Correction: Deptuch et al. Molecular Dynamics and Kinetics of Isothermal Cold Crystallization in the Chiral Smectogenic 3F7FPhH6 Glassformer. Crystals 2021, 11, 1487

The compound investigated in the publication [1] was erroneously introduced as (S)-4’-(1-methylheptylcarbonyl)biphenyl-4-yl 4-[7-(2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutoxy)heptyl -1-oxy]benzoate, denoted as 3F7HPhH6. Actually, the studied compound was (S)-4’-(1-methylheptylcarbonyl)biphenyl-4-yl 4-[7-(2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutoxy)heptyl-1-oxy]-3-fluorobenzoate, abbreviated as 3F7FPhH6, with one fluorine atom substituted to the benzene ring [2].

A corrected Figure 1 is attached together with

Table 1. Phase transition temperatures (onset temperature $T_o$ and peak temperature $T_p$) and energy effects (enthalpy change $∆H$ and entropy change $∆S=∆H/T_p$) determined from the DSC results for the 2 K/min rate.

Transition	${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{o}} \left(\mathbf{K}\right)$	${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{p}} \left(\mathbf{K}\right)$	$\mathbf{∆}\mathit{H} (\mathbf{kJ}/\mathbf{mol})$	$\mathbf{∆}\mathit{S} (\mathbf{J}/(\mathbf{mol}·\mathbf{K}\left)\right)$
Cooling
Iso → ${\mathrm{SmA}}^{*}$	377.0	376.8	9.3	24.8
${\mathrm{SmA}}^{*}$ → (${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathsf{\alpha }}^{*}$) → ${\mathrm{SmC}}^{*}$	371.9	(376.3) 1 371.1	2.1	5.5
${\mathrm{SmC}}^{*}$ → ${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$	–	369.5	1.1	2.9
${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$ → ${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$ glass	233	–	–	–
Heating
${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$ glass → ${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$	233	–	–	–
${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$ → Cr2	275.7	280.4	3.4 3	12.1 3
Cr2 → (${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$) → Cr1 2	287.2	292.1	10.9 3	37.2 3
Cr1 → ${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$	301.2	303.7	2.9 3	9.6 3
${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathrm{A}}^{*}$ → ${\mathrm{SmC}}^{*}$	370.1	370.6	1.3	3.5
${\mathrm{SmC}}^{*}$ → (${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathsf{\alpha }}^{*}$) → ${\mathrm{SmA}}^{*}$	370.9	371.6	2.3	6.2
${\mathrm{SmA}}^{*}$ → Iso	375.5	376.6	9.7	25.6

¹ For the ${\mathrm{SmA}}^{*}$/${\mathrm{SmC}}_{\mathsf{\alpha }}^{*}$ transition, only $T_p$ value (in parentheses) upon cooling can be determined. ² Crystallization to the Cr1 phase starts directly after melting of the Cr2 phase. ³ Values likely underestimated due to overlapping of anomalies and incomplete crystallization.

and

Table 2. Crystallization enthalpy $∆H_{cr}$ and melting enthalpy $∆H_m$ together with onset $T_o$ and peak $T_p$ temperatures of anomalies related to the melting of a crystal phase after the isothermal cold crystallization of 3F7FPhH6 in various $T_{cr}$ temperatures.

${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}\mathit{r}} \left(\mathbf{K}\right)$	$\mathbf{∆}{\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{c}\mathit{r}} (\mathbf{kJ}/\mathbf{mol})$	${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{o}} \left(\mathbf{K}\right)$	${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{p}} \left(\mathbf{K}\right)$	$\mathbf{∆}{\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{m}} (\mathbf{kJ}/\mathbf{mol})$
273	5.8	284.5, 299.2	291.0, 303.3	2.7, 12.6
278	12.3	298.5	303.7	17.6
283	14.9	298.4, –	304.2, 310.8	18.6, 0.9
288	13.8	299.8	305.5	17.7
293	12.6	302.6	307.7	15.7

with the updated values of enthalpy change given in kJ/mol and entropy change given in J/(mol∙K).

The potential energy scans for the selected torsional angles in the 3F7FPhH6 molecule have already been presented in [3]. The energy barrier for the rotation of the benzene ring and biphenyl is 35.3 kJ/mol and 39.8 kJ/mol, respectively [3], giving the total energy barrier of 75.1 kJ/mol. Thus, the interpretation of the β-process as the coupled rotations of the benzene ring and biphenyl in the molecular core is still valid.

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.