Next Article in Journal
Forensic Engineering of Advanced Polymeric Materials—Part VII: Degradation of Biopolymer Welded Joints
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Poly(l-Lactic Acid)-Based Bending Actuators
Previous Article in Journal
One-Step Synthesis of Novel Renewable Vegetable Oil-Based Acrylate Prepolymers and Their Application in UV-Curable Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Triple Layer Tungsten Trioxide, Graphene, and Polyaniline Composite Films for Combined Energy Storage and Electrochromic Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/polym12051164
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Influence of the Sourcing Voltage on Polyaniline Composites for Stress Sensing Applications

by
Andrés Felipe Cruz-Pacheco
1,2,
Leonel Paredes-Madrid
3,*,
Jahir Orozco
2,
Jairo Alberto Gómez-Cuaspud
1,
Carlos R. Batista-Rodríguez
3 and
Carlos Andrés Palacio Gómez
4
1
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja 150003, Colombia
2
Max Planck Tandem Group in Nanobioengineering, University of Antioquia. Complejo Ruta N, Calle 67 No. 52–20, Medellín 050010, Colombia
3
Faculty of Mechanic, Electronic and Biomedical Engineering, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Tunja 150002, Colombia
4
Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Tunja 150002, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(5), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051164
Submission received: 16 April 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 / Published: 19 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducting Polymers for Advanced Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polyaniline (PANI) has recently gained great attention due to its outstanding electrical properties and ease of processability; these characteristics make it ideal for the manufacturing of polymer blends. In this study, the processing and piezoresistive characterization of polymer composites resulting from the blend of PANI with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in different weight percentages (wt %) is reported. The PANI/UHMWPE composites were uniformly homogenized by mechanical mixing and the pellets were manufactured by compression molding. A total of four pellets were manufactured, with PANI percentages of 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt %. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to confirm the effective distribution of PANI and UHMWPE particles in the pellets. A piezoresistive characterization was performed on the basis of compressive forces at different voltages; it was found that the error metrics of hysteresis and drift were influenced by the operating voltage. In general, larger voltages lowered the error metrics, but a reduction in sensor sensitivity came along with voltage increments. In an attempt to explain such a phenomenon, the authors developed a microscopic model for the piezoresistive response of PANI composites, aiming towards a broader usage of PANI composites in strain/stress sensing applications as an alternative to carbonaceous materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyaniline (PANI) has been positioned as a relevant material in recent decades due to its outstanding electromechanical characteristics and attractive processing properties. Despite being discovered in the nineteenth century, the usage of PANI remained rather scarce until the 1980s when highly conductive PANI was synthesized for the first time [1,2]. The conductivity of PANI can be trimmed through grafting or irradiation [3,4] while exhibiting environmental stability to external agents [5,6]. Besides this, PANI is a low-cost polymer with multiple ways of preparation [7]. PANI is commonly synthesized by polymerization of aniline in an aqueous acidic medium, prioritizing the formation of the most conductive form of PANI, the emeraldine salt (ES). The properties of PANI-ES depend on the type of dopant and the level of protonation, the size of the dopant ion, and the preparation conditions (temperature, monomer/oxidant ratio, etc.). In this sense, organic sulfonic acids have been the most widely used dopants to produce more stable and conductive polyaniline [8,9]. For these reasons, the inclusion of PANI and PANI composites has been thoroughly investigated as an alternative material in multiple applications, such as electromagnetic shielding [10], antennas manufacturing [11,12], supercapacitors [13] and as chemical sensors [14,15].
Regarding sensing applications, PANI composites have been successfully tested for measuring the concentration of pollutant gases, such as ammonia [16], carbon monoxide [17] and hydrogen sulfide [18]. Likewise, mechanical variables can be also measured from PANI composites. Valentová et al. investigated the piezoresistive response of PANI pellets under compressive loading [19]. Tensile stress [20] and bending [21] have been measured using polymer blends of PANI and styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS). The usage of ternary polymer composites has been also investigated for strain sensing [22].
Nonetheless, the usage of PANI composites for mechanical measurements does not dominate in nowadays applications; but instead, polymer composites comprising CNT, carbon black (CB), or metallic particles are preferably chosen over PANI [23]. To understand this preference, one must define the gauge factor (GF) as the relative variation in the electrical resistance (ΔR) to the relative variation in dimensional length (Δl), i.e., GF = ΔR/Δl. In general, materials exhibiting large GFs are desirable for sensor development because a small change in the measured parameter (length or stress) causes a significant variation in the electrical resistance. Unfortunately, the GF of PANI composites has been experimentally measured to be around 1 or 2 at most [20,21,24,25,26], whereas CB/CNT polymer composites exhibit GFs typically around 4 [27], 10 [28], or even higher [29,30,31]. Fortunately, recent investigations have demonstrated that with proper doping, the GF of PANI composites can be increased up to 10 [32,33], 50 [34] or even 100, as demonstrated by Falletta et al. [35]. Template polymerization of polyaniline has been also investigated; Sezen-Edmonds et al. demonstrated that the molecular weight of the template polymer plays a major role in the piezoresistive response of PANI [26].
Besides the advantages of polyaniline, current research interest on PANI has arisen from the potential hazard of CNT/CB polymer composites. As mentioned by Costa et al. [20], carbonaceous materials (CNT, CB and graphene nanoplatelets) may be toxic [36,37], and therefore, wearable devices that incorporate carbonaceous materials must be treated with special consideration to avoid potential health disorders. Wearable devices are smart electronic apparatus aimed to be installed or worn on the human body or clothing [25,38,39,40,41].
Similarly, the investigation of support matrix materials is also an active research trend, especially in those applications involving piezoresistive sensing. Recently, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has been used as a polymeric matrix since it is a high-performance thermoplastic polymer [42,43]. UHMWPE is commonly used for the manufacture of implants due to its excellent mechanical, tribological and chemical properties that, combined with a high degree of biocompatibility and low-cost, make it attractive for its use in biomedical applications [44,45]. Particularly, few reports using UHMWPE have focused on analyzing the electromechanical properties under stress, perhaps due to the extensive molecule chain that generates some limitations in terms of viscosity and processing methods [42]. These inconveniences could be solved by reinforcing the UHMWPE particles with inexpensive polymeric elements, and by proposing new processing routes to generate integrated structures during the molding stages [46]. In this way, the development of UHMWPE—and intrinsic semiconductor polymer-based composites—could be of great benefit for the development of piezoresistive materials with superior mechanical and electrical properties. These properties will be beneficial in industrial and biomedical applications [47,48].
Aiming to promote the usage of PANI composites in wearable devices, this study is focused on investigating the piezoresistive response of PANI–polyethylene composites under compressive loading (henceforth referred to as PANI/UHMWPE composites). Typically, the piezoresistive response of PANI composites is studied under conditions of compressive stress [19,24]. Nonetheless, a different methodology was followed in this study with two relevant aspects: first, PANI/UHMWPE pellets have been prepared and tested at multiple sourcing voltages (Vs). This was done for assessing the influence of Vs over the performance metrics of hysteresis and drift errors, being a novel aspect of the present investigation since previous studies were performed under conditions of constant Vs [20,21,24,25,26,32,33,35]. Second, a physical model for the piezoresistive response of PANI/UHMWPE pellets has been derived and tested. The model is based on previous studies from Mikrajuddin et al. [49] and Shi et al. [50] for the constriction resistance of contacts. The methodology and results from this research aim to develop stress sensors based on PANI/UHMWPE blends, which may ultimately replace polymer sensors that incorporate toxic carbonaceous materials such as CB and CNT. Likewise, the performance analyses at multiple voltages are intended to find the optimal Vs that minimizes the error metrics during stress measuring.

2. Theoretical Models for the Temperature- and Voltage-Dependent Response of Polyaniline

Multiple authors have extensively investigated the conduction mechanism of polyaniline since the 1970s; Sheng [51], and Mott and Davis [52] gave the first steps in such a direction, and more recently, Lin et al. [53], and Kang and Snyder [54] further improved the conduction models of PANI and PANI composites. The operating temperature (T) and the sourcing voltage, Vs, do play a significant role in the conductivity of PANI. Given conditions of constant stress and temperature, changes in Vs cause a non-linear variation in the PANI current (I) [20,21,35]. Similarly, given conditions of constant stress and Vs, the resistance of polyaniline changes in a non-linear fashion with temperature increments [53,55,56]. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no author has studied how the sourcing voltage modifies the piezoresistive response of PANI composites at the microscopic level. Costa et al. and Falletta et al. have proposed a model for the piezoresistive response of PANI [20,35], but such a model is a macroscopic approach that is based on a sensor’s dimensional change and Poisson ratio. In the next section, a microscopic model is proposed for the piezoresistive response of polyaniline.

2.1. A review of the Mott’s Model for the Electron Conduction in Granular Metals

Polyaniline conduction is originated from electron hopping among neighboring conducting grains, which are separated from each other by insulating grains. The conducting grains are protonated (emeraldine salt), whereas the insulating ones are unprotonated (emeraldine base), as illustrated by Lin et al. [53]. The average inter-grain separation between conducting monomers is represented by s, which is typically in the range of a few nanometers [53].
According to the Mott’s model [52], the electric-field-dependent conductance of PANI, G(E), can be found from G(E) = G0exp(esE/kBT), where e is the electron charge, s is the inter-grain separation, E is the applied electric field, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature, and G0 is the conductance measured at the lowest admissible Vs. Such expression holds when E is lower than 103 Vcm−1 (low-voltage regime), which is the case of most strain/stress sensors. Typically, the longitudinal dimension (d) of a strain/stress sensor is within the fraction of a centimeter (0.02 cm in the thinnest case), and therefore, voltages up to 20 V can be applied without violating our premise, where E = Vs/d. On the other hand, the inter-grain separation can be related to the applied stress (σ) from the formula
s = s 0 ( 1 − ε ) = s 0 ( 1 − σ / M )
where ε is the resulting strain, s0 is the uncompressed inter-grain separation, and M is the compressive modulus of polyaniline. From a theoretical standpoint, incremental stresses cause a reduction in the inter-grain separation, which ultimately reduce G(E) according to the Mott’s model; this may seem contradictory at a glance, but the hopping mechanism is a two-fold phenomenon that embraces the inter-grain separation and the Coulomb charging energy that also depends upon s. Further details of the hopping mechanism can be found at [57,58]. Conversely, when a PANI composite is elongated, an increment in the sample’s conductance is theoretically expected.
For a better understanding of the Mott’s model, Figure 1 shows a simplified version of G(E) such that the constant G0 has been taken out to study how s and Vs influence G(Vs). The substitution E = Vs/d has been also done as the following:
G ( V s ) = ( G ( E ) − G 0 ) / G 0 = e x p ( e s V s / d k B T ) − 1
The plot in Figure 1 shows G(Vs) for multiple inter-grain separations at T = 300 K and d = 0.02 cm. Note that increasing s or Vs has the same effect on G(Vs)—they are both multiplied in Equation (2)—but changes in G(Vs) are rather small, even if s is doubled or tripled; this is so because the argument of the exponential is quite small (around 10−2). Nonetheless, strain sensors manufactured from PANI composites have demonstrated that small elongations can produce significantly higher variations than those predicted from Equation (2) [32,33,34,35].
Besides this, the PANI strain sensors manufactured by Falletta et al. [35] and Costa et al. [20] showed that elongations of PANI composites produce a decrement in the sensor’s conductance. On the other hand, experimental observations from Valentová et al. demonstrated that PANI compression causes an increment in composite conductance [19]. In brief, experimental observations contradict the theoretical predictions of Mott’s model plotted in Figure 1.
At this point, it must be clarified that the Mott’s model has been thoroughly tested, so its validity is undoubted [53]; later works from Kang and Snyder [54] have further improved the original Mott’s formulation, but the underlying basis of the Mott’s model has remained unchanged to date. The fact that experimental observations do not agree with Mott’s model is a clear indication that additional phenomena may be occurring at a microscopic level that we are currently ignoring.

2.2. Proposal of a Piezoresistive Model for PANI/UHMWPE Composites Based Upon Changes of the Constriction Resistance

Special attention must be placed on the experimental results if a valid model is developed for the piezoresistive PANI composites. In this regard, the work from Valentová et al. reported that the sensor’s conductance saturated upon application of large stresses (over 200 MPa); this is a clue that indicates a plastic deformation in the material microstructure. Based on this observation, the following microscopic model is proposed for the piezoresistive variation of PANI composites
R ( σ ) = R 0 + R 1 / ( σ + σ 0 )
where R(σ) is the total resistance resulting from the sum of two elements: the nanocomposite resistance, R0, and the contact resistance, R1/(σ + σ0), which is a stress-dependent magnitude. The term R0 is originated from electron hopping among neighboring conductive grains following the Mott’s model (G0=1/R0 as defined in Equation(2)), whereas R1/(σ + σ0) is originated from the plastic deformation occurring between the conductive polymer grains and the metallic electrodes. This formulation has been theoretically modeled and experimentally verified by Mikrajuddin et al. [49] and Shi et al. [50]. The contact resistance depends upon the application of stress in an inverse proportionally fashion, but with an effective offset (σ0); this offset can be understood as the pre-compression applied to the nanocomposite during assembly. Finally, the factor R1 depends upon the physical dimensions of the constriction paths. Note from Equation (3) that the nanocomposite resistance, R0, has been written as a stress-independent magnitude; this is a logical consequence of the simulations plotted in Figure 1. The minus one power in the contact resistance term, (σ + σ0)−1, is typical of plastic deformations, which do occur in polymers. Other power factors, such as −1/3 or −2/3 are only observable in elastic deformations [49,50].
In Section 4, experimental data are fitted to Equation (3) to assess its validity as a piezoresistive microscopic model for PANI composites. It must be stated that Equation (3) was given in terms of resistance to be consistent with the original formulation from Mikrajuddin et al. [49] and Shi et al. [50]. However, conductance and resistance magnitudes are indistinctly used in this paper, depending on the context, where R = 1/G.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Commercial polyaniline (emeraldine salt) powder doped with organic sulfonic acids used in this study was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (San Louis, MO, USA, product no: 428329), with a particle size of 3–100 µm and an average molecular weight >15,000 g mol−1. UHMWPE also from Sigma-Aldrich (San Louis, MO, USA, product no: 434272) had a particle size of 40–48 µm, with a density of 0.94 g mL−1 at 25 °C. The ethanol used for the solution mixing was of analytical grade.

3.2. Composites Preparation

UHMWPE composites with different weight percentages (wt %) of polyaniline (20, 25, 30 and 35 wt %) were fabricated by mixing the powders in solution, followed by compression molding technique [43,59]. Costa et al. [20] and Andreatta et al. [60] experimentally determined the percolation threshold to be around 10 wt % for PANI composites, and consequently, the prepared pellets in our study were operating under the percolation regime. Figure 2 shows the general scheme of the sample preparation process.
Initially, PANI was dispersed in ethanol and ultrasonicated at 40 kHz for 30 min. UHMWPE powder was dispersed separately in ethanol using magnetic stirring [59]. Then, UHMWPE/ethanol dispersion was mixed with the PANI/ethanol dispersion and ultrasonication continued for 20 min. The final suspension was placed in a fume hood at room temperature for 24 h to evaporate the solvent completely. The PANI/UHMWPE powder after the evaporation mixture was further milled in an agate mortar for 2 h. Ethanol did not affect the conformation of PANI chains doped with organic sulfonic acids and preserved its morphology and electrical conduction properties [61]. Finally, the macerated and mixed powders of different PANI wt % were compressed and molded in a hydraulic press at 10 MPa for 10 min, followed by a sintering process at 170 °C for 10 min; this was done to obtain rigid pellets of 9 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness, which were finally cooled naturally at room temperature [42,62]. The electrical contact between the pellet and the electrodes was improved by coating the bottom and top surfaces with silver ink. The silver-coated composites were sandwiched between copper electrodes for later electromechanical tests.

3.3. Characterization of Composites

The infrared spectra were measured in a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 spectrometer (Madison, WI, USA), equipped with a diamond crystal by the attenuated total reflection (ATR) technique. Each sample was placed on the ATR accessory diamond crystal and the measurements were made using 32 scans with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Before the analysis, the background was measured under the same conditions with a clean empty cell. The TGA and DTA were developed in a TA instrument simultaneous thermal analyzer, model SDT Q600 (Champaign, IL, USA). Samples were analyzed under a nitrogen atmosphere with 20 mL min−1 flow, from 25 to 700 °C, at 5 °C min−1. The morphological characterization of the PANI/UHMWPE composites was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a gold coating on a JEOL-JSM 6490LV microscope (Tokyo, Japan), with an 15 KV acceleration voltage and operating a secondary electron scattering under high vacuum conditions. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis was performed on a Phenom ProX EDS System (Eindhoven, The Netherlands), equipped with a silicon detector for light elements and resolution of 132 eV.
The experimental set-up comprised a tailored test bench for applying the stress profiles and an amplifier in inverting configuration to readout the resistance of the pellet. The test bench embraced a linear motor, a load cell, and a spring connected in series with the motor shaft to provide mechanical compliance (Tunja, Colombia). Additional details of the test bench were already provided in previous authors’ work [63]. The PANI/UHMWPE pellets had a diameter of 9 mm. The maximum applied force was 68.6 N; thus, the full stress matched for 1.08 MPa.
The driving circuit for measuring the resistance of the pellet comprised the LF353 amplifier connected in an inverting configuration. This configuration ensured that the desired Vs was always applied to the specimen under test [64]. Unless otherwise noted, the test voltages of 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 V were applied to the PANI/UHMWPE pellets. Table 1 shows the pellet’s conductance (G) measured at Vs = 1 V.
Note from Table 1 that conductance does not necessarily increase with larger PANI content; this is caused by a wide range of factors, e.g., random distribution of the PANI percolation network in the composite, and roughness between the PANI/UHMWPE pellet and the electrodes causing contact area to be stress-dependent, thus influencing the conductance at null stress.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Structural, Thermal and Morphological Characterization

FTIR spectroscopy, shown in Figure 3, was used to investigate the successful process of mixing PANI with UHMWPE in the formation of composite materials. The FTIR spectrum of the UHMWPE shows two characteristic bands of the asymmetric and symmetrical stretch vibration modes of the bond –CH2 at 2914 cm−1 and at 2847 cm−1, respectively. The band at 1471 cm−1 corresponds to the bending mode of the C–H and the one at 717 cm−1 represents the rocking mode vibration of the C–H [44,65]. Likewise, the FTIR spectrum of the PANI and the composites show the characteristic bands of the conducting emeraldine salt phase in the region between 1560 and 1530 cm−1 attributed to the stretching vibration of N=Q=N bonds of quinoid diamine ring (Q) and the C–C aromatic ring stretching vibration of the benzenoid diamine in 1460 cm−1 [66]. The band at 1295 cm−1 is attributed to the C–N stretch bond of the aromatic amines of the PANI. The 1100 cm−1 band corresponds to the in-plane bending vibration of a benzene ring and is related to the presence of charge carriers along the polymer chain. The peak at 825 cm−1 is due to the C–H out-of-plane bending vibration of the substituted benzene at position 1,4 [48]. The small peak at 3225 cm−1 is due to the N–H stretching vibration. The bands at 1040–1006 cm−1 and 567 cm−1 are related to S=O and S–O stretching vibrations, respectively, thus confirming the doping of the conductive phase of PANI emeraldine salt with organic sulfonic acids (R-SO3) [67,68]. In this context, the FTIR spectra of the PANI/UHMWPE composites show a decrease in the characteristic bands of the UHMWPE proportional to the increase in the proportion of PANI, confirming the successful formation of the composite materials.
The TGA and DTA curves of the composite with 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt % PANI content are presented in Figure 4a,b. The TGA and DTA were used to confirm the different wt % fraction of polyaniline in the composites and to evaluate the thermal stability of the compressed and heat-treated materials. The thermal decomposition of UHMWPE occurs in a single stage between 300 and 500 °C, while polyaniline exhibits two stages of weight loss. The first stage of loss, before 150 °C, corresponds to the evaporation of doping molecules present in the emeraldine form of polyaniline. The second weight loss after 200 °C is attributed to the decomposition of oligomers and the degradation of the polyaniline macromolecular chain [69]. The thermal decomposition of PANI/UHMWPE composites can be summarized as a three-step process. Thus, the TGA curves of the composites show an increase in weight loss as the proportion of polyaniline changes from 20 to 35 wt %, which is related to the partial and complete degradation of PANI and UHMWPE in the composites [48].
Similarly, the DTA curve shows the heat flow changes in each component of the PANI/UHMWPE composite. DT analysis of UHMWPE shows an endothermic peak at 144 °C, corresponding to the melting point for UHMWPE. The second exothermic peak at 235 °C is related to oxidation of the polyethylene and the beginning of its degradation that continues until 465 °C. At this point, a slight exothermic peak at 468 °C is related to the total combustion of char residue [70]. Thus, the melting point signal of polyethylene serves as a reference to study the increase in the proportion of PANI at the polyethylene interfaces. In this context, when the amount of PANI increased, the intensity of the characteristic peaks in the polyethylene decreased.
To highlight, crystallization and semi-crystallization induced by deformation at temperatures above those of the melting point of UHMWPE are beneficial to decreasing the percolation limit and consequently improving the characteristic electrical conductivity of the composite [71]. This phenomenon is produced by the location of conductive particles at the interfaces of the substrate particles. It generates a deformation hardening, like the behavior of natural rubber, that provides flexibility to the pellets, ideal for applications as stress-sensors [42,72,73,74]. This effect is also associated with a higher degree of CNT–polymer intermingling in the interfacial regions from the lower polymer viscosity at higher temperatures [62]. Semi-crystallization induced by deformation grants’ stability to the composite as the PANI was embedded in the partially molten UHMWPE. This effect was verified in the DTA curve of the different composites. The signal intensity, for example, of the UHMWPE melting point peak, decreased when the amount of PANI increased by checking the effective location of PANI at the interfaces of the UHMWPE particles.
Figure 5 shows the SEM images of the composites with different wt % of PANI. The micrographs show the homogeneous dispersion of the PANI particles around the UHMWPE particles. The SEM results corroborated control in the addition of the two polymers during pellets assembly in agreement with the FTIR, TGA and DTA techniques. In the micrographs, the PANI particles show a bright contrast due to their high electron density. Conversely, the UHMWPE insulating particles are rather dark. Thus, by increasing the amount of PANI from 20 to 35 wt %, the UHMWPE particle surface is comparatively more coated by the conductive polymer, and therefore the electrical conductivity is enhanced, which is ultimately required in piezoresistive sensors.
Besides, the SEM images show the wear of the UHMWPE particles in the form of fibers, which is associated with the partial melting processes that the material suffered in the sintering stage, but without losing its mechanical properties, as discussed in previous work [62,72]. As mentioned in the DT analysis, the semi-crystallization induced by the deformation of polyethylene at high temperatures and with PANI particles at the interfaces allows the manufacture of highly homogeneous and flexible conductive pellets.
The EDS spectra of the PANI/UHMWPE composites shown in Figure 6 contain peaks associated with C, O, N and S confirming the emeraldine salt form of PANI doped with organic sulfonic acids R-SO3. Atomic percentage data for each element are displayed on the EDS spectra. The data indicate increases in the atomic percentages of O, N and S and decreases in C, according to the increase in wt % of PANI doped with sulfonic groups in the UHMWPE matrix. These data agree with the results of FTIR, TGA, DTA and SEM analysis.

4.2. Electrical and Piezoresistive Characterization

The piezoresistive characterization of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets was carried out based on two tests: a voltage sweep to determine the current-voltage characteristic (I-V), and compression tests at different voltages. The sweep was done at null stress, starting at Vs = 0 V up to 7.5 V with a pace of 0.1 V; see Figure 7. In general, the PANI/UHMWPE composites exhibited somewhat high linearity, just as reported in previous studies [20,21,35,53]. However, a closer look at the I-V data showed some nonlinearities occurring in the nanocomposite, especially for voltages under 1 V. The main consequence of the I-V nonlinearity is that Equation (3) requires individual fitting for each Vs, which is later discussed.
Figure 8 reports the piezoresistive response of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at the test voltages. The trend lines obtained from data fitting are also shown in Figure 8, where Equation (3) was used as the fit model. All the fits were successful with a determination coefficient (R2) greater than 0.98. Considering that the pellets’ resistance is voltage-dependent, individual fits were done at each Vs; the parameters resulting from the fits are summarized in Table 2. Note that for a given pellet, R0 and σ0 remain rather constant for each fit; this is a clear indication that such magnitudes are voltage-independent. It is not a surprising result given the fact that Figure 1 predicted a little variation in the nanocomposite resistance, R0. Likewise, nanocomposite pre-compression, σ0, is fundamentally a mechanical variable, thus unaffected by Vs.
Regarding R1, it is not convenient to study it directly from Figure 8 and/or Table 2; this is so because such plots embrace two factors simultaneously: (i) the R1 dependency on Vs, and (ii) the random variations occurring at the interface between the metal electrodes and the polymer. The latter factor originates from the fact that each R(KΩ) vs. σ(MPa) dataset was taken at different trials, thus unavoidably some conductions paths were disconnected among subsequent loadings (and others reconnected), i.e., the polymer surface is rough at the microscopic scale, just as previously shown in the SEM micrographs of Figure 5.
Better setup for studying R1 can be obtained by following these steps, given the data from Figure 7: (i) compute a reference resistance (Rref) using the single datum at Vs = 0.1 V. (ii) calculate resistance values for voltages higher than 0.1 V; these data are henceforth designated as R(V). (iii) Given R(V), the quotient R(V)/Rref is then obtained and plotted in Figure 9. Given the fact that the whole I-V data points were taken in a single trail for each pellet, it is possible to set outplay the random disconnections/reconnections that occur in the interface between the polymer and the metal electrodes.
It is clear from Figure 9 that R(σ) is notably reduced for incremental Vs, where R(σ) has been previously defined in Equation (3). Once again, it must be highlighted that this voltage-dependent behavior is only attributable to R1 itself and not to R0, i.e., the Mott’s model predicts little variation in the nanocomposite resistance, R0, see the plot in Figure 1. Unfortunately, we can only hypothesize about possible reasons for this observation as further tests are required for confirmation. In the works from Mikrajuddin et al. [49] and Shi et al. [50], the parameter R1 is defined as a function of the physical dimension and shape of the constriction paths. In our study case, polymer shape is unaffected by Vs, but larger voltages enhance the activation of conductive grains, thus reducing the total resistance, R(σ).
An important distinction must be presented here. Electron hopping occurring between the polymer conductive grains and the metal electrodes is different from that occurring among conductive grains in the polymer; this is so because the former does not require a free hole to initiate hopping whereas the latter does, i.e., metallic electrodes can be assumed as an electron sink or reservoir depending on the sign of current flow. The practical consequence of this observation is that electron hopping between the electrodes and the conductive grains seems to be dramatically facilitated by incremental Vs.
Finally, in the studies from Mikrajuddin et al. [49] and Shi et al. [50] the sourcing voltage is not a parameter because they were dealing with metals, which are isotropic materials. Conversely, the piezoresistivity of polyaniline is more similar to that of anisotropic materials that exhibit voltage dependency, such as CNT [75].

4.3. Assessment of the Piezoresistive Response at Multiple Voltages

Each specimen was loaded to 0 MPa and then to 1.08 MPa to assess the piezoresistive response of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets; this procedure was repeated at the aforementioned test voltages. With these data, the variation of conductance (ΔG) was computed using the following formula
Δ G = ( G S − G U ) / G U
where GU stands for the uncompressed pellets’ resistance, and GS stands for pellets’ resistance at full stress. The results are presented in Figure 10.
It can be stated that lower ΔG were measured for incremental voltages regardless of polyaniline concentration, with a possible exception occurring for the specimen with 35 wt %. In practice, this implies that the sensor is less sensitive to force changes when operating at high Vs.

4.4. Assessment of Hysteresis Error at Multiple Voltages

It is possible to define the hysteresis error (HE) from the formula
H E = 100 % × ( G u − G l ) / G n o m
where Gu and Gl stand for the conductance measured during the unloading and loading phases at half nominal load (0.54 MPa), respectively. Gnom stands for the nominal conductance measured at the nominal stress of 1.08 MPa.
All the PANI/UHMWPE pellets were evaluated during a loading-unloading cycle to assess the influence of Vs over HE, and then, the HE was computed according to Equation (5). Figure 11 summarizes the results of this test. For voltages below 5 V, a clear trend was not observed in the hysteresis error, but for voltages over 5 V, the HE showed some reduction amid incremental voltages.

4.5. Assessment of Drift Error at Multiple Voltages

The drift error is defined as the relative change in conductance when a constant load is applied to a piezoresistive material. Given G0 as the instantaneous conductance of a pellet measured immediately upon the application of stress, the drift error (DE) can be calculated with the following expression
D E ( t ) = 100 % × ( G ( t ) − G 0 ) / G 0
where G(t) is defined as the time-varying conductance of the pellet.
The change in conductance is originated from the viscoelastic behavior of polymers that causes creep among neighboring conductive particles [76,77]. However, in our study case, it is expected that the major drift contribution is coming from creep occurring in the polymer-metal electrode interface. It is a reasonable hypothesis given the fact that R1/σ0 is considerably larger than R0; see Table 2. Besides, the Motts’ model predicts negligible variation in 1/R0 when s is changed; see Figure 1 and Equation (2).
To present the models that relate the inter-grain separation with time is out of the scope of this article; such models are known in the literature as rheological models and can be found in detail in Mainardi and Spada’s work [78]. In this manuscript, only experimental results of drift error are presented for the PANI/UHMWPE pellets. For this purpose, all the PANI/UHMWPE pellets were loaded to the constant stress of 1.08 MPa for one hour; the test was repeated at each test voltage. Figure 12a shows DE(t) for the 25 wt % pellet at multiple Vs. Finally, Figure 12b summarizes the drift error measured at t = 3600 s for all the PANI/UHMWPE pellets.
Figure 12a,b shows a clear sourcing voltage-drift error trend. Regardless of PANI content, incremental voltages reduce the drift error. This result is consistent with previous drift errors reported in polymer blends with CB [63].

4.6. Discussion and Relevance of Results

The development of polyaniline nanocomposites for strain/stress sensing is currently an active research trend. Given the multiple preparation methods and doping possibilities, it is common to find contradictory results in the specialized literature, e.g., some authors have reported negative GF in PANI strain sensors [79], whereas others have reported positive GF [33]. Sezen-Edmonds et al. made a step forward towards finding the basis of such a controversy; they found that the GF of PANI sensors is dramatically influenced by the molecular weight of the dopant [26]. Likewise, the proposal and validation of Equation (3) is a contribution to the same trend.
The piezoresistive model from Equation (3) explains—to some extent—the inconsistencies between the Mott’s model prediction and the experimental results (not only our results but also third authors’ results [32,33,34,35]). However, two questions remain unanswered: (i) why do some PANI composites exhibit positive GF and other negative GF? (ii) Why is R1 so heavily dependent on Vs (just as reported in Figure 9)? Question (i) was partially answered by Sezen-Edmonds et al. [26] on a phenomenological basis; they provided explanations and arguments that support their observations, but a physical model was not presented. Concerning question (ii), the theory behind constriction resistance has been developed for metals—which are isotropic materials—but when dealing with granular metals such as polyaniline, further theoretical calculations are required.
The experimental results from Figure 10 through Figure 12 demonstrated that Vs plays an important role in sensors performance—especially in the drift error—but a theory of the constriction resistance is required for granular metals. This will let us understand why R1 is heavily influenced by Vs just as experimentally measured in Figure 9, to get a comprehensive understanding of these phenomena. The derivation of such a model is left as a future task for the authors.
The raw I-V data for plotting Figure 7 and Figure 9 are available at [80]. The whole set of conductance data as a function of stress and voltage is available at [81]; these data were employed for plotting Figure 8, Figure 10 and Figure 11. The time-sampled experimental data for drift assessment is available at [82]; these data were employed for plotting Figure 12.

5. Conclusions

Evenly dispersed PANI/UHMWPE composites were obtained by ultrasonication and mechanical milling. The finely mixed polymer powders were compressed and heat-treated to obtain piezoresistive pellets. The homogeneous distribution of PANI particles in the UHMWPE polymer matrix was characterized through FTIR, TGA and SEM analysis.
A microscopic model for the piezoresistive response of PANI composites was proposed and validated. The model embraced two separate contributions: (i) the nanocomposite resistance resulting from electron hopping in the PANI network, and (ii) the contact resistance occurring in the interface between the nanocomposite and the electrodes. The former contribution follows the Mott’s model for granular metals, whereas the latter is based on the constriction resistance of materials. It was experimentally demonstrated that the authors’ proposed model is a valid fit for the piezoresistive response of the PANI/UHMWPE composites.
The drift and hysteresis errors of the PANI/UHMWPE composites were assessed at different sourcing voltages (Vs). It was found that Vs plays an important role in the drift error, where higher Vs resulted in lower drift error for all the nanocomposites. For the case of the hysteresis error, a clear trend was not observed regarding Vs changes; this was probably originated from the experimental setup that involved multiple loading/unloading cycles at different Vs, and consequently, the disconnection and reconnection of conductions paths occurred between subsequent loadings.
The pellet with 25 wt % PANI content outperformed the other samples in the hysteresis and drift tests, observed regardless of the Vs magnitude. Based on this observation, this weight ratio showed the optimal behavior in our study. Regarding Vs, larger voltages lowered the error metrics but also lowered the conductance variation, and therefore an optimal Vs depends upon the specific requirements of the final application.

Author Contributions

L.P.-M. and C.A.P.G. conceived the idea and supervised the experiments. A.F.C.-P. and J.A.G.-C. prepared the composites. J.O. and A.F.C.-P. performed the TGA, DTA, FTIR, SEM and EDS tests and edited the manuscript. L.P.-M. and C.A.P.G. wrote the manuscript. C.R.B.-R. repaired and tuned the tailored test bench for the piezoresistive characterization of the pellets. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad Antonio Nariño under project number 2020005 - PI/UAN-2020-668GFM. The work has been partially funded by COLCIENCIAS, through the Program Ecosistema Científico Cod. FP44842-211-2018 (Project number, 58536). J.O. acknowledges financial support from Colciencias, the University of Antioquia and the Max Planck Society through the Cooperation agreement 566-1, 2014

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chiang, J.-C.; MacDiarmid, A.G. ‘Polyaniline’: Protonic acid doping of the emeraldine form to the metallic regime. Synth. Met. 1986, 13, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Macdiarmid, A.G.; Chiang, J.C.; Richter, A.F.; Epstein, A.J. Polyaniline: A new concept in conducting polymers. Synth. Met. 1987, 18, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhattacharya, A.; Misra, B.N. Grafting: A versatile means to modify polymers: Techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 767–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Güven, O. Radiation-induced conductivity control in polyaniline blends/composites. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2007, 76, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thanpitcha, T.; Sirivat, A.; Jamieson, A.M.; Rujiravanit, R. Preparation and characterization of polyaniline/chitosan blend film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 64, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pud, A.; Ogurtsov, N.; Korzhenko, A.; Shapoval, G. Some aspects of preparation methods and properties of polyaniline blends and composites with organic polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1701–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Visakh, P.M. Chapter 1-Polyaniline-Based Blends, Composites, and Nanocomposites: State of the Art, New Challenges, and Opportunities. In Polyaniline Blends, Composites, and Nanocomposites; Visakh, P.M., Della Pina, C., Falletta, E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–22. ISBN 978-0-12-809551-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayad, M.M.; Zaki, E.A. Doping of polyaniline films with organic sulfonic acids in aqueous media and the effect of water on these doped films. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 3741–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, J.; Wan, M. Polyaniline doped with different sulfonic acids by in situ doping polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 1999, 37, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lyu, J.; Zhao, X.; Hou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Yan, Y. Electromagnetic interference shielding based on a high strength polyaniline-aramid nanocomposite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 149, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guerchouche, K.; Herth, E.; Calvet, L.E.; Roland, N.; Loyez, C. Conductive polymer based antenna for wireless green sensors applications. Microelectron. Eng. 2017, 182, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, X.; Huang, Y.; Wu, C.; Mao, L.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Flexible and reversibly deformable radio-frequency antenna based on stretchable SWCNTs/PANI/Lycra conductive fabric. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 105036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ji, J.; Li, R.; Li, H.; Shu, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiu, S.; He, C.; Yang, Y. Phytic acid assisted fabrication of graphene/polyaniline composite hydrogels for high-capacitance supercapacitors. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 155, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pandey, S.; Ramontja, J. Rapid, facile microwave-assisted synthesis of xanthan gum grafted polyaniline for chemical sensor. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 89, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pandey, S. Highly sensitive and selective chemiresistor gas/vapor sensors based on polyaniline nanocomposite: A comprehensive review. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2016, 1, 431–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Talwar, V.; Singh, O.; Singh, R.C. ZnO assisted polyaniline nanofibers and its application as ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 191, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dixit, V.; Misra, S.C.K.; Sharma, B.S. Carbon monoxide sensitivity of vacuum deposited polyaniline semiconducting thin films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 104, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shirsat, M.D.; Bangar, M.A.; Deshusses, M.A.; Myung, N.V.; Mulchandani, A. Polyaniline nanowires-gold nanoparticles hybrid network based chemiresistive hydrogen sulfide sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 83502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Valentová, H.; Prokeš, J.; Nedbal, J.; Stejskal, J. Effect of compression pressure on mechanical and electrical properties of polyaniline pellets. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 1109–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Costa, P.; Oliveira, J.; Horta-Romarís, L.; Abad, M.J.; Moreira, J.A.; Zapiráin, I.; Aguado, M.; Galván, S.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Piezoresistive polymer blends for electromechanical sensor applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 168, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teixeira, J.; Horta-Romarís, L.; Abad, M.-J.; Costa, P.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Piezoresistive response of extruded polyaniline/(styrene-butadiene-styrene) polymer blends for force and deformation sensors. Mater. Des. 2018, 141, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leyva Egurrola, S.; del Castillo Castro, T.; Castillo Ortega, M.M.; Encinas, J.C.; Herrera Franco, P.J.; Bonilla Cruz, J.; Lara Ceniceros, T.E. Electrical, mechanical, and piezoresistive properties of carbon nanotube–polyaniline hybrid filled polydimethylsiloxane composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Gou, J.; Hui, D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 110, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Della Pina, C.; Zappa, E.; Busca, G.; Sironi, A.; Falletta, E. Electromechanical properties of polyanilines prepared by two different approaches and their applicability in force measurements. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 201, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muthukumar, N.; Thilagavathi, G.; Kannaian, T. Analysis of piezoresistive behavior of polyaniline-coated nylon Lycra fabrics for elbow angle measurement. J. Text. Inst. 2017, 108, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sezen-Edmonds, M.; Khlyabich, P.P.; Loo, Y.-L. Tuning the Magnitude and the Polarity of the Piezoresistive Response of Polyaniline through Structural Control. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12766–12772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abshirini, M.; Charara, M.; Liu, Y.; Saha, M.; Altan, M.C. 3D Printing of Highly Stretchable Strain Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Dai, K.; Liu, M.; Zhou, K.; Zheng, G.; Liu, C.; Shen, C. Conductive thermoplastic polyurethane composites with tunable piezoresistivity by modulating the filler dimensionality for flexible strain sensors. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 101, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bloor, D.; Donnelly, K.; Hands, P.J.; Laughlin, P.; Lussey, D. A metal–polymer composite with unusual properties. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 2851–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duan, L.; Fu, S.; Deng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, K.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. The resistivity–strain behavior of conductive polymer composites: Stability and sensitivity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17085–17098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, S.; Han, B.; Dong, X.; Yu, X.; Ni, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Ou, J. Pressure-sensitive behaviors, mechanisms and model of field assisted quantum tunneling composites. Polymer 2017, 113, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Cong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, T.; Nie, L.; Fu, J. Ultrastretchable Strain Sensors and Arrays with High Sensitivity and Linearity Based on Super Tough Conductive Hydrogels. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 8062–8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pereira, J.N.; Vieira, P.; Ferreira, A.; Paleo, A.J.; Rocha, J.G.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Piezoresistive effect in spin-coated polyaniline thin films. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 9815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, X.X.; Fei, G.T.; Fu, W.B.; Fang, M.; Gao, X.D.; Zhong, B.N.; Zhang, L. De Flexible strain sensor with high performance based on PANI/PDMS films. Org. Electron. 2017, 47, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Falletta, E.; Costa, P.; Della Pina, C.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Development of high sensitive polyaniline based piezoresistive films by conventional and green chemistry approaches. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 220, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Du, J.; Wang, S.; You, H.; Zhao, X. Understanding the toxicity of carbon nanotubes in the environment is crucial to the control of nanomaterials in producing and processing and the assessment of health risk for human: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 36, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ou, L.; Song, B.; Liang, H.; Liu, J.; Feng, X.; Deng, B.; Sun, T.; Shao, L. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: A general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2016, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, C.; Zhang, M.; Xia, K.; Gong, X.; Wang, H.; Yin, Z.; Guan, B.; Zhang, Y. Intrinsically Stretchable and Conductive Textile by a Scalable Process for Elastic Wearable Electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13331–13338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, F.; Lin, J.; Wu, Z.L.; Qu, S.; Yin, J.; Qian, J.; Zheng, Q. Tough and Conductive Hybrid Hydrogels Enabling Facile Patterning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 13685–13692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Highly stretchable strain sensor based on polyurethane substrate using hydrogen bond-assisted laminated structure for monitoring of tiny human motions. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 35013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hu, W.; Guo, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Highly sensitive flexible strain sensor based on threadlike spandex substrate coating with conductive nanocomposites for wearable electronic skin. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 35004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Do, Q.; Obyrne, S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, L. Piezoresistive Behavior of MWCNT-UHMWPE Composite for Compressive Stress Sensing Applications. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2017, 16, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reddy, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Varadarajan, K.M.; Marpu, P.R.; Gupta, T.K.; Choosri, M. Strain and damage-sensing performance of biocompatible smart CNT/UHMWPE nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 92, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Macuvele, D.L.P.; Colla, G.; Cesca, K.; Ribeiro, L.F.B.; da Costa, C.E.; Nones, J.; Breitenbach, E.R.; Porto, L.M.; Soares, C.; Fiori, M.A.; et al. UHMWPE/HA biocomposite compatibilized by organophilic montmorillonite: An evaluation of the mechanical-tribological properties and its hemocompatibility and performance in simulated blood fluid. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Macuvele, D.L.P.; Nones, J.; Matsinhe, J.V.; Lima, M.M.; Soares, C.; Fiori, M.A.; Riella, H.G. Advances in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene/hydroxyapatite composites for biomedical applications: A brief review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 76, 1248–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Unger, T.; Klocke, L.; Herrington, K.; Miethlinger, J. Investigation of the rheological and mechanical behavior of Polypropylene/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene compounds related to new online process control. Polym. Test. 2020, 86, 106442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hong, J.; Pan, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yao, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y. A large-strain weft-knitted sensor fabricated by conductive UHMWPE/PANI composite yarns. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 238, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hong, J.; Pan, Z.; Yao, M.; Zhang, X. Preparation and properties of continuously produced conductive UHMWPE/PANI composite yarns based on in-situ polymerization. Synth. Met. 2014, 193, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mikrajuddin, A.; Shi, F.G.; Kim, H.K.; Okuyama, K. Size-dependent electrical constriction resistance for contacts of arbitrary size: From Sharvin to Holm limits. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 1999, 2, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shi, F.G.; Abdullah, M.; Chungpaiboonpatana, S.; Okuyama, K.; Davidson, C.; Adams, J.M. Electrical conduction of anisotropic conductive adhesives: Effect of size distribution of conducting filler particles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 1999, 2, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sheng, P.; Abeles, B.; Arie, Y. Hopping Conductivity in Granular Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 31, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mott, N.F.; Davis, E.A. Electronic Processes in the Non Crystalline Materials; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780199645336. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lin, Y.-F.; Chen, C.-H.; Xie, W.-J.; Yang, S.-H.; Hsu, C.-S.; Lin, M.-T.; Jian, W.-B. Nano Approach Investigation of the Conduction Mechanism in Polyaniline Nanofibers. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dongmin Kang, S.; Jeffrey Snyder, G. Charge-transport model for conducting polymers. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bao, Z.X.; Liu, C.X.; Kahol, P.K.; Pinto, N.J. Pressure dependence of the resistance in polyaniline and its derivatives at room temperature. Synth. Met. 1999, 106, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Horta-Romarís, L.; Abad, M.-J.; González-Rodríguez, M.V.; Lasagabáster, A.; Costa, P.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Cyclic temperature dependence of electrical conductivity in polyanilines as a function of the dopant and synthesis method. Mater. Des. 2017, 114, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Joo, J.; Long, S.M.; Pouget, J.P.; Oh, E.J.; MacDiarmid, A.G.; Epstein, A.J. Charge transport of the mesoscopic metallic state in partially crystalline polyanilines. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 9567–9580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zuppiroli, L.; Bussac, M.N.; Paschen, S.; Chauvet, O.; Forro, L. Hopping in disordered conducting polymers. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 5196–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alam, F.; Choosri, M.; Gupta, T.K.; Varadarajan, K.M.; Choi, D.; Kumar, S. Electrical, mechanical and thermal properties of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced UHMWPE nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2019, 241, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andreatta, A.; Smith, P. Processing of conductive polyaniline-UHMW polyethylene blends from solutions in non-polar solvents. Synth. Met. 1993, 55, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yin, J.; Xia, X.; Xiang, L.; Zhao, X. Coaxial cable-like polyaniline@titania nanofibers: Facile synthesis and low power electrorheological fluid application. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7096–7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mierczynska, A.; Mayne-L’Hermite, M.; Boiteux, G.; Jeszka, J.K. Electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene composites prepared by a filler prelocalization method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Paredes-Madrid, L.; Matute, A.; Bareño, O.J.; Parra Vargas, A.C.; Gutierrez Velásquez, I.E. Underlying Physics of Conductive Polymer Composites and Force Sensing Resistors (FSRs). A Study on Creep Response and Dynamic Loading. Materials 2017, 10, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sedra, A.S.; Smith, K.C. Microelectronic Circuits Revised Edition, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 0195338839. [Google Scholar]
  65. Patel, A.K.; Balani, K. Dispersion fraction enhances cellular growth of carbon nanotube and aluminum oxide reinforced ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene biocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 46, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Silva, A.L.C.; Ugucioni, J.C.; Correa, S.; Ardisson, J.D.; Macedo, W.A.A.; Silva, J.P.; Cotta, A.A.C.; Brito, A.D.B. Synthesis and characterization of nanocomposites consisting of polyaniline, chitosan and tin dioxide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 216, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Belaabed, B.; Lamouri, S.; Naar, N.; Bourson, P.; Ould Saad Hamady, S. Polyaniline-doped benzene sulfonic acid/epoxy resin composites: Structural, morphological, thermal and dielectric behaviors. Polym. J. 2010, 42, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abdiryim, T.; Jamal, R.; Nurulla, I. Doping effect of organic sulphonic acids on the solid-state synthesized polyaniline. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Linzhi, L.I.; Shujuan, G.A.O. Polyaniline (PANI) and BaTiO3 composite nanotube with high suspension performance in electrorheological fluid. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, W.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Deng, Y. Gel-spun fibers from magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles and UHMWPE nanocomposite: The physical and flammability properties. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 51, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lisunova, M.O.; Mamunya, Y.P.; Lebovka, N.I.; Melezhyk, A. V Percolation behaviour of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Deplancke, T.; Lame, O.; Barrau, S.; Ravi, K.; Dalmas, F. Impact of carbon nanotube prelocalization on the ultra-low electrical percolation threshold and on the mechanical behavior of sintered UHMWPE-based nanocomposites. Polymer 2017, 111, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Deplancke, T.; Lame, O.; Rousset, F.; Seguela, R.; Vigier, G. Mechanisms of Chain Reentanglement during the Sintering of UHMWPE Nascent Powder: Effect of Molecular Weight. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 5328–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Do, Q.; O’Byrne, S.; Perriman, D.; Smith, P. Piezoresistive nanocomposite as an embedded stress sensor in instrumented knee prosthesis. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, 25–29 August 2015; pp. 2677–2680. [Google Scholar]
  75. Buldum, A.; Lu, J.P. Contact resistance between carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 161403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhang, X.-W.; Pan, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Yi, X.-S. Time dependence of piezoresistance for the conductor-filled polymer composites. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 2739–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Esposito, D.; Andreozzi, E.; Fratini, A.; Gargiulo, D.G.; Savino, S.; Niola, V.; Bifulco, P. A Piezoresistive Sensor to Measure Muscle Contraction and Mechanomyography. Sensors 2018, 18, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Mainardi, F.; Spada, G. Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2011, 193, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lillemose, M.; Spieser, M.; Christiansen, N.O.; Christensen, A.; Boisen, A. Intrinsically conductive polymer thin film piezoresistors. Microelectron. Eng. 2008, 85, 969–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Paredes-Madrid, L. Current-Voltage data of polyethylene-polyaniline composites at different weight fractions (% wt.). Mendeley Data 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Paredes-Madrid, L. Piezoresistive response of polyethylene-polyaniline pellets prepared with different weight fractions (% wt.). Data taken at multiple sourcing voltages (Vs). Mendeley Data 2019, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Paredes-Madrid, L. Drift data of polyethylene-polyaniline composites at different weight fractions (% wt.) and voltages. Mendeley Data 2019, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 01164 g001 550
Figure 1. Simulation plot of G(Vs) for multiple inter-grain separations (s) at T = 300 K and d = 0.02 cm. A definition for G(Vs) is provided in Equation (2).
Figure 1. Simulation plot of G(Vs) for multiple inter-grain separations (s) at T = 300 K and d = 0.02 cm. A definition for G(Vs) is provided in Equation (2).
Polymers 12 01164 g001
Polymers 12 01164 g002 550
Figure 2. Sketch summarizing the preparation and assembly of the polyaniline/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (PANI/UHMWPE) composites.
Figure 2. Sketch summarizing the preparation and assembly of the polyaniline/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (PANI/UHMWPE) composites.
Polymers 12 01164 g002
Polymers 12 01164 g003 550
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of UHMWPE, PANI and PANI/UHMWPE composites.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of UHMWPE, PANI and PANI/UHMWPE composites.
Polymers 12 01164 g003
Polymers 12 01164 g004 550
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (a) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) (b) curves of UHMWPE, PANI and PANI/UHMWPE composites.
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (a) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) (b) curves of UHMWPE, PANI and PANI/UHMWPE composites.
Polymers 12 01164 g004
Polymers 12 01164 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of composites with 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt % of PANI.
Figure 5. SEM images of composites with 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt % of PANI.
Polymers 12 01164 g005
Polymers 12 01164 g006 550
Figure 6. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis and SEM images of composites with 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt % of PANI.
Figure 6. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis and SEM images of composites with 20, 25, 30 and 35 wt % of PANI.
Polymers 12 01164 g006
Polymers 12 01164 g007 550
Figure 7. Current-voltage characteristic of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets at null mechanical stress with multiple weight content (wt %). Marker legend: 20 wt % (blue circles), 25 wt % (red dots), 30 wt % (black crosses) and 35 wt % (green squares).
Figure 7. Current-voltage characteristic of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets at null mechanical stress with multiple weight content (wt %). Marker legend: 20 wt % (blue circles), 25 wt % (red dots), 30 wt % (black crosses) and 35 wt % (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g007
Polymers 12 01164 g008 550
Figure 8. Piezoresistive response of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets at different test voltages, Vs. (a) 20 wt %. (b) 25 wt %. (c) 30 wt %. (d) 35 wt %. Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Figure 8. Piezoresistive response of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets at different test voltages, Vs. (a) 20 wt %. (b) 25 wt %. (c) 30 wt %. (d) 35 wt %. Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g008
Polymers 12 01164 g009 550
Figure 9. Normalized resistance of each PANI/UHMWPE pellet measured at null stress. Normalization obtained by dividing resistance data at each Vs, R(V), by the resistance measured at Vs = 0.1 V, Rref. Marker legend: 20 wt % (blue circles), 25 wt % (red dots), 30 wt % (black crosses) and 35 wt % (green squares).
Figure 9. Normalized resistance of each PANI/UHMWPE pellet measured at null stress. Normalization obtained by dividing resistance data at each Vs, R(V), by the resistance measured at Vs = 0.1 V, Rref. Marker legend: 20 wt % (blue circles), 25 wt % (red dots), 30 wt % (black crosses) and 35 wt % (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g009
Polymers 12 01164 g010 550
Figure 10. Conductance Variation, ΔG, in the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages. A definition of ΔG is available in Equation (4). Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Figure 10. Conductance Variation, ΔG, in the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages. A definition of ΔG is available in Equation (4). Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g010
Polymers 12 01164 g011 550
Figure 11. Hysteresis error, HE, of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages. A definition for HE is available in Equation (5). Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Figure 11. Hysteresis error, HE, of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages. A definition for HE is available in Equation (5). Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g011
Polymers 12 01164 g012 550
Figure 12. Drift error, DE, of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages when loaded to 1.08 MPa. A definition for DE is available in Equation (6). (a) Drift error as a function of time for the 25 wt % specimen. (b) Drift error measured at t = 3600 s for all the PANI/UHMWPE pellets. Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Figure 12. Drift error, DE, of the PANI/UHMWPE pellets measured at different voltages when loaded to 1.08 MPa. A definition for DE is available in Equation (6). (a) Drift error as a function of time for the 25 wt % specimen. (b) Drift error measured at t = 3600 s for all the PANI/UHMWPE pellets. Marker legend for Vs: 1.25 V (blue circles), 2.5 V (red dots), 5 V (black crosses) and 7.5 V (green squares).
Polymers 12 01164 g012
Table
Table 1. Conductance and markers legend of PANI/UHMWPE pellets.
Table 1. Conductance and markers legend of PANI/UHMWPE pellets.
PANI/UHMWPE (wt %)Conductance (G) at
Vs = 1 V and Null Stress
20/80762 μS
25/75986 μS
30/7053 μS
35/65320 μS
Table
Table 2. Parameters resulting from fitting pellets resistance R(σ) to Equation (3). Individual fits were done at each voltage (Vs).
Table 2. Parameters resulting from fitting pellets resistance R(σ) to Equation (3). Individual fits were done at each voltage (Vs).
PANI/UHMWPE (wt %)Vs (V)R0 (Ω)R1 (GΩ·Pa)σ0 (MPa)
201.251861.381.17
2.52271.431.22
531611.08
7.52591.41.42
251.256740.0570.11
2.56550.0690.15
56010.0580.15
7.56630.0220.08
301.254702.150.4
2.54012.930.57
54221.220.41
7.54130.910.4
351.25603.161.04
2.5523.281.28
5582.531.38
7.5631.831.13

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cruz-Pacheco, A.F.; Paredes-Madrid, L.; Orozco, J.; Gómez-Cuaspud, J.A.; Batista-Rodríguez, C.R.; Palacio Gómez, C.A. Assessing the Influence of the Sourcing Voltage on Polyaniline Composites for Stress Sensing Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051164

AMA Style

Cruz-Pacheco AF, Paredes-Madrid L, Orozco J, Gómez-Cuaspud JA, Batista-Rodríguez CR, Palacio Gómez CA. Assessing the Influence of the Sourcing Voltage on Polyaniline Composites for Stress Sensing Applications. Polymers. 2020; 12(5):1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruz-Pacheco, Andrés Felipe, Leonel Paredes-Madrid, Jahir Orozco, Jairo Alberto Gómez-Cuaspud, Carlos R. Batista-Rodríguez, and Carlos Andrés Palacio Gómez. 2020. "Assessing the Influence of the Sourcing Voltage on Polyaniline Composites for Stress Sensing Applications" Polymers 12, no. 5: 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop