Next Article in Journal
Pharmacological Activation of Potassium Channel Kv11.1 with NS1643 Attenuates Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Migration by Promoting the Dephosphorylation of Caveolin-1
Next Article in Special Issue
Exporting Proteins Associated with Senescence Repair via Extracellular Vesicles May Be Associated with Early Pregnancy Loss
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Spectrin in Endocytosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Coding RNAs and Prediction of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester of Pregnancy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 15
10.3390/cells11152458
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Endogenous Retroviruses and Placental Evolution, Development, and Diversity

by
Kazuhiko Imakawa
1,*,
Kazuya Kusama
2,
Tomoko Kaneko-Ishino
3,
So Nakagawa
4,
Koichi Kitao
5,
Takayuki Miyazawa
5 and
Fumitoshi Ishino
6
1
Research Institute of Agriculture, Tokai University, Kumamoto 862-8652, Japan
2
Department of Endocrine Pharmacology, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan
3
School of Medicine, Tokai University, Tokyo 259-1193, Japan
4
Department of Molecular Life Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Nakagawa 259-1193, Japan
5
Laboratory of Virus-Host Coevolution, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
6
Institute of Research, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(15), 2458; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152458
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Placental Development in Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The main roles of placentas include physical protection, nutrient and oxygen import, export of gasses and fetal waste products, and endocrinological regulation. In addition to physical protection of the fetus, the placentas must provide immune protection throughout gestation. These basic functions are well-conserved; however, placentas are undoubtedly recent evolving organs with structural and cellular diversities. These differences have been explained for the last two decades through co-opting genes and gene control elements derived from transposable elements, including endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). However, the differences in placental structures have not been explained or characterized. This manuscript addresses the sorting of ERVs and their integration into the mammalian genomes and provides new ways to explain why placental structures have diverged.

1. Introduction

It is well accepted that the transition from oviparity to viviparity occurred independently in many animal lineages. Along with two other lizard species, Lerista bougainvillii and Zootoca vivipara, the yellow-bellied three-toed skink, Saiphos equalis, exhibits intraspecific variation in which both oviparity and viviparity exist [1,2]. Although many genes are expressed throughout their reproductive cycles, the differentially expressed genes within oviparous and viviparous individuals have surprisingly similar biological functions important for sustaining embryos [3]. Although viviparity is found not only in lizards but also in fishes, amphibians and other reptiles [4,5], the cell layer known as the trophectoderm has not been found in these animal species. In most animals, life begins with fertilization of the egg with sperm, followed by mitotic cell divisions or cleavages to generate blastomeres, from which the primary germ layers, namely endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm, are generated. These cell layers eventually give rise to the formation of the various tissues essential for animal life.
The initial development of placental mammals differs from other members of the animal kingdom, in which a blastocyst, consisting of the trophectoderm (TE) and the inner cell mass (ICM), is initially formed; TE becomes the major cell type for the placenta, and ICM forms the body structure, including the amnion, which directly surrounds the fetal body. The blastocyst must implant in the maternal endometrium, after which the three germ layers form from the ICM. TE cell layers are epithelial in nature, each expressing Ca2+-dependent adhesion molecule E-cadherin [6,7]. A typical epithelium also possesses zonula occluden (ZO) proteins, which connect cell membranes between the apposing cells through tight junctions (TJ) [8,9].
For the past two decades, various new technologies to analyze DNA and RNA sequences have become available. In addition, various bioinformatics programs have also been developed to analyze the repetitive and non-repetitive sequences on the genomes, which enable the detection of DNA sequences originating from integrated retroviral sequences. However, mammalian placentas’ evolution and structural diversity have not been fully unraveled. This review endeavors to explain the origin and diversity of mammalian placentas.

2. Structural Diversity of Mammalian Placentas

Following fertilization, the first differentiation of embryonic cells results in the formation of a blastocyst with an inner cell mass (ICM) and an outer trophectoderm. The ICM differentiates into the embryo, amnion, yolk sac, and allantois, while the trophectoderm develops into the chorion, the fetal contribution to the placenta. In most mammals, the yolk sac is displaced with the allantois, forming chorioallantoic placentation [10]. In rodents and lagomorphs, however, the yolk sac forms the so-called inverted yolk sac placenta with a maternal-facing absorptive epithelium, which persists until term [11]. Inverted yolk sac placenta or yolk sac predominance could be the form of placentation in early mammals, which are later replaced with chorioallantoic placentation. The latter is classified into diffuse (pigs and horses), cotyledonary (ruminants), zonary (dogs and cats) and discoids (murines and primates) (Figure 1). Placental cell layer separations are those of epitheliochorial, endotheliochorial, and hemochorial (Figure 2).
An epitheliochorial placenta is found in several orders of animals, including even-toed ungulates, whales, dolphins and lower primates, of which the outer chorioallantoic membrane is in direct contact with the maternal uterine epithelium. The synepitheliochorial placenta is found exclusively in ruminants. As the uterine epithelium is lost, the trophectoderm is directly apposed to the maternal connective tissue, and the placentomal (cotyledonary) chorioallantoic placenta develops at discrete regions of pre-existing, non-glandular caruncular areas on the uterine epithelium [12]. An endotheliochorial placenta is seen in carnivores such as cats and dogs; however, this type of placenta is also found in distantly related elephants [13]. In this type of placentation, the maternal capillaries are located close to the trophectoderm cells of the chorioallantoic membrane, resulting from stromal thinning and a loss of uterine epithelium.
It should be noted that hyenas belong to the order carnivore, but the hyena undergoes hemochorial placentation (Figure 3). A hemochorial placentation is seen in higher primates, including humans and many rodents—the latter in which the inverted yolk sac co-exists. In this type of placentation, maternal blood is directly in touch with the trophectoderm cells and is thus unlike other types of placentation. The capillary endothelium does not exist at or near the region where metabolic exchange occurs.

3. Cells Gain Their Mobility through Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)

The outer layer of trophectodermal cells is basically epithelial cells because they possess apicobasal cell polarity, lateral junctions with neighboring cells, and basal contact with the basement membranes [40,41]. These cells, however, still manage to adhere to the uterine epithelium through its apical domain, beginning periods of peri-implantation. Unless trophectodermal cells undergo an epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [42,43,44,45], these cells do not have the ability of both cell migration and cell adhesion to the maternal cells. Thus, EMT is generally coupled to the acquisition of migratory and invasive properties in the invasive mode of trophectodermal cells.
When DNA synthesis takes place in the absence of karyo- and cytokinesis, giant trophoblast cells arise through endoreduplication, as in the murine species. Except for animal species exhibiting epitheliochorial placentation, such as pigs and horses, the outermost layer of trophectodermal cells in many eutherians go through cell fusion, resulting in the formation of bi-nucleated, multi-nucleated or syncytiotrophoblast cells [46]. Like malignant cells, trophectodermal cells can invade neighboring cells; however, the multi-nucleated or syncytiotrophoblast cells do not go through cell cycles; thus, their invasiveness to neighboring cells is limited [47].
Unlike in murine and primate species, the bovine blastocyst does not invade the uterine endometrium. Instead, it elongates beginning on days 13–14 (day 0 = day of estrus), and as the elongation subsides on days 19–20, the elongated bovine conceptus begins its attachment to the uterine epithelium. Two to three days later, the bovine conceptus starts its adhesion to the uterine epithelium when conceptus trophectoderm expresses mesenchymal markers, such as N-cadherin (CDH2) and vimentin (VIM) [48]. It should be noted that bi-nucleated cells start to appear on day 20, and the number of multi-nucleated cells increases on day 22 when bovine trophectodermal cells express transcription factors SNAI2, ZEB1, ZEB2, TWIST1, TWIST2, and KLF8 transcripts [48]. On day 22, bovine trophectodermal cells with EMT marker expression undergo both cell fusion and cell adhesion, suggesting that EMT-related factor expression is required for the proper adhesion of elongated conceptus trophectodermal cells to the maternal endometrium.
The acquisition of EMT in the non-invasive mode of trophectodermal cells was demonstrated in the following experiments. Using bovine trophoblast CT-1 cells [49], bovine endometrial epithelial cells (bEECs) [50] and those of ex vivo samples. For EMT-related molecule expression, a transcription factor OVOL2 is required to be down-regulated on day 22 [51], whereas the EMT markers induced by day 22, including uterine flushing (UF) or activin A, are inhibited by follistatin (FST) in the CT-1 and bEEC cells co-culture system [52]. The treatment with activin A or day 22 UF in co-cultured CT-1 cells induced cell characteristics similar to those of EMT [52], involving the down-regulation of apicobasal polarity, loss of cell–cell adhesion and expression of MMPs [53]. It should be noted that unique to ruminant ungulates, bi-nucleated cells fuse heterotypically with uterine epithelial cells, resulting in the trinucleated cell formation found in the uterine endometrium [54]. Seo and coworkers provided evidence that ovine trophectodermal cells went through homotypic cell fusion, not heterotypic, and formed syncytiotrophoblast-like fused cells [55]. This observation agrees with our recent publication in which bi-nucleated and multi-nucleated cells observed in vivo are all homotypic cell fusions [56].

4. Formation of Syncytiotrophoblast Layer in the Mammalian Species

The presence and importance of syncytiotrophoblast cells are often overlooked, particularly the differences in their cellular structures. These cells are derived from trophectodermal cell fusion and are located next to the maternal cell components. These cells manage efficient nutrient and gas exchange. Because syncytiotrophoblast cells are located next to the maternal cells, they are involved in the immunotolerance of the conceptus by the maternal immune system [57,58].
The chorionic membrane consists of mono-, di- or tri-layers of trophoblast cells. In hemochorial placentation, the human placenta, discoidal in shape, is classified as a monochorial interface as well as exhibiting villous maternal–fetal interdigitations. In murines, including Muridae and Cricetidae, a labyrinthine placenta is developed in the hemotrichorial organization with three trophoblast layers [59]. The first layer closest to the maternal stroma and/or decidua consists of mononucleate cytotrophoblast cells, and the second layer consists of a syncytiotrophoblast cell layer, whereas the third trophoblast layer consists of cyotrophoblast cells [60].
On the other hand, beavers, rabbits, and bats have two layers of chorionic membranes, or dichorial placentas, with the first layer consisting of syncytiotrophoblast cells and the second of cytotrophoblast cells. It should be noted that Provaviidae (Hyrax), Tenrec ecaudatus and Dipodidae possess hemochorial placentation, and as such, syncytiotrophoblast cells are not formed in their placentas [61,62,63]. Carnivora, including Canidae and Felidae, have two trophoblast layers, with the first layer being syncytiotrophoblast and the second cytotrophoblast. In the ruminants, including Bovidae, syncytiotrophoblast cells are not formed; rather, trinucleate cells, resulting from the fusion between binucleate trophoblast cells and maternal epithelial cell often appear in the uterine stroma [64]. Recently, we [56] and others [55] demonstrated that binucleate and/or multi-nucleate trophoblast cells are derived from the fusion of trophoblast cells. In animals with epitheliochorial placentation, such as horses, camels, pigs, hippopotamuses, and cetaceans, the syncytiotrophoblast layer is not formed; however, binucleate trophoblast cells are found in the horse placenta. Although the placentas serve analogous functions of nutrition and gas exchange, these observations indicate that the cell components of trophoblast cells are far more diversified, which can vary beyond the specific lineages of the mammalian evolutionary tree.

5. Requirement of ERVs for Placental Evolution

During the last several decades, virologists have occasionally proposed retrovirus’s role in placental evolution. For example, Haig (2012) argued that the placenta became a mammalian tissue in which retroviral genes were ‘domesticated’ to serve an adaptive function in the host [65]. Such an interplay may have contributed to evolutional mechanisms associated with genomic imprinting.

5.1. PEG10 and PEG11/RTL1 Are Required for the Acquisition of Placenta

It has been generally accepted that viviparous therian mammals, the marsupials and eutherians, emerged 166 million years ago (MYA) by diversification from oviparous monotremes. Eutherians with chorioallantoic placenta then diverged from marsupials with choriovitelline (yolk sac placenta) 148 MYA [66]. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that occasional endogenization events of LTR of retrotransposons, including ERVs, occurred throughout mammalian evolution. It was found that PEG10 and PEG11/RTL1 are paternally expressed imprinted genes [67]. It was then hypothesized that earlier integration of PEG10 was necessary for the formation of primitive placenta in therians [32,67,68], while the basic structures and functions of the chorioallantoic placenta were established through the endogenization of PEG11/RTL1 [33,69] and LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 [34]. The formation of primitive chorioallantoic placentas was followed by facilitated structural diversity throughout mammalian evolution in each lineage of eutherians by endogenization of syncytins (see next section). PEG10 and PEG11/RTL1 encode proteins that exhibit homology to GAG and POL proteins of sushi-ichi retrotransposon, while LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 encodes only GAG-like proteins of the same retrotransposon. As sushi-ichi retrotransposon is an LTR retrotransposon belonging to the group of gypsy retrotransposons [70,71], it is highly probable that these three genes are derived from some extinct retroviruses [72,73].
The necessity of PEG10 for placental formation was demonstrated through a gene ablation study in mice, which exhibited embryonic lethality at 10 dpc due to a lack of labyrinth and spongiotrophoblast layers [32]. These observations indicated that PEG10 plays an essential role in the differentiation and possibly maintenance of trophoblast cells in these layers. PEG11/RTL1 is essential for maintaining placental fetal capillaries [33,74]. It is expressed in endothelial cells of the fetal capillaries, presumably protected from the attack of surrounding trophoblast cells where PEG10 is expressed. Therefore, its gene-ablated mice exhibited middle to late embryonic lethality due to growth retardation, resulting from the destruction of the fetal capillary network. Interestingly, PEG10 protease mutants also exhibited perinatal lethality due to severe impairment of the placental fetal capillary network, demonstrating that together with PEG11/RTL1, PEG10 is also crucial for the maintenance of fetal vasculature [75]. Therefore, two ERV-derived genes play essential roles in the establishment of the eutherian type of placenta, as a therian-specific gene (PEG10) and a eutherian-specific gene (PEG11/RTL1), respectively.

5.2. Requirement of LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 for the Maintenance of Placental Function

It was demonstrated that another GAG-like protein of the sushi-ichi retrotransposon, LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7, is essential for endocrine regulation of the placenta [34]. It has long been thought that in rodents, the ovary is the major organ producing progesterone (P4) throughout the course of pregnancy [76]. It was found, however, that the mouse placenta also has P4 transiently during days 9.5–12.5 [34], when the ovarian P4 production exhibits an abrupt fall due to a shift from the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy to pregnancy [76,77,78]. LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 gene-ablated mice exhibited overproduction of placental P4, concurrent with the excess production of placental lactogen 1 (PL1), the latter of which was associated with a delayed change from PL1 to PL2 production in trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) and spongiotrophoblast cells from the junctional zone during the last half of gestation [79]. It was also demonstrated that its gene-ablated mothers exhibit delayed parturition and do not take care of their pups, although these pups are viable when raised by foster mothers [34]. Although further research is required to definitively prove the source of P4 production, these data have clearly demonstrated that not only the ovary but also the placenta are the sources of P4 production in rodents. Therefore, with therian-specific PEG10 and eutherian-specific PEG11/RTL1, LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 is also required to maintain mammalian placentas as a eutherian-specific gene.

6. Placental Diversity Requires Syncytin ERVs

Mammalian placentas are extraordinarily diverse in terms of morphology, beyond the influence of therian PEG10 and eutherian PEG11/RTL1 and LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 genes alone. Despite the statistical improbability of ERV integration, the phylogenetic record shows multiple independent instances of these genes’ entry into disparate clades over the last 50 million years, which implicate the ERV family genes as prime candidates for the emergence of structural diversification of mammalian placentas. In the human genome alone, remnants of 18 endogenous retroviruses can be found, 16 of which have full coding env genes [80]. Only two of these env structures possess the fusogenic activity and are highly expressed in the placenta [16,80]: syncytin-1 (ERVWE1) and syncytin-2 (ERVFRDE1), belonging to the HERV-W family and the HERV-FRD family, respectively [16]. These proteins encompass 538 amino acids containing surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits. They are cleaved by a furin protease, and their interaction is required for their fusogenic activity [81,82]. The location and period of syncytin-1 and -2 transcript expression differ: syncytin-1 mRNA, localized to syncytiotrophoblasts, is highly maintained throughout the gestational period, whereas syncytin-2 transcripts are limited to cytotrophoblasts and decline in late pregnancy [83]. The syncytin-1 receptor, RD114/mammalian type D retrovirus receptor (ASCT2), is expressed mainly in cytotrophoblasts in the placenta [84], whereas the syncytin-2 receptor, the major facilitator superfamily domain containing 2 (MFSD2), is expressed in syncytiotrophoblasts [85].
Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the syncytin-2 gene and its fusogenic function were passed on from Platyrrhini to humans (>87.9%), indicating its integration before the divergence of lineage and placing a lower bound on its age at upwards of 40 million years ago [86]. Syncytin-1, however, exists only in Catarrhini, not in Platyrrhini, which indicates the more recent date of infection of 25 MYA, after the separation from the Old World monkeys [87]. These observations suggest that syncytin-2 entered anthropoid lineages and acquired fusogenic as well as immunotolerance activity in cytotrophoblasts, generating the syncytiotrophoblast cell layer. Syncytin-1 then entered Catarrhini, upon which it may have taken over the fusogenic activity in these lineages. Gestation in Platyrrhini and Old World monkeys, which do not possess syncytin-1 or its mutated variant, is considerably shorter than in Catarrhines. In humans, syncytiotrophoblasts form from the fusion between cytotrophoblasts approximately 7 to 11 days into gestation and maintain this activity throughout the pregnancy [88]. It should be noted that syncytiotrophoblast cells do not proliferate, ensuring cellular activity can be maintained only through fusion with cytotrophoblasts.
In ruminants, syncytiotrophoblast cells are not found in their placentas; however, bi-, tri-, or multinucleated trophectodermal cells are instead formed, of which cell fusion starts around the time of conceptus implantation and continues until the end of pregnancy. Among the numerous ERVs characterized, syncytin-Rum1 [18] and BERV-K1 [37] exhibit fusogenic activity. Syncytin-Rum1, found in cattle, sheep, and goats, entered ruminants’ genomes 20 MYA, whereas BERV-K1, found only in cattle, entered cattle genomes 11 MYA [19]. Although BERV-K2 and BERV-P envs were also reported to be expressed in the bovine placenta, these did not show fusogenic activities [36,37]. In addition, we also reported that BERV-K3 gag was expressed in the bovine placenta, of which expression is induced by a WNT agonist [38]. The molecular function of these three ERV-derived genes is still unclear, but they could function for placental development in the bovine species.

7. Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the ERV Expression and ERVs Serving as Transcriptional Regulators

Both syncytin-1 and syncytin-2 genes require a transcription factor, glial cell missing factor homolog 1 (GCM1), for their transcriptional regulation. The GCM family genes, regarded as master regulators, are present even in Drosophila [89]. A multispanning transmembrane protein, CD9, is involved in the invasive behavior of cancer cells and cell fusions between sperm and egg as well as myoblasts in muscle cell development [90,91]. CD9 was found to upregulate the GCM1 and syncytin-1 genes [92]. CD9 mRNA and protein expressions increase in BeWo cells when the cells are treated with forskolin. In addition, CD9 was downregulated by a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, suggesting that GCM1 expression is regulated through the cAMP/PKA signaling system [92].
Through the analysis of transgenic mice carrying a 180-kb human bacterial artificial chromosome DNA that contains the full length of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and extended flanking regions, including the endogenous retroviral long terminal repeat transposon-like human element 1B (THE1B), Dunn-Fletcher and colleagues provided strong evidence that anthropoid primate-specific retroviral element THE1B controls placental CRH expression [93]. In syncytiotrophoblasts, the regulation of CRH by THE1B is through a transcription factor, distal-less homeobox 3 (DLX3).
In addition to ERV gene regulation by transcription factors, unique RNA elements control ERV RNA processing and translation. A specific sequence motif, termed syncytin post-transcriptional regulatory element (SPRE), was originally found in syncytin-1 and syncytin-2 [94]. The SPRE is also present in different syncytin family genes, such as mac-syncytin-3 of macaque, syncytin-Ten 1 of tenrec, and syncytin-Car1 of Carnivora. Still, this motif is not found in any exogenous viral sequences [95]. Through a reporter assay experimentation, Kitao et al. concluded that the SPRE may have facilitated the replication of ancient retroviruses and still support the expression of co-opted ERV genes in host genomes [95].
Accumulated evidence indicates that ERVs are involved in mammalian placentation. It is probable that those integrated into the mammalian genome may work in biological systems other than placentation. For example, one study showed that the transcriptional network of proinflammatory cytokine interferon-gamma (IFNG) could have been shaped by ERVs [96]. This involves lineage-specific ERVs, which had dispersed their numerous IFN-inducible enhancers in mammalian genomes. For example, a gammaretrovirus, MER41, was endogenized in the genome of an anthropoid primate ancestor 45-60 MYA with 7190 LTR elements, from which six subfamilies (MER41A, B, C, D, E, and G) are found in the human genome. MER41A is located 220 bp upstream of the gene Absent in Melanoma 2 (AIM2), one of the interferon-stimulated genes that encodes a sensor for foreign cytosolic DNA and activates an inflammatory response. This ERV was found to regulate AIM2 through IFN signaling in anthropoid primates [96]. Furthermore, the enhancer MER41A/B insertions regulate dozens of lineage-specific serum response factor-binding loci, including one adjacent to FBN2. In humans, an increase in FBN2 expression leads to the production of the peptide hormone placesin, which stimulates glucose secretion and trophoblast invasion [97]. These observations indicate that ERV-derived enhancers have facilitated the rapid diversification of placentas in mammals.

8. Baton Pass Hypothesis: Successive Integration of ERVs

In primate evolutions, including humans, syncytin-2 entered the lineages approximately 40 MYA, followed by syncytin-1 integration 25 MYA. Similarly, in Bovidae, syncytin-Rum1 integrated into the bovine genomes 20 MYA, followed by BERV-K1 (Fematrin-1) 11 MYA. In fact, syncytin-Rum1 is found not only in the bovine subfamily but also in sheep and goats, whereas Fematrin-1 is found only in the bovine subfamily and not in sheep or goats. It appears that during evolution, the exaptation of one ERV is not a one-time event but can be just a temporary link in a chain of successive invasions by new ERVs. The new interloper retroviral genes may subsume their role, often with beneficial enhancements such as increased efficacy in trophoblast cell fusion, as observed with Fematrin-1 versus the older syncytin-Rum1 [18,19]. Meanwhile, the previous ERV genes could be lost, but in other cases, they may remain integrated within the genome, repurposed for uses such as immunosuppression as in the case of syncytin-2 and syncytin-Rum1 [46,98,99]. These ongoing ERV acquisitions are called “a baton pass hypothesis”, in which a new ERV replaced the preexisting ERV gene and acquired the role that the gene had played [98]. However, these ERVs must be integrated specifically at the relevant locus to be transcribed along with placental genes or through their own LTRs [19,100]. For example, Fematrin-1 is integrated into the intron 18 of FAT tumor suppressor homolog 2 (FAT2), of which gene expression is placenta-specific, and no ERV genes are found around its integration site [19,37]. The baton pass hypothesis is still speculation, but the successive co-option of unrelated ERVs in different species could add to those accumulated, explaining the diversification of placental structures in mammals.

9. New Model Explaining Placental Diversity

Fusogenic activity in the mammalian trophectoderm exhibits a great deal of similarity across species, notwithstanding the huge diversity in placental structures and types of placentation such as invasive (humans and murine) or non-invasive (ruminants). Although much research on elucidating placental diversity has been done, molecular mechanisms associated with the construction of structural differences in mammalian placentas have not been definitively characterized. It has been generally accepted that successive integrations of ERV-env (syncytin) genes are the main reasons for placental diversity in mammals (Figure 3). The fact that syncytin genes have been independently integrated into the mammalian genomes provides support. However, it should be noted that based on actual experimentation and typical amino acid sequences, their functions are generally limited to fusogenic activity and immunotolerance, which on their own are not sufficient to fully explain the structural diversity of placentas.
Dunn-Fletcher and colleagues demonstrated that the retroviral THE1B sequence serves as a cis-element for regulating corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) gene expression. Further support is expected as genomic and transcriptomic data analytical tools are developed and refined. Recently, progress has been made in research into ERV sequences serving as transcriptional and translational regulators [94,95,101,102]. These sequences could be co-opted for newly integrated retroviral gene regulation.
Nevertheless, solid confirmation of a retrovirus integration into sperm or egg has not been obtained, and the mechanism of integration remains unclear. The rarity of such events owes in no small part to the narrow windows of possibility for infection, but conversion to active ERVs is also contingent on the perfect confluence of criteria as follows:
(a)
The insertion of ERVs can make functional genes of the host placenta-specific. i.e., Fematirn-1 integration into the intron 18 of pregnancy-specific FAT2 gene;
(b)
Its own LTR is sufficient to transcribe its own gene segments, which serve as the cis-acting element(s), resulting in the activation of a host gene. i.e., IFNG, THE1B on CRH;
(c)
It can make use of transcription factors utilized by the pre-existing gene, as per the baton-pass hypothesis. i.e., A transcription factor GCM1 for syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.
(d)
The ERV is co-opted along with its promoter/enhancer in the integrated genome; i.e., SPRE (syncytin post-transcriptional regulatory element);
(e)
There is cooperation with miRNAs and/or lncRNAs, yet not definitely characterized under placental/trophectodermal conditions, either alone or together with ERVs.
In general, the placentas have lower DNA methylation levels than embryos, allowing free expression of ERVs and transposons during gestation, thereby facilitating the selection of advantageous genes from a broader market. Such extraembryonic circumstances might have allowed for not only the domestication of ERVs to establish novel endogenous genes via multiple selections but also the dissemination of ERVs and transposons throughout genomes as transcriptional regulators. Moreover, ERVs could serve as cis- and/or trans-acting factors for functional genes of the host. Similarly, various degrees of maternal-fetal cell interactions in the uterine compartment may [65] have led to changes in kinds and degrees of gene usage, possibly resulting in cellular and morphological changes in placentas. It is interesting to speculate that placentas themselves might have served as an evolutionary laboratory to promote mammalian evolution [72,103].

10. Conclusions

Exhaustive research on the elucidation of cellular mechanisms associated with structural diversity of the placenta has continued for several decades. Still, in the last twenty years, new methods such as RNA-seq, iTRAQ, and ChiP-seq analyses have become available to analyze whole transcripts, proteins, and their upstream events to regulate such expression. These advancements have made it possible to isolate molecular events regulating placental diversity and the ERVs linked to such variations; however, the mechanisms associated with placental diversity have not been characterized.
It is now clear that the emergence of mammalian placentas was made possible with the acquisition of therian PEG10 and eutherian PEG11/RTL1 and LDOC1/SIRH7/RTL7 genes, followed by independent yet successive integrations of syncytin-type genes for structural variations. A question remains whether the placental structures we know now are the ultimate forms or are still evolving. If it is the latter, placental structures may still be diversifying, and new variations await discovery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.I. and K.K. (Kazuya Kusama); writing—original draft preparation, K.I., S.N. and F.I.; writing—review and editing, K.I., K.K. (Kazuya Kusama) and T.K.-I., S.N., K.K. (Koichi Kitao), T.M. and F.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS KAKENHI 20H03133 (to K.K.), 20K06775 (to S.N.), 21K06127 (T.K-I), 19H00978 (F.I.), and 20H03150 (T.M.) and JSPS fellows 20J22607 (to K. Kitao).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Robert Moriarty for the English editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Laird, M.K.; Thompson, M.B.; Whittington, C.M. Facultative oviparity in a viviparous skink (Saiphos equalis). Biol. Lett. 2019, 15, 20180827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Whittington, C.M.; Van Dyke, J.U.; Liang, S.Q.T.; Edwards, S.V.; Shine, R.; Thompson, M.B.; Grueber, C.E. Understanding the evolution of viviparity using intraspecific variation in reproductive mode and transitional forms of pregnancy. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2022, 97, 1179–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Foster, C.S.P.; Thompson, M.B.; Van Dyke, J.U.; Brandley, M.C.; Whittington, C.M. Emergence of an evolutionary innovation: Gene expression differences associated with the transition between oviparity and viviparity. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 1315–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roberts, R.M.; Green, J.A.; Schulz, L.C. The evolution of the placenta. Reproduction 2016, 152, R179–R189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Stewart, J.R. Developmental morphology and evolution of extraembryonic membranes of lizards and snakes (Reptilia, Squamata). J. Morphol. 2021, 282, 973–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Larue, L.; Ohsugi, M.; Hirchenhain, J.; Kemler, R. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 8263–8267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Shirayoshi, Y.; Hatta, K.; Hosoda, M.; Tsunasawa, S.; Sakiyama, F.; Takeichi, M. Cadherin cell adhesion molecules with distinct binding specificities share a common structure. Embo J. 1986, 5, 2485–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ohsugi, M.; Larue, L.; Schwarz, H.; Kemler, R. Cell-junctional and cytoskeletal organization in mouse blastocysts lacking E-cadherin. Dev. Biol. 1997, 185, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tsukita, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Katsuno, T.; Tamura, A.; Tsukita, S. Tight junction-based epithelial microenvironment and cell proliferation. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6930–6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mess, A.; Carter, A.M. Evolutionary transformations of fetal membrane characters in Eutheria with special reference to Afrotheria. J. Exp. Zool B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2006, 306, 140–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mess, A. Evolutionary transformations of chorioallantoic placental characters in rodentia with special reference to hystricognath species. J. Exp. Zool A Comp. Exp. Biol. 2003, 299, 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amoroso, E.C. Comparative anatomy of the placenta. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1959, 75, 855–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Enders, A.C.; Carter, A.M. What can comparative studies of placental structure tell us?—A review. Placenta 2004, 25 (Suppl. A), S3–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Hedges, S.B. TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mi, S.; Lee, X.; Li, X.; Veldman, G.M.; Finnerty, H.; Racie, L.; LaVallie, E.; Tang, X.Y.; Edouard, P.; Howes, S.; et al. Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature 2000, 403, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blaise, S.; de Parseval, N.; Bénit, L.; Heidmann, T. Genomewide screening for fusogenic human endogenous retrovirus envelopes identifies syncytin 2, a gene conserved on primate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13013–13018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dupressoir, A.; Marceau, G.; Vernochet, C.; Bénit, L.; Kanellopoulos, C.; Sapin, V.; Heidmann, T. Syncytin-A and syncytin-B, two fusogenic placenta-specific murine envelope genes of retroviral origin conserved in Muridae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cornelis, G.; Heidmann, O.; Degrelle, S.A.; Vernochet, C.; Lavialle, C.; Letzelter, C.; Bernard-Stoecklin, S.; Hassanin, A.; Mulot, B.; Guillomot, M.; et al. Captured retroviral envelope syncytin gene associated with the unique placental structure of higher ruminants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E828–E837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nakaya, Y.; Koshi, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Hashizume, K.; Miyazawa, T. Fematrin-1 is involved in fetomaternal cell-to-cell fusion in Bovinae placenta and has contributed to diversity of ruminant placentation. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 10563–10572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dunlap, K.A.; Palmarini, M.; Varela, M.; Burghardt, R.C.; Hayashi, K.; Farmer, J.L.; Spencer, T.E. Endogenous retroviruses regulate periimplantation placental growth and differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 14390–14395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Redelsperger, F.; Cornelis, G.; Vernochet, C.; Tennant, B.C.; Catzeflis, F.; Mulot, B.; Heidmann, O.; Heidmann, T.; Dupressoir, A. Capture of syncytin-Mar1, a fusogenic endogenous retroviral envelope gene involved in placentation in the Rodentia squirrel-related clade. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 7915–7928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Heidmann, O.; Vernochet, C.; Dupressoir, A.; Heidmann, T. Identification of an endogenous retroviral envelope gene with fusogenic activity and placenta-specific expression in the rabbit: A new "syncytin" in a third order of mammals. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cornelis, G.; Vernochet, C.; Carradec, Q.; Souquere, S.; Mulot, B.; Catzeflis, F.; Nilsson, M.A.; Menzies, B.R.; Renfree, M.B.; Pierron, G.; et al. Retroviral envelope gene captures and syncytin exaptation for placentation in marsupials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E487–E496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cornelis, G.; Heidmann, O.; Bernard-Stoecklin, S.; Reynaud, K.; Véron, G.; Mulot, B.; Dupressoir, A.; Heidmann, T. Ancestral capture of syncytin-Car1, a fusogenic endogenous retroviral envelope gene involved in placentation and conserved in Carnivora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E432–E441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cornelis, G.; Funk, M.; Vernochet, C.; Leal, F.; Tarazona, O.A.; Meurice, G.; Heidmann, O.; Dupressoir, A.; Miralles, A.; Ramirez-Pinilla, M.P.; et al. An endogenous retroviral envelope syncytin and its cognate receptor identified in the viviparous placental Mabuya lizard. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E10991–E11000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Esnault, C.; Cornelis, G.; Heidmann, O.; Heidmann, T. Differential evolutionary fate of an ancestral primate endogenous retrovirus envelope gene, the EnvV syncytin, captured for a function in placentation. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cornelis, G.; Vernochet, C.; Malicorne, S.; Souquere, S.; Tzika, A.C.; Goodman, S.M.; Catzeflis, F.; Robinson, T.J.; Milinkovitch, M.C.; Pierron, G.; et al. Retroviral envelope syncytin capture in an ancestrally diverged mammalian clade for placentation in the primitive Afrotherian tenrecs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4332–E4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Heidmann, O.; Béguin, A.; Paternina, J.; Berthier, R.; Deloger, M.; Bawa, O.; Heidmann, T. HEMO, an ancestral endogenous retroviral envelope protein shed in the blood of pregnant women and expressed in pluripotent stem cells and tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6642–E6651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Matsuda, T.; Sasaki, M.; Kato, H.; Yamada, H.; Cohen, M.; Barrett, J.C.; Oshimura, M.; Wake, N. Human chromosome 7 carries a putative tumor suppressor gene(s) involved in choriocarcinoma. Oncogene 1997, 15, 2773–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sugimoto, J.; Sugimoto, M.; Bernstein, H.; Jinno, Y.; Schust, D. A novel human endogenous retroviral protein inhibits cell-cell fusion. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boso, G.; Fleck, K.; Carley, S.; Liu, Q.; Buckler-White, A.; Kozak, C.A. The Oldest Co-opted gag Gene of a Human Endogenous Retrovirus Shows Placenta-Specific Expression and Is Upregulated in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5453–5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ono, R.; Nakamura, K.; Inoue, K.; Naruse, M.; Usami, T.; Wakisaka-Saito, N.; Hino, T.; Suzuki-Migishima, R.; Ogonuki, N.; Miki, H.; et al. Deletion of Peg10, an imprinted gene acquired from a retrotransposon, causes early embryonic lethality. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sekita, Y.; Wagatsuma, H.; Nakamura, K.; Ono, R.; Kagami, M.; Wakisaka, N.; Hino, T.; Suzuki-Migishima, R.; Kohda, T.; Ogura, A.; et al. Role of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, Rtl1, in the feto-maternal interface of mouse placenta. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Naruse, M.; Ono, R.; Irie, M.; Nakamura, K.; Furuse, T.; Hino, T.; Oda, K.; Kashimura, M.; Yamada, I.; Wakana, S.; et al. Sirh7/Ldoc1 knockout mice exhibit placental P4 overproduction and delayed parturition. Development 2014, 141, 4763–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Vernochet, C.; Heidmann, O.; Dupressoir, A.; Cornelis, G.; Dessen, P.; Catzeflis, F.; Heidmann, T. A syncytin-like endogenous retrovirus envelope gene of the guinea pig specifically expressed in the placenta junctional zone and conserved in Caviomorpha. Placenta 2011, 32, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakagawa, S.; Bai, H.; Sakurai, T.; Nakaya, Y.; Konno, T.; Miyazawa, T.; Gojobori, T.; Imakawa, K. Dynamic evolution of endogenous retrovirus-derived genes expressed in bovine conceptuses during the period of placentation. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Baba, K.; Nakaya, Y.; Shojima, T.; Muroi, Y.; Kizaki, K.; Hashizume, K.; Imakawa, K.; Miyazawa, T. Identification of novel endogenous betaretroviruses which are transcribed in the bovine placenta. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sakurai, T.; Nakagawa, S.; Bai, H.; Bai, R.; Kusama, K.; Ideta, A.; Aoyagi, Y.; Kaneko, K.; Iga, K.; Yasuda, J.; et al. Novel endogenous retrovirus-derived transcript expressed in the bovine placenta is regulated by WNT signaling. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 3499–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Funk, M.; Cornelis, G.; Vernochet, C.; Heidmann, O.; Dupressoir, A.; Conley, A.; Glickman, S.; Heidmann, T. Capture of a Hyena-Specific Retroviral Envelope Gene with Placental Expression Associated in Evolution with the Unique Emergence among Carnivorans of Hemochorial Placentation in Hyaenidae. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e01811-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Imakawa, K.; Bai, R.; Fujiwara, H.; Ideta, A.; Aoyagi, Y.; Kusama, K. Continuous model of conceptus implantation to the maternal endometrium. J. Endocrinol. 2017, 233, R53–R65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Biggers, J.D.; Bell, J.E.; Benos, D.J. Mammalian blastocyst: Transport functions in a developing epithelium. Am. J. Physiol. 1988, 255, C419–C432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sutherland, A. Mechanisms of implantation in the mouse: Differentiation and functional importance of trophoblast giant cell behavior. Dev. Biol. 2003, 258, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kokkinos, M.I.; Murthi, P.; Wafai, R.; Thompson, E.W.; Newgreen, D.F. Cadherins in the human placenta--epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and placental development. Placenta 2010, 31, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jordan, N.V.; Johnson, G.L.; Abell, A.N. Tracking the intermediate stages of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in epithelial stem cells and cancer. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2865–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Floridon, C.; Nielsen, O.; Holund, B.; Sunde, L.; Westergaard, J.G.; Thomsen, S.G.; Teisner, B. Localization of E-cadherin in villous, extravillous and vascular trophoblasts during intrauterine, ectopic and molar pregnancy. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 6, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lavialle, C.; Cornelis, G.; Dupressoir, A.; Esnault, C.; Heidmann, O.; Vernochet, C.; Heidmann, T. Paleovirology of ’syncytins’, retroviral env genes exapted for a role in placentation. Philos Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20120507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kemp, B.; Kertschanska, S.; Kadyrov, M.; Rath, W.; Kaufmann, P.; Huppertz, B. Invasive depth of extravillous trophoblast correlates with cellular phenotype: A comparison of intra- and extrauterine implantation sites. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 117, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yamakoshi, S.; Bai, R.; Chaen, T.; Ideta, A.; Aoyagi, Y.; Sakurai, T.; Konno, T.; Imakawa, K. Expression of mesenchymal-related genes by the bovine trophectoderm following conceptus attachment to the endometrial epithelium. Reproduction 2012, 143, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Talbot, N.C.; Caperna, T.J.; Edwards, J.L.; Garrett, W.; Wells, K.D.; Ealy, A.D. Bovine blastocyst-derived trophectoderm and endoderm cell cultures: Interferon tau and transferrin expression as respective in vitro markers. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Skarzynski, D.J.; Miyamoto, Y.; Okuda, K. Production of prostaglandin f(2alpha) by cultured bovine endometrial cells in response to tumor necrosis factor alpha: Cell type specificity and intracellular mechanisms. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bai, R.; Kusama, K.; Nakamura, K.; Sakurai, T.; Kimura, K.; Ideta, A.; Aoyagi, Y.; Imakawa, K. Down-regulation of transcription factor OVOL2 contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in a noninvasive type of trophoblast implantation to the maternal endometrium. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 3371–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kusama, K.; Bai, R.; Ideta, A.; Aoyagi, Y.; Okuda, K.; Imakawa, K. Regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in bovine conceptuses through the interaction between follistatin and activin A. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2016, 434, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Moustakas, A.; Heldin, P. TGFβ and matrix-regulated epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 2621–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wooding, F.B.; Beckers, J.F. Trinucleate cells and the ultrastructural localisation of bovine placental lactogen. Cell Tissue Res. 1987, 247, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Seo, H.; Bazer, F.W.; Burghardt, R.C.; Johnson, G.A. Immunohistochemical Examination of Trophoblast Syncytialization during Early Placentation in Sheep. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yamada, A.; Ohtsuki, K.; Shiga, N.; Green, J.A.; Matsuno, Y.; Imakawa, K. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and bi- and multi-nucleated trophoblast cell formation in ovine conceptuses during the peri-implantation period. J. Reprod. Dev. 2022, 68, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bischof, P.; Irminger-Finger, I. The human cytotrophoblastic cell, a mononuclear chameleon. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moffett, A.; Loke, C. Immunology of placentation in eutherian mammals. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhiwgade, D.A.; Singh, A.B.; Manekar, A.P.; Menon, S.N. Ultrastructural development of chorioallantoic placenta in the Indian Miniopterus bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus (Hodgson). Acta Anat. 1992, 145, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. DeSesso, J.M.; Williams, A.L.; Ahuja, A.; Bowman, C.J.; Hurtt, M.E. The placenta, transfer of immunoglobulins, and safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals in pregnancy. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2012, 42, 185–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. King, B.F.; Mossman, H.W. The fetal membranes and unusual giant cell placenta of the jerboa (Jaculus) and jumping mouse (Zapus). Am. J. Anat. 1974, 140, 405–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Oduor-Okelo, D.; Katema, R.M.; Carter, A.M. Placenta and fetal membranes of the four-toed elephant shrew, Petrodromus tetradactylus. Placenta 2004, 25, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Oduor-Okelo, D.; Musewe, V.O.; Gombe, S. Electron microscopic study of the chorioallantoic placenta of the rock hyrax (Heterohyrax brucei). J. Reprod. Fertil. 1983, 68, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Wooding, F.B. Role of binucleate cells in fetomaternal cell fusion at implantation in the sheep. Am. J. Anat. 1984, 170, 233–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Haig, D. Retroviruses and the placenta. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, R609–R613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Bininda-Emonds, O.R.; Cardillo, M.; Jones, K.E.; MacPhee, R.D.; Beck, R.M.; Grenyer, R.; Price, S.A.; Vos, R.A.; Gittleman, J.L.; Purvis, A. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 2007, 446, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ono, R.; Kobayashi, S.; Wagatsuma, H.; Aisaka, K.; Kohda, T.; Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. A retrotransposon-derived gene, PEG10, is a novel imprinted gene located on human chromosome 7q21. Genomics 2001, 73, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Suzuki, S.; Ono, R.; Narita, T.; Pask, A.J.; Shaw, G.; Wang, C.; Kohda, T.; Alsop, A.E.; Marshall Graves, J.A.; Kohara, Y.; et al. Retrotransposon silencing by DNA methylation can drive mammalian genomic imprinting. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3, e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Charlier, C.; Segers, K.; Wagenaar, D.; Karim, L.; Berghmans, S.; Jaillon, O.; Shay, T.; Weissenbach, J.; Cockett, N.; Gyapay, G.; et al. Human-ovine comparative sequencing of a 250-kb imprinted domain encompassing the callipyge (clpg) locus and identification of six imprinted transcripts: DLK1, DAT, GTL2, PEG11, antiPEG11, and MEG8. Genome. Res. 2001, 11, 850–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kim, A.; Terzian, C.; Santamaria, P.; Pélisson, A.; Purd’homme, N.; Bucheton, A. Retroviruses in invertebrates: The gypsy retrotransposon is apparently an infectious retrovirus of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1285–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Song, S.U.; Gerasimova, T.; Kurkulos, M.; Boeke, J.D.; Corces, V.G. An env-like protein encoded by a Drosophila retroelement: Evidence that gypsy is an infectious retrovirus. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 2046–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. The role of genes domesticated from LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses in mammals. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. The Evolutionary Advantage in Mammals of the Complementary Monoallelic Expression Mechanism of Genomic Imprinting and Its Emergence From a Defense Against the Insertion Into the Host Genome. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 832983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kitazawa, M.; Tamura, M.; Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. Severe damage to the placental fetal capillary network causes mid- to late fetal lethality and reduction in placental size in Peg11/Rtl1 KO mice. Genes Cells 2017, 22, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Shiura, H.; Ono, R.; Tachibana, S.; Kohda, T.; Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. PEG10 viral aspartic protease domain is essential for the maintenance of fetal capillary structure in the mouse placenta. Development 2021, 148, dev199564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Malassiné, A.; Frendo, J.L.; Evain-Brion, D. A comparison of placental development and endocrine functions between the human and mouse model. Hum. Reprod. Update 2003, 9, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Murr, S.M.; Stabenfeldt, G.H.; Bradford, G.E.; Geschwind, I.I. Plasma progesterone during pregnancy in the mouse. Endocrinology 1974, 94, 1209–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Virgo, B.B.; Bellward, G.D. Serum progesterone levels in the pregnant and postpartum laboratory mouse. Endocrinology 1974, 95, 1486–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Renaud, S.J.; Karim Rumi, M.A.; Soares, M.J. Review: Genetic manipulation of the rodent placenta. Placenta 2011, 32 (Suppl. 2), S130–S135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. De Parseval, N.; Lazar, V.; Casella, J.F.; Benit, L.; Heidmann, T. Survey of human genes of retroviral origin: Identification and transcriptome of the genes with coding capacity for complete envelope proteins. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 10414–10422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Chang, C.; Chen, P.T.; Chang, G.D.; Huang, C.J.; Chen, H. Functional characterization of the placental fusogenic membrane protein syncytin. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 71, 1956–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chen, C.P.; Chen, L.F.; Yang, S.R.; Chen, C.Y.; Ko, C.C.; Chang, G.D.; Chen, H. Functional characterization of the human placental fusogenic membrane protein syncytin 2. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Okahara, G.; Matsubara, S.; Oda, T.; Sugimoto, J.; Jinno, Y.; Kanaya, F. Expression analyses of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs): Tissue-specific and developmental stage-dependent expression of HERVs. Genomics 2004, 84, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hayward, M.D.; Pötgens, A.J.; Drewlo, S.; Kaufmann, P.; Rasko, J.E. Distribution of human endogenous retrovirus type W receptor in normal human villous placenta. Pathology 2007, 39, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Esnault, C.; Priet, S.; Ribet, D.; Vernochet, C.; Bruls, T.; Lavialle, C.; Weissenbach, J.; Heidmann, T. A placenta-specific receptor for the fusogenic, endogenous retrovirus-derived, human syncytin-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17532–17537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Blaise, S.; de Parseval, N.; Heidmann, T. Functional characterization of two newly identified Human Endogenous Retrovirus coding envelope genes. Retrovirology 2005, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Cáceres, M.; Thomas, J.W. The gene of retroviral origin Syncytin 1 is specific to hominoids and is inactive in Old World monkeys. J. Hered. 2006, 97, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pötgens, A.J.; Schmitz, U.; Bose, P.; Versmold, A.; Kaufmann, P.; Frank, H.G. Mechanisms of syncytial fusion: A review. Placenta 2002, 23 (Suppl. A), S107–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yu, C.; Shen, K.; Lin, M.; Chen, P.; Lin, C.; Chang, G.D.; Chen, H. GCMa regulates the syncytin-mediated trophoblastic fusion. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 50062–50068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Le Naour, F.; Rubinstein, E.; Jasmin, C.; Prenant, M.; Boucheix, C. Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 2000, 287, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tachibana, I.; Hemler, M.E. Role of transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF) proteins CD9 and CD81 in muscle cell fusion and myotube maintenance. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Muroi, Y.; Sakurai, T.; Hanashi, A.; Kubota, K.; Nagaoka, K.; Imakawa, K. CD9 regulates transcription factor GCM1 and ERVWE1 expression through the cAMP/protein kinase A signaling pathway. Reproduction 2009, 138, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Dunn-Fletcher, C.E.; Muglia, L.M.; Pavlicev, M.; Wolf, G.; Sun, M.A.; Hu, Y.C.; Huffman, E.; Tumukuntala, S.; Thiele, K.; Mukherjee, A.; et al. Anthropoid primate-specific retroviral element THE1B controls expression of CRH in placenta and alters gestation length. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2006337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Kitao, K.; Tanikaga, T.; Miyazawa, T. Identification of a post-transcriptional regulatory element in the human endogenous retroviral syncytin-1. J. Gen. Virol. 2019, 100, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kitao, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Miyazawa, T. An ancient retroviral RNA element hidden in mammalian genomes and its involvement in co-opted retroviral gene regulation. Retrovirology 2021, 18, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chuong, E.B.; Elde, N.C.; Feschotte, C. Regulatory evolution of innate immunity through co-option of endogenous retroviruses. Science 2016, 351, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Sun, M.A.; Wolf, G.; Wang, Y.; Senft, A.D.; Ralls, S.; Jin, J.; Dunn-Fletcher, C.E.; Muglia, L.J.; Macfarlan, T.S. Endogenous Retroviruses Drive Lineage-Specific Regulatory Evolution across Primate and Rodent Placentae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 4992–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Imakawa, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Miyazawa, T. Baton pass hypothesis: Successive incorporation of unconserved endogenous retroviral genes for placentation during mammalian evolution. Genes Cells 2015, 20, 771–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Mangeney, M.; Renard, M.; Schlecht-Louf, G.; Bouallaga, I.; Heidmann, O.; Letzelter, C.; Richaud, A.; Ducos, B.; Heidmann, T. Placental syncytins: Genetic disjunction between the fusogenic and immunosuppressive activity of retroviral envelope proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20534–20539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Dewannieux, M.; Heidmann, T. Endogenous retroviruses: Acquisition, amplification and taming of genome invaders. Curr Opin Virol 2013, 3, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chuong, E.B. The placenta goes viral: Retroviruses control gene expression in pregnancy. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e3000028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Chuong, E.B.; Rumi, M.A.; Soares, M.J.; Baker, J.C. Endogenous retroviruses function as species-specific enhancer elements in the placenta. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Ishino, F. Mammalian-specific genomic functions: Newly acquired traits generated by genomic imprinting and LTR retrotransposon-derived genes in mammals. Proc. Jpn Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2015, 91, 511–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 02458 g001 550
Figure 1. Structural diversity of placentas as classified by the distribution of chorionic villi. Gross anatomy showing diffuse (pigs), cotyledonary (ruminants), zonary (cats and dogs), and discoid (rodents and primates). (A): Diffuse placentas have a uniform distribution of chorionic villi covering the chorion’s surface. (B): Cotyledonary placentas have numerous, discrete, button-like structures called cotyledons and they join with the maternal caruncle, forming a placentome. (C): Zonary placentas have a band-like zone of chorionic villi, of which both edges are primary exchange zones. (D): Discoid placentas form a regionalized disc-like structure. Red and blue lines are the artery and vein, respectively, which are joined to an umbilical cord.
Figure 1. Structural diversity of placentas as classified by the distribution of chorionic villi. Gross anatomy showing diffuse (pigs), cotyledonary (ruminants), zonary (cats and dogs), and discoid (rodents and primates). (A): Diffuse placentas have a uniform distribution of chorionic villi covering the chorion’s surface. (B): Cotyledonary placentas have numerous, discrete, button-like structures called cotyledons and they join with the maternal caruncle, forming a placentome. (C): Zonary placentas have a band-like zone of chorionic villi, of which both edges are primary exchange zones. (D): Discoid placentas form a regionalized disc-like structure. Red and blue lines are the artery and vein, respectively, which are joined to an umbilical cord.
Cells 11 02458 g001
Cells 11 02458 g002 550
Figure 2. Placental classification according to separation between fetal and maternal blood supplies. There are three layers of separate maternal and fetal blood in Hemochorial (primates and rodents); chorionic epithelium (syncytiotrophoblast), chorionic interstitium (basement membrane), and chorionic capillaries (fetal blood). In Endotheliochorial (dogs and cats), there are five layers between the maternal and fetal blood; endometrial capillaries (maternal blood), endometrial interstitium, chorionic epithelium, chorionic interstitium and chorionic capillaries. In Epitheliochorial (pigs and horses), six layers separate the maternal and fetal blood; endometrial capillaries, endometrial interstitium, endometrial epithelium, chorionic epithelium, chorionic interstitium, and chorionic capillaries.
Figure 2. Placental classification according to separation between fetal and maternal blood supplies. There are three layers of separate maternal and fetal blood in Hemochorial (primates and rodents); chorionic epithelium (syncytiotrophoblast), chorionic interstitium (basement membrane), and chorionic capillaries (fetal blood). In Endotheliochorial (dogs and cats), there are five layers between the maternal and fetal blood; endometrial capillaries (maternal blood), endometrial interstitium, chorionic epithelium, chorionic interstitium and chorionic capillaries. In Epitheliochorial (pigs and horses), six layers separate the maternal and fetal blood; endometrial capillaries, endometrial interstitium, endometrial epithelium, chorionic epithelium, chorionic interstitium, and chorionic capillaries.
Cells 11 02458 g002
Cells 11 02458 g003 550
Figure 3. Multiple acquisitions of ERV-derived genes expressed in placenta. The dendrogram indicates a taxonomic relationship of 45 species, including 42 mammals, two reptiles, and one bird. The phylogeny was obtained using the TimeTree website (http://www.timetree.org, accessed on 2 July 2022 [14]). ERV-derived genes expressed in the placenta are illustrated at the location of the presumed inserted lineage. The red or blue color indicated whether the ERV-derived genes were reported to have fusion activity or not, respectively. A gene in parentheses indicated the time of insertion where the gene without parenthesis is when it has acquired function. The details of each ERV-derived gene shown in the figure are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 3. Multiple acquisitions of ERV-derived genes expressed in placenta. The dendrogram indicates a taxonomic relationship of 45 species, including 42 mammals, two reptiles, and one bird. The phylogeny was obtained using the TimeTree website (http://www.timetree.org, accessed on 2 July 2022 [14]). ERV-derived genes expressed in the placenta are illustrated at the location of the presumed inserted lineage. The red or blue color indicated whether the ERV-derived genes were reported to have fusion activity or not, respectively. A gene in parentheses indicated the time of insertion where the gene without parenthesis is when it has acquired function. The details of each ERV-derived gene shown in the figure are summarized in Table 1.
Cells 11 02458 g003
Table
Table 1. ERV-derived genes expressed in the placenta (related to Figure 3).
Table 1. ERV-derived genes expressed in the placenta (related to Figure 3).
Gene NameLTR/ERVTaxonomyFusion ActivityReference
syncytin-1HERV-WHominidae
(Catarrhini)		yes[15]
syncytin-2HERV-FRDSimiiformesyes[16]
syncytin-A-Muridaeyes[17]
syncytin-B-Muridaeyes[17]
syncytin-Rum1-Ruminantiayes[18]
Fematrin-1BERV-K1Bovinaeyes[19]
enJSRV envendogenous JSRVCaprinaeyes[20]
syncytin-Mar1-Squirrelyes[21]
syncyitn-Ory1-Leporidaeyes[22]
syncytin-Opo1-Monodelphisyes[23]
syncytin-Car1-Carnivorayes[24]
syncytin-Mab1-Mabuyayes[25]
mac-syncytin-3ERV-V2Simiiformesyes[26]
syncytin-Ten1-Tenrecidaeyes[27]
HEMOMER34Simiiformes (Boreoeutheria)No[28]
ERV3-1HERV-RSimiiformesNo[29]
suppressynHERV-Fb1CatarrhiniNo[30]
gagV1HERV-V1SimiiformesNo[31]
PEG10sushi-ichiTheriaNo[32]
PEG11/RTL1sushi-ichiPlacentaliaNo[33]
SIRH7/LDOC1sushi-ichiPlacentaliaNo[34]
env-Cav1-CaviomorphaNo[35]
BERV-PBERV-PBovinaeNo[36]
BERV-K2BERV-K2BovinaeNo[37]
BERV-K3BERV-K3BovinaeNo[38]
hyena-Env2-HyaenidaeNo[39]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Imakawa, K.; Kusama, K.; Kaneko-Ishino, T.; Nakagawa, S.; Kitao, K.; Miyazawa, T.; Ishino, F. Endogenous Retroviruses and Placental Evolution, Development, and Diversity. Cells 2022, 11, 2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152458

AMA Style

Imakawa K, Kusama K, Kaneko-Ishino T, Nakagawa S, Kitao K, Miyazawa T, Ishino F. Endogenous Retroviruses and Placental Evolution, Development, and Diversity. Cells. 2022; 11(15):2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Imakawa, Kazuhiko, Kazuya Kusama, Tomoko Kaneko-Ishino, So Nakagawa, Koichi Kitao, Takayuki Miyazawa, and Fumitoshi Ishino. 2022. "Endogenous Retroviruses and Placental Evolution, Development, and Diversity" Cells 11, no. 15: 2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop