Next Article in Journal
Construction of a ceRNA Network and Comprehensive Analysis of lncRNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
ProGeo-Neo v2.0: A One-Stop Software for Neoantigen Prediction and Filtering Based on the Proteogenomics Strategy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/genes13050784
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arginine Decarboxylase Gene ADC2 Regulates Fiber Elongation in Cotton

by
Guangming Ren
1,
Huijuan Mo
2,* and
Ruqiang Xu
1,*
1
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Cotton Research Institute, Anyang 455000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(5), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050784
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 23 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cotton is an important agro-industrial crop providing raw material for the textile industry. Fiber length is the key factor that directly affects fiber quality. ADC, arginine decarboxylase, is the key rate-limiting enzyme in the polyamine synthesis pathway; whereas, there is no experimental evidence that ADC is involved in fiber development in cotton yet. Our transcriptome analysis of the fiber initiation material of Gossypium arboreum L. showed that the expression profile of GaADC2 was induced significantly. Here, GhADC2, the allele of GaADC2 in tetraploid upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L., exhibited up-regulated expression pattern during fiber elongation in cotton. Levels of polyamine are correlated with fiber elongation; especially, the amount of putrescine regulated by ADC was increased. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the fiber length was increased with exogenous addition of an ADC substrate or product putrescine; whereas, the fiber density was decreased with exogenous addition of an ADC specific inhibitor. Next, genome-wide transcriptome profiling of fiber elongation with exogenous putrescine addition was performed to determine the molecular basis in Gossypium hirsutum. A total of 3163 differentially expressed genes were detected, which mainly participated in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, fatty acid elongation, and sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis pathways. Genes encoding transcription factors MYB109, WRKY1, and TCP14 were enriched. Therefore, these results suggested the ADC2 and putrescine involvement in the development and fiber elongation of G. hirsutum, and provides a basis for cotton fiber development research in future.

1. Introduction

Cotton, as one of the most important crops in the world, produces natural fiber materials for the textile industry. Cotton fiber is a single-celled trichome, unbranched cell, differentiated from the epidermis of the ovule, and undergoes substantial elongation and secondary cell wall biosynthesis taking up to 50 days. The development is divided into four distinct but overlapping stages: initiation, elongation, secondary cell wall thickening, and maturation [1]. The ovule epidermal cells enter a rapid elongation period with a growth rate of more than 2 mm/day from 1 day post anthesis (DPA) to 20 DPA, that is, the rapid fiber elongation stage [2]. Many factors affecting cotton fiber elongation, including plant hormones and genes regulating fiber development, have been reported; however, the research on the regulation of fiber elongation by plant endogenous substances is still insufficient.
Arginine decarboxylase (ADC) participates in the metabolism of polyamine pathways [3,4]. Plant polyamines are biosynthesized from either arginine or ornithine, and through the ADC or ornithine decarboxylase pathway, then, putrescine (Put) is produced [5]. Put, spermidine (Spd), and spermine (Spm), as components of polyamine metabolic pathway, are the most common diamine and polyamines in seed plants [6]. D-arginine is used as the specific inhibitor of ADC [7,8]. Arginine was catalyzed to agmatine by ADC, and agmatine iminohydrolase catalyzed agmatine to N-carbamoylputrescine, which was then catalyzed by N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase, then Put is produced [9]. As a substrate for the synthesis of Spd and Spm, diamine Put passes through the Spd and Spm synthase respectively, with aminopropyl provided by s-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase [10,11]. Catabolism of Put is regulated by the diamine oxidase, which produces γ-aminobutyric acid and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in plants [12]. Overexpression of GhCaM7 promoted the early elongation of fibers accompanied by the accumulation of H2O2 content [13], and GhFAnnxA regulates fiber elongation through calcium signaling and ROS [14]. H2O2 is the main small molecule product of ADC-mediated polyamine pathway. Down-regulation of ADC gene-expression causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis thaliana [15]. Engineering Put levels in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced defense against bacterial pathogen [16]. However, the functions of ADC-regulated diamine Put in fiber development are unknown.
ADC, as the key rate-limiting enzyme in the polyamine metabolic cascade, catalyzes the synthesis of Put from L-arginine [17]. There is no definite evidence of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and its encoding gene in cruciferous plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana [18]. In plants, Put is synthesized only through ADC pathway. Currently, ADC genes have been cloned and identified in several plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana [19]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, ADC has two members, AtADC1 (At2G16500) and AtADC2 (At4G34710), whereas the expression of AtADC2 is higher as compared to AtADC1 [20]. In plants, the differential expression patterns of ADC gene members is observed. The activity of the AtADC1 promoter increased under freezing stress, whereas the AtADC2 promoter revealed lower activity [9,21]. The AtADC1 protein is located in cytosol and the adc1-/- mutant plants revealed the similar phenotype and polyamine level as normal plants [19]. The AtADC2 protein locates in chloroplast [19]. Interestingly, the adc2-/- mutant plants exhibited lower levels of Put and Spd as well as reduced seed size [19,22]. Thus, although there are two members of ADC in Arabidopsis, only AtADC2 expression is consistent with Put level [23]. Down-regulation of ADC gene expression through microRNA leads to shorter root hair in Arabidopsis [24]. Cotton fiber cells are highly elongated single cells such as trichomes in Arabidopsis, and both have similar mechanisms for regulating trichome development, speculating that ADC2 may regulate fiber development through the polyamines pathway in cotton.
In our previous research, the ADC gene (GhADC1, GenBank, KC851856) was cloned in Gossypium hirsutum (G. hirsutum), where it revealed variable expression under Verticillium wilt (in China). The dominant gene GaADC2 (Gene ID, Cotton_A_08902) was identified from transcriptome profiling of fiber initiation in diploid Asiatic cotton (Gossypium arboreum), which is a fiber-producing AA genome species that produces spinnable lint (long) fiber and short fiber (fuzz) [24]. At present, the genetic transformation technology of cotton is very difficult in diploid Asiatic cotton, while tetraploid upland cotton (G. hirsutum) was the most successful receptor material for cotton genetic transformation.
Here, we demonstrated that a cotton ADC gene (GhADC2) promotes fibre elongation. Spd, spm, and Put are measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and compared to gene expression on different tissues. Therefore, these findings provide evidence that GhADC2 mediates Put production and the expression of the fiber elongation-related genes in cotton, and, therefore, have significant implications for genetic improvement of cotton fibre quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and RNA Extraction

We used RNA samples prepared from a specific genetic line (ZM24) of the cultivated tetraploid upland cotton (G. hirsutum) for sequencing [25]. G. hirsutum cv. ZM24 was grown in a cotton climatic chamber at 30/27 ± 3 °C and light/dark cycle for 12/12 h. Ovule samples were collected, placed immediately on ice, and then randomly divided into three replicates for each stage. Immediately after dissection, the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR experiments. The purity and concentration of RNA were measured by a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA, USA).

2.2. Sequence Analysis

DNAMAN software was employed for multi-sequence alignments of ADC proteins between G. hirsutum and Arabidopsis. The theoretical isoelectric point and molecular weight of GhADC2 proteins were calculated using the ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 1 July 2021). Putative conserved motifs in these collected ADC proteins were predicted using the MEME program The putative conserved motifs of ADC proteins were online predicted using the MEME program (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/, accessed on 1 July 2021) [26]. All MEME-identified motifs are used by Inter-ProScan as queries against the InterPro database [27].

2.3. QRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from roots, stem, leaves, flowers, pistils, stamens, ovules, and fibers tissues using the RNAprep Pure Polysaccharide Polyphenol Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen, China) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were run using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa Biomedical Technology (Beijing, China) Co., Ltd) on a LightCycler480 system (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative expression levels were calculated by the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method [28]. The gene expression analysis was performed with tissue of three different samples (biological replicates) and three repetitions per sample (technical replicates). A negative control without a cDNA template was run during each analysis to assess the overall specificity. The results were normalized to the expression level of UBQ7 (GenBank: DQ116441) and relative to the root (in Figure 1b) or 2 d ovule samples without Put treatment (in Figure 4b). The specific primers of the experimental genes and internal control gene (UBQ7) are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Measurements of Polyamine

The content of polyamines was determined by HPLC (LC-20A, Shimadzu Corp, Japan) on an apparatus equipped with an Agilent reversed-phase C18 column (particle size, 4 μm; column, 3.9 mm × 150 mm), and was detected at 230 nm as previously described [18]. Polyamine standards or 1 g fresh plant tissue was ground with 5 mL perchloric acid in ice bath, extracted for 30 min at 4 °C, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, 2 mL supernatant was added with 7 μL benzoyl chloride and 1 mL NaOH for derivatization, followed by incubate for 20 min at 37 °C. Then 2 mL diethyl ether and 2 mL saturated NaCl was added, centrifuged at 3700 rpm for 5 min. After vacuum drying for 10 min, add 500 μL 60% methanol to dissolve and wait for measurement. Vortex for 5 min, then filter through 0.45 μm organic membrane. The injection volume of 10 μL was determined by HPLC. The standard curves of Put, Spd, and Spm were made by external standard method, and the content of samples was analyzed. The retention time of each polyamine in the mixed standard product was determined first, and then the retention time of Put, Spd, and Spm in the sample was determined due to the different number of amino groups of the three polyamines. Put was the first to be separated, followed by Spd and Spm. The standard curve of Put exhibits y = 1.0885x − 4.0307, R2 = 0.9996, retention time 7.6 min, the range of concentration for Put standard curve was from 10 μM to 500 μM. The standard curve of Spd reveals y = 1.0721x − 1.0879, R2 = 0.9999, retention time 12 min, the range of concentration for Spd standard curve was from 200 μM to 2000 μM. The standard curve of Spm shows y = 0.8354x − 1.912, R2 = 0.9998, and retention time 15.1 min, the range of concentration for Spm standard curve was from 10 μM to 1000 μM.

2.5. Cotton Ovule Culture In Vitro

Cotton bolls were collected at 0 DPA, sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min, and then washed with sterile distilled water for 2–3 times [1]. The ovules were incubated in a dark environment at 30 °C in an artificial climate chamber for 2–7 days. Photographs were then taken with a high-definition camera and the length of the fibers on the surface of the ovule were measured. In order to observe the protuberances and elongation of fiber cells at very early developmental stages, cotton ovules were vacuum-fixed with 2.5% (V/V) glutaraldehyde at 2 DPA. The surface of the ovules was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of Hitachi (SU3500). The number of fiber protrusions on the ovules was measured at 2 DPA.

2.6. RNA-Sequencing and Analysis of DEG

The total RNA content of each sample was 3 μg, which was used as the input material for RNA sample preparation. The NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to generate the sequencing library and index code was added to the attribute sequence of each sample. TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to cluster the indicator coded samples on the cBot Cluster Generation System. To increase the mapping percentages of tag sequences, the reference database of the Gossypium_hirsutum_v2.1 (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/007/990/345/GCF_007990345.1_Gossypium_hirsutum_v2.1/, accessed on 1 October 2021) genome was used. Raw Illumina reads have been deposited into NCBI’s (accession number: GSE184985). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on DEG by GO seq R software package, and gene length deviation was corrected. The GO terms with a corrected p value less than 0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched in DEG. Statistical enrichment of DEG in KEGG pathway was determined using KEGG orthology-based labeling system software.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of GhADC2

As the success rate of transformation in tetraploid upland cotton (G. hirsutum) is more than diploid Asiatic cotton (G. arboreum), the allele of GaADC2 from tetraploid upland cotton was cloned, which may be defined as GhADC2 (Gene ID, Gh_A04G1054.1). The GhADC2 open reading frame sequence was obtained by PCR technology, with a total length of 2148 bp, encoding an ADC protein of 715 amino acids. GhADC2 (Gh_A04G1054.1) protein shares 99.16% and 65.36% identity with GaADC2 (Cotton_A_08902) and AtADC2 (At4G34710), respectively. GhADC2 protein had a molecular mass of 77.97 kDa and isoelectric point of 5.478. GhADC2 protein was predicted to be located in chloroplast, the same as AtADC2 subcellular location.
Analysis of GhADC2 amino acid sequence showed that the 132–406 position was an ADC conserved domain, which contained two typical characteristic motifs of the decarboxylase gene family (Figure 1a). Residues 158–176 are predicted to be a Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylasesfamily 2 pyridoxal-P attachment site, namely [FY]-[PA]-x-K-[SACV]-[NHCLFW]-x(4)-[LIVMF]-[LIVMTA]-x(2)-[LIVMA]-x(3)-[GTE]. Lysine (K) residues at position 161 may be PLP phosphate binding sites. Residues 339–352 are Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylases family 2 signature 2, the recognition signals of substrates in this family, namely [GSA]-x(2,6)-[LIVMSCP]-x-[N]-[LIVMF]-[DNS]-[LIVMCA]-G-G-G-[LIVMFY]-[GSTPCEQ], in which the three consecutive glycine residues from 348–350 was a specific substrate-binding region, which was a typical member of the type III PLP-dependent arginine decarboxylase family. The above domains and characteristics are crucial for the proper functioning of ADC protein, speculating that GhADC2 has ADC protein activity and function.

3.2. GhADC2 Expression up-Regulated in Elongating Fibers

The qRT-PCR expression analysis reveals the higher expression of GhADC2 especially at 1–5 DPA. As compared to the leaf, the expression of GhADC2 was greater in the root and the stem, whereas GhADC2 expression was significantly decreased in the leaf, flower, pistil, stamen, 15 d, 20 d, and 25 d of fiber (Figure 1c). In addition, GaADC2 showed similar expression patterns in different tissues and at different stages of fiber development in cotton G. arboreum (shixiya 1) (Figure 1b). The GaADC2 showed higher expression in elongating fibers of G. arboreum, especially significantly increased at 1–10 DPA and 5 d of fiber. Interestingly, the expression of GaADC2 was more in the stem as compared to the root and leaf. Moreover, GaADC2 expression was significantly decreased in the flower, pistil, stamen, 20 d, and 25 d of fiber. These results suggest that GaADC2 and GhADC2 were involved in cotton fiber elongation.

3.3. ADC-Mediated Polyamine Level Changed during Fiber Elongation

ADC is a key rate-limiting enzyme in the polyamine metabolic pathway. Put, Spd, and Spm are the three most abundant types of polyamines in plants. The content of polyamine was determined during cotton fiber elongation by high performance liquid chromatography. Put levels are up-regulated during fiber elongation in G. hirsutum (ZM24), especially at 1 DPA and 3 DPA, at which points, Put content was significantly increased (Figure 1d). By contrast, Spd levels exhibit dramatic change, it increased significantly at 1 DPA, whereas decreased significantly at 5 DPA and 10 DPA. At 10 DPA, the Spd level was reduced by 30.47% than that of 0 DPA (Figure 1e). In addition, Spm levels also showed significant variability as it revealed significant increment at 1 DPA and decreased at subsequent periods. At 10 DPA, the Spm level was reduced 11.67% as compared to 0 DPA (Figure 1f). Overall, the trends of up-regulated Put content and the expression pattern of GhADC2 are similar during fiber elongation, suggesting that ADC-mediated Put level is involved in fiber elongation.

3.4. Exogenous Application of Put Increased the Fiber Length

When the elongation rate of fiber cells is delayed, the fiber cells can not fully develop into cotton fibers, resulting in the decrease of lint index [29]. Exogenous polyamines, substrate of ADC (L-arginine) and specific Put biosynthesis inhibitor (D-arginine) were supplied into the culture medium; fiber elongation was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) after 2 d of culture (Figure 2a–c). Addition of 10 μmol/L polyamines or substrate of ADC (L-arginine) to the culture medium significantly stimulated fiber cell elongation, especially, the effect of Put on cotton fiber elongation was stronger than that of Spd or Spm. With the application of 10 μmol/L polyamine or L-arginine to the culture medium, no obvious change was observed in fiber density, except for significant decrease by application of 10 μmol/L specific Put biosynthesis inhibitor (D-arginine). After 7 d of culture, the contributory effect of Put on cotton fiber elongation is still obvious (Figure 2d). These results demonstrate that Put participates in regulating fiber cell elongation.

3.5. Transcriptome Analysis of Fiber Elongation with Put Application

To observe gene expression during fiber elongation with 10 μmol/L Put application, we conducted transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) on ovule samples after 2 d of culture in G. hirsutum (ZM24) using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform. The raw data was submitted to National Genomics Data Center (accession number: GSE184985). After filtering out the low quality tags, the total number of clean tags per library ranged from 38,983,794 to 44,697,902 are given in (Table 2). In total, 96.82% to 96.94% of the reads were successfully mapped to the released Gossypium_hirsutum_v2.1 whole genome sequence (Table 2). Of the mapped reads, between 91.68% and 92.00% could be uniquely mapped to the Gossypium_hirsutum_v2.1 genome (Table 2). Meanwhile, 93.41% to 93.59% of the Q30 sequence quality data was obtained, while 43.90% to 44.04% of the GC content range was calculated with an average of 43.96%, which indicated the reliability of RNA-seq data (Table 2).
The changes of gene expression levels after 2 days of Put treatment were shown by a heat map. In total, 3163 genes were detected as differentially expressed with Put treatment for 2 d (Figure 3a). Genes that have similar expression patterns are usually functionally related. To screen novel candidate genes with expression patterns that correlated with fiber elongation for Put treatment, the 3163 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were clustered into four sub-clusters based on the K-means method and hierarchical clustering, using MultiExperiment Viewer (MeV, v4.7.4) (Figure 3b). Similarly, based on their expression patterns, the genes identified as differentially expressed can be divided into two major groups. Type I, covering 1041 genes, included clusters 1 and 4, which were down-regulated in ovules with addition of 10 μmol/L Put after 2 d of culture; and Type II, involving 2122 genes, included clusters 2 and 3, which were up-regulated. The KEGG orthology based annotation system was used to analyze all of the DEG and determine the metabolic pathways by which they function. Based on our annotation of transcripts, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and fatty acid elongation pathways were up-regulated, whereas sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis, brassinosteroid biosynthesis, and MAPK signaling pathways down-regulated in ovule samples after 2 d of culture with Put treatment, indicating that they may exhibit crucial roles in cotton fiber initiation (Figure 3c). Next, GO enrichment analysis of the DEG was performed, and then identified 86 pathways. In the DEG, genes were enriched mainly in fatty acid biosynthetic process (GO:0006633), glucosyltransferase activity (GO:0046527), cell wall organization or biogenesis (GO:0071554), calcium ion binding (GO:0005509), lipid biosynthetic process (GO:0008610) (Figure 3d). Thus, these data indicate that the functional enrichment of biological pathways may participate in the Put-mediated signal transduction.

3.6. QRT-PCR Expression Pattern Validation

We selected genes with different expression levels and function assignment for qRT-PCR to verify the gene expression analysis results obtained from RNA-Seq data. Among upregulated genes, we noticed several TFs (such as WRKY1, MYB109, and TCP14) have been reported to be involved in regulating cotton fiber development and genes related to biosynthesis of saturated long-chain fatty acids, ATP synthase subunit, peroxidase, and steroid 5-α-reductase (Figure 4a). qRT-PCR analysis showed that cotton fiber elongation promoted by exogenous Put addition was accompanied by expression activation of several genes including Chitinase 10, GASL4 and KCS6 (Figure 4b).

4. Discussion

Put plays a fundamental role in the functioning of all cells [30]. Previous studies focused on the important role of Put in regulating plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Application of Put enhances the salt tolerance ability, accompanied by adaptation of activities of antioxidant enzymes and the level of H2O2 in Korean ginseng sprouts [31]. Studies in recent years have shown that Put enhances the disease resistance of plants in defending against pathogen infection. In Arabidopsis thaliana whole-plant extracts and apoplastic fluids, salicylic acid, the essential plant hormone responsible for host plants’ resistance to pathogen infection, significantly regulates the accumulation of Put and the induction of ADC2 [32]. Here, this study suggests that Put also plays an important positive role in the regulation of cotton fiber cell elongation. Addition of 10 μmol/L Put to the culture medium significantly stimulated cotton fiber cell elongation.
Compared with diploid Asiatic cotton (G. arboreum), tetraploid upland cotton (G. hirsutum) is a more mature receptor for studying genetic transformation of cotton; therefore, this study focused on the GhADC2 gene of tetraploid upland cotton. Genome-wide transcriptome profiling of fiber elongation with exogenous Put addition, 3163 DEG were detected, including many fiber elongation-related genes. Ethylene and very long chain fatty acids (such as KCS6) have been reported to stimulate fiber cell elongation [33]. ATP promotes cotton fiber cell elongation, both 1 μmol/L of L-(2-aminoethoxyvinyl)-glycine and 2 μmol/L of acetochlor (2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methyl-phenyl)-acetamide reduced fiber length, and application of an ATP biosynthesis inhibitor (oligomycin) significantly inhibited fiber cell elongation, while exogenous addition of 0.1 μmol/L of ethylene or 5 μmol/L of C24:0 effectively negated inhibition of fiber elongation by oligomycin [34]. Cotton GASL genes encoding putative gibberellin-regulated proteins [35], Heat Shock proteins Hsp90 [36], WRKY transcription factor protein 1 [37], transcription factor TCP14 [38], fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 2 [39], DET2 (a steroid 5a-reductase) [40], receptor-like protein kinase [37], the R2R3 MYB transcription factor [41] are involved in fiber elongation.
In summary, ADC and Put are involved in fiber development of G. hirsutum cotton. Expression pattern of GhADC2 and levels of polyamine are correlated with fiber elongation, especially, the amount of Put. Moreover, exogenous addition of an ADC substrate or Put increased the fiber length. Further, 3163 DEG were detected in genome-wide transcriptome profiling of fiber elongation with exogenous Put addition, including fiber elongation-related genes transcription Factor MYB109, WRKY1, and TCP14.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M. and R.X.; validation, H.M. and G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, H.M. and G.R.; visualization, H.M. and R.X.; funding acquisition, H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31901579) and The APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31901579).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31901579).

Conflicts of Interest

These authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, N.-N.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lu, R.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Li, X.-B. Phosphorylation of WRKY16 by MPK3-1 is essential for its transcriptional activity during fiber initiation and elongation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Cell 2021, 33, 2736–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haigler, C.H.; Betancur, L.; Stiff, M.R.; Tuttle, J.R. Cotton fiber: A powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Walters, D. Polyamines in plant–microbe interactions. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 57, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Senthil, K.; Wasnik, N.G.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yang, D.-C. Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from leaf and root of Withania somnifera (Ashwgandha). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marzban, M.; Farahani, F.; Atyabi, S.M.; Noormohammadi, Z. Induced genetic and chemical changes in medicinally important plant Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don: Cold plasma and phytohormones. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 49, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zakaria, M.M.; Stegemann, T.; Sievert, C.; Kruse, L.H.; Kaltenegger, E.; Girreser, U.; Çiçek, S.S.; Nimtz, M.; Ober, D. Insights into polyamine metabolism: Homospermidine is double-oxidized in two discrete steps by a single copper-containing amine oxidase in pyrrolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2022, koac068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tran, P.V.; Nguyen, L.T.; Yang, H.; Do, P.H.; Torii, K.; Putnam, G.L.; Chowdhury, V.S.; Furuse, M. Intracerebroventricular injection of L-arginine and D-arginine induces different effects under an acute stressful condition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 533, 965–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, J.; Cheng, F.; Huang, Y.; Bie, Z. Grafting Watermelon Onto Pumpkin Increases Chilling Tolerance by Up Regulating Arginine Decarboxylase to Increase Putrescine Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 812396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kou, S.; Chen, L.; Tu, W.; Scossa, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Fernie, A.R.; Song, B.; Xie, C. The arginine decarboxylase geneADC1, associated to the putrescine pathway, plays an important role in potato cold-acclimated freezing tolerance as revealed by transcriptome and metabolome analyses. Plant J. 2018, 96, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kim, D.W.; Watanabe, K.; Murayama, C.; Izawa, S.; Niitsu, M.; Michael, A.J.; Berberich, T.; Kusano, T. Polyamine Oxidase5 Regulates Arabidopsis Growth through Thermospermine Oxidase Activity. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1575–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Imamura, T.; Fujita, K.; Tasaki, K.; Higuchi, A.; Takahashi, H. Characterization of spermidine synthase and spermine synthase–The polyamine-synthetic enzymes that induce early flowering in Gentiana triflora. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Takahashi, Y.; Uemura, T.; Teshima, Y. Polyamine oxidase 2 is involved in regulating excess spermidine contents during seed germination and early seedling development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 1248–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, W.; Tu, L.; Yang, X.; Tan, J.; Deng, F.; Hao, J.; Guo, K.; Lindsey, K.; Zhang, X. The calcium sensor G h C a M 7 promotes cotton fiber elongation by modulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, F.; Jin, X.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Wu, S.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, T.; Guo, W. A Cotton Annexin Affects Fiber Elongation and Secondary Cell Wall Biosynthesis Associated with Ca2+ Influx, ROS Homeostasis, and Actin Filament Reorganization. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1750–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Isabel, C.-M.A.; Ignacio, J.-R.F.; Margarita, R.-K.; Gill, S.S.; Alicia, B.-F.; Francisco, J.-B.J. Down-regulation of arginine decarboxylase gene-expression results in reactive oxygen species accumulation in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 506, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, S.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Yoo, S.-J.; Min, K.-H.; Nam, S.-H.; Cho, B.H.; Yang, K.-Y. Putrescine regulating by stress-responsive MAPK cascade contributes to bacterial pathogen defense in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 437, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Song, J.; Zhou, C.; Liu, R.; Wu, X.; Wu, D.; Hu, X.; Ding, Y. Expression and purification of recombinant arginine decarboxylase (speA) from Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 1823–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mo, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Z. Cotton polyamine oxidase is required for spermine and camalexin signalling in the defence response to Verticillium dahliae. Plant J. 2015, 83, 962–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Maruri-López, I.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F. Hetero- and homodimerization of Arabidopsis thaliana arginine decarboxylase AtADC1 and AtADC2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 484, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rossi, F.; Marina, M.; Pieckenstain, F.L. Role of Arginine decarboxylase (ADC) in Arabidopsis thalianadefence against the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas viridiflava. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hummel, I.; Bourdais, G.; Gouesbet, G.; Couée, I.; Malmberg, R.L.; El Amrani, A. Differential gene expression of ARGININE DECARBOXYLASE ADC1 and ADC2 in Arabidopsis thaliana: Characterization of transcriptional regulation during seed germination and seedling development. New Phytol. 2004, 163, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhu, X.F.; Wang, B.; Song, W.F.; Zheng, S.J.; Shen, R.F. Putrescine Alleviates Iron Deficiency via NO-Dependent Reutilization of Root Cell-Wall Fe in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Urano, K.; Yoshiba, Y.; Nanjo, T.; Ito, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis stress-inducible gene for arginine decarboxylase AtADC2 is required for accumulation of putrescine in salt tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 313, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mo, H.; Wang, L.; Ma, S.; Yu, D.; Lu, L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, F. Transcriptome profiling of Gossypium arboreum during fiber initiation and the genome-wide identification of trihelix transcription factors. Gene 2019, 709, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Z.; Ge, X.; Yang, Z.; Qin, W.; Sun, G.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations in upland cotton cultivars. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mitchell, A.; Chang, H.Y.; Daugherty, L.; Fraser, M.; Hunter, S.; López, R.; McAnulla, C.; McMenamin, C.; Nuka, G.; Pesseat, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families database: The classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D213–D221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, W.; Gao, Z.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Lv, M.; Wang, J.; Luo, M.; Zuo, K. Cotton fiber elongation requires the transcription factor Gh MYB 212 to regulate sucrose transportation into expanding fibers. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 864–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tian, X.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Duan, H.; Tong, J.; He, X.; Gu, W.; Ma, H.; Xiao, L. Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of cold-tolerant and -sensitive spring soybean cultivars. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 42, 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Islam, J.; Ryu, B.; Azad, O.K.; Rahman, H.; Rana, S.; Lim, J.-D.; Lim, Y.-S. Exogenous Putrescine Enhances Salt Tolerance and Ginsenosides Content in Korean Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) Sprouts. Plants 2021, 10, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rossi, F.R.; Gárriz, A.; Marina, M.; Pieckenstain, F.L. Modulation of polyamine metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana by salicylic acid. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 843–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Qin, Y.-M.; Zhu, Y.-X. How cotton fibers elongate: A tale of linear cell-growth mode. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. He, P.; Xiao, G.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.; Tang, M.; Huang, S.; An, Y.; Yu, J. Two pivotal RNA editing sites in the mitochondrial atp1 mRNA are required for ATP synthase to produce sufficient ATP for cotton fiber cell elongation. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, Z.-H.; Zhu, L.; Shi, H.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.-M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, X.-B. Cotton GASL genes encoding putative gibberellin-regulated proteins are involved in response to GA signaling in fiber development. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 4561–4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sable, A.; Rai, K.M.; Choudhary, A.; Yadav, V.K.; Agarwal, S.K.; Sawant, S.V. Inhibition of Heat Shock proteins HSP90 and HSP70 induce oxidative stress, suppressing cotton fiber development. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hande, A.S.; Katageri, I.S.; Jadhav, M.P.; Adiger, S.; Gamanagatti, S.; Padmalatha, K.V.; Dhandapani, G.; Kanakachari, M.; Kumar, P.A.; Reddy, V.S. Transcript profiling of genes expressed during fibre development in diploid cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, M.-Y.; Zhao, P.-M.; Cheng, H.-Q.; Han, L.-B.; Wu, X.-M.; Gao, P.; Wang, H.-Y.; Yang, C.-L.; Zhong, N.-Q.; Zuo, J.-R.; et al. The Cotton Transcription Factor TCP14 Functions in Auxin-Mediated Epidermal Cell Differentiation and Elongation. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1669–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Huang, G.-Q.; Xu, W.-L.; Gong, S.-Y.; Li, B.; Wang, X.-L.; Xu, D.; Li, X.-B. Characterization of 19 novel cottonFLAgenes and their expression profiling in fiber development and in response to phytohormones and salt stress. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 134, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, M.; Xiao, Y.; Li, X.; Lu, X.; Deng, W.; Li, D.; Hou, L.; Hu, M.; Li, Y.; Pei, Y. GhDET2, a steroid 5α-reductase, plays an important role in cotton fiber cell initiation and elongation. Plant J. 2007, 51, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, F.; Liu, X.; Zuo, K.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a novel SANT/MYB gene from Gossypium barbadense. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 2329–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 13 00784 g001 550
Figure 1. Spatiotemporal expression of ADC2 and polyamine content in cotton fiber elongation. (a) Multiple sequence alignment of GhADC2 and homologous proteins. The red underline is the Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylasesfamily 2 pyridoxal-P attachment site. The black underline is the substrate recognition signal Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylases family 2 signature 2. (b,c) Spatiotemporal expression of GaADC2 and GhADC2 in G. arboreum (b) and G. hirsutum (c), respectively. D, days post-anthesis. F, days of fiber. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (d) Put content analysis. (e) Spd content analysis. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (f) Spm content analysis. FW, fresh weight. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference compared with that of the control 0 DPA (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Spatiotemporal expression of ADC2 and polyamine content in cotton fiber elongation. (a) Multiple sequence alignment of GhADC2 and homologous proteins. The red underline is the Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylasesfamily 2 pyridoxal-P attachment site. The black underline is the substrate recognition signal Orn/DAP/Arg decarboxylases family 2 signature 2. (b,c) Spatiotemporal expression of GaADC2 and GhADC2 in G. arboreum (b) and G. hirsutum (c), respectively. D, days post-anthesis. F, days of fiber. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (d) Put content analysis. (e) Spd content analysis. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (f) Spm content analysis. FW, fresh weight. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference compared with that of the control 0 DPA (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.001).
Genes 13 00784 g001
Genes 13 00784 g002 550
Figure 2. Polyamine (PA) promotes fiber cell elongation. (a) Scanning electronic micrographs of ovule surface with addition of 10 μmol/L polyamines, substrate of ADC (L-arginine), or specific Put biosynthesis inhibitor (D-arginine) after 2 d of culture. CK is water control. Bar = 50 μm. (b,c) Fiber relative density and length with addition of polyamines, L-arginine, or D-arginine. CK is water control. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). (d) Photograph of cotton ovules cultured in vitro for 7 d. The first row is application of 10 μmol/L PBS, L-arginine and Put; second is Spd, Spm, and D-arginine from left to right. Bar = 0.5 cm.
Figure 2. Polyamine (PA) promotes fiber cell elongation. (a) Scanning electronic micrographs of ovule surface with addition of 10 μmol/L polyamines, substrate of ADC (L-arginine), or specific Put biosynthesis inhibitor (D-arginine) after 2 d of culture. CK is water control. Bar = 50 μm. (b,c) Fiber relative density and length with addition of polyamines, L-arginine, or D-arginine. CK is water control. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). (d) Photograph of cotton ovules cultured in vitro for 7 d. The first row is application of 10 μmol/L PBS, L-arginine and Put; second is Spd, Spm, and D-arginine from left to right. Bar = 0.5 cm.
Genes 13 00784 g002
Genes 13 00784 g003 550
Figure 3. DEG analysis. (a) Overall cluster analysis of DEG. FPKM (fragments per kilo base of transcript per million base pairs sequenced) was used to estimate the level of gene expression. The color change from red (highly expressed) to green (low expression) represents the relative expression level value log2 (ratios). (b) The H_cluster analysis of DEG resulted in their categorization into four expression pattern types. Each profile presents a gene expression trend. The mean expression levels of all genes in each of the four categories (blue line) are displayed relative to a log2 ratio of 0 (red line). (c) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis of the DEG genes with Put treatment for 2 d then water control. (d) GO category enrichment of up-regulated and down-regulated DEG between the Put treatment and water control. The number of genes in each category is equal to the dot size. The dot color represents the q-value.
Figure 3. DEG analysis. (a) Overall cluster analysis of DEG. FPKM (fragments per kilo base of transcript per million base pairs sequenced) was used to estimate the level of gene expression. The color change from red (highly expressed) to green (low expression) represents the relative expression level value log2 (ratios). (b) The H_cluster analysis of DEG resulted in their categorization into four expression pattern types. Each profile presents a gene expression trend. The mean expression levels of all genes in each of the four categories (blue line) are displayed relative to a log2 ratio of 0 (red line). (c) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis of the DEG genes with Put treatment for 2 d then water control. (d) GO category enrichment of up-regulated and down-regulated DEG between the Put treatment and water control. The number of genes in each category is equal to the dot size. The dot color represents the q-value.
Genes 13 00784 g003
Genes 13 00784 g004 550
Figure 4. Put regulates the expression of fiber elongation-related genes. (a) Transcriptome analysis of DEG in fibers with addition of 10 μmol/L of Put. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of genes related to cotton fiber development in 2 DPA fibers of Put treatment. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). KCS6 (Gene ID, Gh_D02G1726.1), GASL4 (Gene ID, Gh_D04G0443.1), Hsp90 (Gene ID, Gh_D12G2436.1), WRKY1 (Gene ID, Gh_A05G3199.1), TCP14 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G0333.1), FLA2 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G3503.1), DET2 (Gene ID, Gh_D04G1238.1), RLK (Gene ID, Gh_D05G1151.1), MYB109 (Gene ID, Gh_A05G3123.1), Chitinase 10 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G1103.1).
Figure 4. Put regulates the expression of fiber elongation-related genes. (a) Transcriptome analysis of DEG in fibers with addition of 10 μmol/L of Put. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of genes related to cotton fiber development in 2 DPA fibers of Put treatment. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference in transcript abundance compared with the control (ANOVA, Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). KCS6 (Gene ID, Gh_D02G1726.1), GASL4 (Gene ID, Gh_D04G0443.1), Hsp90 (Gene ID, Gh_D12G2436.1), WRKY1 (Gene ID, Gh_A05G3199.1), TCP14 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G0333.1), FLA2 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G3503.1), DET2 (Gene ID, Gh_D04G1238.1), RLK (Gene ID, Gh_D05G1151.1), MYB109 (Gene ID, Gh_A05G3123.1), Chitinase 10 (Gene ID, Gh_D11G1103.1).
Genes 13 00784 g004
Table
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Primer NameForward and Reverse Primers (5’-3’)Gene ID
GhUBQ7 FWGAAGGCATTCCACCTGACCAACDQ116441
GhUBQ7 RVCTTGACCTTCTTCTTCTTGTGCTTG
GhADC2 FWTTACGACGGTTCAAAATCTGGh_A04G1054.1
GhADC2 RVGCTCTCCCACTCTCGCTACA
GaADC2 FWGTTCTCAAATCCCTTCCACGCotton_A_08902
GaADC2 RVGCTCTCCCACTTTCGCTACA
KCS6 FWCTCCTGCTATTCATTACATCCCGh_D02G1726.1
KCS6 RVAGGTTTCAGCCCCGTTTT
GASL4 FWCTTGTGGCTGCTTTCTTCTTGGh_D04G0443.1
GASL4 RVACATTGGTAACTCTTGAGGCTTC
Hsp90 FWGTGGTATTGGGATGACTAAAGCGh_D12G2436.1
Hsp90 RVGGTGACCGTGAAAGAGCC
WRKY1 FWGGCAGATTCGGTGAGCAGGh_A05G3199.1
WRKY1 RVTCAGGAGAGCAAGTGGGC
TCP14 FWAGGAAACGAAGACCCGAACGh_D11G0333.1
TCP14 RVCCGCTACTGCTTGAACCC
FLA2 FWCCAAGCATTACTCCCTCTACAC Gh_D11G3503.1
FLA2 RVAACCCAACTTTTCCGCCT
DET2 FWGCCAACATTTCTACAACCCTAAGh_D04G1238.1
DET2 RVCATTCACCCACATACCAACTACA
RLK FWCCTCCACTCTCCTTGCCGGh_D05G1151.1
RLK RVCGACCGCCCTCACCTAAA
MYB109 FWAGGGATTATGGGCAATGGAGGh_A05G3123.1
MYB109 RVTTCAAACCTGTTCTGTTGGCTAT
Chitinase 10 FWGAAGAGCCCCTCCGTCCAGh_D11G1103.1
Chitinase 10 RVGCACAAGCCCCAAGCGTAT
Table
Table 2. RNA-seq mapping and QC data.
Table 2. RNA-seq mapping and QC data.
SampleTotal_ReadsTotal_MapUnique_MapQ30GC_pct
CK143,969,37042,606,649(96.9%)40,361,736(91.8%)93.543.9
CK244,697,90243,309,165(96.89%)41,031,266(91.8%)93.4443.9
CK344,061,22442,659,853(96.82%)40,396,630(91.68%)93.4143.97
Put142,464,19841,119,927(96.83%)38,973,126(91.78%)93.4244.04
Put238,983,79437,788,560(96.93%)35,866,850(92.0%)93.5944.01
Put339,482,91238,276,222(96.94%)36,325,782(92.0%)93.4243.93
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, G.; Mo, H.; Xu, R. Arginine Decarboxylase Gene ADC2 Regulates Fiber Elongation in Cotton. Genes 2022, 13, 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050784

AMA Style

Ren G, Mo H, Xu R. Arginine Decarboxylase Gene ADC2 Regulates Fiber Elongation in Cotton. Genes. 2022; 13(5):784. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050784

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Guangming, Huijuan Mo, and Ruqiang Xu. 2022. "Arginine Decarboxylase Gene ADC2 Regulates Fiber Elongation in Cotton" Genes 13, no. 5: 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050784

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop