Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Revolution in Every Decade
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Heat Stress on the Transcriptome of Human Cancer Cells: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Utility of the Age Discrepancy between Frailty-Based Biological Age and Expected Life Age in Patients with Urological Cancers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interventional Oncolytic Immunotherapy with LTX-315 for Residual Tumor after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 24
10.3390/cancers14246228
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hyperthermia as a Potential Cornerstone of Effective Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy, Cisplatin and PARP Inhibitor in IDH1-Mutated Cancer Cells

by
Mohammed Khurshed
1,2,*,
Elia Prades-Sagarra
1,
Sarah Saleh
1,
Peter Sminia
3,
Johanna W. Wilmink
2,
Remco J. Molenaar
2,4,
Hans Crezee
5 and
Cornelis J. F. van Noorden
1,6
1
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4
Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
6
Department of Genetic Toxicology and Cancer Biology, National Institute of Biology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(24), 6228; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246228
Submission received: 30 October 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 17 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Hyperthermia in Cancer Therapy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 are causal in the development and progression of high-grade chondrosarcoma, high-grade glioma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Due to the lack of effective treatment options, these aggressive types of cancer have a dismal outcome. Since hyperthermia increases the efficacy of DNA-damaging therapies such as radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy, we introduce hyperthermia as the cornerstone of a multimodality treatment regimen for patients with IDH1MUT solid cancer. These regimens include (I) hyperthermia added to conventional treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy such as cisplatin and (II) hyperthermia in combination with PARP inhibitors.

Abstract

Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1MUT) gene occur in various types of malignancies, including ~60% of chondrosarcomas, ~30% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and >80% of low-grade gliomas. IDH1MUT are causal in the development and progression of these types of cancer due to neomorphic production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG). Intracellular accumulation of D-2HG has been implicated in suppressing homologous recombination and renders IDH1MUT cancer cells sensitive to DNA-repair-inhibiting agents, such as poly-(adenosine 5′-diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Hyperthermia increases the efficacy of DNA-damaging therapies such as radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy, mainly by inhibition of DNA repair. In the current study, we investigated the additional effects of hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) in the treatment of IDH1MUT HCT116 colon cancer cells and hyperthermia1080 chondrosarcoma cancer cells in combination with radiation, cisplatin and/or a PARPi on clonogenic cell survival, cell cycle distribution and the induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. We found that hyperthermia in combination with radiation or cisplatin induces an increase in double-strand breaks and cell death, up to 10-fold in IDH1MUT cancer cells compared to IDH1 wild-type cells. This vulnerability was abolished by the IDH1MUT inhibitor AGI-5198 and was further increased by the PARPi. In conclusion, our study shows that IDH1MUT cancer cells are sensitized to hyperthermia in combination with irradiation or cisplatin and a PARPi. Therefore, hyperthermia may be an efficacious sensitizer to cytotoxic therapies in tumors where the clinical application of hyperthermia is feasible, such as IDH1MUT chondrosarcoma of the extremities.

1. Introduction

Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene are driving events in the development and progression of various types of cancer, including glioma, chondrosarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1,2,3]. IDH1 is a homodimeric enzyme (IDH1WT) that catalyzes the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (αKG) with concomitant reduction of NADP+ to NADPH in the cytoplasm [1]. The heterozygous hotspot mutations in IDH1 lead to the formation of IDH1WT/MUT heterodimers (IDH1MUT) with a neomorphic IDH activity that converts αKG into the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) [4]. This activity induces a decrease in intracellular reducing power (NADPH) and an accumulation of D-2HG in IDH1MUT cancer cells (Figure 1), resulting in improved responses to irradiation and chemotherapy in solid tumors [1,5].
Accumulation of D-2HG has been implicated in tumor progression through its inhibitory effects on αKG-dependent dioxygenases, which cause suppression of the homologous recombination repair system of DNA double-strand breaks (Figure 1) [6]. The absence of a proper functioning homologous recombination system leads to an increase in double-strand breaks and programmed cell death [7]. Homologous recombination deficiency also sensitizes IDH1MUT cancer cells to DNA-repair-inhibiting agents such as poly-(adenosine 5′-diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi); the PARP inhibition causes reduced repair of both double-strand breaks by homologous recombination deficiency and single-strand breaks (Figure 2) [8]. Recent reports demonstrated sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells to DNA damage and sensitization to PARPi in clinically relevant models, including patient-derived glioma and sarcoma cell lines as well as in vivo models [6,8,9,10,11,12].
Hyperthermia is an anti-cancer therapeutic strategy in which the tumor temperature is elevated to 40–43 °C for approximately 1 h. Hyperthermia has multiple anti-cancer effects, such as enhancing immune responses, inducing heat shock proteins and interfering with DNA metabolism [13,14,15]. When combined with other therapies, such as radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, hyperthermia increases treatment responses in several types of cancer [16,17]. One of the important effects of hyperthermia is heat-induced degradation of proteins involved in DNA repair, which results in a deficient homologous recombination repair system and increased DNA damage [13,16]. Second, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inhibition of antioxidant mechanisms caused by hyperthermia increase oxidative stress in cells [18,19]. Third, blood flow and tissue perfusion increase significantly due to hyperthermia, which improves tumor oxygenation and thereby the sensitivity of (initially hypoxic) cancer cells to RT, since well-oxygenated cancer cells are more sensitive to RT [20]. The hyperthermia-induced deficiency in homologous recombination DNA repair provided a strong rationale for adding PARP inhibition to the combination treatment of HT and RT and/or chemotherapy [21,22,23]. Hyperthermia-induced sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells is likely mediated by at least two components causing cell death: first, the altered metabolism and relatively low reducing power (NADPH) of IDH1MUT cancer cells [20] and, second, the reduced effectiveness of DNA repair systems. Dysfunctional homologous recombination repair systems and altered oxidative stress responses caused by altered metabolism explain the susceptibility of IDH1MUT cancer cells to the combinational treatment with hyperthermia and PARPis.
The first goal of the present study was to provide in vitro evidence of the effect of hyperthermia as an emulsifier in the treatment of patients with IDH1MUT cancers, either in addition to conventional cytotoxic treatments (RT and/or chemotherapy) or in combination with conventional cytotoxic treatments and PARPis. This multimodality approach, which utilizes hyperthermia and PARPis of IDH1MUT solid tumors, may provide a novel, therapeutic strategy for IDH1MUT solid cancers that could locally disable homologous recombination and single-strand breaks repair, thereby sensitizing cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents and increasing cell death (Figure 2).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

HCT116 IDH1MUT knock-in colon carcinoma cells (IDH1MUT HCT116 cells), generated by AAV-targeting technology GENESIS [24], were kindly provided by Horizon Discovery (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Hyperthermia1080 chondrosarcoma cells were gifted by Dr. Hamann (Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC). IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium (Gibco; Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Hyperthermia 1080 chondrosarcoma cells were cultured in 10% CO2 at 37 °C in complete DMEM (Gibco). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (both Gibco).

2.2. Reagents

The IDH1MUT inhibitor AGI-5198 was purchased from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA), D-2HG, oligomycin, olaparib, antimycin A, rotenone, carbonyl-cyanide-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP), L-glutamine and sodium pyruvate were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and cisplatin was purchased from Pharmachemie B.V. (Haarlem, The Netherlands).

2.3. Cell Survival Analyses

Colony-forming assays evaluating cell survival were performed and analyzed as described previously [25]. From 5 to 500 cells/cm2 were seeded; higher cell densities were used with increasing treatment doses to obtain sufficient numbers of colonies. Prior to radiation exposure at doses of 0, 2 and 4 Gy (137Cs at a dose rate of approximately 0.5 Gy/min, at room temperature; Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC), and exposure to cisplatin (0, 2.5 and 5 μM for 48 h), hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) and/or olaparib (10 μM for 48 h), cells were pretreated for 72 h with D-2HG, for 14 days with AGI-5198 or with solvent only (DMSO, 0.5%). Cells were treated for 1 h at 42 °C with hyperthermia in a thermostatically controlled water bath (Lauda aqualine AL12, Beun de Ronde, Abcoude, The Netherlands). Temperature was checked in parallel dishes, and the preferred temperature (±0.1 °C) was reached in circa 5 min with an air atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% and an air inflow of 2 L/min. Cells were treated with cisplatin 4 h after plating in the presence of 0–1 µM AGI-5198 or 0–10 mM D-2HG. After 10 days of treatment, a 0.05% crystal violet (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 6% glutaraldehyde (Merck) mixture was used for fixation of cells for 2 h at room temp. Cell colonies were manually counted using a stereoscope (Leica MZ6; Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). As described previously, clones consisting of at least 50 cells were included and expressed as the clonogenic fraction; this is the number of colonies counted divided by the number of cells plated, corrected for the plating efficiency [26].

2.4. Cell Cycle Analyses

Cell cycle distribution was analyzed using the Click-iT® EdU Imaging Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), which allows for direct measurement of DNA synthesis. The thymidine analogue 5-ethynyl-2′deoxiuridine (EdU) was incorporated into S-phase cells and, as it had an Alexa FluorTM 647 picolyl azide attached, the fluorescence levels of individual cells reflected the cell cycle phase in which they were arrested. Cells (500,000 cells/mL) were plated in 6-well plates before treatment with hyperthermia (1 h at 42 °C). Subsequently, 16 h after treatment, 10 μM EdU was added for 1 h. Then, cells were harvested and fixed as suggested by the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, the Click-it Plus reaction cocktail was added for 30 min (500 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 10 μL of copper protectant, 2.5 μL of Alexa FluorTM 647 picolyl azide and 50 μL of Click-itTM EdU buffer per plate). Cells were washed as suggested, and directly measured using a flow cytometer (BD FACS Canto II, 633/635 nm excitation filter; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

2.5. γ-H2AX Immunofluorescence Staining and Quantification

Cells were plated on coverslips coated with 0.01% poly-D-lysine (Merck) 24 h prior to treatment. Different treatment combinations were used: cisplatin (5 mM for 24 h) alone or in combination with hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) 24 h prior to fixation, RT (1 Gy) and/or hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) for 30 min before fixation with 2% paraformaldehyde (Merck). After washing with PBS and permeabilization with TNBS (1% FCS + 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS; MilliporeSigma) for 30 min, cells were incubated with a monoclonal mouse anti-γ-H2AX primary antibody (dilution 1:100 in TNBS) for 60 min. Next, the samples were washed with PBS and incubated for 30 min with a goat anti-mouse-Cy3 secondary antibody (dilution 1:100 in TNBS). After washing, DAPI-mounting gel (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) was added and coverslips were sealed with nail polish. Directly afterwards, samples were imaged using a wide-field fluorescence microscope (Leica DM6 FS fixed-stage fluorescence microscope) [7]. The number of γ-H2AX foci per cell was analyzed as described previously [7]. Moreover, Cy3 and DAPI signals were captured using excitation/emission wavelengths of 550/570 nm for 400 ms and 360/460 nm for 50 ms, respectively. Stack images of at least 50 cells per sample were prepared. A custom-made software program was used to automatically score the number of γ-H2AX foci per cell.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were processed and analyzed with Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and visualized using Prism (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Two-side tests were used with an α of 0.05. p values were calculated as described in figure legends; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.

3. Results

3.1. IDH1MUT Cancer Cells Are Sensitive to Hyperthermia and This Induces Higher Sensitivity to RT and Chemotherapy

We first investigated the effect of hyperthermia as monotherapy using IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 colon cancer cells by performing colony-forming assays. Hyperthermia treatment alone caused a significantly higher reduction in the surviving fraction of 70% in IDH1MUT cells compared to 40% in IDH1WT HCT116 cells (Figure 3A). In addition, we evaluated the effect of hyperthermia in combined treatment with RT or chemotherapy on IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 cells. The combined treatment with hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) and RT using doses of 2 and 4 Gy increased the sensitivity of IDH1MUT HCT116 cells dose dependently when compared with IDH1WT HCT116 cells (Figure 3B). Combined treatment of hyperthermia and RT (2 and 4 Gy) increased the sensitivity of IDH1WT HCT116 cancer cells by 51% and 85%, respectively, compared to hyperthermia treatment alone. In IDH1MUT HCT116 cells, this combined treatment of hyperthermia and RT (2 and 4 Gy) increased the sensitivity by 76% and 85% compared to hyperthermia treatment alone, respectively. Compared to IDH1WT HCT116 cells, IDH1MUT HCT116 cells showed 60% (2 Gy) and 50% (4 Gy) more sensitivity to combined treatment of hyperthermia and RT. Hyperthermia is also known to improve the therapeutic effect of cisplatin [27,28], and since IDH1MUT cancer cells are more sensitive to cisplatin, we investigated whether combining it with hyperthermia increased this sensitivity. As shown in Figure 3C, the combined treatment with hyperthermia and 2.5 or 5 μM cisplatin for 48 h increased sensitivity of IDH1MUT HCT116 cells. Compared to IDH1WT HCT116 cells, combination treatment of hyperthermia with 2.5 and 5 μM cisplatin showed a significant higher survival reduction of 65% and 93% in IDH1MUT HCT116 cells, respectively. To exclude cell cycle distribution variations after hyperthermia treatment, we evaluated the effects of hyperthermia on the cell cycle of IDH1MUT and IDH1WT cancer cells. As illustrated in Figure 4, IDH1MUT and IDH1WT cancer cells responded similarly and went into cell cycle arrest (G2/M accumulation) after 1 h treatment with hyperthermia (42 °C), suggesting that the observed sensitivity after hyperthermia treatment did not have different effects on the cell cycle in IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cancer cells.

3.2. IDH1MUT Inhibitor Protects lDH1MUT Cancer Cells to Combination Treatment Induced by Hyperthermia

IDH1MUT cancer cells are known to be sensitive to RT and cisplatin due to a decreased NADPH production capacity and increased metabolic vulnerability [26,29]. To confirm the causal relationship between IDH1MUT and increased sensitivity to combination treatment with hyperthermia, we investigated whether the IDH1MUT inhibitor AGI-5198 protects IDH1MUT cells against combination treatment with hyperthermia. We exposed IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 cells to 1 µM AGI-5198 for 7 days before exposure to treatment with RT or cisplatin. AGI-5198 did not affect the sensitivity of IDH1WT HCT116 cells, but it did reduce the sensitivity of IDH1MUT HCT116 cells to combination treatment in a manner comparable to that of IDH1WT HCT116 cells (Figure 3D–G). These data show that AGI-5198 reduced IDH1MUT-induced sensitivity to combination treatment of hyperthermia and RT or cisplatin.

3.3. Increased Numbers of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in IDH1MUT Cancer Cells after Combination Treatment

The accumulation of DNA strand breaks, particularly double-strand breaks, is an important mediator of RT- and cisplatin-induced cell death in replicating cells [30]. Therefore, we investigated whether IDH1MUT cells are sensitive to hyperthermia combined with RT or cisplatin due to a deficiency of the homologous recombination system leading to increased numbers of DNA double-strand breaks after treatment. Data presented in Figure 5 show a higher increase in the number of γ-H2AX foci in IDH1MUT compared with IDH1WT cells following exposure to RT (1 Gy) or cisplatin (5 μM for 24 h) and hyperthermia.

3.4. lDH1MUT Cancer Cells Are Sensitive to PARPi and to Combination Treatment with RT

In addition to the combination of hyperthermia with RT and cisplatin, we investigated whether the combination with a PARPi increased the sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells. First, sensitivity to 10 μM olaparib for 48 h was assessed to confirm the causal relationship between IDH1MUT and increased sensitivity to PARPi (Figure 6A). We then examined the combination treatment using olaparib and hyperthermia, which increased the sensitivity of IDH1MUT HCT116 cancer cells compared to IDH1WT HCT116 cancer cells. Furthermore, the response of IDH1MUT cancer cells to the combination of olaparib, RT and hyperthermia was investigated. With the combination of the three modalities, a significant decrease in the survival of IDH1MUT compared to IDH1WT cancer cells was observed (Figure 6B). Reduced survival of IDH1MUT cancer cells after hyperthermia treatment was also found in hyperthermia1080 chondrosarcoma cells with IDH1MUT (Figure 6C).

4. Discussion

Chondrosarcoma, glioma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are types of cancer that often behave aggressively, often cannot be completely resected, tend to recur locally and commonly cause death through local progression. Since IDH1MUT is causal in the development and progression of these types of cancer, many efforts have been made to discover specific vulnerabilities, especially in domains of metabolism and DNA damage induction and repair [31]. This resulted in a better understanding of the sensitization of cancer cells by IDH1MUT to conventional chemotherapy and RT, but also to targeted agents, such as PARPis. In vitro and in vivo models demonstrated that IDH1MUT cancers are sensitive to PARPis, and that this sensitivity to PARPis synergizes with temozolomide, RT or cisplatin treatment in vitro [6,8,9,10]. Ongoing clinical trials have been set up to test the effects of PARPis in IDH1MUT solid cancers (NCT03212274), PARPis in recurrent IDHMUT glioma (NCT03561870) and PARPis in combination with temozolomide in IDH1MUT glioma (NCT03749187). A randomized phase 1/2 study of temozolomide in combination with the PARPi veliparib showed no benefit in recurrent temozolomide-refractory glioblastoma, but the IDH1MUT status was not considered in the enrollment criteria or subgroup analyses [32]. This phase 1/2 study indicates that strategies and designs of clinical trials may be improved through a more profound understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these therapies.
Hyperthermia has been proven to be beneficial in the treatment of a number of cancer types and is generally applied in combination with RT and/or chemotherapy [17,21,22,23,33,34,35]. To our knowledge, combined treatment with a PARPi and hyperthermia has not been examined in the specific setting of IDH1MUT tumors at either the experimental or clinical level. Our multimodality treatment approach of combining PARPis with hyperthermia to standard RT or cisplatin treatment is a novel strategy in IDH1MUT solid cancers that can locally disable homologous recombination and sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents (Figure 7). Furthermore, we are the first to show that combined hyperthermia and PARPi in vitro increase the effectivity of RT and cisplatin treatment of IDH1MUT and IDH1WT cancer cells, with a 10-fold greater increase in IDH1MUT than IDH1WT cancer cells. We confirmed the causal relationship between IDH1MUT and increased sensitivity to hyperthermia in combination with RT or cisplatin by pretreating IDH1MUT cancer cells with an IDH1MUT inhibitor (AGI-5198). IDH1MUT inhibition reversed the sensitivity and protected IDH1MUT cancer cells from the combination treatment of hyperthermia with RT or cisplatin.
Hyperthermia-induced sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells to combination treatment with PARPi is at least partly mediated by the reduced effectiveness of DNA repair systems in IDH1MUT cancer cells. The relatively low redox status of IDH1MUT cancer cells may also play a role. Hyperthermia is known to increase ROS levels and cause oxidative stress in cancer cells [15,18]; it also inhibits mitochondrial antioxidant systems via mechanisms such as reduced NADPH levels, which then contribute to increased intracellular ROS levels [18]. We and others have shown that the altered redox responses result in improved responses to therapy in IDH1MUT cancers [26,36,37]. In the present study, we showed that IDH1MUT cancer cells are more sensitive to hyperthermia than IDH1WT cancer cells, and we envisage future research that will investigate hyperthermia-induced ROS formation and sensitivity mechanisms in IDH1MUT cancer cells.
Another biological mechanism for hyperthermia that yields a strong enhancement of the effect of RT is inhibition of DNA damage repair [38], which has an impact on clinical results [39,40]. Locally applied hyperthermia also improves the effect of cisplatin [28] by enhancing cytotoxicity in the tumor without changing systemic toxicity [41,42]. Addition of hyperthermia to standard treatment regimens has shown favorable results for cervical carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, melanoma, rectal cancer and recurrent breast carcinoma in large randomized trials [17,33,35,43,44].

5. Conclusions

Hyperthermia may be considered, in view of our preclinical data, as a cornerstone of multimodality treatment regimes for patients with IDH1MUT solid cancer. Regimens include (I) hyperthermia added to conventional treatment with RT and/or chemotherapy such as cisplatin and (II) hyperthermia in combination with PARPis. This multimodality treatment approach may be clinically achievable in certain settings, e.g., in case of an irresectable IDH1MUT chondrosarcoma in an extremity and therefore deserves further study in a clinical trial.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; methodology, M.K., R.J.M., P.S., C.J.F.v.N. and H.C.; formal analysis, investigation and data curation, M.K., E.P.-S. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.K., R.J.M., P.S., C.J.F.v.N. and J.W.W.; supervision, H.C. and C.J.F.v.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF-UVA 2014-6839 to M.K., R.J.M. and C.J.F.v.N., and KWF AMC2016.1-10460 to R.J.M., J.W.W. and C.J.F.v.N.) and the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS P1-0245 and J3-2526 to C.J.F.v.N.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

D-2HGD-2-hydroxyglutarate
HThyperthermia
DSBdouble-strand break
MUTmutation
IDH1isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
αKGα-ketoglutarate
NACN-acetyl cysteine
OCRoxygen consumption rate
OXPHOSoxidative phosphorylation
PARPipoly-(adenosine 5′-diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitor
ROSreactive oxygen species
RTradiotherapy
SSBsingle-strand break
WTwild type

References

  1. Molenaar, R.J.; Radivoyevitch, T.; Maciejewski, J.P.; van Noorden, C.J.; Bleeker, F.E. The driver and passenger effects of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in oncogenesis and survival prolongation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1846, 326–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiao, Y.; Pawlik, T.M.; Anders, R.A.; Selaru, F.M.; Streppel, M.M.; Lucas, D.J.; Niknafs, N.; Guthrie, V.B.; Maitra, A.; Argani, P.; et al. Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1470–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Amary, M.F.; Bacsi, K.; Maggiani, F.; Damato, S.; Halai, D.; Berisha, F.; Pollock, R.; O’Donnell, P.; Grigoriadis, A.; Diss, T.; et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. J. Pathol. 2011, 224, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, H.; Parsons, D.W.; Jin, G.; McLendon, R.; Rasheed, B.A.; Yuan, W.; Kos, I.; Batinic-Haberle, I.; Jones, S.; Riggins, G.J.; et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, S.; Chou, A.P.; Chen, W.; Chen, R.; Deng, Y.; Phillips, H.S.; Selfridge, J.; Zurayk, M.; Lou, J.J.; Everson, R.G.; et al. Overexpression of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant proteins renders glioma cells more sensitive to radiation. Neuro. Oncol. 2013, 15, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sulkowski, P.L.; Corso, C.D.; Robinson, N.D.; Scanlon, S.E.; Purshouse, K.R.; Bai, H.; Liu, Y.; Sundaram, R.K.; Hegan, D.C.; Fons, N.R.; et al. 2-Hydroxyglutarate produced by neomorphic IDH mutations suppresses homologous recombination and induces PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Aten, J.A.; Stap, J.; Krawczyk, P.M.; van Oven, C.H.; Hoebe, R.A.; Essers, J.; Kanaar, R. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 2004, 303, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, Y.; Wild, A.T.; Turcan, S.; Wu, W.H.; Sigel, C.; Klimstra, D.S.; Ma, X.; Gong, Y.; Holland, E.C.; Huse, J.T.; et al. Targeting therapeutic vulnerabilities with PARP inhibition and radiation in IDH-mutant gliomas and cholangiocarcinomas. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gbyli, R.; Song, Y.; Liu, W.; Gao, Y.; Biancon, G.; Chandhok, N.S.; Wang, X.; Fu, X.; Patel, A.; Sundaram, R.; et al. In vivo anti-tumor effect of PARP inhibition in IDH1/2 mutant MDS/AML resistant to targeted inhibitors of mutant IDH1/2. Leukemia 2022, 36, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Molenaar, R.J.; Radivoyevitch, T.; Nagata, Y.; Khurshed, M.; Przychodzen, B.; Makishima, H.; Xu, M.; Bleeker, F.E.; Wilmink, J.W.; Carraway, H.E.; et al. IDH1/2 Mutations sensitize acute myeloid leukemia to PARP inhibition and this is reversed by IDH1/2-Mutant inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1705–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nagashima, H.; Lee, C.K.; Tateishi, K.; Higuchi, F.; Subramanian, M.; Rafferty, S.; Melamed, L.; Miller, J.J.; Wakimoto, H.; Cahill, D.P. Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase inhibition sequesters NAD(+) to potentiate the metabolic lethality of alkylating chemotherapy in IDH-mutant tumor cells. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 1672–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, Y.; Kwintkiewicz, J.; Liu, Y.; Tech, K.; Frady, L.N.; Su, Y.T.; Bautista, W.; Moon, S.I.; MacDonald, J.; Ewend, M.G.; et al. Chemosensitivity of IDH1-Mutated Gliomas Due to an Impairment in PARP1-Mediated DNA Repair. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Oei, A.L.; Vriend, L.E.; Crezee, J.; Franken, N.A.; Krawczyk, P.M. Effects of hyperthermia on DNA repair pathways: One treatment to inhibit them all. Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 10, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. van den Tempel, N.; Laffeber, C.; Odijk, H.; van Cappellen, W.A.; van Rhoon, G.C.; Franckena, M.; Kanaar, R. The effect of thermal dose on hyperthermia-mediated inhibition of DNA repair through homologous recombination. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 44593–44604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vriend, L.E.M.; van den Tempel, N.; Oei, A.L.; L’Acosta, M.; Pieterson, F.J.; Franken, N.A.P.; Kanaar, R.; Krawczyk, P.M. Boosting the effects of hyperthermia-based anticancer treatments by HSP90 inhibition. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 97490–97503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wust, P.; Hildebrandt, B.; Sreenivasa, G.; Rau, B.; Gellermann, J.; Riess, H.; Felix, R.; Schlag, P.M. Hyperthermia in combined treatment of cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Westermann, A.M.; Jones, E.L.; Schem, B.C.; van der Steen-Banasik, E.M.; Koper, P.; Mella, O.; Uitterhoeve, A.L.; de Wit, R.; van der Velden, J.; Burger, C.; et al. First results of triple-modality treatment combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hyperthermia for the treatment of patients with stage IIB, III, and IVA cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 104, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ba, M.C.; Long, H.; Wang, S.; Wu, Y.B.; Zhang, B.H.; Yan, Z.F.; Yu, F.H.; Cui, S.Z. Hyperthermia enhances radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells through ROS inducing autophagic cell death. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 3763–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fu, Q.; Huang, T.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Liu, F.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B. Association of elevated reactive oxygen species and hyperthermia induced radiosensitivity in cancer stem-like cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 101560–101571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Krawczyk, P.M.; Eppink, B.; Essers, J.; Stap, J.; Rodermond, H.; Odijk, H.; Zelensky, A.; van Bree, C.; Stalpers, L.J.; Buist, M.R.; et al. Mild hyperthermia inhibits homologous recombination, induces BRCA2 degradation, and sensitizes cancer cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9851–9856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schaaf, L.; Schwab, M.; Ulmer, C.; Heine, S.; Murdter, T.E.; Schmid, J.O.; Sauer, G.; Aulitzky, W.E.; van der Kuip, H. Hyperthermia synergizes with chemotherapy by inhibiting PARP1-dependent DNA replication arrest. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 2868–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. van den Tempel, N.; Odijk, H.; van Holthe, N.; Naipal, K.; Raams, A.; Eppink, B.; van Gent, D.C.; Hardillo, J.; Verduijn, G.M.; Drooger, J.C.; et al. Heat-induced BRCA2 degradation in human tumours provides rationale for hyperthermia-PARP-inhibitor combination therapies. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 34, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Oei, A.L.; van Leeuwen, C.M.; Ahire, V.R.; Rodermond, H.M.; Ten Cate, R.; Westermann, A.M.; Stalpers, L.J.A.; Crezee, J.; Kok, H.P.; Krawczyk, P.M.; et al. Enhancing synthetic lethality of PARP-inhibitor and cisplatin in BRCA-proficient tumour cells with hyperthermia. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 28116–28124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fernandez, S.L.; Russell, D.W.; Hurlin, P.J. Development of human gene reporter cell lines using rAAV mediated homologous recombination. Biol. Proced. Online 2007, 9, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Franken, N.A.; Rodermond, H.M.; Stap, J.; Haveman, J.; van Bree, C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2315–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khurshed, M.; Aarnoudse, N.; Hulsbos, R.; Hira, V.V.V.; van Laarhoven, H.W.M.; Wilmink, J.W.; Molenaar, R.J.; van Noorden, C.J.F. IDH1-mutant cancer cells are sensitive to cisplatin and an IDH1-mutant inhibitor counteracts this sensitivity. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 6344–6352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bergs, J.W.; Franken, N.A.; Haveman, J.; Geijsen, E.D.; Crezee, J.; van Bree, C. Hyperthermia, cisplatin and radiation trimodality treatment: A promising cancer treatment? A review from preclinical studies to clinical application. Int. J. Hyperth. 2007, 23, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Overgaard, J.; Radacic, M.M.; Grau, C. Interaction of hyperthermia and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) alone or combined with radiation in a C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 707–711. [Google Scholar]
  29. Khurshed, M.; Molenaar, R.J.; Lenting, K.; Leenders, W.P.; van Noorden, C.J.F. In silico gene expression analysis reveals glycolysis and acetate anaplerosis in IDH1 wild-type glioma and lactate and glutamate anaplerosis in IDH1-mutated glioma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 49165–49177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Poklar, N.; Pilch, D.S.; Lippard, S.J.; Redding, E.A.; Dunham, S.U.; Breslauer, K.J. Influence of cisplatin intrastrand crosslinking on the conformation, thermal stability, and energetics of a 20-mer DNA duplex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7606–7611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Khurshed, M.; Molenaar, R.J.; van Linde, M.E.; Mathot, R.A.; Struys, E.A.; van Wezel, T.; van Noorden, C.J.F.; Klumpen, H.J.; Bovee, J.; Wilmink, J.W. A phase Ib clinical trial of metformin and chloroquine in patients with IDH1-mutated solid tumors. Cancers 2021, 13, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Robins, H.I.; Zhang, P.; Gilbert, M.R.; Chakravarti, A.; de Groot, J.F.; Grimm, S.A.; Wang, F.; Lieberman, F.S.; Krauze, A.; Trotti, A.M.; et al. A randomized phase I/II study of ABT-888 in combination with temozolomide in recurrent temozolomide resistant glioblastoma: An NRG oncology RTOG group study. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 126, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. van der Zee, J.; Gonzalez Gonzalez, D.; van Rhoon, G.C.; van Dijk, J.D.; van Putten, W.L.; Hart, A.A. Comparison of radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia in locally advanced pelvic tumours: A prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Group. Lancet 2000, 355, 1119–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Overgaard, J.; Gonzalez Gonzalez, D.; Hulshof, M.C.; Arcangeli, G.; Dahl, O.; Mella, O.; Bentzen, S.M. Hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiation therapy of recurrent or metastatic malignant melanoma. A multicentre randomized trial by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology. Int. J. Hyperth. 2009, 25, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vernon, C.C.; Hand, J.W.; Field, S.B.; Machin, D.; Whaley, J.B.; van der Zee, J.; van Putten, W.L.; van Rhoon, G.C.; van Dijk, J.D.; Gonzalez Gonzalez, D.; et al. Radiotherapy with or without hyperthermia in the treatment of superficial localized breast cancer: Results from five randomized controlled trials. International Collaborative Hyperthermia Group. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1996, 35, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lenting, K.; Khurshed, M.; Peeters, T.H.; van den Heuvel, C.; van Lith, S.A.M.; de Bitter, T.; Hendriks, W.; Span, P.N.; Molenaar, R.J.; Botman, D.; et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated human gliomas depend on lactate and glutamate to alleviate metabolic stress. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Molenaar, R.J.; Botman, D.; Smits, M.A.; Hira, V.V.; van Lith, S.A.; Stap, J.; Henneman, P.; Khurshed, M.; Lenting, K.; Mul, A.N.; et al. Radioprotection of IDH1-mutated cancer cells by the IDH1-mutant inhibitor AGI-5198. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4790–4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kampinga, H.H.; Konings, A.W. Inhibition of repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage by heat: The role of hyperthermic inhibition of DNA polymerase alpha activity. Radiat. Res. 1987, 112, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. van Leeuwen, C.M.; Oei, A.L.; Chin, K.; Crezee, J.; Bel, A.; Westermann, A.M.; Buist, M.R.; Franken, N.A.P.; Stalpers, L.J.A.; Kok, H.P. A short time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia reduces in-field recurrence and mortality in women with advanced cervical cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 12, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crezee, J.; Oei, A.L.; Franken, N.A.P.; Stalpers, L.J.A.; Kok, H.P. Response: Commentary: The impact of the time interval between radiation and hyperthermia on clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Franken, N.A.; Barendsen, G.W. Enhancement of radiation effectiveness by hyperthermia and incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines at low radiation doses as compared with high doses: Implications for mechanisms. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2014, 90, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kok, H.P.; Crezee, J.; Franken, N.A.; Stalpers, L.J.; Barendsen, G.W.; Bel, A. Quantifying the combined effect of radiation therapy and hyperthermia in terms of equivalent dose distributions. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014, 88, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Overgaard, J.; Gonzalez Gonzalez, D.; Hulshof, M.C.; Arcangeli, G.; Dahl, O.; Mella, O.; Bentzen, S.M. Randomised trial of hyperthermia as adjuvant to radiotherapy for recurrent or metastatic malignant melanoma. European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology. Lancet 1995, 345, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Issels, R.D.; Lindner, L.H.; Verweij, J.; Wessalowski, R.; Reichardt, P.; Wust, P.; Ghadjar, P.; Hohenberger, P.; Angele, M.; Salat, C.; et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia on long-term outcomes among patients with localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma: The EORTC 62961-ESHO 95 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 14 06228 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the activity of an IDH1WT/MUT heterodimer. The WT allele of the heterodimer produces αKG and NADPH, which are used by the mutated allele to produce D-2HG and NADP. The reduced NADPH production capacity leads to insufficient detoxification of, e.g., ROS, during irradiation and/or chemotherapy, whereas D-2HG inhibits homologous recombination, which causes increased therapeutic sensitivity.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the activity of an IDH1WT/MUT heterodimer. The WT allele of the heterodimer produces αKG and NADPH, which are used by the mutated allele to produce D-2HG and NADP. The reduced NADPH production capacity leads to insufficient detoxification of, e.g., ROS, during irradiation and/or chemotherapy, whereas D-2HG inhibits homologous recombination, which causes increased therapeutic sensitivity.
Cancers 14 06228 g001
Cancers 14 06228 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the effect of hyperthermia and PARPi on the lethality of IDH1MUT cancer cells. Accumulation of D-2HG has inhibitory effects on αKG-dependent di-oxygenases, which causes suppression of the homologous recombination repair system of double-strand breaks. Instead of monotreatment with PARPi, combination treatment with hyperthermia targeting the defect homologous recombination system in IDH1MUT cancer cells leads to an increase in double-strand breaks and programmed cell death.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the effect of hyperthermia and PARPi on the lethality of IDH1MUT cancer cells. Accumulation of D-2HG has inhibitory effects on αKG-dependent di-oxygenases, which causes suppression of the homologous recombination repair system of double-strand breaks. Instead of monotreatment with PARPi, combination treatment with hyperthermia targeting the defect homologous recombination system in IDH1MUT cancer cells leads to an increase in double-strand breaks and programmed cell death.
Cancers 14 06228 g002
Cancers 14 06228 g003 550
Figure 3. Clonogenic survival assays of HCT116 IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cells after combinations of anti-cancer treatment. (A) Images of crystal-violet-stained colonies (top IDH1WT, bottom IDH1MUT cells) at day 14 after hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) and survival assay. Clonogenic survival assay (B) after combined RT (2 Gy and 4 Gy) and hyperthermia treatment of IDH1WT T and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells; (C) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after combined cisplatin (2.5–5 μM for 48 h) and hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) treatment; (D) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with RT and hyperthermia treatment; (E) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with cisplatin and hyperthermia treatment; (F) IDH1WT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with RT and hyperthermia treatment; and (G) IDH1WT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 in combination with cisplatin and hyperthermia treatment. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between cisplatin-treated or irradiation-treated and untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Significance levels are shown by * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. Clonogenic survival assays of HCT116 IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cells after combinations of anti-cancer treatment. (A) Images of crystal-violet-stained colonies (top IDH1WT, bottom IDH1MUT cells) at day 14 after hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) and survival assay. Clonogenic survival assay (B) after combined RT (2 Gy and 4 Gy) and hyperthermia treatment of IDH1WT T and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells; (C) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after combined cisplatin (2.5–5 μM for 48 h) and hyperthermia (42 °C for 1 h) treatment; (D) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with RT and hyperthermia treatment; (E) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with cisplatin and hyperthermia treatment; (F) IDH1WT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 inhibitor in combination with RT and hyperthermia treatment; and (G) IDH1WT HCT116 cells after (pre)treatment with AGI-5198 in combination with cisplatin and hyperthermia treatment. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between cisplatin-treated or irradiation-treated and untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Significance levels are shown by * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Cancers 14 06228 g003
Cancers 14 06228 g004 550
Figure 4. Cell cycle distribution patterns. Cell cycle distribution graphs of untreated (control) and hyperthermia treated IDH1WT cells and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells. IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 cancer cells responded similarly and went into cell cycle arrest (G2/M accumulation) after 1 h treatment with hyperthermia (42 °C).
Figure 4. Cell cycle distribution patterns. Cell cycle distribution graphs of untreated (control) and hyperthermia treated IDH1WT cells and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells. IDH1MUT and IDH1WT HCT116 cancer cells responded similarly and went into cell cycle arrest (G2/M accumulation) after 1 h treatment with hyperthermia (42 °C).
Cancers 14 06228 g004
Cancers 14 06228 g005 550
Figure 5. Double-strand breaks induced by hyperthermia, radiation (RT) and cisplatin in IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cancer cells. (A) Representative images of γ-H2AX foci in untreated cells (control), irradiated cells (1 Gy) and cells treated with cisplatin (5 μM for 24 h), with or without hyperthermia. γ-H2AX was stained immunocytochemically (red) to demonstrate DNA double-strand breaks and with DAPI (blue) to demonstrate DNA in nuclei. (B) Plots of γ-H2AX-positive foci per cell after cisplatin, RT and hyperthermia exposure of IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells. Plots are visualized with 95% confidence intervals and significance levels are shown by ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between treated and untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons.
Figure 5. Double-strand breaks induced by hyperthermia, radiation (RT) and cisplatin in IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cancer cells. (A) Representative images of γ-H2AX foci in untreated cells (control), irradiated cells (1 Gy) and cells treated with cisplatin (5 μM for 24 h), with or without hyperthermia. γ-H2AX was stained immunocytochemically (red) to demonstrate DNA double-strand breaks and with DAPI (blue) to demonstrate DNA in nuclei. (B) Plots of γ-H2AX-positive foci per cell after cisplatin, RT and hyperthermia exposure of IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cells. Plots are visualized with 95% confidence intervals and significance levels are shown by ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between treated and untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons.
Cancers 14 06228 g005
Cancers 14 06228 g006 550
Figure 6. Clonogenic survival of IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cells after olaparib (PARPi) treatment (10 μM, 48 h) combined with hyperthermia (HT) and radiotherapy (RT). (A,B) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cancer cells and (C) hyperthermia1080 chondrosarcoma IDH1MUT cells after indicated combination treatments. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between cisplatin-treated and -untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Significance levels are shown by ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. Clonogenic survival of IDH1WT and IDH1MUT cells after olaparib (PARPi) treatment (10 μM, 48 h) combined with hyperthermia (HT) and radiotherapy (RT). (A,B) IDH1WT and IDH1MUT HCT116 cancer cells and (C) hyperthermia1080 chondrosarcoma IDH1MUT cells after indicated combination treatments. p values were determined using one-way ANOVA to reveal the difference between cisplatin-treated and -untreated cells, using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Significance levels are shown by ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Cancers 14 06228 g006
Cancers 14 06228 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of hyperthermia and PARPi in IDH1MUT cancer cells. Hyperthermia-induced sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells is likely mediated by at least two components causing cell death: first, the reduced effectiveness of DNA repair systems, and second the relatively low redox status of IDH1MUT cancer cells. A dysfunctional homologues recombination repair system and altered oxidative stress responses due to the altered metabolism explain the susceptibility of IDH1MUT cancer cells to the combinational treatment with hyperthermia and/or PARPi.
Figure 7. Effect of hyperthermia and PARPi in IDH1MUT cancer cells. Hyperthermia-induced sensitivity of IDH1MUT cancer cells is likely mediated by at least two components causing cell death: first, the reduced effectiveness of DNA repair systems, and second the relatively low redox status of IDH1MUT cancer cells. A dysfunctional homologues recombination repair system and altered oxidative stress responses due to the altered metabolism explain the susceptibility of IDH1MUT cancer cells to the combinational treatment with hyperthermia and/or PARPi.
Cancers 14 06228 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khurshed, M.; Prades-Sagarra, E.; Saleh, S.; Sminia, P.; Wilmink, J.W.; Molenaar, R.J.; Crezee, H.; van Noorden, C.J.F. Hyperthermia as a Potential Cornerstone of Effective Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy, Cisplatin and PARP Inhibitor in IDH1-Mutated Cancer Cells. Cancers 2022, 14, 6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246228

AMA Style

Khurshed M, Prades-Sagarra E, Saleh S, Sminia P, Wilmink JW, Molenaar RJ, Crezee H, van Noorden CJF. Hyperthermia as a Potential Cornerstone of Effective Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy, Cisplatin and PARP Inhibitor in IDH1-Mutated Cancer Cells. Cancers. 2022; 14(24):6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khurshed, Mohammed, Elia Prades-Sagarra, Sarah Saleh, Peter Sminia, Johanna W. Wilmink, Remco J. Molenaar, Hans Crezee, and Cornelis J. F. van Noorden. 2022. "Hyperthermia as a Potential Cornerstone of Effective Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy, Cisplatin and PARP Inhibitor in IDH1-Mutated Cancer Cells" Cancers 14, no. 24: 6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop