Next Article in Journal
Incorporating Graphene Nanoplatelets and Carbon Nanotubes in Biobased Poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate): Fillers’ Effect on the Matrix’s Structure and Lifetime
Next Article in Special Issue
CVD Deposited Epoxy Copolymers as Protective Coatings for Optical Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfated Polysaccharides from Macroalgae—A Simple Roadmap for Chemical Characterization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultra-High-Capacity Lithium Metal Batteries Based on Multi-Electron Redox Reaction of Organopolysulfides including Conductive Organic Moieties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plasma Surface Engineering of Natural and Sustainable Polymeric Derivatives and Their Potential Applications

Department of Material Science and Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(2), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020400
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023

Abstract

:

Highlights

  • The article reviewed plasma research on natural fiber functionalization and sustainable polymeric derivatives in the last two decades.
  • The article highlighted various plasma processes: functionalization, ablation, ion implantation, grafting, and polymerization, with special emphasis on natural fiber materials.
  • The review article focused on plasma-modified sustainable materials’ application in heavy metal remediation, water purification, biomedical applications, packaging materials, and sensor applications.
  • Plasma processing employed fortuitously to alter the natural fibers and sustainable polymeric derivatives for potential applications reducing the environmentally hazardous chemicals.
  • The revamped surface properties such as hydrophilicity, adhesion, and surface energy of the materials by dint of plasma processing ensures wide applicability of the sustainable polymeric materials.

Abstract

Recently, natural as well as synthetic polymers have been receiving significant attention as candidates to replace non-renewable materials. With the exponential developments in the world each day, the collateral damage to the environment is incessant. Increased demands for reducing pollution and energy consumption are the driving force behind the research related to surface-modified natural fibers (NFs), polymers, and various derivatives of them such as natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Natural fibers have received special attention for industrial applications due to their favorable characteristics, such as low cost, abundance, light weight, and biodegradable nature. Even though NFs offer many potential applications, they still face some challenges in terms of durability, strength, and processing. Many of these have been addressed by various surface modification methodologies and compositing with polymers. Among different surface treatment strategies, low-temperature plasma (LTP) surface treatment has recently received special attention for tailoring surface properties of different materials, including NFs and synthetic polymers, without affecting any of the bulk properties of these materials. Hence, it is very important to get an overview of the latest developments in this field. The present article attempts to give an overview of different materials such as NFs, synthetic polymers, and composites. Special attention was placed on the low-temperature plasma-based surface engineering of these materials for diverse applications, which include but are not limited to environmental remediation, packaging, biomedical devices, and sensor development.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Growing demand in the field of renewable and environmentally friendly materials has generated interest in current research focused on NFs, polymers, and their derivatives. There are historic indications, through the investigation of wool and flax fabric at the excavation sites of nation lake dwellers in the 6th and 7th centuries BCE and in prehistoric times, that many vegetable fibers were also used as textiles [1]. Hemp fibers originated from Southeast Asia and further extended to China, where cultivation was reported to date to BCE 4500. Linen weaving and spinning were developed in Egypt in BCE 3400, and cotton spinning was started in India in BCE 3000. Sericulture (row silk production through the cultivation of silkworms) was invented and developed in China in BCE 2640, and later, silk manufacturing received attention all around the world. These historical facts are suggestive of the role of natural fibers in human life from prehistorical times. Fibrous materials, mainly cellulosic types like cotton, grains, wood, and straw, were often used in industrial applications and textiles. One of their most important uses was as a reinforcing material in polymer composites due to their abundance, biodegradability, cost-effectiveness, renewability, pliability, elasticity, less abrasive nature, etc. [2,3,4]. The role of NFs increased rapidly as time progressed, and now in the modern world, they have found applications in different sectors of life [5]. The uses of NFs were confined mostly to textiles but now extend to various interphases, composites, recycle strands, biodegradable matrices, micromechanics, biobased polymers, structural materials, and so on [6,7,8].
Like NFs, another class of important materials that play a significant role in applied engineering and technological advancements is synthetic polymer fibers. One of the major drawbacks associated with the usage of polymers is waste management [9,10]. As polymer chemistry has led to various synthetic polymers that the global economy depends on, it can undoubtedly contribute vital solutions to address the current polymer waste challenge. Apart from synthesizing various polymers, it could also contribute to the development of innovative polymers having inherent recyclability potential which further enhances the material properties and performance. NF-reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs), plasma surface modification (PSM) of natural polymers, synthetic polymers, their derivatives, etc., were the major inventions that met these requirements. These can be termed sustainable polymers, or a class of materials that exhibit a closed-loop lifecycle. They were further redefined as materials derived or combined with renewable feedstocks that are safe in both production and use and can be recycled or disposed of in an environmentally innocuous manner. Hence, it is very important to get a comprehensive overview of the recent developments taking place in this field. Inspired by this, in this extensive review, we discussed natural and synthetic polymers, their drawbacks, and innovative applications via PSM that have taken place in the last two decades.

1.1. Natural Fibers

NF sources exist all around the world and are primarily classified by their origins, such as plants, animals, and minerals, as shown in Figure 1 [11,12,13]. The extraction methods and different processing techniques determine the quality of the fibers. Fibers of plant and animal origin have been most widely used, while mineral-derived fibers have hardly ever been discussed; they are beyond the scope of this review. Plant-based (cellulosic or lignocellulosic) fibers are classified as wood and non-wood. Among the non-wood fibers, parts of plants such as leaves, fruit, seed, stem, stalk, and cane, are utilized to extract fibers for different uses with and without further processing. In ancient times, these were mainly used for fabric and packaging applications. Animal (protein)-based fibers are mainly of two types, hair or wool and silk fibers [14]. Animals’ hair has significantly been used for winter wear, most commonly lamb, goat, angora, and horse [15].
The major challenges with NFs are their high moisture absorption, poor thermal stability, quality variations, low hydrophobic polymer matrix compatibility, and color variations with sunlight [16,17]. The presence of polar groups imparts a hygroscopic nature to most NFs; hence, mechanical properties such as strength and stiffness vary [18]. NFs are not that effective in stress transfer via adhesion with polar matrix materials. The physical and mechanical properties can be explained relative to the size and shape of cellulose molecules and different bonds, the interaction of the non-cellulose components of the fibers, and the fibrillar arrangements.
Drawbacks with cellulosic fibers:
  • Improvement of properties via spinning is limited by poor solubility in general solvents.
  • They have poor crease resistance, due to which garments with cellulosic fibers become crumpled during wear.
  • Poor thermo-plasticity limits the use of garments.
  • Less dimensional stability leads to distortion of garments during ironing and laundering.

1.2. Synthetic Polymers

Synthetic polymers have contributed to the development of durable, flexible, and wear-resistant polymeric systems [19,20,21]. Bakelite was the first synthetic polymer, invented in 1907, and the first modern plastic was polyvinyl chloride (PVC), made usable in the 1920s with improved plasticity using additives [22]. Synthetic polymers are a family of materials that are classified as thermoplastic and thermosets based on their ability to change their solidity by the application of heat in both directions [23]. Thermoplastics such as PVC, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), and polystyrene (PS) can be remolded by applying heat; thus, they are recyclable. On the other hand, thermosets such as polyurethane (PU), unsaturated polyester, silicone, and epoxy resins (melamine, acrylic, and phenolic resins) undergo chemical changes with heating, forming an irreversible 3D-crosslinked structure. They cannot be remelted and reformed; hence, they are non-recyclable. Both thermoplastics and thermosets are known for compositing with glass and carbon [24].
Another way of classifying synthetic polymers is based on the carbon source, a fossil or recent biomass [25]; the major categories are biobased plastic and fossil-based (petroleum-based) plastic. Most of the current fossil-based plastics are non-biodegradable. The common notion that all biobased plastics are biodegradable is false. Most biobased plastics are chemically identical to one of the fossil-based polymers, such as PET or PE, and thus share their biodegradable nature. The Coca-Cola company developed a prominent PlantBottle material, consisting of 30% mono ethylene glycol (MEG) and 70% purified terephthalic acid [26]. The MEG for the actual PlantBottle material was made from Brazilian sugarcane, whereas the terephthalic acid was fossil-based. Coca-Cola announced a 100% biobased PlantBottle in 2015 [27].
Synthetic polymers are the most viable alternative to many conventional materials such as metals and wood. This is because of their intact post-treatment mechanical strength and resistance to thermal deterioration and solvent treatments. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a strong, hard, and flexible synthetic polymer found in objects as diverse as camera cases and car bumpers. Some more are PS, which can be easily molded into different shapes such as plastic forks, plates, etc., and polystyrene foam (Styrofoam), used as a thermal insulator and popular as beverage containers in restaurants. Synthetic polymers are an integral part of the modern world that have made life more convenient and easier in different ways. However, this does not mean that synthetic polymers are free of challenges.
The raw materials for synthetic polymers are not limitless, and their disposal has led to environmental pollution. The surface properties of synthetic polymers limit their use in many applications; therefore, surface modification is necessary to improve and suppress various properties to meet the requirements [28]. For example, hydroxyl groups on the surface impart hydrophilicity, which is not an inherent property of all polymeric surfaces. So, the intrinsic weaknesses of the inherently non-conformant surfaces were modified to facilitate various industrial applications. Another major challenge with synthetic polymers is waste management [29]. The lack of reusability in certain cases, inherent nondegradable nature, and limited awareness among users have resulted in environmental pollution. Researchers have focused on solutions for the challenges offered by synthetic polymers [30,31,32].

1.3. Natural-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites (NFRPCs)

It is clear from the previous discussion that neither NFs nor synthetic polymers can address different issues, such as recyclability, for different industrial applications. This has inspired researchers to explore a combination approach where NFs and synthetic polymers were combined to design NFRPCs. This strategy can significantly improve the application potential of these materials. NFs can be converted into a composite by mixing them with suitable materials based on the applications and prerequisites [33,34]. In recent times, NFRPCs found roles in different engineering applications because of their recyclability and sustainability as compared to raw as well as processed NFs. The central point that upholds their use in structural applications was their ability to offer lightweight parts without compromising strength compared to manufactured and metallic materials. NFRPCs emerged as an efficient substitute for ceramics and metals in automotive, aircraft, electronics, sports, goods, and marine industries [35]. Table 1 provides information regarding the large-scale production of NFs which have been commercially used in composites across the world [4].
Considering their inexhaustible nature as well as their good potential for some degree of recyclability and biodegradability, NFRPCs has received consideration for both essential exploration and mechanical applications. One of the significant necessities of the current scenario is eco-friendly materials and strategies without compromising the prerequisites. Scientists have grown new fiber-assembling patterns for composite materials utilizing NFs like flax, cotton, hemp, sisal, jute, kenaf, banana, pineapple, bamboo, wood, and so forth [37]. There are multiple aspects of composite materials that can influence the level of performance/activities, of which the following are a few examples.
(i)
Fiber orientation [38];
(ii)
Fiber strength [39];
(iii)
Various physical properties of fibers [40];
(iv)
Interfacial adhesion between fibers [41].
Germany is the leading nation in the use of NFRPCs due to its automobile industry. Automobile manufacturers such as BMW, Audi, Volkswagen, and Mercedes started using NFRPCs for parts; this later earned worldwide attention [42]. Mercedes S-Class cars started using NFRPCs for the inner door panel in 1999, which was 35% baypreg-F, a semi-rigid elastomer made of bay, and 65% sisal, flax, and hemp. From this, it was evident that NFRPCs were developed and used for environmental needs and to generate global awareness [43]. Hybrid composites were made of different fibers so that the drawback of one can be balanced by the other; they are proven alternatives for existing materials [44,45]. The application of NFRPCs in automobiles includes door and instrument panels, arm- and headrests, parcel shelves, seats [46], bumpers (glass/kenaf epoxy composite) [47], underfloor protection of passenger cars (banana-fiber-reinforced composites) [48], indicator coverings, and nameplates (sisal and roselle hybrid composites) [49], decks, window frames, and molded panel components (plastic/wood fiber composites) [50]. Hydrophilicity was the major challenge faced by NFs as a reinforcing material in synthetic polymers [51]. In cellulose-based composites, a high aspect ratio (length/width) played a vital role, as it gave an idea of the mechanical properties. NFs were selected based on fiber strength, dimensions, defects, variability, and crystallinity. Table 2 discusses the reported works on NFRPCs.

2. Requirements and Methods of Polymer Modifications

The choice of polymers for different applications largely depends on the surface as well as the bulk properties. There have been several surface-tailored natural and synthetic polymers that resulted in added mechanical properties that improve the strength and structure [111]. Contrary to brittle synthetic polymers, NFs possess a high degree of elasticity and are less likely to fracture (having a high aspect ratio) during fabrication processes, including extrusion and injection molding. The poor interfacial attraction between the cellulose filaments and thermoplastic matrix limits the thermal stability and mechanical strength of composites [112,113]. Efficient composites were accomplished by either surface modification of fibers to make them more viable with the matrix or by using coupling agents that stick well to both the matrix and fibers [114]. In general, fiber surface modification is important for improving fiber–matrix adhesion and reducing the moisture absorption by NFs to improve thermal degradation, flammability, and mechanical properties [115]. Modifications can also be done by physical, chemical, and biological methods for property enhancement like improved mechanical and composite properties, increased tensile strength, and considerably higher polar components with free surface energy [116,117].

2.1. Chemical Techniques

Chemical modification offers improved mechanical properties [118] and compatibility between NFs and polymeric matrices [119,120,121]. Polymers can undergo various treatments such as acrylation [122,123], mercerization [124], acetylation [125], and treatment with isocyanate [126], maleic anhydride [127,128], water repellents [129], silane [130], peroxides [131], permanganates [132], etc. The most encouraging methodology was the one wherein covalent bond was framed between the fiber and matrix. NFs were amiable to changes due to the hydroxyl functionalities (from cellulose and lignin) that might be engaged with hydrogen bonding within the cellulose particles, subsequently decreasing the action towards the framework [133]. Unlike NFs, the ease of modification of synthetic polymers purely relied on the polymeric structure due to the lack of available functionalities. The major challenges with chemical modifications are the large chemical requirement, chemical waste, difficulties with chemical handling and processing, time and cost of operation, extent of interaction between chemicals and polymers, development of reaction mechanism, and chemical sensitivity of materials [134].

2.2. Biological Techniques

Polymeric surface change can be also accomplished via biological methods. Unlike natural polymers, synthetic polymers are somewhat reluctant to undergo biological modifications. Instead of biological modification, researchers performed biological functionalization of synthetic polymeric scaffolds for potential applications [135]. A previous report revealed that the cellulose nanofibrils were kept on the surface of NFs utilizing them as substrates during the maturation cycle of bacterial cellulose [136]. This study showed that around 5–6% bacterial cellulose on the surface of fibers would work on the interfacial bond with polymeric grids. This clever strategy for surface change prompts the advancement of natural and synthetic polymers and different composites with a further developed fiber–network interface. The major difficulties with biological modifications include the liability towards different polymers, time, cost of operation, difficulty with the implementation, sustainability, scalability, area of modification, etc. [137].

2.3. Physical Techniques

Various physical processing methodologies were reported for natural and synthetic polymers that resulted in improved mechanical, interfacial, and biological properties depending on their duration as well as intensity [138]. Reported physical modification methods include low- and high-energy radiative methods (X-rays, ionizing radiations, gamma radiations, and e-beams), electrical discharges (thermal or non-thermal plasma, corona discharges, and dielectric barrier discharges), UV and vacuum UV treatments, etc. [139]. These methods resulted in surface-modified fibers and sometimes structurally altered fibers via chemical bond breakage [140,141,142]. Among these, plasma treatment is one of the emerging physical techniques that has been successfully used for surface modification of natural and synthetic polymers, and it helps to improve the mechanical properties significantly [143].

3. Plasma Surface Modification (PSM)

Plasma is the fourth state of matter [144]. The phase transitions occur with energy exchanges, and among those, conversion to plasma requires very high energy. Ionizations and bond breakages and formations can occur with high potential. This has led to the development of the “fourth state of matter”, which consists of atoms, ions, molecules, electrons, free radicals, metastable states, etc. [145]. Irving Langmuir termed this unique combination as “plasma” in 1928 [146]. Plasma has additionally been defined by Chen [147] as a ‘quasi-neutral gas of charged and neutral particles which exhibits collective behavior’.

3.1. Plasma Modification Strategies

The advances in composite science offer critical freedom for new, further developed, biodegradable and recyclable materials, and these materials can be obtained through PSM. Compared to other treatments, PSM has advantages like lower material consumption, retention of bulk properties, lower processing time, zero waste, and no requirement for further purification or drying of materials after processing and safety. The impact of plasma can be controlled by various parameters such as reactor configuration, gas flow, activity voltage, power, pressure, temperature, and so forth.
Plasma has been classified based on the plasma precursor into three categories [148].
  • Chemically non-reactive plasma: basically, that of monoatomic dormant gases like argon (Ar) which can ionize different atoms or unreactive materials.
  • Chemically reactive plasma: inorganic and natural sub-atomic gases like O2, N2, and CF4, which are highly reactive and never create any polymeric deposition on the substrate surface.
  • Polymer-forming plasma: plasma that is responsive yet shapes a polymeric layer on the substrate (methyl methacrylate (MMA), vinyl pyrrolidone (VP)).
Based on working temperature, plasmas have been categorized as thermal or non-thermal. High pressure and temperature with heavy electrons can lead to thermal plasma generation. Non-thermal plasma or plasma near ambient temperature has been generated under atmospheric pressure or vacuum, as mentioned in Table 3. Thermal plasmas have disadvantages in terms of modification of NFs, most of which are heat-sensitive; therefore, the non-thermal plasma technique has a vital role to play in NF modification [149]. For synthetic polymers, based on their thermal stability, many of them can be easily modified using both thermal and non-thermal plasmas [150,151].
Among all the existing modification strategies for polymers, the better fit is low-temperature/cold plasma (LTP) treatment [153,154,155]. In contrast to other methods, plasma treatment is eco-friendly, has an exceptionally short handling time, is appropriate for thermal-sensitive surfaces, is cost-effective, and provides dry interaction. NFs have low adherence to the matrix due to their smooth surfaces, minimal surface energy, and the absence of functionalities to shape covalent bonds in the fiber–matrix interface [156,157]. PSM can change the morphology of the surface by eliminating the peripheral layer via surface etching, and it influences the surface only to several nanometers in depth [158,159,160]. So, we can conclude that PSM is advantageous over the existing methods. Initially, PSM found application in surface cleaning (O2 plasma) [161] and later in surface etching [162], surface functionalization [163], crosslinking [164], etc. An important dynamic species in low-pressure air plasma is oxygen, because it can bring about bonds, abstract electrons, expand oxygen radicals to the polymeric backbone, and is efficient in providing a better NF–polymer interface in composites [165,166,167].

3.2. Plasma–Substrate Interaction Mechanisms

3.2.1. Plasma Polymerization

One of the major plasma–substrate interactions is plasma polymerization, which occurs with reactive monomers (mainly containing vinyl bonds) such as acrylic acid (AA) and methacrylic acid. The inelastic collisions occurring in the chamber excite the monomer segments. Furthermore, division and recombination of the same leads to polymerization and in situ deposition on the substrate surface [168]. Plasma polymerization has been targeted to deliver an ultra-thin (10–100 nm), uniform, and stable polymer coating with resistance towards aging, oxidation, contraction, and so forth [169]. Plasma polymers are appropriate for semiconductors and biomaterials. The choice of monomer permits properties of resistance towards erosion, water, chemicals, scratch, grease, heat, penetrability, etc. [169,170,171]. It should be noted that the substrate properties were not unequivocally influenced by this treatment cycle, but the surface morphology was [172].

3.2.2. Plasma-Aided Graft Copolymerization

This could happen either by the generation of dynamic species on the polymeric surface followed by a close approach of the monomer or by the direct joining of monomer and polymer in a plasma environment [173]. In the first case, free radicals are outlined on the polymeric surface through plasma-processing gas [174], but the second case remembers a joined plasma and monomer transparency for one phase using gaseous monomers in the working gas mixture [175]. Both methods are extraordinarily beneficial over traditional ones by offering a huge scope of substance mixtures as monomers, different thicknesses of monomer layers, and restricted annihilation [176,177].

3.2.3. Plasma Ion Implantation

Plasma implantation is another important plasma–substrate interaction mechanism. This process can furnish the substrate surface with functionalities, perhaps the strongest and most sensible modification method. Gaseous particles can usually be activated by plasma, and they can collaborate with the surface. In a brief timeframe, functional groups like hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, amino, and amido can be deposited on the surface [178]. Likewise, polymer surface properties (hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, mechanical and thermal properties) can be significantly changed through this process [179]. Generally, hydrogen will be distracted first to make radicals at the polymer chain to initiate the mechanism. Other than oxy functionalities, chlorine functionalities such as CCl4 can offer improved hydrophilicity [180].

3.2.4. Plasma Ablation

Plasma ablation is the plasma-aided surface etching of materials, very similar to sputtering, without using any liquid etchant. A major share of plasma etching has been carried out with oxygen plasma [181,182,183] where oxygen, the precursor gas, was channeled into a vacuum chamber. During the process, the most peripheral layer of the substrate is etched off, and accordingly, a negligibly small weight loss occurs [184,185]. All the possible plasma–substrate interactions are discussed in Figure 2.

4. Applications

During the most recent few years, numerous endeavors have been coordinated using synthetic polymers, NFs, and NFRPCs [138,186]. PSM techniques on polymers have been explored in various applications, such as biomedical and healthcare devices, aerospace, automobiles, environmental pollution remediation, development of biodegradability in existing materials, and so on [187,188]. We attempt to provide comprehensive coverage of potential applications of plasma-surface-modified natural and synthetic polymers in the following sections.

4.1. Heavy Metal (HM) Remediation

HMs are a major category of perceived poisons in general prosperity, plants, and animals, considering their harmfulness. For example, HM-contaminated drinking water can cause horrible health issues such as encephalopathy, paleness, nephritic condition, vulnerable muscle coordination, mental growth retardation, etc. [189,190]. HM removal can be accomplished through methodologies like precipitation coagulation [191], membrane separation [192], adsorption [193], electrodialysis [194], and so on. For decentralized water treatment in severely polluted areas and catastrophe zones, adsorption could be pursued. In these areas, it has procured interest as a powerful, adaptable, and cost-effective method for HM removal [195].
Particles having amine [196,197], thiol [198], and -SOx (H) groups (sulfonic acid (SO3H) [199] and sulfonate (SO3)) [200] as functionalities have been effectively applied for adsorptive removal of various bivalent HMs (Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Co2+, Ni+2, and Zn2+). In an aqueous medium, material with SOx H groups (possessing negative charge) acts as an ideal electrostatic adsorbent for metallic species [201]. In the past, these functionalities were immobilized onto the particle surface via wet-chemical methods. This could cause further environmental problems in different ways, since it entails a large quantity of chemical usage and disposal. The substrates need not fulfill any criteria to be used for PSM, i.e., they can be of any size, shape, or morphology, and no surface activation is required in most cases. Plasma treatment parameters could be changed accordingly to achieve homogenous modification [202,203]. The list of the most dangerous HM pollutants includes but is not limited to arsenic (As), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and so forth [204].
An effective adsorbent for HM can be manufactured by plasma polymerization, which can outfit active functionalities for HMs. Akhavan et al. [205] reported the plasma-assisted fabrication of negatively charged particles on silica for HM removal. Sulfur-rich groups were deposited with thiophene plasma, which further converted into sulfonic acid and sulfonate with water plasma. Figure 3 illustrates the impact of various parameters (pH of the medium, duration of water plasma, duration of adsorption, and mass of adsorbent) on metal removal efficiency (MRE). Both pristine and water-plasma-treated-plasma-polymerized-thiophene (WP-PPT)-coated particles show altogether higher MREs for all attempted pH values. Increased MRE with duration of plasma was intended for both Cu and Zn particles, but with time, it diminished.
Pb and Hg are profoundly harmful metals, and their wide use has led to broad environmental and health issues. There are diverse pathways for these metals to contaminate the environment, such as fertilizers and pesticides, automobile exhaust, battery industries, metal plating and finishing, melting, and smelting of ores, and additives in gasoline and pigments. One of the major sources of Pb and Hg contamination is petrochemical ventures. Plasma-assisted surface tailoring of silane substrates for the removal of Pb and Hg was successfully established by Boroujeni et al. [206]. Polyether sulfone (PES) membranes were functionalized with thiol groups via plasma treatment to improve the membrane selectivity as well as wettability during the filtration of HM solution. PES membranes with nanoporous structures were made by the phase inversion technique. Ar/O2-plasma-pretreated PES was immersed in the dispersion of 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane in ethanol. The results revealed the improved adsorption efficiency of membranes with thiol-functionalized nanosilica towards Hg and Pb ions. The polar groups like −OH, −OOH, or −CO on the PES surface offered improved hydrophilicity as demonstrated by Steen et al. [207]. The thiol (−SH) functionalization advances HM adsorption by chelation with Hg2+ and Pb2+ [208]. Removal of Cd2+ is challenging compared to Pb2+ due to the poor Cd2+-binding capacity of thiol-functionalized silica, as demonstrated by Liang et al. [209].
Furthermore, plasma surface engineering has been extended to polymers and NFs for HM removal. Ding et al. [210] successfully used AA and acrylamide (AAm)-grafted polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanofibrous films to remove Cu2+ from solution. PET nanofibrous membranes furnished with carboxyl and acryl amino groups have high reusability and could provide efficient sorption of Cu2+. The detailed characterizations revealed the geometrically uniform nanofibrous defect-free structure of the membrane, successful grafting of carboxyl and acryl amino groups, improved hydrophilicity, and the presence of Cu2+ adsorbed on the surface of the modified membranes. The electrospun (ES) layers before and after Cu2+ adsorption was examined by XPS analysis, and the kinetics of adsorption by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms (Figure 4) successfully revealed the efficiency of PSM on the MRE.
N2 plasma is an active tool for the surface functionalization of polystyrene (PS) with amide (-NCO-) and amine (-NH-) groups [211]. This work targeted the development of AAm-functionalized ES PS nanofibrous samples as a promising nano adsorbent. According to Chan et al. [212], NH3 plasma was more capable of creating −NH2 groups on a polymer surface than N2 plasma because of its inherent properties. NH3 plasma usually creates higher amounts of radicals. Simultaneously, many radicals are converted into certain inappropriate functional groups, but N2 plasma cannot. From the atomic absorption spectroscopic (AAS) analysis, the high adsorption of ions occurred at pH 5 in the order of Cd2+ (10 mg/g) and Ni2+ (4.9 mg/g) by using the adsorbent dosage of 1 g/L. Surface functionalization with AAm monomer and the Cd2+ adsorption by ES PS nanofibers is schematically exhibited in Figure 5.
PP non-woven fabric has been widely used as an adsorbent due to its higher flexibility and chemical stability compared to other polymers [213]. Surface-tailored PP with reactive carboxylic functionalities via AA plasma, grafted with chitosan, was used to capture HMs. Chitosan was up to three times more efficient than chitin towards HMs, which proves the importance of the amino groups [214]. AA was loaded onto PP fibers through LTP followed by gaseous phase grafting. This was further amidated with triethylenetetramine and subjected to imprinting with a Cr (VI) template. The modified polymer exhibits better hydrophilicity and selective Cr (VI) adsorption.
Instead of chitosan, researchers attempted cysteine for HM remediation. Vandenbossche et al. [215] reported that a cysteine-immobilized non-woven PP geotextile was an innovative and eco-friendly HM adsorbent. Reactive carboxylic functionalities were implanted on the PP surface by AA plasma followed by cysteine grafting. The sorption of HMs such as Cd (II), Pb (II), Ni (II), and Cu (II) was reported by using L-cysteine and poly-L-cysteine [216,217]. Another work based on PP was reported by Ozmen et al. [218] on a novel adsorbent for HMs (Cu (II), Co (II), Cr (III), Cd (II), and Pb (II)) using PE-coated PP fiber by plasma-polymerized deposition of glycidyl methacrylate. This was further functionalized with 4- amino benzoic acid. Later, Nia et al. [219] developed AA-plasma-treated PP as an adsorbent for cesium (Cs), which is commonly emitted during nuclear accidents. The specific adsorption capacity towards Cs was shown by Prussian blue. O2-plasma-treated PP was used as the supporting material to immobilize Prussian blue. PP was surface tailored with carboxylic acid groups via polyacrylic acid in the O2 plasma environment.
Peng Wei et al. [220] reported a PP non-woven fiber adsorbent for HMs with an improved surface hydrophilicity. Higher MRE was achieved by grafting chitosan and 1- vinyl imidazole onto the PP non-woven fiber. Surface roughness, hydrophilicity, and surface functionalization were achieved through LTP processing. The adsorption efficiency of the reported adsorbent was positively correlated with time and concentration. A total of 1 g of fabric could trap 28.21 mg Cu ions with an adsorption duration of 300 min from 1.0 g/L Cu solution. The adsorption efficiencies of reported HM adsorbents which were developed/modified with LTP treatment are discussed in Table 4.

4.2. Biomedical Applications

The PSM of polymers has been used for many potential applications in biomedical science and engineering because of its ability to enhance protein absorption [230], immobilize biomolecules, induce stable superhydrophobic and superoleophobic behavior [231,232,233], and its biocompatibility and self-cleaning properties on the surface [234]. Superhydrophobic and super hydrophilic surfaces could be fabricated with various plasmas such as poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) [235], polycaprolactone (PCL) [236], polyether ether ketone (PEEK) [237], and so on. Polymer surfaces can be decorated with oxy and nitro functionalities with LTP treatment using O2, air, N2, or NH3 [238,239] as precursors. These polar hydrophilic groups are formed by the interaction of chemically active species generated by gas discharge plasma with different groups in the polymer molecules. In contrast to O2 or N2 plasmas, helium (He) and Ar discharges lead to free radicals [240,241], which can subsequently be used for crosslinking or grafting oxy functionalities with exposure to air or O2 plasma [242].
Biodegradable aliphatic polyesters have been recognized broadly as a platform material for tissue engineering [243] due to their mechanical properties, low immunogenicity, and biocompatibility [244]. However, the low surface energy of these polymers leads to poor cell adhesion and proliferation [245]. It was reported that various protein components for the extracellular matrix such as gelatin, laminin, fibronectin, and collagen could be immobilized on the polymer surface by plasma processing to improve the cell proliferation rate [246,247]. - PSM has become a better candidate in tissue engineering because of its ability to improve biocompatibility [248] and to modify the inner surface of porous objects [249]. Polymers combined with nanoparticles of bioactive glass for orthopedic applications have been reported by Leite et al. [250]. A functional substrate such as micro-arrays, cell arrays, biocompatible surfaces for medical applications, microfluidics for diagnosis, and many more [251] can be made by immobilizing biomolecules on a substrate surface. Later, the influence of silver-doped bioactive glass on the antibacterial bio-adhesive layer was also confirmed [252], which found application in orthopedic surgery. The durable bioactivity in solution as well as in freeze-dried storage was correlated with the hydrophilic nature of the treated surfaces [253].
A few more endeavors have been made regarding the PSM of PLA. Ho et al. [254] found an improved cell affinity by plasma-aided surface immobilization of RGDS (Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser) on poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds. Surface functionalization of biodegradable PLLA was achieved by plasma coupling reaction of chitosan [242]. L929 (mouse fibroblasts) and L02 (human hepatocytes) cell lines cultured on the modified scaffold have shown spreading. The cells grown on the surface proliferated at almost the same rate as those cultured on glass (Figure 6).
PP is one of the most reluctant polymers towards modifications due to its high chemical barrier responses and structure. Recent reports indicated that plasma-surface-engineered PP with various optimized process variables [255] has improved surface hydrophilicity and adhesive properties of PP or poly(ethylebe terephthalate) (PET) [256,257]. Grenadyorov et al. reported that the plasma-assisted deposition of silicon and oxy functionalities incorporated with hydrogenated amorphous carbon films onto PP improved the antithrombogenicity and hemocompatibility [258]. Blood compatibility with the deposited film was evaluated by an in vitro investigation of platelet adhesion and cytotoxicity.
Lukowiak et al. studied the ability of polyglycerol plasma to improve the protein and bacteria resistance of the PP surface [259]. They performed PSM to anchor Br on the PP surface, which was further replaced by amine groups from hyper-branched polyglycerol. Later, Tsou et al. [260] used the immersion-pad-pressing-drying-plasma (IPDP) process to modify the non-woven PP inert surface by grafting methyl diallyl ammonium salt. They used O2 and Ar as the purge gases, and the grafted PP surface showed excellent antibacterial as well as hydrophilic properties. The use of Cu and Ag was already reported regarding the antibacterial property of materials [261]. Woskowicz et al. [262] investigated the advantage of plasma-aided surface tailoring of PP with Cu or Ag over the sputter coating.
The ability of Ar plasma to alter surface morphology, wettability, and biocompatibility was already reported by Gomathi et al. [263]. Later, Ar plasma was used to modify the PP surface to create a nano-embossed structure for improved surface adhesion, wettability, and biocompatibility. With a longer treatment time, the 2D surface of PP changed to 3D with a long nanofiber-like structure. Further characterization revealed the crosslinking of polymer chains and an increased amount of conducting amorphous carbon on the surface. Hana et al. [264] reported the use of atmospheric pressure plasma to make the PP surface biocompatible. A nanolayer polymer was deposited on PP using plasma of a mixture of propane and butane in N2. The thin layer was highly wetting, smooth, flexible, homogeneous, and had good adhesion to the PP surface; hence, it was a better candidate for technical and biological applications.
The bone regeneration capability of recombinant human-bone-morphogenetic-protein-2 (rhBMP-2)-immobilized Medpor using AA plasma polymerization was studied by Lim et al. [265]. Plasma treatment improved the surface wettability by tailoring the surface with carboxyl groups which improved the protein immobilization. The activity of the Medpor surface towards cells demonstrated the potential of PSM to immobilize the protein on a polymer-based implant, which could be vital in bone tissue engineering.
In the past decades, the number of hernia mesh surgical implantations increased enormously. The commercial hernia mesh was composed of PP due to its biocompatibility, physical properties, inertness, ease of processing, and moldability. However, there were challenges, such as diminished long-term strength, high adhesion to the abdominal wall, lack of biocompatibility, a hydrophobic surface that resisted drug adhesion, and foreign body rejection. Saitaer et al. [266] developed a polydopamine-coated mesh for hernia surgery with improved surface wettability. The PP mesh surface was activated with O2 plasma and further coated with polydopamine. Thereby, the adhesion and release of the drug, levofloxacin, became easy. The drug-loaded mesh has shown improved antimicrobial properties, and the drug release lasted for at least 24 h. Houshyar et al. [267] successfully incorporated nanodiamond with PP (ND-PP) for making hernia mesh with improved long-term stability, mechanical strength, and biological performance. The ND-PP mesh surface activation was done with oxygen plasma.
The use of plasma-aided graft polymerization of (vinyl benzyl) trimethylammonium chloride (VBTAC) on the surface of PE followed by plasma surface activation with air was reported by Kliewer et al. [268]. VBTAC is a contact-active antibacterial quaternary ammonium salt. The poly-VBTAC-modified PE had a homogeneous layer with a thickness of 300 nm and high charge density. The antibacterial evaluation against Gram-positive (S. aureus, S. epidermis) and Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa, E. coli) bacteria revealed the efficiency by eradiating all inoculated bacteria. The contact activity was confirmed by an agar diffusion assay. Therefore, this can be used for packaging applications and green antimicrobial management without biocide release. Antibacterial PE surfaces were developed by Popelka et al. [269] using LTP treatment with substances containing antibacterial groups such as triclosan (5-Chloro-2-(2,4-dichloro phenoxy) phenol) and a chlorhexidine (1,1′-Hexamethylenebis [5-(4-chlorophenyl) biguanide]).
Tissue engineering has shown vital growth in the past two decades and trended towards the application of polymer-based implants. Plasma surface activation and property dependents of biomedical polymers (low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)) were examined by Reznickova et al. [270]. The surface activation was performed with Ar plasma, and the cytocompatibility was examined using vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) as a model for vascular graft testing and mouse fibroblasts as connective tissue cells (L929). PSM shows improved cell adhesion and proliferation, as shown in Figure 7. Pandiyaraj et al. [271] developed an antifouling LDPE surface using atmospheric-pressure-LTP-assisted copolymerization of an AA and polyethylene glycol (PEG) mixture. Further improvement in various properties was achieved by functionalizing the modified PE with chitosan. Protein adsorption, platelet adhesion, and final in vitro studies revealed the improved antifouling nature of the modified matrix. The reported works of plasma-treated polymers for biomedical applications were summarized in the Table 5.

4.3. Water Purification

Water and energy deficiencies are worldwide concerns of developing seriousness. Around the world, over a billion groups seek access to clean drinking water, a central human need. Quick industrialization has posed a huge danger to human well-being and climate due to the expanded release of wastewater, primarily containing inorganic and natural toxins. Wastewater release can create an engaging scope of contamination, which will not only expand the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and harmfulness of sewage, but also reduce the level of light infiltration and repress the photosynthesis of aquatic plants along these lines, causing the annihilation of the amphibian framework [272,273]. Reverse osmosis (RO) is one of the major technologies to produce fresh water from saline and other wastewater sources.
Polysaccharide-based adsorbents such as cellulose and chitosan are efficient adsorbents towards organic and inorganic pollutants from water, even in their raw form [274]. The cost-effectiveness, poly functionalities, abundance, specific entrapment of pollutants, diverse architecture, and reactivities of lignocellulosic materials identified them as the perfect candidate for adsorptive removal of pollutants from water [275].
Another significant method for water purification is RO, but membrane fouling was the major challenge with this. The thin film composite RO membranes have been effectively modified with O2 and Ar plasma [276], and PP microporous membranes with N2 plasma [277], CO2 plasma [278], and air plasma [279], to improve the antifouling property. Zou et al. [280] grafted trimethylene glycol dimethyl ether hydrophilic polymer on aromatic polyamide RO membrane to reduce the organic fouling tendency. Antifouling properties and improved flux performance for RO membranes were successfully developed through surface nano structuring aided with atmospheric-pressure-plasma-induced graft polymerization [281,282] (Figure 8). The membrane surface was activated with atmospheric plasma followed by solution-free radical graft polymerization of water-soluble monomers such as methacrylic acid and AAm. The resulting membrane offers lower mineral-scaling propensity and high permeability as compared to the commercial membrane.
Chitosan is a linear polysaccharide obtained by the deacetylation of chitin. Chitosan has drawn extraordinary consideration as a biopolymer in the field of dye toxin evacuation, even at low concentrations (ppm or ppb levels). It has many benefits, such as inexhaustible nature, eco-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and abundance [284,285]. Chitosan contains an enormous number of dynamic hydroxyl and amino groups, which offers a high level of entanglement towards natural dyes and inorganic HMs. Wen et al. [286] designed another methodology for modifying chitosan by utilizing glow discharge plasma to discover applications as adsorbents for dye removal from aqueous media. The morphology and crystallinity of chitosan particles were changed, and the number of methyl groups was increased by the plasma treatment. The dye adsorption tests revealed the quicker capture productivity of plasma-modified chitosan for dye expulsion compared to untreated chitosan.
Gopakumar et al. effectively used plasma-modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) for the adsorptive removal of toxic dyes and metallic nanoparticles from water [287]. ES PVDF was modified with CO2 plasma to achieve hydrophobicity. The surface decoration with −COO groups was used for removing crystal violet dye and iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles from water. Instead of CO2, ES PVDF modifications were attempted with CF4 for air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) [288]. In that case, newly formed CF2-CF2 and CF3 bonds brought down the surface energy of the layer and imparted omni-phobic properties. This prevented the film from wetting with low-surface-pressure fluids such as methanol, ethylene glycol, and mineral oils. Jie et al. [289] developed a poly (AAm-co-AA) hydrogel using glow-discharge-plasma-induced copolymerization for adsorptive removal of toxic dyes such as crystal violet and methylene blue. Plasma-modified natural shells (almond shells) for adsorptive removal of Eriochrome-Black-T [290] and Jatropha curcas shell for reactive red 120 textile dye [291] were reported. Since water bodies were contaminated with various pollutants, Takam et al. [292] developed a multi-component adsorption system out of cocoa shell which has an optimal capability towards Azur II (cationic dye) and reactive red (anionic dye). The amount of hemicellulose and lignin was reduced by plasma treatment, and the shell became more hydrophilic and an efficient adsorbent. The reported works of plasma- treated polymers and their derivatives for water purification were summarized in the Table 6.

4.4. Packaging Applications

The major share of packaging materials is covered by paper, plastic, glass, and metal in the packaging industry. Plastic plays a vital role due to its flexibility, cost-effectiveness, low weight, heat-sealing capability, durability, and satisfactory mechanical strength [293,294,295]. The use of synthetic polymers in various aspects of day-to-day life has been questioned because of their non-degradable nature and other possible harms [296]. Researchers developed edible biodegradable polymer films derived from polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids [297,298]. The technological applications were hindered by their inherent disadvantages, such as poor mechanical properties, wettability, printability, and adhesive nature [299,300]. Many of the reported works revealed the efficiency of LTP treatment for altering mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, antimicrobial properties, etc. [301,302,303].
For packaging applications, the materials should have good surface and barrier properties. Arolkar et al. [304] reported the use of air-plasma-treated corn starch/poly(ε-caprolactone) (CSPCL) films for packaging applications. The biodegradation and surface properties with plasma treatment at various time intervals revealed the increased surface roughness and adhesive properties. The impact of plasma treatment on the biodegradation of control and treated films was analyzed by simulating natural conditions in a controlled environment using an indoor soil burial method with a system containing Bacillus subtilis, a commonly occurring soil bacterium. The hydrophobic thermoplastic film made of corn starch was invented by Daniele et al. [305] with SF6 plasma to improve hydrophilicity. Later Anastácia et al. [306] analyzed the corn starch film modified using SF6 plasma with a capacitively coupled plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactor. Instead of SF6 plasma, Sifuentes-Nieves et al. [307] used hexamethyldisiloxane (HDMSO) plasma and achieved improved barrier performance against water. Later, they analyzed the effectiveness of HDMSO plasma on three different granular corn starches (normal, Hylon V, and Hylon VII) [308].
Many trials have been conducted with chitosan, a biodegradable polymer, to achieve promising surface properties for application in the packaging industry. Assis et al. [309] investigated the water vapor, CO2, and O2 permeability of a chitosan surface with LTP-deposited hexamethyldisilazane. Later, Chamchoi et al. [310] modified the chitosan with Ar plasma, and Chen et al. [311] attempted a film composite of zein and chitosan, which was further modified with LTP treatment. The treated composite film exhibited optimum tensile strength, enhanced water vapor barrier, and improved thermal stability. The improved properties were due to the ordered secondary structure of zein molecules and the occurrence of more H-bonds between zein and chitosan with PSM.
One of the major challenges in the food packaging industry has been the development of a gentle process concept that can keep food natural, minimally processed, and safe. Ulbin-Figlewicz et al. [312] developed an antibacterial edible chitosan film by low-pressure plasma treatment. They determined the antibacterial activity of chitosan film incorporated with lysosomes exposed to He plasma. The edible film was prepared using low-molecular-weight chitosan by casting from a lactic acid solution with a solution of the lysosome. The dried films were further modified using He plasma and tested against the growth of listeria monocytogenes, yersinia enterocolitica, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Instead of chitosan, Helena et al. [299] used cassava starch for packaging film. To avoid the expected difficulties due to the hydrophilicity of starch, they developed a multi-layer film of PLA-starch and PCL-starch. The capability of air plasma to improve the surface roughness was utilized in this case, and thereby interlayer adhesion was ensured. Song et al. [313] reported O2-plasma-treated PLA as a packaging material without any other coating materials.
The safety aspects of LTP technology are very important, and limited studies have focused on the formation of toxic components due to the interaction of plasma-induced species, polymers, and various foods [314,315]. A significant increase in the peroxide content in nuts with plasma treatment was reported by Thirumdas et al. [316]. The possibility of undesirable derivatives such as aldehydes, keto acids, hydroxyl acids, and short-chain fatty acids was also discussed. All the studies mentioned here finally emphasized the necessity of safety and risk assessment of the effect of PSM on various polymers and food products. The reported works on the PSM of NFs, polymers, and their composites were summarized in Table 7.

4.5. Sensor Development

Polymeric sensors have received attention in monitoring the human-inhabited environment. Recent advancements in polymer-based touch sensors have been utilized in robotic medical procedures such as prosthetics, surgery, catheter radiofrequency ablation, and artificial skin development [206]. Here we attempted to summarize the major advancements achieved in the use of plasma technology to develop polymer-based sensors.
Lee et al. [327] reported a stretchable and transparent touch sensor using selective plasma-based patterning. Thin PU dielectric film was sandwiched between electrode lines made of silver nanowires and graphene oxide on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The hydrophilicity of PDMS was improved using O2 plasma. Another highly efficient pressure sensor was reported by Wang et al. [328] by combining an Indium-Tin-Oxide (ITO) electrode with plasma-modified (3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) and polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), as shown in Figure 9. The piezo-resistive sensitivity and response were enhanced by N2 plasma. The advantages of a polymer-based pressure sensor were the lowest wear resistance and ease of surface modification.
Like pressure, temperature and humidity are vital parameters in health and the environment [329,330,331]. Aliane et al. [332] developed a high-accuracy and stable temperature sensor printed on a flexible foil made of polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) and PET. The temperature-coefficient-sensitive layers were made using antimony tin oxide (ATO), where the resistance temperature coefficient was improved by O2 plasma, because even if the O2 plasma was highly aggressive, short-duration plasma treatment can enhance the temperature sensitivity by providing surface roughness and surface activation towards the ATO layer on the surface of PET and PEN polymer layers.
Spin-coated PMMA on a chromium IDC structure on a glass substrate for humidity sensing was reported by Dhabade et al. [333] As per the literature, this was the first reported work on the use of a plasma-modified polymeric material for humidity sensing. In this work, Ar-plasma-treated PMMA was used as a dielectric component for relative humidity sensing. Later, Zao et al. [334] developed an efficient sensor for both temperature and humidity by sandwiching an O2-plasma-treated graphene-woven fabric (GWF) sensor between PDMS layers. The spin-coated layer of cellulose acetate butyrate on the GWF film helped to achieve humidity sensing capability. In this flexible sensor, the temperature- and humidity-sensing compartments were stacked in a layer, as shown in Figure 10, which offers high sensitivity and negligible mutual interference.
Another important category was gas sensors because a significant amount of volatile organic chemical (VOC) pollutants is released into the atmosphere from chemical treatment plants and automobile exhaust. Polymeric gas sensors mostly work with an electrical response method and can be used for the detection of individual vapors as well as complex gases [335,336,337]. Tang et al. [338] developed a nanowire chemiresistive gas sensor by nanoscale soft lithography specifically for NH3 and NO2 with PEDOT: PSS using O2 plasma. With the exposure of nanowire (p-type) to NH3, molecules interacted through electron transfer and were adsorbed. The acceptance of electrons from NH3 led to the loss of charge carriers. Conversely, the desorption induced the electron consumption in the chain which led to increased conductivity of the sensor recovering towards its initial value. Recent advancements in this field extended to plasma-modified complex polymer composites for gas sensors. Rivera et al. [339] tuned the chemiresistive properties of polyaniline (PAni)/multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) composite doped with l-carrageenan with Ar plasma to improve the conductive sensing ability towards H2.
Gradually, polymer-based sensor research was extended to biomedical applications. Organic semiconductive polymers were explored more for the detection of simple electrolytic salts, enzymes, neurotransmitters, etc. [340]. Organic electrochemical transistors have been used for enzymatic sensing through dedoping or field effect transistor principles which have been combined with PSM to obtain flexible and optically transparent biosensors [341,342]. Based on the cathodic detection of O2 consumed by glucose oxidase reaction, Maekawa et al. [343] developed a sensor for glucose detection by immobilizing the enzyme on O2-plasma-treated PDMS. O2 plasma was utilized to replace silane groups with silanol groups. One of the recent developments in polymer-based sensors was extended to the transformation of LDPE aided with plasma treatment to an electroactive material capable of sensing dopamine and glucose [344,345]. Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter in disorders like Parkinson’s, schizophrenia, etc. The functionalities formed by plasma treatment led to the oxidation of dopamine, producing dopamine-o-quinone. The sensing capability has been further augmented by incorporating gold with a polymer surface [346,347]. Table 8 summarized the reported studies of plasma-treated NFs, polymers, and their derivatives for sensing applications.

5. Plasma-Modified Natural and Synthetic Polymers—Future Perspectives

PSM has been widely explored so far, but there is still much work to be done. The plasma technique contributes significantly to the economic prosperity of industrialized societies. The emerging application of plasma includes optics, glass, energy, aerospace, automotive, plastics, textiles, medicine, hygiene, and the environment. The increased demands for optical elements compatible with intense lasers and other radiation technologies illuminate the use of plasma devices as filters and mirrors for which conventional methods were unable to provide satisfactorily. PSM is a versatile and compatible modification methodology for polymers to achieve abrasion resistance, chemical stability, antifouling properties, and biocompatibility for biomedical applications. An article entitled ‘white paper on the future of plasma science and technology in plastics and textiles’ [352] highlights the existing efforts and frontiers of plasmas in detail. The therapeutic effects of LTP processing were expected in biomedical fields, including the prevention of organ adhesion, cell proliferation, hemostasis, and vascularization. Researchers started using non-thermal plasma in cancer treatments because of existing challenges, such as the existence of reactive species scavengers and the shallow infiltration of plasma on the tumor surface. LTP processing is an emerging anticancer technology that can generate unique reactive oxygen and nitrogen species for cancerous cell elimination. However, the effect of physical interactions between cells and the extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment on the plasma therapy outcome is unknown [353,354]. The current scenario predicts an upsurge in the demand for NFs and their composites. The major limiting factors to the demand of NF-based sustainable materials, such as moisture absorption, lack of wettability, and poor compatibility with the polymer matrix, can be successfully addressed by PSM.
The community of plasma scientists strongly believes that more exciting advances will continue to foster innovations and discoveries in the next decades. The future directions of research will be significantly connected with two terms: machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI). These most efficient, digital, and high throughput methods can be used to identify and create next-generation advanced materials and designs and to evaluate their feasibility in various applications. AI and ML can offer a virtual base in material development via material informatics, computational modeling, and simulation studies [355,356,357]. AI-incorporated plasma processing has already started in neuromorphic engineering [358]. Since plasma is an exciting system of particles, it can offer unpredictable reactions with various parameters. ML has started focusing on modeling, diagnosis, and control of equilibrium plasmas [359]. The current and future trend in this field points towards emerging applications of ML/AI in plasma engineering for recycling of plastics, pollution remediation, water purification and in circular economy for sustainability. in.

6. Conclusions

Investigation attempts in the field of potential applications of plasma-surface-modified NFs and polymers have shown tremendous improvements in the last two decades. In this review, the extraordinarily unique features of NFs, polymers, their derivatives, and various modification methodologies, especially PSM, for various applications have been established. The potential applications include HM sensing, wastewater treatments, biomedical applications, packaging applications, various sensing applications, etc. PSM played a vital role in surface activation, surface functionalization, and changing surface morphology. In this way, surface properties such as hydrophilicity, adhesion, and surface energy can be altered. There was a surge in the use of NFs in the last decades in composite applications due to their surface affinity amelioration towards the matrix after plasma treatment. Likewise, an increased demand of plasma-modified NFs was observed in various applications. PSM has a large role to play in the coming decades with computational tools like AI and ML. Modeling and simulation, real-time monitoring, and control of non-equilibrium plasma can be potentially transformed with these emerging techniques. The field of plasma-modified NFs and their derivatives is seemingly ripe for application-driven advancement in the future. The current article attempts to give an overview of the reported works in this field so far and hence will have a remarkable impact on future research on plasma driven surface engineering of sustainable polymers for circular economy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T., Data and reference collection, R.R.P. and writing/editing, R.R.P. and V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

NIEHS Superfund program through P42-ES027723-01A1.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding from the NIEHS Superfund program through P42-ES027723-01A1 from NIEHS of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Superfund Research Program (SRP) at UAB. We apologize to those authors whose work may have been relevant to this review but was not cited due to perceived lack of fit or accidental oversight.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Glossary

NFNatural fiber
PSMPlasma surface modification
NFCNatural fiber composite
NFRPCNatural fiber reinforced polymer composite
LTPlow-temperature/cold plasma
MREmetal removal efficiency
HMheavy metal
SEMscanning electron microscopy
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
FTIRFourier transform infrared spectroscopy
AASatomic absorption spectrophotometry
ESelectrospun
PEpolyethylene
PPpolypropylene
PSpolystyrene
PLApolylactic acid
PLLApoly-l-lactic acid
PCLpolycaprolactone
PETpolyethylene terephthalate
PENpolyethylene naphthalate
PCpolycarbonate
PVCpolyvinyl chloride
PESpolyether sulfone
Aamacrylamide
AAacrylic acid
PEGpolyethylene glycol
PUpolyurethane
ROreverse osmosis
PSSpolystyrene sulfonate
MMAmethyl methacrylate
PMMApoly methyl methacrylate
VPvinyl pyrrolidone
PVPpolyvinyl pyrrolidone
MWCNTmultiwalled carbon nanotube
LDPElow-density polyethylene
HDPEhigh-density polyethylene
CNTcarbon nanotube
PEEKpolyether ether ketone
VBAC(vinyl benzyl) trimethylammonium chloride
UHMWPEultra-high molecular weight polyethylene

References

  1. Nosch, M.L.; Gillis, C. Ancient Textiles Production, Crafts and Society; Oxbow Books: Barnsley, UK, 2007; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oksman, K.; Wallström, L.; Berglund, L.A.; Filho, R.D.T. Morphology and mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal–epoxy composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 84, 2358–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hornsby, P.R.; Hinrichsen, E.; Tarverdi, K. Preparation and properties of polypropylene composites reinforced with wheat and flax straw fibres: Part I Fibre characterization. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mohammed, L.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Pua, G.; Jawaid, M.; Islam, M.S. A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015, 243947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mwaikambo, L. Review of the history, properties and application of plant fibres. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. 2006, 7, 120–133. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khatib, J.M.; Machaka, M.M.; Elkordi, A.M. 5–Natural fibers. In Handbook of Sustainable Concrete and Industrial Waste Management; Colangelo, F., Cioffi, R., Farina, I., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2022; pp. 85–107. [Google Scholar]
  7. Karimah, A.; Ridho, M.R.; Munawar, S.S.; Adi, D.S.; Damayanti, R.; Subiyanto, B.; Fatriasari, W.; Fudholi, A. A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite. Characteristics, and utilizations. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 13, 2442–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Espinach, F.X. Advances in Natural Fibers and Polymers. Materials 2021, 14, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moore, C.J. Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: A rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ. Res. 2008, 108, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lens-Pechakova, L.S. Recent studies on enzyme-catalysed recycling and biodegradation of synthetic polymers. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2021, 4, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franck, R.R. Bast and Other Plant Fibres, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, G.I.; Wool, R.P. Composites from Natural Fibers and Soy Oil Resins. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2000, 7, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Torres, F.G.; Díaz, R.M. Morphological Characterisation of Natural Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics (NFRTP) Processed by Extrusion, Compression and Rotational Moulding. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2004, 12, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhuyan, S.; Gogoi, N. Natural fibers: Innovative sustainable and eco-friendly. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thyavihalli Girijappa, Y.G.; Mavinkere Rangappa, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. Natural Fibers as Sustainable and Renewable Resource for Development of Eco-Friendly Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wichman, I.; Oladipo, A.B.; Hermann, I. The Influence of Moisture on Fibre/Matrix Adhesion for Wood/HDPE-Composites. In Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications; Proceedings of 9th Annual ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 14–18 July 1997; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  18. Célino, A.; Freour, S.; Jacquemin, F.; Casari, P. The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers. A review. Front. Chem. 2014, 1, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hacker, M.C.; Krieghoff, J.; Mikos, A.G. Chapter 33–Synthetic Polymers. In Principles of Regenerative Medicine, 3rd ed.; Atala, A., Lanza, R., Mikos, A.G., Nerem, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 559–590. [Google Scholar]
  20. Coenen, A.M.J.; Bernaerts, K.V.; Harings, J.A.W.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Ghazanfari, S. Elastic materials for tissue engineering applications: Natural, synthetic, and hybrid polymers. Acta Biomater. 2018, 79, 60–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, S.; Huang, C.; Yue, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, P.; Wu, A.; Chen, C.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, C. Application advance of electrosprayed micro/nanoparticles based on natural or synthetic polymers for drug delivery system. Mater. Des. 2022, 220, 110850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rasmussen, S.C. Revisiting the early history of synthetic polymers. Critiques and new insights. Ambix 2018, 65, 356–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Biron, M. Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Geyer, R. Chapter 2–Production, use, and fate of synthetic polymers. In Plastic Waste and Recycling; Letcher, T.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 13–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thiruchelvi, R.; Das, A.; Sikdar, E. Bioplastics as better alternative to petro plastic. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 37, 1634–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lanthorn, K.R. It’s all About the Green. The Economically Driven Greenwashing Practices of Coca-Cola. Augsbg. Honor. Rev. 2013, 6, 13. [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, P.B. Bio-Based Sources for Terephthalic Acid. In Green Polymer Chemistry: Biobased Materials and Biocatalysis; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; Volume 1192, pp. 453–469. [Google Scholar]
  28. Khulbe, K.C.; Feng, C.; Matsuura, T. The art of surface modification of synthetic polymeric membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 855–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Binder, W.H. The Past 40 Years of Macromolecular Sciences: Reflections on Challenges in Synthetic Polymer and Material Science. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Praveena, B.A.; Buradi, A.; Santhosh, N.; Vasu, V.K.; Hatgundi, J.; Huliya, D. Study on characterization of mechanical, thermal properties, machinability and biodegradability of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites and its Applications, recent developments and future potentials: A comprehensive review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 52, 1255–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lakshmi Narayana, V.; Bhaskara Rao, L. A brief review on the effect of alkali treatment on mechanical properties of various natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 1988–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mousavi, S.R.; Zamani, M.H.; Estaji, S.; Tayouri, M.I.; Arjmand, M.; Jafari, S.H.; Nouranian, S.; Khonakdar, H.A. Mechanical properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced polymer composites. A review of recent case studies. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 3143–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jeyapragash, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Sathiyamurthy, S. Mechanical properties of natural fiber/particulate reinforced epoxy composites–A review of the literature. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 22, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alsubari, S.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ishak, M.R.; Ilyas, R.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M. Potential of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites in Sandwich Structures: A Review on Its Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adekomaya, O.; Jamiru, T.; Sadiku, R.; Huan, Z. Negative impact from the application of natural fibers. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.-P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rohit, K.; Dixit, S. A Review–Future Aspect of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composite. Polym. Renew. Resour. 2016, 7, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shalwan, A.; Yousif, B.F. In State of Art: Mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater. Des. 2013, 48, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahjoub, R.; Bin Mohamad Yatim, J.; Mohd Sam, A.R. A Review of Structural Performance of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber in Polymer Composites. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 415359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Stanojlovic-Davidovic, A.; Bénézet, J.C.; Bergeret, A.; Ferry, L.; Crespy, A. Mechanical and physical properties of expanded starch reinforced by natural fibres. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 37, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramezani Kakroodi, A.; Cheng, S.; Sain, M.; Asiri, A. Mechanical, Thermal, and Morphological Properties of Nanocomposites Based on Polyvinyl Alcohol and Cellulose Nanofiber from Aloe vera Rind. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 903498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bazli, M.; Bazli, L. A review on the mechanical properties of synthetic and natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites and their application in the transportation industry. J. Compos. Compd. 2021, 3, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Puglia, D.; Biagiotti, J.; Kenny, J.M. A Review on Natural Fibre-Based Composites—Part II. J. Nat. Fibers 2005, 1, 23–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. GR, A.; Sanjay, M.R.; Yogesha, B. Review on comparative evaluation of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Adv. Eng. Appl. Sci. Int. J. 2014, 4, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  45. Omrani, E.; Menezes, P.; Rohatgi, P. State of Art on Tribological Behavior of Polymer Matrix Composites Reinforced with Natural Fibers in the Green Materials World. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2015, 19, 717–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Satyanarayana, K.G.; Arizaga, G.G.C.; Wypych, F. Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers—An overview. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 982–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramasubbu, R.; Madasamy, S. Fabrication of Automobile Component Using Hybrid Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Samal, S.K.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K. Banana/Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Hybrid Composites: Fabrication and Performance Evaluation. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2009, 48, 397–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chandramohan, D.; Bharanichandar, J. Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites for Automobile Accessories. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 9, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. John, M.J.; Thomas, S. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 343–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bismarck, A.; Mohanty, A.K.; Aranberri-Askargorta, I.; Czapla, S.; Misra, M.; Hinrichsen, G.; Springer, J. Surface characterization of natural fibers; surface properties and the water up-take behavior of modified sisal and coir fibers. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Seki, Y.; Sarikanat, M.; Sever, K.; Erden, S.; Ali Gulec, H. Effect of the low and radio frequency oxygen plasma treatment of jute fiber on mechanical properties of jute fiber/polyester composite. Fibers Polym. 2010, 11, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rodriguez, E.; Petrucci, R.; Puglia, D.; Kenny, J.; Vázquez, A. Characterization of composites based on natural and glass fibers obtained by vacuum infusion. J. Compos. Mater. 2005, 39, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rana, A.K.; Mandal, A.; Mitra, B.C.; Jacobson, R.; Rowell, R.; Banerjee, A.N. Short jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: Effect of compatibilizer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sari, P.S.; Thomas, S.; Spatenka, P.; Ghanam, Z.; Jenikova, Z. Effect of plasma modification of polyethylene on natural fibre composites prepared via rotational moulding. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 177, 107344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Khorasani, M.T.; Mirzadeh, H.; Irani, S. Plasma surface modification of poly (l-lactic acid) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) films for improvement of nerve cells adhesion. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2008, 77, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Islam, M.S.; Pickering, K.L.; Foreman, N.J. Influence of alkali fiber treatment and fiber processing on the mechanical properties of hemp/epoxy composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119, 3696–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, L.; Miao, M. Commingled natural fibre/polypropylene wrap spun yarns for structured thermoplastic composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sain, M.; Suhara, P.; Law, S.; Bouilloux, A. Interface Modification and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber-Polyolefin Composite Products. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2005, 24, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Baghaei, B.; Skrifvars, M.; Salehi, M.; Bashir, T.; Rissanen, M.; Nousiainen, P. Novel aligned hemp fibre reinforcement for structural biocomposites: Porosity, water absorption, mechanical performances and viscoelastic behaviour. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 61, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Islam, M.S.; Pickering, K.L.; Foreman, N.J. Influence of alkali treatment on the interfacial and physico-mechanical properties of industrial hemp fibre reinforced polylactic acid composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baghaei, B.; Skrifvars, M.; Berglin, L. Manufacture and characterisation of thermoplastic composites made from PLA/hemp co-wrapped hybrid yarn prepregs. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 50, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hu, R.; Lim, J.-K. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Completely Biodegradable Hemp Fiber Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2007, 41, 1655–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yuan, Q.; Wu, D.; Gotama, J.; Bateman, S. Wood Fiber Reinforced Polyethylene and Polypropylene Composites with High Modulus and Impact Strength. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2008, 21, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Felix, J.; Gatenholm, P.; Schreiber, H.P. Plasma modification of cellulose fibers: Effects on some polymer composite properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1994, 51, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morales, J.; Olayo, M.G.; Cruz, G.J.; Herrera-Franco, P.; Olayo, R. Plasma modification of cellulose fibers for composite materials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 3821–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lendvai, L.; Karger-Kocsis, J.; Kmetty, Á.; Drakopoulos, S.X. Production and characterization of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 42397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q.; Liu, Y.; Yang, G.C.; Zeng, H.M. The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bisanda, E.T.N.; Ansell, M.P. The effect of silane treatment on the mechanical and physical properties of sisal-epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1991, 41, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Oksman, K. High Quality Flax Fibre Composites Manufactured by the Resin Transfer Moulding Process. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2001, 20, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Van de Weyenberg, I.; Ivens, J.; De Coster, A.; Kino, B.; Baetens, E.; Verpoest, I. Influence of processing and chemical treatment of flax fibres on their composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1241–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Phillips, S.; Baets, J.; Lessard, L.; Hubert, P.; Verpoest, I. Characterization of flax/epoxy prepregs before and after cure. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2013, 32, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Van de Velde, K.; Kiekens, P. Effect of material and process parameters on the mechanical properties of unidirectional and multidirectional flax/polypropylene composites. Compos. Struct. 2003, 62, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Snijder, M.H.B.; Bos, H.L. Reinforcement of polypropylene by annual plant fibers. Optimisation of the coupling agent efficiency. Compos. Interfaces 2000, 7, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bledzki, A.; Al-Mamun, D.A.; Lucka-Gabor, M.M.; Gutowski, V. The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2008, 2, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ochi, S. Mechanical properties of kenaf fibers and kenaf/PLA composites. Mech. Mater. 2008, 40, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Graupner, N.; Müssig, J. A comparison of the mechanical characteristics of kenaf and lyocell fibre reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 2010–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zampaloni, M.; Pourboghrat, F.; Yankovich, S.A.; Rodgers, B.N.; Moore, J.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: A discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2007, 38, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Le Guen, M.J.; Newman, R.H. Pulped Phormium tenax leaf fibres as reinforcement for epoxy composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2007, 38, 2109–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Le, T.M.; Pickering, K.L. The potential of harakeke fibre as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites including modelling of long harakeke fibre composite strength. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 76, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Devi, L.U.; Bhagawan, S.S.; Thomas, S. Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced polyester composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 64, 1739–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ahmed, K.; Vijayarangan, S.; Kumar, A. Low Velocity Impact Damage Characterization of Woven Jut Glass Fabric Reinforced Isothalic Polyester Hybrid Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2007, 26, 959–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahmed, K.S.; Vijayarangan, S. Tensile, flexural and interlaminar shear properties of woven jute and jute-glass fabric reinforced polyester composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 207, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hassan, M.M.; Wagner, M.H.; Zaman, H.U.; Khan, M.A. Study on the Performance of Hybrid Jute/Betel Nut Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mehta, N.; Parsania, P. Fabrication and evaluation of some mechanical and electrical properties of jute-biomass based hybrid composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1754–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. De Medeiros, E.S.; Agnelli, J.A.M.; Joseph, K.; de Carvalho, L.H.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Mechanical properties of phenolic composites reinforced with jute/cotton hybrid fabrics. Polym. Compos. 2005, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Esfandiari, A. Mechanical Properties of PP/Jute and Glass Fibers Composites: The Statistical Investigation. J. Appl. Sci. 2007, 7, 3943–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Davoodi, M.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ahmad, D.; Ali, A.; Khalina, A.; Jonoobi, M. Mechanical properties of hybrid kenaf/glass reinforced epoxy composite for passenger car bumper beam. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Busu, W.N.; Anuar, H.; Ahmad, S.H.; Rasid, R.; Jamal, N.A. The Mechanical and Physical Properties of Thermoplastic Natural Rubber Hybrid Composites Reinforced with Hibiscus cannabinus, L and Short Glass Fiber. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2010, 49, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hassan, M.M.; Mueller, M.; Tartakowska, D.J.; Wagner, M.H. Mechanical performance of hybrid rice straw/sea weed polypropylene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 120, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hassan, M.M.; Wagner, M.H.; Zaman, H.U.; Khan, M.A. Physico-Mechanical Performance of Hybrid Betel Nut (Areca catechu) Short Fiber/Seaweed Polypropylene Composite. J. Nat. Fibers 2010, 7, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ramachandran, V.; Vairavan, M. Mechanical properties of glass/palmyra fiber waste sandwich composites. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2005, 12, 563–570. [Google Scholar]
  93. Velmurugan, R.; Manikandan, V. Mechanical properties of palmyra/glass fiber hybrid composites. Compos. Part A-Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2007, 38, 2216–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mandal, S.; Alam, S.; Varma, I.K.; Maiti, S.N. Studies on Bamboo/Glass Fiber Reinforced USP and VE Resin. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2010, 29, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nayunigari, M.K.; Reddy, G.; Naidu, A.N.D.; Subha, T. Mechanical Properties of Coir/Glass Fiber Phenolic Resin Based Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 1530–7964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Thiruchitrambalam, M. Improving mechanical properties of banana/kenaf polyester hybrid composites using sodium laulryl sulfate treatment. Mater. Phys. Mech. 2009, 8, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  97. Cicala, G.; Cristaldi, G.; Recca, G.; Ziegmann, G.; El-Sabbagh, A.; Dickert, M. Properties and performances of various hybrid glass/natural fibre composites for curved pipes. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 2538–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Reddy, G.; Rani, T.; Rao, K.; Naidu, S. Flexural, Compressive, and Interlaminar Shear Strength Properties of Kapok/Glass Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 28, 1665–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ornaghi, H.L., Jr.; Bolner, A.S.; Fiorio, R.; Zattera, A.J.; Amico, S.C. Mechanical and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid composites molded by resin transfer molding. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 118, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Amico, S.C.; Angrizani, C.C.; Drummond, M.L. Influence of the Stacking Sequence on the Mechanical Properties of Glass/Sisal Hybrid Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 29, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ashok Kumar, M.; Ramachandra Reddy, G.; Siva Bharathi, Y.; Venkata Naidu, S.; Naga Prasad Naidu, V. Frictional Coefficient, Hardness, Impact Strength, and Chemical Resistance of Reinforced Sisal-Glass Fiber Epoxy Hybrid Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2010, 44, 3195–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Patel, V.A.; Parsania, P.H. Preparation and Physico-Chemical Study of Glass—Sisal (Treated—Untreated) Hybrid Composites of Bisphenol-C based Mixed Epoxy—Phenolic Resins. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 29, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mu, Q.; Wei, C.; Feng, S. Studies on mechanical properties of sisal fiber/phenol formaldehyde resin in-situ composites. Polym. Compos. 2009, 30, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. De Carvalho, L.H.; Moraes, G.S.; D’Almeida, J.R.M. Influence of Water Absorption and Pre-drying Conditions on the Tensile Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Lignocellulosic Fiber/Polyester Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 28, 1921–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Raghu, K.; Noorunnisa Khanam, P.; Venkata Naidu, S. Chemical Resistance Studies of Silk/Sisal Fiber-Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester-Based Hybrid Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 29, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jawaid, M.; Khalil, H.A.; Bakar, A. Mechanical performance of oil palm empty fruit bunches/jute fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 7944–7949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kong, K.; Hejda, M.; Young, R.; Eichhorn, S. Deformation micromechanics of a model cellulose/glass fibre hybrid composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 2218–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Arbelaiz, A.; Fernández, B.; Cantero, G.; Llano-Ponte, R.; Valea, A.; Mondragon, I. Mechanical properties of flax fibre/polypropylene composites. Influence of fibre/matrix modification and glass fibre hybridization. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2005, 36, 1637–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Taşdemır, M.; Koçak, D.; Usta, İ.; Akalin, M.; Merdan, N. Properties of Recycled Polycarbonate/Waste Silk and Cotton Fiber Polymer Composites. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2008, 57, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, H.; Pascal Kamdem, D.; Bezubic, B.; Ruede, P. Mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/wood flour/glass fiber hybrid composites. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2003, 9, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Srinivasan, V.S.; Rajendra Boopathy, S.; Sangeetha, D.; Vijaya Ramnath, B. Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of banana–flax based natural fibre composite. Mater. Des. 2014, 60, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gassan, J.; Gutowski, V. Effects of corona discharge and UV treatment on the properties of jute-fibre epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2000, 60, 2857–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Brostow, W.; Hagg Lobland, H.E.; Narkis, M. The concept of materials brittleness and its applications. Polym. Bull. 2011, 67, 1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Maldas, D.; Kokta, B.V. Role of Coupling Agents on the Performance of Woodflour-Filled Polypropylene Composites. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 1994, 27, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zwawi, M. A Review on Natural Fiber Bio-Composites, Surface Modifications and Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ragoubi, M.; Bienaimé, D.; Molina, S.; George, B.; Merlin, A. Impact of corona treated hemp fibres onto mechanical properties of polypropylene composites made thereof. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 31, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pizzi, A.; Kueny, R.; Lecoanet, F.; Massetau, B.; Carpentier, D.; Krebs, A.; Loiseau, F.; Molina, S.; Ragoubi, M. High resin content natural matrix–natural fibre biocomposites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 30, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Figueiredo, P.; Lintinen, K.; Hirvonen, J.T.; Kostiainen, M.A.; Santos, H.A. Properties and chemical modifications of lignin: Towards lignin-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 233–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Raj, R.G.; Kokta, B.V.; Maldas, D.; Daneault, C. Use of wood fibers in thermoplastics. VII. The effect of coupling agents in polyethylene–wood fiber composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1989, 37, 1089–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Laurichesse, S.; Avérous, L. Chemical modification of lignins: Towards biobased polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1266–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. El Knidri, H.; Belaabed, R.; Addaou, A.; Laajeb, A.; Lahsini, A. Extraction, chemical modification and characterization of chitin and chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mayandi, K.; Rajini, N.; Manojprabhakar, M.; Siengchin, S.; Ayrilmis, N. 1–Recent studies on durability of natural/synthetic fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. In Durability and Life Prediction in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites; Jawaid, M., Thariq, M., Saba, N., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  123. Mittal, K.L. The role of the interface in adhesion phenomena. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1977, 17, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cheek, L.; Wilcock, A.; Hsu, L.-H. Effects of Mercerization, Submercerization, and Liquid Ammonia on Fiber Morphology of Neps in Cotton Fabric. Text. Res. J. 1987, 57, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Misra, S.; Misra, M.; Tripathy, S.S.; Nayak, S.K.; Mohanty, A.K. The influence of chemical surface modification on the performance of sisal-polyester biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2002, 23, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, B.; Panigrahi, S.; Tabil, L.; Crerar, W. Pre-treatment of Flax Fibers for use in Rotationally Molded Biocomposites. J. Reinf. Compos. 2007, 26, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Englund, K. 1–Natural fibers and their composites. In Tribology of Natural Fiber Polymer Composites; Chand, N., Fahim, M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  128. Joseph, K.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Toledo, R.; Thomas, S.; Carvalho, L.; Pothen, L.; Kala, S. Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites. In Natural Polymers and Agro Fibers Composites; Embrapa: San Carlos, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sharif, R.; Mohsin, M.; Ramzan, N.; Ahmad, S.W.; Qutab, H.G. Synthesis and Application of Fluorine-free Environment-friendly Stearic Acid-based Oil and Water Repellent for Cotton Fabric. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 1632–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vijay, R.; Manoharan, S.; Arjun, S.; Vinod, A.; Singaravelu, D.L. Characterization of Silane-Treated and Untreated Natural Fibers from Stem of Leucas Aspera. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 1957–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Barczewski, M.; Matykiewicz, D.; Szostak, M. The effect of two-step surface treatment by hydrogen peroxide and silanization of flax/cotton fabrics on epoxy-based laminates thermomechanical properties and structure. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 13813–13824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Abbas, M.; Bachtiar, D.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Hasany, S.F. Effect of Potassium Permanganate on Tensile Properties of Sugar Palm Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sepe, R.; Bollino, F.; Boccarusso, L.; Caputo, F. Influence of chemical treatments on mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 133, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Godara, S.S. Effect of chemical modification of fiber surface on natural fiber composites: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 3428–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tallawi, M.; Rosellini, E.; Barbani, N.; Cascone, M.G.; Rai, R.; Saint-Pierre, G.; Boccaccini, A.R. Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering A review. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 20150254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Pommet, M.; Juntaro, J.; Heng, J.Y.; Mantalaris, A.; Lee, A.F.; Wilson, K.; Kalinka, G.; Shaffer, M.S.; Bismarck, A. Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria. Depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lu, N.; Oza, S.; Tajabadi, M.G. Surface modification of natural fibers for reinforcement in polymeric composites. Surf. Modif. Biopolym. 2015, 1, 224–237. [Google Scholar]
  138. Neto, J.; Queiroz, H.; Aguiar, R.; Lima, R.; Cavalcanti, D.; Banea, M.D. A Review of Recent Advances in Hybrid Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 561–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Tanasă, F.; Teacă, C.-A.; Nechifor, M.; Stanciu, M.-C. 6–Physical methods for the modification of the natural fibers surfaces. In Surface Treatment Methods of Natural Fibres and Their Effects on Biocomposites; Shahzad, A., Tanasa, F., Teaca, C.-A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2022; pp. 125–146. [Google Scholar]
  140. Bozaci, E.; Sever, K.; Sarikanat, M.; Seki, Y.; Demir, A.; Ozdogan, E.; Tavman, I. Effects of the atmospheric plasma treatments on surface and mechanical properties of flax fiber and adhesion between fiber–matrix for composite materials. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 45, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xiao, H.; He, B.; Li, J. Surface modification of natural fibers by plasma for improving strength properties of paper sheets. Holzforschung 2015, 69, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sun, D. Surface modification of natural fibers using plasma treatment. Biodegrad. Green Compos. 2016, 1, 18–39. [Google Scholar]
  143. Oliveira, F.R.; Erkens, L.; Fangueiro, R.; Souto, A.P. Surface Modification of Banana Fibers by DBD Plasma Treatment. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012, 32, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Boulos, M.I.; Fauchais, P.; Pfender, E. Thermal Plasmas Fundamentals and Applications; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  145. Burm, K. Plasma: The Fourth State of Matter. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012, 32, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Braithwaite, N. The origins of plasma. Phys. World 2008, 21, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Van Roosmalen, A.J.; Baggerman, J.A.G.; Brader, S.J.H. The Plasma State. In Dry Etching for VLSI, Updates in Applied Physics and Electrical Technology; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  148. Yasuda, H.K. Plasma Polymerization; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  149. Macedo, M.J.P.; Silva, G.S.; Feitor, M.C.; Costa, T.H.C.; Ito, E.N.; Melo, J.D.D. Surface modification of kapok fibers by cold plasma surface treatment. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2467–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Louzi, V.C.; Campos, J.S.d.C. Corona treatment applied to synthetic polymeric monofilaments (PP, PET, and PA-6). Surf. Interfaces 2019, 14, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Atyabi, S.M.; Sharifi, F.; Irani, S.; Zandi, M.; Mivehchi, H.; Nagheh, Z. Cell Attachment and Viability Study of PCL Nano-fiber Modified by Cold Atmospheric Plasma. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 74, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Duan, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Meng, Y.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T.; Li, J. Plasma surface modification of materials and their entrapment of water contaminant: A review. Plasma Process. Polym. 2017, 14, 1600218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bhatnagar, N. Effect of Plasma on Adhesion Characteristics of High Performance Polymers. Rev. Adhes. Adhes. 2013, 1, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. John Wiley & Sons. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Polymerization Surface Treatments by Dielectric Barrier Discharge for Enhanced Polymer-Polymer and Metal-Polymer Adhesion. In Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 217–249. [Google Scholar]
  155. John Wiley & Sons. Atmospheric Plasma Surface Treatment of Styrene-Butadiene Rubber: Study of Adhesion and Ageing Effects. In Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 315–328. [Google Scholar]
  156. Li, Z.-F.; Netravali, A.N. Surface modification of UHSPE fibers through allylamine plasma deposition. I. Infrared and ESCA study of allylamine plasma formed polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1992, 44, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Tsafack, M.J.; Hochart, F.; Levalois-Grützmacher, J. Polymerization and surface modification by low pressure plasma technique. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 26, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Acda, M.N.; Devera, E.E.; Cabangon, R.J.; Ramos, H.J. Effects of plasma modification on adhesion properties of wood. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012, 32, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sarikanat, M.; Seki, Y.; Sever, K.; Bozaci, E.; Demir, A.; Ozdogan, E. The effect of argon and air plasma treatment of flax fiber on mechanical properties of reinforced polyester composite. J. Ind. Text. 2016, 45, 1252–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Paukszta, D.; Borysiak, S. The Influence of Processing and the Polymorphism of Lignocellulosic Fillers on the Structure and Properties of Composite Materials—A Review. Materials 2013, 6, 2747–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Oh, C.; Streller, F.; Ashurst, W.R.; Carpick, R.W.; de Boer, M.P. In situ oxygen plasma cleaning of microswitch surfaces-Comparison of Ti and graphite electrodes. J. Micromec. Microeng. 2016, 26, 115020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Nguyen-Tri, P.; Altiparmak, F.; Nguyen, N.; Tuduri, L.; Ouellet-Plamondon, C.M.; Prud’homme, R.E. Robust Superhydrophobic Cotton Fibers Prepared by Simple Dip-Coating Approach Using Chemical and Plasma-Etching Pretreatments. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 7829–7837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Saka, C. Overview on the Surface Functionalization Mechanism and Determination of Surface Functional Groups of Plasma Treated Carbon Nanotubes. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Darvish, F.; Mostofi Sarkari, N.; Khani, M.; Eslami, E.; Shokri, B.; Mohseni, M.; Ebrahimi, M.; Alizadeh, M.; Dee, C.F. Direct plasma treatment approach based on non-thermal gliding arc for surface modification of biaxially-oriented polypropylene with post-exposure hydrophilicity improvement and minus aging effects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 144815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Jelil, R.A. A review of low-temperature plasma treatment of textile materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 5913–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nisol, B.; Watson, S.; Lerouge, S.; Wertheimer, M.R. Energetics of Reactions in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge with Argon Carrier Gas: II Mixtures with Different Molecules. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 13, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Trejbal, J.; Nežerka, V.; Somr, M.; Fládr, J.; Potocký, Š.; Artemenko, A.; Tesárek, P. Deterioration of bonding capacity of plasma-treated polymer fiber reinforcement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 89, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Grill, A. Cold Plasma Materials Fabrication: From Fundamentals to Applications; Wiley-IEEE Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  169. Bitar, R.; Cools, P.; De Geyter, N.; Morent, R. Acrylic acid plasma polymerization for biomedical use. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 448, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Macgregor-Ramiasa, M.N.; Cavallaro, A.A.; Vasilev, K. Properties and reactivity of polyoxazoline plasma polymer films. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 6327–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Iqbal, M.; Dinh, D.K.; Abbas, Q.; Imran, M.; Sattar, H.; Ul Ahmad, A. Controlled Surface Wettability by Plasma Polymer Surface Modification. Surfaces 2019, 2, 349–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Friedrich, J. Mechanisms of Plasma Polymerization–Reviewed from a Chemical Point of View. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 783–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Nitschke, M. Plasma Modification of Polymer Surfaces and Plasma Polymerization; Stamm, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. e1–e2. [Google Scholar]
  174. Jagur-Grodzinski, J. Heterogeneous Modification of Polymers: Matrix and Surface Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1997; Volume 11, p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  175. Attri, P.; Arora, B.; Choi, E.H. Retracted Article: Utility of plasma. A new road from physics to chemistry. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 12540–12567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Simionescu, I.C.; Dénes, F.; Macoveanu, M.M.; Negulescu, I. Surface modification and grafting of natural and synthetic fibres and fabrics under cold plasma conditions. Die. Makromol. Chem. 1984, 8, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Desai, S.M.; Singh, R.P. Surface Modification of Polyethylene. In Advances in Polymer Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; Volume 169. [Google Scholar]
  178. Vesel, A.; Mozetic, M. New developments in surface functionalization of polymers using controlled plasma treatments. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 293001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Stewart, C.; Akhavan, B.; Wise, S.G.; Bilek, M.M.M. A review of biomimetic surface functionalization for bone-integrating orthopedic implants: Mechanisms, current approaches, and future directions. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 106, 100588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sparavigna, A.C.; Wolf, R. Atmospheric Plasma Treatments in Converting and Textile Industries; Lulu.com: Morrisville, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  181. Abromavičius, G.; Juodagalvis, T.; Buzelis, R.; Juškevičius, K.; Drazdys, R.; Kičas, S. Oxygen plasma etching of fused silica substrates for high power laser optics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 453, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Memos, G.; Lidorikis, E.; Gogolides, E.; Kokkoris, G. A hybrid modeling framework for the investigation of surface roughening of polymers during oxygen plasma etching. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 175205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ahmed, N.; Masood, A.; Siow, K.S.; Wee, M.F.M.R.; Haron, F.F.; Patra, A.; Nayan, N.; Soon, C.F. Effects of Oxygen (O2) Plasma Treatment in Promoting the Germination and Growth of Chili. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2022, 42, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Luna, P.; Mariño, A.; Lizarazo-Marriaga, J.; Beltrán, O. Dry etching plasma applied to fique fibers. Influence on their mechanical properties and surface appearance. Procedia Eng. 2017, 200, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Cordeiro, R. Plasma Treatment of Natural Fibers to Improve Fiber-Matrix Compatibility; Coppe: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  186. Li, M.; Pu, Y.; Thomas, V.M.; Yoo, C.G.; Ozcan, S.; Deng, Y.; Nelson, K.; Ragauskas, A.J. Recent advancements of plant-based natural fiber–reinforced composites and their applications. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 200, 108254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Rao, J.; Bao, L.; Wang, B.; Fan, M.; Feo, L. Plasma surface modification and bonding enhancement for bamboo composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 138, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Sundriyal, P.; Pandey, M.; Bhattacharya, S. Plasma-assisted surface alteration of industrial polymers for improved adhesive bonding. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2020, 101, 102626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jia, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, L. Assessment of soil heavy metals for eco-environment and human health in a rapidly urbanization area of the upper Yangtze Basin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Igiri, B.E.; Okoduwa, S.I.R.; Idoko, G.O.; Akabuogu, E.P.; Adeyi, A.O.; Ejiogu, I.K. Toxicity and Bioremediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Ecosystem from Tannery Wastewater: A Review. J. Toxicol. 2018, 2018, 2568038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Fu, F.; Xie, L.; Tang, B.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, S. Application of a novel strategy—Advanced Fenton-chemical precipitation to the treatment of strong stability chelated heavy metal containing wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 189, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Zhang, Q.; Wang, N.; Zhao, L.; Xu, T.; Cheng, Y. Polyamidoamine Dendronized Hollow Fiber Membranes in the Recovery of Heavy Metal Ions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1907–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Jiang, W.; Wang, W.; Pan, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Lv, L. Facile Fabrication of Magnetic Chitosan Beads of Fast Kinetics and High Capacity for Copper Removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 3421–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Hunsom, M.; Pruksathorn, K.; Damronglerd, S.; Vergnes, H.; Duverneuil, P. Electrochemical treatment of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr6+, Ni2+) from industrial effluent and modeling of copper reduction. Water Res. 2005, 39, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kampalanonwat, P.; Supaphol, P. Preparation and Adsorption Behavior of Aminated Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Mats for Heavy Metal Ion Removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 3619–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Xin, X.; Wei, Q.; Yang, J.; Yan, L.; Feng, R.; Guodong, C.; Du, B.; Li, H. Highly efficient removal of heavy metal ions by amine-functionalized mesoporous Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 184, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Nonkumwong, J.; Ananta, S.; Srisombat, L. Effective removal of lead(ii) from wastewater by amine-functionalized magnesium ferrite nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 47382–47393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Yantasee, W.; Rutledge, R.D.; Chouyyok, W.; Sukwarotwat, V.; Orr, G.; Warner, C.L.; Warner, M.G.; Fryxell, G.E.; Wiacek, R.J.; Timchalk, C.; et al. Functionalized nanoporous silica for the removal of heavy metals from biological systems. Adsorption and application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 2749–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Yalçın, S.; Sezer, S.; Apak, R. Characterization and lead (II), cadmium (II), nickel (II) biosorption of dried marine brown macro algae Cystoseira barbata. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Elkady, M.F.; Abu-Saied, M.A.; Rahman, A.M.A.; Soliman, E.A.; Elzatahry, A.A.; Yossef, M.E.; Eldin, M.S.M. Nano-sulphonated poly (glycidyl methacrylate) cations exchanger for cadmium ions removal. Effects of operating parameters. Desalination 2011, 279, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Qu, Q.; Gu, Q.; Gu, Z.; Shen, Y.; Wang, C.; Hu, X. Efficient removal of heavy metal from aqueous solution by sulfonic acid functionalized nonporous silica microspheres. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 415, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Shahravan, A.; Desai, T.; Matsoukas, T. Controlled manipulation of wetting characteristics of nanoparticles with dry-based plasma polymerization method. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 251603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Michl, T.D.; Coad, B.R.; Hüsler, A.; Vasilev, K.; Griesser, H.J. Laboratory Scale Systems for the Plasma Treatment and Coating of Particles. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Akhavan, B.; Jarvis, K.; Majewski, P. Plasma Polymer-Functionalized Silica Particles for Heavy Metals Removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4265–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Rezvani-Boroujeni, A.; Javanbakht, M.; Karimi, M.; Shahrjerdi, C.; Akbari-adergani, B. Immoblization of Thiol-Functionalized Nanosilica on the Surface of Poly (ether sulfone) Membranes for the Removal of Heavy-Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater Samples. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Steen, M.L.; Jordan, A.; Fisher, E. Hydrophilic modification of polymeric membranes by low temperature H2O plasma treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 204, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Mansur, A.A.P.; Nascimento, O.L.d.; Vasconcelos, W.L.; Mansur, H.S. Chemical functionalization of ceramic tile surfaces by silane coupling agents. Polymer modified mortar adhesion mechanism implications. Mater. Res. 2008, 11, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Xu, Y.; Sun, G.; Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Qin, X. Preparation, Characterization of Thiol-functionalized Silica and Application for Sorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 349, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Cao, D.; Cao, Z.; Wang, G.; Dong, X.; Dong, Y.; Ye, Y.; Hu, S. Plasma induced graft co-polymerized electrospun polyethylene terephalate membranes for removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution. Chem. Phys. 2020, 536, 110832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bahramzadeh, A.; Zahedi, P.; Abdouss, M. Acrylamide-plasma treated electrospun polystyrene nanofibrous adsorbents for cadmium and nickel ions removal from aqueous solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 42944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Chan, C.M.; Ko, T.M.; Hiraoka, H. Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1996, 24, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wei, Q.F.; Mather, R.R.; Wang, X.Q.; Fotheringham, A.F. Functional nanostructures generated by plasma-enhanced modification of polypropylene fibre surfaces. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 5387–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Vandenbossche, M.; Jimenez, M.; Casetta, M.; Bellayer, S.; Beaurain, A.; Bourbigot, S.; Traisnel, M. Chitosan-grafted nonwoven geotextile for heavy metals sorption in sediments. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Vandenbossche, M.; Casetta, M.; Jimenez, M.; Bellayer, S.; Traisnel, M. Cysteine-grafted nonwoven geotextile: A new and efficient material for heavy metals sorption—Part A. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 132, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Xiao, L.; Wildgoose, G.G.; Crossley, A.; Knight, R.; Jones, J.H.; Compton, R.G. Removal of Toxic Metal-Ion Pollutants from Water by Using Chemically Modified Carbon Powders. Chem.–Asian J. 2006, 1, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Johnson, A.M.; Holcombe, J.A. Poly(l-cysteine) as an Electrochemically Modifiable Ligand for Trace Metal Chelation. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Özmen, F.; Korpayev, S.; Kavaklı, P.A.; Kavaklı, C. Activation of inert polyethylene/polypropylene nonwoven fiber (NWF) by plasma-initiated grafting and amine functionalization of the grafts for Cu (II), Co (II), Cr (III), Cd (II) and Pb (II) removal. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 174, 105234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Dehbashi Nia, N.; Lee, S.-W.; Bae, S.; Kim, T.-H.; Hwang, Y. Surface modification of polypropylene non-woven filter by O2 plasma/acrylic acid enhancing Prussian blue immobilization for aqueous cesium adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 590, 153101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Wei, P.; Lou, H.; Xu, X.; Xu, W.; Yang, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Preparation of PP non-woven fabric with good heavy metal adsorption performance via plasma modification and graft polymerization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 539, 148195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Shao, D.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Meng, Y. Plasma Induced Grafting Carboxymethyl Cellulose on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for the Removal of UO22+ from Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Shao, D.; Hu, J.; Wang, X. Plasma Induced Grafting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube with Chitosan and Its Application for Removal of UO, Cu2+, and Pb2+ from Aqueous Solutions. Plasma Process. Polym. 2010, 7, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Zhang, W.; Liang, Z.; Feng, Q.; Wei, N.; Liu, Z.; Fu, N.; Zhang, Y. Reed hemicellulose-based hydrogel prepared by glow discharge electrolysis plasma and its adsorption properties for heavy metal ions. Fresenius Environ. Bull 2016, 25, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar]
  224. Yu, J.; Zheng, J.; Lu, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, W. Selective adsorption and reusability behavior for Pb2+ and Cd2+ on chitosan/poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(acrylic acid) adsorbent prepared by glow-discharge electrolysis plasma. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2016, 294, 1585–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Lu, Q.; Yu, J.; Gao, J.; Yang, W.; Li, Y. Glow-discharge Electrolysis Plasma Induced Synthesis of Polyvinylpyrrolidone/Acrylic Acid Hydrogel and its Adsorption Properties for Heavy-metal Ions. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Wu, L.; Wan, W.; Shang, Z.; Gao, X.; Kobayashi, N.; Luo, G.; Li, Z. Surface modification of phosphoric acid activated carbon by using non-thermal plasma for enhancement of Cu (II) adsorption from aqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 197, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Wu, L.; Shang, Z.; Chen, S.; Tu, J.; Kobayashi, N.; Li, Z. Raw walnut shell modified by non-thermal plasma in ultrafine water mist for adsorptive removal of Cu(ii) from aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 21993–22003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  228. Wang, M.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shi, Y.; He, L.; Fang, S.; Zhang, Z. Graphene nanostructures with plasma polymerized allylamine biosensor for selective detection of mercury ions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 203, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Zhu, H.; Kong, Q.; Cao, X.; He, H.; Wang, J.; He, Y. Adsorption of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution by chemically modified natural cellulose. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 20368–20376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Gianneli, M.; Tsougeni, K.; Grammoustianou, A.; Tserepi, A.; Gogolides, E.; Gizeli, E. Nanostructured PMMA-coated Love wave device as a platform for protein adsorption studies. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Ellinas, K.; Tsougeni, K.; Petrou, P.S.; Boulousis, G.; Tsoukleris, D.; Pavlatou, E.; Tserepi, A.; Kakabakos, S.E.; Gogolides, E. Three-dimensional plasma micro–nanotextured cyclo-olefin-polymer surfaces for biomolecule immobilization and environmentally stable superhydrophobic and superoleophobic behavior. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 300, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Ellinas, K.; Pujari, S.P.; Dragatogiannis, D.A.; Charitidis, C.A.; Tserepi, A.; Zuilhof, H.; Gogolides, E. Plasma Micro-Nanotextured, Scratch, Water and Hexadecane Resistant, Superhydrophobic, and Superamphiphobic Polymeric Surfaces with Perfluorinated Monolayers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6510–6524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Vijayan, V.M.; Tucker, B.S.; Baker, P.A.; Vohra, Y.K.; Thomas, V. Non-equilibrium hybrid organic plasma processing for superhydrophobic PTFE surface towards potential bio-interface applications. Colloids Surf. B: Bio Interfaces 2019, 183, 110463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Nageswaran, G.; Jothi, L.; Jagannathan, S. Chapter 4–Plasma Assisted Polymer Modifications. In Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for Polymeric Materials; Thomas, S., Mozetič, M., Cvelbar, U., Špatenka, P., Praveen, K.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 95–127. [Google Scholar]
  235. Ellinas, K.; Tserepi, A.; Gogolides, E. From Superamphiphobic to Amphiphilic Polymeric Surfaces with Ordered Hierarchical Roughness Fabricated with Colloidal Lithography and Plasma Nanotexturing. Langmuir 2011, 27, 3960–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Cheng, Z.; Teoh, S.H. Surface modification of ultra thin poly (epsilon-caprolactone) films using acrylic acid and collagen. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1991–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Tsougeni, K.; Vourdas, N.; Tserepi, A.; Gogolides, E.; Cardinaud, C. Mechanisms of Oxygen Plasma Nanotexturing of Organic Polymer Surfaces: From Stable Super Hydrophilic to Super Hydrophobic Surfaces. Langmuir 2009, 25, 11748–11759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Gengembre, L.; Leys, C.; Payen, E.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Schacht, E. Surface treatment of a polypropylene film with a nitrogen DBD at medium pressure. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 43, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Tucker, B.S.; Aliakbarshirazi, S.; Vijayan, V.M.; Thukkaram, M.; De Geyter, N.; Thomas, V. Nonthermal plasma processing for nanostructured biomaterials and tissue engineering scaffolds: A mini review. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 17, 100259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Desmet, T.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Leys, C.; Schacht, E.; Dubruel, P. Nonthermal plasma technology as a versatile strategy for polymeric biomaterials surface modification. A review. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2351–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. De Geyter, N.; Morent, R.; Leys, C.; Gengembre, L.; Payen, E. Treatment of polymer films with a dielectric barrier discharge in air, helium and argon at medium pressure. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 7066–7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Ding, Z.; Chen, J.; Gao, S.; Chang, J.; Zhang, J.; Kang, E.T. Immobilization of chitosan onto poly-l-lactic acid film surface by plasma graft polymerization to control the morphology of fibroblast and liver cells. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Kasálková, N.S.; Slepička, P.; Kolská, Z.; Hodačová, P.; Kučková, Š.; Švorčík, V. Grafting of bovine serum albumin proteins on plasma-modified polymers for potential application in tissue engineering. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  244. Shen, H.; Hu, X.; Yang, F.; Bei, J.; Wang, S. Combining oxygen plasma treatment with anchorage of cationized gelatin for enhancing cell affinity of poly(lactide-co-glycolide). Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4219–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Trentesaux, M.; Gengembre, L.; Dubruel, P.; Leys, C.; Payen, E. Influence of Discharge Atmosphere on the Ageing Behaviour of Plasma-Treated Polylactic Acid. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2010, 30, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Ogino, A.; Noguchi, S.; Nagatsu, M. Effect of Plasma Pretreatment on Heparin Immobilization on Polymer Sheet. J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 2009, 22, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Huang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-C.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Chen, K.-S. Surface modification and characterization of chitosan or PLGA membrane with laminin by chemical and oxygen plasma treatment for neural regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2007, 82, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Slepička, P.; Trostová, S.; Slepičková Kasálková, N.; Kolská, Z.; Malinský, P.; Macková, A.; Bačáková, L.; Švorčík, V. Nanostructuring of polymethylpentene by plasma and heat treatment for improved biocompatibility. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Zelzer, M.; Scurr, D.; Abdullah, B.; Urquhart, A.J.; Gadegaard, N.; Bradley, J.W.; Alexander, M.R. Influence of the Plasma Sheath on Plasma Polymer Deposition in Advance of a Mask and down Pores. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 8487–8494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Leite, Á.J.; Mano, J.F. Biomedical applications of natural-based polymers combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4555–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Tsougeni, K.; Petrou, P.S.; Awsiuk, K.; Marzec, M.M.; Ioannidis, N.; Petrouleas, V.; Tserepi, A.; Kakabakos, S.E.; Gogolides, E. Direct Covalent Biomolecule Immobilization on Plasma-Nanotextured Chemically Stable Substrates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14670–14681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Carvalho, A.L.; Vale, A.C.; Sousa, M.P.; Barbosa, A.M.; Torrado, E.; Mano, J.F.; Alves, N.M. Antibacterial bioadhesive layer-by-layer coatings for orthopedic applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 5385–5393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Bilek, M.M.; McKenzie, D.R. Plasma modified surfaces for covalent immobilization of functional biomolecules in the absence of chemical linkers. Towards better biosensors and a new generation of medical implants. Biophys. Rev. 2010, 2, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  254. Ho, M.-H.; Hou, L.-T.; Tu, C.-Y.; Hsieh, H.-J.; Lai, J.-Y.; Chen, W.-J.; Wang, D.-M. Promotion of Cell Affinity of Porous PLLA Scaffolds by Immobilization of RGD Peptides via Plasma Treatment. Macromol. Biosci. 2006, 6, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Carrino, L.; Moroni, G.; Polini, W. Cold plasma treatment of polypropylene surface. A study on wettability and adhesion. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, 121, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Jaleh, B.; Parvin, P.; Wanichapichart, P.; Saffar, A.P.; Reyhani, A. Induced super hydrophilicity due to surface modification of polypropylene membrane treated by O2 plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 1655–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Tucker, B.S.; Surolia, R.; Baker, P.A.; Vohra, Y.; Antony, V.; Thomas, V. Low-Temperature Air Plasma Modification of Electrospun Soft Materials and Bio-interfaces. In TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 819–826 . [Google Scholar]
  258. Grenadyorov, A.S.; Solovyev, A.A.; Ivanova, N.M.; Zhulkov, M.O.; Chernyavskiy, A.M.; Malashchenko, V.V.; Khlusov, I.A. Enhancement of the adhesive strength of antithrombogenic and hemocompatible a-C:H:SiOx films to polypropylene. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 399, 126132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Lukowiak, M.C.; Wettmarshausen, S.; Hidde, G.; Landsberger, P.; Boenke, V.; Rodenacker, K.; Braun, U.; Friedrich, J.F.; Gorbushina, A.A.; Haag, R. Polyglycerol coated polypropylene surfaces for protein and bacteria resistance. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Tsou, C.-H.; Yao, W.-H.; Hung, W.-S.; Suen, M.-C.; De Guzman, M.; Chen, J.; Tsou, C.-Y.; Wang, R.Y.; Chen, J.-C.; Wu, C.-S. Innovative Plasma Process of Grafting Methyl Diallyl Ammonium Salt onto Polypropylene to Impart Antibacterial and Hydrophilic Surface Properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 2537–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Babu, A.T.; Antony, R. Green synthesis of silver doped nano metal oxides of zinc & copper for antibacterial properties, adsorption, catalytic hydrogenation & photodegradation of aromatics. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Woskowicz, E.; Łożyńska, M.; Kowalik-Klimczak, A.; Kacprzyńska-Gołacka, J.; Osuch-Słomka, E.; Piasek, A.; Gradoń, L. Plasma deposition of antimicrobial coatings based on silver and copper on polypropylene. Polimery 2020, 65, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Gomathi, N.; Neogi, S. Surface modification of polypropylene using argon plasma: Statistical optimization of the process variables. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 7590–7600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Dvořáková, H.; Čech, J.; Stupavská, M.; Prokeš, L.; Jurmanová, J.; Buršíková, V.; Ráheľ, J.; Sťahel, P. Fast Surface Hydrophilization via Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Polymerization for Biological and Technical Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Lim, J.-S.; Kook, M.-S.; Jung, S.; Park, H.-J.; Ohk, S.-H.; Oh, H.-K. Plasma Treated High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Medpor Implant Immobilized with rhBMP-2 for Improving the Bone Regeneration. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 810404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Saitaer, X.; Sanbhal, N.; Qiao, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, J.; Brochu, G.; Guidoin, R.; Khatri, A.; Wang, L. Polydopamine-Inspired Surface Modification of Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Devices via Cold Oxygen Plasma: Antibacterial and Drug Release Properties. Coatings 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  267. Houshyar, S.; Sarker, A.; Jadhav, A.; Kumar, G.S.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Nayak, R.; Shanks, R.A.; Saha, T.; Rifai, A.; Padhye, R.; et al. Polypropylene-nanodiamond composite for hernia mesh. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 111, 110780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Kliewer, S.; Wicha, S.G.; Bröker, A.; Naundorf, T.; Catmadim, T.; Oellingrath, E.K.; Rohnke, M.; Streit, W.R.; Vollstedt, C.; Kipphardt, H.; et al. Contact-active antibacterial polyethylene foils via atmospheric air plasma induced polymerisation of quaternary ammonium salts. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 186, 110679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Popelka, A.; Novák, I.; Lehocký, M.; Chodák, I.; Sedliačik, J.; Gajtanska, M.; Sedliačiková, M.; Vesel, A.; Junkar, I.; Kleinová, A.; et al. Anti-bacterial Treatment of Polyethylene by Cold Plasma for Medical Purposes. Molecules 2012, 17, 762–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  270. Reznickova, A.; Novotna, Z.; Kolska, Z.; Kasalkova, N.S.; Rimpelova, S.; Svorcik, V. Enhanced adherence of mouse fibroblast and vascular cells to plasma modified polyethylene. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 52, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Pandiyaraj, K.N.; Ramkumar, M.C.; Arun Kumar, A.; Padmanabhan, P.V.A.; Pichumani, M.; Bendavid, A.; Cools, P.; De Geyter, N.; Morent, R.; Kumar, V.; et al. Evaluation of surface properties of low density polyethylene (LDPE) films tailored by atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma (APNTP) assisted co-polymerization and immobilization of chitosan for improvement of antifouling properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 94, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Nigam, P.; Armour, G.; Banat, I.M.; Singh, D.; Marchant, R. Physical removal of textile dyes from effluents and solid-state fermentation of dye-adsorbed agricultural residues. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Saka, C.; Şahin, Ö.; Çelik, M.S. The Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solutions by Using Microwave Heating and Pre-boiling Treated Onion Skins as a New Adsorbent. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2012, 34, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Hokkanen, S.; Bhatnagar, A.; Sillanpää, M. A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res. 2016, 91, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Hajeeth, T.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Gomathi, T.; Sudha, P.N. Removal of Cu (II) and Ni (II) using cellulose extracted from sisal fiber and cellulose-g-acrylic acid copolymer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Wu, S.; Xing, J.; Zheng, C.; Xu, G.; Zheng, G.; Xu, J. Plasma modification of aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis composite membrane surface. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 64, 1923–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Yu, H.-Y.; He, X.-C.; Liu, L.-Q.; Gu, J.-S.; Wei, X.-W. Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling characteristics in an SMBR: N2 plasma treatment. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4703–4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Yu, H.-Y.; Xie, Y.-J.; Hu, M.-X.; Wang, J.-L.; Wang, S.-Y.; Xu, Z.-K. Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling property in MBR: CO2 plasma treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 254, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Yu, H.-Y.; Liu, L.-Q.; Tang, Z.-Q.; Yan, M.-G.; Gu, J.-S.; Wei, X.-W. Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling characteristics in an SMBR: Air plasma treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 311, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Zou, L.; Vidalis, I.; Steele, D.; Michelmore, A.; Low, S.P.; Verberk, J.Q.J.C. Surface hydrophilic modification of RO membranes by plasma polymerization for low organic fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 369, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Lin, N.H.; Kim, M.-M.; Lewis, G.T.; Cohen, Y. Polymer surface nano-structuring of reverse osmosis membranes for fouling resistance and improved flux performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 4642–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Kim, M.-M.; Lin, N.H.; Lewis, G.T.; Cohen, Y. Surface nano-structuring of reverse osmosis membranes via atmospheric pressure plasma-induced graft polymerization for reduction of mineral scaling propensity. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Kang, G.-d.; Cao, Y.-m. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review. Water Res. 2012, 46, 584–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Crini, G. Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal. A review. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97, 1061–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Wen, Y.Z.; Liu, W.Q.; Fang, Z.H.; Liu, W.P. Effects of adsorption interferents on removal of Reactive Red 195 dye in wastewater by chitosan. J. Environ. Sci. 2005, 17, 766–769. [Google Scholar]
  286. Wen, Y.; Shen, C.; Ni, Y.; Tong, S.; Yu, F. Glow discharge plasma in water. A green approach to enhancing ability of chitosan for dye removal. J. Hazard Mater. 2012, 201, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Gopakumar, D.A.; Arumukhan, V.; Gelamo, R.V.; Pasquini, D.; de Morais, L.C.; Rizal, S.; Hermawan, D.; Nzihou, A.; Khalil, H.P.S.A. Carbon dioxide plasma treated PVDF electrospun membrane for the removal of crystal violet dyes and iron oxide nanoparticles from water. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 18, 100268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Chul Woo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Tijing, L.D.; Phuntsho, S.; He, T.; Choi, J.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Kyong Shon, H. CF4 plasma-modified omniphobic electrospun nanofiber membrane for produced water brine treatment by membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 529, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Yu, J.; Yang, G.; Pan, Y.; Lu, Q.; Yang, W.; Gao, J. Poly (Acrylamide-co-Acrylic Acid) Hydrogel Induced by Glow-Discharge Electrolysis Plasma and Its Adsorption Properties for Cationic Dyes. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2014, 16, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Şahin, Ö.; Saka, C.; Kutluay, S. Cold plasma and microwave radiation applications on almond shell surface and its effects on the adsorption of Eriochrome Black T. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19, 1617–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Prola, L.D.T.; Acayanka, E.; Lima, E.C.; Umpierres, C.S.; Vaghetti, J.C.P.; Santos, W.O.; Laminsi, S.; Djifon, P.T. Comparison of Jatropha curcas shells in natural form and treated by non-thermal plasma as biosorbents for removal of Reactive Red 120 textile dye from aqueous solution. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 46, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Takam, B.; Acayanka, E.; Kamgang, G.Y.; Pedekwang, M.T.; Laminsi, S. Enhancement of sorption capacity of cocoa shell biomass modified with non-thermal plasma for removal of both cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 16958–16970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Pankaj, S.K.; Bueno-Ferrer, C.; Misra, N.N.; Milosavljević, V.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Bourke, P.; Keener, K.M.; Cullen, P.J. Applications of cold plasma technology in food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 35, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Pilevar, Z.; Bahrami, A.; Beikzadeh, S.; Hosseini, H.; Jafari, S.M. Migration of styrene monomer from polystyrene packaging materials into foods: Characterization and safety evaluation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Dong, S.; Guo, P.; Chen, Y.; Chen, G.-Y.; Ji, H.; Ran, Y.; Li, S.-H.; Chen, Y. Surface modification via atmospheric cold plasma (ACP): Improved functional properties and characterization of zein film. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 115, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Mirzaei-Mohkam, A.; Garavand, F.; Dehnad, D.; Keramat, J.; Nasirpour, A. Physical, mechanical, thermal and structural characteristics of nanoencapsulated vitamin E loaded carboxymethyl cellulose films. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 138, 105383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Jafarzadeh, S.; Jafari, S.M.; Salehabadi, A.; Nafchi, A.M.; Uthaya Kumar, U.S.; Khalil, H.A. Biodegradable green packaging with antimicrobial functions based on the bioactive compounds from tropical plants and their by-products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 262–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Beikzadeh, S.; Khezerlou, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Pilevar, Z.; Mortazavian, A.M. Seed mucilages as the functional ingredients for biodegradable films and edible coatings in the food industry. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 280, 102164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Heidemann, H.M.; Dotto, M.E.R.; Laurindo, J.B.; Carciofi, B.A.M.; Costa, C. Cold plasma treatment to improve the adhesion of cassava starch films onto PCL and PLA surface. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 580, 123739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Romani, V.P.; Olsen, B.; Pinto Collares, M.; Meireles Oliveira, J.R.; Prentice, C.; Guimarães Martins, V. Plasma technology as a tool to decrease the sensitivity to water of fish protein films for food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Vijayan, V.M.; Walker, M.; Pillai, R.R.; Moreno, G.H.; Vohra, Y.K.; Morris, J.J.; Thomas, V. Plasma Electroless Reduction: A Green Process for Designing Metallic Nanostructure Interfaces onto Polymeric Surfaces and 3D Scaffolds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Chen, Y.Q.; Cheng, J.H.; Sun, D.W. Chemical, physical and physiological quality attributes of fruit and vegetables induced by cold plasma treatment: Mechanisms and application advances. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2676–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Mir, S.A.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Dar, B.N.; Shah, M.A.; Wani, M.H.; Roohinejad, S.; Annor, G.A.; Mallikarjunan, K.; Chin, C.F.; Ali, A. Promising applications of cold plasma for microbial safety, chemical decontamination and quality enhancement in fruits. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  304. Lei, J.; Yang, L.; Zhan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ye, T.; Li, Y.; Deng, H.; Li, B. Plasma treated polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene films assembled with chitosan and various preservatives for antimicrobial food packaging. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 114, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Bastos, D.C.; Santos, A.E.; da Silva, M.L.; Simão, R.A. Hydrophobic corn starch thermoplastic films produced by plasma treatment. Ultramicroscopy 2009, 109, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Santos, A.E.F.; Bastos, D.C.; da Silva, M.L.V.J.; Thiré, R.M.S.M.; Simão, R.A. Chemical analysis of a cornstarch film surface modified by SF6 plasma treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2217–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  307. Sifuentes-Nieves, I.; Neira-Velázquez, G.; Hernández-Hernández, E.; Barriga-Castro, E.; Gallardo-Vega, C.; Velazquez, G.; Mendez-Montealvo, G. Influence of gelatinization process and HMDSO plasma treatment on the chemical changes and water vapor permeability of corn starch films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Sifuentes-Nieves, I.; Velazquez, G.; Flores-Silva, P.C.; Hernández-Hernández, E.; Neira-Velázquez, G.; Gallardo-Vega, C.; Mendez-Montealvo, G. HMDSO plasma treatment as alternative to modify structural properties of granular starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 144, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Assis, O.B.G.; Hotchkiss, J.H. Surface hydrophobic modification of chitosan thin films by hexamethyldisilazane plasma deposition. Effects on water vapour, CO2 and O2 permeabilities. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007, 20, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Chamchoi, N.; Teanchai, K.; Kongsriprapan, S.; Choeysuppaket, A.; Siriprom, W. The surface modification by cold argon plasma jet on the biodegradable films from Perna Viridis shell. Mater. Today: Proc. 2018, 5, 13904–13908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Chen, G.; Dong, S.; Zhao, S.; Li, S.; Chen, Y. Improving functional properties of zein film via compositing with chitosan and cold plasma treatment. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 129, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Ulbin-Figlewicz, N.; Zimoch-Korzycka, A.; Jarmoluk, A. Antibacterial Activity and Physical Properties of Edible Chitosan Films Exposed to Low-pressure Plasma. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 3646–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  313. Song, A.Y.; Oh, Y.A.; Roh, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Min, S.C. Cold Oxygen Plasma Treatments for the Improvement of the Physicochemical and Biodegradable Properties of Polylactic Acid Films for Food Packaging. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, E86–E96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Chizoba Ekezie, F.-G.; Sun, D.-W.; Cheng, J.-H. A review on recent advances in cold plasma technology for the food industry: Current applications and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Audic, J.-L.; Poncin-Epaillard, F.; Reyx, D.; Brosse, J.-C. Cold plasma surface modification of conventionally and nonconventionally plasticized poly(vinyl chloride)-based flexible films: Global and specific migration of additives into isooctane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 1384–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Thirumdas, R.; Sarangapani, C.; Annapure, U.S. Cold Plasma: A novel Non-Thermal Technology for Food Processing. Food Biophys. 2015, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Honarvar, Z.; Farhoodi, M.; Khani, M.R.; Mohammadi, A.; Shokri, B.; Ferdowsi, R.; Shojaee-Aliabadi, S. Application of cold plasma to develop carboxymethyl cellulose-coated polypropylene films containing essential oil. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Pankaj, S.K.; Bueno-Ferrer, C.; Misra, N.N.; O’Neill, L.; Tiwari, B.K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P.J. Physicochemical characterization of plasma-treated sodium caseinate film. Food Res. Int. 2014, 66, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Arolkar, G.A.; Salgo, M.J.; Kelkar-Mane, V.; Deshmukh, R.R. The study of air-plasma treatment on corn starch/poly(ε-caprolactone) films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 120, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Cui, H.; Yang, X.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Lin, L. Cold plasma treated phlorotannin/Momordica charantia polysaccharide nanofiber for active food packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Pankaj, S.K.; Bueno-Ferrer, C.; Misra, N.N.; O’Neill, L.; Tiwari, B.K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P.J. Dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric air plasma treatment of high amylose corn starch films. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Romani, V.P.; Olsen, B.; Pinto Collares, M.; Meireles Oliveira, J.R.; Prentice-Hernández, C.; Guimarães Martins, V. Improvement of fish protein films properties for food packaging through glow discharge plasma application. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 970–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Moosavi, M.H.; Khani, M.R.; Shokri, B.; Hosseini, S.M.; Shojaee-Aliabadi, S.; Mirmoghtadaie, L. Modifications of protein-based films using cold plasma. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 142, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Hu, S.; Li, P.; Wei, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z. Antimicrobial activity of nisin-coated polylactic acid film facilitated by cold plasma treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Oh, Y.A.; Roh, S.H.; Min, S.C. Cold plasma treatments for improvement of the applicability of defatted soybean meal-based edible film in food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Kim, S.J.; Song, E.; Jo, K.; Yun, T.; Moon, M.-W.; Lee, K.-R. Composite oxygen-barrier coating on a polypropylene food container. Thin Solid Film. 2013, 540, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Choi, T.Y.; Hwang, B.U.; Kim, B.Y.; Trung, T.Q.; Nam, Y.H.; Kim, D.N.; Eom, K.; Lee, N.E. Stretchable, Transparent, and Stretch-Unresponsive Capacitive Touch Sensor Array with Selectively Patterned Silver Nanowires/Reduced Graphene Oxide Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 18022–18030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Wang, J.-C.; Karmakar, R.S.; Lu, Y.-J.; Huang, C.-Y.; Wei, K.-C. Characterization of Piezoresistive PEDOT:PSS Pressure Sensors with Inter-Digitated and Cross-Point Electrode Structures. Sensors 2015, 15, 818–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  329. Kim, J.; Lee, M.; Shim, H.J.; Ghaffari, R.; Cho, H.R.; Son, D.; Jung, Y.H.; Soh, M.; Choi, C.; Jung, S.; et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  330. Hankiewicz, J.H.; Celinski, Z.; Stupic, K.F.; Anderson, N.R.; Camley, R.E. Ferromagnetic particles as magnetic resonance imaging temperature sensors. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  331. Aziz, S.; Chang, D.E.; Doh, Y.H.; Kang, C.U.; Choi, K.H. Humidity Sensor Based on PEDOT:PSS and Zinc Stannate Nano-composite. J. Electron. Mater. 2015, 44, 3992–3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Aliane, A.; Fischer, V.; Galliari, M.; Tournon, L.; Gwoziecki, R.; Serbutoviez, C.; Chartier, I.; Coppard, R. Enhanced printed temperature sensors on flexible substrate. Microelectron. J. 2014, 45, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Dabhade, R.V.; Bodas, D.S.; Gangal, S.A. Plasma-treated polymer as humidity sensing material-A feasibility study. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 98, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Zhao, X.; Long, Y.; Yang, T.; Li, J.; Zhu, H. Simultaneous High Sensitivity Sensing of Temperature and Humidity with Graphene Woven Fabrics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 30171–30176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Yoon, H. Current Trends in Sensors Based on Conducting Polymer Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2013, 3, 524–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  336. Maksymiuk, K. Chemical Reactivity of Polypyrrole and Its Relevance to Polypyrrole Based Electrochemical Sensors. Electroanal. 2006, 18, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Ameer, Q.; Adeloju, S.B. Polypyrrole-based electronic noses for environmental and industrial analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 106, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Jian, J.; Guo, X.; Lin, L.; Cai, Q.; Cheng, J.; Li, J. Gas-sensing characteristics of dielectrophoretically assembled composite film of oxygen plasma-treated SWCNTs and PEDOT/PSS polymer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 178, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Rivera, M.; Rahaman, M.; Aldalbahi, A.; Velázquez, R.; Zhou, A.F.; Feng, P.X. Exploring the Effects of Argon Plasma Treatment on Plasmon Frequency and the Chemiresistive Properties of Polymer-Carbon Nanotube Metacomposite. Materials 2017, 10, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  340. Aydemir, N.; Malmström, J.; Travas-Sejdic, J. Conducting polymer based electrochemical biosensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 8264–8277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Bernards, D.A.; Macaya, D.J.; Nikolou, M.; DeFranco, J.A.; Takamatsu, S.; Malliaras, G.G. Enzymatic sensing with organic electrochemical transistors. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Werkmeister, F.; Nickel, B. Towards flexible organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) for biosensing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 3830–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  343. Maekawa, E.; Kitano, N.; Yasukawa, T.; Mizutani, F. Use of a Surface-Modified Poly(dimethysiloxane) Layer for the Preparation of Amperometric Glucose Sensor. Electrochemistry 2009, 77, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  344. Fabregat, G.; Osorio, J.; Castedo, A.; Armelin, E.; Buendía, J.J.; Llorca, J.; Alemán, C. Plasma functionalized surface of commodity polymers for dopamine detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 399, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Buendía, J.J.; Fabregat, G.; Castedo, A.; Llorca, J.; Alemán, C. Plasma-treated polyethylene as electrochemical mediator for enzymatic glucose sensors: Toward bifunctional glucose and dopamine sensors. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1700133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  346. Fabregat, G.; Armelin, E.; Alemán, C. Selective Detection of Dopamine Combining Multilayers of Conducting Polymers with Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 4669–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Mazeiko, V.; Kausaite-Minkstimiene, A.; Ramanaviciene, A.; Balevicius, Z.; Ramanavicius, A. Gold nanoparticle and conducting polymer-polyaniline-based nanocomposites for glucose biosensor design. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 189, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Yoo, K.-P.; Kwon, K.-H.; Min, N.-K.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, C.J. Effects of O2 plasma treatment on NH3 sensing characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 143, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Liu, M.-Q.; Wang, C.; Yao, Z.; Kim, N.-Y. Dry etching and residue removal of functional polymer mixed with TiO2 microparticles via inductively coupled CF4/O2 plasma and ultrasonic-treated acetone for humidity sensor application. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 41580–41586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Choi, Y.-H.; Lee, G.-Y.; Ko, H.; Chang, Y.W.; Kang, M.-J.; Pyun, J.-C. Development of SPR biosensor for the detection of human hepatitis B virus using plasma-treated parylene-N film. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 56, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Ardhaoui, M.; Bhatt, S.; Zheng, M.; Dowling, D.; Jolivalt, C.; Khonsari, F.A. Biosensor based on laccase immobilized on plasma polymerized allylamine/carbon electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 3197–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Cvelbar, U.; Walsh, J.L.; Černák, M.; de Vries, H.W.; Reuter, S.; Belmonte, T.; Corbella, C.; Miron, C.; Hojnik, N.; Jurov, A.; et al. White paper on the future of plasma science and technology in plastics and textiles. Plasma Process. Polym. 2019, 16, 1700228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  353. Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Zhang, G. Research Advances and Application Prospect of Low-Temperature Plasma in Tumor Immunotherapy. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Laroussi, M.; Bekeschus, S.; Keidar, M.; Bogaerts, A.; Fridman, A.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Hori, M.; Stapelmann, K.; Miller, V.; et al. Low-Temperature Plasma for Biology, Hygiene, and Medicine: Perspective and Roadmap. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2022, 6, 127–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Sharma, A.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S.; Kushvaha, V. Advances in Computational Intelligence of Polymer Composite Materials: Machine Learning Assisted Modeling, Analysis and Design. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2022, 29, 3341–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Gartner, T.E.; Jayaraman, A. Modeling and Simulations of Polymers: A Roadmap. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 755–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  357. Turman, E.; Strasser, P.E.W. CFD modeling of LDPE autoclave reactor to reduce ethylene decomposition: Part 1 validating computational methods. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022, 257, 117720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Chan, Y.-T.; Fu, Y.; Yu, L.; Wu, F.-Y.; Wang, H.-W.; Lin, T.-H.; Chan, S.-H.; Wu, M.-C.; Wang, J.-C. Compacted Self-Assembly Graphene with Hydrogen Plasma Surface Modification for Robust Artificial Electronic Synapses of Gadolinium Oxide Memristors. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 2000860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Mesbah, A.; Graves, D.B. Machine learning for modeling, diagnostics, and control of non-equilibrium plasmas. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 30LT02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overview of the classification of NFs.
Figure 1. An overview of the classification of NFs.
Polymers 15 00400 g001
Figure 2. Different interactions between plasma and substrate.
Figure 2. Different interactions between plasma and substrate.
Polymers 15 00400 g002
Figure 3. MRE for WP-PPT-coated particles as a function of (i) plasma treatment time and pH of solution for (a) Cu and (b) Zn, (ii) time of contact, (iii) mass of adsorbent [205], with permission from ACS Publications, 2015.
Figure 3. MRE for WP-PPT-coated particles as a function of (i) plasma treatment time and pH of solution for (a) Cu and (b) Zn, (ii) time of contact, (iii) mass of adsorbent [205], with permission from ACS Publications, 2015.
Polymers 15 00400 g003
Figure 4. PET-AA nanofibrous membrane (i) XPS spectra a. before and b. after Cu2+ adsorption, (ii) adsorption isotherms according to (a) Langmuir equation and (b) Freundlich equation [210], with permission from Elsevier, 2010.
Figure 4. PET-AA nanofibrous membrane (i) XPS spectra a. before and b. after Cu2+ adsorption, (ii) adsorption isotherms according to (a) Langmuir equation and (b) Freundlich equation [210], with permission from Elsevier, 2010.
Polymers 15 00400 g004
Figure 5. A schematic representation of nanoadsorbent preparation via AAm plasma and HM adsorption [211], With permission from Elsevier, 2016.
Figure 5. A schematic representation of nanoadsorbent preparation via AAm plasma and HM adsorption [211], With permission from Elsevier, 2016.
Polymers 15 00400 g005
Figure 6. Microscopy photographs of cells after 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of plating. Set 1, L929 (a) chitosan grafted PLLA, (b) pristine PLLA, and (c) glass control. Set 2, L02 (a) chitosan grafted PLLA, (b) pristine PLLA, and (c) glass control [242], with permission from Elsevier, 2004.
Figure 6. Microscopy photographs of cells after 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of plating. Set 1, L929 (a) chitosan grafted PLLA, (b) pristine PLLA, and (c) glass control. Set 2, L02 (a) chitosan grafted PLLA, (b) pristine PLLA, and (c) glass control [242], with permission from Elsevier, 2004.
Polymers 15 00400 g006
Figure 7. VSMCs and L929 cells adhered (6 or 24 h) and proliferated (72 or 144 h) on pristine and plasma-treated PE (LDPE, HDPE, UHMWPE) (Reproduced from Reznickova et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 52, 259–26 [270], with permission from Elsevier, 2015.
Figure 7. VSMCs and L929 cells adhered (6 or 24 h) and proliferated (72 or 144 h) on pristine and plasma-treated PE (LDPE, HDPE, UHMWPE) (Reproduced from Reznickova et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 52, 259–26 [270], with permission from Elsevier, 2015.
Polymers 15 00400 g007
Figure 8. Polyamide RO membrane modification via plasma-induced surface activation followed by surface graft polymerization [283], with permission from Elsevier, 2012.
Figure 8. Polyamide RO membrane modification via plasma-induced surface activation followed by surface graft polymerization [283], with permission from Elsevier, 2012.
Polymers 15 00400 g008
Figure 9. Schematic representation of PEDOT: PSS pressure sensor (a) part I, (b) part II, (c) final device, and (d) cross-sectional diagram of the sensor [328] under Creative Commons license.
Figure 9. Schematic representation of PEDOT: PSS pressure sensor (a) part I, (b) part II, (c) final device, and (d) cross-sectional diagram of the sensor [328] under Creative Commons license.
Polymers 15 00400 g009
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the path to final FTHS. (b) Mechanism for temperature sensing. (c) The mechanism for humidity sensing [334], with permission from ACS Publications, 2017.
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the path to final FTHS. (b) Mechanism for temperature sensing. (c) The mechanism for humidity sensing [334], with permission from ACS Publications, 2017.
Polymers 15 00400 g010
Table 1. Commercially significant fiber sources and gross production across the world [36], with permission from Elsevier, 2012.
Table 1. Commercially significant fiber sources and gross production across the world [36], with permission from Elsevier, 2012.
Fiber SourcesProduction across the World
(103 tons)
Sugarcane75,000.00
Bamboo30,000.00
Jute 2300.00
Kenaf 970.00
Flax 830.00
Grass700.00
Sisal378.00
Hemp214.00
Coir100.00
Ramie100.00
Abaca70.00
Table 2. Reported some works on NF composites.
Table 2. Reported some works on NF composites.
Sl. No:NFsMatricesReference
01JutePolyester[52]
02JuteUnsaturated Polyester[53]
03JutePolypropylene (PP)[54]
04CoirPolyethylene (PE)[55]
05HempPP[56]
06HempEpoxy[57]
07HempPP[58,59]
08HempPLA[60,61,62,63]
09Wood FiberPE[64]
10CellulosePS and PP[65,66]
11CelluloseThermoplastic starch[67]
12SisalEpoxy[2,68,69]
13FlaxEpoxy[70,71,72]
14FlaxPP[73,74,75]
15FlaxUnsaturated Polyester[53]
16KenafPLA[76,77]
17KenafPP[78]
18HarakekeEpoxy[79,80]
19Pineapple Leaf FiberUnsaturated polyester[81]
20Jute/GlassPolyester (isophthalic)[82,83]
21Jute/Betel NutPP[84]
22Jute/BiomassBisphenol-C-formaldehyde resin[85]
23Jute/CottonNovolac phenolic[86]
24Jute/GlassPP[87]
25Kenaf/GlassEpoxy resin[88]
26Kenaf/GlassNatural rubber[89]
27Rice Straw/SeaweedPP[90]
28Betel Nuts/SeaweedPP[91]
29Palmyra/GlassEpoxy Resin[92,93]
30Bamboo/GlassVinyl Ester[94]
31Coir/GlassPhenolic resin[95]
32Banana/KenafPolyester[96]
33NF/GlassEpoxy vinyl ester[97]
34Sisal/KapokUnsaturated polyester[98]
35Sisal/GlassUnsaturated polyester[99]
36Sisal/GlassPolyester[100]
37Sisal/GlassEpoxy resin[101,102]
38Sisal/GlassPhenolic[103]
39Sisal/CottonPolyester[104]
40Sisal/SilkUnsaturated polyester[105]
41Oil Palm EFB/JuteEpoxy resin[106]
42Cellulose/GlassEpoxy resin[107]
43Flax/GlassPP[108]
44Cotton/SilkPolycarbonate (PC)[109]
45Wood Flour/GlassPolyvinyl chloride (PVC)[110]
Table 3. Classifications of plasmas [152], with permission from Wiley, 2017.
Table 3. Classifications of plasmas [152], with permission from Wiley, 2017.
PlasmaStateExample
High-Temperature Plasma (Equilibrium Plasma)Te = Ti = Th
ne ≥ 1020 m−3
Laser Fusion Plasma
Te = Ti = Th ≈ 106–108 K
Low-Temperature PlasmaStateExample
Thermal Plasma
(Quasi-Equilibrium Plasma)
Te ≈ Ti ≈ Th
ne ≥ 1020 m−3
Arc Plasma (core)
Te ≈ Ti ≈ Th ≈ 104 K
Non-Thermal Plasma
(Non-Equilibrium Plasma)
Te >> Th
Ne < 1019 m−3
Corona Discharge
Te ≈ 104 – 105 K
Th ≈ 3 × 102−103 K
Note: Te, Electron Temperature; Ti, Ion Temperature; Th, Heavy Particle Temperature; ne, Electron Density (state refers to the various parameters in the discharge process).
Table 4. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for HM removal.
Table 4. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for HM removal.
Sl. No.Polymers/NFsPlasma TreatmentReference
1Carboxymethyl cellulose carbon nanotube (CNT)Nitrogen[221]
2CNT-ChitosanNitrogen[222]
3Reed-hemicelluloseNitrogen[223]
4PETAam, AA, nitrogen[210]
5PSAam[211]
6PP-ChitosanAA[214]
7PPAA[215]
8PPAA, oxygen[219]
9PESArgon, oxygen[205]
10PE/PPArgon[218]
11ChitosanGlow discharge plasma[224]
12Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)Glow discharge plasma[225]
13CarbonAtmospheric air[226]
14PPAtmospheric air[220]
15Walnut shellWater[227]
16GrapheneAllylamine[228]
17Silica-polymerThiophene[206]
18Cellulose (bamboo)Epichlorohydrin, diethylenetriamine, and carbon disulfide[229]
Table 5. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for biomedical applications.
Table 5. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for biomedical applications.
Sl. No.NF/PolymerType of Plasma Reference
1PMMAOxygen[230]
2Poly (l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)Oxygen[244]
3PLGA, ChitosanOxygen[247]
4PMMAOxygen[251]
5PPOxygen[256]
6PPOxygen[266]
7PPOxygen[267]
8Cyclo-olefin polymer waferOxygen, C4F8[231]
9PMMA, PEEKOxygen, C4F8[237]
10PMMA, PSOxygen, C4F8[235]
11PMMA, PEEK, PDMSOxygen, SF6, [232]
12PETOxygen, Air[257]
13PPOxygen, Argon[260]
14PCLArgon[236]
15PE, PLLAArgon[243]
16poly-4-methyl-1-penteneArgon[248]
17PLLAArgon[254]
18PPArgon[263]
19PEArgon[270]
20PET, PPArgon, Air, Helium[241]
21PLLAArgon, Chitosan, Acetic acid[242]
22PPArgon, Oxygen, polyphenylmethylsiloxyloxane[258]
23LDPEArgon, acrylic acid polyethylene glycol[271]
24PLAArgon, Air, Nitrogen, He[245]
25Poly urethaneArgon, NH3[246]
26Polyolefin plastomerAllylamine, hexane[249]
27PTFE (Teflon) Oxygen and methyl methacrylate[233]
28PPNitrogen[238]
29PPNitrogen, Propane, butane[264]
30PPAir[262]
31PEAir[268]
32PPBromine[259]
33LDPEAcrylic acid[269]
34Polyolefin plastomerAllylamine, hexane[249]
Table 6. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for water purification.
Table 6. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for water purification.
Sl. No.NF/PolymerType of Plasma Reference
1poly (1,3-phenylene terephthalamide)Oxygen, Argon[276]
2PPNitrogen[277]
3Almond shellNitrogen[290]
4PPCarbon dioxide[278]
5PVDFCarbon dioxide[287]
6Polyamide thin film compositeHydrogen, Helium[281]
7Polyamide thin film compositeHydrogen, Helium[282]
8PPAir[279]
9Jatropha curcas shellHumid air[291]
10cocoa shellsHumid air[292]
11PVDFCarbon tetrafluoride[288]
12ChitosanGlow discharge plasma[286]
13Thin film composite polyamideTrimethylene glycol dimethyl ether[280]
Table 7. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for packaging applications.
Table 7. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for packaging applications.
Sl. No.NF/PolymerType of Plasma Reference
1ZeinAtmospheric Air[295]
2polyethylene terephthalate/polypropyleneAtmospheric Air[304]
3Carboxymethyl cellulose-coated PPAtmospheric Air[317]
4ChitosanAtmospheric Air[310]
5Zein-chitosanAtmospheric Air[311]
6Sodium caseinate filmAtmospheric Air[318]
7CSPCLAtmospheric Air[319]
8Cassava starch films onto PCL and PLAAtmospheric Air[299]
9Phlorotannin and Momordica charantia polysaccharidesAtmospheric Air[320]
10Corn starchAir[321]
11Fish protein filmsDry Air [322]
12Whey and gluten proteinsAtmospheric Air and Argon[323]
13PLAAir, Oxygen[324]
14PLAOxygen[313]
15PLAOxygen Air[324]
16Defatted soybean meal-based edible filmOxygen. Nitrogen, Argon, Air, and He[325]
17PPOxygen, Hexamethyldisiloxane [326]
18ChitosanOxygen, Hexamethyldisilazane [309]
19Corn starchSulfur hexafluoride[305]
20Corn starchSulfur hexafluoride[306]
21Corn starchhexamethyldisiloxane[307]
22Corn starchhexamethyldisiloxane[308]
Table 8. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for sensing applications.
Table 8. Reported some studies of plasma-treated polymers for sensing applications.
Sl. No.Polymer/NFPlasmaSensing ParameterReference
1PU/PDMSOxygenPressure[327]
2PDMSOxygenGlucose[343]
3PAni/MWCNTOxygenAmmonia[348]
4PEDOT: PSSOxygenGases[338]
5PENOxygenTemperature[332]
6GWF/PDMS/celluloseOxygenTemperature, Humidity[334]
7PMMAArgonHumidity[333]
8PAni/MWCNT/l-carrageenanArgonHydrogen[339]
9Silicon/functionalized polymerOxygen/N2H2/CF4Humidity[349]
10PS, PVP, PCL, PP, PEAtmospheric airDopamine[344]
11LDPEAtmospheric airGlucose and Dopamine[345]
12Poly(para-xylylene)Atmospheric airHuman Hepatitis B[350]
13PEDOT: PSSNitrogenPressure[328]
14Carbon electrodeAllylaminePhenolic components[351]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pillai, R.R.; Thomas, V. Plasma Surface Engineering of Natural and Sustainable Polymeric Derivatives and Their Potential Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020400

AMA Style

Pillai RR, Thomas V. Plasma Surface Engineering of Natural and Sustainable Polymeric Derivatives and Their Potential Applications. Polymers. 2023; 15(2):400. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020400

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pillai, Renjith Rajan, and Vinoy Thomas. 2023. "Plasma Surface Engineering of Natural and Sustainable Polymeric Derivatives and Their Potential Applications" Polymers 15, no. 2: 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020400

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop