Next Article in Journal
Study on Boundary Layer and Surface Hardness of Carbon Black in Natural Rubber Using Atomic Force Microscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructural and Thermo-Mechanical Characterization of Furfurylated Douglas Fir
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 21
10.3390/polym14214643
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progressive Trends in Hybrid Material-Based Chemiresistive Sensors for Nitroaromatic Compounds

by
Gaurav Awasthi
1,
Ritika Sharma
1,
Subramanian Sundarrajan
2,3,*,
Seeram Ramakrishna
2 and
Pawan Kumar
1,*
1
Materials Research Application Lab (MARL), Department of Nano Sciences & Materials, Central University of Jammu, Jammu 181143, India
2
NUS Centre for Nanotechnology and Sustainability, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 11758, Singapore
3
Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(21), 4643; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214643
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 15 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Polymers in Electrochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the last decades, development of hybrid materials, especially inorganic–organic materials, coordination polymers, conducting polymers, carbon materials, and many more, has produced breakthroughs in diverse applications. Various advance materials have been reported in the literature using metal organic frameworks (MOFs), which compensate for the limitations of sensors. Diverse combinations of HMs not only offer excellent features, but also give a ray of hope for unprecedented advances in materials in different research areas, such as sensing, energy storage, catalysis, non-linear optics, drug-delivery systems, gas storage, etc. Chemiresistor sensors are a core enabling sensor technology and have led to much progress in the field of material science. Here, we have reviewed the recent progress in chemiresistive sensors based on HMs for nitroaromatic compounds, which could be beneficial for researchers that explore this field further. We have put emphasis on sensing mechanisms and the performance of diverse HMs for nitroaromatic sensing applications including pesticides, pollutants, explosives, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). In the end, we explored opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives in this emerging field.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background of the Hybrid Materials

Hybrid materials, in accordance with the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, are materials made up of a combination of inorganic and organic components, or a combination of both with sizes varying from a few nanometers to tens of nanometers, and they are developing into a very powerful and promising category of materials [1,2]. Although the development of organic-inorganic hybrid materials attracted both scientific and industrial attention in the early 1940s, it is worth noting that the study of hybrid materials underwent its first major evolution mostly between the 17th century and the modern era [3,4]. The earliest period, which proved the existence of hybrid materials, extended from prehistory (20,000 years ago) to the 10th century AD. It can be demonstrated with examples such as the bleaching agents that were based on clay and used in ancient Rome or Cyprus. The hybrid clays were utilized to shape and encase Chinese porcelain known as “egg shell”, and the Maya Blue or Prussian Blue pigments. In the case of natural materials, mostly, the organic component holds the inorganic constituents and/or soft tissue together, while the inorganic part gives them mechanical strength and a structure as a whole [5]. In actuality, these natural hybrid materials are frequently the most integrated intelligent systems, which are skilled in striking trade-offs between various tasks such as mechanical behavior, density, controlled permeability, color, and hydrophobicity [3]. In addition, man-made hybrid materials have existed since the beginning of time; for instance, an intercalated organic color compound called Maya blue found in clay minerals, demonstrates the utilization of hybrid materials in the old days [2]. Hybrid materials are divided into four categories [6]. They are
(i)
Composites: matrix and micron-level dispersion constituting the material mixture.
(ii)
Nanocomposites: combination of comparable types of materials at the sub-micron scale.
(iii)
Hybrids: a sub-micron-scale combination of several materials.
(iv)
Nanohybrids: composite, nanocomposite, hybrid, and non-hybrid materials that have been combined at the atomic or molecular level via chemical bonding.
Based on chemical bond strength, HMs are classified into Class 1 hybrids (hybrids with weak bonding such as van der Waals forces, weak electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding) and Class 2 hybrids (strong interactions/Covalent bonding between components) (Figure 1). The organic–inorganic hybrids can be categorized based on their interfaces as Class 1 materials, which interact weakly and are linked by blends or interpenetrating networks. On the other hand, Class 2 materials interact through strong chemical bonds, and they are linked by covalently connected polymers. An example of a Class 1 hybrid material is a binary blend of poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether) (PPE)/poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN), and an example of a Class 2 hybrid material is obtained by the interaction of three organic components, PPE, SAN and SBM (polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-poly (methyl methacrylate)). HMs that are structural composites can be further classified as either single-layer (continuous or discontinuous fibers) or multilayer (laminates) [7]. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been combined with other functional materials such as metal nanoparticles (NPs), polymers, and other MOFs to create MOF-based hybrid materials. Hybrid materials based on covalent organic frameworks (COF) have also been designed [8]. The introduction of MOFs with high electrical conductivity or intrinsic charge mobility presents the possibility for creation of new types of MOF-based sensing devices. In the new era, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) types of MOFs are utilized in chemiresistive sensors. The highest conductivity values were found in 2D MOFs. It is due to the prolonged conjugation and in-plane charge delocalization in the 2D sheets, which were mediated through electronic communication via the metal nodes [9,10]. For the construction of reliable chemiresistive sensors, it is also important to have a hierarchical pore structure, higher thermal and chemical stability, and strong bonds between each of the analytes. All of these properties are found in MOFs as well as in COFs [11,12]. Considering their functional groups, holes, and highly organized porosity structure, COFs offer a huge active site in which to insert electroactive molecules. Additionally, the stability of electrochemical sensors is increased by their improved biocompatibility [12].

1.2. History of Chemiresistive Sensors

Chemiresistive sensors are conductive materials with a built-in resistance or conductance that changes in response to analyte binding. The resistance change occurs due to either electron or hole transfer induced by the surface reaction between the analyte and the sensing substance. The analyte interacts with the sensing material via covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding or molecular recognition. Wohltjen and co-workers were the first to coin the term “chemiresistor” in 1985 [13]. They investigated copper phthalocyanine complex as a chemiresistive material. At room temperature, it was found that the resistance of the complex decreased when ammonia vapor was present. In 1970, a carbon monoxide detector using powdered SnO2 became the first commercialized metal oxide chemiresistive sensor [14]. Since the mid 1990s, mixed-metal oxide chemiresistor sensors have been commercially available for medical, industrial, and air quality monitoring applications [15]. Metal oxide-based chemiresistive sensors are generally gas sensors that can detect oxidizing as well as reducing gases. Metal oxide chemiresistive sensors require high operating temperature, i.e., 200 °C or higher in order to remove an activation energy barrier for resistivity to change [16]. After metal oxides, conductive polymers are the second most researched material as chemiresistive sensors. The most cited chemiresistive materials include metal oxides (MOx), metallic nanoparticles, conductive polymers, and carbon-based nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene [17]. Composite chemiresistive sensors have recently been developed by integrating two high-performance materials. These composite materials exhibit a significant boost in sensing properties when compared to pristine materials. A schematic diagram of a chemiresistor sensor is displayed in Figure 2 [16].

1.3. Broadening of Nitroaromatic Compounds

Nitroaromatic compounds (NACs) are one of the most prevalent and significant classes of industrial chemicals currently in use. The chemical structure of NACs includes one or more nitro groups, and they are aromatic in nature. These compounds are synthetic as well as naturally occurring compounds. Nitroaromatic compounds can occur in both aqueous and atmospheric conditions. Beginning in the early 19th century, the chemistry of nitro compounds was developed, and in the 20th century, it was combined with organic chemistry [18]. Nitro compounds are crucial as synthetic intermediates and building blocks for the synthesis of frameworks for medicines, agrochemicals, dyes, and explosives [18]. Nitro groups have high electronegativity that causes delocalization of the π-electron to accomplish its own charge deficiency [19]. The primary reaction step is nitration, which is generally used to synthesize nitroaromatic compounds. When sulfuric and nitric acids are mixed, nitronium ions (NO2+) are produced. These ions are then used to react with aromatic substrates in an electrophilic substitution [19]. Several nitroaromatic compounds have been used in high-energy explosives due to the nitro group’s peculiar chemistry. The nitrogen atom rapidly accepts electrons in this oxidation state (III), allowing explosives based on nitroarene to serve as self-oxidants. As a result, due to detonation of an explosive charge, energy is quickly released from the molecules. HNO3 alone or in combination with H2SO4 is used in traditional nitration procedures, and this method has remained unchallenged for more than 150 years [18].
The most commonly used NACs include 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene (TNB), 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (TNP), 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT), Dinitrobenzene (DNB), Dinitrotoluene (DNT), Dinitronaphthalene (DNN), 1,3,5-Trinitroso-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), Dinitrophenol (DNP), Nitrobenzene (NB), Nitroaniline (NA), and Nitrocatechol (NC). NACs can be used as starting materials in the chemical synthesis of a wide range of substances, including explosives, pesticides, dyes, drugs, cosmetics, preservatives, paints, corrosion inhibitors, gasoline additives, and other industrial chemicals. The nitro group has some special properties that make it useful in this regard [20].
Picric acid or 1,3,5-trinitrophenol (TNP) was initially developed as a yellow fabric dye in 1771, and it is now used in explosive shells [21]. Toluene and nitric acid are combined to create dinitrotoluene (DNT). Although DNT exists with six isomers, most of the information is relevant to 2,4-DNT and 2,6-DNT [22]. Mononitrotoluene, DNT, and TNT are the products sequentially produced by the nitration of toluene. 2,4-DNT is synthesized through the nitration of 4-nitrotoluene [23]. Explosive DNT is used to make smokeless powders, as a rocket propellant plasticizer, and as a gelatinizing and waterproofing agent [24].
A chronology of nitro compounds as explosive is presented in Figure 3. In 1867, dynamite was invented. TNT was used as a weapon in World War I in 1914 as it had more advantages over dynamite since the shock waves produced by TNT could rupture the steel on armor-plated vehicles. During World War II, two new explosives were introduced, RDX and PETN (penta erythrito tetranitrate). RDX was renamed as Composition Four or C-4 explosive. In 1945, ammonium nitrate, as an inexpensive fertilizer, was manufactured and shipped to Europe for enriching depleted farm soil. In 1957, ammonium nitrate fuel oil was developed as an explosive [25].

2. Prerequisites for Chemiresistive Sensors

A simple chemiresistor is made up of a sensing material that coats a group of interdigitated electrodes or fills the space between two electrodes. It measures the resistance lying between the electrodes. As analytes interact with the sensing material, the intrinsic resistance of the sensing material can be altered in their presence. These interactions result in changes in measured electric properties such as resistance, which can be used to determine if an analyte is present or not, as well as its quantity if present.
It is advantageous to generate π-stacking complexes with electron-rich fluorophores due to NACs’ electron-deficient characteristic. It can be used to detect them using chromo-fluorogenic probes. Chemical sensors offer unique techniques for the fast detection of ultratrace NACs in explosives and can be integrated with small microelectronic systems [26]. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are a desirable type of chemiresistor due to their low-cost synthesis, ability to operate at ambient temperature, and extremely low power needs. The principle of a chemiresistor formed on chemically sensitive conducting polymers for the specific detection of chemical sensing substances is schematically illustrated in Figure 4 [27].
More recently, research on chemiresistor sensors based on MOFs has been gaining more attention due to their excellent properties, including high porosity, high surface area, chemical and thermal stability, and stable luminescent/electrochemical nature [28]. All of these properties have been summarized in Figure 5. Importantly, MOFs constructed from periodic table Group IV elements, i.e., metals such as cerium, zirconium, and hafnium, have become of particular interest. It is due to their notable chemical stability in water and their operation in aqueous media. Many research reports have been published on similar MOFs for chemosensors since 2013 [29]. Additionally, adding MOFs to a composite of active sensing materials will enhance the performance of chemiresistive sensors. Numerous research initiatives have been implemented in this regard to develop different electrically conductive MOFs as well as materials generated from MOFs for their usage in a variety of applications, including chemiresistive sensors [28]. For instance, chemically resistive sensors for the detection of CO2, NO2, and SO2 gases can be produced with UiO-66 and its derivatives. Due to their low electrical conductivities, the resistive responses of such Zr-MOFs are still within the range of 10−10 Ohm [30].

3. Progress on Chemiresistive Sensors for Nitroaromatic Compounds

Many of the chemiresistors based on hybrid materials such as quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, nanosheets, and fibers for sensing of nitroaromatics have been summarized in Table 1. From Table 1, we can conclude that the chemiresistive sensors most used for nitroaromatics are nanosheets and transition-metal doped nanoparticles. TiO2 nanosheets and Ni-ZnO were reported for sensing of various explosives such as PNT, RDX and TNT at analyte concentrations as low as 9 ppb.
NACs are a common form of organic pollutant found in the environment [39]. NACs are extensively employed in dyes, fireworks, leather, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and agrochemicals (pesticides, herbicides, fungicides). Additionally, they are used as preservatives, paints, antioxidants, gasoline additives, explosives and corrosion inhibitors [20,40]. NACs were also discovered in various food items, e.g., vegetables, grilled and smoked meats, tea, coffee, spices, fresh and cured meat items, oils, and beverages [39]. As per the available literature, approximately 65,000 nitroaromatic pollutants are released from various chemical industries/sources [41] into the environment. In the sensing of nitroaromatic compounds, electrophoresis (CE), spectrometric methods such as Raman spectroscopy (RS) and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), and chromatography techniques such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) are used. These detection techniques are conventional, complicated, and need a trained person. In recent years, various sensor-based techniques have also been used in the detection of NACs. Amongst them, optical fluorescence sensing is the most common method for the detection of NACs. The fluorescence method is based on the fact that reactions between sensors and analytes change the luminescent spectra [42]. Apart from fluorescence techniques, various other techniques such as colorimetric [43], MIP based [44] sensing of nitroaromatics are also used.
The chemiresistive sensing technique is an electrical sensing method that is based on resistance (or conductance) change. In the chemiresistive sensor, the flow of holes or electrons generated either by adsorptions or surface reactions of analyte molecules on detecting materials occurs [28]. Chemiresistive sensors provide a number of advantages, including inexpensive manufacturing costs, ease of integration with a variety of electronic devices, and downsizing [28]. Chemiresistive sensors are made up of a thin layer of chemically sensitive material, coated on a conductive electrode platform, which changes its electrical resistance when exposed to a particular analyte. Metal oxide or conducting polymer sheets are commonly used in traditional chemiresistors [45]. Advancement in technologies gave rise to various materials for chemiresistive sensing, such as quantum dots [31], carbon nanotubes [46], graphenes and their oxides [47], hybrid nanoparticles [48], and MOFs [28]. There are different types of nitroaromatic compounds, and they have different chemiresistive sensitivities. They are described in the upcoming paragraphs. Figure 6 shows a chemiresistor sensor and its utility for sensing different materials.

3.1. Pesticide Sensors

Pesticides are chemicals that are applied to destroy as well as control pests and weeds. They are commonly employed in agricultural fields to save crops from a range of infections and pests. Excessive uses of pesticides cause several harmful impacts on the environment as well as on living beings [49]. Organophosphate pesticides (OPs) are a varied group of chemicals that include insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides. Several pesticides such as parathion, fenitrothion, methyl parathion, pendimethalin, trifluralin, pentachloronitrobenzene, 2,6-dichloro-4-nitroaniline etc. contain nitro groups in their structures, as shown in Figure 7 [50]. Bhuvaneswari et al. in 2020 presented a density functional theory (DFT)-based chemiresistive approach for the sensing of ethyl parathion [44]. They used a 2D nanomaterial, namely ε-Arsenene nanosheet, for the absorption of target molecules that are preeminent allotropes of arsenene (Figure 8). Several factors, such as the projected density of states (PDOS) spectrum, adsorption energy, electron density, energy band gap, average energy gap, and Bader charge transfer modification, indicate the utility of ε-Arsenene nanosheet as a chemiresistive sensor.
Using dielectrophoretically aligned SWNTs across electrode pairs for real-time detection of paraoxon was shown by Liu et al. (2007). When paraoxon is injected into the sensors, the electrical conductance changes in real time because of enzymatic hydrolysis. Aligned carbon nanotubes are used, as they provide consistent coverage and increase the interfacial contact between the organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) enzyme and the SWNTs, which can increase sensitivity. However, the non-specific binding (NSB) nature of the enzyme hinders the biosensor from being useful since it may cause enzyme leaching during operating circumstances [52].

3.2. Explosive Sensor

Due to the escalating terrorism situation, fast and accurate detection of explosives has come to be a major global challenge [33]. In their illicit explosive devices, terrorists employ both less potent homemade explosives made of readily available commercial chemicals as well as powerful military explosives. Military explosives include 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), hexogen (RDX), dinitrotoluene (DNT), and other nitro-explosives, and their chemical structures are shown in Figure 9 [33].
To monitor these substances, a variety of analytical methods are available, including Raman spectroscopy, gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GCMS), ion mobility spectrometry, fluorescence, etc. [53]. Apart from these, trained animals are also used for the sensing of explosive materials [54]. To enable the rapid and precise detection of dangerous compounds in a range of government agencies and public facilities such as airports, railway stations, and bus stations, highly sophisticated systems with high sensitivity, mobility, minimal power utilization, and low cost are needed. Since explosives have low vapor pressure, they are difficult to detect. Vapor detection methods must be capable of detecting extremely low concentrations and/or sampling enormous volumes [55]. Several materials, such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs), quantum dots (QD), graphene, etc., are used to detect nitro explosive in the vapor phase. For the fabrication of chemiresistors, colloidal QD offers various advantages: (a) QD treatment from the solution phase and deposition on various substrates are made possible by the colloidal stability of QD dispersions; (b) the QD’s high surface-to-volume ratio enhances the potential for analyte detection through QD surface chemical modification; and (c) a variety of metal electrodes can be employed since the QD energy levels can be adjusted in accordance with the size-dependent electronic structure [31].
The EDA-capped PbS QD sensor can efficiently detect nitro-benzene vapor at ambient temperature, with a response of 0.34% measured at an NB concentration of 65 ppb with 2 ppb detection [31]. Graphene-based devices for chemiresistive sensing are particularly intriguing because they have the potential to integrate flexibility with excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, electrical conductivity, and specific surface area [56]. As the forerunners of the RGO gas sensor, reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sensors could detect warfare chemicals and explosives at parts-per-billion (ppb) levels [57]. Trinitrotoluene (TNT) sensing has been achieved in seawater using graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) and graphene films. Graphene sheets used for chemiresistive detection of NO2 showed qualitatively similar conductance variations when exposed to the pseudo explosive 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) [58]. As a result of interaction between its aromatic hexagon structure and the graphene surface, the TNT molecule induces a higher shift in conductance than the nitramines [58]. Ge et al. in 2017 reported a gas sensor with In-doped ZnO nanoparticles, which responded more favorably to saturated nitro-explosive vapors at ambient temperature. In contrast to the pure ZnO nanoparticle-based sensors, responses to DNT, TNT, PNT, RDX and PA were enhanced from 8.5, 22.2, 2.9, 9.8, and 4.9% to the values of 52.9, 54.7, 57.2, 47.4, and 58.3%, respectively. Furthermore, a significantly faster response time (<6.3 s vs. 20–40 s) [59] was observed. The crystal structures of 5% In-doped ZnO and pure ZnO NPs are schematically shown in Figure 10.
A nanocomposite of polyvinyl alcohol, polypyrrole, and molecularly imprinted polymer (PVA/PPy/MIP) was synthesized and fabricated in order to identify the 2,4-DNT vapor as a non-aromatizing explosive substance. This sensor showed a linear range of response between 0.1 and 70 parts per million [60].The sensor’s ability to detect DNT is due to strong hydrogen bonds that exist between the explosive nitroaromatic material and polypyrrole’s recoverable adsorption, as shown in Figure 11 [60]. Another graphene-based MIP sensor developed by researchers had cavities consistent with nitrobenzene molecules. Methacrylic acid and vinyl benzene were used as the monomers during its synthesis. It was then mixed with graphene to develop a chemiresistor gas sensor from nanocomposite. This sensor responded linearly to concentrations between 0.50 and 60.0 ppm, with a 0.2 ppm sensing limit [61].
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were discovered by Iijima in 1991, and they are considered as a perfect sensing component for chemical sensors due to their distinct qualities. CNTs are classified as single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), double-wall carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs), and multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [62]. The SWCNTs fabricated with 1-pyrenemethylamine (PMA), known as PMA-SWCNTs, were used to create a chemiresistive sensor with exceptional sensitivity for TNT detection. Due to the selective interaction between the amino substituent of PMA and TNT, negatively charged complexes were formed, which acted as molecular gates. PMA-SWCNT had an LOD of 10 ppt and a response time of less than 1 min for TNT sensing [37,62]. Another group of researchers fabricated an SWCNT chemiresistive sensor in order to detect nitroaromatic explosives. They fabricated sensors using a porous thin SWCNT film, and it was coated with an oligomer of carbazolylethynylene (Tg-Car) for nitroaromatic explosive sensing [38].
Apart from the above nanomaterials, a dye-doped chemiresistive sensor for TNT sensing was also developed. In 2017, Ghoorchian et al. developed a chemiresistive gas sensor for very sensitive ambient 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene sensing in air. It is based on a modified conducting polypyrrole layer doped with sulfonated dye. They fabricated a sensor via electrosynthesis of polypyrrole (PPy) on Au interdigital electrodes (Au-IDEs) with the exposure of the sulfonated dyes. The films were treated using n-butylamine (nBA). When TNT was absorbed on the film, it formed the Meisenheimer complex. The detection limit for determination of TNT with this sensor was reported to be 0.2 ppb [34].
Zhang and their co-workers in 2019 developed a filter paper-based chemiresistive sensor for nitroaromatic detection. They sprayed polyaniline (PANI) on filter paper and achieved non-contact, rapid sensing of nitroaromatic explosives. They achieved limits of detection of 0.094 ppb for 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 0.029 ppb for picric acid (PA) [35].

3.3. Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) Sensors

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are a category of hazardous synthetic chemicals with a high level of chemical resistance and a long half-life before degrading. They resist chemical, biological, and photochemical degradation and thus pose a huge risk to the environment [63]. Thus, through the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, an international agreement was introduced in 2001 to regulate, eliminate, and manage POPs (United Nations Environment Programme, 2001) [64]. Since most of the POPs exist in isomeric forms, development of highly selective systems is very important. A few of examples of POPs include Aldrin, Dieldrin, DDT, Hexachlorobenzene, Chlordane, etc.
A variety of imine-linked covalent organic frameworks (COFs) including triphenylbenzene as an intrinsically luminous platform and a luminescent azine-linked COF that functioned as a docking site to lock guest molecules were used to report the chemo-sensing capabilities for polynitroaromatic compounds. Pablo et al. (2019) reported materials for the chemical detection of contaminants directly in water using pyrene-IMDEA-COF. They reported the disintegration of materials and the formation of stable aqueous suspensions in order to find a number of possible water pollutants, such as nitro explosive compounds and organic dyes. To explore the potential use of COF colloids as chemical sensors, their fluorescence properties were assessed. For a range of organic dyes, the colloidal IMDEA-COF-1 nanolayers exhibited impressive chemical sensing abilities to dyes such as nitrobenzene, dinitrobenzene, methylene blue, janus green, malachite green, bromophenol blue, thionin and crystal violet. They proposed that the mechanism of IMDEA-water COF-1’s colloid pollutant detection was associated with the quenching effect of the interaction between the surface of the colloid’s COF nanolayers and the aromatic portion of the nitro derivative or organic dye [65].
Novel MOF-5 covered SERS-active gold gratings were reported by Guselnikova and their co-workers [66]. A schematic of the two-step process used to create the water colloids (Tyndall effect) for IMDEA-COF-1 and IMDEA-COF-2 is shown in Figure 12. Growing MOF materials on specifically designed gold gratings has the main benefit of reducing the inhomogeneity caused by the aggregation of metal nanoparticles, which are frequently employed as plasmonic surfaces. The repeatability of SERS signals was subsequently improved. The created platform had a detection limit of 10−12 M for two polar organophosphorus insecticides, paraoxon and fenitrothion.

3.4. Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon Sensor

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that include at least one nitro-functional group on their aromatic benzene ring are called nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (N-PAHs) [67]. The N-PAHs are the main subgroup of PAHs existing in ambient air particles occurring from diesel emissions [68]. One of the most common N-PAHs discovered in diesel emission particles is 1-nitropyrene (1-NP) (DEPs), and it is a main contributor to DEPs’ mutagenicity [68]. N-PAHs can occur through thermal decomposition of organic compounds and are found in toners of photocopying machines, combustion emissions from gas fuel, kerosene heaters, and liquified petroleum, coal fly ash, air particulates, and food. They are largely found in particulate matter in the environment [69,70]. N-PAHs are more highly carcinogenic than PAHs. Even if they are present in smaller trace amounts than their parent substances, N-PAHs can be primarily produced from the same source of PAHs, although secondary production is frequently caused by interactions with OH and NO3 radicals [71]. Numerous N-PAHs have undergone significant research into their toxicological properties, including their mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and metabolism [70]. A study of N-PAHs’ variations in urban Shanghai showed that, under meteorological conditions, the amounts of PAH and NPAH present were both dominated by ambient temperature [72]. Chemical structures of some N-PAHs are shown in Figure 13.

3.5. Miscellaneous Sensing

The development of sensors employing chemiresistors and field-effect transistors has received a lot of attention since nitrogen dioxide is one of the most prevalent harmful gases. Compounds such as organic materials, carbon nanomaterials, conducting polymers, and semiconducting metal oxides [73] were explored for detecting the existence of NO2 gas in the atmosphere. An inert iron (II) phthalocyanine (FePc) thin film-based chemiresistor sensor using FePc and an organometallic molecular crystal was developed for the sensing of nitrogen dioxide [73]. FePc works as an electron donor whenever nitrogen dioxide gas is present and generates a charge carrier complex. This complex decreases the resistivity, and its measurement helps in the estimation of NO2 concentrations. Consistently, a concentration in the range of 0.5–2 ppm was recorded. Shaik et al. in 2015 reported chemiresistive sensors utilizing nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets coated onto the interdigitated electrodes NGS/IDE for the detection of nitrogen dioxide gas at room temperature [74]. The proposed sensor showed good response to low concentrations with a minimal detection threshold of 120 ppb (S/N = 3). Even at high concentrations, the sensor displayed outstanding selectivity for sensing NO2 gas in comparison to a variety of interfering gases, including ethanol, CO, H2S, NH3, dichloromethane (DCM), benzene, and chloroform, which may be related to the strong electron-withdrawing properties of NO2 gas. The increased capacity of the NGS/IDE sensor to detect NO2 gas could be attributed to the increased accessibility of active sites for the adsorption of gas because of the nitrogen doping in NGS. Figure 14 shows NGS/IDE for the room temperature sensing of NO2 gas.
Chemiresistor sensors are also used for various biosensing applications, such as detection of various nitroaromatic peptides, which can help in the detection of several diseases. Many groups of researchers reported employing polypyrrole nanoparticle-based chemiresistive biosensors to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD), specific biomarkers Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides on a unique platform. The suggested platform was able to detect both nitroaromatic peptides over a broad detection range (10−14–10−6 g/mL), with limited sensing on the order of 10−15 g/mL. A schematic representation of the proposed Aβ sensing platform is shown in Figure 15 [75].

4. Challenges and Conclusions

NACs are one of the most commonly found pollutants in the environment. In light of the harmful impacts of NACs, many articles in the literature have been published for their regulation and sensing. There is extensive review literature on gas sensing using chemiresistive sensors [73,74]. However, there is none on nitroaromatic compound sensing using chemiresistors. We have discussed chemiresistive sensing of PAHs and persistent organic pollutants that have not been included in any review paper on chemiresistive sensors.
Several materials such as graphite and their composites, carbon nanotubes, and quantum dots are conductive in nature and hence usually used in chemiresistive sensing applications. In the case of nitroaromatic compounds, only nitro explosives such as TNT, DNT, RDX, picric acid (PA), etc. have been explored using various materials, as shown in Table 1. Cross-sensitivity is also a problem that is seen in the sensing application of analytes with nano materials. Cross sensing is a phenomenon of similar responses to different types of analytes [76]. In the case of chemiresistive sensors, low sensitivity and poor selectivity are major challenges [28]. Metal oxides offer greater sensitivity than other materials. Since they work at extremely high temperatures, they have limitations such as baseline drift and limited selectivity. [77]. Apart from metal oxides, carbon-based materials have higher surface area, but they have poor selectivity and low response and reproducibility [78].
In the field of nanomaterials, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are emerging as materials for sensing applications with good selectivity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. MOFs can be designed according to the need for analyte synthesis. Sensing of formaldehyde with a Co-based MOF (ZIF-67) was first reported using pure MOF-based chemiresistive sensing [79]. MOF-based chemiresistive sensors for the sensing of nitroaromatics are less explored in the literature.
Poor electrical conductivity is a major challenge to the potential use of pure MOFs for applications in chemiresistive sensing. Generally, MOFs are not conductive at ambient temperature. Strong orbital overlap and hard metal ions in MOFs prevent electron transit or circulation [80]. Today, the synthesis of conductive MOFs (C-MOFs) is not a difficult task. Various pre- and post-synthesis approaches are available to produce MOFs as C-MOFs. C-MOFs can effectively transduce the electrical signals from surface processes, making them a new family of substances for chemiresistive sensors. Apart from pure MOF, MOF-based composite materials/MOF derivatives are used in chemiresistive sensor applications.
In the field of nitroaromatic sensing, we have great opportunities to explore chemiresistive sensing applications for different classes of pollutants, such as nitro explosives, nitro polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitro-based pesticides, and other emerging pollutants.

Author Contributions

The manuscript writing, figures and tables were contributed by G.A. and R.S. The idea and manuscript review and quality improvement were provided by S.S. The overall handling and guidance were performed by S.R. and P.K. All authors have read and accepted the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We wish to express our gratitude for the research grant under Kalam Center for Science and Technology, Central University of Jammu, Jammu, India.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We want to acknowledge the research grant under Kalam Center for Science and Technology, Central University of Jammu, Jammu, India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saveleva, M.S.; Eftekhari, K.; Abalymov, A.; Douglas, T.E.L.; Volodkin, D.; Parakhonskiy, B.V.; Skirtach, A.G. Hierarchy of hybrid materials-the place of inorganics-in-organics in it, their composition and applications. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rejab, M.R.B.M.; Hamdan, M.H.B.M.; Quanjin, M.; Siregar, J.P.; Bachtiar, D.; Muchlis, Y. Historical Development of Hybrid Materials. Encycl. Renew. Sustain. Mater. 2020, 4, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Faustini, M.; Nicole, L.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Sanchez, C. History of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Materials: Prehistory, Art, Science, and Advanced Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, Y.-P.; Yuan, Z.-Y. History and Classification of Non-Siliceous Hybrid Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 978-3-662-45634-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Radulović, J. Hybrid filament-wound materials: Tensile characteristics of (aramide fiber/glass fiber)-epoxy resins composite and (carbon fibers/glass fiber)-epoxy resins composites. Sci. Tech. Rev. 2020, 70, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nanko, M. Definitions and Categories of Hybrid Materials. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Das, P.P.; Chaudhary, V.; Kumar Singh, R.; Singh, D.; Aditya Bachchan, A. Advancement in hybrid materials, its applications and future challenges: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 3794–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, Y.; Zhao, M.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Dai, F.; Lai, Z.; Cui, X.; Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Hybridization of MOFs and COFs: A New Strategy for Construction of MOF@COF Core–Shell Hybrid Materials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campbell, M.G.; Sheberla, D.; Liu, S.F.; Swager, T.M.; Dincă, M. Cu3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2: An Electrically Conductive 2D Metal—Organic Framework for Chemiresistive Sensing. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4349–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, T.; Rarotra, S.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, R.; Sridharan, V.; Sonne, C. Current perspectives on the environmental applications using conductive metal–organic frameworks (CMOFs). J. Porous Mater. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kolleboyina, J.; DMello, M.E.; Kesavan, K.; Schneemann, A.; Otyepka, M.; Kment, S.; Narayana, C.; Kalidindi, S.B.; Varma, R.S.; Zboril, R.; et al. A multifunctional covalently linked graphene–MOF hybrid as an effective chemiresistive gas sensor. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 17434–17441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.; Yuan, B.; Liu, G.; Zhang, D. Electrochemical Sensors Based on Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Critical Review. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andre, R.S.; Facure, M.H.M.; Schneider, R.; Migliorini, F.L.; dos Santos, D.M.; Mercante, L.A.; Correa, D.S. Sensing Materials: Nanofibers Produced by Electrospinning and Solution Blow Spinning. In Encyclopedia of Sensors and Biosensors, 1st ed.; Roger, N., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 521–541. ISBN 9780128225493. [Google Scholar]
  14. Neri, G. First Fifty Years of Chemoresistive Gas Sensors. Chemosensors. 2015, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wilson, D.M.; Hoyt, S.; Janata, J.; Booksh, K.; Obando, L. Chemical sensors for portable, handheld field instruments. IEEE Sens. J. 2001, 1, 256–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pandey, S. Highly sensitive and selective chemiresistor gas/vapor sensors based on polyaniline nanocomposite: A comprehensive review. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2016, 1, 431–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Abdel-Karim, R.; Reda, Y.; Abdel-Fattah, A. Review—Nanostructured Materials-Based Nanosensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nishiwaki, N. A Walk through Recent Nitro Chemistry Advances. Molecules 2020, 25, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ju, K.-S.; Parales, R.E. Nitroaromatic Compounds, from Synthesis to Biodegradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tiwari, J.; Tarale, P.; Sivanesan, S.; Bafana, A. Environmental persistence, hazard, and mitigation challenges of nitroaromatic compounds. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 28650–28667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, P.R. Explosives Development and Fundamentals of Explosives Technology. In Explosive Effects and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Young, R.A. Dinitrotoluene. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Booth, G. Nitro Compounds, Aromatic. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pichtel, J. Distribution and fate of military explosives and propellants in soil: A review. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 2012, 617236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Graham, T. The Explosive History of Nitrogen. ChemMatters 2003, 8–10. Available online: https://highschoolenergy.acs.org/content/hsef/en/how-do-we-use-energy/history-of-nitrogen/_jcr_content/articleContent/columnsbootstrap/column1/acscontainer_0/containerPar/download/file.res/Explosive_History_Nitrogen.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  26. Zhang, L.; Kang, Z.; Xin, X.; Sun, D. Metal–organic frameworks based luminescent materials for nitroaromatics sensing. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2015, 18, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khanyile, N. Advances in Nanostructured Polyamide-Based Chemical Sensors. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 5543283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koo, W.-T.; Jang, J.-S.; Kim, I.-D. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Chemiresistive Sensors. Chem 2019, 5, 1938–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pal, S.; Yu, S.S.; Kung, C.W. Group 4 Metal-Based Metal—Organic Frameworks for Chemical Sensors. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. DMello, M.E.; Sundaram, N.G.; Singh, A.; Singh, A.K.; Kalidindi, S.B. An amine functionalized zirconium metal–organic framework as an effective chemiresistive sensor for acidic gases. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mitri, F.; De Iacovo, A.; De Santis, S.; Giansante, C.; Sotgiu, G.; Colace, L. Chemiresistive Device for the Detection of Nitroaromatic Explosives Based on Colloidal PbS Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 3234–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, L.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zu, B.; Dou, X. Sensitive, real-time and anti-interfering detection of nitro-explosive vapors realized by ZnO/rGO core/shell micro-Schottky junction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zu, B.; Dou, X. Qualitative Detection Toward Military and Improvised Explosive Vapors by a Facile TiO2 Nanosheet-Based Chemiresistive Sensor Array. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghoorchian, A.; Alizadeh, N. Chemiresistor gas sensor based on sulfonated dye-doped modified conducting polypyrrole film for high sensitive detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in air. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, W.; Wu, Z.; Hu, J.; Cao, Y.; Guo, J.; Long, M.; Duan, H.; Jia, D. Flexible chemiresistive sensor of polyaniline coated filter paper prepared by spraying for fast and non-contact detection of nitroaromatic explosives. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qu, J.; Ge, Y.; Zu, B.; Li, Y.; Dou, X. Transition-Metal-Doped p-Type ZnO Nanoparticle-Based Sensory Array for Instant Discrimination of Explosive Vapors. Small 2016, 12, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wei, L.; Lu, D.; Wang, J.; Wei, H.; Zhao, J.; Geng, H.; Zhang, Y. Highly sensitive detection of trinitrotoluene in water by chemiresistive sensor based on noncovalently amino functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 190, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Bunes, B.R.; Wu, N.; Gross, D.E.; Moore, J.S.; Zang, L. Oligomer-coated carbon nanotube chemiresistive sensors for selective detection of nitroaromatic explosives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7471–7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hao, Y.; Sun, G.; Fan, T.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhong, R.; Peng, Y. Prediction on the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using quantum chemistry descriptors based QSAR and machine learning derived classification methods. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 186, 109822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Chu, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Yang, Y. A facile fabrication of electrodeposited luminescent MOF thin films for selective and recyclable sensing of nitroaromatic explosives. Analyst 2016, 141, 4502–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, P.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, J.; Shang, J.; Khazi, M.I.; Kumar, N.; Lisak, G. Metal-organic framework for sorptive/catalytic removal and sensing applications against nitroaromatic compounds. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 84, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, N.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, G. A carbazole-functionalized metal–organic framework for efficient detection of antibiotics, pesticides and nitroaromatic compounds. Dalt. Trans. 2019, 48, 2683–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Shu, Q. Naphthalene based lab-on-a-molecule for fluorimetric and colorimetric sensing of F− and CN− and nitroaromatic explosives. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Herrera-Chacon, A.; Gonzalez-Calabuig, A.; Del Valle, M. Dummy Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Using DNP as a Template Molecule for Explosive Sensing and Nitroaromatic Compound Discrimination. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Janfaza, S.; Banan Nojavani, M.; Nikkhah, M.; Alizadeh, T.; Esfandiar, A.; Ganjali, M.R. A selective chemiresistive sensor for the cancer-related volatile organic compound hexanal by using molecularly imprinted polymers and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gaikwad, S.; Bodkhe, G.; Deshmukh, M.; Patil, H.; Rushi, A.; Shirsat, M.D.; Koinkar, P.; Kim, Y.H.; Mulchandani, A. Chemiresistive sensor based on polythiophene-modified single-walled carbon nanotubes for detection of NO2. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2015, 29, 1540046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nagarajan, V.; Chandiramouli, R. Investigation on probing explosive nitroaromatic compound vapors using graphyne nanosheet: A first-principle study. Struct. Chem. 2019, 30, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rattan, S.; Singhal, P.; Verma, A.L. Synthesis of PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene))/poly(4-styrene sulfonate))/ ngps (nanographitic platelets) nanocomposites as chemiresistive sensors for detection of nitroaromatics. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 53, 2045–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rawtani, D.; Khatri, N.; Tyagi, S.; Pandey, G. Nanotechnology-based recent approaches for sensing and remediation of pesticides. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 206, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kovida; Sharma, V.; Koner, A.L. Rapid on-site and naked-eye detection of common nitro pesticides with ionic liquids. Analyst 2020, 145, 4335–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bhuvaneswari, R.; Nagarajan, V.; Chandiramouli, R. Novel ε-arsenene nanosheets for sensing toxic malathion and parathion—A first-principles approach. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2020, 1190, 112995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ramnani, P.; Saucedo, N.M.; Mulchandani, A. Carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for label-free sensing of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 2016, 143, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Huang, X.L.; Liu, L.; Gao, M.L.; Han, Z.B. A luminescent metal–organic framework for highly selective sensing of nitrobenzene and aniline. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 87945–87949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Furton, K.G.; Myers, L.J. The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives. Talanta 2001, 54, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gares, K.L.; Hufziger, K.T.; Bykov, S.V.; Asher, S.A. Review of explosive detection methodologies and the emergence of standoff deep UV resonance Raman. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2016, 47, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, J.; Fahrenthold, E.P. Graphene nanoribbons as flexible docks for chemiresistive sensing of gas phase explosives. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 10730–10736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Meng, F.L.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.J. Graphene-based hybrids for chemiresistive gas sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 68, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, J.; Fahrenthold, E.P. Graphene-Based Sensing of Gas-Phase Explosives. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ge, Y.; Wei, Z.; Li, Y.; Qu, J.; Zu, B.; Dou, X. Highly sensitive and rapid chemiresistive sensor towards trace nitro-explosive vapors based on oxygen vacancy-rich and defective crystallized In-doped ZnO. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Koudehi, M.F.; Pourmortazavi, S.M. Polyvinyl Alcohol/Polypyrrole/Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanocomposite as Highly Selective Chemiresistor Sensor for 2,4-DNT Vapor Recognition. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 2302–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alizadeh, T.; Hamedsoltani, L. Graphene/graphite/molecularly imprinted polymer nanocomposite as the highly selective gas sensor for nitrobenzene vapor recognition. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1514–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, R.; Shi, Y.; Hou, Z.; Wei, L. Carbon Nanotube-Based Chemiresistive Sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kodavanti, P.R.S.; Royland, J.E.; Sambasiva Rao, K.R.S. Toxicology of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Ref. Modul. Biomed. Sci. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wagner, M.; Andrew Lin, K.Y.; Oh, W.D.; Lisak, G. Metal-organic frameworks for pesticidal persistent organic pollutants detection and adsorption—A mini review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albacete, P.; López-Moreno, A.; Mena-Hernando, S.; Platero-Prats, A.E.; Pérez, E.M.; Zamora, F. Chemical sensing of water contaminants by a colloid of a fluorescent imine-linked covalent organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1382–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Guselnikova, O.; Postnikov, P.; Elashnikov, R.; Miliutina, E.; Svorcik, V.; Lyutakov, O. Metal-organic framework (MOF-5) coated SERS active gold gratings: A platform for the selective detection of organic contaminants in soil. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1068, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bandowe, B.A.M.; Meusel, H. Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) in the environment—A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 581–582, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Øvrevik, J.; Arlt, V.M.; Øya, E.; Nagy, E.; Mollerup, S.; Phillips, D.H.; Låg, M.; Holme, J.A. Differential effects of nitro-PAHs and amino-PAHs on cytokine and chemokine responses in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 242, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Toledo, M.; Lanças, F.M.; Carrilho, E. Solid-phase extraction of nitro-PAH from aquatic samples and its separation by reverse-phase capillary liquid chromatography. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2007, 18, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xia, Q.; Yin, J.J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y.S.; Wang, Y.Q.; Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Sun, X.; Fu, P.P.; Yu, H. UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Formation of Lipid Peroxides †. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 1062–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Falciglia, P.P.; De Guidi, G.; Catalfo, A.; Vagliasindi, F.G.A. Remediation of soils contaminated with PAHs and nitro-PAHs using microwave irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 296, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xing, W.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, R.; Toriba, A.; Hayakawa, K.; et al. Yearly variation in characteristics and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitro-PAHs in urban shanghai from 2010–2018. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 99, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shu, J.H.; Wikle, H.C.; Chin, B.A. Passive chemiresistor sensor based on iron (II) phthalocyanine thin films for monitoring of nitrogen dioxide. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2010, 148, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shaik, M.; Rao, V.K.; Gupta, M.; Murthy, K.S.R.C.; Jain, R. Chemiresistive gas sensor for the sensitive detection of nitrogen dioxide based on nitrogen doped graphene nanosheets. RSC Adv. 2015, 6, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Supraja, P.; Tripathy, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.; Chaudhury, G.; Singh, S.G. Towards point-of-care diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Multi-analyte based portable chemiresistive platform for simultaneous detection of β-amyloid (1–40) and (1–42) in plasma. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 186, 113294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, T.; Huang, D.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; He, G.; Li, X.; Hu, N.; Yin, G.; He, D.; Zhang, L. A Review on Graphene-Based Gas/Vapor Sensors with Unique Properties and Potential Applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 8, 95–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Lee, J.H. Gas sensors using hierarchical and hollow oxide nanostructures: Overview. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2009, 140, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Swager, T.M. Sensor Technologies Empowered by Materials and Molecular Innovations. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4248–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chen, E.-X.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J. Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework as Formaldehyde Gas Sensor. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 5411–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sun, L.; Campbell, M.G.; Dincă, M. Electrically Conductive Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3566–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 04643 g001 550
Figure 1. Types of hybrid materials.
Figure 1. Types of hybrid materials.
Polymers 14 04643 g001
Polymers 14 04643 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of chemiresistor sensor.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of chemiresistor sensor.
Polymers 14 04643 g002
Polymers 14 04643 g003 550
Figure 3. Chronological history of explosives [25].
Figure 3. Chronological history of explosives [25].
Polymers 14 04643 g003
Polymers 14 04643 g004 550
Figure 4. The chemiresistor sensor idea is illustrated schematically for the purpose of selectively detecting chemical sensing materials using chemically sensitive CPs. Reprinted from [27].
Figure 4. The chemiresistor sensor idea is illustrated schematically for the purpose of selectively detecting chemical sensing materials using chemically sensitive CPs. Reprinted from [27].
Polymers 14 04643 g004
Polymers 14 04643 g005 550
Figure 5. MOFs as chemiresistor sensors, with their properties and different forms.
Figure 5. MOFs as chemiresistor sensors, with their properties and different forms.
Polymers 14 04643 g005
Polymers 14 04643 g006 550
Figure 6. Chemiresistor sensor and its applications.
Figure 6. Chemiresistor sensor and its applications.
Polymers 14 04643 g006
Polymers 14 04643 g007 550
Figure 7. Chemical structures of some nitro group-containing pesticides.
Figure 7. Chemical structures of some nitro group-containing pesticides.
Polymers 14 04643 g007
Polymers 14 04643 g008 550
Figure 8. Detection of ethyl parathion—chemiresistive approach. Reprinted with permission from [51].
Figure 8. Detection of ethyl parathion—chemiresistive approach. Reprinted with permission from [51].
Polymers 14 04643 g008
Polymers 14 04643 g009 550
Figure 9. Chemical structures of nitroaromatic explosive compounds.
Figure 9. Chemical structures of nitroaromatic explosive compounds.
Polymers 14 04643 g009
Polymers 14 04643 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Schematic representations of the 5% In-doped ZnO (upper part) and pure ZnO NPs crystal structures (lower part). (b) Schematic illustration of sensing on the surface of 5% In-doped ZnO (upper part) and pure ZnO NPs (lower part), and (c) possible effects of In3+ concentration on the reaction site, the oxygen vacancy concentration, crystallinity degree and charge depletion layer depth. Reprinted with permission from [59].
Figure 10. (a) Schematic representations of the 5% In-doped ZnO (upper part) and pure ZnO NPs crystal structures (lower part). (b) Schematic illustration of sensing on the surface of 5% In-doped ZnO (upper part) and pure ZnO NPs (lower part), and (c) possible effects of In3+ concentration on the reaction site, the oxygen vacancy concentration, crystallinity degree and charge depletion layer depth. Reprinted with permission from [59].
Polymers 14 04643 g010
Polymers 14 04643 g011 550
Figure 11. A diagram depicting the interactions of 2,4-DNT with the components of nanocomposite materials (a) PVA, (b) PPy and (c) MIP. Reprinted with permission from [60].
Figure 11. A diagram depicting the interactions of 2,4-DNT with the components of nanocomposite materials (a) PVA, (b) PPy and (c) MIP. Reprinted with permission from [60].
Polymers 14 04643 g011
Polymers 14 04643 g012 550
Figure 12. Diagram illustrating the two-step process used to create the water colloids for IMDEA-COF-1 and IMDEA-COF-2. Tyndall effect of the obtained colloids also shown. Reprinted with permission from [65].
Figure 12. Diagram illustrating the two-step process used to create the water colloids for IMDEA-COF-1 and IMDEA-COF-2. Tyndall effect of the obtained colloids also shown. Reprinted with permission from [65].
Polymers 14 04643 g012
Polymers 14 04643 g013 550
Figure 13. Chemical structures of nitro group containing polyaromatic hydrocarbons (nitro PAHs).
Figure 13. Chemical structures of nitro group containing polyaromatic hydrocarbons (nitro PAHs).
Polymers 14 04643 g013
Polymers 14 04643 g014 550
Figure 14. NGS/IDE for detection of NO2 gas at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from [74].
Figure 14. NGS/IDE for detection of NO2 gas at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from [74].
Polymers 14 04643 g014
Polymers 14 04643 g015 550
Figure 15. Schematic representation of the proposed Aβ sensing platform. Reprinted with permission from [75].
Figure 15. Schematic representation of the proposed Aβ sensing platform. Reprinted with permission from [75].
Polymers 14 04643 g015
Table
Table 1. Summary of chemiresistive sensing of nitro explosives with different materials.
Table 1. Summary of chemiresistive sensing of nitro explosives with different materials.
Type of
Sensor		AnalyteMaterial Used in SensingDetection LimitAnalyte ConcentrationResponseReference
Quantum dotsNBPbS quantum dots65 ppb–16 ppm--[31]
Schottky junction-basedDNTCore-shell ZnO/reduced graphene oxide (rGO)411 ppb--[32]
TNTCore-shell ZnO/reduced graphene oxide (rGO)9 ppb--[32]
RDXCore-shell ZnO/reduced graphene oxide (rGO)4.9 ppt--[32]
NanosheetsDNTTiO2 nanosheets-180 ppb65.5%[33]
TNTTiO2 nanosheets-9 ppb115.6%[33]
RDXTiO2 nanosheets-4.9 ppt40.0%[33]
PNTTiO2 nanosheets-647 ppb830.0%[33]
PATiO2 nanosheets-097 ppb115.0%[33]
Organic polymer filmTNTPPy-BCGnBA0.2 ppb--[34]
FibersTNTflower-like PANI fibers0.094 ppb-8.1 s[35]
PAflower-like PANI fibers0.029 ppb--[35]
Transition-metal doped nanoparticleTNTNi-ZnO-9.1 ppb45.5%[36]
DNTFe-ZnO-411 ppb38.9%[36]
RDXNi-ZnO-4.9 ppt45.5%[36]
PNTNi-ZnO-647 ppb22.9%[36]
PAFe-ZnO-0.97 ppb36.1%[36]
SWCNTTNTPMA-SWCNT network-10 ppt-[37]
Carbazole oligomer CNT composite materialsNT
(4-nitrotoluene)		Tg-Car/CNT95 ppb--[38]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Awasthi, G.; Sharma, R.; Sundarrajan, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Kumar, P. Progressive Trends in Hybrid Material-Based Chemiresistive Sensors for Nitroaromatic Compounds. Polymers 2022, 14, 4643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214643

AMA Style

Awasthi G, Sharma R, Sundarrajan S, Ramakrishna S, Kumar P. Progressive Trends in Hybrid Material-Based Chemiresistive Sensors for Nitroaromatic Compounds. Polymers. 2022; 14(21):4643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Awasthi, Gaurav, Ritika Sharma, Subramanian Sundarrajan, Seeram Ramakrishna, and Pawan Kumar. 2022. "Progressive Trends in Hybrid Material-Based Chemiresistive Sensors for Nitroaromatic Compounds" Polymers 14, no. 21: 4643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop