Next Article in Journal
Improvement in Solar-Radiation Forecasting Based on Evolutionary KNEA Method and Numerical Weather Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Supply Chain: Fresh Versus Semi-Finished Based Production Process
Previous Article in Journal
Economic Sustainability and ‘Missing Middle Housing’: Associations between Housing Stock Diversity and Unemployment in Mid-Size U.S. Cities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/su14116821
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prioritizing Cleaner Production Actions towards Circularity: Combining LCA and Emergy in the PET Production Chain

Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6821; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116821
by Gustavo Bustamante 1, Biagio Fernando Giannetti 1,2,*, Feni Agostinho 1,2, Gengyuan Liu 2,3 and Cecília M. V. B. Almeida 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Yixuan Feng
Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6821; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116821
Submission received: 4 April 2022 / Revised: 18 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cleaner Production in Contemporary Operations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have made the suggestions and comments directly in the manuscript attached herewith. Revise the paper accordingly.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors sincerely thank the reviewer’s comments and suggestions that helped improve the text and clarify the ideas to be exposed.

We inform you that all reviewers' comments and suggestions were considered. Please see our answers to each one in blue.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

As one of the selected reviewers I evaluated your submission. I have no special issue with your analysis and method, but I found some serious structural issues that must be fixed before proceeding. firstly acronyms do not used in teh title and must be acknowlwdged in full words when refer in the title.

Then your abstract is too general. you must rewrite it so that it includes research problem, method, main findings and main contribution.

I couldn't understand your main problem statement too.

your conclusion is also too general. I suggest you to express your contribution comapring with previous researches.

Also I recommend you to add twio sections of "suggestions for future researchers" to recommend how they can contunue your work and "research limitations" to show level of generalization of your results.

I look forward to receive the revision of your submission.

Best of luck

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors sincerely thank the reviewer’s comments and suggestions that helped improve the text and clarify the ideas to be exposed.

We inform you that all reviewers' comments and suggestions were considered. Please see our answers to each one in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

  • Line 80, there is an extra bracket symbol.
  • Line 104-107, the font size is inconsistent.
  • Reference number should be added in Table 3.
  • The novelty should be highlighted. Most figures are from literature. It would be good to provide more quantitative analysis based on the calculation.

Author Response

The authors sincerely thank the reviewer’s comments and suggestions that helped improve the text and clarify the ideas to be exposed.

We inform you that all reviewers' comments and suggestions were considered. Please see our answers to each one in blue.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop