Next Article in Journal
Low Temperature In Situ Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles from Electric Arc Furnace Dust (EAFD) Waste to Impart Antibacterial Properties on Natural Dye-Colored Batik Fabrics
Previous Article in Journal
Combining Polymerization and Templating toward Hyper-Cross-Linked Poly(propargyl aldehyde)s and Poly(propargyl alcohol)s for Reversible H2O and CO2 Capture and Construction of Porous Chiral Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extraction and Characterization of Cocoa Bean Shell Cell Wall Polysaccharides

Department of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, QC H9X3V9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030745
Submission received: 17 January 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction, Characterization, and Properties of Plant Polysaccharides)

Abstract

:
Cocoa bean shells (CBS), a by-product of the cocoa industry, from two cacao varieties and obtained after selected processing conditions (fermentation, drying, roasting) were characterized in terms of their chemical composition, where they were found to be a great source of carbohydrates, specifically dietary fiber, protein, ash, and polyphenols, namely quercetin, epicatechin, and catechin. Cell wall polysaccharides were isolated by alkaline extraction (0.5 M or 4 M KOH) and were found to be enriched primarily in pectic polysaccharides (80.6–86%) namely rhamnogalacturonan and arabinogalactan as well as hemi- cellulosic polysaccharides (13.9–19.4%). Overall, 0.5 M KOH polysaccharides were favored having provided a diverse profile of neutral sugars and uronic acids. When tested for the promotion of the growth of selected probiotic strains, CBS cell wall polysaccharides performed similarly or more than inulin and rhamnogalacturonan based on the prebiotic activity scores. The short-chain fatty acid profiles were characterized by high amounts of lactic acid, followed by acetic and propionic acid.

1. Introduction

The generation of cacao (Theobroma cacao) by-products is estimated at 700,000 tons annually, which negatively contributes to the environmental and economic value of the cocoa processing industry. Among these by-products, cocoa bean shells (CBS) are the most abundant and are the outermost layer of the cacao bean that encases cacao nibs. Efforts to valorize CBS have been explored in agricultural and bioremediation fields such as its use in animal feeds and fertilizers [1,2]. In food applications, CBS has been used as a functional ingredient for fiber enrichment and fat replacement in baked goods and as a stabilizer and color enhancer in pork sausages [3,4,5]. Although there has been an increasing industrial interest in effective valorization of CBS into functional food ingredients, only the pilot-scale extraction of polyphenols from CBS has been explored [6]. The extraction of cell wall polysaccharides from CBS has yet to be reported. To the authors’ knowledge, only few studies have characterized the cell wall polysaccharide profile of CBS in terms of monosaccharide profile, molecular weight distribution and linkage types [7,8,9,10]. According to [8], CBS holds a reliable source of dietary fibers as its cell-wall polysaccharide profile comprises of 45% pectic polysaccharides, 35% cellulose, as well as 20% hemicelluloses, namely gluconoarabinoxylan, xyloglucan, and galactoglucomannans. As far as the authors are aware, the extent of the variability in the cell wall polysaccharide profile of CBS, depending on the cacao variety and the processing conditions, has not been studied.
Several approaches have been reported for the isolation of cell wall polysaccharides from cell wall, including chelating agent, acid, microwave-assisted alkaline, and ultrasound-assisted alkaline extractions [8,11,12,13]. The selection of an appropriate extracting agent or approach can help target the isolation of polysaccharides with well-defined structures. As an example, acidic extraction, using hydrochloric acid, targets the isolation of homogalacturonan [11]. Alternatively, alkaline extraction of cell wall polysaccharides, using sodium or potassium hydroxides paired with sodium borohydride, has proven to be effective for isolating and understanding the distribution of pectic and hemi-cellulosic polysaccharides within the cell wall materials of potato, cranberries, bamboo, maize, and more [11,14,15,16]. This approach enables the release of rhamnogalacturonan I through ß-elimination and oxidative peeling of homogalacturonan [11,17,18].
There is an increasing interest in the cell wall-rich by-products as their polysaccharide content can act as a beneficial source of dietary fibers and prebiotics that can modulate the gut microbiota and hence promote the intestinal health [19]. Cell wall polysaccharides of by-products derived from pearl millet fibre, tangerine peels, apple pomace, and coconut residues have been previously reported to support the effective growth of beneficial gut microorganisms [19,20,21,22]. However, no study on the fermentability of CBS cell wall polysaccharides by beneficial lactic acid bacteria has been reported so far.
The aim of the present study was to assess the nutritional composition of CBS at various processing conditions. To the authors’ knowledge, this has not been previously investigated for cocoa beans. In addition, the present study offers novel insight pertaining to the isolation and characterization of CBS cell wall materials from two cacao varieties obtained after selected processing conditions (fermentation, drying, roasting). The cell wall polysaccharides were, thereafter, extracted by alkaline treatments, structurally characterized, and subjected to fermentation by selected lactic acid bacteria. The investigation of the compositional, structural, and functional properties of CBS cell wall polysaccharides would provide novel insight useful to the development of a highly effective approach that valorizes cocoa bean shells as a source of carbohydrate-based functional ingredients in food applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Fresh cacao pods (CCN 51) were supplied by Smart Natural Circle (Montreal, QC, Canada). Commercial samples of CBS [Nacional/Arriba (NAC) and CCN 51] were supplied by the cocoa processing industry (Guayaquil, Ecuador). The bacterial strains, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (RO343 AR) and Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC 15707™) strains were supplied from Harmonium International (Mirabel, QC, Canada) and ATCC©. 1-Kestose, nytose, and 1F-fructofuranoysl-nystose were obtained from Wake Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan). The analytical grade reagents were from Sigma- Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA, and salts were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Cocoa Bean Shells

Fresh cacao pods (CCN 51) were subjected to lab-scale fermentation and drying processes to retrieve the cacao bean shells (CBS) as described by [23]. The inner contents of cacao pods, containing the mucilage-pulp and beans, were placed in tightly sealed containers (4 L) to provide an anaerobic environment in an incubator (Excella E24 incubator, New Brunswick Scientific, NJ, USA), for 117 h, where the temperature was adjusted in 6–24 h intervals, 28 °C at 0 h, 30 °C at 6 h, 32 °C at 21 h, 35 °C at 30 h, 38 °C at 45 h, 42 °C at 54 h, and 45 °C at 69 h. The pulp-bean mass was mixed every 24 h to ensure proper removal of the pulp. After fermentation, the beans were subjected to drying in an oven for 72 h at 45 °C until a final water content of 6–7%. The beans were de-shelled manually. Commercial samples of cocoa bean shells were from two varieties [Nacional/Arriba (NAC) and CCN 51]. Both freshly prepared and commercial CBS samples were blended using a model 7011C commercial blender (Conair corporation, Stamford, CT, USA) and analyzed for their proximate compositions.

2.3. Proximate Compositional Analysis of Cocoa Bean Shells

Moisture content of CBS was determined using a variation of AOAC method 927.05 by drying for 18 h at 70 °C in vacuum oven. Total fat content of blended CBS was determined using a modified AOAC method 945.16. In this last method, Soxhlet extraction of CBS (1 g with 150 mL) was carried out using petroleum ether as solvent for 6 h. Ash content was measured by AOAC method 942.05, charring 2 g of blended CBS for 30 min, followed by incineration in a muffle furnace (5 h at 525 °C). Crude protein content was determined on 0.1 g of blended CBS by Dumas method [24] with a FP 628 analyser (LECO Corporation, St Joseph, MI, USA). Carbohydrate content (% dry weight) of blended CBS will be determined as:
100 ( crude   fat + ash + crude   protein )
Dietary fiber content was determined on 1 g of blended CBS using the total dietary fiber assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MI, USA) and a modified AOAC method 985.29 [25], in which α-amylase, protease and amyloglucosidase activities were used to digest the starting material. The remaining fiber was precipitated with ethanol, washed with ethanol and acetone, filtered, and, once dry, its protein and ash content were determined and subtracted from the dry weight. All analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Isolation of Cell Wall Materials from Cocoa Bean Shells

The cell wall material (CWM) was sequentially isolated [8]. Using de-fatted CBS (4 g), the isolation proceeded as follows: (1) 80% ethanol (2 h, 50 rpm), (2) chloroform: methanol (1:1, 1.5 h, 50 rpm), (3) chloroform: methanol (1:1, 1.5 h, 50 rpm), (4) phenol: acetic acid: water (PAW, 2:1:1, overnight), (5) phenol: acetic acid: water (PAW, 2:1:1, 2 h). Each treatment was followed by centrifugation (7000× g, 15 min) and vacuum filtration prior to the following step. The recovered CWM was dialyzed (5–8 kDa cut-off) against distilled water and freeze-dried. The isolation of CWM was performed in triplicate.

2.5. Alkaline Extraction of Cocoa Bean Shell Cell Wall Material Polysaccharides

Extraction of CBS polysaccharides was performed [11] where CWM material (2% w/v) was suspended in KOH solutions (0.5 and 4 M) containing 0.02 M NaBH4. Mixtures were incubated (60 °C, 24 h), thereafter centrifuged (10,000 × g for 15 min) and recovered via filtration (0.45 µm). Recovered polysaccharides were neutralized with HCl, dialyzed (5–8 kDa cut-off) and freeze-dried

2.6. Structural Characterization of Carbohydrates

2.6.1. Determination of Total Neutral Sugars and Uronic Acid Contents

Uronic acid content was measured by sulphamate/m-hydroxydiphenyl assay [26]. The phenol–sulphuric acid colorimetric assay was used for the determination of neutral sugar content [27].

2.6.2. Monosaccharide Profile

CWM and CBS polysaccharides were subjected to acid hydrolysis as previously described [11]. Briefly, 1 mL of a mixture of 37% HCl/methanol (1:4 v/v) was added to the sample (200 μL of liquid extract, or 5% (w/v) of solid in water). The mixtures were incubated at 70 °C for 24 h and dried by heating in a convection incubator (Excella E24 incubator, New Brunswick Scientific, NJ, USA). To complete hydrolysis, 3 mL of water and 1 mL of trifluoroacetic acid were added and heated at 100 °C for 1 h. After evaporating the trifluoroacetic acid, the samples were neutralized with NaOH and centrifuged (8000 rpm, 5 min). The supernatants (0.02 mL) were analyzed by high performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC) on a Dionex ICS 3000 system equipped with pulsed amperometric detection using a Carbopac PA-20 column (Dionex Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at a temperature of 30 °C. Mobile phase was 20 mM NaOH at flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Rhamnose, arabinose, glucose, xylose, galactose, and mannose were used at varying concentrations (2.5–50 µM) as standards.

2.6.3. Molecular Weight Distribution

A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) system (model 1525 binary HPLC pump, equipped with a model 2414 refractive index detector, Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA) was used to estimate the molecular weight distribution of the carbohydrates. Analysis was determined using a TSK G5000 PWXL (Tosoh Co., Yamaguchi, Japan) column, with dextrans (50–670 kDa), soybean rhamnogalacturonan (0.125–1 g/L), and galactoglucomannan (0.125–1 g/L) standards for molecular weight and concentration calibration. The temperature of the system was 30 °C, the eluent was 0.1 M NaCl, and the flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min.

2.7. Extraction and Determination of Polyphenols Content

The polyphenolic compounds were extracted using accelerated solvent extraction (Dionex ASE 350, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) from CBS and CWM. We placed 0.5 g samples in 22 mL cells containing Ottawa sand and diatomaceous earth. Samples were subjected to three consecutive repeated extractions using 80% methanol (40 °C,1600 psi) to exhaust the material. The total polyphenolic content was determined using the folin–ciocalteu assay as previously described [28]. A gallic acid calibration curve (0.001 to 0.1 mM) was constructed. The total polyphenolic content was expressed as gram of gallic acid equivalent per gram of sample. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Determination of Phenolic Compounds via LC-MS

CBS and CWM were analyzed by LC-MS using an Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC system coupled to the 6560-ion mobility Q-TOF-MS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The LC separation was conducted on a Poreshell120 EC-C18 analytical column (Agilent Technologies; 2.7 μm × 3 mm × 100 mm) connected with a Poreshell120 EC-C18 guard column (Agilent Technologies; 2.7 μm × 3 mm × 5 mm). The mobile phase A was HPLC water with 0.1% formic acid and the mobile phase B was acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. HPLC parameters were as follows: injection volume was 1 µL, the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and the column temperature was set to 30 °C. The mobile phase profile used for the run in negative ion mode was 2% B (0–1.0 min), 2%–20% B (1.0–4.0 min), 20%–100% B (4.0–8.0 min), 100% B (4.0–8.0 min), hold at 100% B (8.0–13.0 min), decrease to 2% B (13.0.0–13.5 min), and hold 2% B (13.5–14 min). The mass spectrometer was equipped with a dual AJS ESI ion source operating in negative ionization mode. MS conditions were as follows: for ESI-, the drying gas temperature was 200 °C, drying gas flow rate was 12 L/min, sheath gas temperature was 250 °C, sheath gas flow rate was 12 L/min, the pressure on the nebulizer was 35 psi, the capillary voltage was 4000 V, the fragmentor voltage was 240 V, and the nozzle voltage was 1000 V. Full scan MS data were recorded between mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) 100 and 1100 at a scan rate of 2 spectra/s, and were collected at both centroid and profile mode. Reference ions (m/z at 112.9856 and 1033.9881 for ESI-) were used for automatic mass recalibration of each acquired spectrum. Data treatment was conducted using Quantitative Analysis B.07.01 from Agilent MassHunter Workstation Software.

2.9. Prebiotic Activity Assay

The fermentability of CBS polysaccharides (0.5 M KOH extracts, roasted CCN and NAC) by B. longum (ATCC 15707™) and L. rhamnosus GG (Harmonium AR) was investigated and compared to that of inulin and rhamnogalacturonan, using a modification of the method reported by [29]. The selected strains, B. longum and L. rhamonosus GG, were maintained in an anaerobic chamber at 37 °C. Pre-reduced reinforced clostridial broth was used for the reanimation of B. longum from a freeze-dried stock, and MRS broth was used for L. rhamnosus GG. An aliquot (0.5 mL) of the primary cultures was then added into tubes containing 5 mL of pre-reduced, carbohydrate-free MRS broth, supplemented with 0.4% glucose. Bacterial growth was measured using colony counting on Tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood for B. longum and pre-reduced MRS agar for L. rhamnosus GG. Tubes containing 5 mL of pre-reduced carbohydrate-free MRS broth supplemented with 0.2% glucose, inulin, rhamnogalacturonan, and cell wall polysaccharides (CCN51 and NAC varieties) were inoculated with 0.1 mL of secondary culture. Colonies were counted on Tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood for B. longum and pre-reduced MRS agar for L. rhamnosus GG after 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h incubation intervals. Microbial counts were measured as colony forming units (CFU)/mL, and the resulting averaged data were transformed to log CFU/mL. A prebiotic activity score (PA) was calculated for each combination of bacterium and polysaccharide as follows:
PA = ( Log CFU ml on   polysaccharide   at   x   hr Log C F U m l o n   p o l y s a c c h a r i d e   a t   0   h r ) L o g C F U m l o n   g l u c o s e   a t   x   h r L o g C F U m l o n   g l u c o s e   a t   0   h r

2.10. Determination of Short Chain Fatty Acid Catabolites

An aliquot of cultures (0.5 mL) was taken at 24 and 48 h. Bacteria were precipitated by centrifugation at 1400× g for 5 min at 37 °C in a Minispin Plus centrifuge (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatants were filtered using 0.22 µm polytetrafluorethylene syringe filters (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and stored at −80 °C for a maximum of 2 weeks. Freshly thawed samples (0.02 mL) were analyzed using the HPLC model 1525 system (Waters) equipped with a refractive index detector and a Zorbax SB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm) (Agilent Technologies). Elution was done with 0.005 N sulfuric acid at a constant flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Standard curves were constructed using lactic, acetic, propionic, and butyric acids as standards.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT software (Addinsoft, New York, NY, USA) in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test were performed to detect significant differences (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterizaton of Cocoa Bean Shells and Its Cell Wall Material

The chemical composition of fermented (CCN), dried (CCN), and roasted (CCN and NAC) cocoa bean shells was determined based on AOAC standard protocols. Overall, the composition of CBSs comprised of 12.7–19.7% protein, 0.3–7.6% fat, 6.1–7.1% ash, 65.5–80.7% carbohydrates, and 50.1–61.4% fibers (Table 1). These findings are within the ranges reported in the literature [30,31,32,33,34], which found CBS to comprise of 6.2–18.6% protein, 2.02–6.46% fat, 6–11.67% ash, 17.8–55.85% carbohydrates, and 13.86–60.6% fibers. However, it should be noted that the broad range in the composition is due to variations in their origin, variety, processing condition, and assessment method.
The protein content has shown a noticeable increase (p < 0.05) from its fermented (13%, CCN) to dried (18.9%, CCN) states, followed by a decrease in its roasted state (12.8%, CCN). According to [31], the observed increase in the protein content from fermented to dried conditions is attributed to the increased microbial mass which produces nitrogen during growth”. The decrease in protein content, following roasting, may be a result of the elevated temperatures involved in the roasting process (120–150 °C). This mediates the Maillard reaction, which involves the interaction between the carbonyl group of a reducing sugar and a free amino acid from protein, thereby decreasing the protein content [31,35]. Interestingly, only 1% of the protein content in cocoa bean shells exists in its free form [34]. The remainder is strongly bound to oxidized polyphenols, further converting into polyphenol–quinones. Similarly, the fat content increases (p < 0.05) with the processing of cocoa beans from fermentation to drying and roasting. The variation in the fat content can be explained by the subjection of elevated temperatures involved in the drying and roasting processes (70–150 °C), further inducing the migration of cocoa butter, from its cotyledon layer to the cocoa bean shells [36,37]. The fatty acid composition in CBS has been reported to predominantly contain palmitic and oleic and linoleic acids [37].The ash content (p < 0.05) is relatively stable amongst the four samples, fermented, dried, and roasted CBS. Overall, cocoa bean shells have shown to contain higher ash contents than other fruit by-products, namely passion fruit seeds (1.34%), and apple pomace (0.5%) [32,38,39].
On average, the fiber content in cocoa bean shells accounts for around 50% of the entire material. Our findings are consistent with the literature [6,40] in which all four CBS samples contain 50.1–64.1% fiber. Using the sequential isolation approach, involving the use of chloroform and methanol, ethanol, followed by phenol, acetic acid, and water (2:1:1), to retrieve the cell wall material, we observed an overall cell wall material yield between 40.6 and 48.1%; higher than previously reported [8]. The overall ratio between neutral sugar and uronic acid between the fermented and dried shells (0.82–0.97) compared to the roasted shells (1.4–1.8), indicate a higher proportion of neutral sugars upon subjection to roasting. One study observed a reduction in the cell wall polysaccharide composition of apple chips, specifically fucose, rhamnose, arabinose, and xylose, with increased drying temperatures (60–90 °C); further supporting that temperature conditions significantly influence the neutral sugar and uronic acid profile of foodstuff [41].
Based on the findings, as determined by anionic exchange chromatography (Table 1), all four sets of CBS CWM, regardless of their processing conditions, were predominantly rich in pectic polysaccharides (80.6–86%), comprised of uronic acids (35.1–50.5%), galactose (22.7–29.2%), arabinose (13.6–17.2%), and rhamnose (5.1–6.9%) residues. The remainder consists of hemi-cellulosic polysaccharides (13.9–19.4%), comprised of glucose (3.3–7.1%), fucose (2.4–3.6%), xylose, and mannose (0.9–1.9%) residues. These are consistent with the other works [6,8] which suggested that CBS contain a greater proportion of pectic and non-cellulosic cell wall polysaccharides than cellulosic polysaccharides. Upon extracting the cell wall material, the protein content (12.9–16.6%) remained unchanged upon extraction, likely indicating the complexes between dietary fiber and protein from the Maillard reaction, especially in the roasted samples [8].

3.2. Polyphenolic Profile of Cocoa Bean Shells and Its Cell Wall Material

Polyphenolic compounds are naturally present within the cotyledons of the cocoa seeds; however, compounds can migrate towards the shell through diffusion, further enriching the by-product [34,42,43]. The CBS total polyphenol content comprised between 0.4 and 0.6% (Table 1) similar to the content found in cocoa beans [44,45]. In addition, after isolating its CWM, the total polyphenol content was obtained around 0.05–0.1%, directly influenced by the use of solvents in the sequential isolation process used to retrieve the CWM. In general, the polyphenol content is expected to increase with further processing. Our findings showed no significant differences in the polyphenol content of CBS at different processing conditions of fermentation, drying and roasting. However, overall, the roasted CBS samples (NAC and CCN) hold a greater total polyphenol content as compared to their fermented and dried states. Alternatively, dried CBS polyphenols may be more tightly bound to cell wall materials than fermented and roasted CBS. Subjection of heat from the drying and roasting process can mediate not only the Maillard reaction, but also promote condensation and polymerization. Given our findings showed a great amount of crude fiber (non-digestible carbohydrates and lignin), one may suggest that lignin is pyrolyzed slowly with the onset of roasting conditions allowing for the release of polyphenols entrapped within its network, otherwise known as the polyphenol complex [31,46,47].
Based on our findings, as determined by LC-MS (p < 0.05) in Table 1, the most abundant class of polyphenols found in CBS and its CWM are the flavan-3-ols, which include epicatechin (122.8–0.9 ng/kg material or extract) and catechin (24.3–0.3 ng/kg material or extract; this is consistent with the literature [48,49]. Other polyphenols were detected in both CBS and the corresponding CWM, which include flavonoids, such as quercetin, as well as phenolic acids, such as gallic, protocatechuic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and caffeic acids. Nevertheless, cocoa and its by-products are known for its richness in methylxanthines, such as theobromine and caffeine [34]. Our findings detected considerable amounts of caffeine among all samples of CBS and its CWM; with the highest amounts found among the fermented and dried types (139.4–261.6 ng/kg material). Interesting, the caffeine content was significantly lower after the roasting process. According to [46], caffeine and other polyphenols were found in greater amounts in their raw and lightly roasted forms (160 °C); further indicating the effect of processing conditions on the polyphenolic profile.

3.3. Extraction of Cell Wall Polysaccharides and Their Characterization

To extract and characterize the CBS cell wall polysaccharides, alkaline extraction was performed using two concentrations of KOH, 0.5 M and 4 M. The polysaccharide yield (Table 2) ranged between 23.7 and 35.4% (w/w) using 0.5 M KOH depending on the starting materials (fermented, dried, roasted) and variety. Interestingly, as the alkaline solution increased, the roasted samples (CCN and NAC) saw an increase in their polysaccharide yields (32.9–53.6%, w/w). Such findings are consistent with the findings assessed on pectic polysaccharides derived from potato peel and cranberry pomace [11,14]. In addition, the results show the proportion of neutral sugars decreased as the alkaline solution was increased, whereas the molar proportion of uronic acid remained relatively unchanged. As a result, the uronic/neutral sugar ratio increased, possibly indicating the onset of debranching or defragmentation of neutral sugar regions.
The monosaccharide composition (Table 2) reveals the main sugars in the extracted CBS cell wall polysaccharides were uronic acids (42.9–58.2%), arabinose (7.8–16.4%), and galactose (8.1–22.4%) for the 0.5 M alkaline treatment, signifying the presence of arabinan, galactan, and rhamnogalacturonan. As for the 4 M alkaline treatment, the main sugars were uronic acids (56.4–66.7%), galactose (9.9–15.9%), xylose, and mannose (2.6–15.9%), indicating a higher proportion of hemicellulose as compared to the latter. We can estimate the proportion of pectic polysaccharides by determining the pectic neutral sugars content, calculated as the ratio of rhamnose, arabinose, and galactose to total neutral sugars. The results suggest the polysaccharide profile of CBS alkaline extracts are predominantly pectic polysaccharides (56.4–88.8%) with the remainder being hemi-cellulosic polysaccharides, as signified by the presence of xylose, mannose, and glucose. Using a 4 M KOH extraction treatment, [8] reported the presence of a mixture of hemicelluloses and pectic polysaccharides based on the levels of uronic acid (26.2%) xylose (23.5%), glucose (21.8%), and mannose (9.9%). In addition, the study reported rhamnogalacturonan as the main pectic polysaccharide, as well as three hemi-cellulosic polysaccharides, namely galactoglucomannan, xylogalacturonan, and glucoarabinoxylan [8]. These findings are supported by the fact that pectic neutral sugars are of a lower proportion compared to 0.5 M alkaline extracts, comprising 55.6–76.1% (Table 2). Considering all samples (using both treatments) showed high proportions of pectic polysaccharides, the ratio of arabinose and galactose to rhamnose provides an estimate of the level of branching of rhamnogalacturonan I. As seen in Table 2, the 4 M extracts showed the highest ratios, indicating the presence of more abundant arabinan and galactan side chains. Furthermore, by increasing the alkaline solution concentration, the degree of branching increased by two to five-fold, depending on the processing condition. Based on the rhamnose molar proportions with the 0.5 M alkaline treatment, it can be assumed that rhamnogalacturonan I is more abundant in fermented and roasted CCN 51 samples.
As the alkaline solution increased, the molar proportion had decreased to 2.3–3.7%. All in all, the NAC variety attained a higher polysaccharide yield (35.4–53.6%) among the two alkaline treatments compared to the CCN variety (19.5–32.9%). In addition, the polysaccharide profiles of both varieties showed similarities, with the exception that the CCN variety expressed a richer profile of galactose (10.7–15.9% µM) and xylose and mannose (4.2–10.6% µM), whereas the NAC variety expressed a richer content of arabinose (13.4% µM).
Roasted samples (NAC and CCN varieties) were analyzed for their molecular weight (MW) distribution. The results showed a significant impact of increasing the alkaline solution from 0.5 to 4 M KOH. In the 0.5 M extracts, three main MW populations were found at 3.7, 12, and 130, kDa (NAC variety) and 4.5, 9.1, and 32.5 kDa (CCN variety) (Figure 1). Increasing the alkaline solution resulted in a shift from high to low molecular weight fractions, where the 4 M extract main populations were found at 24 and 6.3 kDa (NAC variety) and at 11 and 3.2 kDa (CCN variety) (Figure 1). This is a result of increasing the alkaline solution, which allowed for a higher degree of debranching or defragmentation of the pectic polysaccharides present in CBS. As per the author’s knowledge, no studies have been reported on the MW populations of CBS. However, [7] previously reported that a high MW population (2000 kDa) was detected in cell wall polysaccharides extracted from unfermented and fermented cocoa beans. The MW populations of cranberry pomace (1.5–1500 kDa), potato peel protein (1–600 kDa), and olives (260–400 kDa) have also been reported, showing a profile mixture of both low and high MW fractions [11,14,50]. The presence of low MW fractions may be due to the disassociation of non-covalently bound oligosaccharides during the dialysis purification steps [14].

3.4. Prebiotic Activity

The prebiotic activity scores of CBS polysaccharides, rhamnogalacturonan, and inulin, a known prebiotic polysaccharide [51], were compared using them as carbon sources for the anaerobic growth of two probiotic bacteria strains, L. rhamnosus GG and B. longum. Both strains were handled and grown in anaerobic conditions. While L. rhamnosus GG is oxygen-tolerant, the anaerobic conditions were selected to simulate the intestinal environment more accurately. In general, Lactobacillus species show a significant heterogeneity in their abilities to ferment carbohydrates [19,52,53,54]. Figure 2 shows that CBS polysaccharides (NAC and CCN varieties) showed a prebiotic activity score similar to that of inulin and rhamnogalacturonan for L. rhamnosus GG (Figure 2). At 24 h of fermentation, the prebiotic activity scores of CBS polysaccharides were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than that of inulin and rhamnogalacturonan. For B. longum (Figure 3), CBS polysaccharides showed statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) prebiotic activity scores at 48 h of fermentation than that of inulin and rhamnogalacturonan; however, the prebiotic activity scores decreased at the 72 h fermentation period. Therefore, it appears that CBS polysaccharides, primarily rich in pectin, galactan, and arabinan, effectively stimulate the growth of both strains. Dietary fibers, rich in pectin, undergo bacterial fermentation in the ileum and colon, leading to acidification of the colonic contents as well as the production of short-chain fatty acids [55,56,57]. Studies reported effective growth of L. rhamnosus GG with pectic polysaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides derived from pearl millet fibre, and F. kuhistanic leaves [20,21] and B. longum with pectic polysaccharides derived from cranberry pomace, pumpkin peel, and citrus pectin [19,58,59].
Interestingly, gene expression analysis of B. longum indicate the presence of over 40 glycosyl hydrolases, which include two xylanases, nine arabinosidases, two α-galactosidases, and more, whose predicted substrates cover a wide range of di, tri-, and higher order oligo-saccharides, indicating the strain’s high affinity for oligosaccharides with a degree of polymerization less than 8 [60].
Regarding, L. rhamnosus GG, this strain has shown the highest affinity towards fucosylated oligo- and polysaccharides as it has been found to express the fucose permease, fucose isomerase, fucolose kinase, fucose mutarotose, and fucolose-1-phosphate aldolase, promoting the fucose catabolic pathway to produce 1,2-propanediol or lactate [61]. According to one study assessing the probiotic activities of B. longum and L. rhamnosus GG using qPCR showed that both strains indirectly utilize pectic polysaccharides as a source of prebiotics. The polysaccharides undergo metabolization prior by other gut microbiota, namely E. coli H, resulting in metabolic end products that are then metabolized by B. longum and L. rhamnosus GG [62]. In addition, studies suggest the degree of methylation of PS may affect the fermentation rate. Based on FTIR and NMR analysis, CBS pectic fractions have been characterized as highly acetylated low methyoxyl homogalacturonan and type I rhamnogalacturonan with galactan or arabinogalactan side chains [63]. In addition, [64] reports that Lactobacillus strains showed higher fermentation rates with polysaccharides with a low degree of methylation. This may explain the faster fermentation rates observed with L. rhamnosus GG with CBS polysaccharides. Studies also found conflicting correlations between the degree of esterification and bacterial taxa in stimulating their growth [64,65,66]. Further investigation on the structural linkage, degree of methylation and degree of esterification is needed to assess whether they could result in the differential promotion of the growth of selected bacteria.
SCFA are produced upon the fermentation of dietary fiber by gut microbiota [19,67]. Prebiotic production of SCFA can be used to complement L. rhamnosus GG and B. longum fermentation of CBS polysaccharides. Table 3 and Table 4 show the concentration of four SCFA after 24 and 48 hr of fermentation of L. rhamnosus GG and B. longum with glucose, CBS polysaccharides (NAC and CCN varieties) and positive controls, inulin and rhamnogalacturonan. In the culture of L. rhamnosus GG (Table 3), the main increase was seen in the lactic acid followed by acetic acid. Although unabundant, the significance (p < 0.05) was observed with the production of propionic acid for CBS polysaccharides from both varieties (NAC and CCN) at 48 hr of fermentation. L. rhamnosus GG is known for its ability to produce lactic and propionic acid during fermentation, which can promote anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial properties in our gastrointestinal tract [68,69]. The production of butyric acid was prevalent in glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan, indicating that CBS polysaccharides do not favor the production of butyrate in the L. rhamnosus fermentation pathway. However, the presence of butyric acid can be attributed to the metabolization of lactate, further explaining the decrease in the lactate concentration with increased incubation time [70,71].
Similar to the SCFA profile of L. rhamnosus GG, the culture of B. longum was characterized by the greatest increase in lactic acid, followed by acetic acid predominantly after 48 h of fermentation with the except of CCN polysaccharides. The acetic acid content of the medium remained relatively unchanged for the polysaccharides. The lactic acid concentrations produced by polysaccharides were higher at 24 h of fermentation than that of glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan. At 48 h of fermentation, the lactic acid concentrations decreased and were surpassed by their positive controls. However, propionic, and butyric acid concentrations either decreased or were not detected after 24 h of B. longum fermentation. Overall, the total SCFA profile of polysaccharides were higher at 24 h than 48 h, indicating possible SCFA degradation. Studies suggest that Bifidobacterium spp., specifically. B. longum, are producers of lactate, acetate, and propionate in the human intestinal tract [68,72]. However, only the production of lactic and acetic acids was observed with CBS polysaccharides. In addition, when carbohydrates are in excess, Bifidobacterium utilize the fermentation pathway, to produce two molecules of acetate with 1 molecule of lactate [68,73,74]. However, our findings suggest a higher proportion of lactic than acetic acid.
Overall, comparing the total SCFA released at 48 hrs revealed that CBS polysaccharides positively contributed towards effective growth of both strains, producing high proportions of lactic and acetic acid, compared to the growth initiated by glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan. New research suggests that multi-strain probiotics can contribute to more enhanced health benefits compared to single-strain probiotics [75,76]. Further investigation can assess the effect of multi-culturing, using L. rhamnosus GG and B. longum, to determine whether a synergistic approach can promote higher prebiotic activity scores and SCFA production at faster fermentation rates.

4. Conclusions

The chemical composition of CBS (fermented, dried, and roasted) is predominantly carbohydrates (65.5–80.7%), of which around 50% is dietary fiber. CBS was also found to contain a great source of protein (12.7–19.7%) and ash (6.1–7.1%). As expected, the fat content (0.3–7.6%) was less than the amounts reported for cocoa beans; however, fat migration from the bean to the outer shell is induced upon subjection to high temperatures involved in the drying and roasting processes. Upon isolation of the CBS CWM, the polysaccharide profile was found to contain both pectic (80.6–86%) and hemi-cellulosic (13.9–19.4%) polysaccharides. Furthermore, the protein content of CWM remained unchanged relative to their raw states, indicating possible interactions with dietary fiber. The cell wall polysaccharides were isolated from CWM using two concentrations of KOH: 0.5 M and 4 M. The less concentrated extract, although it hada lower recovery yield, was favored as it provided a better neutral sugar and uronic acid profile. By increasing the alkaline concentration, defragmentation and debranching occurred. Overall, the nature of the CBS cell wall composition was found to be predominantly rich in pectic polysaccharides, such as rhamnogalacturonan. When tested for the promotion of the growth of selected probiotic strains, CBS cell wall polysaccharides performed similarly or more than inulin and rhamnogalacturonan based on the prebiotic activity scores. The short chain fatty acid profiles were characterized by high amounts of lactic acid, followed by acetic and propionic acid. Further investigation of the use of these polysaccharides using other single-strain and possibly multi-strain probiotics is needed to assess the effect of CBS polysaccharides on the selectivity of colonic fermentation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Y. and S.K.; methodology, A.Y., E.S.A., S.D. and L.L.; investigation, A.Y.; resources, S.K.; data curation, A.Y. and L.L.; writing–original draft preparation, A.Y.; writing—review and editing, A.Y. and S.K.; supervision, S.K.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (#RGPIN-2016-05042), and financial infrastructure support from Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI# 36708), is grateful acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Smart Natural Circle (Montreal, QC, Canada) and Cocoa processing industry (Guayaquil, Ecuador) for the cocoa pods and cocoa bean shells provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Soeharsono; Amin, M.; Cahyono, A. The Use of Cocoa Bean Waste as a Supplement in Male Bali Cattle Feeding. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology, West Java, Indonesia, 1 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adeyina, A.; Apata, D.; Annongu, A.; Olatunde, O.; Alli, O.; Okupke, K.M. Performance and Physiological Response of Weaner Rabbits Fed Hot Water Treated Cocoa Bean Shell Based Diet. Res. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 5, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernaert, H.; Ruysscher, I.D. Process of Producing Cocoa Shell Powder. U.S. Patent Application No. US9375024B2, 28 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Martínez-Cervera, S.; Salvador, A.; Muguerza, B.; Moulay, L.; Fiszman, S.M. Cocoa Fibre and Its Application as a Fat Replacer in Chocolate Muffins. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choi, J.; Kim, N.; Choi, H.Y.; Han, Y.S. Effect of Cacao Bean Husk Powder on the Quality Properties of Pork Sausages. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2019, 39, 742–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grillo, G.; Boffa, L.; Binello, A.; Mantegna, S.; Cravotto, G.; Chemat, F.; Dizhbite, T.; Lauberte, L.; Telysheva, G. Cocoa Bean Shell Waste Valorisation; Extraction from Lab to Pilot-Scale Cavitational Reactors. Food Res. Int. 2019, 115, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Redgwell, R.J.; Hansen, C.E. Isolation and Characterisation of Cell Wall Polysaccharides from Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Beans. Planta 2000, 210, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Redgwell, R.J.; Trovato, V.; Merinat, S.; Curti, D.; Hediger, S.; Manez, A. Dietary Fibre in Cocoa Shell: Characterisation of Component Polysaccharides. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lecumberri, E.; Mateos, R.; Izquierdo-Pulido, M.; Rupérez, P.; Goya, L.; Bravo, L. Dietary Fibre Composition, Antioxidant Capacity and Physico-Chemical Properties of a Fibre-Rich Product from Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Food Chem. 2007, 104, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vojvodić, A.; Komes, D.; Vovk, I.; Belščak-Cvitanović, A.; Bušić, A. Compositional Evaluation of Selected Agro-Industrial Wastes as Valuable Sources for the Recovery of Complex Carbohydrates. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khodaei, N.; Karboune, S. Extraction and Structural Characterisation of Rhamnogalacturonan I-Type Pectic Polysaccharides from Potato Cell Wall. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Spadoni Andreani, E.; Karboune, S. Comparison of Enzymatic and Microwave-assisted Alkaline Extraction Approaches for the Generation of Oligosaccharides from American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) Pomace. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 2443–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aguiló-Aguayo, I.; Walton, J.; Viñas, I.; Tiwari, B.K. Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Polysaccharides from Mushroom By-Products. LWT 2017, 77, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spadoni Andreani, E.; Karboune, S.; Liu, L. Extraction and Characterization of Cell Wall Polysaccharides from Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Var. Stevens) Pomace. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, J.; Guo, F.; Ma, C.; Wang, H.; Wen, J.; Yu, Y. The Alkaline Extraction Efficiency of Bamboo Cell Walls Is Related to Their Structural Differences on Both Anatomical and Molecular Level. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, M.; Heckwolf, M.; Crowe, J.D.; Williams, D.L.; Magee, T.D.; Kaeppler, S.M.; de Leon, N.; Hodge, D.B. Cell-Wall Properties Contributing to Improved Deconstruction by Alkaline Pre-Treatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis in Diverse Maize (Zea mays L.) Lines. EXBOTJ 2015, 66, 4305–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bonnina, E.; Brunel, M.; Gouy, Y.; Lesage-Meessen, L.; Asther, M.; Thibault, J.F. Aspergillus Niger I-1472 and Pycnoporus Cinnabarinus MUCL39533, selected for the Biotransformation of Ferulic Acid to Vanillin, Are Also Able to Produce Cell Wall Polysaccharide-Degrading Enzymes and Feruloyl Esterases. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2001, 28, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zykwinska, A.; Rondeau-Mouro, C.; Garnier, C.; Thibault, J.F.; Ralet, M.C. Alkaline Extractability of Pectic Arabinan and Galactan and Their Mobility in Sugar Beet and Potato Cell Walls. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spadoni Andreani, E.; Li, M.; Ronholm, J.; Karboune, S. Feruloylation of Polysaccharides from Cranberry and Characterization of Their Prebiotic Properties. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Farooq, U.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H. Enhancement of Short Chain Fatty Acid Production by Co-Cultures of Probiotics Fermentation with Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Fibre Fractions. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 11, 2031–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Islamova, Z.I.; Ogai, D.K.; Abramenko, O.I.; Lim, A.L.; Abduazimov, B.B.; Malikova, M.K.; Rakhmanberdyeva, R.K.; Khushbaktova, Z.A.; Syrov, V.N. Comparative Assessment of the Prebiotic Activity of Some Pectin Polysaccharides. Pharm. Chem. J. 2017, 51, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohd Nor, N.A.N.; Abbasiliasi, S.; Marikkar, M.N.; Ariff, A.; Amid, M.; Lamasudin, D.U.; Abdul Manap, M.Y.; Mustafa, S. Defatted Coconut Residue Crude Polysaccharides as Potential Prebiotics: Study of Their Effects on Proliferation and Acidifying Activity of Probiotics in Vitro. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Romanens, E.; Näf, R.; Lobmaier, T.; Pedan, V.; Leischtfeld, S.F.; Meile, L.; Schwenninger, S.M. A Lab-Scale Model System for Cocoa Bean Fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 3349–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saint-Denis, T.; Goupy, J. Optimization of a Nitrogen Analyser Based on the Dumas Method. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 515, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Latimer, G.W.; AOAC International (Eds.) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 20th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-935584-87-5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Blumenkrantz, N.; Asboe-Hansen, G. New Method for Quantitative Determination of Uronic Acids. Anal. Biochem. 1973, 54, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. [14] Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 299, pp. 152–178. ISBN 978-0-12-182200-2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang, J.; Martínez, I.; Walter, J.; Keshavarzian, A.; Rose, D.J. In Vitro Characterization of the Impact of Selected Dietary Fibers on Fecal Microbiota Composition and Short Chain Fatty Acid Production. Anaerobe 2013, 23, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fakhlaei, R.; Rozzamri, A.; Hussain, N. Composition, Color and Antioxidant Properties of Cocoa Shell at Different Roasting Temperatures. Food Res. 2019, 4, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Agus, B.A.P.; Mohamad, N.N.; Hussain, N. Composition of Unfermented, Unroasted, Roasted Cocoa Beans and Cocoa Shells from Peninsular Malaysia. Food Meas. 2018, 12, 2581–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martínez, R.; Torres, P.; Meneses, M.A.; Figueroa, J.G.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Chemical, Technological and in Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Co-Products. Food Res. 2012, 49, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mellinas, A.C.; Jiménez, A.; Garrigós, M.C. Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Cocoa Bean Shell Waste and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant, Physicochemical and Functional Properties. LWT 2020, 127, 109361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Okiyama, D.C.G.; Navarro, S.L.B.; Rodrigues, C.E.C. Cocoa Shell and Its Compounds: Applications in the Food Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 63, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adeyeye, E.I.; Akinyeye, R.O.; Ogunlade, I.; Olaofe, O.; Boluwade, J.O. Effect of Farm and Industrial Processing on the Amino Acid Profile of Cocoa Beans. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Younes, A.; Li, M.; Karboune, S. Cocoa Bean Shells: A Review into the Chemical Profile, the Bioactivity and the Biotransformation to Enhance Their Potential Applications in Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 2065659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. El-Saied, H.M.; Morsi, M.K.; Amer, M.M.A. Composition of Cocoa Shell Fat as Related to Cocoa Butter. Z. Ernährungswiss 1981, 20, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chau, C.F.; Huang, Y.L. Characterization of Passion Fruit Seed Fibres—A Potential Fibre Source. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sudha, M.L.; Baskaran, V.; Leelavathi, K. Apple Pomace as a Source of Dietary Fiber and Polyphenols and Its Effect on the Rheological Characteristics and Cake Making. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martín-Cabrejas, M.A.; Valiente, C.; Esteban, R.M.; Mollá, E.; Waldron, K. Cocoa Hull: A Potential Source of Dietary Fibre. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1994, 66, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiao, M.; Yi, J.; Bi, J.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, J.; Hou, C.; Lyu, J.; Zhou, M. Modification of Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Drying Process Affects Texture Properties of Apple Chips. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 4510242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Andres-Lacueva, C.; Monagas, M.; Khan, N.; Izquierdo-Pulido, M.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Permanyer, J.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Flavanol and Flavonol Contents of Cocoa Powder Products: Influence of the Manufacturing Process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3111–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Forsyth, W.G.C.; Quesnel, V.C.; Roberts, J.B. The Interaction of Polyphenols and Proteins during Cacao Curing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1958, 9, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rojo-Poveda, O.; Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Zeppa, G.; Stévigny, C. Cocoa Bean Shell—A By-Product with Nutritional Properties and Biofunctional Potential. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hernández-Hernández, C.; Viera-Alcaide, I.; Morales-Sillero, A.M.; Fernández-Bolaños, J.; Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, G. Bioactive Compounds in Mexican Genotypes of Cocoa Cotyledon and Husk. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hečimović, I.; Belščak-Cvitanović, A.; Horžić, D.; Komes, D. Comparative Study of Polyphenols and Caffeine in Different Coffee Varieties Affected by the Degree of Roasting. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Brebu, M.; Vasile, C. Thermal Degradation of Lignin—A Review. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2010, 44, 353. [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, K.B.; Stuart, D.A.; Smith, N.L.; Lee, C.Y.; McHale, N.L.; Flanagan, J.A.; Ou, B.; Hurst, W.J. Antioxidant Activity and Polyphenol and Procyanidin Contents of Selected Commercially Available Cocoa-Containing and Chocolate Products in the United States. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4062–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Payne, M.J.; Hurst, W.J.; Stuart, D.A.; Ou, B.; Fan, E.; Ji, H.; Kou, Y. Determination of Total Procyanidins in Selected Chocolate and Confectionery Products Using DMAC. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jiménez, A.; Guillén, R.; Fernández-Bolaños, J.; Heredia, A. Cell Wall Composition of Olives. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 1192–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shoaib, M.; Shehzad, A.; Omar, M.; Rakha, A.; Raza, H.; Sharif, H.R.; Shakeel, A.; Ansari, A.; Niazi, S. Inulin: Properties, Health Benefits and Food Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Broadbent, J.R.; Neeno-Eckwall, E.C.; Stahl, B.; Tandee, K.; Cai, H.; Morovic, W.; Horvath, P.; Heidenreich, J.; Perna, N.T.; Barrangou, R.; et al. Analysis of the Lactobacillus Casei Supragenome and Its Influence in Species Evolution and Lifestyle Adaptation. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boguta, A.M.; Bringel, F.; Martinussen, J.; Jensen, P.R. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Their Potential as Microbial Cell Factories for Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, J.H.; Block, D.E.; Shoemaker, S.P.; Mills, D.A. Atypical Ethanol Production by Carbon Catabolite Derepressed Lactobacilli. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8790–8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Slavin, J. Fiber and Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Health Benefits. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1417–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Koropatkin, N.M.; Cameron, E.A.; Martens, E.C. How Glycan Metabolism Shapes the Human Gut Microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ashaolu, T.J.; Ashaolu, J.O.; Adeyeye, S.A.O. Fermentation of Prebiotics by Human Colonic Microbiota in Vitro and Short-chain Fatty Acids Production: A Critical Review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jun, H.I.; Lee, C.H.; Song, G.S.; Kim, Y.S. Characterization of the Pectic Polysaccharides from Pumpkin Peel. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 39, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bianchi, F.; Larsen, N.; de Mello Tieghi, T.; Adorno, M.A.T.; Kot, W.; Saad, S.M.I.; Jespersen, L.; Sivieri, K. Modulation of Gut Microbiota from Obese Individuals by in Vitro Fermentation of Citrus Pectin in Combination with Bifidobacterium Longum BB-46. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8827–8840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Schell, M.A.; Karmirantzou, M.; Snel, B.; Vilanova, D.; Berger, B.; Pessi, G.; Zwahlen, M.C.; Desiere, F.; Bork, P.; Delley, M.; et al. The Genome Sequence of Bifidobacterium Longum Reflects Its Adaptation to the Human Gastrointestinal Tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 14422–14427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Becerra, J.E.; Yebra, M.J.; Monedero, V. An L-Fucose Operon in the Probiotic Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG Is Involved in Adaptation to Gastrointestinal Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3880–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, H.; Tang, Y.; Gao, X.; Song, C.; Liu, J.; Long, Y.; Liu, L.; et al. Apple Polysaccharide Could Promote the Growth of Bifidobacterium Longum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vriesmann, L.C.; de Mello Castanho Amboni, R.; de Oliveira Petkowicz, C. Cacao Pod Husks (Theobroma Cacao L.): Composition and Hot-Water-Soluble Pectins. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34, 1173–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Larsen, N.; de Souza, C.B.; Krych, L.; Kot, W.; Leser, T.D.; Sørensen, O.B.; Blennow, A.; Venema, K.; Jespersen, L. Effect of Potato Fiber on Survival of Lactobacillus Species at Simulated Gastric Conditions and Composition of the Gut Microbiota in Vitro. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ferreira-Lazarte, A.; Moreno, F.J.; Cueva, C.; Gil-Sánchez, I.; Villamiel, M. Behaviour of Citrus Pectin during Its Gastrointestinal Digestion and Fermentation in a Dynamic Simulator (Simgi®). Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chengxiao, Y.; Dongmei, W.; Kai, Z.; Hou, L.; Xiao, H.; Ding, T.; Liu, D.; Ye, X.; Linhardt, R.J.; Chen, S. Challenges of Pectic Polysaccharides as a Prebiotic from the Perspective of Fermentation Characteristics and Anti-Colitis Activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 270, 118377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lin, Z.; Fischer, J.; Wicker, L. Intermolecular Binding of Blueberry Pectin-Rich Fractions and Anthocyanin. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Markowiak-Kopeć, P.; Śliżewska, K. The Effect of Probiotics on the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids by Human Intestinal Microbiome. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Al-Lahham, S.H.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Roelofsen, H.; Vonk, R.J.; Venema, K. Biological Effects of Propionic Acid in Humans; Metabolism, Potential Applications and Underlying Mechanisms. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2010, 1801, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Karboune, S.; Seo, S.; Li, M.; Waglay, A.; Lagacé, L. Biotransformation of Sucrose Rich Maple Syrups into Fructooligosaccharides, Oligolevans and Levans Using Levansucrase Biocatalyst: Bioprocess Optimization and Prebiotic Activity Assessment. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 132355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cummings, J.H.; Pomare, E.W.; Branch, W.J.; Naylor, C.P.; Macfarlane, G.T. Short Chain Fatty Acids in Human Large Intestine, Portal, Hepatic and Venous Blood. Gut 1987, 28, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, C.; Kolida, S.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Rastall, R.A. An Evaluation of the Prebiotic Potential of Microbial Levans from Erwinia Sp. 10119. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. LeBlanc, G.; Chain, F.; Martín, R.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Courau, S.; Langella, P. Beneficial Effects on Host Energy Metabolism of Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Vitamins Produced by Commensal and Probiotic Bacteria. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Macfarlane, S.; Macfarlane, G.T. Regulation of Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kwoji, D.; Aiyegoro, O.A.; Okpeku, M.; Adeleke, M.A. Multi-Strain Probiotics: Synergy among Isolates Enhances Biological Activities. Biology 2021, 10, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Puvanasundram, P.; Chong, C.M.; Sabri, S.; Yusoff, M.S.; Karim, M. Multi-Strain Probiotics: Functions, Effectiveness and Formulations for Aquaculture Applications. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular weight distribution of CWP alkaline extracts. Letters are denoted by the different varieties (NAC, CCN) subjected to different alkaline solution treatments (0.5 M, 4 M KOH) A: NAC 4 M, B: NAC 0.5 M, C: CCN 4 M, D: CCN 0.5 M, respectively.
Figure 1. Molecular weight distribution of CWP alkaline extracts. Letters are denoted by the different varieties (NAC, CCN) subjected to different alkaline solution treatments (0.5 M, 4 M KOH) A: NAC 4 M, B: NAC 0.5 M, C: CCN 4 M, D: CCN 0.5 M, respectively.
Polymers 15 00745 g001
Figure 2. Prebiotic activity scores of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (R0343 AR) on polysaccharide extracts, inulin and rhamnogalacturonan, measured at 6,24, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation. Values represented as an average ± standard deviation. Poly NAC: polysaccharide NAC variety, poly CCN: polysaccharide CCN variety, RhamnoG: Rhamnogalacturonan, respectively. For each incubation time, bars with different letters represent scores significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Prebiotic activity scores of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (R0343 AR) on polysaccharide extracts, inulin and rhamnogalacturonan, measured at 6,24, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation. Values represented as an average ± standard deviation. Poly NAC: polysaccharide NAC variety, poly CCN: polysaccharide CCN variety, RhamnoG: Rhamnogalacturonan, respectively. For each incubation time, bars with different letters represent scores significantly different at p < 0.05.
Polymers 15 00745 g002
Figure 3. Prebiotic activity scores of Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC® 15707) on polysaccharide extracts, inulin and rhamnogalacturonan, measured at 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation. Values represented as an average ± standard deviation. Poly NAC: polysaccharide NAC variety, Poly CCN: polysaccharide CCN variety, RhamnoG: Rhamnogalacturonan, respectively. For each incubation time, bars with different letters represent scores significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Prebiotic activity scores of Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC® 15707) on polysaccharide extracts, inulin and rhamnogalacturonan, measured at 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation. Values represented as an average ± standard deviation. Poly NAC: polysaccharide NAC variety, Poly CCN: polysaccharide CCN variety, RhamnoG: Rhamnogalacturonan, respectively. For each incubation time, bars with different letters represent scores significantly different at p < 0.05.
Polymers 15 00745 g003
Table 1. Proximate composition of cocoa bean shells (CBS) and saccharide profile of their corresponding cell wall materials (CWM).
Table 1. Proximate composition of cocoa bean shells (CBS) and saccharide profile of their corresponding cell wall materials (CWM).
Proximate Analyses of CBS
ComponentsContent (%, w/dry w)
Fermented CCN51Dried
CCN 51
Roasted
CCN 51
Roasted
NAC
Protein13 ± 2 b18.9 ± 1.0 a12.8 ± 1.1 b19.8 ± 1.9 a
Fat0.3 ± 0.04 c2.3 ± 0.4 b2.1 ± 0.4 b7.6 ± 0.4 a
Ash6.1 ± 0.07 b7.1 ± 0.1 a6.5 ± 0.5 ab7.1 ± 0.3 a
CHO80.6 ± 2.1 a71.7 ± 1.6 b78.7 ± 1.1 a65.5 ± 1.6 c
Fiber61.4 ± 8.3 a50.2 ± 7.3 a50.1 ± 0.3 a54.3 ± 2.8 a
Polyphenol content *0.5 ± 0.1 a0.6 ± 0.1 a0.6 ± 0.1 a0.4 ± 0.02 a
Composition of CWM of CBS
CWM yield 40.6 ± 12.641.6 ± 2.649.4 ± 0.0448.1 ± 3.2
Polyphenol content *0.05 ± 0.002 c0.1 ± 0.01 a0.1 ± 0.01 b0.1 ± 0.01 b
Protein content *16.6 ± 0.8 a17.6 ± 1.6 a17.3 ± 1.4 a12.9 ± 1.1 a
Neutral sugar content *31.4 ± 5.3 c29.9 ± 7.6 bc41.9 ± 5.8 a40.9 ± 8.0 ab
Uronic acid content *32.5 ± 7.6 a36.5 ± 14.7 a22.8 ± 2 a29.8 ± 2.7 a
Monosaccharide profile (%, g/100 g rel. proportion)
Fucose2.6 ± 0.03 a3.6 ± 2.4 a2.4 ± 0.05 a2.8 ± 1.6 a
Rhamnose6.2 ± 0.9 ab5.1 ± 1.1 b6.9 ± 0.4 ab6.4 ± 0.1 a
Arabinose13.8 ± 2.1 a13.6 ± 1.26 a17.2 ± 1.1 a14.2 ± 0.9 a
Galactose22.7 ± 2.5 a23.7 ± 3.9 a29.2 ± 1.4 a27.2 ± 0.7 a
Glucose3.3 ± 0.1 b5.2 ± 0.7 b7.1 ± 0.8 a5.9 ± 0.3 a
Xylose + Mannose0.9 ± 0.3 a1.3 ± 0.12 a1.9 ± 0.15 a1.5 ± 0.2 a
Uronic acids50.5 ± 5.9 a47.5 ± 1.1 a35.1 ± 2.0 a42.1 ± 2.2 a
Hemi-cellulosic PS *13.9 ± 0.8 a19.4 ± 6.1 a17.8 ± 1.9 a17.5 ± 2.9 a
Pectic PS *86.0 ± 0.8 a80.6 ± 6.1 a82.2 ± 1.9 a82.5 ± 2.9 a
Polyphenol Profile of CBS and CWM (ng/Kg CBS/CWM CBS)
Gallic acid0.2 ± 0.01 ab/0.3 ± 0.03 a0.2 ± 0.06 a/0.2 ± 0.02 ab0.1 ± 0.02 bc/n.d. **cn.d. **c/n.d. **c
Protocatechuic acid7.2 ± 1.9 c/9.3 ± 0.03 c23.2 ± 3.9 b/34.6 ± 5.2 a7.0 ± 0.5 cd/5.3 ± 0.3 cd1.3 ± 0.1 d/7.5 ± 1.1 c
Catechin4.1 ± 0.4 cd/6.4 ± 0.1 cd24.3 ± 6.7 a/20.2 ± 0.9 ab0.3 ± 0.06 d/0.4 ± 0.04 d13.0 ± 1.3 bc/2.1 ± 0.4 d
Epicatechin37.4 ± 0.1 bc/65.8 ± 1.7 ab122.8 ± 7.5 a/124.4 ± 26.9 a6.1 ± 0.5 bc/10.1 ± 0.7 bc0.9 ± 0.1 c/19.8 ± 2.6 bc
Caffeic acid0.1 ± 0.03 b/0.4 ± 0.1 b0.3 ± 0.1 b/0.4 ± 0.1 b0.1 ± 0.003 b/9.6 ± 0.9 b1.1 ± 0.1 a/0.3 ± 0.1 b
p-Coumaric acid0.05 ± 0.01 b/0.05 ± 0.0005 b0.1 ± 0.01 ab/0.1 ± 0.02 abn.d. **b/n.d. **b0.1 ± 0.01 ab/0.2 ± 0.04 a
Ferulic acid0.2 ± 0.01 a/0.2 ± 0.04 a0.1 ± 0.04 a/0.05 ± 0.0001 a0.4 a/0.3 ± 0.2 a0.2 ± 0.1 a/1.2 ± 0.1 a
Quercetin2.1 ± 0.1 bc/4.6 ± 0.5 a3.1 ± 0.3 ab/6.0 ± 1.1 a0.4 ± 0.04 d/0.5 ± 0.003 d0.8 ± 0.1 cd/n.d. ** d
Caffeine261.6 ± 1.2 a/257.6 ± 7.9 a139.4 ± 3.9 a/169.5 ± 13.1 a4.5 ± 0.2 a/19.3 ± 0.4 a17.7 ± 0.1 a/22.3 ± 5.0 a
Values reported as average ± standard deviation. * Units expressed as % weight per weight CWM. ** not detected. a Within the same row, means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Alkaline extraction of polysaccharides from the cell wall material (CWM) of cocoa bean shells (CBS).
Table 2. Alkaline extraction of polysaccharides from the cell wall material (CWM) of cocoa bean shells (CBS).
Fermented CCN51Dried
CCN 51
Roasted
CCN 51
Roasted
NAC
0.5 M KOH
PS yield (%, w/w)23.7 ± 0.0124.4 ± 0.0529.1 ± 0.435.4 ± 4.3
Neutral sugar content *27.1 ± 1.9 a25.5 ± 3.2 a20.6 ± 0.7 b13.5 ± 2.3 b
Uronic acid content *54.5 ± 9.3 a55.1 ± 0.9 a58.3 ± 5.2 a49.8 ± 3.02 a
Uronic/Neutral Sugar ratio2.012.162.833.69
Monosaccharide Composition (%, g/100 g–relative proportion)
Fucose0.9 ± 0.2 b0.7 ± 0.07 b1.8 ± 0.02 a1.8 ± 0.1 a
Rhamnose11.9 ± 0.6 a9.9 ± 0.8 a12.4 ± 0.3 a6.8 ± 1.1 b
Arabinose16.4 ± 0.9 a13.9 ± 0.8 a8.6 ± 0.01 b7.8 ± 0.6 b
Galactose22.4 ± 0.9 a18.5 ± 0.4 b8.1 ± 0.2 c17.5 ± 1.3 b
Glucose1.1 ± 0.1 b3.7 ± 1.1 a5.2 ± 0.5 a2.9 ± 0.1 ab
Xylose+ Mannose4.4 ± 0.9 b8.5 ± 1.9 ab12.6 ± 2.0 c5.0 ± 0.4 b
Uronic acids42.9 ± 2.5 b44.9 ± 2.6 b51.4 ± 3.1 ab58.2 ± 2.8 b
Pectic neutral sugars *88.8 ± 1.7 a76.8 ± 4.2 b59.9 ± 2.8 c76.8 ± 1.8 b
Branching3.33.31.33.7
4 M KOH
PS yield (%, w/w)19.5 ± 0.0521.1 ± 0.0732.9 ± 0.0853.6 ± 8.1
Neutral sugar content *13.9 ± 2.1 a12.3 ± 0.7 a11.4 ± 1.4 a10.7 ± 0.2 a
Uronic acid content *47.9 ± 5.1 a60.3 ± 9.3 a60.8 ± 3.6 a51.6 ± 1.4 a
Uronic/Neutral Sugar ratio3.444.895.314.84
Monosaccharide Composition (%, g/100 g–relative proportion)
Fucose1.2 ± 0.2 b1.8 ± 0.1 b4.3 ± 0.1 a3.4 ± 0.4 a
Rhamnose3.5 ± 0.1 ab2.3 ± 0.4 b3.7 ± 0.3 a3.7 ± 0.5 a
Arabinose5.9 ± 0.7 c4.2 ± 0.3 c10.6 ± 0.6 b13.4 ± 0.6 a
Galactose14.9 ± 1.8 a15.9 ± 0.4 a10.7 ± 0.4 b9.9 ± 0.2 b
Glucose2.2 ± 0.7 a4.2 ± 2.2 a1.5 ± 0.1 a2.03 ± 0.04 a
Xylose + Mannose15.9 ± 0.6 a7.1 ± 1.8 b2.6 ± 0.04 c3.03 ± 0.2 c
Uronic acids56.4 ± 1.0 a64.6 ± 4.9 a66.7 ± 1.4 a64.5 ± 1.02 a
Pectic neutral sugars *55.6 ± 4.5 b63.6 ± 5.9 ab74.85 ± 0.62 a76.1 ± 1.3 a
Branching68.95.86.3
Values represented as averages ± standard deviation. Pectic neutral sugars calculated as (rhamnose + arabinose + galactose) × 100/total neutral sugars. Branching calculated as (rhamnose + arabinose/galactose). * Units expressed as % gram per 100 g sample. a Within the same row, means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Concentration (10−3 mol/L) of short chain fatty acids released in the 0.5 M alkaline treated cell-wall polysaccharide samples (NAC, CCN) as compared to glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan standards which were obtained from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (R0343 AR) fermentation using different carbon sources. Values determined as difference with concentrations detected immediately after inoculation.
Table 3. Concentration (10−3 mol/L) of short chain fatty acids released in the 0.5 M alkaline treated cell-wall polysaccharide samples (NAC, CCN) as compared to glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan standards which were obtained from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (R0343 AR) fermentation using different carbon sources. Values determined as difference with concentrations detected immediately after inoculation.
Time (h)GlucoseInulinRhamnoGNACCCN
Lactic acid24313.0 ± 4.0 a212.5 ± 15.5 a508.8 ± 10.3 a427.6 ± 62.0 a343.0 ± 85.9 a
48386.0 ± 16.2 a315.7 ± 14.8 a293.5 ± 26.0 a354.7 ± 41.1 a393.0 ± 44.2 a
Acetic acid2458.1 ± 8.4 a46.4 *a112.2 ± nd*a42.5 ± 0.9 a71.9 *a
48111.7 *a66.4 *a39.0 ± 8.5 a35.3 ± 3.0 a96.8 *a
Propionic acid244.7 *a1.0 ± 0.04 a1.8 ± 0.03 a1.1 ± 0.1 a1.2 *a
480.7 *b0.4 *b0.6 ± 0.06 b1.1 ± 0.2 ab1.9 ± 0.3 a
Butyric acid241.8 *a0.3 *a0.4 ± 0.04 a--
48-----
Total 24377.6260.2623.2471.2416.1
48498.4382.5333.1391.1491.7
Values represented as average ± standard deviation. RhamnoG; Rhamnogalacturonan. * Standard deviation is zero or not detected. a Within the same row, means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Concentration (10−3 mol/L) of short chain fatty acids released in the 0.5 M alkaline treated cell-wall polysaccharide samples (NAC, CCN) as compared to glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan standards which were obtained from Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC 15707®) fermentation using different carbon sources. Values determined as difference with concentrations detected immediately after inoculation.
Table 4. Concentration (10−3 mol/L) of short chain fatty acids released in the 0.5 M alkaline treated cell-wall polysaccharide samples (NAC, CCN) as compared to glucose, inulin, and rhamnogalacturonan standards which were obtained from Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC 15707®) fermentation using different carbon sources. Values determined as difference with concentrations detected immediately after inoculation.
Time (h)GlucoseInulinRhamnoGNACCCN
Lactic acid2431.3 ± 5.1 a56.3 *a178.0 * a169.0 ± 2.4 a273.2 ± 66.4 a
48404.4 ± 96.6 a281.3 ± 1.8 a327.9 ± 2.1 a299.8 ± 18.3 a216.2 ± 1.5 a
Acetic acid2444.4 ± 3.9 a43.7 ± 10.3 a52.6 *a39.5 *a53.9 *a
48230.1 ± 11.3 a55.3 ± 3.6 b50.5 ± 1.5 b28.6 ± 2.9 b53.3 *b
Propionic acid241.9 ± 0.4 a1.3 ± 0.2 a2.6 ± 0.4 a1.9 ± 0.2 a1.7 *a
480.6 *a0.5 ± 0.1 a0.5 ± 0.03 a0.3 *a2.0 *a
Butyric acid240.3 *0.3 *---
48-----
Total 2477.9101.6233.3210.4328.8
48635.1337.1378.9328.7271.5
Values represented as average ± standard deviation. RhamnoG; Rhamnogalacturonan. * Standard deviation is zero or not detected. a Within the same row, means with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Younes, A.; Karboune, S.; Liu, L.; Andreani, E.S.; Dahman, S. Extraction and Characterization of Cocoa Bean Shell Cell Wall Polysaccharides. Polymers 2023, 15, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030745

AMA Style

Younes A, Karboune S, Liu L, Andreani ES, Dahman S. Extraction and Characterization of Cocoa Bean Shell Cell Wall Polysaccharides. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Younes, Amalie, Salwa Karboune, Lan Liu, Eugenio Spadoni Andreani, and Sarah Dahman. 2023. "Extraction and Characterization of Cocoa Bean Shell Cell Wall Polysaccharides" Polymers 15, no. 3: 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop