Next Article in Journal
Ordered Mesoporous TiO2: The Effect of Structure, Residual Template and Metal Doping on Photocatalytic Activity
Previous Article in Journal
PtCu Nanoparticle Catalyst for Electrocatalytic Glycerol Oxidation: How Does the PtCu Affect to Glycerol Oxidation Reaction Performance by Changing pH Conditions?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Main Routes of Production of High-Value-Added 2,5-Furandincarboxylic Acid Using Heterogeneous Catalytic Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NO Oxidation on Lanthanum-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles with Controlled Morphology

by
Susana Fernández-García
1,
Miguel Tinoco
2,*,
Ana Belén Hungría
1,
Xiaowei Chen
1,
José Juan Calvino
1,
Juan Carlos Martínez-Munuera
3,
Javier Giménez-Mañogil
3 and
Avelina García-García
3,*
1
Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales, Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cádiz, Campus Río San Pedro, 11510 Cádiz, Spain
2
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28020 Madrid, Spain
3
Departamento de Química Inorgánica e Instituto Universitario de Materiales, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2023, 13(5), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050894
Submission received: 12 April 2023 / Revised: 5 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalytic Materials: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in Spain)

Abstract

:
The present work aims to assess the impact of morphology and reducibility on lanthanum-doped ceria nanocatalysts with controlled morphology on the NO oxidation reaction. Specifically, samples were prepared using a hydrothermal method incorporating lanthanum at varying molar concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) into ceria with a controlled morphology (nanocubes and nanorods). The structural, compositional, and redox characterization of these catalysts has been performed via scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (X-EDS), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), and oxygen storage capacity (OSC). NO oxidation catalytic tests were conducted, and the results were compared with estimated curves (obtained by considering the proportions of the corresponding components), which revealed the presence of a synergistic effect between lanthanum and ceria. The degree of enhancement was found to depend on both the morphology and the amount of lanthanum incorporated into CeO2. These findings may facilitate the optimization of features concerning ceria-based nanocatalysts for the removal of NOx emissions from exhaust gases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The adverse environmental impact of nitrogen oxides (NOx) generated by the combustion of fossil fuels (e.g., coal-fired plants, industrial boilers, and vehicles powered by internal combustion engines) is widely recognized, leading to harmful effects such as acid rain, photochemical “smog”, and ozone depletion [1,2]. To mitigate these effects, there is an urgent need to develop effective and sustainable strategies to control NOx emissions [3]. Focusing on automotive combustion engines, NOx is recognized as a major contributor to air pollution, causing several health issues, such as neurological diseases, emphysema, and bronchitis [4,5]. Diesel engines emit a higher quantity of NOx pollutants (referred to as NO and NO2, but mainly NO) as a result of lean burn conditions, which are more efficient than those of stoichiometric combustion. Increasing the ratio of NO2/NOx in the exhaust gas of lean-burning vehicles improves the low-temperature activity of the so-called fast selective catalytic reduction (2NH3 + NO + NO2 → 2N2 + 3H2O) [6] and the adsorption performance of the storage reduction (NSR) catalyst and accelerates the continuous regeneration of the diesel particulate filter. As NO2 is a more powerful oxidant gas than O2 and NO [7,8], the selective catalytic oxidation of NO to NO2 is considered a critical step in the development of the aforementioned strategies [9,10,11]. In this context, the design of catalysts with high activity, selectivity, and stability capable of oxidizing NO to NO2 is of particular interest [5].
Catalysts based on precious metals (Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh) have been traditionally used for NO oxidation to NO2 owing to their outstanding catalytic performances [12,13]. However, their scarcity and high price limit their widespread use as catalysts [14]. Therefore, exploring and developing noble-metal-free alternatives can be considered a possible avenue to moderate the prices of catalysts devoted to this chemical reaction [2,15]. Hence, the use of ceria and related materials for environmental catalysis has attracted much attention in recent years. As it is well known, CeO2 possesses excellent redox properties due to its facile redox pair state of cerium (Ce4+/Ce3+) and, consequently, the concomitant creation of oxygen vacancies [16].
Previous studies have focused on generating controlled-morphology nanoparticles with well-defined facets to improve the catalytic activity of ceria-based materials. The approach of using controlled morphology can be interpreted from different views and by using several routes of preparation. In this line, Zhu et al. [17] reported the regulation of different morphologies for CeO2 by a hard template method and the successful application to the oxidation of toluene at low temperature. CeO2-nanoparticles with more oxygen vacancies exhibited the highest efficiency, improving the toluene oxidation performance with regard to CeO2 with a three-dimensional ordered microporous structure and a CeO2-bulk sample. Controlled size and morphology play crucial roles in the physical and chemical properties of CeO2. In fact, ceria with different exposed crystalline planes, such as {111} and {110} facets for nanorods, {100} surfaces for nanocubes, and {111} facets for nano-octahedra, have been used in catalytic activity for CO oxidation, soot combustion, NO reduction, glycerol oxidation, methanol synthesis, etc. [18,19,20,21,22]. For example, several authors found that the facets exposed by nanorods are more active for CO oxidation than other nanofacets [23,24,25]. Furthermore, CeO2 nanorods and nanocubes have been demonstrated to have higher oxygen storage capacity than octahedra [26]. In conclusion, controlling the crystalline planes in ceria nanoparticles is an effective way to improve their redox characteristics and catalytic activity.
Another alternative to enhance the redox properties and catalytic performance of ceria is to encourage the proliferation of new oxygen vacancies either by doping with transitions metals (e.g., Mn, Cu, Ag) yielding differently modified ceria or by the incorporation of other elements into its crystalline structure. Regarding the first case, Di Sarli et al. [27] reported some Ag-ceria catalysts with significantly enhanced silver–ceria interface, where highly reactive oxygen species were produced yielding an outstanding catalytic activity towards diesel soot combustion during regeneration of a coated DPF. On the other hand, previous studies have demonstrated that doping CeO2 with tetravalent transition metal cations such as Ti4+ and Zr4+ [28,29], or other trivalent rare earth cations such as Tb3+, Gd3+, Eu3+, La3+, and Pr3+ [30,31,32,33], increases both oxygen mobility and the number of oxygen vacancies within the structure, which in turn is reflected in a considerable improvement of its redox properties, in most cases. La3+ possesses an ionic radius similar to Ce4+ (116 and 97 pm, respectively), which results in its facile incorporation into the crystalline lattice of cerium oxide. Moreover, La addition into ceria decreases the sintering effect of nanoparticles at high temperatures [34]. The incorporation of lanthanum into controlled-morphology ceria nanoparticles has recently attracted scientific attention due to the advantages mentioned before [35,36,37,38]. For example, Xia et al. [37] have recently published the synthesis of La-, Y-, or Sm-doped ceria nanorods with dopant molar concentrations ranging between 0 and 30%. An excellent photocatalytic performance of the samples with a molar ratio of 10% was obtained. Sartoretti et al. [38] have reported the synthesis and characterization of ceria catalysts modified with La and Nd with concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 at.% and their performance in oxidation reactions such as CO, NO, and soot oxidation. Their results suggest that large additions of La and Nd do not significantly affect the catalytic behavior of the nanoparticles in NO oxidation, and only the sample with 10% lanthanum, whose nanoparticles possess a nanocube and nanowire morphology, exhibits a slightly higher catalytic conversion compared to pure ceria. The authors attribute this effect to the limited influence of the incorporation of the dopant elements on the reducibility of their nanoparticles. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the influence of morphological aspects and composition homogeneity in both redox and catalytic responses for NO oxidation of La-doped ceria has been not fully explored.
In the present work, the incorporation of lanthanum into ceria nanocubes synthesized under hydrothermal conditions was studied. The structure and redox properties of all samples were assessed to gain insights into the NO oxidation reaction. In parallel, lanthanum hydroxide nanorods were prepared to measure and compare their NO oxidation catalytic activity with that of both pure and La-doped ceria nanoparticles. These results may provide a better understanding of the effect and relevance of the different parameters affecting the catalytic activity of lanthanum-doped ceria nanoparticles for NO oxidation. In summary, the impact of composition and morphology on the redox behavior (including reducibility and OSC properties) of La-doped ceria nanocatalysts synthesized using a soft (hydrothermal) method to achieve controlled morphology was studied. We examined the correlations between these properties and their corresponding performances in the NO oxidation reaction, a reaction with significant environmental interest. Our experimental approach was comprehensive and systematic, with the goal of establishing critical relationships between La-CeO2 composition, structure, morphology, and catalytic activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural and Compositional Analysis of the Ce1−xLaxO2−δ Samples

Figure 1 displays representative TEM images of the as-synthesized samples. As shown in these images, all nanoparticles possess a homogeneous cubic morphology in CeO2 NC, Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, and Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC samples, whereas the Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR sample is formed by the combination of both nanocubes and nanorods. The particle size of nanocubes varies from 5 to 50 nm in all samples, including Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR. On the other hand, nanorods from Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR are moderately bent, possibly due to their high aspect ratio: their diameter ranges between 10 and 40 nm, whilst their length spans between 200 nm and 1 μm.
XRD patterns of all the synthesized samples are shown in Figure 2a. As can be confirmed from Figure 2a, all samples possess a face-centered cubic fluorite-like ceria structure ( F m 3 m ) [26,39]; no additional reflections are spotted, and thus, no secondary crystalline phases can be identified within the samples. This may suggest that La has been fully incorporated into ceria forming a solid solution [40,41].
Nevertheless, the most intense reflection of the diffractograms of La-modified ceria samples, corresponding to {111} planes, is slightly shifted to lower angles compared to pure ceria. This displacement increases with the lanthanum introduced within the fluorite lattice, following the sequence of 2θ(⁰) CeO2 NC (28.50 ⁰) > Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC (28.40 ⁰) = Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC (28.40 ⁰) > Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR (28.35 ⁰). Although the ionic radii of La3+ and Ce4+ are similar, this shift can be attributed to the larger radius of lanthanum cations (116 pm) compared to tetravalent cerium (97 pm) [42]. The formation of a solid solution by the incorporation of La into the CeO2 lattice is confirmed by lattice parameter calculations based on the {111} diffraction of all diagrams [31,34,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Moreover, the lattice distortion due to the incorporation of lanthanum can facilitate the creation of additional oxygen vacancies beyond those intrinsically necessary to maintain the principle of neutrality of the mixed oxide [30,31]. As can be seen in Table 1, the values of the lattice parameter increase slightly with the molar concentration of La.
On the other hand, the average crystal sizes of all the nanocatalysts have been estimated by using the Scherrer equation, measuring the FWHM (full width, half maximum) of the {111} diffraction reflection. As observed in Table 1, the size of crystallites increases with the amount of lanthanum introduced, but the rate of increase gradually slows down with lanthanum content.
To assess the crystallography of the nanocubes in each sample, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were acquired. Figure S1 depicts representative HRTEM images of each catalyst. The reflections observed in the digital diffraction patterns (DDPs), obtained from the white enclosed regions, can be accurately indexed to a CeO2 crystalline phase, as expected. In particular, 2.7 Å distances perpendicular to each other and 1.9 Å distances generating a 45° angle with the previous reflections were measured, which correspond to {200} and {220} ceria family planes, respectively, in a crystal viewed along a [100] zone axis (Figure S1a–c). On the other hand, 2.7 Å and 3.1 Å distances forming 55° angles between each other can be indexed to {200} and {111} family planes, respectively, in a ceria crystal oriented along a [110] zone axis (Figure S1d).
On the other hand, the specific surface areas of all samples were determined by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method (See Table 1). La-doped ceria nanocatalysts present surface values similar between them (23, 25, and 29 m2/g, respectively). However, the CeO2 nanocube sample presents the highest surface area (38 m2/g) among all the samples, which agrees with the smallest particle size estimated by the Scherrer equation.
Table 1 also shows the actual molar concentration of La cations in Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR samples, estimated by ICP. The as-obtained results were 4.4, 9.7, and 14.4 mol.%, respectively, which are very close to the expected concentrations.
In order to analyze the local lanthanum composition in these nanocatalysts, X-EDS spectra were acquired at different positions on the samples. However, due to the proximity of lanthanum and cerium signals in X-EDS, and the low amount of lanthanum in samples Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ and Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ, the lanthanum lines could not be clearly distinguished from the more intense cerium signals. Therefore, the quantitative X-EDS results obtained from these samples differed from the expected ones and disagreed with quantitative EELS results that were previously published elsewhere [47]. These EELS analyses confirmed that lanthanum was homogeneously distributed within the samples, and the amount of lanthanum corresponded to 5 and 10 mol.%, respectively, as expected. Nevertheless, Figure 3 displays a representative HAADF-STEM image and X-EDS spectra of sample Ce 0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR, which contains enough lanthanum to be accurately quantified by X-EDS. As can be seen in Figure 3a, two morphologies can be distinguished: nanocubes and nanorods. X-EDS spectra were recorded at various positions on nanorods (Figure 3b, locations 1 and 3) and on different nanocubes (Figure 3b, positions 2 and 4). Quantitative results evidence that nanorods are richer in lanthanum than nanocubes. In the former, the average La content amounts to 19 ± 5 at.%, whereas the value obtained for nanocubes is just 11 ± 2 at.%. Additionally, these results verify that the distribution of lanthanum along the nanorods is not homogeneous (19 at.% vs. 14 at.% at positions 1 and 3 from Figure 3b). To examine the morphology of pure lanthanum oxide nanoparticles under the hydrothermal conditions employed in this study, another catalyst was prepared using only lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate as a precursor. Therefore, a La(OH)3 nanorod sample was synthesized under the same hydrothermal conditions to confirm that crystallites rich in lanthanum tend to form a rod-shaped morphology with a hexagonal structure. Figures S2 and S3 contain TEM images and an XRD diagram of this sample, respectively, which consisted of La(OH)3 nanorods.
These results indicate that the maximum concentration of lanthanum that can be incorporated into the ceria lattice while maintaining a nanocube morphology is 10 mol.% under hydrothermal conditions. Several authors have reported that the maximum solubility of La3+ in ceria, forming a solid solution without taking into consideration morphological aspects by the coprecipitation method, is about 50% mol. [43]. Loche et al. [40] indicated that the upper limit to the incorporation of La into ceria nanocubes prepared with a surfactant-assisted hydro-solvothermal synthesis is close to 7.5 mol.%, corroborated by XRD and transmission electron microscopy. Recently, Trindade et al. [35] obtained La/Ce mixed oxide nanorods and nanocubes by hydrothermal synthesis by modifying temperature conditions. Structural analyses by HREM and XRD confirmed that the maximum concentration of lanthanum that can be introduced into ceria while preserving both the fluorite-type structure and a nanocube morphology in all nanoparticles is about 10 mol.%, which agrees with our study.

2.2. Redox Properties

In order to study the redox behavior of pure and lanthanum-doped ceria nanoparticles, H2-TPR and OSC analyses have been performed.

2.2.1. H2-TPR Experiments

Figure 4 shows the H2O evolution of all samples through the H2-TPR profiles. H2-TPR analysis of undoped ceria and La(10 mol.%)-doped ceria nanocubes have been discussed in a previous work [41]. To briefly sum up our previous results, the reduction profile of CeO2 nanocubes contains a small peak at 527 °C and another wide peak at 830 °C, as also observed in ceria samples made up of nanoparticles without controlled morphologies [49,50,51,52]. In the case of Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ, the reduction peaks occur at lower temperatures than those of pure ceria.
Figure 4 displays the reduction profile of the reference and lanthanum-doped ceria samples. Two peaks are observed, one occurring at temperatures below 600 °C and another, more prominent signal appearing above 700 °C. According to previous literature, these can be attributed, respectively, to the surface and bulk reduction of ceria [53,54]. Due to the structural similarities between pure and doped ceria nanocrystals, this assignment can be extrapolated to Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR samples.
In this case, the reduction of samples with lanthanum concentrations of 0, 5, and 10 mol.% starts at similar temperatures (around 370 °C), except for the Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR sample, whose H2O formation peak initially appears at 420 °C. The first maximum intensity peaks appear at 527, 520, 571, and 576 °C for CeO2 NC, Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR catalysts, respectively. Moreover, these surface reduction peaks become more intense and wider as lanthanum content rises, which may suggest the amount of Ce3+ generated could be far superior [49,55]. On the other hand, a broad and intense second signal is observed between 730 and 765 °C for the lanthanum-modified ceria nanocatalysts. The maximum of this reduction peak in the La-modified samples appears at lower temperatures than in pure CeO2 NC (830 °C).
These results suggest that the incorporation of increasing amounts of lanthanum into ceria does favor the reduction of the samples at lower temperatures when compared with the reference sample (undoped ceria nanocubes), with the exception of the introduction of 5 mol.% of lanthanum, which does not considerably modify the reducibility of the nanoparticles at low temperature as its surface reduction peaks appears at a temperature similar to that of the pure ceria.

2.2.2. OSC Measurements

OSC measurements of all nanocatalysts are displayed in Figure 5. Lanthanum exclusively presents a trivalent oxidation state, and thus, the observed reducibility during OSC measurements can solely be attributed to the reduction of cerium from Ce4+ to Ce3+. As expected, as temperature increases, all samples exhibit increases in their values of oxygen weight loss expressed in mmol of oxygen/mol oxide, and therefore in their reducibility. However, comparing the catalysts, similar reduction behaviors are observed for all samples within the temperature range of 200–350 °C. Consequently, the addition of La into ceria nanocubes does not confer any benefits in terms of reducibility at low temperatures. Furthermore, Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC is the least reducible sample among all tested catalysts until 500 °C, even when compared to undoped ceria. On the other hand, Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR is the most reducible catalyst with 48.3 mmol O/mol oxide at 500 °C. The trend in oxygen weight loss is clearly observed at 700 °C, with 160.7, 128.8, 120.2, and 90.3 mmol O/mol oxide for Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR, Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, and CeO2 NC, respectively. These oxygen release results from ceria agree with the H2-TPR results discussed beforehand.
Although cerium is the only reducible element during OSC measurements, it is evident that there is a beneficial effect on reducibility when ceria is doped with La3+, particularly at high temperatures. This is clearly observed in the results presented in Table 2, where cerium total reduction values are listed. These figures have been estimated considering the total amounts of released oxygen and assuming that a negligible amount of Ce3+ exists in all samples at room temperature. As expected, the amount of Ce3+ increases with reduction temperature in all cases. Likewise, in general, Ce3+ percentages increase with lanthanum content, particularly in the case of Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR. Therefore, the incorporation of La3+ into the CeO2 structure not only increases the intrinsic oxygen vacancies related to the substitution of Ce4+ with La3+, but also improves the reducibility of Ce4+ species, most likely due to the positive effect of intrinsic (La3+-related) oxygen vacancies on the generation and mobility of additional oxygen vacancies linked to the reduction of cerium [41,56].

2.3. Catalytic Activity: Oxidation of NO to NO2

Since NO oxidation to NO2 is a key component in several NOx remediation technologies [57], this reaction has been chosen to evaluate the catalytic performances of the set of synthesized samples. The NO oxidation catalytic activities have been represented as % of NO2 produced versus temperature in Figure 6.
It is deduced that all the samples accelerate the oxidation of NO to NO2 but to different extents, showing differences both in the onset temperature for the reaction and in the maximum capacity to generate NO2. In general, the lanthanum-containing samples present higher catalytic activity with considerably lower BET surface areas, regarding the reference sample (undoped CeO2 NC). On the other hand, La(OH)3 not only behaves as the least active catalyst regarding NO2 production capacity but also has an onset temperature which is practically that of the uncatalyzed NO oxidation reaction (black curve), revealing a significant “delay” in promoting the NO oxidation reaction for this solid with regard to the rest of the catalysts.
Since the NO oxidation reaction over ceria-based catalysts is the sum of several steps, including ad-NOx species formation, their subsequent oxidation, and their final release as NO/NO2 (this last step depends on several variables, with temperature being of particular importance) [8], the detected NO2 production should be considered as the combination of parallel processes: NO oxidation–NO2 storage–corresponding NO2 desorption (strongly influenced by thermodynamic limitations, as shown in the corresponding curve for the thermodynamic equilibrium in Figure 6) [58,59,60]. In this sense, and in an attempt to shed some light on the observed trends of NO2 production, the corresponding NOx elimination profiles, as a function of temperature, are depicted in Figure 7. All the samples studied remove NOx from the gas stream, and this removal is attributed to NOx chemisorption [58]. Both the population and thermostability of the N-species formed on the sample surface upon NOx chemisorption (ad-NOx species) are very dependent on the formulation of the catalysts (as can be seen in Figure 7). By a detailed comparison of both figures (Figure 6 and Figure 7), interesting issues can be inferred: The NO2 production is prevalent against the generation of thermostable ad-NOx species (nitrites/nitrates are those expected) for La-Ce samples, which accounts for the shift towards lower temperatures of NO2 generation. On the contrary, a very large population of ad-NOx species characterized by a very high thermostability is formed on the La(OH)3 sample in the course of the reaction. In this particular case, since the desorption/decomposition of NOx is extended up to 700 °C (with a maximum of desorption at 600 °C), the NO oxidation capacity to NO2 or the NO2 emission due to ad-NOx species decomposition (if any) is unable to be determined due to the NO2 level decreases following thermodynamics [8].
La(OH)3 exhibits a very different behavior, which can be initially explained on the basis of its accentuated basic character. The Lewis basicity of La(OH)3 is expected to be much higher than that of undoped CeO2. Therefore, the trihydroxide compound will present quite strong basic centers where the NO, but mostly NO2 (being a Lewis acid), will remain “anchored” as thermostable nitrites/nitrates [59]. In addition, La(OH)3 is likely to exhibit more propensity in adsorbing CO2 (as an unavoidable contaminant). Indeed, several publications report the trend of this compound to form hydroxycarbonates on its surface because of storage and handling in air [61,62]. This could explain why the “light-off” for its corresponding NOx elimination curve is a little bit delayed (in the very first stages of the reaction) with regard to that of its counterparts. Nevertheless, once the ad-NOx species formation is initiated, this population becomes larger and larger up to a temperature as high as 500 °C, proving its very high thermostability.
Interestingly, the introduction of La into the cerium oxide nanocubes concurrently improves both the NOx chemisorption ability and the NO2 production capacity following a very smooth and gradual trend along the series (CeO2; Ce0.95O0.05O2−δ and Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ). In this set of catalysts, featuring the preservation of the single nanocube morphology, the good features coming from the pure ceria and the pure “lanthana” component seem to be maximized.
In an attempt to go deeper into the analysis of a possible synergism originated by the La-doping onto ceria towards the NO oxidation catalytic activity, Figure S4 illustrates the NO2 production activities analyzed in this work along with the theoretical curves (dotted lines) that would be obtained for the three mixed oxides adding the curves corresponding to the pure oxides and using the corresponding molar contents in Ce and La as weighting coefficients. These curves (dotted ones in Figure S4) can be considered as a starting point to discuss the synergistic effect caused by the La doping once the intrinsic contribution of the molar proportion of every pure component has been considered.
Interestingly, the maximum synergism seems to be clearly exhibited by Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ, which is the catalyst with the highest La content and unique morphology (NC) (see corresponding green curves). Nevertheless, as discussed in the previous section, this is not the catalyst exhibiting the best redox properties (both quantified by H2-TPR curves and by OSC measurements). Likewise, Ce0.95O0.05O2−δ NC has a higher activity than the catalyst with the highest lanthanum content, despite its lower OSC. In this sense, the analysis of the mentioned synergism (taking into account these premises) would be much more accurate for Ce0.85O0.15O2−δ because it exhibits mixed morphology (provided by the inherent structures of the bare components). In other words, the effect of the synergism originated by the improvement of redox properties and/or oxygen mobility could be more purely analyzed for this catalyst. Actually, the catalytic activity of Ce0.85O0.15O2−δ shows a relevant synergism (if the corresponding experimental and calculated curves, in red color, are compared), even though this is not as pronounced as that for the Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ, which leads to the assertion of the relevance and influence of the type of morphology/facets exposed by the catalysts for this specific application. Nevertheless, this correlation is not straightforward to establish, and it is possibly influenced by the fact that richer contents in La were detected on the nanorod entities, which in turn seems to favor NOx chemisorption against NO oxidation. Finally, it is important to remember that Ce0.85O0.15O2−δ presents a higher BET surface area than Ce0.95O0.05O2−δ and Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ, indicating that this parameter is not playing the major role under these experimental conditions, in agreement with the well-referenced literature on this topic [8,59].
The explanation of the improved oxidation capacity of ceria-based catalysts has been envisaged in the open literature from different viewpoints: ease of migration of oxygen vacancies from the bulk to the surface, type of exposed crystal planes, and compositional nanoheterogeneity [29,63]. In fact, from the whole discussion presented, it is suggested that the NO oxidation manifests some surface dependence (even though a simple correlation cannot be assessed under these experimental conditions). Actually, NO oxidation is probably a structure-sensitive reaction [8].
In summary, it can be concluded that a correct balance among redox properties and “suitable” morphologies is highly desirable for the rational design of very active catalysts. In this study, the mixed oxide with formulation Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ seems to exhibit the optimum balance among the best redox properties and oxygen mobility along with the preservation of the unique and most active morphology for this application. This seems to be achieved with a doping of 10% molar concentration of La onto ceria.
The practical significance of the obtained results lies in achieving the control of the final properties of ceria-related catalysts (in the broadest sense) by controlling both the reliable incorporation of elements (amount and type) into the lattice structure of ceria and the nano-morphology by designing rational routes of synthesis. Another important practical aspect is the identification of the relationships among the physicochemical features of the synthesized catalysts (composition, nanostructure, and morphology), their redox properties, and their catalytic activities towards a reaction of environmental interest (such as the NO oxidation reaction).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalyst Synthesis

Catalysts were prepared using the hydrothermal synthesis conditions described in several publications [41,47]. In particular, lanthanum-doped ceria nanocubes and nanorods were prepared using different molar concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15% mol. La, see Table 1) starting from La(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9%) and Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (99.5%), both salts purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. A mixture of 125 mL of 11.5 M NaOH and 115 mL of a total concentration of 0.050 M corresponding to La and Ce salts was poured into a 300 mL Teflon container. Specifically, 115 mL total volume mixed solutions with molar concentrations of (i) 0.0025 M, (ii) 0.0050 M, and (iii) 0.0075 M in La(NO3)3·6H2O combined with (i) 0.0475 M, (ii) 0.0450 M, and (iii) 0.0425 M in Ce(NO3)3·H2O were employed for the preparation of (i) Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, (ii) Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and (iii) Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR samples, respectively. For the synthesis of the CeO2 NC catalyst, a concentration of 0.050 M in Ce(NO3)3·H2O was used. The solution was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Afterward, the container was introduced into a stainless-steel autoclave, which was heated to 180 °C for 24 h. The resulting suspension was centrifuged, and the solids were washed several times with deionized water and once with absolute ethanol (Panreac). All the obtained powders were dried at 80 °C for 24 h.

3.2. Physical, Compositional, and Redox Characterization

XRD patterns were recorded on a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation, with a range of 5°–110°, a step of 0.02°, and a step time of 1 s. The average crystal size of samples was calculated using the Scherrer equation through the width of the {111} diffraction peak of ceria measured by the software DiffractPlus.
ICP analysis was performed using an ICP-AES Iris Intrepid instrument (Thermal Elemental, Franklin, MA, USA)).
In order to measure the specific Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of all samples, N2 physisorption was carried out in a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 at −196 °C. The samples were previously degasified at 150 °C for 2 h under vacuum.
Transmission and scanning transmission electron microscopy (TEM-STEM) techniques were performed using a JEOL 2010-F (Tokyo, Japan) electron microscope with 0.19 nm spatial resolution at Scherzer defocus. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy images (HAADF-STEM) were obtained by using an electron probe of 0.5 nm diameter at a camera length of 8 cm, combined with an EDX system to analyze chemical compositions at different positions.
Redox properties were examined using H2-TPR and OSC measurements). Samples were pretreated in an oxidizing atmosphere of 5% O2/He flow (60 mL/min) at 500 °C for 1 h prior to both measurements. The samples were cooled in the same oxidizing flow down to 150 °C and kept at this temperature for 30 min, in the case of the OSC measurements; for H2-TPR analysis, the flow was switched to pure helium gas, and then samples were cooled down to room temperature. In H2-TPR analysis, samples were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min to 950 °C, keeping this final temperature for 1 h in a reducing flow of 5% H2/Ar (60 mL/min). Mass/charge ratios (m/z: 2 and 18, H2 consumption and H2O formation, respectively) were measured using a Thermostar GSD301T1 mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Vacuum, Asslar, Germany). In the case of the OSC measurements, the analyses were carried out via a thermogravimetric system, using a SDT Q600 horizontal thermobalance (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA)). The measurements consisted of the monitoring of the weight loss of each sample under a 60 mL/min flow of 5% H2/Ar, at isothermal steady state for 1 h. Weight losses were measured at 200, 350, 500, and 700 °C. In all cases, samples were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min. The amount of Ce3+ generated was calculated based on the total weight loss of the sample, which was only due to the evolution of lattice oxygen.

3.3. Catalytic Test: NO Oxidation to NO2

The catalytic tests consisted of temperature-programmed oxidations, where the temperature was increased from room temperature up to 700 °C at 10 °C/min under the reactive atmosphere, with the purpose of quantifying the NO to NO2 oxidation capacity of the catalysts. The total flow used was 500 mL/min (GHSV 30,000 h−1), and the gas composition was 500 ppm NO, 5%O2, and N2 balance. The gas went through 80 mg of sample, mixed with 300 mg of SiC, and was deposited in a fixed-bed reactor. The reaction was monitored using specific NDIR-UV gas analyzers (Rosemount Analytical, Fisher-Rosemount, Hasselroth, Germany. The analyzed gases were NO, NO2, and O2.
NOx elimination curves were also obtained from 100 °C to 700 °C by comparison with the NOx profiles obtained in a “blank” experiment (only with SiC).

4. Conclusions

Pure and lanthanum-doped (5, 10, and 15 mol.%) ceria samples with controlled morphology were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. The solubility limit of lanthanum in CeO2 nanocubes was estimated to be 10 at.%, as the catalyst prepared with 15 mol.% of lanthanum presented a mixture of morphologies (nanocubes and nanorods). X-EDS analyses confirmed that these nanorods exhibited a composition richer in lanthanum than their nanocube counterparts.
In general, increasing the amount of lanthanum incorporated into the cerium oxide structure enhanced sample reducibility. However, the trend in catalytic activity for NO oxidation did not totally adhere to the redox behavior tendency, as the most active sample, Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ, is not the most reducible one. This result highlighted the importance of nanoparticle morphology in NO oxidation, as lanthanum-rich nanorods seem to favor the formation of quite stable N-chemisorbed species and the formation of hydroxycarbonates, which could act against NO oxidation. Ultimately, the most active sample was Ce0.90O0.10O2−δ, whose particles presented a uniform nanocube shape and exhibited an improved redox behavior with respect to ceria and Ce0.95O0.05O2−δ, being the most reducible catalyst among those presenting the “suitable” unique morphology.
Further research on the following areas will help to move forward on the understanding of the impact and relevance of various parameters affecting the properties and practical applications of La-ceria nanoparticles for the NO oxidation reaction:
-
Investigating the reaction mechanism of NO adsorption and oxidation over La-doped ceria catalysts using in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (in situ DRIFTS);
-
Evaluating the catalytic activity of the most active La-ceria catalysts towards NO oxidation under a more real composition of the exhaust gas, analyzing the impact of the presence of CO2, hydrocarbons, and H2O on the catalysts’ performances.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal13050894/s1, Figure S1: HRTEM images of (a) CeO2 NC, (b) Ce0.95La0.05O2-δ NC, (c) Ce0.90La0.10O2-δ NC, and (d) Ce0.85La0.15O2-δ NC+NR. Digital diffraction patterns, which are displayed at the bottom left corner of each image, have been acquired at the different areas enclosed in white. All scale bars correspond to 10 nm; Figure S2: TEM image of La(OH)3 sample, presenting a nanorod morphology; Figure S3: XRD diffractogram of La(OH)3 sample compared with a lanthanum hydroxide reference pattern [64]; Figure S4: NO2 production of Ce1-xLaxO2-δ (x: 0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) (nanocubes/nanorods) and La(OH)3 NR versus calculated/theoretical curves, represented by dotted lines.

Author Contributions

S.F.-G. and A.G.-G.: conceptualization; S.F.-G., J.G.-M., J.C.M.-M. and M.T.: methodology; S.F.-G., M.T. and A.G.-G.: formal analysis; S.F.-G., M.T., J.G.-M. and A.G.-G.: investigation; S.F.-G.: writing—original draft preparation; M.T. and A.G.-G.: writing—review and editing; A.B.H., X.C. and J.J.C.: supervision; J.J.C. and A.G.-G.: funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Generalitat Valenciana (CIPROM/2021/070 project), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/Research Spanish Agency (PID2019-105542RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, PID2020-113006RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and PID2020-113809RB-C33 projects), and UE-FEDER funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.T. thanks the FPU scholarship program of the Ministry of Education for financial support. J.C.M.-M. acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for financial support through an FPU grant (FPU17/00603).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, L.; Cai, S.; Gao, M.; Hasegawa, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 by using novel catalysts: State of the art and future prospects. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 10916–10976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Wu, T.; Huang, B.; Zhang, J.; Guan, G.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, X.; Hu, C.; Lu, Q. Effects of a-site replacement (Sm, Y, and Pr) on catalytic performances of mullite catalysts for NO oxidation. Fuel 2023, 337, 126838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, T.; Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Cao, F.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Xiong, K.; Wu, J.; Hong, Z.; et al. Electrospun YMn2O5 nanofibers: A highly catalytic activity for NO oxidation. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 247, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jiang, X.-Q.; Mei, X.-D.; Feng, D. Air pollution and chronic airway diseases: What should people know and do? J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E31. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ma, S.-j.; Wang, X.-w.; Chen, T.; Yuan, Z.H. Effect of surface morphology on catalytic activity for NO Oxidation of SmMn2O5 nanocrystals. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 354, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. France, L.J.; Yang, Q.; Li, W.; Chen, Z.; Guang, J.; Guo, D.; Wang, L.; Li, X. Ceria Modified FeMnOx—Enhanced performance and sulphur resistance for low-temperature SCR of NOx. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 206, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Atribak, I.; Bueno-López, A.; García-García, A. Combined removal of diesel soot particulates and NOx over CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides. J. Catal. 2008, 259, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atribak, I.; Bueno-López, A.; García-García, A.; Azambre, B. Contributions of surface and bulk heterogeneities to the NO oxidation activities of ceria–zirconia catalysts with composition Ce0.76Zr0.24O2 prepared by different methods. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 13770–13779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, N.; Yu, J.L.; Dou, J.X.; Tahmasebi, A.; Song, H.; Moghtaderi, B.; Lucas, J.; Wall, T. The effects of oxygen and metal oxide catalysts on the reduction reaction of NO with lignite char during combustion flue gas cleaning. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 152, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, S.; Chen, L.; Yuan, F.; Li, R.; Zhang, T.; Bakhtiar, S.H.; Leng, X.; Niu, X.; Zhu, Y. Synergistic effect between copper and cerium on the performance of Cux-Ce0.5-x-Zr0.5 (x = 0.1–0.5) oxides catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 210, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, I.; Youn, S.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.G.; Cho, S.J.; Kim, D.H. Effects of Microporous TiO2 support on the catalytic and structural properties of V2O5/Microporous TiO2 for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 210, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Auvray, X.; Olsson, L. Stability and activity of Pd-, Pt- and Pd–Pt catalysts supported on alumina for NO oxidation. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 168–169, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, L.; Qu, L.; Cheng, J.; Li, J.; Hao, Z. Oxidation of nitric oxide to nitrogen dioxide over Ru catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 88, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.; Liu, D.; Song, S.; Zhang, H. Pt@CeO2 multicore@Shell self-assembled nanospheres: Clean synthesis, structure optimization, and catalytic applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15864–15872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Shi, J.-W.; Gao, C.; Niu, C. Manganese oxide-based catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: A Review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 522, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trovarelli, A. Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials; World Scientific: Singapore, 2002; Volume 2, ISBN 1783261315. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Liang, C.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Du, X.; Yang, K.; Zhao, J.; Yu, Q.; Zhai, Y.; et al. Regulating CeO2 morphologies on the catalytic oxidation of toluene at lower temperature: A study of the structure–activity relationship. J. Catal. 2023, 418, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Z.; Li, M.; Overbury, S.H. On the structure dependence of CO oxidation over CeO2 nanocrystals with well-defined surface planes. J. Catal. 2012, 285, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aneggi, E.; Wiater, D.; de Leitenburg, C.; Llorca, J.; Trovarelli, A. Shape-dependent activity of ceria in soot combustion. ACS Catal. 2013, 4, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, R.; Zhang, D.; Maitarad, P.; Shi, L.; Rungrotmongkol, T.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Cao, W. Morphology-dependent properties of MnOx/ZrO2–CeO2 Nanostructures for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 10502–10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tinoco, M.; Fernandez-Garcia, S.; Villa, A.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Blanco, G.; Hungria, A.B.; Jiang, L.; Prati, L.; Calvino, J.J.; Chen, X. Selective oxidation of glycerol on morphology controlled ceria nanomaterials. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2328–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ouyang, B.; Tan, W.; Liu, B. Morphology effect of nanostructure ceria on the Cu/CeO2 catalysts for synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation. Catal. Commun. 2017, 95, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tina; Zhang, M.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Shen, W. Morphology-dependent redox and catalytic properties of CeO2 nanostructures: Nanowires, nanorods and nanoparticles. Catal. Today 2009, 148, 179–183. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou, K.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. Enhanced catalytic activity of ceria nanorods from well-defined reactive crystal planes. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiao, Z.-A.; Wu, Z.; Dai, S. Shape-controlled ceria-based nanostructures for catalysis applications. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1821–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mai, H.-X.; Sun, L.-D.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Si, R.; Feng, W.; Zhang, H.-P.; Liu, H.-C.; Yan, C.-H. Shape-selective synthesis and oxygen storage behavior of ceria nanopolyhedra, nanorods, and nanocubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 24380–24385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Di Sarli, V.; Landi, G.; Di Benedetto, A.; Lisi, L. Synergy between ceria and metals (Ag or Cu) in catalytic diesel particulate filters: Effect of the metal content and of the preparation method on the regeneration performance. Top. Catal. 2021, 64, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeste, M.P.; Primus, P.A.; Alcantara, R.; Cauqui, M.A.; Calvino, J.J.; Pintado, J.M.; Blanco, G. Surface Characterization of Two Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 Mixed Oxides with Different Reducibility. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 503, 144255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mamontov, E.; Brezny, R.; Koranne, M.; Egami, T. Nanoscale heterogeneities and oxygen storage capacity of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 13007–13014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernal, S.; Blanco, G.; Cauqui, M.A.; Cifredo, G.A.; Pintado, J.M.; Rodriguez-Izquierdo, J.M. Influence of reduction treatment on the structural and redox behaviour of ceria, La/Ce and Y/Ce mixed oxides. Catal. Lett. 1998, 53, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hernández, W.Y.; Laguna, O.H.; Centeno, M.A.; Odriozola, J.A. Structural and catalytic properties of lanthanide (La, Eu, Gd) doped ceria. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 3014–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giménez-Mañogil, J.; Guillén-Hurtado, N.; Fernández-García, S.; Chen, X.; Calvino-Gámez, J.J.; García-García, A. Ceria-Praseodymia mixed oxides: Relationships between redox properties and catalytic activities towards NO oxidation to NO2 and CO-PROX reactions. Top. Catal. 2016, 59, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bernal, S.; Blanco, G.; Cauqui, M.A.; Corchado, P.; Pintado, J.M.; Rodríguez-Izquierdo, J.M. Oxygen buffering capacity of mixed cerium terbium oxide: A new material with potential applications in three-way catalysts. Chem. Commun. 1997, 16, 1545–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bueno-López, A. Diesel soot combustion ceria catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 146, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Trindade, F.J.; Damasceno, S.; Otubo, L.; Felez, M.R.; De Florio, D.Z.; Fonseca, F.C.; Ferlauto, A.S. Tuning of shape, defects, and disorder in lanthanum-doped ceria nanoparticles: Implications for high-temperature catalysis. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 8859–8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xia, X.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Lan, Y.-P.; Mao, X.; Chu, Z.; Ning, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, F. Collaborative influence of morphology tuning and RE (La, Y, and Sm) doping on photocatalytic performance of nanoceria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 88866–88881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xia, X.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Lan, Y.-P.; Mao, X.; Bai, F. Optimal rare-earth (La, Y and Sm) doping conditions and enhanced mechanism for photocatalytic application of ceria nanorods. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 195708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sartoretti, E.; Novara, C.; Chiodoni, A.; Giorgis, F.; Piumetti, M.; Bensaid, S.; Russo, N.; Fino, D. Nanostructured ceria-based catalysts doped with La and Nd: How acid-base sites and redox properties determine the oxidation mechanisms. Catal. Today 2022, 390–391, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohanty, B.; Nayak, J. Parameters dependent studies of structural, optical and electrical properties of CeO2 nanoparticles prepared via facile one-pot hydrothermal technique. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 115015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Loche, D.; Morgan, L.M.; Casu, A.; Mountjoy, G.; O’Regan, C.; Corrias, A.; Falqui, A. Determining the maximum lanthanum incorporation in the fluorite structure of La-doped ceria nanocubes for enhanced redox ability. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 6745–6751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fernandez-Garcia, S.; Jiang, L.; Tinoco, M.; Hungria, A.B.; Han, J.; Blanco, G.; Calvino, J.J.; Chen, X. Enhanced hydroxyl radical scavenging activity by doping lanthanum in ceria nanocubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 1891–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dean, J.A. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Volume 13. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ryan, K.; McGrath, J.; Farrell, R.; O’Neill, W.; Barnes, C.; Morris, M. Measurements of the lattice constant of Ceria when doped with lanthana and praseodymia-The possibility of local defect ordering and the observation of extensive phase separation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2003, 15, L49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, S.; Veser, G. Mixed lanthana/ceria nanorod-supported gold catalysts for water–gas-shift. Catal. Lett. 2012, 142, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Deng, W.; Frenkel, A.I.; Si, R.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Reaction-relevant gold structures in the low temperature water-gas shift Reaction on Au-CeO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 12834–12840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sudarsanam, P.; Mallesham, B.; Reddy, P.S.; Großmann, D.; Grünert, W.; Reddy, B.M. Nano-Au/CeO2 catalysts for CO oxidation: Influence of dopants (Fe, La and Zr) on the physicochemical properties and catalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 144, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, L.; Fernandez-Garcia, S.; Tinoco, M.; Yan, Z.; Xue, Q.; Blanco, G.; Calvino, J.J.; Hungria, A.B.; Chen, X. Improved oxidase mimetic activity by praseodymium incorporation into ceria nanocubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 18595–18608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Biswas, M.; Bandyopadhyay, S. Synthesis of La3+ doped nanocrystalline ceria powder by urea–formaldehyde gel combustion route. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kašpar, J.; Fornasiero, P.; Graziani, M. Use of CeO2-based oxides in the three-way catalysis. Catal. Today 1999, 50, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Johnson, M.F.L.; Mooi, J. Cerium dioxide crystallite sizes by temperature-programmed reduction. J. Catal. 1987, 103, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giordano, F.; Trovarelli, A.; De Leitenburg, C.; Giona, M. A model for the temperature-programmed reduction of low and high surface area ceria. J. Catal. 2000, 193, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boaro, M.; Vicario, M.; De Leitenburg, C.; Dolcetti, G.; Trovarelli, A. The use of temperature-programmed and dynamic/transient methods in catalysis: Characterization of ceria-based, model three-way catalysts. Catal. Today 2003, 77, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Désaunay, T.; Bonura, G.; Chiodo, V.; Freni, S.; Couzinié, J.P.; Bourgon, J.; Ringuedé, A.; Labat, F.; Adamo, C.; Cassir, M. Surface-dependent oxidation of H2 on CeO2 surfaces. J. Catal. 2013, 297, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tsunekawa, S.; Sivamohan, R.; Ito, S.; Kasuya, A.; Fukuda, T. Structural study on monosize CeO2-x nano-particles. Nanostruct. Mater. 1999, 11, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yao, H.C.; Yao, Y.F.Y. Ceria in automotive exhaust catalysts: I. Oxygen storage. J. Catal. 1984, 86, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Deganello, F.; Martorana, A. Phase analysis and oxygen storage capacity of ceria-lanthana-based TWC promoters prepared by sol–gel routes. J. Solid State Chem. 2002, 163, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bray, J.M.; Schneider, W.F. First-principles analysis of structure sensitivity in NO oxidation on Pt. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guillén-Hurtado, N.; Atribak, I.; Bueno-López, A.; García-García, A. Influence of the cerium precursor on the physico-chemical features and NO to NO2 oxidation activity of ceria and ceria–zirconia catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2010, 323, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Atribak, I.; Azambre, B.; Bueno López, A.; García-García, A. Effect of NOx adsorption/desorption over ceria-zirconia catalysts on the catalytic combustion of model soot. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 92, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Azambre, B.; Atribak, I.; Bueno-López, A.; García-García, A. Probing the surface of ceria–zirconia catalysts using NOx adsorption/desorption: A first step toward the investigation of crystallite heterogeneity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 13300–13312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Klingenberg, B.; Vannice, M.A. Influence of pretreatment on lanthanum nitrate, carbonate, and oxide powders. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2755–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, B.; Li, D.; Wang, X. Catalytic performance of La–Ce–O mixed oxide for combustion of methane. Catal. Today 2010, 158, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nolan, M. Molecular adsorption on the doped (110) ceria surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 2425–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Djerdj, I.; Garnweitner, G.; Sheng Su, D.; Niederberger, M. Morphology-controlled nonaqueous synthesis of anisotropic lanthanum hydroxide nanoparticles. J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) CeO2 NC, (b) Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, (c) Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and (d) Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR.
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) CeO2 NC, (b) Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC, (c) Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC, and (d) Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR.
Catalysts 13 00894 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD diffractograms of La-modified ceria samples at different concentration mol.% of lanthanum, compared with ceria nanocube reference and CeO2 bulk pattern (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)). (b) Zoom on the {111} reflection of all samples, demonstrating the slight shift to smaller angles.
Figure 2. (a) XRD diffractograms of La-modified ceria samples at different concentration mol.% of lanthanum, compared with ceria nanocube reference and CeO2 bulk pattern (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)). (b) Zoom on the {111} reflection of all samples, demonstrating the slight shift to smaller angles.
Catalysts 13 00894 g002
Figure 3. (a) HAADF-STEM image of sample Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR, (b) X-EDS spectra acquired at distinct positions marked with numbers in the image (a). The La/Ce ratios quantified at these exact locations are 19 at.%, 12 at.%, 14 at.%, and 9 at.% at positions 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
Figure 3. (a) HAADF-STEM image of sample Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR, (b) X-EDS spectra acquired at distinct positions marked with numbers in the image (a). The La/Ce ratios quantified at these exact locations are 19 at.%, 12 at.%, 14 at.%, and 9 at.% at positions 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
Catalysts 13 00894 g003
Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of both pure ceria and lanthanum-doped samples.
Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of both pure ceria and lanthanum-doped samples.
Catalysts 13 00894 g004
Figure 5. OSC evolution of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ catalysts.
Figure 5. OSC evolution of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00894 g005
Figure 6. NO2 production of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ (x: 0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) catalysts.
Figure 6. NO2 production of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ (x: 0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00894 g006
Figure 7. NOx elimination profiles of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ (x: 0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) catalysts.
Figure 7. NOx elimination profiles of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ (x: 0, 5, 10, and 15 mol.%) catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00894 g007
Table 1. Morphological, compositional, and structural characteristics of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ nanoshapes.
Table 1. Morphological, compositional, and structural characteristics of Ce1−xLaxO2−δ nanoshapes.
SamplesMorphologyNominal mol.% of Lamol.% of La by ICPLattice
Parameter (Å) a
τScherrer
(nm) b
BET
Surface
Areas (m2/g)
CeO2 NCNanocubes--5.4132138
Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NCNanocubes54.45.4372623
Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NCNanocubes109.75.4402825
Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NRNanocubes +
Nanorods
1514.45.4432929
a Values obtained considering the Bragg law. b Results calculated by Scherrer equation using the {111} reflection of ceria from XRD data in all samples.
Table 2. Ce3+ proportion on the nanocatalysts at increasing temperatures.
Table 2. Ce3+ proportion on the nanocatalysts at increasing temperatures.
SamplesCe3+ (%)
Treduction (°C)
200350500700
CeO2 NC0.22.06.218.1
Ce0.95La0.05O2−δ NC0.11.56.425.0
Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ NC0.22.68.028.6
Ce0.85La0.15O2−δ NC+NR0.42.611.237.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-García, S.; Tinoco, M.; Hungría, A.B.; Chen, X.; Calvino, J.J.; Martínez-Munuera, J.C.; Giménez-Mañogil, J.; García-García, A. NO Oxidation on Lanthanum-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles with Controlled Morphology. Catalysts 2023, 13, 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050894

AMA Style

Fernández-García S, Tinoco M, Hungría AB, Chen X, Calvino JJ, Martínez-Munuera JC, Giménez-Mañogil J, García-García A. NO Oxidation on Lanthanum-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles with Controlled Morphology. Catalysts. 2023; 13(5):894. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-García, Susana, Miguel Tinoco, Ana Belén Hungría, Xiaowei Chen, José Juan Calvino, Juan Carlos Martínez-Munuera, Javier Giménez-Mañogil, and Avelina García-García. 2023. "NO Oxidation on Lanthanum-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles with Controlled Morphology" Catalysts 13, no. 5: 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050894

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop