous system development; however, the role of CUX1 methylation in sheep hair follicle growth and development remains obscure. Our previous study [31] detected mRNA expression in the hair follicles of Hu sheep lambskin with SM and ST patterns, and CUX1 was found to be highly expressed in the hair follicles of the SM group. Consistent with our previous results, the present study also revealed this in the lambskin tissue of the SM group rather than the ST group, which further proves that CUX1 is a potential candidate gene regulating the lambskin pattern of Hu sheep.
Promoter methylation is the most obvious epigenetic modification of DNA methylation [40,41,42]. The core promoter is a part of the promoter region which can assemble the RNA polymerase and initiate transcription [43]. To explore the effect of DNA methylation on CUX1 expression, the core promoter region of the CUX1 gene was first defined via a dual luciferase reporter assay. Estimating promoter activity is the most commonly used approach to determine the core promoter region. In the present study, we observed that the U2 region (−1601–(−1) bp) had the highest luciferase activity in both the 293T cell line group and the DPCs group. The previous study showed that core promoter motifs can significantly increase promoter activity [44,45]; hence, the U2 region was considered as a core promoter region of CUX1 in sheep. Generally, the luciferase activity of truncated core promoter fragments decreases gradually with increasing truncation length; however, the luciferase activity of the U3 (−1151–(−1) bp) was observed to be significantly lower than that of U2 and U6 (−751–(−1) bp). Similar results [46] were observed by Robin et al., who identified an important repressive region on the lck promoter which, when deleted, causes an increase in promoter activity and lck expression. Xu et al. also found that deterrent transcription factors exist in cattle; deletion of the PAX7 gene promoter region can lead to a 2.79-fold increase in promoter activity [47]. Collectively, this evidence suggest that this region (−1151–(−751) bp) should contain repressive elements of CUX1 promoter activity; deletion of this region may also have a promoting effect on the CUX1 promoter activity and expression. Of course, in-depth analyses are needed to prove our hypothesis.
Subsequently, DNA methylation analyses were conducted based on the identified core promoter region. The results of the MethPrimer showed that two CpG islands were predicted, which were present at −886–(−429) bp (Island 1) and −427–(−33) bp (Island 2). Interestingly, the majority of Island 1 and Island 2 were present at U4 and U3 regions, not in the core promoter region (U2). Previous research has shown that methylation of key CpG sites can influence the promoter activity of a specific gene [48,49,50,51]; hence, we raised the hypothesis that certain methylated CpG sites also occurred in the aforementioned potential repressive region. Considering the overlapping region between predicted CpG islands and the potential repressive region, CpG Island 1 was selected for the BAS. Unfortunately, only four and six methylated CpG sites were detected in the SM tissues and ST tissues, respectively. No differential methylation level was detected in the CUX1 core promoter region, which indicates that there was no correlation between the methylation of CpG sites in Island 1 and CUX1 mRNA expression. As previously mentioned, CUX1 was proven to be a highly methylated gene in the lamb nervous system [39]; however, our present study indicates that, in sheep hair follicles, the methylation machinery is dispensable for promoter activity. Whether DNA methylation regulates CUX1 expression remains to be established. It is possible that the CUX1 expression is regulated by other factors, such as miR-143, as we previous reported [22].
It is cautionary to mention the limitations of our study regarding the bisulfite amplicon sequencing and CUX1 core promoter region. Considering the overlapping region between the predicted CpG Islands and the repressive region, only CpG Island 1 was selected for the BSA and the DNA methylation analyses showed no difference between the two groups; The results could have been different if CpG Island 2 was selected for the BSA. Regarding the determination of the CUX1 core promoter region, to date, no study focused on the CUX1 core promoter has been reported; hence, the required knowledge is lacking to make comparisons between different species, and further study is still required to validate the reliability of the U2 region as a CUX1 core promoter in other species.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the expression level of CUX1 was significantly higher in SM tissues than in ST tissues. Five potential core promoter regions of the CUX1 gene were predicted based on bioinformatics analysis, and the core promoter region of CUX1 was determined at (−1601–(−1) bp) upstream of the transcription start site via dual luciferase assay. A repressive region (−1151–(−751) bp) with a strong inhibitory effect on CUX1 promoter activity was also identified. Bisulfite amplicon sequencing showed that four and six methylated CpG sites were detected in the CUX1 CpG Island 1 region of SM tissues and ST tissues, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the methylation levels of SM tissues and ST tissues; hence, the differential expression of CUX1 between SM and ST probably has no association with the CUX1 core promoter DNA methylation. Our studies further enrich the role of CUX1 in hair follicle growth and development and can provide basic knowledge for the Hu sheep lambskin industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14101873/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Primers used in the present study. Supplementary Material S2: Raw results of bisulfite amplicon sequencing. Supplementary Table S3: Original blot results in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: X.L., Y.L. (Yue Li), W.C., S.W., X.C., Z.Y., S.W., T.G., J.M., A.H., Y.L. (Yutao Li) and W.S.; Data curation: X.L. and Y.L. (Yue Li); Formal analysis: X.L. and Y.L. (Yue Li); Supervision: W.S.; Writing—original draft: X.L.; Writing—review and editing: X.L. and W.S.; Funding acquisition: W.S. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China-CGIAR (32061143036), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872333, 32172689, 32302693), Major New Varieties of Agricultural Projects in Jiangsu Province (PZCZ201739), Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (22KJA230001), Major Project of Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (2022D01D47), Jiangsu 333 Distinguished Talents Project Foundation [(2022) 2-323], Distinguished Talents Project Foundation of Yangzhou University, High-end Foreign Expert Introduction Project (G2022014148L), The Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (22KJD230003), and Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX (23)1036).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China) following the requirement with the Jiangsu Provincial Government Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, Nanjing, China) and the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (No: NSFC2020-NFY-1).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, W.; Ni, R.; Yin, J.F.; Musa, H.H.; Ding, T.J.; Chen, L. Genome Array of Hair Follicle Genes in Lambskin with Different Patterns. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lv, X.Y.; Chen, W.H.; Sun, W.; Hussain, Z.; Wang, S.H.; Wang, J.Y. Analysis of lncRNAs Expression Profiles in Hair Follicle of Hu Sheep Lambskin. Animals 2020, 10, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, S.H.; Hu, T.Y.; He, M.L.; Gu, Y.F.; Cao, X.K.; Yuan, Z.H.; Lv, X.Y.; Getachew, T.; Quan, K.; Sun, W. Defining ovine dermal papilla cell markers and identifying key signaling pathways regulating its intrinsic properties. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1127501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schmidt-Ullrich, R.; Paus, R. Molecular principles of hair follicle induction and morphogenesis. Bioessays 2005, 27, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carmon, K.S.; Gong, X.; Lin, Q.S.; Thomas, A.; Liu, Q.Y. R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11452–11457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ito, M.; Nguyen, J.; Myung, P.; Garza, L.; Andl, T.; Millar, S.; Cotsarelis, G. Wnt modulates the differentiation status of interfollicular epidermal melanocytes arising from melanocyte stem cells in the hair follicle bulge after wounding or UVB irradiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, S156. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aubin-Houzelstein, G. Notch Signaling and the Developing Hair Follicle. Notch Signal. Embryol. Cancer 2012, 727, 142–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Botchkarev, V.A.; Sharov, A.A. BMP signaling in the control of skin development and hair follicle growth. Differentiation 2004, 72, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jing, J.; Xu, P.; Xu, J.L.; Ding, Y.X.; Yang, X.S.; Jin, X.Q.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, Y.H.; Wu, X.J.; Lu, Z.F. Expression and localization of Sox10 during hair follicle morphogenesis and induced hair cycle. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 3498–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sriwiriyanont, P.; Lynch, K.A.; Maier, E.A.; Hahn, J.M.; Supp, D.M.; Boyce, S.T. Morphogenesis of chimeric hair follicles in engineered skin substitutes with human keratinocytes and murine dermal papilla cells. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Lv, X.Y.; Wang, S.H.; Cao, X.K.; Yuan, Z.H.; Getachew, T.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Haile, A.; Sun, W. BMP7 Functions to Regulate Proliferation of Dermal Papilla Cells in Hu Sheep. Genes 2022, 13, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, N.; Sun, Q.L.; Wan, L.; Wang, X.; Feng, Y.; Luo, J.D.; Wu, H.L. CUX1, A Controversial Player in Tumor Development. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Topka, S.; Glassmann, A.; Weisheit, G.; Schuller, U.; Schilling, K. The Transcription Factor Cux1 in Cerebellar Granule Cell Development and Medulloblastoma Pathogenesis. Cerebellum 2014, 13, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramdzan, Z.M.; Ginjala, V.; Pinder, J.B.; Chung, D.; Donovan, C.M.; Kaur, S.; Leduy, L.; Dellaire, G.; Ganesan, S.; Nepveu, A. The DNA repair function of CUX1 contributes to radioresistance. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 19021–19038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Krug, S.; Weissbach, J.; Blank, A.; Perren, A.; Haybaeck, J.; Fendrich, V.; Rinke, A.; Gress, T.M.; Rosendahl, J.; Michl, P. CUX1-Transcriptional Master Regulator of Tumor Progression in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancers 2020, 12, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zeng, W.R.; Soucie, E.; Moon, N.S.; Martin-Soudant, N.; Berube, G.; Leduy, L.; Nepveu, A. Exon/intron structure and alternative transcripts of the CUTL1 gene. Gene 2000, 241, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tufarelli, C.; Fujiwara, Y.; Zappulla, D.C.; Neufeld, E.J. Hair defects and pup loss in mice with targeted deletion of the first cut repeat domain of the Cux/CDP homeoprotein gene. Dev. Biol. 1998, 200, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, F.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Zhou, Y.F.; Cheng, Y.H.; Wu, X.J.; Heng, X.Y. CUX1 Facilitates the Development of Oncogenic Properties Via Activating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in Glioma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 705008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Katoh, M.; Katoh, M. Transcriptional mechanisms of WNT5A based on NF-kappa B, Hedgehog, TGF β, and Notch signaling cascades. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 23, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, H.; Huang, S.A.; Lv, X.Y.; Wang, S.H.; Cao, X.K.; Yuan, Z.H.; Getachew, T.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Haile, A.; Quan, K.; et al. Effect of CUX1 on the Proliferation of Hu Sheep Dermal Papilla Cells and on the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Genes 2023, 14, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsai, S.Y.; Sennett, R.; Rezza, A.; Clavel, C.; Grisanti, L.; Zemla, R.; Najam, S.; Rendl, M. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in dermal condensates is required for hair follicle formation. Dev. Biol. 2014, 385, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, T.Y.; Huang, S.A.; Lv, X.Y.; Wang, S.H.; Getachew, T.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Haile, A.; Sun, W. miR-143 Targeting CUX1 to Regulate Proliferation of Dermal Papilla Cells in Hu Sheep. Genes 2021, 12, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Takahashi, Y.; Valencia, M.M.; Yu, Y.; Ouchi, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Shokhirev, M.N.; Lande, K.; Williams, A.E.; Fresia, C.; Kurita, M.; et al. Transgenerational inheritance of acquired epigenetic signatures at CpG islands in mice. Cell 2023, 186, 715–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ortiz-Barahona, V.; Joshi, R.S.; Esteller, M. Use of DNA methylation profiling in translational oncology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 83, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Papanicolau-Sengos, A.; Aldape, K. DNA Methylation Profiling: An Emerging Paradigm for Cancer Diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol-Mech. 2022, 17, 295–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, J.Y.; Tavare, S.; Shibata, D. Human hair genealogies and stem cell latency. BMC Biol. 2006, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bai, L.Y.; Sun, H.T.; Jiang, W.X.; Yang, L.P.; Liu, G.Y.; Zhao, X.Y.; Hu, H.M.; Wang, J.Y.; Gao, S.X. DNA methylation and histone acetylation are involved in Wnt10b expression during the secondary hair follicle cycle in Angora rabbits. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, B.H.; Li, J.L.; Liu, M.; Yang, N.S.; Bao, Z.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Dai, Y.Y.; Cai, J.W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.S. DNA Methylation Mediates lncRNA2919 Regulation of Hair Follicle Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, S.H.; Li, F.; Liu, J.W.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zheng, Y.J.; Ge, W.; Qu, L.; Wang, X. Integrative Analysis of Methylome and Transcriptome Reveals the Regulatory Mechanisms of Hair Follicle Morphogenesis in Cashmere Goat. Cells 2020, 9, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Briollais, L.; Rustand, D.; Allard, C.; Wu, Y.Y.; Xu, J.X.; Rajan, S.G.; Hivert, M.F.; Doyon, M.; Bouchard, L.; McGowan, P.O.; et al. DNA methylation mediates the association between breastfeeding and early-life growth trajectories. Clin. Epigenetics 2021, 13, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lv, X.Y.; Gao, W.; Jin, C.Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.H.; Wang, L.H.; Zou, S.X.; Sheng, S.X.; Chen, L.; Sun, W. Divergently expressed RNA identification and interaction prediction of long non-coding RNA and mRNA involved in Hu sheep hair follicle. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xu, Y.L.; Wang, S.H.; Cao, X.K.; Yuan, Z.H.; Getachew, T.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Haile, A.; Lv, X.Y.; Sun, W. The Effect of EGR1 on the Proliferation of Dermal Papilla Cells. Genes 2022, 13, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, N.; Zhao, C.T.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, X.B. The Transcription Factor Cux1 Regulates Dendritic Morphology of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ramdzan, Z.M.; Nepveu, A. CUX1, a haploinsufficient tumour suppressor gene overexpressed in advanced cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sansregret, L.; Nepveu, A. The multiple roles of CUX1: Insights from mouse models and cell-based assays. Gene 2008, 412, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ong, M.L.; Tuan, T.A.; Poh, J.; Teh, A.L.; Chen, L.; Pan, H.; MacIsaac, J.L.; Kobor, M.S.; Chong, Y.S.; Kwek, K.; et al. Neonatal amygdalae and hippocampi are influenced by genotype and prenatal environment, and reflected in the neonatal DNA methylome. Genes. Brain Behav. 2019, 18, e12576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smyth, L.J.; McKay, G.J.; Maxwell, A.P.; McKnight, A.J. DNA hypermethylation and DNA hypomethylation is present at different loci in chronic kidney disease. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pacht, E. Characterization of DNA Hydroxymethylation in the Cattle and Sheep Brain. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin, Q.L.; Ding, H.; Zheng, Z.; Gu, Z.Q.; Ma, J.H.; Chen, L.; Chan, P.; Cai, Y.N. Promoter methylation analysis of seven clock genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 507, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, H.F.; Feng, H.Y.; Sun, J.; Zhou, Y.J.; Zhu, G.Q.; Wu, S.L.; Bao, W.B. Age-associated changes in DNA methylation and expression of the TNF α gene in pigs. Genes Genet. Syst. 2018, 93, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smith, J.; Sen, S.; Weeks, R.J.; Eccles, M.R.; Chatterjee, A. Promoter DNA Hypermethylation and Paradoxical Gene Activation. Trends Cancer 2020, 6, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shimada, A.; Okumura, A.; Yarnasaki, S.; Iwata, Y.; Koizumi, N.; Nishihara, M.; Mishiba, K. A 64-bp sequence containing the GAAGA motif is essential for CaMV-35S promoter methylation in gentian. Bba-Gene Regul. Mech. 2017, 1860, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Z.C.; Shi, D.F.; Jin, J.; Fan, H.R.; Bao, W.B.; Wu, S.L. DNA Methylation of Pig FUT3 Promoter Alters mRNA Expression to Regulate E. coli F18 Susceptibility. Genes 2021, 12, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Z.P.; Reid, A.M.A.; Wilson, P.W.; Dunn, I.C. Identification of the Core Promoter and Variants Regulating Chicken CCKAR Expression. Genes 2022, 13, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Muise-Helmericks, R.C.; Rosen, N. Identification of a novel repressive element in the proximal lck promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 27538–27543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xu, Y.; Shi, T.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, M.; Klaus, S.; Lan, X.Y.; Lei, C.Z.; Chen, H. A novel PAX7 10-bp indel variant modulates promoter activity, gene expression and contributes to different phenotypes of Chinese cattle. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rishi, V.; Bhattacharya, P.; Chatterjee, R.; Rozenberg, J.; Zhao, J.F.; Glass, K.; Fitzgerald, P.; Vinson, C. CpG methylation of half-CRE sequences creates C/EBP α binding sites that activate some tissue-specific genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20311–20316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bui, C.; Barter, M.J.; Scott, J.L.; Xu, Y.B.; Galler, M.; Reynard, L.N.; Rowan, A.D.; Young, D.A. cAMP response element-binding (CREB) recruitment following a specific CpG demethylation leads to the elevated expression of the matrix metalloproteinase 13 in human articular chondrocytes and osteoarthritis. Faseb J. 2012, 26, 3000–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Murayama, A.; Sakura, K.; Nakama, M.; Yasuzawa-Tanaka, K.; Fujita, E.; Tateishi, Y.; Wang, Y.A.; Ushijima, T.; Baba, T.; Shibuya, K.; et al. A specific CpG site demethylation in the human interleukin 2 gene promoter is an epigenetic memory. Embo J. 2006, 25, 1081–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hashimoto, K.; Otero, M.; Imagawa, K.; de Andres, M.C.; Coico, J.M.; Roach, H.I.; Oreffo, R.O.C.; Marcu, K.B.; Goldring, M.B. Regulated Transcription of Human Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) and Interleukin-1 β (IL1B) Genes in Chondrocytes Depends on Methylation of Specific Proximal Promoter CpG Sites. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 10061–10072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 01873 g001
Figure 1. Expression of CUX1 in lambskin tissues with SM pattern and ST pattern assessed with RT-qPCR (A) and RNA-seq (B). Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Expression of CUX1 in lambskin tissues with SM pattern and ST pattern assessed with RT-qPCR (A) and RNA-seq (B). Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Genes 14 01873 g001
Genes 14 01873 g002
Figure 2. Prediction result of core potential promoter regions (A) and their locations (a~e) on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site (B).
Figure 2. Prediction result of core potential promoter regions (A) and their locations (a~e) on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site (B).
Genes 14 01873 g002
Genes 14 01873 g003
Figure 3. (A) Location of U1~U6 on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site. (B) The PCR amplification products of U1~U6, where M represents the DL2000 marker, 1~6 represent U1~U6. (C) pGL3-U1~U6 were confirmed via double digestion with SacI and HindIII, where M represents the DL5000 marker, B represents pGL3-Basic, and 1~6 represent pGL3-U1~U6.
Figure 3. (A) Location of U1~U6 on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site. (B) The PCR amplification products of U1~U6, where M represents the DL2000 marker, 1~6 represent U1~U6. (C) pGL3-U1~U6 were confirmed via double digestion with SacI and HindIII, where M represents the DL5000 marker, B represents pGL3-Basic, and 1~6 represent pGL3-U1~U6.
Genes 14 01873 g003
Genes 14 01873 g004
Figure 4. Relative luciferase activity of different vectors in HEK-293T (A) and DPC (B). Note: ** p < 0.01, ns: no significance.
Figure 4. Relative luciferase activity of different vectors in HEK-293T (A) and DPC (B). Note: ** p < 0.01, ns: no significance.
Genes 14 01873 g004
Genes 14 01873 g005
Figure 5. (A) Locations of predicted CpG islands on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site, where the red rectangle represents predicted CpG islands, the green rectangle represents U4, the purple rectangle represents U3, the blue rectangle represents the core promoter region (U5). (B) Sulfite-transformed products for the BAS, where M represents the DL2000 marker, 1~6 represent sulfite-transformed products.
Figure 5. (A) Locations of predicted CpG islands on the upstream region of the CUX1 transcription start site, where the red rectangle represents predicted CpG islands, the green rectangle represents U4, the purple rectangle represents U3, the blue rectangle represents the core promoter region (U5). (B) Sulfite-transformed products for the BAS, where M represents the DL2000 marker, 1~6 represent sulfite-transformed products.
Genes 14 01873 g005
Genes 14 01873 g006
Figure 6. The results of BAS (A,B) locations of methylated CpG sites on the selected region, where black nodes represent methylated CpG sites, white nodes represent unmethylated sites.
Figure 6. The results of BAS (A,B) locations of methylated CpG sites on the selected region, where black nodes represent methylated CpG sites, white nodes represent unmethylated sites.
Genes 14 01873 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, S.; Cao, X.; Yuan, Z.; Getachew, T.; Mwacharo, J.; Haile, A.; Li, Y.; et al. Association between DNA Methylation in the Core Promoter Region of the CUT-like Homeobox 1 (CUX1) Gene and Lambskin Pattern in Hu Sheep. Genes 2023, 14, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101873

AMA Style

Lv X, Li Y, Chen W, Wang S, Cao X, Yuan Z, Getachew T, Mwacharo J, Haile A, Li Y, et al. Association between DNA Methylation in the Core Promoter Region of the CUT-like Homeobox 1 (CUX1) Gene and Lambskin Pattern in Hu Sheep. Genes. 2023; 14(10):1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Xiaoyang, Yue Li, Weihao Chen, Shanhe Wang, Xiukai Cao, Zehu Yuan, Tesfaye Getachew, Joram Mwacharo, Aynalem Haile, Yutao Li, and et al. 2023. "Association between DNA Methylation in the Core Promoter Region of the CUT-like Homeobox 1 (CUX1) Gene and Lambskin Pattern in Hu Sheep" Genes 14, no. 10: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop