Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dual Scaled NbC/Ti2AlC Reinforced Titanium–Aluminum Composite
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Quantum Dots-Doped Ni3Se4/Co9Se8/Fe3O4 Multilayer Nanosheets Prepared Using the One-Step Solvothermal Method to Boost Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Martensite/Bainite Dual Phase-Content on the Mechanical Properties of EA4T High-Speed Axle Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multifunctional TiO2 Nanotube-Matrix Composites with Enhanced Photocatalysis and Lithium-Ion Storage Performances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic CoFe1.95Y0.05O4-Decorated Ag3PO4 as Superior and Recyclable Photocatalyst for Dye Degradation

School of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, New Energy Materials and Technology Research Center, Huainan Research Center of New Carbon Energy Materials, Anhui Key Laboratory of Low Temperature Co-Fired Materials, Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232038, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(13), 4659; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134659
Submission received: 17 May 2023 / Revised: 21 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023

Abstract

:
The Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposite with magnetic properties was simply synthesized by the hydrothermal method. The structure and morphology of the prepared material were characterized, and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of the methylene blue and rhodamine B dyes was also tested. It was revealed that the Ag3PO4 in the nanocomposite exhibited a smaller size and higher efficiency in degrading dyes than the individually synthesized Ag3PO4 when exposed to light. Furthermore, the magnetic properties of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 enabled the nanocomposite to possess magnetic separation capabilities. The stable crystal structure and effective degradation ability of the nanocomposite were demonstrated through cyclic degradation experiments. It was shown that Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 could deliver the highest activity and stability in degrading the dyes, and 98% of the dyes could be reduced within 30 min. Additionally, the photocatalytic enhancement mechanism and cyclic degradation stability of the magnetic nanocomposites were also proposed.

1. Introduction

The main hazardous substances in wastewater come from chemical dyes, which can pollute the environment, destroy the ecological balance, and increase the risk of cancer in humans. Therefore, it is extremely urgent to develop efficient wastewater treatment technologies to degrade these chemical dyes. Semiconductor photocatalytic oxidation has been widely considered as one of the most promising photocatalytic technologies to achieve this goal [1,2,3,4,5]. Traditional TiO2- or ZnO-based materials have been studied for a long time as photocatalysts due to their exceptional merits of high electron mobility, high stability, non-toxicity, and low cost. However, both substances have relatively high band gap energies that can only be activated by UV irradiation, limiting their potential applications within the wavelength range of sunlight [6,7,8,9].
Therefore, many efforts have been made to explore new photocatalysts with narrow band gaps under certain conditions to achieve a higher light energy conversion efficiency [10,11,12,13]. One of the most promising photocatalysts is silver phosphate (Ag3PO4), which has an extremely high photooxidation capacity, a high quantum efficiency of around 90%, and a low band gap of approximately 2.5 eV. As a result, Ag3PO4 has been extensively studied in degrading organic pollutants in water due to its good photocatalytic activity [14,15,16,17]. Nevertheless, the reported Ag3PO4 usually has a larger particle size and smaller specific surface area, and has a lower stability with prolonged exposure to light, leading to an unsatisfactory photocatalytic activity and stability. Furthermore, Ag3PO4 is difficult to recycle, leading to a high cost of the photocatalyst as well as secondary pollution to water resources.
In order to optimize the photocatalytic properties of Ag3PO4 in practical applications, it is essential to design matrix materials with a smaller particle size and long-term stability. An effective approach to achieve this is to create a heterojunction structure by coupling Ag3PO4 with another substance [14,16,18]. The heterojunction structure can facilitate the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes, preventing electron–hole recombination and improving the stability of Ag3PO4. It is reported that cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) can exhibit a high electron transfer capability and stability, plus ferromagnetic properties [19,20,21], Additionally, it is also discovered that the visible-light adsorption of CoFe2O4 can be further enhanced by rare-earth-metal doping [22,23]. Therefore, through combining the rare-earth-metal-doped CoFe2O4 with Ag3PO4, the nanocomposites should present high photocatalytic activity, long degradation stability, and designable magnetic properties.
In this paper, an Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposite with magnetic properties was easily synthesized by the hydrothermal method. The structure and morphology of the prepared material were characterized, and its photocatalytic activity was also tested for degradation of the methylene blue and rhodamine B dyes. Especially, the influence of the mass ratio of Ag3PO4 to CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 on the photocatalytic property was discussed. It was revealed that Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 exhibited a higher efficiency in degrading dyes than Ag3PO4 when exposed to light. Additionally, the photocatalytic enhancement mechanism and cyclic degradation stability of the magnetic nanocomposites were also proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate, citric acid, yttrium nitrate hexahydrate, silver nitrate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, methylene blue, and rhodamine B drugs were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); the reagents used were analytically pure; and the solution was prepared with deionized water.

2.2. Synthesis of Samples

2.2.1. Preparation of CoFe1.95Y0.05 O4

Typically, 2.850 g of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (15.6 mmol), 7.429 g of iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate (30.60 mmol), 6.245 g of citrate (32.50 mmol), and 0.018 g of yttrium nitrate hexahydrate (0.05 mmol) were mixed in a 150 mL beaker, then 50 mL of deionized water was poured into the beaker and magnetically stirred at room temperature for one hour to form a transparent solution. Next, 12 mol·L1 of ammonia was dropwise-added to the solution until reaching a pH value of 6–7. The solution was evaporated at a constant temperature of 100 °C for 24 h to obtain a dry gel. Afterward, the gel was calcinated at 700 °C for 3 h with a heating rate of 2.5 °C·min1. Finally, the sample was cooled to room temperature and ground for future use.

2.2.2. Preparation of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4

Different amounts of the prepared CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 (0.1 g, 0.2 g, and 0.3 g) were ultrasonically dispersed in 100 mL of deionized water. Then, 0.840 g of silver nitrate (4.90 mmol), 1.791 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (12.60 mmol), and 1.2 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone were dissolved into the above suspension, which was hydrothermally heated at 200 °C for 24 h. After that, the samples were cooled, filtered, washed by water three times, and dried at 60 °C for 10 h. The samples with different amounts of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 were named Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.1, Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2, and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.3, respectively. The individually synthesized pure Ag3PO4 was prepared by the same procedure without adding CoFe1.95Y0.05O4.

2.3. Analytical Characterization

The samples’ crystal structure was measured by a DX-2800 diffractometer with CuKα (λ = 0.154056 nm) and a scanning range of 2θ = 5°~80°. The morphology and crystalline structure were observed with a ZEISS Sigma500 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and a FEI Talos-F200S Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM, FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA).The diffuse reflectance spectra were determined with a UV-3700 UV-Vis spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Total organic carbon (TOC) was analyzed using a Shimadzu TOC-5000A analyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and photocatalytic testing was performed using the ZQ-GHX-V (Shanghai Zhengqiao Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) was recorded using an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) under a frequency range of 0.1–100 KHz in 0.5 M sodium sulfate solution.

2.4. Measurement of Photocatalytic Activity

To achieve adsorption equilibrium between the photocatalyst and the dye, 0.1 g of each catalyst was added to 50 mL of 1.0 × 105 mol·L1 solution containing either methylene blue (MB) or rhodamine B (RhB), respectively. The mixture was stirred away from light for one hour. Subsequently, the dye solution was subjected to catalytic degradation evaluation under a 500 W xenon lamp. In the photocatalytic process, approximately 5.0 mL of the solution was extracted every 5 min and its absorbance was measured using a UV-vis spectrometer at the maximum absorption wavelength of MB (665 nm) and RhB (550 nm). Furthermore, the photocatalytic effect of the catalyst on various concentrations of dyes was also examined. The TOC values throughout the degradation process were determined by a Shimadzu TOC-5000A analyzer.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structure and Morphology

The XRD patterns of each sample are displayed in Figure 1a. The main peaks of the pure Ag3PO4 can be indexed to the standard diffraction of Ag3PO4 [17] (JCPDS No. 06-0505), while the main peaks of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 can be indexed to the standard diffraction of CoFe2O4 (JCPDS No. 22-1086). However, the main peaks of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 composite are all indexed to Ag3PO4. The proper reason should be that the diffraction peaks of Ag3PO4 are so strong that the crystallographic planes of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 are concealed; as shown in Figure 1a, the peak’s intensity of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 is much lower than that of Ag3PO4. The Energy-Dispersive X-Ray spectrum (EDS) confirms that Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 is composed of Co, Fe, Y, O, Ag, and P elements (Figure 1b).
Figure 2a–c display the SEM images of the pure Ag3PO4, CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 nanocomposites, and it is evident that the individually synthesized Ag3PO4 has an irregular granular morphology with a large size of approximately 5–10 μm, while the Ag3PO4 in the composite exhibits a significantly smaller size around 1 μm, demonstrating that the CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanoparticles plays an important role in reducing the size of Ag3PO4. The nanoparticles decorated on the microparticles are CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, because the lattice spacing in the TEM image is indexed to the (311) plane of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 (Figure 2d). It is difficult to observe the lattice planes of the microsized Ag3PO4 particles. The EDS mapping (Figure 2e) shows that the Ag, Y, P, Fe, Co, and O elements are all distributed in Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2. These findings suggest that the CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanoparticles can effectively regulate the formation and growth of the Ag3PO4 particles, resulting in the formation of uniformly coupled Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 composites. The smaller particle size of Ag3PO4 will result in a larger surface area, thus facilitating the utilization of the incident irradiation energy and photocatalytic reactions through effectively separating the electrons and holes [15].

3.2. Optical Properties of the Samples

It is worth noting that Ag3PO4 has the main ability of absorbing light in the UV region, but with minimal absorption of incident light when the wavelength exceeds 500 nm [14]. To explore the light absorption capacity of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites, Diffuse Reflectance Spectrum (DRS) tests are conducted and are presented in Figure 3a, and it can be seen that pure Ag3PO4 has the ability to absorb light in both the UV and visible regions, with a majority of the absorption occurring in the UV region. When the wavelength of the incident light exceeds 500 nm, there is almost no absorption anymore. Comparatively, the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites exhibit a high absorption efficiency in both the UV and visible regions, particularly in the visible region, where the absorption intensity is significantly amplified.
Figure 3b shows the Kubelka–Munk function band gap energy (Eg) plot, indicating that the band gap energies of all Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites are lower compared to pure Ag3PO4 (2.5 eV). In fact, the band gap energies of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites can reach 1.2 eV along with the increase in CoFe1.95Y0.05O4. This demonstrates that coupling with CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 significantly improves the light absorption ability of Ag3PO4, and simultaneously reduces its band gap. Furthermore, the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) energy levels can be given by equations of ECB = X – Ee − 0.5Eg and EVB = X − Ee + 0.5Eg, respectively, where the value of Ee is 4.5 eV and X is absolute electronegativity, which is 4.97 for Ag3PO4 and 5.83 for CoFe1.95Y0.05O4. Therefore, the CB is calculated as 0.21 and 0.73 eV, while the VB is calculated as 2.71 and 0.93 eV for Ag3PO4 and CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, respectively.
To investigate the photo-separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs in the prepared samples, we conduct Photoluminescence Spectra (PL) tests on Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites. As shown in Figure 3c, the pure Ag3PO4 displays a prominent emission peak at 535 nm, which results from the complexation of excited state electrons in the conduction band and holes in the valence band. Comparatively, the emission intensity of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites is found to be significantly reduced. This is due to the heterojunction structure of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites, which suppresses the complexation of the electrons and holes, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency [16].

3.3. Photocatalytic Properties

The photodegradation performance of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites is analyzed and presented in Figure 4. The results show that all the samples exhibit excellent degradation behaviors for both MB and RhB (Figure 4a,b), The RhB and MB can be degraded within 40 and 30 min, respectively. Specifically, the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites demonstrate a higher degradation efficiency compared to pure Ag3PO4. The degradation efficiency of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 is found to be higher than those of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.1 and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.3 samples. This suggests that the mass ratio of Ag3PO4 to CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 is important to obtain optimized performance. An overabundance of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 may actually decrease the degradation rate because they may cover the Ag3PO4 surface and block light, ultimately leading to lower degradation efficiency. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the composite materials is competitive to other reported photocatalysts (Table 1) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
The primary reaction kinetics equation is satisfied due to the low concentrations of the dyes [2,10]. Figure 4c,d show the ln(C0/Ct) versus light time curves of the RhB and MB, respectively. It is shown that Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 has the fastest degradation rate among all samples, with apparent reaction rate constants of 0.02437 and 0.02725 min1 for RhB and MB, respectively, while the reaction rate constants of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.3, Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.1, and Ag3PO4 are 0.01346, 0.00775, and 0.00712 min1, respectively. The reaction rate constants of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 are 1.81, 3.14, and 3.42 times higher than those of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.3, Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.1, and Ag3PO4, respectively.
Figure 5a,b display the TOC changes during the degradation of MB and RhB. Although the catalyst successfully decolorizes all dye solutions, the desired level of TOC removal is not achieved. This suggests that not all dye molecules can be catalyzed to inorganic molecules, and the dye concentration has an impact on the degradation efficiency. It is indicated that the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 nanocomposite exhibits the most effective photocatalytic performance. The TOC removal rates of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 are approximately 0.35 and 0.20 for MB and RhB, respectively, after 60 min of degradation. Figure 5c–d display the degradation efficiencies of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 for various concentrations of MB and RhB dyes. The initial degradation during the first 5 min is slightly slower under higher dye concentrations. The main reason is that the dark color of the dye shields the light. When the dye concentrations reduce to 4 × 105 mol·L1, the photocatalyst is able to degrade all of the RhB dye within 30 min and completely degrade the MB dye within 50 min.

3.4. Enhancement Mechanism and Stability

As shown in Figure 6a, the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 catalyst exhibits a saturation magnetization intensity of 6.48 A·m2·kg1. As a result, the catalyst can be conveniently separated from the dye using a magnet once the degradation process is finished, which is a benefit for the recycling and reuse of the photocatalyst, effectively preventing any secondary pollution that may result from the addition of the photocatalyst [20,23]. In this study, MB is selected as the target dye for five cycles of catalytic degradation. The results of the degradation process are illustrated in Figure 6b. It can be seen that there is almost no degradation decay of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 nanocomposite compared to Ag3PO4. Furthermore, the XRD patterns (Figure 6c) and SEM images (Figure 6d) show that the phase and morphology of the photocatalyst remain unchanged after five degradation cycles. This suggests that the crystal structure of the composite is stable, and the photocatalyst exhibits both efficient photocatalytic performance and good cycling stability during the photodegradation process.
The Nyquist diagram (Figure 7a) demonstrates that Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 has a smaller arc radius compared to Ag3PO4 and CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, suggesting that the coupling structure of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 is able to quickly transport and effectively separate photogenerated carriers. Based on the above discussion, a photocatalyst degradation mechanism is proposed as shown in Figure 7b; when subjected to continuous light irradiation, the electrons in Ag3PO4 and CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 become excited from the valence band to the conduction band, leading to the creation of valence band holes. These holes then react with H2O, generating ·OH radicals that degrade the dye. And the electrons migrate to the Ag3PO4 layer, where they participate in the photocatalytic reaction. This mechanism enhances the separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs and improves the photocatalytic activity of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposite. The conduction band potential of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 is more negative than that of Ag3PO4, resulting in a continuous transfer of excited electrons to the conduction band of Ag3PO4. Additionally, the valence band of Ag3PO4 has a higher energy level than that of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, leading to a continuous transfer of holes from the valence band of Ag3PO4 to that of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4. The transferred vacancies react with H2O to produce the highly reactive product of ·OH radical. This reaction is enhanced by the presence of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, which can effectively prevent the recombination of the electrons and holes. As a result, the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites exhibit a higher photodegradation performance.

4. Conclusions

In this study, Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 magnetic nanocomposites are prepared and used as photocatalysts against the degradation of MB and RhB dyes. It is observed that the particle size of the Ag3PO4 in nanocomposites can be effectively reduced compared to the pure Ag3PO4. Furthermore, the addition of CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 can enhance the light absorption efficiency of Ag3PO4, resulting in a narrower forbidden band width, allowing the effective degradation of dyes within 30 min at concentrations of up to 4 × 105 mol·L1. The degradation cycling tests show that the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposite demonstrates superior photocatalytic stability. On the other hand, the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposite exhibits exceptional magnetic properties, which enables the recycling and reuse of the photocatalyst. This study involves the development of a new photocatalyst to achieve efficient, stable degradation and magnetic separation, providing a new way for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L., S.C. and S.Y.; methodology, Q.L. and S.Y.; formal analysis, Q.L. and S.Y.; data curation, Q.L. and M.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.L., M.X. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, S.Y. and S.C.; supervision, S.Y.; project administration, Q.L., Y.M. and S.C.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278170), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Department of Education (2022AH051574), and the Scientific Research Start-up Foundation of Huainan Normal University (BSKYQDJ2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, R.H.; Chen, H.Y.; Xiong, J.R.; Xu, X.Y.; Cheng, J.J.; Liu, X.Y.; Liu, G. A mini review on bismuth-based Z-scheme photocatalysts. Materials 2020, 13, 5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tian, K.; Hu, L.M.; Li, L.T.; Zheng, Q.Z.; Xin, Y.J.; Zhang, G.S. Recent advances in persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes for organic wastewater treatment. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 4461–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, G.P.; Wu, H.; Chen, D.Y.; Li, N.J.; Xu, Q.F.; Li, H.; He, J.H.; Lu, J.M. A mini-review on ZnIn2S4-based photocatalysts for energy and environmental application. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 7, 176–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chi, C.C.; Qu, P.P.; Ren, C.N. Preparation of SiO2@Ag@ SiO2@TiO2 core-shell structure and its photocatalytic degradation. J. Inorg. Mater. 2022, 37, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Joanna, B.K.; Gerald, H.; Adriana, B.; Dariusz, P.; Yaroslav, B. Photocatalytic degradation of 4,4-Isopropylidenebis (2,6-dibromophenol) on sulfur-doped nano TiO2. Materials 2022, 15, 361. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, Y.J.; Ye, Z.Q.; Cai, J.X.; Gong, L. Visible-light-promoted asymmetric catalysis by chiral complexes of first-row transition metals. Synthesis 2021, 53, 1570–1583. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, X.; Li, J.; Chen, F.J. Photocatalytic degradation of MB by novel and environmental ZnO/Bi2WO6-CC hierarchical heterostructures. Mater. Charact. 2022, 189, 111961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bian, X.; Yang, J. Effect of microwave irradiation on physical adsorption accuracy and photocatalytic activity of nano-ZnO materials. CISAT2019 2019, 4, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalaivani, G.J.; Suja, S.K. TiO2 (rutile) embedded inulin-A versatile bio-nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 143, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aschauer, U. Charge transfer observed in light-activated catalyst particles. Nature 2022, 610, 263–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, S.T.; Zhang, Y.H.; Huang, H.W. Black phosphorus-based heterostructures for photocatalysis and photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 67, 745–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muhammad, H.; Habib, U.; Muhammad, U.; Aziz, H.Y.; Ali, T.A.; Wang, C.D.; Luo, W. Perovskite-type lanthanum ferrite based photocatalysts: Preparation, properties, and applications. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 66, 314–338. [Google Scholar]
  13. Usman, Q.; Zeb, H.J.; Ahmad, B.R.; Ali, R.; Ghazanfar, N.; Walid, N.; Muhammad, I. Photocatalysis vs adsorption by metal oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 131, 122–166. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, P.C.; Peng, H.L.; Wu, Y.H.; Li, L.; Hao, X.R.; Peng, B.H.; Meng, G.H.; Wu, J.N.; Liu, Z.Y. A green strategy to synthesize Ag/Ag3PO4/chitosan composite photocatalysts and their photocatalytic degradation performance under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 18, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hung, N.M.; Oanh, L.T.M.; Chung, D.P.; Thang, D.V.; Mai, V.T.; Hang, L.T.; Minh, N.V. Tuning the particle size, physical properties, and photocatalytic activity of Ag3PO4 materials by changing the Ag+/ P O 4 3 ratio. Chin. Phys. B 2023, 32, 652–659. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mu, F.F.; Dai, B.L.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, S.J.; Huang, H.B.; Yang, G.; Xia, D.H.; Kong, Y.; Leung, D.Y.C. Construction of a novel Ag/Ag3PO4/MIL-68(In)-NH2 plasmonic heterojunction photocatalyst for high-efficiency photocatalysis. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 101, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tseng, C.S.; Wu, T.; Lin, Y.W. Facile synthesis and characterization of Ag3PO4 microparticles for degradation of organic dyestuffs under white-light light-emitting-diode irradiation. Materials 2018, 11, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rawal, S.B.; Sung, S.D.; Lee, W.I. Novel Ag3PO4/TiO2 composites for efficient decomposition of gaseous 2-propanol under visible-light irradiation. Catal. Commun. 2011, 17, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raluca-Ștefania, D.; Ioan, D.; Maria, I.; Aurel, P. CoFe2O4@HaP as magnetic heterostructures for sustainable wastewater treatment. Materials 2023, 16, 2594. [Google Scholar]
  20. George, V.B.; Pinelopi, P.F.; Islam, I.; Athanassios, G.K. Magnetic metal oxide-based photocatalysts with integrated silver for water treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 4629. [Google Scholar]
  21. Feng, S.; Yu, M.G.; Xie, T.P.; Li, T.; Kong, D.S.; Yang, J.W.; Cheng, C.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Wang, J.K. MoS2/CoFe2O4 heterojunction for boosting photogenerated carrier separation and the dominant role in enhancing peroxymonosulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 134467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Q.W.; Chen, S.K.; Xu, M.; Meng, Y. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanomagnetism Ag2S/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4. Mod. Chem. Ind. 2023, 43, 212–217. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, S.K.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Wen, G.L. Preparation and photocatalytic degradation of magnetic Ag2S/Ag/CoFe1.95Sm0.05O4 Z-type heterojunction. J. Inorg. Mater. 2022, 37, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tai, Y.H.; Sun, J.L.; Tian, H.R.; Liu, F.Y.; Han, B.Y.; Fu, W.; Liu, Z.P.; Yang, X.Y.; Liu, Q.F. Efficient degradation of organic pollutants by S-NaTaO3/biochar under visible light and the photocatalytic performance of a permonosulfate-based dual-effect catalytic system. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 125, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, S.F.; Yu, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, K.N.; Gao, H.J.; Yu, X.L.; Zhao, X.X.; Fang, L.M.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, J. Synthesis and characterization of BaTiO3/TiO2 heterojunction photocatalyst for novel application in photocatalytic degradation of TBBPA under simulated sunlight irradiation. ChemistrySelect 2017, 38, 337–347. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhai, H.F.; Qi, J.J.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.J.; Yang, L.P.; Hu, C.J.; Liu, H.R.; Yang, J. Preparation and photocatalytic performance of hollow structure LiNb3O8 photocatalysts. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liang, F.F.; Wang, H.F.; Yu, R.Q.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.L.; Bai, L.Z.; Hao, C.L.; Hao, G.D. Recent progress in photoelectrocatalysis of g-C3N4 for water environment remediation. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. 2022, 32, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, W.J. Synthesis, electronic structure and visible-light catalytic performance of quaternary BiMnVO5. J. Inorg. Mater. 2022, 37, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haseeb, U.; Mahsa, B.V.; Timuçin, B.; Ziaur, R.; Sarp, K. Scaling-up photocatalytic activity of CdS from nanorods to nanowires for the MB degradation. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 130, 108744. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ritika, M.K.; Ahmad, U.; Surinder, M.; Surinder, S.; Sushil, K.H.; Fouad, O.A. Rapid solar-light driven superior photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using MoS2-ZnO heterostructure nanorods photocatalyst. Materials 2018, 11, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the different samples; (b) EDS pattern of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of the different samples; (b) EDS pattern of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Materials 16 04659 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, and (c) Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2; (d) TEM image of the CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 in composite; (e) EDS mapping of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, and (c) Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2; (d) TEM image of the CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 in composite; (e) EDS mapping of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Materials 16 04659 g002
Figure 3. (a) DRS spectra and (b) the calculated band gap energies diagram of Ag3PO4, CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites; (c) PL curves of Ag3PO4 and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites.
Figure 3. (a) DRS spectra and (b) the calculated band gap energies diagram of Ag3PO4, CoFe1.95Y0.05O4, and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites; (c) PL curves of Ag3PO4 and Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites.
Materials 16 04659 g003
Figure 4. Degradation curves for (a) RhB and (b) MB. The corresponding first-order kinetics of (c) RhB and (d) MB of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites.
Figure 4. Degradation curves for (a) RhB and (b) MB. The corresponding first-order kinetics of (c) RhB and (d) MB of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4 nanocomposites.
Materials 16 04659 g004
Figure 5. TOC removal during the photodegradation process for (a) MB and (b) RhB. The concentration effects of (c) RhB and (d) MB on the photodegradation efficiency of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Figure 5. TOC removal during the photodegradation process for (a) MB and (b) RhB. The concentration effects of (c) RhB and (d) MB on the photodegradation efficiency of the Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2.
Materials 16 04659 g005
Figure 6. (a) Magnetization curve of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 after five degradation cycles for MB (inset shows the visual pictures of the solution after photocatalytic degradation and magnetic field recovery); (b) five degradation cycling curves of the photocatalysts for MB; (c) XRD patterns and (d) SEM images of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 before and after five degradation cycles for MB.
Figure 6. (a) Magnetization curve of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 after five degradation cycles for MB (inset shows the visual pictures of the solution after photocatalytic degradation and magnetic field recovery); (b) five degradation cycling curves of the photocatalysts for MB; (c) XRD patterns and (d) SEM images of Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 before and after five degradation cycles for MB.
Materials 16 04659 g006
Figure 7. (a) EIS spectra of the samples; (b) schematic illustration of the degradation mechanism.
Figure 7. (a) EIS spectra of the samples; (b) schematic illustration of the degradation mechanism.
Materials 16 04659 g007
Table 1. Comparison of the photocatalytic properties between Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 and other reported photocatalysts.
Table 1. Comparison of the photocatalytic properties between Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2 and other reported photocatalysts.
CatalystsPollutantsDegradation Efficiency (%)Irradiation Time (min)Ref.
S-NaTaO3/biocharRhB99.690[24]
BaTiO3/TiO2MB100180[25]
LiNb3O8MB96.9100[26]
BiMnVO5MB98240[28]
CdSMB97.830[29]
MoS2-ZnOMB9720[30]
Ag3PO4/CoFe1.95Y0.05O4–0.2MB9830Us
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Q.; Xu, M.; Meng, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, S. Magnetic CoFe1.95Y0.05O4-Decorated Ag3PO4 as Superior and Recyclable Photocatalyst for Dye Degradation. Materials 2023, 16, 4659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134659

AMA Style

Liu Q, Xu M, Meng Y, Chen S, Yang S. Magnetic CoFe1.95Y0.05O4-Decorated Ag3PO4 as Superior and Recyclable Photocatalyst for Dye Degradation. Materials. 2023; 16(13):4659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Qingwang, Mai Xu, Ying Meng, Shikun Chen, and Shiliu Yang. 2023. "Magnetic CoFe1.95Y0.05O4-Decorated Ag3PO4 as Superior and Recyclable Photocatalyst for Dye Degradation" Materials 16, no. 13: 4659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop