Next Article in Journal
Reducing off-Flavour in Commercially Available Polyhydroxyalkanoate Materials by Autooxidation through Compounding with Organoclays
Next Article in Special Issue
Polydimethylsiloxane/Nanodiamond Composite Sponge for Enhanced Mechanical or Wettability Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Curing Agent on the Compressive Behavior at Elevated Test Temperature of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrosilylation of Reactive Quantum Dots and Siloxanes for Stable Quantum Dot Films
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/polym11060944
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Silicone Contact Lenses Based on TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA Hydrogels

by
Nguyen-Phuong-Dung Tran
and
Ming-Chien Yang
*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(6), 944; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060944
Submission received: 6 May 2019 / Revised: 25 May 2019 / Accepted: 29 May 2019 / Published: 31 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Silicon-Containing Polymeric Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, silicone-based hydrogel contact lenses were prepared by the polymerization of 3-(methacryloyloxy)propyltris(trimethylsiloxy)silane (TRIS), N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA), 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP), and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA). The properties of silicone hydrogel lenses were analyzed based on the methods such as equilibrium water content, oxygen permeability, optical transparency, contact angle, mechanical test, protein adsorption, and cell toxicity. The results showed that the TRIS content in all formulations increased the oxygen permeability and decreased the equilibrium water content, while both DMA and NVP contributed the hydrophilicity of the hydrogels. The maximum value of oxygen permeability was 74.9 barrers, corresponding to an equilibrium water content of 44.5% as well as a contact angle of 82°. Moreover, L929 fibroblasts grew on all these hydrogels, suggesting non-cytotoxicity. In general, the silicone hydrogels in this work exhibited good oxygen permeability, stiffness, and optical transparency as well as anti-protein adsorption. Hence, these silicone hydrogel polymers would be feasible for making contact lens.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrogel is frequently used in fields including biology, medicine, material science and engineering. In particular, hydrogel has been applied in contact lenses due to impressive function such as wettability, biocompatibility, optical characteristic, and mechanical strength [1]. Nevertheless, hydrogel lens limits gas permeability, especially oxygen permeability. High oxygen permeability is very significant to maintaining the wearing comfort and to restrict hypoxia-related complications, such as dry eyes and corneal edema [2,3], as hypoxia frequently occurs in patients who wear contact lenses for long durations.
To reduce the shortage of oxygen supply, the hydrophobic materials containing siloxane groups such as hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and tris-(trimethyl-silyl-propyl-methacrylate) (TRIS) were used to improve the oxygen absorptivity of contact lenses. The cooperation of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine and vinyl ether terminated polydimethylsiloxane macro-monomer, improved the oxygen permeability of hydrogel contact lenses [4]. In addition, the polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with PDMS provided more oxygen permeability than non-silicone hydrogel [5]. Moreover, a silicone hydrogel lens synthesized by the incorporation of oligosiloxane, N-vinyl-pyrrolidone (NVP), and N,N-dimethyl-acrylamide (DMA) also improved the oxygen uptake of hydrogel lens [6].
TRIS is a hydrophobic monomer with siloxane groups that can increase the oxygen absorbability of a conventional hydrogel lens. Because of the short chain length, TRIS is softer and lacks strength compared to PDMS [7]. Hence, TRIS-based hydrogel lenses exhibit lower mechanical strength and higher flexibility than PDMS-based hydrogel lenses. Although TRIS can improve the oxygen transmissibility of contact lenses, higher TRIS content will lead to lower equilibrium water content (EWC) and surface wettability of silicone hydrogel lens [8,9]. In addition, TRIS is prone to cause high lysozyme deposition on silicone-based hydrogel contact lenses [10]. Hydrophilic monomers including NVP, methacrylic acid (MAA), DMA, methacrylic acid (MA), methacrylic acid (MAA), HEMA, and glycerol methacrylate (GMA) were used to restrict the water absorbability decrease as well as poor wettability [11,12]. Additionally, NVP, HEMA, and DMA are hydrophilic monomers that have good water uptake ability and low cytotoxicity. For instance, HEMA can reduce albumin deposition on poly(HEMA-co-MMA) compounds [13]. Thus, this article is aiming to investigate the effect of these monomers on a silicone-based contact lens from TRIS, DMA, NVP and HEMA with respect to oxygen and water absorbability, protein uptake, and wettability. Accordingly, the resultant TRIS-DMA-NVP and TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA hydrogels were characterized by equilibrium water content, oxygen permeability, optical transparency, contact angle, mechanical properties, protein adsorption, and cytotoxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA), 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP), 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone (PI184), human serum albumin (HSA, MW 58 kDa), and lysozyme (MW 14.3 kDa) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo USA). 3-(methacryloyloxy)propyltris(trimethylsiloxy) silane (TRIS, CAS No.: 17096-07-0) was bought from Alfa Aesar Chemical Co. (Heysham, Lancashire, UK). 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) were obtained from Acros Organics (Morris Plains, NJ, USA). Phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4) was prepared in our laboratory.

2.2. Preparation of Silicone Hydrogels

The silicone hydrogels were polymerized from TRIS, DMA, NVP, and HEMA monomers in the presence of cross-linking agent EGDMA and photo initiator PI184, as listed in Table 1. The mixture was stirred in a dark environment at room temperature for 5 h. After being poured into polypropylene molds, the mixture was cured under 365 nm UV light for 40 min. After demolding, the lens material was purified by soaking in 50% ethanol for 24 h at 50 °C to remove the un-reacted monomers and photo initiator. Then, the lens was immersed in distilled water for 12 h at 50 °C to wash out the ethanol. Finally, the lens was preserved in PBS (pH 7.4) at room temperature. For all formulations, the percentages of EGDMA and PI184 were 0.625 wt % and 0.4 wt %, respectively.

2.3. Equilibrium Water Content

The equilibrium water content (EWC) of the sample was defined by the formula as follows:
EWC   ( % ) = W 2 − W 1 W 2 × 100
where W1 and W2 are the weights of the dry and wet lenses. The wet lens was rehydrated in distilled water at room temperature for 24 h.

2.4. Oxygen Permeability

The oxygen permeability (Dk, barrer) of the lens material was detected in humidified gas based on the polarographic method (ISO18369-4:2006) using an oxygen permeometer (Model 201T, Createch, Chesterfield Twp, MI, USA). The measurement was controlled at 35 ± 5 °C and 95% air humidity.

2.5. Optical Transparency

The lens was cut into a small piece (1 cm × 1 cm) after being fully hydrated in a PBS preserved solution. Then the sample was put into a cuvette containing 2 mL distilled water. The optical transparency of the sample was taken as the light transmittance (%) at 400–700 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300, Agilient Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.6. Contact Angle [14]

The evaluation of the surface wettability of silicone hydrogel lens material was based on the contact angle test. The measurement was conducted using a contact angle goniometer (DSA 100, Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) at room temperature. The contact angle value was the average of five measurements.

2.7. Mechanical Properties

After swelling in distilled water, the specimens were cut into a dog bone shape. The dry specimens were obtained by putting them in an oven at 40 °C in one day. The tensile properties of the samples were measured at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min, in accordance with ASTM D1708 standard, using a tensile tester (MTS 810, MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA).

2.8. Protein Deposition [15]

The specimens (1 cm × 1 cm) were soaked in 1 mL PBS consisting of 2 mg/mL of lysozyme or HSA. The samples were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) after their placement in an incubator at room temperature for one day. Then, the samples were transferred into new tubes containing 2 mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and were shaken at 100 rpm for 1 h at room temperature. Afterwards, 2 mL bicinchoninic acid (BCA) was added and the tubes were put back in the incubator for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, protein deposition of all specimens was measured at 562 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 300, Agilient Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.9. Cytotoxicity [14]

Cytotoxicity of the hydrogel discs was determined according to ISO 10993-5. For determination of cytotoxicity, cell culture medium was prepared including 94% Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% penicillin antibiotic (PNC). The specimens (1 cm × 1 cm) were first placed under the UV light for 4 h to kill the bacteria. Then, the specimens were immersed in the cell culture medium at 37 °C for one day. After that, the extracted medium was passed through a 0.22 μL filter and collected in a new flask. After the cultures of L929 cells were completely initiated in the cell culture medium for more than one day at 37 °C, a controlled amount of L929 cells were transferred into the flask. The cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h before thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent was added into the flask for 4 h at 37 °C. Then, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was mixed with the medium to dissolve the purple product. Finally, the absorbance at 570 nm was analyzed. In the cytotoxicity test, the positive control was simultaneously prepared and extracted with the negative control.

3. Results and Discussion

Two types of silicone hydrogel samples were prepared: TRIS-DMA-NVP and TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA. Table 1 lists the formulation of each type of silicone hydrogel.

3.1. Equilibrium Water Content

Equilibrium water content (EWC) is one of the important properties of the contact lens, offering more comfort for frequent patients, especially for the limitation of dry corneal eyes [16]. In TDN series, with equal content of DMA and NVP, EWC decreased sharply with the increase of TRIS content from 5 to 30 wt %. The highest EWC was 83.6%, corresponding to the minimum TRIS content of 5 wt %. The results demonstrate that water content of the lens material depended on the content of hydrophobic TRIS. In the TDNH series, with the incorporation of HEMA, EWC was also influenced by the TRIS content (from 20 to 40 wt %). A similar trend was reported in that the EWC of silicone-based hybrid hydrogels was affected by the ratio of NVP/DMA [17]. In particular, the increase of DMA ratio from 0 to 20 wt % led EWC to increase from 37% to 41%.
Multiple regression was performed on the EWC values in Table 1 and yielded the following correlation:
EWC(%) = 0.0784 CT + 0.9197 CD + 0.7800 CN + 0.1131 CH  R2 = 0.9824
where CT, CD, CN and CH are the percentages of TRIS, DMA, NVP and HEMA in the lens, respectively. Based on this regression, TRIS contributed the least to EWC, due to its hydrophobic nature, whereas DMA contributed the most to EWC, due to its hydrophilicity. The log octane-water partition coefficient of a solute (logP) is a measure of the hydrophobicity. The values of logP for TRIS, DMA, NVP and HEMA are 7.36, −0.13, 0.37, and 0.47, respectively (given by US Environmental Protection Agency’s EPISuite™). Thus DMA is the most hydrophilic followed by NVP and HEMA, while TRIS is very hydrophobic. This trend agrees with the coefficients of the regressed correlation. It is possible to predict the EWC of the TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA system by using this regressed correlation.

3.2. Oxygen Permeability

Table 1 shows that the oxygen permeability (Dk) of silicone hydrogel lenses increased with the TRIS content from 5 to 30 wt %. The highest Dk value was 74.9 barrers obtained at a TRIS content of 40 wt %. The increase of Dk can be attributed to the incorporation of TRIS in a hydrogel network. Hydrophobic TRIS is a bulky polymer containing siloxane groups (-Si(CH3)2-O-) which manifests as a silicone domain in the hydrogel matrix. As such, the massive fibrous textures create small holes that oxygen molecules can pass easily to the corneal epithelium [1].
Figure 1 shows that the oxygen permeability decreased with the increase of EWC. Based on the linear correlation shown in Figure 1, we can predict the Dk of the silicone hydrogel from the EWC, which is in turn predictable from the regressed correlation in Section 3.1.
It has been reported that water content and oxygen transmissibility generally exhibit an inverse correlation. As stated in the literature, water is usually the limiting factor of oxygen transport [1]. In general, the silicon–oxygen bonds and free water are two major pathways for oxygen transportation in silicone hydrogel network. Because the oxygen absorptivity of siloxane group is 10 times greater than that of free water, oxygen transmissibility is primarily through the hydrophobic silicone phase, which is dominated by TRIS in this study. Other than the siloxane groups, oxygen can also transport through free water existing in the silicone phase [18]. In silicone a hydrogel matrix, water exists as free water and bound water. The bound water is directly connected to continuous hydrophilic phase consisting of non-freezable and freezable forms. On the other hand, the water trapped in hydrophobic silicone phase is mostly free water. As a result, in the silicone phase, small pores will appear with very low water content, and oxygen can be absorbed through this channel [19,20,21].

3.3. Optical Transparency

Light transmissibility is the measure of the transparency of contact lenses. Phase separation due to the unsuccessful cooperation of silicone and hydrogel groups would cause opaque lenses and restrict light transmissibility [22,23]. Figure 2 shows that the light transmittance of all hydrogel lenses varied around 96 to 97%, indicating that all of the samples are suitable for contact lenses, which requires the light transmittance to be above 90% [23].

3.4. Contact Angle

As an important factor influencing wearing comfort, the surface wettability of the lenses was evaluated by the contact angle of a drop of water on the solid surface. Figure 3 shows that the contact angle is linearly dependent on the EWC of the contact lens. Similar to predicting Dk, the linear correlation presented in Figure 3 can also be used to predict the contact angle from EWC.
Both contact angle and EWC are related to the hydrophilicity of the hydrogel. Hydrophobic TRIS decreased the hydrophilicity of the hydrogel, and hence decreased the wettability of lens surface. In addition, the hydrophobic monomer (TRIS) is sensitive to environmental conditions because of its reorientation property [24,25]. With the inherent flexible structure, silicon-oxygen bonds in TRIS monomers will rotate forth the lens surface in a dry environment [26]. Thus, TRIS is the monomer that influences the contact angle value of silicone hydrogel lens material according to a previous report [27].
As mentioned in Section 3.1, HEMA is less hydrophilic than DMA and NVP. At the same 30 wt % TRIS content, the contact angle of TDNH4 (14 wt % HEMA) was 75.4°, higher than TDNH3 (7 wt % HEMA), as well as TDN4 (0 wt % HEMA). Moreover, contact angle increased slightly with the decrease of NVP and increase of DMA for the same TRIS content. This means that NVP can increase the wettability more than DMA for silicone hydrogel polymers. In the literature, NVP was able to maintain good surface wettability during 4–6 h of wear, while DMA led to less wettable for the same wearing time [17]. In summary, in this work, almost all contact angles of hydrated lenses were less than 80°, which is comparable to that of other commercial contact lenses such as Lotrafilcon A (Air Optix Night & Day), and Balafilcon A (Purevision) [25].

3.5. Mechanical Properties

For contact lenses, low modulus offers the wearing comfort, physical impact, durableness, as well as fitting property [28], whereas high modulus can cause corneal swelling, papillary conjunctivitis, and corneal erosions due to corneal epithelial lesions [16].
Figure 4 shows that the modulus of hydrated lenses exhibited a linear dependence on the EWC, which is in agreement with previous studies [17,29]. Again, we can predict the modulus of this TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA silicone hydrogel from the composition through the regressed correlation of EWC.
The increase in modulus can be attributed to the hydrophobic characteristic of TRIS. As discussed in the Section 3.1, the existence of TRIS causes a decrease in the water content in hydrogel lens material. Lower EWC would then result in higher modulus and tensile strength. Moreover, because of the existence of free water in the hydrogel, as discussed in Section 3.2, these water molecules can move easily in and out of the hydrogel lens matrix and can evaporate faster than bound water. Thus, hydrogel lenses will become drier more easily and stronger in air without water or another preserving agent. In addition, the lower NVP content led to higher modulus and tensile strength, as reported in previous research [28]. Furthermore, the concentration and type of crosslinker may also influence the mechanical properties of silicone hydrogel-based contact lenses [30]. Overall, these silicone hydrogel polymers possess mechanical properties comparable to existing commercial contact lens materials.

3.6. Protein Adsorption

Protein is a fundamental factor that relates to the transport and metabolism of cellular membranes, potentially manifesting in antimicrobial or inflammation of the corneal eye [31]. Ophthalmic biomaterials for contact lenses should not adsorb constituents of tear film such as lipid and protein, because the deposition of protein can be uncomfortable, raise bacterial cell interaction to the corneal epithelium, and correlate with giant papillary conjunctivitis [32].
Basically, the adsorption of protein is related to the wettability of the lens. Figure 5 shows the effect of contact angle on the protein adsorption of all samples prepared in this work. The most hydrophilic lens (TDN1) exhibited the highest protein adsorption, while the most hydrophobic lens (TDNH6) exhibited the lowest protein adsorption. For HSA, when the TRIS content increased from 5 to 40 wt %, the adsorption of protein decreased from 5.31 to 2.77 µg/cm2 while lysozyme adsorption decreased from 8.85 to 3.42 µg/cm2. According to Figure 5, the deposition of lysozyme on the surface of hydrogel lens was higher than HSA absorption. This phenomenon is due to the lower molecular weight of lysozyme.
The protein deposition of contact lens is also influenced by other factors such as pH of environment, protein dimension, charge of protein, lens material, water content, roughness of lens surface, and material properties [33,34]. In previous research, protein adsorption was directly proportional to the increase of hydrophobic materials as well as TRIS content, which resulted in decreasing water content [35,36]. However, yet other research indicates that increasing protein adsorption was influenced by loading hydrophilic components, especially NVP [32,37,38]. The lysozyme deposition of five silicones-based hydrogel lens material was less than that of pHEMA and decreased with decreasing water content [39]. This may be attributed to the property of the lactam moiety in the NVP [38]. Lysozyme is positively charged whereas HSA is negatively charged [13]. In the molecule structure of NVP, the negative charge belongs to carbonyl group and lysozyme can be attracted to this group. Similarly, HSA will be attracted by the positive charge of nitrogen end. In conclusion, the decrease of protein deposition of all formulations was mainly due to the NVP content in silicone hydrogel.

3.7. Cytotoxicity

On ophthalmic devices, cellular behavior is significant determining the biocompatibility of cells [9]. A cytotoxicity test was conducted to observe the change of cellular morphology by adding the extracted medium of hydrogel lens to a cell culture. Figure 6 shows all extracted media of lenses did not clearly affect cellular growth. The cell mass for all hydrogel lenses increased and was comparable to the negative control. Therefore, the result demonstrates that the hydrogel composing of TRIS, DMA, NVP and HEMA was non-cytotoxic. The RGR value changed continuously from day 1 to day 3 for all extracted medium. In summary, this result proved that the combination of TRIS-DMA-NVP and TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA were safe for cells and humans.

3.8. Comaprison with Commercial Lenses

Table 2 summarizes the properties of commercial lenses and the lenses in this study. Commercial lenses such as Air Optix, Acuvue Oasys, PureVision exhibited higher Dk and lower EWC than the lenses in this study. Although the TDNH6 lens exhibited a maximum contact angle of 81.9° and Young’s modulus of 1.29 MPa, it was still lower than that of PureVision and Air Optix Night & Day, respectively. In general, our hydrogel lenses in this work had EWC, Dk, contact angle and Young’s modulus comparable to commercial lenses. However, our lenses still exhibited lower Dk than PureVision, Acuvue Oasis and Air Optix Night & Day. Thus this formulation still requires further improvement.

4. Conclusions

As demonstrated in this study, the silicone hydrogels were polymerized from TRIS, DMA, NVP, and HEMA monomers. By changing the compositions, the hydrophilicity of the resultant silicone hydrogel lenses can be adjusted. An empirical correlation was obtained through multiple regression for the equilibrium water content. The EWC increased with the contents of DMA and NVP while decreasing with the increase TRIS. Furthermore, the oxygen permeability, the contact angle and Young’s modulus exhibited linear dependency on EWC. With increasing EWC, the Dk, the contact angle, and the modulus all decreased. The deposition of human serum albumin and lysozyme decreased with the contact angle, and the proliferation of L929 indicated that these lenses were non-cytotoxic. Overall, all samples presented high light transparency, reasonable moduli, and non-cytotoxicity. The results of this research showed that these hydrogels exhibited EWC, Dk, contact angle and Young’s modulus comparable with commercial lenses such as Biomedics, Acuvue Advance, Acuvue Oasys, and PureVision. Therefore, the results of this work would be useful for developing soft contact lenses.

Author Contributions

N.-P.-D.T. carried out experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. M.-C.Y. supervised the work and revised the final manuscripts.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan through Grant No. MOST 106-2622-E-011-004-CC2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, Z.; Xie, H.; An, S.; Jiang, Y. The relationship between oxygen permeability and phase separation morphology of the multicomponent silicone hydrogels. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 14640–14647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fonn, D.; Dumbleton, K.; Jalbert, I.; Sivak, A. Benefits of silicone hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectr. 2006, 21, 38. [Google Scholar]
  3. Awasthi, A.K.; Meng, F.R.; Künzler, J.F.; Linhardt, J.G.; Papagelis, P.; Oltean, G.; Myers, S.A. Ethylenically unsaturated polycarbosiloxanes for novel silicone hydrogels: Synthesis, end-group analysis, contact lens formulations, and structure–property correlations. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2013, 24, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, J.J.; Liu, F. Simultaneous interpenetrating network silicone hydrogels prepared by free radical/cationic hybrid polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 2235–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lai, Y.C. Novel polyurethane–silicone hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 56, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chekina, N.A.; Pavlyuchenko, V.N.; Danilichev, V.F.; Ushakov, N.A.; Novikov, S.A.; Ivanchev, S.S. A new polymeric silicone hydrogel for medical applications: Synthesis and properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2006, 17, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tighe, B.J. A decade of silicone hydrogel development: Surface properties, mechanical properties, and ocular compatibility. Eye Contact Lens 2013, 39, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van Beek, M.; Weeks, A.; Jones, L.; Sheardown, H. Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2008, 19, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, C.H.; Yeh, Y.H.; Lin, W.C.; Yang, M.C. Novel silicone hydrogel based on PDMS and PEGMA for contact lens application. Colloid. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 123, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jones, L.; Senchyna, M.; Glasier, M.A.; Schickler, J.; Forbes, I.; Louie, D.; May, C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29, S75–S79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maldonado-Codina, C.; Efron, N. Hydrogel lenses-material and manufacture: A review. Optom. Pract. 2003, 4, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
  12. Parambil, A.M.; Puttaiahgowda, Y.M.; Shankarappa, P. Copolymerization of N-Vinyl pyrrolidone with methyl methacrylate by Ti (III)-DMG redox initiator. Turk. J. Chem. 2012, 36, 397–409. [Google Scholar]
  13. Luensmann, D.; Jones, L. Albumin adsorption to contact lens materials: A review. Cont. Lens Ant. Eye 2008, 31, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abbasi, F.; Mirzadeh, H.; Simjoo, M. Hydrophilic interpenetrating polymer networks of poly (dimethyl siloxane)(PDMS) as biomaterial for cochlear implants. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2006, 17, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishihara, K.; Fukumoto, K.; Iwasaki, Y.; Nakabayashi, N. Modification of polysulfone with phospholipid polymer for improvement of the blood compatibility. Part 1. Surface characterization. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jacob, J.T. Biocompatibility in the development of silicone-hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2013, 39, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lai, Y.C.; Valint, J.; Paul, L. Control of properties in silicone hydrogels by using a pair of hydrophilic monomers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 61, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Tan, G.; Zhang, S.; Guang, Y. Influence of water states in hydrogels on the transmissibility and permeability of oxygen in contact lens materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 604–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, D.; Zhou, J. Effect of water content on microstructures and oxygen permeation in PSiMA–IPN–PMPC hydrogel: A molecular simulation study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 78, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pozuelo, J.; Compañ, V.; González-Méijome, J.M.; González, M.; Mollá, S. Oxygen and ionic transport in hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials: An experimental and theoretical study. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tranoudis, I.; Efron, N. Water properties of soft contact lens materials. Cont. Lens Ant. Eye 2004, 27, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, M.; Shin, Y.H.; Kwon, Y. Synthesis and properties of siloxane-containing hybrid hydrogels: Optical transmittance, oxygen permeability and equilibrium water content. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 6934–6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Korogiannaki, M.; Guidi, G.; Jones, L.; Sheardown, H. Timolol maleate release from hyaluronic acid-containing model silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J. Biomater. Appl. 2015, 30, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Read, M.L.; Morgan, P.B.; Maldonado-Codina, C. Measurement errors related to contact angle analysis of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maldonado-Codina, C.; Morgan, P.B.; Efron, N.; Canry, J.C. Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2004, 81, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. French, K. Contact lens material properties part 1: Wettability. Optician 2005, 230, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao, Z.B.; An, S.S.; Xie, H.J.; Han, X.L.; Wang, F.H.; Jiang, Y. The Relationship between the Hydrophilicity and Surface Chemical Composition Microphase Separation Structure of Multicomponent Silicone Hydrogels. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 9780–9786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tranoudis, I.; Efron, N. Tensile properties of soft contact lens materials. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2004, 27, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.J.; Li, X.S. Preparation and characterization of interpenetrating polymer network silicone hydrogels with high oxygen permeability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 2749–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, Z.B.; An, S.S.; Xie, H.J.; Jiang, Y. Copolymerization and properties of multicomponent crosslinked hydrogels. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 33, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Green-Church, K.B.; Nichols, K.K.; Kleinholz, N.M.; Zhang, L.; Nichols, J.J. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 456–470. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Silva, D.; Fernandes, A.; Nunes, T.; Colaço, R.; Serro, A. The effect of albumin and cholesterol on the biotribological behavior of hydrogels for contact lenses. Acta. Biomater. 2015, 26, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moradi, O.; Modarress, H.; Noroozi, M. Experimental study of albumin and lysozyme adsorption onto acrylic acid (AA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) surfaces. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2004, 271, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Demirel, G.; Özçetin, G.; Turan, E.; Çaykara, T. pH/Temperature–Sensitive Imprinted Ionic Poly (N-tert-butylacrylamide-co-acrylamide/maleic acid) Hydrogels for Bovine Serum Albumin. Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, J.; Somorjai, G.A. Molecular packing of lysozyme, fibrinogen, and bovine serum albumin on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces studied by infrared− visible sum frequency generation and fluorescence microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3150–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Paterson, S.M.; Liu, L.; Brook, M.A.; Sheardown, H. Poly (ethylene glycol)-or silicone-modified hyaluronan for contact lens wetting agent applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 2602–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luensmann, D.; Jones, L. Protein deposition on contact lenses: The past, the present, and the future. Cont. Lens Ant. Eye 2012, 35, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Garrett, Q.; Laycock, B.; Garrett, R.W. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar]
  39. Subbaraman, L.N.; Glasier, M.A.; Senchyna, M.; Sheardown, H.; Jones, L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr. Eye Res. 2006, 31, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 00944 g001 550
Figure 1. The correlation between Dk and EWC.
Figure 1. The correlation between Dk and EWC.
Polymers 11 00944 g001
Polymers 11 00944 g002 550
Figure 2. Light transmittance of hydrated modified silicone hydrogel samples.
Figure 2. Light transmittance of hydrated modified silicone hydrogel samples.
Polymers 11 00944 g002
Polymers 11 00944 g003 550
Figure 3. The correlation between EWC and contact angle for p(TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA).
Figure 3. The correlation between EWC and contact angle for p(TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA).
Polymers 11 00944 g003
Polymers 11 00944 g004 550
Figure 4. The correlation between the modulus and EWC for p(TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA).
Figure 4. The correlation between the modulus and EWC for p(TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA).
Polymers 11 00944 g004
Polymers 11 00944 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of contact angle on the adsorption of lysozyme and HAS.
Figure 5. The effect of contact angle on the adsorption of lysozyme and HAS.
Polymers 11 00944 g005
Polymers 11 00944 g006 550
Figure 6. Relative growth rate (RGR) of silicone hydrogel specimens during 3 cultured days with L929 cells of lens samples.
Figure 6. Relative growth rate (RGR) of silicone hydrogel specimens during 3 cultured days with L929 cells of lens samples.
Polymers 11 00944 g006
Table
Table 1. Formulations of silicone hydrogel by copolymerization of TRIS, DMA, NVP.
Table 1. Formulations of silicone hydrogel by copolymerization of TRIS, DMA, NVP.
SampleFeed (wt %)EWC (%)Dk (barrer)Contact Angle (°)Modulus (MPa)
TRIS DMA NVP HEMA
TDN1547.547.5083.6 ± 0.458.061.4 ± 0.70.56 ± 0.20
TDN2104545075.3 ± 1.559.867.7 ± 0.20.65 ± 0.12
TDN3204040069.0 ± 0.769.070.3 ± 0.40.70 ± 0.21
TDN4303535061.7 ± 1.870.472.1 ± 0.30.84 ± 0.15
TDNH1202448860.6 ± 0.770.673.8 ± 0.20.87 ± 0.10
TDNH22040241658.1 ± 0.372.374.8 ± 0.20.94 ± 0.29
TDNH3302142755.9 ± 0.171.475.4 ± 0.31.13 ± 0.18
TDNH43035211454.8 ± 0.972.676.3 ± 0.31.09 ± 0.18
TDNH5401836649.5 ± 1.072.578.0 ± 0.71.19 ± 0.39
TDNH64030181244.5 ± 1.174.981.9 ± 0.31.29 ± 0.19
Table
Table 2. Properties comparison of commercial lenses and this study.
Table 2. Properties comparison of commercial lenses and this study.
ProductManufacturerDk (barrers)EWC (%)Contact Angle (°)Modulus (MPa)Principle Monomers
Biomedics 38CooperVision8.438300.81HEMA, EGDMA
Acuvue 2Johnson & Johnson Vision Care1958 HEMA, MAA, EGDMA
Biomedics XCCooperVision4460 HEMA, MAA, PC, TEGDMA
Acuvue AdvanceJohnson & Johnson604765.60.43MPDMS, DMA, HEMA, EGDMA, siloxane macromer, PVP
PureVisionBausch & Lomb913693.61.10TEGDMA, NVP, TPVC, NCVE, PBVC
Acuvue OasysJohnson & Johnson1033878.7 0.72MPDMS, DMA, HEMA, siloxane macromer, TEGDMA, PVP
Air OptixCIBA Vision1103344.4 1.00DMA, TRIS, siloxane monomer
Air Optix Night & DayCIBA Vision14024 1.52DMA, TRIS, siloxane monomer
TDN3This work69.069.070.30.70TRIS, DMA, NVP
TDN470.461.772.10.84
TDNH472.654.876.3 1.09 TRIS, DMA, NVP, HEMA
TDNH674.944.581.91.29
PVP polyvinyl pyrrolidone; MPDMS monofunctional polydimethylsiloxane; DMA N,M-dimethylacrylamide; EGDMA ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate; HEMA hydroxyethyl methacrylate; TEGDMA tetraethyleneglycol dimethacrylate; TRIS trimethyl siloxysilyl; NVP N-vinyl pyrrolidone; TPVC tris-(trimethyl siloxysilyl)propylvinyl carbamate; NCVE N-carboxyvinyl ester; PBVC poly-(dimethysiloxy) di-(silylbutanol) bis-(vinyl carbamate).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tran, N.-P.-D.; Yang, M.-C. Synthesis and Characterization of Silicone Contact Lenses Based on TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA Hydrogels. Polymers 2019, 11, 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060944

AMA Style

Tran N-P-D, Yang M-C. Synthesis and Characterization of Silicone Contact Lenses Based on TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA Hydrogels. Polymers. 2019; 11(6):944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060944

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tran, Nguyen-Phuong-Dung, and Ming-Chien Yang. 2019. "Synthesis and Characterization of Silicone Contact Lenses Based on TRIS-DMA-NVP-HEMA Hydrogels" Polymers 11, no. 6: 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060944

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop