Next Article in Journal
Benefits of Valsartan and Amlodipine in Lipolysis through PU.1 Inhibition in Fructose-Induced Adiposity
Next Article in Special Issue
CCN1/Integrin α5β1 Instigates Free Fatty Acid-Induced Hepatocyte Lipid Accumulation and Pyroptosis through NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Improves Intestinal Gut Microbiota Homeostasis and Ameliorates Clostridioides difficile Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 18
10.3390/nu14183758
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Significance of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Heart Failure

by
Peng Zhao
1,2,
Suhong Zhao
1,2,
Jinwei Tian
1,2 and
Xinxin Liu
1,2,*
1
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
2
Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(18), 3758; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183758
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 11 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fatty Acids as Modulators of Immune Function: Implications on Human Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heart failure (HF), as the terminal stage of various heart diseases, seriously threatens an individual’s life, health, and quality of life. Emerging evidence has shown that the gut microbiota comprises an important component of human physiology and metabolic homeostasis, and can directly or indirectly affect the metabolic health of the host through metabolites. Upon in-depth study of intestinal microecology, the “gut-heart axis” appears to provide a novel direction for HF research. Thus, this review primarily focuses on the relationship between the gut microbiota and its major metabolites—i.e., short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)—and HF. It explores the mechanisms underlying HF and its effective treatment by targeting SCFAs to optimize current HF treatment and thus improve the quality of patients’ lives.

1. Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is defined as a clinical syndrome caused by depressed cardiac output or elevated ventricular filling pressure that results in systemic neurohumoral dysfunction and multi-organ involvement [1,2]. The number of HF patients is currently increasing due to an aging population, global population growth, and improvements in survival after diagnosis. Today, there are approximately 64.3 million people with HF worldwide, and its prevalence in developed countries has risen to 1–2% of all adults [3]. As a result of adverse factors such as household air pollution, poor diet, and low education levels in low-and middle-income countries, additional challenges are anticipated in the treatment of HF [4]. In China, for example, the prevalence of HF in adults aged 35 years and older increased by 44% during the past 15 years [5]. In the urban HF patients, the average outpatient cost per capita is $892, with readmissions increasing with age, and the mean annual inpatient cost is as high as $4406 [6]. This increasing burden is therefore taking a great toll on society.
Although the rational use of HF drugs—including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors—can robustly reduce morbidity and mortality in the majority of patients with HF, [2] the economic burden of the non-elderly living with HF has grown following a surge in obesity and obesity-related diseases and constitutes an alarming and ominous sign [3,7]. Accordingly, it is critical that we actively search for a new and effective therapy to counteract HF.

2. Text

2.1. Gut Microbiota

The gut is a gatekeeper to human nutrient absorption, and the gut microbiota is increasingly shown to be vital to gut health [8]. The composition of gut microbiota includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, and certain protists and viruses, [9] and these microbes are estimated to collectively comprise up to 100 trillion cells (which is 10 times the number of human somatic cells) and to encode 100 times as many unique gene products relative to the genome in our own bodies. Over 99% of the microbiotal genes are bacterial, indicating that bacteria occupy a dominant position in the gut [10]. Such a vast microbiota contains the body’s densest ecosystem and functions in physiological roles by modulating nutrition, the immune system, and host defenses [8].
Specific compounds in breast milk drive and modulate the establishment of the intestinal microflora in humans from birth [11]. Following bodily growth, both microbial abundance and the microbial genome exhibit a certain degree of intra-individual long-term stability [12]. Thus, the physiological progression of the gut microbiota from its initiation—from meager to enriched and from simple to complex—can be said to comprise a symbiotic relationship between the gut microbiota and humans [11].

2.2. Disturbances of the Gut Microbiota

Our current thinking reflects a marked departure from previously held positions in that the gut microbiota is not in direct contact with the intestinal endothelium, but is rather separated by a layer of mucus that possesses lubricating and hydrating properties [13]. The mucus layer plays an important role in protecting the intestine from mechanical, chemical, and biological attacks, and the colonic microbiota normally fails to penetrate the inner mucus layer. However, with gut microbiotal dysbiosis caused by host diet or other factors, the microbiota will inevitably be found to be in direct contact with the intestinal endothelium, leading to certain diseases [14].
Evidence points to an association between disturbances in the gut microbiota and diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, cancer, and the novel coronavirus infection, COVID-19 [8,15,16,17,18,19,20]. It is noteworthy that regardless of whether patients with COVID-19 received medication, their gut microbiota composition changed significantly [21]. It was confirmed that gut microbiotal dysbiosis can impair responses between the vaccine and antibodies, and may therefore suggest an adverse impact on the development and application of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine [22].
Briefly, the gut microbiota relies on various biomolecules, nutrient signals, and epigenetic mechanisms to communicate with the host, and thereby enacts a favorable impact on host health. In contrast, perturbation of the gut microbiota disrupts the interdependence between the gut microbiota and host, and tilts the physiological balance of health to the other side [23].

2.3. Changes in the Gut Microbiota of HF Patients

There exists a correlation between HF and gut microbiota. 16S rRNA-amplicon sequencing has evolved into an important method used to study the composition and distribution of the gut microbial community, and provides more comprehensive knowledge and awareness of microbial diversity and its complex physiological traits [24]. Similar to the situation in healthy individuals, the gut microbiota in HF patients is dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, followed by Proteobacteria, [25] and many studies have shown that the composition of the gut microbiota in HF patients is altered considerably, [26] as depicted in Table 1. Significant modifications to the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroides (F/B) were observed in the gut microbiota of some HF patients, implicating the gut microbiota as an emerging and novel biomarker in the prediction of HF [27,28,29].
The changes to gut microbiota may also be different for disparate types of HF. A con- trolled clinical trial confirmed that the number of Rominococcus spp. in patients showing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was markedly reduced [29]. Another study on the relative bacterial abundances of the common core genera in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) revealed that Streptococcus and Veillonella were enriched, while SMB53 was reduced [25]. In addition, as HF gradually progressed, gut microbiota also changed accordingly. Investigators demonstrated that gut microbiotal diversity in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV HF was significantly attenuated; that endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress were augmented; and that gut microbiota with potential anti-inflammatory effects was enriched in patients with Class I and II HF [30]. Similar results were also reported in two other studies, with an increase in Escherichia and Shigella in the HF transformation from a compensated to a decompensated state. A positive correlation between the abundances of Escherichia and Shigella and the deleterious metabolites trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and indoxyl-sulfate (IS) implies that the gut microbiota may also contribute to HF [31,32].
Aging, as an independent and inevitable risk element, is the predominant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and along with other factors, it collectively modulates the development of the disease [33]. Kamo et al. concluded that the gut microbiota of HF patients changed with age, with the proportion of Bacteroidetes diminishing and the quantity of Proteobacteria increasing in elderly HF patients [34]. Subsequent authors also determined that the percentage of Actinomycetes in the gut of aged mice fed an obesogenic diet (OBD) was further enhanced relative to that of younger mice [35].

2.4. Correlation between Gut Microbiota and HF

The integrity of intestinal structure and function is inextricably linked with disease, and serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and zonulin are considered to be two important indicators of intestinal barrier function and intestinal permeability. One study depicted the levels of these molecules as significantly increased in the blood circulation of hypertensive HF mice, and congruent with this observation, the pathology also revealed that the loss of colonic mucosal integrity was accompanied by inflammatory cell infiltration [27]. LPS reduces ZO-1 tight junctions (TJs) in a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent manner and induces an apparent deformation of intestinal epithelial TJs, causing destruction of the integrity of the intestinal barrier; this “leaky gut” then engenders an aberrant interaction between luminal contents and the intestinal mucosa [36,37].
In HF patients who manifest a microbiotal disorder of the mucosal epithelium, LPS (the primary inflammatory trigger) can then transit through damaged intestinal mucosa into the systemic circulation. While LPS directly acts on cardiac myocytes and macrophages to release various proinflammatory cytokines through the stimulation of TLR4, [38] this activity is exacerbated in HF patients [39]. In addition, NLRP3-inflammasome activation is indispensable to myocardial injury, and interleukin-β (IL-β) and IL-18 are the downstream factors of the NLRP3 inflammasome [40]. Changes in the levels of the corresponding metabolites TMAO and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) caused by the reduction in intestinal probiotics or dysbacteriosis can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and thereby affect the secretion of inflammatory cytokines [41,42]. In summary, HF-induced tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia, and edema within the intestines, intestinal epithelial dysfunction, and intestinal barrier weakness produce bacterial translocation and induce systemic low-grade inflammation.
In addition, the gut microbiota interacts with the host immune system in a cyclic manner, [8] with one study showing that the adhesion of segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) to intestinal epithelial cells (ECs) promotes TH17 cell development [43]. The intestinal commensal colonization of Bacteroides fragilis can activate the TLR pathway to induce regulatory T cells and ultimately establish host–microbe symbiosis [44]. CD4+ T cell activation is known to be the major cause of cardiac remodeling and fibrosis, and cardiac pressure overload-induced HF leads to specific T-cell activation; whereas the absence of gut microbiota significantly attenuates CD4+ T cell number [45]. Figure 1 illustrates the gut microbiota, inflammation, and immunity as intertwined processes. Chronic persistent inflammation and immune response eventually generate related cardiac-function suppression, forming a positive-feedback pathway and aggravating HF.

2.5. Correlations between SCFAs and HF

SCFAs are saturated fatty acids with six or fewer carbon molecules that are principally produced by the gut microbiota from resistant starch and dietary fiber (such as cellulose, lignin, and pectin) by fermentation and include acetic acid, acrylic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, and caproic acid [46]. Broadly speaking, SCFA formation in the colon is largely determined by the type and number of microorganisms, substrate availability, and intestinal transit [47]. SCFAs are among the most abundant microbial metabolites in the intestinal lumen and comprise important energy substances in the human body. SCFAs are absorbed and metabolized by colonic ECs and provide approximately 10% of the daily energy requirement of adults, with acetate as the primary energy source [48].
There exists a vicious cycle that encompasses SCFAs and HF. The sodium–hydrogen exchanger-3 (NHE3) is considered to be the major regulator of sodium and fluid homeostasis in the gut, and the intestinal congestion caused by right ventricular (RV) failure promotes the expression of NHE-3. This action reduces the local pH of the gut and alters the intestinal microenvironment, resulting in the disturbance of the gut microbiota [49]. In HF patients, the abundance of Lachnospiraceae family members diminishes, including several species that produce butyrate; and the abundance of Muribaculaceae correlating positively with propionate also decreases [27]. However, SCFAs can mediate interactions with the host SCFA receptors to influence gut health, the immune system, energy metabolism, and cardiovascular function (Figure 2).
The development of HF is accompanied by an imbalance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [50]. SCFAs regulate the secretion of cytokines via several white blood cell types [51] and also mediate the function of a variety of immune cells—including mast cells that participate in immune responses and local inflammatory reactions [52]. In fact, butyrate binds to G-protein receptor 41 (GPR41) to augment the phosphorylation levels of mTOR and Stat3 and induces the expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR) and the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α). Butyrate also inhibits histone deacetylase (HDAC), resulting in the acetylation of HREs on the cytokine interleukin-22 (IL-22) promoter to promote the binding of HIF1α, and ultimately enhances IL-22 production by human CD4+ T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) [53]. Researchers have confirmed that IL-22 promotes epithelial barrier function by regulating epithelial cell growth and permeability, mucus production, and the synthesis of antimicrobial proteins (AMPs) and complement—thus preventing intestinal inflammation [54]. Furthermore, HIF1α is also a protective intestinal barrier factor, and SCFAs can enhance O2 consumption in intestinal ECs and stabilize the transcriptional activity of HIF1α. In antibiotic-treated or germ-free mice, the low expression levels of HIF1α are restored by butyrate supplementation [55] (Figure 3). Apart from this, butyrate also reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated nuclear transcription factor kappa-B (NF-κB) activation and thereby modulates the expression of ICAM-1, COX-2, and TNF-α in intestinal ECs challenged with LPS [56]. In another related study, SCFAs were reported to exert a cardio-protective effect by mediating cognate G-protein receptor 43 (GPR43) and 109A (GPR109A) so as to alter DNA methylation and regulate catecholamine precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) levels and regulatory T cell (Treg) abundance of spleen [57]. Within the gut, acetate significantly increased tight-junction protein-1 (Tjp-1) mRNA levels and inhibited the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-17a (IL-17a) and IL-6. Propionate depends upon Treg to an extent to reduce systemic inflammation, myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, and vascular dysfunction [57,58].
Since energy metabolism is critical to the development of HF and the heart in HF is energy-starved, SCFAs are hypothesized to exert a significant influence on host energy metabolism [59]. For example, butyrate perfusion significantly improved mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthetic efficiency and contractile function in rats fed a high-fat, high-sucrose (HFHS) diet, thereby correcting the cardiac energy starvation and decreased systolic function caused by the HFHS [60]. This corrective effect may have been due to the elevated levels of acyl coenzyme A synthetase medium-chain family member 3 (ACSM3) enzyme, a mitochondrial enzyme that is normally under-expressed in the heart. ACSM3 enhances butyrate oxidation, effectively supporting energy production in rat HF and in human HF [61]. Propionate stimulates sympathetic neurons through the GPR41 receptor and thus directly enhances SNS outflow, controlling energy consumption and maintaining metabolic homeostasis [62]. These results portend the adoption of SCFAs as a potential treatment for HF, and, intriguingly, SCFAs as substrates do not affect apoptosis or IL-6 production [63].
A recent observational study revealed a significant negative association between butyrate concentration and exhaled hydrogen concentration after a breath test that non-invasively assessed small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) [64]. Unfortunately, SIBO can increase the risk of HF rehospitalization in patients with HFrEF and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFpEF [65]. Importantly, butyrate as an independent factor significantly reduced bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine [64].
HF is the terminal stage of all heart diseases, and any adverse factor that affects heart disease can aggravate HF. Although SCFAs exert overall protective effects on cardiovascular disease, the direct effect of SCFAs on HF still requires further investigation. Francine et al. exploited the deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) model and demonstrated that a diet high in both fiber and acetate reduced the heart-to-body weight ratio and that it normalized cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy and improved the overall cardiac function in rats [66]. In addition, SCFAs assist in reducing blood pressure and the accompanying cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis [57]. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common disease that ultimately leads to right HF, and research has revealed that butyrate supplementation prevents right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and hypoxia-induced increased pulmonary vascular remodeling and permeability, delaying the progression of PH and preventing its evolution to HF [67].

2.6. SCFAs: A Potential Therapeutic Target

SCFAs are abundant microbial metabolites in the gut, and they have great potential in the treatment of HF. However, achieving the stable production of SCFAs in the intestine and intervening in HF progression are the current foci of attention.

2.7. Increased Dietary Fiber Intake

The Mediterranean Diet

Dietary therapy constitutes one of the simplest and most convenient and effective treatment modalities used to resist the onset of cardiovascular disease. The Mediterranean diet is one such healthy eating regimen, and it is distinct from the typical Western-type diet characterized by high-calorie, high-fat processed foods [68]. The Mediterranean diet is depicted by an abundance of plant fiber that entails the daily consumption of fruits, vegetables, and grains; a moderate weekly consumption of legumes, nuts, dairy products, fish, and poultry; low-to-moderate amounts of red meat and wine consumed principally with meals; and monounsaturated fatty acids that are derived primarily from olive oil [69]. Fiber intake is closely linked to gut health, and investigators have shown that higher fiber is associated with a higher abundance of genera from the highly polyphyletic class Clostridia, a subset of which can ferment fiber to produce SCFAs in the colon [70].
Although the correlation between the Mediterranean diet and HF is unclear, most studies still support the claim that the Mediterranean diet reduces the incidence or mortality associated with HF (see Table 2 for details) [71,72,73]. Antonino et al. found that adherence to a Mediterranean diet certainly prevents HF but that it also modulates the severity of HF when it does occur, and this may be associated with the underlying pathogenesis of HF [74]. The cardiometabolic benefits of the Mediterranean diet to patients with type 2 diabetes are mostly anti-inflammatory and antioxidative, [75] which may inferentially delay the development of HF patients from the clinical compensatory phase to the decompensated stage. A study by Chrysohoou et al. in 372 HF patients appears to validate this conclusion, as ventricular systolic and diastolic functions were improved in HF patients who adhered to a Mediterranean diet [76]. Another study revealed that a Mediterranean diet improved central hemodynamics, RV function, and arterial stiffness [77].
Dietary interventions, however, are not limited to Mediterranean dietary patterns, as other plant-based, high-fiber diets can be used as environmentally sustainable dietary options that accentuate cardiovascular health and benefit the human body [78].

2.8. Adjustments to Gut Microbiota

Probiotics and Prebiotics

Intestinal probiotics include Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Akkermansia muciniphila, and a small number of Escherichia coli strains. Probiotics can produce cytokines or inhibit apoptosis through specific binding pattern-recognition receptors, the regulation of signaling pathways, and via probiotic metabolites, thereby reducing inflammation and enhancing intestinal epithelial function [79]. Prebiotics are substrates that are selectively utilized by host microorganisms and that confer a health benefit and include indigestible oligosaccharides, fructose, and galactose, which are more likely to be metabolized by Bifidobacterium [80].
Pretreatment with a prebiotic complex reversed the intestinal microbial imbalance in rats with HF, and the content of SCFA-producing bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Propionibacterium significantly increased, while the LPS content in the circulation was decreased commensurately [81]. Probiotics reduce the production of ROS in cells, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress and heart damage; [82] and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) in serum was significantly lowered in patients with chronic HF who consumed probiotic yogurt for 10 weeks [83]. In a small study, Costanza et al. showed improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and decreased left atrial diameter in patients with chronic systolic HF who received the short-term probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii, [84] although a recent study revealed no significant effect on LVEF in HF patients treated for three months with S. boulardii [85].

2.9. Antibiotics

Antibiotics are modulators of the symbiotic relationships between the host and gut microbiota and comprise the most commonly used strategies to modulate gut microbiota in clinical practice, while short-term antibiotic treatment may modulate the gut microbiota to a long-term alternative dysbiotic state and thus allow disease progression and aggravation [86]. Researchers reported that the abundance and diversity of gut microbiota diminished after antibiotic treatment in HF mice, resulting in the expression of biomarker genes involved in cardiac remodeling—including atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), brain natriuretic factor (BNP), and the regulator of calcineurin 1 (Rcan1) [87]. However, some specific antibiotics such as rifaximin (in addition to their bactericidal and antibacterial activity) also promote an elevation in Bifidobacterium and lactobacilli in the gut [88]. After vancomycin treatment for seven days, the abundances of butyrate-producing bacteria such as Coprococcus eutactus and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were significantly lowered in the gut of metabolically impaired men; but this did not alter gut permeability, bacterial translocation, or the levels of secreted IL-6, IL-8, or TNF-α [89]. Although the use of antibiotics in the treatment of HF is debatable, their potential benefits in the clinical treatment of HF are worthy of further investigation.

2.10. Fecal Transplantation

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)—the transfer of feces from a “healthy” donor to a recipient believed to possess altered colonic microbiota that causes disease—is currently the most effective intervention for gut microbiotal disturbances and is also the accepted treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) [90,91]. Apart from this, FMT has demonstrated potential therapeutic value in other diseases, including ulcerative colitis and autism [92,93]. Microbiological investigations showed that the infusion of feces from healthy donors into the cecum and colon of recipients gradually changed the microbiotal composition of the recipient toward that of the healthy donors and that the newly created microbiotal composition remained stable for approximately 24 weeks [94]. Furthermore, FMT showed a superior therapeutic effect relative to probiotics in mice with dysbiosis and treated with antibiotics, with rapid and nearly complete restoration of the mucosal microbiome and gut transcriptome within days [95]. Although FMT exerts a robust impact on the gut microbiota, its application to HF remains in its experimental stages and requires additional investigation due to the complex procedures and risks inherent to FMT [90].

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut microbiota is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. The destruction of the intestinal barrier function in patients with HF leads to bacterial translocation and endotoxin release into the blood, triggering a series of inflammatory and immune responses and aggravating HF. With the increased sophistication of HF treatment options, effectively reducing the morbidity and mortality of HF remains a global focus. In a normal diet, various nutrients are catabolized to distinct metabolites such as TMAO, SCFAs, IS, and aromatic amino acids under the action of gut microbiota; and of these, TMAO is the most widely analyzed with respect to cardiovascular diseases [96,97,98]. However, a role for SCFAs in cardiovascular disease cannot be ignored, and SCFAs actually improve the progression of HF by regulating inflammatory and immune responses and myocardial energy metabolism. Although we expect to attain a deeper understanding of the mechanism (s) underlying SCFA actions in HF, it is currently important that we know that SCFA-centered adjuvant therapy for HF is an effective and aggressive, non-drug-related therapeutic strategy that will reduce the morbidity of HF patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Z.; methodology, P.Z. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Z.; review and editing, J.T. and X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Fund of Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, grant number KF202011.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Verbrugge, F.H.; Dupont, M.; Steels, P.; Grieten, L.; Malbrain, M.; Tang, W.H.; Mullens, W. Abdominal contributions to cardiorenal dysfunction in congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Miller, R.J.H.; Howlett, J.G.; Fine, N.M. A Novel Approach to Medical Management of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Can. J. Cardiol. 2021, 37, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Groenewegen, A.; Rutten, F.H.; Mosterd, A.; Hoes, A.W. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020, 22, 1342–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yusuf, S.; Joseph, P.; Rangarajan, S.; Islam, S.; Mente, A.; Hystad, P.; Brauer, M.; Kutty, V.R.; Gupta, R.; Wielgosz, A.; et al. Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hao, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, B.; Zheng, C.; Kang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in China: The China Hypertension Survey, 2012–2015. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019, 21, 1329–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, H.; Chai, K.; Du, M.; Wang, S.; Cai, J.P.; Li, Y.; Zeng, P.; Zhu, W.; Zhan, S.; Yang, J. Prevalence and Incidence of Heart Failure Among Urban Patients in China: A National Population-Based Analysis. Circ. Heart Fail. 2021, 14, e008406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Elasfar, A.A.; Alhabeeb, W.; Elasfar, S. Heart Failure in the Middle East Arab Countries: Current and Future Perspectives. J. Saudi Heart Assoc. 2020, 32, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nishida, A.; Inoue, R.; Inatomi, O.; Bamba, S.; Naito, Y.; Andoh, A. Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Godoy-Vitorino, F.; Knight, R.; Blaser, M.J. Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 2019, 68, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Milani, C.; Duranti, S.; Bottacini, F.; Casey, E.; Turroni, F.; Mahony, J.; Belzer, C.; Delgado Palacio, S.; Arboleya Montes, S.; Mancabelli, L.; et al. The First Microbial Colonizers of the Human Gut: Composition, Activities, and Health Implications of the Infant Gut Microbiota. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00036-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, L.; Wang, D.; Garmaeva, S.; Kurilshikov, A.; Vich Vila, A.; Gacesa, R.; Sinha, T.; Lifelines Cohort, S.; Segal, E.; Weersma, R.K.; et al. The long-term genetic stability and individual specificity of the human gut microbiome. Cell 2021, 184, 2302–2315.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bansil, R.; Turner, B.S. The biology of mucus: Composition, synthesis and organization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 124, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hansson, G.C. Mucus and mucins in diseases of the intestinal and respiratory tracts. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 285, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tonucci, L.B.; Olbrich Dos Santos, K.M.; Licursi de Oliveira, L.; Rocha Ribeiro, S.M.; Duarte Martino, H.S. Clinical application of probiotics in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Angelucci, F.; Cechova, K.; Amlerova, J.; Hort, J. Antibiotics, gut microbiota, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Donati Zeppa, S.; Agostini, D.; Piccoli, G.; Stocchi, V.; Sestili, P. Gut Microbiota Status in COVID-19: An Unrecognized Player? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 576551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baruch, E.N.; Youngster, I.; Ben-Betzalel, G.; Ortenberg, R.; Lahat, A.; Katz, L.; Adler, K.; Dick-Necula, D.; Raskin, S.; Bloch, N.; et al. Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science 2021, 371, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Janczy, A.; Aleksandrowicz-Wrona, E.; Kochan, Z.; Malgorzewicz, S. Impact of diet and synbiotics on selected gut bacteria and intestinal permeability in individuals with excess body weight—A Prospective, Randomized Study. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2020, 67, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, M.; Qian, Z.; Yin, J.; Xu, W.; Zhou, X. The role of intestinal microbiota in cardiovascular disease. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yeoh, Y.K.; Zuo, T.; Lui, G.C.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, A.Y.; Chung, A.C.; Cheung, C.P.; Tso, E.Y.; Fung, K.S.; et al. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021, 70, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hagan, T.; Cortese, M.; Rouphael, N.; Boudreau, C.; Linde, C.; Maddur, M.S.; Das, J.; Wang, H.; Guthmiller, J.; Zheng, N.Y.; et al. Antibiotics-Driven Gut Microbiome Perturbation Alters Immunity to Vaccines in Humans. Cell 2019, 178, 1313–1328.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, S.; Jazwinski, S.M. The Gut Microbiota and Healthy Aging: A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2018, 64, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Di Segni, A.; Braun, T.; BenShoshan, M.; Farage Barhom, S.; Glick Saar, E.; Cesarkas, K.; Squires, J.E.; Keller, N.; Haberman, Y. Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 19, e56845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Katsimichas, T.; Ohtani, T.; Motooka, D.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Kioka, H.; Nakamoto, K.; Konishi, S.; Chimura, M.; Sengoku, K.; Miyawaki, H.; et al. Non-Ischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Altered Intestinal Microbiota. Circ. J. 2018, 82, 1640–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seo, J.; Matthewman, L.; Xia, D.; Wilshaw, J.; Chang, Y.M.; Connolly, D.J. The gut microbiome in dogs with congestive heart failure: A pilot study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, L.; Zhong, S.J.; Hu, S.Y.; Cheng, B.; Qiu, H.; Hu, Z.X. Changes of gut microbiome composition and metabolites associated with hypertensive heart failure rats. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mayerhofer, C.C.K.; Kummen, M.; Holm, K.; Broch, K.; Awoyemi, A.; Vestad, B.; Storm-Larsen, C.; Seljeflot, I.; Ueland, T.; Bohov, P.; et al. Low fibre intake is associated with gut microbiota alterations in chronic heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2020, 7, 456–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beale, A.L.; O’Donnell, J.A.; Nakai, M.E.; Nanayakkara, S.; Vizi, D.; Carter, K.; Dean, E.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Yiallourou, S.; Carrington, M.J.; et al. The Gut Microbiome of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e020654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuzefpolskaya, M.; Bohn, B.; Nasiri, M.; Zuver, A.M.; Onat, D.D.; Royzman, E.A.; Nwokocha, J.; Mabasa, M.; Pinsino, A.; Brunjes, D.; et al. Gut microbiota, endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with heart failure, left ventricular assist device, and transplant. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2020, 39, 880–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hayashi, T.; Yamashita, T.; Watanabe, H.; Kami, K.; Yoshida, N.; Tabata, T.; Emoto, T.; Sasaki, N.; Mizoguchi, T.; Irino, Y.; et al. Gut Microbiome and Plasma Microbiome-Related Metabolites in Patients With Decompensated and Compensated Heart Failure. Circ. J. 2018, 83, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yoshihisa, A. Altered Gut Flora and Gut Microbiome-Derived Metabolites in Heart Failure Patients in the Compensated and Decompensated Phases. Circ. J. 2018, 83, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. North, B.J.; Sinclair, D.A. The intersection between aging and cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kamo, T.; Akazawa, H.; Suda, W.; Saga-Kamo, A.; Shimizu, Y.; Yagi, H.; Liu, Q.; Nomura, S.; Naito, A.T.; Takeda, N.; et al. Dysbiosis and compositional alterations with aging in the gut microbiota of patients with heart failure. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kain, V.; Van Der Pol, W.; Mariappan, N.; Ahmad, A.; Eipers, P.; Gibson, D.L.; Gladine, C.; Vigor, C.; Durand, T.; Morrow, C.; et al. Obesogenic diet in aging mice disrupts gut microbe composition and alters neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, leading to inflamed milieu in acute heart failure. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 6456–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grosheva, I.; Zheng, D.; Levy, M.; Polansky, O.; Lichtenstein, A.; Golani, O.; Dori-Bachash, M.; Moresi, C.; Shapiro, H.; Del Mare-Roumani, S.; et al. High-Throughput Screen Identifies Host and Microbiota Regulators of Intestinal Barrier Function. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 1807–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stephens, M.; von der Weid, P.Y. Lipopolysaccharides modulate intestinal epithelial permeability and inflammation in a species-specific manner. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.; Lv, J.; Jiang, S.; Ma, Z.; Wang, D.; Hu, W.; Deng, C.; Fan, C.; Di, S.; Sun, Y.; et al. The emerging role of Toll-like receptor 4 in myocardial inflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kruger, S.; Kunz, D.; Graf, J.; Stickel, T.; Merx, M.W.; Koch, K.C.; Janssens, U.; Hanrath, P. Endotoxin hypersensitivity in chronic heart failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2007, 115, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Butts, B.; Gary, R.A.; Dunbar, S.B.; Butler, J. The Importance of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Heart Failure. J. Card. Fail. 2015, 21, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, M.L.; Zhu, X.H.; Ran, L.; Lang, H.D.; Yi, L.; Mi, M.T. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Induces Vascular Inflammation by Activating the NLRP3 Inflammasome Through the SIRT3-SOD2-mtROS Signaling Pathway. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Macia, L.; Tan, J.; Vieira, A.T.; Leach, K.; Stanley, D.; Luong, S.; Maruya, M.; Ian McKenzie, C.; Hijikata, A.; Wong, C.; et al. Metabolite-sensing receptors GPR43 and GPR109A facilitate dietary fibre-induced gut homeostasis through regulation of the inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Atarashi, K.; Tanoue, T.; Ando, M.; Kamada, N.; Nagano, Y.; Narushima, S.; Suda, W.; Imaoka, A.; Setoyama, H.; Nagamori, T.; et al. Th17 Cell Induction by Adhesion of Microbes to Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Cell 2015, 163, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Round, J.L.; Lee, S.M.; Li, J.; Tran, G.; Jabri, B.; Chatila, T.A.; Mazmanian, S.K. The Toll-Like Receptor 2 Pathway Establishes Colonization by a Commensal of the Human Microbiota. Science 2011, 332, 974–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carrillo-Salinas, F.J.; Anastasiou, M.; Ngwenyama, N.; Kaur, K.; Tai, A.; Smolgovsky, S.A.; Jetton, D.; Aronovitz, M.; Alcaide, P. Gut dysbiosis induced by cardiac pressure overload enhances adverse cardiac remodeling in a T cell-dependent manner. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 121, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Macfarlane, S.; Macfarlane, G.T. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brahe, L.K.; Astrup, A.; Larsen, L.H. Is butyrate the link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases? Obes. Rev. 2013, 14, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Polsinelli, V.B.; Marteau, L.; Shah, S.J. The role of splanchnic congestion and the intestinal microenvironment in the pathogenesis of advanced heart failure. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2019, 13, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stanciu, A.E. Cytokines in heart failure. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2019, 93, 63–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vinolo, M.A.; Rodrigues, H.G.; Nachbar, R.T.; Curi, R. Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients 2011, 3, 858–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. O’Mahony, L. Short-chain fatty acids modulate mast cell activation. Allergy 2020, 75, 1848–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, W.; Yu, T.; Huang, X.; Bilotta, A.J.; Xu, L.; Lu, Y.; Sun, J.; Pan, F.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids regulation of immune cell IL-22 production and gut immunity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Keir, M.; Yi, Y.; Lu, T.; Ghilardi, N. The role of IL-22 in intestinal health and disease. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20192195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kelly, C.J.; Zheng, L.; Campbell, E.L.; Saeedi, B.; Scholz, C.C.; Bayless, A.J.; Wilson, K.E.; Glover, L.E.; Kominsky, D.J.; Magnuson, A.; et al. Crosstalk between Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Intestinal Epithelial HIF Augments Tissue Barrier Function. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Russo, I.; Luciani, A.; De Cicco, P.; Troncone, E.; Ciacci, C. Butyrate attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in intestinal cells and Crohn’s mucosa through modulation of antioxidant defense machinery. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaye, D.M.; Shihata, W.A.; Jama, H.A.; Tsyganov, K.; Ziemann, M.; Kiriazis, H.; Horlock, D.; Vijay, A.; Giam, B.; Vinh, A.; et al. Deficiency of Prebiotic Fibre and Insufficient Signalling Through Gut Metabolite Sensing Receptors Leads to Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2020, 141, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bartolomaeus, H.; Balogh, A.; Yakoub, M.; Homann, S.; Markó, L.; Höges, S.; Tsvetkov, D.; Krannich, A.; Wundersitz, S.; Avery, E.G.; et al. The Short-Chain Fatty Acid Propionate Protects from Hypertensive Cardiovascular Damage. Circulation 2019, 139, 1407–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, J.; Lin, S.; Zheng, B.; Cheung, P.C. Short-chain fatty acids in control of energy metabolism. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Panagia, M.; He, H.; Baka, T.; Pimentel, D.R.; Croteau, D.; Bachschmid, M.M.; Balschi, J.A.; Colucci, W.S.; Luptak, I. Increasing mitochondrial ATP synthesis with butyrate normalizes ADP and contractile function in metabolic heart disease. NMR Biomed. 2020, 33, e4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Carley, A.N.; Maurya, S.K.; Fasano, M.; Wang, Y.; Selzman, C.H.; Drakos, S.G.; Lewandowski, E.D. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Outpace Ketone Oxidation in the Failing Heart. Circulation 2021, 143, 1797–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kimura, I.; Inoue, D.; Maeda, T.; Hara, T.; Ichimura, A.; Miyauchi, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Hirasawa, A.; Tsujimoto, G. Short-chain fatty acids and ketones directly regulate sympathetic nervous system via G protein-coupled receptor 41 (GPR41). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8030–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hecker, M.; Sommer, N.; Voigtmann, H.; Pak, O.; Mohr, A.; Wolf, M.; Vadasz, I.; Herold, S.; Weissmann, N.; Morty, R.E.; et al. Impact of short- and medium-chain fatty acids on mitochondrial function in severe inflammation. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2014, 38, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mollar, A.; Marrachelli, V.G.; Nunez, E.; Monleon, D.; Bodi, V.; Sanchis, J.; Navarro, D.; Nunez, J. Bacterial metabolites trimethylamine N-oxide and butyrate as surrogates of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with a recent decompensated heart failure. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Song, Y.; Liu, Y.; Qi, B.; Cui, X.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.; Li, F.; Shen, D.; Zhang, X.; et al. Association of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth With Heart Failure and Its Prediction for Short-Term Outcomes. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e015292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marques, F.Z.; Nelson, E.; Chu, P.Y.; Horlock, D.; Fiedler, A.; Ziemann, M.; Tan, J.K.; Kuruppu, S.; Rajapakse, N.W.; El-Osta, A.; et al. High-Fiber Diet and Acetate Supplementation Change the Gut Microbiota and Prevent the Development of Hypertension and Heart Failure in Hypertensive Mice. Circulation 2017, 135, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Karoor, V.; Strassheim, D.; Sullivan, T.; Verin, A.; Umapathy, N.S.; Dempsey, E.C.; Frank, D.N.; Stenmark, K.R.; Gerasimovskaya, E. The Short-Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate Attenuates Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling and Inflammation in Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zinocker, M.K.; Lindseth, I.A. The Western Diet-Microbiome-Host Interaction and Its Role in Metabolic Disease. Nutrients 2018, 10, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yannakoulia, M.; Kontogianni, M.; Scarmeas, N. Cognitive health and Mediterranean diet: Just diet or lifestyle pattern? Ageing Res. Rev. 2015, 20, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lin, D.; Peters, B.A.; Friedlander, C.; Freiman, H.J.; Goedert, J.J.; Sinha, R.; Miller, G.; Bernstein, M.A.; Hayes, R.B.; Ahn, J. Association of dietary fibre intake and gut microbiota in adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 120, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Strengers, J.G.; den Ruijter, H.M.; Boer, J.M.A.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Verschuren, W.M.M.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Sluijs, I. The association of the Mediterranean diet with heart failure risk in a Dutch population. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Larsson, S.C.; Tektonidis, T.G.; Gigante, B.; Akesson, A.; Wolk, A. Healthy Lifestyle and Risk of Heart Failure: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tektonidis, T.G.; Akesson, A.; Gigante, B.; Wolk, A.; Larsson, S.C. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced risk of heart failure in men. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016, 18, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tuttolomondo, A.; Di Raimondo, D.; Casuccio, A.; Velardo, M.; Salamone, G.; Cataldi, M.; Corpora, F.; Restivo, V.; Pecoraro, R.; Della Corte, V.; et al. Mediterranean diet adherence and congestive heart failure: Relationship with clinical severity and ischemic pathogenesis. Nutrition 2020, 70, 110584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Esposito, K.; Maiorino, M.I.; Bellastella, G.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Giugliano, D. Mediterranean diet for type 2 diabetes: Cardiometabolic benefits. Endocrine 2017, 56, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chrysohoou, C.; Pitsavos, C.; Metallinos, G.; Antoniou, C.; Oikonomou, E.; Kotroyiannis, I.; Tsantilas, A.; Tsitsinakis, G.; Tousoulis, D.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; et al. Cross-sectional relationship of a Mediterranean type diet to diastolic heart function in chronic heart failure patients. Heart Vessels 2012, 27, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Angelis, A.; Chrysohoou, C.; Tzorovili, E.; Laina, A.; Xydis, P.; Terzis, I.; Ioakeimidis, N.; Aznaouridis, K.; Vlachopoulos, C.; Tsioufis, K. The Mediterranean Diet Benefit on Cardiovascular Hemodynamics and Erectile Function in Chronic Heart Failure Male Patients by Decoding Central and Peripheral Vessel Rheology. Nutrients 2020, 13, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Satija, A.; Hu, F.B. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 28, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Q.; Yu, Z.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, W. Surface components and metabolites of probiotics for regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Vlasov, A.A.; Shperling, M.I.; Terkin, D.A.; Bystrova, O.V.; Osipov, G.A.; Salikova, S.P.; Grinevich, V.B. Effect of Prebiotic Complex on Gut Microbiota and Endotoxemia in Female Rats with Modeled Heart Failure. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020, 168, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vasquez, E.C.; Pereira, T.M.C.; Peotta, V.A.; Baldo, M.P.; Campos-Toimil, M. Probiotics as Beneficial Dietary Supplements to Prevent and Treat Cardiovascular Diseases: Uncovering Their Impact on Oxidative Stress. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3086270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pourrajab, B.; Naderi, N.; Janani, L.; Mofid, V.; Hajahmadi, M.; Dehnad, A.; Shidfar, F. Comparison of probiotic yogurt and ordinary yogurt consumption on serum Pentraxin3, NT-proBNP, oxLDL, and ApoB100 in patients with chronic heart failure: A randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 10000–10010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Costanza, A.C.; Moscavitch, S.D.; Faria Neto, H.C.; Mesquita, E.T. Probiotic therapy with Saccharomyces boulardii for heart failure patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 179, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Awoyemi, A.; Mayerhofer, C.; Felix, A.S.; Hov, J.R.; Moscavitch, S.D.; Lappegard, K.T.; Hovland, A.; Halvorsen, S.; Halvorsen, B.; Gregersen, I.; et al. Rifaximin or Saccharomyces boulardii in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from the randomized GutHeart trial. eBioMedicine 2021, 70, 103511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lange, K.; Buerger, M.; Stallmach, A.; Bruns, T. Effects of Antibiotics on Gut Microbiota. Dig. Dis. 2016, 34, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mistry, P.; Reitz, C.J.; Khatua, T.N.; Rasouli, M.; Oliphant, K.; Young, M.E.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; Martino, T.A. Circadian influence on the microbiome improves heart failure outcomes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 149, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ponziani, F.R.; Zocco, M.A.; D’Aversa, F.; Pompili, M.; Gasbarrini, A. Eubiotic properties of rifaximin: Disruption of the traditional concepts in gut microbiota modulation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4491–4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reijnders, D.; Goossens, G.H.; Hermes, G.D.; Neis, E.P.; van der Beek, C.M.; Most, J.; Holst, J.J.; Lenaerts, K.; Kootte, R.S.; Nieuwdorp, M.; et al. Effects of Gut Microbiota Manipulation by Antibiotics on Host Metabolism in Obese Humans: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Vindigni, S.M.; Surawicz, C.M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Gastroenterol. Clin. 2017, 46, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wortelboer, K.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Herrema, H. Fecal microbiota transplantation beyond Clostridioides difficile infections. eBioMedicine 2019, 44, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kang, D.W.; Adams, J.B.; Coleman, D.M.; Pollard, E.L.; Maldonado, J.; McDonough-Means, S.; Caporaso, J.G.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R. Long-term benefit of Microbiota Transfer Therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. El-Salhy, M.; Hatlebakk, J.G.; Gilja, O.H.; Brathen Kristoffersen, A.; Hausken, T. Efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with irritable bowel syndrome in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Gut 2020, 69, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Grehan, M.J.; Borody, T.J.; Leis, S.M.; Campbell, J.; Mitchell, H.; Wettstein, A. Durable Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota by the Administration of Donor Fecal Flora. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2010, 44, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Suez, J.; Zmora, N.; Zilberman-Schapira, G.; Mor, U.; Dori-Bachash, M.; Bashiardes, S.; Zur, M.; Regev-Lehavi, D.; Ben-Zeev Brik, R.; Federici, S.; et al. Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous FMT. Cell 2018, 174, 1406–1423.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kasahara, K.; Rey, F.E. The emerging role of gut microbial metabolism on cardiovascular disease. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gao, H.; Liu, S. Role of uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate in the progression of cardiovascular disease. Life Sci. 2017, 185, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ke, B.; Du, J. TMAO: How gut microbiota contributes to heart failure. Transl. Res. 2021, 228, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 14 03758 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlation between gut microbiota and HF. The gut microbiota of patients with heart failure is disturbed, leading to the destruction of intestinal conjunction and the impairment of intestinal mucosal integrity. The gut microbiota entering the blood binds to the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on the surface of cardiac myocytes and macrophages, promotes the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, and further aggravates heart failure. In addition, the gut microbiota aggravates cardiac remodeling by influencing immune cells, such as CD4+ T cells, and affects the progression of heart failure.
Figure 1. Correlation between gut microbiota and HF. The gut microbiota of patients with heart failure is disturbed, leading to the destruction of intestinal conjunction and the impairment of intestinal mucosal integrity. The gut microbiota entering the blood binds to the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on the surface of cardiac myocytes and macrophages, promotes the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, and further aggravates heart failure. In addition, the gut microbiota aggravates cardiac remodeling by influencing immune cells, such as CD4+ T cells, and affects the progression of heart failure.
Nutrients 14 03758 g001
Nutrients 14 03758 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation between SCFAs and heart failure. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) inhibit intestinal and systemic inflammation by binding to G-protein receptor 43 (GPR43), G-protein receptor 109A (GPR109A) and G-protein receptor 41 (GPR41) on the surface of a variety of cells. The secretion of pro-inflammatory factors decreased while anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-22 increased. Moreover, the nuclear transcription factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway and immune cells are also involved in the anti-inflammatory process of SCFAs. Apart from this, SCFAs can also enhance myocardial energy metabolism, maintain metabolic homeostasis, and play a cardioprotective role. * denotes decrease; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; GPR43, G-protein receptor 43; GPR109A, G-protein receptor 109A; GPR41, G-protein receptor 41; NHE3, sodium–hydrogen exchanger-3; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NF-κB, nuclear transcription factor kappa-B; NRP3, NLRP3 inflammasome; Tjp-1, tight-junction protein-1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-17a, interleukin-17a; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-22, interleukin-22; ILCs, innate lymphoid cells; Treg, regulatory T cell; ATP, adenosine triphosphate.
Figure 2. Correlation between SCFAs and heart failure. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) inhibit intestinal and systemic inflammation by binding to G-protein receptor 43 (GPR43), G-protein receptor 109A (GPR109A) and G-protein receptor 41 (GPR41) on the surface of a variety of cells. The secretion of pro-inflammatory factors decreased while anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-22 increased. Moreover, the nuclear transcription factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway and immune cells are also involved in the anti-inflammatory process of SCFAs. Apart from this, SCFAs can also enhance myocardial energy metabolism, maintain metabolic homeostasis, and play a cardioprotective role. * denotes decrease; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; GPR43, G-protein receptor 43; GPR109A, G-protein receptor 109A; GPR41, G-protein receptor 41; NHE3, sodium–hydrogen exchanger-3; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NF-κB, nuclear transcription factor kappa-B; NRP3, NLRP3 inflammasome; Tjp-1, tight-junction protein-1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-17a, interleukin-17a; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-22, interleukin-22; ILCs, innate lymphoid cells; Treg, regulatory T cell; ATP, adenosine triphosphate.
Nutrients 14 03758 g002
Nutrients 14 03758 g003 550
Figure 3. SCFAs promote the production of IL-22. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) promote the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) and binding to the interleukin-22 (IL-22) by binding to G-protein receptor 41 (GPR41) on the surface of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and CD4+ T cells and inhibiting histone deacetylase. Finally, the elevated secretion of IL-22 further improves intestinal function. ↑ denotes increase; ↓ denotes decrease; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; GPR41, G-protein receptor 41; IL-22, interleukin-22; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; HIF1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; HDAC, histone deacetylase; ILCs, innate lymphoid cells; AMPs, antimicrobial proteins.
Figure 3. SCFAs promote the production of IL-22. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) promote the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) and binding to the interleukin-22 (IL-22) by binding to G-protein receptor 41 (GPR41) on the surface of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and CD4+ T cells and inhibiting histone deacetylase. Finally, the elevated secretion of IL-22 further improves intestinal function. ↑ denotes increase; ↓ denotes decrease; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; GPR41, G-protein receptor 41; IL-22, interleukin-22; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; HIF1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; HDAC, histone deacetylase; ILCs, innate lymphoid cells; AMPs, antimicrobial proteins.
Nutrients 14 03758 g003
Table
Table 1. Changes in the gut microbiota of HF patients.
Table 1. Changes in the gut microbiota of HF patients.
  Group
HF TypeControlSpeciesMethodSummary of ResultsF/BReference
HFrEF (N = 28)N = 19Human16s rRNAStreptococcus, Veillonella ↑
SMB53 ↓		_[25]
CHF (N = 35)N = 15Dog16s rRNAThe abundance of Proteobacteria in patients with CHF increased, primarily Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli_[26]
HHF (N = 8)N = 8Rat16s rRNARuminococcaceae ↑
Muribaculaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillaceae ↓		↑[27]
HFrEF (N = 84)N = 266Human16s rRNAFiber intake influenced gut microbiotal composition and intra-individual diversity↓[28]
HFpEF (N = 26)N = 67Human16s rRNAThe gut microbiome of patients with HFpEF showed a depletion of bacteria, particularly Ruminococcus↓[29]
The HF group is compared with the control group. ↑ denotes increase; ↓ denotes decrease; _ denotes unknown; HF, heart failure; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HHF, hypertensive heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; CHF, congestive heart failure; F/B, Firmicutes/Bacteroides.
Table
Table 2. Adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet reduces HF risk.
Table 2. Adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet reduces HF risk.
Study PopulationCountryResearch MethodEffects of Mediterranean-Style Diet on HF EventsReference
MaleFemale
N = 9316N = 27,645The NetherlandsObservational studyAdherence to a Mediterranean-style diet reduced HF risk, particularly in men[71]
N = 33,966N = 30,713SwedenProspective studyHealthy lifestyle, including adherence to a Mediterranean diet, was correlated with reduced risk for developing HF in both men and women[72]
N = 37,308_SwedenProspective studyHigh adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of developing HF[73]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, P.; Zhao, S.; Tian, J.; Liu, X. Significance of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Heart Failure. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183758

AMA Style

Zhao P, Zhao S, Tian J, Liu X. Significance of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Heart Failure. Nutrients. 2022; 14(18):3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Peng, Suhong Zhao, Jinwei Tian, and Xinxin Liu. 2022. "Significance of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Heart Failure" Nutrients 14, no. 18: 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183758

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop