Next Article in Journal
Interactive Effects of Biochar, Nitrogen, and Phosphorous on the Symbiotic Performance, Growth, and Nutrient Uptake of Soybean (Glycine max L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Apple Autotetraploids—Phenotypic Characterisation and Response to Drought Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide In Silico Analysis and Expression Profiling of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Genes in Loquat, Apple, Peach, Strawberry and Pear
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chromosome Doubling in Genetically Diverse Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) Accessions and Evaluation of Tetraploids in Terms of Phenotype and Ability to Cross with Highbush Blueberry (V. corymbosum L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Meiotic Polyploidisation on Selected Morphological and Anatomical Traits in Interspecific Hybrids of Brassica oleracea × B. napus

by
Agnieszka Marasek-Ciolakowska
1,*,
Piotr Kamiński
2,*,
Małgorzata Podwyszyńska
1,
Urszula Kowalska
1,
Michał Starzycki
3 and
Elżbieta Starzycka-Korbas
3
1
Department of Applied Biology, The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3 Str., 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
2
Department of Genetics and Breeding, The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3 Str., 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
3
Department of Genetics and Breeding of Oilseed Plants, Division of Poznań, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization National Research Institute, Strzeszyńska 36 Str., 60-479 Poznan, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010026
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 19 December 2021 / Accepted: 20 December 2021 / Published: 23 December 2021

Abstract

:
In Brassica, interspecific hybridisation plays an important role in the formation of allopolyploid cultivars. In this study, the ploidy of F1 and F2 generations resulting from interspecific hybridisation between B. oleracea inbred lines of head cabbage (B. oleracea L. var. capitata) (2n = 18) and kale (B. oleracea L. var. acephala) (2n = 18) with inbred lines of rapeseed (B. napus L.) (2n = 38) was examined by flow cytometry analysis and chromosome observation. Furthermore, the effect of meiotic polyploidisation on selected phenotypic and anatomical traits was assessed. The F1 hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed (S3) and kale × rapeseed crosses (S20) were allotriploids with 2n = 28 chromosomes, and nuclear DNA amounts of 1.97 (S3) and 1.99 pg (S20). These values were intermediate between B. oleracea and B. napus. In interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation, which were derived after self-pollination of F1 hybrids (FS3, FS20) or by open crosses between F1 generation hybrids (FC320, FC230), the chromosome numbers were similar 2n = 56 or 2n = 55, whereas the genome sizes varied between 3.81 (FS20) and 3.95 pg 2C (FC230). Allohexaploid F2 hybrids had many superior agronomic traits compared to parental B. napus and B. oleracea lines and triploid F1 hybrids. In the generative stage, they were characterised by larger flowers and flower elements, such as anthers and lateral nectaries. F2 hybrids were male and female fertile. The pollen viability of F2 hybrids was comparable to parental genotypes and varied from 75.38% (FS3) to 88.24% (FC320), whereas in triploids of F1 hybrids only 6.76% (S3) and 13.46% (S20) of pollen grains were fertile. Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation derived by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation (FC320, FC230) had a better ability to set seed than F2 hybrids generated from the self-pollination of F1 hybrids. In the vegetative stage, F2 plants had bigger and thicker leaves, larger stomata, and significantly thicker layers of palisade and spongy mesophyll than triploids of the F1 generation and parental lines of B. oleracea and B. napus. The allohexaploid F2 hybrids analysed in this study can be used as innovative germplasm resources for further breeding new vegetable Brassica crops at the hexaploid level.

1. Introduction

Interspecific hybridisation plays an important role in the origins of polyploid cultivars, and it is acknowledged as the main source of genetic variation in cultivated plants. Approximately 70% of angiosperms have undergone polyploidisation, including whole genome duplication (WGD), during species development [1,2]. Polyploidy may result from the functioning of 2n gametes (meiotic doubling), distant hybridisation followed by chromosome doubling, or induced through artificial chromosome doubling (mitotic polyploidisation) [3,4]. The rate of 2n gamete production in plants is low. Most of the species of Brassicacea produce less than 2% of 2n male gametes, whereas a small number has more than 5% (up to 85%) production [5]. According to Ramsey and Schemske [6], distant hybridisation increase the frequency of unreduced gamete production. Meiotic polyploidisation via crossing with 2n gamete producing genotypes is one of the main methods currently used to obtain polyploidy tulip [4]. Similarly, in Lilium many triploid hybrids have resulted from the use of unreduced gametes [4]. Polyploid plants originating from the process of meiotic polyploidisation are superior to those produced from somatic doubling due to enhanced meiotic recombination, which leads to the rapid creation of genetic diversity [7]. Polyploidisation usually has a positive effect on growth habits, enhanced vigour, the size of generative and vegetative organs, and yield [8]. Good examples are triploid cultivars of apples, most of which are characterised by immunity to scab and high fruit marketable quality [9]. Similarly, allohexaploid wheat has a higher yield potential and is more vigorous than its diploid and tetraploid progenitors [10]. Allopolyploid crops that contain two or more genomes derived from distant species usually benefit from combining their traits and exhibit improved agronomic characteristics, better generative reproduction, and are useful as material for the breeding of new polyploid crop species [11].
Brassica is the most distinguished genus in the family Brassicaceae, which includes agriculturally important food crops domesticated for edible oil, vegetables, spices, forage crops, and ornamental plants [12,13]. Their genomes show high flexibility with respect to the ploidy modification, which allows them to easily adapt to various environmental conditions. The allotetraploid species produced by spontaneous interspecific polyploidisation include Brassica juncea (Indian mustard, AABB genome) formed by the hybridisation of diploid B. rapa (turnip rape, AA genome) and B. nigra (black mustard, BB genome), B. carinata (Ethiopian mustard, BBCC genome) formed from B. nigra and B. oleracea (cabbage, kale, CC genome), and B. napus (oilseed rape, rapeseed, swede, AACC genome) [14]. B. napus is a more recent allopolyploid species that formed about 7500 years ago by hybridisation between B. rapa and B. oleracea [15], which are mainly used as oil vegetables. These allopolyploids are morphologically diverse, including leaf type and shape, wax thickness, position of flowers, inflorescence types, and stack height and thickness [13]. Moreover, they are characterised by several desirable traits. For instance, B. juncea (AABB genome) has non-shattering siliques and disease resistance that are not present in the A or C genomes of B. napus [16,17]. B. carinata (BBCC genome) is resistant to diseases that commonly affect other oilseed Brassica spp., such as black rot disease and powdery mildew [18,19], and is resistant to various abiotic stressors, such as salt and heat [20,21]. Similarly, allotetraploid B. napus gives a higher yield and has increased resistance to biotic and abiotic stress compared to diploid B. rapa [22].
Allopolyploids have been subjected to extensive interspecific hybridisation with diverse parents, and there are examples of the introgression of various desirable characteristics into Brassica crops. For instance, high levels of resistance to black rot disease were found in somatic hybrids between B. oleracea var. botrytis and B. nigra and in all BC1 progeny [23], whereas triploid hybrids (2n = 3x = ABC) produced from the cross B. napus (rapeseed, AACC) × B. nigra (black mustard, BB) and their allohexaploid hybrids (AABBCC) had resistance to blackleg disease inherited from B. nigra [24]. Allotetraploid hybrids of the F2 generation between Brassica rapa var. parachinensis (Chinese cabbage) and Brassica oleracea var. italica (broccoli) showed new traits and a high level of nutritional elements [25]. In South Korea, one new leafy vegetable crop was bred from intergeneric the allopolyploid Brassicoraphanus between B. rapa and Raphanus sativus [26].
B. oleracea is mainly used as an edible vegetable. The most important B. oleracea crops are kale (var. viridis, var. costata, var. medullosa, and var. sabellica), cabbage (var. capitata and var. sabauda), branching bush kale (var. ramosa) cultivated for edible foliage, cauliflower and broccoli (var. botrytis and var. italica) cultivated for their thickened edible inflorescences, Brussels sprouts (var. gemmifera) grown for its edible axillary bud leaves, kohlrabi (var. gongyloides) cultivated for its above ground thickened stem, and Chinese kale (var. alboglabra), a leaf vegetable often treated as Brassica alboglabra (Figure 1) [27]. Several genotypes were selected for interspecific crosses. The rapeseed line RAP62, head cabbage IW1234, and kale IW08 inbred lines had valuable agronomical characteristics, including high tolerance to biotic stress, such as resistance to clubroot and Alternaria leaf spot, desired agronomic characteristics, internal uniformity, and high combining ability. We expected that this breeding program could potentially yield new, improved allopolyploid leafy vegetables exhibiting heterosis in respect to their morphology, genome structure, fertility, and improved agronomic characteristics. The neopolyploids could also serve as innovative germplasm resources for further genomic and genetic research. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of interploidy hybridisation between B. oleracea and B. napus on the ploidy level of the progeny and the variability of selected morphological and anatomical traits in F1 and F2 generation hybrids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The parental genotype of head cabbage IW1234 (B. oleracea L. var. capitata) was developed at the National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Genetics and Breeding, Skierniewice, Poland, as a valuable inbred line, which is characterised by a round head shape, good firmness with a 71–77-d vegetation period from planting to harvest, internal uniformity, and good vigour. Kale line (B. oleracea L. var. acephala) IW08 was obtained from the germplasm collection of the National Institute of Horticultural Research. The kale IW08 line had a semi-compact shape with grey-green horizontal, small leaves without petioles with intermediate blistering and crenated edges and was characterised by low susceptibility to clubroot and bacterial diseases in the field. The rapeseed (B. napus) RAP62 line was obtained from the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization National Research Institute, Poznań, Poland. This line had a high seed yield and lower susceptibility to clubroot and Alternaria leaf spot.
Interspecific F1 hybrids (S3, S20) between B. oleracea IW1234 and IW08 and B. napus RAP62 lines were obtained via embryo rescue according to Starzycki et al. [28]. FS3 and FS20 interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation were derived after self-pollination of the F1 hybrids. Hybrids FC320 and FC230 were obtained by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation. Interspecific hybrids were pollinated following the method described by Kamiński et al. [29,30].
Vernalised plants of parental lines and F1 and F2 interspecific hybrids were grown in a greenhouse in 5 L plastic pots filled with Kronen substrate placed on the ground and grown at 16–20 °C with a 12 h day length. Each genotype was represented by four plants. Matured siliques were harvested individually by hand in the middle of June for each combination, and after siliques were dried, seeds were extracted and counted.

2.2. Assessment of the Ploidy Level

2.2.1. Flow Cytometry Analysis (FCM)

The nuclear DNA content was evaluated for parental lines and hybrids using FCM according to the method reported previously [31]. Leaf fragments (0.5 cm2) were cut with a razor blade in a Petri dish that contained 0.5 mL nuclei isolation Partec buffer supplemented with propidium iodide (50 mg·mL−1) and RNase (50 mg·mL−1). The young leaves of Zea mays CE-777 (2C = 5.43 pg DNA) were used as an internal standard. After chopping, 1.5 mL of the isolation buffer was added, and the samples were filtered through a 30 μm filter and incubated at room temperature for 15–30 min in the dark. Nuclei fluorescence was measured using a CyFlow Ploidy Analyser with CyView software (CyFlow PA, Partec, Germany) with an Nd-YAG green laser at 532 nm. Data were analysed using CyView software (CyFlow PA, Partec, Germany). Samples with at least 5000 nuclei were measured from five leaves of each plant, with two runs per nuclei isolation extract. The 2C DNA content of each sample was calculated as the sample peak mean divided by the standard plant peak and multiplied by the value of the nuclear DNA content of the standard plant.

2.2.2. Chromosome Count

Cytogenetic observation was performed according to Marasek-Ciolakowska et al. [32]. Root tips were treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 4 h, fixed in 3:1 ethanol:glacial acetic acid solution for at least 12 h, and then digested in a mixture of enzymes comprised of 20% pectinase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% cellulase (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), and 1% cellulose ‘Onozuka R-10′ (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) at 37 °C for 1 h. Root meristems were squashed in a drop of 45% (v/v) acetic acid. After freezing in liquid nitrogen, cover slips were removed using a razor blade, and the preparations were dehydrated in absolute ethanol, air dried, and stored at −20 °C. The preparations were stained with 2.5 g/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and closed in glycerol. For each genotype, at least 5 instances of metaphase were photographed with a digital CCD camera PS-Fi1 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) attached to an epifluorescent microscope Optiphot-2 (Nikon, Jappan) using UV excitation for DAPI visualisation.

2.3. Analysis of the Morphological Characteristics

The morphological characteristics during the vegetative and reproductive stages of 2 F1 hybrids, 4 F2 hybrids, and their parental components were evaluated. At the beginning of April, measurements of the leaf surface were made using a surface scanner AM350 (Geomor Technik, Szczecin, Poland). Bud length, flower size, size of median and lateral nectaries, fertility/sterility, pod length, and number of seeds per pod of the vernalised hybrids and their parents were analysed during the generative phase. Measurements of flower diameter and size of flower components (nectary, anther, pistil, and stamen) were determined for 5 flowers under a stereo microscope SZX16 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with imaging software Cell (Olympus, Münster, Germany).

2.4. Pollen Grain Diameter and Viability

A mixed sample of pollen from 3–6 mature anthers were stained according to Alexander [33]. The pollen grain diameter was evaluated for 100 grains with three repetitions. Pollen viability was determined based on pollen stainability with Alexander’s stain in 5 fields of view at 100× magnification. Pollen grain diameter and viability were assessed using a light microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with imaging software NIS-Elements Br ver. 2.30 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for photo documentation and measurements.

2.5. Leaf Anatomy

In a histological study, 10 × 5 mm fragments of the third, fully developed leaves were sampled. Five samples were collected for each genotype. The material was fixed in a chromic acid, acetic acid, and formalin (CrAF) mixture for 48 h at room temperature, dehydrated in graded series of ethanol (70, 80, 90, and 100%), and embedded in paraffin according to a previously reported method [34]. Cross sections (10 µm thick) were cut with a rotary microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with safranin (1% prepared in ultrapure water) and fast green (1% prepared in 95% ethanol). The sections were observed under a light microscope as described for pollen analysis (see above). For each sample, the thickness of the lamina, abaxial and adaxial epidermal layer, and spongy and palisade mesophyll were determined. For statistical analysis, three replicates were used for each genotype, and each replicate consisted of 20 measurements.

2.6. Stomata Length and Density

Samples of the abaxial epidermis from the middle part of the third fully developed leaf were isolated and stained with toluidine blue according to Dyki and Habdas [35]. For each genotype, the number of stomata per 1 mm2 (n = 3 replication/genotype) and length of stomata (n = 3 replications × 100 stomata/genotype) were determined at 100 and 400× magnification, respectively, using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with the program NIS-Elements BR ver. 2.30 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Statistical Analyses

The nuclear DNA content, pollen grain diameter and viability, leaf surface, bud length, flower diameter, pistil and stamen size, size of median and lateral nectary, pod length, stomata length and density, thickness of the lamina, thickness of the abaxial and adaxial epidermal layer, and thickness of the spongy and palisade mesophyll were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (STATISTICA package StatSoft v. 10, Dell Inc. Round Rock, TX, USA). The means were compared using Tukey’s test at p = 0.05. Standard deviations for nuclear DNA content, leaf surface, bud length, pistil and stamen size, nectaries and pod length were calculated in 5 replications (n = 5), whereas standard deviations for pollen grain diameter, thickness of the lamina and epidermal layers, and thickness of the spongy and palisade mesophyll, stomata length and density were calculated in 3 replications (n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Genome Size Determination by FCM and Somatic Chromosome Count

The ploidy levels of parental lines and hybrids were determined by flow cytometry (FCM) analysis and chromosome count (Figure 2 and Figure 3, Table 1). The amount of nuclear DNA and the number of chromosomes in parental lines of B. napus and B. oleracea agreed with data found in the literature. Head cabbage IW1234 (B. oleracea L. var. capitata) and kale IW08 (B. oleracea L. var. acephala) are diploids with 2n = 18 chromosomes and a DNA volume of 1.48 and 1.51 pg 2C, respectively. Allotetraploid rapeseed RAP62 (B. napus L.) had 38 chromosomes and a significantly higher amount of DNA (2.49 pg) than B. oleracea genotypes. The F1 hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed (S3) and kale × rapeseed crosses (S20) were allotriploids with 2n = 28 chromosomes; the nuclear DNA content was intermediate to the genome size of progenitors (1.97 and 1.99 pg, respectively). In interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation, which were derived after self-pollination of F1 hybrids (FS3, FS20) or by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation (FC320, FC230), chromosome numbers were similar (2n = 56 or 2n = 55), whereas genome sizes varied between 3.81 ± 0.10 pg 2C for FS20 and 3.95 ± 0.091 pg 2C for FC230.

3.2. Characteristics of Parental Genotypes and Interspecific Hybrids of the F1 and F2 Generations in the Generative Stage

In the generative stage, interspecific polyploids of the F1 and F2 generation displayed significant heterosis with respect to flower morphology, nectary size, fertility, and ability to set seeds compared to the parent genotypes (Figure 4 and Figure S1). Allohexaploids representing F2 hybrids had significantly longer buds, flower diameters, and longer anthers than those of parental B. napus and B. oleracea lines and triploid F1 hybrids (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the length of the pistils. Each Brassica flower had two pairs of nectaries, the lateral (inner) and median (outer) pairs, that differed in morphology, size, and nectar productivity (Table 2, Figure 4c and Figure S1). The lateral nectaries were of equal size in B. oleracea L. var. capitata and B. napus, and they were shorter by approximately 20% compared to B. oleracea L. var. acephala. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the length of median nectaries among parental lines and interspecific hybrids. Lateral nectaries of the F1 generation had a similar size to parental lines, but they were shorter by 30% than lateral nectaries of the F2 generation (Table 2). Pollen viability was high in parental lines and varied from 85% in kale to 99% in rapeseed, and their average pollen size was 24.54 and 29.86 μm, respectively. All interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations developed male-fertile flowers. In triploid F1 hybrids, pollen viability was low, and only 6.76 (S3) and 13.46% (S20) of pollen grains were stained by Alexander’s solution (Figure 4e and Figure S1, Table 2). In interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation, pollen viability was comparable to the parental genotypes and varied from 75.38 (FS3) to 88.24% (FC320). The average pollen lengths for the interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations were significantly larger compared to the parental lines (Table 2, Figure S1). The distribution of pollen size was similar for the hybrids of head cabbage (Figure 5a) and kale (Figure 5b). A high variation in the size of viable pollen was recorded for F1 hybrids, whose length differed from 19.40 to 36.10 μm in S3 (head cabbage × rapeseed) and from 20.85 to 32.40 µm in S20 (kale × rapeseed) hybrids (Figure 5). Among parental genotypes, differences in seed set and pod length were observed, where rapeseed produced longer pods by approximately 10% and more seeds than parental lines of B. oleracea. The negative effect on the length of pods and seed set was observed especially in the interspecific hybrid of the F1 generation, in which pods were approximately 70% shorter compared to parental lines, and they were usually empty (Table 2, Figure 4h). Hybrids of the F2 generation produced longer pods, and most of them had more seeds per pod than hybrids of the F1 generation. However, among the F2 hybrids, differences in the number of seeds were observed depending on the pollinator. Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation derived by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation (FC320, FC230) had better seed set compared to F2 hybrids derived from the self-pollination of F1 hybrids (FS3, FS20) (Table 2).

3.3. Characteristics of Morphological and Anatomical Traits of Leaves of Parental Genotypes and the Interspecific Hybrids of the F1 and F2 Generations

The morphological and anatomical characteristics of the leaves of F1 and F2 hybrids were compared with those of parental genotypes (Table 3). Allohexaploid hybrids of the F2 generation had bigger and thicker leaves than triploids of the F1 generation and parental lines of B. oleracea and B. napus (Figure 6a and Figure S2). The largest leaf surface and thickest leaves were observed in FC320, which resulted from open pollination of F1 S3 hybrids; the leaves were larger than leaves of head cabbage and F1 S3 hybrids by approximately 250% and thicker by 50–60%. Similarly, the comparison of the abaxial epidermis (Figure 6b–d and Figure S2b–j) showed that hexaploid F2 hybrids had larger stomata than triploids of the F1 generation and parental lines of B. oleracea and B. napus, but their density per mm2 was the lowest. Figure 7 shows that in the diploid parental lines of B. oleracea, approximately 42% of head cabbage stomata and kale stomata had sizes of 24–26 and 22–24 μm in length, respectively. In tetraploid B. napus, there was significant variation in stomata length, which differed from 7.07 to 32.76 μm, and approximately 20% of stomata had a length of 24–26 µm. In the F1 generation, 28% of stomata of head cabbage and 37% of kale stomata had a length of 26–28 µm. F2 hybrids of kale (FS20, FC230) had a similar stomata size distribution, and about 30% of them had lengths from 30 to 36 µm. F2 hybrids of head cabbage showed high variation in stomata sizes. Approximately 26% of FS3 hybrids had stomata 32–34 μm in length, and 28% of FC320 hybrids had stomata 36–38 μm in length. Histological analysis of leaf fragment cross sections revealed high variation among genotypes with respect to the internal structure of leaves (Figure 6e–g and Figure S2k–s). In general, the thickness of the abaxial and adaxial epidermis was higher in interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation derived after self-pollination of F1 hybrids (F2 FS3, FS20) compared to F2 hybrids obtained by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation (FC320, FC230). The thickness of the adaxial epidermis was similar in the F1 generation and the parental lines; similarly, there was no relationship between ploidy level and the thickness of the abaxial epidermis among parental lines and F1 hybrids (Table 3). The cells of the epidermis differed in shape and size, which were tightly arranged into a single layer. The characteristic feature of both head cabbage and kale hybrids was the presence of large, strongly vacuolated cells among smaller ones in the epidermal layer. Layers of both the palisade and spongy mesophyll were significantly thicker in hexaploids of the F2 generation. In general, the examined genotypes differed in the thickness of particular cell layers in leaves, which was related to the thickness of the lamina. Leaves of FC320 F2 hybrids were characterised by a more compact mesophyll structure with smaller intercellular spaces than other genotypes (Figure 6e–g and Figure S1k–s).

4. Discussion

In the genus Brassica, hexaploid species do not exist in nature, as tetraploidy (4x) is the highest naturally occurring ploidy [36]. There are different approaches to hexaploid induction. Trigenomic hexaploids (AABBCC) with 54 chromosomes were produced in Brassica through interspecific hybridisation of B. napus (AACC genome) and B. nigra (BB genome), followed by colchicine treatment [36]. In a similar manner, trigenomic hexaploids (AABBCC) were obtained from B. campestris sp. chinensis (AA) and B. carinata (BBCC) crosses after artificial chromosome doubling of F1 hybrids [37]. Treatment of triploid ACC hybrids with colchicine led to hexaploid AACCCC genotype development; these hybrids were largely used as bridge plants for the introgression of genomic components of B. rapa into B. napus [38]. Mason et al. [39] showed the possibility of producing trigenomic allohexaploid Brassica through unreduced gametes. The allohexaploid (6x) and aneuploid AACCCC Brassica hybrids analysed in this study were created by interploid crosses between diploids of kale (CC) and head cabbage (CC), with tetraploid B. napus (AACC), followed by self-pollination and open-cross-pollination of triploid F1 hybrids (ACC). These results indicate that ploidy manipulation in Brassica is possible via euploid gametes produced by hybrids. The distribution of pollen sizes showed great variation in grain sizes, both in S3F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed) and S20F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed) hybrids (Figure 4e, Figure 5 and Figure S1q,r). There was considerable evidence in the literature that in Brassica, interspecific triploid hybrids can produce euploid (x, 2x, 3x) and aneuploid gametes [22,40,41,42], and the success in ploidy manipulation depends on the lines selected for hybridisation. According to He et al. [43], due to abnormal meiotic processes and cytogenetic instability, aneuploids can be expected when using triploids or tetraploids in crosses with other genotypes, regardless of their ploidy levels. Li et al. [22] reported a high frequency of allotetraploid-like gametes in the interspecific hybrids between B. napus and B. oleracea.
The total nuclear DNA content per cell significantly influenced the phenotypic traits (nucleotypic effects). Cell size, pollen grain diameter, stomata length, and stomatal plastid number are positively correlated with genome size, and they are often used as morphological markers for identifying the ploidy level of plants [44,45,46]. Furthermore, seed size, stomatal density, and pollen fertility are usually related to the ploidy level [46]. For instance, a positive relationship was found between the ploidy level and stomatal guard cell length and width, and a negative correlation was observed between ploidy level and stomatal density for diploid and triploid Citrus clementina [47] and stomata length and pollen size in diploid and tetraploid tulips [31] and apples [48]. In Brassica, a high correlation between ploidy and stomata lengths was reported for trigenomic hexaploid hybrids (AABBCC) [36]. Similarly, in our study, both stomata length and pollen grain diameters were significantly higher as ploidy increases, whereas the density of stomata on the abaxial epidermis decreased. The number and distribution of stomata per unit leaf area may have consequential roles in moisture exchange between the leaves and atmosphere [49]. According to Padoan et al. [47], leaf water loss is higher in diploid plants than in triploids, which are characterised by decreased stomatal density. Thus, the size and stomatal density influence the adaptation to various environmental conditions and productivity of the plants.
The doubling of the cell genome usually leads to increased organ size. In our study, the vegetative and reproductive organs of hexaploids were larger than those of the diploid and tetraploid parents and triploid F1 hybrids (Figure 4, Figure S1 and S2). Larger vegetative and reproductive organs were also observed in hexaploids derived from B. rapa and B. carinata [50]. Trigenomic hexaploid Brassica hybrids (AABBCC) derived from B. napus L. and B. nigra were more vigorous, had broader and thicker leaves, and the hairs on leaves and stems were more abundant compared to triploid (ABC) hybrids and their parents [36]. Some of the changes observed in polyploids are of high agronomical value. Plants of the F2 generation had bigger and thicker leaves and significantly thicker layers of palisade and spongy mesophyll than triploids of the F1 generation and parental lines of B. oleracea and B. napus, whereas FC320 F2 had a compact mesophyll structure with small intercellular spaces. The leaf surface and leaf morphological characteristics may affect their resistance to infestation by insect herbivores [51,52,53]. Marasek-Ciolakowska et al. [53] showed that reduced infestation by the cabbage whitefly (Aleyrodes proletella) on leaves of resistant cultivars of kale and savoy cabbage was related to the structure of the epidermis, thickness of the lamina, and compactness of the mesophyll.
The morphological appearance of flowers in F1 (ACC) and F2 (AACCCC) hybrids was similar to B. napus, except that the organs were larger. Hexaploids had significantly larger flower buds, flowers, and anthers compared to triploids. Larger flowers, petals, and stamens were also observed in hexaploid Brassica (AABBCC) hybrids derived from a colchicine treatment of triploid (ABC) hybrids of B. napus (AACC) × B. nigra (BB) [36] and B. carinata (BBCC) × B. rapa (AA) [54]. Flowers and flower elements of 4x plants of B. rapa were larger than diploid and haploid plants [55]. We observed a negative effect of polyploidy on the length of pods and seed set of the allopolyploid hybrids when compared to diploid and tetraploid progenitors. However, pod length and seed number per pod in the hexaploid plants increased significantly compared to triploids, and seeds were produced without embryo rescue. The ability for seed development was better after open pollination compared to self-pollination of F1 hybrids. Similarly, the seed development in plants of F1 × F2 and BC1 × F1/F2 generations of B. oleracea × B. napus after pollination by the mixture of pollen was higher than that of F1 and BC1 (B. oleracea) generations [30].
Another feature of agronomic importance is the size of nectaries. Nectaries secrete floral nectar, which attracts flower pollinators. Flowers of Brassica spp. have two pairs, which differ in structure and location [55]. Lateral nectaries are found above the base of shorter stamens, whereas median nectaries are located external to the base of the long stamen. In our study, the lateral nectaries of hexaploid plants were significantly larger than their triploid F1 progenitors (Table 2, Figure S1). This characteristic suggests that flowers of allohexaploid Brassica hybrids may be more attractive to pollinators.
Our observations agree with previous studies showing that the Brassica genome is characterised by high plasticity with respect to the level of ploidy. Besides the described triploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids, there are also successful examples of octoploid formation with a significantly changed appearance [11,56]. For example, autoallooctoploids B. napus (AAAACCCC; 2n = 8x = 76) were obtained by doubling the genome of allotetraploid B. napus. Compared to tetraploids, octoploid B. napus showed significant differences in phenotype, such as decreased vegetative organ size, increased number of pollen apertures, moderate reproductive ability, high pollen variability, and a relatively stable meiotic process [11].
In our study, we confirmed that meiotic polyploidisation can be a promising method to obtain new germplasm showing the traits of both B. napus and B. oleracea that can be used as initial material for the development of new types of leafy vegetables.

5. Conclusions

Allohexaploid AACCCC Brassica hybrids of the F2 generation were created by crossing diploid kale and head cabbage with tetraploid B. napus, followed by self-pollination. A positive correlation between genome size and chromosome number was found in F1 and F2 interspecific hybrids of B. oleracea × B. napus. Allohexaploid F2 hybrids showed abundant phenotypic and anatomical variations, including larger and thicker leaves and larger flowers than the diploid and tetraploid parents and triploid F1 hybrids. Stomata size was generally positively correlated with ploidy level. Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation derived by open crosses between plants of the F1 generation (FC320, FC230) had a good seed set ability. Moreover, a comparative anatomical analysis showed that leaves of FC320 F2 hybrids were characterised by a thicker and more compact mesophyll structure than other genotypes.
All F2 hybrids were also male fertile, and pollen fertility of the F2 population was significantly increased compared to F1 hybrids and even reached normal levels of the diploid and tetraploid parents. Analysed hybrids can be used for breeding Brassica at the hexaploid level, potentially leading to the development of new polyploid leafy vegetables.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12010026/s1, Figure S1: Phenotypic characteristic of flowers and pollen viability of parental genotypes and the interspecific hybrids of B. oleracea × B. napus of the F1 and F2 generations; Figure S2: Morphological and anatomical characteristics of leaves and flower stacks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.-C. and P.K.; funding acquisition, P.K., A.M.-C. and M.S.; investigation, A.M.-C., P.K., M.S., M.P., U.K. and E.S.-K.; methodology, A.M.-C., P.K., M.P., M.S., U.K. and E.S.-K.; project administration, A.M.-C.; resources, M.S., E.S.-K. and U.K.; supervision, A.M.-C.; writing—original draft, A.M.-C. and P.K.; writing—review and editing, A.M.-C., P.K. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education through statutory funds (ZBS/7/2021) of The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Skierniewice, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masterson, J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: Evidence for polyploidy in majority of Angiosperms. Science 1994, 264, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Casacuberta, J.M.; Jackson, S.; Panaud, O.; Purugganan, M.; Wendel, J. Evolution of plant phenotypes, from genomes to traits. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2016, 6, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sattler, M.C.; Carvalho, C.R.; Clarindo, W.R. The ploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 2016, 243, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Sochacki, D.; Marciniak, P. Breeding aspects of selected ornamental bulbous crops. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kreiner, J.M.; Kron, P.; Husband, B.C. Frequency and maintenance of unreduced gametes in natural plant populations: Associations with reproductive mode, life history and genome size. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ramsey, J.; Schemske, D.W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29, 467–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pecinka, A.; Fang, W.; Rehmsmeier, M.; Levy, A.A.; Scheid, O.M. Polyploidization increases meiotic recombination frequency in Arabidopsis. BMC Biol. 2011, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Dar, J.A.; Beigh, Z.A.; Wani, A.A. Polyploidy: Evolution and crop improvement. In Chromosome Structure and Aberration; Chapter 10; Bhat, T.A., Wani, A.A., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2017; pp. 201–217. [Google Scholar]
  9. Podwyszyńska, M.; Marasek-Ciolakowska, A. Ploidy, Genome Size, and Cytogenetics of Apple. In The Apple Genome, Compendium of Plant Genomes; Korban, S.S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lage, J.; Trethowan, R.M. CIMMYT’s use of synthetic hexaploid wheat in breeding for adaptation to rainfed environments globally. Aus. J. Agri. Res. 2008, 59, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, L.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, X.; Huang, L.; Li, Y.; Mason, A.S.; Yang, J.; Ge, X.; Long, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Genome-Wide duplication of allotetraploid Brassica napus produces novel characteristics and extensive ploidy variation in self-pollinated progeny. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2020, 10, 3687–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Hortic. Res. 2014, 1, 14024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Katche, E.; Quezada-Martinez, D.; Katche, E.I.; Vasquez-Teuber, P.; Mason, A.S. Interspecific hybridization for Brassica crop improvement. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 2019, 1, e190007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nagaharu, U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of Brassica napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jap. J. Bot. 1935, 7, 389–453. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B.; et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Roy, N.N. Interspecific tranfer of Brassica juncea-type high blackleg resistance to Brassica napus. Euphytica 1984, 33, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gerdemann-Knorck, M.; Nielen, S.; Tzscheetzsch, C.; Iglisch, J.; Schieder, O. Transfer of disease resistance within the genus Brassica through asymmetric somatic hybridization. Euphytica 1995, 85, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, B.B.; Kalia, P.; Singh, D.; Sharma, T.R. Introgression of Black Rot Resistance from Brassica carinata to Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea botrytis Group) through Embryo Rescue. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tonguc, M.; Griffiths, P.D. Transfer of powdery mildew resistance from Brassica carinata to Brassica oleracea through embryo rescue. Plant Breed. 2008, 123, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mafakheri, M.; Kordrostami, M. Biotechnological Approach for Enhancing Capability of Brassica oleracea var. italica Against Stresses Under Changing Climate. In The Plant Family Brassicaceae; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seepaul, R.; Kumar, S.; Iboyi, J.E.; Bashyal, M.; Stansly, T.L.; Bennett, R.; Boote, K.J.; Mulvaney, M.J.; Small, I.M.; George, S.; et al. Brassica carinata: Biology and agronomy as a biofuel crop. GCB Bioenergy 2021, 13, 582–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Z.; Wang, Y. Cytogenetics and germplasm enrichment in Brassica allopolyploids in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2698–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.-X.; Tang, Y.; Yan, H.; Sheng, X.-G.; Hao, W.-W.; Zhang, L.; Lu, K.; Liu, F. Production and characterization of interspecific somatic hybrids between Brassica oleracea var. botrytis and B. nigra and their progenies for the selection of advanced pre-breeding materials. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 1811–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gaebelein, R.; Alnajar, D.; Koopmann, B.; Mason, A.S. Hybrids between Brassica napus and B. nigra show frequent pairing between the B and A/C genomes and resistance to blackleg. Chromosome Res. 2019, 27, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, Y.; Zhu, M.; Qiao, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, H. Characterization of interspecific hybrid between flowering Chinese cabbage and broccoli. Scientia Hortic. 2018, 240, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.S.; Lee, S.A.; Yang, J.; Kim, J. Developing stable progenies of ×Brassicoraphanus, an intergeneric allopolyploid between Brassica rapa and Raphanus sativus, through induced mutation using microspore culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 122, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dixon, G.R. Vegetable Brassicas and Related Crucifers; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2007; 327p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Starzycki, M.; Starzycka, E.; Pszczoła, J. Development of Alloplasmic Rape. Adv. Bot. Res. 2007, 45, 313–335. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kamiński, P.; Podwyszyńska, M.; Starzycki, M.; Starzycka-Korbas, E. Interspecific hybridisation of cytoplasmic male-sterile rapeseed with Ogura cytoplasm and Brassica rapa var. pekinensis as a method to obtain male-sterile Chinese cabbage inbred lines. Euphytica 2016, 208, 519–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kamiński, P.; Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Podwyszyńska, M.; Starzycki, M.; Starszycka-Korbas, E.; Nowak, K. Development and characteristics of interspecific hybrids between Brassica oleracea L. and B. napus L. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Podwyszyńska, M.; Trzewik, A.; Marasek-Ciołakowska, A. In vitro polyploidisation of tulips (Tulipa gesneriana L.)—Phenotype assessment of tetraploids. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 242, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; He, H.; Bijman, P.; Ramanna, M.S.; Arens, P.; van Tuyl, J.M. Assessment of intergenomic recombination through GISH analysis of F1, BC1 and BC2 progenies of Tulipa gesneriana and T. fosteriana. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alexander, M.P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain. Technol. 1969, 44, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Saniewski, M.; Dziurka, M.; Kowalska, U.; Góraj-Koniarska, J.; Ueda, J.; Miyamota, K. Formation of the secondary abscission zone Induced by the interaction of methyl jasmonate and auxin in Bryophyllum calycinum: Relevance to auxin status and histology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dyki, B.; Habdas, H. Metoda izolowania epidermy liści pomidora i ogórka dla mikroskopowej oceny rozwoju grzybów patogenicznych. (The method of isolation of epidermis of tomato and cucumber leaves for microscopic investigation of pathogenic fungus development). Acta Agrobot. 1996, 49, 123–129. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pradhan, A.; Plummer, J.A.; Neslon, M.N.; Cowling, W.A.; Yan, G. Successful induction of trigenomic hexaploid Brassica from a triploid hybrid of B. napus L. and B. nigra (L.) Koch. Euphytica 2010, 176, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meng, J.L.; Shi, S.; Li, G.; Li, Z.; Qu, X. The production of yellow-seeded Brassica napus (AACC) through crossing interspecific hybrids of B. campestris (AA) and B. carianata (BBCC) with B. napus. Euphytica 1998, 103, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, K.; Mason, A.S.; Fariiq, M.A.; Islam, F.; Quezada-Martinez, D.; Hu, D.; Yang, S.; Zou, J.; Zhou, W. Challenges and prospects for a potential allohexaploid Brassica crop. Theor. App. Genet. 2021, 134, 2711–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mason, A.S.; Yan, G.; Cowling, W.A.; Nelson, M.N. A new method for producing allohexaploid Brassica through unreduced gametes. Euphytica 2012, 186, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silkova, O.G.; Shchapova, A.I.; Shumny, V.K. Patterns of meiosis in ABDR amphihaploids depend on the specific type of univalent chromosome division. Euphytica 2011, 178, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiong, Z.Y.; Gaeta, R.T.; Pires, J.C. Homoeologous shufing and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7908–7913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bhatia, R.; Sharma, K.; Parkash, C.; Pramanik, A.; Singh, D.; Singh, S.; Kumar, R.; Dey, S.S. Microspore derived population developed from an inter-specific hybrid (Brassica oleracea × B. carinata) through a modifed protocol provides insight into B genome derived black rot resistance and inter-genomic interaction. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 145, 417–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, D.; Jing, J.; Snowdon, R.J.; Mason, A.S.; Shen, J.; Meng, J.; Zou, J. Exploring the gene pool of Brassica napus by genomics-based approaches. Plant Biotech. J. 2021, 19, 1693–1712. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yuan, S.-x.; Liu, Y.-m.; Fang, Z.-y.; Yang, L.-m.; Zhuang, M.; Zhang, Y.-y.; Sun, P.-t. Study on the relationship between the ploidy level of microspore-derived plants and the number of chloroplasts in stomatal guard cells in Brassica oleracea. Agr. Sci. China 2009, 8, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sohn, S.-I.; Oh, Y.-J.; Lee, K.-R.; Ko, H.-C.; Cho, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-H.; Chang, A. Characteristics analysis of F1 hybrids between genetically modified Brassica napus and B. rapa. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dewitte, A.; Van Laere, K.; Van Huylenbroeck, J. Use of 2n gametes in plant breeding. In Plant Breeding; Abdurakhmonov, I.Y., Ed.; Intech.: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 59–86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Padoan, D.; Mossad, A.; Chiancone, B.; Germana, M.A.; Kjan, P.S.S.V. Ploidy levels in Citrus clementine affects leaf morphology, stomatal density and water content. Theor. Exp. Plant. Physiol. 2013, 25, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Podwyszyńska, M.; Markiewicz, M.; Broniarek-Niemiec, A.; Matysiak, B.; Marasek-Ciolakowska, A. Apple autotetraploids with enhanced resistance to apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) due to genome duplication-phenotypic and genetic evaluation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brownlee, C. The long and short of stomata density signals. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 441–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, M.; Qian, W.; Meng, J.; Li, Z. Construction of novel Brassica napus genotypes through chromosomal substitution and elimination using interploid species hybridization. Chromosome Res. 2004, 12, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seki, K. Leaf-morphology-assisted selection for resistance to two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus uriticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in carnations (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1926–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Goiana, E.S.S.; Dias-Pini, N.S.; Muniz, C.R.; Soares, A.A.; Alves, J.C.; Vidal-Neto, F.C.; Da Silva, C.S.B. Dwarf-cashew resistance to whitefly (Aleurodicus cocois) linked to morphological and histochemical characteristics of leaves. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Soika, G.; Warabieda, W.; Kowalska, U.; Rybczyński, D. Investigation on the relationship between morphological and anatomical characteristic of savoy cabbage and kale leaves and infestation by cabbage whitefly (Aleyrodes proletella L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Malek, M.A.; Rahman, L.; Das, M.L.; Hassan, L.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ismail, M.R. Development of hexaploid Brassica (AABBCC) from hybrids (ABC) of Brassica carinata (BBCC) × B. rapa (AA). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1375–1382. [Google Scholar]
  55. Davis, A.R.; Fowke, L.C.; Sawhney, V.K.; Low, N.H. Floral nectar secretion and ploidy in Brassica rapa and B. napus (Brassicaceae). II. Quantified variability of nectary structure and function in rapid-cycling lines. Ann. Bot. 1996, 77, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Tong, C.; Edwards, D.; Parkin, I.A.; Zhao, M.; Ma, J.; Yu, J.; Huang, S.; et al. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The diversity of Brassica oleracea vegetable crops. (a) Head cabbage (b) Leafy cabbage plants (c) Ornamental leafy cabbage; (d) Brussels sprouts; (e) Kale; (f) Cauliflower; (g) Purple cauliflower.
Figure 1. The diversity of Brassica oleracea vegetable crops. (a) Head cabbage (b) Leafy cabbage plants (c) Ornamental leafy cabbage; (d) Brussels sprouts; (e) Kale; (f) Cauliflower; (g) Purple cauliflower.
Agronomy 12 00026 g001
Figure 2. Histograms of nuclear DNA estimation using flow cytometry (FCM) for Brassica oleracea and hybrids with internal standard Zea mays (2C DNA = 5.43 pg). (a) IW1234 B. oleracea L. var. capitata (head cabbage); (b) RAP62 B. napus (rapeseed); (c) S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed); (d) FS3 F2 (S3 × S3); (e) FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen).
Figure 2. Histograms of nuclear DNA estimation using flow cytometry (FCM) for Brassica oleracea and hybrids with internal standard Zea mays (2C DNA = 5.43 pg). (a) IW1234 B. oleracea L. var. capitata (head cabbage); (b) RAP62 B. napus (rapeseed); (c) S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed); (d) FS3 F2 (S3 × S3); (e) FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen).
Agronomy 12 00026 g002
Figure 3. Chromosome counts of Brassica genotypes. (a) IW1234 B. oleracea L. var. capitata (head cabbage), 2n = 18; (b) IW08 B. oleracea L. var. acephala (kale), 2n = 18; (c) RAP62 B. napus (rapeseed), 2n = 38; (d) S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed), 2n = 28; (e) S20 F1 (kale × rapeseed), 2n = 28; (f) FS3 F2 (S3 × S3), 2n = 56; (g) FS20 F2 (S20 × S20), 2n = 55; (h) FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen), 2n = 55; (i) FC230 F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen), 2n = 55. Scale bars represent 5 µm.
Figure 3. Chromosome counts of Brassica genotypes. (a) IW1234 B. oleracea L. var. capitata (head cabbage), 2n = 18; (b) IW08 B. oleracea L. var. acephala (kale), 2n = 18; (c) RAP62 B. napus (rapeseed), 2n = 38; (d) S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed), 2n = 28; (e) S20 F1 (kale × rapeseed), 2n = 28; (f) FS3 F2 (S3 × S3), 2n = 56; (g) FS20 F2 (S20 × S20), 2n = 55; (h) FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen), 2n = 55; (i) FC230 F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen), 2n = 55. Scale bars represent 5 µm.
Agronomy 12 00026 g003
Figure 4. Phenotypic characteristics of maternal line IW1234 and the interspecific hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed in the F1 and F2 generations in the generative stage. (a) Flowers of head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed) (middle) and FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen) (right, Bar = 1 cm; (b) Flowers with removed sepals and petals of head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (middle) and FC320 F2 (right), Bar = 2 mm; (c) Receptacles with lateral and median nectaries, head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (middle) and FC320 F2 (right), MN—median nectary, LN—lateral nectary, Bar = 1 mm; (df) Pollen staining with Alexander’s solution, Bar = 25 µm; (d) IW1234; (e) S3 F1 (f) FC320 F2; (g) Pod of head cabbage IW1234; (h) Pod of S20 F1 and FC320 F2 generations. Scale bars represent 1 cm (g,h).
Figure 4. Phenotypic characteristics of maternal line IW1234 and the interspecific hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed in the F1 and F2 generations in the generative stage. (a) Flowers of head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed) (middle) and FC320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen) (right, Bar = 1 cm; (b) Flowers with removed sepals and petals of head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (middle) and FC320 F2 (right), Bar = 2 mm; (c) Receptacles with lateral and median nectaries, head cabbage IW1234 (left), S3 F1 (middle) and FC320 F2 (right), MN—median nectary, LN—lateral nectary, Bar = 1 mm; (df) Pollen staining with Alexander’s solution, Bar = 25 µm; (d) IW1234; (e) S3 F1 (f) FC320 F2; (g) Pod of head cabbage IW1234; (h) Pod of S20 F1 and FC320 F2 generations. Scale bars represent 1 cm (g,h).
Agronomy 12 00026 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of pollen grain sizes (%) in parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids. (a) Head cabbage IW1234, rapeseed RAP62, S3F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed), FS3 F2 (S3 × self), and FS320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen). (b) Kale IW08, rapeseed RAP62, S20 F1 (kale × rapeseed), FS20 (S20 × self), and FS230F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen).
Figure 5. Distribution of pollen grain sizes (%) in parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids. (a) Head cabbage IW1234, rapeseed RAP62, S3F1 (head cabbage × rapeseed), FS3 F2 (S3 × self), and FS320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen). (b) Kale IW08, rapeseed RAP62, S20 F1 (kale × rapeseed), FS20 (S20 × self), and FS230F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen).
Agronomy 12 00026 g005
Figure 6. Characteristics of morphological and anatomical traits of leaves of maternal line IW1234 and the interspecific hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed in the F1 and F2 generations. (a) Leaf of maternal genotype IW1234 (middle) and F2 generation FS3 (left), FC320 F2 (right), Bar = 2 cm; (bd) Stomata on the abaxial leaf surface, Bars = 25 µm; (b) IW1234; (c) F1 S3; (d) FC320 F2; (eg) Leaf cross-section, Bars = 50 µm; (e) IW1234; (f) F1 S3; (g) FC320 F2.
Figure 6. Characteristics of morphological and anatomical traits of leaves of maternal line IW1234 and the interspecific hybrids of head cabbage × rapeseed in the F1 and F2 generations. (a) Leaf of maternal genotype IW1234 (middle) and F2 generation FS3 (left), FC320 F2 (right), Bar = 2 cm; (bd) Stomata on the abaxial leaf surface, Bars = 25 µm; (b) IW1234; (c) F1 S3; (d) FC320 F2; (eg) Leaf cross-section, Bars = 50 µm; (e) IW1234; (f) F1 S3; (g) FC320 F2.
Agronomy 12 00026 g006
Figure 7. Distribution of stomata length in percentage in parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids. (a) Head cabbage IW1234, rapeseed RAP62, S3F1 (head cabbage IW1234 × rapeseed RAP62), FS3 F2 (S3 × self), and FS320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen). (b) Kale IW08, rapeseed RAP62, S20 F1 (IW08 kale × RAP62 rapeseed), FS20 (S20 × self), and FS230 F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen).
Figure 7. Distribution of stomata length in percentage in parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids. (a) Head cabbage IW1234, rapeseed RAP62, S3F1 (head cabbage IW1234 × rapeseed RAP62), FS3 F2 (S3 × self), and FS320 F2 (S3 × mixture of pollen). (b) Kale IW08, rapeseed RAP62, S20 F1 (IW08 kale × RAP62 rapeseed), FS20 (S20 × self), and FS230 F2 (S20 × mixture of pollen).
Agronomy 12 00026 g007
Table 1. Nuclear DNA content and chromosome number of parental Brassica napus and B. oleracea lines and their interspecific hybrids in the F1 and F2 generation.
Table 1. Nuclear DNA content and chromosome number of parental Brassica napus and B. oleracea lines and their interspecific hybrids in the F1 and F2 generation.
GenotypeGenomeDNA
Content (pg)
Std. dev.Chromosome Number
IW1234 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 head cabbageCC1.48 d *0.02118
IW08 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 kaleCC1.51 d0.02218
RAP62 Agronomy 12 00026 i002 rapeseedAACC2.49 b0.03638
Interspecific hybrids of the F1 generation
S3 (head cabbage × rapeseed)ACC1.97 c0.03028
S20 (kale × rapeseed)ACC1.99 c0.01728
Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation
FS3 (S3 × S3)AACCCC3.86 a0.03456
FS20 (S20 × S20)AACCCC3.81 a0.10255
FC320 (S3 × mixture of pollen)AACCCC3.86 a0.14156
FC230 (S20 × mixture of pollenAACCCC3.95 a0.09155
* Means in the columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test at p = 0.05. Agronomy 12 00026 i001 maternal line; Agronomy 12 00026 i002 pollen donor.
Table 2. Comparison of phenotypic characteristics of parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations at the generative stage.
Table 2. Comparison of phenotypic characteristics of parental genotypes and interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations at the generative stage.
GenotypeBud
Length
(mm)
Flower Diameter (mm)Pistil
Length
(mm)
Stamen
Length
(µm)
Anther
Length
(mm)
Median
Nectary
Length
(µm)
Lateral
Nectary
Length
(µm)
Pollen Diameter (µm)Pollen
Viability
%
Pod
Length
(cm)
Seed
Number/pod
IW1234 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 head cabbage8.00 bc * ±0.1024.72 c
±0.17
11.83 b
±0.43
11.82 bc
±0.67
3.35 bc
±0.20
738.638 b
±86.02
517.64 e
±73.76
25.79 c
±1.86
89.50 a
±2.93
7.34 ab
±0.44
2.66 c
±0.331
IW08 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 kale8.22 bc
±0.13
24.60 c
±0.21
15.65 a
±0.75
16.40 a
±0.40
3.17 bc
±0.17
1095.78 ab
±113.40
651.31 cd
±67.70
24.54 c
±1.34
85.82 a
±8.12
7.50 ab
±0.75
5.18 ab
±1.01
RAP62 Agronomy 12 00026 i002 rapeseed8.56 bc
±0.14
23.40 d
±0.26
9.37 d
±0.47
10.97 bc
±0.45
3.51 bc
±0.13
978.29 ab
±44.35
578.51 e
±63.93
29.86 b
±1.50
99.37 a
±1.09
8.20 a
±0.47
6.91 a
±0.62
Interspecific hybrids of the F1 generation
S3 (head cabbage × rapeseed)7.41 c
±0.11
22.04 e
±0.36
9.92 d
±0.15
10.06 b
±0.43
2.71 b
±0.11
932.03 ab
±40.28
624.40 cd
±35.35
33.74 ab
±4.16
6.765 b
±2.77
2.46 de
±0.15
0.00 d
±0.00
S20
(kale × rapeseed)
9.22 ab
±0.06
23.00 de
±0.07
11.66 bc
±0.13
11.64 bc
±0.39
3.11 bc
±0.046
1154.26 a
±52.06
688.85 b–d
±50.53
33.04 ab
±3.78
13.46 b
±9.29
2.22 e
±0.13
0.03 d
±0.07
Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation
FS3 (S3 × S3)9.46 ab
±0.23
24.60 c
±0.17
11.53 bc
±0.50
11.51 bc
±0.34
4.03 a,c
±0.15
1014.29 ab
±79.48
717.99 a–d
±39.95
33.63 ab
±1.95
75.38 a
±4.96
4.46 ce
±0.50
0.07 d
±0.15
FS20 (S20 × S20)10.42 a
±0.13
27.80 a
±0.22
11.66 bc
±0.65
13.30 a,c
±0.32
4.24 a,c
±0.15
1076.63 ab
±60.01
729.12 a–d
±81.35
34.04 a
±2.06
85.79 a
±3.09
4.96 cd
±0.65
0.47 cd
±0.15
FC320
(S3 × mixture
of pollen)
10.19 a
±0.19
26.60 b
±0.20
11.72 bc
±0.49
13.39 a,c
±1.09
4.86 a
±0.25
1102.10 ab
±63.37
839.01 a
±47.96
33.81 a
±2.24
88.24 a
±4.03
6.26 ac
±0.49
1.67 cd
±0.49
FC230
(S20 × mixture of pollen)
10.57 a
±0.13
25.20 c
±0.42
10.47 cd
±0.59
12.69 bc
±1.15
4.71 a
±0.47
1120.84 a
±123.23
803.28 ab
±85.51
32.71 ab
±2.20
78.71 a
±2.52
4.28 ce
±0.59
2.76 bc
±0.38
* Means in the columns followed by the same lower case letters are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test at p = 0.05. Agronomy 12 00026 i001 maternal line; Agronomy 12 00026 i002 pollen donor.
Table 3. Comparison of morphological and anatomical characteristics of leaves of parental genotypes and the interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations.
Table 3. Comparison of morphological and anatomical characteristics of leaves of parental genotypes and the interspecific hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations.
GenotypeLeaf
Surface
(cm2)
Leaf
Thickness
(µm)
Palisade Mesophyll Thickness (µm)Spongy Mesophyll Thickness (µm)Abaxial
Epidermis
(µm)
Adaxial
Epidermis
(µm)
Stomata Length (µm)Stomata Density
(No./mm2)
IW1234 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 head cabbage164.50 c *
±9.43
264.60 cd
±19.63
103.3 bc
±15.56
113.9 c–e
±16.48
20.42 bc
±0.65
15.53 bd
±2.65
24.38 b
±0.07
114.11 ce
±6.26
IW08 Agronomy 12 00026 i001 kale85.24 c
±8.61
234.30 d
±14.33
93.6 c
±13.61
103.5 c–f
±15.93
15.43 d
±1.47
13.24 d
±1.68
22.34 b
±0.54
271.22 a
±13.80
RAP62 Agronomy 12 00026 i002 rapeseed137.54 c
±12.76
232.32 d
±21.08
91.96 c
±12.30
92.6 f
±15.68
20.05 c
±2.90
15.86 bd
±1.73
23.54 b
±4.12
181.33 b
±18.28
Interspecific hybrids of the F1 generation
S3 (head cabbage × rapeseed)165.58 c
±18.91
249.14 cd
±17.17
114.1 bc
±15.65
94 ef
±16.28
21.26 bc
±2.05
15.16 cd
±1.82
26.89 b
±1.28
140.78 bc
±10.58
S20 (kale × rapeseed)133.20 c
±26.13
294.83 bc
±16.88
129.6 bc
±15.31
123.6 bd
±15.54
19.23 cd
±1.38
14.99 cd
±1.65
26.87 b
±0.66
120.89 cd
±5.83
Interspecific hybrids of the F2 generation
FS3 (S3 × S3)346.50 b
±9.24
327.91 b
±12.73
138.3 b
±18.66
138 b
±14.38
26.05 a
±4.08
22.47 a
±2.82
32.66 a
±0.39
87.88 ce
±1.39
FS20 (S20 × S20)364.06 b
±12.09
291. 76 bd
±18.53
120.4 bc
±15.62
120.3 b–d
±15.20
24.41 ab
±2.55
19.74 ab
±2.74
32.45 a
±0.97
67.00 de
±7.36
FC320 (S3 × mixture of pollen)603.72 a
±13.03
409.60 a
±28.72
183 a
±26.25
180.1 a
±24.76
17.84 cd
±2.40
17.50 bd
±2.80
32.50 a
±1.33
104.00 ce
±3.34
FC230 (S20 × mixture of pollen)372.34 b
±20.35
294.76 bc
±14.07
119.6 bc
±10.91
129.9 bc
±14.33
24.24 ab
±1.31
19.32 ac
±2.98
37.40 a
±1.29
55.13 e
±3.29
* Means in the columns followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test at p = 0.05. Agronomy 12 00026 i001 maternal line; Agronomy 12 00026 i002 pollen donor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marasek-Ciolakowska, A.; Kamiński, P.; Podwyszyńska, M.; Kowalska, U.; Starzycki, M.; Starzycka-Korbas, E. Effect of Meiotic Polyploidisation on Selected Morphological and Anatomical Traits in Interspecific Hybrids of Brassica oleracea × B. napus. Agronomy 2022, 12, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010026

AMA Style

Marasek-Ciolakowska A, Kamiński P, Podwyszyńska M, Kowalska U, Starzycki M, Starzycka-Korbas E. Effect of Meiotic Polyploidisation on Selected Morphological and Anatomical Traits in Interspecific Hybrids of Brassica oleracea × B. napus. Agronomy. 2022; 12(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marasek-Ciolakowska, Agnieszka, Piotr Kamiński, Małgorzata Podwyszyńska, Urszula Kowalska, Michał Starzycki, and Elżbieta Starzycka-Korbas. 2022. "Effect of Meiotic Polyploidisation on Selected Morphological and Anatomical Traits in Interspecific Hybrids of Brassica oleracea × B. napus" Agronomy 12, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop