Next Article in Journal
Winding Pathways to Rural Regeneration: Exploring Challenges and Success Factors for Three Types of Rural Changemakers in the Context of Knowledge Transfer and Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Abandoned-Bike-Sharing Recycling: Impact of Recycling Subsidy Policy
Previous Article in Journal
Online or Traditional Learning at the Near End of the Pandemic: Assessment of Students’ Intentions to Pursue Online Learning in the Philippines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Electric Vehicle Range and Thermal Comfort through an Innovative Seat Heating System
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on the Performance Recovery Strategy Model of Hangzhou Metro Network Based on Complex Network and Tenacity Theory

Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6613; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086613
by Xiaohong Yin and Jiakun Wu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6613; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086613
Submission received: 20 March 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 3)

The paper has been improved following the suggestion reviewer.

Author Response

We are honoured to have received your approval for this study and we will continue to be conscientious and careful in our future academic career. Please allow us to express our gratitude to you once again.

Reviewer 2 Report (Previous Reviewer 1)

see attached *.pdf document

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have put together a summary of the responses and you can see the attachment I have uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report (Previous Reviewer 1)

I accept improvements in the current version.

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see attached *.pdf

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have put together a summary of the responses and you can see the attachment I have uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The theme is interesting for in the development of urban planning in a modern city. The documentation is vast and denotes a thorough knowledge of the field, being reviewed many papers.The paper is clear and well structured and the translation is quality. The research methodology reveals a good knowledge of the mathematical methods and models specific to the researched field.

The conclusions are useful for optimizing the transportation of the population by metro, as well as for the development of the city.

Author Response

We are honoured to have received your approval for this study and we will continue to be conscientious and careful in our future academic career. Please allow us to express our gratitude to you once again.

Reviewer 3 Report

General comments:

This paper is very interesting and the topic is actual and of great relevance, especially considering the benefit in sustainable transport, in the optical SDGs.

The methodology is presented into detail and  the results obtained are clearly highlighted. 

Some revisions are necessary after the publication.

Introduction should be improved. The state of the art could be improved

The objectives of the work should be highlighted into detail in the paper.

The quality of the Figures and the presentation of the paper should be revised.  

 

Minor comments:

Keywords : Please the keyword “network” is always repeated . Try to reduce the frequency in the keyword.

-INTRODUCTION:

Please add other References with recent publication years to underline the actuality of the research topic. The literature review could be enriched.

Please try to contextualize the problem in the introduction considering the general aim of the topic (Sustainable Development Goal, sustainable transport, human health,..)

Please try to underline the novelty of this work with respect to other papers.

Line 5, Paragraph 1. Introduction. “build metros”

“Please here add these references”:

-Forestieri, G., Marseglia, G., Galiano, G. “Recovery and optimization of the former railway transport track in an area of Sud Italy”, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, Volume 186, 47-57, WIT Press, 2019, ISSN 1743-3509, https://doi.org/10.2495/UT190051

-Marseglia, G., Mesa, J.A. Ortega Riejos, F.A., Piedra de La Cuadra, R.P.A heuristic for the deployment of collecting routes for urban recycle stations (eco-points) Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, January 2022, 101222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101222

Please at the end of the Introduction add some lines that summarize the content of each section of the paper.

A geographical location of Hangzhou could be added to identify the exact area.

-Figure 2. The different Line could be represented with different colour 

-Page 9 “metro net- 245 work consisting of four lines and 41 nodes together, as shown in Figure 8 below, if five nodes, 246 including nodes 7, 19, 24, 31 and 40, are selected as the initial failure nodes, there are a total of 120 247 different recovery strategies that can restore the initial performance of the metro network at this 248 time”. Please. Check the character used in these lines with respect to the other of the text.

-Figure 11 . 
If you specify in the text the kind of Scenario, you can delete in the Figure “where the nodes are degrees of..” and you can consider only Scenario 1,2,3,4 and random scenarios.

-Conclusion paragraph.

Please underline the point of force of this research.

 

REFERENCES:

Please check the style of references required for this Journal.

Please add the doi for each publication.

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have put together a summary of the responses and you can see the attachment I have uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop