Next Article in Journal
Investigation on the Adsorption-Interaction Mechanism of Pb(II) at Surface of Silk Fibroin Protein-Derived Hybrid Nanoflower Adsorbent
Previous Article in Journal
Hydraulic Activity and Microstructure Analysis of High-Titanium Slag
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of CeO2 Nanoparticles on Interface of Cu/Al2O3 Ceramic Clad Composites

1
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cutting Tools, School of Pharmaceutical and Materials Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(5), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051240
Submission received: 15 February 2020 / Revised: 5 March 2020 / Accepted: 6 March 2020 / Published: 9 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology)

Abstract

:
Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites are widely used in electronic packaging and electrical contacts. However, the conductivity and strength of the interfacial layer are not fit for the demands. So CeO2 nanoparticles 24.3 nm in size, coated on Al2O3 ceramic, promote a novel CeO2–Cu2O–Cu system to improve the interfacial bonded strength. Results show that the atom content of O is increased to approximately 30% with the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles compared with the atom content without CeO2 in the interfacial layer of Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites. CeO2 nanoparticles coated on the surface of Al2O3 ceramics can easily diffuse into the metallic Cu layer. CeO2 nanoparticles can accelerate to form the eutectic liquid of Cu2O–Cu as they have strong functions of storing and releasing O at an Ar pressure of 0.12 MPa. The addition of CeO2 nanoparticles is beneficial for promoting the bonded strength of the Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites. The bonded strength of the interface coated with nanoparticles of CeO2 is increased to 20.8% compared with that without CeO2; moreover, the electric conductivity on the side of metallic Cu is 95% IACS. The study is of great significance for improving properties of Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites have anti-wear, anti-corrosion, and anti-high temperature characteristics of ceramics and maintain the high conductivity and machinability of copper. They have been widely used in rail transit, electronic packaging, and electrical contacts [1,2]. Although Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites have the advantages of a ceramic and a copper, ceramic is brittle and difficult to process. Assembly and connection structures of ceramic and metal are often used. To obtain a stable and reliable Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad structure, the wettability between metals and ceramics and the formation of brittle compounds at the interface must be addressed. These problem are of great research significance [3,4].
Many researchers have carried out the research. At present, brazing and diffusion bonding are the main methods to achieve connections between ceramics and metals. Breslin et al. [5] have suggested that the key problem was the interfacial wettability between the ceramics and metals, so a method of co-continuous ceramic composites was proposed [6,7]. The surface of ceramics coated a layer of Mo–Mn could improve wettability [8]. Active metals, such as Ag, Ti, Zr and V, have been added to study effects. However, general oxygen content was lower than 1 Pa to avoid oxidizing [9,10,11]. Burgess et al. [12,13] have used a Cu-Cu2O eutectic liquid system to bond Cu layers with ceramics for the first time. However, Fan Jinglian et al. [14] have discovered that wettability between Cu and Al2O3 was still not significantly improved when the temperature was increased from 1200 to 1400 °C.
Results [15,16] have shown that the contact angle between the molten Cu and Al2O3 ceramic was 158°–170° under oxygen-free conditions at 1100–1300 °C, so they were non-wetting each other. Diemer et al. [17] have found that by controlling the oxygen partial pressure (pO2) and oxygen content in the copper simultaneously, contact angle could be varied between 125°and 22°. Evaluation of the Gibbs adsorption equation for the liquid/solid interface at 1300 °C suggests that adsorption of a Cu–O complex at that interface plays a key role in promoting wetting. Formation of CuAlO2 and dissolution of Al2O3 in the melt also influence the contact angle, especially in the range of pO2 > 1 Pa. When the content of O was higher than 2 at.%, Cu began wetting the Al2O3. Huang [18] and Chatterjee [19] have found that the addition of oxides to metal solders could improve the wettability between Al2O3 ceramics and Cu layers. However, there are few reports on improving bonded strength between Cu and Al2O3 ceramics by the addition of rare earth oxides and reducing the bonded temperature. Thus, new methods are needed to solve these problems.
In this study, CeO2 nanoparticles coat the interface between Al2O3 ceramics and Cu to form a new CeO2–Cu2O–Cu system to increase interfacial strength. Under a special gas pressure and temperature, the poor strengths of the ceramic/copper composites will be improved. The new phases and elements diffusing at low temperatures are studied. A new Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composite with the addition of CeO2 is fabricated.

2. Materials and Methods

The specimens were prepared in a vacuum tube furnace (Boyun Tong company, Nanjing, China), which was vacuumed to 0.01 MPa and then filled Ar gas at a pressure of 0.12 MPa. The Cu cubes (Zhejiang wanteng metal materials firm, Ningbo, China) were 99.90 wt.% Cu. The ceramic cubes (Shenzhen beilong electronic material factory, Shenzhen, China) were 99.9 wt.% Al2O3. The fabrication procedures were as follows: nanoparticles of CeO2 coated the surface of Al2O3 ceramics → in situ Cu2O formed in the Cu interface in the 40 °C air → the melting of Cu and Al2O3 ceramic clad composites at 1300 °C for 5 min in a furnace at an Ar pressure of 0.12 MPa → a cube with the dimensions 40 × 40 × 30 mm was formed, as shown in Figure 1.
After preparation, the samples were etched in a solution containing 3 g of FeCl3, 2 mL of HCl, and 96 mL of C2H5OH. Their metallurgical structures and microstructures were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and backscattered electron imaging (BSE, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) under a control voltage of 20 kV. The electric conductivity was measured at 60 kHz using a digital portable eddy current tester (FD-102, Xiamen xinrui instrument Ltd., Xiamen, China). The bonded strength was measured with a nanomechanical test for Nano Test 600 (Micro Mmaterials Ltd., Wrexham, UK). XRD patterns were obtained using a Bruker D8 Advance (Bruker Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Hardness of Cu/Al2O3 Clad Composites

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of Cu/Al2O3 composites at bonded temperature of 1300 °C. When nanosized CeO2 is not added, the metal Cu and Al2O3 ceramic could not form a new eutectic solution. The wettability of the two ceramics was poor, so there are many cracks in the bonded interface at 1300 °C, as shown in Figure 2a. The measurements are taken at room temperature. However, a closely bonded interface is formed between the Cu and Al2O3 by addition of CeO2 nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 2b. There are no cracks in the bonded interface at 1300 °C. The conductivity of the Al2O3 ceramic is 0% IACS (international annealed copper standard), whereas the conductivity of the side of metallic Cu is 95% IACS, so the conductivity of Cu in the clad composites is reserved. Figure 3 shows the bonded strengths of the interfacial layer of Cu/Al2O3 clad composites with CeO2 and without CeO2 at the bonded temperature 1300 °C. The bonded strength of Cu/Al2O3 interfacial layer with nanoparticles of CeO2 is 990.3 MPa; however, that without CeO2 is 820.1 MPa. The bonded strength of the interfacial layer coated with nanoparticles of CeO2 increases 20.8% compared with that without CeO2. Therefore, nanoparticles of CeO2 can improve the bonded strength.

3.2. EDS of Interface

The element distributions of the interfaces of the composite materials are presented in this section. Figure 4 shows the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of the Cu/Al2O3 interface without CeO2. In the range of 0–40 μm, the contents of Al and O are high, whereas the content of Cu is the lowest, which indicate that 40 μm is the dividing line of the interface of the clad composites. However, in the range of 40–150 μm, the content of Cu is the highest, and a small amount of Al and O can diffuse to the copper layer.
On the bonding surface coated with nanoparticles of CeO2, the contents of these elements are different from that without CeO2, as shown in Figure 5. In the range of 0–40 μm, the contents of Al and O are higher than Cu, whereas the content of Cu is the lowest in all. This indicates that 40 μm is the dividing line of the interface for the clad composites. The content of O is significantly increased to 30% with addition of CeO2 compared with that without CeO2., which indicate that CeO2 could raise the content of O in the interface. The atom content of O tested by EDS is 15.4% when CeO2 nanoparticles are not coated in the surface of Al2O3 ceramic; however, the atom content of O is increased to 20.4% when CeO2 nanoparticles are coated. Again, the results prove that the atom content of O is 30% higher compared with that without CeO2.
Moreover, the content of Ce arises from the range of 0–150 μm due to the addition of CeO2. Figure 5b shows that the CeO2 coated on the surface of the alumina ceramics can easily diffuse into the metallic Cu layer, but not to the Al2O3 ceramics. O and Cu easily form a eutectic liquid of Cu2O–Cu under certain conditions [12,13], so CeO2 can accelerate to form the eutectic liquid of Cu2O–Cu by storing or releasing O at Ar pressure of 0.12 MPa. However, in the range of 40–150 μm, the content of Cu is the highest, and the contents of O and Al are reduced. The eutectic liquid of Cu2O–Cu is the key factor in improving the wettabilities of the Cu and Al2O3 layers.

3.3. Mechanisms Discussion

Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the nanoparticles of CeO2, the size of which are 24.3 nm for 28.5°according to the Peak Search Report of XRD. Thus, rare earth oxide coated on the surface of Al2O3 ceramics is CeO2. Figure 7 shows the SEM image of CeO2. Due to the presence of nanoparticles of CeO2, elements are active and easily diffused into the layers, which is beneficial for reducing the bonding temperature. Figure 8 shows the BSE images of the interface at bonded temperatures of 1300 and 1500 °C. At 1500 °C, Al and Cu easily diffuse into each other to form the compound of CuAlO2. Which is beneficial to the improvement of wettability [8]. At 1300 °C, the diffusion rates of the elements are decreased and oxidation cannot occur in time; however, the interface coated with CeO2 shows that Al and Cu can diffuse into each other quickly in 5 min. Consequently, slags and cracks cannot form at low temperatures. The results show that the addition of nanoparticles CeO2 is beneficial for reducing the bonding temperature.
Al2O3 and Cu usually do not wet each other. The contact angle between the molten Cu and Al2O3 ceramic is 158°–170° under oxygen-free conditions at 1100–1300 °C [15,16]. Thus, the Cu and Al2O3 are completely non-wetting when the Cu is molten. To achieve excellent properties of Cu/Al2O3 clad composite, it is necessary to improve the wettability between them. A small amount of O could reduce the wetting angle between Cu and Al2O3 [17]. When the content of O is higher than 2 at.%, Cu begins wetting the Al2O3. Moreover, Cu and Cu2O could form a eutectic liquid [20]. However, CuO is easily formed at this temperature, so its formation must be strictly prevented. Therefore, reducing the content of O to prevent the formation of CuO and promoting the formation of Cu–Cu2O are the key factors. In this study, CeO2 can react with copper to form Cu2O instead of CuO, promoting the formation of the Cu–Cu2O eutectic solution. Yang, Y.M. [21] declared that in CeO2 crystal structure Ce+4 was easily converted to Ce+3, or vice versa, which makes the nanoparticles of CeO2 have strong functions of storing and releasing oxygen, as shown in chemical Equation (1). Chemical Equation (2) shows that Cu2O can be formed under the condition of trace oxygen content. The chemical equations are as follows:
CeO2 ↔ CeO2(1−X) + xO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.25)
Cu+O2 → Cu2O
The reduction of CeO2 to Ce2O3 has been reported in the high temperature sintering of fine CeO2 particles by [22,23]. The authors in reference [24] have also proved the conclusion by High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) imaging and Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) diffraction. Thus, nanoparticles of CeO2 can improve the bonded strength, as CeO2 nanoparticles have strong functions of oxygen storage and release and, thus, the addition of CeO2 nanoparticles play an important role for a novel system of CeO2–Cu2O–Cu at an Ar pressure of 0.12 MPa.
The authors in [17] reported that, due to the mutual diffusion and redistribution of chemicals in the melting process, these oxides react with Al2O3 under certain conditions to form CuAlO2, which is beneficial to the improvement of wettability [8]. The corresponding Gibbs free energies (ΔG0) [25] are as follows:
2Cu2O + O2 → 4CuO     ΔG0 = −62354 + 44.89 T
2Cu2O + O2 → 4CuO     ΔG0 = −62354 + 44.89 T
Equations (3) and (4) show that the Gibbs free energies of the above reactions are negative at 1300 °C, so CeO2(1−X) can absorb a small amount of O2 to prevent CuO formation, and CuAlO2 can also be formed spontaneously.
The reaction temperature of 1300 °C is 65 °C higher than the melting point of Cu2O (1235 °C). Thus, Cu2O reacts rapidly with Al2O3 to form compounds of CuAlO2 at the interface in only 5 min. The formation of these low melting point copper oxides and interfacial compounds (CuAlO2) is beneficial for the liquid phase copper wetting of the alumina ceramic (melting point of CuO is 1200 °C). Under certain conditions, CeO2 is decomposed at 1000 °C and easily diffuses to the Cu layer, accelerating the formation of the CeO2–Cu2O–Cu eutectic, as shown in Figure 9. Figure 10 shows the SEM images and EDS of the interface. A strong structure, which is the key to strengthening the bonding interface, is formed due to the triangular type of the Cu2O, and Y type of CeO2 and CuAlO2.

4. Conclusions

(1)
The atom content of O is increased to approximately 30% with addition of CeO2 nanoparticles 24.3 nm in size compared with the atom content without CeO2 nanoparticles in the interfacial layer of the Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites, so the addition of CeO2 could raise the atom content of O;
(2)
CeO2 nanoparticles coated on the surface of the Al2O3 ceramics can easily diffuse into the metallic Cu layer, but they do not in Al2O3 ceramics. CeO2 nanoparticles can accelerate to form the eutectic liquid of Cu2O–Cu, as they have strong functions of storing and releasing O at an Ar pressure of 0.12 MPa;
(3)
The addition of CeO2 nanoparticles is beneficial for promoting the bonded strength of Cu/Al2O3 ceramic clad composites. The bonded strength of the interface coated with nanoparticles of CeO2 is 20.8% higher than that without CeO2; however, the electric conductivity of metallic Cu is 95% IACS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F.; methodology, Y.F. and Z.C.; validation, Y.F.; formal analysis, Y.F.; investigation, H.C.; resources, Y.F.; data curation, Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.F.; writing—review and editing, Y.F.; visualization, Y.H.; supervision, Y.F.; project administration, Y.F.; funding acquisition, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 51574058, 51771041 and 51571160); and the Basic Public Welfare Foundation of Zhejiang (LGG20E010004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.D.; Li, Z.Q. Current status and development trend of metal matrix composites. Mater. China 2010, 29, 1–7. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XJKB201004004.htm (accessed on 14 February 2020).
  2. Clyne, T.W. An introductory overview of metal matrix composites systems, types and developments. Compr. Compos. Mater. II 2018, 4, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hammad, I.A.; Talic, Y.F. Designs of bond strength tests for metal-ceramic complexes: Review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996, 75, 602–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, J.C.; Zhang, L.X.; Cao, J. Bonding Technology between Ceramics and Metals; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Breslin, M.C.; Ringnalda, J.; Seeger, J.; Marasco, A.L.; Daehn, G.S.; Fraser, H.L. Alumina/aluminum co-continuous ceramics composite (C4) materials produced by solid/liquid displacement reactions: Processing kinetics and microstructure. In Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings; Wang, J.Y., Kriven, W., Fey, T., Eds.; The American Ceramic Society: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, A.H.; Li, B.S.; Sui, Y.W.; Guo, J.J. Current research status of wettability in liquid metal/ceramic system. Hot Work. Technol. 2010, 39, 90–93. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SJGY201024026.htm (accessed on 14 February 2020).
  7. Sazgar, A.; Movahhedy, M.R.; Mahnama, M.; Sohrabpour, S. A molecular dynamics study of bond strength and interface conditions in the Al/Al2O3 metal-ceramic composites. Comp. Mater. Sci. 2015, 109, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, W.X. Study on the Interface Wettability and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3/Cu Composites; Xi’an University of Technology: Xi’an, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Z.Q.; Cao, J.; Si, X.Q.; Chun, L.; Qi, J.L.; Feng, J.C. Review of research on reactive air brazing ceramics. J. Netshape Form. Eng. 2018, 1, 1–9. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-JMCX201801003.htm (accessed on 14 February 2020).
  10. Friant, J.R.; Meier, A.; Darsell, J.T.; Weil, K.S. Transitions in wetting behavior between liquid Ag-CuO alloys and Al2O3 Substrates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 1549–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Si, X.Q.; Cao, J.; Song, X.G.; Qu, Y.; Feng, J.C. Reactive air brazing of YSZ ceramic with novel Al2O3 nanoparticles reinforced Ag-CuO-Al2O3 composite filler: Microstructure and joint properties. Mater. Des. 2017, 114, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Burgess, J.F.; Neugebauer, C.A.; Flanagan, G. The direct bonding of metals to ceramics by the gas-metal eutectic method. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1975, 122, 688–690. Available online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2134293/pdf (accessed on 14 February 2020). [CrossRef]
  13. Burgess, J.F.; Neugebauer, C.A.; Flanagan, G.; Moore, R.E. The direct bonding of metals to ceramics and application in electronics. Electrocomp. Sci. Technol. 1976, 2, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fan, J.L.; Liu, X.; Huang, B.Y.; Ling, G.L.; Liu, T. Hot pressing of Ni, Cu-Al2O3 nano-ceramic powders. Powder Metall. Technol. 2005, 23, 120–124. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-FMYJ200502012.htm (accessed on 14 February 2020).
  15. Véronique, G.; Dominique, C. Morphologies adopted by Al2O3 single-crystal surfaces in contact with Cu droplets. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 85, 961–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, P.; Fujii, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Nogi, K. Influence of substrate crystallographic orientation on the wettability and adhesion of α-Al2O3 single crystals by liquid Al and Cu. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 2329–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diemer, M.; Neubrand, A.; Trumble, K.P.; Rödel, J. Influence of oxygen partial pressure and oxygen content on the wettability in the copper–oxygen–alumina system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 2825–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.; Lu, J.S. Interfacial reaction for brazing Al2O3 ceramics in atmospheric environment with CuO auxiliary Ag72Cu28 eutectic solder. Mater. Mechancial Eng. 2016, 40, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chatterjee, D.K.; Ketcham, T.D.; Julien, D.J.S. Conductive Coatings, Sealing Materials and Devices Utilizing such Materials and Method of Making. U.S. Patent 20,100,140,330 A1, 10 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shrestha, A.; Asthana, R.; Lacksonen, T.K.; Singh, M. Synthesis and characterization of air-sintered Al2O3-bronze composites. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2009, 18, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Y.M. Study on the Mechanism of Electro-Diposition and Properties of CeO2 Thin Film; Zhejiang University: Hangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhou, Y.; Rahaman, M.N. Effect of redox reaction on the sintering behavior of cerium oxide. Acta Mater. 1997, 45, 3635–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ozawa, M. Effect of oxygen release on the sintering of fine CeO2 powder at low temperature. Scr. Mater. 2004, 50, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Peng, X.; Tan, X.; Wang, F. The reactive element effect of ceria particle dispersion on alumina growth: A model based on microstructural observations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shi, Y.G. Study on the Regulation of Copper Infiltrated Alumina and Al2O3/Cu Composites; Xi’an University of Technology: Xi’an, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sketch of experimental methods.
Figure 1. Sketch of experimental methods.
Materials 13 01240 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of Cu/Al2O3 composites at bonded temperature 1300 °C: (a) without CeO2 and (b) with CeO2.
Figure 2. SEM images of Cu/Al2O3 composites at bonded temperature 1300 °C: (a) without CeO2 and (b) with CeO2.
Materials 13 01240 g002
Figure 3. Bonded strength of interfacial layer.
Figure 3. Bonded strength of interfacial layer.
Materials 13 01240 g003
Figure 4. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of Cu/Al2O3 ceramic interface without CeO2: (a) interface, (b) Cu, (c) Al, (d) O.
Figure 4. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of Cu/Al2O3 ceramic interface without CeO2: (a) interface, (b) Cu, (c) Al, (d) O.
Materials 13 01240 g004
Figure 5. EDS of interface coated with CeO2: (a) interface, (b) Ce, (c) Cu, (d) Al, (e) O.
Figure 5. EDS of interface coated with CeO2: (a) interface, (b) Ce, (c) Cu, (d) Al, (e) O.
Materials 13 01240 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of CeO2.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of CeO2.
Materials 13 01240 g006
Figure 7. SEM image of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 7. SEM image of CeO2 nanoparticles.
Materials 13 01240 g007
Figure 8. Backscattered electron imaging (BSE) images at samples’ bonded temperatures: (a) without CeO2 at bonded temperature 1300 °C, (b) without CeO2 at bonded temperature 1500 °C, and (c) with CeO2 at bonded temperature 1300 °C.
Figure 8. Backscattered electron imaging (BSE) images at samples’ bonded temperatures: (a) without CeO2 at bonded temperature 1300 °C, (b) without CeO2 at bonded temperature 1500 °C, and (c) with CeO2 at bonded temperature 1300 °C.
Materials 13 01240 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of Cu-Cu2O-CeO2 eutectic liquid formation at bonded temperature 1300 °C.
Figure 9. Mechanism of Cu-Cu2O-CeO2 eutectic liquid formation at bonded temperature 1300 °C.
Materials 13 01240 g009
Figure 10. SEM images and EDS of interface (Cl is the etched residuum): (a) SEM, (b) ceramic side, (c) Cu side.
Figure 10. SEM images and EDS of interface (Cl is the etched residuum): (a) SEM, (b) ceramic side, (c) Cu side.
Materials 13 01240 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.; Chen, H.; Cao, Z.; Huo, Y. Effect of CeO2 Nanoparticles on Interface of Cu/Al2O3 Ceramic Clad Composites. Materials 2020, 13, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051240

AMA Style

Fu Y, Chen H, Cao Z, Huo Y. Effect of CeO2 Nanoparticles on Interface of Cu/Al2O3 Ceramic Clad Composites. Materials. 2020; 13(5):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, YaBo, HaoNan Chen, ZhiQiang Cao, and YanQiu Huo. 2020. "Effect of CeO2 Nanoparticles on Interface of Cu/Al2O3 Ceramic Clad Composites" Materials 13, no. 5: 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop