Next Article in Journal
Nutrition in Post-Stroke Subjects during Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Risk of Sensitization and Allergy in Children up to Three Years of Age
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/nu15092055
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Types of Screen Time and Weight Status during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in Children and Adolescents

by
Yujie Liu
1,2,†,
Xiaomin Sun
3,†,
Erliang Zhang
2,
Huilun Li
1,2,
Xin Ge
2,
Fan Hu
2,
Yong Cai
2,* and
Mi Xiang
1,2,*
1
International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, South Chongqing Road No. 227, Shanghai 200025, China
2
School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
3
Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an 710061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2023, 15(9), 2055; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092055
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Revised: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 24 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Screen Time, Dietary Intake, and Obesity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: This study aimed to investigate the changes in distinct types of screen time and explore their longitudinal association with children and adolescents’ weight status. Methods: A two-wave longitudinal study was conducted among 2228 children and adolescents (6–19 years) in Shanghai, China, before and during the pandemic. Recreational screen time (watching TV/videos, online gaming, using social media, and browsing webpages), educational screen time (online homework and online class), and BMI were measured using a self-reported questionnaire. Mixed-effects models were constructed to assess the associations between screen time and weight status. Results: The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 20.5% and 10.2% at baseline, respectively. Both recreational and educational screen time increased significantly over two months. While recreational screen time was found to be a risk factor for obesity, it was not the case for educational screen use. Specifically, adolescents who spent more time watching TV/videos had a higher obesity risk (OR = 1.576). No significant associations were found in children. Conclusions: Overweight and obesity were prevalent among children and adolescents in China. Reducing screen-based activities is a promising strategy to prevent unhealthy weight gain in Chinese children and adolescents, while it is necessary to consider the content and distinguish between educational and recreational screen use.

1. Introduction

Overweight and obesity (ow/ob) among children and adolescents has emerged as one serious public health problem worldwide, with the global prevalence of pediatric obesity increasing significantly from 0.7% to 5.6% for girls and from 0.9% to 7.8% for boys over the past few decades [1]. Increased obesity rates have also been reported among children and adolescents in China [2]. The latest national data from 2015 to 2019 show that 7.9% of children and adolescents aged 6–17 years in China are living with obesity, and another 11.1% are classified as overweight [3]. Ow/ob in children and adolescents can result in an abundance of adverse health problems, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular abnormalities, inflammation, and psychological disorders. The onset of those disorders may begin in childhood and adolescence and track into adulthood [4]. In addition, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, governmental measures such as home confinement and school closure have significantly increased risks of ow/ob by limiting their participation in regular individual or group physical activities outside [5,6]. Reports from China documented a significant increase in weight gain among youth compared with the pre-pandemic rate, with the prevalence of obesity increasing from 10.5% to 12.6% [7].
Lifestyle behaviors are key risk factors for children and adolescents ow/ob [8,9]. Previous studies have suggested that excessive screen time increases the risk of ow/ob among children and adolescents, with more research focused on the impact of recreational screen time [10,11]. However, in addition to the well-studied recreational screen use, a significant portion of screen time is dedicated to learning-related activities (e.g., online courses and homework), especially for students in Asian countries like China who face heavy academic pressure [12,13]. There is growing evidence that the health effects of screen use are contingent upon the type of screen activity [14,15,16]. For example, Sanders found that educational screen use has no negative associations with physical health outcomes, while recreational screen use is linked to adverse outcomes among children [14]. Therefore, it is plausible to suggest that the associations between screen use and child ow/ob may also vary for the specific type of screen use behavior. Furthermore, most of the previous studies on screen time were based on cross-sectional design [17,18,19]. Given the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily routines when children and adolescents are confined to their homes [5,6], the negative health effects of excessive screen use are likely to be even more severe. To fill the gap in current research, it is crucial to explore the longitudinal associations between specific screen use behaviors and weight status among children and adolescents during this unique period of dramatic environmental changes.
Using longitudinal data collected from students and their parents in Shanghai, China, before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, the present study aimed to assess: (1) changes in the different screen use behaviors of children and adolescents before and during the pandemic; and (2) longitudinal associations between specific types of screen time with children and adolescents’ weight status.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Study Sample

An online longitudinal study among children and adolescents aged 6–19 years in Shanghai, China, was conducted. Seven districts in Shanghai were first designated (14 districts in total), then 1–2 schools from each district were selected via cluster sampling. Participants from ten primary or junior high schools were recruited in the first survey, and five of them completed the second survey. All children and adolescents and their parents in the five selected schools were invited to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents before the survey.
The first survey recruited 2641 children and adolescents in the five schools between 3 and 21 January 2020 (before the COVID-19 outbreak). A Level 1 public health emergency was subsequently declared in Shanghai on 24 January 2020 [20]. The government ordered citizens to stay at home and implemented school closures to prevent the further spread of the infection. Children and adolescents were confined at home and took online classes during this period. Approximately two months after the COVID-19 outbreak, the second survey was conducted between 13 and 23 March 2020 to 2427 children and adolescents who completed the first survey. Shortly after, the public health emergency response was downgraded from level 1 to level 2 in Shanghai on 24 March 2020 [21]. The strict lockdown was ended, and schools reopened subsequently. Details are provided in Table S1. Participants with missing or invalid data on age, weight, height, screen time, or parent-reported variables were excluded, and a total of 2228 children and adolescents were included in the final analyses. A flow chart of participant exclusion is shown in Figure 1.
Parents were informed about the study goal, procedure, and rules. Their permission was obtained prior to the survey. The online questionnaire was distributed to parents and then to their children. The research members were asked to answer questions from students and parents concerning the surveys. The questionnaire consists of a section for students and another section for their parents, completed by students (children and adolescents) and parents separately. To address the possible recalling bias and comprehension difficulties in young children, primary school students completed the questionnaire under the instruction of their parents.

2.2. Key Study Variables and Measurements

2.2.1. Outcome Variables

Body weight and height were reported by the children and adolescents in the two surveys. For primary school students, their parents were asked to assist in providing the height and weight data for accuracy. Then BMI was calculated by dividing self-reported weight by self-reported height squared (kg/m2). Ow/ob was defined based on the age- and sex-specific BMI standard developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) using the preferred standard deviation (SD) or z-score system: >1 (SD) represents overweight, and >2 SD represents obesity [22,23].
We compared the agreement of the self-reports with body height and weight measured by physical examination among 1107 children and adolescents in two schools in a pilot study. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied and showed moderate-to-excellent absolute agreement according to Koo & Li (r = 0.972 for height; r = 0.934 for weight; r = 0.717 for BMI) [24].

2.2.2. Exposure Variables

Screen time was reported by the children and adolescents in the two surveys. Parents were instructed to assist primary school students in answering the questions. Screen use items were built on the different categories of screen use proposed by Sanders [14], as well as results derived from our pilot study about screen use, including recreational and educational items. Recreational screen use was further divided into (1) watching TV/videos, VCDs, and DVDs; (2) computer/smartphone gaming; (3) social media use (QQ, WeChat, etc.); and (4) browsing webpages (news, douban, etc.). Educational screen use included online homework and online class. Participants were first required to answer whether they were engaged in each screen behavior (“yes” or “no”). If “yes” was selected, then the number of days per week (0–5 for weekdays and 0–2 for weekends) and the average time per day of each screen behavior were reported on weekdays and weekends, respectively. The average daily screen time was calculated by averaging the time spent on weekdays (5 days) and weekends (2 days) screen time.

2.2.3. Covariates

Household annual income (<200,000 yuan, 200,000–500,000 yuan, and >500,000 yuan), parents’ highest education level (middle school or below, high or vocational school, and college or above), and parents’ body weight and height were reported by the parents. Parents’ BMI was calculated using body weight divided by height squared (kg/m2) and included as confounders to adjust for genetic and family environmental effects. According to WHO, overweight and obesity in the adult population are defined as BMI ≥ 25 and BMI ≥ 30, respectively [25].
Physical activity levels and dietary patterns were reported by the children and adolescents. Parents were instructed to assist primary school students in answering the questions. Children’s moderate and vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) participation was measured using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) developed by the WHO. The Chinese version of the GPAQ was employed, which has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in measuring MVPA [26]. Physical activity level was defined as inactive (<30 min/day), insufficiently active (30–60 min/day), and sufficiently active (≥60 min/day) according to the guidelines for children [27]. Dietary pattern was assessed by the Chinese version of a quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) [28]. Total energy intakes were calculated using the FFQ based on the Chinese Food Composition Tables [29]. Physical activity level and total energy intake were also included as behavioral confounders.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

First, we described children’s characteristics, including sociodemographic variables, weight status, physical activity level, total energy intake, parents’ BMIs, and screen use behaviors using data collected at baseline. Chi-square tests were used to compare the differences between the children classified as having normal weight, overweight, and obesity for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the relationship between different types of screen use behaviors and child ow/ob (normal weight group served as the reference group).
The average daily time spent on overall and specific types of screen use was described in the 2 surveys, reported in minutes. T-tests were conducted to compare the differences in screen time from before to during the pandemic. Then mixed-effects models were fitted to assess the longitudinal associations between standardized screen use time (screen time transformed by converting the raw data to a standard format with mean 0 and standard deviation 1) and weight status. A series of models were constructed using obesity and BMI as dependent variables, respectively. In Model 1, children’s age and gender were adjusted. In Model 2, family covariates, including parents’ highest education levels and parents’ BMIs, were further adjusted. Other behavioral covariates, including physical activity level and total energy intake, were added in the final Model 3.
All statistical analyses were performed using R 3.6.1. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

2.4. Ethics

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (SJUPN-201813) on 8 March 2019.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

Table 1 shows the characteristics of children and adolescents at baseline. Children and adolescents’ average BMIs were 19.0 ± 4.21 kg/m2. The prevalence rates of overweight and obesity were 20.5% and 10.2%, respectively. Boys had a significantly higher rate of ow/ob than girls (p < 0.001). Younger participants were more likely to live with obesity compared to their counterparts (p < 0.001). Children and adolescents with higher parents’ BMIs (p < 0.001) and lower physical activity levels (p = 0.003) had a higher risk of developing ow/ob.
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of different types of screen use at baseline and their associations with ow/ob. On average, participants spent 41.3 ± 58.3 and 82.7 ± 100.6 min per day on recreational and educational screen use. Results from the multinomial regression models showed that recreational screen time was significantly associated with weight status (p = 0.040). When screen use behaviors were further divided, children and adolescents who spent more time watching TV/videos (p = 0.038) and computer/smartphone gaming (p = 0.007) had a higher obesity risk.

3.2. The Dynamic Changes in Screen Use Behavior

The time spent on recreational (mean ± SD, 41.3 ± 58.3 vs. 110.0 ± 132.3 min/day, p < 0.001) and educational screen use (mean ± SD, 82.7 ± 100.6 vs. 263.3 ± 127.6 min/day, p < 0.001) increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, the mean time in watching TV/videos (mean ± SD, 18.1 ± 25.7 vs. 42.6 ± 64.0 min/week, p < 0.001), computer/smartphone gaming (mean ± SD, 7.2 ± 17.3 vs. 17.7 ± 38.4 min/week, p < 0.001), social media use (mean ± SD, 10.5 ± 22.7 vs. 38.0 ± 63.7 min/week, p < 0.001), browsing webpages (mean ± SD, 5.4 ± 13.8 vs. 11.7 ± 29.7 min/week, p < 0.001), online homework (mean ± SD, 7.5 ± 22.3 vs. 40.6 ± 61.9 min/week, p < 0.001), and online classes (mean ± SD, 75.1 ± 96.4 vs. 222.7 ± 101.6 min/week, p < 0.001) all increased significantly (Figure 2).

3.3. Associations between Screen Time and Weight Status

Table 3 displays longitudinal associations between standardized screen time and obesity. When age, sex, and other family and behavioral factors were adjusted, recreational screen time was positively associated with obesity risk (OR = 1.518, 95% CI: 1.159–1.988). This result indicates that for each 1-SD increase in recreational screen time (107.7 min of unadjusted recreational screen time per day), the odds of developing obesity increase by approximately 52%. Among different types of recreational screen use, TV/video viewing was the only significant risk factor for obesity (OR = 1.576, 95% CI: 1.230–2.020). No significant associations were found between educational screen time and obesity risk. When stratified by age (child <10 years old and adolescent ≥10 years old), the associations of screen time with obesity were only observed in the adolescent group (OR = 1.470, 95% CI: 1.040–2.078 for recreational screen time; OR = 1.485, 95% CI: 1.080–2.042 for TV/video viewing) (Table 4).
Longitudinal associations between standardized screen use time and BMI are displayed in Table S2. In the final model adjusted for all confounders, a positive association was found for recreational screen time—the BMI increased by 0.071 for each 1-SD increase in recreational screen time. Specifically, participants who spent more time watching TV/video (β = 0.091, 95% CI = 0.033–0.148) showed higher BMI. No significant associations were found between educational screen time and BMI. When stratified by age, the associations of screen time with BMI were only observed in the adolescent group (β = 0.077, 95% CI: 0.009–0.145 for recreational screen time; β = 0.066, 95% CI: 0.003–0.130 for TV/video viewing) (Table S3).

4. Discussion

Using longitudinal data collected before and during the COVID-19 outbreak in Shanghai, China, the present study first explored the impacts of changes in different types of screen time on children and adolescents’ weight status in the context of dramatic social and environmental change. Lifestyles changed considerably as a result of the pandemic, increasing both the amount of time spent on educational and recreational screen use. Recreational screen time was longitudinally associated with weight status even after controlling for dietary intake, while this is not the case for educational screen time. Given that approximately 1/3 of the children and adolescents had ow/ob, reducing recreational screen time could be a promising strategy to prevent unhealthy weight status, which has significant implications for promoting child and adolescent health.
In the present study, screen time, including both recreational screen time (watching TV/videos, computer/smartphone gaming, social media use) and educational screen time (online homework and online courses), increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is consistent with previous findings that when children are out of school, they tend to adopt unhealthy lifestyles with less physical activity and increased screen time [30]. The increase in educational screen time in this study was the result of the changes in learning patterns from offline to online courses, which significantly increased the reliance on electronic screens. In contrast to the necessity of completing learning tasks, the increase in recreational screen time is more alarming. During home confinement, children and adolescents spontaneously replaced outdoor activities with screen use as a primary form of entertainment, resulting in an increased risk of problematic internet use [31,32]. In addition, excessive recreational screen use can be habit-forming and continue to impose long-lasting detrimental effects. The further exacerbation of ow/ob problems in children and adolescents is one of the potential negative consequences of increased recreational screen time.
To date, accumulating cross-sectional studies have concluded that more screen time is associated with higher levels of obesity risk in children and adolescents. However, there is little longitudinal evidence for this association [33,34,35]. For example, in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, change in BMI was positively associated with screen time at the upper tail of BMI distribution [36]. Another cohort study conducted in five major cities across China found that school children who spent more time on screen use had a higher risk of developing obesity [37]. One major limitation is that these longitudinal studies only investigated overall screen time while not distinguishing the sub-types. Therefore, it remains unclear whether different types of screen use could have the same health effects. Our study filled this gap by exploring the distinct associations of educational and recreational screen time with children and adolescents’ weight status. In the present study, weight status was associated with recreational screen time, while no significant association was observed for educational screen time. These results indicate that more attention should be paid to the portion of the total screen time children and adolescents spend on entertainment.
Minimizing screen use is an essential strategy for preventing and controlling childhood obesity [38]. However, duration is not the only dimension of screen use to be considered. The types may also lead to different health consequences. The present study further explored the various obesity risks associated with specific types of recreational screen use, revealing that prolonged TV/video viewing could significantly increase obesity risk. This is consistent with the previous findings that passive screen use, separate from more socially interactive forms (e.g., computer gaming), significantly affects childhood obesity [39,40]. One possible reason is that TV/video viewing facilitates access to commercial unhealthy food ads as well as possible over-eating [41]. However, the associations remained significant in our study even after controlling for total energy intake, indicating that dietary factors are not the sole explanation. Since children tend to be less focused during passive screen use, the negative impact on weight status may also arise from a lack of mental activity compared to active use. Similarly, no significant association was found in this study between weight status and educational screen time, which involves challenging mental tasks. This result is consistent with a previous finding that educational screen time is associated with positive educational outcomes and has no negative effect on weight-related physical health [14]. However, considering the other health problems (e.g., poor sleep, impaired vision, and psychological distress) associated with excessive educational screen use [42], it is still necessary for schools and parents to balance the potential health risks and educational benefits.
Another finding of our study was that the effects of screen time varied by age. This aligns with previous research that has indicated a significant association between recreational screen time, particularly TV viewing, and weight status among adolescents but not children [43,44]. Jakubec et al. suggest that this variation could be explained by a decline in family influence on health behaviors during the developmental shift from childhood to adolescence, whereby adolescents are less restricted by parents and more prone to unhealthy weight gain due to excessive screen use [45]. Despite the lack of a significant correlation between screen time and children’s weight status in this study, the potential effects of screen time on children cannot be disregarded entirely. Considering the high prevalence of ow/ob among children (18.6% for overweight and 12.6% for obesity), it is essential to exercise caution regarding the health risk associated with excessive screen use in this population.
In the present study, approximately 1/3 of the children and adolescents lived with ow/ob, which is significantly higher than the estimated prevalence of ow/ob in Chinese children and adolescents from 2015 to 2019 [3]. This result is in accordance with the growing rates of ow/ob among children and adolescents in recent years, which is recognized as a major public health problem. The widespread use of electronic devices in recent years is one of the main causes of the increase in ow/ob prevalence among children and adolescents. Within the long-term increasing trend, children and adolescents may experience additional increases in screen time as a result of life events like COVID-19. For example, short-term fluctuation in screen time may occur when children and adolescents are on holiday breaks from school, potentially increasing the risk of unhealthy weight gain [30]. Proactive preparations can be made to mitigate the impact of a similar situation in the future.
Our study has important practical implications in the face of the public health challenge of childhood obesity. First of all, limiting recreational screen use, especially TV or video viewing, can be a crucial point of early prevention for unhealthy weight status. Since school children tend to spend most of their leisure screen time out of school, families play an integral role in the efforts to reduce screen time. Evidence from previous studies has demonstrated the effectiveness of screen time intervention strategies which incorporated family involvement, parental support, and role modeling [46]. To reduce their children’s screen use, parents are encouraged to be good role models for healthy screen use. Other effective measures include setting clear rules on screen time, encouraging other non-screen-based activities, and having open conversations with their children about the negative effects of excessive screen use. In contrast, schools have a greater impact on educational screen use. Although no significant effect was found for educational screen use in this study, the potential health risk is still a matter of concern given its large proportion of the total screen time. Now that the pandemic has subsided, schools can prioritize offline classes and use online educational apps selectively. Since screen-based learning typically requires uninterrupted sedentary behaviors, it would be better to incorporate possible movement and break up the prolonged period of sedentary study [38].
The main strength of our study is the longitudinal investigation of changes in distinct types of screen time under a unique circumstance with dramatic lifestyle changes, providing natural experimental evidence on the associations between different screen use and children and adolescents’ weight status. Another strength is that multiple covariates, including parents’ BMI, physical activity level, and dietary intake, were included to control for confounding effects of genetic, family environmental, and behavioral.
Despite these strengths, the present study also has some limitations. First, data for this study was collected using self-reported questionnaires. Self-reported anthropometric data narrowed the possibility of generalizing the results due to recalling bias. In order to improve the accuracy and reliability of our results, we compared the self-reports with the body height and weight measured by a physical examination in a prior pilot study and found good agreement. Furthermore, the self-reported measures of screen time may result in social desirability bias and underestimate the actual data. Although any possible types of screen use behaviors were included in the questionnaire, the actual effects of screen time on weight status may be compromised due to the inherent bias. Therefore, objective methods to investigate screen time (e.g., accelerometer) and weight status (e.g., portable stadiometer and electronic weighing scales) among children and adolescents are warranted in future studies. Second, despite the large sample size, our study only investigated the prevalence of ow/ob in Shanghai, China. We should be cautious in generalizing the present findings to children and adolescents nationwide. Finally, the two-month follow-up period in this study was relatively short. However, significant changes in screen time were observed in this special study period.

5. Conclusions

This longitudinal study established the association between changes in different types of screen time and the weight status of children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both educational and recreational screen time increased dramatically in this two-month short period, which may lead to potential physical health impacts in the long term. In addition, adolescents who spent more time in recreational screen use had a higher obesity risk, while educational screen time was not a significant risk factor in this study. No significant associations were found in children. Our findings suggest that families and schools should focus on limiting screen-based activities, especially recreational activities, to prevent and control unhealthy weight status.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15092055/s1, Table S1 Baseline and follow-up measurement dates; Table S2 Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying effects of screen time on BMI; Table S3 Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying age-stratified effects of screen time on BMI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and funding acquisition: M.X.; Data curation: M.X., Y.L., X.G. and E.Z.; Formal analysis: Y.L., X.S. and F.H.; Writing—original draft: Y.L. and X.S.; Writing—review and editing: M.X., Y.C. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 71804110), Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds (grant number 21QA1405300), Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (22YJAZH116), Science Foundation for new teachers of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (grant number 20X100040012), and Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (GW-10.1-XK07). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study or the writing of the report.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJUPN- 201813).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the parents involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restriction but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the teachers and students’ parents involved in this study for their contributions and efforts in conducting the survey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dong, Y.; Jan, C.; Ma, Y.; Dong, B.; Zou, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xu, R.; Song, Y.; Ma, J.; Sawyer, S.M. Economic development and the nutritional status of Chinese school-aged children and adolescents from 1995 to 2014: An analysis of five successive national surveys. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pan, X.F.; Wang, L.; Pan, A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 373–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Daniels, S.R.; Arnett, D.K.; Eckel, R.H.; Gidding, S.S.; Hayman, L.L.; Kumanyika, S.; Robinson, T.N.; Scott, B.J.; St Jeor, S.; Williams, C.L. Overweight in children and adolescents: Pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 2005, 111, 1999–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rundle, A.G.; Park, Y.; Herbstman, J.B.; Kinsey, E.W.; Wang, Y.C. COVID-19-Related School Closings and Risk of Weight Gain Among Children. Obesity 2020, 28, 1008–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hall, G.; Laddu, D.R.; Phillips, S.A.; Lavie, C.J.; Arena, R. A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another? Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 64, 108–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, P.; Zhang, L.; Yu, W.; Yu, B.; Liu, M.; Zhang, D.; Yang, S. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on activity patterns and weight status among youths in China: The COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS). Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kelly, A.S.; Barlow, S.E.; Rao, G.; Inge, T.H.; Hayman, L.L.; Steinberger, J.; Urbina, E.M.; Ewing, L.J.; Daniels, S.R.; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, H.; et al. Severe obesity in children and adolescents: Identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013, 128, 1689–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jebeile, H.; Kelly, A.S.; O’Malley, G.; Baur, L.A. Obesity in children and adolescents: Epidemiology, causes, assessment, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. te Velde, S.J.; van Nassau, F.; Uijtdewilligen, L.; van Stralen, M.M.; Cardon, G.; De Craemer, M.; Manios, Y.; Brug, J.; Chinapaw, M.J. Energy balance-related behaviours associated with overweight and obesity in preschool children: A systematic review of prospective studies. Obes. Rev. 2012, 13, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robinson, T.N.; Banda, J.A.; Hale, L.; Lu, A.S.; Fleming-Milici, F.; Calvert, S.L.; Wartella, E. Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2017, 140, S97–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, M.; Xue, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y. Parental Expectations and Child Screen and Academic Sedentary Behaviors in China. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, X.; Hesketh, T. Educational Aspirations and Expectations of Adolescents in Rural China: Determinants, Mental Health, and Academic Outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 11524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sanders, T.; Parker, P.D.; Del Pozo-Cruz, B.; Noetel, M.; Lonsdale, C. Type of screen time moderates effects on outcomes in 4013 children: Evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arundell, L.; Salmon, J.; Veitch, J.; Timperio, A. The Relationship between Objectively Measured and Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviours and Social Connectedness among Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019, 16, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuzik, N.; da Costa, B.G.G.; Hwang, Y.; Verswijveren, S.; Rollo, S.; Tremblay, M.S.; Bélanger, S.; Carson, V.; Davis, M.; Hornby, S.; et al. School-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being among children and youth: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2022, 19, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kenđel Jovanović, G.; Dragaš Zubalj, N.; Klobučar Majanović, S.; Rahelić, D.; Rahelić, V.; Vučak Lončar, J.; Pavičić Žeželj, S. The Outcome of COVID-19 Lockdown on Changes in Body Mass Index and Lifestyle among Croatian Schoolchildren: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Furthner, D.; Ehrenmueller, M.; Lanzersdorfer, R.; Halmerbauer, G.; Schmitt, K.; Biebl, A. Education, school type and screen time were associated with overweight and obesity in 2930 adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crowe, M.; Sampasa-Kanyinga, H.; Saunders, T.J.; Hamilton, H.A.; Benchimol, E.I.; Chaput, J.P. Combinations of physical activity and screen time recommendations and their association with overweight/obesity in adolescents. Can. J. Public. Health 2020, 111, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. People’s Daily Online. Shanghai Takes the Strictest Measures to Implement a Major Public Health Emergency Response Mechanism. 2020. Available online: http://sh.people.com.cn/GB/n2/2020/0124/c134768-33743400.html (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  21. People’s Daily Online. Shanghai’s Emergency Response Level for Major Public Health Emergencies Adjusted to Two. 2020. Available online: http://gz.people.com.cn/n2/2020/0323/c344102-33897262.html (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  22. WHO. Growth Reference Data for 5–19 Years/Indicators/BMI-for-Age (5–19 Years). Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/bmi-for-age (accessed on 29 January 2023).
  23. De Onis, M.; Blössner, M.; World Health Organization. WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition/Compiled by Mercedis de Onis and Monika Blössner; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  24. Koo, T.K.; Li, M.Y. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J. Chiropr. Med. 2016, 15, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. WHO. Obesity and Overweight. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 28 January 2023).
  26. Gao, H.; Li, X.; Zi, Y.; Mu, X.; Fu, M.; Mo, T.; Yu, K. Reliability and Validity of Common Subjective Instruments in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Chinese College Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 8379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. WHO. Recommended Levels of Physical Activity for Children Aged 5–17 Years. Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_young_people/en/ (accessed on 22 August 2022).
  28. Wang, W.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, F.; Hou, D.; Mi, J. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire developed for children and adolescents in Beijing. Chin. J. Child. Health Care 2016, 24, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  29. National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Chinese Food Composition Table; Peking University Medical Press: Beijing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tanskey, L.A.; Goldberg, J.; Chui, K.; Must, A.; Sacheck, J. The State of the Summer: A Review of Child Summer Weight Gain and Efforts to Prevent It. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2018, 7, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mohler-Kuo, M.; Dzemaili, S.; Foster, S.; Werlen, L.; Walitza, S. Stress and Mental Health among Children/Adolescents, Their Parents, and Young Adults during the First COVID-19 Lockdown in Switzerland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, I.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Liu, C.H.; Ahorsu, D.K.; Griffiths, M.D.; Chen, Y.P.; Kuo, Y.J.; Lin, C.Y.; Pakpour, A.H.; Wang, S.M. Internet addiction and psychological distress among Chinese schoolchildren before and during the COVID-19 outbreak: A latent class analysis. J. Behav. Addict. 2021, 10, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Zhong, H.; Pan, C.W. Associations of outdoor activity and screen time with adiposity: Findings from rural Chinese adolescents with relatively low adiposity risks. BMC Public. Health 2020, 20, 1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hui, S.S.; Zhang, R.; Suzuki, K.; Naito, H.; Balasekaran, G.; Song, J.K.; Park, S.Y.; Liou, Y.M.; Lu, D.; Poh, B.K.; et al. The associations between meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and adiposity in Asian Adolescents: The Asia-Fit Study. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2021, 31, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, C.; Fan, J.; Yuan, F.; Feng, G.; Gong, W.; Song, C.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, A. Association between Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviors, Sleep, Diet, and Adiposity among Children and Adolescents in China. Obes. Facts 2022, 15, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mitchell, J.A.; Rodriguez, D.; Schmitz, K.H.; Audrain-McGovern, J. Greater screen time is associated with adolescent obesity: A longitudinal study of the BMI distribution from Ages 14 to 18. Obesity 2013, 21, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sun, X.; Zhao, B.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, F.; Wang, Y.; Xue, H. A 3-year longitudinal study of the association of physical activity and sedentary behaviours with childhood obesity in China: The childhood obesity study in China mega-cities. Pediatr. Obes. 2021, 16, e12753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Saunders, T.J.; Rollo, S.; Kuzik, N.; Demchenko, I.; Bélanger, S.; Brisson-Boivin, K.; Carson, V.; da Costa, B.G.G.; Davis, M.; Hornby, S.; et al. International school-related sedentary behaviour recommendations for children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2022, 19, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Eagle, T.F.; Gurm, R.; Goldberg, C.S.; DuRussel-Weston, J.; Kline-Rogers, E.; Palma-Davis, L.; Aaronson, S.; Fitzgerald, C.M.; Mitchell, L.R.; Rogers, B.; et al. Health status and behavior among middle-school children in a midwest community: What are the underpinnings of childhood obesity? Am. Heart J. 2010, 160, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Holm, J.E.; Lilienthal, K.R.; Poltavski, D.V.; Vogeltanz-Holm, N. Relationships between health behaviors and weight status in American Indian and white rural children. J. Rural. Health 2013, 29, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Biddle, S.J.; García Bengoechea, E.; Wiesner, G. Sedentary behaviour and adiposity in youth: A systematic review of reviews and analysis of causality. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lissak, G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Y.; Amirfakhraei, A.; Ebrahimzadeh, F.; Jahangiry, L.; Abbasalizad-Farhangi, M. Screen Time and Body Mass Index Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 822108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stival, C.; Lugo, A.; Barone, L.; Fattore, G.; Odone, A.; Salvatore, S.; Santoro, E.; Scaglioni, S.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Gallus, S.; et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Overweight, Obesity and Physical Activity in Italian Children and Adolescents from Lombardy, Italy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jakubec, L.; Gába, A.; Dygrýn, J.; Rubín, L.; Šimůnek, A.; Sigmund, E. Is adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines associated with a reduced risk of adiposity among children and adolescents? BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rhodes, R.E.; Guerrero, M.D.; Vanderloo, L.M.; Barbeau, K.; Birken, C.S.; Chaput, J.P.; Faulkner, G.; Janssen, I.; Madigan, S.; Mâsse, L.C.; et al. Development of a consensus statement on the role of the family in the physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviours of children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 15 02055 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow of participants.
Figure 1. Flow of participants.
Nutrients 15 02055 g001
Nutrients 15 02055 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in different types of recreational screen time (a) and educational screen time (b) among children and adolescents. Error bars indicate standard errors.
Figure 2. Changes in different types of recreational screen time (a) and educational screen time (b) among children and adolescents. Error bars indicate standard errors.
Nutrients 15 02055 g002
Table
Table 1. Sample characteristics at baseline.
Table 1. Sample characteristics at baseline.
CharacteristicsTotal (n = 2228)Overweight/Obesity
Overweight
(n = 468)		Obesity
(n = 232)		p-Value *
BMI, mean (SD)19.0 (4.21)21.6 (2.31)26.7 (5.03)<0.001
Child sex, n (%)
        Male1127 (50.6%)303 (64.7%)164 (70.7%)<0.001
        Female1101 (49.4%)165 (35.3%)68 (29.3%)
Child Age (in years), mean (SD)10.9 (2.49)11.2 (2.40)10.5 (2.33)<0.001
Child grade, n (%)
        1–3535 (24.0%)88 (18.8%)66 (28.4%)0.004
        4–6777 (34.9%)182 (38.9%)88 (37.9%)
        7–9916 (41.1%)198 (42.3%)78 (33.6%)
Father Obesity related variables, n (%)
        BMI (in kg m−2), mean (SD)26.1(6.96)26.3 (6.34)28.9 (8.80)<0.001
        Normal 1255 (56.3%)234 (50.0%)86 (37.1%)<0.001
        Overweight732 (32.9%)184 (39.3%)89 (38.4%)
        Obesity241 (10.8%)50 (10.7%)57 (24.6%)
Mother Obesity related variables, n (%)
BMI (in kg m−2), mean (SD)23.3 (6.20)23.6 (5.93)25.4 (7.24)<0.001
        Normal 1837 (82.5%)376 (80.3%)161 (69.4%)<0.001
        Overweight230 (10.3%)61 (13.0%)46 (19.8%)
        Obesity161 (7.2%)31 (6.6%)25 (10.8%)
Household income, n (%)
        <100,000 yuan262 (11.8%)46 (9.8%)39 (16.8%)0.204
        100,000–200,000 yuan655 (29.4%)134 (28.6%)75 (32.3%)
        200,000–300,000 yuan485 (21.8%)99 (21.2%)43 (18.5%)
        300,000–500,000 yuan443 (19.9%)107 (22.9%)42 (18.1%)
        ≥500,000 yuan189 (8.5%)38 (8.1%)17 (7.3%)
        Refuse to answer194 (8.7%)44 (9.4%)16 (6.9%)
Mother’s highest education levels, n (%)
        Middle school or below212 (9.5%)43 (9.2%)26 (11.2%)0.072
        High or vocational school433 (19.4%)81 (17.3%)59 (25.4%)
        College or above1583 (71.1%)344 (73.5%)147 (63.4%)
Father’s highest education levels, n (%)
        Middle school or below159 (7.1%)30 (6.4%)19 (8.2%)0.100
        High or vocational school506 (22.7%)94 (20.1%)66 (28.4%)
        College or above1563 (70.2%)344 (73.5%)147 (63.4%)
Child Physical activity level, n (%)
        Inactive600 (26.9%)116 (24.8%)73 (31.5%)0.003
        Insufficiently active597 (26.8%)107 (22.9%)74 (31.9%)
        Sufficiently active1031 (46.3%)245 (52.4%)85 (36.6%)
Child Dietary pattern
        Total energy intake (kcal), mean (SD)2884 (1863)2873 (1806)2731 (1873)0.398
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation. * The p-values are the results of comparisons between the children and adolescents classified as having normal weight, overweight, and obesity, using chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables.
Table
Table 2. Screen use and associations with weight status at baseline.
Table 2. Screen use and associations with weight status at baseline.
Screen UseTotalOverweightObesity
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)p-Value up-Value aMean (SD)p-Value up-Value a
Recreational screen time
Watching TV/videos18.1 (25.7)17.9 (23.6)0.9870.82621.4 (29.7)0.0490.038
Computer/smartphone gaming7.2 (17.3)7.8 (15.3)0.1210.70710.8 (25.0)<0.0010.007
Social media use10.5 (22.7)9.5 (19.4)0.1840.2188.8 (22.4)0.1620.968
Browsing webpages5.4 (13.8)5.7 (12.7)0.4910.3755.7 (16.0)0.5950.210
Total41.3 (58.3)40.9 (49.4)0.9500.95046.9 (71.7)0.1330.040
Educational screen time
Online homework7.5 (22.3)7.4 (22.1)0.7870.8716.8 (13.5)0.5780.687
Online class75.1 (96.4)75.4 (95.6)0.8900.64068.0 (97.1)0.2280.527
Total82.7 (100.6)82.9 (98.7)0.8460.62774.7 (100.0)0.2000.485
p-value u: Unadjusted p-value; p-value a: p-value adjusted for sex and age. The p-values are the results of multinomial logistic regression using the normal weight group as the reference group.
Table
Table 3. Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying effects of screen time on obesity.
Table 3. Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying effects of screen time on obesity.
ParameterOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) bOR(95% CI) c
Recreational screen time
Watching TV/videos1.565 (1.231–1.989)1.557 (1.219–1.988)1.576 (1.230–2.020)
Computer/smartphone gaming1.081 (0.818–1.427)1.063 (0.801–1.410)1.073 (0.811–1.419)
Social media use1.260 (0.947–1.675)1.241 (0.930–1.657)1.265 (0.948–1.686)
Browsing webpages1.147 (0.905–1.454)1.148 (0.906–1.455)1.161 (0.916–1.472)
Total1.503 (1.155–1.957)1.487 (1.139–1.943)1.518 (1.159–1.988)
Educational screen time
Online homework1.041 (0.764–1.418)1.025 (0.757–1.388)1.032 (0.763–1.395)
Online class1.114 (0.712–1.744)1.094 (0.703–1.705)1.102 (0.707–1.720)
Total1.115 (0.728–1.707)1.089 (0.715–1.658)1.107 (0.726–1.686)
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OR (95% CI) a: Adjusting for grade and sex; OR (95% CI) b: Adjusting for grade, sex, parental educational levels, and parental BMI; OR (95% CI) c: Adjusting for grade, sex, parental educational levels, parental BMI, physical activity level, and total energy intake; Bold lines indicate significant associations (p < 0.05). The ORs were computed by contrasting the children and adolescents classified as having obesity to those classified as overweight/normal weight.
Table
Table 4. Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying age-stratified effects of screen time on obesity.
Table 4. Longitudinal data analysis using mixed effect models studying age-stratified effects of screen time on obesity.
ParameterOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) bOR(95% CI) c
Children (n = 649)
Recreational screen time
Watching TV/videos1.483 (1.092–2.015)1.482 (1.079–2.036)1.489 (0.948–2.337)
Computer/smartphone gaming1.079 (0.755–1.542)1.072 (0.742–1.549)1.008 (0.622–1.634)
Social media use1.347 (0.949–1.911)1.316 (0.918–1.886)1.366 (0.900–2.074)
Browsing webpages1.129 (0.800–1.594)1.146 (0.811–1.618)1.007 (0.716–1.416)
Total1.452 (1.041–2.026)1.450 (1.029–2.043)1.459 (0.907–2.344)
Educational screen time
Online homework1.321 (0.952–1.832)1.283 (0.919–1.791)0.553 (0.298–1.026)
Online class1.146 (0.660–1.990)1.102 (0.640–1.899)0.912 (0.424–1.963)
Total1.353 (0.805–2.276)1.285 (0.769–2.147)0.646 (0.301–1.387)
Adolescents (n = 1579)
Recreational screen time1.484 (1.092–2.015)1.482 (1.079–2.036)1.485 (1.080–2.042)
Watching TV/videos1.079 (0.755–1.542)1.072 (0.742–1.549)1.071 (0.744–1.542)
Computer/smartphone gaming1.347 (0.949–1.911)1.316 (0.918–1.886)1.332 (0.927–1.914)
Social media use1.129 (0.800–1.594)1.146 (0.811–1.618)1.158 (0.823–1.631)
Browsing webpages1.452 (1.040–2.026)1.450 (1.029–2.043)1.470 (1.040–2.078)
Total
Educational screen time1.321 (0.952–1.832)1.283 (0.919–1.791)1.274 (0.913–1.778)
Online homework1.146 (0.660–1.991)1.102 (0.640–1.899)1.108 (0.643–1.908)
Online class1.353 (0.805–2.276)1.285 (0.769–2.147)1.287 (0.770–2.151)
Total1.484 (1.092–2.015)1.482 (1.079–2.036)1.485 (1.080–2.042)
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OR (95% CI) a: Adjusting for grade and sex; OR (95% CI) b: Adjusting for grade, sex, parental educational levels, and parental BMI; OR (95% CI) c: Adjusting for grade, sex, parental educational levels, parental BMI, physical activity level, and total energy intake; Bold lines indicate significant associations (p < 0.05). The ORs were computed by contrasting the children/adolescents classified as having obesity to those classified as overweight/normal weight.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhang, E.; Li, H.; Ge, X.; Hu, F.; Cai, Y.; Xiang, M. Association between Types of Screen Time and Weight Status during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in Children and Adolescents. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092055

AMA Style

Liu Y, Sun X, Zhang E, Li H, Ge X, Hu F, Cai Y, Xiang M. Association between Types of Screen Time and Weight Status during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in Children and Adolescents. Nutrients. 2023; 15(9):2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yujie, Xiaomin Sun, Erliang Zhang, Huilun Li, Xin Ge, Fan Hu, Yong Cai, and Mi Xiang. 2023. "Association between Types of Screen Time and Weight Status during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in Children and Adolescents" Nutrients 15, no. 9: 2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop