Next Article in Journal
Two- and Three-Dimensional Tracking of MFA2 mRNA Molecules in Mating Yeast
Next Article in Special Issue
Autophagy and Lc3-Associated Phagocytosis in Zebrafish Models of Bacterial Infections
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Studies to Define the Cell-Surface and Intracellular Targets of Polyarginine-Conjugated Sodium Borocaptate as a Potential Delivery Agent for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nuclear Receptors as Autophagy-Based Antimicrobial Therapeutics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/cells9102150
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Crosstalk Between Autophagy and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Antifungal Immunity

by
Tim Quäschling
1,
Dirk Friedrich
1,
George S. Deepe, Jr.
2,† and
Jan Rupp
1,3,*,†
1
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
2
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
3
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to the paper.
Cells 2020, 9(10), 2150; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9102150
Submission received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 17 September 2020 / Accepted: 18 September 2020 / Published: 23 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autophagy in Antimicrobial Immunity)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Modern medicine is challenged by several potentially severe fungal pathogens such as Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, or Histoplasma capsulatum. Though not all fungal pathogens have evolved as primary pathogens, opportunistic pathogens can still cause fatal infections in immuno-compromised patients. After infection with these fungi, the ingestion and clearance by innate immune cells is an important part of the host immune response. Innate immune cells utilize two different autophagic pathways, the canonical pathway and the non-canonical pathway, also called microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) -associated pathway (LAP), to clear fungal pathogens from the intracellular environment. The outcome of autophagy-related host immune responses depends on the pathogen and cell type. Therefore, the understanding of underlying molecular mechanisms of autophagy is crucial for the development and improvement of antifungal therapies. One of those molecular mechanisms is the interaction of the transcription-factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) with the autophagic immune response. During this review, we will focus on a comprehensive overview of the role of autophagy and HIF-1α on the outcome of fungal infections.

1. Introduction

During the last years, the significance of autophagy to the innate immune response against fungal infections has become evident. There are 32 identified autophagy-related genes (Atg) conserved across different phylogenies such as plants, mammals, and yeasts, thus, the importance of autophagy for maintaining cell homeostasis is widely accepted [1,2]. Originally recognized as a mechanism to re-introduce cellular components into metabolic pathways, autophagy plays a major role in the innate immune response. There have been two forms of autophagy reported. Both the canonical and the non-canonical autophagy pathways initiate degradation of intracellular components in the lysosome. The canonical pathway is activated through different stimuli including nutritional starvation, low oxygen concentration, infection, or endoplasmic reticulum stress caused by glucose deprivation, as an example [3,4]. Autophagy selectively targets pathogens and is mainly induced when pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and pathogen-induced damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PPRs) such as Dectin1 or toll-like receptors (TLRs) [5]. Upon pathogen-recognition, the autophagy inhibitor, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is blocked and autophagy is induced. This process is followed by the formation of the autophagosome [6].
Concomitant with phagophore nucleation, microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) is recruited to this cellular compartment and, after lipidation of LC3-I to LC3-II, the latter is incorporated into the inner and outer surface of the autophagosome [7]. LC3-II facilitates the fusion of the matured autophagosome with the lysosome to form the autolysosome, and the pathogens are killed through acidification [8]. The impact of autophagy in innate cells extends beyond killing. Regarding dendritic cells (DCs), autophagy is crucial for the presentation of antigens to cluster of differentiation (CD)4+T cells via the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, linking the innate to the adaptive immune response [9]. Support for the in vivo importance of autophagy in antigen presentation was revealed in studies in which a deletion of autophagy-related gene (Atg)5 in mouse DCs impaired priming of T cells after infection with herpes simplex virus [10]. Concerning neutrophils, autophagy is vital for the secretion of granules containing antimicrobial and inflammatory proteins [11]. This release is highly interconnected with an event called neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. During this process, neutrophils release intracellular contents such as histones and calprotectin that exert antimicrobial activity [12]. An increasing amount of evidence points to a close interaction between autophagy and NET formation [13]. The latter is highly regulated by production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)which is in turn influenced by autophagy [14]. Neutrophils lacking Atg5 are deficient in NET formation [15]. Conversely, initiation of autophagy leads to an increase in released NETs [16].
Some fungal pathogens, such as Aspergillus fumigatus, can be recognized upon first contact with the immune cell and the non-canonical autophagy pathway, also called the LAP-pathway, is triggered. The LAP-pathway initiates the selective ingestion and degradation of fungal cells. To contrast to canonical autophagy, the LAP-pathway does not utilize de-novo formation of the double-membraned autophagosome but, instead, drives the recruitment of LC3-II to the phagosome after phagocytosis [17]. Engaging in cell surface receptor signalling, the LAP-pathway conjugates LC3-II to already existing single-membrane phagosomes [18]. Therefore, the formation of these so-called LAPosomes is independent of the canonical signalling cascade and phagophore-formation inside the immune cell. Interestingly, the initiation of the LAP-pathway inhibits the classical autophagy pathway and vice versa [18].
The LAP pathway starts with the stimulation of the Dectin-1/Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) complex [19]. Activation of this complex is followed by the mobilization of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) complex, formed by Beclin1, vacuolar protein sorting 34(VPS34) kinase, UV radiation resistance-associated gene protein (UVRAG) and Rubicon, to the LAPosome [18]. Localization of the class III PI3K-complex to the LAPosome prompts generation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) and is followed by the stabilization of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase-2 (NOX2) complex and ROS. The combination of ROS and PI3P leads to the recruitment of the LC3-conjugation machinery. Maturation of the LAPosome is achieved by the binding of LC3 [20]. The LAPosome fuses with the lysosome, forming the phagolysosome and pathogens are killed through acidification. Simultaneous to the initiation of autophagy, recognition of pathogens also leads to the accumulation of transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) via the Syk-pathway and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) [21].
HIF-1α is an important mammalian regulator of gene expression during hypoxia, but also plays a key role in the regulation of host immune responses during fungal infections. Several studies show the downstream stimulation of HIF-1α, either by hypoxia or infection [22,23], as well as the exposure to nitric oxide (NO) [24]. Considering non-infected cells, HIF-1α is regulated by the amount of ambient oxygen. Under normoxic conditions (>21% O2) HIF-1α is targeted for degradation by the proteasome, while under hypoxic conditions (<6% O2) HIF-1α stabilizes and translocates into the nucleus, forming the HIF-1 complex by binding to HIF-1β. To contrast to stabilization of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions, exposure to NO under normoxic conditions upregulates HIF-1α synthesis without modulating proteasomal degradation [24]. Then, in return, HIF-1α upregulates inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), starting a positive feedback loop [25].
HIF-1 binds to hypoxic response elements (HRE) in the promotor regions of target genes. Liu et al., [26] have stated that induction of the autophagic machinery by infection stabilizes HIF-1α, meaning that even under normoxic conditions a stabilization of HIF-1α can occur. To contrast, several studies have shown the activation of autophagy downstream of HIF-1α [5,27], suggesting a positive feedback loop in which autophagy is needed to generate energy to support the innate immune response while HIF-1α modulates the cell metabolism as part of the immune response. This transcription factor induces a series of alterations in macrophages (MΦ), including increases in inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and antimicrobial peptides. HIF-1α stabilization is vital for the proper migration of MΦ into inflammatory tissue [28]. Collectively, the data show that HIF-1α regulates a number of key functions of innate cells for them to control infections [29]. During this review, we will focus on role of the LAP-pathway for the innate immune response during fungal infections. We will take a closer look at the impact of HIF-1α regulation on the outcome of antifungal immune responses as part of the LAP-pathway.

2. Impact of Autophagic Pathways on Fungal Infections

Known for all microbial infections, the coordination of the first innate immune response and the subsequent adaptive immune response is critical for a successful clearing of infection. Tissue-specific and recruited inflammatory phagocytes, such as macrophages (MΦ) and neutrophils, are the first immune cells to respond to an infection. They are also critical for the killing of fungal pathogens in early stages of the infection. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the link between the innate immune response and the adaptive immune system. They are the professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that prime naïve T cells [30] by presenting fungal antigens. Fungi recognized after they enter a cell are targeted and cleared by the canonical pathway. Additionally, fungal pathogens are recognized by cell surface receptors of immune cells and trigger the LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP)-pathway. Independent of which autophagic pathway is engaged, the process of killing other organisms by autophagy also is known as xenophagy [31].

LC3-Associated Phagocytosis (LAP)

Receptors such as Dectin-1 or toll-like receptors (TLRs) on the cell surface of innate immune cells often recognize fungal pathogens in the extracellular matrix and initiate LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP). Unlike the canonical pathways, LAP relies on the Rubicon/Beclin1-complex and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase-2 (NOX2) activation rather than regulation by mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Upon recognition, fungal pathogens are engulfed by phagocytosis and trigger activation of the Dectin-1/Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) complex [32]. Activation of this pathway ultimately results in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P). The combination of ROS and PI3P lead to the recruitment of the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3)-conjugation machinery consisting of the autophagy-related gene (Atg)5/Atg12/Atg16L1-complex and Atg3, Atg4 and Atg7 [33]. Comparable to the canonical autophagy pathway, LC3-II is incorporated into the outer surface of the LAPosome. Ultimately, LC3-II assists in the fusion of the LAPosome with the lysosome, consequently killing fungi. Studies in dendritic cells (DCs) have shown that the conjugation of LC3-II is crucial for the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II presentation of fungal-derived antigens [34]. To contrast to these findings, the presentation of MHC class I molecules is decreased during autophagy [35]. Still, there is evidence that LAP promotes cross-presentation of antigens with MHC class I molecules [36]. Activation of innate immune cells by recognition of fungal pathogens also leads to a change in metabolism. During infection with Candida albicans or Histoplasma capsulatum, immune cells upregulate anaerobic glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [37,38]. To contrast to these findings, immune cells activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) only upregulate anaerobic glycolysis while downregulating oxidative phosphorylation. This event also is known to occur under normoxic conditions when initiated by LAP. Accompanying the modulation of the metabolism to increased glycolytic flux is the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) [23]. This can be seen during activation of innate immune cells by TLR ligands as well as infection by intracellular pathogens [39]. Once HIF-1α stabilizes, a positive feedback loop is activated in which HIF-1α fuels the increase in the glycolytic flux. One reason for the glycolytic switch is the preparation to enter areas of inflammation which are hypoxic. However, the activity HIF-1α is not restricted only to metabolism.

3. Autophagy in Antifungal Immunity—Friend or Foe

The widespread and increasing use of biologicals and immunosuppressive therapies facilitate the emergence of potentially severe, fungal infections such as Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Histoplasma capsulatum. Recognition of one of these pathogens mediates the activation of antimicrobial chemokines and cytokines, which then initiate the anti-fungal response. Based on the route of entry, or the way a fungal pathogen is recognized, the immune response can differ. Some fungi, such as Aspergillus fumigatus, have developed immune evasion strategies, while others, such as Histoplasma capsulatum and Cryptococcus neoformans, need the autophagic response for survival and proliferation. Autophagy is an efficient tool for the containment and killing of fungal pathogens. Simultaneously, once a pathogen is phagocytosed, it can no longer be targeted by other immune cells, thus evading the adaptive immune response, for example. Furthermore, they might take advantage of the metabolic process autophagy supplies, utilizing nutrients inside the phagosome that should have been re-introduced into the metabolic cycle. During the following, we will take a look at different fungal pathogens and their interactions with the autophagic machinery.

3.1. Aspergillus Fumigatus

Aspergillus conidia are engaged by LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), but not classical autophagy, putting emphasis on the importance of LAP [18]. Aspergillus fumigatus is recognized by Dectin-1 receptors which play a fundamental role in the activation of the LAP pathway. Defective β-glucan recognition, caused by the loss of Dectin-1, produces a higher susceptibility to infection with A. fumigatus in mice [40]. Humans with a genetic polymorphism affecting Dectin-1 show a higher susceptibility to aspergillosis [41].
Disrupting the LAP pathway in mice has given additional insight into the importance of this process during infection with A. fumigatus. Mice lacking autophagy-related gene (Atg)7 manifest an increased fungal burden and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels during infection [42]. While β-glucan on the surface of A. fumigatus induces the signalling cascades for LAP, the masking of β-glucan is a viable immune-evasion strategy. Conidia are decorated with hydrophobins, thus blocking recognition by Dectin-1. Upon germination of A. fumigatus, β-glucan is unmasked, and LAP is initiated. Consequently, LC3-II is recruited to the fungus-containing phagosome. During infection of human monocytes with A. fumigatus, recruitment of LC3-II is dependent on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase [43]. Patients suffering from chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) have a mutation in the NADPH complex affecting their ability to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and display a defective immune response to infection with A. fumigatus, marked by poor recruitment of LC3-II to the phagosome. Regarding mice harboring the CGD mutation, the immunosuppressive drug, Anakinra, normalizes inflammasome activity and the number of LC3-II positive cells in Aspergillus infection [44]. Akoumianaki et al., [45] have shown that A. fumigatus uses cell wall melanin to functionally block LAP; similar to the way CGD affects patients. Melanin selectively interferes with ROS production by interfering with the initial assembly of the NADPH oxidase complex, thus inhibiting killing of the pathogen and advocating the development of intracellular infections. Concerning antifungal immune responses of dendritic cells (DCs) against A. fumigatus, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) modulates cytokine release and the metabolic profile and is partly dependent on stabilization via Dectin-1 [46].

3.2. Candida Albicans

Yeasts of C. albicans induce formation of microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) to the phagosome membrane, while there is not enough LC3 recruited to completely cover its surface [47]. This suggests that there is no immediate killing of internalized Candida spores via autophagy or LAP as LC3-II conjugation is critical for the successful fusion with the lysosome. Seen in primary macrophages (MΦ), as well as macrophage cell lines, only low levels of LC3 are observed in an infection with viable C. albicans [48]. When MΦ are exposed to beads coated with β-glucan, however, robust recruitment of LC3 transpires. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that viable C. albicans yeasts do not exhibit a sufficient level of β-glucan on their surface to provoke vigorous LC3 recruitment. Yet, autophagy and LAP are critical for the immune response against infection with C. albicans. The importance of autophagy or LAP has been established; mice lacking autophagy-related gene (Atg)5 have a deleterious outcome in systemic infections with C. albicans [49]. This effect appears to be independent of changes in phagocytosis or killing of C. albicans, since the organism is killed by Atg knock-out cell lines comparable to controls [50]. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) has been shown to be important for priming of the innate immune system via cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL-37 during infections with Candida albicans [51,52].

3.3. Histoplasma Capsulatum

Regarding Histoplasma capsulatum, the implication of LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) is still unclear as regulation of the autophagic host response is independent of Rubicon, a key regulator of LAP [53]. Upon infection, yeasts are ingested by innate immune cells. Macrophages (MΦ), the primary effector cells, permit yeast replication, while dendritic cells (DCs) kill the pathogen [54]. Killing of H. capsulatum yeasts by MΦ may be influenced by hypoxia-induxible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Concomitant with HIF-1α expression, yeasts provoke an increase in mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis in MΦ [37]. Ingestion of yeast cells is accompanied by microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3)-II recruitment to the phagosome [55]. Enhancement of the HIF-1α signal by prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors arm MΦ to degrade intracellular yeasts; using image flow cytometry with antibodies for LC3II and labeled H. capsulatum yeasts, this change was linked to a reduction in LC3II in phagosomes. [54]. Survival of H. capsulatum in LC3-II positive phagosomes indicates that autophagy or an autophagy-like mechanism may provide a beneficial niche for the fungus. This notion was supported by experiments that applied autophagy inhibitors to infected MΦ, reporting an increase in the fungal burden compared to MΦ with intact autophagy [55]. To conclude, with the idea that autophagy provides a beneficial niche, the inhibition of autophagy lead to the degradation of H. capsulatum.

3.4. Cryptococcus Neoformans

Similar to β-glucan masking in Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans yeasts use polysaccharides, glucuronoxylomannan, and galactoxylomannan to mask β-glucan and recognition by the host immune system via Dectin-1 [56]. This immune evasion seems to be selective, as studies have shown that autophagy supports intracellular survival of C. neoformans. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy in mice reduced the fungal burden with C. neoformans, while survival of the host was not altered [48]. Recruitment of autophagy-related gene (Atg)5 and Atg9 to the phagosome has been reported, with Ribonucleid acid interference (RNAi)-knockdowns of these proteins reducing fungal growth inside infected murine macrophages (MΦ) [57]. These findings have been further supported by reports that show increased fungal growth inside MΦ following knockdowns of the autophagy initiation complex [58]. It is possible that a receptor other than Dectin-1 is responsible for recognition of C. neoformans and initiation of LC3-asspciated phagocytosis (LAP). It has been shown that fragment crystallizable (Fc)-receptor activation triggers recruitment of microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) to the phagosome [59]. This is supported by a study from Nikola et al., [48] that shows differences in the recruitment pattern of LC3 the between antibody-mediated and opsonin-mediated autophagy of C. neoformans. Besides the possibility that C. neoformans is dependent on a functioning autophagic machinery, there is evidence that it is dependent on various Atgs beyond their core function in autophagy [60].

4. Conclusions

Over a long period, autophagy was understood as a self-catabolic process to counteract nutritional starvation. The ability of canonical autophagy and LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) to recognize and clear fungal infections, however, clearly shows the potential a better understanding of autophagy has to fight against infectious pathogens. During fungal infections, canonical autophagy or LAP are activated as a first line of defense against the intruders. Even though the function of LAP in antifungal immunity is not fully understood, it is clear that it plays a vital role in the modulation of host immune responses. It is crucial to not only understand the molecular variations of autophagy and LAP during fungal infections but, also, the secondary effects of autophagy such as metabolic shifts or the presentation of fungal antigens. Like other pathogens, fungi have to overcome nutritional starvation during infection and might use the phagosome as a niche for their survival. It has become clear that fungal pathogens are often reliant on their interaction and modulation of the autophagy pathways. Here, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), linking autophagy/LAP to the modulation of metabolism, therefore, should be of special interest (Figure 1).
It has already been shown in H. capsulatum that modulation of HIF-1α can have a positive effect on the clearance of infection in MΦ. Though there is only little data on the role of HIF-1α as part of the antifungal host response during infection with other fungi, HIF-1α also has been shown to interact with autophagy in various other challenges, and to play a role in apoptosis. HIF-1α promotes chondrocyte survival when challenged for apoptosis [61]. Gene knockdowns of HIF-1α increased survival of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli in intestinal epithelial cells [62] and Lu et al., [63] have shown in SH-SY5Y cells that HIF-1α-mediated autophagy was needed for protection against hypoxic brain injuries. Data from both HIF-1α in antifungal immunity and its role in other diseases suggests HIF-1α is a promising target for further research. Once we understand the interactions and modulations of HIF-1α and autophagy, successful therapies targeting the autophagy pathways can be found to help boost our innate immune response or deprive fungal pathogens of their survival strategies.

Funding

The project was supported by the DFG-funded international research training group (IRTG) 1911 (project B 8.3).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support by Dorinja Zapf for her help to this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nakatogawa, H.; Suzuki, K.; Kamada, Y.; Ohsumi, Y. Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: Lessons from yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sun, Q.; Fan, J.; Billiar, T.R.; Scott, M.J.; Qian, S. Inflammasome and Autophagy Regulation: A Two-way Street. Mol. Med. 2017, 23, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qian, M.; Fang, X.; Wang, X. Autophagy and inflammation. Clin. Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Battu, S.; Afroz, S.; Giddaluru, J.; Naz, S.; Huang, W.; Khumukcham, S.S.; Khan, R.A.; Bhat, S.Y.; Qureshi, I.A.; Manavathi, B.; et al. Amino acid starvation sensing dampens IL-1β production by activating riboclustering and autophagy. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2005317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shi, C.-S.; Kehrl, J.H. TRAF6 and A20 regulate lysine 63-linked ubiquitination of Beclin-1 to control TLR4-induced autophagy. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, Y.C.; Guan, K.-L. mTOR: A pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kabeya, Y.; Mizushima, N.; Ueno, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Kirisako, T.; Noda, T.; Kominami, E.; Ohsumi, Y.; Yoshimori, T. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 5720–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Glick, D.; Barth, S.; MacLeod, K.F. Autophagy: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Pathol. 2010, 221, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dalod, M.; Chelbi, R.; Malissen, B.; Lawrence, T. Dendritic cell maturation: Functional specialization through signaling specificity and transcriptional programming. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 1104–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, H.K.; Mattei, L.M.; Steinberg, B.E.; Alberts, P.; Lee, Y.H.; Chervonsky, A.V.; Mizushima, N.; Grinstein, S.; Iwasaki, A. In Vivo Requirement for Atg5 in Antigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells. Immunity 2010, 32, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mayadas, T.N.; Culleré, X.; Lowell, C.A. The Multifaceted Functions of Neutrophils. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2014, 9, 181–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fuchs, T.A.; Abed, U.; Goosmann, C.; Hurwitz, R.; Schulze, I.; Wahn, V.; Weinrauch, Y.; Brinkmann, V.; Zychlinsky, A. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Brinkmann, V. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria. Sci. 2004, 303, 1532–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Remijsen, Q.; Vandenberghe, T.; Wirawan, E.; Asselbergh, B.; Parthoens, E.; De Rycke, R.; Noppen, S.; Delforge, M.; Willems, J.; Vandenabeele, P. Neutrophil extracellular trap cell death requires both autophagy and superoxide generation. Cell Res. 2010, 21, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chargui, A.; Cesaro, A.; Mimouna, S.; Fareh, M.; Brest, P.; Naquet, P.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Hebuterne, X.; Mograbi, B.; Vouret-Craviari, V.; et al. Subversion of Autophagy in Adherent Invasive Escherichia coli-Infected Neutrophils Induces Inflammation and Cell Death. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Itakura, A.; Mccarty, O.J.T. Pivotal role for the mTOR pathway in the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps via regulation of autophagy. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2013, 305, C348–C354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mehta, P.; Henault, J.; Kolbeck, R.; Sanjuan, M.A. Noncanonical autophagy: One small step for LC3, one giant leap for immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martinez, J.; Malireddi, R.K.S.; Lu, Q.; Cunha, L.D.; Pelletier, S.; Gingras, S.; Orchard, R.; Guan, J.-L.; Tan, H.; Peng, J.; et al. Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and autophagy proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stuart, L.M.; Ezekowitz, R.A. Phagocytosis and comparative innate immunity: Learning on the fly. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grinstein, S.; Brumell, J.H. Activation of antibacterial autophagy by NADPH oxidases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 6226–6231. [Google Scholar]
  21. Frede, S.; Stockmann, C.; Freitag, P.; Fandrey, J. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces HIF-1 activation in human monocytes via p44/42 MAPK and NF-κB. Biochem. J. 2006, 396, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shimoda, L.A. 55th Bowditch Lecture: Effects of chronic hypoxia on the pulmonary circulation: Role of HIF-1. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 113, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Corcoran, S.E.; O’Neill, L.A. HIF1α and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3699–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kasuno, K.; Takabuchi, S.; Fukuda, K.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Yodoi, J.; Adachi, T.; Semenza, G.L.; Hirota, K. Nitric Oxide Induces Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 Activation That Is Dependent on MAPK and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 279, 2550–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jung, F.; Palmer, L.A.; Zhou, N.; Johns, R.A. Hypoxic regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase via hypoxia inducible factor-1 in cardiac myocytes. Circ. Res. 2000, 86, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Liu, X.-D.; Yao, J.; Tripathi, D.N.; Ding, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; Bai, S.; German, P.; Hoang, A.; et al. Autophagy mediates HIF2α degradation and suppresses renal tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2014, 34, 2450–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Guo, Y. Role of HIF-1a in regulating autophagic cell survival during cerebral ischemia reperfusion in rats. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 98482–98494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cramer, T.; Yamanishi, Y.; Clausen, B.E.; Förster, I.; Pawlinski, R.; Mackman, N.; Haase, V.H.; Jaenisch, R.; Corr, M.; Nizet, V.; et al. HIF-1α Is Essential for Myeloid Cell-Mediated Inflammation. Cell 2003, 112, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fabian, Z.; Taylor, C.T.; Nguyen, L.K. Understanding complexity in the HIF signaling pathway using systems biology and mathematical modeling. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ghislat, G.; Lawrence, T. Autophagy in dendritic cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 15, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bauckman, K.A.; Owusu-Boaitey, N.; Mysorekar, I.U. Selective autophagy: Xenophagy. Methods 2015, 75, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Taylor, P.R.; Tsoni, S.V.; Willment, J.A.; Dennehy, K.M.; Rosas, M.; Findon, H.; Haynes, K.; Steele, C.; Botto, M.; Gordon, S.; et al. Dectin-1 is required for β-glucan recognition and control of fungal infection. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 8, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Walczak, M.; Martens, S. Dissecting the role of the Atg12–Atg5-Atg16 complex during autophagosome formation. Autophagy 2013, 9, 424–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ma, J.; Becker, C.; Lowell, C.A.; Underhill, D.M. Dectin-1-triggered Recruitment of Light Chain 3 Protein to Phagosomes Facilitates Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Presentation of Fungal-derived Antigens. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 34149–34156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Loi, M.; Müller, A.; Steinbach, K.; Niven, J.; Da Silva, R.B.; Paul, P.; Ligeon, L.-A.; Caruso, A.; Albrecht, R.; Becker, A.C.; et al. Macroautophagy Proteins Control MHC Class I Levels on Dendritic Cells and Shape Anti-viral CD8 + T Cell Responses. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. De Luca, A.; Iannitti, R.G.; Bozza, S.; Beau, R.; Casagrande, A.; D’Angelo, C.; Moretti, S.; Cunha, C.; Giovannini, G.; Massi-Benedetti, C.; et al. CD4(+) T cell vaccination overcomes defective cross-presentation of fungal antigens in a mouse model of chronic granulomatous disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1816–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, X.; Mardinoglu, A.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Kuivenhoven, J.A.; Li, Y.; Netea, M.G.; Groen, A.K. Identification of Discriminating Metabolic Pathways and Metabolites in Human PBMCs Stimulated by Various Pathogenic Agents. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Friedrich, D. HIF-1α drives fungal immunity in human macrophages. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  39. Werner, J.L.; Metz, A.E.; Horn, D.; Schoeb, T.R.; Hewitt, M.M.; Schwiebert, L.M.; Faro-Trindade, I.; Brown, G.D.; Steele, C. Requisite role for the dectin-1 beta-glucan receptor in pulmonary defense against Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4938–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Spirig, R.; Djafarzadeh, S.; Regueira, T.; Shaw, S.G.; Von Garnier, C.; Takala, J.; Jakob, S.M.; Rieben, R.; Lepper, P.M. Effects of TLR Agonists on the Hypoxia-Regulated Transcription Factor HIF-1α and Dendritic Cell Maturation under Normoxic Conditions. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cunha, C.; Di Ianni, M.; Bozza, S.; Giovannini, G.; Zagarella, S.; Zelante, T.; D’Angelo, C.; Pierini, A.; Pitzurra, L.; Falzetti, F.; et al. Dectin-1 Y238X polymorphism associates with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis in hematopoietic transplantation through impairment of both recipient- and donor-dependent mechanisms of antifungal immunity. Blood 2010, 116, 5394–5402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sanjuan, M.A.; Dillon, C.P.; Tait, S.W.G.; Moshiach, S.; Dorsey, F.; Connell, S.; Komatsu, M.; Tanaka, K.; Cleveland, J.L.; Withoff, S.; et al. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the autophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 450, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kyrmizi, I.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Akoumianaki, T.; Samonis, G.; Sidiropoulos, P.; Boumpas, D.; Netea, M.G.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Chamilos, G. Corticosteroids block autophagy protein recruitment in Aspergillus fumigatus phagosomes via targeting dectin-1/Syk kinase signaling. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 1287–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. De Luca, A.; Smeekens, S.P.; Casagrande, A.; Iannitti, R.; Conway, K.L.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Begun, J.; Plantinga, T.S.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Van Der Meer, J.W.M.; et al. IL-1 receptor blockade restores autophagy and reduces inflammation in chronic granulomatous disease in mice and in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, 111, 3526–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Akoumianaki, T.; Kyrmizi, I.; Valsecchi, I.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Samonis, G.; Drakos, E.; Boumpas, D.; Muszkieta, L.; Prevost, M.C.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; et al. Aspergillus cell wall melanin blocks LC3-associated phagocytosis to promote pathogenicity. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fliesser, M.; Morton, C.-O.; Bonin, M.; Ebel, F.; Hünniger, K.; Kurzai, O.; Einsele, H.; Löffler, J. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α modulates metabolic activity and cytokine release in anti- Aspergillus fumigatus immune responses initiated by human dendritic cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tam, J.M.; Mansour, M.K.; Khan, N.S.; Seward, M.; Puranam, S.; Tanne, A.; Sokolovska, A.; Becker, C.E.; Acharya, M.; Baird, M.A.; et al. Dectin-1–Dependent LC3 Recruitment to Phagosomes Enhances Fungicidal Activity in Macrophages. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1844–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Brothers, K.M.; Gratacap, R.L.; Barker, S.E.; Newman, Z.R.; Norum, A.; Wheeler, R.T. NADPH Oxidase-Driven Phagocyte Recruitment Controls Candida albicans Filamentous Growth and Prevents Mortality. PLOS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Nicola, A.M.; Albuquerque, P.; Martinez, L.R.; Dal-Rosso, R.A.; Saylor, C.; De Jesus, M.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. Macrophage Autophagy in Immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 3065–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Smeekens, S.P.; Malireddi, R.K.S.; Plantinga, T.S.; Buffen, K.; Oosting, M.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Kullberg, B.J.; Perfect, J.R.; Scott, W.K.; Van De Veerdonk, F.L.; et al. Autophagy is redundant for the host defense against systemic Candida albicans infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 33, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, D.; Coughlin, L.A.; Neubauer, M.M.; Kim, J.; Kim, M.S.; Zhan, X.; Simms-Waldrip, T.R.; Xie, Y.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, A.Y. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. López-García, B.; Lee, P.H.; Yamasaki, K.; Gallo, R.L.; Bel, P.H.A.L. Anti-Fungal Activity of Cathelicidins and their Potential Role in Candida albicans Skin Infection. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005, 125, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Huang, J.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; Wu, S.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.; Chang, T.-H.; Kan, H.-W.; Hsieh, S.-T.; Ting, J.P.-Y.; Wu-Hsieh, B.A. NLRX1 Facilitates Histoplasma capsulatum-Induced LC3-Associated Phagocytosis for Cytokine Production in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kauffman, C.A. Histoplasmosis: A Clinical and Laboratory Update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Friedrich, D.; Zapf, D.; Lohse, B.; Fecher, R.A.; Deepe, G.S.; Rupp, J. The HIF-1α/LC3-II Axis Impacts Fungal Immunity in Human Macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, e00125-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sato, K.; Kawakami, K. Recognition of Cryptococcus neoformans by Pattern Recognition Receptors and its Role in Host Defense to This Infection. Med. Mycol. J. 2017, 58, J83–J90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qin, Q.-M.; Luo, J.; Lin, X.; Pei, J.; Li, L.; Ficht, T.A.; De Figueiredo, P. Functional Analysis of Host Factors that Mediate the Intracellular Lifestyle of Cryptococcus neoformans. PLOS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pandey, A.; Ding, S.; Qin, Q.-M.; Gupta, R.; Gomez, G.; Lin, F.; Feng, X.; Da Costa, L.F.; Chaki, S.P.; Katepalli, M.; et al. Global Reprogramming of Host Kinase Signaling in Response to Fungal Infection. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, J.; Canadien, V.; Lam, G.Y.; Steinberg, B.E.; Dinauer, M.C.; Magalhaes, M.A.O.; Glogauer, M.; .Hara, T.; Mizushima, N. Role of ULK-FIP200 complex in mammalian autophagy: FIP200, a counterpart of yeast Atg17? Autophagy 2009, 5, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ding, H.; Caza, M.; Dong, Y.; Arif, A.A.; Horianopoulos, L.C.; Hu, G.; Johnson, P.; Kronstad, J.W. ATG Genes Influence the Virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans through Contributions beyond Core Autophagy Functions. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00069-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bohensky, J.; Shapiro, I.M.; Leshinsky, S.; Terkhorn, S.P.; Adams, C.S.; Srinivas, V. HIF-1 regulation of chondrocyte apoptosis: Induction of the autophagic pathway. Autophagy 2007, 3, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Mimouna, S.; Bazin, M.; Mograbi, B.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Brest, P.; Scoazec, J.-Y.; Vouret-Craviari, V. HIF1A regulates xenophagic degradation of adherent and invasiveEscherichia coli(AIEC). Autophagy 2014, 10, 2333–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lu, N.; Li, X.; Tan, R.; An, J.; Cai, Z.; Hu, X.; Wang, F.; Wang, H.; Lu, C.; Lu, H.-X. HIF-1α/Beclin1-Mediated Autophagy Is Involved in Neuroprotection Induced by Hypoxic Preconditioning. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 66, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 09 02150 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of the LAP pathway in macrophages during fungal infection. (1) Pattern recognition receptors (PPRs) on macrophages (Dectin1) recognize fungal pathogen and initiates phagocytosis. (2) The Dectin1/Syk kinase complex recruits the PI3K-complex to the LAPosome. (3) The PI3K-complex generates PI3P, which localizes to the LAPosome. (4) PI3K, together with Rubicon, stabilizes the NOX2-complex, followed by assembly of the NOX2 NADPH oxidase complex. (5) ROS production leads to recruitment of the LC3-conjugation complex (Atg5/Atg12/Atg16L1). (6) Atg3, Atg4 and Atg7 form LC3-II from LC3. (7) Lipidation of LC3-II to the LAPosome and maturation of the LAPosome. Maturation is followed by fusion with the lysosome and killing of fungal pathogens. (A) The Syk-pathway simultaneously increases NFκB (B) HIF-1α is stabilized by increased NFκB, hypoxia or pharmacological treatment. (C) HIF-1α is inversely regulated to LC3-II. (D) HIF-1α upregulates glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration during infection with C. albicans or H. capsulatum.
Figure 1. Overview of the LAP pathway in macrophages during fungal infection. (1) Pattern recognition receptors (PPRs) on macrophages (Dectin1) recognize fungal pathogen and initiates phagocytosis. (2) The Dectin1/Syk kinase complex recruits the PI3K-complex to the LAPosome. (3) The PI3K-complex generates PI3P, which localizes to the LAPosome. (4) PI3K, together with Rubicon, stabilizes the NOX2-complex, followed by assembly of the NOX2 NADPH oxidase complex. (5) ROS production leads to recruitment of the LC3-conjugation complex (Atg5/Atg12/Atg16L1). (6) Atg3, Atg4 and Atg7 form LC3-II from LC3. (7) Lipidation of LC3-II to the LAPosome and maturation of the LAPosome. Maturation is followed by fusion with the lysosome and killing of fungal pathogens. (A) The Syk-pathway simultaneously increases NFκB (B) HIF-1α is stabilized by increased NFκB, hypoxia or pharmacological treatment. (C) HIF-1α is inversely regulated to LC3-II. (D) HIF-1α upregulates glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration during infection with C. albicans or H. capsulatum.
Cells 09 02150 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quäschling, T.; Friedrich, D.; Deepe, G.S., Jr.; Rupp, J. Crosstalk Between Autophagy and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Antifungal Immunity. Cells 2020, 9, 2150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9102150

AMA Style

Quäschling T, Friedrich D, Deepe GS Jr., Rupp J. Crosstalk Between Autophagy and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Antifungal Immunity. Cells. 2020; 9(10):2150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9102150

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quäschling, Tim, Dirk Friedrich, George S. Deepe, Jr., and Jan Rupp. 2020. "Crosstalk Between Autophagy and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Antifungal Immunity" Cells 9, no. 10: 2150. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9102150

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop