Next Article in Journal
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Hybrid Energy Storage Systems: Balancing Lead and Hydrogen Storage
Next Article in Special Issue
Ammonia and Biogas from Anaerobic and Sewage Digestion for Novel Heat, Power and Transport Applications—A Techno-Economic and GHG Emissions Study for the United Kingdom
Previous Article in Journal
A New Multilevel Inverter Topology with Reduced DC Sources
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 14
Issue 15
10.3390/en14154710
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Potential Utilizing of Critical Element from Coal and Combustion Residues

by
Yunhu Hu
1,2,
Mu You
2,3,4,*,
Guijian Liu
2,
Zhongbing Dong
5,
Facun Jiao
5 and
Ying Meng
1
1
School of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232001, China
2
School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3
National Center for Coal Chemical Products Quality Supervision and Inspection, Huainan 232001, China
4
School of Bioengineering, Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232001, China
5
School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(15), 4710; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154710
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 21 July 2021 / Accepted: 30 July 2021 / Published: 3 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy from Biomass and Waste)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Strategically critical elements are becoming significant for the rising demand of emerging energy-efficient technologies and high-tech applications. These critical elements are mostly geologically dispersed, and mainly recovered from recycled materials. Coal with high concentrations of critical elements is supposed to stable alternative sources. The abundances of critical elements in coal varies widely among different deposits and regions. The high concentrations of critical elements are found in many Chinese and Russian coal ores. The global mining potential ratio (MPR) is applied and suggests scandium, hafnium, cesium, yttrium, germanium, gallium, thallium, strontium and rare-earth elements could be potential recovery from coal. A number of benefits are expected with the extraction of critical elements during coal utilization.

1. Introduction

Rare metals, known as lithium (Li), gallium (Ga), Germanium (Ge), rare-earth elements (REE), and platinum group elements (PGE) are regarded as strategic mineral resources, which are indispensable substances of emerging energy-efficient technologies or high-tech applications for their unique electrical, magnetic, catalytic, metallurgical, nuclear and luminescent characteristics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The production of critical elements increased significantly in the past few decades. Gallium and lithium production in 2017 was 310 t and 107,322 t, which rose by 59.8% and 30.1% from 2016 to 2017, respectively [8]. Meanwhile, the prices of these elements rose remarkably. Due to their extreme significance for economic development and national security, these metals are intensively valued (Table 1). China listed 24 minerals as strategic minerals in the National Plan for Mineral Resources (2016–2020) in 2016. The European Union listed 27 substances in the EU Critical Raw Material List of 2017 to prompt future utilization of these critical raw materials. The Japanese government released a report, and 31 minerals were presented in 2018. In addition, 35 minerals were identified as critical materials by the United States in 2018 and published in the Final List of Critical Minerals 2018. Australia announced Australia’s Critical Minerals Strategy in 2019 and 24 critical metals were identified. Due to the incremental demand and exhaustive conventional ores of these critical elements, the necessity to develop alternative resources has become an irresistible trend [9,10,11,12,13]. Moreover, many critical elements (including Ga, Sc, Ge) are rare dispersed elements and mainly recovered from recycled materials [14]. Therefore, a stable, reliable, and sustainable supply of these critical elements is of extremely urgent.
Coal resources occupy a significant place in the world’s energy consumption and supply the largest share of global power generation at 38% [15]. Coal production was approximately8012.8 Mt in 2018 and accounted for 27.2% of global primary energy [15]. With the growing primary energy consumption, coal is and will continue to be a crucial energy source in the foreseeable future for its available abundance and cost-effectiveness [16]. Coal not only supplies calorific value, but also contains high concentrations of potential critical elements during complex geological evolution [17,18]. The enrichment characteristics of critical elements (Li, Ga, Ge, U, etc.) have been widely reported [19,20,21,22]. Coal with high concentrations of critical elements (10 times higher than world coal average) is regarded as metalliferous coal [23]. The concentrations of critical elements in metalliferous coal may be equal to (or even higher than) conventional ores, particularly enriched in coal combustion products with the decomposition of organic matter during high-temperature oxidation [16,17]. Therefore, the critical elements extraction from coal (ash) may be positive and stable substitutions to these nonrenewable resources. It is worth noting that coal mining and combustion activities have already resulted in serious environmental impacts, and the traditional pathways to decrease the negative effects are inefficient [24,25,26]. Therefore, recovering critical elements from coal (ash) may not only relieve the environmental implications associated with coal mining activities and reduce conventional ore deposits operation expenses, but also greatly benefit socioeconomic and resource conservation.
The concentrations, associations, enrichment genetic and extraction technologies of critical elements (Ga, Ge, Li, U, REE, PGE) in metalliferous coals have received fairly intensive study [17,20,21,23,27]. Seredin and Finkelman reviewed the genetic types, geochemical processes and modes of occurrence of critical elements in coal deposits (2008). Dai and Finkelman evaluated the potential utilizations of critical elements from coal and discussed the challenges (2018). However, a systematic global-level analysis related to the potential utilization of critical elements in coal is limited [28]. Consequently, the quantitatively investigation of potential significance of coal as an alternative critical element resource is necessary.

2. Methods

The mining potential ratio (MPR) described by Chen and Graedel (2015) was carried out to investigate the potential utilization of coal for the global supply of critical element. The MPR is a dimensionless ratio, defined as the quantity of elemental production from coal to the conventional production of element. According to Chen and Graedel (2015), the quantity of elemental production from phosphate rock was obtained by multiplying the median concentrations of element in global phosphate rock and the global production of phosphate rock. The ranges of elemental concentrations widely differ among different regions and geological environments. The national concentrations of elements in coal and the national coal production are applied in this study to minimize uncertainty. The modified MPR could be calculated be the following formulas:
MPR i = MQ ij GP i
MQ ij = ∑ P j × C j ¯
where MPR represents the mining potential ratio of element i; MQij represents the summation of quantity of element i (Tg) accompanying coal production of country j; GPi is the global conventional production of element i (Tg); Pj is the coal production of country j (Tg); C j ¯ is the elemental abundance in coal from country j (ppm).

3. Coal Production and Consumption across the World

The share of coal in the global primary energy consumption has steadily reduced and was 27.2% in 2018 [15]. However, coal production and consumption increased gradually due to the high requirement for it in Asia region, particularly in China and India. According to the national production and consumption of coal reported by the BP Statistical Review of World Energy (Figure 1 and Figure 2a), 12 countries (China, India, USA, Indonesia, Australia, Russia, South Africa, Germany, Poland, Kazakhstan, Colombia, and Turkey) are the main producers and consumers that contribute approximately 90% of the global production and 85% of the world coal consumption, respectively [15]. This is attributed to the energy reserve, consumer structure and socioeconomic aspects of the countries. The coal reserve of the 12 countries accounts for approximately 90% of the world’s coal reserve (Figure 2b). Among them, China is the largest coal producer and consumer in the world, and accounts for 46% of the global coal production and 51.7% of the world coal consumption in 2018, respectively. In addition, coal plays a significant role in each national primary energy structure, especially for Asia regions. The share of coal accounts for 58.2%, 55.9%, 33.2%, 30.7% and 25.9% of the national primary consumption in China, India, Indonesia, Australia, and Japan, respectively. Therefore, coal is and always will be the major primary energy source.
Coal is widely employed in power generation, metallurgical, coal chemistry, gasification, building industrial and activated carbon extraction. Among them, power generation is the main use of coal, accounting for 62.7% of global coal production [15]. According to the China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2017, coal used for power generation accounted for approximately 49.3% of total coal consumption in China. However, the ratio of coal consumption for power generation in developed countries is mostly higher than 80%, such as 91% and 82.7% for the USA and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), respectively. The combustion of coal can not only provide calorific value, but also discharge coal ash. The global production of coal ash is about 750 Mt per year [29]. Although the global utilization of coal ash increased gradually with the growing application of new technologies (building materials, road construction, soil amendment, adsorbent), a large amount is disposed of or landfilled [30]. The improper disposal of coal ash has resulted in potential environmental problems [30]. Therefore, further multi-component utilization of coal ash should be prompted.

4. The Abundance of Trace Element in Coal and Coal Ash

Coal is an organic resource formatted by long-term biological and geological processes. Elements are almost found in coal except for a small amount of extremely rare elements such as actinium (Ac), astatine (At), francium (Fr), polonium (Po), and protactinium (Pa) [31]. The concentrations of the elements in coal varies among different regions, geological ages, coal rank and coal seam [32,33]. These variations may be attributed to the different plant communities, source material, depositional environment, detrital influx, diagenetic processes, and epigenetic processes [23,34]. The average elemental abundances in coal and coal ash (Table S1) reported by Ketris and Yudovich (2009) were modified intothe periodic table as shown in Figure 3.
The concentrations of elements range from 10−12 ppm to more than 50 wt%. As typical hydrocarbons, C, O, H, N and S are the most common elements in coal, which can totally reach to more than 90 wt%. Si, Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na, and K are the most common components of inorganic minerals in coal, with median abundance higher than 103 ppm. The base metals (V, Cr, Ni, Cu and Zn), Li, Rb, Zr, and some light REE (La, Ce and Nd) generally range from 10 to 100 ppm in coal. The other rare, dispersed elements are mostly less than 10 ppm. The correlation between the median elemental abundances in coal (ash) and continental crust (Table S1) [35] is presented in Figure 4. It could be found that most of the critical elements are depleted in coal when compared with continental crust. The enhanced PGEs (Ag and Au) are found in coal.
Significantly, the natural elemental abundances in coal ash are obviously higher than that of continental crust, indicating the potential utilization of critical elements from coal ash.
According to the description of Swaine (2000), 26 trace elements (Table 2) in coal are supposed to be of environmental concern and could lead to potential environmental impacts during discharge with effective interventions [36]. It could be found that some environmentally sensitivity elements (As, B, Cd, Hg, Mo, Se and Sb) are found to be relatively abundant in coal (Figure 4), which suggests potential environmental impacts during coal utilization. In addition, the concentrations of all the environmentally-sensitive elements in coal ash are much higher than that of continental crust. These metal elements are accumulated and transferred among the ecosystem without degradation. The long-term and excess discharges of these elements during coal activities undoubtedly lead to adverse environmental effects. Nevertheless, these environmentally-sensitive elements are important substances for industrial development. The negative environmental impacts and the element supply shortages could be relived once these elements recovery from coal and coal ash. Therefore, for global development and environmental protection, the potential utilization of elements from coal will be worthy.

5. The Potential Utilization of Critical Element from Coal

Twelve countries (China, India, USA, Indonesia, Australia, Russia, South Africa, Germany, Poland, Kazakhstan, Colombia, and Turkey) contributed90% of the global coal production. Therefore, the MQ was obtained by the summation of the 12 countries to ensure feasibility. The elemental concentrations in coal (Table S2) and coal production (Table S3) of the 12 countries could be found in the Supplementary Material.
The MPRs of the critical elements are calculated and presented in Figure 5 and Table S4. Meanwhile, the enhanced MPRs are listed in Table 3. The MPRs of scandium (Sc),hafnium (Hf),cesium (Cs),yttrium (Y),germanium (Ge),gallium (Ga), Thallium(Tl), strontium (Sr), REE, selenium (Se),vanadium (V),lithium (Li)and beryllium (Be) are higher than 2, suggesting potential utilization.
Sc is the element with highest MPR. The potentially recoverable Sc amount from coal is approximately 29.5 Gg, which is much more than the traditional productions (500 kg) [8]. Sc is generally recovered from the by-products of W, Ti, U and other metals, with the concentration of 80–100 ppm [23]. The low production of Sc is attributed to the low demand and the unfixed sources. The occurrence of Sc in the conventional sources varies widely and is difficult to extract for the existence of thorium [37]. Although the natural abundances of Sc in coal (2.9 ppm) and coal ash (23 ppm) are lower than the suggested cut-off grade (100 ppm) [21,38], the high concentration of Sc (Table S5) is mainly found in Russian and Chinese coal deposits such as Yakhlinsk, Nizhen-Bikinsk, Rettikhovsk, Minusa, and Xinde [23,39,40,41,42]. The highest concentration of Sc was found in the low-ash coal of the Yakhlinsk deposit with 1320 ppm in the ash [41]. Meanwhile, the high concentration of Sc (560 ppm in the ash) was also found in the Amos coal bed in Western Kentucky [43]. Consequently, Sc recovered from coal ash deserves further investigation.
Hf is used in electronics, nuclear industry, chemistry, and alloy material for its excellent performance. Hf is naturally paragenesis with Zr, and mainly recovered from the waste of Zr extraction with the production of 0.05 Gg in 2017 [8]. The MPR and potential extraction of Hf from coal are 370.6 and 18.5 Gg, respectively. The average concentrations of Hf are 1.2 ppm and 8.3 ppm in coal and coal ash, respectively [38]. Nevertheless, the natural abundance of Hfis 11.6 ppm and 9.54 ppm in Chinese coal [27] and Indian coal [44], respectively. Meanwhile, the high concentration of Hf (Table S5) is explored in Chinese coal mines including Adaohai [45], Datanhao [46], Huayingshan [47], Xinde [42], Fushui [48] and Hailiushu [49]. The extraction of Hf from coal ash is regarded as feasible in Asia regions.
Cs is the softest element with the average concentration of 3.4 ppm in the continental crust [35]. Cs is mostly used in the extractive oil industry as drilling fluids. Meanwhile, commercial uses of Cs including application in electricity, electronics, chemistry, and nuclear applications. Cs is mainly associated with and refined from the pollucite ore with the annual production of 20 t [8]. The MPR and potential recovery amount of Cs from coal are 351.9 and 7 Gg.The elevated concentration of Cs (Table S5) is found in the Spetsugli, Lincang and Fushui coal [48,50,51]. The average Cs concentration in Spetsugli coal is 30.3 ppm with maximal content of 50.7 ppm [50]. The accumulation of Cs is related to the circulation of volcanogenic thermal solutions [23]. It is noteworthy that Cs is mainly enriched in Ge-bearing coals in the form of host sedimentary rocks and underlying granites [23]. Therefore, the recovery of Cs with Ge from coal can reduce the mining expense effectively.
Y is usually grouped with REE for similar physicochemical properties and tends to be paragenetic in geological processes [52]. REE and Y are widely incorporated in various emerging power and energy-efficient technologies including catalysts, fuel cells, super-power permanent magnets applied in energy conversion, hybrid and electrical vehicles, and superconducting electrics [22,23]. The natural continental crust and annual production are 168.3 ppm [35] and 167.1 Gg [8], respectively. The REE and Y are mainly recovered from carbonatites (bastnaesite and monazite) and weathered crust elution-deposited ores, both of which are predominantly produced in China (>80%) [52]. With the long-term and excess exploitation, the resources of conventional ores are being exhausted and cannot provide growing demand in the foreseeable future. The natural median abundances of REE+Y in coal and coal ash are 68.5 ppm and 404 ppm, respectively [38], which are lower than the suggested cut-off grade (1000 ppm) [21]. Nevertheless, the coal deposits with high REE+Y have received fairly intensive study [21,47,53,54,55,56,57,58]. TheREE oxides concentration in coal deposits including Guanbanwusu [59], Daqingshan [45], Huayingshan [47], Moxinpo [58], Guxu [57], Eastern Kentucky [53], Vanchinsk [21] are more than 0.1% (Table S5), suggesting recovery potential. In addition, potential recovery amount of REE and Y from coal is 843.2 Gg and 112.2 Gg, respectively, which are greatly higher than the annual production of 166.7 Gg and 0.4 Gg [8]. Therefore, the recovery of REE and Y from coal may be an alternative with the traditional ores exhausted and growing demand of emerging cleaning energy technologies.
Ge is regarded as a technology-critical element for its wide application in electronics, polymerization catalyst, and organometallic chemistry. The annual production of Ge was 98 t in 2017 [8], of which more than 50% was recovered from coal [22]. However, the average concentration of Ge in world coal and coal ash are 2.2 ppm and 15 ppm, respectively [38]. The high concentration of Ge (Table S5) is found in many Chinese and Russian coal ores (including Lincang, Wulangtuga, Spetzugli and Novikovsk coals) with the total reserves more than 10 Gg [23]. It has been reported that the designed capacities for Ge production inLincang, Wulangtuga and Spetzugli coal ores are 150–170 t/a [60], which can satisfy industrial requirements completely. Therefore, the recovery of Ge from coal is and continues to be the main source.
Semiconductor applications (integrated circuits, optoelectronics, and satellites) account for 98% of the commercial production of Ga. Meanwhile, the application of Ga in hydrogen storage is growing gradually with the development of emerging power technologies. The annual production of Ga was 310 t, which was rose 496.2% since 2000 [8]. It is foreseeable that the production of Ga will continuously increase with the growing requirement. More than 90% of Ga is extracted from the bauxite processing, and 10% of Ga is recovered from the residues of Zn-ores. The concentration of Ga in the residues of bauxite and Zn ores ranged from 30 to 80 ppm with the median value of approximately 50 ppm [23]. The natural abundances of Ga in world coal and coal ash are 5.8 ppm and 33 ppm, respectively [38], which meets the suggested cut-off grade (30 ppm). In addition, elevated Ga concentration (Table S5) and large reserves are detected in many coal deposits [45,54,56,58,59]. The concentration and reserve of Ga are 92 ppm in coal ash and 49 Gg in Jungar Coalfield, respectively. The utilization potential is proven by the MPR of Ga (152.71) [20]. Therefore, coal could be considered as new deposits for Ga.
The traditional production of Tl is mainly recovered from the by-products of Cu, Pb and Zn processing with annual amounts of 30 t [8]. More than 60% of Tl is used in the electronics industry, and the remainder is utilized in the pharmaceutical industry and glass manufacturing. The high MPR and potential recovery amount suggest that the mining potential of Tl from coal may increase the production of Tl effectively. Sr is an alkaline earth metal that is highly chemically reactive. The consumption of Sr is decreasing with the substitution of cathode ray tubes in color televisions. Nevertheless, the large annual production of Sr (137 Gg) suggests the mining potential from coal [8]. The MPRs of Se, V, Li and Be range from 2 to 5, thus, the utilization potential should not be ignored. According to Table S5, the elevated concentrations of Se, V, Li and Be are found in many coal ores [20,21,23,40,56,58,61]. Among then, the recovery of Se from coal was commercialization [20]. The recovery cost and efficiency of these elements from coal may be equal to or even lower than conventional productions.

6. Future Prospects

Most of the aforementioned critical elements are produced from the by-products of base metals (Cu, Pb, Ni and Zn) without steady production capacity. The recovery of these critical elements from coal with high concentrations may be expected for the many mineral resources, and economic and environmental benefits (Figure 6).
Nevertheless, the commercial extraction of critical elements from coal and coal ash suffers from different theoretical, technological, economic and environmental difficulties.
(1) Many theoretical issues need to be studied. The high-efficiency and cost effective recovery of critical elements from coal is greatly determined by their concentrations and associations in coal. The concentration and reserve of critical elements in coal is of extreme significance for the mining potential. The modes of occurrence of critical elements in coal can provide important information for the design of recovery methods. The enrichment mechanisms and modes of occurrence of critical elements should be solved.
(2) Various technological difficulties including exploration, joint-mining, and co-extraction methods should be developed. The concentrations of critical elements varied among different coal-forming period, coal rank, coal seam and even in the different location of the same coal seam. In addition, many critical elements are enriched in the coal seam. For example, V, Se, Mo, REE, Y and Ga are usually co-enriched in the high-Ga coal ores. To minimize mining costs and maximize extracting multiple elements, high precision exploration methods, joint mining and extraction technologies should be developed.
(3) The recovery cost and market price of critical elements should be considered. The recovery cost is a very important factor in critical element recovery. Much effort has been expanded in studying the recovery of critical elements from coal. Solvent extraction is regarded as a promising method for the extraction of critical elements. However, the extraction costs of solvent recovery are unfavorable economics for the high prices of regents. Meanwhile, the market prices of the critical elements also influence the commercial mining potential of critical elements.
(4) Emerging environmental issues should also be of concern. Some toxic elements (As, Hg, Cd) may be co-enriched with critical elements in coal ores during the complex geological processes. These toxic elements may be released and enter intothe environment during recovery of critical elements, resulting in potential environmental and health risks. Therefore, the countermeasures for control of toxic elements during recovery should be adopted.

7. Conclusions

Coal contains high concentrations of potential critical elements during complex geological evolution. The abundances of critical elements in coal varied widely among different deposits and regions. The high concentrations of critical elements are found in many Chinese and Russian coal ores. The potential utilization of elements from coal will be worthy for global development and environmental protection. The concentrations of critical elements in the global coal ash are higher than that of continental crust. According to the mining potential analysis and enrichment characterizations of critical elements, the coal hosted ore deposits are regarded as highly alternative sources for Sc, Hf, Cs, Y, Ge, Ga Tl, Sr and REE. The industrial extraction of critical elements from coal can obtain both economic and environmental benefits. Nevertheless, the commercial recovery of critical elements from coal still suffers from many theoretical, technical, environmental, and economical difficulties.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en14154710/s1, Table S1: The natural abundances of trace elements in continental crust, world coal and coal ash (ppm), Table S2: The abundances of trace elements in different countries coal (mg/kg), Table S3: The coal productions of the selected countries (million tons). Table S4: The Mining potential ratios (MPR) for trace elements in coal when compared to the global production in 2017. Table S5: Distribution of high concentrations of critical resources in coal (ppm).

Author Contributions

Y.H.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation. M.Y.: investigation, data curation. G.L.: software, investigation. Z.D.: data curation. F.J.: reviewing and editing. Y.M.: reviewing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Key Program for Science and Technology Development of Anhui Province (No. 1908085MD113), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 2020B438), the major science and technology projects in Anhui Province (No. 202003a07020022).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the editors and reviewers for polishing the language of the paper and for in-depth discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Afonso, E.L.; Carvalho, L.; Fateixa, S.; Amorim, C.O.; Amaral, V.S.; Vale, C.; Pereira, E.; Silva, C.M.; Trindade, T.; Lopes, C.B. Can contaminated waters or wastewater be alternative sources for technology-critical elements? The case of removal and recovery of lanthanides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 380, 120845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Canovas, C.R.; Chapron, S.; Arrachart, G.; Pellet-Rostaing, S. Leaching of rare earth elements (REEs) and impurities from phosphogypsum: A preliminary insight for further recovery of critical raw materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 219, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Diallo, M.S.; Kotte, M.R.; Chot, M. Mining Critical Metals and Elements from Seawater: Opportunities and Challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 9390–9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Negrel, P.; Ladenberger, A.; Reimann, C.; Birke, M.; Demetriades, A.; Sadeghi, M.; Albanese, S.; Andersson, M.; Baritz, R.; Batista, M.J.; et al. GEMAS: Geochemical background and mineral potential of emerging tech-critical elements in Europe revealed from low-sampling density geochemical mapping. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 111, 104425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prodius, D.; Gandha, K.; Mudring, A.V.; Nlebedim, I.C. Sustainable Urban Mining of Critical Elements from Magnet and Electronic Wastes. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1455–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, M.P.; Moore, K.; Kavecsanszki, D.; Finch, A.A.; Kynicky, J.; Wall, F. From mantle to critical zone: A review of large and giant sized deposits of the rare earth elements. Geosci. Front. 2016, 7, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Etschmann, B.; Liu, W.H.; Li, K.; Dai, S.F.; Reith, F.; Falconer, D.; Kerr, G.; Paterson, D.; Howard, D.; Kappen, P.; et al. Enrichment of germanium and associated arsenic and tungsten in coal and roll-front uranium deposits. Chem. Geol. 2017, 463, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. BMNT. World Mining Data 2019; Austrian Federal Ministry of Sustainability and Tourism: Vienna, Austria, 2019.
  9. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, S.C.; Coulon, F.; Jiang, Y.; Wagland, S.T. Rare earth elements and critical metal content of extracted landfilled material and potential recovery opportunities. Waste Manag. 2015, 42, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huang, Z.X.; Fan, M.H.; Tiand, H.J. Coal and coal byproducts: A large and developable unconventional resource for critical materials—Rare earth elements. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 337–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jacinto, J.; Henriques, B.; Duarte, A.C.; Vale, C.; Pereira, E. Removal and recovery of Critical Rare Elements from contaminated waters by living Gracilariagracilis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tkaczyk, A.H.; Bartl, A.; Amato, A.; Lapkovskis, V.; Petranikova, M. Sustainability evaluation of essential critical raw materials: Cobalt, niobium, tungsten and rare earth elements. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 203001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tunsu, C.; Petranikova, M. Perspectives for the recovery of critical elements from future energy-efficient refrigeration materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nuss, P.; Blengini, G.A. Towards better monitoring of technology critical elements in Europe: Coupling of natural and anthropogenic cycles. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dudley, B. BP Statistical Review of World Energy; BP Statistical Review of World Energy: London, UK, 2019; Available online: http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview (accessed on 1 July 2021).
  16. Kolker, A.; Hower, J.C.; Karamalidis, A.K. Introduction to critical elements in coal and coal ash and their recovery, a virtual special issue. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2019, 206, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dai, S.; Finkelman, R.B. Coal as a promising source of critical elements: Progress and future prospects. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2018, 186, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hower, J.C.; Ruppert, L.F.; Eble, C.F.; Clark, W.L. Geochemistry, petrology, and palynology of the Pond Creek coal bed, northern Pike and southern Martin counties, Kentucky. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2005, 62, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, W.C.; Honaker, R. Characterization and recovery of rare earth elements and other critical metals (Co, Cr, Li, Mn, Sr, and V) from the calcination products of a coal refuse sample. Fuel 2020, 267, 117236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dai, S.F.; Yan, X.Y.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X.B.; Zhao, L.X.; Ren, D.Y.; Finkelman, R.B. Valuable elements in Chinese coals: A review. Int. Geol. Rev. 2018, 60, 590–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seredin, V.V. Metalliferous coals: Formation conditions and outlooks for development. Coal Resour. Russ. 2004, 6, 452–519. [Google Scholar]
  22. Seredin, V.V.; Dai, S.F.; Sun, Y.Z.; Chekryzhov, I.Y. Coal deposits as promising sources of rare metals for alternative power and energy-efficient technologies. Appl. Geochem. 2013, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seredin, V.V.; Finkelman, R.B. Metalliferous coals: A review of the main genetic and geochemical types. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2008, 76, 253–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, C.C.; Liu, G.J.; Wang, X.D.; Qi, C.C.; Hu, Y.H. Combustion characteristics and arsenic retention during co-combustion of agricultural biomass and bituminous coal. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 214, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, C.C.; Liu, G.J.; Wu, D.; Fang, T.; Wang, R.W.; Fan, X. Mobility behavior and environmental implications of trace elements associated with coal gangue: A case study at the Huainan Coalfield in China. Chemosphere 2014, 95, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhou, C.C.; Liu, G.J.; Xu, Z.Y.; Sun, H.; Lam, P.K.S. Retention mechanisms of ash compositions on toxic elements (Sb, Se and Pb) during fluidized bed combustion. Fuel 2018, 213, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dai, S.F.; Ren, D.Y.; Chou, C.L.; Finkelman, R.B.; Seredin, V.V.; Zhou, Y.P. Geochemistry of trace elements in Chinese coals: A review of abundances, genetic types, impacts on human health, and industrial utilization. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 94, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, R.H.; Soong, Y.; Granite, E.J. Evaluation of trace elements in US coals using the USGS COALQUAL database version 3.0. Part II: Non-REY critical elements. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2018, 192, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blissett, R.S.; Rowson, N.A. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel 2012, 97, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yao, Z.T.; Ji, X.S.; Sarker, P.K.; Tang, J.H.; Ge, L.Q.; Xia, M.S.; Xi, Y.Q. A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth Sci. Rev. 2015, 141, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Finkelman, R.B. Trace and minor elements in coal. In Organic Geochemistry; Engel, M.H., Masko, S.A., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 593–607. [Google Scholar]
  32. Finkelman, R.B.; Dai, S.F.; French, D. The importance of minerals in coal as the hosts of chemical elements: A review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2019, 212, 103251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Finkelman, R.B.; Palmer, C.A.; Wang, P.P. Quantification of the modes of occurrence of 42 elements in coal. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2018, 185, 138–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ward, C.R. Analysis, origin and significance of mineral matter in coal: An updated review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 165, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wedepohl, K.H. The Composition of the Continental-Crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Swaine, D.J. Why trace elements are important. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, M.P.; Graedel, T.E. The potential for mining trace elements from phosphate rock. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 91, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ketris, M.P.; Yudovich, Y.E. Estimations of Clarkes for Carbonaceous biolithes: World averages for trace element contents in black shales and coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2009, 78, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arbuzov, S.I.; Ershov, V.V.; Rikhvanov, L.P.; Rikhvanov, L.P. Rare-Metal Potential of Coals in the Minusa Basin; Acad. Sci. (Siberian Division): Novosibirsk, Russia, 2003; p. 347. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nifantov, B.F. Valuable and toxic elements in coals. In Coal Resources of Russia; Geoinformmark: Moscow, Russia, 2003; Volume II, pp. 77–91. [Google Scholar]
  41. Seredin, V.V. Germanium deposits. In Large and Superlarge Ore Deposits; Laverov, N.P., Rundkvist, D.V., Eds.; IGEM RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2006; Volume 3, pp. 707–736. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dai, S.F.; Li, T.; Seredin, V.V.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; Zhou, Y.P.; Zhang, M.Q.; Song, X.L.; Song, W.J.; Zhao, C.L. Origin of minerals and elements in the Late Permian coals, tonsteins, and host rocks of the Xinde Mine, Xuanwei, eastern Yunnan, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 121, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hower, J.C.; Ruppert, L.F.; Williams, D.A. Controls on boron and germanium distribution in the low-sulfur Amos coal bed, Western Kentucky coalfield, USA. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2002, 53, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saha, D.; Chakravarty, S.; Shome, D.; Basariya, M.R.; Kumari, A.; Kundu, A.K.; Chatterjee, D.; Adhikari, J.; Chatterjee, D. Distribution and affinity of trace elements in Samaleswari coal, Eastern India. Fuel 2016, 181, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dai, S.F.; Zou, J.H.; Jiang, Y.F.; Ward, C.R.; Wang, X.B.; Li, T.; Xue, W.F.; Liu, S.D.; Tian, H.M.; Sun, X.H.; et al. Mineralogical and geochemical compositions of the Pennsylvanian coal in the Adaohai Mine, Daqingshan Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China: Modes of occurrence and origin of diaspore, gorceixite, and ammonianillite. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 94, 250–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, L.; Dai, S.F.; Nechaev, V.P.; Nechaeva, E.V.; Graham, I.T.; French, D.; Sun, J.H. Enrichment of critical elements (Nb-Ta-Zr-Hf-REE) within coal and host rocks from the Datanhao mine, Daqingshan Coalfield, northern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 111, 102951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dai, S.F.; Luo, Y.B.; Seredin, V.V.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; Zhao, L.; Liu, S.D.; Zhao, C.L.; Tian, H.M.; Zou, J.H. Revisiting the late Permian coal from the Huayingshan, Sichuan, southwestern China: Enrichment and occurrence modes of minerals and trace elements. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 122, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dai, S.F.; Zhang, W.G.; Ward, C.R.; Seredin, V.V.; Hower, J.C.; Li, X.; Song, W.J.; Wang, X.B.; Kang, H.; Zheng, L.C.; et al. Mineralogical and geochemical anomalies of late Permian coals from the Fusui Coalfield, Guangxi Province, southern China: Influences of terrigenous materials and hydrothermal fluids. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2013, 105, 60–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dai, S.F.; Li, T.J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; Sun, J.H.; Liu, J.J.; Song, H.J.; Wei, J.P.; Li, Q.Q.; et al. Mineralogical and geochemical compositions of the Pennsylvanian coal in the Hailiushu Mine, Daqingshan Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China: Implications of sediment-source region and acid hydrothermal solutions. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 137, 92–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Seredin, V.V. Anomalous concentrations of trace elements in the spetsugli germanium deposit (Pavlovka brown coal deposit, southern primorye): Communication 2. Rubidium and cesium. Lithol. Min. Resour. 2003, 38, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qi, H.W.; Hu, R.Z.; Su, W.; Qi, L.; Feng, J. Continental hydrothermal sedimentary siliceous rock and genesis of superlarge germanium (Ge) deposit hosted in coal: A study from the LincangGe deposits, Yunnan, China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2004, 47, 973–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lefticariu, L.; Klitzing, K.L.; Kolker, A. Rare Earth Elements and Yttrium (REY) in coal mine drainage from the Illinois Basin, USA. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2020, 217, 103327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hower, J.C.; Calder, J.H.; Eble, C.F. Lanthanide, yttrium, and zironium anomalies in the fire clay coal bed, Eastern Kentucky. Int. J. Coal Geol. 1999, 39, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dai, S.F.; Ren, D.Y.; Chou, C.L.; Li, S.S.; Jiang, Y.F. Mineralogy and geochemistry of the No. 6 coal (Pennsylvanian) in the Junger Coalfield, Ordos Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2006, 66, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dai, S.F.; Zhou, Y.P.; Ren, D.Y.; Wang, X.B.; Li, D.; Zhao, L. Geochemistry and mineralogy of the Late Permian coals from the Songzao Coalfield, Chongqing, southwestern China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2007, 50, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dai, S.F.; Li, D.; Chou, C.L.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, D.; Ma, Y.W.; Sun, Y.Y. Mineralogy and geochemistry of boehmite-rich coals: New insights from the Haerwusu Surface Mine, Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2008, 74, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dai, S.F.; Liu, J.J.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; French, D.; Jia, S.H.; Hood, M.M.; Garrison, T.M. Mineralogical and geochemical compositions of Late Permian coals and host rocks from the Guxu Coalfield, Sichuan Province, China, with emphasis on enrichment of rare metals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 166, 71–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dai, S.F.; Xie, P.P.; Jia, S.H.; Ward, C.R.; Hower, J.C.; Yan, X.Y.; French, D. Enrichment of U-Re-V-Cr-Se and rare earth elements in the Late Permian coals of the Moxinpo Coalfield, Chongqing, China: Genetic implications from geochemical and mineralogical data. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 80, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dai, S.F.; Jiang, Y.F.; Ward, C.R.; Gu, L.D.; Seredin, V.V.; Liu, H.D.; Zhou, D.; Wang, X.B.; Sun, Y.Z.; Zou, J.H.; et al. Mineralogical and geochemical compositions of the coal in the Guanbanwusu Mine, Inner Mongolia, China: Further evidence for the existence of an Al (Ga and REE) ore deposit in the Jungar Coalfield. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 98, 10–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dai, S.F.; Seredin, V.V.; Ward, C.R.; Jiang, J.H.; Hower, J.C.; Song, X.L.; Jiang, Y.F.; Wang, X.B.; Gornostaeva, T.; Li, X.; et al. Composition and modes of occurrence of minerals and elements in coal combustion products derived from high-Ge coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 121, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hower, J.C.; Greb, S.F.; Cobb, J.C.; Williams, D.A. Discussion on origin of vanadium in coals: Parts of the Western Kentucky (USA) No. 9 coal rich in vanadium. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 2000, 157, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 14 04710 g001 550
Figure 1. The distributions of the world’s coal production from 1989–2020.
Figure 1. The distributions of the world’s coal production from 1989–2020.
Energies 14 04710 g001
Energies 14 04710 g002 550
Figure 2. The distributions of the world’s coal consumption (a) and reserve (b) in 2020.
Figure 2. The distributions of the world’s coal consumption (a) and reserve (b) in 2020.
Energies 14 04710 g002
Energies 14 04710 g003 550
Figure 3. The Clake values of major elements and trace elements in the world coal. The element in different colors mean the current situation of utilization.
Figure 3. The Clake values of major elements and trace elements in the world coal. The element in different colors mean the current situation of utilization.
Energies 14 04710 g003
Energies 14 04710 g004 550
Figure 4. The correlation between the median elemental abundances in coal (ash) and continental crust.
Figure 4. The correlation between the median elemental abundances in coal (ash) and continental crust.
Energies 14 04710 g004
Energies 14 04710 g005 550
Figure 5. Mining potential ratios for critical elements in coal. The actual values are listed in Supplementary Information.
Figure 5. Mining potential ratios for critical elements in coal. The actual values are listed in Supplementary Information.
Energies 14 04710 g005
Energies 14 04710 g006 550
Figure 6. The benefits for recovery of critical elements from coal.
Figure 6. The benefits for recovery of critical elements from coal.
Energies 14 04710 g006
Table
Table 1. Detailed list of critical elements.
Table 1. Detailed list of critical elements.
Critical ElementUSAAustraliaEUJapanChina
Aluminum (Al)X XX
Antimony (Sb)XXXXX
Arsenic (As)X
Beryllium (Be)XXX
Bismuth (Bi)XXX
Cesium (Cs)X
Chromium (Cr)XX XX
Cobalt (Co)XXXXX
Copper (Cu) XX
Gallium (Ga)XXXX
Germanium (Ge)XXXX
Hafnium (Hf)XXX
Nickel (Ni) XX
Indium (In)XXXX
Iron (Fe) XX
Lead (Pb) X
Lithium (Li)XX XX
Magnesium (Mg)XXXX
Manganese (Mn)XX X
Molybdenum (Mo) XX
Niobium (Nb)XXXX
Potassium (K)X X
Rhenium (Re)XX X
Rubidium (Rb)X
Scandium (Sc)XXXX
Silicon (Si) XX
Strontium (Sr)X
Tantalum (Ta)XXXX
Tellurium (Te)X
Tin (Sn)X XX
Titanium (Ti)XX X
Tungsten (W)XXXXX
Uranium (U)X
Vanadium (V)XXXX
Zinc (Zn) X
ZirconXX XX
REEXXXXX
PGEXXXXX
PGE: platinum-group elements; REE: rare-earth elements.
Table
Table 2. Trace elements considered to be of environmental concern in coal (Swaine, 2000).
Table 2. Trace elements considered to be of environmental concern in coal (Swaine, 2000).
GradeElements
Extremely high concernAs, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Se
High concernB, Cl, F, Mn, Mo, Ni, Be, Cu, P, Th, U, V, Zn
Moderate concernBa, Co, I, Ra, Sb, Sn, Tl
Table
Table 3. The MPRs of some trace elements in coal.
Table 3. The MPRs of some trace elements in coal.
ElementScHfCsYGeGaTl
MPR0.6370.6351.9280.6234.3152.793.9
ElementSrREESeVLiBe
MPR6.315.064.113.062.482.33
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Y.; You, M.; Liu, G.; Dong, Z.; Jiao, F.; Meng, Y. The Potential Utilizing of Critical Element from Coal and Combustion Residues. Energies 2021, 14, 4710. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154710

AMA Style

Hu Y, You M, Liu G, Dong Z, Jiao F, Meng Y. The Potential Utilizing of Critical Element from Coal and Combustion Residues. Energies. 2021; 14(15):4710. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Yunhu, Mu You, Guijian Liu, Zhongbing Dong, Facun Jiao, and Ying Meng. 2021. "The Potential Utilizing of Critical Element from Coal and Combustion Residues" Energies 14, no. 15: 4710. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop