Next Article in Journal
Chondrogenic Commitment of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Perfused Collagen Hydrogel Functionalized with hTGF-β1-Releasing PLGA Microcarrier
Next Article in Special Issue
Scaling Approaches for Pediatric Dose Selection: The Fremanezumab (AJOVY®) Journey to Select a Phase 3 Dose Using Pharmacokinetic Data from a Phase 1 Study
Previous Article in Journal
Genetically Encoded Self-Assembling Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Possible Platform for Cancer-Cell Tracking
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Is the Best Predictor of Phenobarbital Pharmacokinetics to Use for Initial Dosing in Neonates?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Umbilical Cord, Maternal Milk, and Breastfed Infant Levetiracetam Concentrations Monitoring at Delivery and during Early Postpartum Period

Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(3), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030398
by Ivana Kacirova 1,2, Milan Grundmann 1,* and Hana Brozmanova 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(3), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030398
Submission received: 22 February 2021 / Revised: 12 March 2021 / Accepted: 14 March 2021 / Published: 17 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacokinetics of Pediatric Drugs)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript.

 

Please clearly state the aims of the investigation in the Introduction.

 

The second paragraph in Materials and Methods is repeated.

 

Is the LC analysis method based on a previously-published method?

More information is required regarding colostrum and milk collection and analysis.

What volumes of colostrum or milk were collected?

Were whole colostrum and milk analysed or were the samples defatted first?

What volume of colostrum or milk was used for analysis?

Has the analytical method been validated previously for milk samples?

Is there a difference in the concentrations of levetiracetam between samples collected before a breastfeed or expression (lower cream content) compared to after a breastfeed or expression (higher cream content)?

 

Table 1

I am very concerned about the weights of the infants 7-31 days. The heaviest infant would have been on the 11th centile on the World Health Organisation weight-for-age chart, and the lightest less than the 1st centile.

 

Table 3

How were 47 milk samples obtained from 8 women? Serial collections?

 

Table 4 is mis-labelled as Table 1.

 

Infant intestinal absorption of levetiracetam should be discussed e.g. Nicolas et al Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 38: 209–230 (2017)

 

It is interesting that the infant serum concentrations of levetiracetam are more-or-less constant from colostrum to mature milk stages (Figure 3) given the large increase in volume of milk ingested, and therefore dose of levetiracetam, between the two stages. Although the volume of ingested breastmilk was not measured, some reference to literature values should be made, and then discussion as to why a greater intake of levetiracetam does not result in a higher serum concentration in the infants.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors of the paper “Umbilical cord, maternal, milk, and breastfed infant levetiracetam concentrations monitoring at delivery and during early postpartum period”  analysed the transplacental passage and transport of levetiracetam to colostrum, mature milk and breastfed infants. Research design is appropriate, and methods are adequately described. The result might be more clearly presented, sometimes it is difficult to read the tables. Tables provide lots of data, which is good, but for average reader it might be difficult to analyse presented data. Some minor typing errors are present – lines 67-72 are repeated; line 232 should be Table 4 instead of Table 1.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a high-quality manuscript devoted to an important and interesting research topic. The manuscript is well organized and well written. Figures and tables are informative, and statistical analysis is extensive. I have only several minor comments to the contents of this manuscript:

1. Lines 67 & 70 - the same paragraph is repeated twice. Please correct.

2. Line 81 - the "milk" subgroup - the collected samples represent the pre-dose (trough) concentrations? Please clarify in the methods, and consider to elaborate on the timing of collection of these samples and its influence on the results of this dataset in the Discussion. 

3. Discussion - please divide the text into several paragraphs, to improve its readability.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop