Next Article in Journal
Superhydrophobic Coating Based on Porous Aluminum Oxide Modified by Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
Next Article in Special Issue
Additive Manufacturing as a Solution to Challenges Associated with Heat Pipe Production
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Polysaccharide-Based Chitin/Chitosan-Aerogel Materials by Learning from Genetics and Molecular Biology
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Mechanic Enhancement of Chopped Carbon Fiber Reinforced-Low-Density Unsaturated Polyester Resin Composite at Low Preparation Temperature with Facile Polymerization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Porous Glass Microspheres from Alkali-Activated Fiber Glass Waste

1
FunGlass, Centre for Functional and Surface Functionalized Glass, Alexander Dubček University of Trenčín, 911 50 Trenčín, Slovakia
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
3
Joint Glass Centre of the IIC SAS, TnUAD and FChFT STU, 911 50 Trenčín, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(3), 1043; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031043
Submission received: 22 December 2021 / Revised: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porous Materials and Advanced Manufacturing Technologies)

Abstract

:
Fiber glass waste (FGW) was subjected to alkali activation in an aqueous solution with different concentrations of sodium/potassium hydroxide. The activated materials were fed into a methane–oxygen flame with a temperature of around 1600 °C. X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the formation of several hydrated compounds, which decomposed upon flame synthesis, leading to porous glass microspheres (PGMs). Pore formation was favored by using highly concentrated activating alkali solutions. The highest homogeneity and yield of PGMs corresponded to the activation with 9 M KOH aqueous solution.

1. Introduction

Reusing glass waste can considerably decrease the demand for new raw materials for glass production and contribute to the reduction of landfills, known to represent a multiform ecological problem (in terms of consumption of free land, water and air pollution, and emission of greenhouse gases) [1,2].
Landfilling can be significantly reduced only if waste glass is involved in the manufacturing of a new generation of original glass articles. The sustainability of this approach (e.g., cullet from crushed container used for new containers) is complicated by the need for expensive sorting operations, aimed at separating glass from other materials, glasses of different chemical compositions, or even glasses with different colors [3]. Some materials, such as residues from the production of glass fibers (fiber glass waste, FGW), are practically ‘unrecyclable’ [4]. The utilization of FGW can be accomplished either by decreasing the cost of cleaning and sorting through applying new procedures or by applying an up-cycling approach, consisting of the obtainment of innovative products, which could justify the expense of processing [5].
Recent trends in glass up-cycling often employ alkali activation, i.e., the (at least) partial dissolution of glass in concentrated aqueous solutions of alkali hydroxides, aluminates, and silicates that yields hydrated compounds. When subjected to condensation reactions, they form a gel at room temperature or typically below 100 °C [4]. According to the specific chemistry of waste glass, a stable (alumino-silicate) ‘zeolite-like’ network, useful as a new cementitious material, may be formed. Glass fibers, in particular, may yield high-strength gels by reaction with Na-aluminate solutions [6]. The alkali activation may be used also as an intermediate step, since glass suspensions, before complete setting, may be foamed by intensive mechanical stirring, leading to highly porous bodies, later consolidated by sintering. When a stable gel is not the main objective, the glass can be simply activated by reaction with less expensive alkali hydroxides [7].
The present paper concerns the exploitation of alkali activation for the manufacturing of highly porous glass microspheres (PGMs), following a preliminary study on Bioglass® 45S5 [8]. Powders prepared by the crushing of hardened suspensions are fed into a flame synthesis apparatus: glass microbeads formed by high-temperature processing are simultaneously expanded by gases released upon the decomposition of hydrated compounds [8]. PGMs derived from glass waste are optimized using different concentrations of alkaline solutions. The prepared PGMs could be applied as filtration materials or in hydrogen storage applications [9].

2. Materials and Methods

FGW (56.4 SiO2, 23.2 CaO, 13.6 Al2O3, 5.1 B2O3, 0.4 Na2O, 0.6 K2O, 0.4 TiO2, 0.2 Fe2O3 in wt.%, data obtained by XRF analysis) was crushed and a fraction below 40 µm was obtained by sieving. NaOH and KOH (reagent grade, Penta, Bratislava, Slovakia) were dissolved in deionized water to form activating solutions of different molarity (3 M, 5 M, 7 M, 9 M NaOH; 9 M 50 mol% NaOH—50 mol% KOH; 9 M KOH). Glass waste powders were suspended in the solutions with a solid loading of 65 wt.% by mechanical stirring (1 h, at 500 rpm). The suspensions were poured into polystyrene containers and left to dry at 75 °C for 24 h.
Fine powders obtained by crushing of hardened suspensions were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD-Panalytical Empyrean, CuKα radiation, λ = 1.5405 Å) and thermogravimetry (STA449 F1 Jupiter TG/DTA/DSC, Netzsch, Selb, Germany), using air, with a flow rate of 30 mL/min. Sieved powder (40–80 µm fraction) was then fed into a methane–oxygen flame at 1600 °C and glass microspheres were prepared by quenching the melt droplets with deionized water. The produced glass microspheres were collected in a sedimentation tank, filtered, and washed with deionized water.
The chemical composition of obtained glass microspheres was determined by ICP (ICP OES 5100 SVDV Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), using a decomposition–microwave digestion system, speedwave 4 Berghof, 20 mg + 6 mL HCl+ 2 mLHNO3 + 0.5 mL HF. Nebulizer flow was 0.55 L/min and plasma flow was 12 L/min.
SEM was used to study the morphology of prepared glass microspheres (JSM-7600F Schottky Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope), applying normal operation, 1.2 kVA. A schematic drawing of the PGM production process by a combination of alkali activation and flame synthesis is shown in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

The starting glass waste was X-ray amorphous, as shown in Figure 2. Glass matrix bonds including Si-O-Si, Al-O-Si, and Ca-O are attacked by the alkaline solutions during the alkali activation process, yielding hydrated compounds, which form coagulated structures, leading to condensation and crystallization [10,11]. The activation of glass waste with a relatively weak alkaline solution (3 M NaOH) promoted the formation of a calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) compound, (tobermorite A, Ca5(Si6O16)(OH)2, PDF 89-6458), which was in line with the results previously observed in [4].
The amount of the phase, belonging to so-called C-S-H compounds, typically formed upon the hydration of conventional cements, increased with increasing molarity of the alkaline activators [12,13]. By increasing the concentration to 5 M NaOH, tobermorite was accompanied by sodium alumino-silicate hydrate (N-A-S-H) (zeolite phase) (sodalite, 4Na2O·3Al2O3·6SiO2·3H2O, PDF 76-1639), as shown in Figure 2. This suggests the more extensive dissolution of the calcium alumino-silicate FGW matrix and a higher concentration of hydrated compounds (C-S-H and N-A-S-H); see Table 1.
Dissolution in 7 M NaOH led also to the development of hydrated sodium carbonate phases (Na2CO3·7H2O, PDF 25-0816, and Na3H(CO3)2·2H2O, PDF 29-1447—also known as ‘trona’). It was observed that the peak intensities reached their maximum by applying 7 M NaOH, which indicated the formation of the highest quantity of the hydrated compounds. Moreover, 9 M NaOH yielded the same hydrated compounds in lower quantities. At high alkali concentrations (<9 M NaOH), the silicic acid activity in the solution increased due to the congruent dissolution of the glass matrix. The chemical affinity for further dissolution is thus reduced. This means that less alkali is incorporated into the obtained glass [14].
Using concentrated alkaline solutions initiated and increased the incorporation of ionic species, which led to restricting the movement of ions and inhibited the polymerization process [15]. When the alkali activation occurs at a high temperature, the viscosity of the system will be higher, and the dissolution of silica will be lower, which leads to a lower contribution in the gel and weakness of the formed chain [16].
On the other hand, dissolution of FGW in 9 M KOH and 9 M (KOH+NaOH) suppressed the formation of Na-containing compounds, yielding only tobermorite and hydrated potassium carbonate. The hydroxide ions and potassium ions from KOH retarded the diffusion of NaOH through the solution; therefore, dissolution of the glass fibers required more activation energy [17].
C-S-H compounds are of particular interest since they are known to decompose completely at relatively high temperatures from 105 to 1000 °C [18]. Upon flame synthesis, porous microbeads are formed only if some gases are still released at the temperatures at which droplets of molten glass form. The results of thermogravimetric analysis (TG and DTG) revealed that the gas release was completed at approximately 600 °C in FGW activated by 9 M NaOH solution, where all the formed hydrated compounds (C-S-H, N-A-S-H, Na-carbonate) decomposed and evolved into gases in two steps, as shown in Figure 3a,b. The activation with KOH led to significant gas evolution from 800 to 950 °C. The decomposition of the hydrated compounds systematically followed three steps, as shown in Figure 3b. The first step started at around 120 °C, which indicated the degradation of C-S-H compounds, followed by the decomposition of the residual C-S-H compound at around 800 °C; then, the last step was dedicated to the decomposition of the K-carbonate hydrate phase at around 950 °C. In conclusion, the decomposition of the hydrated compounds near the melting point of glass resulted in porous glass microspheres [19]. Hence, it was confirmed that applying KOH as an alkaline activator could yield superior results regarding the formation of porous glass microspheres. The strategy to successfully produce a porous glass structure is to carefully choose the appropriate alkaline activators [20].
Flame synthesis did not only result in the softening of glass, but also mixed unreacted glass with the residues of the decomposition of the gels, incorporating volatile alkali oxides into the melt. As shown in Table 1, the chemical composition of the glass microspheres was altered. In practice, the activation resulted in two conflicting effects: highly concentrated alkali solutions promoted the formation of hydrated compounds responsible for the gas release, but the incorporation of alkalis reduced the viscosity of the melt during flame synthesis, causing the collapse of cellular structures.
The viscosity–temperature relation in glasses was calculated by the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) equation: log(η) = A + B/(T − T0) [21], where A is the logarithm of the viscosity at the high temperature, and B is the free fitting parameter of the VFT equation. Based on the chemical composition of glasses (activated by different concentrations of alkaline solutions, Table 1), the viscosity–temperature relation of the batch can be estimated, as shown in Figure 4. The increase in Na2O content in the glasses activated by 3–7 M NaOH solutions decreased the viscosity in the glass melting range, while activation with 9 M NaOH led to a glass with slightly lower Na2O content and moderately higher viscosity.
Mixed alkalis (Na2O and K2O) shifted the viscosity/temperature curve close to those for glasses activated by NaOH, due to alkali–alkali interactions; the mixed alkali effect is a manifestation of a general nonlinear composition–viscosity behavior [22]. Activation with pure KOH increased the content of K2O in the glass and shifted the viscosity curve to moderately lower values. The results correspond to the study of Isard, who demonstrated that alkali and alkaline earth oxides decreased the viscosity in glass melts in the approximate order MgO < CaO < SrO < BaO < K2O < Na2O [23]. The alkaline earth oxides possess the ability to bridge over two non-bridging oxygen sites at low temperatures, therefore strengthening the network and increasing the viscosity [24].
The SEM micrographs show the formation of solid microspheres from glass activated with 3 M NaOH solution (Figure 5a), where FGW is in 3 M NaOH dissolved to a comparatively lower extent, as supported by the XRD results (Figure 2). Increasing the hydrated compounds slightly using 5 M NaOH activator is not sufficient to induce pores, as revealed in Figure 5b, whereas applying effective concentrated solutions (7 and 9 M NaOH) leads to the formation of porous glass microspheres. With the increasing concentration of NaOH, the amount of hydrated compounds is increased; hence, a higher quantity of porogen gases is released upon decomposition, ultimately leading to the formation of larger pores [25]. However, it is important to note that the overall quantity of pores is still limited (Figure 5c,d). The application of a mixed alkali solution (50 mol% KOH + 50 mol% NaOH) seemingly enhanced the quantity of the formed pores (Figure 5e). This might be due to the formation of the K-carbonate hydrate phase (Figure 2), which decomposes at relatively high temperatures (Figure 3b). Finally, increasing the amount of K-carbonate hydrate phase under 9 M KOH alkaline activation seems to yield the highest amount of pores in glass microspheres (Figure 5f).

4. Conclusions

The impact of alkali activation using different concentrations of alkaline solutions on the preparation of porous glass microspheres from fiber glass waste was studied. Lower concentrations of alkaline solution yielded solid glass microspheres, which means that alkali activation under 7 M NaOH does not produce a sufficient amount of hydrated phases necessary for pore formation. Moreover, 7 M and 9 M NaOH solutions initiated the formation of porous glass microspheres. The mixed 9 M alkali solution (50 mol% KOH + 50 mol% NaOH) furthermore seemingly improved the quantity of pores. The most positive results were yielded with 9 M KOH solution, where we observed the highest quantity of pores in the glass microspheres.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., J.K., D.G. and E.B.; methodology, M.M., J.K., H.K., M.H. and S.C.; software, E.B., J.K. and M.M.; validation, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; formal analysis, M.M., H.K. and M.H.; investigation, M.M., J.K., H.K., M.H. and S.C.; resources, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; data curation, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, J.K., D.G., E.B., H.K., M.H. and S.C.; visualization, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; supervision, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; project administration, J.K., D.G. and E.B.; funding acquisition, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant number 739566. In addition, the research was funded by the Slovak Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport, VEGA No. 1/0456/20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of the dissemination activities of the project FunGlass. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 739566. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Slovak Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport, VEGA No. 1/0456/20.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meyer, C.; Baxter, S.; Jin, W. Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete with Waste Glass as Aggregate. In Proceedings of the 4th Materials Engineering Conference, Mate. for the New Mille, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 November 1996; pp. 1388–1394. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rivera, J.F.; Cuarán-Cuarán, Z.I.; Vanegas-Bonilla, N.; de Gutiérrez, R.M. Novel use of waste glass powder: Production of geopolymeric tiles. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 3448–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ogundairo, T.O.; Adegoke, D.D.; Akinwumi, I.I.; Olofinnade, O.M. Sustainable use of recycled waste glass as an alternative material for building construction–A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 640, 012073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ramteke, D.D.; Hujova, M.; Kraxner, J.; Galusek, D.; Romero, A.R.; Falcone, R.; Bernardo, E. Up-cycling of ‘unrecyclable’ glasses in glass-based foams by weak alkali-activation, gel casting and low-temperature sintering. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Flood, M.; Fennessy, L.; Lockrey, S.; Avendano, A.; Glover, J.; Kandare, E.; Bhat, T. Glass Fines: A review of cleaning and up-cycling possibilities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 121875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bernardo, E.; Cedro, R.; Florean, M.; Hreglich, S. Reutilization and stabilization of wastes by the production of glass foams. Ceram. Int. 2007, 33, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Torres-Carrasco, M.; Puertas, F. Waste glass in the geopolymer preparation. Mechanical and microstructural characterisation. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 90, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kraxner, J.; Michalek, M.; Romero, A.R.; Elsayed, H.; Bernardo, E.; Boccaccini, A.; Galusek, D. Porous bioactive glass microspheres prepared by flame synthesis process. Mater. Lett. 2019, 256, 126625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Righini, G.C. Glassy Microspheres for Energy Applications. Micromachines 2018, 9, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Redden, R.; Neithalath, N. Microstructure, strength, and moisture stability of alkali activated glass pow-der-based binders. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 45, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Castro-Gomes, J.; Jalali, S. Alkali-activated binders: A review: Part Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Moghadam, M.J.; Ajalloeian, R.; Hajiannia, A. Preparation and application of alkali-activated materials based on waste glass and coal gangue: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rincón, A.; Giacomello, G.; Pasetto, M.; Bernardo, E. Novel ‘inorganic gel casting’ process for the manufacturing of glass foams. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gin, S.; Delaye, J.-M.; Angeli, F.; Schuller, S. Aqueous alteration of silicate glass: State of knowledge and perspectives. npj Mater. Degrad. 2021, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Novais, R.M.; Ascensão, G.; Seabra, M.; Labrincha, J. Waste glass from end-of-life fluorescent lamps as raw material in geopolymers. Waste Manag. 2016, 52, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Panias, D.; Giannopoulou, I.P.; Perraki, T. Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 301, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bashir, S.T.; Yang, L.; Liggat, J.; Thomason, J.L. Kinetics of dissolution of glass fibre in hot alkaline solution. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 1710–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, Q.; Ye, G. Dehydration kinetics of Portland cement paste at high temperature. J. Therm. Anal. 2012, 110, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Studart, A.R.; Gonzenbach, U.T.; Tervoort, E.; Gauckler, L.J. Processing Routes to Macroporous Ceramics: A Review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeremy, P.W.W. Reuse of Silicate Wastes: Process Development and Property Measurements of Dense and Porous Glass-Ceramics. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fluegel, A. Glass viscosity calculation based on a global statistical modeling approach. Glass Technol. Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. A 2007, 48, 13–30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fluegel, A. Statistical regression modeling of glass properties—A Tutorial. Glass Technol. Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. A 2009, 50, 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. Isard, J. The mixed alkali effect in glass. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1969, 1, 235–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Garai, M.; Sasmal, N.; Karmakar, B. Effects of M2+ (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba) Addition on Crystallization and Microstructure of SiO2-MgO-Al2O3-B2O3-K2O-F Glass. Indian J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 2015, 638341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sasmal, N.; Garai, M.; Karmakar, B. Preparation and characterization of novel foamed porous glass-ceramics. Mater. Charact. 2015, 103, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of production of PGMs according to alkali activation combined with flame synthesis.
Figure 1. Scheme of production of PGMs according to alkali activation combined with flame synthesis.
Materials 15 01043 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of FGW before and after alkali activation.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of FGW before and after alkali activation.
Materials 15 01043 g002
Figure 3. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of activated glass waste.
Figure 3. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of activated glass waste.
Materials 15 01043 g003
Figure 4. Viscosity–temperature curves of the investigated glass compositions calculated from the measured glass composition with the use of the VFT equation.
Figure 4. Viscosity–temperature curves of the investigated glass compositions calculated from the measured glass composition with the use of the VFT equation.
Materials 15 01043 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of glass microspheres after alkali activation by (a) 3 M NaOH, (b) 5 M NaOH, (c) 7 M NaOH, (d) 9 M NaOH, (e) 9 M (NaOH + KOH), (f) 9 M KOH.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of glass microspheres after alkali activation by (a) 3 M NaOH, (b) 5 M NaOH, (c) 7 M NaOH, (d) 9 M NaOH, (e) 9 M (NaOH + KOH), (f) 9 M KOH.
Materials 15 01043 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of the obtained glass microspheres (% Wt.).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the obtained glass microspheres (% Wt.).
Glass MicrospheresOxides Ratio (Wt.%)
SiO2CaOAl2O3B2O3Na2OK2OTiO2Fe2O3
FGW + 3 M NaOH61
±3
24
±2
13
±1
0.40
±0.01
0.1
±0.02


0.50
±0.02
0.30
±0.03
FGW + 5 M NaOH60
±1
24.2
±0.7
13.7
±0.6


0.70
±0.01


0.50
±0.01
0.30
±0.03
FGW + 7 M NaOH58
±2
19.8
±0.5
11.0
±0.6
1.8
±0.1
7.8
±0.2
0.20
±0.02
0.40
±0.01
0.30
±0.01
FGW + 9 M NaOH58
±2
19.5
±0.5
11.1
±0.5
3.2
±0.2
6.5
±0.1
0.40
±0.02
0.40
±0.01
0.30
±0.01
FGW+ 9 M
NaOH + KOH
57
±2
19.8
±0.4
12.0
±0.6
2.6
±0.2
3.0
±0.1
4.3
±0.1
0.40
±0.01
0.30
±0.01
FGW + 9 M KOH59
±2
19.6
±0.9
11.6
±0.9
1.8
±0.1
0.30
±0.02
5.9
±0.1
0.40
±0.01
0.30
±0.02
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmoud, M.; Kraxner, J.; Kaňková, H.; Hujová, M.; Chen, S.; Galusek, D.; Bernardo, E. Porous Glass Microspheres from Alkali-Activated Fiber Glass Waste. Materials 2022, 15, 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031043

AMA Style

Mahmoud M, Kraxner J, Kaňková H, Hujová M, Chen S, Galusek D, Bernardo E. Porous Glass Microspheres from Alkali-Activated Fiber Glass Waste. Materials. 2022; 15(3):1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmoud, Mokhtar, Jozef Kraxner, Hana Kaňková, Miroslava Hujová, Si Chen, Dušan Galusek, and Enrico Bernardo. 2022. "Porous Glass Microspheres from Alkali-Activated Fiber Glass Waste" Materials 15, no. 3: 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop