Next Article in Journal
Experiences of People with Cardiovascular Disease during COVID-19 in Sweden: A Qualitative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Formulation and Processing Strategies to Reduce Acrylamide in Thermally Processed Cereal-Based Foods
Previous Article in Journal
Infantile Hemangioma: A Common Lesion in a Vulnerable Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk/Benefit Evaluation of Chia Seeds as a New Ingredient in Cereal-Based Foods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thermal Contaminants in Coffee Induced by Roasting: A Review

by
David Silva da Costa
1,
Tânia Gonçalves Albuquerque
2,3,
Helena Soares Costa
2,3 and
Adriana Pavesi Arisseto Bragotto
1,*
1
Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Cidade Universitária, R. Monteiro Lobato 80, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil
2
Departamento de Alimentação e Nutrição, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, I.P. Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal
3
REQUIMTE-LAQV, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade do Porto, R. Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(8), 5586; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085586
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processed Food: Nutrition, Safety and Public Health)

Abstract

:
Roasting is responsible for imparting the main characteristics to coffee, but the high temperatures used in the process can lead to the formation of several potentially toxic substances. Among them, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, acrylamide, furan and its derivative compounds, α-dicarbonyls and advanced glycation end products, 4-methylimidazole, and chloropropanols stand out. The objective of this review is to present a current and comprehensive overview of the chemical contaminants formed during coffee roasting, including a discussion of mitigation strategies reported in the literature to decrease the concentration of these toxicants. Although the formation of the contaminants occurs during the roasting step, knowledge of the coffee production chain as a whole is important to understand the main variables that will impact their concentrations in the different coffee products. The precursors and routes of formation are generally different for each contaminant, and the formed concentrations can be quite high for some substances. In addition, the study highlights several mitigation strategies related to decreasing the concentration of precursors, modifying process conditions and eliminating/degrading the formed contaminant. Many of these strategies show promising results, but there are still challenges to be overcome, since little information is available about advantages and disadvantages in relation to aspects such as costs, potential for application on an industrial scale and impacts on sensory properties.

1. Introduction

The coffee production chain has a significant influence on the world economic sector, making it the second most marketable commodity in the world [1,2]. According to data from the International Coffee Organization (ICO), about 129 million bags of 60 kg of beans were exported worldwide in 2021–2022. Brazil, Vietnam, and Colombia are the largest producers and exporters of coffee in the world, with 39, 26, and 12 million bags exported, respectively, in the period of 2021–2022, which is equivalent to 60% of the world’s production [3,4].
Coffee belongs to the botanical family Rubiaceae, which has about 500 genera and more than 6000 species [5]. The genus Coffea has just over 100 species, and only two members are widely marketed, Coffea arabica (about 70%) and Coffea canephora (about 30%), with a restricted supply of the species Coffea liberica and Coffea excelsa (less than 1%) [1,5]. Green coffee has an astringent taste due to the high levels of chlorogenic acids and, after maturation, it is called coffee cherry due to the red phenotype [6,7].
Morphologically, Figure 1 shows that coffee cherry is formed from the exocarp, mesocarp, endocarp, silver skin, and the bean itself, called endosperm. The exocarp, also known as outer skin, is the outermost component of the fruit, formed by a single parenchyma and cellular chloroplast [6,7]. The mesocarp is the pasty intermediate layer of the bean, called the mucilage, which is composed of carbohydrates (pectin, glucose, and fructose), proteins, minerals, polyphenols, and caffeine [8]. The seed (endosperm) has a protective layer known as the spermoderm, called the silver skin. The endosperm has the biological function of protecting the coffee embryo [6,7,8,9].
Coffee is valued for its sensory characteristics, such as a peculiar flavor, but, moreover, for its health benefits. Total polyphenols are bioactive substances found in higher concentrations in the green beans, making coffee a potential food for the prevention of diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease. Among these bioactive substances, chlorogenic acids, trigonelline, and diterpenes (cafestol) stand out [10,11,12,13,14].
The coffee fruit goes through different stages before it reaches the consumer’s cup. Cultivation, harvesting, processing, and storage are known as preprocessing, and are important steps for standardization and quality [15]. The formation of chemical components responsible for sensory perception, such as flavor, aroma, and color, occurs in roasting, which is a process divided into drying, roasting, and cooling [16]. Roasting is the stage responsible for chemical transformations such as pyrolysis, Maillard reaction, and caramelization, forming flavors, aromas, and pigments characteristic of the product [17]. In roasted coffee, the number of identified volatile chemicals can reach 1000 and, of these, about 300 are heterocyclic organic compounds, which include thiazoles, imidazoles, furans, and pyrazines [18].
Despite the sensory importance of roasting for coffee, several toxic substances can be formed at this stage [1,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Among them, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, acrylamide, furan, furfuryl alcohol, 5-hydroxymethylfufural, α-dicarbonyls and advanced glycation end products, 4-methylimidazole and chloropropanols can be highlighted, which are substances with neurotoxic, carcinogenic, and genotoxic potential, among others. These compounds can be formed from precursors that are naturally present in green coffee (e.g., sugars, amino acids, fatty acids, among others), which undergo chemical transformations at high temperatures. The precursors and routes of formation are different for each contaminant, with some exceptions, and the formed concentrations can be quite high for some substances. The quantification of these compounds normally depends on chromatographic techniques (liquid or gas) coupled to mass spectrometry or other types of detectors. Regulations exist for only a few substances and in a few countries, but as they can pose a risk to human health, the development of mitigation strategies along the coffee production chain is highly desirable [1,20,21,22,23,24,25].
This review aims to present a current and comprehensive overview of the chemical contaminants formed during coffee roasting, including a discussion about mitigation strategies available to decrease the content of these toxicants.

2. Materials and Methods

The publication searches were carried out in six bibliographic databases—PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed10, SciFinder, and Scopus. After the search on each database, duplicate references were deleted. A scan of all possible information regarding contaminants and coffee was performed, leading to articles published from 1985 to 2022. A total of 182 articles were selected based on the titles and abstracts, and their being written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish.

3. Coffee

3.1. Species

Botanically, coffee belongs to the Rubiaceae family, and among the various genera, of which there are about 500, the genus Coffea has more than 103 species described in the literature. Only four species are widespread in world trade: Coffea arabica, Coffea canephora, Coffea liberica, and Coffea excelsa, the first two of which are significantly more expressive [1,5]. Figure 2 shows the morphological differences between the two most highly produced species.

3.1.1. Coffea Arabica

Coffea arabica (Arabica coffee), which is native to Ethiopia, is considered the most commercialized coffee species in the world. Coffea arabica has superior sensory characteristics, with a sweet taste and strong aroma and with large-scale production worldwide, being consumed pure or in blends (with other species) [1]. This species has a genetic peculiarity when compared with other species, since it is the only tetraploid (the others are diploids) [5,7]. This means that Coffea arabica has a 4n configuration, that is, each chromosome has three replicas, thus four basic sets of chromosomes of the genus (n = 11), totaling 44 chromosomes [5,25,26].
The species Coffea arabica differs from the other species by undergoing fruit maturation in shorter time, ranging from 7 to 9 months; also, Arabica coffee is more susceptible to pests and abiotic variations (temperature, humidity, pH, and altitude) due to its shape [27,28]. Regarding cultivation, this species needs altitudes greater than 600 m and a mild climate (15–22 °C), since without these abiotic factors, the development of the plant is impaired [29]. Additionally, Coffea arabica has lower levels of caffeine and soluble solids when compared with Coffea canephora, besides its resulting beverage being generally more aromatic and acidic [29].

3.1.2. Coffea Canephora

Coffea canephora, popularly known for its variety Coffea robusta (Robusta coffee), is native to Central Africa, and its cultivation is popular in Asian countries and in Brazil [30,31]. In contrast to Arabica coffee, Robusta contains higher levels of caffeine, giving it a stronger bitter taste. It is usually used in blends, in which it is combined with Arabica coffee, and may make up to 30% of the final product [32,33]. Robusta coffee gives a higher yield after the roasting process, besides being an essential component of soluble coffees, since it has a higher percentage of soluble solids than Arabic coffee [34].
Since they are diploid, Coffea robusta plants have two copies of the basic chromosome number (n = 11), resulting in a total of 22 chromosomes per cell nucleus [27]. It presents characteristics of allogamous reproduction and gametophytic self-incompatibility, making cross-fertilization the only form of sexual reproduction of the species [28,35]. Coffee trees of Coffea robusta are multi-stem, with a phenological cycle (9–11 months) longer than Coffea arabica [31].
Morphologically, its roots are generally more developed than those of Arabica coffee and can absorb even more nutrients and water from the soil, making the plant more resistant to water and nutritional deficiencies [35]. The leaves are larger than the species Coffea arabica, with less intense green coloration. The fruits are rounded, red (intense to light), and may be yellow (rare). Coffea canephora beans have a shorter shelf life than Coffea arabica, and are therefore recalcitrant [35]. Coffea canephora is cultivated at lower altitudes (0–900 m), equatorial climates and temperatures ranging from 17 °C (minimum) to a maximum of 31 °C. The species has high levels of caffeine and is less aromatic [36,37,38].

3.2. Chemical Composition of the Species Coffea Arabica and Coffea Robusta

Raw, unprocessed, and processed coffee has high chemical complexity [8]. These include the intrinsic components of the beans, which are precursors of the substances responsible for the sensory properties (color, aroma, and flavor) of the coffee beverage, such as proteins (11 to 15%, dry basis), free amino acids (0 to 2%, dry basis), polysaccharides (24 to 55%, dry basis), lipids (9 to 20%, dry basis), trigonelline (0.5 to 1.2%, dry basis), chlorogenic acids (1.2 to 10%, dry basis), and caffeine (0.9 to 2.4%, dry basis) [38]. The most abundant amino acids in raw beans are: alanine (410 to 1400 μg/g), asparagine (280 to 960 μg/g), and phenylalanine (180 to 780 μg/g) [39].

3.3. Coffee Preprocessing

Coffee is native to tropical Africa, where it is believed to have evolved as an understory tree [40,41]. The first coffee plantations in the world were shaded, but the plants can also be cultivated in full sun, which leads to the faster maturation of the beans [40,41,42,43]. The cultivation of Coffea arabica is generally undertaken in the shade due to its greater susceptibility to temperature variation, whereas Coffea robusta can be grown in an environment with higher temperatures, being more suitable for full-sun cultivation [42,43].
Harvesting is a fundamental step in coffee preprocessing, and is associated with the quality of the final product, which is determined by the degree of fruit maturation [44,45]. The presence of immature fruits results in flawed and poor-quality beans, whereas ripe fruits result in a high-quality beverage. This step can be performed manually or mechanically. Depending on the harvesting method, the level of bean defects can increase [44,45,46]. Avoiding the contamination of these fruits by microorganisms, mainly fungi (Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium), is also essential, since it can affect both the sensory quality of coffee and the health of the consumer in the case of the presence of mycotoxins [47,48,49].
After harvest, the coffee fruits must undergo a preliminary processing to separate the seeds from the rest of the fruit, consisting of washing and separation processes [50]. They are then separated based on the number and categories of defects, size, and other factors, to assist in the classification of coffee batches. The most used methods are dry and wet processing. The two methods show some variations depending on where the procedure will be performed, but they are, generally, the best known and most widely used [51,52,53,54,55].

3.4. Roasting

The green beans, also known as raw coffee, have high rigidity and do not have essential elements appreciated during the tasting of the beverage. With roasting, heat and mass transfer occurs, and the bean becomes more fragile, with darker coloration, allowing the grinding and preparation of the beverage. Coffee beans are roasted at temperatures ranging from 180 to 240 °C [56], and process times can vary from 5 to 15 min. The time–temperature ratio is established according to the desired roasting degree [57,58].
Several types of coffee roasting technology are available today. In terms of roasting techniques, coffee beans are traditionally roasted in batch or continuous systems. Heat can be transferred to the beans by direct contact with hot metal surfaces, runoff (hot air), and radiation. Drum roasters are the most common type of roasters available for domestic and industrial use. They comprise a horizontal rotating cylinder that roasts the coffee beans positioned inside, continuously circulating them, and heating them with hot air pumped through the center of the cylinder or the perforated sides to ensure a uniform roast. Recently, fluid-bed roasting technology has been used in industries, where high-speed hot gas is directed to coffee beans, commonly from the bottom of the roasting machine, so that gases heat and move the beans evenly [59,60].
The roasting is divided into: (i) drying, characterized by the elimination of water (partial) and volatile losses; (ii) roasting, comprising pyrolysis, Maillard reaction, and caramelization, with CO2 release; and (iii) cooling, which can occur via cold air or water sprinkling, as shown in Figure 3 [59,60]. Roasting is considered the most important step, contributing to the color, aroma, and flavor of the beans [61,62].
The coffee roasting process comprises three important chemical transformations: pyrolysis, Maillard reaction, and caramelization. Before the roasting process, the bean goes through a drying step until its moisture reaches 8–12%. At the beginning of roasting, the beans start to exhibit a yellowish color, due to the pyrolysis reaction, with moisture and mass loss. Sucrose begins to be transformed into glucose and fructose, accompanied by the degradation of carbohydrates and amino acids. Then, the Maillard reaction occurs, which leads to the formation of several new molecules responsible for the development of the color and aromatic qualities, commonly at temperatures close to 160 °C [63,64].
The Maillard reaction is a compilation of non-enzymatic reactions between reducing sugars and compounds with a free amino group, and occurs mainly in foods submitted to thermal processes [65]. In the first phase of the reaction, the condensation between an amino group from proteins, peptides, or amino acids and the carbonyl group of a reducing sugar occurs [66]. The condensation releases water and forms an unstable Schiff base. In the second stage, the Schiff base rearranges itself, forming Amadori or Heyns products that, in the third and last stage of the reaction, are fractioned and suffer reactions of dehydration, retro-aldolization, and enolization, generating dicarbonyl compounds and unsaturated carbonyl products (heterocyclic, reductone compounds). From this reaction cascade, 5-hydroxomethylfurfural (HMF) and cyclic compounds with high reactivity can be formed. Intermediate compounds such as HMF can be polymerized, forming stable, darkly colored compounds called melanoidins [23].
Finally, in the caramelization stage, residual moisture from the beans evaporates and the first cracking occurs, due to internal pressure (accumulation of formed gases) and expansion of the bean, commonly at temperatures between 170 °C and 200 °C (approximately). At this stage, the sugars and essential oils begin their release on the outside of the bean, leading it to turn a brown hue. The second crack indicates that the roasting process is almost finished, and its completion is dependent on the desired roasting degree. After that, the bean cools down and rests (18–24 h), which is an important step for the release of CO2 [63].

3.5. Coffee Products

Regarding the degree of roasting, coffees are usually classified into light, medium, and dark roast. Light roast coffee is less bitter, has accentuated acidity, and a softer aroma and flavor when compared with other roasting degrees, and is ideal for preparing espresso coffee. Medium roast coffee has more pronounced acidity than light roast, and is more full-bodied and ideal for filtered coffee (cloth or paper). Dark roast coffee has the lowest sensory gains due to its lower acidity, and it has a light body, is more bitter, and results in a darker beverage [67,68].
Regarding grinding degree, the most common types are fine, medium, and coarse grind coffees. Fine grind is proper for preparing filtered coffee. On the other hand, medium grind can be used for espresso coffee, since the preparation of this beverage occurs under pressure, requiring a higher granulometry to reach adequate concentrations of the beverage. Coarse grinding is more used in the preparation of beverages by percolating or pressing [69,70,71].
Other types of coffee include soluble, flavored, gourmet, organic, and decaffeinated. Soluble coffee production involves the same stages as traditional coffee, such as processing, roasting, and grinding. The differences arise due to the extraction (hydration) and drying (dehydration) processes. Extraction is the hydration stage of the ground powder by immersion in water, aiming to obtain a concentrated beverage while preserving the organoleptic properties. In drying, the extract can be subjected to two processes: spraying (sprinkler) or freezing (freeze drying). This type of coffee has a longer shelf life when compared with traditional coffee, but lower caffeine concentration (about 20% less) [72,73,74,75].
Aromatized coffee is the result of new consumption practices in the world. This type of coffee is obtained from inserting essences into the beans, to add more flavor to the beverage. The aromatization of coffee can occur after the roasting process (cooling), using water vapors with the most diverse types of vaporized essences in the beans, which absorb these droplets since they are still hot [76,77,78,79]. Gourmet coffee has superior quality, which comes from the cultivation and the preparation of the beverage. This type of coffee goes through careful processes before packaging, during which the chosen beans must be ripe and of good quality. Further, it is produced only from the Arabica species [76,77,78,79], which has about 50% less caffeine than Robusta and is much more aromatic [76,77]. Gourmet coffee beans are roasted under milder temperature conditions, since the dark roast is commonly used to disguise defects that are not found in selected beans [80,81].
Organic coffee is produced in crops that do not use pesticides and high-solubility chemical fertilizers (potassium chloride and nitrate), which are replaced by plant and animal organic matter [82,83,84,85]. Decaffeinated coffee contains a maximum level of 3% caffeine. Caffeine extraction occurs before bean roasting, and the methods most commonly used in industries involve organic solvents (ethyl acetate or dichloromethane and water), supercritical fluid (CO2), or hot water [86,87,88,89,90,91].

3.6. Types of Beverage

The coffee beverage can be prepared in several ways, which can be divided into four main categories, namely: boiling, filtering, infusion, and pressure (Figure 4) [92]. Boiling coffee is most consumed in Europe. It is based on adding the coffee powder into a piece of equipment called a Moka pot, which is heated to bring the water from the bottom of the equipment to boiling and press the liquid coffee into some container, obtaining only the beverage. Filtration is a common method in Brazil, using homemade filters and electric coffee makers, consisting of the addition of hot water, but not boiling, over the coffee powder that is packed in a paper or cloth filter. In the infusion process used in French presses, the coffee is mixed with hot water, but not boiling, and introduced later into a filter to separate the coffee powder from the coffee beverage. In the pressure process, commonly used in the preparation of espresso coffee, the powder is directed to a filter with water pressure at a temperature close to 90 °C for approximately 30 s, producing an aromatic and creamy beverage [92,93,94,95,96,97,98].

4. Contaminants Formed in Coffee

The roasting process is the most significant step for commercializing coffee, since it determines the aroma, color, and flavor. However, in addition to the benefits that can be derived from roasting, toxic compounds may be formed due to precursors found in the raw material (proteins, peptides, amino acids, carbohydrates, and reducing sugars). Since coffee is widely consumed worldwide, the formation of contaminants during roasting has become a concern, and may pose a long-term risk to the consumer. Understanding the precursors of these contaminants and their formation and mitigation mechanisms helps in reducing their levels [1,19,20,21,22,23,24].
Compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, acrylamide, furan and derivatives, α-dicarbonyls and advanced glycation end products, 4-methylimidazole and chloropropanols, which are associated with different adverse effects such as neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and genotoxicity, are examples of the contaminants formed during coffee roasting (Figure 5) [1,19,20,21,22,23,24].

4.1. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of more than 200 hydrophobic compounds consisting of two or more aromatic rings containing carbon and hydrogen atoms, formed from pyrolysis and the incomplete combustion of organic matter [99,100]. In food, the formation of PAHs occurs during high-temperature processes, such as barbecuing, smoking, and roasting. These compounds have lipophilic characteristics due to their aromatic polynuclear components and structures with conjugated double bonds [100].
Molecularly, PAHs can be divided into two groups: (i) low molecular weight, with structures containing up to three fused aromatic rings, and (ii) high molecular weight, with structures containing four or more aromatic rings [101]. Among the PAHs formed in coffee processing, benzo(a)pyrene (Figure 5) stands out as one of the most studied compounds, due to its classification as a carcinogen to humans (group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [99,100,101,102,103,104].
PAHs form from organic precursors, such as amino acids, lipids and carbohydrates, during heat treatment, such as roasting. However, elucidating the exact mechanisms that lead to PAH synthesis in roasted coffee is still a challenge due to the complexity of coffee species. Generally, the heat treatment applied to coffee beans leads to the pyrolysis of organic compounds, forming free radicals and fragments of molecules, which lead to contaminants when they fuse. In coffee, lipids are among the potential precursors, and these range from 10 to 17% of the chemical composition of the bean [103].
Regarding toxic effects, PAHs show potential mutagenicity and carcinogenicity [103,104]. The possibility of genetic damage to humans is mainly associated with high-molecular weight and high-hydrophobicity compounds [101,103,104]. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 16 PAHs are considered of priority due to their frequency of occurrence in food and toxicity (Table 1) [104,105].
According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), four substances (chrysene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, and benzo(b)fluoranthene) are considered markers of the presence of PAHs in food [101]. According to the European Commission, the sum of these four compounds (PAH4) cannot exceed 10 μg/kg for oils and 30 μg/kg for meat and fishing products, with the maximum levels set for benzo(a)pyrene of 2 μg/kg and 5 μg/kg, respectively. There are no maximum limits set for coffee [106].
The analytical techniques most widely used for detecting and quantifying PAHs are high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In general, the roasting degree does not influence the final concentration of the coffee beverage (infusion), but, in contrast, is an important variable in roasted beans, since the longer the roasting time, the higher the levels of high-molecular weight PAHs. In this sense, choosing light roasting can help in reducing the level of PAHs contamination, especially due to the relatively high volatility of light PAHs [102,103].

4.2. Acrylamide

Acrylamide is an acyclic chemical compound of the amide family. Its structure has the NH2 radical bound to a carbon atom, which is then bound to an oxygen atom (Figure 5). The acrylamide formation in coffee occurs predominantly due to the reaction between a reducing sugar and the amino acid asparagine, via the Maillard reaction [107]. The cascade of reactions for acrylamide formation can occur from the decarboxylation and deamination of asparagine, forming the contaminant [107]. The unstable Schiff base is formed from the reaction of amino acids with carbonyl compounds and broken up to form acrylamide. This pathway, whereby asparagine transforms into acrylamide, constitutes the first phase of the Maillard reaction [107,108].
In 2002, Tareke et al. reported for the first time the formation of acrylamide in heated foods, and observed that carbohydrate-rich and high-temperature-processed foods had greater potential for the formation of this contaminant [109]. Regarding coffee, studies show that the peak of acrylamide formation occurs in the intermediate stage of the roasting process (160–180 °C), where, predominantly, the Maillard reaction occurs [109,110,111].
The IARC classifies acrylamide as a probable human carcinogen (group 2A) [112]. Its presence in the diet represents a concern, since this substance has carcinogenic, genotoxic, and neurotoxic potential. Coffee is among the foods with the highest acrylamide concentration, with an average value of 522 μg/kg. Roasted ground coffee has lower concentrations than soluble coffee [113,114,115,116]. The European Commission sets benchmark levels for acrylamide content in coffee, which are 400 μg/kg in roasted coffee and 850 μg/kg in soluble coffee [117].
Acrylamide concentrations are higher in light and medium roast coffees. Temperatures above 180 °C favor acrylamide degradation. Thus, lighter roast coffees have higher acrylamide levels, in contrast with dark roasting [108]. Acrylamide formation is significantly different between Coffea arabica and Coffea robusta species. Acrylamide can be easily transferred to the beverage because it is water-soluble. Granulometry can also interfere in acrylamide extraction, since it helps to increase the contact area between coffee powder and water [118,119,120,121,122].

4.3. Furanic Compounds

4.3.1. Furan

Furan (Figure 5) is a heterocyclic organic compound, lipophilic, of low molecular weight (68 g/mol) and transparent liquidity, and with high volatility and a boiling point of 31 °C. This substance has aromatic characteristics due to its structure that accommodates oxygen, which interacts with the unsaturation (double bond) of the aromatic ring, leading to the delocalization of the electron pair [123].
Furan is considered highly dangerous to the organism, associated with genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and other toxic effects, and is classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (group 2B) according to the IARC [124,125]. The carcinogenic action of this compound is supposedly explained by metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 in cis-butene-1,2-diol. Due to this worldwide speculation about the depreciable effects on health, researchers have payed special attention to its formation and concentration in food [126,127,128,129].
The thermal degradation of amino acids and carbohydrates, via the Maillard reaction or not, and the thermal oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids during roasting can lead to its formation. In coffee, the main precursors of furan are glucose, linolenic acid, and linoleic acid. The furan formation process is related to aldol condensation, cyclization, and the dehydration of intermediates, such as acetaldehyde and glycolaldehyde [126].
Furan concentration in coffees derived from a lighter to a darker roast can vary on average from 2300 to 5375 μg/kg, respectively [126,127,128,129]. There are no regulatory limits to the amount of furan in food. The European Commission recommends (2007/196/EC of 28 March 2007) the monitoring of the contaminant in foodstuffs [128].
Kuballa et al. [130] monitored furan from bean to cup. Even with high volatility and the loss of the contaminant during the beverage extraction process, all infusion methods result in the presence of furan in the final product. Automated coffee machines result in higher concentrations in the beverage when compared with household equipment, due to the greater amount of powder used in the infusion and lower loss by volatility, favoring the concentration of the contaminant. Additionally, the roasting degree (time/temperature), species, and varieties are closely related to the level of furan in the beverage.

4.3.2. Furfuryl Alcohol and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural

Furfuryl alcohol (FFA) and HMF are process contaminants formed from furan and modified by a hydroxymethyl group. The FFA can account for about 50% of all furans. The HMF is the main volatile compound found in some categories of coffee, such as light roast coffee [131].
The FFA is considered a possible carcinogen to humans (group 2B), according to IARC [132]. The metabolization process of FFA and HMF is associated with sulfotransferases, resulting in 2-sulfoximethylfuran and 5-sulfoximethylfurfural, respectively. These substances are considered mutagenic due to being reactive electrophiles that can interact with DNA molecules or proteins. However, this potential was evidenced in an in vivo study, without evidence in humans [133,134].
Regarding FFA, its formation is not elucidated in a unitary manner in the literature, and some suggested processes include: (i) the retro-aldol cleavage of the isomer of the Amadori product formed via the Maillard reaction; (ii) glucose oxidation; (iii) the cleavage of 1,2-enaminol or 1,2-enediol formed by Maillard reaction or isomerization, respectively. The HMF is associated with 3-deoxyosone, formed via the Maillard reaction and caramelization, in which the aldol reaction between methylglyoxal and glyceraldehyde occurs, or the direct conversion of the fructofuranosyl cation that is formed from fructose/sucrose [135,136].
Studies show that the FFA concentration is higher in lighter roast coffees, and the kinetics of formation of this contaminant are similar to those of other contaminants, such as HMF and acrylamide. The amount of FFA in Arabica coffee is higher than in other coffee species, and this is due to the greater presence of sucrose, which is considered an important precursor and is found in greater quantities in Arabica coffee (7.5%) compared to Robusta coffee (3.5%). Regarding 5-HMF, the literature has already reported that this contaminant increases at higher temperatures, observing a decay in continuous roasting (above 8 min) with temperatures above 220 °C [23,137,138,139,140].

4.4. α-Dicarbonyls and Advanced Glycation End Products

The α-dicarbonyls (α-DCs) are compounds of low molecular weight containing two carbonyl groups in the α-carbon. They are intermediates in the caramelization and Maillard reactions, or lipid oxidation. There are 18 α-DCs categories described in foods; however, only glyoxal (GO), methylglyoxal (MGO), and diacetyl (AD) are found in representative concentrations [21,141,142,143,144].
In vitro studies in human cells have shown that GO, MGO, and DA have cytotoxicity due to the inhibition of enzymes important for transcriptional and translational regulation [144]. Additionally, inhaling these compounds during the coffee roasting process can be toxic to humans. The formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are related to diabetes and kidney disease, occurs from the interaction of α-DCs with the free amino group of proteins. Pentosidine, carboxymethyllysin, and pyrraline are examples of well-characterized and widely studied AGEs [145,146].
The AGEs are formed by non-enzymatic glycation, but they can also originate from glucose self-oxidation, lipid peroxidation, or condensation reactions of the polyol pathway. Reactive α-DCs such as MGO, GO, and 3-deoxyglucosone are preserved species leading to the formation of AGEs. MGO leads to the formation of N-(carboxyethyl)lysine and methylglyoxal-lysine dimer by modifying several proteins. Due to the biological effects that are harmful to humans, the search for natural inhibitors of AGEs formation to treat chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus type 2, and decrease their risk is a worldwide priority. There is no recommendation regarding the maximum AGE concentrations in food [145].
Levels of GO, MGO, and DA decrease in darker roasts, and this is probably due to thermal degradation by caramelization and Maillard reactions. α-DCs have also been observed in light-roasted Arabica coffee (200 °C for 10 min), with more evident formation of GO [146].

4.5. 4-Methylimidazole

4-methylimidazole (4-MEl) is an organic compound with a heterocyclic structure of simple nitrogen (Figure 5), formed from the reaction of sugars with ammonia. This compound can be formed by the degradation of sugars in alkyl dicarbonyls and alkylketones, which later react with the ammonia released by amino acids and/or proteins via Strecker degradation producing imidazoles, including 4-MEl, during the roasting process [147].
Data from the National Toxicology Program of the United States of America indicate that 4-MEl has been identified as a carcinogenic substance. The study was conducted with mice (males and females) treated with 170 mg of 4-MEI/kg of body weight, and showed that this compound can induce the appearance of pulmonary neoplasia (alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma) and carcinoma [148]. The IARC classified 4-MEl as a possibly carcinogenic substance to humans (group 2B) [149].
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established a tolerable intake of no significant risk level (NSRL) for 4-MEI of 0.05 mg/day body weight [149,150]. Regarding regulation, the European Union recommends a maximum concentration level of 4-MEl of 200 mg/kg for Class III caramels (E150c) and 250 mg/kg for Class IV (E150d) (EU 231/2012). However, no legislation covers the presence of 4-MEl in coffees [150].
The average 4-MEI concentration in Robusta coffee is higher than that in Arabica coffee. Additionally, the concentration of the contaminant increases due to the increase in temperature and roasting time. The 4-MEI levels in decaffeinated coffees compared with soluble coffee are not statistically different, indicating that the decaffeination of raw beans does not affect the amount of its precursors [151].

4.6. Chloropropanols and Their Esters

Chloropropanols are a class of chemical contaminants derived from glycerol, and are structurally characterized by three carbon atoms bound to one or two chlorine atoms. Several compounds, including monochloropropanodiols (MCPDs) and dichloropropanols (DCPs), have been identified as contaminants of various foods. Studies show that 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) (Figure 5) is the most abundant chloropropanol, followed by 2-monochloropropane-1,3-diol (2-MCPD), 2,3-dichloropropan-1-ol (2,3-DCP), and 1,3-dichloropropan-2-ol (1,3-DCP), in the proportions of 10%, 1% and 0.1%, respectively, compared with that of 3-MCPD [152,153,154,155].
Chloropropanol esters are a class of molecules that have, in their chloropropanol structure, one or two hydroxyl groups esterified with fatty acids. Analogous to chloropropanols, their esters can be divided into two groups—the MCPD esters (MCPDE), which are the majority and comprise the esters of 3-MCPD (3-MCPDE) and 2-MCPD (2-MCPDE), and the esters of DCPs (DCPE) [152,153,154,155].
The IARC classifies 3-MCDP as a possible carcinogen to humans (group 2B) [154]. An in vivo study showed that 3-MCDP undergoes rapid metabolization and systemic distribution in tissue lipids, such as testicles, brain, liver, and kidneys [155]. According to Lynch et al. [155], the biotransformation of 3-MCDP takes place via two routes, one of which is by the formation of oxalate as a final product by oxidation of 3-MCDP, and the other is by conjugation with glutathione, forming mercapturic acids. The main form of metabolization in mammals is the formation of oxalic acid from the oxidation of 3-MCDP, which begins with the formation of β-chlorolactaldehyde by oxidation, followed by the aldol reaction that converts it to β-chlorolactic acid, then forming oxalic acid. The 3-MCPD esters are completely hydrolyzed by lipase during digestion, leading to the release of free 3-MCPD, which can be absorbed and metabolized as described.
The toxic potential of 3-MCPD has been widely studied. The compound presented nephrotoxicity and adverse effects on reproduction in studies conducted with rats, in addition to carcinogenic, but not genotoxic, potential in high doses (400 ppm). The tolerable daily intake (TDI) for 3-MCPD and its esters was established at 2 μg/kg of body weight by the EFSA Contaminant Panel in 2017, whereas the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) determined a value of 4 μg/kg body weight/day for the same parameter [156,157,158,159,160,161].
In food, chloropropanols and their esters are formed from heat treatment above 100 °C, in an environment with low moisture content. The 3-MCPD has already been reported in coffee, and its formation occurs during the roasting process, from intrinsic precursors of the green bean such as lipids and chlorine [160]. The presence of 3-MCPD in coffee is not regulated, but for its occurrence in hydrolyzed vegetable protein and soy sauce, the European Commission establishes maximum levels of 20 μg/kg (for a liquid product containing 40% dry matter) and 50 μg/kg (in dry matter) [162].
The 3-MCPD concentrations in coffee are relatively low, and the highest levels were observed in decaffeinated coffee and products undergoing prolonged roasting. The color is directly linked to 3-MCPD formation, and the darker beans have higher levels of the contaminant. Due to the water dilution effect, 3-MCPD was not detected in coffee beverages [163,164,165,166].

5. Mitigation

Mitigation aims to reduce the risk to consumer health from exposure to potentially toxic chemicals, which can be achieved by applying strategies that reduce the formation of these contaminants throughout coffee processing. The literature presents forms of mitigation involving: (i) decreasing the concentration of precursors; (ii) modifying the process conditions; and (iii) eliminating and/or degrading the formed substance post-processing. Table 2 describes some reported mitigation strategies for the previously mentioned compounds.
The strategies from the literature involving reducing the concentration of precursors are basically directed towards acrylamide. Asparagine, considered one of the key precursors in the acrylamide formation, can be removed and/or decreased by the action of the enzyme asparaginase. The enzyme acts on the substrate containing the amino acid asparagine via a nucleophilic attack, thus leading to a dissociation of the amide radical and the release of ammonia, and forming an acyl-enzyme intermediate. In the second phase of the reaction, the intermediate acyl-enzyme is hydrolyzed, forming the L-aspartate molecule. Some authors have observed a decrease in asparagine concentration after the treatment of Arabica and Robusta coffee with the enzyme [167]. The treatment of green coffee beans with asparaginase combined with ultrasound had significant effects on mitigating acrylamide in Robusta coffee without significant sensory interferences [169].
Roasting is the most important step for the formation of contaminants, and its conditions, especially time and temperature, directly affect the concentration of the compounds formed. Decreasing roasting time and temperature can be a form of mitigation for contaminants such as furan and PAHs, but this leads to losses in the sensory aspects of coffee, such as aroma and flavor, since it prevents the formation of volatile substances essential for the final product [113,177]. Hyong et al. [151] observed that as temperature and roasting time increased, MGO, DA, and 4-MEI levels increased significantly. The study by Kwon et al. [146] also used the roast time/temperature ratio, and reported that darker roasting and longer time increased the levels of α-DCs. Regarding 3-MCPD and its esters in soluble coffee, higher concentrations were observed in dark roasting [166,167]. On the other hand, the increase in temperature and roasting time can decrease levels of acrylamide, HMF, and FFA [136,137]. Rattanarat et al. [108] evaluated the PAHs and acrylamide levels in freshly roasted coffee beans using hot air and overheated steam, verifying that the latter can be a method of reducing contaminants due to its oxygen-free heating capacity. Anese et al. [173] investigated the effects of vacuum roasting on acrylamide formation in Arabica beans, and observed a 50% decrease in the concentration of this contaminant for medium roast coffees. Hu et al. [172] reported that the presence of glycine and aspartic acid in raw coffee beans can reduce the formation of acrylamide during coffee roasting.
Regarding mitigation strategies involving the elimination and/or degradation of the formed substance after processing, Wang et al. [180] investigated the action of anthocyanins for furan removal, which resulted in a significant reduction in the contaminant by up to 33%. The use of phenolic compounds (non-phenolic antioxidant, flavonoids, and phenolic acids) in mitigating FFA and HMF is already well established in the literature, with reduction in these contaminants to variable degrees [131]. The use of green technologies such as supercritical CO2 extraction demonstrated its maximum efficiency with the removal of 79% of acrylamide in coffee beans [174]. Emerging technologies such as cold plasma and the use of molecular printing polymers and ionic liquids may also present potential for use in the mitigation of some compounds [22,175]. Genovese et al. [176] demonstrated that the furan levels decreased due to grinding during the degassing phase, possibly due to this process increasing the surface area and opening the cellular structures, facilitating the release and thus the loss of furan. However, the finer grinding of coffee beans as a mitigation measure can be problematic for the preparation of beverages that require thicker grinding. For espresso coffee, using smaller particles led to significantly higher α-DCs and 4-MEI concentrations, whereas for cold brew, the highest α-DCs and 4-MEI concentrations were verified with larger coffee bean particles [151]. The concentrations of some contaminants can also be decreased depending on the brewing method, which may represent a viable alternative at the consumer level [124,177].
As can be seen, the studies described in the literature demonstrate different ways to reduce the occurrence of thermal contaminants in coffee induced by roasting. However, little information is presented about the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies in relation to aspects such as costs, potential for application on an industrial scale and impacts on sensory properties. Optimizing roasting conditions (time/temperature), grinding and brewing procedures could be more cost-effective strategies, since changes in equipment and the use of emerging technologies require financial investments. However, it should be noted that the use of higher roasting temperatures to reduce the concentration of some contaminants, such as acrylamide, may result in an increased degradation of polyphenols and/or deterioration of the sensory characteristics and antioxidant activity [171]. Most of the strategies presented were evaluated only on a laboratory scale, with the use of asparaginase being one of the most promising and effective methods at the industrial scale, since it has already been used for other food matrices (e.g., biscuits) [182]. Regarding the impacts on sensory characteristics, few authors conducted related studies [169,173,175,180], but there are still many biases related to the mitigation methods due to the lack of experiments involving the determination of substances that are relevant to the organoleptic properties.

6. Conclusions

Coffee is a product commercialized and much appreciated worldwide. Due to the presence of natural chemical constituents and the need for high temperatures applied in the roasting process, several toxic compounds can be formed in coffee, with carcinogenic and genotoxic potential, among others, representing a public health concern. Therefore, knowing the precursors of these contaminants and their mechanisms of formation is important to developing efficient mitigation strategies. However, many challenges must still be overcome to make coffee a safer and higher-quality product regarding the presence of thermal contaminants induced by roasting. First, it is necessary to find means for simultaneously reducing these contaminants, since the same strategy can disfavor the formation of a group of compounds and at the same time favor the formation of others. Additionally, most studies have been conducted on a laboratory scale, and need to be tested on an industrial scale. Finally, the impacts of implementing mitigation strategies on the sensory aspects of the product are not well known. It is important that the levels of these contaminants be continuously monitored in order to allow the assessment of the real risks that they pose to human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.A.B., T.G.A., H.S.C. and D.S.d.C.; methodology, D.S.d.C. and A.P.A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.d.C.; writing—review and editing, A.P.A.B., T.G.A. and H.S.C.; supervision, A.P.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) (Finance code 0010).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barrios-Rodríguez, Y.F.; Gutiérrez-Guzmán, N.; Pedreschi, F.; Mariotti-Celis, M. Rational design of technologies for the mitigation of neoformed contaminants in roasted coffee. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grzelczyk, J.; Fiurasek, P.; Kakkar, A.; Budryn, G. Evaluation of the thermal stability of bioactive compounds in coffee beans and their fractions modified in the roasting process. Food Chem. 2022, 384, 132888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. ICO—International Coffee Organization. 2020a. Exports of All Forms of Coffee by All Exporting Countries. Available online: https://www.ico.org/historical/1990%20onwards/PDF/2a-exports.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  4. ICO—International Coffee Organization. 2020b. Imports by Selected Importing Countries. Available online: https://www.ico.org/historical/1990%20onwards/PDF/2b-imports.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  5. Clifford, M.N.; Wilson, K.C. Coffee Botany, Biochemistry and Production of Beans and Beverage, 1st ed.; Springer: Westport, CT, USA, 1985; pp. 48–257. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall, R.D.; Trevisan, F.; De Vos, C.H. Coffee berry and green bean chemistry– opportunities for improving cup quality and crop circularity. Food Res. Int. 2022, 151, 110825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mendes, G.A.; De Oliveira, M.A.; Rodarte, M.P.; De Carvalho dos Anjos, V.; Bell, M.J. Origin geographical classification of green coffee beans (Coffea arabica L.) produced in different regions of the Minas Gerais state by FT-MIR and chemometric. CRFS 2022, 5, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. De Melo Pereira, G.V.; De Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Magalhães Júnior, A.I.; Vásquez, Z.S.; Medeiros, A.B.P.; Vandenberghe, L.P.S.; Soccol, C.R. Exploring the impacts of postharvest processing on the aroma formation of coffee beans—A review. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferreira, T.; Shuler, J.; Rubens, G.; Farah, A. Introduction to Coffee Plant and Genetics, Coffee: Production. In Quality and Chemistry, 1st ed.; Farah, A., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  10. Severini, C.; Derossi, A.; Ricci, I.; Caporizzi, R.; Fiore, A. Roasting conditions, grinding level and brewing method highly affect the healthy benefits of a coffee cup. Int. J. Clin. Nutr. Diet. 2018, 4, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ciaramelli, C.; Palmioli, A.; Airoldi, C. Coffee variety, origin and extraction procedure: Implications for coffee beneficial effects on human health. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chieng, D.; Kistler, P.M. Coffee and tea on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 32, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lara-Guzmán, O.J.; Álvarez, R.; Muñoz-Durango, K. Changes in the plasma lipidome of healthy subjects after coffee consumption reveal potential cardiovascular benefits: A randomized controlled trial. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 176, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bastian, F.; Hutabarat, O.S.; Dirpan, A.; Nainu, F.; Harapan, H.; Emran, T.B.; Simal-Gandara, J. From plantation to cup: Changes in bioactive compounds during coffee processing. Foods 2021, 10, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aguilar-Alvarez, M.; Saucedo-Castaneda, G.; Durand, N.; Perraud-Gaime, I.; González-Robles, R.O.; Rodríguez-Serrano, G. The variety, roasting, processing, and type of cultivation determine the low OTA levels of commercialized coffee in Chiapas State, Mexico. Food Control 2021, 126, 108088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pires, F.C.; Pereira, R.A.; Baqueta, M.R.; Valderrama, P.; Da Rocha, R.A. Near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration as an alternative to the Agtron to predict roasting degrees in coffee beans and ground coffees. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schwan, R.; Silva, C.; Batista, L. Coffee Fermentation. In Handbook of Plant-Based Fermented Food and Beverage Technology, 1st ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 677–690. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moon, J.K.; Yoo, H.S.; Shibamoto, T. Role of roasting conditions in the level of chlorogenic acid content in coffee beans: Correlation with coffee acidity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5823–5831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cunha, S.C.; Senra, L.; Cruz, R.; Casal, S.; Fernandes, J.O. 4-Methylimidazole in soluble coffee and coffee substitutes. Food Control 2016, 63, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ciecierska, M.; Derewiaka, D.; Kowalska, J.; Majewska, E.; Drużyńska, B.; Wołosiak, R. Effect of mild roasting on Arabica and Robusta coffee beans contamination with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cha, J.; Debnath, T.; Lee, K.G. Analysis of α-dicarbonyl compounds and volatiles formed in Maillard reaction model systems. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Monsalve-Atencio, R.; Montaño, D.F.; Contreras-Calderón, J. Molecular imprinting technology and poly (ionic liquid) s: Promising tools with industrial application for the removal of acrylamide and furanic compounds from coffee and other foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 63, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, M.; Long, Y.; Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wan, Y.; Yu, Q.; Chen, Y. Investigation of thermal contaminants in coffee beans induced by roasting: A kinetic modeling approach. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 132063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Melese, Y.Y.; Kolech, S.A. Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Methods, objectives, and future strategies of breeding in Ethiopia—Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herrera, J.C.; Combes, M.C.; Cortina, H.; Alvarado, G.; Lashermes, P. Gene introgression into Coffea arabica by way of triploid hybrids (C. arabica × C. canephora). Heredity 2002, 89, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Oliveira Aparecido, L.E.; De Souza Rolim, G. Models for simulating the frequency of pests and diseases of Coffea arabica L. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2020, 64, 1063–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Belitz, H.D.; Grosch, W.; Schieberle, P. Coffee, tea, cocoa. In Food Chemistry, 4th ed.; Springer: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 938–970. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cubry, P.; De Bellis, F.; Pot, D.; Musoli, P.; Leroy, T. Global analysis of Coffea canephora Pierre ex Froehner (Rubiaceae) from the Guinea-Congolese region reveals impacts from climate refuges and migratory effects. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 483–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fávaris, N.A.; Rosa, S.D.; Figueiredo, M.A.; Coelho, S.V.; Vilela, A.; Padilha, L. Protein profile in arabica coffee seeds in gel electrophoresis: Importance of freeze-drying. J. Seed Sci. 2022, 44, e202244017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aouadi, B.; Vitalis, F.; Bodor, Z.; Zaukuu, J.L.; Kertesz, I.; Kovacs, Z. NIRS and Aquaphotomics Trace Robusta-to-Arabica Ratio in Liquid Coffee Blends. Molecules 2022, 27, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Purwoko, T.; Suranto, S.; Setyaningsih, R.; Marliyana, S.D. Chlorogenic acid and caffeine content of fermented Robusta bean. Biodivers. J. 2022, 23, 902–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barroso, L.A.; Macedo, A.S.; Lemos, I.L.; Andrade, N.N.; Schmiele, M.; Silveira, J.V.; Fonte, T.N. Optimization of the brewing parameters on coffee extraction using a central composite rotatable design. JSFA Rep. 2022, 2, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tran, H.T.; Vargas, C.A.; Slade Lee, L.; Furtado, A.; Smith, H.; Henry, R. Variation in bean morphology and biochemical composition measured in different genetic groups of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Tree Genet. Genomes 2017, 13, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patil, S.; Vedashree, M.; Murthy, P.S. Valorization of coffee leaves as a potential agri-food resource: Bioactive compounds, applications and future prospective. Planta 2022, 255, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Q. Evaluation of coffee ecological adaptability using Fuzzy, AHP, and GIS in Yunnan province, China. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jayakumar, M.; Rajavel, M.; Surendran, U. Climate-based statistical regression models for crop yield forecasting of coffee in humid tropical Kerala, India. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2016, 60, 1943–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pereira, P.V.; Da Silveira, D.L.; Schwan, R.F.; De Assis Silva, S.; Coelho, J.M.; Bernardes, P.C. Effect of altitude and terrain aspect on the chemical composition of Coffea canephora cherries and sensory characteristics of the beverage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 10, 2570–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clarke, R.J.; Macre, R. Introduction. In Coffee: Chemistry, 1st ed.; Smith, A.W., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985; Volume 1, pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  39. Murkovic, M.; Derler, K. Analysis of amino acids and carbohydrates in green coffee. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2006, 69, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fournier, L.A. Cultivation of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in the sun or in the shade: An agronomic and ecophysiological approach. Agronomy 1988, 12, 131–146. [Google Scholar]
  41. Damatta, F.M. Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: A review. Field Crops Res. 2004, 86, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Beer, J.; Muschler, R.; Kass, D.; Somarriba, E. Shade management in coffee and cocoa plantations. Agrofor. Syst. 1998, 38, 139–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farah, A.; Dos Santos, T.F. The coffee plant and beans: An introduction. In Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention, 1st ed.; Preddy, V.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  44. Farah, A.; Monteiro, M.C.; Calado, V.; Franca, A.S.; Trugo, L.C. Correlation between cup quality and chemical attributes of Brazilian coffee. Food Chem. 2006, 9, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Toci, A.T.; Fara, A. Volatile compounds as potential defective coffee beans’ markers. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Da Silva, C.S.; De Freitas, A.P.; Lisbon, C.F.; Vieira, G.; De Abreu, M.C. Coffee post-harvest: Factors that influence the final quality of the beverage. Eng. Agric. 2022, 30, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dos Santos, D.G.; Coelho, C.S.; Ferreira, A.R.; Freitas-Silva, O. Brazilian coffee production and the future microbiome and mycotoxins profile considering the climate change scenario. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Agnoletti, B.Z. Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica) and Conilon (Coffea canephora) Classified According to the Quality of the Beverage. Master’s Dissertation, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Alegre, Brazil, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lu, L.; Tibpromma, S.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Lumyong, S.; Xu, J.; Hyde, K.D. Comprehensive review of fungi on coffee. Pathogens 2022, 11, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ghosh, P.; Venkatachalapathy, N. Processing and drying of coffee—A review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2014, 3, 784–794. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang, N.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Degn, T.K.; Munchow, M.; Fisk, I. Determination of volatile marker compounds of common coffee roast defects. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kleinwächter, M.; Bytof, G.; Selmar, D. Coffee beans and processing. In Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention, 1st ed.; Preddy, V.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  53. Clarke, R.J. Processing of green coffee. In Coffee, 1st ed.; Clifford, M.N., Wilson, K.C., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1985; pp. 230–250. [Google Scholar]
  54. Subedi, R. Comparative analysis of dry and yet processing of coffee with respect to quality and Cost in Kavre district, Nepal: A case of Panchkhal village. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. 2011, 2, 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pazmiño-Arteaga, J.; Gallardo, C.; González-Rodríguez, T.; Winkler, R. Loss of sensory cup quality: Physiological and chemical changes during green coffee storage. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2022, 77, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Suslick, B.A.; Feng, L.; Suslick, K.S. Discrimination of complex mixtures by a colorimetric sensor array: Coffee aromas. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2067–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Castellanos-Onorio, O.; Gonzalez-Rios, O.; Guyot, B.; Fontana, T.A.; Guiraud, J.P.; Schorr-Galindo, S.; Suárez-Quiroz, M. Effect of two different roasting techniques on the Ochratoxin A (OTA) reduction in coffee beans (Coffea arabica). Food Control 2011, 22, 1184–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Agresti, P.M.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S.; Augusti, R. Discrimination between defective and non-defective Brazilian coffee beans by their volatile profile. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bolka, M.; Emire, S. Effects of coffee roasting technologies on cup quality and bioactive compounds of specialty coffee beans. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 6120–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, X.; Lim, L.T. Effect of roasting conditions on carbon dioxide degassing behavior in coffee. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kipkorir, R.K. Effects of Different Processing Technologies on the Quality Characteristics of Kenyan Coffee. Master’s Dissertation, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wei, F.; Furihata, K.; Koda, M.; Hu, F.; Miyakawa, T.; Tanokura, M. Roasting process of coffee beans as studied by nuclear magnetic resonance: Time course of changes in composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pereira, L.L.; Marca-te, P.P.; Calmam, A.C.; Garçons, R.C.; Moreli, A.P. Roasting process. In Determinants of Quality in Coffee Production, 1st ed.; Pereira, L.L., Moreira, T.Z., Eds.; Springer: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; pp. 303–372. [Google Scholar]
  64. Coghe, S.; Gheeraert, B.; Michiels, A.; Delvaux, F.R. Development of Maillard reaction related characteristics during malt roasting. Beer Inst. Mag. 2006, 112, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nursten, H.E. The Maillard Reaction: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Implications, 1st ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2005; pp. 2–30. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nagaraju, V.D.; Murthy, C.T.; Ramalakshmi, K.; Rao, P.N.S. Studies on roasting of coffee beans in a spouted bed. J. Food Eng. 1997, 31, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  67. Smrke, S.; Wellinger, M.; Suzuki, T.; Balsiger, F.; Opitz, S.E.; Yeretzian, C. Time-resolved gravimetric method to assess degassing of roasted coffee. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5293–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brent, A.A.; Sihamoni, E.; Liardon, R.; Labuza, T.P. The diffusion kinetics of carbon dioxide in fresh roasted and ground coffee. J. Food Eng. 2003, 59, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tavares, M.P.; Mourad, A.L. Coffee beverage preparation by different methods from an environmental perspective. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25, 1356–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nguyen, L.D.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Mason, G. Product and Process Innovation in Coffee Supply Chain: From Seed to Cup. In Frameworks and Cases on Evolutional Supply Chain, 1st ed.; Toru, G., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 169–193. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sinned, D.R.; Chambers, E. Coffee flavor: A review. Beverages 2020, 6, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pohl, P.; Szymczycha-Madeja, A.; Welna, M. Simple ICP-OES based method for determination of selected elements in brewed ground and soluble coffees prior to evaluation of their intake and chemical fractionation. Food Chem. 2018, 263, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Krause, M.C.; Moitinho, A.C.; Ferreira, F.R.; Souza, R.L.; Krause, L.C.; Caramão, E.B. Production and characterization of the bio-oil obtained by the fast pyrolysis of spent coffee grounds of the soluble coffee industry. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2019, 30, 1608–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Favaro, C.P.; Baraldi, I.J.; Casciatori, F.P.; Farinas, C.S. β-mannanase production using coffee industry waste for application in soluble coffee processing. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wisniewski, C.M.; Slater, C.; SavelskI, M.J. Dynamic vibratory membrane processing for use in water recovery from soluble coffee product manufacturing wastewater. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 1791–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rubiyo, R.; Sudarsono, S.; Anshori, M.F.; Nurdebyandaru, N.; Dewi, Y.A.; Akbar, M.R. Determining kinship pattern of robusta and arabica coffee clones using multivariate analysis. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 82, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vezzulli, F.; Rocchetti, G.; Lambri, M.; Lucini, L. Metabolomics combined with sensory analysis reveals the impact of different extraction methods on coffee beverages from Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora var. Robusta. Foods 2022, 11, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vasconcelos, T.L. The consumption of experiences in specialty coffees. In Consumption and Industry Strategies in Brazil, 1st ed.; Almeida, L.F., Spers, E.E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 275–295. [Google Scholar]
  79. Cangussu, L.B.; Rodrigues, C.G.; Ribeiro, M.C.; Dutra, V.M.; Amaral, E.G.; Fante, C.A. Projective mapping: Potential tool for sensory evaluation of coffees for industrial application. Samina: Agric. Sci. 2020, 41, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. De Araújo, T.L.; Nóbrega, R.O.; De Sousa, D.D.; De Araújo, M.U.; Diniz, P.D.; Da Silva, E.C. Non-destructive authentication of gourmet ground roasted coffees using NIR spectroscopy and digital images. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Barahona, I.; Sanmiguel, E.M.; Yang, J. Sensory attributes of coffee beverages and their relation to price and package information: A case study of Colombian customers’ preferences. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1173–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Gebreeyessus, G.D. Towards the sustainable and circular bioeconomy: Insights on spent coffee grounds valorization. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 833, 155113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jiménez-Ortega, A.D.; Ibarra, A.A.; Galeana-Pizaña, J.M.; Núñez, J.M. Changes over time matter: A cycle of participatory sustainability assessment of organic coffee in Chiapas, Mexico. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ramos, E.; Mesia, R.; Cavero, C.; Vera, B.; Wu, Z. Modeling the distribution of organic coffee supply Chain from Junín region, Peru. Int. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2019, 8, 394–403. [Google Scholar]
  85. Flores-Chávez, B.; Garza-López, P.M.; Angel-Cuapio, A.; Hernández-León, S.; Espinosa-Zaragoza, S.; Villafaña-Rivera, F.J.; Arce-Cervantes, O.; Espitia-López, J. Analysis Verbal sensory methods in the evaluation of organic coffee with different roasting intensities. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dong, X.; Li, S.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D. Association of coffee, decaffeinated coffee and caffeine intake from coffee with cognitive performance in older adults: National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) 2011–2014. Nutrients 2020, 12, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Cheng, C.; Hu, D. Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of all-cause mortality: A dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Hum. Nutr. 2019, 32, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yulia, M.; Asnaning, A.R.; Suhandy, D. The classification of ground roasted decaffeinated coffee using UV-VIS spectroscopy and the SIMCA method. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2010, 147, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Colombo, R.; Papetti, A. Decaffeinated coffee and its benefits on health: Focus on systemic disorders. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2506–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zou, Y.; Gaida, M.; Franchina, F.A.; Stefanuto, P.H.; Focant, J.F. Distinguishing between decaffeinated and regular coffee by HS-SPME-GC × GC-TOFMS, chemometrics and machine learning. Molecules 2022, 27, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Honda, M.; Takezaki, D.; Tanaka, M.; Fukaya, M.; Goto, M. Effect roasting degree on Major Coffee Compounds: A comparative between coffee beans with and without supercritical CO2 decaffeination treatment. J. Oleo Sci. 2022, 71, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Different Types of Coffee, Roasts, and Drinks. Homegrounds. Available online: https://www.homegrounds.co/types-of-coffee/ (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  93. Klingel, T.; Kremer, J.; Gottstein, V.; Rezende, T.R.; Schwartz, S.; Lachenmeier, D.W. A review of coffee by-products including leaf, flower, cherry, husk, silver skin, and spent grounds as novel foods within the European Union. Foods 2020, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Smith, W.D. From coffeehouse to parlour: The consumption of coffee, tea and sugar in north-western Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Consuming Habits, 2nd ed.; Goodman, J., Sherratt, A., Lovejoy, P.E., Eds.; Routledge: England, UK, 2014; pp. 158–173. [Google Scholar]
  95. Landais, E.; Moskal, A.; Mullee, A.; Nicolas, G.; Gunter, M.J.; Huybrechts, I.; Overvad, K.; Roswall, N.; Affret, A.; Fagherazzi, G.; et al. Coffee and tea consumption and the contribution of their added ingredients to total energy and nutrient intake in 10 European countries: Benchmark data from the late 1990s. Nutrients 2018, 10, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Parras, P.; Martinez-Tomé, M.; Jiménez, A.M.; Murcia, M.A. Antioxidant capacity of coffees of several origins brewed following three different procedures. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Corrêa, T.A.; Monteiro, M.P.; Mendes, T.M.; Oliveira, D.M.; Rogério, M.M.; Benites, C.I.; Vinagre, C.M.; Mioto, B.M.; Tarasoutchi, D.; Tuda, V.L.; et al. Medium light and medium roast paper-filtered coffee increased antioxidant capacity in healthy volunteers: Results of a randomized trial. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2012, 67, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Angeloni, G.; Guerrini, L.; Masella, P.; Bellumori, M.; Daluiso, S.; Parenti, A.; Innocenti, M. What kind of coffee do you drink? An investigation on effects of eight different extraction methods. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singh, L.; Varshney, J.G.; Agarwal, T. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons’ formation and occurrence in processed food. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 768–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Camargo, M.C.R.; Toledo, M.C.F. Coffee and mate tea as a dietary source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Campinas. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 22, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Food—Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. EFSA J. 2008, 724, 1–114. [Google Scholar]
  102. Orecchio, S.; Ciotti, V.P.; Culotta, L. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coffee samples: Analytical method by GC-MS, profile, levels and sources. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pissinatti, R.; Nunes, C.M.; De Souza, A.G.; Junqueira, R.G.; De Souza, S.V. Simultaneous analysis of 10 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in roasted coffee by isotopic dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Optimization, in-house method validation and application to an exploratory study. Food Control 2015, 51, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Chapter 7. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air and Cancer. Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/3702/599178c77c005eb1852285d36361b2612c6840ec.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  105. Park, J.H.; Penning, T.M. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons. In Process-Induced Food Toxicants: Occurrence, Formation, Mitigation, and Health Risks, 2nd ed.; Wiley, J., Sons, I., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 243–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. European Commission (EU). Commission Regulation No. 835/2011 of 19 August 2011 Amending Regulation (EC)No. 1881/2006 with Regard to Maximum levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union, 20 August 2011. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:215:0004:0008:En:PDF (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  107. KocadalI, T.; Gökmen, V. Formation of acrylamide in coffee. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022, 45, 100842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rattanarat, P.; Chindapan, N.; Devahastin, S. Comparative evaluation of acrylamide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Robusta coffee beans roasted by hot air and superheated steam. Food Chem. 2021, 341, 128266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tareke, E.; Rydberg, P.; Karlsson, P.; Eriksson, S.; Tornqvist, M. Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated foodstuffs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4998–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Khan, M.R.; AlothmanA, Z.A.; Naushad, M.; Alomary, A.K.; Alfadul, S.M.; Alsohaimi, I.H.; Algamdi, M.S. Occurrence of acrylamide carcinogen in Arabic coffee Qahwa, coffee and tea from Saudi Arabian market. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Karami, M.; Akbari-Adergani, B.; Jahed Khaniki, G.; Shariatifar, N.; Sadighara, P. Determination and health risk assessment of acrylamide levels in instant coffee products available in Tehran markets by GC-MS. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Working Group on The Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Acrylamide. In Some Industrial Chemicals; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1994. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/n/iarcmono60/p389-s1/?report=reader (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  113. Guenther, H.; Anklam, E.; Wenzl, T.; Stadler, R.H. Acrylamide in coffee: Review of progress in analysis, formation and level reduction. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Vezzulli, F.; Triachini, S.; Mulazzi, A.; Lambri, M.; Bertuzzi, T. Acrylamide: Impact of precursors concentration, origin, post-harvesting process and roasting level in high-quality arabica and Robusta coffee. Int. J. Food Sci. 2022, 57, 7468–7476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Schouten, M.A.; Tappi, S.; Angeloni, S.; Cortese, M.; Caprioli, G.; Vittori, S.; Romani, S. Acrylamide formation and antioxidant activity in coffee during roasting—A systematic study. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Holkar, C.R.; Jadhav, A.J.; Pinjari, D.V. Critical review on the possible remediation of sediment in cocoa/coffee flavored milk. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2158 of 20 November 2017 Establishing Mitigation Measures and Benchmark Levels for the Reduction of the Presence of Acrylamide in Food. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/2158/oj (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  118. Başaran, B.; Aydin, F.; Kaban, G. The determination of acrylamide content in brewed coffee samples marketed in Turkey. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2020, 37, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bertuzzi, T.; Martinelli, E.; Mulazzi, A.; Rastelli, S. Acrylamide determination during an industrial roasting process of coffee and the influence of asparagine and low molecular weight sugars. Food Chem. 2020, 303, 125372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mesías, M.; Morales, F.J. Acrylamide in coffee: Estimation of exposure from vending machines. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2016, 48, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lantz, I.; Ternité, R.; Wilkens, J.; Hoenicke, K.; Guenther, H.; van der Stegen, G.H. Studies on acrylamide levels in roasting, storage and brewing of coffee. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006, 50, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Alves, R.C.; Soares, C.; Casal, S.; Fernandes, J.O.; Oliveira, M.P. Acrylamide in espresso coffee: Influence of species, roast degree and brew length. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Crews, C.; Castle, L. A review of the occurrence, formation, and analysis of furan in heat-processed foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pavesi Arisseto, A.; Vicente, E.; Ueno, M.S.; Tfouni, S.A.V.; De Figueiredo, M.C. Furan levels in coffee as influenced by species, roast degree, and brewing procedures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3118–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Monographs on Carcinogenic Risk Assessment for Humans. In Dry Cleaning, Some Chlorinated Solvents and other Industrial Chemicals; IARC: France, Lyon, 1995; Volume 63, pp. 393–407. [Google Scholar]
  126. Yaylayan, V.A. Precursors, formation and determination of furan in food. J. Verbrauch Lebensm. 2006, 1, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). Exploratory Data on Furan in Food; US Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2004. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/process-contaminants-food/exploratory-data-furan-food (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  128. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Update of results on monitoring furan levels in food. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1702. Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/1702.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2023). [CrossRef]
  129. Sijia, W.; Enting, W.; Yuan, Y. Detection of furan levels in select Chinese foods by solid phase microextraction–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method and dietary exposure estimation of furan in the Chinese population. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 64, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kuballa, T.; Stier, S.; Strichow, N. Furan concentrations in coffee and coffee beverages. Dtsch. Lebensm.-Rundsch. 2005, 101, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  131. Albouchi, A.; Murkovic, M. Investigation on the mitigation effects of furfuryl alcohol and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and their carboxylic acid derivatives in coffee and coffee-related model systems. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 09444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Internacional Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Iarc Monographs on the Evuation of Carcinogenic to Humans—Furfuryl Alcohol. Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/5622/b564c69f5c19a2d0f4236ac3ec0b23bdcc221e3c.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  133. Monien, B.H.; Frank, H.; Seidel, A.; Glatt, H. Conversion of the common food constituent 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into a mutagenic and carcinogenic sulfuric acid ester in the mouse in vivo. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Monien, B.H.; Sachse, B.; Meinl, W.; Abraham, K.; Lampen, A.; Glatt, H. Hemoglobin adducts of furfuryl alcohol in genetically modified mouse models: Role of endogenous sulfotransferases 1a1 and 1d1 and transgenic human sulfotransferases 1A1/1A2. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 295, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. WnorowskI, A.; Yaylayan, V.A. Influence of pyrolytic and aqueous—Phase reactions on the mechanism of formation of Maillard products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3549–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Albouchi, A.; Murkovic, M. Formation kinetics of furfuryl alcohol in a coffee model system. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hamzalioğlu, A.; Gökmen, V. 5-Hydroxymethylfural accumulation plays a critical role on acrylamide formation in coffee during roasting as confirmed by multiresponse kinetic modeling. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Albouchi, A.; Russ, J.; Murkovic, M. Parameters affecting the exposure to furfuryl alcohol from coffee. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fowble, K.L.; Okuda, K.; Cody, R.B.; Musah, R.A. Spatial distributions of furan and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in unroasted and roasted Coffea arabica beans. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Park, S.H.; Jo, A.; Lee, K. Effect of various roasting, extraction and drinking conditions on furan and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural levels in coffee. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Yaylayan, V.A.; Keyhani, A. Origin of carbohydrate degradation products in L-alanine/D-[13C] glucose model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2415–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cämmerer, B.; Wedzicha, B.L.; Kroh, L.W. Nonenzymatic browning reactions of retro-aldol degradation products of carbohydrates. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1999, 209, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hollnagel, A.; Kroh, L. Formation of α-dicarbonyl fragments from mono- and disaccharides under caramelization and Maillard reaction conditions. Z. Für Lebensm.-Unters. Und-Forsch. A 1998, 207, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Amoroso, A.; Maga, G.; Daglia, M. Cytotoxicity of α-dicarbonylated compounds submitted to in vitro simulated digestion process. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Papetti, A.; Mascherpa, D.; Gazzani, G. Free α-dicarbonyl compounds in coffee, barley coffee and soy sauce and effects of in vitro digestion. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kwon, J.; Ahn, H.; Lee, K. Analysis of α-dicarbonyl compounds in coffee (Coffea arabica) prepared under various roasting and brewing methods. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hengel, M.; Shibamoto, T. Carcinogen 4 (5) -methylimidazole found in beverages, sauces, and caramel colors: Chemical properties, analysis, and biological activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 780–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. National Toxicology Program. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 4-methylimidazole (Cas No. 822-36-6) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (feeding studies). Natl. Toxicol. Program Tech. Rep. Ser. 2007, 535, 1–274. [Google Scholar]
  149. Internacional Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Iarc Monographs on the Evuation of Carcinogenic to Humans—4-Methylimidazole. Available online: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono101-015.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2023).
  150. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP). Safety and efficacy of a food additive composed of acetic acid for all animal species. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06615. [Google Scholar]
  151. Hyong, S.; Chu, M.; Park, H.; Park, J.; Lee, K.G. Analysis of α-dicarbonyl compounds and 4-methylimidazole in coffee made with various roasting and brewing conditions. LWT 2021, 151, 112231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Arisseto, A.P.; Marcolino, P.C.; Vicente, E.; Sampaio, K.A. Chloropropanol and glycidol esters in foods. Quim. Nova 2013, 36, 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zelinkova, Z.; Doležal, M.; Velíšek, J. Occurrence of 3-chloropropane-1, 2-diol fatty acid esters in infant and baby foods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 228, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Revised Safe Intake for 3-MCPD in Vegetable Oils and Food. 2018. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/180110 (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  155. Lynch, B.S.; Bryant, D.W.; Hook, G.J.; Nestmann, E.R.; Munro, I.C. Carcinogenicity of monochloro-1,2-propanediol (alpha-chlorohydrin, 3-MCPD). Int. J. Toxicol. 1998, 17, 47–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lemos, A.C.; Scaglioni, P.T.; Borba, V.S.; Furlong, E.B. Contaminants formed during food processing. In Advances in Food Science and Technology, 1st ed.; Digital Scientific Publisher: Guarujá, Brazil, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 111–157. [Google Scholar]
  157. Bakhiya, N.; Abraham, K.; Gürtler, R.; Appel, K.E.; Lampen, A. Toxicological assessment of 3-chloropropane-1, 2-diol and glycidol fatty acid esters in food. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 59, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cho, W.S.; Han, B.S.; Nam, K.T.; Park, K.; Choi, M.; Kim, S.H.; Jang, D.D. Carcinogenicity study of 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol in Sprague-Dawley rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 3172–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Schlatter, J.; Baars, A.J.; DiNovi, M.; Lawrie, S.; Lorentzen, R. Safety Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. WHO Food Additives Series: 48. 2002. Available online: http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v48je18.htm (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  160. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Risks for human health related to the presence of 3- and 2-monochloropropanediol (MCPD), and their fatty acid esters, and glycidyl fatty acid esters in food. EFSA J. 2016, 5, 14. [Google Scholar]
  161. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Evaluations of Contaminants. JECFA 83rd Meeting Summary. 2016. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/feb0d3a7-cb80-4dd6-a03a-403bd20d0db4/ (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  162. Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1322 of 23 September 2020. Amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as Regards Maximum Levels of 3 Monochloropropanediol (3-MCPD), 3-MCPD Fatty Acid Esters and Glycidyl Fatty Acid Esters in Certain Foods. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R1322 (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  163. Baer, I.; De La Calle, B.; Taylor, P. 3-MCPD in foods other than soy sauce or hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Breitling-Utzmann, C.M.; Hrenn, H.; Haase, N.U.; Unbehend, G.M. Influence of dough ingredients on the formation of 3-chloropropane-1, 2-diol (3-MCPD) in toast. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Divinova, V.; Dolezal, M.; Velisek, J. Free and bound 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol in coffee surrogates and malts. Czech J. Food Sci. 2007, 25, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hamlet, C.G.; Sadd, P.A.; Crews, C.; Velíšek, J.; Baxter, D.E. Occurrence of 3-chloro-propane-1, 2-diol (3-MCPD) and related compounds in food: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Porto, A.V.; Freitas-Silva, O.; Souza, E.D.; Gottschalk, L.F. Effect of asparaginase enzyme in the reduction of asparagine in green coffee. Beverages 2019, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Corrêa, C.O.; Penha, E.M.; Dos Anjos, M.R.; Pacheco, S.; Freitas-Silva, O.; Luna, A.D.; Gottschalk, L.F. Use of asparaginase for acrylamide mitigation in coffee and its influence on the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid, and caffeic acid. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 128045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Pham, T.H.; Hoang, M.H. Reducing acrylamide in roasted coffee beans by L-asparaginase using ultrasound. Sci. Technol. Asia 2022, 27, 55–68. [Google Scholar]
  170. Akgün, B.; Aricı, M.; Çavuş, F.; Karataş, A.B.; Karaağaç, H.E.; Uçurum, H.O. Application of l-asparaginase to produce high-quality Turkish coffee and the role of precursors in acrylamide formation. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Budryn, G.; Nebesny, E.A.; Oracz, J. Correlation between the stability of chlorogenic acids, antioxidant activity and acrylamide content in coffee beans roasted in different conditions. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hu, H.; Liu, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H. The relationship between acrylamide and various components during coffee roasting and effect of amino acids on acrylamide formation. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Anese, M.; Nicoli, M.C.; Verardo, G.; Munari, M.; Mirolo, G.; Bortolomeazzi, R. Effect of vacuum roasting on acrylamide formation and reduction in coffee beans. Food Chem. 2014, 145, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Banchero, M.; Pellegrino, G.; Manna, L. Supercritical fluid extraction as a potential mitigation strategy for the reduction of acrylamide level in coffee. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lee, T.; Park, H.; Puligundla, P.; Koh, G.H.; Yoon, J.; Mok, C. Degradation of benzopyrene and acrylamide in roasted coffee beans by corona discharge plasma jet (CDPJ) and its effects on biochemical and sensory properties. Food Chem. 2020, 328, 127117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Genovese, A.; De Vivo, A.; Aprea, A.; Tricarico, M.C.; Sacchi, R.; Sarghini, F. Particle size and variety of coffee used as variables in mitigation of furan and 2-methylfuran content in espresso coffee. Food Chem. 2021, 361, 130037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Tfouni, S.A.V.; Serrate, C.S.; Gomes, F.L.; Camargo, C.R.; Teles, R.A.; Cipolli, K.B.; Furlani, R.Z. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coffee brew: Influence of roasting and brewing procedures on two Coffea cultivars. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bedade, D.K.; Sutar, Y.B.; Singhal, R.S. Chitosan coated calcium alginate beads for covalent immobilization of acrylamidase: Process parameters and removal of acrylamide from coffee. Food Chem. 2019, 275, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Akillioglu, H.G.; Gökmen, V. Mitigation of acrylamide and hydroxymethyl furfural in instant coffee by yeast fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, B.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Xu, M.; Sun, X.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Y. Red-fleshed apple anthocyanin extract reduces furan content in ground coffee, Maillard model system, and not-from-concentrate apple juice. Foods 2021, 10, 2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Alafeef, A.K.; Ariffin, F.; Zulkurnain, M. Organic selenium as antioxidant additive in mitigating acrylamide in coffee beans roasted via conventional and superheated steam. Foods 2021, 9, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Xu, F.; Oruna-Concha, M.J.; Elmore, J.S. The use of asparaginase to reduce acrylamide levels in cooked food. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphology of the coffee fruit (authorial).
Figure 1. Morphology of the coffee fruit (authorial).
Ijerph 20 05586 g001
Figure 2. The two most traded coffee species in the world (authorial).
Figure 2. The two most traded coffee species in the world (authorial).
Ijerph 20 05586 g002
Figure 3. Coffee roasting (authorial). 1: cultivation by hand; 2: drying; 3: roasting; 4: endothermic phase of the roasting; 5: exothermic phase of the roasting.
Figure 3. Coffee roasting (authorial). 1: cultivation by hand; 2: drying; 3: roasting; 4: endothermic phase of the roasting; 5: exothermic phase of the roasting.
Ijerph 20 05586 g003
Figure 4. Preparation of coffee beverages (authorial).
Figure 4. Preparation of coffee beverages (authorial).
Ijerph 20 05586 g004
Figure 5. Thermal contaminants in coffee induced by roasting (authorial).
Figure 5. Thermal contaminants in coffee induced by roasting (authorial).
Ijerph 20 05586 g005
Table 1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) considered as a priority by the US Environmental Protection Agency and their IARC classification.
Table 1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) considered as a priority by the US Environmental Protection Agency and their IARC classification.
SubstanceGenotoxicityIARC
Classification
Aromatic RingsStructure
NaphthalenePositive2B2Ijerph 20 05586 i001
AcenaphtheneQuestionableNot evaluated3Ijerph 20 05586 i002
AcenaphthyleneQuestionableNot evaluated3Ijerph 20 05586 i003
AnthraceneNegative33Ijerph 20 05586 i004
PhenanthreneQuestionable33Ijerph 20 05586 i005
FluoranthenePositive34Ijerph 20 05586 i006
FluoreneNegative33Ijerph 20 05586 i007
PyreneQuestionable34Ijerph 20 05586 i008
Benzo(a)anthracenePositive2B4Ijerph 20 05586 i009
Crysene Positive2B4Ijerph 20 05586 i010
Benzo(b)fluoranthenePositive2B5Ijerph 20 05586 i011
Benzo(k)fluoranthenePositive2B5Ijerph 20 05586 i012
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracenePositive2A5Ijerph 20 05586 i013
Benzo(a)pyrenePositive15Ijerph 20 05586 i014
Indene(1,2,3-cd)pyrenePositive2B6Ijerph 20 05586 i015
Benzo(g,h,i)perylenePositive36Ijerph 20 05586 i016
Source: Park and Penning (2009) [105]; reproduced with permission from John Wiley & Sons, title Process-Induced Food Toxicants: Occurrence, Formation, Mitigation, and Health Risks.
Table 2. Mitigation strategies for thermal contaminants in coffee induced by roasting.
Table 2. Mitigation strategies for thermal contaminants in coffee induced by roasting.
Technology for
Reduction
ContaminantReduction LevelReferenceCommentsLimitations
AsparaginaseAcrylamide60% reduction in asparagine in C. arabica and 35% in C. robusta.[167]This study aimed to test the efficacy of asparaginase application and evaluate the reduction in asparagine in coffee beans. The results showed the effectiveness of the enzyme in reducing free asparagine in green coffee beans of both species (C. arabica and C. robusta).Steam pretreatment was effective for the two species but required different times (30 min for C. arabica and 45 min for C. canephora). This can be attributed to the different chemical compositions found in the two species.
AsparaginaseAcrylamide59% reduction in acrylamide in Arabica coffee compared to the control sample.[168]The predicted reduction was obtained with a hydrolysis time of 2 h, water content of 90% and asparaginase load of 5000 ASNU (amount of asparaginase that produces one micromole of ammonia per minute under standard conditions (pH 7.0; 37 °C))/kg. The applied method did not influence the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid or caffeic acid.Impacts on the sensory profile were not evaluated.
Asparaginase treatment combined with ultrasoundAcrylamideReductions of 42% and 14% in acrylamide in the final product in relation to the reference sample (7 min roasting at 220 °C) and control sample (without asparaginase treatment), respectively.[169]Pretreatment conditions of green coffee: enzyme concentration of 3 IU/mL, immersion time of 30 min, temperature of 37 °C, pH 7.3 and ultrasound with power of 37 kHz.At enzyme concentrations higher than 3 IU/mL, the decrease in acrylamide concentration in the final product was not observed. This may be due to the fact that the penetration of the enzyme into the beans is not favored at high concentrations, leading to a decrease in the asparaginase efficiency.
AsparaginaseAcrylamideNot reported.[170]Arabica green coffee beans were treated with L-asparaginase at various dosages (0–4000 ASNU/kg green bean) and times (30–120 min). The optimal conditions were determined as 2126.4 ASNU/kg of green bean and 82.73 min. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.669, p < 0.01) was found between the concentration of asparagine in green coffee beans and the acrylamide content of coffees produced from these beans.The optimum treatment time (82.75 min) was higher than the treatment time recommended for the commercial enzyme (45–60 min).
Roasting conditionsAcrylamideNot reported.[171]In the roasting of Robusta coffee, temperatures ranging from 190 to 216 °C and dry or moist air at a velocity of 0.5 or 1 m/s were used. The optimum roasting parameters were: temperature 203 °C, dry air and low speed of the roasting air. Under these conditions, roasted beans were characterized by relatively low levels of acrylamide with moderate degradation of polyphenols and deterioration of antioxidant properties, while having a pleasant, full flavor.The reduction in acrylamide formation caused by the increase in humidity of roasting air was observed only at the highest roasting temperature. Modifying the roasting conditions to achieve a drop in acrylamide concentration resulted in the increased degradation of polyphenols and/or deterioration of antioxidant activity.
Roasting conditionsAcrylamideNot reported.[172]Robusta coffee beans were roasted in a hot air roaster, in which the temperature was increased from room temperature to 220 °C. The maximum acrylamide level of 974 ± 29 μg/kg was achieved at 180 °C. Thereafter, acrylamide continuously decreased down to 109 ± 18 μg/kg. In a model system, the addition of glycine and aspartic acid exerted an inhibitory effect on acrylamide production (up to 27% and 25%, respectively).The effects of amino acids on acrylamide formation were evaluated via an asparagine–FGS (fructose/glucose/sucrose) model system only.
Roasting conditionsPAHsEight-fold decrease in the 19 PAHs content in Arabica coffee beans from Indonesia (42.32 to 5.57 μg/kg), Kenya (from 57.65 to 8.17 μg/kg) and Tanzania (from 59.0 to 8.05 μg/kg). Robusta coffee, on the other hand, had a decrease of about six times for the 19 PAHs from Cameroon (from 58.36 to 9.29 μg/kg) and Indonesia (from 48.52 to 8.57 μg/kg).[20]The temperature and time variables used were 125–135 °C for 25–26 min. The contamination level for 19 PAHs varied from 4.29 to 16.17 µg/kg in roasted coffee beans and from 8.66 to 76.63 µg/kg in green coffee beans. The contamination level in roasted coffee beans was significantly lower than that in green beans. The roasting process itself significantly reduced the PAHs content in the final product and the reason for this phenomenon was relatively high volatility of light PAHs.The geographical origin of green coffee beans, the local environmental pollution and the method of post-harvest coffee drying cause significant differentiation in the PAHs’ initial contamination level.
Superheated steam (SHS)PAHs and acrylamideDecrease in acrylamide content in medium (~16%) and dark roast (~25%) coffee beans; decreased PAHs levels in roasted coffee beans (62–69%).[108]SHS can help to reduce the contaminants due to its oxygen-free heating capacity. The same roasting parameters were used in the beans, with temperatures of 210, 230 and 250 °C, until the values of color reached 30, 25 and 20, which indicate the light, medium and dark levels of roasting, respectively.SHS roasting at 250 °C decreased the acrylamide contents in medium- and dark-roasted coffee beans, but in the case of the light-roasted beans, SHS roasting seemed to induce more extensive acrylamide formation than hot air roasting. This is probably because SHS roasting led to significantly higher contents of acrylamide precursors, especially glucose, which was generated by the thermal hydrolysis of carbohydrates during the earlier stage of roasting. SHS roasting at 250 °C can be used to lower PAH contents only in dark-roasted coffee beans. Further studies involving industrial application of the proposed mitigation strategy as well as its energy consumption and cost should be conducted.
Vacuum roastingAcrylamide~50% decrease.[173]Coffea arabica beans were roasted in an oven at 200 °C for increasing lengths of time under vacuum (i.e., 0.15 kPa). Data were compared with those obtained from coffee roasted at atmospheric pressure (i.e., conventional roasting), as well as at atmospheric pressure for 10 min followed by vacuum treatment (0.15 kPa; i.e., conventional vacuum roasting).No significant differences in acrylamide concentration among the coffee beans roasted according to the different processes were found at thermal effect (F) values higher than 15 min. The vacuum dark-roasted coffee presented a lower odor intensity compared with the reference sample (conventionally roasted). Further research should be conducted at pilot and industrial scale to find optimum process conditions.
Supercritical CO2 extractionAcrylamide79% decrease.[174]The acrylamide removal efficiency ranged from 8% to 45% when the extraction duration was less than 525 min, which corresponds to a supercritical solvent consumption of approximately 19 g/g of coffee beans. When the extraction time was increased to 1305 min, a maximum extraction efficiency of 79% was found, which corresponds to a supercritical solvent consumption of 47 g/g of coffee beans. Temperature was the variable that most affected the measured extraction process, as the extraction efficiency was highly increased above 60–80 °C. The addition of ethanol (up to 9.5% w/w) resulted in a significant increase in extraction performance due to the change in polarity of the supercritical solvent mixture. The best working conditions found were 100 °C, 200 bar and 9.5% w/w of ethanol. The authors did not evaluate the optimization of the acrylamide extraction process with the organoleptic investigation. Exploratory degustation tests pointed out that the supercritical removal of acrylamide must be followed by a cleaning step with pure supercritical CO2 in order to remove the ethanol residues.
Corona discharge plasma jet (CDPJ)Benzo[a]pyrene and acrylamideDecreases of 53.6% and 32% for benzo[a]pyrene and acrylamide, respectively.[175]CDPJ was generated under atmospheric pressure conditions using a 1.5 A current (input) at 58 kHz operating frequency. For each treatment, roasted coffee beans taken in a Petri plate were exposed to CDPJ. The plasma treatment times were 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. There was no change in components such as total acids, caffeine and trigonelline.After CDPJ treatment, the concentration of total phenolic content and Agtron color values were altered significantly. The CDPJ treatment of beans altered aroma and aftertaste characteristics of the corresponding coffee brews.
Use of phenolic acids, flavonoids, non-phenolic antioxidants, and non-antioxidant agentsFurfuryl alcohol (FFA) and 5-hydroxymethyl- furfural (HMF)Variable.[131]Ascorbic acid showed good mitigating effects (in the range of 48.3–80.7%). No mitigating effect of β-carotene on FFA formation was observed. Sodium sulfite drastically reduced HMF by 87.7%, while it had no effect on FFA. Taurine exhibited a notable effect only on FFA by a 39.6% mitigation.The composition of model systems during mitigation experiments should be carefully chosen, since components that are presumed to be non-precursors can adversely interfere with the work of mitigation agents in the model systems.
Particle size and species Furan11.4% decrease.[176]In the Arabica coffee, the furan level in espresso coffee increased with increasing particle size. Particularly, from circumference (C) < 200 μm to C > 425 μm fractions, furan increased from 68.27 to 91.48 ng/mL. In Robusta coffee, the highest concentration of furan occurred in beverages prepared using C 300–425 μm, showing values of 116.39 ng/mL and 845.14 ng/mL, respectively. Robusta coffee reached a concentration of furan around 35% higher than Arabica coffee for both intermediate size classes C200–300 μm and C300–425 μm.
Roasting conditions and particle size4- methylimidazole (4-MEI) and α-dicarbonyls (α-DC)Not reported.[151]With increasing temperature and roasting time, levels of methylglyoxal (MGO), diacetyl (DA) and 4-MEI increased significantly (p < 0.05). In the espresso beverage, the use of smaller coffee bean particles led to significantly higher concentrations of α-DC and 4-MEI (p < 0.05). In the cold brew method, the highest concentrations of α-DC and 4-MEI were found with the largest coffee bean particles (p < 0.05). Among the α-DCs, MGO was present in the greater quantity, followed by glyoxal (GO) and DA. The effect of the particle size as a mitigation strategy depends on the type of beverage. Further sensory evaluation studies are needed to assess the taste experienced by consumers.
Brewing methodPAHsNot reported.[177]PAHs were evaluated in ground roasted coffees in three roasting degrees obtained from Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora and their respective coffee brews prepared by two brewing procedures (filtered and boiled). Filtered coffee presented average summed PAHs contents higher than boiled coffee.Coffee brews prepared with C. arabica ground roasted beans presented mean summed PAHs levels higher than the ones prepared with C. canephora, independently of the brewing procedure used. A high variability of the results within the same cultivar and roasting degree, submitted to the same brewing procedure, was verified.
Brewing methodFuranNot reported.[124]Furan was evaluated in filtered nonboiled coffee (prepared by letting water (92−96 °C) drip onto roasted ground coffee held in a paper filter) and filtered boiled coffee (prepared by mixing water (25 °C) with roasted ground coffee, heating the mixture until boiling, and filtering it in a paper filter). Most of the beverages made by filtering nonboiled coffee showed significantly higher furan levels than beverages made by filtering boiled coffee. This could be due to a higher furan volatilization when the ground coffee is boiled with the water before filtration, resulting in a higher % of furan reduction in these beverages.Factors other than the brewing procedure may influence the furan content in the beverages such as the food composition, especially the lipid content.
Acrylamidase Acrylamide~97% decrease[178]Immobilized acrylamidase could degrade acrylamide from roasted instant coffee solution within 60 min at initial concentrations of 100–500 mg/L in packed column operations. Acrylamidase can hydrolyze preformed acrylamide to acrylic acid and ammonia.The reusability of immobilized enzyme showed that about 70% of its initial activity was retained after four consecutive cycles of acrylamide degradation. The activity decreased on further reuse and reached 30% after seven cycles. The reduction in enzyme activity may be due to the shear forces exerted on the beads during column operations, or due to the accumulation of the coffee constituents at the active site of the enzyme.
FermentationAcrylamide and HMF70% for acrylamide and up to 99.2% for HMF[179]Instant coffee (20%, w/v) was mixed with sucrose (0–10, w/v) and baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 1–2%, w/v) in a tightly closed glass vessel. The mixture was fermented at 30 °C for 48 h. HMF and acrylamide contents were reduced exponentially at varying rates, depending upon fermentation medium and time. After 24 h, the HMF concentration was decreased by 61.2%, 75.7%, 93.6% and 99.2% in the fermentation media containing no, 1%, 5%, and 10% sucrose, respectively. After 48 h, acrylamide concentration was decreased by about 70%.Increasing the yeast concentration to 2% improved slightly the mitigation of acrylamide during the fermentation. The metabolic degradation product of acrylamide is unknown for S. cerevisiae and needs further investigation.
Red-fleshed apple anthocyanin extract (RAAE)FuranUp to 33%.[180]The addition of RAAE significantly reduced the content of furan in ground coffee. Anthocyanins are effective antioxidants, and they effectively burst free radicals and terminate the chain reaction of oxidative damage.The reduction of furan content in coffee by RAAE was closely related to its antioxidant capacity.
Organic seleniumAcrylamide73% decrease.[181]Organic selenium as antioxidant additive supplemented via pretreatment of green coffee beans was effective in reducing acrylamide formation by 73%. The increase in antioxidation capacity from selenium fortification and removal of water-soluble precursors of the Maillard reaction may explain the acrylamide reduction mechanism of Se-coffee.For higher selenium concentrations, ~30% selenium loss was observed after roasting the Arabica and Robusta Se-coffee beans. Robusta coffee showed a significantly lower final selenium content after roasting. Besides costing, sensory properties of the Se-coffee remain the most important consumer parameter that warrants study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Costa, D.S.; Albuquerque, T.G.; Costa, H.S.; Bragotto, A.P.A. Thermal Contaminants in Coffee Induced by Roasting: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085586

AMA Style

da Costa DS, Albuquerque TG, Costa HS, Bragotto APA. Thermal Contaminants in Coffee Induced by Roasting: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(8):5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085586

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Costa, David Silva, Tânia Gonçalves Albuquerque, Helena Soares Costa, and Adriana Pavesi Arisseto Bragotto. 2023. "Thermal Contaminants in Coffee Induced by Roasting: A Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 8: 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop