Next Article in Journal
Water Management Capacity of Metal Foam Flow Field for PEMFC under Flooding Situation
Next Article in Special Issue
Photoluminescent Microbit Inscripion Inside Dielectric Crystals by Ultrashort Laser Pulses for Archival Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Micro-Hotplate-Based Oven-Controlled System Used to Improve the Frequency Stability of MEMS Resonators
Previous Article in Special Issue
A False Trigger-Strengthened and Area-Saving Power-Rail Clamp Circuit with High ESD Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A FIN-LDMOS with Bulk Electron Accumulation Effect

1
College of Electronics Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China
2
Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
3
CSIRO Manufacturing, 36 Bradfield Road, P.O. Box 218, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(6), 1225; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061225
Submission received: 2 May 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 June 2023 / Published: 10 June 2023

Abstract

:
A thin Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) LDMOS with ultralow Specific On-Resistance (Ron,sp) is proposed, and the physical mechanism is investigated by Sentaurus. It features a FIN gate and an extended superjunction trench gate to obtain a Bulk Electron Accumulation (BEA) effect. The BEA consists of two p-regions and two integrated back-to-back diodes, then the gate potential VGS is extended through the whole p-region. Additionally, the gate oxide Woxide is inserted between the extended superjunction trench gate and N-drift. In the on-state, the 3D electron channel is produced at the P-well by the FIN gate, and the high-density electron accumulation layer formed in the drift region surface provides an extremely low-resistance current path, which dramatically decreases the Ron,sp and eases the dependence of Ron,sp on the drift doping concentration (Ndrift). In the off-state, the two p-regions and N-drift deplete from each other through the gate oxide Woxide like the conventional SJ. Meanwhile, the Extended Drain (ED) increases the interface charge and reduces the Ron,sp. The 3D simulation results show that the BV and Ron,sp are 314 V and 1.84 mΩ∙cm−2, respectively. Consequently, the FOM is high, reaching up to 53.49 MW/cm2, which breaks through the silicon limit of the RESURF.

1. Introduction

The Lateral Double-diffused Metal–Oxide Semiconductor (LDMOS) is a very important device in power-integrated circuits and electronic power systems [1,2,3], which are used in many places in our daily life. The Breakdown Voltage (BV) and the Specific On-Resistance (Ron,sp) are significant parameters to evaluate the quality of devices [4,5,6,7]. For the conventional LDMOS, there is an unavoidable trade-off relationship between the BV and Ron,sp, which can be written as RonBV2.5, while what we need are high BV and low Ron,sp. Baliga’s Figure Of Merit (FOM) is calculated by BV2/Ron,sp to evaluate the device, where a higher value is better [8,9,10]. Many advanced theories and structures have been investigated to increase the FOM of the power devices [11,12,13,14]. For example, for the BFG LDMOS proposed in [11], the author made half of the device into a grid, and for the HKGF LDMOS proposed in [14], the authors distinguished the device drift into three parts, each surrounded by a three-dimensional High-K dielectric, both of which greatly enhanced the control ability of the device and greatly reduced the Ron,sp of the device. The Enhanced Dielectric layer Field (ENDIF) theory can introduce a higher electric field between the top layer of silicon and the buried oxygen layer, which can obviously enhance BV [15,16,17]. However, it is possible to increase Ron,sp with the application of ENDIF theory. For example, the T-SJ LDMOS proposed in [17] enhances the BV of the device by making the top layer of silicon near the drain extremely thin, but greatly reduces the volume of the device drift region, thus reducing the Ron,sp of the device. The SuperJunction (SJ) structure can effectively increase the drift doping concentration by using N-type semiconductors and P-type semiconductors to assist each other; thus, the Ron,sp is reduced and the BV is guaranteed simultaneously, and thus the FOM can be effectively improved [18,19,20,21]. However, the superjunction structure is often placed on the P-type substrate in lateral devices, and the surface superjunction region is affected by the Substrate-Assisted Depletion (SAD) effect, which results in reduced pressure tolerance. Moreover, the power FINFET with a 3D electron channel and the LDMOS with an Accumulation Extended Gate (AEG LDMOS) are also used to improve the device [22].
In this paper, the FIN-LDMOS with Bulk Electron Accumulation (BEA-LDMOS) is first proposed. The device adopts an SOI structure, which can effectively suppress the SAD effect. The bulk electron accumulation effect produced by the extended superjunction trench gate in the N-drift and the ENDIF effect produced by the Extended Drain are produced. Moreover, the assisted depletion effect is performed by the extended superjunction trench gate, which dramatically reduces the Ron,sp while BV is guaranteed. The devices are performed by Synopsys Sentaurus, and the main physics models are as follows: Effectice Intrinsic Density, Mobility (High Field Saturation Enormal PhuMob DopingDependence), and Recombination (SRH Auger Avalanche) [23].

2. Device Structure and Mechanism

2.1. Device Structure of the BEA

The FIN-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and the proposed BEA-LDMOS are compared together in Figure 1. The FIN-LDMOS greatly increases the channel area of the device by turning the one-dimensional gate into a three-dimensional one, to reduce the Ron,sp. The AEG-LDMOS structure is characterized by extending the gate, which is only near the source region in the conventional LDMOS, to the drain, separated by SiO2. In order to extend the drain potential better, two back-to-back PN junctions are used in the extension gate to generate a charge accumulation effect at the top of the N-drift area, forming a low-resistance channel and greatly reducing the Ron,sp of the device. However, the BV will be affected by the PN junction in the extension grid, which reduces the BV of the device. The 3-D structure of the BEA-LDMOS is shown in Figure 1. The extended superjunction trench gate is formed as follows: the two back-to-back diodes are introduced at the collector, and the P-region and N-drift are separated by the SiO2. Moreover, the two ends of the P-region are, respectively, shortly connected to the gate electrode and the drain electrode, as shown in Figure 1a. When the device is in the on-state, the positive VGS is extended through most of the P-region to the positively biased D1, and positive VDS is extended through the P-region to the positively biased D2. Thus, the P-region is covered by the VGS and VDS; then, a Bulk Electron Accumulation (BEA) is generated in the drift region, as shown in Figure 1b, and the metal–insulator–semiconductor structure is composed of P-region/oxide/N-drift. It is equivalent to a low-resistance 3-D channel in the drift region. Therefore, the Ron,sp of the device is greatly reduced. Figure 1c indicates the breakdown mechanism of the BEA-LDMOS in the off-state, and it is similar to the conventional superjunction. The P-region and the N-drift region are separated by SiO2, and there is still a built-in electric field from the N-drift region toward the P-region, resulting in the formation of a depletion region near SiO2. Therefore, the electric field of the N-drift is modulated, thus helping to increase BV. At the same time, the Extended Drain structure is also introduced in the drift area, which can not only introduce the high electric field near the drain region into the more voltage-resistant silicon dioxide buried layer to increase the BV of the device, but also play the role of low-resistance channel, reducing the Ron,sp of the device. The key parameters of the devices are listed in Table 1, with a drift length LD of 21.0 μm, depth TD of 5.0 μm, Extended Drain length L of 9 μm, and thickness of 0.4 μm. The optimized drift doping Ndrift of 2.2 × 1015 cm−3 is designed for the BEA-LDMOS.
The simplified production process of the BEA-LDMOS is given as follows: The emphasis is the extended superjunction trench gate and Extended Drain. The SOI wafer in Figure 2a is injected with oxygen ions and annealed to form a silicon dioxide isolation layer. The P-well and Extended Drain are obtained by implantation, as shown in Figure 2b. The following undergo thermal oxidation to grow the isolation layer and undergo secondary ion implantation doping, as shown in Figure 2c. The subsequent processes such as metallization and passivation are compatible with conventional LDMOSs in Figure 2d.

2.2. Mainly Applied Physical Models

The main physical models used in this simulation include the carrier mobility model, carrier recombination model, and avalanche breakdown generation model [24,25,26]. Carrier mobility is expressed as follows:
1 μ = exp ( x l cirt ) μ ac + exp ( x l cirt ) μ sr + 1 μ b + 1 μ F
where μac represents the surface phonon scattering model, μsr represents the surface roughness scattering model, x represents the distance between the insulator and the semiconductor interface, μb represents the low-field-mobility model, and μF represents the high-field-mobility model.
In the simulation, we use the SRH carrier recombination model, which can accurately simulate the recombination mechanism of carrier under quantum effects. The carrier recombination model is expressed as follows:
R n e t S R H = n p γ n γ p n i , e f f T p ( n + γ n n i , e f f ) + T n ( p + γ p n i , e f f )
γ n = n N C exp ( E F n E C k T n )
γ p = p N V exp ( E V E F p k T p )
In the formula, Tn represents the lifetime of non-equilibrium minority electron, Tp represents the lifetime of non-equilibrium minority hole, NC represents the effective state density of the conduction band, NV represents the effective state density of the valence band, EFn represents the quasi-Fermi level of the conduction band, EFp represents the quasi-Fermi level of the valence band.
In order to accurately simulate the breakdown voltage of the device, the avalanche breakdown generation model is introduced in the simulation process. When the device is working in the blocking voltage, as the drain voltage continues to increase, the internal electric field of the device becomes stronger. When the maximum electric field inside the device is greater than or equal to the critical breakdown electric field of silicon, the charge multiplication effect will occur, and the leakage of the device will increase sharply, resulting in electrical breakdown of the device. The avalanche breakdown generation model is expressed as follows:
G A v a l a n c h e = α n n v n + α p p v p
α = γ a e γ b F
γ = tan h ( h ω o p 2 k T 0 ) tan h ( h ω o p 2 k T )
In the formula, α is the ionization factor, it’s the inverse of the mean free path, F represents the Vector mechanics, h ω o p represents the optical phonon energy, y represents the Dependence coefficient of phonon.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Control Mechanism and Bulk Electron Accumulation Effect of the BEA

Figure 3 shows the transfer, transconductance (gm), and gate potential characteristics for the devices. Figure 3a shows that when VGS is increased from 6 V to 16 V, and the VDS of the drain is grounded, VGS is extended through the whole P-region, and it is shunted by the negatively biased D2. Figure 3b compares the transfer and gm characteristics for the CON-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, and BEA-LDMOS. The peak gm for the devices is 2.26, 3.16, 4.21, and 18.33 mS/mm, respectively. Because the higher peak gm can be achieved by the 3-D bulk electron channel, the BEA shows the best control capability of IDS.
Figure 4 shows the electron current densities of devices in the on-state. It can be seen that the electron current density of the AEG-LDMOS and BEA-LDMOS are much higher than those of the other two devices due to the existence of a charge accumulation effect. Moreover, because of the 3-D charge accumulation effect of the BEA-LDMOS, while the charge accumulation effect of the AEG is one-dimensional, the area of the low-resistance channel formed by the BEA-LDMOS is much higher than that of AEG-LDMOS, so the electron current density of the BEA-LDMOS is the largest of all four devices.
Figure 5 shows the output IDS-VDS characteristics of the four devices at the forward conduction. For the proposed BEA-LDMOS, the P-region is covered by VGS and VDS to obtain a 3-D low-resistance channel, so the linear current and saturation current in the drift region are much higher than those of the CON-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and FIN-LDMOS under the same VDS. Thus, stronger conductivity and ultra-low Ron,sp are achieved.

3.2. Specifics of Resistance Ron,sp and Breakdown Voltage BV

Figure 6 shows the influence of the thickness of the top layer of silicon on Ron, sp and BV of the device. It can be seen from the figure that Ron,sp gradually decreases with the increase in TD under different gate voltages. This can be explained by the formula for volume resistance:
R = R s L W
R s = ρ T D
where L and W are the length and width of the device channel, respectively; Rs is the resistance of the block; ρ is the resistivity; and TD is the thickness of the silicon film. However, the BV first increases and then decreases with the increase in TD, and the optimum BV is 314 V when TD is 5.0 μm. This is because when TD is small, the longitudinal breakdown voltage of the device is very low, and the BV of the device mainly depends on the longitudinal breakdown voltage. When TD is too large, the relationship between Ndrift and TD does not conform to the RESURF theory [27], the device will breakdown in advance, as shown in Figure 6b, and the electric field will be 0 at half of the drift area of the device.
Figure 7 shows the influences of the doping Ndrift on the Ron,sp and BV for the devices. For the CON-LDMOS, the optimized BV and Ron,sp are 329 V and 14.54 mΩ∙cm2 when the Ndrift is 2.5 × 1015 cm−3, respectively. For the FIN-LDMOS, the optimized BV and Ron,sp are 323 V and 11.78 mΩ∙cm2 when the Ndrift is 2.5 × 1015 cm−3, respectively. For the BEA-LDMOS, the optimized BV and Ron,sp are 314 V and 1.84 mΩ∙cm2 when the Ndrift is 2.2 × 1015 cm−3, respectively. It can be seen that the BV of the four devices increases first and then decreases with the increase in Ndrift. This is because when the doping concentration is very low, the maximum electric field of the device is near the drain region, and the breakdown voltage of the device mainly depends on the heterojunction formation of the drain region and N-drift region. When the doping concentration in the N-drift region gradually increases, the PN junction formed in the drift region and the P-well also begins to participate in the voltage resistance. When the N-drift region doping concentration continues to increase, the maximum electric field of the device will appear near the source region, and the doping concentration difference between the drain and the drift region is very small. The breakdown voltage of the device mainly depends on the PN junction formed by the drift region and P-well. The breakdown voltage reaches its maximum when the two electric field spikes are almost high. The Ron,sp of CON-LDMOS and FIN-LDMOS decreases obviously with the increase in Ndrift, but the Ron,sp of AEG-LDMOS and BEA-LDMOS almost does not change with the change in Ndrift. This is because these two devices have low-resistance channels formed by the electron accumulation effect, so Ron,sp does not depend on Ndrift. Consequently, Baliga’s Figures OF Merit (FOMs) of the CON-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and BEA-LDMOS are calculated as 7.42 MW/cm2, 8.86 MW/cm2, 20.02 MW/cm2, and 53.43 MW/cm2, respectively.
Figure 8 shows the corresponding equipotential distribution at the avalanche breakdown for the four devices. The yellow area in the figure is the N-drift area, the brown area is the buried oxygen layer, the green area is the P-type substrate, the top left is the drain, the right is the source and the gate. It is noted that the BVs of the CON-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and BEA-LDMOS are 315, 306, 297, and 314 V, respectively. The CON-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, and AEG-LDMOS have a similar distribution of potential lines, but there is no distribution of potential lines in the area near the drain of the BEA-LDMOS. This is because the Extended Drain introduces the higher electric field into the silicon dioxide layer, so the silicon dioxide layer below the Extended Drain has a denser distribution of the potential line. Because SiO2 has a smaller interfacial defect density and a larger dielectric constant than silicon, SiO2 can withstand a higher voltage and can improve the BV of the device.
Figure 9 demonstrates the electric field Efield distribution along the cut line of X = 1.9 μm, Z = 6 μm and X = 1.9 μm, Z = 4.9 μm. It is noted that the Efield in the N-drift of the BEA-LDMOS reaches a maximum at the end of the Extended Drain and then drops rapidly, as shown in Figure 9a. This is because the Extended Drain of high doping forms a heterojunction with the drift region of low doping concentration. In heterogeneous junctions, electrons and holes are unevenly distributed on both sides due to different material doping concentrations. Since the concentration of electrons in the highly doped region is higher than that in the low-doped region, electrons will diffuse from the high-doped region to the low-doped region, while holes will diffuse from the low-doped region to the high-doped region. Electrons and holes will meet at the center of the junction, resulting in a large number of recombination. This recombination results in a region of space charges near the junction, and the uneven distribution of charges in this region leads to the formation of a sharp electric field. Meanwhile, the Efield in the buried silicon dioxide layer of the BEA-LDMOS is much higher than those of the other three devices, as shown in Figure 9b. This is because the Extended Drain draws the high electric field in the N-drift region into the buried silicon dioxide layer, which can withstand higher voltages.

3.3. Influence of Unique Key Parameters on the Ron,sp, Peak gm, and BV of the BEA LDMOS

Figure 10 shows the influence of the length (L) and thickness (H) of the Extended Drain on the Ron,sp and BV for the BEA-LDMOS. In Figure 10a, the Extended Drain is equivalent to a low-resistance channel, so increasing the thickness of the Extended Drain is equivalent to increasing the volume of the low-resistance channel. Consequently, the specific conduction resistance decreases with increase in thickness of the Extended Drain. In Figure 10b, the specific conduction resistance decreases with increase in the length of the Extended Drain. The BV of the device generally increases first and then decreases with the increase in the thickness and length of the Extended Drain. This is because at the beginning, with the increase in the volume of the Extended Drain, the high electric field can be better introduced into the silicon dioxide layer. However, when the increase exceeds a certain range, it is equivalent to increasing the drift concentration, which will reduce the breakdown voltage. Considering the trade-off property between the Ron,sp and BV, the thickness of 0.4 μm and length of 9 μm are selected as the best parameters.

3.4. Dynamic Characteristics

The switching characteristics under inductive load are shown in Figure 11a, and a slower turn-on speed TON and turn-off speed TOFF of the BEA-LDMOS are observed compared to the CON-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and FIN-LDMOS. Because the gate capacity is proportional to the gate area, the larger the area, the larger the gate capacity. The BEA-LDMOS not only has a FIN structure, but also has an extended superjunction trench gate, so the gate area is much larger than those of the other three devices. Figure 11b shows the effect of different widths of the gate on the switching speed of the device. It can be seen that the wider the gate, the lower the switching speed of the device. The switching performance of the device can be improved by reducing the width of the gate.

3.5. The Trade-Off Property between the Ron,sp and BV

Figure 12 demonstrates the trade-off characteristic and FOM for the BEA LDMOS, single RESURF, double RESURF, and triple RESURF in Ref. [9], which are the classic three structures. It can be seen from the figure that the Ron,sp of the device is still very low at a larger BV. According to FOM = BV2/Ron,sp, it can be concluded that the FOM of BEA is largest and achieves the best trade-off property. The main performance indexes of the four devices compared in this paper are shown in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

The mechanism and electric characteristics of the BEA-LDMOS are proposed and researched. The VGS of the BEA is extended through the P-region, and the full buck accumulation effect is formed at the inside of the N-drift, where a 3-D low-resistance channel at the N-drift is achieved. In addition, the Extended Drain is also equivalent to a low-resistance channel. Thus, the Ron,sp is significantly decreased. Simultaneously, the superior BV is guaranteed by the charge compensation and assisted depletion effect between the P-type doping and N-drift. Consequently, a FOM of 53.49 MW/cm2 is achieved, which breaks through the silicon limit of the RESURF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.D. and W.C.; methodology, W.C.; software, Z.D.; validation, Z.D., W.C. and H.Z.; formal analysis, Z.D.; investigation, Z.D. and Z.W.; resources, Z.D. and W.C.; data curation, Z.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.D.; writing—review and editing, W.C. and Z.W.; visualization, Z.D.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, Z.H.; funding acquisition, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, S.; Gan, K.P.; Samudra, G.S.; Liang, Y.C.; Sin, J.K.O. 120 V interdigitated-drain LDMOS (IDLDMOS) on SOI substrate breaking power LDMOS limit. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2000, 47, 1980–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, I.Y.; Choi, Y.I.; Chung, S.K.; Lim, H.J.; Mo, S.I.; Choi, J.S.; Han, M.K. Numerical analysis on the LDMOS with a double epi-layer and trench electrodes. Microelectron. J. 2001, 32, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erlbacher, T.; Bauer, A.J.; Frey, L. Reduced on Resistance in LDMOS Devices by Integrating Trench Gates into Planar Technology. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2010, 31, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Wang, R.; Cheng, S.; Gu, Y.; Zahng, S.; He, B.; Qiao, M.; Li, Z.; Zhang, B. Optimization and Experiments of Lateral Semi-Superjunction Device Based on Normalized Current-Carrying Capability. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 1969–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hardikar, S.; Tadikonda, R.; Green, D.W.; Vershinin, K.V.; Narayanan, E.M.S. Realizing high-voltage junction isolated LDMOS transistors with variation in lateral doping. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2004, 51, 2223–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saxena, R.S.; Kumar, M.J. A new buried-oxide-in-drift-region trench MOSFET with improved breakdown voltage. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2009, 30, 990–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qiao, M.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, B. A 700- V Junction-Isolated Triple RESURF LDMOS with N-Type Top Layer. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 774–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baliga, B.J. Power semiconductor device figure of merit for high-frequency applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 1989, 10, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iqbal, M.M.; Udrea, F.; Napoli, E. On the static performance of the RESURF LDMOSFETS for power ICs. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June 2009; pp. 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ge, W.; Luo, X.; Wu, J.; Lv, M.; Wei, J.; Ma, D.; Deng, G.; Cui, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, K. Ultra-Low On-Resistance LDMOS With Multi-Plane Electron Accumulation Layers. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, W.; Qin, H.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Han, Z. A Bulk Full-Gate SOI-LDMOS Device with Bulk Channel and Electron Accumulation Effect. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 6286–6291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, W.; Qin, H.; Zhang, H.; Han, Z. Bulk Electron Accumulation LDMOS With Extended Superjunction Gate. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 1900–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, Y.; Yao, J.; Zhang, B.; Lin, H.; Zhang, C. Variation of Lateral Width Technique in SoI High-Voltage Lateral Double-Diffused Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Transistors Using High-k Dielectric. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2015, 36, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wu, J.; He, Y.; Li, M.; Lin, H. Novel LDMOS With Integrated Triple Direction High-k Gate and Field Dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3997–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Fu, Q.; Xie, G.; Li, Z. An L-Shaped Trench SOI-LDMOS With Vertical and Lateral Dielectric Field Enhancement. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 703–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, W.; Zhan, Z.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, S.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Luo, X.; Li, Z.; Qiao, M.; Li, Z.; et al. Novel Superjunction LDMOS (>950 V) With a Thin Layer SOI. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 1555–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, B.; Li, Z.; Hu, S.; Luo, X. Field Enhancement for Dielectric Layer of High-Voltage Devices on Silicon on Insulator. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2009, 56, 2327–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, J.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, X.; Li, B.; Chen, K.J. Superjunction MOSFET With Dual Built-In Schottky Diodes for Fast Reverse Recovery: A Numerical Simulation Study. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okada, M.; Kyogoku, S.; Kumazawa, T.; Saito, J.; Morimoto, T.; Takei, M.; Harada, S. Superior Short-Circuit Performance of SiC Superjunction MOSFET. In Proceedings of the 2020 32nd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), Vienna, Austria, 13–18 September 2020; pp. 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Udrea, F.; Deboy, G.; Fujihira, T. Superjunction Power Devices, History, Development, and Future Prospects. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.B.; Sin, J.K.O. Optimization of the specific on-resistanceof the COOLMOS/sup TM. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2001, 48, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, J.; Luo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z. High-Voltage Thin-SOI LDMOS With Ultralow ON-Resistance and Even Temperature Characteristic. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2016, 63, 1637–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sentaurus Device User Guide, Version J-2014.09; Synopsys: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2014.
  24. Arora, N.D.; Hauser, J.R.; Roulston, D.J. Electron and Hole Mobilities in Silicon as a Function of Concentration and Temperature. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1982, 29, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fossum, J.G.; Mertens, R.P.; Lee, D.S.; Nijs, J.F. Carrier Recombination and Lifetime in Highly Doped Silicon. Solid-State Electron. 1983, 26, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McIntyre, R.J. On the Avalanche Initiation Probability of Avalanche Diodes Above the Breakdown Voltage. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1973, 20, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Appels, J.A.; Vaes, H.M.J. High voltage thin layer devices (RESURF devices). In Proceedings of the 1979 International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 3–5 December 1979; pp. 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The three-dimensional (3D) schematic and mechanism of the three proposed devices. (a) FIN-LDMOS, (b) AEG-LDMOS, (c) BEA-LDMOS, (d) the Bulk Electron Accumulation (BEA) effect induced at the N-drift, (e) the assisted depletion between the P-region and N-drift in the Off-state. Diode D1 is formed by the (P−/N+) and D2 is formed by the (P/N+) junction.
Figure 1. The three-dimensional (3D) schematic and mechanism of the three proposed devices. (a) FIN-LDMOS, (b) AEG-LDMOS, (c) BEA-LDMOS, (d) the Bulk Electron Accumulation (BEA) effect induced at the N-drift, (e) the assisted depletion between the P-region and N-drift in the Off-state. Diode D1 is formed by the (P−/N+) and D2 is formed by the (P/N+) junction.
Micromachines 14 01225 g001
Figure 2. Simplified key process of the proposed BEA-LDMOS. (a) SOI substate, (b) Ion doping, (c) Thermal oxidation, (d) Electrode deposition.
Figure 2. Simplified key process of the proposed BEA-LDMOS. (a) SOI substate, (b) Ion doping, (c) Thermal oxidation, (d) Electrode deposition.
Micromachines 14 01225 g002
Figure 3. The gate potential VGS in the on-state, transfer, and gm characteristics for the devices. (a) Potential distribution along the p–n–p for the BEA-LDMOS. (b) Transfer and gm of the CON-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and BEA-LDMOS.
Figure 3. The gate potential VGS in the on-state, transfer, and gm characteristics for the devices. (a) Potential distribution along the p–n–p for the BEA-LDMOS. (b) Transfer and gm of the CON-LDMOS, FIN-LDMOS, AEG-LDMOS, and BEA-LDMOS.
Micromachines 14 01225 g003
Figure 4. The electgron Current density distribution for the four devices at the On-state.
Figure 4. The electgron Current density distribution for the four devices at the On-state.
Micromachines 14 01225 g004
Figure 5. Output characteristics of the devices, and VGS of 15 and 20 V are applied.
Figure 5. Output characteristics of the devices, and VGS of 15 and 20 V are applied.
Micromachines 14 01225 g005
Figure 6. Influence of key parameter TD on the Ron,sp, BV, and electric field for the BEA-LDMOS (TD is the thickness of the N-drift). (a) Influence on the Ron,sp and BV, (b) influence on the electric field of top layer.
Figure 6. Influence of key parameter TD on the Ron,sp, BV, and electric field for the BEA-LDMOS (TD is the thickness of the N-drift). (a) Influence on the Ron,sp and BV, (b) influence on the electric field of top layer.
Micromachines 14 01225 g006aMicromachines 14 01225 g006b
Figure 7. Effect of doping concentration of N-drift region on BV and Ron,sp for the four devices.
Figure 7. Effect of doping concentration of N-drift region on BV and Ron,sp for the four devices.
Micromachines 14 01225 g007
Figure 8. The 3-D equipotential contours at the avalanche breakdown at the same Ndrift.
Figure 8. The 3-D equipotential contours at the avalanche breakdown at the same Ndrift.
Micromachines 14 01225 g008
Figure 9. The electric field distribution at the avalanche breakdown at (a) X = 1.9 μm, Z = 6 μm; (b) X = 1.9 μm, Z = 4.9 μm.
Figure 9. The electric field distribution at the avalanche breakdown at (a) X = 1.9 μm, Z = 6 μm; (b) X = 1.9 μm, Z = 4.9 μm.
Micromachines 14 01225 g009aMicromachines 14 01225 g009b
Figure 10. Key parameters: (a) thickness (H) of the Extended Drain, (b) length (L) influence on the Ron,sp, peak gm, and BV for the BEA-LDMOS.
Figure 10. Key parameters: (a) thickness (H) of the Extended Drain, (b) length (L) influence on the Ron,sp, peak gm, and BV for the BEA-LDMOS.
Micromachines 14 01225 g010aMicromachines 14 01225 g010b
Figure 11. (a) Capacitance switching characteristics of the four devices. Turn-on and turn-off curves under inductive load.(b) Switching characteristic curves at different gate widths.
Figure 11. (a) Capacitance switching characteristics of the four devices. Turn-on and turn-off curves under inductive load.(b) Switching characteristic curves at different gate widths.
Micromachines 14 01225 g011aMicromachines 14 01225 g011b
Figure 12. The trade-off relationship between Ron,sp and BV for the BEA-LDMOSs and the RESURF. The FOM is calculated by the FOM = BV2/Ron,sp.
Figure 12. The trade-off relationship between Ron,sp and BV for the BEA-LDMOSs and the RESURF. The FOM is calculated by the FOM = BV2/Ron,sp.
Micromachines 14 01225 g012
Table 1. Key parameters used in simulation.
Table 1. Key parameters used in simulation.
SymbolDescriptionFIN-LDMOSCON-LDMOSAEG-LDMOSBEA-LDMOS
LDdrift length (μm)21212121
TDdrift depth (μm)5555
WgateGate wideth (μm)2222
NdriftN-drift doping (cm−3)2.5 × 10152.5 × 10152.5 × 10152.5 × 1015
h-topAEG structure thickness (μm)----0.2--
WoxideGate oxide width (μm)0.10.10.10.1
WEGExtended gate width (μm)----2.20.6
LFINFIN-Gate length (μm)1----1
LExtended drain lenth (μm) ------9
HExtended drain thickness (μm)------0.4
Table 2. Trade-off Property between the Ron,sp and BV.
Table 2. Trade-off Property between the Ron,sp and BV.
SymbolFIN-LDMOSCON-LDMOSAEG-LDMOSBEA-LDMOS
BV (V)323329297314
Ron,sp (mΩ∙cm−2)11.7814.544.411.84
FOM8.867.4220.0153.43
Ndrift (cm−3)2.5 × 10152.5 × 10152.5 × 10152.5 × 1015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Han, Z.; Wang, Z. A FIN-LDMOS with Bulk Electron Accumulation Effect. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061225

AMA Style

Chen W, Duan Z, Zhang H, Han Z, Wang Z. A FIN-LDMOS with Bulk Electron Accumulation Effect. Micromachines. 2023; 14(6):1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Weizhong, Zubing Duan, Hongsheng Zhang, Zhengsheng Han, and Zeheng Wang. 2023. "A FIN-LDMOS with Bulk Electron Accumulation Effect" Micromachines 14, no. 6: 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop