Next Article in Journal
Identification and Expression of SAUR Genes in the CAM Plant Agave
Next Article in Special Issue
HiCNN2: Enhancing the Resolution of Hi-C Data Using an Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks
Previous Article in Journal
A Guide on Deep Learning for Complex Trait Genomic Prediction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computational Processing and Quality Control of Hi-C, Capture Hi-C and Capture-C Data
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Chromatin Interaction Analysis with Updated ChIA-PET Tool (V3)

by Guoliang Li *, Tongkai Sun, Huidan Chang, Liuyang Cai, Ping Hong and Qiangwei Zhou
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 23 June 2019 / Revised: 16 July 2019 / Accepted: 16 July 2019 / Published: 22 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Genomics)

Round  1

The very initial submission was withdrawn; the current round was started with previous comments and reply provided to previous reviewers.  


Reviewer 1 Report

1. With the addition of section 2.2, the description of the updates in ChIA-PET tool V3 is now sufficient. I must add, however, that the extent of the update in ChIA-PET Tool V3 (relative to previous versions) is not substantial, and largely involves re-implementation of code to increase computational speed/efficiency and user-friendliness. 

2. The authors have NOT sufficiently answered my concerns regarding the description of how the significant interactions are identified, as they have not updated the manuscript with more information on this.

     The included figure does clearly show that the genomic distances of the interactions specific to ChIA-PET Tool V3 (red) are shorter in genomic length. This fact should be mentioned in the manuscript, since this is relevant information for potential users of the tool. I was also puzzled by the small peak at log10(distance)>9. This means that ChIA-PET tool V3 reports interactions between anchors that are > 1 billion basepairs from each other. Surely, these must be artifacts.

3. This is now ok.

4. As mentioned in point 2 above, I suggest adding this information to the manuscript. This is important information for potential users of the tool.

5. I have tried running both the short- and long read test data using the commands provided on the GitHub.

    In both cases, I get the following error:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException

at process.Path.setParameter(Path.java:99)

at process.Main.main(Main.java:52)

    I therefore still have not managed to run the software successfully. 


Author Response

We are thankful for the reviewer’s comments. Please find our reply in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx


Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addressed the comments well.

Author Response

We are thankful for the reviewer’s comments.

Back to TopTop