Next Article in Journal
Citrate-Assisted One-Pot Hydrothermal Preparation of Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Microspheres
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructure Evolution in a β-γ TiAl Alloy during Hot Deformation under Variable Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Solvent Vapor Atmosphere on Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystal Structure and Properties of Zinc Phosphate Layers on Aluminum and Steel Alloy Surfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Platinum Group Metals: Green Recovery from Spent Auto-Catalysts and Reuse in New Catalysts—A Review

by
Maria Luisa Grilli
1,*,†,
Anca Elena Slobozeanu
2,†,
Claudio Larosa
1,3,
Daniela Paneva
4,
Iakovos Yakoumis
5 and
Zara Cherkezova-Zheleva
4,*
1
Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources Department, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
2
National R&D Institute for Nonferrous and Rare Metals—IMNR, 102 Biruintei Blvd, Pantelimon, 077145 Ilfov, Romania
3
Department of Chemical Science and Technology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
4
Institute of Catalysis, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev St., Bldg. 11, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
5
MONOLITHOS Catalysts and Recycling Ltd., Vrilissou 83, 114 76 Athens, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Crystals 2023, 13(4), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13040550
Submission received: 23 January 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Abstract

:
This manuscript reviews the current trends in the recovery of Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) from end-of-life autocatalysts and the aims of the recently funded Marie Sklodowska-Curie Project “Chemistry of Platinum Group Metals-CHemPGM” towards the greening of PGMs recovery processes and the reusing of recovered PGMs for preparation of new catalysts. Together with the analysis of the state of the art recovery of PGMs from spent autocatalysts through pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical routes and the recent trends in reducing their environmental impact, also emerging sustainable and green technologies are analyzed. Particular focus is given on the mechanochemical processing as a promising sustainable route not only for the pretreatment of waste materials but also for direct PGMs leaching. The present review identifies also the trends in catalysts for carbon neutrality and the few recent efforts in developing PGM-based catalysts starting directly from the liquor of the leach solutions of spent catalysts envisaging therefore a possible key to close PGMs loop in a more efficient and sustainable way.

1. Introduction

1.1. Platinum Group Metals

The Platinum group metals (PGMs) consists of six chemically similar elements, sometimes further classified into light (ruthenium (Ru), rhodium (Rh) and palladium (Pd)) and heavy (iridium (Ir), osmium (Os) and platinum (Pt)). The chemistry of these elements is similar being based on 4d electron shells (Ru, Rh, and Pd) or 5d shells (Os, Ir, and Pt) [1]. Most of the world’s PGMs are produced from two types of deposits: PGM-dominated deposits where PGMs are the main product and Ni–Cu sulfide deposits where PGMs are the by-product [2]. In the former case their production is concentrated in South Africa, Zimbabwe and USA while in the latter case in Canada and Russia [3].
Since 2011, PGMs have been included in the list of critical raw materials for the EU [4] because they represent metals which are strategic for the EU economy and at high supply risk.
PGMs supply risk, however, is not only an EU concern. Recently, also the US has been considering PGMs as critical for the energy sector recognizing their strategic role in tomorrow’s decarbonized economy [5]. PGMs are in fact employed as catalysts in many decarbonization and energy technologies, including catalytic converters, fuel cells, thermal catalytic reactors and electrolyzers [5,6].
Figure 1 reports the flow chart of PGMs prices over the last five years, expressed in USD dollars/troy oz, where 1 troy oz equals 0.0311035 kg [7]. The Pd price increase, starting in 2020, is attributable to the suspension of Nornickel’s Taimyrsky and Oktyabrsky mines due to severe flooding [8], resulting in a 28% reduction in palladium output.
Rh is the most expensive among PGMs and its price is nowadays about 8 times higher than that of gold. Ru is instead the cheapest one. The high price of PGMs has pushed the development of efficient recycling processes worldwide rendering secondary resources such as spent automotive catalysts, electronic scraps and residues of primary production as valid alternatives to the primary ones. Among secondary resources, spent automotive catalysts (SACs) play a crucial role because they can deliver more than 57% of PGMs’ European supply [9]. Processing 2 mg of spent automobile catalysts to recover PGMs can prevent the mining of 150 kg of their ores [10,11]. In addition, recovery of PGMs from secondary sources minimizes also waste disposal, limits power consumption and reduces environmental pollution: according to Fornalczyk and Saternus, 1 kg of platinum from primary ores is obtained from processing 150 Mg of ores and generates 400 Mg waste, whereas the same amount of platinum can be recovered from recycling 2 Mg of SACs [12]. According to Saidani et al., the estimated required amount of energy and greenhouse gas emissions to produce 1 kg of platinum from primary ores in South African mines are 20 times higher than those used for recycling from secondary resources in European refining plants [13].
About 80% of the PGMs demand is in catalytic converters [10] where Pt is used both as an oxidation and as a reduction catalyst, Pd as an oxidation catalyst and Rh as a reduction catalyst [14]. While Pt and Pd can be interchanged, they cannot substitute Rh role in autocatalysts. PGMs are also used in light duty diesel engines. Pd substitution by Pt, which is low-price and abundant relative to Pd, has been investigated recently by many groups [15], especially because of Pd’s increased price and the increased fuel quality (less sulfur).
Despite their positive role in controlling exhaust emissions, PGMs are known to be present in the urban environments together with the residual exhaust fumes, polluting therefore biosphere, soil, vegetation, river and marine environments.
This review reports about the most notable research trends in PGM-based catalysts, PGMs recycling from spent autocatalysts and reusing of recovered PGMs in new catalysts. With respect to the many already published papers on the topic, a special focus is given here on new emergent methods and especially on the application of mechanochemistry not only as an efficient pretreatment process of waste materials, but also as a new and green promising route for the leaching of spent autocatalysts. In addition, the few attempts reported in the literature to synthesize PGM-based catalysts directly starting from the liquor of the leach solutions are described. Both of the above mentioned issues are among the scopes of the Marie Curie Project “Chemistry of Platinum Group Metals-CHemPGM” whose efforts are devoted to secure and close the PGMs loop.

1.2. PGM-Based Catalysts

Catalysis is a key component in many industrial applications and PGMs play a fundamental role in many homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic processes, as summarized in the review from Huges et al. [1]. Homogeneous catalysts offer advantages in terms of reactivity and stability due to their high solubility in reaction media, but they are difficult to recover. On the other hand, heterogeneous catalysts are less efficient but more easily to be recovered [16]. Table 1 reports the main precious metals (PMs) and supports used in heterogeneous catalysts for a wide range of applications.
A broader and more detailed PGMs utilization in various catalytic applications is reported in [1].
A modern three-way auto-catalyst contains a skeleton with a honeycomb structure made of cordierite (2MgO•2Al2O3•5SiO2), which is coated with a thin layer of washcoat (90% γ-Al2O3), catalytic metals (PGMs) and other additives (oxides of Ce, Zr, La, Ni, Fe and alkaline earth metals) (Figure 2).
The proportion of PGMs in catalysts is dependent on several factors: the manufacturer, the characteristics of the vehicle, including the engine power, the weight of the vehicle, the type of fuel consumed by the vehicle (gasoline or diesel), as well as the required catalytic functions [15].
Through a series of oxidation reactions Pt and Pd convert CO and HC to CO2 and H2O, and the reduction of NO to N2 is accomplished by Rh [14,21]. The catalytic efficiency of each element is influenced by several factors such as the engine temperatures, the type of fuel used, the quality of the fuel and the durability of the autocatalyst washcoat [22].
A three-way automotive catalytic converter it is considered to have between 3–7 g Pt, 1.5–5.0 g Pd and 0.8–1.5 g Rh [23].
The automotive catalyst industry in Europe had a large growth both due to the implementation of emission standards such as Euro 5 and Euro 6 and the adoption of a regulation in 2017 in which more reliable emission tests have been implemented such as Real driving Emissions (RDE) and World Harmonized Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) for the light motor vehicles [24,25,26].
Also, an increase in the demand for catalysts is expected due to the strict emission standards implemented by governments around the world. As an example, in China the regulations regarding emission control limits implemented by the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) have become recently more stringent to reduce pollution [24].
Autocatalysts global market had a size of USD 12.45 billion in 2022 with a prevision of USD 18.98 billion by 2030 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.4% [24].
Auto market is actually dominated by internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEs) powered by fossil fuels, but to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 there is the need of substituting the conventional fossil fuels across the different segments of the economy. To meet the goal of CO2-neutral by 2050, starting from 2035 in Europe all the new cars that come on the market cannot emit any CO2. Given that the life span of a car is about 15 years, we may predict that the source of PGMs from catalytic converters will last at least until 2050 for gasoline powered car. Catalytic converter, however, will continue to be on the marked for application in plug-in hybrid cars and even if automotive industry will move away from fossil fuels, the ICEs imprint will last still for decades.
To achieve carbon neutrality and realize the so-called “double-carbon” goal, two strategies to reach CO2 emissions reduction can be adopted. The excess CO2 may be removed by the atmosphere and converted into reusable value-added chemicals through an efficient transformation technology. The other strategy is to develop a clean and efficient energy conversion technology to produce green and environmentally friendly renewable energy, such as hydrogen, to effectively replace traditional fossil fuels and reduce CO2 emissions. A recent review from Whang et al. deals with the description of the challenges and outlooks for future applications of single-atom catalysts in contributing toward carbon neutrality [27].
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), about 6.6 million electric vehicles (EVs) were sold in 2021, and the trend is expected to increase in the next years towards a final transition from ICEs to EVs powered by batteries or H2 (fuel cells.)
The near future trend for light vehicles is mostly towards battery-electric vehicles, because the total cost of ownership is lower than the hydrogen and e-fuels alternatives. However, because batteries are heavy, ships, planes or heavy-duty vehicles cannot easily be battery-powered and therefore hydrogen or e-fuels can be good alternative solutions [28].
Some EVs based on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC), direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC) and alkaline fuel cells (AFC) rely on the use of PGMs.
Despite Pt and Pd are not key components in a battery, next-generation lithium-ion battery technologies will probably need platinum and palladium to enhance overall battery performance [1,19,27,29]. Instead, the technologies for the production of green hydrogen by using water electrolysis powered by renewable energy sources, at present the most promising way to produce green hydrogen potentially free of greenhouse gas emissions, mainly rely on PGMs. Presently, there are two low-temperature water electrolysis technologies commercially available, the alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and the proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) [30], while up-scaling of the high temperature solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) technology is hindered presently by the high degradation and the thermal variations that cause thermomechanical stress in the cell.
AWE is a mature technology with low investment costs, but its major limitations lie in the low operational current density and low conversion energy efficiency. AWE does not rely necessary on PGMs, being able to utilize non-noble-metal electrodes and, despite the low efficiency, it has been established as the technology closest to large-scale industrial realization [31,32,33]. On the other hand, PEMWE relies on Pt, Ir and Ru supply as catalysts to promote the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). According to the study from Minke et al. [34] two necessary preconditions have been identified to meet the immense future iridium demand: first, the dramatic reduction of iridium catalyst loading in PEM electrolysis cells and second, the development of an efficient recycling infrastructure for iridium catalysts. The global availability of the mainly South African supplied iridium is, in fact, insufficient to meet the targets of the EU Commission which has a strategy demanding for 40 GW of electrolyser capacity by 2030, if conventional Ir based catalysts are used [35].
Both commercial PEMFCs and AFCs use Pt-based catalysts. Despite the advantages of fast response, low operating temperature, high energy conversion efficiency and high power density, PEMFCs have as drawback the low catalytic activity and the low stability. Improving the catalytic activity and the stability of the electrodes by using Pt nanoparticles with particular morphologies and reducing the Pt loading by alloying with other metals, together with the search of innovative catalysts supports are the current strategies to improve the PEMFCs performances [36].
DMFCs are a subcategory of PEMFCs in which methanol rather than hydrogen is consumed in the fuel cells. Instead of hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR), the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) occurs at the anode material. DMFCs use mainly Pt-Ru or Pt-Co or Pt-Ni based catalysts. DMFC is considered one of the most likely fuel cells to be commercialized due to its advantages of low operating temperature and high energy density, but still has the disadvantages of stability and the methanol crossover through the Nafion membrane [37].
According to the recent study about DMFCs from Zuo et al. [38], more than 97% research works are concerning on precious-metal-based catalysts, of which Pt- and Pd-based electrocatalysts mainly, while only about 3% refer to nonprecious metal catalysts for sustainable energy applications.
Recently, PGM-doped lanthanum ferrites have been proposed as a viable solution for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) electrodes in substitution of Co-based ferrites, due to the increase in Co cost. Pt was found to increase the number of oxygen vacancies, thus promoting the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and reducing the lanthanum strontium ferrite (LSF) polarization resistance by 12.9%, while Ru was found to improve LSF stability in reducing conditions promoting the exsolution of metal nanoparticles [39]. The same authors have also investigated the effect of a small Pd doping on the properties of a lanthanum strontium ferrite in a IT-SOFC. Pd was found to positively affect the oxidation properties toward H2 and CH4 oxidation. In addition, the potential presence of PdO on the perovskite surface was found to promote the ORR [40].
Pt-based catalysts are also quite demanding for CO2 capture and valorization. For CO2 utilization, various transformative catalytic or non-catalytic reactions have been developed [41].
As an example, CH4 and CO2 may be used as feedstock in the production of syngas, a mixture of H2 and CO known as a building block to produce value-added compounds like alcohols and olefins through the Fischer-Tropsch process [42,43]. The main players in the dry reforming of methane (DRM) (Equation (1) and Figure 3) are Ni-supported catalysts which suffer from both coking and sintering. PGMs are very active for DRM because they limit the deactivation of Ni catalysts by carbon residues thus preserving the catalysts stability over time. Many studies have reported on the superior catalytic properties of Ni when promoted by PGMs such as Pt, Rh, Ru, or Pd, both because of the increased activity and coke resistance compared to the non-promoted Ni catalysts [44,45,46]. Different types of supported metal catalysts such as Pt, Rh, Ir, Ni and Co-based have displayed promising catalytic properties in the DRM process [42,47,48]:
CH4 + CO2 → 2CO + 2H2    ΔH = +247 kJ mol−1
From what above mentioned, it is therefore clear that the recovery of PGM from spent catalysts is not only an actual urgent demand, but will continue to be essential also in the future to meet the growing PGMs demand and close the PGMs loop until PGM-free green power technologies will be consolidated.

2. Recycling of PGMs

According to data provided by Johnson Matthey’s PGM market report [49] and represented in Figure 4a, Figure 5a and Figure 6a, the Southern African region holds the largest market share for PGMs, with almost half of the global supply.
For platinum main applications are those related to automotive and jewelry (Figure 4b). In the case of palladium, the automotive sector and that of electronics are applications that represent a major share of the total consumption (Figure 5b).
Palladium, platinum and rhodium are widely used in the automotive sector, more precisely for catalytic converters because these elements do not form volatile oxides like the other PGM elements [50,51]. The automotive sector is the most important in the case of rhodium (Figure 6b).
For ruthenium, the main markets are represented by the electrical & electronics and chemical sectors (Figure 7a), while for iridium, the main markets are the electrochemical and electrical & electronics sectors (Figure 7b).
In recent years there has been an increasing interest in recycling PGMs from secondary sources such as spent catalysts, electronic scrap and membrane electrode assemblies, used equipment and jewelry [52,53].
In 2022, the recycling of platinum from the automotive field contributed with 43.21% of the demand for the same field; recycling from the electrical and electronic field with 17.78% of the platinum demand for the same field; recycling from the jewelry field with 24.66% for recycling from the same field (Figure 4e).
Regarding palladium, in 2022, recycling from the automotive field contributed to the demand for the same field by 32.49%, for the electrical & electronics field with 73%, and for jewelry with 10.71% (Figure 5e). The recycling of rhodium from the automotive field contributed to the demand for the same field with 36.45% (Figure 6d).
The primary production of PGMs must be intertwined with the recycling of PGMs to support sustainable development, reducing the environmental footprint of PGMs production.
With the data reported so far, in 2022 the recycling of PGMs was approximately 160 Mg. The largest contribution to the global demand for elements from the PGM group was Rh with 36.45% of the global demand for Rh, followed by Pd with 31.65% of the global demand for Pd and Pt with 23.91% of the global demand for Pt, as shown in Figure 8.
As the main end-use sector of PGMs, the automotive industry, i.e., spent automotive catalysts, represents the major recycling potential. It should be noted that a SAC contains a higher amount of PGMs than natural ores, 2000–15,000 g/Mg compared to 2–10 g/Mg [9,54,55,56]. Moreover, spent catalysts contain as critical elements also rare earth oxides (REOs).
Article 7 of the End-of Life Vehicles (ELVs) Directive 2000/53/EC targets for each country the reuse and recovery of ELVs (95% by an average weight per vehicle and year). These targets were due to be met by the Member States by 1 January 2015. According to data in 2017, 15 of the 28 Member States had met the minimum reuse and recovery target of 95% by an average weight per vehicle and year. The average reuse and recovery rate for the EU28 as a whole was 94%, just below the target [57,58].
PGMs recovery consists of several steps as follows: pretreatment, PGMs enrichment, PGMs extraction, PGMs separation and purification and reduction to metal products [56,59,60]. In Figure 9 the overall process for recovering PGMs is presented.
Regardless of the PGMs recovery route adopted, generally a pretreatment stage is necessary. This stage involves mechanical treatment (collection, decanning of the PGMs ceramic monolith carrier, which is crushed and cleaned to remove residues), calcination and chemical treatment aimed at particle size reduction, removal of impurities or activation [61].
The enrichment of PGMs can be carried out by pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical or biometallurgical processes.
Table 2 reports about characteristics of the above mentioned processes.
In the pyrometallurgical process, PGMs are separated from the nonmetal fractions by smelting, fluxes and reductants [65,75]. In hydrometallurgical processes, oxidizing leaching systems (e.g., hydrogen peroxide and ferric iron) acid (e.g., hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid) and/or bases (e.g., sodium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite), and complexing agents (e.g., cyanide and thiosulfate) are used to extract PGMs [76]. In the case of biohydrometallurgy, the same similar principles apply, but the leachates are biological products. The leaching rates of biohydrometallurgical processes are slower than those of hydrometallurgical ones, however, they are more environmentally friendly and have a low cost [77].
Table 3 lists some major PGM recycling companies in the world.
As can be seen, the existing industry for the recycling of PGMs is based on pyrometallurgical processing operations. Although the hydrometallurgical route represents an innovative and promising method for PGMs recycling, its adoption in the industry is rather slow.

2.1. Pyrometallurgical Processes

Pyrometallurgical processes are used to recover PGMs from both SACs and electronic waste. These techniques involve the physical or chemical transformation of PGMs at high temperatures with or without additives (collectors and fluxes) and include smelting, chlorination, metal vapor treatment, heating-quenching processes, sintering and then recovery through refining technologies [83].

2.1.1. Smelting

Classic smelting refers to the mixing of catalytic converter powder with flux, collector and reducing agent and then melted in a furnace (e.g., plasma, plasma arc and induction) and maintained at approximately 1500–2000 °C. The extraction of PGMs is done in the alloy phase, with the collector (e.g., iron, copper, lead and nickel). The flux agent (e.g., cryolite, borax, lime, and soda ash) has the role of dissolving the impurities in the catalytic converters to generate slag that will easily separate from the metallic phase due to density differences. The PGM alloy undergoes chemical treatment to dissolve and separate the PGMs [18,84].
The most important parameters of the capture process are the choice of collector and flow agent. For example, several factors such as melting point, crystal structure, density, mutual solubility and chemical reactivity will be considered when choosing the collector.
The flow agent must ensure a low viscosity. The oldest collector used to recover PGMs from spent autocatalysts is lead. Although its use is associated with a number of advantages such as simplicity of operation, low melting temperature, easy oxidation to separate lead from PGMs, this process presents environmental problems due to the formation of toxic lead oxide. Besides, Rh recovery is 70–80%, considered to be relatively low [85].
With a lower environmental impact and a higher recovery rate, iron and copper capture technologies have been applied industrially following various studies [14].
When recovering PGMs using copper as a collector, an electric arc furnace is used in which temperatures reach 1450–1600 °C, in which the raw material is introduced accompanied by flows of e.g., SiO2 or CaO, Cu collector (CuO, CuCO3) and reductants [86].
Due to the chemical affinity with PGMs to form solid solutions and to the low cost, iron is one of the most promising collectors used. PGM-based waste is crushed and mixed with iron or iron oxide, reductant and fluxes (CaO) in order to melt at a temperature of approximately 1500–2000 °C, thus forming a PGM-Fe alloy. This alloy is easily separated from the slag due to the large difference in density, 6.0–7.0 g/cm3 versus 3.0–3.5 g/cm3 [87,88].
Chuan Liu et al. [89] have recently proposed a new technology for the extraction of PGMs from SACs. By using the vitrification process combined with the melting-collecting process, they obtained a recovery rate of over 99% of PGMs. They mixed SAC waste with cyanide tailings (CT) and subjected it to the thermal carbon reduction-melting process with the addition of CaO flux and Na2B4O7. The Fe-PGM alloy was formed by attaching the PGMs from SAC to Fe from CT. Addition of 30 wt% CT resulted in over 99% recovery of PGMs. The residual slag produced by vitrification could efficiently immobilize heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, Zn and As. Their proposed method of simultaneous treatment of hazardous waste by SAC and CT offers a practical strategy for the recovery of PGMs and Fe from hazardous waste, with a process cost lower than the costs of traditional processes.

2.1.2. Chlorination

The chlorination method, also called the carbochlorination process, is the process involving the volatilization of PGMs under high temperature conditions with the aim of forming chlorine salts in the gas phase, followed by condensation at lower temperatures to allow separation from the carrier, achieving the enrichment of PGMs [90,91].
Kim et al. [90] recovered approximately 95.9% platinum and 92.9% rhodium from unroasted spent autocatalyst samples using a mixture of chlorine and carbon monoxide, at a temperature of 550 °C. However, this technique is still approached at the laboratory level, due to the fact that it presents a series of disadvantages such as high temperature, strong corrosion, high equipment requirements and toxic gases (CO, Cl2) [18].
The chlorination reactions of PGMs are expressed by the following equations:
Pt + Cl2 → PtCl2
Pd + Cl2 → PdCl2
2/3 Rh + Cl2 → 2/3RhCl3

2.1.3. Metal Vapor Treatment

Metal vapor treatment involves the reaction between PGMs and vapors of active metals at a high temperature, in order to form a metal-PGM alloy, which facilitates dissolution in the acidic environment.
Several studies have addressed Mg and Ca vapor treatment [92,93,94] to extract Pt and Rh from spent autocatalysts.
Yu-ki Taninouchi et al. [95] studied the physical concentration method involving treatment with FeCl2 vapor at about 1200 K (927 °C), followed by magnetic separation. It resulted in an efficient alloying of PGMs (Pt, Pd and Rh) with Fe, the major components of the catalyst (cordierite and alumina) remaining unreacted, while the CeO2 and La2O3 species were transformed into oxychlorides. Thus, FeCl2 vapor treatment can potentially improve the efficiency and throughput of existing PGMs recycling processes when used during the pretreatment step.
Sasaki and Maeda [96] examined the effect of Zn vapor treatment prior to acid leaching for PGM recovery from catalytic converters. They demonstrated that the studied treatment improved the dissolution of PGMs during leaching in aqua regia, also improving the extractions of PGMs in hydrochloric acid at a high temperature. In the case of Pt and Pd, treatment with Zn vapors was effective, while for Rh a considerable improvement was observed.

2.2. Hydrometallurgical Processes

Hydrometallurgical processes involve the recovery of PGMs by dissolving waste containing PGMs in a suitable solvent/leaching agent, followed by separation and purification [97]. These processes present a number of advantages over pyrometallurgical recycling: use of lower process temperatures, higher purification yields, reduced energy consumption, co-metal extraction potential and better process control. However, the duration of the process, the nature of the reagents, the costs and the management of liquid waste and gaseous emissions must be taken into account [9].
A hydrometallurgical process involves several stages: the leaching stage in which PGM complexes are formed, followed by the separation of dissolved precursors and the purification of PGMs from the leach solution.
Leaching efficiency is influenced by several factors: the concentration of leaching reagents, pH value of the leachate, leaching time, leaching temperature and stirring conditions [98].
Pretreatment processes are used with the aim of increasing the leaching efficiency of PGMs by improving the dissolution rate, kinetics and reducing the cost of the process. Pretreatment also helps to avoid the use of solvents with high acidity. The basic methods in pretreatment are: oxidative roasting, reduction roasting, alloying and mechanochemical activation [59].
Recently, highly efficient recovery of PGMs (100%, 92% and 61% for Pt, Pd and Rh, respectively) from spent autocatalysts has been demonstrated also without pretreatment. The proposed leaching system was a HCl–H2O2–NaCl medium under mild conditions (70 °C, 2 h), while the high solid per liquid ratio (S/L 70%), provides very promising ground for upscaling in industrial conditions [10].
There are several hydrometallurgical techniques for the recovery of PGMs: hydrochloric acid leaching, cyanide leaching, halogen leaching, microwave assisted leaching and thiosystem leaching.

2.2.1. Chloride Leaching

Chloride leaching is a process in which PGMs are leached in a chloride-based environment under acidic conditions and in the presence of an oxidant (Cl2, HNO3, NaClO, NaClO2, NaClO3, H2O2) [9,54,68,99,100,101].
The oxidation potential of oxidizing agents influences the degree of leaching of PGMs. A higher potential is needed for Pt leaching, while Pd and Rh need a lower potential.
The equations below show standard electrode potentials of the PGM-chloro complexes [54]:
[ PtCl 6 ] 2 + 4 e Pt + 6 Cl         E ° = 0.74   V
[ PdCl 4 ] 2 + 2 e Pd + 4 Cl         E ° = 0.62   V
[ RhCl 6 ] 3 + 3 e Rh + 6 Cl         E ° = 0.44   V
If the oxidizing agent has an electron potential higher than that of the PGM, then the complete dissolution of the PGM is kinetically favorable.
Actually, the chloride-based system is one of the most consolidated leaching systems, where PGMs chloro-complexes are quite stable into chloride acid solutions. The most stable chloro-complexes are [ PtCl 6 ] 2 , [ PdCl 4 ] 2 and [ RhCl 6 ] 3 , and their formation is strongly dependent on chlorine media concentration, where chlorine acid and additional Cl sources could be used in balance [9]. PGMs dissolution is enhanced with higher chloride concentration, because an increase in the Cl concentration decreases the equilibrium potential [102].
In the formation of Pt and Pd complexes, the oxidation valence of palladium and platinum are mainly divalent and tetravalent and the coordination number of their corresponding chlorine complexes are 4 and 6, respectively. The most stable oxidation valence of rhodium is trivalent, and the complex formed when the coordination number is 6 is more stable. The exploitation of the coordination chemistry of precious metal ions is critical in deriving successful separations and the reactivity of the PGMs depends on the oxidation state of the metal ion as well as the nature of the extracting ligands [103].
Table 4 reports the primary PGM-chlorine complexes that form in leaching system with hydrochloric acidic solutions at various concentration values. Specifically, PGMs chloro-complexes form starting from molar concentration values of ≥0.1 for Pd, ≥3 for Pt, and ≥6 for Rh. In particular, for dilute systems, various chloro-complexes species are presents involving solvation water and part of them interchanges their oxidation state.
Ana Paula Paiva’s and colleagues’ study aimed at maximizing the recovery of PGMs with a high concentration of them in the leachates and minimizing the co-dissolution of aluminum by approaching the leaching process with concentrated HCl solutions (with H2O2 as oxidant) and low liquid/solid ratios. The optimized conditions found were 11.6 mol L−1 HCl, 1%vol H2O2, 60 °C, L/S = 2 L kg−1 and 3 h, leading to PGM yields of 90–98% Pt, 99% Pd and 70–96% Rh, and leachate compositions of 0.41–0.78 g L−1 Pt, 1.6 g L−1 Pd, 0.062–0.066 g L−1 Rh, depending on the catalyst sample [97].
Viet Nhan Hoa Nguyen et al. [108] investigated the separation of Pd and Pt from a mixture of these metals by the simultaneous use of leaching and solvent extraction system with concentrated HCl, commercial extractants and oxidizing agents. The selective dissolution of Pd over Pt metal was possible by the leaching process followed by extraction, which used a mixture of concentrated HCl, TBP (tributyl phosphat) in kerosene and H2O2. Complete extraction of Pt was possible by replacement of H2O2 and kerosen with NaClO3 as an oxidizing agent and MIBK (methyl isobutyl ketone) as a polar diluent in the solvent mixture.
The simultaneous leaching and extraction systems were found to be more efficient than the aqueous HCl and H2O2 system in terms of selectivity and leaching capacity for Pd. The Pd (II) and Pt (IV) ions from the charged TBP phases were thus completely stripped by a mixture of HCl and thiourea. The purity of these metal ions in the respective stripping solutions was greater than 99.9%.
Inela Birloaga and colleagues [66] presented an innovative hydrometallurgical methodology for the recovery of precious metals from various waste streams, consisting of a single leaching system (HCl, H2O2 and C2H4O2) of all elements and then selective recovery of elements from solution by chemical reduction/processes. For the leaching of Pd and Pt from spent autocatalysts, the influence of hydrochloric acid concentration and process time was evaluated. A recovery of 100% for Pd and over 89% for Pt was obtained using: 5 M HCl; 1.96 M H2O2; 1.67 M of C2H4O2; 250 rpm of stirring for 3 h; room temperature; 10% of solid concentration.
Paolo Trucillo and collaborators [109] proposed a hydrometallurgical process for the recovery of platinum from diesel catalysts, which has as a first step leaching with aqueous solutions of H2O2 (up to 0.2 M) and light concentrations of HCl (0.4 M), followed by a refinery where the platinum is deposited over a granular activated carbon. The results revealed that a low concentration of HCl results in longer leaching times but the process conditions can be adjusted to achieve complete recovery of platinum with negligible extraction of other metals from the catalyst, minimizing the subsequent adsorption process. Optimum conditions were observed in leaching at 20 °C with a 0.13 M H2O2 0.4 M HCl solution followed by the adsorption step at 20 °C using an activated carbon with a high BET surface area and a high content of reducing surface groups.

2.2.2. Leaching in Cyanide Solution

At an industrial level, cyanide leaching is used to leach precious metals from ores [110]. Regarding the leaching of PGM from SACs, sodium cyanide is an important leaching agent, due to its capacity to form stable metal complexes at high pressure and temperature. The following equations show the chemical reactions in cyanide leaching of PGMs
2 Pt + 8 NaCN + 2 H 2 O + O 2   2 Na 2   [ Pt ( CN ) 4 ] + 4 NaOH
2 Pd + 8 NaCN + 2 H 2 O + O 2   2 Na 2   [ Pd ( CN ) 4 ] + 4 NaOH
4 Rh + 24 NaCN + 6 H 2 O + 3 O 2   4 Na 3   [ Rh ( CN ) 6 ] + 12 NaOH
The dissolution of PGMs in cyanide follows the order Pd > Pt > Rh, given by their melting points (Pd (1552 °C) < Pt (1772 °C) < Rh (1966 °C)) and is independent of other parameters such as the initial concentration of NaCN, the oxygen pressure and the reaction temperature [111].

2.2.3. Leaching with Halogens

As an alternative to cyanides for PGMs leaching, halogens (F2, Cl2, Br2 and I2) are used. Of these, iodine forms the most stable complexes with PGMs.
For example, standard redox potentials of [PtI6]2− (0.40 V) is lower if compared to [PtCl6]2− (0.74 V) and [PtBr6]2− (0.65 V), therefore the dissolution of Pt using iodine/iodide solutions is more promising than the other halogen systems [56].
The following equations show the dissolution reactions of PGMs in iodine solution.
Pt + 2 I 3 [ PtI 6 ] 2
Pd +   I 3 +   I [ PdI 4 ] 2
2 Rh + 3 I 3 + 3 I 2 [ RhI 6 ] 3

2.2.4. Leaching with Thiosystems (Thiosulfate, Thiocyanate, Thiourea)

Thiosystem leaching (thiosulphate, thiocyanate and thiourea) is still under-investigation for the leaching of PGMs and precious metals from spent catalysts [111]. However, PGMs form stable complexes with thiosystem ions, being more stable than their chloro/bromo/iodo counterparts [112].
Thiosulfate leaching was reported as early as 1880 for gold extraction [113]. It was shown that by increasing the concentration of ( S 2 O 3 ) 4 6 the dissolved concentration of Pt also increases [114].
Several studies have shown that Pt and Pd form stable complexes with thiocyanate that can be leached under acidic conditions [115,116]. The stability of Pt and Pd complexes with the hydrophobic thiocyanate ligand ( SCN )   has also been reported [116,117].
[ PtCl 6 ] 2 + 6 ( SCN ) [ Pt ( SCN ) 6 ] 2 + 6 Cl
[ PdCl 4 ] 2 + 4 ( SCN ) [ Pd ( SCN ) 4 ] 2 + 4 Cl
Thiourea ((NH2)2CS) also forms extra-stable complexes with Pt and Pd [118,119]. The use of thiourea over cyanide has a number of advantages such as higher metal recovery and lower sensitivity for base metals [120,121].

2.2.5. Leaching Media: Efficiency, Environmental Impact, Recent Trends

Figure 10 presents detailed evaluations of different leaching methods from the point of view of environmental impact, economic feasibility and reliability. It is found that leaching with aqua regia and cyanide are the most reliable methods, but they have a high impact on the environment, being toxic and corrosive. Halogen leaching presents high recovery rates and a moderate toxicity, but has problems in terms of corrosion and technological reliability. Leaching with thiourea and thiosulfate has the advantage of having a moderate impact on the environment, but it is not feasible from an economic point of view and moreover the technologies are less reliable compared to the other methods of leaching.
Recent efforts in PGMs recovery aim to the search of techniques which minimize the energy consumption and use milder reagents in order to minimize the residual waste.
Parameters for eco- and cost- effective leaching are summarized in the review from Yakoumis et al. [9], where the different leaching solutions are widely discussed.
In further work carried out by Yakoumis et al. [10], a HCl–H2O2–NaCl medium under mild conditions (70 °C, 2 h) leaching system was proposed, without SAC pretreatment, leading to high solid per liquid ratio (S/L 70%), thus demonstrating very promising ground for upscaling in industrial conditions.
Lanaridi et al. [122] proposed benign deep eutectic solvents (DESs) in addition with a small amount of oxidizing agent (HNO3) as leaching media for the extraction of PGMs. DESs are characterized by low toxicity and low vapor pressure, which render them suitable to replace commonly used organic solvents and, in addition, they are cheap and biodegradable. In another study, Lanaridi et al. have proposed a novel separation approach for PGMs leached in hydrochloric acid by employing supported (polymerized)-ionic liquid phases (polySILPs) [123].
Ionic liquid was used also by Van den Bossche et al. for selective palladium leaching from SACs [124] and phosphonium ionic liquids have been used for the separation of palladium (II), platinum (IV), rhodium (III) and ruthenium (III) from their multi-component model mixtures of composition based on real solutions after leaching of PGM-containing wastes [125]. A review of Ils used in solvent extraction of PGMs is reported by Fyrmansyah et al. [126], while Lee et al. reviewed the ion exchange separation techniques for PGMs in different leaching systems [127].
The review from Zheng et al. analyzed the new technologies for the separation and purification of PGMs, including solvent extraction, membranes separation, supercritical fluids, solid-phase extraction, photoreduction, and electrochemical methods, with focus on challenges and perspectives for their commercial exploitation [94].

2.2.6. Assisted Leaching Methodologies

Hydrometallurgical processes can be improved by heating with microwaves and ultrasounds [128,129].
Microwaves provide an environmental friendly way of heat transfer, which is fast, direct, selective, and volumetric [85,130].
Suoranta et al. have demonstrated that microwave-assisted leaching in hydrochloric acid (37–38%) can be as effective as concentrated aqua regia to extract ≥90% PGMs at a temperature of 150 °C and a liquid-to-solid ratio ≥10 [131]. A local superheating mechanism was proposed to explain the better performance of microwave-assisted leaching. In addition, PGM particles could be selectively heated [130].
Another recent study [132] compares the performances of microwave-assisted leaching of PGMs in 6 M HCl at 150 °C with those in 6 M HCl + 10 vol% H2O2, with the aim of investigating how the leachability is influenced by the addition of the oxidation agent.
Wang et al. have used the microwave-assisted roasting of SACs using sodium chlorate and sodium bisulfate at 300–330 W and 500 °C followed by water leaching, obtaining in 60 min a recovery of 99.74% for Pd and of 94.79% for Rh, which was higher and faster than in absence of MW (120 min, <90% recovery) [133].
Microwave assisted leaching was also recently tested at pre-industrial pilot scale and it was demonstrated that the optimization of the leaching process resulted in the reduction of HCl acid concentration from 12 to 6 M [134], thanks to fast and homogeneous volumetric MW heating able to enhance the leaching efficiency.
Ultrasound-assisted nitric acid pretreatment was used by Karim and Ting [73] in a bioleaching process which uses the cyanogenic bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus megaterium for improving recovery rate of PGMs from SACs.

2.3. Biometallurgical Process

Biotechnological processes integrated with hydrometallurgy and electrometallurgy are considered emerging sustainable and clean technologies for metal recovery [135,136,137]. These processes use microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, archaea, or a combination of them) and enzymes to transform metals into soluble form, by proton generation (formation of organic or inorganic acids), by oxidation and reduction reactions and by complexing agents [138,139,140,141,142].
Recovery methods from biometallurgy have a number of advantages such as the fact that they use more environmentally friendly solvents, selective recovery of metals, lower energy consumption, lower carbon footprint and no hazardous gases. However, the variation of several parameters such as oxygen, pH, leaching temperatures, concentration of sorbent and sorbate, constitutes a challenge, playing a crucial role in leaching but also in the extraction of PGMs [9].
In the mobilization of metals, microbes play the role of a catalyst [143]. Microorganisms mobilize the metal from the solid matrix in an environment with a pH between 1.5 and 3.0, step followed by the production of organic and/or inorganic acids [142,144,145].
The main known bioleaching mechanisms are acidolysis, redoxolysis and complexolysis.
Acidosis and redoxolysis are produced by autotrophic prokaryotes, which include acidophilic chemolithoautotrophic microbes, and complexolysis is predominantly produced by heterotrophic cyanogenic bacteria [137].
Currently, literature data regarding bioleaching of PGMs is limited. PGM recovery by biohydrometallurgical processes is difficult due to the complex nature of SACs. Biological cyanidation involves the production of cyanide by bacteria as a secondary metabolite from glycine by oxidative decarboxylation [73,74].
PGMs form stable chemical complexes with the cyanide ion.
2 Pt + 8   CN + 2 H 2 O + O 2 2 [ Pt ( CN ) 4 ] 2 + 4 OH
2 Pd + 8   CN + 2 H 2 O + O 2 2 [ Pd ( CN ) 4 ] 2 + 4 OH
4 Rh + 24   CN + 6 H 2 O + 3 O 2 4 [ Rh ( CN ) 6 ] 3 + 12 OH
One of the first studies regarding the biometallurgical recovery of Pt from SACs, using P. Plecoglossicida, resulted in a value of 0.2% Pt. This is due to the resistant nature of Pt and the fact that biogenic cyanide has a low yield in the presence of solid waste [146].
Another study examined the role of biogenic cyanide for PGMs extraction from SACs, reporting a higher yield [74].
Recently, it has been shown that ultrasound-assisted nitric acid pretreatment with the role of removing interfering metals present in SACs, leads to a higher rate of bioleaching of PGMs by producing more cyanide [73].
Biosorption involves a number of retention mechanisms such as ion exchange, adsorption, complexation, chelation, reduction and precipitation [147].
Microbial cells are considered biological adsorbents (biosorbents) for the retention of metal cations, except alkali metals [148,149].
Biosorption presents advantages such as increased selectivity at very low metal concentrations in solution, good energy efficiency and the possibility of regenerating some biosorbents [150].
The adsorption capacity is given by the existing chemical groups on the extracellular surfaces of the microbial cells (phosphoryl, hydroxyl, carboxyl, sulfhydryl, phosphate, carbonyl, sulfate, amino, thioether, amide, phenol).
The performance of the mechanism is determined by a series of factors such as: metal characteristics (chemical, molecular weight, ionic radius, oxidation state), process parameters (temperature, pH, concentration of sorbent and sorbate), biosorbent properties (structure, nature) and binding sites (type, availability) [147].

2.4. Mechanochemical Processing

Nowadays, the evolution of the circular economy concept is focused not only on higher PGM recovery rates, but also on higher economic and environmental standards by following green principle rules [130,151,152,153,154]. Currently, the research and innovation efforts are focused on greening and optimization of conventional PGM recovery methods toward decrease of their acid dependence, energy consumption and the increase of the efficiency of simultaneous recovery of target metals [9,130,153,154,155]. One of the emerging recycling technologies is based on mechanochemical treatment [156,157,158,159,160] as numerous advantages of the method are beneficial for recycling secondary PGMs resources with high recovery yields in a sustainable, environmentally friendly and technoeconomically feasible processing.

2.4.1. Mechanochemical Method—Advantages for PGM Recycling

Mechanochemistry is a branch of chemistry, where chemical reactions are initiated or triggered by mechanical means such as compression, shear, or friction [161,162,163,164,165]. The mechanical forces provide the energy required for the activation of chemical reactions as the heat, light, or electrical potential providing the energy in the thermo-, photo-, or electrochemistry, respectively [156,157,158,159,162,166,167,168]. Mechanochemical reactions can lead to preparation of compounds, phases, and microstructures that are completely different from the products of the regular chemical reactions [161,162,165,166]. It was registered that large batches of energy, well above kT, can be locally released during mechanochemical treatment. This is considered as a key reason to obtain the proceeding of reactions that cannot occur thermally as it was found for photochemical reactions induced by the energy of photons [161,165,166]. Macroscopic deformation affects simultaneously many defect sites of the solid, which makes the mechanism of mechanochemical reaction additionally complicated. In this regard, the selection of treatment parameters is of critical importance to improve a chemical reaction of interest as effectiveness, selectivity, co-products formation, etc.
Selection of an appropriate milling device is the first issue for practical implementation of mechanochemistry both in laboratory and on industrial scale. The type of ball mill and the working regimes influence the thermodynamics, kinetics and the final result of the mechanochemical processing. Milling devices have been used to induce comminution with application of the lowest amount of energy, or to induce mechanochemical interactions introducing a maximum amount of energy into the reagents. Current developments of mechanochemical devices and characterization techniques made it feasible to better control mechanochemical processing toward extraction of metals of interest [156,160,165].
Several milling parameters determine the energy transfer to the reactants: milling speed, ball-to-powder weight ratio, milling media and filling extent of the milling reactor. These parameters are highly interlinked to each other and are especially important for mechanochemical output [161,162,165]. Significant modification to the reaction products can be reached by the addition of small amount (1–5 wt%) of liquid or solid in the milling vessel, so called liquid- or solid-assisted milling [156,157,165,168]. Selected milling parameters determine the secondary effects that occur during the treatment and the specific phenomena related to the mechanochemical reaction. One of them is the temperature increase and the huge difference between the reached local and bulk temperatures during treatment [168]. In case of high energy milling, as a result of collision of the milling material, the local temperature peaks can be higher than 103 °C for a very short time period (≈10−9 s). In parallel, the impacts of the milling balls and milling vessel in a planetary ball mill, lead to increase of the bulk temperature, but it’s value is about ten times lower than the local temperature, typically ≈ 200 °C [168]. Thus, the mechanochemical processes are complex and involve multiple length and time scales. They are system specific and take place under a broad variety of conditions. The main variables that determine the output of a mechanochemical reaction are the milling device, the dynamic milling conditions, as well as the characteristics of the processed material.

2.4.2. Mechanical Pre-Treatment

The effect of fine grinding on metal extraction is one of the early subjects of mechanochemistry and it is still widely used at the industrial level. Nowadays, the potential of application of mechanochemistry as a pre-treatment step or as a main stage in extraction of metals of interest significantly increases (Figure 11) [156,157,158,159,160,161,162].
Mechanical pre-treatment aims to increase the reactivity of target substances and to promote the subsequent leaching process with additional purification by precipitation or selective metal extraction [156]. Mechanical milling of SACs is largely utilized as pre-treatment step in PGMs recovery process (Figure 9), which induces comminution and significant morphological and/or phase changes [156,157,158,159,160,161]. As a result, better contact and penetration of the leaching agent to the treated material, as well as faster dissolution of the product layer can be reached. On the other hand, PGMs leaching is dramatically hindered even in concentrated acid solution, due to their high chemical stability. In addition, usually the PGMs in SACs are agglomerated and can be also encapsulated into the inner layer of the monolith after long-term operation at high temperature [169]. SEM images of SACs clearly demonstrate high non-uniformity of auto-catalysts waste. Some of PGMs are scattered around the monolith carrier in the form of agglomerated metals or metal oxides, and some PGMs are attached or wrapped in the carrier. Such a serious sintering reactions and PGM wrapping further increase the hardness and insolubility of the SAC waste. The high inertness of PGMs and extremely strong stability of cordierite support, significantly hinder a complete recycling of PGMs from spent automotive catalyst [169]. So, the PGMs leaching efficiency in the traditional metallurgical recovery process is critically reduced. In this regard, the specific characteristics of mechanochemistry and especially the increase of the reactivity of treated materials opens new possibilities to maximize the recycling efficiency [156,158,159,160,170]. The initiation of mechanically induced solid-state reaction is essential for effective metal recovery.

2.4.3. Mechanochemical Leaching

The main processes occurring during the mechanochemical treatment have been identified as reduction of particle size, increase of specific surface area, dramatical evolution of crystalline structure and/or amorphization, fresh surface formation, bond breakage and generation of defects or other metastable forms. However, these effects are not stable and have different relaxation times (from 10−10 to more than 106 s). So, the separation of mechanical activation from the leaching process leads to a loss of some of these highly excited states due to their decay before leaching [156,159,162,165]. Thus, when the mechanical activation is a pre-treatment step, the subsequent chemical recovery reaction deals only with the long-lived slowly relaxing states. Integration of mechanical activation and chemical extraction into a common process (mechanochemical leaching) will utilize all the excitation states. Thus, the leaching agent serves both as a grinding additive which improves grinding performance, as well as contributes to higher extraction rates. During simultaneous milling and leaching, the activation energy required for PGM leaching decreases and reaction activity increases. Repeated fracturing and cold welding of reacting particles occurs during the collisions when the respective wastes are treated with appropriate chemicals in a milling device. Thus, solid-state reactions that cannot occur normally can be performed across the welded interfaces when several ingredients are milled together.
Recently published review studies on the applications of mechanochemistry for metal recycling from wastes discussed in depth the reaction mechanisms, equipment used, treatment procedures, and optimized processing parameters, as well as detailed approaches for improvement of the recycling process [156,157,158,159,160,165]. The method was successfully applied for recycling metals from wastes in a technically feasible and efficient way for some specific wastes, such as e-waste and low-grade tailings where significant recycling efficiency was registered. The main problems to be addressed and future perspectives on the development of mechanochemistry applied for metal recycling are also presented. Numerous key characteristics of mechanochemistry make the method greener and advantageous in comparison to traditional ones. Mechanochemistry promotes leaching reactions using solvent-free conditions (dry milling) or significantly smaller amounts of liquid (wet milling or liquid-assisted grinding), in comparison to the conventional chemical treatment, where the solvent is a medium for energy dispersion, dissolution/solvation and transportation of reagents. Disadvantage of mechanochemical leaching is that the milling pots and balls should be made of materials inert to produced aqueous slurry or solution of activated materials [156,159]. The continuous mixing process under ball milling offers an efficient way for mass and energy transport, enabling the reactions for effective dissolution of PGMs by using different additives (as halide or sulphur compounds, small amount of solvent and/or oxidizing agent, etc.) in recovery process. Additionally, the continuous mixing and formation of fresh surface during treatment is highly beneficial for liberation of PGMs from aluminosilicate carriers in SACs processing.
One of the major drawbacks in the PGMs recovery from SAC waste comes from the nature of car catalysts [169]. Spent catalytic monoliths have different surface morphology, impurities and contamination. SACs contain PGMs with very low and various concentrations. The PGM-bearing phases have also diverse composition, particle size, morphology and distribution on the carrier surface and bulk, that significantly hinders leaching procedure. On the other hand, shoot and unburned hydrocarbons’ deposition makes the catalyst surface to be inert to chemical treatment [169].
A significant advance in a high-rate PGM extraction efficiency was observed in recent investigations based on the mechanochemical leaching or mechanical activation of materials in combination with post-treatment processing (hydro- or pyrometallurgy) [156,158,159,160,170]. These reports revealed numerous potential benefits for PGMs recovery from waste, but there is a lot to be done to reveal the power of mechanochemistry in recycling of PGM from different primary ores, low-grade tailings and end-of-life materials, as well as from SACs.
Mechanochemical process was suggested to recover valuable metals from e-waste scraps by co-milling with different reagents [156,158,159,160,170,171]. After dry co-milling with a mixture of K2S2O8 and NaCl, high metal recovery rates of 95.5% of Pd were obtained by processing with 0.5 mol/L diluted HCl in 15 min. The mechanism of mechanochemically induced solid-state reactions during ball milling was proposed offering the advantages of high recovery rate and quick leaching speed [171].
X. Wei et al. (2019) [172] suggest a pretreatment method of mechanochemical activation with the hydrochloric acid leaching system with a total PGMs leaching rate of 93.42%. The article analyzed the physio-chemical characteristics of the spent automotive catalyst composite, which contains mostly aluminosilicate carriers with less than 0.1% PGMs. The high leaching rates of 77.2%, 62.1% and 97.4% for Pt, Rh and Pd, respectively, were obtained in a greener and optimized way [172].
One-pot mechanochemical conversion of the metals, including spent catalysts, to simple water-soluble salts, or to metal-organic catalysts was demonstrated in [173]. Green and direct noble metal activation and recycling of elementary palladium and gold was obtained by mild, clean, solvent-free and room-temperature chemistry. The exact conditions were established for mechanochemical activation of metal Pd and Au in a form of powder, pellets, or wire with a mild oxidant Oxone® and readily available inexpensive halide salts (NH4Cl, KCl). The study reports a new sustainable and eco-friendly approach for solvent-free recycling of noble metals avoiding harsh oxidative or complexation reagents, which proceeds at room temperature. Suggested material processing generates sulphate by-products of Oxone reduction, however it allows replacement of aggressive HNO3, aqua regia, molten salts or cyanides.
Therefore, mechanochemistry offers a high potential to replace classical extractive metallurgy decreasing the number of technological stages with possibility for one-pot and one-step SACs processing, together with high efficiency (higher leaching yields and selectivity) and significantly lower environmental footprint (solvent-free processing, dramatic reduction of chemical’s consumption, very low toxic emissions and wastes) [156,157,158,159,160,170,171,172,173]. Crushing and grinding the PGMs scrap together with additives give rise to sufficient release of the precious metal from the aluminosilicate carrier, and this can greatly reduce the dissolution time and simultaneously improve the leaching efficiency toward PGMs recovery.

3. Secondary Sources of PGMs for the Synthesis of Catalysts

To close the PGMs loop it is important not only to recover PGMs efficiently and in a sustainable way from secondary sources but also to reuse them. The reuse of PGMs from spent autocatalysts was already achieved in the frame of the EU project PLATIRUS [174] through the development of an innovative and cost-efficient process to recover PGMs from secondary source materials to brand new automotive catalysts with the recycled materials [21]. Among the aims of the already mentioned CHemPGM project, is to close the PGMs loop not only by fabricating autocatalysts starting from recovered PGMs, but also by fabricating other types of catalysts for carbon neutrality, possibly starting directly from the pregnant leach solutions of SACs. Efforts will be devoted to investigate if the leaching systems of our hydrometallurgical and/or mechanochemical treatments of SACs may be valuable precursors for the synthesis of new catalysts, which will allow us to eliminate the PGMs separation and the costly purification steps of the recovering process. Challenge will be to separate already in the leach liquor the PGM precursor/s of interest for the fabrication of PGMs based nanoparticles or catalysts. A deep understanding of the multimetallic catalyst composites for catalytic activity improvement would be desirable in order to use as catalysts precursors the PGMs complexes contained in the leach liquor. In addition, besides of PGMs leaching also the leaching of cerium will be pursued. Cerium is a valuable and critical element contained in high quantities in the leaching systems and used in catalysts for CO oxidation, water–gas shift reaction and HC conversion. Increased activity, by cerium spillover onto Pt, may be facilitated by atomic-level mixing of Pt and Ce in the alloy precursor [175].
As already stated previously, the most consolidated recovery methods of PGMs from the leach solutions are precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction (or solvent extraction) and ion exchange, while the new emerging ones use deep eutectic solvents (DESs), ionic liquids (Ils) and electrowinning [127]. The recovery of individual PGMs by single-stage separation from leach liquors of spent autocatalysts has been rarely investigated. Moreover, as far as we know, only a few examples are found in the literature about the synthesis of PGM NPs or PGM-based catalysts directly obtained starting from the leach liquors of SACs. A recent work on the leaching of a Pt-Rh SAC [62] demonstrated for the first time that after pH correction strongly acidic solutions (pH < 0.5) obtained after hydro-metallurgical treatment of the SAC may be a valuable secondary source of PGMs nanoparticles to be employed in TiO2–based catalysts. According to this study, and as predictable, the difficulty in NPs formation from the leach solution lies in the high acidity of this solutions (pH < 0.5) and the presence of accompanying/contaminating ions of non-precious metals, as shown in Table 5 where the composition of the leach solution is shown. The PGMs precipitation strongly depended on the solution pH: the yield of the precipitated PGM NPs increased considerably from 40% to almost 100% when the pH was adjusted to 7–8.
In another recent study [176], a cheap process based on hydrometallurgy is described to directly recycle PGMs from Pd-Rh SACs to synthesize carbon supported PGMs based catalysts. SACs were firstly leached by a HCl+H2O2 system, resulting in Pd and Rd chloro-complexes. The optimized leaching rates of Pd and Rh were 97.99 ± 2.64% and 87.70 ± 1.23%, respectively. Then Pd precursor was separated from the leach solution by precipitation, to remove most impurities. The Pd precursor or Pd chloro-complexes solution was used to synthesize carbon supported catalysts directly via an ethylene glycol (EG) reduction method. To synthesize carbon-based catalysts, in fact, EG reduction method is a common way starting from the PGM chloro-complex solution [176,177].
In another work by Racles et al. [178] a SAC was treated with HCl+H2O2 in very mild conditions to extract approximately half of its PGMs content, mainly as chlorides. The noble metals were subsequently charged into functionalized mesoporous silica by complexation with mercapto groups to synthetize a heterogeneous catalyst for hydrosilylation and oxidation reactions. In addition, also the cordierite scrap after PGMs leaching was tested for potential use in the primary purification of wastewaters.
Therefore, it can be emphasized that it may be possible to directly synthesize PGM-based catalysts from the PGMs leach solution through the hydrochloric acid and oxidant systems. For PGM catalysts, the main raw materials are thus PGMs chlorides and PGMs chlorates [176].
Chloro-complexes contain a wide variety of PGMs anionic species (Table 4) with low molecular weight and two oxidation state for species, exhibiting stable anions as ion pairs counterpart. These ions may be coupled with counter ions from different organic ligands [179,180,181] that generate stable ion pairs with low charge density and different selectivity. As first-ligand generation we cite ammonium chloride, butanedione oxime, zinc and magnesium powders which are only a few examples of counter ions which may be coupled with generic noble metal charges. However, these ligands present some stability problems thus requiring the search for new innovative ligands.
Quaternary ammonium and sulphoxide derivatives salts are an example of tunable and stable complexes of new compounds. Stable and complex chlorine solution systems which contain ion pairs mixture of PGMs are highly desirable. These stable systems can be perturbed by using the common ion effect technique (salting out) in order to obtain selective catalytic precursors by focused separations. The salting out effect not only influences the selective separation of catalysts by providing catalytic precursors, but it also affects the recovered quantities.
In another approach, the chlorine complex solution may be coupled with organic ligands [182,183] as a counter ion pair and, by imposing supersaturated condition, catalyst nanoparticles with a high specific surface area may be obtained for application as catalysts.
In CHemPGM project, hydrometallurgical leaching of SACs will be carried out involving already consolidated low acid solutions (namely HCL-H2O2-NaCl as oxidant) with low liquid/solid ratios and novel ones aiming at maximizing PGMs recovery thus guaranteeing high PGMs concentration in leachates. PGMs chloro-complexes in acid solution are therefore our starting precursors for catalysts in case of the hyrometallurgical process. The composition of leach solution in case of mechanochemical process is still under investigation by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, and will be published in a future work.
Conventional and novel techniques [184] will be considered in the synthesis of supported PGM-based catalysts, always being inspired to green and sustainable principles.

4. Conclusions

The rapid growth demand of critical raw materials for the EU industry and the need to close CRMs loop has pushed the development of environmentally-friendly recycling processes of end-of-life devices. This paper presents an overview about the current trends in PGMs recycling from spent automotive catalysts, and focuses on the study of a new emerging green technologies. In addition, analysis of the pregnant leach solution from consolidated hydrometallurgical routes in chloride media is carried out, aiming at finding the way to obtain direct precursors for the synthesis of novel catalytic materials, thus reducing the separation and purification recovery steps. These research activities ladder up to the goals of the “Chemistry of Platinum Group Metals-CHemPGM” project whose main objective is to provide a deep insight into the chemistry and mechanisms associated with the recovery of PGMs from secondary sources and reuse of the recovered PGMs for the synthesis of new catalysts in order to secure the PGMs value chain and achieve carbon neutrality.

Author Contributions

M.L.G. and Z.C.-Z. conceived the work. Data curation: M.L.G., Z.C.-Z., A.E.S., C.L., D.P. and I.Y. Original manuscript writing: M.L.G., A.E.S. and Z.C.-Z. Review and editing: M.L.G., A.E.S. and Z.C.-Z. Project funding I.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie- Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 101007669.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the project activities of H2020-MSCA-RISE-2020 101007669: Chemistry of Platinum Group Metals, CHemPGM. The authors thank the CHemPGM consortium and in particular Igor Luisetto and Umberto Pasqual Laverdura from ENEA and Vasiliki Alexiou from Monolithos for the fruitful discussions and suggestions on the subjects of this manuscript. Part of this work is based on activities in the frame of the POR FESR LAZIO 2014-2020 MARVELOUS (A0375-2020-36494) project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hughes, A.E.; Haque, N.; Northey, S.A.; Giddey, S. Platinum Group Metals: A Review of Resources, Production and Usage with a Focus on Catalysts. Resources 2021, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Doi, A.G. Elements of Exploration Geochemistry, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; ISBN 9780128194959. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lawrence, D.C. CRM Critical Raw Materials Substitution Profiles September 2013 Revised May 2015. Available online: https://silo.tips/download/critical-raw-materials-substitution-profiles-september-2013-revised-may-2015 (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  4. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “Tackling the Challenges in Commodity Markets and on Raw Materials”; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  5. U.S. Department of Energy. Achieving American Leadership in the Platinum Group Metals Supply Chain; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 1–3.
  6. Moschkowitsch, W.; Lori, O.; Elbaz, L. Recent Progress and Viability of PGM-Free Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1082–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. PGM Prices and Trading|Johnson Matthey. Available online: https://matthey.com/products-and-markets/pgms-and-circularity/pgm-management (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  8. A Guide to Precious Metals: Platinum vs. Palladium Breakdown. Available online: https://www.theassay.com/articles/the-assay-insights/palladium-vs-platinum-investment/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  9. Yakoumis, I.; Panou, M.; Moschovi, A.M.; Panias, D. Recovery of platinum group metals from spent automotive catalysts: A review. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 3, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yakoumis, I.; Moschovi, A.; Panou, M.; Panias, D. Single-Step Hydrometallurgical Method for the Platinum Group Metals Leaching from Commercial Spent Automotive Catalysts. J. Sustain. Metall. 2020, 6, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fornalczyk, A.; Saternus, M. Removal of Platinum Group Metals from the Used Auto Catalytic Converter. Metalurgija 2009, 48, 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fornalczyk, A.; Saternus, M. Catalytic Converters as a Source of Platinum. Metalurgija 2011, 50, 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  13. Saidani, M.; Kendall, A.; Yannou, B.; Leroy, Y.; Cluzel, F. Closing the loop on platinum from catalytic converters: Contributions from material flow analysis and circularity indicators. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 1143–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kolliopoulos, G.; Balomenos, E.; Giannopoulou, I.; Yakoumis, I.; Panias, D. Behavior of Platinum Group during Their Pyrometallurgical Recovery from Spent Automotive Catalysts. Oalib 2014, 1, e736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Omrani, M.; Goriaux, M.; Liu, Y.; Martinet, S.; Jean-Soro, L.; Ruban, V. Platinum group elements study in automobile catalysts and exhaust gas samples. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 257, 113477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miceli, M.; Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Malara, A. Recovery/Reuse of Heterogeneous Supported Spent Catalysts. Catalysts 2021, 11, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Sun, S.; Zhu, X.; Tu, G. Metals smelting-collection method for recycling of platinum group metals from waste catalysts: A mini review. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 2020, 39, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dong, H.; Zhao, J.; Chen, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, B. Recovery of platinum group metals from spent catalysts: A review. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2015, 145, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hagelüken, C. Precious Metals Process Catalysts—Material Flows and Recycling. Chim. Oggi-Chem. Today 2006, 24, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xia, J.; Ghahreman, A. Platinum group metals recycling from spent automotive catalysts: Metallurgical extraction and recovery technologies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 311, 123357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moschovi, A.; Giuliano, M.; Kourtelesis, M.; Nicol, G.; Polyzou, E.; Parussa, F.; Yakoumis, I.; Sgroi, M. First of Its Kind Automotive Catalyst Prepared by Recycled PGMs-Catalytic Performance. Catalysts 2021, 11, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Substitution among Platinum Group Metals—CME Group. Available online: https://www.cmegroup.com/education/articles-and-reports/substitution-among-platinum-group-metals.html (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  23. Eskina, V.V.; Dalnova, O.A.; Filatova, D.G.; Baranovskaya, V.B.; Karpov, Y.A. Direct precise determination of Pd, Pt and Rh in spent automobile catalysts solution by high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2020, 165, 105784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Auto Catalyst Market Size, Share, Growth|Report. 2030. Available online: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/auto-catalyst-market-5362 (accessed on 16 February 2023).
  25. EU: Light-Duty: Real-Driving Emissions (RDE)|Transport Policy. Available online: https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/eu-light-duty-real-driving-emissions/ (accessed on 16 February 2023).
  26. International: Light-Duty: Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP)|Transport Policy. Available online: https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/international-light-duty-worldwide-harmonized-light-vehicles-test-procedure-wltp/ (accessed on 16 February 2023).
  27. Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Single-atom catalysis for carbon neutrality. Carbon Energy 2022, 4, 1021–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. EU Ban on Sale of New Petrol and Diesel Cars from 2035 Explained|News|European Parliament. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20221019STO44572/eu-ban-on-sale-of-new-petrol-and-diesel-cars-from-2035-explained (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  29. JV Article: Platinum Group Metals Is at the Vanguard of next Generation Lithium-Ion Batteries—MINING.COM. Available online: https://www.mining.com/joint-venture/jv-article-platinum-group-metals-is-at-the-vanguard-of-next-generation-lithium-ion-batteries/ (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  30. Liu, L. Platinum group metal free nano-catalysts for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2021, 34, 100743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Kong, H.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.; Ciucci, F.; Hao, Y.; Yang, S.; Shao, Z.; Lim, J. Non-precious-metal catalysts for alkaline water electrolysis: Operando characterizations, theoretical calculations, and recent advances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 9154–9196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marini, S.; Salvi, P.; Nelli, P.; Pesenti, R.; Villa, M.; Berrettoni, M.; Zangari, G.; Kiros, Y. Advanced alkaline water electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 82, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Safizadeh, F.; Ghali, E.; Houlachi, G. Electrocatalysis developments for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions—A Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 256–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Minke, C.; Suermann, M.; Bensmann, B.; Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. Is iridium demand a potential bottleneck in the realization of large-scale PEM water electrolysis? Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 23581–23590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Iridium Breakthrough a Boost for Green Hydrogen Economy, PGM Mining. Available online: https://www.miningweekly.com/article/iridium-breakthrough-a-boost-for-green-hydrogen-economy-pgm-mining-2020-11-16/rep_id:3650 (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  36. Li, H.; Zhao, H.; Tao, B.; Xu, G.; Gu, S.; Wang, G.; Chang, H. Pt-Based Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Controllable Preparation and Structural Design of Catalytic Layer. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qin, C.; Tian, S.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Z.-J.; Jiang, Z. Advances in platinum-based and platinum-free oxygen reduction reaction catalysts for cathodes in direct methanol fuel cells. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zuo, Y.; Sheng, W.; Tao, W.; Li, Z. Direct methanol fuel cells system—A review of dual-role electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction and methanol oxidation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 114, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marasi, M.; Panunzi, A.P.; Duranti, L.; Lisi, N.; Di Bartolomeo, E. Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Activity and Structural Stability of La0.6Sr0.4FeO3-Δby 1 Mol% Pt and Ru B-Site Doping for Application in All-Perovskite IT-SOFCs. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 2918–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marcucci, A.; Zurlo, F.; Sora, I.N.; Placidi, E.; Casciardi, S.; Licoccia, S.; Di Bartolomeo, E. A redox stable Pd-doped perovskite for SOFC applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 5344–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, D.; Xu, R.; Gu, Z.; Zhu, X.; Qing, S.; Li, K. Chemical-Looping Conversion of Methane: A Review. Energy Technol. 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Araiza, D.G.; González-Vigi, F.; Gómez-Cortés, A.; Arenas-Alatorre, J.; Díaz, G. Pt-based Catalysts in the Dry Reforming of Methane: Effect of Support and Metal Precursor on the Catalytic Stability. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2021, 65, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lunsford, J.H. Catalytic conversion of methane to more useful chemicals and fuels: A challenge for the 21st century. Catal. Today 2000, 63, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hussien, A.G.S.; Polychronopoulou, K. A Review on the Different Aspects and Challenges of the Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM) Reaction. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hou, Z.; Yashima, T. Small Amounts of Rh-Promoted Ni Catalysts for Methane Reforming with CO2. Catal. Lett. 2003, 89, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pawelec, B.; Damyanova, S.; Arishtirova, K.; Fierro, J.; Petrov, L. Structural and surface features of PtNi catalysts for reforming of methane with CO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 323, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Singh, R.; Dhir, A.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Mahla, S.K. Dry reforming of methane using various catalysts in the process. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 10, 567–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pakhare, D.; Spivey, J. A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7813–7837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Matthey, J. PGM Market Report. 2021. Available online: https://matthey.com/documents/161599/509428/PGM-market-report-May-2022.pdf/542bcada-f4ac-a673-5f95-ad1bbfca5106?t=1655877358676 (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  50. Gandhi, H.S.; Graham, G.W.; McCabe, R.-W. Automotive exhaust catalysis. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shelef, M.; McCabe, R. Twenty-five years after introduction of automotive catalysts: What next? Catal. Today 2000, 62, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Işıldar, A.; Rene, E.R.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Lens, P.N. Electronic waste as a secondary source of critical metals: Management and recovery technologies. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sandig-Predzymirska, L.; Barreiros, T.V.; Thiere, A.; Weigelt, A.; Vogt, D.; Stelter, M.; Charitos, A. Recycling Strategy for the Extraction of PGMs from Spent PEM Electrodes. Available online: https://recycalyse.eu/wp-content/uploads/Paper-Sandig-Predzymirska-Lesia.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  54. de Aberasturi, D.J.; Pinedo, R.; de Larramendi, I.R.; Rojo, T. Recovery by hydrometallurgical extraction of the platinum-group metals from car catalytic converters. Miner. Eng. 2011, 24, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Steinlechner, S.; Antrekowitsch, J. PGM Recycling from Catalysts in a Closed Hydrometallurgical Loop with an Optional Cerium Recovery. TMS Annu. Meet. 2013, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jha, M.K.; Lee, J.-C.; Kim, M.-S.; Jeong, J.; Kim, B.-S.; Kumar, V. Hydrometallurgical recovery/recycling of platinum by the leaching of spent catalysts: A review. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 133, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. EUR-Lex—52021SC0060—EN—EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021SC0060#footnote47 (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  58. EUR-Lex—52020DC0033—EN—EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0033 (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  59. Sun, S.; Jin, C.; He, W.; Li, G.; Zhu, H.; Huang, J. A review on management of waste three-way catalysts and strategies for recovery of platinum group metals from them. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 305, 114383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Padamata, S.K.; Yasinskiy, A.S.; Polyakov, P.V.; Pavlov, E.A.; Varyukhin, D.Y. Recovery of Noble Metals from Spent Catalysts: A Review. Met. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 2413–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Saguru, C.; Ndlovu, S.; Moropeng, D. A review of recent studies into hydrometallurgical methods for recovering PGMs from used catalytic converters. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 182, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wiecka, Z.; Cota, I.; Tylkowski, B.; Regel-Rosocka, M. Recovery of platinum group metals from spent automotive converters and their conversion into efficient recyclable nanocatalysts. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morcali, M.H. A new approach to recover platinum-group metals from spent catalytic converters via iron matte. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 159, 104891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, H.; Peng, Z.; Tian, R.; Ye, L.; Zhang, J.; Rao, M.; Li, G. Recycling of platinum-group metals from spent automotive catalysts by smelting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, L.; Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z. Novel approach for recovery of palladium in spent catalyst from automobile by a capture technology of eutectic copper. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Birloaga, I.; Vegliò, F. An innovative hybrid hydrometallurgical approach for precious metals recovery from secondary resources. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ilyas, S.; Srivastava, R.R.; Kim, H.; Cheema, H.A. Hydrometallurgical recycling of palladium and platinum from exhausted diesel oxidation catalysts. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 248, 117029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Trinh, H.B.; Lee, J.-C.; Srivastava, R.R.; Kim, S. Total recycling of all the components from spent auto-catalyst by NaOH roasting-assisted hydrometallurgical route. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 379, 120772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Trinh, H.B.; Lee, J.-C.; Srivastava, R.R.; Kim, S.; Ilyas, S. Eco-threat Minimization in HCl Leaching of PGMs from Spent Automobile Catalysts by Formic Acid Prereduction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 7302–7309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, M.-S.; Park, S.-W.; Lee, J.-C.; Choubey, P.K. A novel zero emission concept for electrogenerated chlorine leaching and its application to extraction of platinum group metals from spent automotive catalyst. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 159, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ilyas, S.; Srivastava, R.R.; Kim, H. Mobilization of platinum and palladium from exhausted catalytic converters using bio-cyanide and an ionic-liquid as mass transport carriers. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 5204–5218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Karim, S.; Ting, Y.-P. Bioleaching of platinum, palladium, and rhodium from spent automotive catalyst using bacterial cyanogenesis. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 18, 101069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Karim, S.; Ting, Y.-P. Ultrasound-assisted nitric acid pretreatment for enhanced biorecovery of platinum group metals from spent automotive catalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shin, D.; Park, J.; Jeong, J.; Kim, B.-S. A biological cyanide production and accumulation system and the recovery of platinum-group metals from spent automotive catalysts by biogenic cyanide. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 158, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Song, Q.; Xu, Z. Recovery of palladium and silver from waste multilayer ceramic capacitors by eutectic capture process of copper and mechanism analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 388, 122008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ding, Y.; Zheng, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Ekberg, C. An Efficient Leaching of Palladium from Spent Catalysts through Oxidation with Fe(III). Materials 2019, 12, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ilyas, S.; Lee, J.C. Bioprocessing of Electronic Scraps. Microbiol. Miner. Met. Mater. Environ. 2015, 307–328. [Google Scholar]
  78. Umicore|Precious Metals Refining|Umicore. Available online: https://pmr.umicore.com/en/ (accessed on 3 November 2022).
  79. Recycling of PGMs (Platinum Group Metals). Available online: https://www.basf.com/global/en/who-we-are/sustainability/we-drive-sustainable-solutions/sustainable-solution-steering/examples/recycling-of-pgms.html (accessed on 3 November 2022).
  80. Multimetco, Inc. PGM Refining & Recovery Experts. Available online: https://www.multimetco.com/ (accessed on 3 November 2022).
  81. PGMs and Specialist Metallurgy|Johnson Matthey. Available online: https://matthey.com/science-and-innovation/core-capabilities/pgms-and-specialist-metallurgy (accessed on 3 November 2022).
  82. Hensel Recycling—Ihr Partner im Edelmetallrecycling. Available online: https://hensel-recycling.com/en/ (accessed on 3 November 2022).
  83. Akcil, A.; Vegliò, F.; Ferella, F.; Okudan, M.D.; Tuncuk, A. A review of metal recovery from spent petroleum catalysts and ash. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 420–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fornalczyk, A.; Saternus, M. Vapour treatment method against other pyro- and hydrometallurgical processes applied to recover platinum form used auto catalytic converters. Acta Met. Sin. 2013, 26, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Trinh, H.B.; Lee, J.-C.; Suh, Y.-J.; Lee, J. A review on the recycling processes of spent auto-catalysts: Towards the development of sustainable metallurgy. Waste Manag. 2020, 114, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Peng, Z.; Li, Z.; Lin, X.; Tang, H.; Ye, L.; Ma, Y.; Rao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Jiang, T. Pyrometallurgical Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from Spent Catalysts. JOM 2017, 69, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, C.; Sun, S.; Zhu, X.; Tu, G. Feasibility of platinum recovery from waste automotive catalyst with different carriers via cooperative smelting-collection process. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021, 23, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ding, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Zheng, H.; Chang, C.-C.; Ekberg, C. Recovery of precious metals from electronic waste and spent catalysts: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 141, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, C.; Sun, S.; Tu, G.; Xiao, F. Co-treatment of spent automotive catalyst and cyanide tailing via vitrification and smelting-collection process for platinum group metals recovery. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kim, C.-H.; Woo, S.I.; Jeon, S.H. Recovery of Platinum-Group Metals from Recycled Automotive Catalytic Converters by Carbochlorination. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Horike, C.; Morita, K.; Okabe, T.H. Effective Dissolution of Platinum by Using Chloride Salts in Recovery Process. Met. Mater. Trans. B 2012, 43, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Okabe, T.H.; Yamamoto, S.; Kayanuma, Y.; Maedaaff, M. Recovery of platinum using magnesium vapor. J. Mater. Res. 2003, 18, 1960–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Okabe, T.H.; Kayanuma, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Maeda, M. Platinum Recovery Using Calcium Vapor Treatment. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 1386–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Kayanuma, Y.; Okabe, T.H.; Mitsuda, Y.; Maeda, M. New recovery process for rhodium using metal vapor. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 365, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Taninouchi, Y.-K.; Okabe, T.H. Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from Spent Catalysts Using Iron Chloride Vapor Treatment. Met. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 1781–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sasaki, H.; Maeda, M. Zn-vapor pretreatment for acid leaching of platinum group metals from automotive catalytic converters. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 147–148, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Paiva, A.P.; Piedras, F.V.; Rodrigues, P.G.; Nogueira, C.A. Hydrometallurgical recovery of platinum-group metals from spent auto-catalysts—Focus on leaching and solvent extraction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 286, 120474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Resource Recovery and Recycling from Metallurgical Wastes—S.R. Ramachandra Rao—Google Books. Available online: https://books.google.ro/books?hl=en&lr=&id=0m-JuMpFZPAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=wih3D97nl4&sig=Ne4hPx2b8hdqH8wg5Y2pUG37Svk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  99. Upadhyay, A.K.; Lee, J.-C.; Kim, E.-Y.; Kim, M.-S.; Kim, B.-S.; Kumar, V. Leaching of platinum group metals (PGMs) from spent automotive catalyst using electro-generated chlorine in HCl solution. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kriek, R.J. Leaching of Selected PGMs: A Thermodynamic and Electrochemical Study Employing Less Aggressive Lixiviants. Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  101. Puvvada, G.V.K.; Sridhar, R.; Lakshmanan, V.I. Chloride metallurgy: PGM recovery and titanium dioxide production. JOM 2003, 55, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nogueira, C.A.; Paiva, A.P.; Costa, M.C.; da Costa, A.M.R. Leaching efficiency and kinetics of the recovery of palladium and rhodium from a spent auto-catalyst in HCl/CuCl2 media. Environ. Technol. 2019, 41, 2293–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Moleko-Boyce, P.; Makelane, H.; Ngayeka, M.Z.; Tshentu, Z.R. Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from Leach Solutions of Spent Catalytic Converters Using Custom-Made Resins. Minerals 2022, 12, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nikoloski, A.N.; Ang, K.-L. Review of the Application of Ion Exchange Resins for the Recovery of Platinum-Group Metals from Hydrochloric Acid Solutions. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. Rev. 2013, 35, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kudrev, A.G. Application of the Matrix Method for Calculating Internal Equilibrium Constants and Complex Formation Microconstants. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2019, 89, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Matsumoto, K.; Yamakawa, S.; Sezaki, Y.; Katagiri, H.; Jikei, M. Preferential Precipitation and Selective Separation of Rh(III) from Pd(II) and Pt(IV) Using 4-Alkylanilines as Precipitants. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 1868–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Le, M.N.; Lee, M.S.; Senanayake, G. A Short Review of the Separation of Iridium and Rhodium from Hydrochloric Acid Solutions by Solvent Extraction. J. Solut. Chem. 2018, 47, 1373–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nguyen, V.N.H.; Song, S.J.; Lee, M.S. Separation of palladium and platinum metals by selective and simultaneous leaching and extraction with aqueous/non-aqueous solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2022, 208, 105814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Trucillo, P.; Lancia, A.; Di Natale, F. Recovery of platinum from diesel catalysts by combined use of H2O2/HCl leaching and adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, K.; Schnoor, J.L.; Zeng, E.Y. E-Waste Recycling: Where Does It Go from Here? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 10861–10867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Karim, S.; Ting, Y.-P. Recycling pathways for platinum group metals from spent automotive catalyst: A review on conventional approaches and bio-processes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 170, 105588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hamáček, J.; Havel, J. Determination of platinum(II, IV) and palladium(II) as thiocyanate complexes by capillary zone electrophoresis: Analysis of carboplatin and similar drugs. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 834, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Prasad, M.; Mensah-Biney, R.; Pizarro, R. Modern trends in gold processing—Overview. Miner. Eng. 1991, 4, 1257–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Azaroual, M.; Romand, B.; Freyssinet, P.; Disnar, J.-R. Solubility of platinum in aqueous solutions at 25 °C and pHs 4 to 10 under oxidizing conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2001, 65, 4453–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Albazi, S. Platinum metals-solution chemistry and separation methods (ion-exchange and solvent extraction). Talanta 1984, 31, 815–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Oleschuk, R. The separation of platinum and palladium by selective extraction of H2Pt(SCN)6 and H2Pd(SCN)4 using a polyTHF-impregnated filter. Talanta 1998, 45, 1235–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Fontàs, C.; Hidalgo, M.; Salvadó, V. Adsorption and Preconcentration of Pd(II), Pt(IV), and Rh(III) using Anion-Exchange Solid-Phase Extraction Cartridges (SPE). Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2009, 27, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tatarnikov, A.V.; Sokolskaya, I.; Shneerson, Y.M.; Lapin, A.Y.; Goncharov, P.M. Treatment of Platinum Flotation Products. Platin. Met. Rev. 2004, 48, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Schoeman, E.; Bradshaw, S.; Akdogan, G.; Eksteen, J. The Recovery of Platinum, Palladium, and Gold from a Cyanide Heap Solution, with Use of Ion Exchange Resins. In Proceedings of the 5th International Platinum Conference A Catalyst for Change, Sun City, South Africa, 17–21 September 2013; pp. 729–742. [Google Scholar]
  120. Lee, H.Y.; Kim, S.G.; Oh, J.K. Cementation behavior of gold and silver onto Zn, Al, and Fe powders from acid thiourea solutions. Can. Met. Q. 1997, 36, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Juarez, C.; Dutra, A. Gold electrowinning from thiourea solutions. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lanaridi, O.; Platzer, S.; Nischkauer, W.; Betanzos, J.H.; Iturbe, A.U.; Gaztelurrutia, C.D.R.; Sanchez-Cupido, L.; Siriwardana, A.; Schnürch, M.; Limbeck, A.; et al. Benign recovery of platinum group metals from spent automotive catalysts using choline-based deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2022, 15, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lanaridi, O.; Sahoo, A.R.; Limbeck, A.; Naghdi, S.; Eder, D.; Eitenberger, E.; Csendes, Z.; Schnürch, M.; Bica-Schröder, K. Toward the Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from a Spent Automotive Catalyst with Supported Ionic Liquid Phases. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 9, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Bossche, A.V.D.; Rodriguez, N.R.; Riaño, S.; Dehaen, W.; Binnemans, K. Dissolution behavior of precious metals and selective palladium leaching from spent automotive catalysts by trihalide ionic liquids. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 10110–10120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rzelewska-Piekut, M.; Regel-Rosocka, M. Separation of Pt(IV), Pd(II), Ru(III) and Rh(III) from model chloride solutions by liquid-liquid extraction with phosphonium ionic liquids. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 212, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Firmansyah, M.L.; Yoshida, W.; Hanada, T.; Goto, M. Application of Ionic Liquids in Solvent Extraction of Platinum Group Metals. Solvent Extr. Res. Dev. Jpn. 2020, 27, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, J.-C.; Kurniawan; Hong, H.-J.; Chung, K.W.; Kim, S. Separation of platinum, palladium and rhodium from aqueous solutions using ion exchange resin: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 246, 116896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Al-Harahsheh, M.; Kingman, S. Microwave-assisted leaching—A review. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 73, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yan, S.; Sun, C.; Zhou, T.; Gao, R.; Xie, H. Ultrasonic-assisted leaching of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries using organic additives. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 257, 117930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Granados-Fernández, R.; Montiel, M.; Díaz-Abad, S.; Rodrigo, M.; Lobato, J. Platinum Recovery Techniques for a Circular Economy. Catalysts 2021, 11, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Suoranta, T.; Zugazua, O.; Niemelä, M.; Perämäki, P. Recovery of palladium, platinum, rhodium and ruthenium from catalyst materials using microwave-assisted leaching and cloud point extraction. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 154, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Atia, T.A.; Wouters, W.; Monforte, G.; Spooren, J. Microwave chloride leaching of valuable elements from spent automotive catalysts: Understanding the role of hydrogen peroxide. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 166, 105349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wang, S.; Chen, A.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, J. Leaching of palladium and rhodium from spent automobile catalysts by microwave roasting. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2013, 33, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nicol, G.; Goosey, E.; Yıldız, D.; Loving, E.; Nguyen, V.T.; Riaño, S.; Yakoumis, I.; Martinez, A.M.; Siriwardana, A.; Unzurrunzaga, A.; et al. Platinum Group Metals Recovery Using Secondary Raw Materials (PLATIRUS): Project Overview with a Focus on Processing Spent Autocatalyst. Johns Matthey Technol. Rev. 2021, 65, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhuang, W.-Q.; Fitts, J.P.; Ajo-Franklin, C.M.; Maes, S.; Alvarez-Cohen, L.; Hennebel, T. Recovery of critical metals using biometallurgy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Işıldar, A.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Lenz, M.; Du Laing, G.; Marra, A.; Cesaro, A.; Panda, S.; Akcil, A.; Kucuker, M.A.; Kuchta, K. Biotechnological strategies for the recovery of valuable and critical raw materials from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)—A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 362, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Desmarais, M.; Pirade, F.; Zhang, J.; Rene, E.R. Biohydrometallurgical processes for the recovery of precious and base metals from waste electrical and electronic equipments: Current trends and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 11, 100526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cui, J.; Zhang, L. Metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158, 228–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Awasthi, A.K.; Zeng, X.; Li, J. Environmental pollution of electronic waste recycling in India: A critical review. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 211, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Priya, A.; Hait, S. Comparative assessment of metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste with special emphasis on bioleaching. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 6989–7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Islam, A.; Ahmed, T.; Awual, R.; Rahman, A.; Sultana, M.; Aziz, A.A.; Monir, M.U.; Teo, S.H.; Hasan, M. Advances in sustainable approaches to recover metals from e-waste-A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 244, 118815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yu, Z.; Han, H.; Feng, P.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, T.; Kakade, A.; Kulshrestha, S.; Majeed, S.; Li, X. Recent advances in the recovery of metals from waste through biological processes. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Castro, C.; Urbieta, M.; Cazón, J.P.; Donati, E. Metal biorecovery and bioremediation: Whether or not thermophilic are better than mesophilic microorganisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 279, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Watling, H.R. Review of Biohydrometallurgical Metals Extraction from Polymetallic Mineral Resources. Minerals 2014, 5, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Rasoulnia, P.; Mousavi, S. Maximization of organic acids production by Aspergillus niger in a bubble column bioreactor for V and Ni recovery enhancement from power plant residual ash in spent-medium bioleaching experiments. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 216, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Brandl, H.; Lehmann, S.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Martinelli, D. Biomobilization of silver, gold, and platinum from solid waste materials by HCN-forming microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 94, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Gavrilescu, M. Microbial recovery of critical metals from secondary sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 344, 126208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sulaymon, A.H.; Abbas, S.H.; Ismail, I.M.; Mostafa, T.M.; Sulaymon, A.H. Biosorption of Heavy Metals: A Review. J. Chem. Sci. Technol. 2014, 3, 74–102. [Google Scholar]
  149. Jing, R.; Kjellerup, B.V. Biogeochemical cycling of metals impacting by microbial mobilization and immobilization. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 66, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Diep, P.; Mahadevan, R.; Yakunin, A.F. Heavy Metal Removal by Bioaccumulation Using Genetically Engineered Microorganisms. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Download Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice Online Free Language; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  152. Anastas, P.T.; Zimmerman, J.B. Peer Reviewed: Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 94A–101A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Bossi, T.; Gediga, J.; Tania, B.; Johannes, G. The Environmental Profile of Platinum Group Metals. Johns Matthey Technol. Rev. 2017, 61, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, T.-L.; Kim, H.; Pan, S.-Y.; Tseng, P.-C.; Lin, Y.-P.; Chiang, P.-C. Implementation of green chemistry principles in circular economy system towards sustainable development goals: Challenges and perspectives. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 716, 136998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Moschovi, A.; Souentie, S.; Yakoumis, I.; Siriwardana, A. An Integrated Circular Economy Model for Decoupling Europe from Platinum Group Metals Supply Risk in the Automotive Sector. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Extractive Metallurgy of Activated Minerals—P. Baláž—Google Cărți. Available online: https://books.google.com.vc/books?id=YU2iZme3NfkC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  157. Boldyrev, V.V. Mechanochemistry and mechanical activation of solids. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2006, 75, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tan, Q.; Li, J. Recycling Metals from Wastes: A Novel Application of Mechanochemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 5849–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Baláž, M. Recycling Waste into Materials Using High-Energy Ball Milling. Environ. Mechanochem. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ou, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, Z. Application of mechanochemistry to metal recovery from second-hand resources: A technical overview. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2015, 17, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Takacs, L. The historical development of mechanochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7649–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Boldyrev, V.V.; Tkáčová, K. Mechanochemistry of Solids: Past, Present, and Prospects. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 2000, 8, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Alex, T.C.; Srikanth, S.; Mehrotra, S.P. Process innovations using mechanical activation of minerals and wastes. In Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Modern Mechanochemistry; Delogu, F., Mulas, G., Eds.; Transworld Research Network: Kerala, India, 2010; Chapter 16; pp. 255–272. ISBN 978-81-7895-454-7. [Google Scholar]
  164. Suryanarayana, C. Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2001, 46, 1–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Baláž, P.; Achimovičová, M.; Baláž, M.; Billik, P.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Criado, J.M.; Delogu, F.; Dutková, E.; Gaffet, E.; Gotor, F.J.; et al. Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: From nanoparticles to technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7571–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Boldyreva, E. Mechanochemistry of inorganic and organic systems: What is similar, what is different? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7719–7738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Paneva, D.; Encheva, E.; Tsvetkov, M.; Krstić, J.; Grilli, M.L. Application of Mechanochemically Treated Waste Materials for Water Remediation. Phys. Status Solidi 2022, 219, 2100515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Takacs, L.; McHenry, J.S. Temperature of the milling balls in shaker and planetary mills. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 5246–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Machado, M. Automotive Catalysts: Performance, Characterization and Development. New Trends Dev. Automot. Ind. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Guo, X.; Xiang, D.; Duan, G.; Mou, P. A review of mechanochemistry applications in waste management. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Zhang, F.-S.; Yao, T. An environmentally friendly ball milling process for recovery of valuable metals from e-waste scraps. Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Wei, X.; Liu, C.; Cao, H.; Ning, P.; Jin, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Sun, Z. Understanding the features of PGMs in spent ternary automobile catalysts for development of cleaner recovery technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Do, J.-L.; Tan, D.; Friščić, T. Oxidative Mechanochemistry: Direct, Room-Temperature, Solvent-Free Conversion of Palladium and Gold Metals into Soluble Salts and Coordination Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2667–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. PLATInum Group Metals Recovery Using Secondary Raw Materials—PLATIRUS. Available online: https://www.platirus.eu/ (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  175. Hardacre, C.; Rayment, T.; Lambert, R.M. Platinum/Ceria CO Oxidation Catalysts Derived from Pt/Ce Crystalline Alloy Precursors. J. Catal. 1996, 158, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wei, J.; Wang, L.; Peng, T.; Huang, Y.; Wu, X. Direct Recycle Palladium from Spent Automotive Catalyst to Carbon-Supported Palladium. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 063520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Adegbola, O. An Investigation into Stability of Palladium-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction. Ph.D. Thesis, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  178. Racles, C.; Zaltariov, M.; Coroaba, A.; Silion, M.; Diac, C.; Dascalu, A.; Iacob, M.; Cazacu, M. New heterogeneous catalysts containing platinum group metals recovered from a spent catalytic converter. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Narita, H.; Morisaku, K.; Tanaka, M. Highly Efficient Extraction of Rhodium(III) from Hydrochloric Acid Solution with Amide-Containing Tertiary Amine Compounds. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2015, 33, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Paiva, A.P.; Martins, M.E.; Ortet, O. Palladium(II) Recovery from Hydrochloric Acid Solutions by N,N′-Dimethyl-N,N′-Dibutylthiodiglycolamide. Metals 2015, 5, 2303–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Bernardis, F.L.; Grant, R.A.; Sherrington, D.C. A review of methods of separation of the platinum-group metals through their chloro-complexes. React. Funct. Polym. 2005, 65, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Cui, X.-Y.; Tan, C.-H.; Leow, D. Metal-catalysed reactions enabled by guanidine-type ligands. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 4689–4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Francos, J.; Cadierno, V. The chemistry of guanidinate complexes of the platinum group metals. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 9021–9036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Munnik, P.; de Jongh, P.E.; de Jong, K.P. Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Supported Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 6687–6718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow chart of PGMs prices over the last five years. Reprinted with permission from [7].
Figure 1. Flow chart of PGMs prices over the last five years. Reprinted with permission from [7].
Crystals 13 00550 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of automotive catalytic converter. Reprinted from [20], with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2023.
Figure 2. Scheme of automotive catalytic converter. Reprinted from [20], with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2023.
Crystals 13 00550 g002
Figure 3. Schematics of the DRM reaction and of syngas utilization. Reprinted from [44].
Figure 3. Schematics of the DRM reaction and of syngas utilization. Reprinted from [44].
Crystals 13 00550 g003
Figure 4. (a) Platinum supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Platinum demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Platinum Recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Platinum demand in Europe from 2017–2022; (e) Global platinum recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Figure 4. (a) Platinum supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Platinum demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Platinum Recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Platinum demand in Europe from 2017–2022; (e) Global platinum recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Crystals 13 00550 g004
Figure 5. (a) Palladium supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Palladium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Palladium recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Palladium demand in Europe from 2017–2022; (e) Global palladium recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Figure 5. (a) Palladium supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Palladium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Palladium recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Palladium demand in Europe from 2017–2022; (e) Global palladium recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Crystals 13 00550 g005
Figure 6. (a) Rhodium supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Rhodium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Rhodium recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Global rhodium recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Figure 6. (a) Rhodium supply by region from 2017–2022; (b) Rhodium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (c) Rhodium recycling by sectors from 2017–2022; (d) Global rhodium recycling, supply and demand from 2017–2022 (according to the data from [49]).
Crystals 13 00550 g006
Figure 7. (a) Ruthenium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (b) Iridium demand by sectors from 2017 (according to the data from [49]).
Figure 7. (a) Ruthenium demand by sectors from 2017–2022; (b) Iridium demand by sectors from 2017 (according to the data from [49]).
Crystals 13 00550 g007
Figure 8. Contribution of PGM recycling to global demand for PGMs in 2022 (According to data from [49]).
Figure 8. Contribution of PGM recycling to global demand for PGMs in 2022 (According to data from [49]).
Crystals 13 00550 g008
Figure 9. PGMs recycling scheme.
Figure 9. PGMs recycling scheme.
Crystals 13 00550 g009
Figure 10. Basic assessment indices of different leaching methods (according to the data from [88]).
Figure 10. Basic assessment indices of different leaching methods (according to the data from [88]).
Crystals 13 00550 g010
Figure 11. PGM recycling improvement by mechanochemical method.
Figure 11. PGM recycling improvement by mechanochemical method.
Crystals 13 00550 g011
Table 1. Heterogeneous catalysts: support, precious metal (PM) load and applications [17,18,19].
Table 1. Heterogeneous catalysts: support, precious metal (PM) load and applications [17,18,19].
Catalyst Type SupportApplicationPrecious MetalsPM-Loading
Al2O3
Al2O3 zeolites
SiO2 zeolites
Al2O3 (SiO2, TiO2)
Oil-refining
Reforming
Isomerization
Hydrocraking
Gas to liquid (GTL)
Pt, Pt/Re, Pt/Ir
Pt, Pt/Pd
Pd,
Pt
Co+(Pt or Pd or Ru or Re)
0.02–1%
Actives carbon
(powder)
Fine Chemicals
Hydrogenation
Oxidation
Debenzylation
Hydro-isomerisation
Reduction
Pt–Zn
Pt–Sn–In/Al2O3–Li
Pt/Ni
Pt–Cu
Pt/C
0.5–10%
Cordierite monolith
Ceramic pellet
Metallic monolith
SIC or cordierite
Automotive
Catalysts
Diesel
particulate filter
Pt/Rh
Pt/Pd/Rh
Pt
Pt/Pt
Pt (gauze catalyst)
0.1–0.5%
Table 2. Characteristics of metallurgical extraction methods.
Table 2. Characteristics of metallurgical extraction methods.
Type of ProcessAdvantagesDisadvantagesRecovery PGM
Recovery Yield of the PGMsConditionsRef.
Pyrometallurgical processesused for upscaling recovery of PGMs,
offers promising recovery yields
[9].
special equipment,
high temperatures,
high energy consumption,
cost of continuous furnace operation,
production of significant waste (e.g., volatile waste, slag) [9,62]
99% Pt,
99% Pd,
97% Rh.
T = 950 °C,
T = 75 min,
addition of 3 times flux (0.72 wt/wt, B2O3/Na2O) of spent catalytic converters and 10 g of FeS2 with a corresponding enrichment factor of around 6.0.
[63]
98.59% Pt,
97.91% Pd,
97.16% Rh.
T = 1250 °C,
t = 2 h,
and N2 atmosphere
(microwave smelting), using nickel matte as collector and sodium salts as fluxes.
[64]
>97% PdT = 1350 °C
adding 15 wt% CuO, 5 wt% C, 2 of SiO2/CaO, 2.2 of SiO2/Al2O3 and heating time t = 2 h.
[65]
Hydrometallurgical processesmilder process temperatures than pyrometallurgy,
process control,
high selectivity,
minimal energy consumption,
ability to be used at both small and large scale [9,61].
attention to waste management (liquid waste, gas emissions), process duration,
cost and nature of reagents [9,61]
90–98% Pt,
99% Pd,
70–96% Rh.
11.6 mol L−1 HCl, 1%vol H2O2, T = 60 °C,
L/S = 2 L kg−1 and t = 3 h
[61]
>89% Pt,
100% Pd.
5 M HCl, 1.96 M H2O2, 1.67 M of C2H4O2,
250 rpm of stirring for 3 h, room temperature; 10% of solid concentration.
[66]
90% Pt
94% Pd
3 vol% H2O2 with 8.0 mol/L HCl solution, T = 55 °C and leach time t = 180 min.[67]
97% Pt,
97% Pd,
97% Rh.
Substrate dissolution: NaOH roasting with mole ratio 1:17, T = 600 °C, t = 60 min and dissolution in 1.0 M H2SO4, T = 90 °C, t = 1 h
Cementation: Al0-powder 0.5 g/L at T = 90 °C, t = 15 min
Oxidation leaching: 6.0 M HCl, 2.0 M NaClO3, T = 90 °C,
t = 2 h.
[68]
95.1% Pt,
94.9% Pd,
95.2% Rh.
Pre-reduction: 15 vol% HCOOH, pulp density 10%,
T = 60 °C,
t = 1 h,
Post-leaching: 2.0 M HCl, 2M NaClO3,
T = 90 °C, t = 2 h
[69]
99.6% Pt, 65% Rh.Leaching using electro-generated Cl2 in 8.0 M HCl, T = 80 °C,
pulp density 100 g/L, t = 4 h.
[70]
Biotechnological processeslower carbon footprint,
low energy consumption,
the use of more ecological solvents than in hydrometallurgy,
the absence of dangerous gases [9].
extensive PGM extraction methodology>95% Pt,
>95% Pd.
biogenic cyanide produced by Chromobacterium violaceum
2 h under 150 °C and 14 bar,
[71]
58% Pt,
65%Pd,
97% Rh.
Pseudomonas fluorescens (that produce cyanide as a secondary metabolite)
0.5% (w/v) pulp density and initial pH 10.
[72]
38% Pt,
44% Pd,
91% Rh.
Pseudomonas fluorescens were used to bioleach PGMs from pretreated SAC (by Ultrasound-assisted nitric acid), pulp density of 1% (w/v) at pH 9.[73]
92.1% Pt
99.5% Pd
96.5% Rh
1000 mg/L biogenic cyanide solution, T = 150 °C.[74]
Table 3. Companies involved in PGM recycling.
Table 3. Companies involved in PGM recycling.
CompanyWaste TypeProcessRef.
Umicorelarge variety of complex, precious metals containing materials (E-scrap, spent automotive catalysts, spent industrial catalysts)smelter, the copper leaching and electrowinning plant and the precious metals refinery.[78]
BASFSpent catalystprocess of smelting and refining[79]
Multimetcospent automotive and industrial catalyst.process of smelting and refining[80]
Johnson Mattheyspent process catalysts, autocatalysts, fuel cell catalysts, secondary mine residues and jewellery or scrap metal.pyrometallurgy, advanced hydrometallurgy processing[81]
Hensel recyclingcatalytic converters, e-scrap or other materials containing precious metalssmelting[82]
Table 4. PGM species found as chloro-complexes in aqueous chloride media at different concentration values.
Table 4. PGM species found as chloro-complexes in aqueous chloride media at different concentration values.
Noble Metals.SpeciesConcentrationRef.
Pt (II)
Pt (IV)
[PtCl4]2−
[PtCl6]2−
CHCl ≥ 1 M
CHCl ≥ 3 M
[104,105]
[104,105]
Pd (II)[PdCl4]2CHCl ≥ 0.1 M[104]
Pd (IV)[PdCl6]2−--
Rh (III)

Rh (IV)
[RhCl6]3−
RhCl5(H2O)]2−
[RhCl4(H2O)]2−
[RhCl6]2−
[RhCl5]2−
CHCl ≥ 6 M
*
*
-
CHCl ≥ 0.4 M
[104,106,107]
[104,106]
-
-
[104,107]
* Species present in diluted acid systems.
Table 5. Metal ion concentrations after leaching with HCl/H2O2/H2SO4 (S/L = 1/100 g/cm3, 3 h, 70 °C, 300 rpm) [62].
Table 5. Metal ion concentrations after leaching with HCl/H2O2/H2SO4 (S/L = 1/100 g/cm3, 3 h, 70 °C, 300 rpm) [62].
Chemical ElementConcentration of Metal Ions
in Leach Solution (mg/dm3)
Pt(IV)22.79
Rh(III)2.03
Fe ions2.27
Mg(II)24.87
Cu(II)0.14
Zn(II)0.67
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grilli, M.L.; Slobozeanu, A.E.; Larosa, C.; Paneva, D.; Yakoumis, I.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z. Platinum Group Metals: Green Recovery from Spent Auto-Catalysts and Reuse in New Catalysts—A Review. Crystals 2023, 13, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13040550

AMA Style

Grilli ML, Slobozeanu AE, Larosa C, Paneva D, Yakoumis I, Cherkezova-Zheleva Z. Platinum Group Metals: Green Recovery from Spent Auto-Catalysts and Reuse in New Catalysts—A Review. Crystals. 2023; 13(4):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13040550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grilli, Maria Luisa, Anca Elena Slobozeanu, Claudio Larosa, Daniela Paneva, Iakovos Yakoumis, and Zara Cherkezova-Zheleva. 2023. "Platinum Group Metals: Green Recovery from Spent Auto-Catalysts and Reuse in New Catalysts—A Review" Crystals 13, no. 4: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13040550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop