Next Article in Journal
Direction of Arrival Estimation with Nested Arrays in Presence of Impulsive Noise: A Correlation Entropy-Based Infinite Norm Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
An Adaptive Learning Approach for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Correction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of the Response of Environmental Factors of the Coastal Area in Zhoushan Fishery to Typhoon In-fa Based on Remote Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lanz et al. The InflateSAR Campaign: Developing Refugee Vessel Detection Capabilities with Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2008

1
Department of Computing Science, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
2
Institute for Applied Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Jade University Oldenburg, Ofener Str. 16/19, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
3
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
4
Institute for AI Safety and Security, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rathausallee 12, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
5
Faculty for Humanities and Cultural Sciences, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Am Kranen, 96045 Bamberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(22), 5344; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225344
Submission received: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 19 July 2023 / Published: 13 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Marine Environmental Disaster Response)

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figures 11a–h, 12a–d and 13a–d. All 16 Figures have the headline “Incidence Angle” which is wrong and was removed in the corrected figures below. The correct Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13 appears below.

Error in Table

In the original publication, there was a mistake in Tables 11–13 as published. The names of the detectors in row 5 (“PolRatio1”) and in row 6 (“PolRatio2”) are incomplete. The corrected Table 11, Table 12 and Table 13 appears below.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Lanz, P.; Marino, A.; Simpson, M.D.; Brinkhoff, T.; Köster, F.; Möller, M. The InflateSAR Campaign: Developing Refugee Vessel Detection Capabilities with Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 11. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave heights for HH VV. (a) Wind: cross, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: cross, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 90°. (e) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (f) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (g) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (h) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Figure 11. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave heights for HH VV. (a) Wind: cross, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: cross, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: low and boat orientation: 90°. (e) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (f) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (g) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (h) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Remotesensing 15 05344 g011aRemotesensing 15 05344 g011b
Figure 12. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave height for HV HH. (a) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Figure 12. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave height for HV HH. (a) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Remotesensing 15 05344 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave heights for VH VV. (a) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Figure 13. Comparison of the detector AUCs for different wave heights for VH VV. (a) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 45°. (b) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: medium and boat orientation: 90°. (c) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 45°. (d) Wind: up/down, incidence angle: high and boat orientation: 90°.
Remotesensing 15 05344 g013
Table 11. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with different sensor parameters. The background colours indicate different AUCs from white (low AUCs) to dark green (very high AUCs).
Table 11. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with different sensor parameters. The background colours indicate different AUCs from white (low AUCs) to dark green (very high AUCs).
PolarizationHH VVHV HHVH VV
Incidence AngleLowMediumHighMediumHighMediumHighAvg
PMF0.7870.8880.9760.9960.9060.9450.9950.928
PWF0.7790.8820.9750.9970.9120.9410.9950.926
PNF0.670.8220.9560.9940.8810.8710.9860.883
PolEntropy0.8340.8130.5340.0460.2790.5590.3730.491
PolRatio1/30.5290.7680.9470.9130.6890.7140.9390.786
PolRatio2/40.5540.5990.8490.9830.90.7680.9360.799
SubCorr_HH0.5650.6880.7440.90.608 0.701
SubCorr_VV0.5280.5570.684 0.6040.4810.571
SubCorr_cross 0.7850.5310.4830.5370.584
CACFAR_HH0.60.7750.9750.980.943 0.854
CACFAR_VV0.6280.6950.915 0.7980.9460.797
CACFAR_cross 0.9720.7010.7660.9090.837
PolSym 0.9990.920.8950.9910.951
avg0.6470.7490.8560.8690.7520.7590.826
Table 12. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with high sea states (SPAN > −17 dB). The background colours indicate different AUCs from white (low AUCs) to dark green (very high AUCs).
Table 12. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with high sea states (SPAN > −17 dB). The background colours indicate different AUCs from white (low AUCs) to dark green (very high AUCs).
PolarizationHH VVHV HHVH VV
Incidence AngleLowMediumHighMediumHighMediumHighAvg
PMF0.7870.8430.935 0.7280.945 0.848
PWF0.7790.830.932 0.7450.941 0.846
PNF0.670.750.887 0.6620.871 0.768
PolEntropy0.8340.8040.9 0.5060.559 0.721
PolRatio1/30.5290.6690.858 0.6640.714 0.687
PolRatio2/40.5540.5210.64 0.7140.768 0.639
SubCorr_HH0.5650.6340.455 0.58 0.558
SubCorr_VV0.5280.4940.468 0.604 0.523
SubCorr_cross 0.5510.483 0.517
CACFAR_HH0.60.6660.931 0.85 0.762
CACFAR_VV0.6280.590.758 0.798 0.694
CACFAR_cross 0.7230.766 0.745
PolSym 0.7760.895 0.835
avg0.6470.680.776 0.6820.759
Table 13. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with different orientations of the rubber vessel. The blue background colours indicate better AUCs for the 45° inclined vessel, the orange colours show higher AUCs for the vessel oriented at 90°.
Table 13. The AUCs of the vessel-detection algorithms with different orientations of the rubber vessel. The blue background colours indicate better AUCs for the 45° inclined vessel, the orange colours show higher AUCs for the vessel oriented at 90°.
PolarizationHH VVHV HHVH VV
Incidence AngleLowMediumHighMediumHighMediumHighAvg
PMF0.23−0.07−0.0100.0800.010.03
PWF0.25−0.08−0.0200.0900.010.04
PNF0.22−0.100.05−0.010.040.080.020.04
PolEntropy0.060.020.120.01−0.170.51−0.500.01
PolRatio1/30−0.050−0.020.050.440.10.07
PolRatio2/40.22−0.01−0.05−0.020.09−0.350.120
SubCorr_HH0−0.19−0.13−0.18−0.12 −0.13
SubCorr_VV0.07−0.24−0.18 −0.260.3−0.06
SubCorr_cross −0.35−0.060.15−0.09−0.09
CACFAR_HH0.05−0.060.03−0.03−0.01 0
CACFAR_VV0.22−0.010.03 −0.200.090.03
CACFAR_cross −0.060.030.460.140.14
PolSym 00.020.090.020.03
avg0.13−0.08−0.02−0.0600.080.020.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lanz, P.; Marino, A.; Simpson, M.D.; Brinkhoff, T.; Köster, F.; Möller, M. Correction: Lanz et al. The InflateSAR Campaign: Developing Refugee Vessel Detection Capabilities with Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2008. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5344. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225344

AMA Style

Lanz P, Marino A, Simpson MD, Brinkhoff T, Köster F, Möller M. Correction: Lanz et al. The InflateSAR Campaign: Developing Refugee Vessel Detection Capabilities with Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2008. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(22):5344. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lanz, Peter, Armando Marino, Morgan David Simpson, Thomas Brinkhoff, Frank Köster, and Matthias Möller. 2023. "Correction: Lanz et al. The InflateSAR Campaign: Developing Refugee Vessel Detection Capabilities with Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2008" Remote Sensing 15, no. 22: 5344. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop