Next Article in Journal
Efficient Chemo-Enzymatic Flow Synthesis of High Value Amides and Esters
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal-Based Electrocatalysts for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of 1-(3-Sulfopropyl)-3-Methylimidazolium Hydrogen Sulfate as a Catalyst for Hardwood Upgrading into Bio-Based Platform Chemicals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Developing Low-Cost, High Performance, Robust and Sustainable Perovskite Electrocatalytic Materials in the Electrochemical Sensors and Energy Sectors: “An Overview”

1
Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2
Department of Chemistry, The Madura College, Vidya Nagar, Madurai 625 011, Tamil Nadu, India
3
Electroanalysis and Bioelectrochemistry Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, No.1, Section 3, Chung-Hsiao East Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
4
Department of Chemistry, Thiruvalluvar University, Vellore 632 115, Tamil Nadu, India
5
Department of Chemistry, Sri Kumaragurupara Swamigal Arts College, Srivaikuntam, Thoothukudi 628 619, Tamil Nadu, India
6
Physics Research Centre, S.T. Hindu College, Nagercoil 629 002, Tamil Nadu, India
7
Department of Chemistry, Jeppiaar Institute of Technology, Sriperumbudur, Chennai 631 604, Tamil Nadu, India
8
Rajarajan Institute of Science, Madurai 625 009, Tamil Nadu, India
9
Department of Chemistry, Alagappa Govt Arts College, Karaikudi 630 003, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(8), 938; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080938
Submission received: 1 July 2020 / Revised: 10 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published: 16 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion and Storage-Related Reactions)

Abstract

:
Since its discovery in 1839, research on the synthesis and application of perovskite materials has multiplied largely due to their suitability to be used in the fields of nanotechnology, chemistry and material science. Appropriate changes in composition or addition of other elements or blending with polymers may result in new hybrid and/or composite perovskite materials that will be applied in advanced fields. In this review, we have recapitulated the recent progress on perovskite nanomaterial in solar cell, battery, fuel cell and supercapacitor applications, and the prominence properties of perovskite materials, such as excellent electronic, physical, chemical and optical properties. We discussed in detail the synthesis and results of various perovskite hybrid nanomaterials published elsewhere. We have also discussed the results of various studies on these low dimensional composite nanomaterials in broad sectors such as electronics/optoelectronics, batteries, supercapacitors, solar cells and electrochemical sensors.

1. Introduction

Perovskite-based materials have become a promising candidate, which can be applied in a modern scientific society, because of light-harvesting, basic structure, and unique properties for sustainable energy storage device [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The discovery of calcium titanate (CaTiO3) in 1839 by the Russian mineralogist Perovski was regarded to be the origin of Perovskite, and materials with the same form of a crystal structure as CaTiO3 were known as Perovskite materials (structure) [8]. Generally, the chemical formula used to describe the perovskite materials is ABX3, where ‘A’ and ‘B’ are cations of different sizes and ‘X’ is an anion that binds to both, which are typically oxides or halogens. The ‘A’ atoms are bigger than the ‘B’ atoms. The A and B locations can be replaced by either metal or semimetal from the periodic table [9]. The perovskite structure oxide has the general formula ABO3, as shown in Scheme 1. The A cations such as calcium, lanthanum, lead and strontium are lower in valence and occupy 12-fold holes coordinated with oxygen. The B cations, such as cobalt, chromium, iron, nickel, titanium, and zirconium, reside in smaller six-fold (octahedral) coordination holes. Absolute or partial replacement of A or B cations with lower valence cations, such that the charge of A and B cations is less than +6, causes vacancies in the oxygen lattice sites. This replacement allows the perovskite structure to achieve mixed ionic and electronic conductivity where electronic conductivity is provided by the transition metal cations [10]. Hybrid-based organic–inorganic halide-supported perovskite has lead to great potential and is very popular in renewable energy sources, unique electronic properties, and key materials for the development of perovskite solar cell (PSC)-based devices [11,12,13]. Wang et al. [14] used the first d-block metal-based perovskite oxides (FDMPOs), which received considerable attention for their promising electrocatalytic activity in the water oxidation reaction. The highly tunable process-based infiltration of cation layered perovskite (LPK) modified organic–inorganic hybrid methyl ammonium lead iodide (MAPS) film results in increased open-circuit voltage and conversion efficiency [15]. Chiang et al. [16] observed that highly efficient cost-affordable and sustainable planar organometallic perovskite/fullerene heterojunction solar cells were considered as potential candidates for high power conversion efficiency (4.54%) with increased open circuit-voltage (920 mV). Bromide-based (CsPbBr3/CsPbBr3-CsPb2Br5/CsPbBr3-Cs4PbBr6) inorganic perovskite electrode materials have been used as the most promising candidate for solar cell applications. The heterojunction energy storage device showed reasonable power conversion efficiency (10.17%) with excellent cyclic stability (3000 h) under thermal conditions (@ 100 °C) [17]. Currently, batteries are considered as a primary prospective technology and have become key for applications in electric and hybrid vehicles [18]. Sun et al. [19] have synthesized Mn-doped La0.6Sr0.4Co1−xMnxO3/Super P electrode, which displayed their higher discharge capacity and long cyclic durability during the discharge-charge process. Different types of unconventional (SmFeO3 and Bi-doped SmFeO3) perovskite-based electrodes are being explored in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, the developed perovskite catalysts (SmFeO3 and Sm0.92(2)Bi0.08(2)FeO3) delivered discharged capacity values of 450 and 550 mAh g−1 at 5 mA g−1 [20]. A new approach to enhance the charge capacity of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ perovskite electrode catalyst, which can be immobilized with lithium sulphide (Li2S), is also available. In this embedded lithium–sulfur (Li-S) batteries, the bifunctional LiPS promoter provides an ultralow capacity decay rate of 0.050% in 400 cycles, a substantially improved rate capability of 753 mAh g−1 at 2C (three fold larger than the pristine Li-S cell), and a stable areal capacity with high S loading (2.5–5.2 mg cm−2) for practical applications [21]. Cao et al. [22] have developed a cubic pre-expanding perovskite iron fluoride (KFeF3)-based open framework cathode for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), the displayed Na-storage reversible capacity value of 110 mAh g−1 @ 1C. The development of new sustainable-based green/clean fuel cell energy sources has attracted great attention for commercially available energy storage devices for minimal noise, and low emissions with high power conversion efficiency [23,24,25]. An interesting amorphous iron oxide-modified 3D heterostructured SrSc0.2Co0.8O3−δ (SSC) porous perovskite catalyst showed superior ORR with high power density [26]. Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.2Fe0.2O3−δ perovskite oxide-modified acetylene black (BSCF/AB) composite materials should exhibit and significantly influence their catalytic activity (ORR) [27]. Zhou et al. [28] have used a prominent novel SrSc0.175Nb0.025Co0.8O3−δ (SSNC) cathode electrode material that demonstrated excellent ORR reactivity under low temperature (≤600 °C) conditions. Supercapacitors have attracted worldwide research, because of their versatile unique properties, high specific power and rapid charging–discharging process [29]. Sol–gel strategies have gained a significant interest in the synthesis of perovskite-type oxides due to their excellent chemical homogeneity and ability to control the size, morphology, chemical properties and texture of the particles. Shao et al. [29] have demonstrated a new approach to the manufacture of perovskite oxides, in which the mesoporous LaFeO3 is synthesized by calcinating the MIL-100-Fe gel prototype. The derived electrode material retained the benefits of gel and MOF, with a high area of 41 m2g−1 and rich mesoporosity. This distinctive structure provides excellent electrode material charge transfer capability, resulting in a high specific capacity of 241.3 F g−1 (67.1 mAh g−1) at 1 A g−1 [30]. Perovskite-based LaxSr1−xCoO3−δ (LNF-x) nanofiber materials are considered as potential electrode materials for symmetric and asymmetric supercapacitor devices. The nanofiber possessed a high surface to volume ratio and the estimated capacitance value of 747.75 F g−1 @ 2 A g−1 under aqueous (1 M Na2SO4) electrolytic conditions [31]. Recently, hierarchical mesoporous nanostructured lanthanum chromate (LaCrO3) perovskite oxide has been given much consideration, because of its efficient electrochemical performance with extremely low charge transfer resistance [32]. There are increasing demands and considerable interest for electrochemical sensor techniques, which can be recommended owing to their simple handling, high sensitivity, and environmentally friendly nature [33]. ZnSnO3 perovskite nanomaterials have been greatly used in the electrochemical sensing of biomarker troponin T [34]. The stabilized power conversion efficiency of 19.0% @ 0.1 cm2 is attained by using the lightweight and mechanical flexible robust-based conducting polymer network electrode in perovskite solar cells [35]. The ideal and unique properties of the crystal structure of metal halide-based perovskite (ABX3) electrode materials are shown in Scheme 1.
In this article, the principles of energy storage and the different characteristics of perovskite electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage (solar cells, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and supercapacitors) have been highlighted (Scheme 2).

2. Energy Storage Devices

2.1. Solar Cells

Over the past decade, the increasing global energy demand and fascinating cyclic nature of green and clean energy sources have emerged as a great promise for high-efficiency solar cell device applications [36]. Recently, different kinds of nanomaterials MWCNTs [37], mesoporous carbon [38], mesoporous scaffold [39], carbon nanofiber [40], functionalized graphene [41] and graphene nanoplatelets [42] have received much attention for the study of high performance solar cell applications. The most commonly focused carbon supported electrode materials, like MWCNTs, fullerene and reduced graphene oxide, have emerged as a potential material for dye-sensitized solar energy storage devices [43,44,45].
The hole-conduct-free, compact layer-free and cost effective organic–inorganic-based PSCs are successfully employed for next generation high efficiency photovoltaic energy devices [46,47]. PSCs have excellent energy storage for the improvement of intrinsic stability of the absorbing layer with highly efficient promising future technology [48]. Interestingly, the Jiang group [49] has reported layer and hole-conductor-free mesoscopic MPSC/TiO2 PSCs, which showed remarkable PCE of 13% and offer a simple, low cost and more effective photovoltaic energy device. The fabrication of transparent conducting polymer electrodes comprised of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) can be accomplished by a spectrally-selective antireflection coating method. In these colorful PSCs (CPSCs), the PCE value ranges from 12.8 to 15.1% (red to blue colour), whereas the illuminated fluorinated indium tin oxide (FTO) electrode displayed from 11.6 to 13.8% (red to blue colour) [50]. The Wei group [36] developed inexpensive and high electrical conductive natured 3D potassium-ion supported graphene-based electrode (KIPIG) for sustainable PSC and DSSCs devices, which revealed its PCE of 7.81 and 9.12%. Fabrication of PSCs (nanoparticulated bilayer, SnO2/TiO2) electrode has aroused one of the potential candidates for photovoltaic studies with impressive photovoltaic efficiency values of up to 15% [51]. Chiang et al. [52] have developed a microwave-assisted PSC-based synthesis of indium-doped zinc oxide (IZO) for the study of solar cell applications. The authors have demonstrated a low fabrication cost, reasonable PCE (16% with a Voc value of 1.02 V, Joc value of 22.86 mA cm−2 and the fill factor value of 69.43%) and impression light-soaking stability. Recently, the novel, low-cost, facile processability and transparent hole-transporting materials (HTM) of CNTs-based semi-transparent methylammonium lead halide (MAPbBr3) electrode materials were employed as PSC with the achieved efficiency value of up to 5.82%. This MAPbBr3/CNTs electrode showed great potential applications in tandem solar cells, solar fuels, and solar-driven water splitting [53].
Dai et al. [54] have studied a novel silver nanowire (AgNWs)-based transparent electrode for PSCs. The AgNWs electrode showed a PCE of 11.0% with Voc of 0.96 V and Jsc of 20.47 mA cm−2 (Figure 1). The new type of planar structured tin and germanium (Sn-Ge)-based PSCs was prepared by Ito et al. [55], which showed a noticeably improved efficiency value of 4.48%. Very recently, a simple and cost-effective hollow structured two-dimensional titanium dioxide-based reduced-graphene scaffold (TiO2/2D graphene) perovskite has been demonstrated as an outstanding electrode material for PSC applications. Figure 2a shows the top view porous structure and large surface area of rGS in AgNWs films. The results achieved reported a power conversion efficiency of 27% with good electrode stability (Figure 2b) [56].

2.2. Batteries

The successive developments of battery technology have attracted electric and hybrid vehicles, due to their excellent electrical conductivity, cost-effectiveness and potential applications in green energy devices [18,57]. Recent researchers have focused on surface-active morphological oriented nano structured electrode materials, which can be used for promising energy systems and the development of next generation commercialized LIBs [58,59]. The design and development of an efficient ultra-long porous perovskite-based La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Mn0.2O3 nanofiber-supported RuO2 nanosheet electrode catalyst has been synthesized by the electrospinning method. The fabricated electrode materials can be used as an excellent electrode catalyst for an efficient durable rechargeable Li-O2 battery [60]. Miao et al. [61] synthesized Mn-based perovskite (La1xYxMnO3, LYM-10) composite catalyst for metal–air batteries and found the maximum power density of 167 mW/cm2 with good cyclic stability. Wang et al. [62] prepared the bifunctional electrocatalytic natured perovskite Sr0.9Y0.1CoO3−δ-supported CoO via the electrospinning method, which showed improved electrochemical performances towards oxygen reduction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The Sr0.9Y0.1CoO3−δ nanorod can increase their electrochemical properties for Li-O2 batteries with reduced voltage (~80–140 mV) (Figure 3). The successful mechanochemical synthesis of a novel electroactive silver molybdenum oxyfluoride (SMOF) perovskite Ag+3Mo6+ (O3F3) cathode electrode can improve the volumetric capacitance value of 954 A h/L of the Ag+3Mo6+ (O3F3) nanostructure [63]. The development and design of flexible composite solid electrolytes (CSEs)-based PEO perovskite nanofiber networks has relatively good contact electrodes to achieve good mechanical properties and high ionic conductivity. The LiPEO–LiTFSI–LLTO/Li symmetric cell electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) exhibited low internal battery resistance and high Li+ ion conductivity, and a capacity value of 135.0 mAh g−1 with reasonable cyclic stability of 300 cycles (Figure 4) [64]. The fabrication of 2D hybrid halide-based perovskite (HHP) (CH3(CH2)2NH3)2(CH3NH3)2Pb3Br10 solid electrolyte has been explored in secondary lithium-ion battery. The as-fabricated potential electrode lithium secondary battery with high temperature operation showed better reversible capacity value (242 mAh g−1 @ 0.13 mA cm−2) [65]. On the other hand, 3D-methylammonium lead mixed halide and 2D-propylammonium-methylammonium lead bromide-based organohalide perovskite thin film electrodes reported capacity values of 500 and ~375 mAh g−1 coupling with Li+ intercalation and good cycling stability [66]. Ogunniran et al. [67] reported that the Mn-doped perovskite orthorhombic structured Nd0.9Mn0.1FeO3 nanoparticle could significantly increase its specific capacity value of 763 mAh g−1 @ 0.5 A g−1. The successful synthesis of cubic perovskite BaSnO3 embedded reduced graphene oxide (BaSnO3/rGO) composite for LIBs exhibited an excellent reversible capacity (1200 mAhg−1 @ 0.5 C) and outstanding long-term (100 cycles) stability [68]. Liu et al. [69] developed a nanotubular structure of a hierarchical-based La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−x (HPN–LSC) bifunctional electrode catalyst, which shows the upper limit capacity value of 500 mAh g−1 and long cyclic durability (50 cycles) (Figure 5). The cathode perovskite Sr2CrMoO6−δ (SCM) electrode materials have been synthesized by the sol–gel route, which displayed a controlling discharge capacity value of 600 mAh g−1 and the applied current density value of 75 mA g−1 [70]. The 3D-ordered mesoporous La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ (3DOM LSC) perovskite is used as cathode for the Li-O2 air battery. LSC perovskite oxide could reasonably be attributed to increased surface area that enhanced its catalytic performance [71]. The noble metal-based multi-functional CoP-PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ (CoP-PBSCF) and perovskite-based electrode catalyst has been widely used for renewable energy devices where the optimized trifunctional electrode catalyst proved high power density (138 mW cm−2), lower overpotential in water splitting and more stability during charge/discharge polarization [72].

2.3. Fuel Cells (Oxygen Reduction)

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), can be used as an attractive new concept and promising cathode material for superior electrochemical performances of ORR. Recently, the development of active cathode materials has become a wider research area. In this review part, we have focused on the lanthanum-based cathode as the main material; the modifications made to be significantly improved in cathode activity and oxygen electrochemistry. Besides, there are numerous researchers who have contributed to the perovskite-based cathode materials. Here, some of the results and importance of their works are discussed in detail. Moreover SOFCs lead to friction and speed up the breakdown of cell components, respectively, owing to high temperature operation, which hampers the life span of SOFCs. Hence, in line with this, we have collectively presented some of the recent advancements in SOFC’s cathode materials [73]. The ionic conductivity of SOFC’s cathode materials was overcome by the functional electrolytes through-composed Perovskite La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ as a cathode with sodium carbonate, which results in enhanced electronic and ionic conductivity, as reported by the Zhu group [74]. The resulting functional material shows good oxygen reduction characteristics at 550 °C and a maximum SOFC value of 700 mW/cm2. A change in the composition of the metal oxide of cobalt (0.8) and iron (0.2) resulted in a reduction in area-specific resistance (~0.14 mho cm2). Additionally, the nickel and cobalt nitrate enhance the ORR kinetics and Sr/Ni/Co plays an important role in the reaction of electrode surface for further usage [75]. In line with the earlier study, the Hong group has developed a core–shell type LSCF113-214 to enhance the cathode performance and oxygen reaction for IT-SOFCs. Cubic phase LSCF 113 perovskite as the core was coated with Ruddlesden–Popper LSCF214 thin film to core–shell type by the solution coating method [76], resulting in lower polarization resistance of 0.17 mho cm2 compared to LSCF113 of 0.32 mho cm2 at 650 °C. This enhancement was explained by the following: the lattice parameters of LSCF 113 mismatch with LSCF 214 in the core–shell material, therefore, the oxygen vacancy is greater, and this helps to absorb more oxygen molecules afterwards. Recently, a number of authors have studied the effects of various ions in LSCF materials and their influence has been reported.
Thus, the Budiman [77] group have studied in a detailed manner about the effect of Sr and Co composition in LSCF, which results in the surface oxygen exchange coefficient and oxide ion diffusivity concerning compositions of Sr and Co; if the concentration of the Sr/Co decreases the oxygen vacancy also decreases. Low dimensional materials such as nanometric level materials exhibit higher structural disorder, which depends on the method of preparation of material. Lamas group has tested the crystal structure of Co and Fe non-stoichiometric LSCF nanorods and found that the nanorods exhibit better electrochemical properties compared to the conventional micro-architecture cathode. Co-rich samples have more oxygen-defective sites and exhibit better ORR kinetics [78]. The Li [79] group has made detailed studies on the effect of doping the Fe, Ni, Zn in LSC on their electrochemical performance such as ORR; furthermore, their reduced oxides were tested for hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR). They utilized 30 wt% of perovskite oxide prepared and 70 wt% samarium doped ceria-(Li0.67Na0.33) CO3. Fe, Ni, and Zn occupy the Co3+ sites, and Zn-LSC exhibits higher ORR compared to LSC, whereas Fe and Ni-doped LSC decreases surface oxygen and, subsequently, ORR kinetics were also reduced. On the other hand, the reduction of these doped materials results in Co0.72Fe0.28, a core–shell type alloy-oxide nanoparticle (size: ~20 nm), which shows excellent HOR; other oxides i.e., ZnCo2O4, NiCo2O4 show lower HOR. Here, HOR is the rate-determining step for the fuel activity and the single component H2 fuel cell exhibits a Pmax of 239.1 mW cm−1 at 700 °C. Similarly, Xie et al. [80] have studied Sr replaced with the effect of Barium (0.75) and calcium (0.25) with LSCF by the citric acid–EDTA sol–gel method. Here, Ca doping increases the electrical behavior of perovskite as it increases the whole concentration, additionally this shows more oxygen vaccines. Results enhanced the ORR process and the single-cell peak power density of 1102 mW cm−2 at 750 °C. Zhang et al. [81] have reported the LSCF/CeO2 nanofibers catalyst as a highly electroactive and robust material for the IT-SOFC cathode. The LSCF/CeO2 nanofibers were developed by the co-axial electrospinning process. The precursors were separately mixed with PVP and subject to electrospinning and after the calcinations, the particles’ size reduced to 30–50 nm. These porous nanofibers can help to attain higher ORR activity due to high specific surface area and area-specific resistance also reduced significantly for LSCF/CeO2 nanofiber (0.12 mho cm2), compared to the LCSF nanofiber (0.53 mho cm2) and LSCF powder (0.98 mho cm2). The introduction of this CeO2 suppresses the segregation of the LSCF and its heterostructures that act as excellent ORR activity.
Enhanced electrochemical activity and catalytic durability of LSCF was achieved by a simple sol–gel method reported by the Liu group to modify the surface of PrO2−δ and Pr0.8Ce0.2O2−δ nanoparticles [82]. The PrO2−δ-LSCF shows a 67% lowered specific resistance value of ~0.241 mho cm2 at 600 °C compared to LSCF. Additionally, these PrO2−δ/LSCF generate the active surface in LSCF and accelerate the oxygen vacancies and improved ionic conductivity leading to higher ORR. The durability of these catalysts was further improved by Ce ion, by adjusting the intrinsic activity of LSCF. Nadeem et al. [83] have investigated the effect of group III-A oxides such as B2O3, Al2O3, Ga2O3, and In2O3-doped LSCF and LSF perovskites by multiple steps. Among them, In2O3 shows significant improvements of about 13.73 wt% in LSCF and 7.88 wt% in LSF. In addition, the impregnation reduces the area-specific resistance of 0.41 mho cm2 to 0.27 (LSCF) and 0.99 to 0.39 mho cm2 (LSF), respectively. The electrochemical properties, i.e., oxygen electrocatalysis, are greatly enhanced by the chemical oxygen surface exchange coefficient of 4.53 × 10−5 cm/s (LSCF) and 2.39 × 10−5 cm/s (LSF) impregnation of In2O3. The proton migration and vapor formation are one of the major processes in the SOFC; the cathode microstructure is governed by these processes. In line with this, Lai et al. [84] have utilized 500 nm polystyrene nanospheres to make LSCF perovskite cathode. The results showed that 15 wt% of polystyrene polymer tailored cathode exhibits a much higher power density of about 620 mA/cm2, which was due to the self-organized distribution by the polymer. Apart from the LSCF, a number of authors try to replace lanthanum, strontium, cobalt and iron with suitable ions to get better oxygen electrochemistry, but few of them are discussed further. The Ryu et al. [85] group developed BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ initially by the sol–gel, then by the pulse laser deposition method. The resulting material exhibits a highly nano sized porous morphology with an open-circuit voltage of 1.13 V at an operating temperature of 500 °C. They reported that cathode material is cost effective, durable, and has high thermal stability for the long run. Additionally, the pulse laser deposition process results in a thin-film cathode without any morphological defect, i.e., materials that are not agglomerated in the nano dimension.
Zhang et al. [86] reported carbon dioxide tolerance cathode for oxygen electrochemistry compressed of Nd0.2Sr0.8Nb0.1Co0.9O3−δ perovskite. By altering the Sr,Co,Nb in the A-site, B-site synergy enhances the oxygen electro kinetic significantly, by low specific resistance of 0.037 mho cm2 at 650 °C. Additionally, the cathode shows high durability and CO2 tolerance i.e., 0.08 to 0.2 mho cm2 after 300 min under air atmosphere (5% CO2). Namgung et al. [87] have developed Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ as catalyst–cathode backbone to enhance the durability of the catalyst performance. The prepared material exhibits high porosity in nature and a single phase, which directly reduces the cathode polarization significantly and exhibits the enhanced powder density of 1.57 W cm−2 at 700 °C. A diagonal/rhombohedral structure of La0.5Sr0.5Mn1−xNixO3−δ (LSMN) transition metal–carbon hybrid nano crystal-based perovskite electrode can act as a well-known metal oxide redox couple and play the key role of boosting the intrinsic conduction with excellent electrocatalytic activity towards ORR (Figure 6) [88]. Development of a novel iron-based Bi0.5Fe1−xTixO3−δ (BSFT0.15) perovskite cathode is considered as an ideal electrode material for high performance of electrochemical properties (ORR) with outstanding CO2 tolerance ability (Figure 7) [89]. A systematic analysis of A-site (5 mol% La3+, Sm3+ and Gd3+) dopant and B-site (5 mol% Zr4+ and Ce4+) dopant substituting for BaFeO3−δ materials has been widely used as a cathode for SOFCs applications [90].

2.4. Supercapacitors

Supercapacitors have become an essential component to achieve a clean and safe environment. The goal of the research on supercapacitors is to lower the emission of pollutant gases from electric vehicles. Among several nanomaterials-based supercapacitors, those with perovskite as an active component are gaining attention due to their high charging−discharging speed and the increased high power density [91]. Zhou et al. [92] developed vertically integrated solar cell systems based on perovskite/MoO3/Au/MoO3 composites and electrochromic supercapacitor through the organo lead halide perovskite-based semitransparent photovoltachromic supercapacitors. Seamless integration has been reported by the authors from the photovoltachromic supercapacitors that gave the energy harvesting/storage without any negative impact. The perovskites materials that have a high specific surface area may be useful in enhancing supercapacitor functions. Sr/SrO-based perovskite metal oxides have attracted great attention for the development of supercapacitors due to their high electrical conductivity from electronic devices [93,94], for instance; Lang et al. developed Sr incorporated lanthanum manganite perovskite (La1x Srx MnO3) as modified electrodes for supercapacitors, through the sol–gel technique [95]. The specific capacitance value of perovskite with Sr0.15 was found to be 102 F g−1 and lower intrinsic resistance was observed at 1 M KOH. Similarly, Sr-based supercapacitors exhibited superior specific capacitance having around 5000 times of charging and discharging cycles [96]. A Sr-doped supercapacitor applied to the use of oxygen ions as a charge carrier in a supercapacitor for anion-intercalation was studied using Co3O4, SrCoO3−δ and Ba0.5Sr0.5 Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ as electrodes in an alkaline aqueous electrolyte. SrCoO3−δ was found to be a favourable electrode for supercapacitors because of its cycling stability, high capacity and proper cation leaching capacity (Figure 8) [97]. For supercapacitors, the anion-intercalated perovskite structured SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3−δ was used as an electrode in an aqueous KOH electrolyte, giving this model outstanding cycling stability and capacity. These supercapacitors had a gravimetric capacitance value of approximately 773.6 F g−1, high volumetric capacitance of around 2034.6 F cm−3, good cycling stability and 95.7% capacity retention over 3000 cycles [98].
The composite nanosystem of La1−xSrxBO3−δ (x = 0–1; B = Fe, Mn, Co) has been studied for anion-based pseudo capacitance behavior. The La1−xSrx BO3−δ composition of a library of perovskite oxides composed of La0.2Sr0.8MnO2.7 showed a specific capacitance of 492 F g−1 at 5 mV s–1. Among the three pairs of asymmetric pseudo capacitors designed from SrCoO2.7, La0.2Sr0.8 MnO2.7, and brown millerite Sr2 Fe2O5, the brown millerite-Sr2Fe2O5//SrCoO2.7 mixture showed high specific capacitance [99]. It is reported that the Cubic structure of perovskite materials may provide three-dimensional diffusion channels, which can aid oxygen anion diffusion. A cubic structured strontium titanate was studied for its charge storage property by Anuj Kumar Tomar et al. Strontium titanate electrode displayed a capacitance value of 592 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1 as anticipated from its mesoporous structure, large specific surface area and good mass transfer rate. A high specific capacitance of 212.5 F g−1 at 0.63 A g−1 with good capacitance retention of up to 74.5% and excellent cycling stability was reported for the developed symmetric supercapacitor cell in aqueous media [100].
In recent years, supercapacitors have had superior specific capacity with good cycling stability using bimetallic perovskite, which has also been shown to be a promising candidate for supercapacitor applications. For example, Co-Mn perovskite fluorides (KCox Mn1−x F3) studied for supercapacitors applications revealed that the material had a specific capacity and rate behavior combined with good cycling stability after 5000 cycles at 8 A g−1, and the AC//K-Co-Mn-F-based asymmetric supercapacitor exhibited excellent energy density and power density with a value of 8.0–2.4 Wh Kg−1 at 0.14–8.7 KW Kg−1 [101].
In another report, the light-sensitive photo-supercapacitor was reported as a potential source of energy storage with a high areal capacitance of 150 mF cm−2 and a capacitance loss of 4%. They also found that the photo voltage and photocurrent is zero in the absence of light [102]. Organometallic halide perovskites were found to have excellent ionic responses though they are known for their electronic properties. Luqman et al. [103] have synthesized and developed cadmium sulfide quantum dots. The authors fabricated a cadmium sulfide quantum dots-based electrochemical capacitor as an active electrode of organometallic halide perovskite. Popoola et al. [104] fabricated solid-state perovskite electrochemical supercapacitors having an aerial capacitance of 21.50 µ F/cm2, for an organometallic halide perovskite electrode, which is 3.65 times greater than similar perovskite electrochemical capacitors. Perovskite with ABO3 type exhibited enhanced performance, coarse BO2·xH2O (2 < x < 80) gels, free of anion contaminants reacting with A(OH)2 under refluxing conditions at 70–100 °C, giving rise to crystallites of single phased, nanometer-size powders of ABO3 perovskites (A = Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg, Pb; B = Zr, Ti, Sn) [105]. Lattice relaxation on the surface of PbTiO3 and BaTiO3 was investigated under the assumption that the spurious lattice expansion in perovskite nanocrystals is caused by surface relaxation [106]. Jose et al. [107] synthesized and produced the barium europium zirconate nanoparticles, a complex perovskite oxide recorded from different applications based on supercapacitors of perovskite. Two binary oxide perovskite with general formula A2BB8O6 have been studied; for instance, ZnAl2O4 with a spinel structure has been prepared through the microemulsion process. The LaMnO3-based perovskite prepared by reverse microemulsion was found to have a peculiar doughnut-like texture with a diameter of 2 µm [108]. The perovskite with the LaNiO3 phase exhibited a high specific capacitance value of 160 F g−1 at 10 mV s−1 for manganese oxide/LaNiO3 electrodes [109]. Perovskite KNi0.8Co0.2F3 nanocrystals have been introduced as potential electrode materials for supercapacitors, with superior specific capacity and rate behavior due to the optimal synergistic effect of Ni and Co redox species. The AC//KNi0.8Co0.2F3 asymmetric capacitor delivered high power and energy densities together with excellent cycling stability [110].
The perovskite solar cells exhibit significant electron transport properties when they combine with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs) at low temperatures. The authors suggest that this material may be used instead of titanium dioxide (TiO2) to develop high-efficiency perovskite solar cells on flexible substrates. Zinc oxide nanoparticles use perovskite solar cells with high level performance. On the other hand, electrochemical devices are shown to be stationary partial to ZnO-NPs from the other electrochemical device, but still limited to ZnO-HAP. Cheng et al. studied the chemistry and crystal growth of organometal halides such as CH3NH3PbI3 containing perovskite on ZnO-NP thin films. The polymeric buffer layer poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) was found to enhance power conversion efficiencies of perovskite photovoltaic cells to a value of 10.2%. [111]. A rechargeable battery with bifunctional catalysts was studied recently for several applications. The bifunctional catalyst perovskite lanthanum nickel oxide nanoparticles with intertwined core corona structured morphology were studied to produce highly efficient energy storage devices [112]. Lanthanide has become an important element of anion supercapacitors; for example, perovskite LaNiO3 oxide, which has been found to show that LaNiO3 has a specific capacitance value of 478.7 F g−1 at 0.1 mV −1, and has excellent cycling stability after 15,000 cycles with a slight decrease in charge discharge efficiency of about 5.5%. The studies on the LaNiO3 electrode revealed that charge storage is closely related to the intercalation of oxygen-ion into oxygen vacancies, which originated from the different valence states of the B site, for example, Ni in perovskite ABO3 structure [113]. The carbon cloth electrode containing 28.6 mg cm−2 of Ag nanoparticles showed a volumetric capacitance of 262.5 F cm−3 at 1 mA cm−2, an aerial capacity of 14.8 F cm−2 and a specific capacitance of 517.5 F g−1, which retains 85.6% of its cycling stability after 3000 cycles. The Ag/LSC/carbon cloth electrode also showed a significant energy density of 21.9 mWh cm−3, the marked capacitive performance of the modified electrodes that result from porous, conductive and Ag nanoparticles [114]. Shankar et al. synthesized NdCr1−x FexO3 perovskites by the sol–gel auto-combustion process and studied the dielectric behavior at varying frequency and temperature. The NdCr1−x FexO3 perovskites ceramic nanoparticles material showed a high dielectric constant in the order of 107 at room temperature and were found to decrease proportionally to Fe content [115].
George et al. [116] have prepared nanofibers of SrMnO3 perovskite oxide through the sol–gel electrospinning method and the effect of doping Ba/Ca on the specific capacitance of this nanofiber supercapacitor has been studied. A high specific capacitance value of 446.8 F g−1 is reported for the SrMnO3 electrode incorporated with barium, of about 20 mol%. Nano Ru-doped perovskites with graphene oxide are synthesized by doping Sr, Ba or Ca. The perovskite with a lower quantity of Ru was used as supercapacitor electrode and it was found that the electrodes had a specific capacitance of 564, 460, and 316 F g−1, respectively, for Sr, Ba and Ca Graphene composites [117]. Hussian et al. [118] developed NaNiF3 hollow spheres asymmetric supercapacitor-based perovskite fluoride, which displays an energy density of 51.78 Wh kg−1 at a wide voltage window (1.65 V) with good cyclic stability. Ag nanoparticles embedded La0.85Sr0.15MnO3 were synthesized by Lang et al. [119] for supercapacitor study. The modified electrode showed a specific capacitance value of 186 F g−1 at 1 A g−1. The perovskite lanthanum aluminate has been synthesized by a hydrothermal method in the presence of reduced graphene oxide. This composite electrode showed 721 F g−1 of specific capacitance, which is higher than pure LaAlO3 and graphene oxide supercapacitors, whereas the chronopotentiometry studies on the graphene oxide/LaAlO3 showed 283 F g−1 as specific capacitance [120]. Mn and Nd doping onto LaFeO3 produced La0.8Nd0.2Fe0.8Mn0.2O3, which showed an enhanced specific capacitance value of 158 F g−1 at 50 mV/s, which is higher than that of the LaFeO3 electrode [121]. The recent research demonstrated that the organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites provide significant power conversion efficiency, suitable to be used in commercial applications. The hybrids based on polymers or an organic molecule with perovskite have been studied in detail by several authors. However, the utility of organic hole transport layers is limited due to the restrained electronic behavior of perovskite and the influence of reactive dopants [122], for instance, the devices made up of PEDOT/Py, P(EDOT-co-MPy) and P(EDOT-co-PyMP) copolymers and carbon nanotube composite have been studied. The devices showed appreciable performance in supercapacitor studies with excellent cycling stability, as opposed to the poor cyclability anticipated from conjugated polymers [123]. Xu et al. [124] studied and developed a combined power pack of energy production (solar cell) with storage using CH3NH3PbI3 solar cell and a polypyrrole-containing hybrid supercapacitor. The polypyrrole-based hybrid supercapacitor is found to have a higher efficiency, approximately 10%, than that of the photovoltaic cell with another type of supercapacitor. Polymer-loaded organic–inorganic hybrids are also synthesized and reported for supercapacitors by intercalating unsaturated compounds containing amine functional groups into the organic–inorganic laminar perovskite, followed by the polymerization of unsaturated amine compound using UV light irradiation [125].
Jain et al. have grown supercapacitor-containing thin films of manganite, with the general formula RE1xMxMnO3, with perovskite composite films of La1xSrxMnO3, Pr0.5Ca0.5MnO3 and La1xCaxMnO3 on lanthanum aluminum oxide substrate. The prepared perovskite films were oriented along the epitaxial and c-axis, and exhibited high magnetoresistance [126]. Hou et al. [127] prepared a stable colloidal perovskite nanocrystal having a core–shell structure using a co-polymer template. The polymer template present in the nanoshell provides functionalization that may result in the production of functional nanodevices. Choi et al. [128] demonstrated water-resistant polythiophene derivatives obtained through photo-crosslinking PEDOT:PSS showing significant improvement in performance. Xu et al. [129] have shown that highly promising and oxygen–ion-intercalation type B-site cation-containing Ba2Bi0.1Sc0.2Co1.7O6-δ perovskite oxide can also be effectively used as an electrode material for supercapacitor studies, having achieved a specific capacitance value of about 1050 F g−1 and an excellent cyclic stability (3000 cycles) in alkaline electrolyte (6M KOH) solution (Figure 9).

3. Electrochemical and Bio-Sensors

Electrochemical bio-sensors are currently an area of focus and considerable attention is being given to detecting bio-sensing molecules using enzyme-free electrochemical techniques [130]. Perovskite-type SrTiO3 nanocubes decorated with reduced graphene oxide were synthesized using a sonochemical method. The modified electrode SrTiO3@RGO nanocomposite has an excellent electrochemical detection toward amino acids (tryptophan, LOD of 7.15 nM) [131]. In addition, two different electrodes (ZnSnO3 and ITO-coated polyethylene terephthalate (ITO/PET)) perovskite-based substrates have been produced, which have been reported as excellent electrode materials for the electrochemical detection of cardiac bio-marker troponin T. The sensors were developed by electrochemical means in the concentration range of 1 fg mL−1 to 1mg mL−1 and their LOD value was 0.187 fg mL−1 and 0.571 fg mL−1, respectively [34]. The perovskite material SrPdO3 modified with carbon paste (CPE/SrPdO3) electrode is being used in the growth of electrochemical sensing towards dopamine oxidation (DA) and the exhibited low level detection limit (9.3 nM) with high sensitivity [132]. Sr0.85Ce0.15FeO3 perovskite (SCF) electrode materials play a significant role in electrochemical sensor and exhibited electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (LOD = 10 μM) with high sensitivity (60 mA mM−1 cm−2) [133]. Ponnusamy et al. [134] reported the findings of crystal-structure-dependent nonenzymatic glucose-sensing properties of nanostructures of tungsten oxide (WO3) and Pd-doped WO3. The WO3 nanomaterials with orthorhombic, monoclinic, and mixed (ortho + monoclinic) phases were harvested using a simple hydrothermal method by varying the reaction time and subsequent annealing process. The Pd-doped WO3 exhibited a higher glucose-sensing performance of 11.4 μA μM−1 cm−2 (linear range: 5–55 μM) and 5.6 μA μM−1 cm−2. Furthermore, it was concluded that Pd-doped monoclinic WO3 is a possible material for the development of real-time glucose sensors (Figure 10). The development of perovskite-based LaTiO3-Ag0.1 nanocomposite is successfully utilized in the study of non-enzymatic electrochemiluminescence (ECL) glucose sensors, because they displayed their LOD value of 2.50 × 10−9 M with a high sensitivity of 7.80 × 102 μA mM−1 cm−2 [135]. Ye et al. [136] have fabricated LaNi0.5Ti0.5O3/CoFe2O4 (LNT-CFO/GCE) perovskite-based nanocomposite towards H2O2 detection, which showed the reported detection limit value of 23 nM by the amperometric method. Luque et al. [137] have stated the electrochemical properties of carbon-based manganese (La0.66Sr0.33MnO3-CPE) perovskite electrode for the sensitive determination of H2O2 reduction and oxidation (two commercial products). The strontium-supported reduced graphene oxide (rGO/SrTiO3) perovskite nanocomposite has been synthesized by an in-situ technique, in which the spherical morphological rGO/SrTiO3 electrode displayed a better electrochemical response for para-nitrophenol [138]. A novel perovskite-type LaNi0.5Ti0.5O3 (LNT) coated carbon paste electrode (CPE) holds high promise in electrocatalytic activity and excellent long-term stability for the electrochemical detection of non-enzymatic glucose sensors [139].

4. Conclusions

We have an overview of the recent development of different methods of preparation and fabrication of perovskite-based materials and their composite, a new and promising class of advanced electrode materials for various electrochemical applications like solar cells, batteries, fuel cells, etc. Nanostructured perovskite materials are currently of great interest in electrochemical energy storage devices owing to their high electrode surface area, size effects, unique structures, cost-effectiveness, mechanical flexibility, significantly enhanced electrochemical properties and long durability. The state-of-the-art electrode catalyst has been attracting interest in the expansion of green energy devices. The current challenges and forthcoming perspectives of perovskite materials in the framework of device stability, surface smooth electrode and low-cost device fabrication, which yield tremendous electrochemical performances in both electrochemical sensors and energy storage device applications, are discussed briefly. However, an in-depth discussion of various perovskite hybrid nanomaterials and their range of promising potential electrochemical application is accomplished.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-M.C.; Resources, R.R.; Supervision, S.-M.C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.R., S.-M.C., T.-W.C., K.D. and R.K.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.R., S.-M.C., T.-W.C., G.A., K.D., R.K., N.K., N.B., T.J., V.M., S.D.R. and S.C. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.-M.C. received funding from Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 107-2113-M-027-005-MY3), Taiwan (ROC). R.R. received financial support from the Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India, New Delhi, File No: EEQ/2016/000427 and K.D. received funding from Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India, New Delhi, EEQ/2016/000049; Diary No: SERB/F/8355/2016-17.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shen-Ming Chen for help with manuscript review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PSCPerovskite solar cell
LPKLayered perovskite
LIBsLithium-ion batteries
SIBsSodium-ion batteries
PCEPower conversion efficiency
PEDOT: PSSPoly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and poly(styrene sulfonate)
FTOFluorinated indium tin oxide
CPSCsColorful perovskite solar cells
KIPIGPotassium-ion pre-intercalated graphene
DSSCsDye-sensitized solar cells
IZOIndium doped zinc oxide
HTMHole transporting materials
MAPbBr3Methyl ammonium lead halide
AgNWsSilver nanowires
SEMScanning electron microscope
ORROxygen reduction reaction
OEROxygen evolution reaction
LiPSLithium Polysulfide
MOFMetal-Organic Framework

References

  1. Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Wu, M.; Prakash, J.; Sun, S. Rational design of multifunctional air electrodes for rechargeable Zn–Air batteries: Recent progress and future perspectives. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 21, 253–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wali, Q.; Iftikha, F.J.; Khan, M.E.; Ullah, A.; Iqbal, Y.; Jose, R. Advances in stabiligy of perovskite solar cells. Org. Electron. 2020, 78, 105590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dong, C.R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zeng, H. Halide perovskite materials as light harvesters for solar energy conversion. Energy Chem. 2020, 2, 100026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jena, A.K.; Kulkarni, A.; Miyasaka, T. Halide perovskite photovoltaics: Background, status, and future prospects. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3036–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Review on sensing applications of perovskite nanomaterials. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, J.; Xing, G.; Li, S.; Huang, X.; Huang, W. Metal halide perovskites: Stability and sensing-ability. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 10121–10137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boyd, C.C.; Cheacharoen, R.; Leijtens, T.; McGehee, M.D. Understanding degradation mechanisms and improving stability of perovskite photovoltaics. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3418–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Assirey, E.A.R. Perovskite synthesis, properties and their related biochemical and industrial application. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 817–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Varma, P.C.R. perovskites. In Perovskite Photovoltaics; Academic Press: Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, 2018; pp. 197–229. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galloway, K.V.; Sammes, N.M. Fuel Cells—Solid Oxide Fuel Cells/Anodes. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yun, S.; Qin, Y.; Uhl, A.R.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Yin, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Hagfeldt, A. New-generation integrated devices based on dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 476–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, U.; Zhinong, Y.; Khan, A.A.; Zulfiqar, A.; Khan, Q.U. Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites based on methylamine lead halide solar cell. Sol. Energy 2019, 189, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salim, T.; Sun, S.; Abe, Y.; Krishna, A.; Grimsdale, A.C.; Lam, Y.M. Perovskite-based solar cells: Impact of morphology and device architecture on device performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Choi, S.; Kim, J.; Cha, S.W.; Lim, J. Recent advances of first d-block metal-based perovskite oxide electrocatalyst for alkaline water splitting. Catalysts 2020, 10, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, Y.; Schlipf, J.; Wusslerr, M.; Petrus, M.L.; Jaegermann, W.; Bein, T.; Buschbaum, P.M.; Docampo, P. Hybrid Perovskite/Perovskite Heterojunction Solar cells. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5999–6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chiang, Y.F.; Jeng, J.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Peng, S.R.; Chen, P.; Guo, T.F.; Wen, T.C.; Hsu, Y.J.; Hsu, C.M. High voltage and efficient bilayer heterojunction solar cells based on organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite absorber with low-cost flexible substrate. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 6033–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tong, G.; Chen, T.; Li, H.; Song, W.; Chang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yu, L.; Xu, J.; Qi, Y.; Jiang, Y. High Efficient Hole Extraction and Stable All-Bromide Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells via Derivative-Phase Gradient Bandgap architecture. Sol. RRL 2019, 1900030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Fleischer, C.; Sauer, D.U. Critical review of the methods for monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles. J. Power Sources 2014, 258, 321–339. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, N.; Liu, H.; Yu, Z.; Zhenning, Z.; Shao, C. Mn-doped La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 perovskite catalysts with enhanced performances for non-aqueous electrolyte Li-O2 batteries. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 13522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.; Sheha, E.; Dek, S.I.E.; Goonetilleke, D.; Harguindeguey, M.; Sharma, N. SmFeO3 and Bi-doped SmFeO3 perovskites as an alternative class of electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. Cryst. Eng. Commun. 2018, 20, 6165–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kong, L.; Chen, X.; Li, B.Q.; Peng, H.J.; Huang, J.Q.; Xie, J.; Zhang, Q. A Bifunctional Perovskite Promoter for Polysulfide Regulation toward Stable Lithium–Sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cao, D.; Yin, C.; Shi, D.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, C. Cubic Perovskite Fluoride as Open Framework Cathode for Na-Ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 1701130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.; Zhou, W.; Ding, D.; Liu, M.; Ciucci, F.; Tade, M.; Shao, Z. Advances in Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Complex Oxides without Alkaline Earth metal elements. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, H.; Zhou, M.; Choudhury, P.; Luo, H. Perovskite oxides as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution/reduction reactions-A mini review. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 16, 5671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ge, X.; Sumboja, A.; Wu, D.; An, T.; Li, B.; Goh, F.W.T.; Hor, T.S.A.; Zong, Y.; Liu, Z. Oxygen Reduction in Alkaline Media: From Mechanisms to Recent Advances catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4643–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, W.; Ge, L.; Chen, Z.G.; Liang, F.; Xu, H.Y.; Motuzas, J.; Julbe, A.; Zhu, Z. Amorphous Iron Oxide Decorated 3D Hetero structured Electrode for Highly Efficient Oxygen reduction. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4193–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fabbri, E.; Mohamed, R.; Levecque, P.; Conrad, O.; Kotz, R.; Schmidt, T.J. Composite Electrode Boosts the Activity of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δPerovskite and Carbon toward Oxygen Reduction in alkaline media. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, W.; Sunarso, J.; Zhao, M.; Liang, F.; Klande, T.; Feldhoff, A. A Highly Active Perovskite Electrode for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction below 600 °C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14036–14040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeyalakshmi, M.; Balasubramanian, K. Simple Capacitors to Supercapacitors—An Overview. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 3, 1196–1217. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Ding, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, M.; Shao, R.; Sun, Y.; Lin, B. Mesoporous LaFeO3 perovskite derived from MOF gel for all-solid-state symmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 386, 124030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Lin, B.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X. Symmetric/Asymmetric Supercapacitor Based on the Perovskite-type Lanthanum Cobaltate Nanofibers with Sr-substitution. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 178, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hussain, S.; Javed, M.S.; Ullah, N.; Shaheen, A.; Aslam, N.; Ashraf, I.; Abbas, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Qiao, G. Unique hierarchical mesoporous LaCrO3 perovskite oxides for highly efficient electrochemical energy storage applications. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15164–15170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Park, S.; Boo, H.; Chung, T.D. Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 556, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Supraja, P.; Sudarshan, V.; Tripathy, S.; Agarwal, A.; Singh, S.G. Label free electrochemical detection of cardiac biomarker troponin T using ZnSnO3 perovskite nanomaterials. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, X.; Meng, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Huang, Z.; Su, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, X.; et al. A Mechanically Robust Conducting Polymer Network Electrode for Efficient Flexible Perovskite solar cells. Joule 2019, 3, 2205–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wei, W.; Li, M.; Hu, Y. Applications of 3D Potassium-Ion Pre-Intercalated Graphene for Perovskite and Dye-Sensitized solar cells. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 8743–8749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, W.J.; Ramasamy, E.; Lee, D.Y.; Song, J.S. Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Catalytic Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Counter electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 6, 1145–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wu, M.S.; Lin, J.C. Dual doping of mesoporous carbon pillars with oxygen and sulfur as counter electrodes for iodide/triiodide redox mediated dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 471, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, G.; Xia, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Fan, R.; Sui, L.; Su, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, P.; Li, Y. In-situ passivation of TiO2 mesoporous scaffold with nano-sized heteropolyacid for boosting the efficiency of the perovskite solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 332, 135427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joshi, P.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Q.; Glipeau, D.; Fong, H.; Qiao, Q. Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers as Low-Cost Counter Electrode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 12, 3572–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yue, H.; Wu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Lin, J.; Huang, M.; Lan, Z.; Fan, L. Functionalized graphene/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate as counter electrode catalyst for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy 2013, 54, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kavan, L.; Yum, J.H.; Gratzel, M. Optically Transparent Cathode for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Graphene nanoplates. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, G.; Kuang, S.; Zhang, J.; Hou, S.; Nian, S. Graphitic carbon nitride/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite as Pt-free counter electrode for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 187, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hino, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Kuramoto, N. Preparation of functionalized and non-functionalized fullerene thin films on ITO glasses and the application to a counter electrode in a dye-sensitized solar cell. Carbon 2006, 44, 880–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Torres, D.; Sebastian, D.; Lazzaro, M.J.; Pinilla, J.L.; Suelves, I.; Arico, A.S.; Baglio, V. Performance and stability of counter electrodes based on reduced few-layer graphene oxide sheets and reduced graphene oxide quantum dots for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 306, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jost, M.; Alrecht, S.; Kegelmann, L.; Wolf, C.M.; Lang, F.; Lipovsek, B.; Krc, J.; Korte, L.; Neher, D.; Rech, B.; et al. Efficient Light Management by Textured Nanoimprinted Layers for Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 1232–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ye, S.; Sun, W.; Li, Y.; Yan, W.; Peng, H.; Bian, Z.; Liu, Z.; Huang, C. CuSCN-Based Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cell with an Average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3723–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Berhe, T.A.; Su, W.N.; Chen, C.H.; Pan, C.J.; Cheng, J.H.; Chen, H.M. Organometal halide perovskite solar cells: Degradation and stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 323–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Mei, A.; Rong, Y.; Hu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Liu, Q.; Han, H. Efficient Compact-Layer-Free, Hole-Conductor Free, Fully Printable Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 4142–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiang, Y.; Luo, B.; Jiang, F.; Hernandez, C.F.; Liu, T.; Mao, L.; Xiong, S.; Li, Z.; Wang, T.; Kippelen, B.; et al. Efficient colorful perovskite solar cells using a top polymer electrode simultaneously as spectrally selective antireflection coating. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 7829–7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Denegri, G.M.; Colodrero, S.; Kamarenko, M.; Martorrell, J. All-Nanoparticle SnO2/TiO2 Electron-transporting layers processed at low temperature for efficient thin-film perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 5548–5556. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chiang, Y.H.; Shih, C.K.; Sie, A.S.; Li, M.H.; Peng, C.C.; Shen, P.S.; Wang, Y.P.; Guo, T.F.; Chen, P. Highly stable perovskite solar cells with all-inorganic selective contacts from microwave-synthesized oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Z.; Boix, P.P.; Xing, G.; Fu, K.; Kulkarnai, S.A.; Batabyal, S.K.; Xu, W.; Cao, A.; Sum, T.C.; Mathews, N.; et al. Carbon nanotubes as an efficient hole collector for high voltage methylammonium lead bromide perovskite solar cells. Nano Scale 2016, 8, 6352–6360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, H.; Luo, Q.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Lin, H. Working from Both Sides: Composite Metallic Semitransparent Top Electrode for High Performance Perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4523–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ito, N.; Kamarudin, M.A.; Hirotani, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Ogomi, Y.; Iikubo, S.; Minemoto, T.; Yoshino, K.; Hayase, S. Mixed Sn-Ge Perovskite for Enhanced Perovskite Solar Cell Performance in Air. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 1682–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tavakoli, M.M.; Tavakoli, R.; Hasanzadeh, S.; Mirfasin, M.H. Interface Engineering of Perovskite Solar Cell Using a Reduced-Graphene Scaffold. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 19531–19536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhaskar, A.; Mikhailova, D.; Yuvuz, N.K.; Nikolowski, K.; Oswald, S.; Braminik, N.N.; Ehrenberg, H. 3d-Transition metal doped spinels as high-voltage cathode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2014, 42, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Goriparti, S.; Miele, E.; Angelis, F.D.; Fabrizio, E.D.; Zaccaria, R.P.; Capiglia, C. Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 257, 421–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Krass, S.; Vijn, A.; Falk, M.; Ufer, B.; Luerben, B.; Janek, J.; Froba, M. Nanostructured and nanoporous LiFePO4and LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-δ as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2014, 42, 218–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, X.; Gong, Y.; Li, S.; Sun, C. Porous Perovskite La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Mn0.2O3 Nanofibers Loaded with RuO2 Nano sheets as an Efficient and Durable Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Li-O2 Batteries. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7737–7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miao, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Sun, S.; Xue, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, J. A new family of Mn-based perovskite (La1−xYxMnO3) with improved oxygen electrocatalytic activity for metal-air batteries. Energy 2018, 154, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, J.; Cheng, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, M.; Lu, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, C. Perovskite Sr0.9Y0.1CoO3−δ Nano rods Modified with CoO Nanoparticles as a Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Li–O2 Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 5557–5566. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tong, W.; Yoon, W.S.; Hagh, N.M.; Amatucci, G.G. A Novel Silver Molybdenum Oxy fluoride Perovskite as a Cathode Material for Lithium batteries. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, K.; Zhang, R.; Sun, J.; Wu, M.; Zhao, T. Polyoxyethylene (PEO)|PEO–Perovskite|PEO Composite Electrolyte for All-Solid-State Lithium Metal batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 46930–46937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fujii, Y.; Ramirez, D.; Navarro, N.C.R.; Jullian, D.; Miura, A.; Jaramillo, F.; Tadanaga, K. Two-Dimensional Hybrid Halide Perovskite as Electrode Materials for All-Solid-State Lithium Secondary Batteries Based on Sulfide Solid Electrolytes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 6569–6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ramirez, D.; Suto, Y.; Cavarro, C.R.; Miura, A.; Tadanaga, K. Structural and Electrochemical Evaluation of Three and Two Dimensional Organohalide Perovskites and Their Influence on the Reversibility of Lithium intercalation. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 4181–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ogunniran, K.O.; Murugadoss, G.; Thangamuthu, R.; Periyasamy, P. All inorganic based Nd0.9Mn0.1FeO3 perovskite for Li-ion battery application: Synthesis, structural and morphological investigation. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 766, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Veerappan, G.; Yoo, S.; Zhang, K.; Ma, M.; Kang, B.; Park, J.H. High-reversible capacity of Perovskite BaSnO3/rGO composite for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 214, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, G.; Chen, H.; Xia, L.; Wang, S.; Ding, L.X.; Li, D.; Xiao, K.; Dai, S.; Wang, H. Hierarchical Mesoporous/Macroporous Perovskite La0.5Sr0.5CoO3–xNanotubes: A Bifunctional Catalyst with Enhanced Activity and Cycle Stability for Rechargeable Lithium Oxygen batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22478–22486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, Z.; Yuan, X.; Li, L.; Ma, Z.F. Double Perovskite Oxide Sr2CrMoO6-δ as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Rechargeable Lithium Air batteries. Chem. Comm. 2014, 50, 14855–14858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oh, M.Y.; Lee, J.J.; Zuhoor, A.; Gnanakumar, G.; Nahm, K.S. Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of three-dimensionally-ordered macroporous La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ perovskite oxide for Li–O2 battery applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 32212–32219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, Y.Q.; Tao, H.B.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.F.; Hua, B.; Luo, J.L. In situ grown cobalt phosphide (CoP) on perovskite nanofibers as an optimized trifunctional electrocatalyst for Zn–air batteries and overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26607–26617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Larramendi, I.R.; Vitoriano, N.O.; Dzul Bautista, I.B.; Rojo, T. Chapter 20, Designing perovskite oxides for solid oxide fuel cells. In Perovskite Materials—Synthesis, Characterisation, Properties, and Applications; Intech Open Limited: London, UK, 2016; pp. 590–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Chen, Y.; Nie, X.; Wang, B.; Xia, C.; Dong, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, B. Tuning La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ perovskite cathode as functional electrolytes for advanced low-temperature SOFCs. Catal. Today 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Wei, Z.; Guan, K.; Meng, J.; Meng, F.; Meng, J.; Liu, X. Enhancing catalysis activity of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for solid oxide fuel cell by a facile and efficient impregnation process. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 13757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, L.; Wang, P.; Geng, C.; Cao, H.; Xu, C.; Cheng, J.; Hong, T. A novel core-shell LSCF perovskite structured electro catalyst with local hetero-interface for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 11824–11833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Budiman, R.A.; Bangarinao, K.D.; Ishiyama, T.; Krishimoto, H.; Yamaji, K.; Horita, T.; Yokokawa, T. Influence of Sr and Co deficiency on the transport properties and oxygen reduction reaction of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ. Solid State Ion. 2020, 348, 115285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gomez, A.E.M.; Sacanell, J.; Iriart, C.H.; Ramos, C.P.; Soldati, A.L.; Figueroa, S.J.A.; Tabacniks, M.H.; Fantini, M.C.A.; Craievich, A.F.; Lamas, D.G. Crystal structure, cobalt and iron speciation and oxygen nonstoichiometry of La0.6Sr0.4Co1-yFeyO3-d nano rods for IT-SOFC cathodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 153250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Li, P.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Yao, M.; Yan, F.; Fu, D. Effect of Fe, Ni and Zn dopants in La0·9Sr0·1CoO3 on the electrochemical performance of single-component solid oxide fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 11802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xie, D.; Li, K.; Yang, J.; Yan, D.; Jia, L.; Chi, B.; Pu, J.; Li, J. High-performance La0.5(Ba0.75Ca0.25)0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Guan, K.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, X.; Meng, J.; Liu, X.; Meng, J. La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ/CeO2 Hetero structured Composite Nanofibers as a Highly Active and Robust Cathode Catalyst for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 26830–26841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Guan, K.; Wei, Z.; Meng, J.; Meng, J.; Liu, X. Enhancing Activity and Durability of A-Site-Deficient (La0.6Sr0.4)0.95Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ Cathode by Surface Modification with PrO2−δ Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 3367–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nadeem, M.; Wan, Y.; Xia, C. The effect of group IIIA oxides on the oxygen reduction reaction at cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 189, 107924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lai, Y.W.; Lee, K.R.; Yang, S.Y.; Tseng, C.J.; Jang, S.C.; Tsao, I.Y.; Chen, S.Y.; Lee, S.W. Production of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode with graded porosity for improving proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 22479–22485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ryu, S.; Lee, S.; Jeong, W.; Pandiyan, A.; Moorthy, S.B.K.; Chang, I.; Park, T.; Cha, S.W. Pulsed laser deposition of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ cathode for solid oxide fuel cell. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 369, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Dai, J.; Yang, G.; Ran, R.; Zhou, W.; et al. A new highly active and CO2-stable perovskite-type cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells developed from A- and B-site cation synergy. J. Power Sources 2020, 457, 227995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Namgung, Y.; Hong, J.; Kumar, A.; Lim, D.K.; Song, S.J. One step infiltration induced multi-cation oxide nanocatalyst for load proof SOFC application. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 267, 118374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ge, X.; Du, Y.; Li, B.; Hor, T.S.A.; Sindoro, M.; Zong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z. Intrinsically Conductive Perovskite Oxides with Enhanced Stability and Electrocatalytic Activity for Oxygen Reduction Reactions. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 7865–7871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gao, J.; Li, Q.; Xia, W.; Sun, L.; Huo, L.H.; Zhao, H. Advanced Electrochemical Performance and CO2 Tolerance of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 Fe1−x Tix O3−δ Perovskite Materials as Oxygen Reduction Cathodes for Intermediate—Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18647–18656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, J.; Saccoccio, M.; Chen, D.; Gao, Y.; Chen, C. The effect of A-site and B-site substitution on BaFeO3−δ; An investigation as a cathode material for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2015, 297, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 797–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zhou, F.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, X.; Wang, A.; Li, Y.Y.; Surya, C.; Chai, Y. Perovskite Photovoltachromic Supercapacitor with All-Transparent Electrodes. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5900–5908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Xu, N.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, N. Electrical conduction behavior of La, Co co-doped SrTiO3 perovskite as anode material for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 6407–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, W.; Xu, N.; Xie, Z.; Chen, N. Electrical conductivity and structural stability of La-doped SrTiO3 with A-site deficiency as anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 7913–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yoo, K.B.; Choi, G.M. Performance of La-doped strontium titanate (LST) anode on LaGaO3-based SOFC. Solid State Ion. 2009, 180, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lang, X.; Mo, H.; Hu, X.; Tian, H. Supercapacitor performance of perovskite La1−xSrxMnO3. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 13720–13730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Liu, Y.; Dinh, J.; Tade, M.O.; Shao, Z. Design of Perovskite Oxides as Anion-Intercalation-Type Electrodes for Supercapacitors: Cation Leaching Effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23774–23783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhu, L.; Liu, Y.; Su, C.; Zhou, W.; Liu, M.; Shao, Z. Perovskite SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3-δ as an Anion-Intercalated Electrode Material for Supercapacitors with Ultrahigh Volumetric Energy Density. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 9728–9731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Alexander, C.T.; Mefford, J.T.; Saunders, J.; Forslund, R.P.; Johnston, K.P.; Stevenson, K.J. Anion-Based Pseudocapacitance of the Perovskite Library La1−xSrx BO3−δ (B = Fe, Mn, Co). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 5084–5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tomar, A.K.; Singh, G.; Sharma, R.K. Charge storage characteristics of mesoporous strontium titanate perovskite aqueous as well as flexible solid-state supercapacitor cell. J. Power Sources 2019, 426, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shi, W.; Ding, R.; Li, X.; Xu, Q.; Ying, D.; Huang, Y.; Liu, E. Bimetallic Co-Mn perovskite fluorides as high-stable electrode materials for supercapacitors. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 15305–15311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ng, C.H.; Lim, H.N.; Hayase, S.; Zainal, Z.; Shafie, S.; Lee, H.W.; Huang, N.M. Cesium Lead Halide Inorganic-Based Perovskite-Sensitized Solar Cell for PhotoSupercapacitor Application Under High Humidity Condition. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Luqman, E.; Oloore, E.; Gondal, M.A.; Idris, K.; Popoola, A. CdS Quantum Dots-Organometallic Halide Perovskites Bilayer Electrodes Structures for Supercapacitor Applications. Chem. Electron. Chem. 2019, 7, 486–492. [Google Scholar]
  104. Popoola, I.; Gondal, M.; Oloore, L.; Popoola, A.; AlGhamdi, J. Fabrication of organometallic halide perovskite electrochemical supercapacitors utilizing quasi-solid-state electrolytes for energy storage devices. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 332, 135536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kutty, T.R.N.; Padmini, P. Wet chemical formation of nanoparticles of binary perovskites through isothermal gel to crystallite conversion. Mater. Res. Bull. 1992, 27, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ishikawa, K.; Uemori, T. Surface relaxation in ferroelectric perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 60, 11841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jose, R.; James Asha, J.; John, M.; Divakar, R.; Koshy, J. Synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles of Ba2EuZrO5.5: A new complex perovskite ceramic oxide. J. Mater. Res. 2000, 15, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Giannakas, A.E.; Vaimakis, T.C.; Ladavos, A.K.; Trikalitis, P.N.; Pomonis, P.J. Variation of surface properties and textural features of spinel ZnAl2O4 and perovskite LaMnO3 nanoparticles prepared via CTAB–butanol–octane–nitrate salt microemulsions in the reverse and bicontinuous states. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 259, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hwang, D.K.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.H.; Hwang, I.S.; Kim, I.D. Phase evolution of perovskite LaNiO3 nanofibers for supercapacitor application and p-type gas sensing properties of LaOCl–NiO composite nanofibers. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1959–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ding, R.; Li, X.; Shi, W.; Xu, Q.; Han, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hong, W.; Liu, E. Flexible high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3208–3214. [Google Scholar]
  111. Cheng, Y.; Yang, Q.D.; Xiao, J.; Xue, Q.; Li, H.W.; Guan, Z.; Yip, H.L.; Tsang, S.W. On the Decomposition of Organometal Halide Perovskite Films on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19986–19993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lee, D.U.; Park, H.W.; Park, M.G.; Ismayilov, V.; Chen, Z. Synergistic Bifunctional Catalyst Design based on Perovskite Oxide Nanoparticles and Intertwined Carbon Nanotubes for Rechargeable Zinc−Air Battery Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Che, W.; Wei, M.; Sang, Z.; Ou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Perovskite LaNiO3−δ oxide as an anion-intercalated pseudocapacitor electrode. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, P.; Liu, J.; Cheng, S.; Cai, W.; Yu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, P.; Liu, M. A high-performance electrode for supercapacitors: Silver nanoparticles grown on a porous perovskite-type material La0.7S0.3CoO3−δ substrate. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 328, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shankar, J.; Prasad, B.V.; Suresh, M.B.; Kumar, R.V.; Babu, D.S. Electrical Properties of NdCr1−xFexO3 Perovskite Ceramic Nanoparticles-An Impedance Spectroscopy studies. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 94, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. George, G.; Jackson, S.L.; Luo, C.Q.; Fang, D.; Luo, D.; Hu, D.; Wen, J.; Luo, Z. Effect of doping on the performance of high-crystalline SrMnO3 perovskite nanofibers as a supercapacitor electrode. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 21982–21992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Galal, A.; Hassan, H.K.; Atta, N.F.; Jacob, T. Energy and cost-efficient nano-Ru-based perovskites/RGO composites for application in high performance supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 538, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hussain, N.; Wu, F.; Younasd, W.; Xu, L. Hollow sphere formation by the self-aggregation of perovskite fluoride NaNiF3 nanocrystals and the application of these spheres as an electrode in an ultrahigh performance asymmetric supercapacitor. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 11959–11967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lang, X.; Sun, X.; Liu, Z.; Nan, H.; Li, C.; Hu, X.; Tian, H. Ag nanoparticles decorated perovskite La0.85Sr0.15MnO3 as electrode materials for supercapacitors. Mater. Lett. 2019, 243, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Vinuthraj, T.N.; Hoskeri, P.A.; Muralidhara, H.B. Facile synthesis of perovskite Lanthanum aluminate and its green reduced graphene oxide composite for high performance supercapacitors. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 858, 113830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rezanezhad, A.; Rezaie, E.; Ghadimi, L.S.; Hajalilou, A.; Lotf, E.A.; Arsalani, N. Outstanding supercapacitor performance of Nd–Mn co-doped perovskite LaFeO3@nitrogen-doped graphene oxide nanocomposites. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 335, 135699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ishida, N.; Wakamiya, A.; Saeki, A. Quantifying Hole Transfer Yield from Perovskite to Polymer Layer: Statistical Correlation of Solar Cell Outputs with Kinetic and Energetic Properties. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 1678–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lacerda, G.R.D.B.S.; Santos, G.A.; Rocco, M.L.M.; Lavall, R.L.; Matencio, T.; Calado, T.H.D.R. Development of nanohybrids based on carbon nanotubes/P(EDOTco-MPy) and P(EDOT-co-PyMP) copolymers as electrode material for aqueous supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 335, 135637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xu, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Cheng, Y.B.; Wang, M. A Power Pack based on Organometallic Perovskite Solar Cell and Supercapacitor. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1782–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Takeoka, Y.; Asai, K. Perovskite-Type Organic/Inorganic Lamellar Polymer. U.S. Patent No: US6741,6927B2, 6 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
  126. Jain, M.; Bauer, E.; Ronning, F.; Hundley, M.F.; Civale, L.; Wang, H.; Maiorov, B.; Burrell, A.K.; McClesky, T.M.; Foltyn, S.R.; et al. Mixed-Valence Perovskite Thin Films by Polymer-Assisted Deposition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 1858–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hou, S.; Guo, Y.; Tang, Y.; Quan, Q. Synthesis and Stabilization of Colloidal Perovskite Nanocrystals by Multidentate Polymer Micelles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 18417–18422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Choi, H.; Ha, S.R.; Park, S.; Oh, J.T.; Kim, D.H.; Cho, S.; Bae, S.Y.; Kang, D.; Kim, J. Water-resistant PEDOT:PSS hole transport layer by photo crosslinking agent for high-performance perovskite and polymer solar cells. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 13187–13193. [Google Scholar]
  129. Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Tade, M.O.; Shao, Z. B-Site Cation-Ordered Double-Perovskite Oxide as an Outstanding Electrode Material for Supercapacitive Energy Storage Based on the Anion Intercalation mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9415–9423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Hu, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, G.; Hu, X.; Li, T.; Yang, Z. Synthesis of perovskite-type SrTiO3 nanoparticles for sensitive electrochemical bio-sensing applications. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 810, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Govindasamy, M.; Wang, S.F.; Pan, W.C.; Subramanian, B.; Ramalingam, R.J.; Lohedan, H.A. Facile sonochemical synthesis of perovskite-type SrTiO3 nanocubes with reduced graphene oxide nanocatalyst for an enhanced electrochemical detection of α-amino acid (tryptophan). Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 56, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Atta, N.F.; Ali, S.M.; Ads, E.H.E.; Galal, A. Nano-perovskite carbon paste composite electrode for the simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 128, 16–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Deganello, F.; Liotta, L.F.; Loonardi, S.G.; Neri, G. Electrochemical properties of Ce-doped SrFeO3 perovskites-modified electrodes towards hydrogen peroxide oxidation. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ponnusamy, R.; Chakraborty, B.; Rout, C.S. Pd Doped WO3 Nanostructures as Potential Glucose Sensor with Insight from Electronic Structure simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 2737–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jia, F.F.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, W.G.; Li, X.R.; Wang, G.Y.; Song, J.; Chen, Z.P.; Yin, J.Z.; Guo, L.P. A novel nonenzymatic ECL glucose sensor based on perovskite LaTiO3-Ag0.1 nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 212, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ye, D.; Xu, Y.; Luo, L.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xing, L.; Peng, J. A novel hydrogen peroxide sensor based on LaNi0.5Ti0.5O3/CoFe2O4 modified electrode. Colloids Surf. B 2012, 89, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Luque, G.L.; Ferreyra, N.F.; Leyva, A.G.; Rivas, G.A. Characterization of carbon paste electrodes modified with manganese based perovskites-type oxides from the amperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide. Sens. Actuators B 2009, 142, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ahmad, K.; Mohammad, A.; Mathur, P.; Mobin, S.M. Preparation of SrTiO3 perovskite decorated rGO and electrochemical detection of nitroaromatics. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 215, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Luo, L.; Ding, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, A. A novel sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on perovskite LaNi0.5Ti0.5O3-modified carbon paste electrode. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 151, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Crystal structure of metal halide ABX3 (ABO3) type perovskite.
Scheme 1. Crystal structure of metal halide ABX3 (ABO3) type perovskite.
Catalysts 10 00938 sch001
Scheme 2. Perovskite electrode materials for electrochemical (energy storage devices and electrochemical sensors) applications.
Scheme 2. Perovskite electrode materials for electrochemical (energy storage devices and electrochemical sensors) applications.
Catalysts 10 00938 sch002
Figure 1. (a) SEM images of AgNWs films stored in ambient environment for one week directly on top of perovskite/hole transporting materials (HTM) active layer (b) JV curves of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with different intermediate Au layer thickness illuminated from the AgNWs side. Reprinted with permission from [54]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. (a) SEM images of AgNWs films stored in ambient environment for one week directly on top of perovskite/hole transporting materials (HTM) active layer (b) JV curves of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with different intermediate Au layer thickness illuminated from the AgNWs side. Reprinted with permission from [54]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of the reduced graphene scaffold (rGS) structure (Top view) (b) Stability of the devices in an ambient environment (~65% humidity) after encapsulation using UV-cured epoxy. Reprinted with permission from [56]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of the reduced graphene scaffold (rGS) structure (Top view) (b) Stability of the devices in an ambient environment (~65% humidity) after encapsulation using UV-cured epoxy. Reprinted with permission from [56]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of strontium ytterbium cobalt-nanorods (SYC–NRs) synthesis through electrospinning and the CoO-coated electrode preparation process (b) TEM image of the synthesized SYC–NRs. Reprinted with permission from [62]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of strontium ytterbium cobalt-nanorods (SYC–NRs) synthesis through electrospinning and the CoO-coated electrode preparation process (b) TEM image of the synthesized SYC–NRs. Reprinted with permission from [62]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g003
Figure 4. (a) The cross-sectional SEM image of the polyethyleneoxide-LiC2F6NO4S2-Li0.33L0.557TiO3/lithium ferrophosphate (PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO/LiFePO4) and PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO-O/LiFePO4 interface (b) The impedance spectra of the Li/PEO–LiTFSI/Li and Li/PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO/Li symmetric cells at 60 °C. Reprinted with permission from [64]. Copyright (2019), American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (a) The cross-sectional SEM image of the polyethyleneoxide-LiC2F6NO4S2-Li0.33L0.557TiO3/lithium ferrophosphate (PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO/LiFePO4) and PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO-O/LiFePO4 interface (b) The impedance spectra of the Li/PEO–LiTFSI/Li and Li/PEO–LiTFSI–LLTO/Li symmetric cells at 60 °C. Reprinted with permission from [64]. Copyright (2019), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g004
Figure 5. (a) Transmission electron microscopy and elemental distribution mapping (HAADFSTEM) image of hierarchical mesoporous-macroporous La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−x (HPN–LSC) (b) Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of Li−O2 batteries with the HPN–LSC/KB electrode at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from [69]. Copyright (2015), American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (a) Transmission electron microscopy and elemental distribution mapping (HAADFSTEM) image of hierarchical mesoporous-macroporous La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−x (HPN–LSC) (b) Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of Li−O2 batteries with the HPN–LSC/KB electrode at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from [69]. Copyright (2015), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g005
Figure 6. (a) XRD of La0.5Sr0.5Mn0.9Ni0.1O3−δ (LSMN)nanocrystals (b) Cyclic voltammograms of LSMN and Pt/C (O2-saturated, solid line; N2-saturated, dashed line). Reprinted with permission from [88]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. (a) XRD of La0.5Sr0.5Mn0.9Ni0.1O3−δ (LSMN)nanocrystals (b) Cyclic voltammograms of LSMN and Pt/C (O2-saturated, solid line; N2-saturated, dashed line). Reprinted with permission from [88]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g006
Figure 7. (a) The electrochemical impedance spectra of Bi0.5Sr0.5Fe1−xTixO3−δ (BSFT0.15) cathode (b) IV and IP curves of the cells with BSFTx cathodes at 700 °C. Reprinted with permission from [89]. Copyright (2019), American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (a) The electrochemical impedance spectra of Bi0.5Sr0.5Fe1−xTixO3−δ (BSFT0.15) cathode (b) IV and IP curves of the cells with BSFTx cathodes at 700 °C. Reprinted with permission from [89]. Copyright (2019), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g007
Figure 8. (a) The cyclic voltammetric curves in SC//AC ASC at different scanning rates (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves at different current densities of the SC//AC ASC. Reprinted with permission from [97]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. (a) The cyclic voltammetric curves in SC//AC ASC at different scanning rates (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves at different current densities of the SC//AC ASC. Reprinted with permission from [97]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g008
Figure 9. (a) Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) curves at different current densities of Ba2Bi0.1Sc0.2Co1.7O6−δ//anode cathode electrodes (BBSC//AC) and (b) Cycling stability of BBSC//AC at a current of 1 A g−1. Reprinted with permission from [129]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. (a) Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) curves at different current densities of Ba2Bi0.1Sc0.2Co1.7O6−δ//anode cathode electrodes (BBSC//AC) and (b) Cycling stability of BBSC//AC at a current of 1 A g−1. Reprinted with permission from [129]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g009
Figure 10. (a) High magnification FESEM micrographs of WO3-Pd AA (b) Cyclic voltammagramme of WO3-Pd AA in presence of different concentrations of glucose. Reprinted with permission from [134]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. (a) High magnification FESEM micrographs of WO3-Pd AA (b) Cyclic voltammagramme of WO3-Pd AA in presence of different concentrations of glucose. Reprinted with permission from [134]. Copyright (2018), American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 10 00938 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, T.-W.; Ramachandran, R.; Chen, S.-M.; Kavitha, N.; Dinakaran, K.; Kannan, R.; Anushya, G.; Bhuvana, N.; Jeyapragasam, T.; Mariyappan, V.; et al. Developing Low-Cost, High Performance, Robust and Sustainable Perovskite Electrocatalytic Materials in the Electrochemical Sensors and Energy Sectors: “An Overview”. Catalysts 2020, 10, 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080938

AMA Style

Chen T-W, Ramachandran R, Chen S-M, Kavitha N, Dinakaran K, Kannan R, Anushya G, Bhuvana N, Jeyapragasam T, Mariyappan V, et al. Developing Low-Cost, High Performance, Robust and Sustainable Perovskite Electrocatalytic Materials in the Electrochemical Sensors and Energy Sectors: “An Overview”. Catalysts. 2020; 10(8):938. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080938

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Tse-Wei, Rasu Ramachandran, Shen-Ming Chen, Narayanasamy Kavitha, Kannaiyan Dinakaran, Ramanjam Kannan, Ganesan Anushya, Nagulan Bhuvana, Tharini Jeyapragasam, Vinitha Mariyappan, and et al. 2020. "Developing Low-Cost, High Performance, Robust and Sustainable Perovskite Electrocatalytic Materials in the Electrochemical Sensors and Energy Sectors: “An Overview”" Catalysts 10, no. 8: 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080938

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop