Next Article in Journal
A Novel Polymer Inclusion Membrane-Based Green Optical Sensor for Selective Determination of Iron: Design, Characterization, and Analytical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Properties of a Novel Levulinic Acid-Based Environmental Auxiliary Plasticizer for Poly(vinyl chloride)
Previous Article in Journal
Dielectric and Structural Properties of the Hybrid Material Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Bacterial Nanocellulose-Based Composite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Additive Free Crosslinking of Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate via Electron Beam Irradiation at Elevated Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Synthesis of Polymers with Narrow Molecular Mass Distribution through Interface-Initiated Room-Temperature Polymerization in Emulsion Gels

Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2023, 15(20), 4081; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15204081
Submission received: 15 September 2023 / Revised: 28 September 2023 / Accepted: 6 October 2023 / Published: 13 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modifications and Applications of Natural Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
Homopolymers of n-butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, styrene, and their random copolymers were prepared via interface-initiated polymerization of emulsion gels at 20 °C. The polymerization was conducted in a free radical polymerization manner without inert gas protection. Compared with the polymers synthesized at 60 °C, the polymerization of emulsion gels at 20 °C produced homo- and copolymers with a higher molecular mass and a narrower molecular mass distribution. The polydispersity indices for the polymers synthesized at 20 °C were found to be between 1.12 and 1.37. The glass transition temperatures for the as-synthesized butyl acrylate copolymers agree well with the prediction from the Gordon–Taylor equation. Interface-initiated room-temperature polymerization is a robust, energy-saving polymerization technique for synthesizing polymers with a narrow molecular mass distribution.

1. Introduction

Polymerization in emulsion systems is an important technique used to produce polymers, latexes, composites, and porous materials [1,2,3,4]. At least 20 million tons of polymer materials are produced via emulsion techniques worldwide each year [2]. Usually, emulsion polymerization is conducted at elevated temperatures (60 °C or above) in order for sufficient numbers of radicals to form through thermal decomposition of initiators. However, high-temperature polymerization destabilizes colloidal structures and consumes tremendous amounts of energy [1,5,6]. With the Paris Agreement, conducting polymerization at room temperature became a key criterion for green polymer industries [6,7]. Additionally, conducting polymerization at high temperatures is not suitable for a system consisting of temperature-sensitive molecules, such as proteins [8,9].
Room-temperature polymerization can be achieved through several initiation methods. For example, 2,2′-azobis(4-methoxy-2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile), a low-temperature initiator, decomposes at 30 °C with a half-life of 10 h [10]. Low-temperature initiators require strict regulations and safety measurements as they may explode accidentally under ambient conditions. Redox initiators can initiate polymerization at room temperature efficiently, but metal complexes are usually required [11,12,13,14]. Photo and γ-radiation are also used for initiating polymerization at room temperature [9,15,16], but they are limited by production scale and may not work for some systems [17]. The interfaces in emulsions were found to lower the activation energy for initiator decomposition, consequently initiating polymerization at room temperature [1,18]. Interface initiation does not require hazardous compounds or additional devices to conduct room-temperature polymerization in an emulsion system. Therefore, interface initiation is considered an efficient eco-friendly technique for room-temperature polymerizations.
When producing a high-performance polymer, a narrow molecular mass distribution is desired [19]. Currently, narrow molecular mass distribution is mainly achieved through controlled free radical polymerizations or living radical polymerizations [20,21,22]. Compared with free radical polymerization, the experimental requirement and costs for conducting living radical polymerization are remarkably high [21]. A robust, energy-efficient, and cost-effective technique for producing polymers with a narrow molecular mass distribution is important for green polymer industries.
Herein, we report using emulsion gels as polymerization media to produce vinyl homopolymers and copolymers with a narrow molecular mass distribution at room temperature (20 °C). The room-temperature polymerization was achieved through the thermal decomposition of 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) at emulsion interfaces [1]. For comparison, the polymers synthesized in emulsion gels at 60 °C were also characterized as demonstrated in Figure 1. This work not only demonstrates the effectiveness of conducting room-temperature polymerization in emulsion systems but also provides a cost-effective technique for producing polymers with a narrow molecular mass distribution.

2. Results and Discussion

Increasing emulsion viscosity stabilizes oil–water interfaces, which enhances interface initiation at room temperature [1,23]. Emulsion gels were obtained by adding fumed silica particles into emulsions. Chain-like fumed silica particles bridged monomer-dispersed phases in emulsions to form a three-dimensional network, leading to gelation in emulsions or emulsion gels [5,24]. All the emulsions used in this study were in their gel state, as seen in Figure 2. Different monomers did not affect the gel stability with the compositions used in this study. The emulsion gels remained stable without phase separation for weeks in ambient conditions.
The polymerizations of emulsion gels at 20 °C and 60 °C were conducted as free radical polymerization without inert gas protection. Initiator AIBN decomposed efficiently at emulsion interfaces at 20 °C, consequently initiating polymerization [18,23]. At 60 °C, thermal initiation of AIBN in the bulk phase occurred [1]. A monomer-to-polymer conversion of 70% was reached within 6 h for most of the polymerizations conducted at 60 °C and 5–7 days for those conducted at 20 °C. For n-butyl acrylate (BA), the conversion at 60 °C only reached 50% within 6 h due to the relatively low reactivity of BA [25,26]. Slower polymerizations at 20 °C are likely because only the AIBN molecules at the interfaces are decomposed [1,18,27]. Although AIBN keeps migrating to the interfaces [18], the overall initiation rate at 20 °C is smaller compared with that at 60 °C [23]. A reduced initiation efficiency (<0.4) at 20 °C also contributes to the smaller polymerization rate [28]. The resulting monoliths are white and uniform in their appearance (Figure 2). The nuclear magnetic resonance spectra for the extracted polymers and their tacticity analysis can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
The differences in molecular mass were observed for the extracted polymers synthesized at different temperatures. As seen in Table 1, the weight average molecular masses for poly(butyl acrylate) (PBA), polystyrene (PS), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and butyl acrylate copolymers synthesized at 20 °C are significantly greater than those of their counterparts synthesized at 60 °C. For example, the PBA synthesized at 60 °C is glue-like due to its very small molecular mass of 31 kg/mol. The PBA synthesized at 20 °C has a much greater molecular mass (757 kg/mol) and appears to be a rubbery material with a well-defined shape. The molecular masses and the PDI values for the homo- and copolymers synthesized at 60 °C are in line with those synthesized using conventional free radical polymerizations [29]. This suggests that emulsion gel itself has little effect on polymerizations conducted at high temperatures.
Polymerization in an emulsion system is primarily carried out in micelles. As the combination is the probable termination mechanism [30], the number of propagating chains and their probability of collision within micelles are reduced. Compared with other polymerization techniques, polymers with a higher molecular mass can be produced using emulsion polymerization [2,31]. Based on the decomposition rate constants for the AIBN in emulsion gels (kd ~ 10−8 and 10−6 s−1 at 20 °C and 60 °C, respectively) [23,32,33,34], the concentration of radicals generated at 20 °C is much smaller than that of radicals produced at 60 °C. With a reduced radical concentration, the number of propagating chains is considerably smaller in emulsion gels at 20 °C. Additionally, a highly viscous environment in emulsion gels also decreases polymer chain mobilities as the termination is diffusion-controlled [35,36]. The propagating chains in emulsion gels have a much smaller probability of colliding with each other or terminating at 20 °C. Polymer chains grow to a considerable length until the polymer particles become too large to stabilize [37]. As a result, polymers with a high molecular mass were produced in emulsion gels at 20 °C.
The polydispersity indices (PDIs) for the polymers synthesized at 20 °C were found to be between 1.12 and 1.37, which are in line with those synthesized from living radical polymerizations [38,39]. The GPC traces of the polymers synthesized in emulsion gels are shown in Figure 3 and the Supporting Information. The polymerization in emulsion gels did not proceed in a living radical manner. No known living radical agent was included in the emulsion gels. Only a trace amount of calcium was detected in the fumed silica used in this study, which rules out the possibility that the transition metal impurities alter the kinetics of the polymerization in emulsion gels. The results from inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP) can be found in the Supporting Information. One possible reason for the obtained narrow molecular mass distribution may be the less pronounced side reactions at 20 °C. For example, β-scission and intramolecular transfer can alter the structure and the chain length of the resulting polymers at high temperatures [30,40]. These side effects are greatly reduced at 20 °C because of their high activation energies [30].
Low polymerization temperature should not be considered as the only reason contributing to narrow distribution. Room-temperature interface-initiated polymerization in emulsions without fumed silica produced the PS with a PDI value around 3~4 [5]. Similar results were also reported for room-temperature emulsion polymerization initiated by photo- or redox initiators, where PDI values of 2~12 were observed for PS and butyl acrylate copolymers [31,41,42]. Similar to the reason leading to high molecular masses, the relatively small radical concentrations from the interface initiation and the high viscosity in the emulsion gels greatly reduce the probability of chain termination.
The stability of silica gels increases as the temperature decreases [43]. The propagating chains can grow without early termination until the polymer particles reach their critical size for super swelling [37]. Once the critical size has been reached, the polymer particles are no longer stable in emulsion gels and tend to precipitate. As the number of the propagating chains is considerably small in the polymerization of emulsion gels at 20 °C, most of the polymer chains reach their maximum lengths and consequently produce a narrower molecular mass distribution. In sum, the narrow molecular mass distribution of the polymers synthesized in emulsion gels at 20 °C is the result of synergistic effects from a low temperature, small radical concentration, and high viscosity.
The role of fumed silica particles in the polymerization of emulsion gels is somewhat complicated. On the one hand, fumed silica induces gelation and stabilizes the oil–water interfaces in emulsion gels [5,44,45]. It facilitates AIBN decomposition and reduces the probability of propagating chain collision. On the other hand, the silanol groups on fumed silica surfaces react with radicals [32]. In the presence of silica, the PDI values generally increase for polymers synthesized using bulk polymerization, especially those synthesized via living radical polymerization [46,47,48]. In contrast, the cationic surfactants, e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), can adsorb onto silica surfaces in emulsion gels and block the negatively charged silanol groups [32]. As a result, the side reactions between silanol groups and the propagating chains, which broaden the molecular mass distribution, are minimized in emulsion gels [32].
The glass transition temperatures (Tg) for the extracted polymers were determined from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms. The glass transition temperatures for the polymers synthesized at 20 °C and 60 °C are close to each other (Figure 4b). This suggests that the compositions of the copolymers are less sensitive to polymerization temperature. The reactivity ratios of a monomer are dependent on temperature, i.e., the lower the temperature, the smaller the reactivity ratio [25]. For the monomers used in this study, their reactivity decreased with decreasing temperature at a similar scale [25]. Although the overall polymerization rate decreased, the ratios at which different monomers reacted with a propagating chain remained similar at 20 °C and 60 °C. The compositions of the as-synthesized copolymer and consequently the glass transition temperatures remained similar.
The thermograms for BA-co-styrene copolymer and the respective homopolymers (PBA and PS) synthesized at 20 °C are plotted in Figure 4a. PBA and PS showed a glass transition at −42 °C and 89 °C, respectively. For BA-co-styrene copolymers, the glass transition temperatures gradually increased with increased styrene content in the polymerization. The glass transition temperatures of the copolymers with different compositions are compared with the theoretical results predicted using Gordon–Taylor equation [49], or
T g = T g , B A w B A + K T g , 2 w 2 w B A + K w 2
where Tg,BA and Tg,2 are the glass transition temperatures for the homopolymer of BA and the second monomer (styrene or MMA), respectively. wBA and w2 are the weight fractions for BA and the second monomer in their copolymers, respectively. K is the Gordon–Taylor coefficient, which is related to the volume expansion during glass transition. The value of K is 0.86 for BA-co-styrene copolymers and 0.82 for BA-co-MMA copolymers [50]. The glass transition temperatures of the copolymers generally fit well with the Gordon–Taylor model, as seen in Figure 4b. This suggests that the copolymerization in emulsion gels was conducted similarly to the conventional copolymerizations.

3. Conclusions

We have shown the effectiveness of using interface-initiated polymerization in emulsion gels to produce homo- and copolymers at 20 °C. A low temperature, small radical concentration, and high-viscosity environment lead to the formation of polymers with a high molecular mass and narrow molecular mass distribution. The composition of the resulting copolymers is less sensitive to the polymerization temperature. Polymerization in emulsion gels provides not only an energy-efficient technique but also a robust method of producing polymers with a narrow molecular mass distribution.

4. Experimental Section

Styrene and methyl methacrylate were purchased from Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany, and n-butyl acrylate was obtained from Greagent, Shanghai, China. All monomers were purified by passing them through a base-activated alumina column before use. 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile (Greagent, Shanghai, China) was purified via recrystallization from methanol and dried in a vacuum oven for 12 h to eliminate solvent residue. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (Aldrich, Delhi, India) and fumed silica (Cab-O-Sil M5, Cabot, Inner Mongolia, China) were used as received.
Emulsion gels were prepared using the following procedure: 2.0 mL of monomer, 0.105 g of fumed silica, and 0.04 g of AIBN were mixed in a glass vial first, and then 0.5 mL of 0.5 M CTAB aqueous solution was added. The mixtures were mixed using a vortex mixer for 1 min to form stable emulsion gels. The polymerization of the emulsion gels was conducted in an ambient, dark environment at 20 °C or 60 °C. After the completion of the polymerization, the polymerized samples were dried under ambient conditions and then under vacuum to remove water and unreacted monomers. The conversions were determined by comparing the sample masses before and after the polymerization by subtracting the masses of fumed silica and CTAB.
For polymer extraction, the as-synthesized monoliths were dissolved in toluene. A methanol solution (methanol/deionized water: 85/15 by volume) was used to precipitate polymers from toluene. The extracted polymers were washed with methanol and dried under vacuum before characterization.
The molecular mass and the polydispersity index were measured in tetrahydrofuran using gel permeation chromatography (Waters E2695, Milford, MA, USA) with a Heleos light-scattering detector and a refractive index detector (Optilab rEX, Phoenix, AZ, USA). Differential scanning calorimetry measurements were taken using a DSC 25 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) with a scan rate of 10 °C/min. The thermograms from the second heating procedure were plotted. Inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP) was measured using a Avio 200 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15204081/s1, S1: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra for the polymers synthesized at 20 °C; S2: GPC traces for the polymers synthesized at 20 °C; S3: Composition of fumed silica. Reference [51] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

M.P.D.: data curation, Z.Z.: data curation, T.Z.: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is sponsored by the Kunshan Municipal Government through research funding 23KKSGR026.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Kunshan Municipal Government research fund. The authors also thank Cabot Corporation for providing the fumed silica used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, T.; Xu, G.; Blum, F.D. Eco-friendly room-temperature polymerization in emulsions and beyond. Polym. Rev. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Asua, J.M. Emulsion polymerization: From fundamental mechanisms to process developments. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 1025. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, T.; Sanguramath, R.A.; Israel, S.; Silverstein, M.S. Emulsion templating: Porous polymers and beyond. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 5445. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Y.B.; Sun, B.J.; Hao, Z.W.; Zhang, J.H. Advances in organic-inorganic hybrid latex particles via in situ emulsion polymerization. Polymers 2023, 15, 2995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, T.; Xu, G.; Li, Z.F.; Regev, O.; Maddumaarachchi, M.; Blum, F.D. PS/CTAB/silica composites from room temperature polymerization of high internal phase emulsion gels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 451, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dube, M.A.; Salehpour, S. Applying the principles of green chemistry to polymer production technology. Macromol. React. Eng. 2014, 8, 7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schon, A.; Clarkson, B.R.; Jaime, M.; Freire, E. Temperature stability of proteins: Analysis of irreversible denaturation using isothermal calorimetry. Proteins 2017, 85, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, J.Q.; Bulmus, V.; Herlambang, D.L.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Stenzel, M.H.; Davis, T.P. In situ formation of protein-polymer conjugates through reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamashina, M.; Sei, Y.; Akita, M.; Yoshizawa, M. Safe storage of radical initiators within a polyaromatic nanocapsule. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szekely, A.; Klussmann, M. Molecular radical chain initiators for ambient- to low-temperature applications. Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarac, A.S. Redox polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 1149. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kohut-Svelko, N.; Pirri, R.; Asua, J.M.; Leiza, J.R. Redox initiator systems for emulsion polymerization of acrylates. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jacob, L.I.; Pauer, W.; Schroeter, B. Influence of redox initiator component ratios on the emulsion copolymerisation of vinyl acetate and neodecanoic acid vinyl ester. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 14197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schmitt, M.; Garra, P.; Lalevee, J. Bulk polymerization photo-initiator ZnO: Increasing of the benzoyl formic acid concentration and LED illumination. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2018, 219, 1800208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.Y.; Lian, Q.J.; Xu, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.C.; Zhang, P.F.; Geng, J. Aggregation-induced emission luminogen catalyzed photocontrolled reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization in an aqueous environment. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Watson, M.D.; Fechtenkotter, A.; Mullen, K. Big is beautiful—“Aromaticity” revisited from the viewpoint of macromolecular and supramolecular benzene chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1267. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tauer, K.; Oz, N. Interfacial energy promotes radical heterophase polymerization. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Godwin, A.; Hartenstein, M.; Muller, A.H.E.; Brocchini, S. Narrow molecular weight distribution precursors for polymer-drug conjugates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 594–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Truong, N.P.; Jones, G.R.; Bradford, K.G.E.; Konkolewicz, D.; Anastasaki, A. A comparison of RAFT and ATRP methods for controlled radical polymerization. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021, 5, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rzayev, J.; Penelle, J. HP-RAFT: A free-radical polymerization technique for obtaining living polymers of ultrahigh molecular weights. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nieswandt, K.; Georgopanos, P.; Held, M.; Sperling, E.; Abetz, V. RAFT emulsion polymerization of styrene using a poly((N,N-dimethyl acrylamide)-co-(N-isopropyl acrylamide)) mCTA: Synthesis and thermosensitivity. Polymers 2022, 14, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, G.; Nambiar, R.R.; Blum, F.D. Room-temperature decomposition of 2,2’-azobis(isobutyronitrile) in emulsion gels with and without silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 302, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, T.; Xu, G.; Regev, O.; Blum, F.D. Low-temperature polymerization of methyl methacrylate emulsion gels through surfactant catalysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 461, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chambard, G.; Klumperman, B.; German, A.L. Dependence of chemical composition of styrene/butyl acrylate copolymers on temperature and molecular weight. Polymer 1999, 40, 4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sosnowski, S.; Szymanski, R.; Lorandi, F.; Olszewski, M.; Sobieski, J.; Yin, R.G.; Bockstaller, M.R.; Matyjaszewski, K. Distribution of alternating sequences in methyl methacrylate/n-butyl acrylate copolymers prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 9837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, G.; Blum, F.D. Surfactant-enhanced free radical polymerization of styrene in emulsion gels. Polymer 2008, 49, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buback, M.; Huckestein, B.; Kuchta, F.D.; Russell, G.T.; Schmid, E. Initiator efficiency in 2,2′-azoisobutyronitrile-initiated free-radical polymerizations of styrene. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1994, 195, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lv, C.N.; Du, Y.X.; Pan, X.C. Alkylboranes in Conventional and Controlled Radical Polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ballard, N.; Hamzehlou, S.; Ruiperez, F.; Asua, J.M. On the termination mechanism in the radical polymerization of acrylates. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kruger, K.; Tauer, K.; Yagci, Y.; Moszner, N. Photoinitiated bulk and emulsion polymerization of styrene—Evidence for photo-controlled radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, T.; Blum, F.D. Cationic surfactant blocks radical-inhibiting sites on silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 504, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Charton, N.; Feldermann, A.; Theis, A.; Stenzel, M.H.; Davis, T.P.; Barner-Kowollik, C. Initiator efficiency of 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) in bulk dodecyl acrylate free-radical polymerizations over a wide conversion and molecular weight range. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guan, Z.B.; Combes, J.R.; Menceloglu, Y.Z.; Desimone, J.M. Homogeneous free-radical polymerizations in supercritical carbon-dioxide 2. Thermal-decomposition of 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile). Macromolecules 1993, 26, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burnett, G.M.; Cameron, G.G.; Joiner, S.N. Solvent effects on the free radical polymerization of styrene. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 1973, 69, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakamura, Y.; Ogihara, T.; Hatano, S.; Abe, M.; Yamago, S. Control of the termination mechanism in radical polymerization by viscosity: Selective disproportionation in viscous media. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, Y.; Tsavalas, J.; Schork, F.J. Theoretical aspects of particle swelling in living free radical miniemulsion polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 5501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, J.H.; Yao, H.T.; Ma, J.Z. Recent advances in RAFT-mediated surfactant-free emulsion polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2532. [Google Scholar]
  39. You, Y.Z.; Hong, C.Y.; Bai, R.K.; Pan, C.Y.; Wang, J. Photo-initiated living free radical polymerization in the presence of dibenzyl trithiocarbonate. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, S.; Srinivasan, S.; Grady, M.C.; Soroush, M.; Rappe, A.M. Backbiting and beta-scission reactions in free- radical polymerization of methyl acrylate. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2014, 114, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goikoetxea, M.; Heijungs, R.; Barandiaran, M.J.; Asua, J.M. Energy efficient emulsion polymerization strategies. Macromol. React. Eng. 2008, 2, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lin, J.; Yan, D.; Yuan, C. Non-steady-state model for kinetics of free radical polymerization, 3. Direct photo-initiation. Polym. Int. 1992, 28, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, X.J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, M.B.; Dan, W. A rheological study on temperature dependent microstructural changes of fumed silica gels in dodecane. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 10457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frelichowska, J.; Bolzinger, M.A.; Chevalier, Y. Effects of solid particle content on properties of o/w Pickering emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brown, N.; de la Pena, A.; Razavi, S. Interfacial rheology insights: Particle texture and Pickering foam stability. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, 384002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khezri, K.; Mahdavi, H. Polystyrene-silica aerogel nanocomposites by in situ simultaneous reverse and normal initiation technique for ATRP. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 228, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khezri, K.; Roghani-Mamaqani, H. Effect of MCM-41 nanoparticles on ARGET ATRP of styrene: Investigating thermal properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 49, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Salami-Kalajahi, M.; Haddadi-Asl, V.; Rahimi-Razin, S.; Behboodi-Sadabad, F.; Roghani-Mamaqani, H.; Hemmati, M. Investigating the effect of pristine and modified silica nanoparticles on the kinetics of methyl methacrylate polymerization. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gordon, M.; Taylor, S.J. Ideal copolymers and the second-order transitions of synthetic rubbers. I. non-crystalline copolymers. J. Appl. Chem. 1952, 2, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Penzel, E.; Rieger, J.; Schneider, H.A. The glass transition temperature of random copolymers: 1. Experimental data and the Gordon-Taylor equation. Polymer 1997, 38, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miyake, G.M.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Synthesis of highly syndiotactic polymers by discrete catalysts or initiators. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The structures of styrene, n-butyl acrylate (BA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and their corresponding homopolymers.
Figure 1. The structures of styrene, n-butyl acrylate (BA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and their corresponding homopolymers.
Polymers 15 04081 g001
Figure 2. Appearance of the emulsion gel and the as-synthesized polymer composite monolith.
Figure 2. Appearance of the emulsion gel and the as-synthesized polymer composite monolith.
Polymers 15 04081 g002
Figure 3. The light-scattering detector intensity (solid line) and the refractive index detector intensity (dashed line) obtained from gel permeation chromatography as a function of the elution time for the extracted butyl acrylate-co-styrene 50/50 polymers synthesized at 20 °C and 60 °C.
Figure 3. The light-scattering detector intensity (solid line) and the refractive index detector intensity (dashed line) obtained from gel permeation chromatography as a function of the elution time for the extracted butyl acrylate-co-styrene 50/50 polymers synthesized at 20 °C and 60 °C.
Polymers 15 04081 g003
Figure 4. (a) Differential scanning calorimetry thermogram of the BA-co-styrene copolymers synthesized at 20 °C; (b) glass transition temperatures of the BA-co-styrene and BA-co-MMA copolymers.
Figure 4. (a) Differential scanning calorimetry thermogram of the BA-co-styrene copolymers synthesized at 20 °C; (b) glass transition temperatures of the BA-co-styrene and BA-co-MMA copolymers.
Polymers 15 04081 g004
Table 1. The molecular mass and polydispersity index (PDI) of the extracted polymers from emulsion gels.
Table 1. The molecular mass and polydispersity index (PDI) of the extracted polymers from emulsion gels.
Polymer20 °C60 °C
Mw (kg/mol)PDIMw (kg/mol)PDI
PBA7571.26312.46
PS16611.371722.04
PMMA6741.121083.86
Butyl acrylate-co-styrene 50/5018071.17963.06
Butyl acrylate-co-MMA 50/508881.252571.96
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, M.P.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, T. Synthesis of Polymers with Narrow Molecular Mass Distribution through Interface-Initiated Room-Temperature Polymerization in Emulsion Gels. Polymers 2023, 15, 4081. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15204081

AMA Style

Duan MP, Zhou Z, Zhang T. Synthesis of Polymers with Narrow Molecular Mass Distribution through Interface-Initiated Room-Temperature Polymerization in Emulsion Gels. Polymers. 2023; 15(20):4081. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15204081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Miles Pamueles, Zhirong Zhou, and Tan Zhang. 2023. "Synthesis of Polymers with Narrow Molecular Mass Distribution through Interface-Initiated Room-Temperature Polymerization in Emulsion Gels" Polymers 15, no. 20: 4081. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15204081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop