The Biomass Productivity of Maize, Hemp and Faba Bean Multi-Crops
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Site
2.2. Treatments and Agronomic Practice
2.3. Methods and Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Impact of Crop Diversification Level on Maize Productivity
3.2. Impact of Crop Diversification Level on the Hemp Productivity
3.3. Impact of Crop Diversification Level on Faba Bean Productivity
3.4. Total Dried Biomass of Multi-Crops
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ioelovich, M. Energetic Potential of Plant Biomass and Its Use. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2013, 2, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Bondeau, A.; Lauk, C.; Muler, C.; Plutzar, C.; Steinberger, J.K. Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: Sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 4753–4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ehrmann, J.; Ritz, K. Plant: Soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant Soil 2014, 376, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lithourgidis, A.S.; Dordas, C.A.; Damalas, C.A.; Vlachostergios, D.N. Annual intercrops: An alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2011, 5, 396–410. [Google Scholar]
- Maitra, S.; Hossain, A.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Ondrisik, P.; Gitari, H.; Brahmachari, K.; Shankar, T.; Bhadra, P.; Palai, J.B.; et al. Intercropping-A low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. Agron J. 2021, 11, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, S.K.; Panda, P.; Pramanick, B.; Shankar, T.; Praharaj, S.; Saren, B.K.; Gitari, H.I.; Brahmachari, K.; Hossain, A.; Maitra, S. Advantages of cotton based intercropping system: A review. Int. J. Biores. Sci. 2020, 7, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, M.A.; Gul, H.; Wang, J.; Yasin, H.S.; Qin, R.; Khalid, M.H.B.; Naeem, M.; Feng, L.Y.; Iqbal, N.; Gitari, H.; et al. Land productivity and water use efficiency of maize-soybean strip intercropping systems in semi-arid areas: A case study in Punjab Province, Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 308, 127282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, H.S.A.; Abdel-Moneim, M.H. Maximizing land use efficiency and productivity of soybean and fodder maize intercrops 657 through manipulating sowing schedule and maize harvest regime. Agronomy 2021, 11, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Jensen, E.S. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil 2005, 274, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Rahman, T.; Song, C.; Yang, F.; Su, B.; Cui, L.; Bu, W.; Yang, W. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize–soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Res. 2018, 224, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpenstein-Machan, M.; Stuelpnagel, R. Biomass yield and nitrogen fixation of legumes monocropped and intercropped with rye and rotation effects on a subsequent maize crop. Plant Soil 2000, 218, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karkanis, A.; Ntatsi, G.; Lepse, L.; Fernandez, J.A.; Vagen, I.M.; Rawald, B.; Alsina, I.; Kronberga, A.; Balliu, A.; Olle, M.; et al. Faba Bean Cultivation–Revealing Novel Managing Practices for More Sustainable and Competitive European Cropping Systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jensen, E.; Peoples, M.B.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 2010, 115, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adak, M.S.; Kibritci, M. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus levels on nodulation and yield components in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Legume Res. 2016, 39, 991–994. [Google Scholar]
- Argaw, A.; Mnalku, A. Effectiveness of native Rhizobium on nodulation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in Eastern Ethiopia. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 1390–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silberg, T.R.; Richardson, R.B.; Lopez, M.C. Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce Striga in Malawi. Food Secur. 2020, 12, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasin, M.; Ahmad, A.; Khaliq, T.; Habib-ur-Rahman, M.; Niaz, S.; Gaiser, T.; Ghafoor, I.; Hassan, H.S.; Quasim, M.; Hoogenboom, G. Climate change impact uncertainty assessment and adaptations for sustainable maize production using multi-crop and climate models. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 18967–18988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seran, T.H.; Brintha, I. Review on Maize Based Intercropping. J. Agron. 2010, 9, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adu-Gyamfi, J.J.; Myaka, F.A.; Sakala, F.D.; Odgaard, R.; Vesterager, J.M.; Hogh-Jensen, H. Biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize-pigeonpea in semi-arid Sounthern and Eastern Africa. Plant Soil 2007, 295, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Rahman, T.; Song, C.; Su, B.; Yang, F.; Yong, T.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, W. Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Res. 2017, 20, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilalis, D.; Papastylianou, P.; Konstantas, A.; Patsiali, S.; Karkanis, A.; Efthimiadou, A. Weed-suppressive effects of maize–legume intercropping in organic farming. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2010, 56, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frankowski, J.; Sieracka, D. Possibilities for Using Waste Hemp Straw for Solid Biofuel Production. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 9, 18. [Google Scholar]
- Prade, T.; Svensson, S.E.; Andersson, A.; Mattsson, J.E. Biomass and energy yield of industrial hemp for biogas and solid fuel. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 3040–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burczyk, H.; Grabowska, L.; Kolodziej, J.; Strybe, M. Industrial Hemp as a Raw Material for Energy Production. J. Ind. Hemp. 2008, 13, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolarikova, M.; Havrland, B.; Ivanova, T. Energy Balance of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Grown for Energy Purposes. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 2013, 46, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golaszewska, K.; Golaszewski, J. Hemp Production. Sustain. Agric. Rev. 2020, 42, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
- Chimonyo, V.G.P.; Modi, A.T.; Mabhaudhi, T. Perspective on crop modelling in the management of intercropping systems. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2015, 61, 1511–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petlickaitė, R.; Jasinskas, A.; Mieldažys, R.; Romaneckas, K.; Praspaliauskas, M.; Balandaitė, J. Investigation of Pressed Solid Biofuel Produced from Multi-Crop Biomass. Sustainability 2022, 14, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IUSS working group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 3rd ed.; World Soil Resources Reports No.106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2022).
- Romaneckas, K.; Balandaitė, J.; Sinkevičienė, A.; Kimbirauskienė, R.; Jasinskas, A.; Ginelevičius, U.; Romaneckas, A.; Petlickaitė, R. Short-Term Impact of Multi-Cropping on Some Soil Physical Properties and Respiration. Agronomy 2022, 12, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torney, F.; Moeller, L.; Scarpa, A.; Wang, K. Genetic engineering approaches to improve bioethanol production from maize. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinnifesi, F.K.; Makumba, W.; Kwesiga, F.R. Sustainable maize production using gliricidia/maize intercropping in Southern Malawi. Exp. Agric. 2006, 42, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ofori, E.; Oteng-Darko, P.; Berchie, J.N.; Nimako, F.O.; Yeboah, S.; Danquah, E.O. Monitoring of soil moisture regime and water 689 use efficiency under maize cowpea cropping system. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2014, 3, 837–848. [Google Scholar]
- Tsubo, M.; Walker, S.; Ogindo, H.O. A simulation model of cereal-legume intercropping system of semi-arid regions. Field Crops Res. 2005, 93, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dordas, C.A.; Lithourgidis, A.S. Growth, yield and nitrogen performance of faba bean inter crops with oat and triticale varying seedling ratios. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 66, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prade, T.; Svensson, S.E.; Mattsson, J.E. Energy balances for biogas and solid biofuel production from industrial hemp. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 40, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geetha, P.; Tayade, A.S.; Chandrasekar, C.A.; Selvan, T.; Kumar, R. Agronomic Response, Weed Smothering Efficiency and Economic Feasibility of Sugarcane and Legume Intercropping System in Tropical India. Environ. Policy 2018, 21, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, H.S.A.; Nawar, A.I.; Khalil, H.E. Intercropping pattern and N fertilizer schedule affect the per-2 formance of additively intercropped maize and forage cowpea 3 in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy 2022, 12, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewansiha, S.U.; Kamara, A.Y.; Chiezey, U.F.; Onyibe, J.E. Performance of cowpea grown as an intercrop with maize of different 737 populations. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 2015, 23, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
- Köpke, U.; Nemecek, T. Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crops Res. 2010, 115, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoltz, E.; Nadeau, E.; Wallenhammar, A.C. Intercropping Maize and Faba Bean for Silage Under Swedish Climate Conditions. Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bybee-Finley, K.A.; Mirsky, S.B.; Ryan, M.R. Crop Biomass Not Species Richness Drives Weed Suppression in Warm-Season Annual Grass–Legume Intercrops in the Northeast. Weed Sci. 2017, 65, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, L.; Liu, E.; Saeed, A.; Williams, D.W.; Hu, H.; Li, C.; Ray, A.E.; Shi, J. Industrial hemp as a potential bioenergy crop in comparison with kenaf, switchgrass and biomass sorghum. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aubin, M.P.; Seguin, P.; Vanasse, A.; Tremblay, G.; Mustafa, A.; Charron, J. Industrial hemp response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization. Crop. Forage Turfgrass Manag. 2016, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brooker, R.W.; Bennett, A.E.; Cong, W.F.; Daniell, T.J.; George, T.S.; Hallett, C.H.; Iannetta, P.P.M.; Jones, H.G.; Karley, A.J.; Li, L.; et al. Improving intercropping: A synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romaneckas, K.; Balandaitė, J.; Švereikaitė, A.; Jasinskas, A.; Ginelevičius, U.; Pakalnis, D. Impact of maize, hemp and faba bean inter-cropping for energy purposes on the soil chemical and physical composition. In Proceedings of the 49th International Symposium Actual Tasks On Agricultural Engineering, Opatija, Croatia, 28 February–2 March 2023. in press. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, J.G.; King, S.R.; Masabni, J.G.; Volder, A. Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 203, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romaneckas, K.; Adamavičienė, A.; Pilipavičius, V.; Šarauskis, E.; Avižienytė, D.; Buragienė, S. Interaction of maize and living mulch. Crop weediness and productivity. Zemdirbyste 2012, 99, 1392–3196. [Google Scholar]
Months | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Long-Term Average (Since 1974) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Air temperatures °C | ||||
April | 0.0 | −0.7 | −0.7 | 6.9 |
May | −2.7 | −1.8 | −2.2 | 13.2 |
June | +2.9 | +3.4 | −1.6 | 16.1 |
July | −1.3 | +3.9 | −0.8 | 18.7 |
August | +1.4 | −0.8 | +3.6 | 17.3 |
Precipitations rates mm | ||||
April | −37.3 | −7.6 | −2.7 | 41.3 |
May | +32.7 | +59.9 | +22.3 | 61.7 |
June | +22.4 | −36.6 | +0.7 | 76.9 |
July | −36.2 | −48.2 | +3.9 | 96.6 |
August | +3.9 | +33.3 | −50.2 | 88.9 |
Treatments | Cultivation | Abbreviation |
---|---|---|
single crop | maize | MA |
hemp | HE | |
faba bean | FB | |
binary crop | maize + hemp | MA + HE |
maize + faba bean | MA + FB | |
hemp + faba bean | HE + FB | |
ternary crop | maize + hemp + faba bean | MA + HE + FB |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Balandaitė, J.; Romaneckas, K.; Švereikaitė, A.; Kimbirauskienė, R.; Sinkevičienė, A.; Romaneckas, A. The Biomass Productivity of Maize, Hemp and Faba Bean Multi-Crops. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123193
Balandaitė J, Romaneckas K, Švereikaitė A, Kimbirauskienė R, Sinkevičienė A, Romaneckas A. The Biomass Productivity of Maize, Hemp and Faba Bean Multi-Crops. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123193
Chicago/Turabian StyleBalandaitė, Jovita, Kęstutis Romaneckas, Austėja Švereikaitė, Rasa Kimbirauskienė, Aušra Sinkevičienė, and Andrius Romaneckas. 2022. "The Biomass Productivity of Maize, Hemp and Faba Bean Multi-Crops" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123193