Next Article in Journal
Early-Phase Drive to the Precursor Pool: Chloroviruses Dive into the Deep End of Nucleotide Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of N-Glycosylation on Virus–Host Interactions in Halorubrum lacusprofundi
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Analysis of Amphioxus Reveals a Wide Range of Fragments Homologous to Viral Sequences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Proteomics of SSV1 and Related Fusellovirus: A Minireview
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Virus-Host Dynamics in Archaeal Groundwater Biofilms and the Associated Bacterial Community Composition

Viruses 2023, 15(4), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040910
by Victoria Turzynski 1,2,3, Lea Griesdorn 1,2,3, Cristina Moraru 4, André R. Soares 1,2,3, Sophie A. Simon 1,2,3, Tom L. Stach 1,2,3, Janina Rahlff 1,†, Sarah P. Esser 1,2,3 and Alexander J. Probst 1,2,3,5,6,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Viruses 2023, 15(4), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15040910
Submission received: 3 February 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Archaeal Virology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript presented very interesting experimental design and results over a relevant topic as lytic viruses in deep groundwater.

The work overall was easy to read and follow, methods are clearly explained as well as the results. Minor revision should be made to improve the understanding. Please, find the attached pdf with my comments and suggestions.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Turzynski et al use virusFISH to study the spatial and temporal distribution of lytic viruses in groundwater. The manuscript is well written and will advance the field of microbial ecology’s knowledge on virus-microbe dynamics in deep subsurface microbial systems. I have no main issues with the manuscript since the authors use appropriate sampling and analytic techniques and do not overstate their findings. I only have two minor comments.

1.       Could the authors provide a more descriptive overview about their sampling procedure? Since the sampling procedure is integral to assessing, understanding and repeating their work a more detailed description should be provided. References are provided but one of the references refers to the other reference for more detail.

2.       I could not access the Supplementary Materials because I got an ‘Error 404 - File not found’ message anytime I tried. Could the authors check and fix this?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop