Next Article in Journal
An Improved Modeling and Numerical Analysis Method for Tooth Surface Wear of Double-Arc Harmonic Gears
Next Article in Special Issue
A Numerical Assessment of Mitigation Strategies to Reduce Local Oxygen and Proton Transport Resistances in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Mechanism Analysis of Graphite Tailings Environment-Friendly Concrete
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Protonic Conductor SrLa2Sc2O7 with Layered Structure for Electrochemical Devices

by
Nataliia Tarasova
1,2,*,
Anzhelika Bedarkova
1,2,
Irina Animitsa
1,2,
Ekaterina Abakumova
1,2,
Vladislava Gnatyuk
2 and
Inna Zvonareva
1,2
1
The Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Russia
2
Institute of Hydrogen Energy, Ural Federal University, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(24), 8867; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248867
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022

Abstract

:
Novel materials with target properties for different electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices are currently being actively created and investigated. Materials with high level of protonic conductivity are attracting attention as electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cells and electrolyzers. Though many materials are being investigated as potential electrolytic components for these devices, many problems exist, including comparability between electrodes and electrolytes. In this paper, layered perovskite SrLa2Sc2O7 was investigated as a protonic conductor for the first time. The possibility for water uptake and protonic transport was revealed. It was shown that the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition can be considered a prospective ionic conductor. The layered perovskites can be considered as very promising materials for electrochemical devices for energy applications.

1. Introduction

Novel materials with target properties for different electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices are currently being actively created and investigated [1,2,3,4]. These devices must meet certain requirements, such as high effectiveness, low cost, eco-friendliness and safety. Hydrogen energy satisfies those criteria well, and can be considered one of the most promising energy sources for the future [5,6,7,8,9]. Accordingly, the development of systems for the production, transportation and conversion of hydrogen is necessary. Protonic ceramic fuel cells are electrochemical devices that convert the chemical energy of hydrogen oxidation into electrical energy. The main components of such devices are electrolytes [10,11,12,13,14] and electrodes [15,16]. Though many materials have been investigated as potential electrolytic and electrode components for these devices, many problems exist, including comparability between electrodes and electrolytes [17,18,19,20]. The most studied proton-conducting materials for use as electrolytes in protonic ceramic fuel cells are barium cerate-zirconates BaCeO3–BaZrO3, which are characterized by a perovskite structure [21,22]. However, promising electrode materials such as nickelites [23,24,25,26] and cobaltates [27,28,29] have layered perovskite structure. Consequently, the creation of proton-conductive materials with layered perovskite structure is very important from the point of view of comparability between electrolyte and electrode materials.
Layered perovskites can be described by the general formula AA’nBnO3n+1, where A is the alkali-earth metal, such as barium or strontium, A’ is the rare-earth metal, such as lanthanum or neodymium, and B is the trivalent metal, such as indium or scandium. Monolayer perovskites AA’BO4 (n = 1) were described as protonic conductors several years ago for the first time [30]. Such matrix compositions as BaNdInO4 [31,32,33,34,35], BaNdScO4 [36], SrLaInO4 [37,38,39,40,41], BaLaInO4 [42,43,44,45,46,47] and compounds based on them were investigated, and general regularities of proton transport in doped monolayer perovskites were revealed [48]. Two-layer perovskites with the general formula AA’2B2O7 (n = 2), such as BaLa2In2O7 [49,50,51,52] and BaNd2In2O7 [53], were described as proton-conducting materials earlier this year. It was proven that they are nearly pure protonic conductors below 350 °C in wet air. Accordingly, two-layer perovskites are a promising class of materials in terms of their protonic conductivity. In this paper, layered perovskite SrLa2Sc2O7 was investigated as a protonic conductor for the first time. The local structure, possibility for water uptake and protonic transport were revealed.

2. Materials and Methods

Composition SrLa2Sc2O7 was synthesized using a solid-state method. The starting reagents SrCO3, La2O3 and Sc2O3 (for all 99.99% purity, REACHIM, Moscow, Russia) were used. The final temperature of calcination was 1300 °C.
The XRD investigations were performed using a Bruker Advance D8 Cu Kα diffractometer (step of 0.01°, scanning rate of 0.5°/min, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Raman spectra were collected on the modular confocal Raman microscopy system Alpha 300 AR (WiTec, Ulm, Germany). The 10× objective lens (numerical aperture 0.2) were used to the focus the blue laser (l = 488 nm, averaging three spectra) to a spot size around 3 μm. The morphology and chemical composition of the samples were studied using a VEGA3 TESCAN scanning electron microscope (SEM, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) equipped with a system for energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
The thermogravimetry (TG) was made using an STA 409 PC Netzsch Analyser (NETZSCH, Selb, Germany). The heating of the initially hydrated samples was made at the temperature range of 40–1100 °C with the rate of 10 °C/min under a flow of dry Ar.
The electrical conductivity was measured using impedance spectrometer Z-1000P, Elins, Chernogolovka, Russian. The investigations were made from 1000 to 200 °C with 1°/min cooling rate under dry air or dry Ar conditions. The dry gas (air or Ar) was produced by circulating the gas through P2O5 (pH2O = 3.5 × 10−5 atm). The wet gas (air or Ar) was obtained by first bubbling the gas at room temperature through distilled water and then through a saturated solution of KBr (pH2O = 2 × 10−2 atm).

3. Results

Figure 1a represents the results of the XRD-analysis for the obtained SrLa2Sc2O7 composition. All peaks correspond to the Fmmm space group, and their calculated lattice parameters (Table 1) are well correlated with previously reported data [54,55] (ICSD 67625). Figure 1b represents the results of SEM investigations. The SrLa2Sc2O7 compositions consists of agglomerates (~10−20 μm) of grains (~3−5 μm) with irregular shape.
The elements ratio was determined using EDS analysis. The average element ratios determined by EDS analysis for the SrLa2Sc2O7 compositions were 8.1 (8.3) for Sr, 16.6 (16.7) for La, 16.8 (16.7) for Sc and 58.5 (58.3) for O, where theoretical values are in brackets. A good agreement between the theoretical and experimental values was confirmed.
Local structure of the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition was investigated using the Raman spectroscopy method. Figure 2 represents the deconvolution of the Raman spectrum for the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition.
The low-wavenumbers region (120−200 cm−1) contains several signals corresponded to the stretching and bending vibrations of alkali-earth- and rare-earth-containing metal polyhedra [51,56,57,58,59] (Table 2). The tilting/bending and stretching vibrations of trivalent metal with small ionic radii polyhedra (scandium, in our case [60]) should be located in the mid- and high-wavenumbers region (higher 200 cm−1). This region contains more signals as compared to BaLa2In2O7 [53], which can indicate an increase in the deformation of polyhedra [ScO6] in the structure of SrLa2Sc2O7 compared with polyhedra [InO6] in the structure of BaLa2In2O7. The signals in the 500−900 cm−1 wavenumbers region correspond to the repulsion between the Sr2+/La3+ ions and oxygen ions in compressed Sc-contained polyhedra [61], i.e., it proves the deformation of Sc-contained polyhedra. The additional confirmation of this is the decrease in the lattice parameters and unit cell volume in the row BaLa2In2O7−SrLa2Sc2O7 (Table 1).
The possibility of interaction of the investigated composition with water vapors was checked using thermogravimetry (TG) measurements (Figure 3). As can be seen, the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition can dissociatively intercalate some amount of water molecules, however, the water uptake is not much; about 0.05 mol H2O per mol complex oxide. The mass spectroscopy (MS) results confirm the release of water during heating. At the same time, water uptake for the BaLa2In2O7 composition was about 0.17 mol H2O per formula unit [53]. For the layered perovskites, the possibility of water uptake is due to the presence of enough space between the perovskite blocks and the rock-salt layers [48]:
H 2 O + O o x ( OH ) o + ( OH ) i
where ( OH ) o is the hydroxyl group in the regular oxygen position; ( OH ) i is the hydroxyl group located in the interlayer space. The increase of the size of this space leads to the increase of the water uptake. Accordingly, the decrease of the unit cell volume and the decrease of this space should lead to a decrease of the water uptake. In other words, the concentration of protons decreases in the BaLa2In2O7−SrLa2Sc2O7 row in accordance with the decrease of the unit cell volumes (Table 1).
The electrical conductivity values were collected using the impedance spectroscopy method. The EIS plots for the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition obtained at different temperatures are presented in Figure 4. All EIS plots consist of two semicircles. The fitting of the spectra was made using ZView software (Scribner, Southern Pines, NC, USA), and the obtained results are presented in Table 3. The first (high-frequency) corresponds to volume resistance and has a capacitance of ~10−12 F/cm. The second semicircle (very small) corresponds to grain boundaries resistance and has a capacitance of ~10−10 F/cm. To calculate conductivity, we used the resistance value of the sample obtained by extrapolating the high-frequency semicircle to the abscissa axis (approximation with using the Zview software).
The temperature dependencies of conductivity are presented in Figure 5. The conductivity values obtained under high temperatures and dry air conditions (pO2 = 0.21 atm) are higher than those obtained under dry Ar conditions (pO2~10−5 atm, conditions of dominance of oxygen-ionic conductivity), which confirms the mixed oxygen–hole nature of conductivity:
V o + 1 2 O 2 O o x + 2 h
where V O is the oxygen vacancy; h is the hole. However, the temperature decreasing leads to the increase in the oxygen transport share from 30% at 900 °C to 70% at 300 °C. It should be noted that the BaLa2In2O7 composition is characterized by mixed oxygen–hole conductivity, with a 20% share of oxygen transport in the entire temperature 900−300 region [53].
Figure 6 represents the comparison of the temperature dependencies for the SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7 compositions obtained under dry conditions. As can be seen, the conductivity values obtained under dry air are close, and the conductivity values obtained under dry Ar (oxygen-ion conductivity) are higher for the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition. In other words, the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition is more preferable from the point of view of oxygen–ionic conductivity compared with the BaLa2In2O7 composition.
The conductivity values obtained for the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition under wet conditions are presented in Figure 5 (open symbols). The effect of humidity on the conductivity values started lower, at ~400 °C, which correlates well with TG-data. At the same time, the conductivity values obtained under wet air and wet Ar below 400 °C are very close, which indicates the ionic (protonic) nature of conductivity under wet air conditions and low temperatures. The proton conductivity was calculated as the difference between the conductivity values obtained under wet Ar and dry Ar, i.e., as:
σ H + = σ w e t   A r σ d r y   A r = σ w e t i o n σ d r y i o n
and its temperature dependences are shown in Figure 7. The calculation was made for the temperatures 300, 350, 400, 450 and 500 °C.
As can be seen, the protonic conductivity values for the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition are lower than for the BaLa2In2O7 composition. It is clear that this decrease is due to a decrease of the proton concentration for SrLa2Sc2O7 compared with BaLa2In2O7. Meanwhile, the SrLa2Sc2O7 composition is very promising prospective ionic conductor. The increase of the unit cell volume by the doping, for example, can lead to an increase of the proton concentration in the structure and an increase of the proton conductivity.

4. Conclusions

The layered perovskite SrLa2Sc2O7 was investigated as a protonic conductor for the first time. The local structure, possibility for water uptake and protonic transport was revealed. The doping of the layered perovskite structure potentially can increase the proton conductivity. Based on this, the layered perovskite SrLa2Sc2O7 can be considered as a very promising material for energy applications in electrochemical devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A. and N.T.; methodology, I.A. and N.T.; investigation, A.B., V.G., E.A. and I.Z.; data curation, N.T., A.B., V.G., E.A. and I.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, N.T.; writing—review and editing, N.T. and I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was performed according to the budgetary plan of the Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry and funded by the Budget of Russian Federation The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (state assignment no. 075-03-2021-051/5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Malerba, D. Poverty-energy-emissions pathways: Recent trends and future sustainable development goals. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2019, 49, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Buonomano, A.; Barone, G.; Forzano, C. Advanced energy technologies, methods, and policies to support the sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 4844–4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olabi, A.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 158, 112111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Østergaard, P.A.; Duic, N.; Noorollahi, Y.; Mikulcic, H.; Kalogirou, S. Sustainable development using renewable energy technology. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 2430–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdalla, A.M.; Hossain, S.; Nisfindy, O.B.; Azad, A.T.; Dawood, M.; Azad, A.K. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 165, 602–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dawood, F.; Anda, M.; Shafiullah, G.M. Hydrogen Production for Energy: An Overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 3847–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scovell, M.D. Explaining hydrogen energy technology acceptance: A critical review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 10441–10459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lebrouhi, B.; Djoupo, J.; Lamrani, B.; Benabdelaziz, K.; Kousksou, T. Global hydrogen development—A technological and geopolitical overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 7016–7048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arsad, A.Z.; Hannan, M.; Al-Shetwi, A.Q.; Mansur, M.; Muttaqi, K.; Dong, Z.; Blaabjerg, F. Hydrogen energy storage integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: A review analysis for future research directions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 17285–17312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, J.; Ji, Y.; Shao, Z. Perovskites for protonic ceramic fuel cells: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 2200–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, C.; Huang, J.; Sullivan, N.; O’Hayre, R. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2020, 7, 011314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.; Sengodan, S.; Kim, S.; Kwon, O.; Bu, Y.; Kim, G. Proton conducting oxides: A review of materials and applications for renewable energy conversion and storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 109, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shahid, M. Recent advances in protonconducting electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cells. Ionics 2022, 28, 3583–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, W.; Hu, Y.H. Progress in proton-conducting oxides as electrolytes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: From materials to devices. Energy Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 984–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, N.; Tang, C.; Du, L.; Zhu, R.; Xing, L.; Song, Z.; Yuan, B.; Zhao, L.; Aoki, Y.; Ye, S. Advanced Cathode Materials for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, M.; Su, C.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, H.; Ge, L. Composite cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells: Rationales and materials. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 238, 109881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Medvedev, D.A. Current drawbacks of proton-conducting ceramic materials: How to overcome them for real electrochemical purposes. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 32, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zvonareva, I.; Fu, X.-Z.; Medvedev, D.; Shao, Z. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 15, 439–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, B.; Mi, Y.; Xia, C.; Wang, B.; Kim, J.-S.; Lund, P.; Li, T. A nanoscale perspective on solid oxide and semiconductor membrane fuel cells: Materials and technology. Energy Mater. 2022, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.; Zhu, B.; Shi, J.; Yun, S. Advanced low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells based on a built-in electric field. Energy Mater. 2022, 1, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Syafkeena, M.A.N.; Zainor, M.L.; Hassan, O.H.; Baharuddin, N.A.; Othman, M.H.D.; Tseng, C.-J.; Osman, N. Review on the preparation of electrolyte thin films based on cerate-zirconate oxides for electrochemical analysis of anode-supported proton ceramic fuel cells. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 918, 165434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rasaki, S.A.; Liu, C.; Lao, C.; Chen, Z. A review of current performance of rare earth metal-doped barium zirconate perovskite: The promising electrode and electrolyte material for the protonic ceramic fuel cells. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2021, 63, 100325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tarutin, A.P.; Lyagaeva, J.G.; Medvedev, D.A.; Bi, L.; Yaremchenko, A.A. Recent advances in layered Ln2NiO4+δ nickelates: Fundamentals and prospects of their applications in protonic ceramic fuel and electrolysis cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 154–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tarutin, A.P.; Gorshkov, M.Y.; Bainov, I.N.; Vdovin, G.K.; Vylkov, A.I.; Lyagaeva, J.G.; Medvedev, D.A. Barium-doped nickelates Nd2–xBaxNiO4+δ as promising electrode materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 24355–24364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tarutin, A.; Lyagaeva, J.; Farlenkov, A.; Plaksin, S.; Vdovin, G.; Demin, A.; Medvedev, D. A Reversible Protonic Ceramic Cell with Symmetrically Designed Pr2NiO4+δ-Based Electrodes: Fabrication and Electrochemical Features. Materials 2018, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tarutin, A.P.; Lyagaeva, J.G.; Farlenkov, A.S.; Vylkov, A.I.; Medvedev, D.M. Cu-substituted La2NiO4+δ as oxygen electrodes for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 16105–16112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Woo, S.H.; Song, K.E.; Baek, S.-W.; Kang, H.; Choi, W.; Shin, T.H.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, J.H. Pr- and Sm-Substituted Layered Perovskite Oxide Systems for IT-SOFC Cathodes. Energies 2021, 14, 6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Subardi, A.; Liao, K.-Y.; Fu, Y.-P. Oxygen transport, thermal and electrochemical properties of NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ cathode for SOFCs. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Meng, J.; Zhang, X.; Meng, F.; Meng, J. Investigation of layered perovskite NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+ as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 12048–12054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tarasova, N.A.; Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin; Animitsa, I.E.; Galisheva, A.O.; Medvedev, D.A.; Institute of High–Temperature Electrochemistry UB RAS. Layered and hexagonal perovskites as novel classes of proton-conducting solid electrolytes. A focus review. Electrochem. Mater. Technol. 2022, 1, 20221004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fujii, K.; Shiraiwa, M.; Esaki, Y.; Yashima, M.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, S. Improved oxide-ion conductivity of NdBaInO4by Sr doping. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11985–11990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ishihara, T.; Yan, Y.; Sakai, T.; Ida, S. Oxide ion conductivity in doped NdBaInO4. Solid State Ionics 2016, 288, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, X.; Liu, S.; Lu, F.; Xu, J.; Kuang, X. Acceptor Doping and Oxygen Vacancy Migration in Layered Perovskite NdBaInO4-Based Mixed Conductors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 6416–6426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fujii, K.; Yashima, M. Discovery and development of BaNdInO4 —A brief review. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 126, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhou, Y.; Shiraiwa, M.; Nagao, M.; Fujii, K.; Tanaka, I.; Yashima, M.; Baque, L.; Basbus, J.F.; Mogni, L.V.; Skinner, S.J. Protonic Conduction in the BaNdInO4 Structure Achieved by Acceptor Doping. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 2139–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shiraiwa, M.; Kido, T.; Fujii, K.; Yashima, M. High-temperature proton conductors based on the (110) layered perovskite BaNdScO4. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 8607–8619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kato, S. Synthesis and oxide ion conductivity of new layered perovskite La1−xSr1+xInO4−d. Solid State Ionics 2002, 149, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Troncoso, L.; Alonso, J.A.; Aguadero, A. Low activation energies for interstitial oxygen conduction in the layered perovskites La1+xSr1−xInO4+δ. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 17797–17803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Troncoso, L.; Alonso, J.; Fernández-Díaz, M.; Aguadero, A. Introduction of interstitial oxygen atoms in the layered perovskite LaSrIn1−xBxO4+δ system (B=Zr, Ti). Solid State Ionics 2015, 282, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Troncoso, L.; Mariño, C.; Arce, M.D.; Alonso, J.A. Dual Oxygen Defects in Layered La1.2Sr0.8−xBaxInO4+δ (x = 0.2, 0.3) Oxide-Ion Conductors: A Neutron Diffraction Study. Materials 2019, 12, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Troncoso, L.; Arce, M.D.; Fernández-Díaz, M.T.; Mogni, L.V.; Alonso, J.A. Water insertion and combined interstitial-vacancy oxygen conduction in the layered perovskites La1.2Sr0.8−xBaxInO4+δ. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 6087–6094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I. Effect of acceptor and donor doping on the state of protons in block-layered structures based on BaLaInO4. Solid State Commun. 2021, 323, 114093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I. Improvement of oxygen-ionic and protonic conductivity of BaLaInO4 through Ti doping. Ionics 2020, 26, 5075–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I.; Korona, D.; Davletbaev, K. Novel proton-conducting layered perovskite based on BaLaInO4 with two different cations in B-sublattice: Synthesis, hydration, ionic (O2−, H+) conductivity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 18972–18982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I.; Anokhina, I.; Gilev, A.; Cheremisina, P. Novel mid-temperature Y3+ → In3+ doped proton conductors based on the layered perovskite BaLaInO4. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 15677–15685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tarasova, N.; Bedarkova, A.; Animitsa, I. Proton Transport in the Gadolinium-Doped Layered Perovskite BaLaInO4. Materials 2022, 15, 7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tarasova, N.; Bedarkova, A. Advanced Proton-Conducting Ceramics Based on Layered Perovskite BaLaInO4 for Energy Conversion Technologies and Devices. Materials 2022, 15, 6841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tarasova, N.; Animitsa, I. Materials AIILnInO4 with Ruddlesden-Popper Structure for Electrochemical Applications: Relationship between Ion (Oxygen-Ion, Proton) Conductivity, Water Uptake, and Structural Changes. Materials 2021, 15, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I.; Korona, D.; Kreimesh, H.; Fedorova, I. Protonic Transport in Layered Perovskites BaLanInnO3n+1 (n = 1, 2) with Ruddlesden-Popper Structure. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tarasova, N.; Bedarkova, A.; Animitsa, I.; Belova, K.; Abakumova, E.; Cheremisina, P.; Medvedev, D. Oxygen Ion and Proton Transport in Alkali-Earth Doped Layered Perovskites Based on BaLa2In2O7. Inorganics 2022, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tarasova, N.A. Local structure and ionic transport in acceptor-doped layered perovskite BaLa2In2O7. Chim. Technol. Acta 2022, 9, 20229415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tarasova, N.; Bedarkova, A.; Animitsa, I.; Abakumova, E.; Belova, K.; Kreimesh, H. Novel High Conductive Ceramic Materials Based on Two-Layer Perovskite BaLa2In2O7. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I.; Belova, K.; Egorova, A.; Abakumova, E.; Medvedev, D. Layered Perovskites BaM2In2O7 (M = La, Nd): From the Structure to the Ionic (O2−, H+) Conductivity. Materials 2022, 15, 3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cao, R.; Ouyang, X.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Q.; Chen, T.; Liao, C.; Li, Y. Deep-red-emitting SrLa2Sc2O7:Mn4+ phosphor: Synthesis and photoluminescence properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 795, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, I.-S.; Kawaji, H.; Itoh, M.; Nakamura, T. Structural and dielectric studies on the new series of layered compounds, strontium lanthanum scandium oxides. Mater. Res. Bull. 1992, 27, 1193–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tarasova, N.; Galisheva, A.; Animitsa, I. Spectroscopic and transport properties of Ba- and Ti-doped BaLaInO 4. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2021, 52, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tarasova, N.; Animitsa, I.; Galisheva, A. Effect of doping on the local structure of new block-layered proton conductors based on BaLaInO4. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2020, 51, 2290–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Scherban, T.; Villeneuve, R.; Abello, L.; Lucazeau, G. Raman scattering study of acceptor-doped BaCeO3. Solid State Ionics 1993, 61, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chemarin, C.; Rosman, N.; Pagnier, T.; Lucazeau, G. A High-Pressure Raman Study of Mixed Perovskites BaCexZr1−xO3 (0≤x≤1). J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 149, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. 1976, A32, 751–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paul, B.; Chatterjee, S.; Gop, S.; Roy, A.; Grover, V.; Shukla, R.; Tyagi, A.K. Evolution of lattice dynamics in ferroelectric hexagonal REInO3(RE = Ho, Dy, Tb, Gd, Eu, Sm) perovskites. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 075703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The XRD-patterns (a) (Rp = 1.99, Rwp = 2.03, χ2 = 1.09) and SEM-image (b,c) of powder sample SrLa2Sc2O7.
Figure 1. The XRD-patterns (a) (Rp = 1.99, Rwp = 2.03, χ2 = 1.09) and SEM-image (b,c) of powder sample SrLa2Sc2O7.
Materials 15 08867 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectrum of SrLa2Sc2O7 composition.
Figure 2. Raman spectrum of SrLa2Sc2O7 composition.
Materials 15 08867 g002
Figure 3. TG- and MS(H2O)-results for hydrated SrLa2Sc2O7 composition.
Figure 3. TG- and MS(H2O)-results for hydrated SrLa2Sc2O7 composition.
Materials 15 08867 g003
Figure 4. EIS plots for SrLa2Sc2O7 composition obtained under dry air at 580, 600 and 620 °C.
Figure 4. EIS plots for SrLa2Sc2O7 composition obtained under dry air at 580, 600 and 620 °C.
Materials 15 08867 g004
Figure 5. Temperature dependencies of conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 composition obtained under dry (filled symbols) and wet (open symbols) conditions.
Figure 5. Temperature dependencies of conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 composition obtained under dry (filled symbols) and wet (open symbols) conditions.
Materials 15 08867 g005
Figure 6. Temperature dependencies of conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7 compositions obtained under dry air (filled symbols) and dry Ar (open symbols) conditions.
Figure 6. Temperature dependencies of conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7 compositions obtained under dry air (filled symbols) and dry Ar (open symbols) conditions.
Materials 15 08867 g006
Figure 7. Temperature dependencies of protonic conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7 composition.
Figure 7. Temperature dependencies of protonic conductivity for SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7 composition.
Materials 15 08867 g007
Table 1. The lattice parameters and unit cell volumes of the compositions SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7.
Table 1. The lattice parameters and unit cell volumes of the compositions SrLa2Sc2O7 and BaLa2In2O7.
Compositiona, Åb, Åc, ÅUnit Cell Volume, (Å3)
SrLa2Sc2O75.781(1)5.738(1)20.534(2)681.17(1)
SrLa2Sc2O7 [54]5.781(8)5.736(7)20.534(2)681.09(9)
SrLa2Sc2O7 [55]5.781(8)5.736(7)20.534(2)681.08(7)
BaLa2In2O7 [49]5.914(9)5.914(9)20.846(5)729.33(6)
Table 2. Wavenumbers (cm−1) of Raman bands for the SrLa2Sc2O7 compound.
Table 2. Wavenumbers (cm−1) of Raman bands for the SrLa2Sc2O7 compound.
No of BandWavenumber, cm−1
1128
2144
3165
4191
5214
6228
7240
8257
9278
10289
11303
12326
13348
14406
15416
16461
17560
18625
19810
Table 3. Results of EIS plots fitting, where CPE is the constant phase element (F), and R is the resistance (kΩ∙cm).
Table 3. Results of EIS plots fitting, where CPE is the constant phase element (F), and R is the resistance (kΩ∙cm).
ElementValue (580 °C)Value (600 °C)Value (620 °C)
CPE11.9 × 10−122.1 × 10−122.2 × 10−12
R18.35.83.9
CPE23.1 × 10−103.5 × 10−102.0 × 10−10
R29.26.54.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarasova, N.; Bedarkova, A.; Animitsa, I.; Abakumova, E.; Gnatyuk, V.; Zvonareva, I. Novel Protonic Conductor SrLa2Sc2O7 with Layered Structure for Electrochemical Devices. Materials 2022, 15, 8867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248867

AMA Style

Tarasova N, Bedarkova A, Animitsa I, Abakumova E, Gnatyuk V, Zvonareva I. Novel Protonic Conductor SrLa2Sc2O7 with Layered Structure for Electrochemical Devices. Materials. 2022; 15(24):8867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarasova, Nataliia, Anzhelika Bedarkova, Irina Animitsa, Ekaterina Abakumova, Vladislava Gnatyuk, and Inna Zvonareva. 2022. "Novel Protonic Conductor SrLa2Sc2O7 with Layered Structure for Electrochemical Devices" Materials 15, no. 24: 8867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop