Next Article in Journal
Continuous Phosphate Removal and Recovery Using a Calcium Silicate Hydrate Composite Monolithic Cryogel Column
Next Article in Special Issue
Dispersion and Homogeneity of MgO and Ag Nanoparticles Mixed with Polymethylmethacrylate
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Extrusion Process on the Physicochemical Properties of Biodegradable and Active Cassava Starch Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functionalized GO/Hydroxy-Terminated Polybutadiene Composites with High Anti-Migration and Ablation Resistance Performance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/polym15030537
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Flame Retardant Properties of Polyoxymethylene with Surface Modified Intumescent Flame Retardant and Calcium Carbonate

by
Zheng Yang
1,2,
Xueting Chen
2,
Shike Lu
2,
Zhenhua Wang
2,
Jiantong Li
1,2,
Baoying Liu
1,
Xiaomin Fang
1,2,*,
Tao Ding
1,2,* and
Yuanqing Xu
1
1
Henan Engineering Research Center of Functional Materials and Catalytic Reaction, Kaifeng 475004, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030537
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles and Polymers: Preparations and Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) was successfully modified by a titanate coupling agent which was compounded with benzoxazine (BOZ) and melamine (ME) to become a new type of intumescent flame retardant (Ti-IFR). Ti-IFR and CaCO3 as synergists were utilized to modify polyoxymethylene (POM), and the flame-retardant properties and mechanism of the composites were analyzed by vertical combustion (UL-94), limiting oxygen index (LOI), TG-IR, and cone calorimeter (Cone), etc. The results show that Ti-IFR can enhance the gas phase flame retardant effect, while CaCO3 further strengthens the barrier effect in the condensed phase. When they were used together, they can exert their performance, respectively, at the same time showing excellent synergistic effect. The FR-POM composite with 29% Ti-IFR and 1% CaCO3 can pass the UL-94 V0 level. The LOI reaches 58.2%, the average heat release (Av HRR) is reduced by 81.1% and the total heat release (THR) is decreased by 35.3%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyoxymethylene (POM) is an engineering plastic with excellent physical and mechanical properties and is known as a metal plastic [1]. It is widely used in the electrical and electronic, automotive and construction industries in contemporary society to replace copper, aluminum, zinc, and other metal materials [2]. With the development of modern industry, the demand for POM in the market has soared. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the consumption of POM in the world has reached 540,000 tons with an average annual growth rate of 5–6% [3]. However, with the increase in the demand for POM, its flammable defect is gradually exposed. Once ignited, POM burns violently, and the burning process is accompanied by a large number of burning molten droplets and toxic formaldehyde gas. This is extremely detrimental to its development in the construction and automotive industries [4]. Therefore, the flame-retardant research of POM came into being.
The processing temperature of POM is extremely narrow at 170–200 °C, and it is very easy to decompose at above 185 °C, and the decomposition products will further accelerate it resulting in “unzipper-like” degradation [5]. In addition, POM is very sensitive to acids and alkalis which may also cause its unzipper decomposition [6]. Moreover, the high crystallinity of POM results in its poor compatibility with flame retardant additives leading to an unavoidable and substantial reduction in mechanical properties [7,8]. Therefore, it is quite difficult to obtain ideal POM flame retardants.
Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are high-efficiency, easy to use, and have good compatibility with polymeric materials which have been used for a long time. However, the harm of BFRs to the environment and human beings has been gradually proposed with the improvement of people’s awareness of environmental protection in recent years, and thus they have been gradually eliminated by the market [5,9,10]. Efficient and environment-friendly flame retardants are the trend of future development. Phosphorus-based [11], nitrogen-based [12], inorganic [13], and organic [14] halogen-free flame retardants have been produced successively. Organic flame retardants have good flame retardancy and good compatibility with polymeric materials. However, the synthesis process is complicated [15]. Inorganic flame retardants such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide, are easy to obtain and very economical. However, the additional amount to meet the demand is large, and the compatibility with polymer is not good, which is easy to cause stress concentration, thereby reducing the mechanical properties [16]. Intumescent flame retardants (IFRs) are regarded as green and environment-friendly ones with the advantages of being halogen-free, low smoke, low toxicity, and no corrosive gas generation. They usually consist of dehydrating agents, char-forming agents, and blowing agents which act synergistically and make it more advantageous than the use of phosphorus-based and nitrogen-based flame retardants alone [17,18]. Phosphorus-containing flame retardants are often used as dehydrating agents, and nitrogen-based flame retardants are often used as foaming agents, so they are also called phosphorus-nitrogen IFRs. They are considered as the most promising flame retardant for POM, but the efficiency is not high enough, and the additional amount sometimes even exceeds the content of POM itself [19]. Lu et al. made ME/RP composite flame retardant by simply mixing red phosphorus and melamine by mechanical grinding, which achieved excellent flame-retardant performance in polyurethane foam and had more advantages than using ME and RA alone [20]. Adding synergists is the easiest way to improve flame retardant efficiency by promoting the synergistic effect between the IFR components [21]. Commonly used flame-retardant synergists mainly include organosilicon compounds [22], red phosphorus and phosphorus compounds [23], zinc borate [24], metal oxides [25], layered nanomaterials [26], etc.
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is a common chemical substance on the earth, which is an inorganic salt mineral and has a certain flame-retardant effect. It has a wide range of sources and is a very economical flame-retardant synergist [27]. In addition, CaCO3 can still improve the processability and heat resistance of the polymer to a certain extent [28]. Sarang et al. [29]. studied the chemical action mode of calcium carbonate nanoparticles combined with ammonium polyphosphate as a flame retardant in polypropylene. Due to the interaction of additives, which impedes the advancing flame, the combustion rate is reduced, and the fire resistance is greatly improved. However, as an inorganic flame-retardant synergist, CaCO3 has poor compatibility and dispersity in polymeric materials [30]. Surface modification technology can be used to make up for this deficiency on the premise of maintaining the original properties of products [31]. There are mainly surface chemical reaction method, surface grafting method, surface composite method, and other technologies [32]. Coupling agents are the most commonly used surface modifiers, such as titanate coupling agents, silane coupling agents, and aluminate coupling agents, etc. [33]. The element of Ti, Si, and Al in the molecule make them have potential flame retardancy [34].
In our previous study, ammonium polyphosphate (APP), benzoxazine (BOZ), and melamine (ME) were found a highly effective IFR for POM [35]. In order to further enhance flame retardant efficiency and the compatibility of additives with the POM matrix, titanate coupling agent 201 was used to modify the surface of APP and CaCO3 as synergists in this paper. The effects of surface-modified APP and CaCO3 on the flame-retardant properties of POM were explored, and the synergistic flame-retardant mechanism of CaCO3 and IFR was studied.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

POM(M90) and Antioxidant (Model 1010) was provided by Kaifeng Longyu Chemical Co., Ltd. APP (TF-201, crystal form II, n ≥ 1000) was purchased from Shifang Taifeng New Flame Retardant Co., Ltd., and its SEM image is shown in (Figure 1a). BOZ was synthesized in our laboratory, and its chemical structure is shown in (Figure 2) [35]. ME is provided by Henan Zhongyuan Dahua Group Co., Ltd.China. CaCO3 (Common type, 3000 mesh) was purchased from Shandong Jinrunze New Material Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong, China and its SEM image is shown in (Figure 1b). Titanate coupling agent (PN-201) was purchased from Nanjing Pinning Coupling Agent Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China.

2.2. Preparation of Ti-APP and Ti-CaCO3

Pour APP (200 g) into a three-neck flask, add industrial alcohol (400 mL), and stir at 50 °C water bath for 1 h to disperse APP to a uniform suspension. Then, 10 mL ethanol-water mixed solvent was prepared in equal proportion. PN-201 (2 g) was added into the mixed solvent and dispersed by ultrasonic wave for 0.5 h. Finally, the dispersed PN-201 was slowly dropped into the APP suspension and continued to stir at 50 °C for 1 h. After the reaction, the APP suspension was filtered by negative pressure and washed with anhydrous ethanol for 2–3 times. Finally, put the cake in the air blast oven and dry it for 12 h at 80 °C, then modified APP was obtained, namely Ti-APP.
The modified CaCO3 (Ti-CaCO3) was prepared with 20 g CaCO3, 100 mL industrial alcohol, and 2 g PN-201 according to the above program of modified APP.
The mechanism of modified APP and CaCO3 is shown in (Figure 3), and the preparation process is shown in (Figure 4).

2.3. Preparation of FR-POM Composites

The IFR consists of APP, BOZ, and ME in the mass ratio of 10:2:3 in line with our previous optimization results. Here, Ti-APP is compounded with BOZ and ME at the same mass ratio to form a new intumescent flame retardant named as Ti-IFR instead of IFR. Additionally, the total amount of additives was kept at 30 wt%.
According to the formula in Table 1, POM and a certain proportion of the flame-retardant additives are uniformly mixed in a high-speed mixer and then put into an extruder for melt blending and granulation. The melting temperature of POM was maintained at 165–175 °C. The pellets were placed in a blast drying oven and dried at 80 °C until moisture-free. Finally, the fully dried pellets were put into the injection molding machine for standard test specimens.

2.4. Characterization

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was performed by a VERTEX 70 spectrophotometer (Bruker Spectrometer, Germany). Potassium bromide tablets were used with an optical range of 400–4000 cm−1 and a resolution of 4 cm−1.
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed by Bruker D8 Advance. The 2θ angle range was 5–50°, and the scan time was 15 min.
LOI data of all samples were obtained in accordance with GB/T 2406.2 standard on a smart oxygen index fume hood integrated machine (Suzhou Testech Testing Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.), and the sample size was 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm.
The UL-94 test was performed in accordance with the GB/T 2408-2008 standard on a horizontal and vertical combustion tester (Testech (Suzhou)) Testing Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.) using a sample with a geometric size of 125 mm × 12.5 mm × 3.2 mm and 125 mm × 12.5 mm × 1.6 mm. Test results were classified as Class V-0, V-1, V-2, or No Class (NR).
Thermal degradation-infrared analysis of the samples was carried out in a combined thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA/SDTA 851, Mettler-Toledo) and Fourier infrared tester (INVENIOS, Bruker), heated from room temperature to 800 °C under a nitrogen and air atmosphere. The weight of the test sample was kept at about 5 mg, the gas flow rate was 50 mL/min, and the heating rate was 10 °C/min.
Cone calorimetry (Fire Testing Technology Ltd., East Grinstead, West Sussex, UK) using ISO 5660 standard to study the combustion behavior at an incident radiant flux of 50 kW/m2. The dimensions of the samples are 100 mm × 100 mm × 6 mm.
Surface topography of the coke slag measured by cone calorimetry was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7610F). The test voltage is 5 kV.
The degree of graphitization of the carbon layer was tested by a laser microscope Raman spectrometer (Renishaw inVia, Renishaw, London, UK), 532 nm excitation wavelength, spectral range: 1000–2000 cm−1

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Ti-APP and Ti-CaCO3

Thermogravimetric analysis characterizes the mass change in the material during the temperature-programmed process. It reflects the sensitivity and stability of the material to heat [36]. Materials with higher initial decomposition temperature and carbon residue rate tend to have better flame-retardant properties. (Figure 5) and (Table 2) are the thermogravimetric test curves and characteristic parameter tables of modified APP and modified CaCO3, respectively. It can be found from Figure 4 that the modified APP and CaCO3 are significantly different compared with the unmodified ones. The characteristic data in Table 2 can more intuitively show the difference before and after modification. The modified APP (Ti-APP) still decomposes twice during the temperature programmed process, which is consistent with the decomposition process of unmodified APP. However, the heat resistance of Ti-APP was improved after modification, and its initial decomposition temperature (T-5%, T-10%) and the first fastest decomposition temperature (Tmax) were increased by about 10 °C, respectively. The fastest decomposition temperature for the second time even increased by 25 °C. Unfortunately, the residual carbon rate of Ti-APP is lower than that of APP.
After modification, Ti-CaCO3 turned to decompose in two steps similar to APP during the temperature programmed process of 25–800 °C, and its heat resistance also changed obviously. The initial decomposition temperature (T-10%) was advanced by 21 °C which may be caused by the decomposition of the titanate coupling agent coated on its surface, but the fastest decomposition temperature (Tmax) in the second step was delayed by 21 °C indicating that the decomposition process of Ti-CaCO3 is more gradual, and the addition of titanate slows down its decomposition process.
The infrared spectra of APP, CaCO3, and their modification are shown in (Figure 6). PN-201 mainly has two characteristic peaks. From 1030 cm−1 to 740 cm−1, the infrared absorption decreases continuously and shows strong absorption corresponding to Ti-O. Additionally, the antisymmetric vibration peak of C-H appears around 2934 cm−1 [37]. In Figure 5, Ti-APP exhibits the characteristic absorption peak of Ti-O at 1015 cm−1, while Ti-CaCO3 shows it at 1064 cm−1. The absorption of Ti-CaCO3 at 2929 cm−1 is attributed to the C-H antisymmetric vibration peak. Comparatively speaking, the C-H absorption of Ti-APP appears at 3054 cm−1 showing a blue shift, which may be due to the shift of the absorption peak to the high wave number caused by the induction effect. The characteristic peak of PN-201 was detected in the modified APP and CaCO3, indicating that it was successfully loaded on APP and CaCO3.
The XRD spectra of APP, CaCO3, and their modification are shown in (Figure 7). The characteristic diffraction peaks of CaCO3 and Ti-CaCO3 were found at 23°, 29°, 36°, 39°, 43°, 47.5°, 48.5° [38]. Both APP and Ti-APP found their characteristic diffraction peaks at 16.7°, 15.5°, 20°, 22°, 26°, 27.6°, 29°, 30.6°, 35.7°, 36.5°, 38° [39]. According to it, the spectra of Ti-APP and Ti-CaCO3 after modification have no obvious change from those before modification. This indicates that the modification of APP and CaCO3 by PN-201 does not change their crystal morphology and has no obvious effect on their structure and state.

3.2. Flammability of FR-POM Composites

UL-94 and LOI tests are often used to initially characterize the combustion properties of materials. According to the analysis of them, the char formation of the intumescent material during the combustion process, and the compactness of the char formation can be identified [40]. The test results of UL-94 and LOI are shown in (Table 3).
Pure POM has virtually no flame retardancy. Once ignited, it will burn violently and produce combustion dripping, so it fails to reach the flame-retardant level and its LOI value only reaches 15%. After IFR is added, the combustion drip–drop phenomenon disappears, and the LOI of P1 reaches 46.6%, which is more than three times that of P0, indicating that P1 has good carbon formation performance in the combustion process. However, UL-94 results showed that P1’s second ignition time was too long to reach flame retardant level. It indicates that the carbon layer cannot effectively block the release of combustible gas inside the material, and the density is still insufficient. After APP was modified by PN-201, the flame-retardant performance was further improved. The P2 achieves a V1 rating with an improved LOI value of 51%. The synergistic effect of adding CaCO3 to the IFR makes P3 reach the UL-94 V1 level, and the LOI value is increased to 53.6%. It is shown that whether the modified APP (Ti-APP) or the synergistic effect of CaCO3 is used, the carbon formation of FR-POM composites can be further enhanced, and the compactness of the carbon layer can be significantly improved.
IFR with Ti-APP as acid source (Ti-IFR) synergistic CaCO3 achieved the most excellent synergistic flame-retardant effect among all the FR-POM. The P4 achieves a UL-94 V0 rating and a high LOI value of 58.2%, far better than P2, P3, and even P5. The performance of P5 with modify CaCO3 (Ti-CaCO3) and Ti-IFR is only inferior to that of P4. It also reaches the UL-94 V0 level, but its LOI of 56.8% is slightly lower than P4. It may be due to the decrease in thermal stability of Ti-CaCO3 leading to a slight decrease in carbon formation and carbon layer compactness of P5, compared with unmodified CaCO3.

3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The TG and DTG curves of FR-POM composites under N2 and air atmospheres are shown in (Figure 8), and the thermogravimetric data are summarized in (Table 4 and Table 5). It can be seen from Figure 7 that the decomposition trends of FR-POM composites under N2 and air atmospheres are almost the same, both showing one-step decomposition. However, the N2 atmosphere seems to be more conducive to the formation of carbon residues, which may be due to the participation of oxygen in the air atmosphere to generate CO2, thereby reducing the amount of carbon residues [41]. In both atmospheres, the initial decomposition temperature T-5% of P0 is around 233 °C, T-10% is around 248 °C, and the fastest decomposition temperature is about 295 °C. Moreover, the whole decomposition process of P0 was smoother than others, the decomposition was more thorough, and there was basically no carbon residue left. After adding different flame retardants, the thermal decomposition of FR-POM is very similar. The initial decomposition temperature T-5% is increased by about 20 °C compared with P0, but Tmax is only about 260 °C, which is very close to T-10% and T-5%. The thermal resistance of P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 is improved, and the thermal decomposition temperature range is narrow. It may be that the addition of flame retardants not only improves the heat resistance of composite materials but also disturbs the original structured molecular structure of POM so that its decomposition process is very rapid and shows a narrow decomposition range.
The carbon residue rate at 800 °C reflects the carbon-forming ability of the materials. In the N2 atmosphere, the addition of IFR makes the carbon residue rate of P1 reach 15.2%. After using Ti-IFR, the carbon residue rate of P2 is further improved, reaching 17.1%. While the carbon residue rate of P3 with CaCO3 as a synergist is only 14.0% indicating that Ti-APP can improve the carbon residue rate more efficiently than CaCO3. Unexpectedly, the synergistic system of CaCO3 and Ti-IFR achieved the best carbon formation effect. The carbon residue rate of P4 reached 18.2%, which was 19.7% higher than that of P1. However, by combining Ti-CaCO3 with Ti-IFR, the carbon residue rate of P5 is slightly lower than that of P4. It shows that Ti-IFR and CaCO3 have an excellent synergistic flame-retardant effect and excellent carbon-forming properties. In addition, the FR-POM composites also showed similar carbon-forming ability in the air atmosphere. Furthermore, the carbon residue rate of P3, P4, and P5 with calcium carbonate in the AIR atmosphere is apparently higher than that of P1 and P2 without it, indicating that CaCO3, whether modified or not, is highly efficient to promote the carbon-forming and synergistic effect with IFR under air atmosphere.

3.4. Cone Calorimeter Research

Cone calorimetry (CONE) is a method to record information about the combustion state of materials in a simulated real fire environment. As a very reliable test, it has been widely used in the evaluation of flame-retardant properties of composite materials such as various engineering plastics, general plastics, foam materials, and wood materials [38]. Characteristic data such as time to ignition (TTI), heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), effective heat of combustion (EHC), total smoke generation (TSP), and specific extinction area (SEA) can be obtained. Through these data, an objective analysis of the material’s heat release, gas release, and flame-retardant mechanism can be carried out. The curves of HRR, THR, TSP, and mass loss rate (MLR) of FR-POM composites as a function of time are shown in (Figure 9). The characteristic data obtained from the cone calorimetry test are listed in (Table 6).
As shown in Figure 8, P0 was ignited at 43 s, the peak heat release rate (Pk HRR) reached 361.2 kW/m2, and the THR amounted to 140.7 MJ/m2. The HRR curve peaks in a very short time, so the average heat release rate (Av HRR) is as high as 267.6 kW/m2. After the introduction of flame-retardant additives, the ignition time of all FR-POM was significantly earlier than that of P0, probably due to the decomposition of IFR at high temperatures to perform its flame-retardant effect and lead to the earlier decomposition time of FR-POM composites.
The flame-retardant effect of IFR is very effective and significant. The Pk HRR value of P1 is only 124.6 kW/m2, and the THR value is only 107.9 kW/m2. Compared with P0, the Pk HRR and THR of P1 are decreased by 65.5% and 23.3%, respectively. In addition, because of the prolonged burning time, the Av HRR value of P1 decreased by 77.6%. The HRR value characterizes the heat release rate per second of the material and is closely related to the total heat released (THR) during the combustion process. Obviously, the higher the HRR and THR of the material, the higher the fire risk.
After using Ti-IFR instead of general IFR, the Pk HRR and the mean effective heat of combustion (mean EHC) of P2 decreased by 16.3% and 8.1%, respectively, compared with that of P1, but both Av HRR and THR increased slightly. Moreover, the specific extinction area (SEA) increased by 81.4%, the total smoke emission (TSP) of P2 is 2.1 times that of P1, while the amount of carbon residue is 0.8 times of P1, which fully shows that Ti-IFR plays a flame-retardant role more in the gas phase than IFR.
Compared with P1, the Pk HRR of P3 decreased by 19.5%, and its Av HRR and THR also decreased a little. Meanwhile, the mean EHC was basically unchanged, and SEA increased slightly. In addition, the amount of residual carbon of P3 is two times that of P1, but the total smoke emission is almost the same. It is proved that the flame-retardant effect was exerted mainly in the condensed phase. It is the large amount of carbon residue that effectively isolates the contact between the combustible gas inside the matrix, oxygen, and the external heat so that the combustion process tends to stagnate.
P2 and P3 show different flame-retardant mechanisms. The former with Ti-IFR further strengthens the gas phase flame retardant effect of IFR, while the latter with CaCO3 further improves the condensed phase flame retardant effect. In order to enhance both gas phase and condensed phase performance at the same time, Ti-IFR was compounded with CaCO3 to flame retardant POM. As a result, the Pk HRR, Av HRR and THR values of P4 decreased by 75.8%, 81.1%, and 35.3% compared to pure POM, respectively. The flame-retardant effect is far better than P1, P2, and P3. Its mean EHC was slightly decreased, and the SEA was increased compared with P3, indicating a gas phase flame retardant mechanism. Moreover, compared with P2, the mean EHC of P4 was basically unchanged, the SEA and TSP were significantly reduced, and the amount of carbon residue was increased by 2.6 times, which is an obvious condensed phase flame retardant mechanism. Therefore, P4 achieves an excellent effect by combining two flame retardant mechanisms that enhance simultaneously.
Like P4, P5 has excellent flame retardancy which uses PN-201 modified CaCO3 (Ti-CaCO3) and Ti-IFR to synergize flame retardant POM. Its Pk HRR, Av HRR, and THR decreased by 73.3%, 75.4%, and 16% compared with pure POM, respectively. However, its flame-retardant properties are slightly lower than P4, although it is better than other samples. The amount of residual carbon was significantly reduced, and the mean EHC was increased indicating that the condensed phase flame retardancy is restrained after loading Ti-CaCO3. It may be because of the addition of Ti-CaCO3 that the content of PN-201 in the system increased slightly as a whole breaking the original equilibrium ratio of the gas phase and condensed phase, resulting in a decrease in synergy.

3.5. Carbon Layer Analysis of FR-POM Composites

In order to further analyze the integrity and strength of the carbon layer, the surface carbon layer of the FR-POM composite after cone calorimetry was analyzed by digital photographs, field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS) [42,43,44]. Digital photos, SEM pictures and LRS spectra are shown in (Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12) respectively.
Composites with IFR generate large amounts of gas during combustion due to the presence of blowing agents. If the carbon layer has good compactness and high strength, it is difficult for all the gases to break through and will inevitably expand. Therefore, the expansion height of the residual carbon can often preliminarily judge the strength and compactness of the carbon layer, as well as the flame-retardant performance [45]. As shown in the digital photo of carbon residue in Figure 10, pure POM has almost no carbon residue. After adding flame retardant filler, the carbon residue increases significantly, especially for the sample added with calcium carbonate. Ti-IFR furthers the flame-retardant performance in the gas phase, so the carbon layer of P2 is a little fragmented with no obvious difference from that of P1. While P3, P4, and P5 added with CaCO3 mainly act in the condensed phase, their carbon layers are obviously denser and higher than P1. P4 and P5 have the best flame-retardant properties in CONE due to the synergistic effect which is also reflected in digital photos in terms of carbon layer strength, swelling height, and compactness.
The digital photos of carbon residues are used to preliminarily judge the strength and compactness of the carbon layer from the macroscopic point of view, while the SEM photos are observed from the microscopic point of view. In the observed field of SEM image as shown in Figure 11, there are many pores in the carbon layer of P1, accompanied by a few cracks. P2 shows a fragmented carbon layer like P1, but basically has no holes and still has a certain degree of compactness. It may be related to its gas phase flame retardant mechanism. The carbon layer of P3 is much denser than that mentioned above, with very few cracks and sporadic holes in the field of view. This is closely related to its condensed phase flame retardant mechanism. In the field of view of P4, there are basically no holes and cracks, and the surface of the carbon layer is smooth and flat, which is consistent with the results of its flame-retardant properties. The carbon layer of P5 has a few holes, but basically no cracks.
The LRS of the carbon layer mainly shows two peak positions. As shown in Figure 12, one is around 1350 cm−1 (D peak), which represents lattice defects in the disordered carbon structure. The other is around 1580 cm−1 (G peak), representing the sp2 hybridization of the ordered carbon structure with in-plane stretching vibrations. The graphitization degree of the carbon layer is usually indicated by the peak area ratio (ID/IG) of the D peak to the G peak. Obviously, the smaller the ID/IG value, the higher the degree of graphitization of the carbon layer, which is more beneficial for the surface carbon layer to resist flame burning [46]. The ID/IG values of P1 and P2 are 0.72 and 0.75 with little difference indicating that Ti-IFR has no contribution to the degree of graphitization of the carbon layer. While the ID/IG values of P3, P4, and P5 are significantly lower than that of P1 and P2. This demonstrates that CaCO3, whether modified or not, can improve the degree of graphitization of the carbon layer. Especially, P4 has the highest degree of graphitization with the smallest ID/IG value of 0.57 among all the samples, which is consistent with its flame-retardant performance.
From the FTIR spectrum of the carbon layer (Figure 13), it can be clearly found that the residual carbon spectra mainly include the absorption peak of OH (3431 cm−1), C=O (1630 cm−1), P-O (1184 cm−1) and P=O symmetric stretching vibration (985 cm−1). P0 has obvious -OH and C=O peaks at 3431 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1. As to the FR-POM samples, their FTIR spectrum is very similar. APP in the additives can produce metaphosphoric acid and pyrophosphoric acid compounds at high temperatures, which catalyzed the ring-opening polymerization of the BOZ carbon agent but also promoted the dehydration and carbonization of the matrix. Thus, significantly weakened the -OH and C=O peaks of P1-P5, and enhanced the absorption peaks of P-O and P=O. After adding CaCO3, the peak at around 1184 cm−1 of P3–P5 decreased obviously and became a broad one, which is different from that of P1 and P2. It indicated that CaCO3 participates in the formation of the carbon layer and changes the mechanism of carbon formation. The reason may be due to the degradation of CaCO3 to CaO at high temperatures, which acts as a strong alkaline catalyst to promote the esterification and cross-linking reaction resulting in a high-quality carbon layer.
The EDS data in (Table 7) reveal the main components of the expanded carbon layer. The stable and dense expanded carbon layer is mainly formed by the elements of C, N, O, P, and Ca. The carbon-to-oxygen ratios (C/O) of the carbon layer on the surface of P1-5 are all around 0.5 and greatly lower than their corresponding inner carbon layer. This is because the carbon layer on the surface burns more fully in contact with the flame with a higher oxidation degree to form a more heat-resistant and high-temperature-resistant oxide to protect the inner carbon layer from being burned. The change in the C/O ratio of the inner carbon layer of all samples strongly proves this point. P4 has the best flame-retardant performance, and its surface carbon layer has strong compactness. Therefore, the protection of the inner carbon layer is the best, the C/O of the inner carbon layer is 2.7, and the degree of oxidation is extremely low. In addition, no Ti element was detected in all samples, probably due to the fact that it mainly functions in the gas phase and is used in a very small amount.

3.6. Gaseous Products Analysis

The TG-IR combination method was used to obtain information on gas volatiles in FR-POM composite as a function of temperature. The 3D spectra of P0 and P4 are shown in (Figure 14). Since the temperature range of the TG test is 25–800 °C, and the heating rate is 10 °C/min. Therefore, the relationship between time and temperature in Figure 14 is:
T e = 1 60 t i × 10 + 25
(Te refers to temperature and ti refers to time).
It can be found from the 3D figure that the types of gas volatiles of P0 and P4 composites are basically the same in the nitrogen atmosphere. Mainly carbonyl compounds (CH2O, 1715 cm−1, and 1773 cm−1), aliphatic lipids (1745 cm−1), and hydrocarbon groups such as methyl and ethyl groups (2801–2924 cm−1). The results show that FR-POM composites crack mainly in the form of formaldehyde and various small molecular chain alkanes under the condition of high temperatures without oxygen. In addition, the absorption peaks of C-O (1161 cm−1), the symmetric stretching vibration of -CH3 (1320 cm−1), the skeleton stretching vibration of aromatic hydrocarbons (1458–1532 cm−1), and the absorption of N-H (3468 cm−1) can still be found in the 3D diagram.
In the air atmosphere, P0 and P4 composites have an obvious CO2 absorption peak (2358 cm−1), which may be due to the participation of oxygen, prompting a part of formaldehyde or small molecular chain alkanes to completely burn, thus producing CO2. Moreover, the CO2 absorption peak of P4 was significantly lower than that of P0 due to the addition of flame retardant. The results show that the addition of flame-retardant leads to incomplete combustion of the material and locks more C in the carbon layer, thus effectively reducing the corrosion of the gas volatiles. In addition, the decomposition is basically the same as that in the nitrogen atmosphere.
The FTIR spectra of FR-POM composites with the maximum release of gas residues are shown in (Figure 15). It can be found that the decomposition of other groups is basically the same as that of P4. All FR-POM composites showed mainly flammable gas release such as aldehydes, hydrocarbons, and lipids, and no typical titanium-containing substances were found, mainly due to the very small proportion of PN-201 in the overall system.

3.7. Flame Retardant Mechanism

Combined with the previous analysis, we put forward the following possible flame-retardant process mechanism. As shown in (Figure 16), when FR-POM composites are continuously exposed to fire or heat sources, the flame-retardant additives begin to take effect mainly in the condensed phase as well as in the gas phase simultaneously.
In the condensed phase, the high temperature makes the surface of the matrix dehydrate and carbonize rapidly, which has a certain protective effect on the interior of the matrix. With the continuous high-temperature erosion, the surface carbon layer will be destroyed, the internal matrix will be affected by the high temperature and the constant release of flammable gas. At this point, the BOZ carbonating agent comes into play. The pyrophosphoric acid and metaphosphate decomposed by APP catalyze the esterification and crosslinking of BOZ, and finally make it become a stable carbon layer with a three-dimensional network structure, which greatly improves the density and strength of the carbon layer, thus blocking the communication channel between the combustible gas in the matrix and the external heat source, and finally interrupts the combustion process [41]. The addition of calcium carbonate further catalyzes BOZ and plays a stronger catalytic carbonization role in the matrix, thus accelerating the formation of the carbon layer.
In the gas phase, the matrix structure is destroyed, and a large number of formats and hydrocarbon-based combustible gases are released, which makes the heat release peak quickly. At the same time, when IFR flame retardant is decomposed by heat, ME quickly decomposes into refractory nitrogen and begins to dilute flammable gas in the gas phase with a large amount of carbon dioxide produced by matrix combustion, thus reducing the intensity of combustion. In addition, TiOxprodued by Ti-APP under high temperature scavenges the high activity free radicals such as H· and HO· bringing the combustion process to a standstill. Thus, a significant flame-retardant performance was achieved (i.e., the gas phase TiO clears the incomplete combustion caused).

4. Conclusions

Titanate coupling agent was successfully loaded onto APP. In addition, Ti-APP is compounded with BOZ and ME to become a new type of intumescent flame retardant (Ti-IFR). Compared with IFR, Ti-IFR can enhance the gas phase flame retardant effect. The UL-94 of POM with Ti-IFR is improved from NR level to V1 level, and the LOI is improved from 46.6% to 51.0% compared with that with IFR. Furthermore, the addition of CaCO3 into the Ti-IFR system exhibits an excellent synergistic flame-retardant effect. The UL-94 test level was raised to V0, and the LOI was raised to 58.2%. At the same time, the cone calorimetry results show that the Pk HRR, Av HRR, and THR are all significantly reduced. Additionally, Ti-IFR can further its gas phase flame retardant performance, while CaCO3 as a synergist promotes the condensed phase flame retardant effect of the system which not only fixed more C in the carbon layer, but also enhanced the quantity of the carbon layer. Therefore, an excellent flame-retardant performance was achieved through the combination of both the condensed phase and the gas phase flame retardant mechanism enhanced simultaneously.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Z.Y.; validation, X.C., S.L. and Z.W.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, S.L. and Z.W.; resources, T.D., Y.X. and X.F.; data curation, Z.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Y.; supervision, B.L.; funding acquisition, B.L. and X.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51703051) and the project support from Education Department of Henan Province (grant number 21A430005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akhmedov, F.A.; Koltunov, M.A.; Kozlov, P.V. The mechanical properties of polyformaldehyde. Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R 1966, 8, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lüftl, S.; Visakh, P.M.; Chandran, S. Polyoxymethylene Handbook: Structure, Properties, Applications and Their Nanocomposites; John Wiley Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Heym, M. Polyamide, polyester und polyoxymethylen. Die klassischen technischen kunststoffe und ihre perspektiven. Die Angew. Makromol.Chem. Appl. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1997, 244, 67–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hilado, C.J. Flammability Handbook for Plastics; Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  5. Busse, W.F.; Bruner, W.M. Flame Retardant Polyoxymethylene Composition. U.S. Patent 3,485,793, 23 December 1969. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Flame retardant polyoxymethylene with aluminium hydroxide/melamine/novolac resin syner-gistic system. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patil, C.B.; Kapadi, U.R.; Hundiwale, D.G.; Mahulikar, P.P. Effect of Nano–Magnesium Hydroxide on Mechanical and Flame-Retarding Properties of SBR and PBR: A Comparative Study. Polym. Technol. Eng. 2008, 47, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramazani, S.A.; Rahimi, A.; Frounchi, M.; Radman, S. Investigation of flame retardancy and physical–mechanical properties of zinc borate and aluminum hydroxide propylene composites. Mater. Des. 2008, 29, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liepins, R.; Pearce, E.M. Chemistry and toxicity of flame retardants for plastics. Environ. Health Perspect. 1976, 17, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Green, J. Mechanisms for flame retardancy and smoke suppression-a review. J. Fire Sci. 1996, 14, 426–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harashina, H.; Tajima, Y.; Itoh, T. Synergistic effect of red phosphorus, novolac and melamine ternary combination on flame retardancy of poly(oxymethylene). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 1996–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wilén, C.E.; Pfaendner, R. Design and utilization of nitrogen containing flame retardants based on N-alkoxyamines, azoalkanes and related compounds. Polym. Green Flame Retard. 2014, 267–288. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fei, G.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Synergistic effects of novolac-based char former with magnesium hydroxide in flame retardant polyamide-6. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2008, 93, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, X.; Liang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Hai, Y.; Zhong, X.; Xiao, S.; Jiang, S. Influence of phytic acid on flame retardancy and adhesion performance enhancement of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel coating to wood substrate. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 161, 106453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wagner, J.; Deglmann, P.; Fuchs, S.; Ciesielski, M.; Fleckenstein, C.A.; Döring, M. A flame retardant synergism of organic disulfides and phosphorous compounds. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 129, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiao, C.; Zhang, C.; Dong, J.; Chen, X.; Qian, Y.; Li, S. Combustion behavior and thermal pyrolysis kinetics of flame-retardant epoxy composites based on organic–inorganic intumescent flame retardant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 119, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bhoite, S.P.; Kim, J.; Jo, W.; Bhoite, P.H.; Mali, S.S.; Park, K.-H.; Hong, C.-K. Expanded Polystyrene Beads Coated with Intumescent Flame Retardant Material to Achieve Fire Safety Standards. Polymers 2021, 13, 2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shiu, B.C.; Wu, K.; Lou, C.W.; Lin, Q.; Lin, J.H. Synthesis of a Compound Phosphorus-Nitrogen Intumescent Flame Retardant for Appli-cations to Raw Lacquer. Polymers 2021, 13, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q. Effects of magnesium hydroxide and its synergistic systems on the flame retardance of polyformaldehyde. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 125, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, W.; Zeng, Z.; He, Z.; Liang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Song, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, R. A highly efficient melamine/red phosphorus flame retardant for polyurethane-based foams. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 140, e53546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, B.-R.; Hu, X.-M.; Cheng, W.-M.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Wang, W.; Liang, Y.-T.; Liu, T.-Y.; Feng, Y.; Xue, D. A novel intumescent flame-retardant to inhibit the spontaneous combustion of coal. Fuel 2021, 297, 120768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Gu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, S. Improving flame retardant and mechanical properties of ethylene–vinyl acetate by cured compound silicone decorated magnesium hydroxide. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 2243–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mostashari, S.M.; Fayyaz, F. A Combination of Red Phosphorus-Zinc Chloride for Flame-Retardancy of a Cotton Fabric. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2007, 57, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, Y.; Zhou, R.; Mu, J.; Ding, Y.; Jiang, J. Synergistic flame retardancy of linear low-density polyethylene with surface modified intumescent flame retardant and zinc borate. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 640, 128400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kundu, C.K.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. Chitosan-metal oxide nanoparticle hybrids in developing bi-functional polyamide 66 textiles with enhanced flame retardancy and wettability. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Daimatsu, K.; Sugimoto, H.; Kato, Y.; Nakanishi, E.; Inomata, K.; Amekawa, Y.; Takemura, K. Preparation and physical properties of flame retardant acrylic resin containing nano-sized aluminum hydroxide. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Merk, V.; Chanana, M.; Gaan, S.; Burgert, I. Mineralization of wood by calcium carbonate insertion for improved flame retardancy. Holzforschung 2016, 70, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhou, X.; Yu, R.; Jiang, J.; Dang, J.; Luan, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, M. PEEK composite resin with enhanced intumescent flame retardancy loaded with Octa-phenylsilsesquioxane and nano calcium carbonate and its application in fibers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022, 202, 110042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deodhar, S.; Shanmuganathan, K.; Fan, Q.; Wilkie, C.A.; Costache, M.C.; Dembsey, N.A.; Patra, P.K. Calcium carbonate and ammonium polyphosphate-based flame retardant composition for polypropylene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 120, 1866–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hermansson, A.; Hjertberg, T.; Sultan, B.Å. Distribution of calcium carbonate and silicone elastomer in a flame retardant system based on ethylene–acrylate copolymer, chalk and silicone elastomer and its effect on flame retardant properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 2085–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Yu, J.; Guo, S.; Lu, S.; Luo, Z.; He, M. Surface modification of magnesium hydroxide and its application in flame retardant polypro-pylene composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, L.Y.; Zhu, B.; Cai, X.; Wang, Y.W.; Han, R.H.; Li, Y.W. Review of Polymer Surface Modification Method. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 852, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chang, S.; Xie, T.; Yang, G. Interfacial modification of high impact polystyrene magnesium hydroxide composites effects on flame retardancy properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W.; Peng, Y.; Dong, Y.; Wang, K.; Li, J.; Zhang, W. Effect of coupling agent modified intumescent flame retardant on the mechanical properties, thermal degradation behavior, and flame retardancy of wood-flour/polypropylene composites. Polym. Compos. 2016, 39, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, Z.; Feng, W.; Kang, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Fang, X. Flame retardant effect and mechanism of benzoxazine as synergist in intumescent flame-retardant polyoxymethylene. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020, 31, 2512–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nair, M.N.R.; Thomas, G.V.; Nair, M.R.G. Thermogravimetric analysis of PVC/ELNR blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, X.; Ma, X.; Zhu, L. Fabrication of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) biocomposite reinforced wood fiber modified with mixed coupling agents CS-201 and KH550. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 164, 113352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, J.; Lian, B.; Ling, H. Induction of Calcium Carbonate by Bacillus cereus. Geomicrobiol. J. 2013, 30, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Xie, H. Synergistic effect of strontium stannate and ammonium polyphosphate on flame-retardant and smoke-suppressant of flexible polyurethane foam. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2021, 26, 517–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dasari, A.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Cai, G.-P.; Mai, Y.-W. Recent developments in the fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1357–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Z.; Kang, X.; Lu, S.; Wang, Z.; Fang, X.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Ding, T.; Xu, Y. Synergistic effects of molybdenum disulfide on a novel intumescent flame retardant polyformaldehyde system. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 140, e53385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, H.; Bai, H.; Zhang, G.; Guo, F.; Jiang, W. Preparation and anti-migration performance of ethylene propylene diene terpolymer composites modified with GO-SiO2 hybrid nanomaterials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, G.; Guo, F.; Jiang, W. Anti-migration performance of EPDM composite improved by octadecylamine-functionalized graphene oxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, e52713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, G.; Guo, F.; Jiang, W. EPDM/GO composite insulation for anti-migration of plasticizers. J. Polym. Res. 2022, 29, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bourbigot, S.; Le Bras, M.; Duquesne, S.; Rochery, M. Recent advances for intumescent polymers. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2004, 289, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, D.; Zhao, W.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ji, P. Influence of the Chemical Structure on the Flame Retardant Mechanism and Mechanical Properties of Flame-Retardant Epoxy Resin Thermosets. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022, 307, 2200169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 00537 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of commercial APP (a) and CaCO3 (b).
Figure 1. SEM images of commercial APP (a) and CaCO3 (b).
Polymers 15 00537 g001
Polymers 15 00537 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structure of a novel charring-forming agent (BOZ).
Figure 2. Chemical structure of a novel charring-forming agent (BOZ).
Polymers 15 00537 g002
Polymers 15 00537 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanism of modified APP and CaCO3.
Figure 3. Mechanism of modified APP and CaCO3.
Polymers 15 00537 g003
Polymers 15 00537 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the preparation process of modified APP and CaCO3.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the preparation process of modified APP and CaCO3.
Polymers 15 00537 g004
Polymers 15 00537 g005 550
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis of modified APP and CaCO3 (a) is TG curve and (b) is DTG curve).
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis of modified APP and CaCO3 (a) is TG curve and (b) is DTG curve).
Polymers 15 00537 g005
Polymers 15 00537 g006 550
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of APP, CaCO3 and their modification.
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of APP, CaCO3 and their modification.
Polymers 15 00537 g006
Polymers 15 00537 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD spectra of APP, CaCO3 and their modification.
Figure 7. XRD spectra of APP, CaCO3 and their modification.
Polymers 15 00537 g007
Polymers 15 00537 g008 550
Figure 8. TG and DTG curves of FR-POM composites under N2 (a,b) and AIR (c,d) atmospheres.
Figure 8. TG and DTG curves of FR-POM composites under N2 (a,b) and AIR (c,d) atmospheres.
Polymers 15 00537 g008
Polymers 15 00537 g009 550
Figure 9. HRR, THR, TSP, and mass loss rate curves of FR-POM composites.
Figure 9. HRR, THR, TSP, and mass loss rate curves of FR-POM composites.
Polymers 15 00537 g009
Polymers 15 00537 g010 550
Figure 10. Digital photo of carbon layer after cone calorimetry test.
Figure 10. Digital photo of carbon layer after cone calorimetry test.
Polymers 15 00537 g010
Polymers 15 00537 g011 550
Figure 11. SEM image of surface carbon layer.
Figure 11. SEM image of surface carbon layer.
Polymers 15 00537 g011
Polymers 15 00537 g012 550
Figure 12. Raman analysis image of surface carbon layer.
Figure 12. Raman analysis image of surface carbon layer.
Polymers 15 00537 g012
Polymers 15 00537 g013 550
Figure 13. FTIR spectra of residual carbon after cone test.
Figure 13. FTIR spectra of residual carbon after cone test.
Polymers 15 00537 g013
Polymers 15 00537 g014 550
Figure 14. TG-IR 3D diagrams of P0 and P4 composites in N2 and AIR atmospheres, respectively.
Figure 14. TG-IR 3D diagrams of P0 and P4 composites in N2 and AIR atmospheres, respectively.
Polymers 15 00537 g014
Polymers 15 00537 g015 550
Figure 15. Total decomposition FTIR spectra of FR-POM composites in N2 and AIR atmospheres, respectively.
Figure 15. Total decomposition FTIR spectra of FR-POM composites in N2 and AIR atmospheres, respectively.
Polymers 15 00537 g015
Polymers 15 00537 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of flame retardancy mechanism of FR-POM.
Figure 16. Schematic diagram of flame retardancy mechanism of FR-POM.
Polymers 15 00537 g016
Table
Table 1. Formulation and nomenclature of flame-retardant composites.
Table 1. Formulation and nomenclature of flame-retardant composites.
Sample CodesCompositionPOMIFR (APP)Ti-IFR (Ti-APP)CaCO3Ti-CaCO3Antioxidant
P0POM99.500000.5
P1POM/IFR69.5300000.5
P2POM/Ti-IFR69.5030000.5
P3POM/IFR/CaCO369.5290100.5
P4POM/Ti-IFR/CaCO369.5029100.5
P5POM/Ti-IFR/Ti-CaCO369.5029010.5
Table
Table 2. Thermogravimetric data of modified APP and CaCO3.
Table 2. Thermogravimetric data of modified APP and CaCO3.
SamplesT-5%/°CT-10%/°CTmax/°CResidue (800 °C)/%
APP313.4345.4327.0/604.3 *45.2
Ti-APP324.2357.6337.5/630.5 *31.5
CaCO3638.1671.5731.555.2
Ti-CaCO3301.7650.3298.7/752.9 *53.8
Note: T-5% and T-10% represent the temperature at 5% and 10% weight loss, respectively; Tmax stands for maximum weight loss rate temperature; “*” represents the maximum weight loss rate temperature during the multi-stage weight loss process of the sample.
Table
Table 3. UL-94 and LOI performance data of FR-POM composites.
Table 3. UL-94 and LOI performance data of FR-POM composites.
SamplesDrippingUL-94RatingLOI
T1/sT2/sT10/s
P0Yes---NR15
P1No0.342.6214.8NR46.6
P2No0.323.4118.5V151.0
P3No0.223.7119.2V153.6
P4No0.37.438.4V058.2
P5No0.67.239.3V056.8
Note: T1 and T2 represent the mean values of the first and second ignition times, respectively; T10 is the total time of ten fires.
Table
Table 4. Thermogravimetric data of FR-POM composites under nitrogen atmosphere.
Table 4. Thermogravimetric data of FR-POM composites under nitrogen atmosphere.
Samples (N2)T-5%/°CT-10%/°CTmax/°CResidue (800 °C)/%
P0233.1248.8298.00.4
P1254.1254.2258.415.2
P2253.6254.6260.117.1
P3252.5253.8259.714.0
P4254.6255.6261.118.2
P5254.4255.1260.117.5
Table
Table 5. Thermogravimetric data of FR-POM composites in AIR atmosphere.
Table 5. Thermogravimetric data of FR-POM composites in AIR atmosphere.
Samples (AIR)T-5%/°CT-10%/°CTmax/°CResidue (800 °C)/%
P0233.2248.0292.40.7
P1254.2254.9260.88.7
P2251.5252.5258.210.7
P3252.3254.3261.29.8
P4254.0254.7260.913.4
P5252.2252.4259.812.8
Table
Table 6. Cone calorimetric characteristic data of FR-POM composites.
Table 6. Cone calorimetric characteristic data of FR-POM composites.
SamplesP0P1P2P3P4P5
TTI(s)432527282724
Pk HRR(kW/m2)361.2124.6104.3100.387.396.4
Av HRR(kW/m2)267.660.064.558.750.565.7
Pk HRR/TTI(kW/(m2·s))8.45.03.93.63.24.0
THR(MJ/m2)140.7107.9116.3105.891.1118.2
Mean EHC(MJ/kg)15.614.913.715.114.016.1
SEA(m2/kg)1.958.2105.663.476.164.1
Av MLR(g/(m2·s))17.24.04.73.93.64.1
TSP(m2)03.77.93.94.44.2
Residue(wt%)06.75.513.414.511.9
Table
Table 7. EDS data of surface carbon layer and inner carbon layer.
Table 7. EDS data of surface carbon layer and inner carbon layer.
SamplesC/%N/%O/%P/%Ca/%Ti/%C/O
P127.7 (44.7)0 (4.4)59.9 (43.7)12.4 (7.2)0 (0)0 (0)0.5 (1.0)
P223.7 (54.1)0 (4.9)63.0 (34.7)13.3 (6.3)0 (0)0 (0)0.4 (1.6)
P329.2 (51.2)10.2 (18.3)52.2 (27.8)8.1 (2.6)0.3 (0.1)0 (0)0.6 (1.8)
P428.7 (61.2)0 (11.0)59.6 (22.9)11.5 (4.8)0.2 (0.1)0 (0)0.5 (2.7)
P523.3 (49.5)0 (11.2)63.1 (33.2)12.9 (5.9)0.7 (0.2)0 (0)0.4 (1.5)
Note: A (B) indicates that data A was obtained from the surface of residual carbon, while data B was from the bottom of carbon layer.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; Lu, S.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Fang, X.; Ding, T.; Xu, Y. Synergistic Flame Retardant Properties of Polyoxymethylene with Surface Modified Intumescent Flame Retardant and Calcium Carbonate. Polymers 2023, 15, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030537

AMA Style

Yang Z, Chen X, Lu S, Wang Z, Li J, Liu B, Fang X, Ding T, Xu Y. Synergistic Flame Retardant Properties of Polyoxymethylene with Surface Modified Intumescent Flame Retardant and Calcium Carbonate. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Zheng, Xueting Chen, Shike Lu, Zhenhua Wang, Jiantong Li, Baoying Liu, Xiaomin Fang, Tao Ding, and Yuanqing Xu. 2023. "Synergistic Flame Retardant Properties of Polyoxymethylene with Surface Modified Intumescent Flame Retardant and Calcium Carbonate" Polymers 15, no. 3: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop