Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Benzene- and Triazine-Based Azo-Bridged Porous Organic Polymers
Next Article in Special Issue
The Study of Crystallization Behavior, Microcellular Structure and Thermal Properties of Glass-Fiber/Polycarbonate Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Effective Crosslinking Density for Pseudo-Semi Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Based on Polyether Glycols Mixture by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/polym15010227
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lightweight and High Impact Toughness PP/PET/POE Composite Foams Fabricated by In Situ Nanofibrillation and Microcellular Injection Molding

by
Junwei Sun
1,
Qian Li
1,*,
Yufan Jiang
2,
Jing Jiang
3,*,
Lian Yang
3,
Caiyi Jia
3,
Feng Chen
4 and
Xiaofeng Wang
1
1
School of Mechanics and Safety Engineering, Zhengzhou University, National Center for International Research of Micro-Nano Molding Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3
School of Mechanical & Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
4
College of Material Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(1), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010227
Submission received: 10 December 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 1 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High Performance Polymeric Composite Foam: Design, Processing and Properties)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polypropylene (PP) has become the most promising and candidate material for fabricating lightweight products. Microcellular injection molding (MIM) is a cost-effective technology for manufacturing porous plastic products. However, it is still challenging to fabricate high-performance PP microcellular components. Herein, we reported an efficient strategy to produce lightweight and high impact toughness foamed PP/polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/polyolefin-based elastomer (POE) components by combining in situ fibrillation (INF) and MIM technologies. First, the INF composite was prepared by integrating twin-screw compounding with melt spinning. SEM analysis showed PET nanofibrils with a diameter of 258 nm were achieved and distributed uniformly in the PP due to the POE’s inducing elaboration effect. Rheological and DSC analysis demonstrated PET nanofibrils pronouncedly improved PP’s viscoelasticity and crystal nucleation rate, respectively. Compared with PP foam, INF composite foam showed more stretched cells in the skin layer and refined spherical cells in the core layer. Due to the synergistic toughening effect of PET nanofibrils and POE elastic particles, the impact strength of INF composite foams was 295.3% higher than that of PP foam and 191.2% higher than that of melt-blended PP/PET foam. The results gathered in this study reveal potential applications for PP based INF composite foams in the manufacturing of lightweight automotive products with enhanced impact properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polypropylene (PP) is one of the most widely used thermoplastic all over the global plastic market. Owing to its advantageous performances, including low cost and density, good processability, excellent chemical and temperature resistance and high mechanical properties, PP has been widely used in many fields such as automotive, packing, construction and consumer electronics [1]. Using auto parts as an example, more than 20% of automotive interior and exterior are made from PP and PP-based composites [2]. In this context, PP becomes the most promising and candidate for fabricating lightweight and high-performance products. Driven by the economic and social interests, such as cost-saving, healthy and sustainable social development, fabricating lightweight and high-performance PP products shows a promising future for both academia and industry.
Material lightweighting, structural optimization design and manufacturing process innovation are three effective ways to achieve lightweight products [3]. Polymer foams are a kind of lightweight material made up of a polymer matrix with gas cells incorporated in it. The internal porous structure can also endow the polymer foams more unique functional properties such as thermal insulation, electromagnetic shielding, oil-adsorption and tissue engineering [4,5]. At present, there are three continuous fabrication process of porous polymeric materials, including extrusion microcellular foaming, 3D printing and microcellular injection molding (MIM). The extrusion foaming process provides higher productivity, ease of control and versatility in end-product properties and profiles, but it cannot fabricate foamed products with complex structures [6]. Three-dimensional printing has great potential for the preparation of porous materials. It is not constrained by existing manufacturing methods and can be tailored to operational applications and environmental conditions [7,8]. However, product dimensional accuracy, surface roughness and raw material limitations constrain its industrialization and large-scale application to a certain extent [9]. MIM, as a promising technology to fabricate foamed products, has been applying in many industries, due to its easy processing flexibility, good scalability, environmental benefit and high efficiency to mold products with complex structures [10]. However, there remains challenges to fabricate lightweight and high-performance PP foams by MIM owing to the following reasons. First, the PP molecular chain is prone to be disentangled due to its linear molecular chain structure, leading to its low melt strength and viscoelasticity [11]. Thus, cell collapse and coalescence usually happen at relative high foaming temperature in the MIM process, resulting in poor mechanical performance [12]. Second, unlike the batch foam in a static condition, MIM contains a complex behavior of fountain flow. Both foaming pressure and temperature vary during the whole filling process, resulting in different cell nucleation time and then different melt conditions for cell growth under different shearing history. Therefore, it is difficult to form a homogeneous and stable cell structure [13], and further deteriorates mechanical performance. Third, the mechanical properties of foamed products, especially stiffness or hardness, are generally inferior to that of solid samples [14,15]. It is due to the fact that the internal cells, which normally act as stress concentration points, may decrease the mechanical properties corresponding to the weight reduction [12].
Therefore, promoting the foaming ability of PP during MIM process, and further achieving uniform micro/nano-scale cells, plays an important role in enhancing mechanical properties. In situ fibrillation-based technology is increasingly recognized as an environmentally sustainable, inexpensive and high-throughput process for the fabrication of in situ nanofiber (INF) reinforced composites. INF composites are potential candidates to be substituted by carbon/glass fiber reinforced composites [16,17]. During the INF process, the fibrillar network, which is developed by physical entanglements without dispersion difficulty for the fibrils with high aspect ratios, is formed from well-dispersed phases [18]. The in situ deformation and orientation of the incorporation dispersed phase in the matrix can form micro/nanoscale fibrils and disordered physical network offering unique advantages, including the enhancement of melt viscoelasticity, crystallization, mechanical properties and foamability [19,20]. Many studies have indicated that the lightweight and high-strength polymer foams can be prepared by combining in situ fibrillation technology with microcellular foaming process [21,22].
The incompatibility between the matrix and the dispersed phase is beneficial for the formation of physical fibrillar network. While on the other hand, the weak interfacial interaction originating from the incompatibility makes the micro/nanoscale fibrils strip out of the matrix at the interface due to the stress concentration [23]. Therefore, the incorporation of compatibilizer is necessary to regulate the contradiction between in situ fibrillation and interfacial adhesion on compatibility requirements. Polyolefin-based elastomer (POE), one of the most prominent thermoplastic elastomers, has a unique combination of flexibility, good processability and elasticity due to its micro-phase separation structure [24]. It is well known that POE has been widely using as a toughing agent for polymer composites. Recently, a new concept of compatibilization using thermoplastic elastomers as interfacial agents for immiscible polymer blends has been proposed [25,26,27]. A few studies have reported that the hardness and toughness of composites were synergistically enhanced by interfacial compatibilization and toughening after introducing thermoplastic elastomers [28,29]. Nevertheless, to our best knowledge, there is little research on the influence of POE on INF composite fabrication and corresponding microcellular foaming behaviors.
In this study, INF technology associated with the MIM process was applied to fabricate lightweight and excellent toughness INF composite foams. First, the PP/PET/POE composites with PET nanofibrils were prepared by coupling twin-screw compounding with melt spinning. Afterwards, the phase morphology, rheological properties, and isothermal crystallization behaviors of prepared the PP-based composites were analyzed. Then, MIM experiments were carried out to fabricate PP foams, PP/nanofibrous PET foams, and PP/nanofibrous PET/POE foams. PP/spherical PET and PP/spherical PET/POE foams were also prepared for comparison with the same process setting. The cellular morphologies of all foams, including parallel and perpendicular to flow direction, were investigated to identify the role of PET nanofibrils and POE particles in improving PP’s foaming ability. Finally, impact testing was performed to evaluate the mechanical performance of PP and PP-based composite foams. The synergistic toughening mechanism of MIM products by PET nanofibrils and POE were further explored.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

An isotactic PP (homopolymer, Moplen Z30S) was supplied as matrix polymer by Maoming Petrochemical Co., Ltd., with a density of 0.9 g/cm3 and a melt flow rate (MFR) of 25 g/10 min (230 °C/ 2.16 kg). The dispersed phase polymer employed in this work was PET (FC510) by Yizheng Chemical Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China). The melt point of PP and PET was determined by DSC as 167°C and 253°C, respectively. Polyolefin elastomer (POE, LC565) was provided by Dow Chemical Investment Co. (Shanghai, China), with an MFI of 5 g/10 min at 190 °C/2.16 kg. The physical blowing agent, CO2 (99% purity), was obtained from Ningbo Wanli Gas Corporation (Ningbo, China).

2.2. Preparation of Nanofibrillar PP based Composites and Foams

The in situ nanofibril (INF) process combining twin-screw compounding with high-speed hot drawing is presented in this study, and is shown in Figure 1. At first, PP pellets were dried at 80 °C for 6 h, and PET pellets were dried at 130 °C for 8 h to avoid hydrolysis during compounding. A co-rotating twin-screw extruder (TSE, Ruiya Co., Ltd., Foshan, China), with a screw diameter of 22 mm and an aspect ratio of 40, was used to compound PP, PET and POE pellets. In order to compare the PP based binary blends and triple blends, the dosage of PP matrix was maintained at 90 wt.%. The formulations of neat PP and PP based composites are listed in Table 1.
The processing temperature of extruder barrel was set to 7 segments from feeding zone to die, specifically 160 °C, 190 °C, 230 °C, 265 °C, 265 °C, 265 °C and 255 °C. A screw speed of 80 rpm was used and feeding speed was kept at about 7.5 kg per hour. The extrudate from the die was connected with a custom-built fiber spinning system, comprised of a variable speed motor and a high-speed roller with diameter of 25 mm. The rotational motion of the roller drew the extruder, and the spherical PET domains was deformed into nanofibrils uniformly dispersed in PP matrix. By maintaining the rotational rate of the roller, the extrudate draw ratio was kept at 12.5:1. For comparison, an undrawn sample which only experienced traditional melt blending was also studied. The neat PP went through the same process to ensure the same thermal history. It should be mentioned that many trials prior to the formal experiments have been performed to acquire the above processing parameters.
The pelletized INF composites were used as raw materials for fabricating fibrillary PET reinforced PP composite foams by a 120-ton injection molding machine (FE120-430h, YIZUMI, Guangdong, China), equipped with a Mucell SCF delivery system (T-100, Trexel Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA). MIM experiments were conducted to prepare PP based composite foams. The main processing parameters, including melt temperature, mold temperature, injection speed and gas dosage were set to be 190 °C, 35 °C, 75 mm/s and 0.7 wt.%, respectively. The shot size adjusted to maintain the resulting weight reduction was 20% compared with the solid sample. For comparison purposes, neat PP and PP based melt-blended composite foams were also prepared under the same conditions.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. INF Composites and Foams Morphology Characterization

A scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tuscan Mira LMS, Czech) was used to observe the sample’s micromorphology. All pelletized materials were first compressed into a rectangular plate at 190 °C under 10 MPa by a vacuum hot compression machine (K14L20VHE), and then were cryogenically fractured in liquid nitrogen. The fracture surface of the sample was coated with a thin layer of platinum to avoid electron charging during SEM observation. In order to observe the variation of PET domains, all composite samples were exposed to xylene vapors for 1.5 h at 140 °C, followed by ultrasonic cleaning in deionized water twice to remove the PP matrix. With the obtained micrographs, Image J software (version 1.8.0.) was used to define the spherical and fibril PET domain size.
In order to observe the cellular morphology inside the foamed sample, the impact spline was cooled in liquid nitrogen for 30 min and immediately fractured along melt flow direction (FD) and thickness direction (TD) to obtain the real cellular morphology. The geometry of the impact sample and SEM characterization regions are illustrated in Figure 2. Finally, the fracture surface was coated with platinum layer by a sputter coater (Quorum SC7620). Image J software was further used to collect the quantitative information of cells.
The average diameter of the cells can be calculated by the following formula:
D = ∑ i = 1 n d i n
where d i is the diameter of a single cell, n is the number of cells.
The population density of the cells can be calculated using the following equation:
N = ( n × M 2 A ) 3 2    
where M is the magnification of the SEM microscope, and A is the area of the image.
As in conventional injection molding, a typical three-layer structure is obtained with the increase in distance from the mold wall during the MIM process [30]. In order to investigate the variation of stretched cells consisted in the shear layer, the length–diameter ratio of the cells and the offset angle of the cells were used to characterize quantitatively the deformation of cells. As can be seen from Figure 3, with the increase of length–diameter ratio of the cells, the offset angle deflection flow direction became smaller, indicating a bigger cell deformation. The ratio of length to diameter (d) was calculated by the following equation [31]:
d = b a

2.3.2. Rheology Characterization

A rotational rheometer (DHR-2, TA, USA) was used to investigate the rheology behavior of the PP and PP based composites. A dynamic strain sweep was conducted first to identify the linear viscoelastic region. Afterwards, the dynamic frequency sweep tests were applied with the frequency (ω) ranging from 0.01 to 100 rad/s at 190 °C to obtain storage modulus (G’), loss factor (tan δ) and complex viscosity (η*). All tests were conducted under the protection nitrogen atmosphere to avoid oxidative degradation of melt.

2.3.3. Isothermal Crystallization Characterization

A differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, Q2000, TA, New Castle, DE, USA) was used to investigate the isothermal crystallization behavior. The samples were heated from 40 °C to 200 °C at a 10 °C/min heating rate and held for 5 min to eliminate thermal history. Subsequently, the samples were cooled at 10 °C/min to 130 °C and held for 20 min. All measurements were performed under nitrogen atmosphere protection.

2.3.4. Mechanical Characterization

Izod impact testing was conducted by using an impact tester (PTM7000, SANS, Shenzhen, China) according to ISO 180. Before testing, all samples were dried at 60 °C in a vacuum for at least 3 days to remove any moisture. All specimens were notched in the middle with a depth of 2 mm using a standard cutter, and then placed horizontally with the notch oriented away from the pendulum and broken by a hammer with an energy of 2 J. At least five specimens were tested for each test to evaluate the reliability and stability of results.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Composite Morphology

For polymer composites, the phase morphology and distribution of dispersed domains play an important part in determining their foaming behavior and mechanical performances. Figure 4 shows the phase morphology of melt-blended PP/PET blends with and without POE particles. It can be found that both micrographs exhibit no evidence of fibrillation and typical sea-island structure with a homogeneous dispersion of the minor blend component as spherical particles. In the PP/PET(S)/POE composite, the phase interface of PP matrix and PET domains becomes rougher compared to the PP/PET(S) blend, indicating the interfacial adhesion is improved. In other words, the incorporation of POE particles plays a role like compatibilizer, which reduce the interfacial energy and facilitates the stress transfer across the matrix–particle interface [32]. Furthermore, after 3 wt.% content of POE is added (Figure 4b), no agglomeration phenomenon is detected. The average diameter of PET particles is reduced from 4.3 μm to 2.9 μm, and the POE particles are uniformly distributed in PP matrix as yellow dotted circles marked (Supporting Information Figure S1).
Figure 5 presents the morphology of INF composites before and after etching PP matrix using xylene. In Figure 5(a1,b1), it was found that the PET domains have been fibrillated into fibrils and uniformly distributed in PP matrix due to the combined shearing and stretching effect during the INF process. Moreover, the addition of POE particles significantly reduces the degree of PET fibrils shedding from the PP matrix, which indicates that the interfacial adhesion between PP and PET fibrils are improved due to the interface compatibilization of POE incorporation [33]. Figure 5(a2,a3) and Figure 5(b2,b3) obviously depict that all fibrillated PET fibrils with a big length–diameter ratio formed an entangled network structure. Compared to PP/PET(F) composite, the average diameter of PET fibrils was decreased from 465 nm to 258 nm, and the fibril distribution is more uniform after adding POE. The effect of POE on the PET fibrils morphology agrees with that of PET spherical domains discussed above. These results reveal that a small amount of POE particles are beneficial to obtain an entangled nanofibril PET network with nano-scale diameter and uniform distribution, which can effectively promote crystallization and enhance melt viscoelasticity, and thus greatly improve the foamability [34].

3.2. Rheological Behavior

As rheological behavior has a significant influence on the foaming behavior of polymers, dynamic frequency sweep tests were carried out to characterize the effect of PET fibrils and POE particles on the linear viscoelastic responses of the PP matrix. Figure 6 shows the plots of storage modulus (G’), complex viscosity (η*) and loss tangent (tan δ) as a function of frequency. It is observed from Figure 6a that the slope of the G’ curve for neat PP, PP/PET(S) and PP/PET(S)/POE was about 2, indicating the rheological behavior of a melt with liquid-like properties [35]. PP/PET(S) and PP/PET(S)/POE exhibited a higher G’ curve than that of neat PP, especially in the region of low frequencies. We attributed this shift in G’ to the presence of the solid spherical PET domains that behave as rigid and influence the stress relaxation behavior of the PP matrix [36,37,38]. Remarkably, INF composites displayed an increment of G’ and a plateau occurred at low frequency, owing to the constraint formed by the PET fibril network as well as the increased entanglements between PET fibrils and PP molecular chains [39,40]. Besides, G’ of PP/PET(F)/POE was bigger than that of PP/PET(F), particularly at low frequencies, mainly attributing to the higher fibril aspect ratio and increased molecular entanglements caused by the spatially linked structure of PET nanofibrils [40].
As Figure 6b illustrates, both INF composites presented a more obvious shear shinning effect and typical non-Newtonian fluid behavior relative to the other materials. It was also detected that INF composites showed much higher η* over the frequency range, especially at low frequency, than that of neat PP and melt-blended composites. The enhanced η* is attributed to the fact that the PET fibril network, acting as the skeleton within the PP matrix, obviously restricts the motion of PP molecular chains. Under higher frequency, the decline in the value of η* was found to be more significant for INF composites, which is attributed to the higher orientation of PET nanofibrils, and their restrictions to the motion of PP molecular chains become weaker. Figure 6c shows the variation of tan δ with different shear frequencies, aiming to explore the influence of morphological variation of PET domains on the elastic response of PP matrix. Both neat PP and melt-blended composites exhibited a typical characteristic of viscoelastic liquids, with tan δ decreasing completely with an increment in frequency, and the values of tan δ bigger than 1 in the certain frequency region. These results match the Winter–Chambon criteria properly [41]. In contrast, the INF composites showed a slow increase in tan δ with increasing ω, and the values of tan δ were less than 1. In addition, the tan δ nearly expressed independence of ω under the high frequency regions. This indicates that the PET-nanofibril network structures formed in the PP matrix, which can sharply reduce viscous dissipation and contribute to the transition of a liquid-like behavior to a solid-like behavior. Similar results have been obtained from previous studies [42].

3.3. Crystallization Behavior

Aside with rheological behavior, crystallization is another important factor in determining a composite’s foamability. The heat flow traces during isothermal crystallization at 130 °C for both neat PP and PP-based composites are displayed in Figure 7a. All heat flow curves show a single peak as is typical for isothermal crystallization of semi-crystalline polymer. Additionally, the extreme wide crystallization peak of neat PP is observed, indicating a rather slow crystallization behavior due to the low mobility of molecular chains [43]. Compared with neat PP, INF and melt-blended composites exhibit much narrower and sharper crystallization peaks. The addition of spherical or fibril PET domains accelerates the isothermal crystallization characteristic because of the nucleation effect of heterogeneous crystallization. Figure 7b shows the relative crystallinity X(t) as a function of time for all samples. As seen, all curves have a similar sigmoidal shape. PP crystallization characteristic was mostly enhanced for INF composites. Compared with melt-blended composites, PET nanofibrils in INF composite have much bigger specific surface areas than that of spherical PET domains, which thereby can promote the crystallization rate as function of nucleation agents. Besides, previous studies have indicated that PET nanofibrils incorporation could also facilitate the PP molecular mobility effectively [44], and hence enhance its crystallization characteristic. Furthermore, the fastest crystallization rate is obtained for the PP/PET(F)/POE composite due to the synergistic nucleation effect of PET nanofibrils and POE fillers.
A thermodynamic analysis of isothermal crystallization based on the Avrami model was conducted at 130 °C to further evaluate the influence of PET nanofibrils on crystallization. The Avrami plots are shown in Figure 7c, and corresponding Avrami parameters are also summarized in Table 2. The Avrami n exponent of all samples varied between 2–3. Although the heterogeneous crystal nucleating effect of the additive could generally promote spherulitic crystal growth resulting in the increase of n value beyond 3 [45], the trans-crystallization along the nanofibers could promote a two-dimensional disk shape and one-dimensional rod-like crystallization which correspond to n values between 2–3. It is also of note that PP/PET(F)/POE shows a significant three-magnitude and one-magnitude higher Zt value than that of neat PP and PP/PET(F), respectively. It is well known that polymer crystallization contains crystal nucleation and growth. It is necessary to note that the existence of PET nanofibrils can promote the crystal nucleation rate as explained above. However, the crystal nuclei are normally subject to high resistance during the growth owing to the big viscoelastic property. It is difficult to compare the overall crystallization rate directly from the values of Zt because the unit of Zt is s-n and n is not constant for the samples. Therefore, the half-time of crystallization (t1/2, the time required to achieve 50% of the final crystallization of the samples) is computed for the purpose of discussing the kinetics of crystallization [44]. Figure 7d illustrates the value of t1/2 as a function of materials. The experimentally determined t1/2 from the relative crystallinity data was plotted alongside the t1/2 values derived from Avarima equation. It can be clearly distinguished from Table 1 that the t1/2 of INF composites took dozens of seconds and was much shorter than that of neat PP. Intriguingly, compared with PP/PET(F), PP/PET(F)/POE had a shorter t1/2. We attributed this result to the smaller diameter and larger aspect ratio of PET nanofibrils caused by adding 3 wt.% POE, which offered a larger surface-to-volume ratio for crystal nucleation. Therefore, the gathered results give rise to the suggestion that the synergistic effect of PET nanofibrils and POE particles substantially enhance the PP matrix crystallization kinetics thermodynamically.

3.4. Cellular Morphology

It is known that the differences of shearing stress and temperature along TD and FD usually generate a nonuniform cell structure, which deteriorates the mechanical properties of the foamed parts. An RMIM experiment was performed to fabricate neat PP and PP-based composite foams. Figure 8 shows the TD and FD SEM images of PP/PET(F)/POE composite foam. It is found that both integral section structures were quite consistent with the typical sandwich structure of microcellular injection molded part. No foam exists at the frozen layer touched with the mold surface. In fact, the frozen layer consists of two regions during filling process. The stretched cells are moved from the flow front to the mold surface and destroyed because of the big temperature gradient, and then a thin frozen layer is formed. The melt pressure increases gradually from the flow front to the gate, and the stretched cells are redissolved into the polymer melt under critical pressure. Then, a thicker solid-like layer is subsequently formed [46]. The shear layer contains stretched cells that are parallel to the flow direction. The stretched cells are pushed out from the flow front and cannot dissolve into the melt due to the unsaturated pressure. In the core layer, numerous spherical cells form after the filling process and are located in the central portion of the samples.

3.4.1. Cellular Structures along TD

To investigate the effect of PET dispersed phase morphology evolution on the foaming behavior of PP, Figure 9 shows the SEM images of all foamed internal structures of the TD. It can be observed that the neat PP foam (Figure 9a) had a rather non-uniform cellular structure. Few large and irregular cells were found in the core layer of the foamed part. During RMIM, foaming always happens at relatively high temperature, at which the PP melt has rather low melt strength, leading to serious cell collapse and coalescence. For PP/PET(S) and PP/PET(S)/POE composite foams (Figure 9b,c), a finer cellular structure with smaller cell size and increased cell density was achieved around the core layer due to the improved viscoelasticity of melt and heterogeneous nucleation effect of PET and POE particles [31]. Moreover, many small sized and oriented cells appeared in the shear layer. The strong shear combined with foaming during the filling stage of MIM promotes cell collapse and coalescence, resulting in oriented cellular structure [47]. As shown in Figure 9d,e, obviously improved cellular structure characterized by reduced cell size, increased cell density and uniform cell distribution was achieved in INF composite foams. The refined cell structure of INF composite foams can be explained by two reasons. First, PET nanofibrils can enhance the heterogeneous nucleation efficiency at interfaces, which improves cell nucleation. Second, PET fibrils can not only promote the viscoelasticity and strain hardening behavior of PP [48], but also increase the crystallization rate, which in turn improves the melt strength of PP in relatively high temperature. Both reasons can contribute to the reduction of cell coalescences and collapses.
To quantitatively characterize the cell distribution, the cell size distribution of foamed samples was plotted in Figure 10(a–e). It is easy to note that all samples exhibit a bimodal cell structure, corresponding to the non-uniformity distribution of cells across the TD section. Noteworthily, the cell size in the core layer and shear layer were ranged 85–120 μm and 30–50 μm, respectively, for neat PP. After introducing PET nanofibrils, the corresponding cell size ranged to 60–80 μm and 10–40 μm, indicating the cell uniformity was greatly improved. It is well known that the uniformity of cell distribution is closely related to the phase morphology evolution of sandwich microstructure in RMIM sample. Figure 10f shows the thickness variation of core layer. It is found that the core layer thickness of INF composite foam was increased by approximately 45% compared to neat PP foam. During the filling stage of RMIM, the local shear viscosity of polymer melts with PET nanofibrils is increased and subsequently the flowability is reduced. Previous studies have indicated that the shear stress distribution in the TD section are more uniform, demonstrating the increment of core layer thickness [49].
Table 3 lists the statistical results of cell size and cell density of all foams at different sandwich structures. In both the core layer and shear layer, the cell size reduced while the cell density increased gradually, with the dispersed PET phase transferring from spherical domains to nanofibrils. The minimum cell size and maximum cell density of PP/PET(F)/POE foams in the core layer are about 50 μm and 1.6 × 107 cells/cm3, respectively, which was greatly improved compared with that of neat PP. This indicates that the PET nanofibrils can homogenize the cell distribution, which was in accordance with the crystallization and cell morphology results discussed above.

3.4.2. Cellular Structure along FD

The cell morphologies parallel to FD are shown in Figure 11 to get a comprehensive understanding of the cell structure evolution of RMIM parts. It is noteworthy that the varied cell morphologies in the core layer of FD for all foamed samples are similar to that of TD as discussed above. However, many deformed cells were detected in shear layer due to the characteristic of shear flow of polymer melt in cavity. It can be concluded that most of the cells are extremely stretched and sheared during cell nucleation and growth in the filling stage. Furthermore, the cell deformation is obviously different among all PP-based composite foams.
Figure 12 shows the quantitative test results of cell deformation according to SEM micrographs. The ratio of length–diameter (d) is affected by the cell deformation, and normally higher cell deformation corresponds to a larger d value. The offset angle (θ) is affected by the melt temperature and local melt viscosity, and higher temperature and lower viscosities means a larger θ. It is clear that when compared with neat PP, the d of INF composite foams is larger, and the θ become smaller. This demonstrated that a lot of cells have occurred larger deformation. The main reason maybe that the presence of PET nanofibrils increase the resistance to polymer molecular chain motion, resulting in an increase in local viscosity and enhanced shearing stress. At the same time, the cell wall thickness decreased, and the ability of the cells to undergo deformation was reduced, leading to an increase in cell deformation. In particular, the biggest d and smallest θ were obtained for PP/PET(F)/POE foams. Besides the effect of PET nanofibrils, the POE with long chain branching can also improve the resistance of molecular chain motion [50].

3.5. Impact Properties

Izod impact testing was conducted to evaluate the ductility of the injection molded foams at a relatively high deformation rate. Figure 13a plots the Izod impact strength of foamed samples. Obviously, the PP/PET(F)/POE foams exhibited the highest impact strength of 6.72 kJ/m2, increasing by 295.3% compared with the neat PP foams, and followed by PP/PET(S), PP/PET(S)/POE and PP/PET(F), which were increased by 191.2%, 71.2% and 27.1%, respectively. The sharply improved impact strength should definitely be correlated with the synergistic effect of cell structure and filler system (PET fibrils and POE additives). For one thing, the refined crystals caused by PET fibrils can promote the flexibility and toughness of PP matrix. Due to the weak cohesive forces between PET molecular chains, the PET fibrils can enhance the sliding ability of PP crystals [48]. Previous studies have demonstrated that PET nanofibrils could induce flexible transcrystalline layers around them, leading to greatly improvement of the interfacial adhesion between PET nanofibril and polymer matrix [51]. Figure 13b,c show the Izod impact fracture surfaces of the neat PP foam and PP/PET(F)/POE composite foam, respectively. It can be found that numerous micro cells appeared on the fracture surface of INF composite foam. The PET fibrils resulted in reduced cell size and increased cell density, which probably can prevent crack initiation and propagation by passivating crack tips [52] during the impact tests. Overall, the unique cellular structure combined with enhanced crystallization would promote the slips and fibrillations of polymer chains in impact tests, thereby improving the toughness of foam.
It is noteworthy that a large number of PET fibrils and POE additives dispersed uniformly in the frozen layer and cell wall, which is efficient for ductile fracture behavior. Figure 14 illustrated the crack toughening mechanism by cellular structure, PET fibrils and POE additives. Although cells, as well as rubber particle POE, are confirmed frequently to initiate crazes owing to them acting as stress concentrators, both small sized cells and POE particles can control craze growth or craze path. Based on the craze–shear band theory, the dispersed POE particles can induce the silver stripes and shear bands in the PP matrix when subjected to the impact load, and a large amount of impact energy was absorbed. In addition, during the impact testing for most of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite, the crack always propagates along the impact direction, but it will also deflect for an angle from the impact direction. The fibrils may induce a crack deflection perpendicular to the impact direction and transmit the stress to the matrix due to the fiber orientation effect [26]. This will make the matrix participate more actively in the stress transfer, thereby in turn increasing the absorbed energy.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a cost-effective and environmentally friendly strategy based on in situ fibrillation and microcellular injection molding process was developed to fabricate lightweight and high toughness PP/PET/POE composite foams. Nanofibrillar PP/PET/POE composite was prepared by combing twin-screw compounding mixed with melt spinning process. Incorporation of POE particles in PP/PET blend played a role of compatibilizer and plasticizer. The average diameter of PET nanofibrils were decreased after introducing POE due to the particle-induced PET domains elaboration. A long and an average diameter of 258 nm were achieved and distributed uniformly in the PP matrix. The rheological analysis data demonstrated that the PET nanofibrils dramatically increased melt viscoelasticity and strength. The isothermal crystallization results showed that PP’s crystal nuclei rate as well as the chain mobility were effectively improved because of the dual heterogeneous nucleation effects of PET nanofibrils and POE particles, and eventually promoted the PP’s crystallization kinetics.
The INF composite foams prepared by MIM achieved a sandwich-like structure, including a solid frozen layer, a shear layer contained stretched cells, and a core layer that consisted of numerous spherical cells. Owing to the improved crystallization and rheological properties, the obvious refined foam structure in the core layer of the PP matrix, with decreased cell size and increased cell density, was obtained by introducing the PET nanofibrils and POE particles. Furthermore, compared with neat PP foams and other melt-blended composites, the PP/PET(F)/POE composite foams exhibited the largest cell deformation in skin layer because the presence of PET nanofibrils increases the resistance to polymer molecular chain motion. Notably, the Izod impact results showed that the PP/PET(F)/POE composite foams exhibited the highest impact strength, increasing by 295.3% compared to PP foams. The existence of oriented PET nanofibrils may induce a crack deflection perpendicular to the impact direction and hinder the crack propagation, thus increasing the absorbed energy. The toughening effect of POE’s uniform dispersion in the PP matrix is another reason for the outstanding impact strength.
The results obtained in this study reveal potential applications for PP based INF composite foams in the manufacturing of lightweight automotive products with enhanced impact properties. Future work would focus on investigating various mechanical and functional properties of INF composite foams, including tensile, flexural and thermal insulation properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15010227/s1, Figure S1: SEM micrographs of the cryo-fractured surfaces of: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/POE blend with 3 wt.% POE and size distribution of POE particles (c).

Author Contributions

J.S.: Methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft. Q.L.: Super-vision, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—review and editing. Y.J.: Formal analysis, investigation. J.J.: Investigation, writing—original draft, supervision, funding acquisi-tion. L.Y. and C.J.: Formal analysis, data curation. F.C.: Formal analysis, methodology. X.W.: Formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, U1909219. Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project, 202102210028. Henan provincial key research and development project, 221111520200.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the NSFC–Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization (U1909219), Scientific and Technological Research Project of Henan Province (202102210028) and Key R&D projects in Henan province (221111520200). The authors also wish to acknowledge Xiping Li from Zhejiang Normal University for the help in MIM experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Penumakala, P.K.; Santo, J.; Thomas, A. A critical review on the fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2020, 201, 108336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tadele, D.; Roy, P.; Defersha, F.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. A comparative life-cycle assessment of talc- and biochar-reinforced composites for lightweight automotive parts. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2020, 22, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hadiji, H.; Assarar, M.; Zouari, W.; Pierre, F.; Behlouli, K.; Zouari, B.; Ayad, R. Damping analysis of nonwoven natural fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites used in automotive interior parts. Polym. Test. 2020, 89, 106692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jin, F.L.; Zhao, M.; Park, M.; Park, S.J. Recent trends of foaming in polymer processing: A review. Polymers 2019, 11, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cao, Y.J.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Li, Z.H.; Hou, J.H.; Li, Q. Biodegradable highly porous interconnected poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds by supercritical foaming for small-diameter vascular tissue engineering. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 440–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sauceau, M.; Fages, J.; Common, A.; Nikitine, C.; Rodier, E. New challenges in polymer foaming: A review of extrusion processes assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 749–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Moradi, M.; Aminzadeh, A.; Rahmatabadi, D.; Hakimi, A. Experimental investigation on mechanical characterization of 3D printed PLA produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 035304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahmatabadi, D.; Aberoumand, M.; Soltanmohammadi, K.; Soleyman, E.; Ghasemi, I.; Baniassadi, M.; Abrinia, K.; Zolfagharian, A.; Bodaghi, M.; Baghani, M. A New Strategy for Achieving Shape Memory Effects in 4D Printed Two-Layer Composite Structures. Polymers 2022, 14, 5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Buj-Corral, I.; Bagheri, A.; Petit-Rojo, O. 3D Printing of Porous Scaffolds with Controlled Porosity and Pore Size Values. Polymers 2018, 11, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Li, Z.H.; Yang, H.G.; Wang, X.F.; Li, Q.; Turng, L.S. Microcellular injection molding of polymers: A review of process know-how, emerging technologies, and future directions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2021, 33, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, M.H.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, C.Y.J.P. Preparation of high melt strength polypropylene by addition of an ionically modified polypropylene. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 202, 122743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.C.; Jien, M.Y.; Hsu, C.C.; Hwang, S.S.; Feng., C.T. Processing Effects on the Through-Plane Electrical Conductivities and Tensile Strengths of Microcellular-Injection-Molded Polypropylene Composites with Carbon Fibers. Polymers 2022, 14, 3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dugad, R.; Radhakrishna, G.; Gandhi, A. Recent advancements in manufacturing technologies of microcellular polymers: A review. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.C.; Wang, G.L.; Zhao, J.C.; Zhang, A.; Dong, G.W.; Wang, X.B.; Zhao, G.Q.; Park, C.B. Research on cellular morphology and mechanical properties of microcellular injection–molded bcpp and its blends. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2021, 116, 2223–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, H.G.; Román, A.J.; Chang, T.C.; Yu, C.L.; Jiang, J.; Shotwell, D.; Chen, E.W.; Osswald, T.A.; Turng, L.S. Cell morphologies, mechanical properties, and fiber orientation of glass fiber-reinforced polyamide composites: Influence of subcritical gas-laden pellet injection molding foaming technology. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 013101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuzmanović, M.; Delva, L.; Cardon, L.; Ragaert, K. Relationship between the processing, structure, and properties of microfibrillar composites. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Evstatiev, M.; Fakirov, S. Microfibrillar reinforcement of polymer blends. Polymer 1992, 33, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rizvi, A.; Andalib, Z.K.M.; Park, C.B. Fiber-spun polypropylene/polyethylene terephthalate microfibrillar composites with enhanced tensile and rheological properties and foaming ability. Polymer 2017, 110, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rizvi, A.; Park, C.B. Dispersed polypropylene fibrils improve the foaming ability of a polyethylene matrix. Polymer 2014, 55, 4199–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiao, Y.; Li, Q.; Jalali, A.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, N.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, S.; Hou, J.; Jiang, J. In-situ microfibrillated Poly(ε-caprolactone)/ Poly(lactic acid) composites with enhanced rheological properties, crystallization kinetics and foaming ability. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2021, 208, 108594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Zhao, G.; Dong, G.; Mu, Y.; Park, C.B. Lightweight and strong microcellular injection molded PP/talc nanocomposite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 168, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, G.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, L.; Mu, Y.; Park, C.B. Lightweight and tough nanocellular PP/PTFE nanocomposite foams with defect-free surfaces obtained using in situ nanofibrillation and nanocellular injection molding. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Souza, A.D.; Caldeira, C.B. An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP-EP compatibilized blends: Rheological, morphological, and mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41892–41900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, J.Z.; Zhu, B.; Ma, W.Y. Morphology and mechanical properties of PP/POE/nano-CaCO3 composites. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.; Huang, Y.; Kong, M.; Yang, Q.; Li, G. Assessment of compatibilization efficiency of SEBS in the PP/PS blend. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46244–46253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuzmanovic, M.; Delva, L.; Mi, D.; Martins, C.I.; Cardon, L.; Ragaert, K. Development of Crystalline Morphology and Its Relationship with Mechanical Properties of PP/PET Microfibrillar Composites Containing POE and POE-g-MA. Polymers 2018, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, Z.M.; Yang, W.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, S.Y.; Yang, M.B.; Feng, J.M.; Rui, H.A. Effects of compatibilization on the essential work of fracture parameters of in situ microfiber reinforced poly(ethylene terephtahalate)/polyethylene blend. Mater. Res. Bull. 2003, 38, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, C.Z.; Wang, C.; Li, J. Strategy for the preparation of lightweight polypropylene/polyethylene-octene elastomer composite foams with different phase morphologies using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 41857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shang, M.Y.; Wu, Y.J.; Shentu, B.Q.; Weng, Z.X. Toughening of pbt by poe/poe-g-gma elastomer through regulating interfacial adhesion and toughening mechanism. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 12650–12663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, Y.F.; Hassan, M.H.; Bakker, O.; Hinduja, S.; Bartolo, P. A Review on Microcellular Injection Moulding. Materials 2021, 14, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, K.; Guo, W.; Mao, H.J.; Yang, Q.; Meng, Z.H. Investigation on Foamed PP/Nano-CaCO3 Composites in a Combined in-Mold Decoration and Microcellular Injection Molding Process. Polymers 2020, 12, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, G.; Qiu, G. Study on the mechanical and morphological properties of toughened polypropylene blends for automobile bumpers. Polym. Bull. 2013, 70, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, W.J.; Schlarb, A.K.; Evstatiev, M. Study of PET/PP/TiO2 Microfibrillar-Structured Composites, Part 2: Morphology and Mechanical Properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 3300–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, J.W.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, N.; Wang, X.F.; Duan, T.S.; Li, Q. Research progress of in-situ fibrous composite foamed material. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2022, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, K.K.; Wang, Y.Q.; Jiang, J.; Wang, X.F.; Hou, J.H.; Sun, S.H.; Li, Q. Fabrication of highly interconnected porous poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with supercritical CO2 foaming and polymer leaching. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 5112–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, S.H.; Li, Q.; Zhao, N.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, K.K.; Hou, J.H.; Wang, X.F.; Liu, G.J. Preparation of highly interconnected porous poly (ε-caprolactone)/poly (lactic acid) scaffolds via supercritical foaming. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 3065–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, G.; Zhao, J.; Wang, G.; Zhao, H.; Lin, J.; Zhao, G.; Park, C.B. Strong and super thermally insulating in-situ nanofibrillar PLA/PET composite foam fabricated by high-pressure microcellular injection molding. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 390, 124520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, H.Y.; Jiang, J.; Li, Z.H.; Jin, Z.Y.; Hou, J.H.; Wang, X.F.; Li, Q. Solid-state supercritical CO2 foaming of PCL/PLGA blends: Cell opening and compression behavior. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 1880–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, T.; Lian, X.H.; Li, L.W.; Peng, X.F.; Kuang, T.R. Facile fabrication of fully biodegradable and biorenewable poly (lactic acid)/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) in-situ nanofibrillar composites with high strength, good toughness and excellent heat resistance. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2020, 171, 109044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, T.; Ju, J.J.; Chen, F.; Wu, B.Z.; Yang, J.T.; Zhong, M.Q.; Peng, X.F.; Kuang, T.R. Superior mechanical performance of in-situ nanofibrillar HDPE/PTFE composites with highly oriented and compacted nanohybrid shish-kebab structure. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chambon, F.; Winter, H.H. Linear Viscoelasticity at the Gel Point of a Crosslinking PDMS with Imbalanced Stoichiometry. J. Rheol. 1987, 31, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, M.M.; Ding, X.Y.; Mi, J.G.; Zhou, H.F.; Wang, X.D. Role of high-density polyethylene in the crystallization behaviors, rheological property, and supercritical CO2 foaming of poly (lactic acid). Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2017, 146, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qiao, Y.; Jalali, A.; Yang, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Hou, J.; Jiang, J.; Li, Q.; Park, C.B. Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene/polytetrafluoroethylene fibrillated composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 3562–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rizvi, A.; Park, C.B.; Favis, B.D. Tuning viscoelastic and crystallization properties of polypropylene containing in-situ generated high aspect ratio polyethylene terephthalate fibrils. Polymer 2015, 68, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kakroodi, A.R.; Kazemi, Y.; Ding, W.; Ameli, A.; Park, C.B. Poly(lactic acid)-Based in Situ Microfibrillar Composites with Enhanced Crystallization Kinetics, Mechanical Properties, Rheological Behavior, and Foaming Ability. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3925–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nobe, R.; Qiu, J.; Kudo, M.; Ito, K.; Kaneko, M. Effects of SCF content, injection speed, and CF content on the morphology and tensile properties of microcellular injection-molded CF/PP composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, 1371–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hou, J.J.; Zhao, G.Q.; Wang, G.L. Polypropylene/talc foams with high weight-reduction and improved surface quality fabricated by mold-opening microcellular injection molding. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mark, L.H.; Zhao, C.X.; Chu, R.K.M.; Park, C.B. Mechanical Properties of Injection Molded PP/PET-Nanofibril Composites and Foams. Polymers 2022, 14, 2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yi, X.; Chen, C.; Zhong, G.J.; Xu, L.; Tang, J.H.; Ji, X.; Hsiao, B.S.; Li, Z.-M. Suppressing the Skin-Core Structure of Injection-Molded Isotactic Polypropylene via Combination of an in situ Microfibrillar Network and an Interfacial Compatibilizer. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7497–7504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mao, H.J.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, W.; Meng, Z.H.; Wei, W.T.; Hua, L.; Yang, Q. Effect of POE on mechanical properties and cellular structure of PP/Nano-CaCO3 composites in IMD/MIM process. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 95308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Z.M.; Li, L.B.; Shen, K.Z.; Yang, W.; Huang, R.; Yang, M.B. Transcrystalline morphology of an in situ microfibrillar poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(propylene) blend fabricated through a slit extrusion hot stretching-quenching process. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 2004, 25, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Maidenberg, D.A.; Volksen, W.; Miller, R.D.; Dauskardt, R.H. Toughening of nanoporous glasses using porogen residuals. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 15 00227 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic fabricating of INF composites and foams.
Figure 1. Schematic fabricating of INF composites and foams.
Polymers 15 00227 g001
Polymers 15 00227 g002 550
Figure 2. The geometry of impact specimen and characterization areas. FD, flow direction; TD, thickness direction.
Figure 2. The geometry of impact specimen and characterization areas. FD, flow direction; TD, thickness direction.
Polymers 15 00227 g002
Polymers 15 00227 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the length-diameter ratio and cellular offset angle.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the length-diameter ratio and cellular offset angle.
Polymers 15 00227 g003
Polymers 15 00227 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of the melt-blended composites cryogenic fractured surfaces: (a) PP/PET(S), (b) PP/PET/POE(S).
Figure 4. SEM images of the melt-blended composites cryogenic fractured surfaces: (a) PP/PET(S), (b) PP/PET/POE(S).
Polymers 15 00227 g004
Polymers 15 00227 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of fibrillary PP based composite before (a1,b1) and after etching PP matrix (a2,b2) with xylene vapor and size distribution of PET fibrils (a3,b3).
Figure 5. SEM images of fibrillary PP based composite before (a1,b1) and after etching PP matrix (a2,b2) with xylene vapor and size distribution of PET fibrils (a3,b3).
Polymers 15 00227 g005
Polymers 15 00227 g006 550
Figure 6. Rheological properties of neat PP, melt-blended and INF composites: (a) storage modulus (G’), (b) complex viscosity (η*) and (c) loss tangent (tan δ).
Figure 6. Rheological properties of neat PP, melt-blended and INF composites: (a) storage modulus (G’), (b) complex viscosity (η*) and (c) loss tangent (tan δ).
Polymers 15 00227 g006
Polymers 15 00227 g007 550
Figure 7. Isothermal crystallization behavior of neat PP, melt-blended and INF composites at 130 °C: (a) Isothermal crystallization exotherms as a function of time; (b) Relative crystallinity, X(t), as a function of time; (c) Isothermal crystallization kinetics analyzed curves; (d) Half-time, t1/2, of crystallization determined from the Avrami analysis and the relative crystallinity shown in (b).
Figure 7. Isothermal crystallization behavior of neat PP, melt-blended and INF composites at 130 °C: (a) Isothermal crystallization exotherms as a function of time; (b) Relative crystallinity, X(t), as a function of time; (c) Isothermal crystallization kinetics analyzed curves; (d) Half-time, t1/2, of crystallization determined from the Avrami analysis and the relative crystallinity shown in (b).
Polymers 15 00227 g007
Polymers 15 00227 g008 550
Figure 8. Integral section structure of microcellular PP/PET(F)/POE samples.
Figure 8. Integral section structure of microcellular PP/PET(F)/POE samples.
Polymers 15 00227 g008
Polymers 15 00227 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of the cellular structure in TD of foamed samples: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE.
Figure 9. SEM images of the cellular structure in TD of foamed samples: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE.
Polymers 15 00227 g009
Polymers 15 00227 g010 550
Figure 10. Cell size distribution of vertical sections: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE; (f) thickness of core layer.
Figure 10. Cell size distribution of vertical sections: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE; (f) thickness of core layer.
Polymers 15 00227 g010
Polymers 15 00227 g011 550
Figure 11. SEM images of the cellular structure along FD of foamed samples: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE.
Figure 11. SEM images of the cellular structure along FD of foamed samples: (a) neat PP, (b) PP/PET(S), (c) PP/PET(S)/POE, (d) PP/PET(F), (e) PP/PET(F)/POE.
Polymers 15 00227 g011
Polymers 15 00227 g012 550
Figure 12. Cellular offset angles and length–diameter ratios of cells in shear layer along FD for different foamed samples.
Figure 12. Cellular offset angles and length–diameter ratios of cells in shear layer along FD for different foamed samples.
Polymers 15 00227 g012
Polymers 15 00227 g013 550
Figure 13. Impact test results: (a) Izod impact strength; (b) and (c) are the impact fracture surface morphology of neat PP and PP/PET(F)/POE foam, respectively.
Figure 13. Impact test results: (a) Izod impact strength; (b) and (c) are the impact fracture surface morphology of neat PP and PP/PET(F)/POE foam, respectively.
Polymers 15 00227 g013
Polymers 15 00227 g014 550
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the crack toughening mechanism.
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the crack toughening mechanism.
Polymers 15 00227 g014
Table
Table 1. Formulations of Neat PP and PP based composites.
Table 1. Formulations of Neat PP and PP based composites.
DenotationPET Content (wt.%)POE Content (wt.%)Remark
PP00Neat pellet PP
PP/PET(S)100Melt blended PP/PET with spherical PET domains
PP/PET(S)/POE73Melt blended PP/PET/POE with spherical PET domains
PP/PET(F)100In situ nanofibril PP/PET composite
PP/PET(F)/POE73In situ nanofibril PP/PET/POE composite
Table
Table 2. Summary of Avrami parameters for the isothermal crystallization kinetics of samples.
Table 2. Summary of Avrami parameters for the isothermal crystallization kinetics of samples.
SamplesnZt (s−n)t1/2 (s)
PP2.812.48 × 10−7196.84
PP/PET(S)2.684.19 × 10−537.50
PP/PET(S)/POE2.519.05 × 10−535.27
PP/PET(F)2.818.27 × 10−524.91
PP/PET(F)/POE2.494.71 × 10−418.71
Table
Table 3. Statistical results of cell size and cell density at different layers in all foams.
Table 3. Statistical results of cell size and cell density at different layers in all foams.
SamplesCore LayerShear Layer
Cell Size
(μm)		Cell Density
(cells/cm3)		Cell Size
(μm)		Cell Density
(cells/cm3)
PP100.5 ± 5.32.5 × 10654.6 ± 3.46.4 × 106
PP/PET(S)82.3 ± 4.14.4 × 10642.3 ± 3.18.9 × 106
PP/PET(S)/POE79.6 ± 3.64.8 × 10638.7 ± 2.49.5 × 106
PP/PET(F)64.2 ± 3.99.3 × 10624.8 ± 2.73.4 × 107
PP/PET(F)/POE50.3 ± 2.21.6 × 10718.2 ± 1.65.3 × 107
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Li, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Yang, L.; Jia, C.; Chen, F.; Wang, X. Lightweight and High Impact Toughness PP/PET/POE Composite Foams Fabricated by In Situ Nanofibrillation and Microcellular Injection Molding. Polymers 2023, 15, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010227

AMA Style

Sun J, Li Q, Jiang Y, Jiang J, Yang L, Jia C, Chen F, Wang X. Lightweight and High Impact Toughness PP/PET/POE Composite Foams Fabricated by In Situ Nanofibrillation and Microcellular Injection Molding. Polymers. 2023; 15(1):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Junwei, Qian Li, Yufan Jiang, Jing Jiang, Lian Yang, Caiyi Jia, Feng Chen, and Xiaofeng Wang. 2023. "Lightweight and High Impact Toughness PP/PET/POE Composite Foams Fabricated by In Situ Nanofibrillation and Microcellular Injection Molding" Polymers 15, no. 1: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop