Next Article in Journal
Migration Mechanism of Lattice Oxygen: Conversion of CO2 to CO Using NiFe2O4 Spinel Oxygen Carrier in Chemical Looping Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Titanium Dioxide–Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes in Water
Previous Article in Journal
Pd-Decorated 2D MXene (2D Ti3C2Tix) as a High-Performance Electrocatalyst for Reduction of Carbon Dioxide into Fuels toward Climate Change Mitigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of TaON/CdS Heterostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Auto-Combustion Synthesis of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 Catalysts for Diesel Soot Combustion

1
Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Dongying 257061, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(10), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101182
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 6 October 2022

Abstract

:
The increase in diesel consumption has led to the proliferation of soot particles from diesel exhaust, resulting in pollution in the form of smog. To solve this problem, a series of Ag-doped Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel catalysts were successfully prepared using an auto-combustion synthesis method that uses glucose as a fuel. X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis were used to analyse the phase structure of the as-prepared samples. The results reveal that the selected catalysts featured a spinel-type structure. Moreover, the catalytic activity of the catalysts for soot combustion was evaluated by temperature-programmed reaction analysis. The temperature required for soot combustion depended heavily on the Ag concentration in the Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 catalyst. The Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 catalyst had a superior catalytic activity with a T90 of 399 °C and CO2 selectivity of 99.3%.

1. Introduction

Soot particulates produced during diesel combustion are a significant source of urban ambient pollution (PM10 and PM2.5), which causes serious respiratory diseases and environmental problems. Therefore, efficient after-treatment systems, namely diesel particulate filters (DPFs), are required to treat the exhaust gas from diesel. Most of the soot particles in exhaust gas can be trapped by the DPF. However, soot deposits block pipes, weaken the purification ability and decrease the engine efficiency. Additionally, the catalyst employed here can catalyse soot combustion within an exhaust temperature range of 150–400 °C, which is much lower than the temperature required for non-catalytic soot combustion (approximately 500–600 °C). Hence, a catalyst with a high activation for soot combustion at low temperatures is highly desirable. The catalytic combustion of diesel soot is a typical gas-solid-solid reaction. Noble metals (Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd) [1,2,3,4], transition metal oxides [5], alkaline metal oxides [6], and mixed metal oxides [7,8] have been studied intensively in recent years. Despite their high catalytic activity for soot removal, conventional noble metal catalysts are underutilised because of their high cost and scarcity. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop a new type of catalyst for diesel engine exhaust purification. Spinel-type oxides have proven to be good candidates for the catalytic combustion of diesel soot owing to their good redox properties, thermal stability, and tuneable catalytic performances [9].
The spinel complex oxide has the chemical formula AB2O4, where A and B occupy the tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively (Figure 1). The transition metal cations can shift between the A and B sites. For example, the A ions and half of the B ions can exist in the octahedral sites, while the remaining B ions are located in the tetrahedral sites. This may result in an inverse spinel structure [10,11]. In the case of the spinel-type complex oxide catalyst, B-site cations are beneficial for diesel soot combustion, and the activity of the catalyst can be adjusted by the doping of B-site ions directly or by changing the valence state of B ions via the doping of A-site ions without changing the primary crystal structure [12,13]. In a previous study [14], our Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel oxide catalysts, prepared using a sol-gel method, exhibited an excellent catalytic performance for soot combustion, and the catalytic activities of the samples increased when increasing the Ag concentration. The Mn0.6Ag0.4Co2O4 catalysts demonstrated a better catalytic performance for soot combustion than most active catalysts reported for Pt/SiO2 [3] and 3DOM Au1.25/LaFeO3 [1].
AB2O4 spinel-type catalysts are typically prepared via annealing at high temperatures of up to 1000 °C or via a complicated approach including dissolution, evaporation, or hydrothermal treatment [15]. In contrast to conventional approaches for preparing spinel-type oxides such as the sol-gel method, precipitation method, and solid-state reaction method, the auto-combustion method promotes the formation of the targeted materials and reduces the roasting temperature via a redox reaction between a metal precursor and organic additives. In our earlier study [16], the auto-combustion method was introduced to prepare a series of MnCo2O4 spinel-type oxides, and the effects of the synthetic conditions on the structure and soot combustion performance were investigated in detail.
Ag is effective in soot oxidation for the removal of diesel exhaust gas, as demonstrated by a wide range of studies on Ag-supported MnO2-CeO2, Al2O3 and LaCoO3, or Ag-doped LaMnO3 [17,18,19,20,21]. A series of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel-type catalysts was prepared by an auto-combustion method in this study. Their physical and chemical properties and the effect of the Ag doping concentration on the structure and catalytic performance were investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Results

The XRD patterns of the as-prepared samples are shown in Figure 2. Comparisons with the standard spinel sample (JCPDS 00-023-1237) established that the Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 sample was successfully prepared with a spinel structure through auto-combustion. Meanwhile, relative to an unsubstituted MnCo2O4 catalyst, the diffraction peak (2θ = 38.397°) corresponding to the (311) plane of the Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 catalyst gradually shifted to a higher 2θ value with an increasing Ag-substitution due to the distortion and expansion of the crystal structure after the doping of Ag into the spinel lattice. Moreover, a trace quantity of Ag impurity phase (JCPDS 01-087-0597) could also be detected when the fraction of Ag was greater than 0.2. This was attributed to the fact that Ag+ could not enter the MnCo2O4 lattice and form metallic Ag, as the radius of the introduced Ag+ is larger than that of Mn2+. In addition, the diffraction intensity decreased gradually at the peak (311), indicating that increasing the Ag content could retard sintering and decrease the particle size in favour of soot combustion.

2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Results

The FT-IR spectra of the as-prepared Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4) samples are shown in Figure 3. Two intense vibration peaks appear at approximately 547 cm−1 and 649 cm−1 in the spectra for every sample. The peak at the lower wavenumber can be ascribed to the stretching vibration of the Co-O bond in the BO6 octahedron, and the peak at the higher wavenumber can be attributed to the stretching vibration of the tetrahedral Mn-O bond in the AO4 tetrahedron [22,23]. The existence of both of these absorption bands is indicative of the formation of a spinel structure. These results are consistent with the XRD results. Moreover, after adding Ag to partially substitute the A-site cations, both vibration peaks shift upfield when increasing the Ag concentration, possibly due to the presence of high-valent Co4+, when the Ag+ ions partially replace the Mn2+ ions. The wavenumbers of the stretching vibration caused by Co4+-O bonding are higher and the interactions are stronger than those caused by Co3+-O bonding [24].

2.3. Temperature-Programmed Reduction with H2 (H2-TPR)

To investigate the reduction behaviour of the catalysts, a H2-TPR analysis was performed, and the results are shown in Figure 4. The TPR spectra reveal two peaks due to the reduction of each cation. As previously reported [25,26,27], the first peak, observed in the range of 270–410 °C, is attributable to the reduction of Co(III) to metallic Co. Moreover, the peaks are split, which was ascribed to the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+ (lower temperature) and Co2+ to metallic Co (higher temperature). The second peak, which appears at 450–610 °C, was attributed to the reduction of Mn(III) to Mn(II). This peak appears at a lower temperature than that for pure Mn2O3, owing to the presence of cobalt cations, which are reduced at lower temperatures than Mn. This effect has been previously reported in the literature [28]. In addition, the peaks for the Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 sample shifted to a lower temperature, suggesting that the presence of Ag increased the reducibility of surface oxygen atoms and enhanced oxygen mobility throughout the reduction process [29]. Moreover, the H2 consumption was the highest for the samples catalysed with Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4, which likely led to more surface oxygen being adsorbed through the formed vacancies and structural distortions on the mixed oxide that resulted from the different radii and charges of the Ag+ and Mn2+ species.

2.4. Catalytic Activity

Figure 5 shows the catalytic performance of diesel soot oxidation evaluated by temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) experiments in an O2 atmosphere balanced by He. When compared with pure soot combustion, the results indicate that all catalysts promoted soot combustion. The T10, which is the temperature at which 10% of the soot was oxidised during the TPO procedure, decreased from 614 to 400 °C for soot combustion over the MnCo2O4 catalyst. After Ag doping, the catalytic activity for soot combustion improved markedly. Most significantly, Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 exhibited the lowest T10 (327 °C) and T90 (442 °C), reflecting the desirable redox properties of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4. These results are consistent with the TPR results.
To clarify the role of NOx in the reaction, we also investigated the catalytic activity of the as-prepared catalysts in a 2000 ppm NO and 5% O2 atmosphere. Figure 6 shows the catalytic performance for soot combustion under these conditions. After introducing 2000 ppm NO to the flow of 5% O2 and He, the catalytic performance for soot combustion improved, obtaining a lower T10 and T50 than those obtained in an O2 atmosphere (Table 1), which indicates that NO oxidation is a key influence on catalytic soot combustion. Similar conclusions have been reported in the literature [30,31,32,33]. The T10 (301 °C) and T50 (370 °C) of the Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 catalyst were the lowest among the catalysts tested. The SCO2 (CO2 selectivity during the TPRe run) of this catalyst was 99.3%.
The regenerating lattice vacancies introduced via the doped Ag are extremely important as they adsorb oxygen species and O2− species and promote the combustion of soot particles. The T10, T50, and T90 of Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 decreased by 140 °C, 209 °C, and 242 °C, respectively, relative to pure soot combustion. Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 has a better soot combustion activity than the reported catalysts Co3O4 [5], Ag/LaCoO3-400 [20], and 3DOM Au1.25/LaFeO3 [1], even though the 3DOM Au1.25/LaFeO3 catalyst has a larger surface area and pore size, which improve soot combustion.
The activation energy is an intrinsic property for determining the catalytic activity, and for soot combustion it can be calculated through the so-called Redhead method, using the temperature at which the maximum rate occurs (Tm) during TPO experiments [34]. Table 1 shows the Ea values of the catalysts.
The Ea value for MnCo2O4 under O2 is 165.1 kJ/mol, which is similar to that for non-catalytic soot combustion. The Ea value for Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 under O2 + NO flow decreased by 56.1 kJ/mol relative to that for non-catalytic soot combustion (Table 1) and decreased by 13.4 kJ/mol relative to that for MnCo2O4. Ag doping and the introduction of NO reduce the activation energy for soot oxidation because the NO2 formed via the oxidation of NO with surface oxygen species provides an oxidant for soot combustion, particularly since these species have a higher soot oxidation activity than NO and O2 [20].
In summary, based on the above interpretations, Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 catalysts could be successfully synthesised by auto-combustion, and among the catalysts tested, Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 had the highest catalytic activity for diesel soot combustion. The possible reasons for this are as follows: (1) after lower-valence Ag+ replaces Mn2+, for the neutral balance, the valence state of some cobalt ions rises; that is, some of the Co3+ ions are oxidized to Co4+; (2) the doping of low-valent ions generates many oxygen vacancies, which results in the adsorption of oxygen species and O2− species and promotes the combustion of soot particles [29]; and (3) Ag+, which does not enter the lattice, forms metallic Ag, which collects atomic O and transforms it into highly reactive oxygen, which further catalyses the combustion of soot particles, even though the activity of Ag is lower than that of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4. Overall, the synergy between the Ag species and oxygen vacancies improves soot oxidation [20,35].

3. Conclusions

Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel oxide catalysts were synthesised by an auto-combustion method. The as-prepared catalysts demonstrated an excellent catalytic soot oxidation performance compared with bare soot combustion. After the introduction of Ag, the catalytic activity for soot oxidation was further improved. Considering the combined characterisation results and the catalytic performance, the Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O4 catalyst was the best candidate [T10 (301 °C), T90 (399 °C), and SCO2 (99.3%)] among the tested catalysts as a result of the formation of oxygen vacancies and the doping of metallic Ag. However, the contact area between the catalyst and solid reactant is the key factor for the reaction, since the combustion occurs at the three-phase boundary of the soot, catalysts, and reactant gas. Because the catalyst is a non-porous or a microporous nano-powder, it is difficult for soot particles with particle sizes ranging from 20 nm to 1 mm to enter its inner pores [36]. Hence, future studies should focus on the development of catalysts with a three-dimensional, ordered, macroporous structure to improve activity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis of Catalysts

Mn(AC)2·4H2O, AgNO3, and Co(NO3)2·6H2O, with a certain molar ratio, were first ground for 15 min. Subsequently, glucose (0.6 times the total metal ion concentration) was added as a fuel, followed by another 25 min of grinding to ensure that the reaction proceeded homogenously. The obtained sample was transferred to an oven at 160 °C for 12 h, and the auto-combustion reaction proceeded slowly. During combustion, gas evolved, and a grey fluffy powder formed in the beaker. Finally, the precursor was annealed for 4 h in a muffle furnace at 700 °C.

4.2. Catalyst Characterisation

To examine the crystal structures of the samples, XRD was conducted (Philips PANalytical, X’pert Pro. MPD, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Cu-Kα radiation at a scan speed of 2°/min and a 2θ range of 10–80°. The patterns were compared with JCPDS reference data for phase identification.
FT-IR absorbance spectra were obtained on a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (The Thermoelectric Company of America, Saddle Brook, NJ, USA) from 4000 to 400 cm−1. The sample was prepared as a KBr pellet with a sample-to-KBr-weight ratio of 1:100.
To fully explore the redox ability of the catalyst, H2-TPR analyses were performed on Quantachrome ChemBET-3000 (Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Typically, the sample was pretreated at 300 °C for 1 h in a He flow and then cooled to room temperature. A H2/Ar flow (9.87 vol%, 60 mL/min) was subsequently applied to the heated sample (room temperature to 800 °C). The effluent gas signal was monitored by a thermal conductivity detector.

4.3. Activity Evaluation

The performance of the prepared samples was evaluated using a temperature-programmed reaction (TPRe) technique on a fixed-bed. The reaction temperature varied during each TPRe run from 100 °C to 800 °C. The model soot used in this work, Printex-U (Degussa, Frankfurt, Germany), had a primary particle size of 25 nm and specific surface area of 100 m2/g. The catalyst (150 mg) and soot (15 mg) were carefully mixed to simulate the loose contact mode, which is the model most representative of diesel particles flowing through a catalytic filter. Gas containing 5 vol% O2 in Ar was employed. The outlet gases were analysed using gas chromatography. The catalytic performances of the catalysts were evaluated by obtaining the T10, T50, and T90.
The activation energy for soot combustion was determined by the Redhead method using the following equation:
k 0 e E a R T p = α E a R T P 2
where k0 is the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy in kJ/mol, Tp is the temperature at which the maximum rate occurs, and α is the heating rate.

Author Contributions

Writing—H.L. and Y.C.; preparation—D.H. and W.M.; investigation—X.D. and Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The results in this manuscript were presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation (including image-based manipulation).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Jiao, J.; Liu, J.; Duan, A.; Jiang, G. Facile synthesis of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous LaFeO3-supported gold nanoparticle catalysts with high catalytic activity and stability for soot combustion. Catal. Today 2015, 245, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Corro, G.; Flores, A.; Pacheco-Aguirre, F.; Pal, U.; Bañuelos, F.; Ramirez, A.; Zehe, A. Biodiesel and fossil-fuel diesel soot oxidation activities of Ag/CeO2 catalyst. Fuel 2019, 250, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hinot, K.; Burtscher, H.; Webe, A.P.; Kasper, G. The effect of the contact between platinum and soot particles on the catalytic oxidation of soot deposits on a diesel particle filter. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2007, 71, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Weinstein, M.; Roth, S. NO oxidation on catalyzed soot filters. Catal. Today 2015, 258, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, C.; Xing, L.; Yang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ding, T.; Zhang, J.; Hu, T.; Zheng, L.; Li, X. Diesel soot elimination over potassium-promoted Co3O4 nanowires monolithic catalysts under gravitation contact mode. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 218, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Zou, X. The catalytic activities and thermal stabilities of Li/Na/K carbonates for diesel soot oxidation. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Neha; Prasad, R.; Singh, S.V. Simultaneous catalytic oxidation of CO and diesel soot over LaCoO3 perovskite. Mater. Lett. 2021, 292, 129588–129590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, N.; Chen, C.; Meng, J.; Fang, F.; Wang, L.; Wan, H.; Guan, G. K-Mn supported on three-dimensionally ordered macroporous La0.8Ce0.2FeO3 catalysts for the catalytic combustion of soot. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 399, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Álvarez-Docio, C.M.; Portela, R.; Reinosa, J.J.; Rubio-Marcos, F.; Granados-Miralles, C.; Pascual, L.; Fernández, J.F. Pt-free CoAl2O4 catalyst for soot combustion with NOx/O2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 591, 117404–117413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rios, E.; Poillerat, G.; Koenig, J.F.; Gautier, L.; Chartier, P. Preparation and characterization of thin Co3O4 and MnCo2O4 films prepared on glass/SnO2: F by spray pyrolysis at 150 °C for the oxygen electrode. Thin Solid Film. 1995, 264, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Walker, E.H.; Owens, J.W.; Etienne, M.; Walker, D. The novel low temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline MgAl2O4 spinel using “gel” precursors. Mater. Res. Bull. 2002, 37, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shangguan, W.F.; Teraoka, Y.; Kagawa, S. Promotion effect of potassium on the catalytic property of CuFe2O4 for the simultaneous removal of NOx and diesel soot particulate. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 16, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, H.; Sun, L.; Fu, M.; Mao, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Dong, G. Effect of A-site substitution on the simultaneous catalytic removal of NOx and soot by LaMnO3 perovskites. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 11684–11691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, H.; Dai, X.; Wang, K.; Qian, L.; Yan, Z. Highly Efficient Catalysts of Mn1-xAgxCo2O4 Spinel Oxide for Soot Combustion. Catal. Commun. 2017, 101, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nissinen, T.; Kiros, Y.; Gasik, M.; Lampinen, M. Comparison of preparation routes of spinel catalyst for alkaline fuel cells. Mater. Res. Bull. 2004, 39, 1195–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, H.; Zhuang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, X.; Yan, Z. Catalytic removal of soot particles over MnCo2O4 catalysts prepared by the auto-combustion method. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, E.J.; Kim, M.J.; Choung, J.W.; Kim, C.H.; Lee, K.-Y. NOx-assisted soot oxidation based on Ag/MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 627, 118396–118405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, Z.; Ma, J.; Li, M.; Liu, W.; Wu, X.; Liu, S. Show more. Model Ag/CeO2 catalysts for soot combustion: Roles of silver species and catalyst stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132802–132812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Villani, K.; Brosius, R.; Martens, J.A. Catalytic carbon oxidation over Ag/Al2O3. J. Catal. 2005, 236, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Dong, X.; Zhang, L.; Shan, W.; Zhu, Z. Catalytic oxidation of diesel soot particulates over Ag/LaCoO3 perovskite oxides in air and NOx. Chin. J. Catal. 2016, 37, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, K.; Qian, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Yan, Z. Simultaneous removal of NOx and soot particulates over La0.7Ag0.3MnO3 perovskite oxide catalysts. Catal. Today 2010, 158, 423–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, Q.; Chen, K.; Hou, W.; Yan, Q. CO hydrogenation over nanometer spinel-type Co/Mn complex oxides prepared by sol-gel method. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1998, 166, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pirogova, G.N.; Panich, N.M.; Korosteleva, R.L. Regularities of formation and catalytic properties of supported cobaltites in the oxidation of CO and hydrocarbons and in the reduction of nitrogen oxides. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2000, 49, 1536–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z. Easy synthesis of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous La1-xKxCoO3 catalysts and their high activities for the catalytic combustion of soot. J. Catal. 2011, 282, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kwak, B.S.; Lee, G.; Park, S.-M.; Kang, M. Effect of MnOx in the catalytic stabilization of Co2MnO4 spinel during the ethanol steam reforming reaction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 503, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. La, G.; Li, L.; Shi, J. One-pot pyrolytic synthesis of mesoporous MCo2O4(4.5) (M = Mn, Ni, Fe, Cu) spinels and its high efficient catalytic properties for CO oxidation at low temperature. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2014, 390, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  27. Orfila, M.; Linares, M.; Molina, R. Thermochemical hydrogen production using manganese cobalt spinels as redox materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 13532–13543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Klissurski, D.G.; Uzunova, E.L. Cation-deficient nanodimensional particle size cobalt-manganese spinel mixed oxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003, 214, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Liu, W. Soot oxidation over CeO2 and Ag/CeO2: Factors determining the catalyst activity and stability during reaction. J. Catal. 2016, 337, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Yuan, S.; Wang, J.L. Effects of contact model and NOx on soot oxidation activity over Pt/MnOx-CeO2 and the reaction mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 327, 1066–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oi-Uchisawa, J.; Obuchi, A.; Enomoto, R.; Xu, J.; Nanba, T.; Liu, S.; Kushiyama, S. Oxidation of carbon black over various Pt/MOx/SiC catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2001, 32, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.; Obuchi, A.; Uchisawa, J.; Nanba, T.; Kushiyama, S. An exploratory study of diesel soot oxidation with NO2 and O2 on supported metal oxide catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Setiabudi, A.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J.A. An optimal NOx assisted abatement of diesel soot in an advanced catalytic filter design. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 10, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dernaika, B.; Uner, D. A simplified approach to determine the activation energies of uncatalyzed and catalyzed combustion of soot. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 40, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, C.; Jeon, Y.; Kim, T.; Tou, A.; Park, J.-I.; Einaga, H.; Shul, Y.-G. Ag-loaded cerium-zirconium solid solution oxide nano-fibrous webs and their catalytic activity for soot and CO oxidation. Fuel 2018, 212, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Neeft, J.P.A.; van Pruissen, O.P.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J.A. Catalysts for the oxidation of soot from diesel exhaust gases II. Contact between soot and catalyst under practical conditions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1997, 12, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Spinel crystal structure.
Figure 1. Spinel crystal structure.
Catalysts 12 01182 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of as-prepared Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel-type samples.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of as-prepared Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel-type samples.
Catalysts 12 01182 g002
Figure 3. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of Mn1xAgxCo2O4 catalysts.
Figure 3. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of Mn1xAgxCo2O4 catalysts.
Catalysts 12 01182 g003
Figure 4. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) profiles of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel-type catalysts.
Figure 4. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) profiles of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 spinel-type catalysts.
Catalysts 12 01182 g004
Figure 5. Temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) profiles of soot oxidation over Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 in O2/He atmosphere.
Figure 5. Temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) profiles of soot oxidation over Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 in O2/He atmosphere.
Catalysts 12 01182 g005
Figure 6. Soot catalytic combustion activity of the as-prepared catalyst under different conditions.
Figure 6. Soot catalytic combustion activity of the as-prepared catalyst under different conditions.
Catalysts 12 01182 g006
Table 1. The catalytic activity for soot combustion under the condition of loose contact between catalyst and soot.
Table 1. The catalytic activity for soot combustion under the condition of loose contact between catalyst and soot.
Reaction ConditionsCatalystT10/°CT50/°CT90/°CSCO2/%Ea(Tp)/kJ/mol
O2 + NOBlank44157964155.0173.6
MnCo2O432840947097.8130.9
Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O430137039999.3117.5
3DOM Au1.25/LaFeO331238741599.4--
Co3O4 nanowires397466------
Ag/LaCoO3-400311363397--131.7
O2MnCo2O440044649397.5165.1
Mn0.8Ag0.2Co2O432738844299.0141.4
Ag/LaCoO3-400392439464 146.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Han, D.; Ma, W.; Dai, X.; Yan, Z. Auto-Combustion Synthesis of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 Catalysts for Diesel Soot Combustion. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101182

AMA Style

Liu H, Chen Y, Han D, Ma W, Dai X, Yan Z. Auto-Combustion Synthesis of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 Catalysts for Diesel Soot Combustion. Catalysts. 2022; 12(10):1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Huanrong, Yanhong Chen, Dongmin Han, Weiwei Ma, Xiaodong Dai, and Zifeng Yan. 2022. "Auto-Combustion Synthesis of Mn1−xAgxCo2O4 Catalysts for Diesel Soot Combustion" Catalysts 12, no. 10: 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop