Next Article in Journal
Multi-Mycotoxin Long-Term Monitoring Survey on North-Italian Maize over an 11-Year Period (2011–2021): The Co-Occurrence of Regulated, Masked and Emerging Mycotoxins and Fungal Metabolites
Next Article in Special Issue
Fibrinogenolysis in Venom-Induced Consumption Coagulopathy after Viperidae Snakebites: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Maize in North China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Monoclonal scFv against Cytotoxin to Neutralize Cytolytic Activity Induced by Naja atra Venom on Myoblast C2C12 Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/toxins14080522
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Equatorial Spitting Cobra (Naja sumatrana) from Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan and Penang), Southern Thailand, and Sumatra: Comparative Venom Proteomics, Immunoreactivity and Cross-Neutralization by Antivenom

by
Choo Hock Tan
1,*,
Kae Yi Tan
2,
Kin Ying Wong
1,
Nget Hong Tan
2 and
Ho Phin Chong
1
1
Venom Research and Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Protein and Interactomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2022, 14(8), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14080522
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Snakebite and Clinical Toxinology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Equatorial Spitting Cobra (Naja sumatrana) is a medically important venomous snake species in Southeast Asia. Its wide geographical distribution implies potential intra-specific venom variation, while there is no species-specific antivenom available to treat its envenoming. Applying a protein-decomplexing proteomic approach, the study showed that three-finger toxins (3FTX), followed by phospholipases A2 (PLA2), were the major proteins well-conserved across N. sumatrana venoms of different locales. Variations were noted in the subtypes and relative abundances of venom proteins. Of note, alpha-neurotoxins (belonging to 3FTX) are the least in the Penang specimen (Ns-PG, 5.41% of total venom proteins), compared with geographical specimens from Negeri Sembilan (Ns-NS, 14.84%), southern Thailand (Ns-TH, 16.05%) and Sumatra (Ns-SU, 10.81%). The alpha-neurotoxin abundance, in general, correlates with the venom’s lethal potency. The Thai Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) was found to be immunoreactive toward the N. sumatrana venoms and is capable of cross-neutralizing N. sumatrana venom lethality to varying degrees (potency = 0.49–0.92 mg/mL, interpreted as the amount of venom completely neutralized per milliliter of antivenom). The potency was lowest against NS-SU venom, implying variable antigenicity of its lethal alpha-neurotoxins. Together, the findings suggest the para-specific and geographical utility of NkMAV as treatment for N. sumatrana envenoming in Southeast Asia.
Keywords:
venom variation; antivenom potency; Naja kaouthia monovalent antivenom (NkMAV); monocled cobra antivenom; snakebite envenoming
Key Contribution: The study unveils the potential intra-specific venom variation of Naja sumatrana, a medically important venomous snake species in Southeast Asia, and the immunoreactivity as well as cross-neutralization efficacy of a hetero-specific antivenom raised against Thai Monocled Cobra against the N. sumatrana venoms of different locales, providing valuable information for improvement of antivenom production and use in the region.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Removed from the list of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) in 2013, snakebite envenoming was finally redesignated as a priority neglected tropical disease by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017 [1,2]. Yearly, an estimate of 81,000–138,000 deaths and approximately 400,000 disabilities are resultant from this global scourge worldwide [1,3]. The problem disproportionately affects impoverished rural populations in many developing countries, including those in Southeast Asia where venomous snakes such as cobras are abundant and commonly implicated in snakebite envenoming [4,5].
Cobras play significant roles in many popular cultures and are well known for their medical and public health importance. Specifically, “true cobras” are members of the genus Naja, which contains various species occurring in regions throughout Africa, Southwest Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia and East Asia [6]. In Southeast Asia, there are at least six to seven distinct species of cobras that are able to inflict fatal and disabling envenomation [4,7]. Of these, the Equatorial Spitting Cobra, Naja sumatrana, is distributed throughout the Malay Peninsula (including the islands of Penang and Singapore), Sumatra, the southern part of Thailand, and part of Borneo Island. The species was previously grouped under a larger species complex of Naja naja sputatrix, locally known as theMalayan Spitting Cobra without a clear distinction from other spitting cobras in the region, which are now elevated to different species such as Naja siamensis in Indochina, and Naja sputatrix on the Java Island of Indonesia [8]. To note, the N. sumatrana species is morphologically varied, especially in body coloration, with a transition from yellow or light brown in southern Thailand, northern West Malaysia and Penang Island to black in most parts of the Malay Peninsula (south to Kedah), Singapore, Sumatra, and Borneo. As cobras are diversely distributed in the region, the diagnosis of species is crucial for proper snakebite management, improved prognosis, and in fatality cases for forensic inputs [9].
Clinically, the majority of cobra species produce neurotoxic and cytotoxic envenoming syndrome, attributed to the effects of neurotoxins and cytotoxins present in their venoms [7]. Nevertheless, snake venoms can vary substantially between species in terms of protein composition and antigenicity, thus resulting in variable toxic manifestations and treatment effectiveness [1,10,11,12]. Consequently, the identification of cobra species is critical in the management of snakebite envenoming. Venom variability has also been widely recognized within the same snake species, in particular those with a wide biogeographical distribution, as distant populations evolved variable venoms for adaptation to the distinct ecological niche. For instance, in Southeast Asia, marked geographical venom variation has been reported for the Monocled Cobra (Naja kaouthia) from Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, showing variable venom proteomes that correlate with venom toxicity and discrepancy in the neutralization efficacy of antivenom [13,14]. Similarly, intra-specific variations in snake venom composition, antigenicity and neutralization have been reported for various other medically important snakes in Southeast Asia, including Russell’s Viper, Malayan Pit Viper, Malayan Krait, Banded Krait and King Cobra [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The variations have ramifications on antivenom use, as antivenoms are usually domestic products manufactured in one locale and thus may have limited efficacy in neutralizing the venom of the same snake species from another geographical area. Moreover, in Southeast Asia, the antivenom products have limited species coverage, leaving most snakes in the region without specific antivenom. Consequently, non-specific antivenoms are commonly used as para-specific treatment for envenoming caused by many snake species in this region [7,21]. In this regard, the Thai Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NKMAV) is the recommended treatment for N. sumatrana envenoming, given that Neuro Polyvalent Antivenom, a poly-specific antivenom raised against the venoms of N. kaouthia, Bungarus candidus, Bungarus flaviceps and Ophiophagus hannah, has been found to be effective in cross-neutralizing N. sumatrana venom sourced from Seremban in West Malaysia [22,23]. Nevertheless, the potential geographical variability of N. sumatrana venom and its impact on the immunoreactivity and neutralization activity of antivenom have not been investigated.
This study therefore aimed to explore the venom variation of N. sumatrana sourced from four geographical locales, i.e., southern Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan), Penang Island (West Malaysia), and the island of Sumatra (Indonesia), applying a decomplexation proteomic approach for snake venom [24]. Furthermore, the immunoreactivity and neutralization efficacy of NkMAV, which is the clinically recommended monovalent antivenom for treatment, was assessed against the different venoms using an in vitro immunoassay and an in vivo murine model. The findings shall provide deeper insights into the intra-specific venom variability of N. sumatrana and valuable information for antivenom use optimization in the region.

2. Results

2.1. Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Profiles of Naja sumatrana Venoms

C18 reverse-phase HPLC resolved N. sumatrana venoms into 12 to 15 fractions over a time course of 180 min (Figure 1). The venoms of N. sumatrana from Negeri Sembilan (Ns-NS), Penang (Ns-PG) and southern Thailand (Ns-TH) exhibited similar elution patterns based on the chromatograms, whereas that from Sumatra (Ns-SU) showed notable differences between 100 and 125 min, a region where the majority of proteins were eluted for the four venoms.
Electrophoretic profiles of the chromatographic fractions of all four venoms showed the proteins eluted from 55 to 140 min were of low molecular weight (MW) (<15 kDa), accounting for >92% of the total venom proteins based on the AUC (area under the curve) of the respective venoms. Minor proteins were eluted in the later course of the fractionation, where heterogeneous mixtures of low and moderate MW proteins (15–30 kDa) were eluted between 140 and 150 min, while high MW proteins (>40 kDa) eluted between 155 and 170 min (Figure 1).

2.2. Naja sumatrana Venom Proteomes

The identification and quantitation of N. sumatrana venom proteins fractionated by RP-HPLC are shown in Table 1. Mass spectrometric data including parameters for spectral ions, protein scores, and amino acid sequences of peptides are provided in Supplementary Materials.
In comparison, a total of 22–55 proteoforms, belonging to 8–14 protein families, were identified in N. sumatrana venoms at varying abundances (Table 1). Most proteins were annotated by matching homologous toxin sequences to Naja species available in the databases used for data mining. Among the protein families identified, three-finger toxins (3FTX), phospholipase A2 (PLA2), venom nerve growth factor (vNGF), snake venom metalloproteinase (SVMP), cobra venom factor (CVF), phosphodiesterase (PDE) and L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) are the seven protein families consistently detected in all four N. sumatrana venoms. Cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRiSP) and snake venom serine protease (SVSP) were detected in all N. sumatrana venoms, except for Ns-TH, whereas vespryn was detected in all samples, except for Ns-NS. Hyaluronidase (HYA), acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and 5′ nucleotidase (5′NUC) were only detected in Ns-PG and Ns-SU, while Kunitz-type serine protease (KSPI) was distinctively present in Ns-SU. The overall proteomic profiles of the four venoms are illustrated in Figure 2.
Across the venom proteomes of N. sumatrana from all four locales, 3FTX constitutes the most abundant protein family, accounting for 57–70% of the total venom proteins. The 3FTX proteins include subtypes of long neurotoxins (LNTX, 2.6–10.3%), short neurotoxins (SNTX, 2.8–6.4%), cytotoxin (CTX, 30.0–54.0%), muscarinic toxin-like protein (MTLP, 2.0–9.6%) and weak toxins (WTX, 3.7–13.7%) (Table 1; Figure 2). LNTX, SNTX and CTX were present in all four venoms, while MTLP was detected in Ns-PG and Ns-SU venoms, and WTX was detected in Ns-NS, Ns-PG and Ns-SU venoms. The second most abundant protein of all four venoms was PLA2, which constitutes 23.3–34.6% of total venom proteins. Toxins belonging to the remaining protein families have lower abundances, each accounting for less than 7% of the total venom proteins. These include vNGF (0.9–6.6%), KSPI (5.9%, solely detected in Ns-SU), SVMP (1.5–4.8%), CVF (0.4–1.4%), PDE (0.5–0.9%), CRiSP (0.2–0.5%), LAAO (0.1–0.7%), SVSP (0.1–0.7%), HYA (0.1–0.2%), AChE (0.1–0.3%) Vespryn (~0.1%) and 5′NUC (~0.1%) (Figure 2).

2.3. Immunoreactivity of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV)

In indirect ELISA, the immunoreactivity of NkMAV increased dose dependently toward the venoms tested (Figure 3). NkMAV has high immunoreactivity toward the N. kaouthia venom, which served as the positive control, with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 2.04 ± 0.32 µg/mL and a maximal absorbance (Abmax) of 2.40 ± 0.03. In comparison, its immunoreactivity significantly reduced when testing against the N. sumatrana venoms and varied among these venoms (EC50 = 4.06–9.64 µg/mL, Abmax = 1.82–2.20) (Table 2).

2.4. Venom Lethality and Neutralization by NkMAV

The four samples of N. sumatrana venom were lethal to mice. Ns-SU, Ns-TH and Ns-NS have median lethal doses (LD50) ranging between 0.39 and 0.50 µg/g. Ns-SU was the most potent (LD50 = 0.39 µg/g), comparable to the venom of Ns-TH (LD50 = 0.41 µg/g) and Ns-MS (LD50 = 0.50 µg/g) (Table 3). In comparison, Ns-PG has a higher LD50 value (0.96 µg/g) and is almost one-fold less lethal than the three other N. sumatrana venoms.
In the neutralization experiment, NkMAV effectively neutralized the lethality of all N. sumatrana venoms, with values of normalized potency (n-P) ranging from 11–21 mg/g (milligram of venom completely neutralized per gram of antivenom protein). Based on the previous study, NkMAV neutralization activity against the homologous N. kaouthia venom was comparable, with an n-P value of 20.44 mg/g. In the present study, the neutralization effects of NkMAV against the Ns-NS, Ns-PG and Ns-TH venoms were similar (n-P~20 mg/g), whereas the potency against Ns-SU was approximately one-fold lower (n-P = 11.4 mg/g) (Table 3).

3. Discussion

The decomplexation proteomic approach allows for the comparison of venom compositions of N. sumatrana from different geographical locales. 3FTX proteins dominated the venom proteomes, and within 3FTX are cobra-characteristic toxins, i.e., short-chain and long-chain alpha-neurotoxins (SNTX and LNTX), and cytotoxins (CTX), well conserved across the different geographical specimens. The alpha-neurotoxins block post-synaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) at the neuromuscular junctions, thereby inhibiting the neurotransmission and causing paralysis, which is the primary mode of death in cobra envenoming [26,27]. The alpha-neurotoxin abundance (quantitatively expressed in percentage of total venom proteins) correlates with the lethal potency of cobra venom, and these toxins therefore should be the main target for immunological binding and neutralization by antivenom [28,29]. Earlier, the venom proteome of N. sumatrana sourced from Seremban (Malaysia) showed an alpha-neurotoxin abundance of 15% [30], a value comparable to our current finding of 14.84% and 16.05% alpha-neurotoxins for N. sumatrana from Negeri Sembilan (Malaysia) (Ns-NS) and southern Thailand (Ns-TH), respectively. The present study further unveils the variable alpha-neurotoxin abundances of N. sumatrana from Penang (Ns-PG) and Sumatra (Ns-SU). Of note, the venoms of both insular origins contained less alpha-neurotoxins compared with the continental venoms, where Ns-PG has the lowest abundance (5.41%) and accordingly, a lower lethal potency (discussed below).
While SNTX and LNTX are present across all N. sumatrana venoms tested, the proteoforms and relative abundances varied among the venoms. The differences might influence the venom toxicity, antigenicity and neutralization, thus resulting in variable clinical manifestation and response to antivenom treatment. Previous studies indicated that SNTX, in contrast to LNTX, binds less irreversibly to nAChR and is therefore, theoretically, less medically relevant to envenoming in humans [31,32]. Nevertheless, SNTX still contributes to the overall venom lethality, especially for cobras of eastern dispersal, e.g., Naja sputatrix and Naja atra whose alpha-neurotoxins are predominantly SNTX [33,34], and Naja philippinensis as well as Naja samarensis, whose alpha-neurotoxins are exclusively SNTX [28,35]. In addition, previous studies showed that commercial antivenoms have a lower neutralization potency against SNTX than LNTX, suggesting SNTX is the limiting factor of antivenom efficacy, presumably because of its small molecular size and fewer epitopes, accompanied with a low antigenicity [25,36,37,38]. Thus, the ratio between the two alpha-neurotoxins could influence the efficacy of a heterologous antivenom, such that cobra venoms rich in SNTX might not be well neutralized by an antivenom raised against LNTX-dominant cobra venoms. The present study provides the relative abundances of SNTX and LNTX, and shows that N. sumatrana venoms from Negeri Sembilan (Ns-NS) and southern Thailand (Ns-TH) contained slightly more LNTX than SNTX (ratios of LNTX:SNTX~1.5–2:1). Conversely, N. sumatrana from Penang (Ns-PG) and Sumatra (Ns-SU), representing insular populations, have a more balanced expression ratio of LNTX and SNTX in the venom (LNTX:SNTX = 1:1). The antivenom proposed for cross-neutralization of N. sumatrana venom, i.e., NkMAV, is raised against the Thai Monocled Cobra venom, which contains abundant LNTX (as its dominant form of alpha-neurotoxins) and relatively less SNTX (33.3% LNTX, 7.7% SNTX) [14]. In comparison, the N. sumatrana venoms have lower LNTX abundances (2.62–10.3%) and a considerably balanced distribution of LNTX and SNTX. The amino acid sequences of LNTX of N. kaouthia and N. sumatrana, despite variation, demonstrate high homology between the two species, and the same is true for their SNTX [39,40]. Accordingly, NkMAV was able to cross-neutralize the N. sumatrana venoms of different locales, albeit with varying degrees of potency (discussed below). A recent bioinformatic study also suggested that SNTX and LNTX, despite their small molecular sizes and toxicities, are still immunogenic but effective adjuvants, and improved immunization procedures are needed for the production of potent antivenoms against these elapid neurotoxins [41].
Cobra cytotoxins (CTX), conventionally called cardiotoxins, are universally present in cobra venoms across all African and Asiatic lineages of Naja spp. [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. These are toxins mainly implicated in the pathogenesis of cytotoxicity and tissue necrosis [49,50,51,52], and they are lethal when administered intravenously in mice. CTX have, however, much higher LD50 (>1 µg/g, implying lower lethality) compared with the highly lethal alpha-neurotoxins (LD50 < 0.2 µg/g). The present study shows that CTX constitutes the main bulk of N. sumatrana venom proteins (~30–60%), and their high abundance supports the occurrence of extensive tissue necrosis associated with local envenoming by N. sumatrana [5,7,53]. A recent study showed that the local cytotoxic effect caused by N. sumatrana venom and its CTX could be cross-neutralized by commercially available N. kaouthia and Naja atra antivenoms, although the efficacy was generally low, a finding consistent with limited antivenom effectiveness in the clinical treatment of local tissue damage caused by cobra bites [49]. Other 3FTX detected in N. sumatrana venom proteomes are different forms of weak toxins and muscarinic toxin-like proteins, whose roles in the clinical pathophysiology of envenoming remain obscure.
Snake venom PLA2 are secretory enzymatic proteins with diverse pharmacological activities, and they are commonly present in snake venoms [53]. Following 3FTX, PLA2 made up the second most abundant protein family in all N. sumatrana venoms, a phenotypic pattern similarly observed across various cobra species including N. sumatrana from Seremban [29,43,44,46,48]. Cobra venom PLA2 follows a unique distribution pattern across different Naja subgenera. PLA2 content is absent or negligible in the venoms of African non-spitting cobras (subgenus Uraeus) but markedly higher in the other subgenera (Naja, Afronaja and Boulengerina) especially spitting cobras, presumably associated with the venom algesic (pain-inducing) properties for defense [51,54]. The PLA2 forms identified in N. sumatrana venom proteomes are diverse. The N. sumatrana venoms contain acidic PLA2 which are present virtually in all cobra venoms, and the acidic PLA2 generally lack lethal activity in mice [25,36]. In addition, the N. sumatrana venoms also contain highly conserved neutral forms of PLA2, which have been shown to be lethal to mice [23]. Nonetheless, the neutral PLA2 of N. sumatrana, with an intravenous LD50 of 2 µg/g in mice, is less lethal than the toxic PLA2 of N. sputatrix (LD50 = 0.5 µg/g, near-neutral PLA2) [34] and Hydrophis schistosus (Beaked Sea Snake) (LD50 = 0.08 µg/g, basic PLA2) [55]. Comparing between the present study and the earlier report for N. sumatrana from Seremban, the relative abundance of PLA2 ranged between 23% and 34% of total venom proteins in the current work, whereas the PLA2 abundance was only 7.2% as reported previously [30]. In addition, while LCMS/MS analysis in the present work detected 4–6 PLA2 proteoforms, two were reported by the previous study. The relative abundance of PLA2 in N. sumatrana venoms (present study) is comparable with that reported for N. sputatrix venom [34], in line with the anticipated high PLA2 abundance for spitting cobras. Nonetheless, there are exceptions in two Asiatic spitting cobras (N. philippinensis and N. samarensis), who have greatly downregulated the expression of PLA2 and CTX while conserving the venom-spitting trait [28,35].
Other minor proteins detected in N. sumatrana venoms are vNGF, SVMP, CVF, PDE, CRiSP, LAAO, SVSP, HYA, AChE, Vespryn, 5′NUC and KSPI. These are, in general, proteins with high molecular weights (contrary to the major toxin group, 3FTX), and are less abundant in the venoms, suggesting ancillary functions without direct lethal implication. Certain toxins are known to play roles in inflammatory responses (e.g., SVMP, CRiSP) and facilitate venom dissemination (e.g., CVF, PDE, 5′NUC) during snakebite envenoming [56,57,58,59].
In mice, Ns-NS, Ns-TH and Ns-SU venoms showed comparable lethality (LD50 = 0.4–0.5 µg/g), while Ns-PG venom was significantly less lethal (LD50 = 0.9 µg/g). In cobra envenoming, lethality is primarily a sequel of neuromuscular paralysis caused by the alpha-neurotoxins, whose protein abundance positively correlates with the venom’s lethal potency. The lethality of Ns-NS, Ns-TH and Ns-SU venoms is considered moderate in comparison to the Thai N. kaouthia, Pakistani N. naja, Philippine’s N. philippinensis and N. samarensis venoms, which have much higher abundances of alpha-neurotoxins (23–66%) and are thus more potent for lethal effect (LD50 = 0.1–0.2 µg/g) [14,35,60]. In contrast, Ns-PG venom, with the least alpha-neurotoxins (~5% of total venom proteins) among the four N. sumatrana venoms, is less neurotoxic and less lethal. This is a venom characteristic shared by the Javan N. sputatrix, Malaysian and Vietnamese N. kaouthia, and Taiwanese N. atra which are generally considered less neurotoxic (LD50 ≥ 0.9 µg/g) [14,33,48,60].
Presently, there is no species-specific antivenom available against N. sumatrana, and thus, hetero-specific antivenom products are recommended by the Clinical Guideline of Malaysia for treatment of N. sumatrana envenoming [21]. As both species of N. kaouthia and N. sumatrana share close geographical proximity, NkMAV (raised against the Thai N. kaouthia venom) as a monovalent antivenom commercially available in Southeast Asia appears to be the appropriate choice of antivenom for N. sumatrana envenoming. The ELISA finding showed that NkMAV is immunoreactive toward all N. sumatrana venoms, suggesting largely conserved venom antigenicity between N. kaouthia and N. sumatrana, and among specimens of the latter from different geographical locales. The significantly lower immunoreactivity of NkMAV toward N. sumatrana venoms (in comparison to N. kaouthia venom), however, implies subtle antigenic divergence between N. kaouthia and N. sumatrana venom proteins. Among the N. sumatrana venoms, NkMAV immunoreactivity varied with the highest activity noted in Ns-SU, followed by Ns-TH, Ns-PG and Ns-NS. The immunoreactivity of NkMAV reflects the general binding activity of antibody toward various protein antigens, including lethal and non-lethal components in the venoms. Hence, while it is a good indicator of antibody–antigen (toxin) binding, it does not necessarily provide accurate prediction for antivenom neutralization efficacy. The cross-reactivity shown, nonetheless, suggests potential cross-neutralization, which should be subsequently evaluated with functional toxicity assays, such as in vivo neutralization of lethality which is the gold standard as per the WHO guideline [60,61].
Thus, using a mouse model, this study further confirmed the in vivo efficacy of NkMAV in cross-neutralizing the lethal effect of N. sumatrana venoms. Its neutralization activity for Ns-TH, Ns-PG and Ns-NS is moderate, with a normalized potency of approximately 20 mg/g (interpreted as the amount of venom neutralized completely by one gram of antivenom proteins), which is comparable to its neutralization potency against the homologous Thai N. kaouthia venom (normalized potency = 20.44 mg/g) [25]. The neutralization against Ns-SU venom, however, is apparently weaker (by almost one-fold), indicating that a higher dose of antivenom may be needed to effectively cross-neutralize the lethal alpha-neurotoxins of Ns-SU. Presumably, the alpha-neurotoxins specific to the Indonesian N. sumatrana are antigenically more varied from N. kaouthia, and N. sumatrana of Malaysia (Ns-NS, Ns-PG) and Thailand (Ns-TH). Additionally, Ns-SU venom might possess synergistic toxins that are less neutralized by the antivenom NkMAV. The discrepancy unveiled should also be taken into consideration when formulating a “diverse toxin repertoire” immunogen for the development of a pan-specific, pan-regional antivenom product [62,63].
To put things into perspective, we estimate that N. sumatrana venom has an intravenous LD50 of approximately 0.04–0.07 mg/kg in humans, through converting the murine LD50 to human equivalent dose (multiplying the animal dose by 0.081) [64]. Accordingly, for an adult man weighing 60 kg, a few milligrams of the venom (>2.4–4.2 mg) with access to the circulation would be lethal. A full-grown cobra is capable of injecting copious venom, easily at any amount between 20–50 mg or more (author’s experience). Assuming 30 mg of injected venom is well absorbed during envenoming, and based on the neutralization potency of NkMAV, a dose consisting of 3–4 vials of antivenom would be needed for complete neutralization against the Ns-TH, NS-PG and Ns-NS venoms, while a higher dose (six vials) might be required for neutralizing the Ns-SU venom. In the absence of species-specific antivenom, this preclinical finding thus provides a guide to justify the para-specific use and the dosing of NkMAV for N. sumatrana envenoming. This is also consistent with clinical guidelines that recommend an initial dose of 100 mL (10 vials) of cobra antivenoms [4,21]. Although 10 vials of antivenom appears to be a high dose, it may be reasonable in anticipation of excessive venom injection and concurrent clearance of antivenom from the body. Furthermore, repeated antivenom doses will be needed in recurrent neurotoxic envenoming [65], where venom deposited at the bite site gradually enters the circulation while the antivenom effect wears off with time—a phenomenon described as the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mismatch between venom and antivenom. Hence, while the patient shows favorable response to initial antivenom treatment, recurrent syndrome must be closely monitored for prompt antivenom re-treatment.

4. Conclusions

This study shows intra-specific venom variation of N. sumatrana from four geographical locales in Southeast Asia. 3FTX constitutes the major protein family that is well conserved in the venoms, notwithstanding variable subtypes and abundances of the lethal alpha-neurotoxins within this protein family. Of note, the alpha-neurotoxin abundance is the lowest in Ns-PG venom, and this correlates with its significantly lower lethality among the venom specimens. The hetero-specific antivenom raised against Thai Monocled Cobra venom, NkMAV, shows dose-dependently increasing immunoreactivity toward the N. sumatrana venoms, suggesting conserved venom protein antigenicity between N. kaouthia and N. sumatrana. NkMAV was efficacious in cross-neutralizing the lethal effects of N. sumatrana venoms to varying degrees, with the lowest potency found against the Indonesian N. sumatrana venom, implying distinct antigenicity of its lethal neurotoxins. On the whole, the findings support NkMAV utility as a para-specific antivenom treatment for N. sumatrana envenoming in Southeast Asia. The antivenom dosage for cross-neutralization derived from the study suggests dosing consistent with most guidelines’ recommendations for N. kaouthia envenoming. Further study should aim to improve the antivenom potency through approaches such as improving the antibody purity, increasing the antivenom concentration, or incorporating toxin-specific antibodies to overcome the need for high doses of antivenom.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Antivenoms and Venoms

The venoms of Malaysian N. sumatrana were sourced from Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia (Ns-NS) and Penang Island (Ns-PG). The venom of Indonesian N. sumatrana (Ns-SU) was obtained from local snake catchers from Sumatra, Indonesia, and the Thai N. sumatrana (Ns-TH) was supplied by Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. All venoms were obtained from adult specimens (n > 5), lyophilized and stored at −20 °C until use. The antivenom used was Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) manufactured by Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute (batch no.: NK00514) supplied in lyophilized form. NkMAV contained purified F(ab)’2 derived from sera of horses hyperimmunized against Thai N. kaouthia (Monocled Cobra) venom. The antivenom was reconstituted in 10 mL of distilled water prior to use.

5.2. Animal Supply and Ethics Statement

Mice used in this study were of albino ICR strain (20–25 g) supplied by the Animal Experimental Unit from the University of Malaya. The protocol for animal experimentation was carried out based on the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Malaya (Ethics clearance number: 2014-09-11/PHAR/R/TCH).

5.3. Reverse-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC)

Three milligrams of N. sumatrana venoms were reconstituted in 200 µL ultrapure water and the supernatant was subjected to C18 RP-HPLC. The LiChrospher® WP 300 C18 column (5 µm particle size) column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was pre-equilibrated with 0.1% TFA in water (Eluent A), and the sample was eluted with 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile (Eluent B) using linear gradients of 5% B for 10 min, 5–15% B over 20 min, 15–45% B over 120 min and 45–70% B over 20 min. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min. Absorbance was monitored at 215 nm, and the eluted proteins indicated by resulting peaks were collected, lyophilized and kept at −20 °C prior to use.

5.4. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

The fractions collected from RP-HPLC were reconstituted in ultrapure water and separated by 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing condition at 100 V for 2 h. Thermo Scientific Spectra™ Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder containing 10 prestained proteins ranging from 10 to 260 kDa was used for molecular mass calibration. Gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, and the bands were scanned using ImageScanner III (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden).

5.5. In-Solution Tryptic Digestion and Tandem Mass Spectrometry

The protein fractions were reduced with dithiothreitol (DTT), alkylated with iodoacetamide (IAA), and digested with MS grade trypsin (PierceTM) before desalting with C18 ZipTip® Pipette Tips. The tryptic peptides were then reconstituted in 7 µL of 0.1% formic acid in water and subjected to nano-electrospray ionization liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (nano-ESI-LCMS/MS). Peptide separation was performed by 1260 Infinity Nanoflow LC system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) connected to Accurate-Mass Q-TOF 6550 series with a nanoelectrospray ionization source. The eluate was subjected to HPLC Large-Capacity Chip Column Zorbax 300-SB-C18 (160 nL enrichment column, 75 µm × 150 mm analytical column and 5 µm particles) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Injection volume was adjusted to 1 µL per sample, using a flow rate of 0.4 µL/min, with linear gradient of 5–70% of solvent B (0.1% formic acid in 100% acetonitrile). Drying gas flow was 11 L/min and drying gas temperature was 290 °C. Fragmentor voltage was 175 V, and the capillary voltage was set to 1800 V. Mass spectra were acquired using Mass Hunter acquisition software (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in MS/MS mode with an MS scan range of 200–3000 m/z and MS/MS scan range of 50–3200 m/z. Data were extracted with MH+ mass range between 50 and 3200 Da and processed with Agilent Spectrum Mill MS Proteomics Workbench software packages version B.04.00 against a merged database incorporating both non-redundant NCBI databases of Serpentes (taxid: 8570) and an in-house transcripts database. Carbamidomethylation was specified as a fixed modification and oxidized methionine as a variable modification. The identified proteins or peptides were validated with the following filters: protein score > 5, and peptide score > 5.

5.6. Estimation of Protein Relative Abundance

The relative protein abundances were estimated based on the chromatographic peak area of protein eluted and the mean spectral intensity (MSI) of peptides previously described [66]. The following calculation was adopted:
Relative   abundance   of   protein   X   in   fraction   Y   ( % )   =   MSI   of   protein   X   in   HPLC   fraction   Y Total   MSI   of   all   proteins   in   HPLC   fraction   Y ×   %   Area   under   the   curve   ( AUC )   of   HPLC   fraction   Y
The MSI of protein X in fraction Y refers to the mean spectral intensity of the peptide ions assigned to protein X eluted in HPLC fraction Y. The fraction AUC was determined from the chromatogram using the Shimadzu LC Solution Software (Version 1.23, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

5.7. Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The immunological binding activity of NkMAV toward N. sumatrana venoms was performed using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with modification from the previous study [38]. N. kaouthia venom was used as the positive control. Briefly, 96-well immunoplates were coated with 10 ng venom antigen in 100 µL carbonate-bicarbonate coating buffer overnight at 4 °C. The plate was then flicked dry and rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween®20 (PBST). Various dilutions of antivenom (1:150, 1:450, 1:1350, 1:4050, 1:12,150 and 1:36,450) from an antivenom stock concentration of 10 mg/mL were added to each antigen-coated well and incubated for an hour at room temperature. After washing the plate three times with PBST, 100 µL of appropriately diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antihorse-IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) in PBST (1:10,000) was added to the well and incubated for another hour at room temperature. The excess unbound antibody-enzyme conjugate was removed by rinsing three times with PBST. Then, 100 µL of freshly prepared substrate solution (0.5 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine and 0.003% hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 5.0) was added to each well. The plate was left in dark for 30 min at room temperature, and the reaction was terminated by adding 50 µL of 12.5% sulfuric acid. The venom–antivenom complexes were monitored at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (SUNRISE-TECAN Type Touch Screen F039300, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The experiment was performed in triplicate, and absorbance values were expressed as means ± S.E.M. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of venom-antivenom binding reaction was determined from the OD values through non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0, GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA).

5.8. Determination of Venom Lethality and the Neutralization by Antivenom

The lethal activities of the N. sumatrana venoms were determined in ICR albino mice (n = 4 per dose, 20–25 g) as previously described [38]. Venoms of various doses of 100 µL were injected intravenously into the mice via caudal vein and the death ratios were recorded after 24 h. The median lethal doses (LD50) of the venoms were determined by Probit analysis, using the BioStat 2009 analysis software (AnalystSoft Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada). LD50 was defined as the venom dose (µg/g) at which 50% of the mice were dead.
The neutralization study was performed by preincubating different doses of antivenom with a venom challenge dose of 2.5/5 LD50 at 37 °C for 30 min. The venom and antivenom mixtures were subsequently injected intravenously into the mice, and the survival ratios were recorded after 24 h. The median effective doses (ED50) of the venoms were determined by Probit analysis using BioStat 2009 analysis software (AnalystSoft Inc., Vancouver, Canada). ED50 was defined as the volume dose of antivenom (µL) at which 50% of mice survived. The neutralization efficacy was also expressed as median effective ratio (ER50), potency (P) and normalized potency (n-P) for comparative purposes [60,67].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins14080522/s1, Table S1: Mass spectrometric data and peptide sequences of protein identified from the Naja sumatrana venom fractions using nano-ESI-LCMS/MS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and N.H.T.; methodology, C.H.T. and K.Y.T.; validation, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and K.Y.W.; formal analysis, K.Y.T., K.Y.W., H.P.C. and C.H.T.; investigation, K.Y.T., K.Y.W., H.P.C. and C.H.T.; resources, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and N.H.T.; data curation, C.H.T. and K.Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.T. and K.Y.T.; writing—review and editing, C.H.T., K.Y.T., K.Y.W., N.H.T. and H.P.C.; visualization, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and K.Y.W.; supervision, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and N.H.T.; project administration, C.H.T. and K.Y.T.; funding acquisition, C.H.T., K.Y.T. and N.H.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Higher Education, Government of Malaysia (FRGS/1/2019/SKK08/UM/02/19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol for animal experimentation was carried out based on the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Malaya (Ethics clearance number: 2014-09-11/PHAR/R/TCH, date of approval: 11 September 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the iProX partner repository [68] with the dataset identifier PXD034497 (released on 14 June 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Malaya for research facility support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J.; Habib, A.G.; Harrison, R.A.; Williams, D.J.; Warrell, D.A. Snakebite envenoming. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chippaux, J.-P. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease! J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 23, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kasturiratne, A.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; de Silva, N.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Premaratna, R.; Savioli, L.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. WHO. Guidelines for the Management of Snakebites; WHO Regional Office for Southeast Asia: New Delhi, India, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fry, B.G. Snakebite: When the Human Touch Becomes a Bad Touch. Toxins 2018, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Uetz, P.; Hosek, J. The Reptile Database. Available online: http://www.reptile-database.org/ (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  7. Tan, N.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Snakebite in Southeast Asia: Envenomation and Clinical Management. In Handbook of Venoms and Toxins of Reptiles, 2nd ed.; Mackessy, S.P., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wuster, W. Taxonomic changes and toxinology: Systematic revisions of the Asiatic cobras (Naja naja species complex). Toxicon 1996, 34, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feola, A.; Marella, G.L.; Carfora, A.; Della Pietra, B.; Zangani, P.; Campobasso, C.P. Snakebite Envenoming a Challenging Diagnosis for the Forensic Pathologist: A Systematic Review. Toxins 2020, 12, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kalita, B.; Patra, A.; Das, A.; Mukherjee, A.K. Proteomic Analysis and Immuno-Profiling of Eastern India Russell’s Viper (Daboia russelii) Venom: Correlation between RVV Composition and Clinical Manifestations Post RV Bite. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 2819–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Faisal, T.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Sim, S.M.; Gnanathasan, C.A.; Tan, C.H. Proteomics, toxicity and antivenom neutralization of Sri Lankan and Indian Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) venoms. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 27, e20200177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pla, D.; Sanz, L.; Quesada-Bernat, S.; Villalta, M.; Baal, J.; Chowdhury, M.A.W.; Leon, G.; Gutierrez, J.M.; Kuch, U.; Calvete, J.J. Phylovenomics of Daboia russelii across the Indian subcontinent. Bioactivities and comparative in vivo neutralization and in vitro third-generation antivenomics of antivenoms against venoms from India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. J. Proteom. 2019, 207, 103443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Sim, S.M.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, N.H. Geographical venom variations of the Southeast Asian monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia): Venom-induced neuromuscular depression and antivenom neutralization. Comp. Biochem. Physiology. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 185–186, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, N.H. Venomics, lethality and neutralization of Naja kaouthia (monocled cobra) venoms from three different geographical regions of Southeast Asia. J. Proteom. 2015, 120, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lingam, T.M.C.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Proteomics and antivenom immunoprofiling of Russell’s viper (Daboia siamensis) venoms from Thailand and Indonesia. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 26, e20190048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hia, Y.L.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Comparative venom proteomics of banded krait (Bungarus fasciatus) from five geographical locales: Correlation of venom lethality, immunoreactivity and antivenom neutralization. Acta Trop. 2020, 207, 105460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rusmili, M.R.A.; Othman, I.; Abidin, S.A.Z.; Yusof, F.A.; Ratanabanangkoon, K.; Chanhome, L.; Hodgson, W.C.; Chaisakul, J. Variations in neurotoxicity and proteome profile of Malayan krait (Bungarus candidus) venoms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0227122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tan, C.H.; Bourges, A.; Tan, K.Y. King Cobra and snakebite envenomation: On the natural history, human-snake relationship and medical importance of Ophiophagus hannah. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 27, e20210051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tan, K.Y.; Ng, T.S.; Bourges, A.; Ismail, A.K.; Maharani, T.; Khomvilai, S.; Sitprija, V.; Tan, N.H.; Tan, C.H. Geographical variations in king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) venom from Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and China: On venom lethality, antivenom immunoreactivity and in vivo neutralization. Acta Trop. 2020, 203, 105311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, E.L.H.; Tan, N.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, C.H. Comparative proteomes, immunoreactivities and neutralization of procoagulant activities of Calloselasma rhodostoma (Malayan pit viper) venoms from four regions in Southeast Asia. Toxicon 2019, 169, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sivaganabalan, R.; Ismail, A.K.; Salleh, M.S.; Mohan, K.; Tan, C.H.; Adnan, A.; Ariff, A.M.; Mohamed, Z.; Thevarajah, N.; Daud, R.; et al. Guideline: Management of Snakebite Ministry of Health Malaysia, 1st ed.; Ministry of Health Malaysia: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Leong, P.K.; Sim, S.M.; Fung, S.Y.; Sumana, K.; Sitprija, V.; Tan, N.H. Cross neutralization of Afro-Asian cobra and Asian krait venoms by a Thai polyvalent snake antivenom (Neuro Polyvalent Snake Antivenom). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leong, P.K.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Sim, S.M.; Tan, N.H. Immunological cross-reactivity and neutralization of the principal toxins of Naja sumatrana and related cobra venoms by a Thai polyvalent antivenom (Neuro Polyvalent Snake Antivenom). Acta Trop. 2015, 149, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tan, C.H. Snake Venomics: Fundamentals, Recent Updates, and a Look to the Next Decade. Toxins 2022, 14, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, N.H. Neutralization of the Principal Toxins from the Venoms of Thai Naja kaouthia and Malaysian Hydrophis schistosus: Insights into Toxin-Specific Neutralization by Two Different Antivenoms. Toxins 2016, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ranawaka, U.K.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. Neurotoxicity in snakebite—The limits of our knowledge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Barber, C.M.; Isbister, G.K.; Hodgson, W.C. Alpha neurotoxins. Toxicon 2013, 66, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tan, C.H.; Wong, K.Y.; Chong, H.P.; Tan, N.H.; Tan, K.Y. Proteomic insights into short neurotoxin-driven, highly neurotoxic venom of Philippine cobra (Naja philippinensis) and toxicity correlation of cobra envenomation in Asia. J. Proteom. 2019, 206, 103418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ratanabanangkoon, K.; Tan, K.Y.; Eursakun, S.; Tan, C.H.; Simsiriwong, P.; Pamornsakda, T.; Wiriyarat, W.; Klinpayom, C.; Tan, N.H. A Simple and Novel Strategy for the Production of a Pan-specific Antiserum against Elapid Snakes of Asia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yap, M.K.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H. Proteomic characterization of venom of the medically important Southeast Asian Naja sumatrana (Equatorial spitting cobra). Acta Trop. 2014, 133, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chicheportiche, R.; Vincent, J.P.; Kopeyan, C.; Schweitz, H.; Lazdunski, M. Structure-function relationship in the binding of snake neurotoxins to the torpedo membrane receptor. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 2081–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, A.; Cristofori-Armstrong, B.; Rash, L.D.; Hodgson, W.C.; Isbister, G.K. Defining the role of post-synaptic α-neurotoxins in paralysis due to snake envenoming in humans. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 4465–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shan, L.L.; Gao, J.F.; Zhang, Y.X.; Shen, S.S.; He, Y.; Wang, J.; Ma, X.M.; Ji, X. Proteomic characterization and comparison of venoms from two elapid snakes (Bungarus multicinctus and Naja atra) from China. J. Proteom. 2016, 138, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tan, N.H.; Wong, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Venomics of Naja sputatrix, the Javan spitting cobra: A short neurotoxin-driven venom needing improved antivenom neutralization. J. Proteom. 2017, 157, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Palasuberniam, P.; Chan, Y.W.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Snake Venom Proteomics of Samar Cobra (Naja samarensis) from the Southern Philippines: Short Alpha-Neurotoxins as the Dominant Lethal Component Weakly Cross-Neutralized by the Philippine Cobra Antivenom. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 727756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wong, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Tan, N.H. Venom and Purified Toxins of the Spectacled Cobra (Naja naja) from Pakistan: Insights into Toxicity and Antivenom Neutralization. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Ng, T.S.; Sim, S.M.; Tan, N.H. Venom Proteome of Spine-Bellied Sea Snake (Hydrophis curtus) from Penang, Malaysia: Toxicity Correlation, Immunoprofiling and Cross-Neutralization by Sea Snake Antivenom. Toxins 2018, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tan, C.H.; Wong, K.Y.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H. Venom proteome of the yellow-lipped sea krait, Laticauda colubrina from Bali: Insights into subvenomic diversity, venom antigenicity and cross-neutralization by antivenom. J. Proteom. 2017, 166, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chong, H.P.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Tan, C.H. Exploring the diversity and novelty of toxin genes in Naja sumatrana, the Equatorial spitting cobra from Malaysia through de novo venom-gland transcriptomics. Toxins 2019, 11, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Chanhome, L.; Tan, N.H. Comparative venom gland transcriptomics of Naja kaouthia (monocled cobra) from Malaysia and Thailand: Elucidating geographical venom variation and insights into sequence novelty. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pruksaphon, K.; Yuvaniyama, J.; Ratanabanangkoon, K. Immunogenicity of snake α-neurotoxins and the CD4 T cell epitopes. Toxicon 2022, 214, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wong, K.Y.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Tan, C.H. A Neurotoxic Snake Venom without Phospholipase A2: Proteomics and Cross-Neutralization of the Venom from Senegalese Cobra, Naja senegalensis (Subgenus: Uraeus). Toxins 2021, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Petras, D.; Sanz, L.; Segura, A.; Herrera, M.; Villalta, M.; Solano, D.; Vargas, M.; Leon, G.; Warrell, D.A.; Theakston, R.D.; et al. Snake venomics of African spitting cobras: Toxin composition and assessment of congeneric cross-reactivity of the pan-African EchiTAb-Plus-ICP antivenom by antivenomics and neutralization approaches. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1266–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wong, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Quraishi, N.H.; Tan, N.H. Elucidating the biogeographical variation of the venom of Naja naja (spectacled cobra) from Pakistan through a venom-decomplexing proteomic study. J. Proteom. 2018, 175, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Senji Laxme, R.R.; Attarde, S.; Khochare, S.; Suranse, V.; Martin, G.; Casewell, N.R.; Whitaker, R.; Sunagar, K. Biogeographical venom variation in the Indian spectacled cobra (Naja naja) underscores the pressing need for pan-India efficacious snakebite therapy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dutta, S.; Chanda, A.; Kalita, B.; Islam, T.; Patra, A.; Mukherjee, A.K. Proteomic analysis to unravel the complex venom proteome of eastern India Naja naja: Correlation of venom composition with its biochemical and pharmacological properties. J. Proteom. 2017, 156, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tan, K.Y.; Wong, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Tan, C.H. Quantitative proteomics of Naja annulifera (sub-Saharan snouted cobra) venom and neutralization activities of two antivenoms in Africa. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, H.W.; Liu, B.S.; Chien, K.Y.; Chiang, L.C.; Huang, S.Y.; Sung, W.C.; Wu, W.G. Cobra venom proteome and glycome determined from individual snakes of Naja atra reveal medically important dynamic range and systematic geographic variation. J. Proteom. 2015, 128, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chong, H.P.; Tan, K.Y.; Liu, B.S.; Sung, W.C.; Tan, C.H. Cytotoxicity of Venoms and Cytotoxins from Asiatic Cobras (Naja kaouthia, Naja sumatrana, Naja atra) and Neutralization by Antivenoms from Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Toxins 2022, 14, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, C.C.; Chou, Y.S.; Chen, C.Y.; Liu, K.L.; Huang, G.J.; Yu, J.S.; Wu, C.J.; Liaw, G.W.; Hsieh, C.H.; Chen, C.K. Pathogenesis of local necrosis induced by Naja atra venom: Assessment of the neutralization ability of Taiwanese freeze-dried neurotoxic antivenom in animal models. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Panagides, N.; Jackson, T.N.; Ikonomopoulou, M.P.; Arbuckle, K.; Pretzler, R.; Yang, D.C.; Ali, S.A.; Koludarov, I.; Dobson, J.; Sanker, B.; et al. How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting. Toxins 2017, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Chong, H.P.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H. Cytotoxicity of Snake Venoms and Cytotoxins From Two Southeast Asian Cobras (Naja sumatrana, Naja kaouthia): Exploration of Anticancer Potential, Selectivity, and Cell Death Mechanism. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 583587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gutiérrez, J.M.; Lomonte, B. Phospholipases A2: Unveiling the secrets of a functionally versatile group of snake venom toxins. Toxicon 2013, 62, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tan, C.H.; Wong, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Ng, T.S.; Tan, K.Y. Distinctive Distribution of Secretory Phospholipases A₂ in the Venoms of Afro-Asian Cobras (Subgenus: Naja, Afronaja, Boulengerina and Uraeus). Toxins 2019, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Lim, S.E.; Tan, N.H. Venomics of the beaked sea snake, Hydrophis schistosus: A minimalist toxin arsenal and its cross-neutralization by heterologous antivenoms. J. Proteom. 2015, 126, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yamazaki, Y.; Morita, T. Structure and function of snake venom cysteine-rich secretory proteins. Toxicon 2004, 44, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vogel, C.W.; Fritzinger, D.C. Cobra venom factor: Structure, function, and humanization for therapeutic complement depletion. Toxicon 2010, 56, 1198–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dhananjaya, B.L.; CJ, D.S. An overview on nucleases (DNase, RNase, and phosphodiesterase) in snake venoms. Biochem. Biokhimiia 2010, 75, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silva-de-França, F.; Villas-Boas, I.M.; Serrano, S.M.d.T.; Cogliati, B.; Chudzinski, S.A.d.A.; Lopes, P.H.; Kitano, E.S.; Okamoto, C.K.; Tambourgi, D.V. Naja annulifera Snake: New insights into the venom components and pathogenesis of envenomation. PLoS Negl.Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y. Functional Application of Snake Venom Proteomics in In Vivo Antivenom Assessment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1871, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. WHO. WHO Guidelines for the Production, Control and Regulation of Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulins; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ratanabanangkoon, K. A Quest for a Universal Plasma-Derived Antivenom Against All Elapid Neurotoxic Snake Venoms. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 668328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ratanabanangkoon, K.; Tan, K.Y.; Pruksaphon, K.; Klinpayom, C.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Quraishi, N.H.; Tan, C.H. A pan-specific antiserum produced by a novel immunization strategy shows a high spectrum of neutralization against neurotoxic snake venoms. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nair, A.B.; Jacob, S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2016, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Tongpoo, A.; Trakulsrichai, S.; Putichote, K.; Sriapha, C.; Wananukul, W. Recurrent neurotoxic envenoming of cobra bite. Toxicon 2019, 167, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Tan, N.H. A Protein Decomplexation Strategy in Snake Venom Proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1871, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Araujo, H.P.; Bourguignon, S.C.; Boller, M.A.; Dias, A.A.; Lucas, E.P.; Santos, I.C.; Delgado, I.F. Potency evaluation of antivenoms in Brazil: The national control laboratory experience between 2000 and 2006. Toxicon 2008, 51, 502–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, J.; Chen, T.; Wu, S.; Yang, C.; Bai, M.; Shu, K.; Li, K.; Zhang, G.; Jin, Z.; He, F.; et al. iProX: An integrated proteome resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D1211–D1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Toxins 14 00522 g001 550
Figure 1. Protein decomplexation profiles of Naja sumatrana venoms sourced from (A) Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, (B) Penang, Malaysia, (C) Southern Thailand, and (D) Sumatra, Indonesia. Upper panel: chromatographic profiles of venoms by C18 reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Lower panel: electrophoretic profiles of venom proteins separated by 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions.
Figure 1. Protein decomplexation profiles of Naja sumatrana venoms sourced from (A) Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, (B) Penang, Malaysia, (C) Southern Thailand, and (D) Sumatra, Indonesia. Upper panel: chromatographic profiles of venoms by C18 reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Lower panel: electrophoretic profiles of venom proteins separated by 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions.
Toxins 14 00522 g001
Toxins 14 00522 g002 550
Figure 2. Venom proteomes of Naja sumatrana profiled using C18 RP-HPLC followed by tandem mass spectrometry for specimens from various geographical locales: (A) Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia (Ns-NS), (B) Penang, Malaysia (Ns-PG), (C) Southern Thailand (Ns-TH), and (D) Sumatra, Indonesia (Ns-SU). Abbreviation: 3FTx, three-finger toxin; PLA2, phospholipase A2; vNGF, venom nerve growth factor; KSPI, Kunitz-type serine protease; SVMP, snake venom metalloproteinase; CVF, cobra venom factor; PDE, phosphodiesterase; CRiSP, cysteine-rich secretory protein; LAAO, L-amino acid oxidase; SVSP, snake venom serine protease; HYA, Hyaluronidase; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; and 5′NUC, 5′nucleotidase. Bar graphs represent the sub-proteome of three-finger toxins in the venoms. Insets: Images of N. sumatrana with adaptations: A, www.reptilefact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Equatorial-Spitting-Cobras.jpg, accessed on 21 July 2022; B, author CHT; C, Joel Sartore; D, Gernot Vogel (www.reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Naja&species=sumatrana, accessed on 21 July 2022).
Figure 2. Venom proteomes of Naja sumatrana profiled using C18 RP-HPLC followed by tandem mass spectrometry for specimens from various geographical locales: (A) Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia (Ns-NS), (B) Penang, Malaysia (Ns-PG), (C) Southern Thailand (Ns-TH), and (D) Sumatra, Indonesia (Ns-SU). Abbreviation: 3FTx, three-finger toxin; PLA2, phospholipase A2; vNGF, venom nerve growth factor; KSPI, Kunitz-type serine protease; SVMP, snake venom metalloproteinase; CVF, cobra venom factor; PDE, phosphodiesterase; CRiSP, cysteine-rich secretory protein; LAAO, L-amino acid oxidase; SVSP, snake venom serine protease; HYA, Hyaluronidase; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; and 5′NUC, 5′nucleotidase. Bar graphs represent the sub-proteome of three-finger toxins in the venoms. Insets: Images of N. sumatrana with adaptations: A, www.reptilefact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Equatorial-Spitting-Cobras.jpg, accessed on 21 July 2022; B, author CHT; C, Joel Sartore; D, Gernot Vogel (www.reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Naja&species=sumatrana, accessed on 21 July 2022).
Toxins 14 00522 g002
Toxins 14 00522 g003 550
Figure 3. Concentration-dependent immunological binding activity of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) toward Naja sumatrana venoms from four different geographical locales. Naja kaouthia venom was used as positive control. Values were means ± S.E.M of triplicates.
Figure 3. Concentration-dependent immunological binding activity of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) toward Naja sumatrana venoms from four different geographical locales. Naja kaouthia venom was used as positive control. Values were means ± S.E.M of triplicates.
Toxins 14 00522 g003
Table
Table 1. Comparison of toxins identified in the Naja sumatrana venom proteomes sorted by protein families, subtypes, and relative abundances.
Table 1. Comparison of toxins identified in the Naja sumatrana venom proteomes sorted by protein families, subtypes, and relative abundances.
Protein Family/Protein NameDatabase Accession aRelative Protein Abundance b
Ns-NS
(%) (32)		Ns-PG
(%) (42)		Ns-TH
(%) (22)		Ns-SU
(%) (55)
Three-finger toxins (3FTX) 58.5863.8669.8257.71
Long neurotoxins (LNTX) 10.302.629.645.80
Long neurotoxin 7O4225710.30-9.645.80
Long neurotoxin 3P25671-0.52--
Long neurotoxin 2P25669-0.17--
Long neurotoxin 7O42257-1.94--
Short-neurotoxins (SNTX) 4.542.796.415.01
Cobrotoxin homologQ9PTT03.130.42--
Neurotoxin 3Q9PSN61.400.794.052.94
Alpha-neurotoxin NTX-1Q9YGJ6---0.53
Alpha-neurotoxin NTX-2Q9YGJ5--1.480.50
Alpha-neurotoxin NTX-3O57326-0.210.890.19
Neurotoxin homolog NL1CL977.Contig3_NsM-1.37--
Short neurotoxin 1P60774---0.84
Cytotoxin (CTX) 30.0452.7753.7733.07
Cytotoxin 2aAAC613160.98---
Cytotoxin 4NQ9W6W90.841.3014.70-
Cytotoxin 2aQ9PST45.11---
Cytotoxin 6P80245--3.99-
Cytotoxin 5bP603109.5937.6713.167.43
Cytotoxin 4P60303---8.65
Cytotoxin 3P603026.51-12.67-
Cytotoxin 5P075250.0113.74--
Cytotoxin 9P014545.04--0.14
Cytotoxin 4P01443--9.25-
Cytotoxin 2P01442---7.58
Cytotoxin 2P014401.94--8.60
Cytotoxin 3CL1512.Contig1_CiM-0.05--
Cytotoxin 5CL1026.Contig4_NkT---0.66
Muscarinic toxin-like protein (MTLP) -2.02-9.60
Muscarinic toxin-like proteinQ9W727-0.88-3.16
Muscarinic toxin-like protein 2P82463-1.14-6.44
Weak toxins (WTX) 13.713.66-4.22
Weak neurotoxin 8Q802B30.013.66-0.61
Weak toxin CM-9aP2567913.69--
Weak neurotoxin 6P29180---2.97
Weak neurotoxin 6O42256---0.65
Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) 34.5923.5923.2625.18
Acidic phospholipase A2 DQ9I90010.120.753.128.58
Acidic phospholipase A2 CQ920860.075.32--
Neutral phospholipase A2 muscarinic inhibitorQ920845.7815.379.869.64
Acidic phospholipase A2 2Q911336.97 --
Acidic phospholipase A2 DE-IIP00600-2.15-1.89
Acidic phospholipase A2 1P005965.47---
Acidic phospholipase A2 2P00597--4.74-
Acidic phospholipase A2 CCL3683.Contig1_NsM6.19-5.365.07
Neutral phospholipase A2 muscarinic inhibitorCL2189.Contig1_CbM--0.19-
Venom nerve growth factor (vNGF) 2.796.630.873.21
Venom nerve growth factor 2Q5YF892.796.630.87-
Venom nerve growth factor 2CL429.Contig1_NnSL---3.21
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor (KSPI) ---5.86
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitorCL534.Contig1_NkT---3.09
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitorunigene30356_NkT---2.45
Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitorunigene8258_TwM---0.32
Snake venom metalloproteinase (SVMP) 1.502.144.823.79
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like kaouthiagin-likeD3TTC10.75-1.76-
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atraginD3TTC2-0.891.77-
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atrase-AD5LMJ3---0.05
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like cobrinQ9PVK70.75---
scutatease-1B5KFV7---0.13
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like kaouthiagin-likeCL626.Contig5_NsM2-0.17-0.39
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atraginCL626.Contig4_NsM2-0.96-0.82
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atraginCL626.Contig2_NsM2---0.45
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atraginCL626.Contig1_NsM--1.290.92
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like atraginCL444.Contig1_NsM-0.13-0.42
Zinc metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like cobrinCL115.Contig8_NkT---0.36
Snake venom metalloproteinase-disintegrin-like mocarhaginCL115.Contig6_NkT---0.24
Cobra venom factor (CVF) 1.181.390.351.36
Cobra venom factorQ911320.140.380.350.35
Complement C3Q01833---0.20
Ophiophagus venom factorI2C090-0.25--
Cobra venom factorCL4560.Contig1_NsM20.760.26-0.27
Cobra venom factorCL1625.Contig1_NnSL0.090.24--
Cobra venom factorCL472.Contig1_NkT---0.29
Cobra venom factorUnigene370_NsM0.190.26-0.24
Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 0.740.890.630.46
Venom phosphodiesteraseCL2341.Contig1_NsM0.44-0.63-
Venom phosphodiesteraseCL1403.Contig1_BcSL0.07---
Venom phosphodiesteraseCL1181.Contig1_NnSL0.230.33-0.20
Venom phosphodiesteraseunigene5869_NsM-0.23-0.26
Venom phosphodiesteraseunigene19187_EsM-0.34-
Cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRiSP) 0.390.17-0.47
Cysteine-rich venom protein natrin-1Q7T1K60.390.10-0.16
Cysteine-rich venom protein natrin-2Q7ZZN8---0.09
Cysteine-rich venom protein natrin-1CL2736.Contig1_NsM2-0.07-0.19
Cysteine-rich venom protein natrin-1CL85.Contig1_NnSL---0.02
L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) 0.130.360.180.72
L-amino acid oxidaseQ4JHE30.130.360.180.28
L-amino-acid oxidaseQ4JHE2---0.14
L-amino-acid oxidaseCL4047.Contig1_NsM2---0.30
Snake venom serine protease (SVSP) 0.100.41-0.72
Plasminogen activatorCL4067.Contig1_NsM0.100.21-0.58
Serine protease harobinunigene6087_NsM-0.19--
Plasminogen activatorunigene33606_NnSL---0.14
Hyaluronidase (HYA) -0.09-0.18
HyaluronidaseCL2939.Contig1_NkT-0.09--
Hyaluronidaseunigene27829_NsM---0.18
Vespryn -0.060.070.14
ThaicobrinP82885-0.040.070.01
Vesp22F8RKW3-0.02--
OhaninCL118.Contig3_NsM2---0.13
Ohaninunigene31699_NnSL-0.00--
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) -0.28-0.14
AcetylcholinesteraseCL4231.Contig1_NsM-0.28-0.14
5′ nucleotidase (5′NUC) -0.13-0.06
Ecto-5′-nucleotidase 1aA0A0F7YZM6---0.06
Snake venom 5′-nucleotidaseCL3600.Contig1_NsM2-0.13--
Abbreviations: Ns-NS, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia; Ns-PG, Penang, Malaysia; Ns-TH, Southern Thailand; Ns-SU, Sumatra, Indonesia. Protein identification and accession numbers were derived from databases based on best homology match, as shown in Supplementary Materials. a Accession numbers with suffix “_xxxx” were proteins identified based on tryptic peptides matched to sequences from an in-house transcript-database. b Relative abundance is represented as the percentage of total venom proteins, the value in parentheses indicates the number of proteoforms identified.
Table
Table 2. Immunoreactivity of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) toward N. sumatrana venoms from different geographical locales.
Table 2. Immunoreactivity of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) toward N. sumatrana venoms from different geographical locales.
VenomNkMAV
EC50 a (µg/mL)Absmax b
Naja sumatrana (Negeri Sembilan)9.64 ± 1.831.82 ± 0.15
Naja sumatrana (Penang)8.20 ± 0.712.19 ± 0.12
Naja sumatrana (Southern Thailand)6.34 ± 1.022.10 ± 0.11
Naja sumatrana (Sumatra)4.06 ± 0.562.20 ± 0.07
Naja kaouthia (Thailand)2.04 ± 0.322.40 ± 0.03
Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of triplicates. NkMAV concentration = 42.99 ± 1.02 mg/mL. a EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration), defined as antivenom dose at which half-maximal binding occurred. b Absmax (maximal absorbance), defined as maximal absorbance value at the highest concentration of antivenom.
Table
Table 3. Lethality neutralization of N. sumatrana venoms from different geographical locales by NkMAV.
Table 3. Lethality neutralization of N. sumatrana venoms from different geographical locales by NkMAV.
Venomi.v. LD50 (µg/g)Challenge DoseED50 (µL)ER50 (mg/mL)Potency, P
(mg/mL)		Potency per VialNormalized Potency, n-P (mg/g)
Ns-NS0.50 (0.40–0.62)5 LD5050.001.15
(0.93–1.43)		0.929.221.40
Ns-PG0.96 (0.78–1.17)2.5 LD5036.961.49
(1.20–1.86)		0.909.020.94
Ns-TH0.41 (0.36–0.47)5 LD5043.991.07
(0.97–1.18)		0.868.620.00
Ns-SU0.39 (0.32–0.48)5 LD5073.930.61
(0.49–0.76)		0.494.911.40
Naja kaouthia (Thailand) *0.18 (0.12–0.27)5 LD5018.751.15
(0.77–1.73)		0.929.220.44
Abbreviation: Ns-NS, N. sumatrana (Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia); Ns-PG, N. sumatrana (Penang, Malaysia); Ns-TH, N. sumatrana (Southern Thailand); Ns-SU, N. sumatrana (Sumatra, Indonesia). Note: LD50 (median lethal dose), dose of venom (µg/g) at which 50% of mice died. ED50 (median effective dose), dose of antivenom (µL) at which 50% of mice survived. ER50 (median effective ratio), ratio of venom (mg) to the volume does of antivenom (mL) at which 50% of mice survived. P (Potency), amount of venom (mg) completely neutralized per unit volume of antivenom (mL). n-P (normalized Potency), the neutralization potency of antivenom at which the amount of venom (mg) completely neutralized per unit amount of antivenom protein (g). Protein concentration of Naja kaouthia Monovalent Antivenom (NkMAV) estimated was 42.99 ± 1.02 mg/mL in this current study. Reconstituted antivenom had a volume of 10 mL per vial. * Values for N. kaouthia were adapted from Tan et al. [14,25], in which the NkMAV protein concentration was 45.0 ± 0.6 mg/g.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Wong, K.Y.; Tan, N.H.; Chong, H.P. Equatorial Spitting Cobra (Naja sumatrana) from Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan and Penang), Southern Thailand, and Sumatra: Comparative Venom Proteomics, Immunoreactivity and Cross-Neutralization by Antivenom. Toxins 2022, 14, 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14080522

AMA Style

Tan CH, Tan KY, Wong KY, Tan NH, Chong HP. Equatorial Spitting Cobra (Naja sumatrana) from Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan and Penang), Southern Thailand, and Sumatra: Comparative Venom Proteomics, Immunoreactivity and Cross-Neutralization by Antivenom. Toxins. 2022; 14(8):522. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14080522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Choo Hock, Kae Yi Tan, Kin Ying Wong, Nget Hong Tan, and Ho Phin Chong. 2022. "Equatorial Spitting Cobra (Naja sumatrana) from Malaysia (Negeri Sembilan and Penang), Southern Thailand, and Sumatra: Comparative Venom Proteomics, Immunoreactivity and Cross-Neutralization by Antivenom" Toxins 14, no. 8: 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14080522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop