Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Alternating Polymers Incorporating Boron-Chelated Heterochrysene Units
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Melt-Dispersion Technique for Simplistic Preparation of Chlorpromazine-Loaded Polycaprolactone Nanocapsules
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 7
Issue 6
10.3390/polym7061177
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Size-Controlled Nanomicelles of Poly(lactic acid)–Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers with a Multiblock Configuration

by
Shota Somekawa
1,2,
Kazunari Masutani
2,
Yu-I Hsu
2,
Atsushi Mahara
1,
Yoshiharu Kimura
2 and
Tetsuji Yamaoka
1,*
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan
2
Department of Biobased Materials Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2015, 7(6), 1177-1191; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7061177
Submission received: 13 March 2015 / Revised: 9 June 2015 / Accepted: 18 June 2015 / Published: 23 June 2015
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The ability to control the micelle size of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PLA–PEG) block copolymers is important for controlling their circulation in blood cell recognition, drug release and therapeutic effects. We successfully controlled the micelle size by changing the block number of copolymers (multiblock index). PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers with multiblock indexes ranging from 1.35 to 2.78 were synthesized by direct polycondensation with tin chloride/p-toluenesulfonic acid binary catalysts, using PEG with a molecular weight (Mw) of 3200 Da. The Mw of PLA–PEG copolymers increased with an increase in the multiblock index, while micelle size, measured by dynamic light scattering, decreased greatly from 349 to 28 nm. In addition, the X-ray diffraction peak of the PLA crystal disappeared when the multiblock index was increased. These results indicate that a multiblock structure is useful for controlling micelle size without changing the PLA/PEG composition or PEG molecular weight, which strongly influences other micelle features.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Diblock and triblock copolymers of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PLA–PEG copolymers) possess excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. It is well known that these block copolymers form micelle structures in water, with a PLA core and PEG shell, owing to the amphiphilicity of hydrophilic PEG and hydrophobic PLA. These structures have been investigated for use as drug carriers [1], along with other amphiphilic block copolymers [2]. We previously reported a novel function of the micelle aqueous suspension. When heated, the mixed suspension of poly(l-lactic acid)–PEG micelles and poly(d-lactic acid)–PEG micelles forms a hydrogel based on the rearrangement of the micelle structure to form a network structure with stereocomplex crosslinking points, which can be used as an injectable hydrogel-type biomaterial [3,4].
The topologies of the PLA–PEG copolymer micelles have been extensively studied. PLA–PEG–PLA triblock copolymers form flower-like micelles with the PEG blocks [3,4,5], while PLA–PEG diblock copolymers tend to form star-like micelles [4,5]. These micelles can enclose hydrophobic drugs in the core and are highly stable in the blood for a long period of time. Since micelle size affects various functions and efficacies, methods for size control are very important and have been studied extensively. In general, the micelle size of PLA/PEG block copolymers is controlled by the PLA/PEG composition and total molecular weight. Yue et al. reported in vivo behavior of PEG–b–PLA micelles with a size of 30 to 150 nm. They also controlled the micelle size by changing the PLA block length. The amount of micelles that accumulated in each organ depended on the micelle size, and the smaller micelles were more effective in tumor-growth inhibition [6].
However, it is not easy to change PLA–PEG copolymer characteristics in a wide range. Generally, the molecular weight of PEG used for block copolymers is less than 50,000 Da, because higher molecular weight PEGs are not excreted from the kidney and may accumulate in the body [7]. If the molecular weight of PEG in PLA–PEG diblock or PLA–PEG–PLA triblock copolymers is fixed, the PLA/PEG composition determines not only the amphiphilicity, but also the total molecular weight of the copolymers.
To solve these problems, the development of a multiblock structure is one of the most promising strategies. In 1999, we developed multiblock copolymers composed of PEG and water-soluble polyether segments [8]. We confirmed that tissue encapsulation of these multiblock copolymers was reduced, along with inflammatory cytokine production [9]. The multiblock structure enabled independent control of the segment length, total molecular weight and compositions of block copolymers. Multiblock copolymers with high molecular weight can even be processed to form films and fibers, while copolymers with high and low PLA content are effective as sutures or adhesion prevention membranes [10,11]. The multiblock copolymers also form nanoparticles in the water. In 2000, Bae et al. and Na et al. reported nanoparticles of PLA–PEG and poly(ε-caprolactone)–PEG (PCL–PEG) multiblock copolymers [12,13].
In the present study, the effect of the multiblock index (expressed as “n” in (PLA–PEG)n) of PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers on their micelle size was investigated. PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers with different multiblock indexes were synthesized by changing the reaction temperature and reaction time in direct polycondensation, using tin (II) chloride dihydrate (SnCl2) and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (TSA) as a binary catalyst system. This binary catalyst system does not require a chain extender and was developed in our group to synthesize higher molecular weight PLLA (poly(l-lactide)) with low racemization and less coloring [14,15,16].

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The d-lactic acid (LA) aqueous solution (90%) was purchased from Musashino Chemical Laboratory, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). PEG with a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 3200 Da, succinic acid (SA) and TSA were purchased from Nacalai Tesque Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). SnCl2 was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Polycondensation

LA (0.25 mol), PEG (7.0 mmol) and SA (6.8 mmol) were charged into a three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a reflux condenser. The temperature of the reflux condenser was maintained at 100 °C using a ribbon heater. At first, the air in the flask was replaced with argon gas. The flask was immersed in an oil bath at 150 °C, and the pressure was reduced to 66.7 kPa, with the conditions maintained for 5 h. Since SA might be removed from the system at high temperature and reduced pressure, SA was allowed to react with LA and PEG at 150 °C and 66.7 kPa. Then, SnCl2 (1 wt% relative to the total amount of LA and PEG) and TSA (an equimolar amount to SnCl2) were added into the flask, and the flask was heated to 150 or 180 °C. The pressure was reduced gradually to reach 0.67 kPa and maintained for 15, 30 and 60 h at 150 °C or 10, 20, 30 and 60 h at 180 °C. The products were dissolved in dichloromethane, and the resulting solutions were poured into an excess amount of cold diethyl ether. The precipitated products were filtered and dried under vacuum for 24 h.

2.3. Preparation of Micelle Suspension

Ten milligrams of copolymer were dissolved in 100 µL of tetrahydrofuran (THF), and the solution was dropped into 1 mL of distilled water. THF was removed from the solution by stirring at room temperature overnight. The final concentration of the micelle suspension was adjusted to 1 and 7 wt% by changing the volume of distilled water.

2.4. Measurement

1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ARX-600 spectrometer (Bruker Co., Karlsruhe, Germany) at 600 MHz with deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) containing 0.03 vol% tetramethylsilane (TMS) used as an internal standard. The number average molecular weight (Mn), Mw and molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The analyzer was composed of a Shimadzu LC-10AD pump and a RID-10A refractive-index detector (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). A set of Tosoh TSK gel-GMHHR-H columns (particle size (mean): 5 µm. 7.8 mm I.D. × 30 cm) was used with CHCl3 as the eluent at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min at 35 °C. The molecular weights were calibrated with polystyrene standards. We termed the number of repeating units (n) of (PLA–PEG)n as the multiblock index. Copolymers with n = 1 and 1.5 represent diblock and triblock copolymers, respectively. The multiblock index of PLA–PEG copolymers was calculated from the PLA/PEG block ratio (NMR) and Mw (GPC).
The light transmittance of a micelle suspension of 1 wt% was measured using a spectrometer on a Shimadzu UV-1800 at a wavelength of 500 nm at room temperature. The micelle size was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) on a nano ZS Zetasizer at 20 °C (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK).
The micelle morphology was observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on multimode equipment (Veeco Co, Ltd., Plainview, NY, USA). Five microliters of micelle suspension (1 wt%) were dropped on the mica plate, dried at room temperature and observed in tapping mode using a silicon cantilever with a force constant of 40 N/m and a typical resonant frequency of 325 kHz.
Wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) of micelles was measured on an RINT 2100 FSL refractometer (Rigaku Co., Tokyo, Japan). The PLA–PEG multiblock micelle suspension (7 wt%) was freeze-dried and measured. The scattering intensities were scanned in the 2θ range of 5 to 40° at a scan rate of 2°/min at room temperature. The relative PLA crystal peak intensity was calculated by evaluating the area under the WAXD diffraction peaks (PLA crystal/(total crystal + total amorphous)).

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of Multiblock Copolymers

Multiblock copolymers consisting of PLA, PEG and SA were synthesized by direct polycondensation using binary catalysts of SnCl2 and TSA (Scheme 1). The reaction was confirmed by 1H-NMR. As shown in Figure 1, methine and methyl protons in PLA appeared at around 5.2 ppm and 1.5 ppm, respectively, and the signals of main chain methylene units in the PEG blocks appeared at 3.7 ppm. The α-methylene protons of the ethylene glycol units connected to PLA appeared at 4.3 ppm, together with the methine protons of the hydroxylated lactyl end units. The proton peaks of SA (δ = 2.7 ppm) were observed from the resultant polymer by 1H-NMR. This result coincides with several earlier studies of PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers [17,18,19].
Polymers 07 01177 g010 1024
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA)–PEG multiblock copolymer.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA)–PEG multiblock copolymer.
Polymers 07 01177 g010
Polymers 07 01177 g001 1024
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer in CDCl3.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer in CDCl3.
Polymers 07 01177 g001
The characteristics of the copolymers are summarized in Table 1. The LE(m)-x indicates a PLA–PEG (LE) multiblock copolymer (m) with the multiblock index of x. Figure 2 shows the changes in the Mw of PLA–PEG copolymers as a function of reaction time at 150 and 180 °C. Before the catalysts were added, the Mw and Mn of the polymer were 3700 and 3400 Da, respectively. At 150 °C, the Mw gradually increased with increasing reaction time to reach 9200 Da after 65 h. On the other hand, at 180 °C, the Mw sharply increased to 14,000 Da after 25 h, but gradually decreased afterwards. There was an obvious decrease in Mw at 65 h. Long-term heating and high reaction temperatures might induce the decomposition of the PLA segments in the PLA–PEG copolymer.
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the PLA–PEG copolymers.
Table 1. Characteristics of the PLA–PEG copolymers.
Sample nameTemperature (°C)Reaction time (h)Mn a (Da)Mw a (Da)Mw/Mn aPLA/PEG b (w/w)Multiblock index c
LE(m)-1.35150203,6006,1001.6729.1:70.91.35
LE(m)-1.53150354,2006,9001.6629.1:70.91.53
LE(m)-2.27150656,9009,2001.3421.2:78.82.27
LE(m)-1.38180154,3007,0001.6237.1:62.91.38
LE(m)-2.78180259,60014,0001.4636.4:63.62.78
LE(m)-2.75180358,30013,4001.6334.3:65.72.75
LE(m)-2.93180659,10012,7001.4026.2:73.82.93
a Determined by GPC (flow rate: 0.3 mL/min; eluent: CDCl3; molecular weight standard: polystyrene); b calculated from 1H-NMR; c calculated from 1H-NMR and GPC.
Polymers 07 01177 g002 1024
Figure 2. Changes in the molecular weight of the PLA–PEG copolymers as a function of the reaction time at 150 (○) and 180 °C (●).
Figure 2. Changes in the molecular weight of the PLA–PEG copolymers as a function of the reaction time at 150 (○) and 180 °C (●).
Polymers 07 01177 g002
Figure 3 shows typical GPC curves of the reprecipitated PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers. A bimodal peak was observed at 35 h when the reaction temperature was 180 °C. The small peak was probably due to a small amount of LA oligomers. The PLA of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer end units might have decomposed by transesterification. On the other hand, the bimodal peak was not observed at 5, 15, 25 or 65 h. The LA oligomers might have decomposed by 65 h and probably disappeared during reprecipitation. The PLA/PEG ratio measured by 1H-NMR spectroscopy supports this result. The PLA content of the multiblock copolymer decreased with an increase in reaction time at 180 °C.
Polymers 07 01177 g003 1024
Figure 3. GPC curve of multiblock copolymers at (a) 150 and (b) 180 °C for each reaction time.
Figure 3. GPC curve of multiblock copolymers at (a) 150 and (b) 180 °C for each reaction time.
Polymers 07 01177 g003
The PLA content of all of the PLA–PEG copolymers was similar to the feed ratio, but changed slightly according to the reaction conditions. The PLA content of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer was 29.1% when it was synthesized at 150 °C for 20 and 35 h. At 150 °C for 65 h, it was 21.2%. When the polymerization was conducted at 180 °C for 15, 25 and 35 h, it was about 36%. There was an obvious decrease in the PLA content (26.2%) when the reaction time was 65 h. The PLA content of the product synthesized at the high reaction temperature was higher than that of the product synthesized at the low reaction temperature. The multiblock index, which was calculated by the unit ratio of PLA/PEG (NMR) and Mw (GPC), increased with an increase in reaction temperature and time. At 150 °C, the multiblock index increased with time and reached 2.27 at 65 h. At 180 °C, the multiblock index was 2.78 at 25 h and reached 2.93 after 65 h. Figure 4 shows the methyl protons decoupled from the methine protons of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers. The spectral signals were assigned according to previous studies [20,21,22,23]. The subscripts i and s indicate isotactic and syndiotactic, respectively. It was difficult to quantify the racemization from the NMR spectrum, but we tried to calculate the racemization ratio ((isi + sss + iis/ssi + sis)/(iii + ssi/iss + isi + sss + iis/ssi + sis)) and show the result in Figure S1. At 150 °C, the racemization ratio slowly increased with time, while at 180 °C, it rapidly increased after 35 h and reached over 30% at 65 h. In addition, the LE(m)-2.93 changed color to dark brown at 65 h of polymerization at 180 °C. Since these results indicate the possibility of racemization, we omitted the results of LE(m)-2.93 from the entire analysis.
Polymers 07 01177 g004 1024
Figure 4. Methine proton signals from the homonuclear-decouple 1H-NMR spectra of (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.53, (c) LE(m)-2.27, (d) LE(m)-1.38, (e) LE(m)-2.78, (f) LE(m)-2.75 and (g) LE(m)-2.93 (i, isotactic; s, syndiotactic).
Figure 4. Methine proton signals from the homonuclear-decouple 1H-NMR spectra of (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.53, (c) LE(m)-2.27, (d) LE(m)-1.38, (e) LE(m)-2.78, (f) LE(m)-2.75 and (g) LE(m)-2.93 (i, isotactic; s, syndiotactic).
Polymers 07 01177 g004

3.2. Micelles

Figure 5a shows the effect of the multiblock index on the light transmittance of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer micelle suspensions (1 wt%) at room temperature. Light transmittance of LE(m)-1.35, LE(m)-1.38 and LE(m)-1.53 was less than 35%, while that of LE(m)-2.27, LE(m)-2.75 and LE(m)-2.78 was higher than 80%. The correlation coefficient (r) between the multiblock index and the light transmittance was r = 0.96 (p = 0.002). In contrast, no correlation was observed between light transmittance and the PLA content of copolymers at room temperature (Figure 5b). The correlation coefficient was r = −0.13 (p = ns). Figure 6a shows the dependence of the particle size of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer micelle, in 1 wt% suspension at 20 °C, on the multiblock index. Interestingly, micelle size clearly decreases with the increased multiblock index, although the Mw of the copolymer increases with the increased multiblock index, as shown in Table 1. Figure S2 clearly shows that the particle size decreased with the increasing Mw of the block copolymers, which does not generally occur. The particle size of LE(m)-1.35, LE(m)-1.38, LE(m)-1.53, LE(m)-2.27, LE(m)-2.75 and LE(m)-2.78 was 349, 209, 218, 74, 28 and 38 nm, respectively. Their correlation coefficient was r = −0.94 (p = 0.006). The smaller size at the higher multiblock index is in good agreement with the higher light transmittance (Figure 5a). It is clear that the PLA contents is not a determinant of the particle size (Figure 6b, r = −0.10 (p = ns)).
The AFM image revealed that all of the PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers micelles were spherical (Figure 7). The majority of micelles of LE(m)-2.27, LE(m)-2.75 and LE(m)-2.78 were small at a diameter of 30 to 100 nm, while all of the micelles of LE(m)-1.35, LE(m)-1.38 and LE(m)-1.53 were much larger. These results agree with the DLS measurement.
Polymers 07 01177 g005 1024
Figure 5. Light transmittance change of the PLA–PEG copolymers suspension (1 wt%) (a) multiblock indexes and (b) PLA content at room temperature (** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001).
Figure 5. Light transmittance change of the PLA–PEG copolymers suspension (1 wt%) (a) multiblock indexes and (b) PLA content at room temperature (** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001).
Polymers 07 01177 g005
Polymers 07 01177 g006 1024
Figure 6. Change in the micelle suspension (1 wt%) of PLA–PEG copolymers as a function of (a) multiblock indexes and (b) PLA contents at 20 °C (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6. Change in the micelle suspension (1 wt%) of PLA–PEG copolymers as a function of (a) multiblock indexes and (b) PLA contents at 20 °C (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001).
Polymers 07 01177 g006
Polymers 07 01177 g007 1024
Figure 7. AFM images of the (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.38, (c) LE(m)-1.53, (d) LE(m)-2.27, (e) LE(m)-2.75 and (f) LE(m)-2.78 micelles. The AFM image size and height are 2 µm × 2 µm and 50 nm, respectively (scale bar = 500 nm). The image size and height of the enlargement images are 1 µm × 1 µm and 10 nm, respectively (scale bar = 250 nm).
Figure 7. AFM images of the (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.38, (c) LE(m)-1.53, (d) LE(m)-2.27, (e) LE(m)-2.75 and (f) LE(m)-2.78 micelles. The AFM image size and height are 2 µm × 2 µm and 50 nm, respectively (scale bar = 500 nm). The image size and height of the enlargement images are 1 µm × 1 µm and 10 nm, respectively (scale bar = 250 nm).
Polymers 07 01177 g007
Figure 8 shows the WAXD profiles of the micelles. The PEG crystal peaks are located at 2θ = 23.5°. The peaks at 2θ = 19° are the overlapping peaks of PLA and PEG. LE(m)-1.35, LE(m)-1.38 and LE(m)-1.53 micelles show PLA crystal peaks at 2θ = 17°, while LE(m)-2.27, LE(m)-2.75 and LE(m)-2.78 micelles do not. The relative PLA crystal peak intensity was calculated by PLA crystal (diffraction peaks of 17°)/(total crystal + total amorphous). Figure 9 indicates a clear decrease in the relative PLA crystal peak intensity with an increase in the multiblock index.
Polymers 07 01177 g008 1024
Figure 8. WAXD profile of the (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.38, (c) LE(m)-1.53, (d) LE(m)-2.27, (e) LE(m)-2.75 and (f) LE(m)-2.78 micelles.
Figure 8. WAXD profile of the (a) LE(m)-1.35, (b) LE(m)-1.38, (c) LE(m)-1.53, (d) LE(m)-2.27, (e) LE(m)-2.75 and (f) LE(m)-2.78 micelles.
Polymers 07 01177 g008
Polymers 07 01177 g009 1024
Figure 9. Relative PLA crystal peak intensity in the micelle of PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers as a function of multiblock indexes.
Figure 9. Relative PLA crystal peak intensity in the micelle of PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers as a function of multiblock indexes.
Polymers 07 01177 g009

4. Discussions

4.1. Racemization

Our group reported that high molecular weight PLLA (about 100,000 Da) can be synthesized directly from LA without discoloring or racemization, through the use of binary catalysts [14,15,16]. Baick et al. reported the reversible oligomerization of l-lactic acid in this binary catalyst system [24]. Miao et al. applied this binary catalyst method to the synthesis of PLA–PEG–PLA triblock copolymers [25]. The reaction time, temperature, pressure and ratio of binary catalysts were studied to determine their effect on polymer decomposition, discoloring and racemization [14,15,16,24,25]. We previously reported that a reaction time longer than 20 h in melt polycondensation of PLLA was ineffective for further polymerization, but rather induced discoloration and racemization of PLLA [14]. In the present study, we succeeded in preparing PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers using binary catalysts without chain extenders for the first time. However, we observed obvious racemization and decomposition during polymerization at 180 °C for 65 h (Figure 4). We then excluded this data point from the main analysis.

4.2. Micelle Size

It is generally known that the micelle size of PLA–PEG block copolymers depends on the balance of hydrophobic and hydrophilic components (PLA and PEG ratio), as well as the PLA and PEG block lengths [4,5,13,26,27,28]. However, in our results, PLA contents ranging from 21.2% to 37.1%, which affect the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance, were not a determinant of the micelle size. The micelle size depended rather on the multiblock index with an inverse correlation. A large multiblock index resulted in a small micelle diameter, although an increasing multiblock index increases the copolymer molecular weight (Table 1). It is hard to conclude that the multiblock index is the dominant parameter, but we could show that it must be one of the effective parameters for determining the micelle diameter.
Recently, Hadjiantoniouet et al. prepared and evaluated non-biodegradable multiblock copolymers from hydrophobic 2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate and hydrophilic methyl methacrylate, bearing from two to six blocks. Variations in the number of blocks led to differences in micelle size, micelle structure and aggregation number [29]. We also tried to evaluate the micelle structures.

4.3. Crystallinity

It is known that the crystallinity of both the PEG and the PLA segments decreases in the copolymer, and the crystallinity of multiblock copolymers is lower than that of triblock copolymers. The crystallinity also changes with block length and molecular weight. Lee et al. suggested that the presence of succinic acid might have inhibited PLA crystallization. Moreover, the crystallinity of PLLA and PEG in PLLA–PEG multiblock copolymers was influenced by both the molecular weight and the PLLA/PEG ratio [30].
In this study, we assessed the crystallinity of the PLA segment in the micelle structures. The multiblock copolymer with low PLA content (LE(m)-1.35) clearly showed the PLA crystal peak, but the multiblock copolymer with large PLA content (LE(m)-2.78) did not. The multiblock index affected PLA crystal formation of PLA–PEG copolymers to a greater extent than PLA content did (Figure 9).
Glavas et al. reported that the crystallinity of the micelle core influenced micelle size and critical micelle concentration [31]. Micelles with a semicrystalline core (PEG–PCL) and those with an amorphous core (PEG–PεDL) showed different trends in size as a function of the hydrophobic/hydrophobic ratio. Semicrystalline micelles were smaller than amorphous micelles when the hydrophobic ratio was high (the hydrophobic/hydrophilic ratio was 2.0). On the other hand, semicrystalline micelles were larger than amorphous micelles when the hydrophobic ratio was low (the hydrophobic/hydrophilic ratio was 0.5). The micelle core crystallinity might be an important factor that influences micelle size.
Agrawal et al. reported that the crystallinity of the PLA core greatly affects the release of incorporated drugs [32]. They compared the micelles of poly(dl-lactic acid)–DLLA–PEG–poly(dl-lactic acid) (amorphous core) with the micelles of PLLA–PEG–PLLA (crystal core). The crystalline PLA core released drugs from the micelle at a relatively fast rate, whereas the amorphous PLA core showed a slower release. They suggested that the reason for the difference was the packing of PLA chains in the core. Moreover, the report suggested that the aggregation number of crystal core micelles was larger than that of amorphous core micelles [33]. The core crystallinity, which can be altered by the multiblock index, may also be an important factor in determining the micelle size and drug releasing behavior.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we synthesized PLA–PEG multiblock copolymers by a simple direct polycondensation, using SnCl2 dihydrate and TSA as binary catalysts. The 1H-NMR and GPC analysis showed that the multiblock index can be controlled by controlling the reaction time and temperature. It was found that the multiblock index of the biodegradable PLA–PEG copolymer is one of the major factors influencing the micelle size in aqueous solutions, as well as the crystallinity of the PLA core. The effect of these features on drug incorporation properties, drug releasing behavior and thermoresponsive gelation capacity will be investigated in the future.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/7/6/1177/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Intramural Research Fund of National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (22-2-4), the S-innovation Research Program for the “Development of the biofunctional materials for realization of innovative medicine”, Japan Science and Technology Agent (JST), and the Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 2660623.

Author Contributions

Shota Somekawa conducted the entire experimental work under the supervision of Tetsuji Yamaoka (Corresponding author), Yoshiharu Kimura, Kazunari Masutani, and Atsushi Mahara. Yu-I Hsu assisted the WAXD experiment. The Manuscript was finally written by Shota Somekawa and Tetsuji Yamaoka.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gref, R.; Minamitake, Y.; Peracchia, M.T.; Trubetskoy, V.; Torchilin, V.; Langer, R. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science 1995, 263, 1600–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kataoka, K.; Harada, A.; Nagasaki, Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fujiwara, T.; Mukose, T.; Yamaoka, T.; Yamane, H.; Sakurai, S.; Kimura, Y. Novel thermo-responsive formation of a hydrogel by stereo-complexation between PLLA–PEG–PLLA and PDLA–PEG–PDLA block copolymers. Macromol. Biosci. 2001, 1, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fujiwara, T.; Miyamoto, M.; Kimura, Y.; Iwata, T.; Doi, Y. Self-organization of diblock and triblock copolymers of poly(l-lactide) and poly(oxyethylene) into nanostructured bands and their network system. Proposition of a doubly twisted chain conformation of poly(l-lactide). Macromolecules 2001, 34, 4043–4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fujiwara, T.; Kimura, Y. Macromolecular organization of poly(l-lactide)-block-polyoxyethylene into bio-inspired nano-architectures. Macromol. Biosci. 2002, 2, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yue, J.; Liu, S.; Xie, Z.; Xing, Y.; Jing, X. Size-dependent biodistribution and antitumor efficacy of polymer micelle drug delivery systems. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 4273–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamaoka, T.; Tabata, Y.; Ikada, Y. Distribution and tissue uptake of poly(ethylene glycol) with different molecular weights after intravenous administration to mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yamaoka, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Ohta, T.; Miyamoto, M.; Murakami, A.; Kimura, Y. Synthesis and properties of multiblock copolymers consisting of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(oxypropylene-co-oxyethylene) prepared by direct polycondensation. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1999, 37, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ehashi, T.; Kakinoki, S.; Yamaoka, T. Water absorbing and quick degradable PLLA/PEG multiblock copolymers reduce the encapsulation and inflammatory cytokine production. J. Artif. Organs 2014, 17, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamaoka, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Fujisato, T.; Kimura, Y. Preparation and evaluations of PLLA-based multiblock copolymer fibers as a novel suture. Jpn. J. Artif. Organs 2000, 29, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yamaoka, T.; Njatawidjaja, E.; Kasai, A.; Agudelo, C.A.; Ehashi, T.; Kakinoki, S.; Kato, S.; Mahara, A. Elastic/adhesive double-layered PLA–PEG multiblock copolymer membranes for postoperative adhesion prevention. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2013, 98, 2168–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bae, Y.H.; Huh, K.M.; Kim, Y.; Park, K.H. Biodegradable amphiphilic multiblock copolymers and their implications for biomedical applications. J. Control. Release 2000, 64, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Na, K.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, D.H.; Bae, Y.H. Biodegradable thermo-sensitive nanoparticles from poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) alternating multi-block copolymer for potential anti-cancer drug carrier. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 27, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moon, S.I.; Lee, C.W.; Miyamoto, M.; Kimura, Y. Melt polycondensation of l-lactic acid with Sn(II) catalysts activated by various proton acids: A direct manufacturing route to high molecular weight poly(l-lactic acid). J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moon, S.I.; Taniguchi, I.; Miyamoto, M.; Kimura, Y.; Lee, C.W. Synthesis and properties of high-molecular-weight poly(l-lactic acid) by melt/solid polycondensation under different reaction conditions. High Perform Polym. 2001, 13, S189–S196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moon, S.I.; Deguchi, K.; Miyamoto, M.; Kimura, Y. Synthesis of polyglactin by melt/solid polycondensation of glycolic/l-lactic acids. Polym. Int. 2004, 53, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huh, K.M.; Bae, Y.H. Synthesis and characterization of poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(l-lactic acid) alternating multiblock copolymers. Polymer 1999, 40, 6147–6155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, W.; Li, S.; Bei, J.; Wang, S. Dependence of morphology on composition of poly(l-lactide)–poly(ethylene glycol) multiblock copolymers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2002, 13, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, W.; Luo, W.; Wang, S.; Bei, J. Synthesis and properties of poly(l-lactide)–poly(ethylene glycol) multiblock copolymers by coupling triblock copolymers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2003, 14, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fukushima, K.; Kimura, Y. An efficient solid-state polycondensation method for synthesizing stereocomplexed poly(lactic acid)s with high molecular weight. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 3714–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kricheldorf, H.R.; Boettcher, C.; Tonnes, K.U. Polylactones: 23. Polymerization of racemic and meso d,l-lactide with various organotin catalysts-stereochemical aspects. Polymer 1992, 33, 2817–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thakur, K.A.M.; Kean, R.T.; Hall, E.S.; Kolstad, J.J.; Lindgren, T.A. High-resolution 13C and 1H solution NMR study of poly(lactide). Macromolecules 1997, 30, 2422–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ovitt, T.M.; Coates, G.W. Stereochemistry of lactide polymerization with chiral catalysts: New opportunities for stereocontrol using polymer exchange mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Baick, I.H.; Luciani, C.V.; Park, S.Y.; Lim, T.; Choi, K.Y. Kinetics of reversible oligomerization of l-lactic acid with a SnCl2·2H2O/p-toluenesulfonic acid catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 16617–16625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miao, P.; Zhao, C.; Xu, G.; Fu, Q.; Tang, W.; Zeng, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yang, G. Degradation of poly(d,l-lactic acid)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(d,l-lactic acid) copolymer by electron beam radiation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2981–2987. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu, X.; Ghzaoui, A.E.; Li, S. Anisotropic self-assembling micelles prepared by the direct dissolution of PLA/PEG block copolymers with a high PEG fraction. Langmuir 2011, 27, 8000–8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jie, P.; Venkatraman, S.S.; Min, F.; Freddy, B.Y.; Huat, G.L. Micelle-like nanoparticles of star-branched PEO–PLA copolymers as chemotherapeutic carrier. J. Control. Release 2005, 110, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Park, S.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Piao, L. Preparation and characterization of PEG/PLA multiblock and triblock copolymer. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 1638–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hadjiantoniou, N.A.; Triftaridou, A.I.; Kafouris, D.; Gradzielski, M.; Patrickios, C.S. Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic multiblock copolymers: Effect of the number of blocks on micellization. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 5492–5498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, S.Y.; Chin, I.J.; Jung, J.S. Crystallization behavior of poly(l-lactide)–poly(ethylene glycol) multiblock copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 1999, 35, 2147–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Glavas, L.; Olsen, P.; Odelius, K.; Albertsson, A.C. Achieving micelle control through core crystallinity. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 4150–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Agrawal, S.K.; Sanabria-Delong, N.; Coburn, J.M.; Tew, G.N.; Bhatia, S.R. Novel drug release profiles from micellar solutions of PLA–PEO–PLA triblock copolymers. J. Control. Release 2006, 112, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Agrawal, S.K.; Sanabria-Delong, N.; Tew, G.N.; Bhatia, S.R. Structural characterization of PLA–PEO–PLA solutions and hydrogels: Crystalline vs. amorphous PLA domains. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 1774–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Somekawa, S.; Masutani, K.; Hsu, Y.-I.; Mahara, A.; Kimura, Y.; Yamaoka, T. Size-Controlled Nanomicelles of Poly(lactic acid)–Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers with a Multiblock Configuration. Polymers 2015, 7, 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7061177

AMA Style

Somekawa S, Masutani K, Hsu Y-I, Mahara A, Kimura Y, Yamaoka T. Size-Controlled Nanomicelles of Poly(lactic acid)–Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers with a Multiblock Configuration. Polymers. 2015; 7(6):1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7061177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Somekawa, Shota, Kazunari Masutani, Yu-I Hsu, Atsushi Mahara, Yoshiharu Kimura, and Tetsuji Yamaoka. 2015. "Size-Controlled Nanomicelles of Poly(lactic acid)–Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers with a Multiblock Configuration" Polymers 7, no. 6: 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7061177

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop