Next Article in Journal
Net Primary Productivity of Forest Ecosystems in the Southwest Karst Region from the Perspective of Carbon Neutralization
Next Article in Special Issue
Online Measurement of Outline Size for Pinus densiflora Dimension Lumber: Maximizing Lumber Recovery by Minimizing Enclosure Rectangle Fitting Area
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Nutrient Elements on Growth and Expression of Insect-Defense Response Genes in Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Canker Disease on the Machining Properties of Eucalyptus urograndis

by
Rasdianah Dahali
1,
Seng Hua Lee
1,*,
Paridah Md. Tahir
1,*,
Edi Suhaimi Bakar
2,
Adlin Sabrina Muhammad Roseley
1,2,
Siti Aminah Ibrahim
3,
Norwahyuni Mohd Yusof
1 and
Redzuan Mohammad Suffian James
1
1
Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Faculty of Agriculture and Marine Science, Kochi University, 200 Monobe-Otsu, Nankoku 783-8502, Kochi, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(9), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091366
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published: 27 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Wood Cutting and Processing)

Abstract

:
This study assessed the machining properties of 11-year-old Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis, known as E. urograndis wood, that was infected by stem canker disease, Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis. Instead of being discarded directly, the study aimed to explore the possibility of infected trees being used in other applications such as furniture. Sawing, planing, and boring properties as well as the surface roughness of the healthy and infected trees were evaluated. The samples were collected from infected and healthy trees and classified according to the severity of the attack: healthy (class 1), moderately infected (class 2), severely infected (class 3), and very severely infected (class 4). Prior to sawing, planing, and boring, the samples were prepared according to ASTM D 1666-11 Standard Test Methods for Conducting Machining Tests of Wood and Wood-Base Materials. All samples were sawn, planed, and bored and were evaluated for their respective machining quality. The surface roughness of the machined samples was also assessed. Overall, E. urograndis of different infection severity has very good machining properties ranging from Grade I to III. Fuzzy grain, chip grain, chip mark, and tear out are the most commonly seen physical defects. As for surface roughness, healthy trees have lower surface roughness compared to that of infected trees, which indicates a better surface quality. The findings of this study suggested that infected E. urograndis can still be used in many applications. The results of this study will provide us with better knowledge about the machining performance of disease-infected E. urograndis wood and its possibilities to be used as raw material for the wood products industry.

1. Introduction

Commercial natural wood has excellent physical, mechanical, and aesthetic properties, and it is widely used in markets worldwide. However, the supply of these natural wood species is dwindling, and prices are skyrocketing, indicating a supply–demand imbalance. Plantation forests were established in an effort to reduce reliance on natural round logs from natural forests and as a strategy to address the issue of scarcity [1]. It was expanded after it was discovered that these plantations had the potential to meet the entire world’s wood needs [2,3,4].
In Malaysia, forestry sectors and investors have launched a commercial planting programme of selected fast-growing species to ensure a steady supply of wood. Neolamarckia cadamba [5] or kelempayan (laran), Paraserianthes falcataria (batai), and Eucalyptus spp. were among the native and exotic species planted under this programme [6,7]. Eucalyptus is the most widely planted broad-leaved tree species globally, covering over 20 million ha worldwide [8]. The planting programme was prompted in part by a recent outbreak of Ceratocystis spp. wilt disease, which killed 10 to 20% of plantation tree species, particularly Acacias [9]. In response to this situation, planters in Sabah and Sarawak switched to Eucalyptus species such as E. pellita F. Muell and Eucalyptus hybrid in areas previously planted with Acacias. Both species have been well accepted as plantation species, with a total of 11,000 ha and 28,090 ha of Eucalyptus hybrid and E. pellita plantations established in Sabah and Sarawak by the end of 2015 [9]. The previously introduced E. hybrids from Southern China were successfully trial planted as pilot plantations in various parts of Sabah, with the oldest stands dating back to 2008 in Sabah Softwoods Berhad, Tawau. According to Arnold et al. [10], the hybrid clone created by crossing E. urophylla S.T. Blake and E. grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and has been widely accepted and planted in plantations due to its stability and other superiorities such as growth, high survival rate, and adaptability [11,12].
Previously, there have been no reports of disease in Malaysian Eucalyptus plantations, indicating a general lack of knowledge about Eucalyptus diseases in the country. However, in mid-2014, stem cankers disease caused by Cryphonectriaceae was reported for the first time. Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Gryzenh. and M. J. Wingf. were found on the bark of E. grandis trees in the Sipitang and Tawau plantation regions of Sabah, Malaysia [13]. The findings showed that C. deuterocubensis has been identified as a pathogenesis of Eucalyptus species and is a potential threat to plantation forestry in Sabah. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the machining properties of 11-years old E. urograndis coming from the Sabah Softwoods plantation site infected by C. deuterocubensis. In order to determine its suitability and potential usage, the effect of the severity of class infection on machining properties was an important matter to be considered. Machining properties describe how wood behaves when planed, shaped, turned, or subjected to any other standard woodworking operation. Machining properties are important for wood and wooden products [14,15]. Equally significant is the machined surface roughness, which serves as one of the primary indicators of the quality of the machined wooden materials [16]. Additionally, the efficacy of glueing and coating, as well as the aesthetic value of timber materials, were strongly influenced by their surface roughness [17].
In general, wood is simple to cut, shape, and fasten. For some applications, the difference in machinability between woods is negligible; for others, such as furniture and fixtures, the smoothness and ease with which woods can be worked may be the most important of all properties. Unless a wood is machined reasonably well and easily, it is not economically suitable for such uses, regardless of its other qualities. Nevertheless, little information regarding the properties of the Eucalyptus hybrid is currently known, especially its machining properties [18,19]. Wood with good machining properties could be used in industrial applications of high-value-added products [20]. An earlier study by Rasdianah et al. [21] showed that E. urograndis wood that was only mildly infected by C. deuterocubensis still showed potential for use in furniture and other non-structural applications rather than being rejected immediately. Therefore, instead of being discarded directly, this study aimed to examine the machining properties of E. urograndis wood with several infection intensities. The results of this study will provide us with better knowledge about the machining performance of disease-infected E. urograndis wood and its possibilities to be used as raw material for the wood products industry.

2. Materials and Methods

The infected Eucalyptus hybrids clone used in this study was identified as E. urophylla × E. grandis, which is of Chinese origin and is known as E. urograndis. The plot used in this study was an 11-year-old E. urograndis plantation plot in Block 38 C (4°33′16.3″ N, 117°42′58.7″ E), Sabah Softwoods Berhad, Tawau, Malaysia. Based on the appearing symptom during infection, the trees were divided into four classes of the severity of infection (Table 1) as reported in a previous study [21]. The infected trees were identified by the appearance of canker signs on their stems. The trees were chosen based on a rubric of stem canker symptoms that was created prior to sampling. Table 1 shows how selected trees were visually examined to determine their symptoms and severity, and then classified into severity classes. Due to the limited number of infected trees in the plot, only two trees from each infection class were felled. At a height of 15 cm above ground, eight trees were felled. The remaining logs were not analysed because they had very few to no defects. The logs were then numbered and end coated before being transported to a processing workshop for further analysis. The eight trees felled for this study yielded a total of 40 billets. Using a live sawing technique and a Wood-Mizer twin vertical saw with a bank of four horizontal resaws (Wood-Mizer Europe, Koło, Poland), four to five 28 mm-thick boards were cut from each billet. Prior to air drying, the initial moisture content of the boards was determined. The boards were air dried in the shade at an average temperature of 32 °C and relative humidity (RH) of 82% until they reached a moisture content of 20%. Following air drying, the board was planed and ripped to a final dimension (20 mm thick × 102 mm wide × 910 mm long) for sawing, planing, and boring evaluation.

2.1. Evaluation of Machining Properties

The sample preparation and testing procedures were carried out in accordance with the ASTM D 1666-11 standard [22], with some minor modifications. Because of limited wood and resources, the standard has been modified and the dimension has been reduced. The tests were carried out at the Wood Technology Workshop at Universiti Putra Malaysia in Serdang, Selangor. For each severity class and type of machining test, a total of 30 samples were used. Before each machining test, all samples were kept in a conditioning room that was kept at 20 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 65% ± 2% until they reached an equilibrium moisture content (EMC) of 12%. Following testing, the machining quality of each individual sample was visually examined and graded using the ASTM D 1666-11 standard [22]. The surface qualities were classified into five quality grades based on the degree of defects (%) and the impact of defects, as shown in Table 2. Fuzzy grain, chip grain, chip mark, and tear out were observed as defects in this study. The integral weighted method was used to compare the quality of every sample from four class infections on each machining property: The I, II, III, IV, and V of quality grades received 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and 1 point, respectively. The surface roughness was tested according to the ISO 4288 standard [23].

2.1.1. Sawing Quality Assessment

The samples were cut using a panel saw machine (Altendorf F45, Remscheid, German) (Figure 1) fitted with a tungsten carbide tipped (TCT) circular saw. The TCT circular saw has a 300 mm diameter, a bore size of 30 mm, a cutting width of 3.2 mm, and the number of teeth was 72 with alternate tooth bevel to prevent snatching in crosscut applications for exceptionally clean cutting results. The cutting direction was across the grain at 4000 rpm, and the feeding speed was about 2.4 m/s. Samples from each infection class were cut using a new circular saw blade. The samples were then compared and graded visually for qualitative qualities. A visual examination for each testing sample was performed and expressed in a percentage based on the defect-free surface and graded based on five visual examinations as shown in Table 3. For the sawing test, the cuts of wood were graded visually based on the roughness of the edge surface such as the occurrence of fuzzy grain and tear out.

2.1.2. Planing Quality Assessment

All the samples were tested using a thickness planer to assess their planing performance. The planing test was carried out using a standard single-faced planing machine (Sanjui SA16, Taichung, Taiwan) equipped with a 40 cm long cutterhead with four knives at a 27° cutting angle attached (Figure 2). The rotational speed of the cutterhead was 5500 revolutions per minute (RPM). All samples were planed twice with a 2 mm depth of cut at a feed rate of 18 m/min. Only the second planing was utilised for observation, with the first planing being excluded. This was to ensure that all the samples were in the same condition. The planed samples were marked to identify their planed surface. New knives were used for these tests and knives were freshly sharpened every time to start planed samples from other class of severity to minimize the knife blunting effects. The samples were planed along the grain and run butt to butt to eliminate the possibility of a defect, such as a burn mark caused by overheating of the knife edge. The samples were then assessed visually for defects. The defect types and defectives-free area were recorded. Samples were graded based on the presence of fuzzy grain, chip grain and chip mark. The defective areas of the planed sample were assessed using the planimeter and graded based on percentages of the defect-free area. The percentages of the defected areas were obtained using Equation (1):
Defected area, (%) = 100 (Wi − Wf)/Wi
where, Wi is the total area of the surface (mm), and Wf is the defective area (mm) for each sample.

2.1.3. Boring Quality Assessment

A single-spindle electric boring machine (JK-BD-25, Gujarat, India) as shown in Figure 3 was used for this test. The machine was fitted with a TCT Forstner type bit, and the bits are all new. Two holes were bored across the grain in the same sample with a brad point bit with a diameter of 25 mm. The spindle rotation was set at 900 RPM as bigger diameter holes required less speed and a feed rate of 0.6 m/min. Four holes were bored across the grain for each sample. A smooth board was set under the samples to ensure that they were closely touching. The boring properties of different infection classes were evaluated based on the examination of the holes. Transverse and lateral faces of each hole were visually examined for the smoothness of the cut and the defect that was present during the bore is recorded. Surfaces were evaluated for fuzzy grain and tear out and were rated on a grade scale of I to V. The results of the boring properties were expressed as a percentage.

2.1.4. Surface Roughness Test

Surface roughness testing (Figure 4) was conducted on all the samples after the machining test (sawing, planing, and boring). The test is carried out by using the portable contact stylus tracing method (Profilometer TR-220, Shandong, China). This device was operated for obtaining the roughness data according to the ISO 4288 standard [23] and a study by Redzuan et al. [27] with the specifications specified in Table 3. The tool had a measurement speed of 0.1 mm/s, a pin diameter of 2 m, and a pin top angle of 90°, respectively. The parameters measured were maximum roughness depth (Rmax), mean peak-to-valley height (Rz), and average surface roughness (Ra). For sawing, planing, and boring, readings were taken perpendicular to the direction of the grain using tracing lengths of 4 mm, 4 mm, and 12.5 mm, respectively. Each sample underwent five random measurements.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed and interpreted using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in order to assess the impact of infection classes on the machining characteristics of the wood. The difference between the mean values of each severity class was tested using Duncan’s multiple range (DMR) test at p < 0.05. All statistical evaluations were performed using SPSS version 22.0. (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sawing Properties

Sawing is the first step in the machining process in the woodworking industry. Defect-free surfaces are commonly used to assess the quality of wood surfaces produced during the sawing process [28,29]. Table 4 and Table 5 summarises the effects of infection classes (healthy, moderate, severe, and very severe) on the sawing properties of the 11-year-old E. urograndis. In the sawing test of E. urograndis, the most noticeable defects were fuzzy grain and tear out, with the fuzzy grain being more dominant. The presence of a group of standing fibres causes fuzzy grain (not cut perfectly). This is due to the presence of reaction wood [30]. Meanwhile, tear out occurs most frequently when the blade exits the stock and breaks rather than cuts the wood fibres [31]. As a result of this breakage, the majority of the tear out occurs only at the underside, back edge, and corners of the wood (Figure 5). The sawing quality of the class 1 sample (84.04% defect-free area) is slightly better. The defective area did not differ significantly between classes 1, 2, and 3. However, when compared to other classes, the defective area of class 4 wood was significantly higher (23.33% defective area). Therefore, classes 1, 2, and 3 of wood were classified as grade I, while class 4 was classified as grade II.

3.2. Planing Properties

Table 6 and Figure 6 summarises the obtained defect-free values and quality classes based on the planing process. The samples defect-free surface area is related to the machining defects that appear during the planing process. The proportion of defects for each severity classes was not obvious, as class 1 is 83.60% defect-free. Meanwhile, the infected class 2, 3, and 4, respectively, has 78.90, 76.93, and 71.71% defect-free area. In all wood classes, the largest defect is chip mark followed by chip grain. Fuzzy grains also existed but to a much lesser extent. Another plausible reason for this observation is because classes 2, 3, and 4 contain kino pockets and gummosis [32], causing the wood to withstand the force from the blade during blade exit. The defects also could be caused by feed speed, which plays an important role in processing. High feed speed can cause a poor surface, especially for hardwood [33].
The test results show that the test samples from class 1 are significantly better than class 4 samples, with class 4 recording a higher degree of defect (28.29%). Wood class 4 had a higher defect rate, with three samples in grade III and four samples in grade V out of 30 samples tested as depicted in Table 7. Overall, 10 of the 30 samples were in grade I, while 13 were in grade II. From Table 6 and Table 7, the overall planing quality of class 1 wood falls into grade I—very good quality. Meanwhile, all infected wood classes 2, 3, and 4 fell in grade II. This shows the planing surface of the infected classes 2, 3, and 4 wood has a low magnitude of defect. According to MTIB [34], Eucalyptus wood is relatively easy to plan and produce a smooth surface where, less vibration and noise is emitted by the planer during the cut, but the quality of planing is very much dependent on its density [35,36] and how severe the wood was infected. According to [21], the densities of classes 1, 2, 3, and 4 are 670.8 kg/m3, 618.9 kg/m3, 706.8 kg/m3, and 542.3 kg/m3, respectively; those with higher densities (Classes 1, 2 and 3) perform better than those with lower densities (Class 4).

3.3. Boring Properties

Fuzzy grain and tear cut are the defects that appear in the boring test shown in Table 8 and Figure 7. Meanwhile, the total number of samples in each grade of healthy and infection classes are summarized in Table 9.
The most common defect was tear cut, which ranged from 9.75 to 13.44%, followed by fuzzy grain, which ranged from 7.43 to 11.75%. Based on Abdurrachman criteria [24], which classify the grade of the machined surface based on the percentage of defective areas, it can be seen that E. urograndis wood shows very good and good boring quality as it falls into grade I to grade II with a defect-free surface percentage range of 82.82%–74.81%. Belleville et al. [37] and Gupta et al. [38] observed that the denser species of eucalyptus showed better boring performances than lighter timbers. This result is in the line with finding by MTIB [34], as the boring process of Eucalyptus sp was easy to handle and produce a fairly smooth surface. Sitinjak [36] added that the presence of broken fibers occurs during the machining process as the surface of the wood sample is forcibly removed. This happens presumably because the drill bit is blunt. In contrast to the process of sawing and planing, the condition of the wood before boring also greatly affects the final result. This is thought to be because the mechanism and direction of the cut in the boring process are slightly different from the two processes. Boring is commonly used in the manufacture of chairs, furniture, and other hardwood products that use dowels, spindles, rungs, and screws for the wood structure joint. The bored hole should be round without any noticeable distortion and the inner surface should be smooth for good glue bonding.
Stem canker diseases are common in trees under stress. Damage occurs when opportunistic, living (biotic), infectious pathogens (fungi or bacteria) enter a wound during a time of tree stress, such as transplant shock, drought, or winter injury. Other stress agents that provide opportunities for canker diseases include prolonged exposure to extremely high or low temperatures, flooding, summer or winter sunscald, hail, high winds, nutritional imbalances, soil compaction, mechanical injuries (lawn mower, vehicles), animal damage, pruning wounds, root rot, insect borers, and improper planting. Most cankers are caused by fungi, which invade bark tissue on current season wood. Plants do not have immune systems like animals. Instead, they have evolved an entirely different way of dealing with infections. In trees, this process is known as the compartmentalization of decay in trees or “CODIT” [39]. Trees have an amazing ability to generate new cells. However, they do not have the ability to repair the damage. Instead, trees respond to disease and injury by walling it off from their living tissues. This involves three distinct processes. The first of these has to do with minimizing the spread of damage. Trees accomplish this by strengthening the walls between cells. Essentially, this begins the process of isolating whatever may be harming the living tissues. This is done via chemical means. In living sapwood, it is the result of changes in the chemical environment within each cell. In heartwood, enzymatic changes work on the structure of the already deceased cells. Though the process is still poorly understood, these chemical changes are surprisingly similar to the process of tanning leather. Compounds like tannic and gallic acids are created, which protect tissues from further decay. They also result in a discoloration of the surrounding wood. The second step in the CODIT process involves the construction of new walls around the damaged area. This is where the real compartmentalization process begins. The cambium layer changes the types of cells it produces around the area so that it blocks that compartment off from the surrounding vascular tissues. These new cells also exhibit highly altered metabolisms so that they begin to produce even more compounds that help resist and hopefully stave off the spread of whatever microbes may be causing the injury. Many of the defects seen in wood products are the result of these changes [40]. Another study by Paiman et al. [41] using a natural regeneration (non-stressed) and planted (stressed) Acacia mangium × A. auriculiformis hybrid observed that non-stressed wood produced a smoother surface cut than stressed wood. This finding was similar to Tan [42] who found that the sawing process of stressed wood produced a rougher surface than non-stressed wood. Stressed and non-stressed wood tend to have different wood qualities as a result of different fibre lengths and wall thicknesses caused by different growth conditions [43].

3.4. Surface Roughness

For surface roughness, Ra is the average roughness of a surface while Rz is the difference between the tallest peak and the deepest valley in the surface. As presented in Table 10, the sawn, bored, and planed E. urograndis wood showed a similar trend in surface roughness as samples from class 1 (healthy) and class 2 (moderate) has lower Ra values than that of class 3 and 4, implying a better surface quality of the former classes. However, Rz values displayed an inconsistent trend whereas, for sawing, the Rz value decreased as the severity classes increased. Meanwhile, for boring, the Rz values increased as the severity classes increased. On the other hand, severity class 3 has the lowest Rz value for planing. Lower Ra and Rz values are advantageous since they improve paint performance and need less paint to cover a smooth surface [44]. Overall, planing resulted in higher average surface roughness (Ra) compared to that of sawing and boring as planed samples displayed a higher percentage of the defective area (16.40 to 28.29%, see Table 6) such as chip mark, chipped grain, and fuzzy grain that existed on the surface after being planed. Statistical analyses for machinability characteristics (Table 10) show that both planing and boring tests are significantly different (p > 0.05) between infection classes. The surface roughness of sawn samples did not differ significantly within infection classes.
A study by Gunduz et al. [40] reported that the surface of Chestnut disease (Cryphonectria parasitica) infected Castanea sativa Mill. wood has a rougher surface than healthy ones. The authors observed that the physiological and cambial activities of the infected part of the trees were slowed down by the Chestnut disease. Although the shapes of the vessel elements are still intact, the transverse section of the infected wood has vessels with smaller lengths and diameters as well as frequency. Through examining the morphologies of the fibre cells, fibres of infected wood showed abnormal formation. Additionally, bifurcations and other abnormal structures were seen at the extremities of the infected wood’s fibres. Additionally, bifurcations and other abnormal structures were seen at the extremities of the infected wood’s fibres, most likely brought on by the fungus’s stress-induced increase in anticlinal divisions in the vascular cambium. In addition, the authors also found various sizes of the parenchyma cells by light microscope images using SEM/EDX on the tangential sections of the infected wood, and in some of the parenchyma cells, starch grains were observed. As a result of this observation, the surface was found to be smooth in healthy wood, while some granular formation was observed on the infected wood as a result of the activity of the pathogen. As stated by Tulik et al. [45], this phenomenon can also be seen in compression wood in gymnosperms as a result of developmental processes. Some would be pondering that the infected wood might then have a coarser surface as a result, which might make processing the wood more difficult. However, it should be noted that these formations have no impact on the wood’s economic worth because they are incredibly uncommon and easy to remove [40].

4. Conclusions

Generally, wood samples from class 1 produced a cleaner and smoother surface than infected samples from classes 2, 3, and 4. However, the difference in the severity of class infection did not give significantly different results toward the sawing, planing, and boring quality, as the lowest grade that was attained, was grade III (average). The machining properties of all the samples are excellent and within the grade range of I to III. Therefore, this research confirmed that the infected medium-density plantation-grown of E. urograndis can perform well during sawing, planing, and boring processes. According to the machining properties results, the infected E. urograndis can be used in many applications. One method of preventing disease spread in plantations or forests is to remove the infected trees. To make these methods/scenarios useful, these logs can be utilized to produce high-quality timber for furniture, ships, wooden buildings, and musical instruments. Heat treatment may be recommended in order to improve the dimensional stability, durability, and, in particular, sterilisation of timber obtained from infected trees.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M.T., E.S.B., and A.S.M.R.; Methodology, E.S.B., P.M.T., R.D., S.A.I., N.M.Y., and R.M.S.J.; Formal Analysis, R.D. and S.H.L.; Investigation, R.D., S.A.I., N.M.Y., and R.M.S.J.; Data Curation, R.D., P.M.T., and S.A.I.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.D., S.H.L., and A.S.M.R.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.D., S.H.L., and P.M.T.; Supervision, S.H.L., P.M.T., A.S.M.R.; Project Administration, P.M.T.; Funding Acquisition, P.M.T. and S.H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Trans-disciplinary Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (TRGS 2018-1), Reference code: TRGS/1/2018/UPM/01/2/3 (vote number: 5535800) by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia.

Data Availability Statement

Not accessible.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Sabah Softwoods Berhad (SSB) staff and management for providing the wood materials and to the Institute of Tropical forestry and Forest Products and Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia for the facilities and assistance provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. Global Forest resources assessment 2015. In How Are the World’s Forests Changing? 2nd ed.; Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2016; p. 56. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4793e.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  2. Fenning, T.M.; Gershenzon, J. Where will the wood come from? Plantation forests and the role of biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siry, J.P.; Cubbage, F.W.; Ahmed, M.R. Sustainable Forest management: Global trends and opportunities. For. Policy Econ. 2003, 7, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cabalova, I.; Vybohova, E.; Igaz, R.; Kristak, L.; Kack, F.; Antov, P.; Papadopoulos, A.N. Effect of oxidizing thermal modification on the chemical properties and thermal conductivity of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) wood. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, Z.Y. Evaluating the Growth Performance of 4-year-old Neolamarckia cadamba in Malaysia. Planter 2012, 88, 100–107. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmad, Z.Y. Planting of Eucalyptus in Malaysia. Acta Sci. Agric. 2020, 4, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmad, Z.Y.; Hassan, N.H.; Loon, N.T.; Heng, L.H.; Zorkarnain, F.A. Comparing the early growth performance of plantation–grown Eucalyptus hybrid and Eucalyptus pellita, South Johore, Peninsular Malaysia. WJARR 2020, 6, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, S.H.; Lum, W.C.; Antov, P.; Kristak, L.; Paridah, M.T. Engineering wood products from Eucalyptus spp. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8000780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wong, S.K.; Ahmad, Z.Y.; Charles, G.D.C.; Peter, K.C.S. Recommending Eucalyptus Species for Soft Loan Financing; Working Paper Presented at the 1st Technical Meeting on Forest Plantation Programme; Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB): Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arnold, R.; Xie, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, S.; Apeng, D.U.; Luo, J. Advances in eucalypt research in China. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2017, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Van den Berg, G.J.; Verryn, S.D.; Chirwa, P.W.; Van Deventer, F. Realised genetic gains and estimated genetic parameters of two Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla hybrid breeding strategies. South. For. J. For. Sci. 2018, 80, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Melesse, S.F.; Zewotir, T. Variation in growth potential between hybrid clones of Eucalyptus trees in eastern South Africa. J. For. Resour. 2017, 28, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rauf, M.R.B.A.; McTaggart, A.R.; Marincowitz, S.; Barnes, I.; Japarudin, Y.; Wingfield, M.J. Pathogenicity of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis and Myrtoporthe bodenii gen. et sp. nov. on Eucalyptus in Sabah, Malaysia. Australas Plant Pathol. 2020, 49, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, R.; He, C.; Xu, W.; Wang, X. Modeling and optimizing the specific cutting energy of medium density fiberboard during the helical up-milling process. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kminiak, R.; Siklienka, M.; Igaz, R.; Krišťák, Ľ.; Gergeľ, T.; Němec, M.; Réh, R.; Očkajová, A.; Kučerka, M. Effect of cutting conditions on quality of milled surface of medium-density fibreboards. BioResources 2020, 15, 746–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, R.; Yao, Q.; Xu, W.; Li, J.; Wang, X. Study of Cutting Power and Power Efficiency during Straight-Tooth Cylindrical Milling Process of Particle Boards. Materials 2022, 15, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, R.; Yang, F.; Wang, X. Modeling and Predicting the Machined Surface Roughness and Milling Power in Scot’s Pine Helical Milling Process. Machines 2022, 10, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rokeya, U.K.; Akter, H.M.; Rowson, A.M.; Paul, S.P. Physical and mechanical properties of (Acacia auriculiformis × A. mangium) hybrid Acacia. J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 2010, 34, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jusoh, I.; Zaharin, F.A.; Adam, N.S. Wood quality of Acacia hybrid and second-generation Acacia mangium. BioResources 2014, 9, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ruiz, A.F.; Gonzalez, P.; Hernandez, V.J.I.; Romero, M.A.; Fuentes, M.S. Mechanical properties of wood of two Mexican oaks: Relationship to selected physical properties. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2018, 76, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dahali, R.; Md Tahir, P.; Roseley, A.S.M.; Hua, L.S.; Bakar, E.S.; Ashaari, Z.; Abdul Rauf, M.R.; Zainuddin, N.A.; Mansoor, N.S. Influence of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Canker Disease on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Eucalyptus urograndis. Forests 2021, 12, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). ASTM D 1666-11; Standard Test Methods for Conducting Machining Tests of Wood and Wood-Based Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011.
  23. ISO 4288; Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS). Surface Texture. Profile Method. Rules and Procedures for The Assessment of Surface Texture. British Standards Institute: London, UK, 1996.
  24. Abdulrachman, A.J.; Karnasudirdja, S. Sifat Permesinan Kayu-Kayu Indonesia. Lap. BPHH 1982, 160, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ginoga, B. Sifat Pemesinan Enam Jenis Kayu Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan dan Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan. Badan Penelit. Pengemb. Kehutan. Bogor. 1995, 13, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sucipto, T. Pengerjaan Kayu dan Sifat Pemesinan Kayu; Universitas Sumatera Utara, Digital Library: Medan, Indonesia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  27. Redzuan, M.S.J.; Paridah, M.T.; Anwar, U.M.K.; Juliana, A.H.; Lee, S.H.; Norwahyuni, M.Y. Effects of surface pretreatment on wettability of Acacia mangium wood. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2019, 31, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Davis, E.M. Machining and Related Characteristics of United States Hardwoods. Technical Bulletin No. 1267; Wood Technologist, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1962; pp. 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  29. Siswanto, N. Sifat-Sifat Pemesinan Kayu Pilang (Acacia leucophloea Willd) Dibandingkan dengan Kayu Gmelina (Gmelina arborea Roxb) dan Mangium (Acacia mangium Willd). Skripsi Fak. Kehutanan. Inst. Pertan. Bogor. Bogor. 2002; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  30. Roger, R. Sifat Pemesinan Kayu Ekaliptus; Program Studi Kehutanan Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sumatera Utara: Medan, Indonesia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gearson, F. How to Prevent Tearout on A Table Saw in Hobbies. 2002. Available online: http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.Cgi?C=2298287 (accessed on 12 May 2022).
  32. Wong, T.C.; Chan, C.S.; Ting, K.B.; Khairul, M. Chapter 4: Sawing and Machining. In Testing Methods for Plantation Grown Tropical Timbers; Tan, Y.E., Lim, N.P.T., Gan, K.S., Wong, T.C., Lim, S.C., Thilagawaty, M., Eds.; FRIM: Selangor, Malaysia, 2010; pp. 45–78. [Google Scholar]
  33. Malkocoglu, A.; Ozdemir, T. The machining properties of some hardwoods and softwoods naturally grown in Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2006, 173, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Malaysian Timber Industrial Board (MTIB). Medium Hardwood Eucalyptus. In 100 Malaysian Timbers-2010 Edition; Malaysian Timber Industry Board: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2010; pp. 132–133. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamzah, N.N.; Bakar, E.S.; Ashaari, Z.; Hua, L.S. Assessment of oil palm wood quality improvement through integrated treatment process as function of sawing pattern and slab thickness. J. Oil Palm Res. 2017, 29, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sitinjak, H. Sifat Pemesinan Kayu Kemiri (Aleurites moluccana Willd); Skripsi Departemen Kehutanan, Universitas Sumatera Utara: Medan, Indonesia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Belleville, B.; Ashley, P.; Ozarska, B. Wood machining properties of Australian plantation-grown Eucalypts. Maderas.-Cienc. Tecnol. 2016, 18, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gupta, S.; Singh, C.P.; Kishan-Kumar, V.S.; Shukla, S. Machining properties of Melia dubia wood. Maderas. Cienc. Tecnol. 2019, 21, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shortle, W.D.; Dudzik, K.R. Wood Decay in Living and Dead Trees: A Pictorial Overview; United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Research Station: Nashville, TN, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gunduz, G.; Oral, M.A.; Akyuz, M.; Aydemir, D.; Yaman, B.; Asik, N.; Bulbul, A.S.; Allahverdiyev, A. Physical, Morphological Properties and Raman Spectroscopy of Chestnut Blight Diseased Castanea Sativa Mill. Wood. CERNE 2016, 22, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paiman, B.; Lee, S.H.; Zaidon, A. Machining properties of natural regeneration and planted Acacia Mangium × A. Auriculiformis hybrid. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2018, 30, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tan, W.S. Machining Properties of Stressed and Non-Stressed Wood of H. brasiliensis, A. mangium and A. auriculiformis. BSc Dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  43. Naji, H.R.; Bakar, E.S.; Sahri, M.H.; Soltani, M.; Hamid, H.A.; Ebadi, S.E. Variation in mechanical properties of two rubberwood clones in relation to planting densities. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2014, 26, 503–512. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lubis, M.A.R.; Park, B.D.; Lee, S.M. Performance of hybrid adhesives of blocked-pMDI/melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins for the surface lamination on plywood. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tulik, M. Cambial history of Scots pine trees (Pinus sylvestris) prior and after the Chernobyl accident as encoded in the xylem. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2001, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Panel saw machine.
Figure 1. Panel saw machine.
Forests 13 01366 g001
Figure 2. Thickness planer machine used for planing testing.
Figure 2. Thickness planer machine used for planing testing.
Forests 13 01366 g002
Figure 3. Single-spindle electric boring machine used in this trial.
Figure 3. Single-spindle electric boring machine used in this trial.
Forests 13 01366 g003
Figure 4. Surface roughness tester.
Figure 4. Surface roughness tester.
Forests 13 01366 g004
Figure 5. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after sawing test; (ac); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (d) fuzzy grain and (e,f); tear out signifies low quality (lower).
Figure 5. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after sawing test; (ac); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (d) fuzzy grain and (e,f); tear out signifies low quality (lower).
Forests 13 01366 g005
Figure 6. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after planing test; (a,b); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (c) fuzzy grain, (d,e); chipped grain and (f); chip mark surface cut signifies low quality (lower).
Figure 6. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after planing test; (a,b); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (c) fuzzy grain, (d,e); chipped grain and (f); chip mark surface cut signifies low quality (lower).
Forests 13 01366 g006
Figure 7. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after boring test; (ac); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (d) fuzzy grain, (e); tear out and (f); smoothness signifies low quality (lower).
Figure 7. Surface quality of healthy and infected E. urograndis wood samples after boring test; (ac); clean surface cut signifies acceptable quality (upper) while unclean (d) fuzzy grain, (e); tear out and (f); smoothness signifies low quality (lower).
Forests 13 01366 g007
Table 1. Classes of severity for Eucalyptus urograndis infected with Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis a.
Table 1. Classes of severity for Eucalyptus urograndis infected with Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis a.
ClassCategorySymptom
1HealthyStem appears normal without any symptom of being infected
2ModerateSwollen bark (callus)
Cracking
Fruiting structure
Fresh kino pocket
Canker
3SevereSwollen bark (callus)
Cracking
Fruiting structure
Fresh kino pocket and fresh kino/gummosis
Canker
Sunken
Rotten
4Very severeSwollen bark (callus)
Cracking
Fruiting structure
Dried kino pocket and dried kino/gummosis
Canker
Sunken
Rotten
Shoots
a Adapted with permission from Rasdianah et al. [21].
Table 2. Grading quality of wood machining properties [24,25,26].
Table 2. Grading quality of wood machining properties [24,25,26].
Quality GradeMachining QualityDefect Free Area (%)
IVery good (no defects)81–100
IIGood (few slight defects which can be eliminated by light sanding)61–80
IIIFair (lots of slight defects, some obvious defects which can be eliminated by sanding)41–60
IVPoor (serious defects (deep and big) which are hard to eliminate)21–40
VVery poor (very serious defects and prohibited to use)0–20
Table 3. Specification of stylus tracing.
Table 3. Specification of stylus tracing.
Tracing DirectionAcross the Grain
Tracing speed0.1 mm/s
Cut off length0.8 mm (sawing and boring), and 2.5 mm (planing)
Stylus tip radius2 µm
Stylus tip angle90°
Tracing length4 mm (sawing and boring), and 12.5 mm (planing)
Table 4. Sawing performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Table 4. Sawing performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Defect TypesValueInfection Classesp-Value
1
(Healthy)
2
(Moderate)
3
(Severe)
4
(Very Severe)
Defect-free area (%)Mean 184.04 b81.35 b83.88 b76.67 a0.001 ***
SD5.856.688.2910.01
Defective area (%)Mean15.96 a18.65 a16.11 a23.33 b0.001 ***
SD5.856.688.2910.01
Fuzzy grain (%)Mean8.57 a10.11 ab9.60 ab12.77 b 0.064
SD4.976.286.976.46
Tearout (%)Mean7.39 a8.54 ab6.51 a10.57 b 0.002 **
SD2.693.333.326.17
Notes: Defect types according to ASTM D 1666-11 standard [16]. 1 Means followed by the same letter a, b in the same column is not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan multiple range test. ** high significance (p < 0.01); *** very high significance (p < 0.001).
Table 5. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in sawing test.
Table 5. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in sawing test.
Infection ClassesGrade I
(Very Good)
Grade II
(Good)
Grade III
(Fair)
Grade IV
(Poor)
Grade V
(Very Poor)
1 (Healthy)228000
2 (Moderate)1910100
3 (Severe)226200
4 (Very severe)1511400
Table 6. Planing performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Table 6. Planing performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Defect TypesValueInfection Classes
1
(Healthy)
2
(Moderate)
3
(Severe)
4
(Very Severe)
p-Value
Defect-free area (%)Mean 183.60 b78.90 ab76.93 ab71.71 a0.011 **
SD10.4214.7513.3915.81
Defective area (%)Mean16.40 a21.00 ab23.07 ab28.29 b0.011 **
SD10.4214.7513.3915.81
Fuzzy grain (%)Mean1.20 a1.12 a1.30 a2.05 a0.286
SD1.931.921.832.53
Chip grain (%)Mean4.91 a8.00 ab8.22 ab10.42 c 0.093
SD5.349.327.5010.44
Chip mark (%)Mean10.29 a11.98 a13.56 a15.82 a 0.279
SD8.0512.9911.2112.41
Notes: Defect types according to ASTM D 1666-11 standard [16]. 1 Means followed by the same letter a, b, c in the same column is not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan multiple range test. ** high significance (p < 0.01).
Table 7. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in planing test.
Table 7. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in planing test.
Infection ClassesGrade I
(Very Good)
Grade II
(Good)
Grade III
(Fair)
Grade IV
(Poor)
Grade V
(Very Poor)
1 (Healthy)253200
2 (Moderate)1314210
3 (Severe)189120
4 (Very severe)1013340
Note. Grade I = 81%–100%; Grade II = 61%–80%; Grade III = 41%–60%; Grade IV = 21%–40%; Grade V = 0%–20%.
Table 8. Boring performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Table 8. Boring performance of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis.
Defect TypesValueInfection Classesp-Value
1
(Healthy)
2
(Moderate)
3
(Severe)
4
(Very Severe)
Defect-free area (%)Mean 182.82 c81.30 bc77.26 ab74.81 a0.001 ***
SD6.588.659.478.25
Defective area (%)Mean17.80 a18.70 ab22.74 bc25.19 c0.001 ***
SD6.588.659.478.25
Fuzzy grain (%)Mean7.43 a8.90 ab10.58 b11.75 b 0.027 **
SD2.976.517.645.08
Tearout (%)Mean9.75 a9.80 a12.17 b13.44 b0.001 ***
SD4.493.403.304.94
Notes. Defect types according to ASTM D 1666-11 standard [16]. 1 Means followed by the same letter a, b, c in the same column is not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Dun- can multiple range test. ** high significance (p < 0.01); *** very high significance (p < 0.001).
Table 9. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in boring test.
Table 9. Machining grade of healthy and infected samples of Eucalyptus urograndis in boring test.
Infection ClassesGrade I
(Very Good)
Grade II
(Good)
Grade III
(Fair)
Grade IV
(Poor)
Grade V
(Very Poor)
1 (Healthy)1811100
2 (Moderate)1212600
3 (Severe)1611300
4 (Very severe)422400
Note. Grade I = 81%–100%; Grade II = 61%–80%; Grade III = 41%–60%; Grade IV = 21%–40%; Grade V = 0%–20%.
Table 10. Mean reading of surface roughness on the sawing, planing, and boring quality.
Table 10. Mean reading of surface roughness on the sawing, planing, and boring quality.
Infection Classes SawingPlaning Boring
ValueRa (µm)Rz (µm)Rmax (µm)Ra (µm)Rz (µm)Rmax (µm)Ra (µm)Rz (µm)Rmax (µm)
1
(Healthy)
Mean 17.82 a31.24 a54.99 a8.31 a27.81 a52.96 a6.90 a56.6 a73.40 a
SD1.919.7811.661.9210.8916.790.967.588.41
2
(Moderate)
Mean7.62 a30.67 a54.54 a8.76 ab27.92 a52.78 a6.69 a56.64 a74.68 a
SD1.7610.3711.561.807.6910.730.877.819.37
3
(Severe)
Mean8.06 a29.28 a53.99 a9.48 b26.25 a52.66 a7.76 b57.25 a71.95 a
SD1.2010.1211.822.1212.8513.750.937.657.53
4
(Very severe)
Mean8.10 a29.54 a51.32 a9.80 b29.17 a55.77 a8.25 b58.15 a73.96 a
SD1.6110.1011.282.2812.8621.711.147.3310.25
p-Value 0.640 0.859 0.629 0.023 **0.797 0.859 0.000 ***0.846 0.684
Notes. 1 Means followed by the same letter a, b in the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan multiple range test. ** high significance (p < 0.01); *** very high significance (p < 0.001).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahali, R.; Lee, S.H.; Md. Tahir, P.; Bakar, E.S.; Muhammad Roseley, A.S.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Mohd Yusof, N.; Mohammad Suffian James, R. Influence of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Canker Disease on the Machining Properties of Eucalyptus urograndis. Forests 2022, 13, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091366

AMA Style

Dahali R, Lee SH, Md. Tahir P, Bakar ES, Muhammad Roseley AS, Ibrahim SA, Mohd Yusof N, Mohammad Suffian James R. Influence of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Canker Disease on the Machining Properties of Eucalyptus urograndis. Forests. 2022; 13(9):1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahali, Rasdianah, Seng Hua Lee, Paridah Md. Tahir, Edi Suhaimi Bakar, Adlin Sabrina Muhammad Roseley, Siti Aminah Ibrahim, Norwahyuni Mohd Yusof, and Redzuan Mohammad Suffian James. 2022. "Influence of Chrysoporthe deuterocubensis Canker Disease on the Machining Properties of Eucalyptus urograndis" Forests 13, no. 9: 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop