Next Article in Journal
Dynamics of Viral Shedding and Symptoms in Patients with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Antiviral Toll-like Receptor Signaling in Non-Parenchymal Liver Cells Is Restricted to TLR3
Previous Article in Journal
Repeated MDA5 Gene Loss in Birds: An Evolutionary Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toll-like Receptors in Viral Encephalitis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/v13112132
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Understanding of the Innate Control of Toll-like Receptors in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

by
Hi Eun Jung
and
Heung Kyu Lee
*
Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(11), 2132; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112132
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 17 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toll-Like Receptors in Antiviral Immunity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, threatens the entire world. It has affected every aspect of life and increased the burden on both healthcare and socioeconomic systems. Current studies have revealed that excessive inflammatory immune responses are responsible for the severity of COVID-19, which suggests that anti-inflammatory drugs may be promising therapeutic treatments. However, there are currently a limited number of approved therapeutics for COVID-19. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which recognize microbial components derived from invading pathogens, are involved in both the initiation of innate responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection and the hyperinflammatory phenotype of COVID-19. In this review, we provide current knowledge on the pivotal role of TLRs in immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection and demonstrate the potential effectiveness of TLR-targeting drugs on the control of hyperinflammation in patients with COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a threat to human life. Since the first case of infection was reported in China in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19, has been rapidly transmitted from person to person worldwide. Confirmed cases of global COVID-19 have surpassed 238 million, and more than 4.85 million people have died from the disease according to researchers at Johns Hopkins University. Patients with COVID-19 have reported a wide range of symptoms, ranging from mild to severe illness, with several studies suggesting that robust expression of proinflammatory cytokines is involved in the pathogenesis of the most severe cases [1,2,3]. The dysregulated release of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, are related to a poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19 [4,5,6,7,8].
SARS-CoV-2, which belongs to the Betacoronavirus genus, is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) virus. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic. Before the outbreak, two members of the Betacoronavirus genus, SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV), had previously been documented to have caused epidemics: SARS-CoV infected 8422 people and killed 916 in 2003 according to the WHO, and MERS-CoV caused 2574 confirmed cases with 886 deaths from 2012 until June 2021 [9,10]. These zoonotic coronaviruses circulated in bats, jumping to humans via intermediate hosts, and resulted in public health emergencies. Compared with these two epidemics, the current COVID-19 outbreak has led to an unprecedented burden on both healthcare and socioeconomic systems.
While the mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 triggers immune responses has not been fully elucidated, much research has been devoted to investigating the virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and host immune responses. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the mechanisms in which host Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize SARS-CoV-2.

2. Virological Features of SARS-CoV-2

Betacoronavirus is one of four genera (Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Deltacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus) of the Coronavirinae subfamily, which belongs to Coronaviridae family. Among these, Alphacoronavirus (HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63) and Betacoronavirus (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) can infect humans. Prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV, human coronaviruses were most commonly responsible for the common cold [11] and mild upper respiratory tract infections. However, highly pathogenic coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) have emerged in human populations, resulting in serious health problems and even death.
The intact SARS-CoV-2 virion is surrounded by a lipid envelope that contains the envelope protein (E), membrane protein (M), and spike glycoprotein (S). The genome of SARS-CoV-2 consists of large, single-stranded positive RNA (from 29.8 to 29.9 kb) that contains 14 open-reading frames (ORFs) encoding 27 proteins [12,13,14,15]. The genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 displays 79.0% homology with SARS-CoV and 51.8% with MERS-CoV [14]. Nucleocapsid (N) proteins form complexes with genomic RNA for genome packaging [16,17].
During viral entry into host cells, the surface trimeric S glycoprotein mediates receptor recognition and viral-host cell membrane fusion. The host protease furin cleaves the S protein into S1 and S2 subunits for preactivation, and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S1 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expressed on the surfaces of host cells [18,19,20,21]. Then, SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells by either direct fusion [22,23] or endocytosis [24,25]. The transmembrane protease serine subtype 2 (TMPRSS2) on host cells leads to a conformational change in the S protein by cleaving the S2′ site to initiate membrane fusion [25,26]; additionally, the endosomal cysteine proteases cathepsins B and L promote the fusion of viral and endosomal membranes [25,27,28]. Following viral entry into host cells, the viral RNA genome is released into the host cell cytoplasm and is translated into the viral proteins required for viral replication.
SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the host cell cytoplasm [29]. Initially, viral polymerase proteins are directly translated from the RNA genome, which the polymerases use as a template [30]. Two major ORFs, ORF1a and ORF1b, encode pp1a and pp1b polyproteins that are proteolytically cleaved into 16 nonstructural proteins (nsps) [15,31]. The nsps compose the viral replication and transcription complex (RTC), and nsp12, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, synthesizes viral RNAs, including genomic RNA and subgenomic (sg) RNA, in double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) in the perinuclear region [29,32,33,34]. The other ORFs encode structural proteins S, E, M, and N, as well as accessory proteins [31]. sgRNAs are translated into viral proteins, and newly synthesized viral RNAs and proteins are translocated to single-membrane vesicles (SMVs) where viral assembly occurs, with new virions released from infected cells by exocytosis [33,35] (Figure 1).

3. TLRs Are Involved in SARS-CoV-2 Recognition

During an infection, the immune system works to protect the host from foreign invaders. Innate immune responses are the first line of defense against pathogens entering the body and are responsible for the priming of adaptive immune responses. Innate immune cells express pattern-recognition receptors, such as TLRs, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors, C-type lectin receptors, and absent in melanoma-2-like receptors, to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on pathogens [36]. Among them, TLRs play a crucial role in the activation of innate immune responses against various pathogens (Table 1). TLRs are expressed in immune cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells, including type II pneumocytes which highly express ACE2 in the airways [37,38,39]. The activation of TLRs initiates the recruitment of adaptor molecules, such as MyD88 and TRIF, that lead to the subsequent production of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines via the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs).
According to the latest research [40,41,42,43,44,45], several TLRs are involved in the sensing of PAMPs from SARS-CoV-2. It has been suggested that TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7/8, and TLR9 contribute to antiviral responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection (Figure 2).

3.1. Cell Surface TLRs

Currently, 10 members of the TLR family have been identified in humans. TLRs are currently classified into two categories based on their cellular localization [64]: TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10 belong to cell surface TLRs that recognize microbial components including proteins and lipids derived from invading pathogens, whereas TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 are intracellular TLRs that sense nucleic acid ligands [65].
TLR2 is a surface receptor that recognizes diverse ligands derived from viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites [66]. TLR2 forms heterodimers with TLR1 and TLR6, utilizing MyD88 for signal transduction. While the involvement of TLR2 in immune responses against coronavirus infections has not been elucidated, a recent study revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein is sensed by TLR2 [40,67]. Zheng and colleagues reanalyzed the expression of MyD88 and TLRs in patients with different severity grades of COVID-19 using a public dataset and found that the expression of MyD88, TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR8, and TLR9 was increased in patients with severe to critical illness. To clarify which TLRs were essential for the sensing of Betacoronavirus, they infected bone marrow-derived macrophages deficient in TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, or TLR9 with mouse hepatitis virus, which belongs to the Betacoronavirus genus, and found that TLR2 deficiency resulted in the abrogated expression of inflammatory cytokine genes. They then investigated the role of TLR2 in SARS-CoV-2 infection using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with a TLR2 inhibitor. They performed experiments using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 to identify the viral components responsible for TLR2 activation, and structural proteins were identified as promising targets. Among four viral structural proteins identified, the E protein activated the TLR2 signaling pathway. In addition, the authors found that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein induced TLR2-dependent inflammation in mice and that the TLR2 inhibitor protected mice from lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that the SARS-CoV-2 E protein is a novel ligand for TLR2 activation.
However, a separate group identified the SARS-CoV-2 S protein as a TLR2 ligand in non-peer reviewed preprints [68]. They observed that recombinant S protein induced inflammatory mediators in macrophages, monocytes, and human lung epithelial A549 cells via the activation of the TLR2-mediated NF-κB pathway. Indeed, intraperitoneal injection of recombinant S protein triggered TLR2-mediated proinflammatory cytokine production in mice. While further studies are required, these results offer valuable insight into TLR2-dependent immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
TLR4 is well known to recognize lipopolysaccharides produced by Gram-negative bacteria. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, an in silico study suggested a possible interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and TLR4 [69]. Investigators used a computational approach to study the interaction between the S protein and host receptors. Interestingly, they found that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein strongly bound to TLR4, suggesting a potential role for TLR4 in SARS-CoV-2 recognition. This hypothesis has been supported by other evidence demonstrating that TLR4 and its downstream signaling molecules are significantly upregulated in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to those with mild illness [40,70]. Recently, two groups confirmed that the S protein leads to proinflammatory cytokine production in monocytes and macrophages in a TLR4-dependent manner [43,44]. However, the identity of TLR4-binding sites in the S protein remains unclear. Shirato and Kizaki showed that the S1 subunit (residues 16–671) induced the activation of the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways as well as subsequent proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages [44]. S1-induced proinflammatory responses in macrophages were abrogated following treatment with a TLR4 antagonist or by transfection with TLR4 siRNA. On the other hand, Zhao and colleagues demonstrated that only the trimeric S protein, rather than its N-terminal domain (NTD) (residues 1–307) or RBD (residues 319–541), activates immune responses in macrophages [43]. They suggested that a conformational binding site composed of the RBD and NTD of the S protein was likely to interact with TLR4. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between TLR4 and the S protein.

3.2. Intracellular TLRs

Nucleic acid-sensing TLRs (TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9) are localized in endosomes to prevent the recognition of self-DNA or -RNA. As SARS-CoV-2 is an ssRNA virus and produces double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) during replication in host cells [34,71], intracellular RNA sensors are thought to be involved in the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 infection. TLR3 senses dsRNA in endosomes, and TLR3 stimulation leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs via the activation of the TRIF signaling pathway. In contrast, ssRNA is recognized by TLR7 and TLR8, which use MyD88 as a downstream adapter protein. Recently, the roles of TLR3 and TLR7 in antiviral responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified using three-dimensional lung multicellular spheroids [41]. The relative expression levels of TLR3 and TLR7, as well as the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs, were elevated in SARS-CoV-2-infected multicellular spheroids, and both IRF3 and NF-κB appeared to participate in the signaling pathway downstream of TLR3 and TLR7. Furthermore, another group demonstrated that an ssRNA fragment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA was responsible for the activation of the TLR7/8-dependent MyD88 pathway in human DCs [45]. As TLR7/8 is activated by guanosine (G)- and uridine (U)-rich ssRNA [72], this group scanned putative TLR7/8 ligands within the SARS-CoV-2 genome and selected two GU-rich ssRNA sequences—termed SCV2-RNA—to test their hypothesis. Using human monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs), the authors found that SCV2-RNA treatment induced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, as well as the secretion of the T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL9. SCV2-RNA-stimulated MoDCs exhibited a mature form and triggered cocultured CD4 and CD8 T cells to produce IFN-γ, suggesting that SCV2-RNA can mediate DC activation. Similar results were observed in pDCs. SCV2-RNA induced the upregulation of CD86 expression and the production of IFN-α and TNF-α in pDCs. The authors suggested that such ssRNA-induced activation is mediated via the TLR8/MyD88/NF-κB pathway in MoDCs and by TLR7 in pDCs. Taken together, these results indicate that ssRNA and dsRNA produced by SARS-CoV-2 are recognized by endosomal RNA sensors.
TLR9 recognizes CpG-rich DNA fragments derived from bacteria, viruses, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) [60]. While the relationship between TLR9 and the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 infection is not clear, the coding region of the E protein and ORF10 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome was shown to be enriched with CpG [73]. Recently, TLR9 was suspected of inducing severe COVID-19 [42]. This TLR9-COVID-19 hypothesis, presented by Bezemer and Garssen, proposes that CpG islands in SARS-CoV-2 or mtDNA released from damaged host cells could trigger TLR9 activation and subsequently elicit pathogenic hyperinflammatory responses. As it is still unclear whether TLR9 directly detects viral components derived from SARS-CoV-2, future studies are needed to address this issue.
While it is well known that intracellular TLRs are physically separated from the cell surface to prevent autoimmune responses following receptor activation by host nucleic acids [74], interestingly, several studies have suggested the cell surface positioning of endosomal TLRs in certain cell types [75,76,77,78]. Cell surface expression of TLR3 was observed in human fibroblast cell lines [79], mouse splenic CD8+ dendritic cells, and marginal zone B cells [80]. Mouse bone marrow (BM)-derived macrophages, BM-conventional dendritic cells, BM-plasmacytoid DCs and B cells expressed TLR7 on the cell surface [77]. TLR9 was expressed on the surface of mouse splenic DCs [78], monocytes [81], and human neutrophils [82]. These findings suggest that both the cell surface and intracellular expression of nucleic acid-sensing TLRs may participate in the activation of immune responses. Interestingly, human airway epithelial cells expressed TLR3, TLR7 and TLR9 on the apical cell membrane [76], indicating that nucleic acid-sensing TLRs on the epithelial cell surface may play a crucial role in innate responses against inhaled pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. However, further studies are required to prove this hypothesis.

4. Conclusions

TLRs participate in the first line of defense against invading pathogens. They recognize a broad range of PAMPs derived from microorganisms, and the main function of TLRs is the ability to activate innate immune responses, including cytokine production. At present, TLR2, TLR4, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 have been suggested as possible receptors capable of recognizing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Viral components including the S protein, E protein, ssRNA, and dsRNA seem to serve as ligands for these TLRs. TLR-mediated immune responses are essential for host protection; however, uncontrolled and exacerbated inflammation can result in pathologic responses such as tissue damage. In patients with COVID-19, robust innate immune responses and hyperinflammation were observed in severe cases [3,4,7], resulting in septic shock [83], acute lung injury [84], and acute respiratory distress syndrome [85]. Therefore, immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies, including the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, have been suggested as promising treatments for severe COVID-19. Many approaches targeting TLR signaling pathways have been tested for their ability to attenuate hyperinflammation following SARS-CoV-2 infection. For example, the U.S. FDA has approved an investigation into the efficacy of a PUL-042 inhalation solution that blocks TLR2/6/9 to reduce the infection rate, progression, and disease severity of COVID-19 (NCT04312997, NCT04313023) [42,86]. Additionally, a clinical study to evaluate the inhibition of TLR3-mediated inflammatory responses by Famotidine [87] to improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19 has been conducted (NCT04389567, NCT04504240, NCT04724720, NCT04370262) [88,89]. Various TLR4 modulators, such as EB05 (NCT04401475), Eritoran (NCT02735707), Naltrexone [90] (NCT04604704, NCT04604678), Curcumin [91] (NCT04382040), and Berberine [92,93,94] (NCT04479202) are undergoing clinical trials for COVID-19. Although current studies have not produced sufficient encouraging results, based on the evidence presented in this review, targeting TLRs could be an effective treatment for COVID-19.

Author Contributions

Writing and original draft preparation, H.E.J. and H.K.L.; writing, reviewing, and editing, H.E.J. and H.K.L.; supervision, H.K.L.; funding acquisition, H.K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021M3A9D3026428 and NRF-2021M3A9H3015688) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea. This work was also supported by Mobile Clinic Module Project funded by KAIST and the 2020 Joint Research Project of Institutes of Science and Technology. H.E. Jung was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1I1A1A01059948).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This review was completed with no requirement for institutional review.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the Laboratory of Host Defenses for helpful advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Q.; Li, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 214, 108393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, J.H.; Lee, H.K. Re-analysis of Single Cell Transcriptome Reveals That the NR3C1-CXCL8-Neutrophil Axis Determines the Severity of COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, L.; Xie, X.; Tu, Z.; Fu, J.; Xu, D.; Zhou, Y. The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Signal. Transduct Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Del Valle, D.M.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Huang, H.H.; Beckmann, N.D.; Nirenberg, S.; Wang, B.; Lavin, Y.; Swartz, T.H.; Madduri, D.; Stock, A.; et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1636–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mazzoni, A.; Salvati, L.; Maggi, L.; Capone, M.; Vanni, A.; Spinicci, M.; Mencarini, J.; Caporale, R.; Peruzzi, B.; Antonelli, A.; et al. Impaired immune cell cytotoxicity in severe COVID-19 is IL-6 dependent. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 4694–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Investigators, R.-C.; Gordon, A.C.; Mouncey, P.R.; Al-Beidh, F.; Rowan, K.M.; Nichol, A.D.; Arabi, Y.M.; Annane, D.; Beane, A.; van Bentum-Puijk, W.; et al. Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1491–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karki, R.; Sharma, B.R.; Tuladhar, S.; Williams, E.P.; Zalduondo, L.; Samir, P.; Zheng, M.; Sundaram, B.; Banoth, B.; Malireddi, R.K.S.; et al. Synergism of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma Triggers Inflammatory Cell Death, Tissue Damage, and Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cytokine Shock Syndromes. Cell 2021, 184, 149–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cherry, J.D.; Krogstad, P. SARS: The first pandemic of the 21st century. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Al-Tawfiq, J.A.; Petersen, E.; Memish, Z.A.; Perlman, S.; Zumla, A. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus—The need for global proactive surveillance, sequencing and modeling. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 43, 102118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mesel-Lemoine, M.; Millet, J.; Vidalain, P.O.; Law, H.; Vabret, A.; Lorin, V.; Escriou, N.; Albert, M.L.; Nal, B.; Tangy, F. A human coronavirus responsible for the common cold massively kills dendritic cells but not monocytes. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 7577–7587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wu, A.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B.; Ding, X.; Wang, X.; Niu, P.; Meng, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; et al. Genome Composition and Divergence of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Originating in China. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ren, L.L.; Wang, Y.M.; Wu, Z.Q.; Xiang, Z.C.; Guo, L.; Xu, T.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.J.; Li, X.W.; et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: A descriptive study. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chan, J.F.; Kok, K.H.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, H.; To, K.K.; Yuan, S.; Yuen, K.Y. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cubuk, J.; Alston, J.J.; Incicco, J.J.; Singh, S.; Stuchell-Brereton, M.D.; Ward, M.D.; Zimmerman, M.I.; Vithani, N.; Griffith, D.; Wagoner, J.A.; et al. The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein is dynamic, disordered, and phase separates with RNA. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kang, S.; Yang, M.; Hong, Z.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; Chen, X.; He, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, Q.; et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein RNA binding domain reveals potential unique drug targeting sites. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pohlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, Q.; Xiang, R.; Huo, S.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q.; Yu, F. Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Murgolo, N.; Therien, A.G.; Howell, B.; Klein, D.; Koeplinger, K.; Lieberman, L.A.; Adam, G.C.; Flynn, J.; McKenna, P.; Swaminathan, G.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 tropism, entry, replication, and propagation: Considerations for drug discovery and development. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bayati, A.; Kumar, R.; Francis, V.; McPherson, P.S. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells after viral entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ou, X.; Liu, Y.; Lei, X.; Li, P.; Mi, D.; Ren, L.; Guo, L.; Guo, R.; Chen, T.; Hu, J.; et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Kruger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, M.M.; Yang, W.L.; Yang, F.Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, W.J.; Hou, W.; Fan, C.F.; Jin, R.H.; Feng, Y.M.; Wang, Y.C.; et al. Cathepsin L plays a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and humanized mice and is a promising target for new drug development. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Padmanabhan, P.; Desikan, R.; Dixit, N.M. Targeting TMPRSS2 and Cathepsin B/L together may be synergistic against SARS-CoV-2 infection. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020, 16, e1008461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Klein, S.; Cortese, M.; Winter, S.L.; Wachsmuth-Melm, M.; Neufeldt, C.J.; Cerikan, B.; Stanifer, M.L.; Boulant, S.; Bartenschlager, R.; Chlanda, P. SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Harrison, A.G.; Lin, T.; Wang, P. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Pathogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 1100–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Finkel, Y.; Mizrahi, O.; Nachshon, A.; Weingarten-Gabbay, S.; Morgenstern, D.; Yahalom-Ronen, Y.; Tamir, H.; Achdout, H.; Stein, D.; Israeli, O.; et al. The coding capacity of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2021, 589, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hillen, H.S.; Kokic, G.; Farnung, L.; Dienemann, C.; Tegunov, D.; Cramer, P. Structure of replicating SARS-CoV-2 polymerase. Nature 2020, 584, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mendonca, L.; Howe, A.; Gilchrist, J.B.; Sheng, Y.; Sun, D.; Knight, M.L.; Zanetti-Domingues, L.C.; Bateman, B.; Krebs, A.S.; Chen, L.; et al. Correlative multi-scale cryo-imaging unveils SARS-CoV-2 assembly and egress. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Horova, V.; Landova, B.; Hodek, J.; Chalupsky, K.; Krafcikova, P.; Chalupska, D.; Duchoslav, V.; Weber, J.; Boura, E.; Klima, M. Localization of SARS-CoV-2 Capping Enzymes Revealed by an Antibody against the nsp10 Subunit. Viruses 2021, 13, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ghosh, S.; Dellibovi-Ragheb, T.A.; Kerviel, A.; Pak, E.; Qiu, Q.; Fisher, M.; Takvorian, P.M.; Bleck, C.; Hsu, V.W.; Fehr, A.R.; et al. β-Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway. Cell 2020, 183, 1520–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, D.; Wu, M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ziegler, C.G.K.; Allon, S.J.; Nyquist, S.K.; Mbano, I.M.; Miao, V.N.; Tzouanas, C.N.; Cao, Y.; Yousif, A.S.; Bals, J.; Hauser, B.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 Is an Interferon-Stimulated Gene in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Is Detected in Specific Cell Subsets across Tissues. Cell 2020, 181, 1016–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zou, X.; Chen, K.; Zou, J.; Han, P.; Hao, J.; Han, Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front. Med. 2020, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Qi, F.; Qian, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z. Single cell RNA sequencing of 13 human tissues identify cell types and receptors of human coronaviruses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zheng, M.; Karki, R.; Williams, E.P.; Yang, D.; Fitzpatrick, E.; Vogel, P.; Jonsson, C.B.; Kanneganti, T.D. TLR2 senses the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein to produce inflammatory cytokines. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bortolotti, D.; Gentili, V.; Rizzo, S.; Schiuma, G.; Beltrami, S.; Strazzabosco, G.; Fernandez, M.; Caccuri, F.; Caruso, A.; Rizzo, R.J.M. TLR3 and TLR7 RNA Sensor Activation during SARS-COV-2 Infection. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bezemer, G.F.G.; Garssen, J. TLR9 and COVID-19: A Multidisciplinary Theory of a Multifaceted Therapeutic Target. Front. Pharm. 2020, 11, 601685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Kuang, M.; Li, J.; Zhu, L.; Jia, Z.; Guo, X.; Hu, Y.; Kong, J.; Yin, H.; Wang, X.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 818–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shirato, K.; Kizaki, T. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salvi, V.; Nguyen, H.O.; Sozio, F.; Schioppa, T.; Gaudenzi, C.; Laffranchi, M.; Scapini, P.; Passari, M.; Barbazza, I.; Tiberio, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-associated ssRNAs activate inflammation and immunity via TLR7/8. JCI Insight 2021, 6, 150542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Takeuchi, O.; Sato, S.; Horiuchi, T.; Hoshino, K.; Takeda, K.; Dong, Z.; Modlin, R.L.; Akira, S. Cutting edge: Role of Toll-like receptor 1 in mediating immune response to microbial lipoproteins. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Takeuchi, O.; Hoshino, K.; Kawai, T.; Sanjo, H.; Takada, H.; Ogawa, T.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity 1999, 11, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kang, J.Y.; Nan, X.; Jin, M.S.; Youn, S.J.; Ryu, Y.H.; Mah, S.; Han, S.H.; Lee, H.; Paik, S.G.; Lee, J.O. Recognition of lipopeptide patterns by Toll-like receptor 2-Toll-like receptor 6 heterodimer. Immunity 2009, 31, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Alexopoulou, L.; Holt, A.C.; Medzhitov, R.; Flavell, R.A. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 2001, 413, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Poltorak, A.; He, X.; Smirnova, I.; Liu, M.Y.; Van Huffel, C.; Du, X.; Birdwell, D.; Alejos, E.; Silva, M.; Galanos, C.; et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: Mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 1998, 282, 2085–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Georgel, P.; Jiang, Z.; Kunz, S.; Janssen, E.; Mols, J.; Hoebe, K.; Bahram, S.; Oldstone, M.B.; Beutler, B. Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G activates a specific antiviral Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway. Virology 2007, 362, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Haynes, L.M.; Moore, D.D.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Finberg, R.W.; Anderson, L.J.; Tripp, R.A. Involvement of toll-like receptor 4 in innate immunity to respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 10730–10737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Popova, L.; Kwinn, L.; Haynes, L.M.; Jones, L.P.; Tripp, R.A.; Walsh, E.E.; Freeman, M.W.; Golenbock, D.T.; Anderson, L.J.; et al. Pattern recognition receptors TLR4 and CD14 mediate response to respiratory syncytial virus. Nat. Immunol. 2000, 1, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hayashi, F.; Smith, K.D.; Ozinsky, A.; Hawn, T.R.; Yi, E.C.; Goodlett, D.R.; Eng, J.K.; Akira, S.; Underhill, D.M.; Aderem, A. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 2001, 410, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gewirtz, A.T.; Navas, T.A.; Lyons, S.; Godowski, P.J.; Madara, J.L. Cutting edge: Bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 1882–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lund, J.M.; Alexopoulou, L.; Sato, A.; Karow, M.; Adams, N.C.; Gale, N.W.; Iwasaki, A.; Flavell, R.A. Recognition of single-stranded RNA viruses by Toll-like receptor 7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5598–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Diebold, S.S.; Kaisho, T.; Hemmi, H.; Akira, S.; Reis e Sousa, C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 2004, 303, 1529–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Heil, F.; Hemmi, H.; Hochrein, H.; Ampenberger, F.; Kirschning, C.; Akira, S.; Lipford, G.; Wagner, H.; Bauer, S. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 2004, 303, 1526–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Hemmi, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Kawai, T.; Kaisho, T.; Sato, S.; Sanjo, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Hoshino, K.; Wagner, H.; Takeda, K.; et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 2000, 408, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, Q.; Raoof, M.; Chen, Y.; Sumi, Y.; Sursal, T.; Junger, W.; Brohi, K.; Itagaki, K.; Hauser, C.J. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature 2010, 464, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hasan, U.; Chaffois, C.; Gaillard, C.; Saulnier, V.; Merck, E.; Tancredi, S.; Guiet, C.; Briere, F.; Vlach, J.; Lebecque, S.; et al. Human TLR10 is a functional receptor, expressed by B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which activates gene transcription through MyD88. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 2942–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Hess, N.J.; Jiang, S.; Li, X.; Guan, Y.; Tapping, R.I. TLR10 Is a B Cell Intrinsic Suppressor of Adaptive Immune Responses. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Fore, F.; Indriputri, C.; Mamutse, J.; Nugraha, J. TLR10 and Its Unique Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Potential Use as a Target in Therapeutics. Immune Netw. 2020, 20, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Marks, K.E.; Cho, K.; Stickling, C.; Reynolds, J.M. Toll-like Receptor 2 in Autoimmune Inflammation. Immune Netw. 2021, 21, e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kawasaki, T.; Kawai, T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Oliveira-Nascimento, L.; Massari, P.; Wetzler, L.M. The Role of TLR2 in Infection and Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Sariol, A.; Perlman, S. SARS-CoV-2 takes its Toll. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 801–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.S.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.; Savani, R.C.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-kappaB pathway. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Choudhury, A.; Mukherjee, S. In silico studies on the comparative characterization of the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein with ACE-2 receptor homologs and human TLRs. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sohn, K.M.; Lee, S.G.; Kim, H.J.; Cheon, S.; Jeong, H.; Lee, J.; Kim, I.S.; Silwal, P.; Kim, Y.J.; Paik, S.; et al. COVID-19 Patients Upregulate Toll-like Receptor 4-mediated Inflammatory Signaling That Mimics Bacterial Sepsis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Li, Y.; Renner, D.M.; Comar, C.E.; Whelan, J.N.; Reyes, H.M.; Cardenas-Diaz, F.L.; Truitt, R.; Tan, L.H.; Dong, B.; Alysandratos, K.D.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 induces double-stranded RNA-mediated innate immune responses in respiratory epithelial-derived cells and cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022643118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Cao, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, H. Extraordinary GU-rich single-strand RNA identified from SARS coronavirus contributes an excessive innate immune response. Microbes Infect. 2013, 15, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Digard, P.; Lee, H.M.; Sharp, C.; Grey, F.; Gaunt, E. Intra-genome variability in the dinucleotide composition of SARS-CoV-2. Virus Evol. 2020, 6, veaa057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Blasius, A.L.; Beutler, B. Intracellular toll-like receptors. Immunity 2010, 32, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Mielcarska, M.B.; Bossowska-Nowicka, M.; Toka, F.N. Cell Surface Expression of Endosomal Toll-Like Receptors-A Necessity or a Superfluous Duplication? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 620972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ioannidis, I.; Ye, F.; McNally, B.; Willette, M.; Flano, E. Toll-like receptor expression and induction of type I and type III interferons in primary airway epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 3261–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kanno, A.; Tanimura, N.; Ishizaki, M.; Ohko, K.; Motoi, Y.; Onji, M.; Fukui, R.; Shimozato, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Shibata, T.; et al. Targeting cell surface TLR7 for therapeutic intervention in autoimmune diseases. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Onji, M.; Kanno, A.; Saitoh, S.; Fukui, R.; Motoi, Y.; Shibata, T.; Matsumoto, F.; Lamichhane, A.; Sato, S.; Kiyono, H.; et al. An essential role for the N-terminal fragment of Toll-like receptor 9 in DNA sensing. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Matsumoto, M.; Kikkawa, S.; Kohase, M.; Miyake, K.; Seya, T. Establishment of a monoclonal antibody against human Toll-like receptor 3 that blocks double-stranded RNA-mediated signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 293, 1364–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Murakami, Y.; Fukui, R.; Motoi, Y.; Kanno, A.; Shibata, T.; Tanimura, N.; Saitoh, S.; Miyake, K. Roles of the cleaved N-terminal TLR3 fragment and cell surface TLR3 in double-stranded RNA sensing. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 5208–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Murakami, Y.; Fukui, R.; Motoi, Y.; Shibata, T.; Saitoh, S.I.; Sato, R.; Miyake, K. The protective effect of the anti-Toll-like receptor 9 antibody against acute cytokine storm caused by immunostimulatory DNA. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lindau, D.; Mussard, J.; Wagner, B.J.; Ribon, M.; Ronnefarth, V.M.; Quettier, M.; Jelcic, I.; Boissier, M.C.; Rammensee, H.G.; Decker, P. Primary blood neutrophils express a functional cell surface Toll-like receptor 9. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 2101–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Russell, C.D.; Millar, J.E.; Baillie, J.K. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet 2020, 395, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Chen, N.; Zhou, M.; Dong, X.; Qu, J.; Gong, F.; Han, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020, 395, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Schijns, V.; Lavelle, E.C. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 disease by controlled modulation of innate immunity. Eur J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 932–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mukherjee, R.; Bhattacharya, A.; Bojkova, D.; Mehdipour, A.R.; Shin, D.; Khan, K.S.; Hei-Yin Cheung, H.; Wong, K.B.; Ng, W.L.; Cinatl, J.; et al. Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 100925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Samimagham, H.R.; Hassani Azad, M.; Haddad, M.; Arabi, M.; Hooshyar, D.; KazemiJahromi, M. The Efficacy of Famotidine in improvement of outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020, 21, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Malone, R.W.; Tisdall, P.; Fremont-Smith, P.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.P.; White, K.M.; Miorin, L.; Moreno, E.; Alon, A.; Delaforge, E.; et al. COVID-19: Famotidine, Histamine, Mast Cells, and Mechanisms. Front. Pharm. 2021, 12, 633680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Hutchinson, M.R.; Rice, K.C.; Yin, H.; Watkins, L.R. Pharmacological characterization of the opioid inactive isomers (+)-naltrexone and (+)-naloxone as antagonists of toll-like receptor 4. Br. J. Pharm. 2016, 173, 856–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Youn, H.S.; Saitoh, S.I.; Miyake, K.; Hwang, D.H. Inhibition of homodimerization of Toll-like receptor 4 by curcumin. Biochem. Pharm. 2006, 72, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Varghese, F.S.; van Woudenbergh, E.; Overheul, G.J.; Eleveld, M.J.; Kurver, L.; van Heerbeek, N.; van Laarhoven, A.; Miesen, P.; den Hartog, G.; de Jonge, M.I.; et al. Berberine and Obatoclax Inhibit SARS-Cov-2 Replication in Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cells In Vitro. Viruses 2021, 13, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhang, B.Y.; Chen, M.; Chen, X.C.; Cao, K.; You, Y.; Qian, Y.J.; Yu, W.K. Berberine reduces circulating inflammatory mediators in patients with severe COVID-19. Br. J. Surg. 2021, 108, e9–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chu, M.; Ding, R.; Chu, Z.Y.; Zhang, M.B.; Liu, X.Y.; Xie, S.H.; Zhai, Y.J.; Wang, Y.D. Role of berberine in anti-bacterial as a high-affinity LPS antagonist binding to TLR4/MD-2 receptor. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Viruses 13 02132 g001 550
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle. Viral entry of SARS-CoV-2 is initiated by the recognition of the host cell receptor ACE2 via the RBD of the S glycoprotein. After binding to host cell receptors, SARS-CoV-2 enters cells by endocytosis or direct fusion with the plasma membrane. The host proteases TMPRSS2 and cathepsins B and L mediate the proteolytic cleavage of the S protein, triggering membrane fusion and viral genome release into the cytoplasm. The RTC carries out viral RNA synthesis in DMVs, and newly produced viral RNAs and proteins are delivered to SMVs for assembly of new viruses. Finally, virions are secreted by exocytosis. This figure was created by BioRender.com accessed on 10 September 2021 (BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle. Viral entry of SARS-CoV-2 is initiated by the recognition of the host cell receptor ACE2 via the RBD of the S glycoprotein. After binding to host cell receptors, SARS-CoV-2 enters cells by endocytosis or direct fusion with the plasma membrane. The host proteases TMPRSS2 and cathepsins B and L mediate the proteolytic cleavage of the S protein, triggering membrane fusion and viral genome release into the cytoplasm. The RTC carries out viral RNA synthesis in DMVs, and newly produced viral RNAs and proteins are delivered to SMVs for assembly of new viruses. Finally, virions are secreted by exocytosis. This figure was created by BioRender.com accessed on 10 September 2021 (BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Viruses 13 02132 g001
Viruses 13 02132 g002 550
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 recognition by Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs are responsible for recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) derived from invading pathogens. Surface TLR2 and TLR4 and intracellular TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9 are thought to be involved in the sensing of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Activated TLRs initiate downstream signaling pathways by recruiting adaptor molecules, such as MyD88 and TRIF, which results in the subsequent production of inflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs through transcription factors NF-κβ and IRFs. This figure was created by BioRender.com accessed on 10 September 2021 (BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 recognition by Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs are responsible for recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) derived from invading pathogens. Surface TLR2 and TLR4 and intracellular TLR3, TLR7/8, and TLR9 are thought to be involved in the sensing of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Activated TLRs initiate downstream signaling pathways by recruiting adaptor molecules, such as MyD88 and TRIF, which results in the subsequent production of inflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs through transcription factors NF-κβ and IRFs. This figure was created by BioRender.com accessed on 10 September 2021 (BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Viruses 13 02132 g002
Table
Table 1. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in humans.
Table 1. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in humans.
TLRsLigandsPrimary
Localization		Adaptor
Molecules		Signaling
Characteristics		Refs.
TLR1Triacyl lipopeptidesCell surfaceMyD88Heterodimerization with TLR2[46]
TLR2Lipoproteins, Zymosan, etcCell surfaceMyD88 [47,48]
TLR3dsRNAIntracellularTRIF [49]
TLR4LPS, Viral envelope glycoproteins, etcCell surfaceMyD88/TRIF [50,51,52,53]
TLR5FlagellinCell surfaceMyD88 [54,55]
TLR6Diacyl lipopeptidesCell surfaceMyD88Heterodimerization with TLR2[48]
TLR7ssRNAIntracellularMyD88 [56,57]
TLR8ssRNAIntracellularMyD88 [58]
TLR9Unmethylated CpG-rich DNA fragment, mtDNAIntracellularMyD88 [59,60]
TLR10UndefinedCell surfaceMyD88 [61,62,63]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, H.E.; Lee, H.K. Current Understanding of the Innate Control of Toll-like Receptors in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112132

AMA Style

Jung HE, Lee HK. Current Understanding of the Innate Control of Toll-like Receptors in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Hi Eun, and Heung Kyu Lee. 2021. "Current Understanding of the Innate Control of Toll-like Receptors in Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop