Next Article in Journal
Mammary Paget’s Disease: An Update
Next Article in Special Issue
Durvalumab after Sequential High Dose Chemoradiotherapy versus Standard of Care (SoC) for Stage III NSCLC: A Bi-Centric Retrospective Comparison Focusing on Pulmonary Toxicity
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression Processes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using High-Throughput Proteomics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS) Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Resected Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Pre-Operative Brain Imaging in Patients with NSCLC Stage I: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis

by
Luis Filipe Azenha
1,†,
Pietro Bertoglio
2,†,
Peter Kestenholz
1,
Michel Gonzalez
3,
Matyas Pal
3,
Thorsten Krueger
3,
Bassam Redwan
4,
Volkan Koesek
4,
Eyad Al Masri
4,
Takuro Miyazaki
5,
Farahnaz Sadegh Beigee
6,
Benedetta Bedetti
7,
Philipp Schnorr
7,
Joachim Schmidt
7,8,
Patrick Zardo
9,
Laura Boschetti
10,
Sven Oliver Schumann
11 and
Fabrizio Minervini
1,*
1
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland
2
Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, 40138 Bologna, Italy
3
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
4
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Westfalen Hospital, 44536 Lünen, Germany
5
Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8102, Japan
6
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 69411, Iran
7
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Helios Hospital, 53123 Bonn Rhein-Sieg, Germany
8
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Bonn University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany
9
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany
10
Division of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, 6210 Sursee, Switzerland
11
Department of General Internal Medicine, Bülach Hospital, 8180 Bülach, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(10), 2419; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102419
Submission received: 19 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary and Secondary Lung Cancers)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the worldwide leading cause of cancer-related death among both genders, with about 230,000 patients/year being diagnosed in the US alone. It accounts for about 40% of all brain metastases, which already occur in around 3% of early-stage patients. Nonetheless, current international guidelines do not unanimously recommend brain imaging for use in the early stages of cancer. Some studies have suggested that surgical or radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases may provide better survival, especially in asymptomatic patients. Additionally, advances in genome analysis have identified molecular targets for pharmaceutical agents. These recent advancements in treatment stress the importance of studying incidence as well as patient and tumor characteristics in order to potentially adapt future guidelines and provide the best possible treatment for early-stage lung cancer. This multicentric study analyzed the data of 577 patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer who had been submitted for brain imaging at initial tumor staging.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the worldwide leading oncological cause of death in both genders combined and accounts for around 40–50% of brain metastases in general. In early-stage lung cancer, the incidence of brain metastases is around 3%. Since the early detection of asymptomatic cerebral metastases is of prognostic value, the aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of brain metastases in early-stage lung cancer and identify possible risk factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients with Stage I (based on T and N stage only) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who had received preoperative cerebral imaging in the form of contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Patients with a history of NSCLC, synchronous malignancy, or neurological symptoms were excluded from the study. Analyzed variables were gender, age, tumor histology, cerebral imaging findings, smoking history, and tumor size. Results were expressed as mean with standard deviation or median with range. Results: In total, 577 patients were included in our study. Eight (1.4%) patients were found to have brain metastases in preoperative brain imaging. Tumor histology was adenocarcinoma in all eight cases. Patients were treated with radiotherapy (five), surgical resection (two), or both (one) prior to thoracic surgical treatment. Other than tumor histology, no statistically significant characteristics were found to be predictive of brain metastases. Conclusion: Given the low incidence of brain metastases in patients with clinical Stage I NSCLC, brain imaging in this cohort could be avoided.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the worldwide leading oncological cause of death in both genders combined [1,2]. Around 44,500 people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year in the UK and more than 230,000 are diagnosed each year in the USA [3]. Additionally, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 40–50% of brain metastases, making it the most frequent cause of brain metastases [4,5]. Brain metastases will affect 40–50% of patients during the course of the disease and have a significant impact on their survival as well as their quality of life [6]. The most common treatment options for patients with NSCLC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy [7]. With the advances made in tumor genome analysis, several oncogenic driver mutations have been identified. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), ROS1, and ALK translocation have given us the possibility of providing targeted treatment [8]. Accurate staging is the cornerstone for appropriate treatment in patients with NSCLC. The importance of neuroimaging for locally advanced or symptomatic patients is clear, but in early-stage asymptomatic NSCLC patients, many physicians instead perform brain MRI or CT scans, although recommendations are lacking [9,10]. The overall survival of patients with brain metastases is generally poor and ranges from 6 to 9 months, although some studies suggest that the detection of asymptomatic brain metastases is a prognostic factor in terms of survival [4]. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of brain metastases in patients with Stage I NSCLC as well as tumor and patient characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Board of Central Switzerland (28 October 2021, project #2021-02034). This article was written according to the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines [11].

2.1. Patients

This study was designed as a multicentric retrospective analysis. We collected data from all patients older than 18 years affected by a clinical Stage IA-IB-IC NSCLC diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2020 in seven thoracic surgery units (Lucerne, Lausanne, Hannover, Lünen, Bonn, Teheran and Nagasaki). We included patients with a NSCLC clinical Stage I (based only on T and N status) who received brain imaging in the preoperative workup, either by contrast-enhanced CT scan or MRI. We excluded from the analysis all patients with any prior history of lung cancer, further synchronous or metachronous disease, previous brain malignancies, or neurological symptoms requiring a priori pre-operative brain imaging.

2.2. Endpoints

We aimed to assess the incidence of brain metastasis in clinical early-stage, node-negative NSCLC and to evaluate the possible features of patients who developed brain metastases.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the software SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). Continuous variables were expressed in terms of mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with range, while categorical variables were expressed in terms of frequency. The two-tailed Pearson’s chi-square test and likelihood ratio test were used for the intergroup comparison of categorical variables, while the Student’s t test was used for continuous variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 reports the main features of our cohort. Briefly, we included in the study 577 patients; 320 (55.5%) were male and the mean age was 68.8 years (±SD 9.0). A total of 456 patients (79%) had a history of smoking. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent diagnosis (400 patients, 69.3%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (135, 23.4%), while the remaining 42 cases (7.3%) had different histologies. In total, 480 patients (83.2%) underwent MRI, while 97 (16.8%) underwent contrast-enhanced CT scan. The vast majority of our cohort (569, 98.6%) had no brain metastases. In eight cases with brain metastases, four had a single metastasis, two metastases were found in two cases, and three and for metastases were found in one case each.
Among these patients, the majority were female (5, 62.5%), with a mean age of 63.5 years (±SD 6.4). All of them had a smoking history, with a mean pack/year of 43.7 (±SD 9.3). Half of these patients had a previous malignancy in their medical history. Most patients (5, 62.5%) received radiotherapy for their brain metastases, while surgery alone was performed in two (25.0%) cases and the remaining received surgery and radiotherapy. All of them received lung resection after the treatment of brain metastasis. We compared different features of patients with and without brain metastases, despite the small number of patients with brain metastases identified, and did not find any statistically significant difference between both groups when we considered age (p = 0.096), gender (p = 0.303), smoking history (p = 0.185), presence of previous malignancies (p = 0.123), side of the lung cancer (p = 0.899), SUVmax of the lung cancer (p = 0.637), tumor dimension (p = 0. 532), and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR, p = 0.954). On the other hand, all patients with brain metastasis were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (p = 0.038).

4. Discussion

Our retrospective analysis showed that 1.4% of patients with clinical Stage I NSCLC presented with brain metastases, which is in line with previous studies suggesting that cerebral imaging in stage I NSCLC is widely overused [9]. Silent brain metastases have been reported to occur in roughly 30% of patients diagnosed with NSCLC (>T1N0M0). This number drops to around 3% in Stage I NSCLC, which is why brain imaging in this subgroup of patients is not recommended, as it may result in increased costs and delays in therapy and have only a marginal impact on patient management [12]. Balekian et al., using the data available from the National Lung Screening trial, found that one in eight patients with clinical Stage IA disease underwent brain MRI or CT, despite a lack of guidelines supporting this practice. Interestingly, none of the patients in this analysis had brain metastases [13]. A prospective study which included 91 patients found an incidence of brain metastases of 3% in Stage I-II and 20% in Stage IIIA NSCLC patients who underwent brain imaging screening [14]. Yohena and colleagues reported a low percentage of brain metastases in resectable NSCLC after MRI screening (0% in N0-disease, 5.2% in N1-disease, and 4.7% in N2-disease) [15]. Despite these reports, there is some evidence supporting the use of brain imaging in patients scheduled for lung resection in NSCLC. O’Dowd and colleagues reported that patients with lung malignancy who developed metastases in the further course of their disease are most likely to be those initially discovered at an early stage (73% stage I-II) [16]. Hudson et al. still recommend the use of brain imaging prior to lung resection, despite a low percentage of 5.3% having brain metastases. They state that, even if the incidence is low, newly diagnosed brain metastases potentially change the management of these patients [17].
Rami-Porta et al. recommend cerebral staging in all patients with curative therapeutic options apart from in patients with pure ground glass adenocarcinoma [18]. This recommendation is supported by Postmus et al., who established the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for early and locally advanced NSCLC [19]. On the other hand, NCCN and the British Thoracic Society and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend the use of brain MRI for Stage II-III and declare it optional for stage IB but not for stage IA NSCLC [20,21].
As contrast-enhanced MRI has a superior sensitivity in brain metastasis detection compared to contrast-enhanced CT [22,23,24] and 81.3% of patients enrolled in this study underwent MRI, we consider our primary endpoint well addressed in our cohort. Additionally, contrast-enhanced CT scan has a negative predictive value of 94% when it comes to the diagnosis of brain metastasis [25]. Tumor size, histology, and N stage have been reported to be risk factors for brain metastases [26]. In our study population, only patients with adenocarcinoma were diagnosed with brain metastases, in accordance with previous studies that confirm adenocarcinoma as a risk factor [27,28,29]. In the end, brain imaging appears to be redundant in patients with Stage I NSCLC, which is in line with the Choosing Wisely campaign partnered with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in the United States.
The development of genome analysis and the detection of several oncogenic driver mutations such as mutations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS 1 have led to the concept of personalized medicine. These biomarkers represent targets for therapeutic agents with the consequent improvement of overall survival in patients with NSCLC and brain metastasis [8]. Hence, it is ethically questionable whether patients with early-stage NSCLC should be deprived of brain imaging even though a small proportion present brain metastasis at an early stage and subsequently would not receive the best possible treatment. Since it has been established that patients with EGFR mutation are more likely to present brain metastases, molecular analysis of tissue samples pre- or postoperatively could be used as a tool to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from brain imaging [30]. Of course, this possibility is reserved for cases in which histology has been determined preoperatively.
The limitations of our study mainly relate to its retrospective design, which is based on reviews of data primarily collected for clinical or quality control purposes. The multicenter design leads simultaneously to a large variability of patients but to a broader sample, thus reflecting a real-life scenario with potentially more generalizable conclusions.

5. Conclusions

The utility of pre-operative brain imaging in patients with Stage I NSCLC undergoing lung resection is a controversial topic. This is reflected by the different guidelines established by leading oncological societies worldwide, such as NCCN, ESMO, NICE, and BTS. Our data suggest that the incidence of brain metastasis in clinical early-stage lung cancer is low and that brain imaging might be avoided in this subset of patients. On the other hand, if the histology is known before surgery, the advances in the targeted treatment of NSCLC with the identification of molecular drivers could help us to define a subset of patient with clinical stage I who could benefit from pre-operative brain imaging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.; methodology, F.M. and P.B.; software, P.B.; validation, L.F.A., P.B., P.K., M.G., M.P., T.K., B.R., V.K., E.A.M., T.M., F.S.B., B.B., P.S., J.S., P.Z., L.B., S.O.S., F.M.; formal analysis, P.B.; investigation, all authors; data curation, all authors; writing, F.M., P.B., and L.F.A.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; visualization, F.M.; supervision, F.M.; project administration, F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee Central Switzerland, project#2021-02034 28 October 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to private and ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barta, J.A.; Powell, C.A.; Wisnivesky, J.P. Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Ann. Glob. Health 2019, 85, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Minervini, F.; Scarci, M. Lung cancer screening: Where do we stand? Precis. Cancer Med. 2019, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sanchez de Cos, J.; González, S.; Montero, M.V.; Calvo, P.; Vicente, M.J.; Valle, M.H.N. Non-small cell lung cancer and silent brain metastasis. Lung Cancer 2009, 63, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nayak, L.; Lee, E.Q.; Wen, P.Y. Epidemiology of Brain Metastases. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 14, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peters, S.; Bexelius, C.; Munk, V.; Leighl, N. The impact of brain metastasis on quality of life, resource utilization and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 45, 139–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Novello, S.; Barlesi, F.; Califano, R.; Cufer, T.; Ekman, S.; Levra, M.G.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Peters, S. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, v1–v27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ulahannan, D.; Khalifa, J.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Lee, S.M. Emerging treatment paradigms for brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview of the current landscape and challenges ahead. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2923–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Milligan, M.G.; Cronin, A.M.; Colson, Y.; Kehl, K.; Yeboa, D.N.; Schrag, D.; Chen, A.B. Overuse of Diagnostic Brain Imaging Among Patients with Stage IA Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020, 18, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Schoenmaekers, J.J.A.O.; Dingemans, A.M.C.; Hendriks, L.E.L. Brain imaging in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Still a controversial topic? J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, S2168–S2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P.; Strobe Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int. J. Surg. 2014, 12, 1495–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Silvestri, G.A.; Gonzalez, A.V.; Jantz, M.A.; Margolis, M.L.; Gould, M.K.; Tanoue, L.T.; Harris, L.J.; Detterbeck, F.C. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013, 143, e211S–e250S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Balekian, A.A.; Fisher, J.M.; Gould, M.K. Brain Imaging for Staging of Patients with Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: Adherence With Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign. Chest 2016, 149, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hochstenbag, M.M.H.; Twijnstra, A.; Hofman, P.; Wouters, E.F.M.; ten Velde, G.P.M. MR-imaging of the brain of neurologic asymptomatic patients with large cell or adenocarcinoma of the lung. Does it influence prognosis and treatment? Lung Cancer 2003, 42, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yohena, T.; Yoshino, I.; Kitajima, M.; Uehara, T.; Kanematsu, T.; Teruya, T.; Ikeda, J.; Ichinose, Y. Necessity of preoperative screening for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients without lymph node metastasis. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004, 10, 347–349. [Google Scholar]
  16. O’Dowd, E.L.; Kumaran, M.; Anwar, S.; Palomo, B.; Baldwin, D.R. Brain metastases following radical surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: Is preoperative brain imaging important? Lung Cancer 2014, 86, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hudson, Z.; Internullo, E.; Edey, A.; Laurence, I.; Bianchi, D.; Addeo, A. Brain imaging before primary lung cancer resection: A controversial topic. Ecancermedicalscience 2017, 11, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rami-Porta, R.; Call, S.; Dooms, C.; Obiols, C.; Sánchez, M.; Travis, W.D.; Vollmer, I. Lung cancer staging: A concise update. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1800190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Postmus, P.E.; Kerr, K.M.; Oudkerk, M.; Senan, S.; Waller, D.A.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Escriu, C.; Peters, S.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, iv1–iv21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maconachie, R.; Mercer, T.; Navani, N.; McVeigh, G. Guideline Committee. Lung cancer: Diagnosis and management: Summary of updated NICE guidance. Br. Med. J. 2019, 364, l1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022 [Internet]. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail (accessed on 18 March 2022).
  22. Earnest, F.; Ryu, J.H.; Miller, G.M.; Luetmer, P.H.; Forstrom, L.A.; Burnett, O.L.; Rowland, C.M.; Swensen, S.J.; Midthun, D.E. Suspected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Incidence of Occult Brain and Skeletal Metastases and Effectiveness of Imaging for Detection—Pilot Study. Radiology 1999, 211, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vogelbaum, M.A.; Suh, J.H. Resectable brain metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schellinger, P.D.; Meinck, H.M.; Thron, A. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared to CCT in patients with brain metastases. J. Neurooncol. 1999, 44, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Toloza, E.M.; Harpole, L.; McCrory, D.C. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the current evidence. Chest 2003, 123, 137S–146S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Na, I.I.; Lee, T.H.; Choe, D.H.; Cheon, G.J.; Kim, C.H.; Koh, J.S.; Baek, H.; Lee, J.C. A diagnostic model to detect silent brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 2411–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Park, H.S.; Cho, M.J.; Kim, J.O.; Kim, J.W.; Lim, S.-P.; Jung, S.S. Screening of brain metastasis with limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Clinical implications of using limited brain MRI during initial staging for non-small cell lung cancer patients. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2005, 20, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shi, A.A.; Digumarthy, S.R.; Temel, J.S.; Halpern, E.F.; Kuester, L.B.; Aquino, S.L. Does initial staging or tumor histology better identify asymptomatic brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? J. Thorac. Oncol. 2006, 1, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Park, H.Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, H.; Koh, W.J.; Suh, G.Y.; Chung, M.P.; Kwon, O.J. Routine screening by brain magnetic resonance imaging decreased the brain metastasis rate following surgery for lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2007, 58, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tan, L.; Wu, Y.; Ma, X.; Yan, Y.; Shao, S.; Liu, J.; Ma, H.; Liu, R.; Chai, L.; Ren, J. A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Association between EGFR Mutation Status and Brain Metastases in NSCLC. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2019, 25, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Patient demographics.
Table 1. Patient demographics.
Gender n (%)
Male

320 (55.5)
Age mean (±SD)68.8 (±9.0)
BMI mean (±SD)24.7 (±4.6)
Smoking history n (%)
Yes (current or previous smoker)

456 (79.0)
Pack/year mean (±SD)
(only for patients with a smoking history)
35.8 (±28.4)
Previous malignancies n (%)
Yes

151 (26.2)
Clinical tumor dimension mean (±SD)
mm

20.8 (± 9.0)
SUV mean (±SD)6.6 (±5.1)
PLR mean (±SD)100.2 (78.1)
Histology n (%)
Adenocarcinoma
Squamous Cell carcinoma
Other histologies

400 (69.3)
135 (23.4)
42 (7.3)
BMI: Body mass index; SD: standard deviation; SUV: standardized uptake value; PLR: platelet to lymphocyte ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azenha, L.F.; Bertoglio, P.; Kestenholz, P.; Gonzalez, M.; Pal, M.; Krueger, T.; Redwan, B.; Koesek, V.; Masri, E.A.; Miyazaki, T.; et al. Role of Pre-Operative Brain Imaging in Patients with NSCLC Stage I: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis. Cancers 2022, 14, 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102419

AMA Style

Azenha LF, Bertoglio P, Kestenholz P, Gonzalez M, Pal M, Krueger T, Redwan B, Koesek V, Masri EA, Miyazaki T, et al. Role of Pre-Operative Brain Imaging in Patients with NSCLC Stage I: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis. Cancers. 2022; 14(10):2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azenha, Luis Filipe, Pietro Bertoglio, Peter Kestenholz, Michel Gonzalez, Matyas Pal, Thorsten Krueger, Bassam Redwan, Volkan Koesek, Eyad Al Masri, Takuro Miyazaki, and et al. 2022. "Role of Pre-Operative Brain Imaging in Patients with NSCLC Stage I: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis" Cancers 14, no. 10: 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop