Next Article in Journal
Attempts at the Characterization of In-Cell Biophysical Processes Non-Invasively—Quantitative NMR Diffusometry of a Model Cellular System
Next Article in Special Issue
Functional, Metabolic and Morphologic Results of Ex Vivo Donor Lung Perfusion with a Perfluorocarbon-Based Oxygen Carrier Nanoemulsion in a Large Animal Transplantation Model
Previous Article in Journal
NIR-Triggered Hyperthermal Effect of Polythiophene Nanoparticles Synthesized by Surfactant-Free Oxidative Polymerization Method on Colorectal Carcinoma Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/cells9092123
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Human Amnion Epithelial Cells Impair T Cell Proliferation: The Role of HLA-G and HLA-E Molecules

by
Fabio Morandi
1,*,
Danilo Marimpietri
1,
Andre Görgens
2,3,
Alessia Gallo
4,
Raghuraman Chittor Srinivasan
5,†,
Samir El-Andaloussi
2 and
Roberto Gramignoli
5,*
1
Stem Cell Laboratory and Cell Therapy Center, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gaslini5, 16147 Genova, Italy
2
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Biomolecular and Cellular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14157 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
4
Department of Research, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Via E.Tricomi 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy
5
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Alle 8, Huddinge SE-141 83, 14157 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Longboat Amniotics, 22363 Lund, Sweden.
Cells 2020, 9(9), 2123; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092123
Submission received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 1 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 19 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immuno-Pathology in Organ and Cell Transplantation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The immunoprivilege status characteristic of human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs) has been recently highlighted in the context of xenogenic transplantation. However, the mechanism(s) involved in such regulatory functions have been so far only partially been clarified. Here, we have analyzed the expression of HLA-Ib molecules in isolated hAEC obtained from full term placentae. Moreover, we asked whether these molecules are involved in the immunoregulatory functions of hAEC. Human amnion-derived cells expressed surface HLA-G and HLA-F at high levels, whereas the commonly expressed HLA-E molecule has been measured at a very low level or null on freshly isolated cells. HLA-Ib molecules can be expressed as membrane-bound and soluble forms, and in all hAEC batches analyzed we measured high levels of sHLA-G and sHLA-E when hAEC were maintained in culture, and such a release was time-dependent. Moreover, HLA-G was present in extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by hAEC. hAEC suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro at different hAEC:T cell ratios, as previously reported. Moreover, inhibition of T cell proliferation was partially reverted by pretreating hAEC with anti-HLA-G, anti-HLA-E and anti-β2 microglobulin, thus suggesting that HLA-G and -E molecules are involved in hAEC-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation. Finally, either large-size EV (lsEV) or small-size EV (ssEV) derived from hAEC significantly modulated T-cell proliferation. In conclusion, we have here characterized one of the mechanism(s) underlying immunomodulatory functions of hAEC, related to the expression and release of HLA-Ib molecules.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The human placenta is a complex organ, whose role in regenerative medicine applications have been largely proposed and is gaining interest worldwide. Placenta tissue is composed of both maternal and fetal tissues, with the latest as a source of multipotent stem cells successfully employed in innovative biomedical approaches [1]. The fetal membrane in direct contact with the fetus (amnion membrane) is composed of cuboidal epithelial cells firmly adherent to a thick basement membrane, and an abundant extracellular matrix with intersperse fibroblast-like cells.
Human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs) can be released from the amnion membrane and depicted by epithelial characteristics and membrane antigens. While expressing high levels of classic epithelial adhesion molecules, such as EpCAM (CD326) or integrin subunits (including CD29 and CD49f), hAEC tested negative for stromal cell markers [1,2]. Distinctive is the surface expression of embryonic stem cell markers, such as globoseries glycolipids (SSEA-3 and -4) and keratansulfate associated antigens (TRA 1-60 and 1-81) in hAEC [3,4,5]. AECs have been proved safe and non-tumorigenic upon transplantation, with a normal karyotype, lack of telomerase and limited growing potential in culture [5,6]. These features differentiate hAECs from pluripotent stem cells and support their use in cell-based therapies. As a result, recent studies have reported on the therapeutic potential of amnion-derived cells. Amnion epithelial cells have shown efficacy in different clinical and preclinical trials, representing a promising therapeutic approach in life-threatening models of inborn error of diseases and respiratory distress [7,8,9,10,11].
Amnion-derived epithelial cells display a characteristic expression of the non-canonical HLA class Ib molecule HLA-G, along with a low expression of HLA class Ia molecules, and deprival of HLA class II molecules [12,13,14,15]. These properties represent a physiological immunomodulatory mechanism characteristic of resident cells at the fetal–maternal interface.
HLA-G has been originally described as an important tolerogenic molecule expressed by cytotrophoblast cells at the maternal/fetal interface, to prevent immune recognition of (semi) allogeneic fetal tissue by maternal immune cells [16]. HLA-G belongs to ‘‘non-canonical” HLA-class Ib molecules, along with HLA-E, -F and -H [17]. In contrast to highly polymorphic HLA-class Ia molecules (HLA-A, -B and -C), HLA-Ib molecules display a scarce polymorphism, with a small number of alleles encoding a limited number of proteins, conveying immune responses in both physiological and pathological conditions [18]. HLA-G has been identified on mature human epithelial cells [19,20,21], including umbilical cord lining epithelial cells [22] and amnion/chorion epithelial and stromal cells [12,13,14,23,24,25], and its expression can be modulated in pathological settings [23,26,27]. HLA-G restraining effect may modulate the recipient immune response and induce tolerance to the host graft, as a therapeutic agent in (tissue or cell) transplantation [25]. The HLA-G molecule can be present in seven isoforms, four membrane-bound (m) isoforms (mHLA-G: HLA-G1, -G2, -G3 and -G4) and three soluble (s) isoforms (sHLA-G: HLA-G5, -G6 and -G7). In addition, sHLA-G1 is generated by shedding of the membrane-bound HLA-G1 isoform through metalloproteases-mediated cleavage [28]. HLA-G1/G5 isoforms are the most expressed and the most relevant in relation to immunomodulatory functions [29]. Both forms have been described as disulfide-linked dimers, which are more biologically active than monomers [30].
The constitutive presence of mHLA-G on the full-term amnion membrane and isolated hAEC has been shown [13], even after cryogenic preservation [12,23]. Conversely, to the best of our knowledge, no previous report described expression of HLA-E and HLA-F on hAEC. The HLA-E gene is expressed by all nucleated cells. However, HLA-E expression on the cell surface reflects cell activation and is in relation with interaction molecules as β2 microglobulin or nonapeptides derived from other HLA-I molecules, or viruses and other pathogens [31]. HLA-E may interact with the CD94/NKG2A inhibitory receptor, triggering immunosuppressive signals to NK and CD8 T cells, or with the activating CD94/NKG2C receptor, the hinge on the peptide bound to the HLA-E molecule [32]. Similarly, HLA-F surface expression is also triggered by cell activation, while gene expression is normally detected within cells. The HLA-F molecule can be expressed either associated with β2 microglobulin and peptides or as an open conformer (represented by heavy chain alone). These two different forms can bind to different receptors, triggering activating or inhibitory signals [33].
Few studies have previously described hAEC functions in relation to the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) [34,35,36]. EV include microvesicles, exosomes and apoptotic bodies [37]. Microvesicles differ from exosomes in diameter (range 50–1000 nm and 40–120 nm, respectively) and genesis. Indeed, exosomes originate through an endocytic pathway, while microvesicles are released from the plasma membrane of activated or neoplastic cells. Among other surface molecules, microvesicles express integrins, selectins, CD40 or CD81, and are involved in intercellular communications, being captured by target cells through endocytosis, receptor-mediated endocytosis or fusion with the plasma membrane [38,39]. We have previously described that EVs released by tumor cells may carry some immunomodulatory molecules (i.e., adenosinergic ectoenzymes), contributing to the inhibition of the host antitumor immune response [40,41]. Moreover, several studies reported the role of HLA-G-bearing EV in modulation of an immune response in normal pregnancy or neoplastic context [42].
With such premises, the aim of our study was to assess whether HLA-Ib molecules (in particular HLA-G and HLA-E) are expressed and released by hAEC and may play a role in their immunomodulatory functions. Furthermore, we characterized the expression of HLA molecules on large-size (ls) and small-size (ss) EV derived from primary hAEC. Finally, the contribution of hAEC-derived ssEV and lsEV was assessed in relation to the modulation of the immune response.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Preparations

Full term placentae from uncomplicated caesarean sections at a gestational age of 37–42 weeks were obtained from Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) with Institutional Review Board approval. Isolation of hAEC was performed as previously described [1]. Briefly, the amnion membrane was surgically removed from the placenta surface and washed to remove blood cells. Epithelial cells were released by TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) digestion (30 min) and immediately cryopreserved in Belzer solution supplemented with 10% dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and stored in liquid nitrogen vapors. The cell viability range was 90–97% after isolation and 85–94% after cryopreservation, as assessed by the Trypan Blue exclusion test.
Peripheral blood samples were obtained from normal donors afferent at Blood Bank of Istituto Giannina Gaslini (Genoa, Italy). CD4+ T cells were isolated by incubating whole blood samples with RosetteSepTM Human CD4+ T cells enrichment cocktail (StemCell Technologies, Cambridge, UK) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Unmanipulated CD4+ T cells were successfully obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma) density gradient centrifugation.

2.2. Cell Culture

One week before experiments, one vial of frozen hAEC was thawed and 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded in gelatin-coated plates. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2:95% air in the D-MEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM non-essential amino acids, 4 mM L-glutamine, 55 µM2β-mercaptoethanol (all from Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 ng/mL recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF, Immunotools). Every two days, the medium was removed and fresh medium added. After 6 days of culture, hAEC were used for the experiments described below. For cell suspension experimental settings, hAEC were detached using Tripsin 0.05%/EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.3. Isolation of EV from hAEC

EVs were isolated from preconditioned supernatants obtained from different batches of hAEC, cultured as described above. EV were prepared by using two different approaches: to enrich lsEV, supernatants were collected after an additional 72 h of culture in D-MEM medium described above, supplemented with 10% EV-depleted fetal bovine serum. Supernatants were subjected to a differential centrifugation protocol as previously described [43]. Briefly, supernatants (10 mL) were centrifuged (3000× g for 15 min at 4 °C) to pellet large cell debris. The supernatant was collected in a suitable centrifugation tube and centrifuged (20,000× g for 1 h at 4 °C) in a fixed-angle rotor, washed once in PBS and resuspended in 50 µL of binding buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA; all purchased from Sigma Aldrich). lsEV size and polydispersity were analyzed using the Zetasizer Nano ZS90 particle sizer at a 90° fixed angle (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK), as previously described [44]. In some experiments, lsEV were isolated using a well-defined ultrafiltration/TFF method [45]. In those samples, particle size and concentration were determined via a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) using NanoSight NS500 equipped with NTA 2.3 analytical software and a 488 nm laser, as previously described [45].
Small size EV were isolated from 10 mL of hAEC supernatant mixed with ExoQuick solutions and ExoQuick-TC™ polymers (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cell supernatants were centrifuged at 3000× g for 15 min to remove cells and cell debris. The supernatant was transferred to sterile vessels and mixed with ExoQuick solution/polymers, vortexed and stored at 4 °C for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged at 1500× g for 30 min at room temperature and the pellet suspended in nuclease-free water. For HLA-G staining ssEV were analyzed by flow cytometry after vesicle adsorption onto latex beads as previously reported [44].
hAEC-derived EV preparations were suspended in 100 µL of binding buffer or culture medium for subsequent experiments.

2.4. Inhibition of EV Release

In some experiments, hAEC were treated with the following inhibitors (all purchased from Sigma Aldrich): Manumycin A (10 µM) and GW4869 (1 µM, inhibitors of ssEV release) or D-Pantethine (1 mM, inhibitor of lsEV release). Cells were cultured in D-MEM medium described above, supplemented with 10% EV-depleted fetal bovine serum for additional 48 h in the presence of inhibitors before being detached and used for the cell proliferation assay. Supernatant was collected and subjected to 0.8 µM filtration (to remove cell debris) before being subjected to ultracentrifugation for EV isolation. To confirm inhibition of EV release, lsEV and ssEV concentration was analyzed using Zetasizer Nano ZS90, as described above.

2.5. Flow Cytometry

The presence of immunomodulatory molecules was detected on hAEC intact cells and hAEC-derived EV using the following monoclonal antibodies: FITC-conjugated anti-HLA-G (clone: MEM-G/9, Exbio), PE-conjugated anti-HLA-F (clone: 3D11, Biolegend) and purified anti-HLA-E (clone: MEM-E/02, Exbio). PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 (Beckman Coulter) was used as a secondary reagent for anti-HLA-E mAb.
Cells were run on a Gallios cytometer and analyzed using Kaluza software version 1.1.11052.10190 (built on 7/9/2010, Beckman Coulter). Data are presented as the percentage of positive cells or the mean relative of fluorescence intensity (MRFI, for cells and EV), obtained as follows: mean fluorescence obtained with specific mAb normalized to mean fluorescence obtained with irrelevant isotype-matched mAb.
The multiplex-bead based analysis of surface markers was performed on ssEV using the MACSPlex Exosome kit (MiltenyiBiotec) by using allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated pan-tetraspaninantibodies included in the kit for detection (CD9/CD63/CD81), as previously described [46]. In brief, ssEV were incubated with capture beads (input dose: 1 × 109 EVs as estimated by NTA, diluted to a total volume of 120 µL with PBS), incubated overnight at room temperature for the capture step, and subsequently incubated with a mixture of pan-tetraspanin antibodies for 1 h followed by washing. The samples were analyzed with a MACSQuant Analyzer 10 flow cytometer (MiltenyiBiotec). Data are presented following the background subtraction of the median APC fluorescence intensity (MedFI) values for each bead population, i.e., values obtained for non-EV containing controls (beads + antibodies) were subtracted from sample values (beads + EVs + antibodies) for each bead population.

2.6. ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) specific for soluble HLA-G1/G5, HLA-G5 and HLA-E was performed as previously described [47]. Briefly, MaxiSorp Nunc-Immuno 96 microwell plates (Nunc A/S) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 1 µg/mL of MEM-G9 monoclonal antibody (specifically for sHLA-G1/G5; Exbio), 5A6G7 monoclonal antibody (specific for HLA-G5; Exbio) or 3D12 monoclonal antibody (specific for HLA-E; eBioscience). After washes with PBS 0.05% Tween 20 (washing buffer), plates were saturated with 200 μL/w of PBS 2% BSA (Sigma) for 30 min at RT. One hundred microliters of hAEC supernatants (samples) and serial dilutions of supernatants from the 721.221 cell line, transfected either with HLA-G1 or HLA-G5 (standard for HLA-G, kindly provided by Dr. Francesco Puppo, DIMI, Genoa) or total extract from normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (standard for HLA-E) were added in the corresponding wells and plates were incubated at RT for 1 h. After washes, 100 μL of detection reagent (HRP-conjugated anti-β2 microglobulin mAb, Exbio) was added, and plates incubated for 1 h at RT. After washes, 100 μL of TMB (substrate for HRP, Sigma-Aldrich) was added, and the reaction was stopped approximately 30 min later by adding H2SO4 5N. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using Infinite® 200 PRO spectrometer (Tecan Group Ltd.). Results are expressed as ng/mL (sHLA-G1/G5 and sHLA-G5) or arbitrary units (U)/mL (sHLA-E). One arbitrary unit is equal to the quantity of sHLA-E in 1 µg of the total normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells extract.

2.7. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was assessed using the carboxyfluoresceindiacetatesuccinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution assay. Briefly, CD4+ T cells were stained with CFSE (Invitrogen, 1 µg/mL, 15 min at 37 °C), washed and cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Subsequently, T cells were seeded in 96 flat-bottom well plates (Costar Corning, 100,000/well) and stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 mAb coated beads (T cell activation/expansion kit, Miltenyi Biotec), in the presence or absence of hAEC (at hAEC:effector cell ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:8). In the control group, hAEC were treated for 30 min with anti-HLA-G (#87G, Exbio, 10 µg/mL), anti-HLA-E (#3D12, Biolegend, 20 µg/mL) or anti-β2 microglobulin (kindly supplied by Dr. Fabio Malavasi, University of Turin, Italy).
In another set of experiments, 100,000 stimulated T cells were cultured in the presence of ssEV or lsEV derived from 40 mL of hAEC supernatant derived from 75 cm2 at confluence (5 millions of cells) and resuspended in 100 µL of culture medium, or with hAEC (at hAEC:effector cell ratio 1:1) previously cultured in the presence of inhibitors of EV release, as described above.
Effector cells were harvested after 6 days, and stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb (Beckman Coulter). CFSE/CD4 positive cells were analyzed using the Gallios cytometer and Kaluza software.

2.8. Gene Profiling by qPCR

Thawed hAEC were lysed in Trizol™ solution (Life Tech, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was converted to complementary DNA using the high capacity cDNA kit (Life tech, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Gene expression was assessed using TaqMan assays for HLA-G (HS00365950), HLA-E (HS03045171) and HLA-F (HS04185703). Reactions were run in duplicate with human cyclophilin A (PPIA) (Hs99999904_m1) as a house keeping gene as the control for all experiments. Calculation of the relative levels of expression were done according to the comparative Ct-method as follows: 2(−ΔCt), where ΔCt = (Ct gene of interest –Ct internal control Cyclophilin). Ct values for the gene of interest 35 or higher were considered as unreliable and ignored from the calculation.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.03 software (GraphPad Software). Gaussian distribution of data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney test was used to compare data, depending on data distribution. The significance range is represented as follows: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.005 and *** p < 0.0005.

3. Results

3.1. Human Amnion Epithelial Cells Express and Release HLA-Ib Molecules

First, we evaluated the expression of HLA molecules on hAECs derived from different donors. We analyzed 10 batches of hAEC products isolated from different donors, and we consistently detected expression of HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G at the RNA level (Figure 1A).
We analyzed the expression of HLA-class Ib immunomodulatory molecules at the protein level on the surface of intact hAEC by flow cytometry, including HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G. As shown in Figure 1, panel B, hAEC expressed high surface levels of HLA-F (MRFI ± SD; 3.1 ± 0.42) and HLA-G (MRFI ± SD; 12.9 ± 1.97), whereas HLA-E surface expression was very low (MRFI ± SD; 1.35 ± 0.13). We performed analysis on 17 different batches of primary hAEC, and all the batches presented a surface profile similar to the one represented in Figure 1, panel C.
To assess whether hAEC release HLA-G and -E, the presence of such soluble molecules was quantified in the conditioned media derived from hAEC (n = 6) cultured for 24 and 72 h (Figure 2A). Every batch of hAEC released both sHLA-G (ng/mL ± SE: 13.52 ± 1.16) and sHLA-E (U/mL ± SD: 7.54 ± 0.57) after 24 h of culture, with an increasing amount after 2 more days (sHLA-G: 20.16 ± 1.15; sHLA-E: 21.38 ± 1.15). Additional experiments performed on supernatants from four different hAEC batched (using specific mAbs recognizing HLA-G1/G5 or HLA-G5 as capture reagents) revealed that both sHLA-G1 and sHLA-G5 are present (ng/mL sHLA-G1/G5: 2.55, 1.67, 10.53 and 1.09; ng/mL sHLA-G5: 0, 3.25, 5.31 and 0.77).

3.2. hAEC-Derived EV Expressed HLA-G and Epithelial Markers

In addition to soluble proteins, cells also release EVs that could contribute to the immunoregulatory/immunomodulatory functions of hAECs. Thus we, characterized EVs derived from hAECs next. Amnion epithelial cells generate high amounts of EVs, quantified as an average amount of 1.39 ± 0.09 × 109 released particles per milliliter of medium (n = 3). A representative size distribution of EV derived from the conditioned media of hAEC at passage 0 (upper panel) and 1 (lower panel) is shown in Figure 3A.
The size distribution ranged from 100 to 600 nm, thus confirming the presence of both ssEV and lsEV. When we profiled the surface molecules expressed on ssEV released by hAEC, we detected characteristic epithelial markers, such as CD326 (EpCAM) and CD29 (beta1-integrin subunit; Figure 3, panel B), commonly described at the cellular level on hAEC [1]. We also detected molecules commonly expressed on pluripotent stem cells and previously identified on hAEC, such as SSEA-4 (Figure 3, panel B).
We further determined whether HLA-G molecules measured in hAEC-preconditioned medium were present in a soluble form or expressed on the surface of lsEV and ssEV. To address this issue, we purified EV from different batches of primary hAEC kept in culture for a few days, and we measured HLA-G presence on lsEV and ssEV by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 3C, HLA-G was expressed at high levels on lsEV (MRFI ± SD; 47.4 ± 19.9) and, to a lesser extent, on ssEV (MRFI ± SD; 3.8 ± 0.86). The antigen density of the surface of lsEV resembled the level of expression commonly measured on intact hAEC cells (a representative staining is shown in histograms in Figure 3D).

3.3. HLA-G is Involved in hAEC-Mediated Inhibition of Allogeneic T Cell Proliferation

To further understand which factors contribute to the immunosuppressive function of hAEC, we performed functional assays next. hAECs were cocultured with immune effector cells (CD4+ T cells) at different effector:target ratios. The proliferation rate of CD4+ T cells, stimulated with beads coated with anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies, was significantly reduced in the presence of hAEC, at 1:1 (% of the proliferating cells ± SD: 29.4 ± 13.2, p < 0.0001), 1:2 (49.4 ± 16.4, p < 0.0001), 1:4 (69.2 ± 14.1, p < 0.0001) and 1:8 (83.7 ± 9.5, p = 0.0004) hAEC:CD4 ratios, compared to control T cells (88.4 ± 9.9; Figure 4, panel A).
The inhibitory effect of intact hAEC was significantly reduced when such cells were pre-exposed to blocking antibodies against HLA-G or β2 microglobulin. We measured T cell proliferation side by side in T cells only (82.1 ± 4.4), and in the presence of amnion cells (1:1 hAEC:CD4 ratio) preincubated with anti-HLA-G (51.8 ± 8.2, p = 0.0054) or anti-β2 microglobulin (58.8 ± 17.0, p = 0.017) blocking antibodies, and in the absence of blocking agents (29.9 ± 12.3; p < 0.0001; Figure 4, panel B). Additional experiments were performed to dissect the role of HLA-E (Figure 4, panel C). Again, the percentage of proliferating T cells (97.1 ± 0.62) was significantly reduced at the 1:1 (hAEC:CD4) ratio (14.5 ± 2.8; p = 0.0004). The T cell proliferation was partially but significantly restored in the presence of anti-HLA-E blocking mAb (23.2 ± 2.7; p = 0.02), although such an effect was limited as compared to anti-HLA-G blocking mAb. These experiments revealed that both HLA-G and, to a lesser extent, HLA-E were at least in part involved in immunomodulatory activities performed by hAEC.
When immune effector cells were exposed to hAEC-derived EVs, T cell proliferation (97.1 ± 0.62) was significantly inhibited, either in the presence of lsEV (91.3 ± 1.6; p = 0.0008) or ssEV (49 ± 24.6; p = 0.0008; Figure 5, panel A). To further address the contribution of EV derived from hAEC to their immunosuppressive functions, we cultured the latter cells in the presence (or absence) of specific inhibitors of the release of ssEV (Manumycin A and GW4869) or lsEV (D-Pantethine) for 48 h. The concentration of ssEV and lsEV was analyzed in supernatants from treated cells. As shown in Figure 5B the concentration of both lsEV (mean count rate ± SD: 98.8 ± 16.2 vs. 76.3 ± 14.5; p = 0.01) and ssEV (61.7 ± 22.4 vs. 22.3 ± 16.4; p = 0.03) was significantly reduced by the treatment. Such cells were cocultured with CD4+ T cells at a 1:1 (effector:target) ratio in the presence of beads coated with CD3/CD28 mAbs. The percentage of proliferating T cells (97.1 ± 0.62) was significantly reduced in the presence of hAEC (14.5 ± 2.8; p = 0.0004). Such inhibition was significantly lower in the presence of hAEC treated with inhibitors of ssEV (22.3 ± 6.7; p = 0.02) or lsEV (24.8 ± 9.3; p = 0.01) release (Figure 5, panel C). Collectively, such experiments suggested that both ssEV and lsEV were partially involved in the immunomodulatory activity performed by hAEC.

4. Discussion

In allogeneic transplants, both as a solid organ, tissue or cell transplantation, immunosuppression of the recipient is the normal procedure [48]. During the last three decades, the improvement in immunosuppressive regimens has greatly reduced donor rejection, without completely solving acute and long-term side effects [49]. In immune-competent models, hAEC engrafted and survived, without administration of immunosuppressive drugs [7,8,9,13]. Seminal clinical transplants have been proved safe in allogenic hAEC injections, with no signs of rejection [50,51,52]. Nevertheless, the hAEC immune regulatory mechanism remains, for the most part, unknown. The amnion membrane represents an immunomodulatory system that typically sets up as a protective barrier for the fetus against the maternal immune system. Several groups have described restraining effects on immune effector cells exposed to hAEC, such as decreased peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation or activation, altered maturation of antigen-presenting or dendritic cells, phenotype switch from classically (M1) to alternatively activated (M2) macrophages and increased frequency of regulatory T and B cells [13,23,24,25,53,54]. Liu et al. observed a hAEC-mediated inhibition of mouse splenocyte proliferation in vitro, and an attenuation of the disease in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, through a T-helper 2 (Th2) shift of T cells [54]. Similarly, recent evidence suggest that hAECs play a critical role in guiding the Th1/Th2 shift and Treg induction [55]. Notably, amnion-derived cells actively interact and cross-talk with innate and adaptive immune cells not only by cell-to-cell interactions but also through paracrine mediators. Recent reports describe hAEC capable of suppressing T cell proliferation and activation, through release of soluble factors or membrane-bound molecules [13,25,56].
To further elucidate and enhance hAEC use in clinical settings, we confirmed that hAECs are capable of suppressing T cell proliferation in vitro, evaluating the effects at different hAEC/T cell ratios. Since the mechanism(s) underlying these immunoregulatory properties of hAEC have been only partially elucidated [55], we focused on investigating the role of HLA-Ib molecules, particularly HLA-G. HLA-G can interact with different receptors, namely immunoglobulin-like transcript (ILT) 2, ILT4, KIR2DL4, CD160 and CD8α, which are differentially expressed on different cell populations. Upon interaction with these receptors, HLA-G can affect the function of immune effectors cells, leading to the suppression of the immune response in both physiological and pathological settings [33]. HLA-Ib molecules can bind peptides generated from the degradation of cytosolic proteins and present them to specific subpopulations of CD8+ T cells [20], like classical HLA-Ia molecules. We confirmed that membrane-bound HLA-G is expressed on the surface of cryopreserved hAEC and hAEC-derived EVs, but it is also released by hAEC as a soluble protein. We quantified the constitutive presence of sHLA-G1 and sHLA-G5 in hAEC culture. In the clinical procedure, cryopreserved cellular products are commonly used. Consequently, we focused our analysis on hAEC cells and products, such as EVs and soluble molecules, generated by cryopreserved cells, since these are the products manufactured in GMP conditions for clinical use [1].
In every cell batch tested, mHLA-G expression on intact cells was observed. Similarly, a low density presence of polymorphic HLA-ABC and a lack of HLA-DR was confirmed (data not shown). Moreover, the presence of soluble HLA-G1/G5 molecules in the supernatants of ex-vivo hAEC was observed, in line with previous studies [12,23]. In contrast with the systematic mHLA-G level in every cell batch analyzed, we measured restrained mHLA-E expression on the surface of hAEC. However, we demonstrated for the first time that hAEC are able to release sHLA-E in the absence of signals triggered by proinflammatory cytokines, in contrast with other cell populations that released sHLA-E upon activation [57].
In this line, upregulation of HLA-G expression on amnion-derived cells following exposure to interferon gamma has been previously reported [13,23]. Different studies reported that sHLA-E acts predominantly as an immunoregulatory molecule, whereas mHLA-E exerts immunoregulatory or immunostimulatory activities, depending on the receptor engaged [57,58]. Thus, the low expression of mHLA-E and the high release of the soluble counterpart in hAEC may suggest that HLA-E exerts immunosuppressive activities rather than immunostimulatory functions in these “immune-privileged” cells. Collectively, these data confirmed an important role of these perinatal stem cells in the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity [59].
We clearly proved that HLA-G is involved in hAEC-mediated inhibition of the T cell response, as previously suggested [13,23,25]. Proliferation of T cells was partially but significantly restored in the presence of a blocking antibody against HLA-G. Similar effects were obtained with a blocking antibody against β2-microglobulin. Blocking experiments performed with the anti-HLA-E antibody support the HLA-E role in the immunomodulatory activity played by hAEC. However, since a complete recovery in T cell proliferation was not obtained by blocking antibody activities, our data support the hypothesis that another immunomodulatory mechanism(s) is present and protect hAEC from immunorecognition [4,7,8,55].
A novel finding of this work is that HLA-G is present not only as a soluble moiety in supernatants from hAEC, but it is also expressed on ssEV and lsEV released from these cells. We provided a characterization of the EV surface phenotypes and confirm the amniotic origin of isolated EVs, as witnessed by the presence of epithelial markers, such as CD326 (EpCAM), CD29 and SSEA-4. We showed hAEC-derived ssEV and lsEV able to modulate T cell proliferation in coculture settings. In addition, intact hAEC treated with specific compounds inhibiting EV release were measured as less effective in inhibiting T cell proliferation, confirming that vesicles released by hAEC may modulate an immune cell response. Such results are in line with previous studies describing the important role of secretome, such as soluble mediators and EV released by primary hAEC [34,35].

5. Conclusions

We here showed that perinatal hAEC expressed and released HLA-Ib molecules. Moreover, we confirmed that these cells were able to suppress T cell proliferation in vitro, and that such an immunoregulatory capacity was partially mediated by both HLA-G and HLA-E. HLA-Ib molecules were also expressed on hAEC-derived EV, and might contribute, at least in part, to hAEC immunomodulatory activity. Such features should be carefully considered in support of clinical applications for allogenic hAEC products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., R.G.; Methodology, F.M., R.G., D.M., A.G. (Andre Görgens), S.E.-A.; Investigation, F.M., R.G., D.M., A.G. (Andre Görgens), A.G. (Alessia Gallo), R.S.; Data Curation, F.M., R.G., D.M., A.G. (Andre Görgens), R.C.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, F.M. and R.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, F.M., R.G., A.G. (Andre Görgens), S.E.-A.; Funding Acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National PKU Alliance (RG). The APC was funded by Ruth och Richard Julin Foundation (RG).

Acknowledgments

A.G. (Andre Görgens) is an International Society for Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) Marylou Ingram Scholar 2019–2023. S.E. is supported by SSF-IRC and the Swedish Medical Research Council.

Conflicts of Interest

AG and SE are consultants for and have equity interest in Evox Therapeutics, Oxford, UK.

References

  1. Gramignoli, R.; Srinivasan, R.C.; Kannisto, K.; Strom, S.C. Isolation of Human Amnion Epithelial Cells According to Current Good Manufacturing Procedures. Curr. Protoc. Stem. Cell Biol. 2016, 37, 1E.10.1–1E.10.13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Parolini, O.; Alviano, F.; Bagnara, G.P.; Bilic, G.; Buhring, H.J.; Evangelista, M.; Hennerbichler, S.; Liu, B.; Magatti, M.; Mao, N.; et al. Concise review: Isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: Outcome of the first international Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bryzek, A.; Czekaj, P.; Plewka, D.; Komarska, H.; Tomsia, M.; Lesiak, M.; Sieron, A.L.; Sikora, J.; Kopaczka, K. Expression and co-expression of surface markers of pluripotency on human amniotic cells cultured in different growth media. Ginekol. Pol. 2013, 84, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gramignoli, R. Therapeutic Use of Human Amnion-Derived Products: Cell-Based Therapy for Liver Disease. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 2016, 4, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miki, T.; Lehmann, T.; Cai, H.; Stolz, D.B.; Strom, S.C. Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Marongiu, F.; Gramignoli, R.; Dorko, K.; Miki, T.; Ranade, A.R.; Paola Serra, M.; Doratiotto, S.; Sini, M.; Sharma, S.; Mitamura, K.; et al. Hepatic differentiation of amniotic epithelial cells. Hepatology 2011, 53, 1719–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Skvorak, K.J.; Dorko, K.; Marongiu, F.; Tahan, V.; Hansel, M.C.; Gramignoli, R.; Arning, E.; Bottiglieri, T.; Gibson, K.M.; Strom, S.C. Improved amino acid, bioenergetic metabolite and neurotransmitter profiles following human amnion epithelial cell transplant in intermediate maple syrup urine disease mice. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2013, 109, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Skvorak, K.J.; Dorko, K.; Marongiu, F.; Tahan, V.; Hansel, M.C.; Gramignoli, R.; Gibson, K.M.; Strom, S.C. Placental stem cell correction of murine intermediate maple syrup urine disease. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Strom, S.C.; Skvorak, K.; Gramignoli, R.; Marongiu, F.; Miki, T. Translation of amnion stem cells to the clinic. Stem Cells Dev. 2013, 22 (Suppl. 1), 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lim, R.; Malhotra, A.; Tan, J.; Chan, S.T.; Lau, S.; Zhu, D.; Mockler, J.C.; Wallace, E.M. First-In-Human Administration of Allogeneic Amnion Cells in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Safety Study. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Malhotra, A.; Lim, R.; Mockler, J.C.; Wallace, E.M. Two-year outcomes of infants enrolled in the first-in-human study of amnion cells for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Strom, S.C.; Gramignoli, R. Human amnion epithelial cells expressing HLA-G as novel cell-based treatment for liver disease. Hum. Immunol. 2016, 77, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Banas, R.A.; Trumpower, C.; Bentlejewski, C.; Marshall, V.; Sing, G.; Zeevi, A. Immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects of amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells. Hum. Immunol. 2008, 69, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pratama, G.; Vaghjiani, V.; Tee, J.Y.; Liu, Y.H.; Chan, J.; Tan, C.; Murthi, P.; Gargett, C.; Manuelpillai, U. Changes in culture expanded human amniotic epithelial cells: Implications for potential therapeutic applications. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tee, J.Y.; Vaghjiani, V.; Liu, Y.H.; Murthi, P.; Chan, J.; Manuelpillai, U. Immunogenicity and immunomodulatory properties of hepatocyte-like cells derived from human amniotic epithelial cells. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013, 8, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Rizzo, R.; Vercammen, M.; van de Velde, H.; Horn, P.A.; Rebmann, V. The importance of HLA-G expression in embryos, trophoblast cells, and embryonic stem cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Le Bouteiller, P.; Lenfant, F. Antigen-presenting function(s) of the non-classical HLA-E, -F and -G class I molecules: The beginning of a story. Res. Immunol. 1996, 147, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Braud, V.M.; Allan, D.S.; McMichael, A.J. Functions of nonclassical MHC and non-MHC-encoded class I molecules. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1999, 11, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mallet, V.; Fournel, S.; Schmitt, C.; Campan, A.; Lenfant, F.; Le Bouteiller, P. Primary cultured human thymic epithelial cells express both membrane-bound and soluble HLA-G translated products. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1999, 43, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Crisa, L.; McMaster, M.T.; Ishii, J.K.; Fisher, S.J.; Salomon, D.R. Identification of a thymic epithelial cell subset sharing expression of the class Ib HLA-G molecule with fetal trophoblasts. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Higa, K.; Shimmura, S.; Shimazaki, J.; Tsubota, K. Ocular surface epithelial cells up-regulate HLA-G when expanded in vitro on amniotic membrane substrates. Cornea 2006, 25, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cai, Y.J.; Huang, L.; Leung, T.Y.; Burd, A. A study of the immune properties of human umbilical cord lining epithelial cells. Cytotherapy 2014, 16, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kolanko, E.; Kopaczka, K.; Koryciak-Komarska, H.; Czech, E.; Szmytkowska, P.; Gramignoli, R.; Czekaj, P. Increased immunomodulatory capacity of human amniotic cells after activation by pro-inflammatory chemokines. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 859, 172545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Magatti, M.; De Munari, S.; Vertua, E.; Gibelli, L.; Wengler, G.S.; Parolini, O. Human amnion mesenchyme harbors cells with allogeneic T-cell suppression and stimulation capabilities. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wolbank, S.; Peterbauer, A.; Fahrner, M.; Hennerbichler, S.; van Griensven, M.; Stadler, G.; Redl, H.; Gabriel, C. Dose-dependent immunomodulatory effect of human stem cells from amniotic membrane: A comparison with human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 1173–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. LeBouder, F.; Khoufache, K.; Menier, C.; Mandouri, Y.; Keffous, M.; Lejal, N.; Krawice-Radanne, I.; Carosella, E.D.; Rouas-Freiss, N.; Riteau, B. Immunosuppressive HLA-G molecule is upregulated in alveolar epithelial cells after influenza A virus infection. Hum. Immunol. 2009, 70, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. White, S.R.; Loisel, D.A.; Stern, R.; Laxman, B.; Floreth, T.; Marroquin, B.A. Human leukocyte antigen-G expression in differentiated human airway epithelial cells: Lack of modulation by Th2-associated cytokines. Respir. Res. 2013, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pistoia, V.; Morandi, F.; Wang, X.; Ferrone, S. Soluble HLA-G: Are they clinically relevant? Semin. Cancer Biol. 2007, 17, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Carosella, E.D.; Rouas-Freiss, N.; Roux, D.T.-L.; Moreau, P.; LeMaoult, J. Chapter Two-HLA-G: An Immune Checkpoint Molecule. In Advances in Immunology; Alt, F.W., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 127, pp. 33–144. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zilberman, S.; Schenowitz, C.; Agaugué, S.; Benoît, F.; Riteau, B.; Rouzier, R.; Carosella, E.D.; Rouas-Freiss, N.; Menier, C. HLA-G1 and HLA-G5 active dimers are present in malignant cells and effusions: The influence of the tumor microenvironment. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1599–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Braud, V.M.; Allan, D.S.; Wilson, D.; McMichael, A.J. TAP- and tapasin-dependent HLA-E surface expression correlates with the binding of an MHC class I leader peptide. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Braud, V.M.; Allan, D.S.; O’Callaghan, C.A.; Söderström, K.; D’Andrea, A.; Ogg, G.S.; Lazetic, S.; Young, N.T.; Bell, J.I.; Phillips, J.H.; et al. HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature 1998, 391, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, A.; Yan, W.H. The Emerging Roles of Human Leukocyte Antigen-F in Immune Modulation and Viral Infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alhomrani, M.; Correia, J.; Zavou, M.; Leaw, B.; Kuk, N.; Xu, R.; Saad, M.I.; Hodge, A.; Greening, D.W.; Lim, R.; et al. The Human Amnion Epithelial Cell Secretome Decreases Hepatic Fibrosis in Mice with Chronic Liver Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, J.L.; Lau, S.N.; Leaw, B.; Nguyen, H.P.T.; Salamonsen, L.A.; Saad, M.I.; Chan, S.T.; Zhu, D.; Krause, M.; Kim, C.; et al. Amnion Epithelial Cell-Derived Exosomes Restrict Lung Injury and Enhance Endogenous Lung Repair. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 180–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Han, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Q.; Guan, H.; Liu, J.; Shi, J.; Su, L.; Hu, D. Exosomes derived from human amniotic epithelial cells accelerate wound healing and inhibit scar formation. J. Mol. Histol. 2017, 48, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. György, B.; Szabó, T.G.; Pásztói, M.; Pál, Z.; Misják, P.; Aradi, B.; László, V.; Pállinger, E.; Pap, E.; Kittel, A.; et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: Emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2667–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Boyiadzis, M.; Whiteside, T.L. The emerging roles of tumor-derived exosomes in hematological malignancies. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kawamoto, T.; Ohga, N.; Akiyama, K.; Hirata, N.; Kitahara, S.; Maishi, N.; Osawa, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Kondoh, M.; Shindoh, M.; et al. Tumor-derived microvesicles induce proangiogenic phenotype in endothelial cells via endocytosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Morandi, F.; Marimpietri, D.; Horenstein, A.L.; Bolzoni, M.; Toscani, D.; Costa, F.; Castella, B.; Faini, A.C.; Massaia, M.; Pistoia, V.; et al. Microvesicles released from multiple myeloma cells are equipped with ectoenzymes belonging to canonical and non-canonical adenosinergic pathways and produce adenosine from ATP and NAD+. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1458809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Morandi, F.; Marimpietri, D.; Horenstein, A.L.; Corrias, M.V.; Malavasi, F. Microvesicles expressing adenosinergic ectoenzymes and their potential role in modulating bone marrow infiltration by neuroblastoma cells. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, e1574198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rebmann, V.; König, L.; Nardi, F.d.S.; Wagner, B.; Manvailer, L.F.S.; Horn, P.A. The Potential of HLA-G-Bearing Extracellular Vesicles as a Future Element in HLA-G Immune Biology. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ferretti, E.; Tripodo, C.; Pagnan, G.; Guarnotta, C.; Marimpietri, D.; Corrias, M.V.; Ribatti, D.; Zupo, S.; Fraternali-Orcioni, G.; Ravetti, J.L.; et al. The interleukin (IL)-31/IL-31R axis contributes to tumor growth in human follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 2015, 29, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Marimpietri, D.; Petretto, A.; Raffaghello, L.; Pezzolo, A.; Gagliani, C.; Tacchetti, C.; Mauri, P.; Melioli, G.; Pistoia, V. Proteome profiling of neuroblastoma-derived exosomes reveal the expression of proteins potentially involved in tumor progression. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Corso, G.; Mäger, I.; Lee, Y.; Görgens, A.; Bultema, J.; Giebel, B.; Wood, M.J.A.; Nordin, J.Z.; Andaloussi, S.E.L. Reproducible and scalable purification of extracellular vesicles using combined bind-elute and size exclusion chromatography. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wiklander, O.P.B.; Bostancioglu, R.B.; Welsh, J.A.; Zickler, A.M.; Murke, F.; Corso, G.; Felldin, U.; Hagey, D.W.; Evertsson, B.; Liang, X.M.; et al. Systematic Methodological Evaluation of a Multiplex Bead-Based Flow Cytometry Assay for Detection of Extracellular Vesicle Surface Signatures. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Morandi, F.; Venturi, C.; Rizzo, R.; Castellazzi, M.; Baldi, E.; Caniatti, M.L.; Tola, M.R.; Granieri, E.; Fainardi, E.; Uccelli, A.; et al. Intrathecal soluble HLA-E correlates with disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis and may cooperate with soluble HLA-G in the resolution of neuroinflammation. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013, 8, 944–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gramignoli, R.; Vosough, M.; Kannisto, K.; Srinivasan, R.C.; Strom, S.C. Clinical hepatocyte transplantation: Practical limits and possible solutions. Eur. Surg. Res. 2015, 54, 162–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grinyó, J.M.; Cruzado, J.M. Mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin-inhibitor reduction: Recent progress. Am. J. Transpl. 2009, 9, 2447–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akle, C.A.; Adinolfi, M.; Welsh, K.I.; Leibowitz, S.; McColl, I. Immunogenicity of human amniotic epithelial cells after transplantation into volunteers. Lancet 1981, 2, 1003–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bembi, B.; Comelli, M.; Scaggiante, B.; Pineschi, A.; Rapelli, S.; Gornati, R.; Montorfano, G.; Berra, B.; Agosti, E.; Romeo, D. Treatment of sphingomyelinase deficiency by repeated implantations of amniotic epithelial cells. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1992, 44, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yeager, A.M.; Singer, H.S.; Buck, J.R.; Matalon, R.; Brennan, S.; O’Toole, S.O.; Moser, H.W. A therapeutic trial of amniotic epithelial cell implantation in patients with lysosomal storage diseases. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1985, 22, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, Y.H.; Chan, J.; Vaghjiani, V.; Murthi, P.; Manuelpillai, U.; Toh, B.H. Human amniotic epithelial cells suppress relapse of corticosteroid-remitted experimental autoimmune disease. Cytotherapy 2014, 16, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, Y.H.; Vaghjiani, V.; Tee, J.Y.; To, K.; Cui, P.; Oh, D.Y.; Manuelpillai, U.; Toh, B.H.; Chan, J. Amniotic epithelial cells from the human placenta potently suppress a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Morandi, F.; Horenstein, A.L.; Quarona, V.; Faini, A.C.; Castella, B.; Srinivasan, R.C.; Strom, S.C.; Malavasi, F.; Gramignoli, R. Ectonucleotidase Expression on Human Amnion Epithelial Cells: Adenosinergic Pathways and Dichotomic Effects on Immune Effector Cell Populations. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. McDonald, C.A.; Payne, N.L.; Sun, G.; Moussa, L.; Siatskas, C.; Lim, R.; Wallace, E.M.; Jenkin, G.; Bernard, C.C. Immunosuppressive potential of human amnion epithelial cells in the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Coupel, S.; Moreau, A.; Hamidou, M.; Horejsi, V.; Soulillou, J.P.; Charreau, B. Expression and release of soluble HLA-E is an immunoregulatory feature of endothelial cell activation. Blood 2007, 109, 2806–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Derre, L.; Corvaisier, M.; Charreau, B.; Moreau, A.; Godefroy, E.; Moreau-Aubry, A.; Jotereau, F.; Gervois, N. Expression and release of HLA-E by melanoma cells and melanocytes: Potential impact on the response of cytotoxic effector cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 3100–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gavlovsky, P.J.; Tonnerre, P.; Guitton, C.; Charreau, B. Expression of MHC class I-related molecules MICA, HLA-E and EPCR shape endothelial cells with unique functions in innate and adaptive immunity. Hum. Immunol. 2016, 77, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 09 02123 g001 550
Figure 1. Expression of HLA-class Ib molecules by human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs). (A) Transcriptional analysis on 10 different batches of hAEC for all three HLA-Ib molecules; (B) the expression of immunomodulatory molecules HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G was assessed by flow cytometry on 17 different batches of hAEC. Data are expressed as mean relative of fluorescence intensity (MRFI) ± SE; (C) Panel C shows a representative staining. Light grey profiles indicate staining with isotype control, whereas dark grey profiles indicate staining with specific mAbs.
Figure 1. Expression of HLA-class Ib molecules by human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs). (A) Transcriptional analysis on 10 different batches of hAEC for all three HLA-Ib molecules; (B) the expression of immunomodulatory molecules HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G was assessed by flow cytometry on 17 different batches of hAEC. Data are expressed as mean relative of fluorescence intensity (MRFI) ± SE; (C) Panel C shows a representative staining. Light grey profiles indicate staining with isotype control, whereas dark grey profiles indicate staining with specific mAbs.
Cells 09 02123 g001
Cells 09 02123 g002 550
Figure 2. Release of HLA-class Ib molecules by hAECs. (A) Soluble (s) HLA-G and -E molecules were quantified by ELISA in supernatants from 6 different batches of hAECs, collected after 24 h (white columns) or 72 h (grey columns) of culture. Results are expressed as ng/mL (sHLA-G) or units/mL (sHLA-E). (B) sHLA-G1/G5 and sHLA-G5 were quantified by ELISA in 4 random different batches of hAEC using MEM-G9 or 5A6G7 mAbs as a capture reagent, respectively.
Figure 2. Release of HLA-class Ib molecules by hAECs. (A) Soluble (s) HLA-G and -E molecules were quantified by ELISA in supernatants from 6 different batches of hAECs, collected after 24 h (white columns) or 72 h (grey columns) of culture. Results are expressed as ng/mL (sHLA-G) or units/mL (sHLA-E). (B) sHLA-G1/G5 and sHLA-G5 were quantified by ELISA in 4 random different batches of hAEC using MEM-G9 or 5A6G7 mAbs as a capture reagent, respectively.
Cells 09 02123 g002
Cells 09 02123 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression of the membrane bound HLA-IbonhAEC-derived extracellular vesicle (EV). (A) Representative size distribution of EVs derived from 1 batch of hAEC at passage 0 (upper panel) and 1 (lower panel) and (B) representative multiplex-bead analysis for surface markers on small-size EV (ssEV) released by hAEC. (C) The expression of mHLA-G was evaluated by flow cytometry on large-size EV (lsEV) and on latex bead-conjugated ssEV isolated from 6 different batches of hAEC. Data are expressed as MRFI ± SE. (D) Representative staining for mHLA-G on hAEC-derived ssEV and lsEV. Light grey profiles indicate staining with isotype control antibodies, whereas dark grey profiles indicated staining with anti-HLA-G mAb.
Figure 3. Expression of the membrane bound HLA-IbonhAEC-derived extracellular vesicle (EV). (A) Representative size distribution of EVs derived from 1 batch of hAEC at passage 0 (upper panel) and 1 (lower panel) and (B) representative multiplex-bead analysis for surface markers on small-size EV (ssEV) released by hAEC. (C) The expression of mHLA-G was evaluated by flow cytometry on large-size EV (lsEV) and on latex bead-conjugated ssEV isolated from 6 different batches of hAEC. Data are expressed as MRFI ± SE. (D) Representative staining for mHLA-G on hAEC-derived ssEV and lsEV. Light grey profiles indicate staining with isotype control antibodies, whereas dark grey profiles indicated staining with anti-HLA-G mAb.
Cells 09 02123 g003
Cells 09 02123 g004 550
Figure 4. Cell proliferation assay on T cells exposed to hAEC. (A) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC at hAEC:T cell ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:8 (grey boxes). Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 39 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (B) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white bar) were cocultured with hAEC at the hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1, in the presence (grey boxes) or absence (light grey box) of anti-HLA-G blocking mAb or anti-β2 microglobulin mAb. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 5 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (C) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white bar) were cocultured with hAEC at the hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1, in the presence (grey boxes) or absence (light grey box) of anti-HLA-E blocking mAb. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. The mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant.
Figure 4. Cell proliferation assay on T cells exposed to hAEC. (A) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC at hAEC:T cell ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:8 (grey boxes). Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 39 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (B) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white bar) were cocultured with hAEC at the hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1, in the presence (grey boxes) or absence (light grey box) of anti-HLA-G blocking mAb or anti-β2 microglobulin mAb. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 5 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (C) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white bar) were cocultured with hAEC at the hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1, in the presence (grey boxes) or absence (light grey box) of anti-HLA-E blocking mAb. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. The mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant.
Cells 09 02123 g004
Cells 09 02123 g005 550
Figure 5. Cell proliferation assay on T cells exposed to hAEC-derived EV. (A) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC-derived lsEV (light grey box) or ssEV (grey box). Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (B) Concentration of lsEV and ssEV was assessed in supernatants from hAEC either untreated (black dots) or treated with inhibitors of ssEV or lsEV release (white dots). Results are expressed as the mean count rate (Kcps). (C) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC, either untreated (black box) or treated with inhibitors of ssEV (light grey box) or lsEV (grey box) release, at hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant.
Figure 5. Cell proliferation assay on T cells exposed to hAEC-derived EV. (A) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC-derived lsEV (light grey box) or ssEV (grey box). Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant. (B) Concentration of lsEV and ssEV was assessed in supernatants from hAEC either untreated (black dots) or treated with inhibitors of ssEV or lsEV release (white dots). Results are expressed as the mean count rate (Kcps). (C) CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (white box) were cocultured with hAEC, either untreated (black box) or treated with inhibitors of ssEV (light grey box) or lsEV (grey box) release, at hAEC:T cell ratio of 1:1. Results are expressed as % of proliferating cells. Mean of 9 experiments ± SD is shown. p values are indicated where differences are statistically significant.
Cells 09 02123 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morandi, F.; Marimpietri, D.; Görgens, A.; Gallo, A.; Srinivasan, R.C.; El-Andaloussi, S.; Gramignoli, R. Human Amnion Epithelial Cells Impair T Cell Proliferation: The Role of HLA-G and HLA-E Molecules. Cells 2020, 9, 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092123

AMA Style

Morandi F, Marimpietri D, Görgens A, Gallo A, Srinivasan RC, El-Andaloussi S, Gramignoli R. Human Amnion Epithelial Cells Impair T Cell Proliferation: The Role of HLA-G and HLA-E Molecules. Cells. 2020; 9(9):2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morandi, Fabio, Danilo Marimpietri, Andre Görgens, Alessia Gallo, Raghuraman Chittor Srinivasan, Samir El-Andaloussi, and Roberto Gramignoli. 2020. "Human Amnion Epithelial Cells Impair T Cell Proliferation: The Role of HLA-G and HLA-E Molecules" Cells 9, no. 9: 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop