Next Article in Journal
Warm Mix Asphalt Binder Utilizing Water Foaming and Fluxing Using Bio-Derived Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation on the Carbonation Behavior of Alkali-Activated Pastes Served under Windy Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Changes in the Surface Layer of Stainless Steel Annealed at a Temperature of 550 °C
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Interfacial Interaction Ability between Basalt Fibers and the Asphalt Mastic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Alkali and Sulfate on the Hydration Characteristic of Cement-Based Materials Containing Coal Gasification Slag

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
2
School of Traffic & Logistics Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
3
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Road Structure and Materials, Guangxi Transportation Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 8868; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248868
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
Coal gasification slag is an inevitable by-product of the coal gasification process. This paper explored the feasibility of using activators (calcium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, calcium sulfate, sodium sulfate) to promote the pozzolanic activity of milled coal gasification coarse slags (MCS), and analyzed the effect of alkali and sulfate activators on the hydration characteristic of cement-based materials containing MCS. Coal gasification slags with ignition lossses more than 15% were removed and the remaining slags were considered as cementitious material after milling. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and hydration heat tests were employed to analyze the hydration mechanism of the samples. Besides, the compressive strength values of cement mortars with MCS and activators were evaluated. The results showed that calcium hydroxide was conductive to the formation of hydration products and its crystallization could contribute to the strength improvement of the sample. Calcium sulfate mainly participated in the hydration process of cement to form ettringite (AFt) phases. Sodium hydroxide could accelerate the dissolution of active mineral phases of MCS, resulting in the pozzolanic activity being enhanced. Moreover, sodium sulfate could not only increase the formation of AFt phases, but also improved the alkalinity in sample to facilitate the production of gels. Among them, a better promotion effect could be obtained from the combined application of calcium hydroxide and sodium sulfate. In addition, the compressive strength values of cement mortars containing MCS tended to increase when activators were used. The sample activated by calcium hydroxide and sodium sulfate exhibited the highest strength, increasing by 18.55% at 28 days compared with the sample without an activator.

1. Introduction

It is well known that coal gasification technology has been widely applied in the coal chemical industry, contributing to the clean use of coal by controlling pollutant discharge [1,2]. However, the coal gasification process leaves plenty of slags, accounting for around 20% of the total mass of raw coal, including coarse slag and fine slag [3]. The vast accumulating of coal gasification slags not only occupies valuable land resources, but also releases some sulfur-containing or ammonia-containing gases, which cause severe pollution to the surrounding environment.
In recent years, the resourceful utilization of gasification slags has drawn the attention of more and more researchers. Zhu et al. [4] adopted coal gasification fine slags as soil conditioners to effectively improve the physical and chemical properties of alkali sandy soil. Additionally, the gasification slags could be used as silicon fertilizers for promoting the growth of rice [5]. Furthermore, previous studies explored the structural characteristics and mineral composition of coal gasification slags, indicating that gasification slags contain active SiO2 and Al2O3 mineral phases [6,7]. In view of those, some researchers employed coal gasification slags as the admixtures in cement-based materials due to their potential pozzolanic activity [7,8,9]. The results showed that coal gasification slag with proper content could have a nucleation and pozzolanic effect, which is conducive to accelerating the reaction process, facilitating the formation of the hydration products, and refining the microstructure of cement-based materials [8]. In addition, Wu et al. [10] believed that the residual carbon in the slags would hinder the hydration of cement. Thus, the fine slag was not suitable to be used as an admixture in cement-based materials owing to its high content of unburned carbon [6].
In order to further extend the application of industrial wastes (such as blast-furnace slag, fly ash, and coal gasification slags) in civil engineering materials, it is a feasible method to promote their pozzolanic activity by using various activators. For example, some researchers analyzed the effect of sodium sulfate on the hydration and properties of granulated blast-furnace slag. The results showed that the compressive strength of the activated slag pastes could be enhanced at all curing ages [11,12]. Besides, sodium hydroxide could also be applied to promote the pozzolanic activity of blast-furnace slag [13,14,15,16]. For fly ash (FA), many studies have been carried out to improve its activity. On the one hand, sodium sulfate could increase the alkalinity in fly ash cement paste and accelerate the dissolution of fly ash, thus enhancing the compressive strength of concrete at all curing ages [17,18,19,20]. On the other hand, sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide were deemed to be effective in accelerating the pozzolanic reaction of fly ash [15,21,22]. For coal gasification slags, Chen et al. [23] prepared geopolymer composites with coal gasification slag and steel slag and found the reaction of hydration and geopolymerization was accelerated by using alkali activators. Xin et al. [24] prepared backfill materials with coal gasification slag, aeolian sand and cement and employed Na2SO4 and CaO as activators. It could be concluded that the activator type and dosage had a significant impact on the changes of hydration kinetic and mechanical properties of backfill materials. Consequently, this indicates that the utilization of coal gasification slag can be further expanded by using appropriate activators.
The objective of this work was to explore the effect of various activators on hydration and mechanical strength of cement-based materials containing coal gasification coarse slag. Firstly, coal gasification coarse slags (CS) with relatively low carbon content were selected and then were milled. Secondly, the cement pastes containing milled coarse slags (MCS) were prepared with addition of various activators. The hydration mechanism of the cement pastes was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and hydration heat tests. Finally, the mechanical strength values of cement mortars containing MCS and various activators were evaluated. This research will be conducive to comprehensively understand the activation mechanism of coal gasification coarse slags by various activators and further extend the application of gasification coarse slags in civil engineering materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Selection and Milling of Coal Gasification Coarse Slags

The coal gasification coarse slags (CS) used in this research were supplied by Shaanxi Changqing Energy & Chemical Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China. The oxide compositions of CS were determined by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF), and the results are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that the main minerals of CS are silicon oxide, alumina, calcium oxide and ferric oxide.
Furthermore, the sieve analysis of CS was carried out according to the aggregate screening method of Chinese standard JTG E42-2005. During the test, the dry coal gasification coarse slags, weighted by 500 g, were screened by hand until the mass of CS on each sieve remained stable. The sieve results are shown in Figure 1. Obviously, the particle size distribution of CS is mainly from 0.15 mm to 2.36 mm.
As was mentioned above, the residual carbon in CS could inhibit the hydration of cement [10]. The ignition loss test is an effective method to distinguish carbon content of CS with different particle sizes. During the test, coal gasification coarse slags weighing about 5 g were placed in a muffle furnace, heated from room temperature to 950 °C and then kept for 15 min. After cooled to room temperature, the samples with different particle sizes were weighed, respectively, and the ignition loss for every sample was calculated. The results are displayed in Table 2.
The ignition loss of CS with particle sizes from 0.15 mm to 2.36 mm is almost more than 15.0%, while that of particle sizes with more than 2.36 mm and less than 0.15 mm are below 7.0%. Generally speaking, the bigger the loss ignition, the higher the content of residual carbon. Thus, it is necessary to screen out CS with high residual carbon content before blending with cement-based materials.
According to the ignition loss results, the CS with particle sizes which were more than 2.36 mm and less than 0.15 showed lower ignition loss, and thus were selected to be admixture of cement-based materials in this study. The selected CS was processed by means of ball milling (SM-500, China), and the milling time was two hours. The particle size distribution of the milled coarse slag (MCS) was determined by using a Mastersizer2000 testing machine, and the results are shown in Figure 2. Moreover, Table 3 shows the physical parameters of MCS.

2.1.2. Activators

The alkaline activators were calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), while the sulfate activators were calcium sulfate (CaSO4) and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). During the experiment process, the soluble activators (NaOH or Na2SO4) were dissolved in water before experiments and then mixed with cement and MCS. The insoluble activators (Ca(OH)2 or CaSO4) were mixed with cement and MCS evenly before adding water.

2.1.3. Other Original Materials

Other materials used in tests were listed in Table 4.

2.2. Characteristic of MCS

Figure 3 demonstrates the formation process of CS. Typically, CS were collected from the outlet of the lock-hopper. In the process of gasification, molten slag gradually accumulated, then separated from the furnace wall and finally gathered in the bottom of furnace under high-temperature liquid ambiances. The molten slag was chilled after feeding into a slag chamber below the gasifier and then discharged from the gasifier [25].
A SEM photograph of MCS is shown in Figure 4. As is demonstrated, most particles of MCS showed irregular block and some small spherical particles could be also observed clearly in the image.
Figure 5 depicts the XRD pattern of the MCS. A small hump in the pattern corresponds to the presence of glassy phase and amorphous material in the MCS, observed at <15° and within 25°–35° of 2θ [26]. It can be found that some mineral phases, such as quartz and mullite, exist in MCS. The majority of those minerals possess pozzolanic activity. Moreover, the activity can be promoted by using various activators.

2.3. Characteristic of MCS

2.3.1. Mixture Design

To explore the effect of various activators on the hydration of cement paste (CP) mixed with MCS, the scheme of the cement pastes was designed, including: (a) cement paste mixed with MCS; (b) cement paste mixed with MCS and alkali or sulfate activators; (c) cement paste mixed with MCS, alkali and sulfate activators. All the samples were prepared in the following proportion: cement 0.9, MCS 0.1, water 0.5 (by mass). The selected content of activators (Ca(OH)2, NaOH, CaSO4 and Na2SO4) added in the sample were 6%, 1%, 2% and 1% as the mass of binders, respectively. In addition, pure cement paste was cured simultaneously as the control test. When the samples were cured to the specified age, they were soaked in ethanol to stop their hydration, and then dried to constant weight at 60 °C before test.
After that, parallel run phase of the study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of the cement mortar (CM). The ratio of cement paste to sand stands at 1:3 by weight. The mixture ratios of all samples are listed in Table 5.

2.3.2. Sample Preparation

The cement paste samples were placed into the standard curing box (relative humidity was 95 ± 5%, the temperature was 20 ± 1 °C) after mixed evenly, and they were taken out for testing when the curing age reached 7 days. The cement mortar samples were prepared in accordance with the Chinese standard GB/T 17671-2020. The size of the sample used for strength test is 40 × 40 × 160 mm. The preparation process of the sample was divided into two steps. Firstly, the samples were placed in a room-temperature environment for one day before they were demolded. Secondly, the demolded samples were placed in a standard curing box until testing ages were reached.

2.4. Analysis Methods

2.4.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

The hydration products of samples were determined by using a Bruker D8-ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer. All samples were ground into powder that can pass through a 200-mesh sieve before test. The tube current and tube voltage of XRD equipped with a Cu-Ka X-ray source were 40 mA and 40 kV, respectively. The samples were scanned in the region from 5–70° (2θ) at a rate of 10°/min

2.4.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric analysis test was conducted by using an SDT 650 thermogravimetric analyzer. The samples were ground into powder when the curing time reached 7 days. During the test, about 5–10 mg samples were placed in an aluminum pan and heated in a nitrogen atmosphere from room temperature to 900 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min.

2.4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

A small piece of crushed sample was selected and the microstructure of sample was observed by using Hitachi S-4800 scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). The acceleration voltage used in the test was 3–5 kV.

2.4.4. Hydration Heat Tests

The heat of cement paste during hydration process was measured by using a PTS-12S isothermal calorimeter, and the hydration heat of sample was calculated according to Chinese standard GB/T 12959-2008. The temperature of the thermostatic water bath was 20 ± 0.1 °C, and the data collection interval was 5 min. Two parallel tests were carried out for each sample, and the average value was taken when the difference between the two results was less than 12 J/g.

2.4.5. Strength Test

A universal testing machine (CMT-5105) was used to test the compressive strength of mortar samples at 7 and 28 days. The loading rate was 240 N/s according to the Chinese standard GB/T 17671-2020. Each sample contained six test data, with average value reporting.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Analysis of Hydration Products

3.1.1. Hydration Products of Cement Paste

The XRD method was adopted to analyze the hydration products of cement pastes which were hydrated for 7 days. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 6. The main hydration products of hardened pastes were gels (C-S-H or C-A-S-H), calcium hydroxide and ettringite (AFt). There was no significant difference for hydration products between CP-MCS and CP-Control, indicating that the pozzolanic activity of MCS is low at the early curing age.
In cement paste, Ca(OH)2 produced from cement hydration and alkali activators can both ionize OH ions, as follows in Equations (1) and (2).
Ca(OH)2 → Ca2+ + 2OH
NaOH → Na+ + OH
When MCS contacting with OH ions, the Si-O-Si and Al-O-Al bonds of active mineral phases can be broken by OH ions, resulting that silicate and aluminosilicate in MCS were depolymerized and dissolved into the solution [27], as follows in Equations (3)–(5).
Si-O-Si + 3OH → [SiO(OH)3]
Al-O-Al + 4OH → [Al(OH)4]
Si-O-Al + 7OH → [SiO(OH)3] + [Al(OH)4]
After that, the above-mentioned ionic monomers were attracted to each other by hydroxyl groups and formed intermediate complexes, further transforming into oligomeric sols after dehydration and condensation. Finally, the oligomeric sols were interconnected with Ca2+ ions and then the hydrated products with three-dimensional network structure appeared in the sample [12], as follows in Equations (6)–(8).
[SiO(OH)3] + Ca2+ + H2O + OH → C-S-H
[Al(OH)4] + Ca2+ + H2O + OH → C-A-H
[SiO(OH)3] + [Al(OH)4] + Ca2+ + H2O + OH → C-A-S-H
Generally speaking, the C-(A)-S-H phases are represented by the peak at 30° (2θ) [28]. With the participation of Al3+ ions, C-S-H gel was inclined to turn into C-A-S-H gel [29].
It is obvious that the diffraction peaks of Ca(OH)2 and gels in CP-CH were higher than that in CP-MCS. The enhancement of the Ca(OH)2 phase was mainly attributed to the addition of Ca(OH)2 activator, while the increase of gels phase was caused by the activation effect of Ca(OH)2. A previous study confirmed that Ca(OH)2 could react with coal gasification slag [6], thus improving the potential pozzolanic activity of MCS.
After the addition of NaOH, the diffraction peak intensity of Ca(OH)2 weakened, while that of C-(A)-S-H at 2θ = 29° and 2θ = 33° increased, which means that Ca(OH)2 from the cement reaction was partially consumed during hydration and more gels were generated owing to the activation effect of NaOH. Furthermore, the diffraction peak intensity of gels in CP-SH was higher than that in CP-CH; it can be concluded that the activation effect of NaOH is better than that of Ca(OH)2 because of its stronger ability to dissolve active minerals.
Generally, SO42− reacts with free Ca2+ and [Al(OH)4] in solution to produce ettringite (CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O, AFt), as follows in Equation (9):
[Al(OH)4] + Ca2+ + OH + SO42− → AFt
The dissolution rate of aluminosilicate and diffusion rate of ionic monomer were sped up by consuming [Al(OH)4] in sample. The promotion effect of sulfate activators on MCS were reflected in the consumption of [Al(OH)4] to accelerate the dissolution of active minerals, rather than directly dissolve minerals like alkali activators.
As is shown in Figure 6, the diffraction peak of AFt appeared clearly in the pattern with sulfate activators and the diffraction peak intensity of C-(A)-S-H gels was also higher than that in CP-MCS.
In addition, for CP-CS, it is worth noting that CaSO4 in paste can react with C3A and C-A-H directly, as follows in Equations (10) and (11):
C3A + CaSO4·2H2O + H2O → AFt
C-A-H + CaSO4·2H2O + H2O → AFt
CaSO4 mainly participated in the hydration of cement, and it had poor solubility. Therefore, calcium sulfate is not an ideal activator for MCS.
Evidently, Na2SO4 had a significant promotion effect on the pozzolanic activity of MCS from the variation of the diffraction peak intensity in XRD pattern. On the one hand, as follows in Equation (12), Na2SO4 could react with Ca(OH)2 produced by the hydration of cement and produced NaOH, thereby increasing the alkalinity in sample and promoting the dissolution of the active minerals.
Na2SO4 + Ca(OH)2 → CaSO4 + NaOH
On the other hand, SO42− from Na2SO4 can react with [Al(OH)4] to form AFt. Thus, the sodium sulfate in sample played the both roles of alkali and sulfate activators.
As to synergistic activation, the gels diffraction peak intensity of the pastes was higher than that of other samples, showing that the synergistic activation effect of alkali and sulfate on MCS was more obvious than any other single activator. Compared with CP-CH, in the CP-CH+SS, the diffraction peak intensity of Ca(OH)2 weakened while that of gels increased obviously. Additionally, the peak of gels in CP-CH+SS was also higher than that in CP-SS. Two reasons can explain such phenomena. On the one hand, Ca(OH)2 was consumed by Na2SO4 and formed NaOH through Equation (12). On the other hand, the increasing of OH ions content could enhance the alkalinity in sample, leading to easier dissolution of active minerals and production of gels. Hence, the synergistic activation of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4 created a better promotion effect on the activity of MCS.
For CP-SH+CS, there were no distinct differences between the pattern of CP-SH+CS and CP-SH, expect for the AFt phase. Such a result further proved that CaSO4 mainly participated in the hydration of cement, but did not accelerate the pozzolanic reaction of MCS. In addition, it can be concluded from the above analysis that more C-(A)-S-H gels were generated owing to the effect of NaOH and Na2SO4.

3.1.2. TGA/DTG Analysis of Cement Paste

The hydration characteristic of samples was investigated by using thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) analytical techniques. The corresponding results are illustrated in Figure 7. Three distinct weight-loss peaks were observed from room temperature to 900 °C in the DTG curves, as described below [17]:
  • The first weight-loss peak below 200 °C was attributed to the decompositions of C-(A)-S-H gel and AFt as well as evaporation of free water in samples.
  • The second peak between 370 °C and 480 °C was regarded as the decomposition of Ca(OH)2 in the samples, which may reflect the activation effect of different activators on pozzolanic activity of MCS. The less calcium hydroxide was left, the deeper the pozzolanic reaction went, and the better the activation effect appeared.
  • The third peak from 510 °C to 730 °C was caused by the decomposition of calcite from the carbonation of calcium hydroxide.
From the results of the DTG curves, compared with CP-MCS, MCS cement pastes with activators exhibited higher weight-loss at the first peak, indicating that more hydration products were formed.
In addition, it could also be observed that the samples with two kinds of activators had the largest weight loss at temperatures up to 200 °C, followed by the samples with a single activator.
For the samples with alkali activators, the intensity of the second peak related to the content of Ca(OH)2 increased in CP-CH, and this was mainly caused by the addition of Ca(OH)2, while that was observed to decrease in CP-SH, owing to the consumption of Ca(OH)2 during pozzolanic reaction. Besides, the sample with NaOH showed higher weight loss below 200 °C, demonstrating that it had a better activation effect than Ca(OH)2. In general, the more hydration products, the better the promotion effect. This result was consistent with the previous analysis from XRD.
Based on the DTG data, the first weight-loss peak of CP-CS was close to that of CP-MCS, and this further proved the conclusion that CaSO4 was not an ideal activator for mineral admixtures. For CP-SS, it was obvious that more hydration products were generated and Ca(OH)2 produced by cement hydration was consumed in the sample. Such a result further demonstrated that the promotion effect of Na2SO4 was better than that of CaSO4. Interestingly, the sample with Na2SO4 exhibited less weight loss than that with NaOH at the first peak. This demonstrates that although Na2SO4 can serve as an alkali activator to dissolve active minerals, NaOH has a better direct activation effect. In general, more gels were formed due to the dissolution of active minerals, caused by NaOH and Na2SO4.
It should be noted that the formation amount of gels and AFt was an important indicator of the activation effect. As illustrated in Figure 7, the addition of alkali and sulfate activators clearly enhanced the activity of MCS due to the relative higher content of hydration products compared with CP-MCS. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the combined application of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4 showed a better synergistic activation effect, which was consistent with above analysis.

3.1.3. Microstructure of Cement Paste

Figure 8 shows the microstructure of cement paste samples hydrated for 7 days. From the thorough observation of the Figure, all the samples contained lamellar crystals, amorphous gels and needle-like hydration products, and they were calcium hydroxide, calcium silicate hydrate gel (C-S-H) or calcium aluminum silicate hydrate gel (C-A-S-H), ettringite (AFt), respectively. In pure cement, the calcium silicate hydrate gels presented with a flocculent structure. Compared with CP-Control, CP-MCS showed more interlacing gels covering on the surface of other hydration products, indicating that MCS participated in the hydration process of cement.
As is shown in Figure 8c, CP-CH exhibited a denser structure. Many tabular crystals could be found in the image and lots of hydrated products were attached around them, improving the compactness of hydration products significantly. However, there were not many gels in the image, implying that the addition of Ca(OH)2 mainly promoted the crystallization of calcium hydroxide in the sample. Obviously, more compact gels appeared in Figure 8d, which showed that the potential pozzolanic activity of MCS was activated and more gels were generated owing to the addition of NaOH.
As shown in Figure 8e, CP-CS also showed denser microstructure, containing some fine ettringite crystals. As to CP-SS, it can be seen from Figure 8f that lots of interlaced and crowded needle bars were distributed in the sample and amorphous gels could be also clearly observed. It can be concluded that CaSO4 was beneficial to the formation of ettringite, filling the void among hydration products, but could not accelerate the reaction between MCS and cement significantly. Nevertheless, for CP-SS, it can be seen that more gels and ettringite appeared in the sample, indicating that sodium sulfate contributed to accelerating the pozzolanic reaction of MCS. Some researchers analyzed the effect of Na2SO4 on the properties of the CaO activated slags [12]. It was reported that the main hydration products of sample were C-S-H and AFt after the addition of Na2SO4, which is consistent with the result of this study. Moreover, the addition of Na2SO4 can fully disperse the raw materials in the sample, resulting in that the reaction between cement and MCS was more sufficient [24].
As can be seen from Figure 8g,h, considerable amounts of hydrated products could be clearly observed in the samples, which demonstrated that the synergistic activation of alkali and sulfate activators caused an obvious effect on the hydration of MCS. Moreover, the sample activated by Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4 showed a more compact structure with needle-like phases crossing around each other and penetrating evenly in gels. Although CP-SH+CS from Figure 8h contained some fine ettringite crystals and amorphous gels, it showed a relatively loose structure. In conclusion, a better promotion effect on pozzolanic activity of MCS can be obtained from the synergistic activation of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4.

3.1.4. Hydration Heat Analysis of Cement Paste

The hydration heat test results are presented in Figure 9. It can be seen that the shapes of the heat release rate curves of all samples were similar. The hydration process can be classified into five stages: dissolution, induction, acceleration, deceleration and slow reaction stages, respectively [30].
Compared with CP-Control, the exothermic peak of CP-MCS decreased by 12.09% in the initial period of hydration, owing to the decrease of cement content in the sample and low activity of MCS at early age. It was interesting to note that the heat release rate of CP-MCS was higher than that of CP-Control after about 35 h, which could be attributed to the reaction between MCS and Ca(OH)2 produced by cement hydration. Obviously, the addition of activators could advance the arrival of exothermic peak of samples and increase the cumulative heat release quantity, indicating that the pozzolanic reaction was accelerated during hydration process.
For the sample with alkali activators, the heat release rates of CP-CH and CP-SH were greater than that of CP-MCS during the whole experiment, and the initial exothermic peak increased by 5.57% and 3.02%. As mentioned in previous analysis, Ca(OH)2 could contribute to the crystallization of calcium hydroxide in the sample, which could shorten the duration of induction stage and make the acceleration stage earlier. Ca(OH)2 could also play the role of an alkali activator in accelerating the pozzolanic reaction process, thus increasing the heat release rate and the cumulative heat release quantity. For CP-SH, the exothermic peak did not advance significantly, which indicated that NaOH primarily promoted the pozzolanic activity of MCS and could not affect the induction period of cement hydration.
For the samples with sulfate activator, the exothermic rate curves of CP-CS and CP-MCS were extremely similar, while there was a slight difference in that a small exothermic peak appeared at about 30 h in CP-CS. It should be pointed out that the exothermic peak in CP-CS corresponded to the transformation from AFt to AFm [30]. Such results demonstrated that CaSO4 mainly participated in cement hydration and produced more AFt, rather than promoted the pozzolanic activity of MCS significantly. When the activator was Na2SO4, the initial exothermic peak increased by 4.48% and a small exothermic peak also appeared at about 30 h. Such results showed that Na2SO4 had an obvious promotion effect on pozzolanic activity of MCS. In addition, it should be noted that in the process of cement hydration, AFt was formed under the condition of sufficient SO42− while AFt was transformed to AFm for lack of SO42− [30]. So, the exothermic peak of transformation from AFt to AFm appeared earlier in CP-SS than that in CP-CS, which may be caused by the low SO42− concentration and result in AFt formation in the sample.
Furthermore, it can be concluded that the samples with both alkali and sulfate activators release more heat than other samples with single activator. The initial exothermic peak of CP-CH+SS and CP-SH+CS increased by 11.2% and 7.98%, respectively, compared with CP-MCS. The more heat release, the more violent the reaction. In conclusion, the synergistic activation with alkali and sulfate was better than any single activator, especially for the combined application of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4. Additionally, the reaction between Na2SO4 and Ca(OH)2 could result in the production of heat, contributing to the maximum heat release of CP-CH+SS.

3.2. Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

The mechanical strength of sample can indirectly reflect the formation of hydration products. The more the products contained, the higher compressive strength shown. The compressive strength values of cement mortars at the curing time of 7 and 28 days are displayed in Figure 10. It is obvious that the strength of samples increased after activators were added. Compared with CM-Control, the compressive strength of CM-MCS increased slightly, which could be ascribed to MCS filling into the pore structure of the hydrated products. Some researchers investigated the microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete, and they pointed out that proper content of admixtures mainly acted as a filler at early age, which could play a nucleation effect on hydration process, thereby accelerating the reaction rate and promoting the formation of hydration products [31].
From Figure 10, it can be found that significant improvement on compressive strength was observed after using Ca(OH)2, increasing by 14.87% at 28 days. Combined with SEM analysis, a considerable amount of tabular crystals attached with other hydrated products could be observed clearly in CM-CH, indicating that Ca(OH)2 could improve the compactness of the structure and contribute to the enhancement of mechanical strength. For CM-SH, based on the previous analysis, more gels were generated owing to the promotion effect of NaOH, being beneficial to the strength improvement of samples. So, the compressive strength of CM-SH was higher than that of CM-MCS, increasing by 13.19%. In addition, although NaOH had a better promotion effect on the pozzolanic reaction, the compressive strength of CM-CH was higher than that of CM-SH, which could be attributed to the fact that the crystallization of Ca(OH)2 in sample could improve the compactness of microstructure significantly, thereby enhancing the strength of sample apparently.
The samples with sulfate activators, CM-CS and CM-SS, also exhibited higher compressive strength than the contrast sample (CM-MCS). Adding calcium sulfate and sodium hydroxide increased the compressive strength from 45.93 to 47.88 and 51.52 MPa at 28 days. As was mentioned in the previous analysis, the samples with sulfate activators contained more AFt phases which was favorable for the strength at early curing age. In addition, it should be noted that the incorporation of Na2SO4 not only participated in the formation process of AFt phases, but also contributed to the production of NaOH which could increase the alkalinity of the sample. That is, the reaction between Na2SO4 and the Ca(OH)2 produced by cement exerted a synergistic effect on the hydration of MCS. Hence, the strength of CM-SS improved significantly.
As to the synergistic activation, the compressive strength of samples with alkali and sulfate activators enhanced apparently. It was proved once again that the combined application of alkali and sulfate activators had a better activation effect on the hydration of samples. When the two samples of CM-CH+SS and CM-SH+CS were compared, the compressive strength of CM-CH+SS increased by 18.55% compared with CM-MCS, while that of CM-SH+CS increased by 15.13%. It can be concluded that better activation effect could be obtained by the incorporation of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the effect of various activators on hydration characteristic and mechanical strength of cement-based materials containing MCS was investigated. The following conclusions were obtained:
(1)
Coal gasification coarse slag contained some active minerals, such as quartz and mullite, which possessed pozzolanic activity. However, the residual carbon in the slags would hinder the hydration of cement. It was necessary to remove the CS with particle sizes which were from 0.15 mm to 2.36 mm. The remaining slags could be considered as cementitious materials after milling.
(2)
The pozzolanic activity of MCS could be promoted by incorporating alkali or sulfate activators. Ca(OH)2 was beneficial to the formation of hydration products. Its crystallization also improved the strength of sample. CaSO4 mainly participated in the hydration of cement to form more AFt phases. NaOH could accelerate the dissolution rate of active mineral phases, resulting in the pozzolanic activity of MCS being enhanced. Na2SO4 was not only beneficial to the formation of AFt, but also played the role of an alkali activator for increasing the alkalinity in sample. Moreover, the synergistic activation of alkali and sulfate had a more obvious promotion effect on the activity of MCS than any single activator and a better promotion effect could be obtained from the combined application of Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4.
(3)
Adding alkali and sulfate activators could increase the heat release of sample. The sample with sulfate activators exhibited a small exothermic peak at about 30 h, owing to the transformation process of AFt to AFm. Moreover, the heat release rates and the cumulative heat release quantities of the samples with both alkali and sulfate activators were higher than other samples with a single activator, especially for the sample activated by Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4.
(4)
The addition of various activators benefited the strength improvement of samples. Ca(OH)2 could improve the compactness of microstructure significantly, contributing to the strength improvement of cement mortar. The formation of gels and AFt could enhance the strength of sample as well. In comparison, the sample with both alkali and sulfate activators together exhibited higher compressive strength, especially the sample with Ca(OH)2 and Na2SO4.

Author Contributions

Z.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Review and Editing; F.L.: Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation; H.X.: Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Supervision; W.L.: Validation, Review and Editing; R.H.: Validation, Review and Editing; P.C.: Validation, Review and Editing; J.Z.: Validation, Review and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 2019D01A44), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978070), Key research and development program in Shaanxi Province (No. 2022GY-422), and the Basic Research Project of Natural Science in Shaanxi Province (No. 2019JQ-118).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, S.; Zhuo, J.; Meng, S.; Qin, S.; Yao, Q. Clean Coal Technologies in China: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Engineering 2016, 2, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Masudi, A.; Che Jusoh, N.W.; Muraza, O. Recent progress on low rank coal conversion to dimethyl ether as clean fuel: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 124024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Du, M.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Guo, S.; Wang, Z.; Fang, Y. Reaction characteristics and evolution of constituents and structure of a gasification slag during acid treatment. Fuel 2018, 224, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, D.; Miao, S.; Xue, B.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, C. Effect of Coal Gasification Fine Slag on the Physicochemical Properties of Soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, D.; Xue, B.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, C. Using chemical experiments and plant uptake to prove the feasibility and stability of coal gasification fine slag as silicon fertilizer. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 5925–5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, H.; He, R. Structure characteristics and composition of hydration products of coal gasification slag mixed cement and lime. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 213, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, F.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, C. Potential of decarbonized coal gasification residues as the mineral admixture of cement-based material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 269, 121259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fu, B.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, D.; Li, N. Investigation on the utilization of coal gasification slag in Portland cement: Reaction kinetics and microstructure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, Z.; Lian, X.; Zhai, X.; Li, X.; Guan, M.; Wang, X. Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Coal Gasification Coarse Slag as River Sand Replacement. Materials 2022, 15, 7552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, T.; Gong, M.; Lester, E.; Wang, F.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, Z. Characterisation of residual carbon from entrained-bed coal water slurry gasifiers. Fuel 2007, 86, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rashad, A.M.; Bai, Y.; Basheer PA, M.; Milestone, N.B.; Collier, N.C. Hydration and properties of sodium sulfate activated slag. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 37, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhao, Y.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, S.; Guo, Z.; Ma, Z.; Sun, X.; Xing, J. Effect of sodium sulfate on the hydration and mechanical properties of lime-slag based eco-friendly binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 250, 118603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. De Filippis, U.; Prud’homme, E.; Meille, S. Sodium hydroxide substitution in slag activating mixes: A potential pathway to more sustainable slag-based binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 300, 124183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karam, R.; Paris, M.; Deneele, D.; Wattez, T.; Cyr, M.; Bulteel, D. Effect of sediment incorporation on the reactivity of alkali-activated GGBFS systems. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dai, X.; Ren, Q.; Aydın, S.; Yardımcı, M.Y.; Lesage, K.; De Schutter, G. Enhancing thixotropy and structural build-up of alkali-activated slag/fly ash pastes with nano clay. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, Q.; Tian, X.; Xie, G.; Luo, X.; Peng, H. Investigation of Setting Time and Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of MK/GGBFS-Blended Geopolymer Pastes. Materials 2022, 15, 8431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zou, F.; Hu, C.; Wang, F.; Ruan, Y.; Hu, S. Enhancement of early-age strength of the high content fly ash blended cement paste by sodium sulfate and C-S-H seeds towards a greener binder. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ali, B.; Gulzar, M.A.; Raza, A. Effect of sulfate activation of fly ash on mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 277, 122329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nawaz, M.A.; Ali, B.; Qureshi, L.A.; Usman Aslam, H.M.; Hussain, I.; Masood, B.; Raza, S.S. Effect of sulfate activator on mechanical and durability properties of concrete incorporating low calcium fly ash. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2020, 13, e00407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adesina, A.; Rodrigue Kaze, C. Physico-mechanical and microstructural properties of sodium sulfate activated materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 295, 123668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bui, P.T.; Ogawa, Y.; Nakarai, K.; Kawai, K. A study on pozzolanic reaction of fly ash cement paste activated by an injection of alkali solution. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 94, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kamakshi, T.A.; Reddy, K.C.; Subramaniam, K.V.L. Studies on rheology and fresh state behavior of fly ash-slag geopolymer binders with silica. Mater. Struct. 2022, 55, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wan, S.; Zheng, R.; Tong, J.; Hou, H.; Wang, T. Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer composites based on gasification coal fly ash and steel slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 211, 646–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xin, J.; Liu, L.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, P.; Qu, H.; Xie, G. Early-age hydration characteristics of modified coal gasification slag-cement-aeolian sand paste backfill. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 322, 125936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kong, L.; Bai, J.; Li, W. Viscosity-temperature property of coal ash slag at the condition of entrained flow gasification: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Patil, R.A.; Zodape, S.P. X-ray Diffraction and SEM Investigation of Solidification/Stabilization of Nickel and Chromium Using Fly ash. J. Chem. 2011, 8, S395–S403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akinyemi, B.A.; Alaba, P.A.; Rashedi, A. Selected performance of alkali-activated mine tailings as cementitious composites: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 50, 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cong, P.; Mei, L. Using silica fume for improvement of fly ash/slag based geopolymer activated with calcium carbide residue and gypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 275, 122171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.; Li, J.-S.; Zhan, B.-J.; Sharma, U.; Poon, C.S. Compressive strength and microstructural properties of dry-mixed geopolymer pastes synthesized from GGBS and sewage sludge ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 182, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bullard, J.W.; Jennings, H.M.; Livingston, R.A.; Nonat, A.; Scherer, G.W.; Schweitzer, J.S.; Scrivener, K.L.; Thomas, J.J. Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1208–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gunasekara, C.; Zhou, Z.; Law, D.W.; Sofi, M.; Setunge, S.; Mendis, P. Microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6441–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sieve analysis results of coal gasification coarse slags.
Figure 1. Sieve analysis results of coal gasification coarse slags.
Materials 15 08868 g001
Figure 2. The particle distribution of MCS.
Figure 2. The particle distribution of MCS.
Materials 15 08868 g002
Figure 3. The formation process of CS.
Figure 3. The formation process of CS.
Materials 15 08868 g003
Figure 4. SEM photograph of MCS.
Figure 4. SEM photograph of MCS.
Materials 15 08868 g004
Figure 5. XRD pattern of MCS.
Figure 5. XRD pattern of MCS.
Materials 15 08868 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of cement pastes.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of cement pastes.
Materials 15 08868 g006
Figure 7. TGA-DTG curves of cement pastes: (a) TGA curves of cement pastes, (b) DTG curves of cement pastes.
Figure 7. TGA-DTG curves of cement pastes: (a) TGA curves of cement pastes, (b) DTG curves of cement pastes.
Materials 15 08868 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of cement pastes: (a) CP-Control, (b) CP-MCS, (c) CP-CH, (d) CP-SH, (e) CP-CS, (f) CP-SS, (g) CP-CH+SS, (h) CP-SH+CS.
Figure 8. SEM images of cement pastes: (a) CP-Control, (b) CP-MCS, (c) CP-CH, (d) CP-SH, (e) CP-CS, (f) CP-SS, (g) CP-CH+SS, (h) CP-SH+CS.
Materials 15 08868 g008
Figure 9. Hydration heat release curves of cement paste: (a) cumulative heat release quantity of cement paste, (b) heat release rate of cement paste.
Figure 9. Hydration heat release curves of cement paste: (a) cumulative heat release quantity of cement paste, (b) heat release rate of cement paste.
Materials 15 08868 g009
Figure 10. Compressive strength of cement mortar.
Figure 10. Compressive strength of cement mortar.
Materials 15 08868 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of CS (% wt).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of CS (% wt).
MineralSiO2Al2O3CaOFe2O3MgOTiO2Na2OK2OP2O5SO3
CS42.5915.4612.677.781.011.011.370.620.30.27
Table 2. Ignition loss of CS with different particle sizes.
Table 2. Ignition loss of CS with different particle sizes.
Partical Size (mm)>4.752.36–4.751.18–2.360.6–1.180.3–0.60.15–0.3<0.15
Ignition Loss (%)0.110.1615.8742.5264.8543.326.63
Table 3. The physical characteristics of MCS.
Table 3. The physical characteristics of MCS.
IndicatorSpecific Surface Area (m2/kg)Apparent Density (g/cm3)Loss on Ignition (%)Water Absorption (%)
MCS314.182.011.121.06
Table 4. List of materials used.
Table 4. List of materials used.
MaterialsTypeSpecifications
Cement42.5-type Normal Portland cementApparent density: 3.15 g/cm3
Specific surface area: 344 m2/kg
SandRiver sandDensity in oven-dry condition: 2.60 g/cm3
Water absorption: 1.02%
WaterTap water
Table 5. Mixture ratios of samples (g).
Table 5. Mixture ratios of samples (g).
SamplesCementMCSSandWaterActivatorsSample Abbreviations
Cement paste (CP)100//50/CP-Control
9010/50/CP-MCS
9010/50Ca(OH)2CP-CH
9010/50NaOHCP-SH
9010/50CaSO4CP-CS
9010/50Na2SO4CP-SS
9010/50Ca(OH)2 + Na2SO4CP-CH+SS
9010/50NaOH + CaSO4CP-SH+CS
Cement mortar (CM)450/1350225/CM-Control
405451350225/CM-MCS
405451350225Ca(OH)2CM-CH
405451350225NaOHCM-SH
405451350225CaSO4CM-CS
405451350225Na2SO4CM-SS
405451350225Ca(OH)2 + Na2SO4CM-CH+SS
405451350225NaOH + CaSO4CM-SH+CS
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Li, F.; Xie, H.; Liu, W.; He, R.; Cong, P.; Zeng, J. Effect of Alkali and Sulfate on the Hydration Characteristic of Cement-Based Materials Containing Coal Gasification Slag. Materials 2022, 15, 8868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248868

AMA Style

Li Z, Li F, Xie H, Liu W, He R, Cong P, Zeng J. Effect of Alkali and Sulfate on the Hydration Characteristic of Cement-Based Materials Containing Coal Gasification Slag. Materials. 2022; 15(24):8868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zuzhong, Fan Li, Haiwei Xie, Weidong Liu, Rui He, Peiliang Cong, and Jinhai Zeng. 2022. "Effect of Alkali and Sulfate on the Hydration Characteristic of Cement-Based Materials Containing Coal Gasification Slag" Materials 15, no. 24: 8868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop