Next Article in Journal
Effect of Resin Content on the Structure, Water Resistance and Mechanical Properties of High-Density Bamboo Scrimbers
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Thermal Aging Performance of a GAP-Based Polyurethane Elastomer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 16
Issue 6
10.3390/polym16060796
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multi-Streamline Approach for Upcycling PET into a Biodiesel and Asphalt Modifier

by
Kainan Chen
1,
Zeinab Mraiza
2,
Yunqiao Pu
3,
Jinghao Li
1,
Zhihua Liu
1,
Arthur J. Ragauskas
3,4,5,
Fujie Zhou
2,* and
Joshua S. Yuan
1,6,*
1
Synthetic and Systems Biology Innovation Hub, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
Joint Institute for Biological Sciences, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
4
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
5
Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, Center for Renewable Carbon, Institute of Agriculture, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
6
Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(6), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060796
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 8 March 2024 / Published: 13 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Circular and Green Polymer Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The non-degradable nature of petroleum-based plastics and the dependence on petroleum-based products in daily life and production are dilemmas of human development today. We hereby developed a plastic waste upcycling process to address these challenges. A multi-stream fraction strategy was developed to process poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) plastics into soluble and insoluble fractions. The soluble fraction was used as a sole carbon source for microbial fermentation to produce biodiesel precursor lipids with an appreciable bioconversion yield. The insoluble fraction containing fractionated polymers was used as the asphalt binder modifiers. The downsized PET additive improved the high-temperature performance of the asphalt binder by 1 performance grade (PG) without decreasing the low-temperature PG. Subsequent SEM imaging unveiled alterations in the micromorphology induced by PET incorporation. Further FTIR and 1H NMR analysis highlighted the aromatic groups of PET polymers as a crucial factor influencing performance enhancement. The results demonstrated the multi-stream fraction as a promising approach for repurposing plastic waste to produce biodiesel and modify asphalt. This approach holds the potential to tackle challenges in fuel supply and enhance infrastructure resilience to global warming.

1. Introduction

Contemporary society is facing two prominent issues: the accumulation of plastic waste and the emission of global warming [1,2]. There has been an unprecedentedly rapid rise in plastic waste due to the massive demand for plastic products in various industrial and consumer products [3]. Poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is one of the largest groups of plastics, with about 70 million tons manufactured and used each year [4]. Due to their resistance to natural degradation, PET plastics can remain in the ecosystem for decades, causing environmental pollution and impacting public and environmental health [5]. Furthermore, insufficient and unsustainable practices in the management and treatment of plastic can also contribute to global warming [6,7].
The inexorable progression of global warming and climate change draws us closer to increasingly uncertain and potentially catastrophic climate impacts, which will have substantial consequences for transportation infrastructure [8]. In particular, the rise in temperature resulting from global warming contributes to elevated the thermal stresses and escalated corrosion of steel structures in infrastructure, as well as the reduced stiffness of flexible pavements, disrupting the proper distribution of loads [9,10,11]. Therefore, infrastructure with improved resistance to higher temperature will be crucial to ensure the efficiency of transportation networks in the context of future global warming [12]. Among the transportation system, asphalt pavement is highly sensitive to the temperature conditions [13,14]. Studies have shown that high-temperature-induced permanent deformation is a primary concern for asphalt pavements in climate warming scenarios [15,16]. Improving the high-temperature performance of asphalt materials constitutes a primary measure for addressing deformation caused by temperature. The modification of asphalt or the incorporation of additives can augment the resistance of asphalt mixtures to permanent deformation to a certain degree [17,18,19].
In recent years, plastic waste has been increasingly studied as an additive to asphalt in recent years [3]. Many works have reported that the addition of plastic improves the mechanical properties of asphalt [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Moreover, there are emerging studies showing that PET particle-modified asphalt shows improved high-temperature performance [5,30,31]. Compared to coarse PET particles, fine PET or PET small particle sizes show improved modification effects since the smaller sizes can create a more uniform distribution of PET particles in asphalt [5,30,31]. Finely ground PET is commonly produced through grinding or crushing processes, leading to the generation of microparticles. This practice poses a potential environmental concern due to the negative impact associated with the interactions of microplastics throughout the ecosystem [32,33]. A treatment method to downsize the PET particles in a way that is both efficient and environment-friendly is thus important for PET waste upcycling and its applications in asphalt modification.
Our previous research has established a hydrolysis-based fractionation process for lignin and found that fractionated lignin can improve the high-temperature property of asphalt binder modifier without compromising the low-temperature property [34]. Considering that both PET and lignin are aromatic polymers, we explored a PET fractionation process to downsize PET particles for asphalt binder additive usage. Unlike other solvolysis-based methods like methanolysis and aminolysis, the hydrolysis process allows for the depolymerization of PET in water without the introduction of extra substances such as methanol and amines, which enhances its environmental and economic viability [35]. In this study, we developed a fractionation strategy based on alkaline hydrolysis to reduce the molecular weight of PET and turn it into soluble and insoluble parts for different applications (Figure 1). We further demonstrated that the insoluble fraction improved the high-temperature performance of the asphalt binder modifier without significantly compromising its low-temperature performance, and the soluble fraction is amenable to microbial fermentation and the production of biodiesel precursor lipids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Matreials

The PET powder (catalog number ES306031) was purchased from Goodfellow Corporation (Coraopolis, PA, USA). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. PET Fractionation via Alkali-Heat Treatment

A suspension comprising 10% (w/v) PET powders and 1% (w/v) NaOH was prepared in deionized water. The mixture underwent autoclaving for 2 h at a temperature of 121 °C and a pressure of around 15 pounds per square inch (103,421 Pa). The solubilized PET and insolubilized fraction were separated by centrifuging at 8000× g for 10 min and collected. Following the fractionation process, the insoluble fraction of PET was subjected to two washes with deionized water. Subsequently, it was dried to a constant weight in an oven set at 80 °C for future utilization as an additive to asphalt binders. The solubilized PET fraction underwent precipitation through the addition of HCl to eliminate the alkali solution. The resulting white precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 8000× g for 10 min, followed by two washes with deionized water. Subsequently, the washed precipitate (the soluble fraction) was dried to a constant weight in an oven set at 80 °C for future utilization as a carbon source in microbial fermentation.

2.2.2. Characterization of PET Insoluble Fraction

The morphology and size of the PET particles were investigated utilizing an optical microscope (Boreal Science, St. Catharines, ON, Canada). Under bright-field conditions, visible light illuminated the sample, and images of particles with a scale were captured by a digital camera.

2.2.3. Characterization of PET Soluble Fraction

The previously reported sample preparation method was adopted with modifications [36]. Specifically, a 2 mL solubilized PET fraction was transferred into screw-cap reaction vials. Acid hydrolysis was performed by adding 300 μL of HCl (to pH 1–2). Samples were extracted twice with 2 mL of ethyl acetate by agitating for 15 min and centrifuging for 10 min at 2500 rpm. Upper organic layers were transferred into new glass tubes. Extracts were evaporated to dryness under a gentle nitrogen stream at 40 °C. Residues were resuspended in 300 μL of ethyl acetate; 30 μL of BSTFA were added for derivatization. Specifically, the samples were heated at 60 °C for 60 min to convert total terephthalic acid (TPA) equivalents into 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl)terephthalic acid by replacement of the hydrogen of the hydroxy groups. Derivatized extracts were then cooled to room temperature for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis.
GC/MS-QP2010SE, (Shimadzu Scioentifc Instruments, Inc., Houston, TX, USA) equipped with a Zebron ZB-5HT Inferno column (30 m × 250 µm ID × 0.1 µm df) was used for analysis. The injector was set to a temperature of 260 °C, the transfer line was at 250 °C, the ion source was at 230 °C, and a constant column flow rate was held at 1.0 mL of helium/min. The oven temperature program started at 200 °C for 3 min, increased to 260 °C at 30 °C/min, was held for 11 min, then increased to 280 °C at 35 °C/min, and was held for 4 min. The mass detector operated in single ion monitoring mode, using a 70 eV electron beam to generate fragment ions. The spectrum was analyzed using the workstation software (version 4.11 SU2) in the GC/MS system to identify the derivatives of the PET soluble fraction.

2.2.4. Microbial Fermentation Using Fractionated Soluble PET

The soluble fraction of PET was used as the sole carbon source for microbial fermentation. Briefly, the seed culture of Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 was grown at 30 °C in LB broth to an OD600 of about 0.8. One percent of the seed culture was inoculated into the minimal salt medium [37] containing 3.2 g/L of dried fractionated PET (from the soluble part) as the sole carbon source. Cultures were incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 5 days. Biomass increase was monitored by measuring OD600. At the end of fermentation, all 50 mL of the cultures were collected by centrifuging at 5000× g for 10 min to collect RHA1 cells for lipid characterization.

2.2.5. Lipid Extraction, Identification, and Quantification

Briefly, the RHA1 cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and subsequently lyophilized for 48 h. The total dry cell weight (DCW) of each sample was measured with analytic balance (Sartorius, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). An amount of 5–10 mg of the dried biomass pellets was incubated with 2 mL of methanol–sulfuric acid (v/v = 85:15) solution and 2 mL of chloroform at 95 °C for 180 min, during which the acid catalyzed the methanolysis, converting the fatty acids of the lipids into their corresponding monomeric derivatives that were dissolved in the chloroform. After incubation, the sample was moved from the oven and cooled to room temperature. Then, 1 mL of deionized water was added twice for washing until no acid residual remained. The upper layer (water phase) was removed using a vacuum system to collect the organic layer. Two hundred microliters of the organic section were diluted in 1800 µL of chloroform, which contained internal standard methyl benzoate at a concentration at 21 µg/mL. The well mixed solution was then filtered using a 0.2 µm filter before GC/MS analysis.
GC/MS (QP2010SE, Shimadzu) equipped with a Zebron ZB-35HT Inferno column (30 m × 250 µm ID × 0.25 µm df) was used for analysis. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a 1.0 mL/min linear velocity. The injector was set to a temperature of 260 °C, the transfer line was at 250 °C, and the ion source was at 230 °C. The gas chromatograph (GC) oven temperature program was set initially at 50 °C for 3 min and then increased to 300 °C at 10 °C/min. The mass detector operated using a 70 eV electron beam with an ionization current of 40 μA. The monomeric derivatives of lipids were identified using the Compound Composer Database Software in the GC/MS system.
The quantification for each component was performed by calculating a response factor (RF) for each component analytical standard. For example, the RF for C16 monomer analytical standard was calculated using the following expression:
R F = ( A x × C i n ) / ( A i n × C x ) = ( A x / A i n ) / ( C x / C i n )
where Ax is the peak area of the C16 analytical standard, Ain is the peak area of the methyl benzoate internal standard, and Cx and Cin are the concentrations of the C16 analytical standard and methyl benzoate internal standard, respectively. Based on the peak area and concentration of the internal standard, as well as the peak area of C16, the concentrations of C16 monomer in the 2 mL GC/MS sample were determined. The weight of lyophilized cells used for lipid extraction was then employed to calculate the lipid content in the RHA1 cells.

2.2.6. Characterizing Asphalt Binder Temperature Performance Grade

Fractionation PET (insoluble part) were incorporated into the pre-melt asphalt binder at concentrations of 2% and 5% (w/w). The mixture was thoroughly stirred. High-temperature performance grade characterization was conducted using AASHTO T315 [38]. Briefly, the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) test was carried out on 25 mm diameter specimens, and the temperature at which rutting parameters (G*/sin δ) of the asphalt binder specimens equal to 1.0 kPa was determined, a value typically indicating the onset of softening or reduced resistance of asphalt binder specimens to rutting or permanent deformation [39]. The measured temperature is defined as high critical temperature [40]. AASHTO T313 was used to characterize the low temperature performance grade [41].
Briefly, asphalt binders were aged with a two-step process, including a rolling thin-film oven (RTFO) at 163 °C for 85 min and a pressure aging vessel (PAV) at 100 °C, 2.1 MPa, for 20 h [42]. The long-term aged asphalt binders were heated and molded to beam specimens. The Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) test was carried out to determine the temperature in a condition of the parameters of relaxation constant (m) and flexural creep stiffness (S) at 60 s of loading equal to 0.300 and 300 kPa, respectively. Typically, these two values are critical points in the BBR test where the asphalt binder begins to lose some of its viscoelastic properties and may exhibit deformation under the applied load [43]. The determined temperature was defined as low critical temperature and served as the indicator for low temperature performance. The high and low temperature performance grades of all tested asphalt binders were accordingly determined by the results for DSR and BBR tests according to the AASHTO M320 specification [44].

2.2.7. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Characterization

Fractionated PET-modified asphalt binders were prepared by melting at 150 °C and mounted on samples stages with carbon tape and coated with a thin layer of gold to enhance conductivity. Samples were observed using a TESCAN LYRA-3 Model GMH Focused Ion Beam Microscope (KEYENCE Corp. of America, Itasca, IL, USA). The images were collected at a working distance of 10 mm. The accelerating voltage applied was 5 kV.

2.2.8. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Characterization

Fractionated PET-modified asphalt binders were analyzed using a Nicolet i50 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX, USA). FTIR spectra of all samples were collected using an attenuated total reflection (ATR) stage. Samples were loaded in ATR crystal. All samples were scanned 64 times and acquired at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.2.9. Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) Characterization

The 1H NMR spectra of original and treated samples were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400-MHz spectrometer (Bruker Scientific LLC, Billerica, MA, USA) with a broadband inverse (BBI) probe. The asphalt samples were dissolved in 0.75 mL of deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) containing tetramethylsilane (TMS) as a chemical shift reference. The 1H spectra were obtained at a frequency of 400.18 MHz with a relaxation delay of 4.0 s, an acquisition time of 2.6 s, and 16 scans.

3. Results

3.1. Multi-Stream Fractionation of PET

The concept of plastic waste fractionation for multi-stream usage is as shown in Figure 1. The research focuses on PET, which accounts for 12% of total solid waste [45]. We hypothesized that hydrolysis-based treatment method can effectively downsize the PET particles, with a generation of different PET fractions for multi-stream usage based on their forms, achieving PET upcycling in a way that is both efficient and environment-friendly. To investigate the hypothesis, we treated PET materials with water in an alkaline environment at 121 °C for 1 h using a laboratory autoclave instrument and separated the soluble and insoluble fractions after the treatment. The insoluble fraction of hydrolyzed PET was utilized as an effective modifier to improve asphalt binder performance, and the soluble fraction was utilized as a carbon source for microbial fermentation to produce lipids for biodiesel (Figure 1).

3.2. Solubilized PET for Microbial Lipids Production

Biodiesel, which can be produced from microbial lipids, has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to replace or supply fossil fuels in certain applications [46,47]. The predicted terephthalate bioconversion pathways of bacteria R. jostii RHA1, which is a oleaginous microorganism, inspired us to explore the possibility of upcycling PET soluble fractions to lipids for biodiesel production [48,49]. First, we extracted and analyzed the soluble fraction using GC/MS [36] and found that the PET monomer, TPA, is the dominant depolymerization product (Figure 2A and Figure S1). This suggested that the alkaline hydrolysis specifically generated high-purity monomers, which is essential for the subsequent bioconversion.
Second, we then tested if the solubilized PET could support the growth of oleaginous bacteria R. jostii RHA1. With the solubilized PET as the sole carbon source, the cell density of R. jostii RHA1 indicated by the optical density at a 600 nm wavelength (OD600) increased from 0.097 ± 0.002 to 0.860 ± 0.006 in 36 h (Figure 2B). This growth rate is comparable to that with typical carbon sources like glucose [50]. The result suggested that the fractionated soluble PET can be used as a substrate to efficiently support RHA1 growth. Lastly, we investigated the lipid production of RHA1 with the solubilized PET as a carbon source. The results showed that the lipid content (lipids/DCW w/w) in RHA reached 37.0 ± 1.5%, which is about the same level as the RHA cells that utilized pure TPA (37.6 ± 0.7%), supporting that the major component of the solubilized PET is TPA (Figure 2C). A component comparison of the lipids from the two carbon sources also showed similar results, revealing that 15–18 carbon fatty acids constituted the predominant components, comprising 83.4 ± 8.1% and 82.5 ± 4.3%, respectively (Figure 2C). These results demonstrated that R. jostii RHA1 utilized the fractionated PET and TPA as the sole carbon source to support their growth and lipid accumulation. To further evaluate the viability of fractionated PET as a feedstock for lipid production, we calculated the lipid titer, which was found to reach 884.2 ± 20.7 mg/L, also comparable to 966.9 ± 67.9 mg/L from TPA and other typical industrial lipid-producing microorganisms [51,52] (Figure 2D). Furthermore, the carbon yield from the solubilized PET and TPA to lipid were 23.4 ± 0.7% and 25.7 ± 0.2%, respectively (Figure 2E). Overall, the results validated our hypothesis that the soluble fraction can be efficiently utilized as a carbon source for biodiesel precursor lipids production. Additionally, our findings supported a previous transcriptomics analysis revealing the existence of the terephthalate degradation pathway in the R. jostii RHA1, and for the first time demonstrated that R. jostii RHA1 can utilize fractionated PET as the sole carbon source for growth and lipid production [48].

3.3. Characterization of Insolubilized PET and Modified Asphalt Binder

To determine whether the hydrolysis-based fractionation effectively downsized the PET particles, the original and fractionated PET particles were compared under optical microscopy, and the images showed that the size of the PET particles decreased significantly after fractionation, from about 300 µm to about 30 µm (Figure 3A,B). This result, combined with the presence of PET monomers in the soluble fraction, supports the hypothesis that hydrolysis-assisted fractionation is an efficient method for downsizing PET materials while preventing the release of microplastics. Notably, our hydrolysis-based fractionation method, compared to conventional alkaline hydrolysis processes, used a lower pressure, temperature, and NaOH concentration, which make the process a “greener” way to recycle PET waste [53]. Additionally, unlike other PET chemical recycling methods such as methanolysis, glycolysis, and aminolysis, it produces RHA1 strain utilizable TPA and avoided the involvement of additional hazardous substrate substances like methanol or amines that could be toxic to microbial lipid production [54].
Original and fractionated PETs (2% and 5%) were added into the pre-melt asphalt binder and evenly stirred to produce PET-modified asphalt binders (Figure 3C,D). To assess the uniform dispersion of PET particles within the binder and investigate the microstructure of the modified asphalt binder, an SEM was employed to examine the morphology of different asphalt samples. Microscopic examination of the original asphalt indicated a non-smooth surface with certain disconnections (Figure 3E). These characteristics have the potential to contribute to pavement deformation under challenging conditions [55]. In the PET-modified asphalt samples, PET additives are observable as tiny white particles in the images that showed a good dispersion state in the modified asphalt binders (Figure 3F,G). Notably, the two modified asphalt binders exhibited smoother micrographic surfaces than the original asphalt binder, highlighting the effect of PET incorporation on the cohesion of the asphalt mixture [56].
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis was conducted to identify chemical bonds and functional groups in the asphalt binders, both unmodified and modified with PET. Characteristic peaks of the asphalt binder at 2919, 2850, 1459, and 1375 cm−1 were identified [57]. The introduction of PET additives was evident through strong stretching vibration bands at 1031 cm−1, representing the ester group bond C–O observed in both PET particles and modified asphalt binders [57] (Figure 3F,G). Specifically, the characteristic peak of PET at 1730 cm−1 was present in the modified binders (Figure 3F,G). The intensity of these PET characteristic peaks was lower in the fractionated-PET-modified asphalt binder compared to the original-PET-modified binder, aligning with the observed pattern in fractionated and original PET samples (Figure 3F,G). This consistency suggests that the observed peaks in PET-modified binders primarily originated from PET particles rather than interactions between PET and asphalt binder. In contrast, the peak observed at 1540 cm−1, indicative of reactive aromatic groups, exhibited an opposing trend, displaying higher intensity in the fractionated-PET-modified binder compared to the original-PET-modified binder [58] (Figure 3F,G). Notably, this aromatic group peak was detected in the fractionated PET but not in the original PET (Figure 3G, blue area). These findings suggested that the aromatic group peak in the modified binders is influenced by both PET incorporation and the interaction between PET microparticles and the asphalt binder, involving the aromatic structures inherent in PET polymers [59].

3.4. Insolubilized PET for Asphalt Binder Modification

To evaluate the potential of the PET particles as a modifier to enhance high-temperature rutting resistance of asphalt binders, original or modified asphalt binders were subjected to the DSR test to measure the high critical temperature [40] (Figure 4A). The results showed that the addition of PET and fractionated PET at 2% elevated the high critical temperature from 69 °C to 71.7 and 71.8 °C, respectively, signifying a notable enhancement in the performance grade (PG) of the asphalt binder, progressing from PG 64 to PG 70 after the modification with PET particles. The improved high-temperature performance could be attributed to the rising softening point of asphalt binders with PET polymer addition [60].
It is noteworthy that further increasing the original PET content to 5% did not yield a significant additional improvement in performance temperature. However, escalating the incorporation of fractionated PET to 5% resulted in a further increase in the fall temperature, reaching 72.9 °C (Figure 4A). This difference could be attributed to the larger specific surface area of the smaller-size fractionated PET, leading to an improved cohesion to the binder. Given the potential existence of an optimal incorporation percentage of PET particles for resilient asphalt binder performance, the results indicate that downsized PET particles after fractionation exhibit a higher optimal binder content [20].
Due to the high fusion temperature and relatively rigid nature of PET particles compared to the elastomeric characteristics of asphalt binders, incorporating PET usually increases the stiffness of the binder, making it more prone to cracking in cold temperatures [61,62,63]. To study the effect of fractionated PET in low temperature performance, we conducted the BBR test to determine the low critical temperature of asphalt binders (Figure 4B). Indeed, the increase of both original and fractionated PET up to 5% resulted in an increase in the low critical temperature, from −25.6 °C to −24.5 and −23.9 °C, respectively (Figure 4B). Despite this marginal decline, the asphalt binder’s low-temperature PG level remained at −22, underscoring the efficacy of PET incorporation without substantial compromise to its low-temperature performance. Surprisingly, compared to original PET-modified binder, the fractionated PET-modified binder showed a greater decrease in low critical temperature (Figure 4B). This observation could be ascribed to the fact that fractionated PET particles with smaller sizes tended to form aggregates in certain areas within the asphalt mixture (Figure 3G). The existence of the large sized aggregates can affect the adhesion between the asphalt binder and PET [64,65]. However, smaller particles that have a larger specific surface area can facilitate a uniform mix in asphalt binder, thus decreasing the chance of phase separation and enhancing the stability of the modified asphalt [66,67]. Notably, a recent study demonstrated that the incorporation of micronized PET particles improved the viscosity, adhesion, and resilience of the asphalt mixers [56].

4. Discussion

PET plastic waste is typically chemically inert, but the alkaline-assisted fractionation renders two fractions that are amenable to bioconversion and pavement additive applications, respectively. While the current hydrolysis process has successfully generated TPA monomers and reduced the size of PET particles for subsequent upcycling, further investigation on parameters like processing time and alkaline concentration could potentially enhance monomer yield and overall conversion efficiency.
For the subsequent bioconversion, our results have demonstrated an approach to upcycling PET waste to biodiesel precursor lipids. Even though the terephthalate degradation pathways were predicted in R. jostii RHA1 through comparative genomics, no study has experimentally demonstrated the bioconversion of plastic waste using this strain. This demonstration highlighted the viability of biodiesel production from PET waste, offering the potential to decrease PET treatment costs and feedstock expenses for lipid bioproduction. The utilization of readily available, low-cost substrates will play a critical role in making biodiesel economically competitive [68]. Furthermore, considering the versatile metabolism of Rhodococcus spp. strains and their potential applications in biotechnological strategies for compound production, the study opened new avenues to engineer R. jostii RHA1 to convert plastic waste to a broad range of industrial products, including terpenes, proteins, bioplastics, and others [69,70].
For asphalt binder modification, the insoluble fraction of PET improved the high-temperature performance of asphalt binder by 1 PG, from PG 64 to PG 70, without decreasing its low-temperature PG. This improvement could be attributed to the reduced particle size after fractionation. The smaller-sized particles become more amenable to blend in asphalt binders, promoting dissolution and exhibiting aromatic groups [35] (Figure 3F). It could facilitate the interactions between PET polymers and the aromatic complex within the asphalt binders [59]. The incorporation of aromatic groups into the modified asphalt binders was further evidenced by the increase in the relative content of aromatic hydrogens and benzylic protons determined with 1H NMR analysis (Table S1). In our prior investigation on a lignin-based asphalt binder modifier, we demonstrated the feasibility of fractionating the polymer and customizing its structure to enhance asphalt performance [34]. Drawing parallels with the molecular structure of lignin, the introduction of PET, which is also characterized by aromatic structures, fostered aromatic interactions with the aromatic structures within asphalt binders, consequently enhancing cohesion and augmenting the stiffness of the binders [71]. Our findings offer a valuable opportunity for delving deeper into the molecular mechanisms that underlie the enhancement of asphalt binder high-temperature performance through the incorporation of plastic waste.
The study also offered an economically feasible solution to address infrastructure resilience in response to the frequent occurrence of extremely high temperatures due to global climate changes. The results are of significant commercial value, as increasing 1 PG of asphalt binder will increase its price by about $100 per ton [72]. A 2% to 5% plastic waste addition will translate into approximately $2000 to $5000 per ton market value of waste plastics. The research provided a practical approach to achieving this economic value, while enhancing the pavement rutting resistance toward rising and fluctuating temperatures. Furthermore, this observation provides an opportunity to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms in terms of PET-asphalt interaction for improved high-temperature performance.

5. Conclusions

The study demonstrated the potential of multi-stream valorization to achieve plastic waste upcycling for both the usage of pavement material additives and biodiesel precursor production. We have shown that R. jostii RHA1 converts the soluble fraction of PET efficiently into lipids. We characterized the fractionized PET and the PET-modified asphalt binders with SEM and FTIR to reveal the incorporation of fractionized PET in asphalt and corresponding morphological changes. We have also shown that an addition of the fractioned PET significantly improved the high-temperature performance of asphalt binder by 1 PG without compromising the low-temperature performance. These results showcased the potential of the multi-streamed usage strategy of PET wastes on responding the trendy global warming and sustainable bioenergy generation in the future. Additionally, the enhanced high-temperature performance observed due to the inclusion of PET warranted a more in-depth exploration of the molecular-level interaction mechanisms between PET and asphalt mixers. This exploration, along with future PET treatment method design, will contribute to the utilization of PET for pavement material with enhanced high-temperature performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16060796/s1, Figure S1: GC/MS characterization of the solubilized PET; Table S1: Relative contents of aromatic hydrogens and benzylic protons in asphalt binders determined by 1H NMR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S.Y.; methodology, J.S.Y., F.Z. and Z.L.; software, K.C., Z.M. and Y.P.; validation, F.Z., K.C., Z.M. and Y.P.; formal analysis, K.C., Y.P. and J.L.; investigation, J.S.Y.; resources, J.S.Y. and F.Z.; data curation, J.S.Y. and K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.; writing—review and editing, K.C., A.J.R. and J.S.Y.; visualization, K.C.; supervision, J.S.Y.; project administration, J.S.Y.; funding acquisition, J.S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Texas A&M University for the excellent experiment platform and management.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cressey, D. Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: The struggle to track ocean plastics. Nature 2016, 536, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turner, W.R.; Oppenheimer, M.; Wilcove, D.S. A force to fight global warming. Nature 2009, 462, 278–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ben Zair, M.M.; Jakarni, F.M.; Muniandy, R.; Hassim, S. A Brief Review: Application of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate in Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tournier, V.; Topham, C.M.; Gilles, A.; David, B.; Folgoas, C.; Moya-Leclair, E.; Kamionka, E.; Desrousseaux, M.L.; Texier, H.; Gavalda, S.; et al. An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature 2020, 580, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taherkhani, H.; Arshadi, M.R. Investigating the mechanical properties of asphalt concrete containing waste polyethylene terephthalate. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2019, 20, 381–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shen, M.; Huang, W.; Chen, M.; Song, B.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y. (Micro)plastic crisis: Un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, K.H.D. Climate Change and Plastic Pollution: A Review of Their Connections. Trop. Environ. Biol. Technol. 2023, 1, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moretti, L.; Loprencipe, G. Climate Change and Transport Infrastructures: State of the Art. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stewart, M.G.; Wang, X.; Nguyen, M.N. Climate change impact and risks of concrete infrastructure deterioration. Eng. Struct. 2011, 33, 1326–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaves, I.A.; Melchers, R.E.; Peng, L.; Stewart, M.G. Probabilistic remaining life estimation for deteriorating steel marine infrastructure under global warming and nutrient pollution. Ocean Eng. 2016, 126, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishra, V.; Sadhu, A. Towards the effect of climate change in structural loads of urban infrastructure: A review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 89, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ganin, A.A.; Kitsak, M.; Marchese, D.; Keisler, J.M.; Seager, T.; Linkov, I. Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, X.; You, Z.; Hiller, J.; Watkins, D. Sensitivity of flexible pavement design to Michigan’s climatic inputs using pavement ME design. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2017, 18, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stoner, A.M.K.; Daniel, J.S.; Jacobs, J.M.; Hayhoe, K.; Scott-Fleming, I. Quantifying the Impact of Climate Change on Flexible Pavement Performance and Lifetime in the United States. Transp. Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jeong, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Kim, H. Prediction of Flexible Pavement Deterioration in Relation to Climate Change Using Fuzzy Logic. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2017, 23, 04017008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Knott, J.F.; Sias, J.E.; Dave, E.V.; Jacobs, J.M. Seasonal and Long-Term Changes to Pavement Life Caused by Rising Temperatures from Climate Change. Transp. Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, C.; Mai, Y.; Cannone Falchetto, A.; Tartari, E. Experimental Investigation on the Use of Selenice Natural Bitumen as an Additive for Pavement Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiao, F.; Wang, J.; Yuan, J.; Liu, Z.; Ma, D. Fatigue and Rutting Performance of Airfield SBS-Modified Binders Containing High Modulus and Antirutting Additives. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04019366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Domingos, M.D.I.; Faxina, A.L.; Bernucci, L.L.B. Characterization of the rutting potential of modified asphalt binders and its correlation with the mixture’s rut resistance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 144, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ameri, M.; Nasr, D. Performance properties of devulcanized waste PET modified asphalt mixtures. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadinia, E.; Zargar, M.; Karim, M.R.; Abdelaziz, M.; Ahmadinia, E. Performance evaluation of utilization of waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 984–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ziari, H.; Kaliji, A.G.; Babagoli, R. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of waste plastic bottle (PET) on rutting performance of hot mix asphalt mixtures. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Silva, J.D.A.A.E.; Rodrigues, J.K.G.; de Carvalho, M.W.; Lucena, L.C.D.F.L.; Cavalcante, E.H. Mechanical performance of asphalt mixtures using polymer-micronized PET-modified binder. Road Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2017, 19, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Padhan, R.K.; Mohanta, C.; Sreeram, A.; Gupta, A. Rheological evaluation of bitumen modified using antistripping additives synthesised from waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2018, 21, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murkute, K.; Kumar, A.; Choudhary, R. Properties of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Modified Asphalt Mixes: Dependence on PET Size, PET Content, and Mixing Process. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2018, 62, 685–693. [Google Scholar]
  26. El-Naga, I.A.; Ragab, M. Benefits of utilization the recycle polyethylene terephthalate waste plastic materials as a modifier to asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 219, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dehghan, Z.; Modarres, A. Evaluating the fatigue properties of hot mix asphalt reinforced by recycled PET fibers using 4-point bending test. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 139, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baghaee Moghaddam, T.; Soltani, M.; Karim, M.R.; Shamshirband, S.; Petković, D.; Baaj, H. Estimation of the rutting performance of Polyethylene Terephthalate modified asphalt mixtures by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 96, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baghaee Moghaddam, T.; Karim, M.R.; Syammaun, T. Dynamic properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures containing waste plastic bottles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mashaan, N.; Chegenizadeh, A.; Nikraz, H. Laboratory Properties of Waste PET Plastic-Modified Asphalt Mixes. Recycling 2021, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abuaddous, M.; Taamneh, M.M.; Rabab’ah, S.R. The potential use of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) plastic waste in asphalt binder. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koelmans, A.A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E.; Nor, N.H.M.; de Ruijter, V.N.; Mintenig, S.M.; Kooi, M. Risk assessment of microplastic particles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galloway, T.S.; Cole, M.; Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xie, S.; Li, Q.; Karki, P.; Zhou, F.; Yuan, J.S. Lignin as Renewable and Superior Asphalt Binder Modifier. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2817–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Sabagh, A.M.; Yehia, F.Z.; Eshaq, G.; Rabie, A.M.; ElMetwally, A.E. Greener routes for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Egypt. J. Pet. 2016, 25, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berthet, A.; Berode, M.; Bouchard, M. Gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry determination of phthalic acid in human urine as a biomarker of folpet exposure. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seto, M.; Kimbara, K.; Shimara, M.; Hatta, T.; Fukuda, M.; Yano, K. A novel transformation of polychlorinated biphenyls by Rhodococcus sp. strain RHA1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 3353–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. AASHTO T315; Standard Test Method for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  39. Usanga, I.N.; Okafor, F.O.; Ikeagwuani, C.C. Effect of recycled vegetable oil on the performance of nanomarl-modified asphalt mixtures. J. Infrastruct. Preserv. Resil. 2023, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maciejewski, K.; Ramiączek, P.; Remisova, E. Effects of Short-Term Ageing Temperature on Conventional and High-Temperature Properties of Paving-Grade Bitumen with Anti-Stripping and WMA Additives. Materials 2021, 14, 6229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. AASHTO T313; Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  42. Karki, P.; Zhou, F. Impact of Re-Refined Engine Oil Bottoms on Asphalt Binder Properties. J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 2019, 145, 04019033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alattieh, S.A.; Al-Khateeb, G.G.; Zeiada, W. Evaluation of Low- and Intermediate-Temperature Performance of Bio Oil-Modified Asphalt Binders. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. AASHTO M320; Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  45. Benyathiar, P.A.-O.; Kumar, P.; Carpenter, G.; Brace, J.; Mishra, D.A.-O.X. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottle-to-Bottle Recycling for the Beverage Industry: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, M.A.H.; Bonifacio, S.; Clowes, J.; Foulds, A.; Holland, R.; Matthews, J.C.; Percival, C.J.; Shallcross, D.E. Investigation of Biofuel as a Potential Renewable Energy Source. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Neupane, D.A.-O. Biofuels from Renewable Sources, a Potential Option for Biodiesel Production. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hara, H.; Eltis Lindsay, D.; Davies Julian, E.; Mohn William, W. Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals a Bifurcated Terephthalate Degradation Pathway in Rhodococcus sp. Strain RHA1. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alvarez, H.M.; Herrero, O.M.; Silva, R.A.; Hernández, M.A.; Lanfranconi, M.P.; Villalba, M.S. Insights into the Metabolism of Oleaginous Rhodococcus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00498-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiong, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, S. Engineering of a xylose metabolic pathway in Rhodococcus strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5483–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liang, M.H.; Jiang, J.G. Advancing oleaginous microorganisms to produce lipid via metabolic engineering technology. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 395–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patel, A.; Karageorgou, D.; Rova, E.; Katapodis, P.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. An Overview of Potential Oleaginous Microorganisms and Their Role in Biodiesel and Omega-3 Fatty Acid-Based Industries. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Paszun, D.; Spychaj, T. Chemical Recycling of Poly(ethylene terephthalate). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 1373–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Damayanti; Wu, H.A.-O. Strategic Possibility Routes of Recycled PET. Polymers 2021, 13, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ahmad, M.S.; Ahmad, S.A. The impact of polyethylene terephthalate waste on different bituminous designs. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2022, 69, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghabchi, R.; Dharmarathna, C.P.; Mihandoust, M. Feasibility of using micronized recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as an asphalt binder additive: A laboratory study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. ashoor, A.S.; Kareem, M.M.; Al-Baiati, M.N. Improved asphalt binder using recycle polyethylene terephthalate polymer. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 571, 012094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sreeram, A.; Leng, Z.; Padhan, R.K.; Qu, X. Eco-friendly paving materials using waste PET and reclaimed asphalt pavement. HKIE Trans. 2018, 25, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, P.; Dong, Z.-j.; Tan, Y.-q.; Liu, Z.-y. Investigating the Interactions of the Saturate, Aromatic, Resin, and Asphaltene Four Fractions in Asphalt Binders by Molecular Simulations. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Almeida e Silva, J.d.A.; Lopes Lucena, L.C.d.F.; Guedes Rodrigues, J.K.; Carvalho, M.W.; Beserra Costa, D. Use of Micronized Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Waste in Asphalt Binder. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 1508–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Movilla-Quesada, D.; Raposeiras, A.C.; Olavarría, J. Effects of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) on Stiffness of Hot Asphalt Mixtures. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 6969826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Modarres, A.; Hamedi, H. Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes. Mater. Des. 2014, 61, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Usman, I.U.; Kunlin, M. Influence of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) utilization on the engineering properties of asphalt mixtures: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xing, B.; Fan, W.; Lv, X.; Qian, C. Study the effects of filler particle size and filler/asphalt ratio on the high and low temperature performance of asphalt mastics. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 493, 012163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Du, Z.; Jiang, C.; Yuan, J.; Xiao, F.; Wang, J. Low temperature performance characteristics of polyethylene modified asphalts—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Li, K. Using Waste Plastics as Asphalt Modifier: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brasileiro, L.; Moreno-Navarro, F.; Tauste-Martínez, R.; Matos, J.; Rubio-Gámez, M. Reclaimed Polymers as Asphalt Binder Modifiers for More Sustainable Roads: A Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gallego-García, M.; Susmozas, A.; Negro, M.J.; Moreno, A.D. Challenges and prospects of yeast-based microbial oil production within a biorefinery concept. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cappelletti, M.; Presentato, A.; Piacenza, E.; Firrincieli, A.; Turner, R.J.; Zannoni, D. Biotechnology of Rhodococcus for the production of valuable compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8567–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, D.; Choi, K.Y.; Yoo, M.; Zylstra, G.J.; Kim, E. Biotechnological Potential of Rhodococcus Biodegradative Pathways. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 1037–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zahedi, M.; Zarei, A.; Zarei, M.; Janmohammadi, O. Experimental determination of the optimum percentage of asphalt mixtures reinforced with Lignin. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rand, D.A. High Price HMA Going the Way of the Caveman. Available online: http://www.naylornetwork.com/tax-nwl/assets/dr%20caveman.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2024).
Polymers 16 00796 g001
Figure 1. Schematics of alkaline-assisted fractionation and multi-stream usage of plastic PET. The picture is created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Schematics of alkaline-assisted fractionation and multi-stream usage of plastic PET. The picture is created with BioRender.com.
Polymers 16 00796 g001
Polymers 16 00796 g002
Figure 2. Solubilized PET after alkaline-assisted fractionation support cell growth of R. jostii RHA1 and lipid fermentation. (A) Illustrations depicting the microbial utilization of solubilized PET and lipid analysis. (B) Growth curve of RHA1 indicated by OD600 in minimum medium with the solubilized PET or TPA as the sole carbon source. (C–E) Lipid components and contents (C), lipid titer (D), and carbon yield of lipids (E) obtained with R. jostii RHA1 from solubilized PET or TPA. All data were collected with three biological triplicates, processed with GraphPad Prism 9, and shown as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean).
Figure 2. Solubilized PET after alkaline-assisted fractionation support cell growth of R. jostii RHA1 and lipid fermentation. (A) Illustrations depicting the microbial utilization of solubilized PET and lipid analysis. (B) Growth curve of RHA1 indicated by OD600 in minimum medium with the solubilized PET or TPA as the sole carbon source. (C–E) Lipid components and contents (C), lipid titer (D), and carbon yield of lipids (E) obtained with R. jostii RHA1 from solubilized PET or TPA. All data were collected with three biological triplicates, processed with GraphPad Prism 9, and shown as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean).
Polymers 16 00796 g002
Polymers 16 00796 g003
Figure 3. Characterizations of the original and fractionated PET, as well as the original and PET-modified asphalt binders. (A,B) Optical microscope images of original (A) and fractionated PET particles (B). (C–E) SEM images of original asphalt binder (C) and modified asphalt binders (D,E) with 5% original and fractionated PET, respectively. (F,G) FTIR spectra of asphalt binders (F) and PET particles (G), with characteristic peaks highlighted. Green arrows denote original PET; blue arrows denote fractionated PET.
Figure 3. Characterizations of the original and fractionated PET, as well as the original and PET-modified asphalt binders. (A,B) Optical microscope images of original (A) and fractionated PET particles (B). (C–E) SEM images of original asphalt binder (C) and modified asphalt binders (D,E) with 5% original and fractionated PET, respectively. (F,G) FTIR spectra of asphalt binders (F) and PET particles (G), with characteristic peaks highlighted. Green arrows denote original PET; blue arrows denote fractionated PET.
Polymers 16 00796 g003
Polymers 16 00796 g004
Figure 4. Effect of PET particle incorporation on asphalt binders’ performance. (A) High-temperature performance of the asphalt binder modified with original and insoluble PET. The high critical temperature is determined by the rutting factors (G*/sin δ) of the asphalt binder specimens, reaching an equilibrium value of 1.0 kPa in the DSR test. (B) Low-temperature performance of the asphalt binder modified with original and insoluble PET. The determination of the low critical temperature in the BBR test relies on the relaxation constant (m) and flexural creep stiffness (S) at 60 s of loading, set at 0.300 and 300 kPa, respectively. Data was processed with GraphPad Prism 9.
Figure 4. Effect of PET particle incorporation on asphalt binders’ performance. (A) High-temperature performance of the asphalt binder modified with original and insoluble PET. The high critical temperature is determined by the rutting factors (G*/sin δ) of the asphalt binder specimens, reaching an equilibrium value of 1.0 kPa in the DSR test. (B) Low-temperature performance of the asphalt binder modified with original and insoluble PET. The determination of the low critical temperature in the BBR test relies on the relaxation constant (m) and flexural creep stiffness (S) at 60 s of loading, set at 0.300 and 300 kPa, respectively. Data was processed with GraphPad Prism 9.
Polymers 16 00796 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, K.; Mraiza, Z.; Pu, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Zhou, F.; Yuan, J.S. A Multi-Streamline Approach for Upcycling PET into a Biodiesel and Asphalt Modifier. Polymers 2024, 16, 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060796

AMA Style

Chen K, Mraiza Z, Pu Y, Li J, Liu Z, Ragauskas AJ, Zhou F, Yuan JS. A Multi-Streamline Approach for Upcycling PET into a Biodiesel and Asphalt Modifier. Polymers. 2024; 16(6):796. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060796

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Kainan, Zeinab Mraiza, Yunqiao Pu, Jinghao Li, Zhihua Liu, Arthur J. Ragauskas, Fujie Zhou, and Joshua S. Yuan. 2024. "A Multi-Streamline Approach for Upcycling PET into a Biodiesel and Asphalt Modifier" Polymers 16, no. 6: 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060796

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop