Next Article in Journal
A Novel Manifold Dual-Microchannel Flow Field Structure with High-Performance Heat Dissipation
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation Study: The Impact of Structural Variations on the Characteristics of a Buried-Channel-Array Transistor (BCAT) in DRAM
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Low-Cost Resistance Temperature Detectors and Micro-Heaters by Electrohydrodynamic Printing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Power Gain Assessment of GaN-SOI-FinFET for Improved RF/Wireless Performance Using TCAD

1
ECE Department, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida 201309, India
2
ASH Department, Dr. Akhilesh Das Gupta Institute of Technology & Management, New Delhi 110053, India
3
Innovative Technologies Laboratories (ITL), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(9), 1418; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091418
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Revised: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 28 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in MOSFET and Field Effect Devices)

Abstract

:
In this work, we present a radio frequency (RF) assessment of the nanoscale gallium nitride-silicon-on-insulator fin field-effect transistor (GaN-SOI-FinFET). All the performances of the device were compared with GaN-FinFET and conventional FinFET (Conv. FinFET) simultaneously. All the results show that the power gains significantly improved in terms of Gma, Gms, Stern stability factor (SS), GMT, and intrinsic delay in comparison with conventional FinFET. Current gain and unilateral power gain were also evaluated for the extraction of fT (cut-off frequency) and fMAX, respectively. fT and fMAX were enhanced by 88.8% and 94.6%, respectively. This analysis was performed at several THz frequencies. Further, the parametric assessment was also performed in terms of gate length and oxide thickness to find the optimized value of gate length and oxide thickness. The implementation of GaN in the channel reduces the parasitic capacitance and paves the way for high-performance RF applications.

1. Introduction

Continuous scaling of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) devices is required for high speed, better performance, and higher power efficiency. Scaling leads to undesirable short channel effects (SCEs) and parasitic capacitances in an MOS device, which make it unsuitable for RF application. To overcome these effects, 3D structures based on silicon, such as FinFETs [1,2,3], gate-all-around FinFET and FETs [4,5,6], and many FETs with multi-gate, have been developed [7,8]. In recent years, different materials have been introduced in nanochannel transistors, which exhibit better performance. Such devices present near ideal subthreshold slope and lower leakage currents [9]. Gallium nitride (GaN) is used for high voltage and frequency operation owing to its larger bandgap, higher electron mobility, and ability to operate at very high temperatures without degrading its characteristics [10,11]. The FinFETs based on GaN have better gate controllability due to the nonplanar 3D structure [12]. Very low thermal resistance has been observed in GaN material, which makes it suitable for power transistors [13]. Therefore, the self-heating effect was not considered in this analysis. Many other properties make it a more desirable semiconductor for high frequency (THz range) applications [14,15].
This work emphasizes the RF performance of GaN-SOI-FinFET and compares it with two other devices called GaN-FinFET and Conv. FinFET using TCAD. Many figures of merit, such as Gma, Gms, Stern stability factor (SS), GMT, and intrinsic delay, were considered and compared with their counterparts. Current gain and unilateral power gain were also considered for the extraction of fT and fMAX. Further, parametric assessment was also performed in terms of gate length and oxide thickness to find the optimized value of gate length and oxide thickness. Due to the rising need for high-speed electronics goods, precise modelling of a FinFET device is needed at high frequencies to demonstrate the behaviours in microwave circuits.

2. Device Structure and Simulation Methodology

Figure 1 shows the three-dimensional and two-dimensional device design of the GaN-SOI-FinFET. The proposed device structure (shown in Figure 1) is heterojunction-free; there is no 2DEG (2D electron gas). For this work, 8 nm gate length (LG) was considered along with the oxide thickness (tox) of 1 nm on all three fins’ sides. The width (WFin) and height (HFin) of the fin are 4 nm and 8 nm, respectively. Low doping concentration (1016 cm−3) was considered in the channel region (NCh) uniformly; however, high (1021 cm−3) doping concentration of Si (uniform) was considered in the source/drain (NS,D) regions The device parameters are summarized in Table 1. ZrO2 is used as high-k material to reduce leakage currents and increase the physical oxide thickness without significantly increasing the actual effective oxide thickness of gate dielectrics. The increased physical thickness contributes to the reduction in tunneling of carriers through the dielectric. The gate electrode work function is 5.0 eV (nickel).
In this work, the proposed device (GaN-SOI-FinFET) was simultaneously compared with GaN-FinFET and conventional FinFET. GaN-FinFET architecture has the same dimensions as the proposed device without SOI and high-k material (ZrO2). Conventional FinFET has silicon (Si) in the channel region instead of GaN. In the conventional device, high-k material (ZrO2) was also not used, and the rest of the device dimensions are the same as the proposed device.
We used a TCAD device simulator to perform the entire simulation [16]. We performed the numerical simulation followed by device design in this work. The construction of structure and numerical resolution are the two key processes in TCAD device simulation. While the numerical element entails defining the work function and selecting the necessary physical models and mathematical techniques to be employed in the simulation, structure design entails establishing the mesh, then specifying the various regions in the device, the doping, and the electrodes [16]. The constant voltage and temperature model was considered for the numerical simulation of the device and this model is used to account for the mobility degradation and the ionized impurity scattering caused due to surface roughness scattering, photon scattering, and field-dependent mobility. Next, we considered the Shockley Read Hall model for recombination effects, which is useful for the leakage current simulation.

3. Calibration with Experimental Data

The calibration of the proposed device was performed with experimental data [17] as shown in Figure 2. A device with a 100 nm gate length is calibrated with experimental work of heterojunction-free GaN FinFET [17] for more validation with our simulated data. This well calibrated result (Figure 2) shows the validity of simulation models.

4. Result and Discussion

The energy band diagram of the proposed GaN-SOI-FinFET device across the vertical cross-section (with conduction band, valence band, and Fermi level) is depicted in Figure 3. For the improved RF performance of the proposed device, various gain parameters were evaluated. In order to evaluate power gains, first Gma and Gms were evaluated for conventional FinFET, GaN-FinFET, and GaN-SOI-FinFET using Equation (1) [18]. All the data for Gma and Gms were plotted against frequency (in THz range) as reflected in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows the improved performance of GaN-SOI-FinFET in comparison with GaN-FinFET and conventional FinFET. Gma and Gms represent the desirable maximum theoretical power gain of the device. To define the Gma, a two-port network was considered and defined as the ratio of the power available (maximum) at load to the power available (maximum) at the source. GaN-SOI-FinFET depicts substantial improvement in Gma and Gms due to the electrical properties of GaN as the larger value of Gma and Gms is desirable for high-frequency applications.
G m a = P l o a d , max P s o u r c e , max
Low-noise amplifier (LNA) designing is as important as power gains for RF amplifiers and in this way stability is the key parameter. An amplifier’s stability is also known as the Stern stability factor (K), and has a value of K usually >1 at high frequency and <1 at low frequency [19,20]. K can be defined as in Equation (2) [18,21],
K = 1 + | Δ | 2 | S 11 | 2 | S 22 | 2 2 . | S 12 S 21 |
Here, coefficients of reflection are denoted by S11 and S22, while coefficients of transmission are denoted by S12 and S21, and Δ is represented as
Δ = S 11 × S 22 S 12 × S 21
The Stern stability factor for both the devices is shown in Figure 5. From Figure 5, it can be observed that K is greater than one at high frequency for the GaN-FinFET and conventional FinFET, and ~1 (slightly > 1) for the proposed device at a higher frequency; this is desirable for the designing of RF amplifiers.
Further, cut-off frequency (fT) was extracted from the current gain plot at unity current gain [22] (shown in Figure 5a). fT can be defined by Equation (4) and it measures the swing and speed of high-speed digital applications [23,24,25]:
f T = g m 2 π ( C g s + C g d )
where gm is the transconductance and stray capacitances are represented by the gate to source capacitance (Cgs) and gate to drain capacitance (Cgd). These stray (parasitic) capacitances were also evaluated and plotted against frequency as shown in Figure 6. The results show that fT increases nine-fold in GaN-SOI-FinFET compared to conventional FinFET and two-fold compared to GaN-FinFET, as shown in Figure 7a, due to reduced values of capacitances (shown in Figure 6). The maximum oscillator frequency (fMAX) was also evaluated at the unity unilateral power gain [26] (shown in Figure 5b). fMAX should be as high as possible for RF applications and can be calculated as in Equation (5) [22,27]:
f M A X = f T 4 R g ( g d s + 2 π f T C g d )
where gds is drain conductance and Rg is gate resistance. Figure 5b shows that fMAX enhances ten-fold and two-fold in the GaN-SOI-based device as compared to GaN-FinFET and silicon-based FinFET, respectively, as clearly reflected in Figure 7b. Figure 5 also shows the RF performance of the device and the efficacy of the two ports in terms of GMT, which is an evaluation of the effectiveness of the two ports. GMT is improved in the GaN-based device compared to GaN-FinFET and silicon-based FinFET, as shown in Figure 5b, owing to GaN material in the channel region which made the device more suitable for RF applications. Thereafter, intrinsic delay (as shown in Figure 8) was calculated and plotted for both conventional FinFET and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
τ = C g g · V d I O N
where applied drain bias voltage is denoted by Vd, Cgg is the gate capacitance evaluated and plotted in Figure 6, and ION is the on-current of the device. Figure 8 reflects a very high reduction (85.29%) in intrinsic delay in the GaN-based device compared to the silicon-based FinFET device due to the reduction in gate capacitances and higher current driving capability. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET proves to be the most suitable candidate for RF applications.
For high-frequency applications, GFP (gain frequency product) is one essential parameter and is given in Equation (7). Figure 9a shows that GFP is enhanced in the proposed device compared to the other two devices due to the higher value of fT and hence the gain bandwidth product (GBP) increases. Moreover, other important RF parameters were evaluated in terms of gain transconductance frequency product (GTFP) and transconductance frequency product (TFP), as expressed in Equations (8) and (9), respectively. TFP is utilized in high-speed designs as it exhibits an agreement between bandwidth and power [28]. Figure 9b shows the TFP and GTFP for GaN-SOI, GaN, and Conv. FinFETs. The result reflects that both TFP and GTFP increase for Gan-SOI-FinFET compared to GaN and Conv. FinFETs and then attain a maximum value due to the higher value of fT. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET is the most suitable device design in terms of power gain improvements for RF applications.
G F P = ( g m g d ) × f T
G T F P = ( g m g d ) × ( g m I d ) × f T
T F P = ( g m I d ) × f T

4.1. Impact of Gate Length Variation

Further, to optimize the device parameters, the improved RF performance gate length was varied. Power gain parameters Gma and Gms were evaluated for GaN-SOI-FinFET for various gate lengths using Equation (1) [18]. All the data for Gma and Gms were plotted against frequency (in THz range), as reflected in Figure 10, for various gate lengths. Figure 10 shows that when the gate length is reduced from 12 nm to 6 nm, the gains are improved. GaN-SOI-FinFET depicts substantial improvement in Gma and Gms at 6 nm gate length, which is desirable for high-frequency applications.
The Stern stability factor was also observed for different gate lengths as a function of frequency for GaN-SOI-FinFET, as shown in Figure 11a. From Figure 11a, it was observed that the Stern stability factor improved (slightly < 1) for reduced gate length (6 nm) in the proposed device at a higher frequency and it is desirable for the designing of RF amplifiers. fT was extracted from the current gain plot at unity current gain (shown in Figure 11a) for various gate lengths at very high frequencies. When gate length is reduced from 12 nm to 6 nm, fT increases by 28% due to a reduction in stray capacitances, as clearly reflected in Figure 12a.
fMAX was also evaluated at the unity unilateral power gain for different gate lengths (shown in Figure 11b). Figure 11b shows that fMAX is enhanced by 66.66% when gate length is reduced, as shown in Figure 12b. Figure 11b also shows the RF performance of the device in terms of GMT for different gate lengths and it is observed that GMT is improved with the reduction in gate length to 6 nm in the proposed device, which makes the device more suitable for RF applications at 6 nm gate length. Thereafter, intrinsic delay (as shown in Figure 13) was calculated and plotted for varied gate lengths. Figure 13 reflects a very high reduction (86.66%) in intrinsic delay when gate length is reduced from 12 nm to 6 nm due to the reduction in gate capacitances and higher current-driving capability. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET with a 6 nm gate length proves to be the most suitable candidate for RF applications.
Figure 14a shows that GFP is enhanced (by 13.2%) in the proposed device when the gate length is reduced from 12 nm to 6 nm due to the higher value of fT at a lower gate length and hence GBP increases by 29.69%. Moreover, GTFP and TFP were evaluated at different gate lengths, as shown in Figure 14b. Figure 14b shows TFP and GTFP increased in GaN-SOI-FinFET at lower gate lengths compared to longer gate lengths by 14.08% and 24.13%, respectively, and then attained a maximum value due to the higher value of fT. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET reflects more favourable results in terms of power gain improvements for RF applications at 6 nm gate length.

4.2. Impact of Oxide Thickness Variation

Moreover, oxide thickness was considered for the optimization of the device parameters to improve RF performance. Once again, we started with well known power gain parameters, Gma and Gms, which were evaluated for the proposed device for various oxide thicknesses. Both parameters were calculated and plotted against a frequency range of several THz for various oxide thicknesses, as reflected in Figure 15. Figure 15 shows that when oxide thicknesses are reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm, the gains are reduced due to gate leakage current and when oxide thicknesses increase from 1 nm to 2 nm, again the gains are reduced due to increased capacitances. GaN-SOI-FinFET depicts substantial improvement in Gma and Gms at 1 nm oxide thickness, which is the optimal value for high-frequency applications.
The Stern stability factor was also observed to optimize the oxide thickness as a function of frequency (in the THz range) for GaN-SOI-FinFET, as shown in Figure 16a. From Figure 16a, it was observed that the Stern stability factor increases (slightly > 1) for reduced oxide thickness (0.5 nm), while increasing more when the oxide thickness increases to 2 nm at a higher frequency. For different oxide thicknesses at very high frequencies, fT was extracted from the current gain plot at unity current gain, as shown in Figure 16a. When oxide thickness is reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm, fT is slightly reduced (by 20.31%); however, more reduction is observed when oxide thickness increases to 2 nm (by 37.5%) due to increased stray capacitances, as clearly reflected in Figure 17a. fMAX was also evaluated at the unity unilateral power gain for different gate lengths, as shown in Figure 16b. Figure 16b shows that fMAX is slightly reduced (by 7.5%) when oxide thickness is reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm; however, more reduction is observed when oxide thickness increases to 2 nm (by 45%) due reduction in fT as shown in Figure 17b. Figure 16b also shows the RF performance of the device in terms of GMT for different oxide thicknesses and it is observed that GMT is slightly reduced when oxide thickness is reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm; however, more reduction is observed when oxide thickness increases to 2 nm. Thereafter, the intrinsic delay was calculated and plotted for various oxide thicknesses, as shown in Figure 18. Figure 18 reflects increased values (by 98%) in intrinsic delay when oxide thickness is reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm; however, a higher value (by 6.5 times) is observed when oxide thickness increases to 2 nm due to reduction in gate capacitances. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET with 1 nm oxide thickness proves to be the most suitable candidate for RF applications.
Figure 19a shows that GFP is slightly reduced (by 4.82%) when oxide thickness is reduced from 1 nm to 0.5 nm; however, more reduction is observed when oxide thickness increases to 2 nm (by 15.86%) due to the reduction in fT compared to 1 nm oxide thickness, and hence GBP also follows the same patterns (by 9.3% and 26.5%). Thereafter, GTFP and TFP were evaluated at different oxide thicknesses, as shown in Figure 19b. Figure 19b shows the TFP and GTFP show the higher value at 1 nm oxide thickness and reduce their values when oxide thickness decreases/increases to 0.5/2 nm due to the change in fT. Thus, GaN-SOI-FinFET reflects more favourable results in terms of power gain improvements for RF applications at 1 nm oxide thickness.

5. Conclusions

The presented work investigated the efficacy of the GaN-based SOI-FinFET device for improved RF performance. From the results, it was observed that GaN-SOI-FinFET enhanced gain matrices significantly in terms of Gma, Gms, and GMT. The capacitances (parasitic) were also measured in terms of Cgs, Cgd, and Cgg and it is observed that these capacitances are reduced significantly, which enhances the cut-off frequency by ~9 times and the fMAX by ~18 times in the GaN-based SOI-FinFET compared to Conv. FinFET and GaN-FinFET. The intrinsic delay was also reduced by 6.8 times in GaN-based SOI-FinFET compared to silicon-based FinFET. Further, to find the optimized value of gate length and oxide thickness, parametric assessment was also performed and it was found that 6 nm gate length and 1 nm oxide thickness are the optimized values for desired RF performances. Thus, all the results show that GaN-based SOI-FinFET is the most suitable solution for high-performance RF applications in the sub-10 nm regime.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., N.G., A.K.G. and Y.M.; formal analysis, A.K.G. and A.K.; investigation, Y.M.; methodology, A.K.; supervision, Y.M.; validation, A.K.G. and N.G.; writing—original draft, A.K., N.G. and A.K.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the research funding to the Innovative Technologies Laboratories (ITL) from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hisamoto, D.; Lee, W.-C.; Kedzierski, J.; Takeuchi, H.; Asano, K.; Kuo, C.; Anderson, E.; King, T.-J.; Bokor, J.; Hu, C. FinFET-a self-aligned double-gate MOSFET scalable to 20 nm. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2000, 47, 2320–2325. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu, B.; Chang, L.; Ahmed, S.; Wang, H.; Bell, S.; Yang, C.-Y.; Tabery, C.; Ho, C.; Xiang, Q.; King, T.-J. FinFET scaling to 10 nm gate length. In Proceedings of the Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 8–11 December 2002; pp. 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta, N.; Kumar, A. Assessment of High-k Gate Stack on Sub-10 nm SOI-FinFET for High-Performance Analog and RF Applications Perspective. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 123009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sahay, S.; Kumar, M.J. Spacer design guidelines for nanowire FETs from gate-induced drain leakage perspective. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 3007–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Colinge, J.-P.; Gao, M.; Romano-Rodriguez, A.; Maes, H.; Claeys, C. Silicon-on-insulator ‘gate-all-around device’. In Proceedings of the International Technical Digest on Electron Devices, San Francisco, CA, USA, 9–12 December 1990; pp. 595–598. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, B.; Chaujar, R. Analog and RF Performance Evaluation of Junctionless Accumulation Mode (JAM) Gate Stack Gate All Around (GS-GAA) FinFET. Silicon 2021, 13, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farzana, E.; Chowdhury, S.; Ahmed, R.; Khan, M.Z.R. Analysis of temperature and wave function penetration effects in nanoscale double-gate MOSFETs. Appl. Nanosci. 2013, 3, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xue, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, F.; Zhong, R.; Wang, Q. Fabrication and characteristics of back-gate black phosphorus effect field transistors based on PET flexible substrate. Appl. Nanosci. 2019, 10, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Colinge, J.-P.; Lee, C.-W.; Afzalian, A.; Akhavan, N.D.; Yan, R.; Ferain, I.; Razavi, P.; O’neill, B.; Blake, A.; White, M. Nanowire transistors without junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Zubair, A.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, M.; Perozek, J.; Ma, Y.; Palacios, T. GaN FinFETs and trigate devices for power and RF applications: Review and perspective. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 36, 054001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Palacios, T. (Ultra) wide-bandgap vertical power FinFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 3960–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teng, M.; Yue, H.; Chi, C.; Xiaohua, M. A new small-signal model for asymmetrical AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. J. Semicond. 2010, 31, 064002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shur, M. GaN based transistors for high power applications. Solid-State Electron. 1998, 42, 2131–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shrestha, P.; Guidry, M.; Romanczyk, B.; Hatui, N.; Wurm, C.; Krishna, A.; Pasayat, S.S.; Karnaty, R.R.; Keller, S.; Buckwalter, J.F. High linearity and high gain performance of N-polar GaN MIS-HEMT at 30 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Romanczyk, B.; Li, W.; Guidry, M.; Hatui, N.; Krishna, A.; Wurm, C.; Keller, S.; Mishra, U.K. N-polar GaN-on-Sapphire deep recess HEMTs with high W-band power density. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 1633–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guide, S.D.U. Version, E Sentaurus device User Guide; Synopsys Inc.: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Im, K.-S.; Jo, Y.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Cristoloveanu, S.; Lee, J.-H. Heterojunction-free GaN nanochannel FinFETs with high performance. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 381–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, A.; Gupta, N.; Chaujar, R. Power gain assessment of ITO based Transparent Gate Recessed Channel (TGRC) MOSFET for RF/wireless applications. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 91, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pati, S.K.; Koley, K.; Dutta, A.; Mohankumar, N.; Sarkar, C.K. Study of body and oxide thickness variation on analog and RF performance of underlap DG-MOSFETs. Microelectron. Reliab. 2014, 54, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dastjerdy, E.; Ghayour, R.; Sarvari, H. Simulation and analysis of the frequency performance of a new silicon nanowire MOSFET structure. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2012, 45, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, N.; Kumar, A.; Chaujar, R. Impact of device parameter variation on RF performance of gate electrode workfunction engineered (GEWE)-silicon nanowire (SiNW) MOSFET. J. Comput. Electron. 2015, 14, 798–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nae, B.; Lazaro, A.; Iniguez, B. High frequency and noise model of gate-all-around MOSFETs. In Proceedings of the 2009 Spanish Conference on Electron Devices, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 11–13 February 2009; pp. 112–115. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar, A.; Gupta, N.; Chaujar, R. TCAD RF performance investigation of Transparent Gate Recessed Channel MOSFET. Microelectron. J. 2016, 49, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, A.; Tripathi, M.M.; Chaujar, R. Reliability Issues of In2O5Sn Gate Electrode Recessed Channel MOSFET: Impact of Interface Trap Charges and Temperature. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, A. Effect of trench depth and gate length shrinking assessment on the analog and linearity performance of TGRC-MOSFET. Superlattices Microstruct. 2017, 109, 626–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarkar, A.; Jana, R. The influence of gate underlap on analog and RF performance of III–V heterostructure double gate MOSFET. Superlattices Microstruct. 2014, 73, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, N.; Chaujar, R. Investigation of temperature variations on analog/RF and linearity performance of stacked gate GEWE-SiNW MOSFET for improved device reliability. Microelectron. Reliab. 2016, 64, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, A.; Tripathi, M.; Chaujar, R. Investigation of parasitic capacitances of In2O5Sn gate electrode recessed channel MOSFET for ULSI switching applications. Microsyst. Technol. 2017, 23, 5867–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Three-dimensional Device structure of GaN-SOI-FinFET, (b) 2D view of GaN-SOI-FinFET, and (c) 3D meshed device structure.
Figure 1. (a) Three-dimensional Device structure of GaN-SOI-FinFET, (b) 2D view of GaN-SOI-FinFET, and (c) 3D meshed device structure.
Micromachines 13 01418 g001
Figure 2. Ids-Vds characteristics calibration of experimental GaN FinFET [17].
Figure 2. Ids-Vds characteristics calibration of experimental GaN FinFET [17].
Micromachines 13 01418 g002
Figure 3. Energy Band diagram for the vertical cross-section of GaN-SOI FinFET.
Figure 3. Energy Band diagram for the vertical cross-section of GaN-SOI FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g003
Figure 4. Gma and Gms for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 4. Gma and Gms for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g004
Figure 5. (a) SS and Current Gain for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 5. (a) SS and Current Gain for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g005
Figure 6. Parasitic capacitances (a) Cgs, (b) Cgd, and (c) Cgg; plots against high frequencies (THz) for Conv. FinFET and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 6. Parasitic capacitances (a) Cgs, (b) Cgd, and (c) Cgg; plots against high frequencies (THz) for Conv. FinFET and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g006
Figure 7. (a) fT and (b) fMAX for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 7. (a) fT and (b) fMAX for Conventional and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g007
Figure 8. Intrinsic delay for Conv. FinFET and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 8. Intrinsic delay for Conv. FinFET and GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g008
Figure 9. (a) GFP and GBP for GaN-SOI, GaN, and Conv. FinFETs. (b) TFP and GTFP for GaN-SOI, GaN, and Conv. FinFETs.
Figure 9. (a) GFP and GBP for GaN-SOI, GaN, and Conv. FinFETs. (b) TFP and GTFP for GaN-SOI, GaN, and Conv. FinFETs.
Micromachines 13 01418 g009
Figure 10. Gma and Gms at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 10. Gma and Gms at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g010
Figure 11. (a) SS and Current Gain at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 11. (a) SS and Current Gain at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g011
Figure 12. (a) fT and (b) fMAX at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 12. (a) fT and (b) fMAX at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g012
Figure 13. Intrinsic delay at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 13. Intrinsic delay at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g013
Figure 14. (a) GFP and GBP at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) TFP and GTFP at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 14. (a) GFP and GBP at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) TFP and GTFP at various gate lengths of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g014
Figure 15. Gma and Gms at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 15. Gma and Gms at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g015
Figure 16. (a) SS and Current Gain at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 16. (a) SS and Current Gain at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) Unilateral Power Gain and GMT at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g016
Figure 17. (a) fT and (b) fMAX at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 17. (a) fT and (b) fMAX at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g017
Figure 18. Intrinsic delay at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 18. Intrinsic delay at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g018
Figure 19. (a) GFP and GBP at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) TFP and GTFP at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Figure 19. (a) GFP and GBP at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET. (b) TFP and GTFP at various oxide thicknesses of GaN-SOI-FinFET.
Micromachines 13 01418 g019
Table 1. Device Parameters.
Table 1. Device Parameters.
ParameterDimension
LG (nm)8
Length of Source (LS) and Drain (LD) (nm)10
Fin Height, HFin (nm)8
Fin Width, WFin (nm)4
Oxide Thickness, tOX (nm)1
NCh (cm−3)1.0 × 1016
NS,D (cm−3)1.0 × 1021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, A.; Gupta, N.; Goyal, A.K.; Massoud, Y. Comprehensive Power Gain Assessment of GaN-SOI-FinFET for Improved RF/Wireless Performance Using TCAD. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091418

AMA Style

Kumar A, Gupta N, Goyal AK, Massoud Y. Comprehensive Power Gain Assessment of GaN-SOI-FinFET for Improved RF/Wireless Performance Using TCAD. Micromachines. 2022; 13(9):1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Ajay, Neha Gupta, Amit Kumar Goyal, and Yehia Massoud. 2022. "Comprehensive Power Gain Assessment of GaN-SOI-FinFET for Improved RF/Wireless Performance Using TCAD" Micromachines 13, no. 9: 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop