Next Article in Journal
Efficient and Stable O-Methylation of Catechol with Dimethyl Carbonate over Aluminophosphate Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Oxygen-Deficient Engineering for Perovskite Oxides in the Application of AOPs: Regulation, Detection, and Reduction Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fungal Assisted Valorisation of Polymeric Lignin: Mechanism, Enzymes and Perspectives

1
Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, Delhi, India
2
School of Agriculture& Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
3
Biochemistry, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
4
College of Agriculture, Central Agriculture University, Imphal 795004, Manipur, India
5
Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 4590 Children’s Place, Ste. 8200, Campus Box 8057, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
6
Department of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India
7
Biorefining and Advance Material Research Centre, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburg EH9 3JG, UK
8
Centre for Safe and Improved Food, SRUC, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburg EH9 3JG, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2023, 13(1), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010149
Submission received: 5 November 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Lignocellulose is considered one of the significant recalcitrant materials and also is difficult to break down because of its complex structure. Different microbes such as bacteria and fungi are responsible for breaking down these complex lignin structures. This article discussed briefly the lignin-degrading bacteria and their critical steps involved in lignin depolymerization. In addition, fungi are regarded as the ideal microorganism for the degradation of lignin because of their highly effective hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme systems for the breakdown of lignocellulosic materials. The white rot fungi, mainly belonging to basidiomycetes, is the main degrader of lignin among various microorganisms. This could be achieved because of the presence of lignolytic enzymes such as laccases, lignin peroxidases, and manganese peroxidases. The significance of the fungi and lignolytic enzyme’s role in lignin depolymerization, along with its mechanism and chemical pathways, are emphasized in this article.

1. Introduction

Agricultural leftovers, crops, yard trimmings, and forestry residues are a few examples of lignocellulosic biomass, which are plants or plant-based substances that are not utilized for food or feed and are largely available throughout the year [1]. They are essential components of plant woody cell walls and have a complex structure and are mostly proteins, polysaccharides, and phenolic polymers [2]. As an outcome, the surge in enthusiasm for producing biomass-derived lignocellulosic products such as chemicals, bio jet fuel, bioenergy, biofuels, and biochemicals [3,4].
Figure 1 depicts the non-uniform three-dimensional structure of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, the primary components of biomass. Cellulose is an unbranched and linear polysaccharide that consists of hundreds to thousands of analogous chains of glucose units linked jointly by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds. The crystalline and amorphous portions of cellulose are interwoven to create the cellulose structure [5].
Hemicellulose is considered the most prevalent biopolymer and its structure are amorphous and random. It is made with short and high-branched heteropolymers comprising mostly of xylose, along with glucose, galactose, mannose, uronic acids, and arabinose. Hemicelluloses are categorized as xylans, xyloglucans, galactans, or mannans, depending on the kind of substituent. One of the most important components of lignocellulosic biomass is lignin, which is entwined with the linkage of cellulose-hemicellulose, making it more resistant towards physical and biological perturbations. The lignin structure is made of three distinct phenylpropane units called monolignols: sinapyl alcohol p-coumaryl alcohol, and coniferyl alcohol [5].
Fungi are the world’s second-largest species in the non-animal living world. The effective degradation of lignocellulose is a constant challenge at the industrial level but in nature, microbes and particularly fungi degrade it very effectively. Many enzymes (fungal) are utilized in industrial processes such as food production, fermentation and biomass conversion to ethanol. Moreover, the genome sequencing of important fungus has the potential to reveal new perspectives on the nature and synthesis of novel physiologically active natural compounds as well as unexplored metabolic potential.

2. Lignin Depolymerization by Different Microbes

Actinomycetes, α-Proteobacteria, and γ-Proteobacteria are the three primary classes of lignin-degrading bacteria. These bacterial species are widely distributed in the natural ecosystem and are regarded as essential decomposers of lignocellulose biomass in soils due to the formation of secondary metabolites and the utilization of extracellular enzymes. Some Proteobacteria, including some lineages that had not previously been involved in lignin degradation, were found to be potential polymeric lignin or aromatic fragment degraders. Some of the lignin-degrading bacteria are represented in Table 1.
Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were identified as possible significant degraders of lignin-derived polymeric substances in the ecosystem. They showed that the genomes that belong to class β-proteobacteria have comprehensive enzyme methods for vanillate degradation, protocatechuate, and diarylpropanes, along with the ability to break down additional lignin-derived aromatic compounds [13]. This vanillin can be produced from lignin by depolymerization or from ferulic acid via microbial catalysis during the lignin metabolic process [14]. Some of the other lignin-derived monomeric compounds are shown in Figure 2:
There are mainly two steps involved in the breakdown of the lignin through microorganisms. (a) depolymerization and (b) solubilization (lignin monomers, oligomers, and their derivatives). Through these two steps, the breakdown of the lignin takes place by unlocking the inter monomeric linkages by enzymes. Figure 3. illustrates the breakdown of cellulose and hemicellulose and the formation of short-chain saccharides reducing sugars but the breakdown of lignin does not result in sugars. The lignin breakdown and solubilization can be indicated by the alterations in phenol content which are the end products of lignin breakdown. Radhika, Sachdeva, and Kumar (2021) concluded that, for growth, microbes utilize the sugars and for the breakdown of lignin into metabolites, the obtained energy from this catabolism is potentially used [15]. It was observed that adding simple sugars as a co-substrate improves lignin depolymerization because the bacteria initiate the degrading activity on simple substrates and then move on to lignin as a secondary substrate.
Microbes through their arsenal of enzymes function as soil engineers and play an important role in the pre-treatment for lignocellulose degradation. The importance of biological pre-treatment of lignocellulose are represented in Figure 4 and Table 2.

2.1. Advantages of Fungal Microbiota

Fungi are vital in metabolizing complicated carbon sources, lignocellulosic polymer breakdown, and stabilizing organic materials in the compost system [17]. By the virtue of a highly efficient enzymatic system having hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme systems for lignocellulosic degradation, fungi are thought to be the best microorganisms for lignin breakdown. Based on their mode of degradation of lignocellulosic materials, lignin degrading fungi are diving into white rot, brown rot, and soft rot fungi. Of these white rot fungi can perform complete degradation of lignin to CO2 and H2O, whereas the brown rot and soft rot fungi do partial degradation [14]. Phanerochaete chrysosporium, a white rot fungi, is considered a model lignin-degrading organism due to its capability of degrading one gram of lignin per gram of mycelium per day. The percentage contribution of the key fungal families in lignocellulose degradation is represented in Figure 5 using a heat map plot from these studies [7,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The plot explains that mostly ascomycetes and basidiomycetes play a role in lignocellulose degradation. The list of lignin degrading fungi is given below in Table 3 [14].
Apart from terrestrial fungi, some marine fungi such as the marine cnidarian fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides CBMAI 857, Aspergillus sclerotiorum CBMAI 849, and Mucor racemosus CBMAI 847 were able to synthesize ligninolytic enzymes. In the studies conducted by Bonugli-Santos et al., (2010) it was reported that the fungus M. racemosus CBMAI 847 produced the highest values for lignin peroxidase (75376.34 UI L−1) followed by Manganese peroxidase (4484.30 UI L−1), and Laccase (898.15 UI L−1). These enzymes are frequently referred to as lignolytic enzymes which play an important role in the degradation of lignin.
This figure clearly represents that, cellulose was highly depolymerized by the action of the ascomycetes and basidiomycetes fungal groups almost equally. Hemicellulose was significantly degraded by the ascomycetes group followed by basidiomycetes. In the case of lignin, the basidiomycetes are the major players followed by ascomycetes.

2.2. Significance of White Rot Fungi in Lignin Degradation

The white-rot fungus (mainly Basidiomycota) are key contributors to lignin depolymerization because of the presence of extracellular laccase and peroxidases, their presence assists in the degradation of lignocellulose, also known as Lignin Modifying Enzymes (LMEs) such as Laccases, Lignin Peroxidases, Manganese Peroxidases, and Versatile Peroxidases [60]. The white rot fungi are classified as simultaneous and selective degraders. These selective lignin degraders from white rot fungi are focused significantly in biotechnology applications in lignin elimination [61]. The depolymerization metabolites are heterogeneous aromatics that other microorganisms can use in the future [62]. White-rot fungi are capable of mineralizing lignin in soil, despite the soil’s resistance to the process. The majority of the lignin in the soil is connected to humic compounds, yet white-rot fungi could mineralize lignin bound to humus [63]. Phellinus pini, Ganoderma australe, Phlebia tremellosa, and Ceriporiopsis subvermispora are white-rot fungi that break down only lignin and hemicellulose. Other strains, such as Trametes versicolor, Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Irpex lacteus, and Heterobasidion annosum can break down cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin all at the same time [14]. Various enzymes that are detected from the white rot fungi are shown in the following Table 4.

3. Fungal Enzymatic Depolymerization of Lignin

The lignin biological catabolism is a naturally occurring process, enabling the deconstruction of lignin through a wide range of enzymes under naturally optimized conditions. Their genomic sequencing exposes a diverse range of genes involved in lignin decomposition putting the parent family of basidiomycetes on the pedestal of the most preferred fungi for lignin-degrading biotechnological applications [67]. The technical challenge with this group of fungi is that they guard their secrets of enzyme production very strongly and most of them are still unknown to humans. There have been elusive results of heterologous production of basidiomycetes for rapid detections of enzymes. The simulation of the enzymatic degradation process is very complex and not very successful at an industrial scale. Figure 6 represents oxidation mechanism of peroxidase.
The redox potential of versatile peroxidase is largely unexplored and remains a persistent research question. An attempt of understanding the comprehensive functioning of lignocellulose degrading enzymes and the redox potential of versatile peroxidase is made through an illustration (Figure 7) explaining MnP, VP, LiP; their location, and action of degradation in lignocellulose. The role of lignolytic enzymes in lignin degradation are represented in Figure 7.
Looking at the complexities involved, the in vivo or in-cell secretion of the degrading system is the best-fit option. This makes the microbial model organism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the obvious next choice for heterologous production of delignifying enzymes although the challenge of non-secretion of nature heme peroxidases still remains with this microbe. To address this problem, scientists consider using a plant-based expression for lignin-degrading heme peroxidase and plants natively produce this enzyme extracellularly for biosynthesis and morphogenesis of cell walls [68].
Basidiomycetes fungi are equipped with high redox potential to perform electron oxidation during lignin degradation. Fungal lignin peroxidases (LiP) resemble closely with other peroxidases in terms of their potential to oxidize recalcitrant substrates such as methoxybenzenes. Lignin peroxidases (LiP) generally use long-range electron transfer (LRET) to oxidize lignin compounds. Manganese peroxidases (MnP) use Mn (III) oxidation as a diffusible mediator whereas versatile peroxidases (VP) use both LRET and diffusible mediator as the mode of operation. The LRET mechanism (Figure 8) is an important and evolutionary adaptation in ligninolytic peroxidases because it allows electron abstraction from lignin, as lignin is thick and bulk, it restricts direct contact with activated cofactor at the protein’s surface.
A better understanding of the genetic machinery of lignolytic enzyme-producing basidiomycetes is still in the infancy stage and requires more knowledge on the folding and processing of such enzymes. The model microbes have proven to be insufficient as they mostly lack the specialized cellular environment which is acting as a production site for the functional expression of lignolytic enzymes. The studies [68,69] also suggest the possibility of the existence of a more complex and specialized cellular machinery in basidiomycetes for addressing the oxidative stress resulting from peroxidase production.

3.1. The Mechanism Involved in Lignin Depolymerization

As shown in Figure 9, The first step involved in lignin degradation is to form radical mediators via enzymatic reaction. Later, this diffuses into the lignin substrate and then the oxidizing equivalent will be transferred to the polymer. The formation of the lignin-based radical, results in bond scission and ultimately leads to the depolymerization of lignin [70]. The oxidation mechanism of lignolytic enzymes is shown in Figure 10.

3.2. Role of Different Enzymes in the Fungal-Assisted Depolymerization Pathway

The mycelial growth system of fungi is responsible for the transportation of nutrients from distant host parts to the fungi. The key transported materials are nitrogen and iron to the lignocellulosic host which is the sole carbon source for fungi armed with extracellular hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes, fungi degrade lignin and open the phenyl rings [37]. The enzymes are classified into seven classes as shown in Figure 11.
Apart from individual enzymes, the depolymerization of lignocellulose also occurs by the action of enzyme cocktails which can be understood as (free enzymes, each containing one/more catalytic domains) and cellulosomes (complex multienzyme complexes with many catalytic units). By peeling away pockets of cell wall lamellas, cellulosomes gain access to deeper lamella layers. Free enzymes that infiltrate the accessible walls destroy the accessible microfibrils synergistically. Cellulosomes are produced by Ruminococcus, Clostridium, Bacteroides, and Acetivibrio genera of mesophilic anaerobic bacteria [71].
Lignolytic enzymes such as Lignin Peroxidase (LiP), Laccase, Versatile Peroxidase, Dye-decolorizing Peroxidase (DyP) and Manganese Peroxidase (MnP) are all well-known lignin-degrading enzymes [72]. To take another step towards depolymerization into basic sugars Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases (LPMOs), a revolutionary new generation microbial enzyme, is being considered a revolutionary tool and combining LPMOs with other glycolytic enzymes is effective in the conversion of agricultural waste to valuable compost [73].
Laccases enzymes produced by white-rot fungi are capable of oxidizing a variety of phenolic and nonphenolic compounds. Peroxidases are biocatalysts for the bioremediation of harmful environmental pollutants. Cellulases differ in their ability to hydrolyze the β-1,4-glycosidic links that join glucose units in cellulose fiber. Other enzymes play a critical role in oxidizing many primary alcohols such as glyoxylate oxidase. The details regarding lignolytic enzymes are as follows:

3.2.1. Laccase

Laccase is a representative enzyme of the multicopper enzyme family laccases. Laccase-mediated reactions are linked to the generation of radicals. They can be aided by a class of tiny molecules known as redox mediators because ligninolytic enzymes are primarily released to deconstruct lignin / humic compounds. This transition is defined as cometabolic, which refers to the unintentional degradation of a contaminant through enzymes secreted during the microbial metabolism of some other substance [62]. The majority of ligninolytic fungus species generate at least one laccase isoenzyme as a constitutive product, and laccases predominate among ligninolytic enzymes in soil environments. They are useful for biotechnological applications for the reformation or immobilization of xenobiotic substances since they just need molecular oxygen for catalysis [74]. Some of the common laccase-producing fungi are represented in the following Figure 12.
The generic mechanism of lignin depolymerization by laccase enzyme is explained in detail. The Cα-Cβ cleavage, Alkyl aryl, and Cα oxidation is the site of action of the laccase enzyme as illustrated in Figure 13. They reduce and form the products such as syringaldehyde and 1-(3,5-dimethoxy-4-ethoxyphenyl)-2-hydroxyethanone through Cα-Cβ cleavage, 1-(3,5-dimethoxy-4-ethoxyphenyl)-2-hydroxypropanal and 2,6-dimethoxy-p-benzoquinone through Alkyl aryl, 1-(3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,5-dimethoxy-ethoxyphenyl)-3-hydropropane via Cα oxidation.

3.2.2. Lignin Peroxidase

Lignin Peroxidase was the first ligninolytic enzyme identified from Phanerochaete chrysosporium, a white-rot fungus [75]. The non-phenolic lignin units are known to be degraded effectively by the LiP. They promote the hydrolysis process by targeting the lignin layer found in lignocellulosic biomass early in the process. LiP catalyzes oxidative lignin breakdown in the presence of H2O2. The oxidation of lignin involves electron transport, opening aromatic rings, and the non-catalytic breakage of multiple bonds. These enzymes are considered the strongest biocatalyst in bioremediation [76]. Lignin peroxidases are mainly obtained from the fungal species represented in the following Figure 14.
As shown in Figure 15, the LiP can catalyze several reactions such as β-0-4 ether bonds cleavage and Cα-Cβ linkages. These two cleavages play a very significant role in lignin depolymerization. Moreover, they also catalyze the oxidation of Cα alcohols to Cα-oxo compounds, hydroxylation aromatic ring cleavages, and quinone formation. The quinone formation is a significant step as they polymerize to form humic substances as shown in Figure 3. The intermediates involved in these catalytic reactions are cation radicals. Generally, LiP is considered a highly efficient enzyme, having the potential to degrade even the diluted lignin solutions but due to the involvement of the radicals, they can immediately repolymerize [77].

3.2.3. Manganese Peroxidase

Manganese Peroxidase (MnP) has been proposed as a phenolic structure degrader. Similar to an electron donor in MnP, Mn2+ is oxidized to Mn3+ and becomes stable as a result of chelation with dicarboxylic acids. Chelated Mn3+ then works as redox mediator, breaking down non phenolic units [78].
It may oxidise Mn2+ to Mn3+ by diffusing off its surface and oxidising phenolic substrates such as lignin combinations and organic pollutants. By oxidising Mn2+, which is abundant in wood, MnP has evolved the potential to fracture minor phenolic lignin. Furthermore, MnP cannot oxidise non-phenolic chemicals, which have a higher resistance to oxidation, it accounts for up to 90% of lignin polymer [76]. Manganese peroxidases mainly obtained from the fungal species are represented in the following Figure 16.

4. Protein Engineering Approaches towards Improving the Efficiency of Enzymes

The majority of the enzymes that are utilized are either from cultured microorganisms or metagenomic methods. They need to work well for a low price and within the parameters of the manufacturing process that have been specified. Industrial processes must be modified to adapt to these subpar biocatalysts because the enzymes used in industry are not working as well as they should. In this specific circumstance, one of the primary choices to return what is going on is to synthetically or hereditarily alter proteins to work on their properties. The two main approaches that can be used to carry out engineering are directed evolution and rational design. In this method, the protein-coding sequence is changed (through insertions, duplications, mutations, deletions, recombinations, and so on) to produce a collection of unique proteins; Directed evolution performs a faster simulation of natural selection. After that, these variations are evaluated for at least one trait that helped them advance to the next level. The rational design makes use of computational tools and prior knowledge of the structure of proteins to deliberately design novel proteins. Both rational design and directed evolution approaches to protein engineering are used to enhance the protein properties of enzymes implicated in (a) depolymerization and (b) lignocellulosic material’s fermentation for the production of biofuels or fine chemicals [79]. The following paragraph provides recent examples of the studies.
Recent research has focused on the implementation of directed evolution methods to bacterial Dyp-type peroxidase enzymes., it is also reported that an error-prone polymerase chain reaction was used to engineer P. putida DyP, resulting in a mutant enzyme with three mutations on its surface—E188K, A142V, and H12V [80]. Rahmanpour and others reported that focused libraries were used around the active site of P. fluorescens Dyp1B, which resulted in a 7–8 fold increase in the Kcat/KM for 2,4-dichlorophenol. These mutations also shift the optimal pH to 8.5. Additionally, the mutation H169L was found to increase polymeric lignin product release [81].

5. Hybrid Biochemical Routes of Lignin Valorisation

In general, the initial step involved to break lignocellulose is fractionalization and then depolymerization to give ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, gallic acid etc. The next step is the upper path way which yields vanillic acid, protocatechuic acid, catechol, and benzoyl-CoA and the lower pathway gives muconic acid, pyruvate acetyl-CoA, succinyl-CoA as represented in Figure 17 [82].

5.1. Fungal Depolymerization Pathways

Lignin having lower solubility in the aqueous phase is one of the major challenges for the enzymatic depolymerization of lignin. Lignin depolymerization is an end-step process and there are several prerequisites for the depolymerization such as fractionation from the lignocellulose with the help of different pre-treatment processes such as acidic, alkaline, and hydrothermal, etc. But again, these methods have a major limitation of the low amount of lignin removal so the process becomes very cost-intensive for pretreating and final degrading. To make the process industrially viable and sustainable, the biological resources for lignin degradation are offering a silver lining [83].
Biological depolymerisation is extensively researched and it was found that various fungi are able to produce several effective oxidative enzymes such as Laccases, Aryl Alcohol Oxidases, Manganese Peroxidases (MnP), Lignin peroxidase (LiP), Dye Decolourizing Peroxidase, etc. [52]. The lignin depolymerization by fungal metabolisms method and their isolated enzymes are shown in Figure 18.
Other than white rot, the brown rot fungi degrade the lignin by the Fenton oxidation process or by producing hydroxyl radicals. The entire process of redox cycling is initiated with the oxidation of Quinone to hydroxyquinone which converts Fe+3 into Fe+2 which in the end reacts with hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl radicals.
On the other hand, very limited information is available about the mechanisms of the soft rot fungi which were originated from the white rot fungi and are able to degrade the lignin content by targeting higher moisture and lower lignin-containing materials and Syringyl units [84]. Some of the soft rot fungi are able to rapidly degrade the last stage products of the lignin degradation pathways such as vanillic acid and phenols which made them suitable components as co-culture or multi-organisms mediated lignin depolymerization [85]. The steps involved in lignin depolymerization are shown in Figure 19.

5.1.1. Model Organism

Traditionally, the white rot fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporium is regarded as the model organism for the studies related to lignin polymerization. The microorganisms produce multiples isozymes of the MnP and Lip which may be effective in lignin depolymerization but one of the major limitations of this species is the production of laccases. So, it includes advantages in the last stage of the degradation in case of the nitrogen made available by the other organisms [7].

5.1.2. Major Pathways

Lignin is the second most abundant biopolymer in the entire earth’s environment, the catabolic pathways(aromatic) are the most efficient manner used by microorganisms to degrade the lignin content for their energy requirement fulfillment (energy production). So, the entire catabolic pathway has three main steps and among them, depolymerization is the first one and the other two are aromatic degradation and product biosynthesis. So, aromatic catabolism is regarded as the “Upper pathways” which produce several intermediates for “Peripheral Pathways” or “Lower Pathways”), e.g. Catechol. The intermediate of the upper pathways further degraded by the one of the key pathways β-ketoadipate pathway. This pathway is intensively studied in the white rot fungi. The end product of the β-ketoadipate pathway functions as the intermediated for the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (TCA) which is central to the entire process and called the central pathway [87]. The schematic representation of the fungal biological pathways in depolymerization and degradation of lignin is shown in Figure 20.

5.2. Current Research and Future Trends

As described, above the degradation of lignin is a complex process and due to the low solubility of lignin in the aqueous phase it becomes more challenging and depolymerisation is the starting phase of the degradation so researchers are trying to use an enzyme multi-enzyme system for better results. Co-culture system is also used in the degradation of lignin. Very recently consortium of white rot fungi was used for the enhanced degradation of lignin [89]. Table 5. having information about the impact of the co-culture of white rot fungi on the monoculture system.

6. Products from Lignin Volarization

The excess lignin extracted from lignocellulosic biomass provides a sustainable source of a range of aromatic compounds that may be further converted into high-value chemicals [96]. Additionally, the lignocellulosic biorefinery model may become financially viable thanks to lignin depolymerization, which could replace the use of aromatic materials derived from petrochemicals. Among the high-value aromatic chemicals that can be derived from lignin are vanillin, P-hydroxybenzoic acid, Muconic acid, pyrogallol, benzene, toluene, and xylene. Lignin can also be transformed into bulk aromatic chemicals by aerobic microorganisms through fermentation and transformation.
Biotechnological lignin valorization by enzymatic conversion/degradation is a novel cost- and energy-efficient sustainable method. However, biotechnological conversion of lignin is difficult because native organisms that are capable of converting lignin into economically viable value-added product portfolios are rarely adapted to industrial settings Redesigning the metabolic pathways is absolutely necessary to speed up the rate of conversion of these aromatic derivatives from lignocellulosic into bio-based products [97].
Lignin biodegradation by microbes has also been studied as a crucial pretreatment step in the production of biodiesel from cellulose. Zhang et al. state that Lipids that can be used as a feedstock for the production of biodiesel can also be directly produced by lignin degradation. Sonoki et al. used as substrates mixtures of vanillic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, and syringic acid, lignin model compounds [98]. The KT2440 strains of Pseudomonas putida and Sphingobium sp. SYK6 bacteria break down lignin and its derivatives to produce cis, cis-muconic acid, a precursor to several industrial polymers [99].
Thanks to advances in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology, it is now possible to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from microorganisms utilizing using lignin as a substrate at a price that is competitive. Recent years have seen Brown et al., By communicating the Phap1 phasin (phaP1) qualities of the Cupriavidus necator H16 bacterial model in R. palustris, the Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 bacterium aims to overproduce a PHA known as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) from the breakdown product of lignin, p-coumarate. According to their findings, R. palustris heterologous phasin expression led to PHBV aerobic bioplastic production (0.7 g/L) that was greater than the wild-type anaerobic production (0.41 g/L) [100].
Microorganisms have the ability to transform lignin or substances derived from lignin into lipids, which are regarded as a sustainable material for the production of biodiesel. Microbial species of oleaginous may metabolize aromatic lignin into lipids by utilizing it as a nutritional substrate [101].
The utilization of biomass to produce high-value biofuels such as biogas and the valorization of the lignin stream for the production of cellulosic ethanol could potentially boost the profitability of biomass-based biorefineries. The large quantities of lignin-rich residues produced by lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) pretreatment can be converted into biogas through anaerobic digestion (AD), thereby increasing the energy carrier output of biorefinery plants. Because of its delayed decomposition and nutrient release, lignin is a great source material for soil-enriching fertilizers such as phosphate fertilizers, chelated micro-fertilizers, and slow-release nitrogen fertilizers [102]. After being changed with various elements, lignin-derived fertilizers display excellent fertilizer efficiency, improved biological activity, long-term stability, economical, anti-leaching qualities, and low pollution [103].

7. Challenges in Lignin Biomass Conversion through Microbes

Due to the variation of lignin that results in combinations of products, isolating and purification of the distinct components for use in future applications will be challenging and less economically feasible. However, in order to identify the most efficient technologies for separating lignin from raw biomass and depolymerizing isolated lignin into value-added products, a comprehensive understanding of every conversion process in a lignin biorefinery and the life cycle of lignin-derived products from upstream to downstream is required [104].
Although enzymes have a strong ability to valorize lignin, it is evident that significant breakthroughs to get around multiple important obstacles are required before enzyme lignin valorization can be used in the real world. First, the commercialization of the enzyme-based degradation process of lignin has been hampered by the enzymes’ low productivities. Only in sufficient quantities enzymes are produced to provide a fundamental understanding of the process of degradation. However, there is insufficient supply for extensive commercial applications. Overexpression of a few proteins may be beneficial, but it can also result in the production of proteins with little or no activity or none of the desired proteins.
Due to the difficulty of protein expression and genetic modifications, as well as the absence of useful genetic information for fungal enzymes, industrialization of fungal enzyme degradation is also challenging. Despite tremendous advancements, the role of mediators in the enzymatic degradation pathway remains unknown. Additional concerns include toxicity of the mediators, recycling, and cost.
More binding sites can be added to enzymes with genetic modification tools to significantly increase their activities and efficiency, but this may have an effect on enzyme yield. To put it succinctly, extensive research is required to clarify and confirm the relationship between the types of mutations and the expression level. Because re-polymerization of phenolic compounds happens often when the lower molecular weight compounds are not eliminated, the removal of phenolic compounds generated during the degradation process remains a stumbling block in large-scale lignin degradation. In addition to degrading lignin, MnP may polymerize guaiacol, o-cresol, and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol [105]. Some of the other highlights are listed as follows:
  • There is a gap in understanding the synergistic action of the fungal enzymes and the enhancement of the delignification efficiency.
  • There is a need of applying molecular-level and genetical biotechnologies to achieve an industrial level of application
  • Biosafety Issues-Fungal enzymes allergy for humankind.
  • The substrate bioavailability of the lignin and rate of conversion is the main challenge. Moreover, industrial applications and process scale-up still have some challenges and need to be addressed [106].
  • Single cultures are ineffective in breaking down the lignocellulose components. Delignification cannot be achieved by a single species, as studies have revealed that in nature, lignin depolymerization is achieved by the combined efforts of many microorganisms under aerobic and anaerobic environments [107].
  • The secretion of enzymes from bacteria necessitates a higher level of specificity than other processes. The construction and research of bacterial enzyme complexes are more complicated [108].

8. Way Forward and Future Prospects

The search for stable and strong inherent cellulolytic enzymes from varied and distinct environments, all of which are definitely of microbial origin, might be a fundamental strategy for the successful exploitation of readily accessible cellulosic substrates, particularly for bio-refineries. In the future, a wide range of molecular and genetic tools and techniques, such as strain enhancement by mutagenesis, genetic engineering, structure-guided recombination, heterologous gene expression, homologous, and so on, must be used to improve an in-depth understanding of the potential source of cellulolytic enzymes and their efficient production [109].
Due to ongoing advancements in gene synthesis, deep sequencing, continuous evolution, and ultra-high-throughput screening methods, new biocatalysts are already being discovered experimentally. As well as being more qualified for bioprocesses or more dynamic, these clever chemicals should be efficient for modern use. Research into microbial enzymes that can convert biomass more effectively also requires the ability to engineer enzymes within the context of a genome. At the present time, the packed regularly interspaced short palindromic reiterate/related protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system is the most reassuring contraption for genome adjusting. CRISPR/Cas9-based tools for directed evolution and rational design may become an appealing option for the quick and efficient protein engineering of enzymes on industrial strains’ chromosomes [79].
Lignin isolation and depolymerization processes also have an impact on the composition of depolymerized lignin feedstocks. Regardless of the feedstock composition, a perfect microbe would efficiently catabolize all lignin-derived compounds. However, such a microbe has not yet been discovered or created. More specifically, we are able to select microbes based on the feedstock’s composition using feedstock-tailored microbes or microbial systems. Utilizing and engineering previously characterized microbes that are suitable for another depolymerized lignin feedstock that is rich in the compounds these employed microbes are known to efficiently utilize can be used to create these “tailor-made” microbial systems. It is possible to discover new microbes that effectively utilize the majority of the compounds in a particular feedstock of depolymerized lignin [110].
  • Microbial enzymes via fungi can be produced quicker, cost-effective and is scalable, hence it is crucial in nourishing life and is sustainable
  • Continuous search for fungal novel enzymes can lead to numerous nutritional value and health benefits for mankind
  • The diverse enzymatic actions of fungi such as mushrooms can leverage low-cost agricultural production systems.
  • Exploring of synthetic biology for improving the lignin degradation process.
  • Food fermentation can be naturally performed by fungi enzymes whose application will enhance the preservation and shelf life of foods without affecting the characteristics of the organoleptic and nutritional content of foods [111]
  • Treatment of lignocellulosic agricultural waste by fungi that are naturally abundant in diverse enzymes can valorize cellulosic material into valuable industrial bioproducts such as biofuels.
  • Antioxidants are essential for healthy living and fungi have the capacity to produce antioxidant metabolites such as phenolics and flavonoids.
  • Industrial applications of the fungal enzymes represent a sustainable, eco-friendly, and energy-saving solution for many environmental and quality aspects compared to the currently applied conventional chemical approaches.

Author Contributions

K.D., V.K.G. Corresponding author, Conceptualization and finalizing the draft manuscript, M.G. Writing-original draft preparation, Writing—review and editing, G.D.T., Z.J., S.S., M.T., P.K.S., D.D. and H.B.S. Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adewuyi, A. Underutilized Lignocellulosic Waste as Sources of Feedstock for Biofuel Production in Developing Countries. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yousuf, A.; Pirozzi, D.; Sannino, F. Chapter 1—Fundamentals of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Lignocellulosic Biomass to Liquid Biofuels; Yousuf, A., Pirozzi, D., Sannino, F., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 1–15. ISBN 978-0-12-815936-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ge, X.; Chang, C.; Zhang, L.; Cui, S.; Luo, X.; Hu, S.; Qin, Y.; Li, Y. Chapter Five—Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass into Platform Chemicals for Biobased Polyurethane Application. Adv. Bioenergy 2018, 3, 161–213. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gutiérrez-Antonio, C.; Romero-Izquierdo, A.G.; Gómez-Castro, F.I.; Hernández, S. 5-Production Processes from Lignocellulosic Feedstock. In Production Processes of Renewable Aviation Fuel; Gutiérrez-Antonio, C., Romero-Izquierdo, A.G., Gómez-Castro, F.I., Hernández, S., Eds.; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 129–169. ISBN 978-0-12-819719-6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Singhvi, M.S.; Gokhale, D.V. Lignocellulosic Biomass: Hurdles and Challenges in Its Valorization. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 9305–9320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McCarthy, A.J.; Broda, P. Screening for Lignin-Degrading Actinornycetes and Characterization of Their Activity against [14C] Lignin-Labelled Wheat Lignocellulose. Microbiology 1984, 130, 2905–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Janusz, G.; Pawlik, A.; Sulej, J.; Świderska-Burek, U.; Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A.; Paszczyński, A. Lignin Degradation: Microorganisms, Enzymes Involved, Genomes Analysis and Evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 941–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ball, A.S.; Betts, W.B.; Mccarthy, A.J. Degradation of Lignin-Related Compounds by Actinomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 1642–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tan, F.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y. Genomics Analysis and Degradation Characteristics of Lignin by Streptomyces Thermocarboxydus Strain DF3-3. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2022, 15, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, M.; Verma, S.; Gazara, R.K.; Kumar, M.; Pandey, A.; Verma, P.K.; Thakur, I.S. Genomic and Proteomic Analysis of Lignin Degrading and Polyhydroxyalkanoate Accumulating β-Proteobacterium Pandoraea Sp. ISTKB. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Souza, W.R. Microbial Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Sustainable Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass-Techniques, Applications and Commercialization; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 207–247. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brink, D.P.; Ravi, K.; Lidén, G.; Gorwa-Grauslund, M.F. Mapping the Diversity of Microbial Lignin Catabolism: Experiences from the ELignin Database. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 3979–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Li, J.; Wang, P.; Salam, N.; Li, X.; Ahmad, M.; Tian, Y.; Duan, L.; Huang, L.; Xiao, M.; Mou, X.; et al. Unraveling Bacteria-Mediated Degradation of Lignin-Derived Aromatic Compounds in a Freshwater Environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 141236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Weng, C.; Peng, X.; Han, Y. Depolymerization and Conversion of Lignin to Value-Added Bioproducts by Microbial and Enzymatic Catalysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Radhika, N.L.; Sachdeva, S.; Kumar, M. Microbe Assisted Depolymerization of Lignin Rich Waste and Its Conversion to Gaseous Biofuel. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 300, 113684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abraham, A.; Mathew, A.K.; Park, H.; Choi, O.; Sindhu, R.; Parameswaran, B.; Pandey, A.; Park, J.H.; Sang, B.I. Pretreatment Strategies for Enhanced Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. De Gannes, V.; Eudoxie, G.; Hickey, W.J. Insights into Fungal Communities in Composts Revealed by 454-Pyrosequencing: Implications for Human Health and Safety. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mathew, G.M.; Sukumaran, R.K.; Singhania, R.R.; Pandey, A. Progress in Research on Fungal Cellulases for Lignocellulose Degradation. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2008, 67, 898–907. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schoenherr, S.; Ebrahimi, M.; Schoenherr, S.; Ebrahimi, M.; Czermak, P. Lignin Degradation Processes and the Purification of Valuable Products. In Lignin-Trends and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Keerthana, S.; Kalaiselvi, P.; Maheshwari, M.; Kalaiselvi, T. Isolation and Screening of Lignin and Cellulose Degrading Proficient Microbial Strains from Diverse Biotic Substrates Based on Qualitative Traits. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2019, 8, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saroj, P.; Manasa, P.; Narasimhulu, K. Characterization of Thermophilic Fungi Producing Extracellular Lignocellulolytic Enzymes for Lignocellulosic Hydrolysis under Solid-State Fermentation. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kantharaj, P.; Boobalan, B.; Sooriamuthu, S. Lignocellulose Degrading Enzymes from Fungi and Their Industrial Applications. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 2017, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Idris; Ramadhani, I.; Kanti, A.; Sudiana, I.M. Screening of Potential Lignin-Degrading Fungi from the Tropical Forest for Lignocellulose Biotreatment. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lopez, M.J.; Vargas-García, M.C.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; Nichols, N.N.; Dien, B.S.; Moreno, J. Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes Produced by the Ascomycete Coniochaeta Ligniaria and Related Species: Application for a Lignocellulosic Substrate Treatment. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tengerdy, R.P.; Szakacs, G. Bioconversion of Lignocellulose in Solid Substrate Fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003, 13, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferreira, R.G.; Azzoni, A.R.; Freitas, S. On the Production Cost of Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2021, 15, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez, C. Lignocellulosic Residues: Biodegradation and Bioconversion by Fungi. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pointing, S.; Hyde, K. Biofouling: The Journal of Bioadhesion and Biofilm Lignocellulose-Degrading Marine Fungi. Biofouling 2000, 15, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dashtban, M.; Schraft, H.; Qin, W. Fungal Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Residues; Opportunities & Perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5, 578–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andlar, M.; Rezić, T.; Marđetko, N.; Kracher, D.; Ludwig, R.; Šantek, B. Lignocellulose Degradation: An Overview of Fungi and Fungal Enzymes Involved in Lignocellulose Degradation. Eng. Life Sci. 2018, 18, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bak, J.S.; Ko, J.K.; Choi, I.G.; Park, Y.C.; Seo, J.H.; Kim, K.H. Fungal Pretreatment of Lignocellulose by Phanerochaete Chrysosporium to Produce Ethanol from Rice Straw. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 104, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Breen, A.; Singleton, F.L. Fungi in Lignocellulose Breakdown and Biopulping. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wan, C.; Li, Y. Fungal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lang, E.; Eller, G.; Zadrazil, F. Lignocellulose Decomposition and Production of Ligninolytic Enzymes during Interaction of White Rot Fungi with Soil Microorganisms. Microb. Ecol. 1997, 34, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, S.F.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.L.; Zhu, H.X.; Yao, R.S.; Wu, H. Degradation and Transformation of Lignin by a Fungus Aspergillus Flavus Strain F-1. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, C.; Yang, X.; Ma, F.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X. Screening of White Rot Fungi for Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Food Ferment. Ind. 2009, 2, 17–21. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Piscitelli, A.; Del Vecchio, C.; Faraco, V.; Giardina, P.; MacEllaro, G.; Miele, A.; Pezzella, C.; Sannia, G. Fungal Laccases: Versatile Tools for Lignocellulose Transformation. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Homma, H.; Shinoyama, H.; Nobuta, Y.; Terashima, Y.; Amachi, S.; Fujii, T. Lignin-Degrading Activity of Edible Mushroom Strobilurus Ohshimae That Forms Fruiting Bodies on Buried Sugi (Cryptomeria Japonica) Twigs. J. Wood Sci. 2007, 53, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Platt, M.W.; Hadar, Y.; Chet, I. Fungal Activities Involved in Lignocellulose Degradation by Pleurotus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1984, 20, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jamil, A.; Ahmed, S.; Al, E.T. Production and Purification of Cellulose- Degrading Enzymes From a Filamentous Fungus. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, G.; Qu, Y. Engineering of Filamentous Fungi for Efficient Conversion of Lignocellulose: Tools, Recent Advances and Prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Znameroski, E.A.; Glass, N.L. Using a Model Filamentous Fungus to Unravel Mechanisms of Lignocellulose Deconstruction. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kumar, A.; Chandra, R. Ligninolytic Enzymes and Its Mechanisms for Degradation of Lignocellulosic Waste in Environment. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Doolotkeldieva, T.D.; Bobusheva, S.T. Screening of Wild-Type Fungal Isolates for Cellulolytic Activity. Microbiol. Insights 2011, 4, MBI.S6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. de Oliveira Rodrigues, P.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; Pasquini, D.; Badotti, F.; Góes-Neto, A.; Baffi, M.A. Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes Production by Solid-State Fermentation through Fungal Consortium among Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. Renew. Energy 2020, 145, 2683–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Namnuch, N.; Thammasittirong, A.; Thammasittirong, S.N.R. Lignocellulose Hydrolytic Enzymes Production by Aspergillus Flavus KUB2 Using Submerged Fermentation of Sugarcane Bagasse Waste. Mycology 2021, 12, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhao, L.; Cao, G.-L.; Wang, A.-J.; Ren, H.-Y.; Dong, D.; Liu, Z.-N.; Guan, X.-Y.; Xu, C.-J.; Ren, N.-Q. Fungal Pretreatment of Cornstalk with Phanerochaete Chrysosporium for Enhancing Enzymatic Saccharification and Hydrogen Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Singh, D.; Zeng, J.; Laskar, D.D.; Deobald, L.; Hiscox, W.C.; Chen, S. Investigation of Wheat Straw Biodegradation by Phanerochaete Chrysosporium. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 1030–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shirkavand, E.; Baroutian, S.; Gapes, D.J.; Young, B.R. Pretreatment of Radiata Pine Using Two White Rot Fungal Strains Stereum Hirsutum and Trametes Versicolor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 142, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taniguchi, M.; Suzuki, H.; Watanabe, D.; Sakai, K.; Hoshino, K.; Tanaka, T. Evaluation of Pretreatment with Pleurotus Ostreatus for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Rice Straw. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kamei, I.; Hirota, Y.; Meguro, S. Integrated Delignification and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Hard Wood by a White-Rot Fungus, Phlebia Sp. MG-60. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 126, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Salvachúa, D.; Katahira, R.; Cleveland, N.S.; Khanna, P.; Resch, M.G.; Black, B.A.; Purvine, S.O.; Zink, E.M.; Prieto, A.; Martínez, M.J. Lignin Depolymerization by Fungal Secretomes and a Microbial Sink. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 6046–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Dong, X.Q.; Yang, J.S.; Zhu, N.; Wang, E.T.; Yuan, H.L. Sugarcane Bagasse Degradation and Characterization of Three White-Rot Fungi. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yelle, D.J.; Ralph, J.; Lu, F.; Hammel, K.E. Evidence for Cleavage of Lignin by a Brown Rot Basidiomycete. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1844–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guerra, P.A.M.; Salas Sanjúan, M.C.; López, M.J. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties and Enzymatic Activity of Organic Substrates during Four Crop Cycles in Soilless Containers. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2066–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Varnaitė, R.; Raudonienė, V. Enzymatic Lignin Degradation in Rye Straw by Micromycetes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2005, 56, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dey, S.; Maiti, T.K.; Bhattacharyya, B.C. Production of Some Extracellular Enzymes by a Lignin Peroxidase-Producing Brown Rot Fungus, Polyporus Ostreiformis, and Its Comparative Abilities for Lignin Degradation and Dye Decolorization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 4216–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Knežević, A.; Milovanović, I.; Stajić, M.; Lončar, N.; Brčeski, I.; Vukojević, J.; Ćilerdžić, J. Lignin Degradation by Selected Fungal Species. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 138, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chang, A.J.; Fan, J.; Wen, X. Screening of Fungi Capable of Highly Selective Degradation of Lignin in Rice Straw. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 72, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bonugli-Santos, R.C.; Durrant, L.R.; da Silva, M.; Sette, L.D. Production of Laccase, Manganese Peroxidase and Lignin Peroxidase by Brazilian Marine-Derived Fungi. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2010, 46, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dashtban, M.; Schraft, H.; Syed, T.A.; Qin, W. Fungal Biodegradation and Enzymatic Modification of Lignin. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 1, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Gu, D.; Xiang, X.; Wu, Y.; Zeng, J.; Lin, X. Synergy between Fungi and Bacteria Promotes Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cometabolism in Lignin-Amended Soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 425, 127958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tuomela, M.; Oivanen, P.; Hatakka, A. Degradation of Synthetic 14C-Lignin by Various White-Rot Fungi in Soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 1613–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fackler, K.; Gradinger, C.; Hinterstoisser, B.; Messner, K.; Schwanninger, M. Lignin Degradation by White Rot Fungi on Spruce Wood Shavings during Short-Time Solid-State Fermentations Monitored by near Infrared Spectroscopy. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pointing, S.B.; Parungao, M.M.; Hyde, K.D. Production of Wood-Decay Enzymes, Mass Loss and Lignin Solubilization in Wood by Tropical Xylariaceae. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hatakka, A. Lignin-Modifying Enzymes from Selected White-Rot Fungi: Production and Role from in Lignin Degradation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 13, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dashora, K.; Gattupalli, M.; Javed, Z.; Tripathi, G.D.; Sharma, R.; Mishra, M.; Bhargava, A.; Srivastava, S. Leveraging Multiomics Approaches for Producing Lignocellulose Degrading Enzymes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khlystov, N.A.; Yoshikuni, Y.; Deutsch, S.; Sattely, E.S. A Plant Host, Nicotiana Benthamiana, Enables the Production and Study of Fungal Lignin-Degrading Enzymes. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zong, Z.; Mazurkewich, S.; Pereira, C.S.; Fu, H.; Cai, W.; Shao, X.; Skaf, M.S.; Larsbrink, J.; Lo Leggio, L. Mechanism and Biomass Association of Glucuronoyl Esterase: An α/β Hydrolase with Potential in Biomass Conversion. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dutta, S. Lignin Deconstruction: Chemical and Biological Approaches; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; ISBN 9780444595799. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mirmohamadsadeghi, S.; Karimi, K.; Azarbaijani, R.; Parsa Yeganeh, L.; Angelidaki, I.; Nizami, A.-S.; Bhat, R.; Dashora, K.; Vijay, V.K.; Aghbashlo, M.; et al. Pretreatment of Lignocelluloses for Enhanced Biogas Production: A Review on Influencing Mechanisms and the Importance of Microbial Diversity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Brink, D.P.; Prothmann, J.; Ravi, K.; Sun, M.; García-Hidalgo, J.; Sandahl, M.; Hulteberg, C.P.; Turner, C.; Lidén, G.; et al. Biological Valorization of Low Molecular Weight Lignin. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1318–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Sagarika, M.S.; Parameswaran, C.; Senapati, A.; Barala, J.; Mitra, D.; Prabhukarthikeyan, S.R.; Kumar, A.; Nayak, A.K.; Panneerselvam, P. Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases (LPMOs) Producing Microbes: A Novel Approach for Rapid Recycling of Agricultural Wastes. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Baldrian, P. Fungal Laccases—Occurrence and Properties. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 215–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Brown, M.E.; Chang, M.C.Y. Exploring Bacterial Lignin Degradation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rani, R.; Kumar, A.; Raj, T.; Chen, C.; Kumar, V.; Tahir, N.; Kim, S.; Dong, C. Lignin Valorisation via Enzymes : A Sustainable Approach. Fuel 2022, 311, 122608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Eriksson, K.-E.L.; Bermek, H. Lignin, Lignocellulose, Ligninase. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 373–384. ISBN 978-0-12-373944-5. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bugg, T.D.H.; Rahmanpour, R. Enzymatic Conversion of Lignin into Renewable Chemicals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 29, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ribeiro, L.F.; Amarelle, V.; Alves, L.F.; Viana de Siqueira, G.M.; Lovate, G.L.; Borelli, T.C.; Guazzaroni, M.-E. Genetically Engineered Proteins to Improve Biomass Conversion: New Advances and Challenges for Tailoring Biocatalysts. Molecules 2019, 24, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Pour, R.R.; Ehibhatiomhan, A.; Huang, Y.; Ashley, B.; Rashid, G.M.; Mendel-Williams, S.; Bugg, T.D.H. Protein Engineering of Pseudomonas Fluorescens Peroxidase Dyp1B for Oxidation of Phenolic and Polymeric Lignin Substrates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2019, 123, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Bugg, T.D.H.; Williamson, J.J.; Rashid, G.M.M. Bacterial Enzymes for Lignin Depolymerisation: New Biocatalysts for Generation of Renewable Chemicals from Biomass. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 55, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, M.; Wilkins, M. Lignin Bioconversion into Valuable Products: Fractionation, Depolymerization, Aromatic Compound Conversion, and Bioproduct Formation. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2021, 1, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, E.; Segato, F.; Prade, R.A.; Wilkins, M.R. Exploring Lignin Depolymerization by a Bi-Enzyme System Containing Aryl Alcohol Oxidase and Lignin Peroxidase in Aqueous Biocompatible Ionic Liquids. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 338, 125564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Goodell, B.; Qian, Y.; Jellison, J. Fungal Decay of Wood: Soft Rot—Brown Rot—White Rot; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; ISBN 1947-5918. [Google Scholar]
  85. Aarti, C.; Arasu, M.V.; Agastian, P. Lignin Degradation: A Microbial Approach. Indian J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 1, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  86. Radhika, N.L.; Sachdeva, S.; Kumar, M. Lignin Depolymerization and Biotransformation to Industrially Important Chemicals/Biofuels. Fuel 2022, 312, 122935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, Z.-H.; Le, R.K.; Kosa, M.; Yang, B.; Yuan, J.; Ragauskas, A.J. Identifying and Creating Pathways to Improve Biological Lignin Valorization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 105, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Del Cerro, C.; Erickson, E.; Dong, T.; Wong, A.R.; Eder, E.K.; Purvine, S.O.; Mitchell, H.D.; Weitz, K.K.; Markillie, L.M.; Burnet, M.C. Intracellular Pathways for Lignin Catabolism in White-Rot Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2017381118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Cui, T.; Yuan, B.; Guo, H.; Tian, H.; Wang, W.; Ma, Y.; Li, C.; Fei, Q. Enhanced Lignin Biodegradation by Consortium of White Rot Fungi: Microbial Synergistic Effects and Product Mapping. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Benavides, V.; Pinto-Ibieta, F.; Serrano, A.; Rubilar, O.; Ciudad, G. Use of Anthracophyllum Discolor and Stereum Hirsutum as a Suitable Strategy for Delignification and Phenolic Removal of Olive Mill Solid Waste. Foods 2022, 11, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ma, K.; Ruan, Z. Production of a Lignocellulolytic Enzyme System for Simultaneous Bio-Delignification and Saccharification of Corn Stover Employing Co-Culture of Fungi. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Meehnian, H.; Jana, A.K.; Jana, M.M. Pretreatment of Cotton Stalks by Synergistic Interaction of Daedalea Flavida and Phlebia Radiata in Co-Culture for Improvement in Delignification and Saccharification. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 117, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Luo, R.; Liao, Q.; Xia, A.; Deng, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, X. Synergistic Treatment of Alkali Lignin via Fungal Coculture for Biofuel Production: Comparison of Physicochemical Properties and Adsorption of Enzymes Used as Catalysts. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 575371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, K.-J.; Tang, J.-C.; Xu, B.-H.; Lan, S.-L.; Cao, Y. Degradation Enhancement of Rice Straw by Co-Culture of Phanerochaete Chrysosporium and Trichoderma Viride. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Wang, W.; Yuan, T.; Cui, B. Biological Pretreatment with White Rot Fungi and Their Co-Culture to Overcome Lignocellulosic Recalcitrance for Improved Enzymatic Digestion. BioResources 2014, 9, 3968–3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Zhang, K.; Xu, R.; Abomohra, A.E.-F.; Xie, S.; Yu, Z.; Guo, Q.; Liu, P.; Peng, L.; Li, X. A Sustainable Approach for Efficient Conversion of Lignin into Biodiesel Accompanied by Biological Pretreatment of Corn Straw. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 199, 111928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nandal, P.; Arora, A.; Virmani, S. An Appraisal on Valorization of Lignin: A Byproduct from Biorefineries and Paper Industries. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 155, 106295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sonoki, T.; Takahashi, K.; Sugita, H.; Hatamura, M.; Azuma, Y.; Sato, T.; Suzuki, S.; Kamimura, N.; Masai, E. Glucose-Free Cis, Cis-Muconic Acid Production via New Metabolic Designs Corresponding to the Heterogeneity of Lignin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Atiwesh, G.; Parrish, C.C.; Banoub, J.; Le, T.T. Lignin Degradation by Microorganisms: A Review. Biotechnol. Prog. 2022, 38, e3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Brown, B.; Immethun, C.; Alsiyabi, A.; Long, D.; Wilkins, M.; Saha, R. Heterologous Phasin Expression in Rhodopseudomonas Palustris CGA009 for Bioplastic Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2022, 14, e00191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Saini, R.; Kaur, A.; Saini, J.K.; Patel, A.K.; Varjani, S.; Chen, C.-W.; Singhania, R.R.; Dong, C.-D. Trends in Lignin Biotransformations for Bio-Based Products and Energy Applications. BioEnergy Res. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dos Santos, A.C.S.; Henrique, H.M.; Cardoso, V.L.; Reis, M.H.M. Slow Release Fertilizer Prepared with Lignin and Poly (Vinyl Acetate) Bioblend. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 185, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sharma, V.; Tsai, M.-L.; Nargotra, P.; Chen, C.-W.; Sun, P.-P.; Singhania, R.R.; Patel, A.K.; Dong, C.-D. Journey of Lignin from a Roadblock to Bridge for Lignocellulose Biorefineries: A Comprehensive Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 160560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhou, N.; Thilakarathna, W.; He, Q.S.; Rupasinghe, H.P. A Review: Depolymerization of Lignin to Generate High-Value Bio-Products: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 9, 758744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chan, J.C.; Paice, M.; Zhang, X. Enzymatic Oxidation of Lignin: Challenges and Barriers toward Practical Applications. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, X.; Zheng, Y. Biotransformation of Lignin: Mechanisms, Applications and Future Work. Biotechnol. Prog. 2020, 36, e2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chukwuma, O.B.; Rafatullah, M.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Ismail, N. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. López-Mondéjar, R.; Algora, C.; Baldrian, P. Lignocellulolytic Systems of Soil Bacteria: A Vast and Diverse Toolbox for Biotechnological Conversion Processes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Thapa, S.; Mishra, J.; Arora, N.; Mishra, P.; Li, H.; Bhatti, S.; Zhou, S. Microbial Cellulolytic Enzymes: Diversity and Biotechnology with Reference to Lignocellulosic Biomass Degradation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2020, 19, 621–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Davis, K.; Moon, T.S. Tailoring Microbes to Upgrade Lignin. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 59, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. da Silva, R.R. Enzyme Technology in Food Preservation: A Promising and Sustainable Strategy for Biocontrol of Post-Harvest Fungal Pathogens. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 531–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Components of lignocellulosic materials.
Figure 1. Components of lignocellulosic materials.
Catalysts 13 00149 g001
Figure 2. Different types of lignin derived compounds.
Figure 2. Different types of lignin derived compounds.
Catalysts 13 00149 g002
Figure 3. Key steps involved in lignin depolymerization in aerobic degradation.
Figure 3. Key steps involved in lignin depolymerization in aerobic degradation.
Catalysts 13 00149 g003
Figure 4. Significance of pre-treatment of lignocellulose.
Figure 4. Significance of pre-treatment of lignocellulose.
Catalysts 13 00149 g004
Figure 5. Percentage contribution of fungal families in lignocellulose degradation.
Figure 5. Percentage contribution of fungal families in lignocellulose degradation.
Catalysts 13 00149 g005
Figure 6. Oxidation mechanism of peroxidase.
Figure 6. Oxidation mechanism of peroxidase.
Catalysts 13 00149 g006
Figure 7. Role of lignolytic enzymes in lignin degradation.
Figure 7. Role of lignolytic enzymes in lignin degradation.
Catalysts 13 00149 g007
Figure 8. Shows the transport mechanism of electrons in direct electron transfer and long-range electron transfer (LRET).
Figure 8. Shows the transport mechanism of electrons in direct electron transfer and long-range electron transfer (LRET).
Catalysts 13 00149 g008
Figure 9. The mechanism involved in lignin depolymerization.
Figure 9. The mechanism involved in lignin depolymerization.
Catalysts 13 00149 g009
Figure 10. Oxidation mechanism of various lignolytic enzymes.
Figure 10. Oxidation mechanism of various lignolytic enzymes.
Catalysts 13 00149 g010
Figure 11. Classes of Enzymes.
Figure 11. Classes of Enzymes.
Catalysts 13 00149 g011
Figure 12. Key fungal groups actively producing Laccase enzyme which predominates the lignolytic enzyme group.
Figure 12. Key fungal groups actively producing Laccase enzyme which predominates the lignolytic enzyme group.
Catalysts 13 00149 g012
Figure 13. The mechanism involved in lignin depolymerization by laccase.
Figure 13. The mechanism involved in lignin depolymerization by laccase.
Catalysts 13 00149 g013
Figure 14. Some of the fungi that secrete lignin peroxidase for lignin degradation.
Figure 14. Some of the fungi that secrete lignin peroxidase for lignin degradation.
Catalysts 13 00149 g014
Figure 15. Different catalytic actions by LiP.
Figure 15. Different catalytic actions by LiP.
Catalysts 13 00149 g015
Figure 16. Some of the fungi that secrete Manganese peroxidase.
Figure 16. Some of the fungi that secrete Manganese peroxidase.
Catalysts 13 00149 g016
Figure 17. Depolymerization and pathways of lignin.
Figure 17. Depolymerization and pathways of lignin.
Catalysts 13 00149 g017
Figure 18. Lignin depolymerization by fungal metabolisms method and their isolated enzymes.
Figure 18. Lignin depolymerization by fungal metabolisms method and their isolated enzymes.
Catalysts 13 00149 g018
Figure 19. Step-wise process of the depolymerization of Lignin [86].
Figure 19. Step-wise process of the depolymerization of Lignin [86].
Catalysts 13 00149 g019
Figure 20. A hypothetical schematic representation of the biological pathways (fungal) involved in the depolymerization and degradation of the lignin [88].
Figure 20. A hypothetical schematic representation of the biological pathways (fungal) involved in the depolymerization and degradation of the lignin [88].
Catalysts 13 00149 g020
Table 1. Different types of lignin degrading bacteria.
Table 1. Different types of lignin degrading bacteria.
S. NoType of BacteriaName of the BacteriaReferences
1ActinomycetesStreptomyces viridosporus[6,7,8,9]
paucinobilis
Rhodococcus jostii
2α-proteobacteriaBrucella sp.,[10,11,12]
Ochrobactrum sp.,
Sphingobium sp.,
Sphingomonas sp.,
3γ-proteobacteriaPseudomonas fluorescens
putida
Enterobacter lignolyticus
Escherichia coli
Table 2. Advantages of biological pre-treatments [16].
Table 2. Advantages of biological pre-treatments [16].
PretreatmentName of the PretreatmentAdvantages
Biological MicrobialConsumption of cellulose and helicellulose
No inhibitory compound formation,
Low energy consumption.
EnzymesAlteration of cellulose structure,
Delignification,
Partial hydrolysis of hemicellulose,
Fast process,
Low energy demand
Table 3. List of fungal strains with their potential to degrade lignin.
Table 3. List of fungal strains with their potential to degrade lignin.
Name of the FungiPercentage of Lignin Degradation References
Phanerochaete chrysosporium30 and 34.3[47,48]
Trametes versicolor22[49]
Pleurotus ostreatus41[50]
Phlebia sp. MG-6040.7[51]
Pleurotus eryngii63 and 75[52]
Lentinula edode LE1687.6[53]
Gloeophyllum trabeum16[54]
Ceriporiopsis subvermispora22[55]
Galactomyces geotrichum48[56]
Polyporus ostreiformis18.6[57]
Dichomytus squalens34.1[58]
Phlebia sp. MG-6040.7[51]
Fomitopsis pinicola32.4[58]
Fusarium sp. 89, Fusarium moniliforme33.5, 34.7[59]
Table 4. Lignolytic Enzymes detected from white rot fungi.
Table 4. Lignolytic Enzymes detected from white rot fungi.
Name of the White Rot FungiName of the EnzymesReferences
Artemisia biennisLaccase, Manganese peroxidase[63]
Hypoxylon fragiformeLignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase[64,65]
Bjerkandera adustaLaccase, lignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase, Aryl alcohol oxidase[63]
Oxyporus latemarginatusLignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase[64]
Dichomitus squalensLaccase, Manganese peroxidase[63,66]
Phanerochaete sordidaManganese peroxidase[63]
Phlebia. radiataLaccase, lignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase, Glyoxyl oxidase[63,64,66]
Phlebia brevisporaLaccase, lignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase.[64,66]
Pleurotus ostreatusLaccase, Manganese peroxidase, Aryl alcohol oxidase[63]
Phlebia tremellosaLaccase, lignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase.[64,66]
Trametes hirsutaLaccase, Manganese peroxidase[63]
Ceriporiopsis subvermisporaLaccase, Manganese peroxidase[64,66]
Trametes versicolorLaccase, lignin peroxidase, Manganese peroxidase, Aryl alcohol oxidase.[63]
Table 5. Co-culture system with improved lignin degradation.
Table 5. Co-culture system with improved lignin degradation.
Dual Culture or Consortium Lignin Degradation Percentage References
Anthracophyllum discolor + Stereum hirsutum94.1[90]
Lenzites betulina + Trametes versicolorMore than 40 % enhancement than monoculture[89]
Coprinus comatus + Trichoderma reesei66.5[91]
Daedalea flavida MTCC 145 + Phlebia radiata MTCC 279136.29[92]
Phanerochaete chrysosporium + Irpex lacteus CD226.4[93]
Phanerochaete chrysosporium +Trichoderma viride26.38[94]
Lenzites betulinus+Trametes Orientalis + Trametes Velutina58[95]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dashora, K.; Gattupalli, M.; Tripathi, G.D.; Javed, Z.; Singh, S.; Tuohy, M.; Sarangi, P.K.; Diwan, D.; Singh, H.B.; Gupta, V.K. Fungal Assisted Valorisation of Polymeric Lignin: Mechanism, Enzymes and Perspectives. Catalysts 2023, 13, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010149

AMA Style

Dashora K, Gattupalli M, Tripathi GD, Javed Z, Singh S, Tuohy M, Sarangi PK, Diwan D, Singh HB, Gupta VK. Fungal Assisted Valorisation of Polymeric Lignin: Mechanism, Enzymes and Perspectives. Catalysts. 2023; 13(1):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dashora, Kavya, Meghana Gattupalli, Gyan Datta Tripathi, Zoya Javed, Shweta Singh, Maria Tuohy, Prakash Kumar Sarangi, Deepti Diwan, Harikesh B. Singh, and Vijai Kumar Gupta. 2023. "Fungal Assisted Valorisation of Polymeric Lignin: Mechanism, Enzymes and Perspectives" Catalysts 13, no. 1: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop